Anchorage Regulations: Special Anchorage Areas, Marina del Rey Harbor, California, 10156-10158 [2016-04336]
Download as PDF
10156
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0142]
RIN 1625–AA01
Anchorage Regulations: Special
Anchorage Areas, Marina del Rey
Harbor, California
Coast Guard, DHS.
Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
On May 28, 2014, the Coast
Guard published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to disestablish the
special anchorage in Marina del Rey
Harbor, California. Based on the
comments received in response to that
NPRM, we are now proposing to amend
the shape and reduce the size of the
special anchorage in Marina del Rey
Harbor, California. Additionally, we
propose to clarify the language in the
note section of the existing regulation.
This SNPRM would leave sufficient
navigable water on adjacent sides of the
anchorage for vessel traffic, effectively
removing this special anchorage area
from a location where it could endanger
vessel traffic.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before April 14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2014–0142 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Van Vu, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard
District 11, telephone (510) 437–2978,
email van.h.vu@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
The legal basis for the proposed rule
is: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221, through 1236,
and 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1; and
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorized the Coast Guard
to define anchorage areas. A special
anchorage area is a designated water
area within which vessels less than 65
feet (20 meters) in length are not
required to: Sound signals required by
Rule 35 of the Inland Navigation Rules
(33 CFR 83.35); or exhibit the white
anchor lights or shapes required by Rule
30 of the Inland Navigation Rules (33
CFR 83.30). By regulation, special
anchorage areas should be well removed
from the fairways and located where
general navigation will not endanger or
be endangered by unlighted vessels (33
CFR 109.10).
This supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNPRM) is intended to
reduce the size of the anchorage. The
amended anchorage will leave sufficient
navigable water on adjacent sides of the
anchorage for vessel traffic, effectively
removing the anchorage from a location
where it could endanger vessel traffic.
The proposed rule would better
accommodate transiting vessels and
create a clearly defined area for
anchored vessels, thus improving
navigation safety.
A. Regulatory History and Information
In 1967, the Coast Guard placed the
regulation for a special anchorage area
in the main channel of Marina del Rey
in 33 CFR, as anchorage regulations
were transferred from the Army Corp of
Engineers to the Coast Guard (32 FR
17726, 17737, Dec. 12, 1967). The
specific regulations and boundaries for
this special anchorage area are defined
by coordinates in 33 CFR 110.111.
On May 28, 2014, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Anchorage Regulations: Special
Anchorage Area, Marina del Rey,
California, in the Federal Register (79
FR 30509) to disestablish the anchorage.
The purpose was to align the regulations
with the current and future
configuration of the main channel and
docking facilities. On November 4,
2014, we published a notice for a public
meeting (79 FR 65361). The meeting was
held in Marina del Rey, CA on
November 20, 2014. At the public
meeting, we heard from six speakers.
For greater public participation, all
comments submitted to the public
docket as late as January 5, 2015 were
considered. In addition to the six
speakers at the public meeting, we
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
received comments in 44 written
submissions to the docket. Based on all
comments received we have prepared
this supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNPRM) which proposes to
maintain the anchorage but amend the
boundaries and reduce the size of the
anchorage.
B. Discussion of Comments on NPRM
and Changes
The Coast Guard received 44 written
submissions to the docket and heard
from six speakers at the public meeting
regarding the NRPM to disestablish the
anchorage. All written submissions thru
the portal, the recorded transcript of the
public meeting and all other documents
pertaining to this topic are available in
the public docket for this rulemaking,
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
Below, we have summarized the
received comments and our response to
these comments.
The Coast Guard received 31
comments to keep the anchorage as is or
to establish an alternate anchorage at
another location in the harbor. The
Coast Guard understands the
commenters’ concern of the need for a
safe refuge for transiting recreational
vessels during storms or other
dangerous conditions. Thus, we are
proposing a smaller anchorage as an
option for mariners.
The Coast Guard received eight
comments for a public hearing and
additional time for public comment. We
held a public meeting in Marina Del Rey
on November 20, 2014 and considered
comments received until January 5,
2015.
The Coast Guard received nine
comments in support of removing the
anchorage. Some of those comments
indicated that vessels anchoring in the
existing anchorage in the main channel
create an unsafe situation. Other
comments reported mariners rarely use
the anchorage and there is little
knowledge of its existence. The special
anchorage is clearly marked on the chart
with reference to the applicable
regulation. A copy of the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) Office of Coast
Survey Chart number 18744 has been
posted to the docket to illustrate this
point. The Coast Guard has determined
the current special anchorage area
encompassing the entire channel width
at the north end of the harbor could
cause an unsafe situation. In this
SNPRM, the Coast Guard is proposing a
smaller special anchorage area which
will allow vessel traffic to pass safely on
all sides.
The Coast Guard received two
comments and questions at the public
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
meeting in November concerning
proposed projects located outside of the
anchorage area. The Coast Guard
indicated these comments addressed
areas and subjects outside the anchorage
that would not impact the existing
anchorage and were beyond the scope of
the proposed rulemaking.
III. Discussion of SNPRM Proposed
Rule
This proposed rule would decrease
the size of the current anchorage in
Marina del Rey harbor. Currently, it is
a trapezoid-shaped anchorage of
approximately 0.48 square nautical
miles. The Coast Guard proposes to
change the shape of the anchorage from
a trapezoid to a rectangle and decrease
its size from approximately 0.48 to 0.11
square nautical miles. The revised
anchorage would be moved to the
middle of the channel across from
Burton Chace Park, with its northern
boundary line approximately from the
midpoint of basin G extending south to
the midpoint of Basin H. The anchorage
dimensions would be 1154 feet in
length and 365 feet in width. The
distance from the closest shore side
dock to the anchorage boundary would
be approximately 243 feet. The
anchorage boundaries are described,
using precise coordinates, in the
proposed regulatory text at the end of
this document.
This proposed rule would also amend
the note section for 33 CFR 110.111 to
clarify the purpose of the anchorage, as
well as the types of vessels eligible to
use the anchorage. It would also reflect
that the Marina del Rey Harbor Master,
Los Angeles County, prescribes local
regulations for mooring and boating
activities in this harbor, rather than the
Director, Department of Small Craft
Harbors, Los Angeles County, which is
obsolete. This updated note will clarify
the role of the Marina del Rey Harbor
Master in the administration of the
special anchorage.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or
executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule would not be
significant to the maritime and local
community. The existing anchorage is
currently used only in emergency
circumstances, and this proposed
change will not significantly reduce the
number of vessels using the anchorage.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule may affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or
operator of recreational vessels that
have a need to anchor in Marina del Rey
special anchorage.
This proposed rule would not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Although this
rule would decrease the size of the
special anchorage area, the proposed
dimensions provide sufficient space for
vessels to anchor when authorized by
the Harbor Master, without presenting a
hazard to vessels transiting in the
channel.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Government
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States or local governments
and would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10157
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves the amendment of a
currently-existing anchorage area.
Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(f) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D. A
preliminary environmental analysis
checklist and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
10158
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
received during the comment period. As
demonstrated by this SNPRM, your
comment can help shape the outcome of
this rulemaking. If you submit a
comment, please include the docket
number for this rulemaking, indicate the
specific section of this document to
which each comment applies, and
provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
erulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instruction.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this SNPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
We plan to hold a public meeting to
receive oral comments on this SNPRM
and will announce the date, time, and
location in a separate document
published in the Federal Register. If you
signed up for docket email alerts
mentioned in the paragraph above, you
will receive an email notice when the
public meeting notice is published and
placed in the docket.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110—ANCHORAGE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through
1236, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05–1; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
■
2. Revise § 110.111 to read as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
§ 110.111
Marina del Rey Harbor, Calif.
An area in the main channel
encompassed within the following
described boundaries: Beginning at the
northeasterly corner in position latitude
33°58′41.6″ N., longtitude 118°26′50.8″
W.; thence southerly to latitude
33°58′30.2″ N., longtitude 118°26′50.8″
W.; thence westerly to latitude
33°58′30.2″ N., longtitude 118°26′55.1″
W.; thence northerly to latitude
33°58′41.6″ N., longtitude 118°26′55.1″
W.; thence easterly to the point of
origin. All coordinates referenced North
American Datum 1983.
Note to § 110.111: The Marina Del Rey
Harbor Master, Los Angeles County
prescribes local regulations for mooring and
boating activities in this area.
Dated: February 8, 2016.
J. A. Servidio,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2016–04336 Filed 2–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
evidencing systems and to reflect new
revenue assurance practices. (See 80 FR
42392–42393.) Postage collection under
the new rules will start on December 31,
2016. This document proposes minor
additional changes to the rules in
support of our efforts to collect the
appropriate revenue on mail pieces in a
more automated fashion. If this proposal
is adopted, the proposed clarifying
changes will also be implemented on
December 31, 2016. The revenue
assurance guidelines can be found in 39
CFR 501.16, and on https://
ribbs.usps.gov in the site index of
Automated Package Verification (APV)
documents, named APV Standard
Operating Procedure (SOP).
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 501
Administrative practice and
procedure.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated,
the Postal Service proposes to amend 39
CFR part 501 as follows:
PART 501—AUTHORIZATION TO
MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE
POSTAGE EVIDENCING SYSTEMS
POSTAL SERVICE
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR
part 501 continues to read as follows:
■
39 CFR Part 501
Revisions to the Requirements for
Authority To Manufacture and
Distribute Postage Evidencing
Systems
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101,
401, 403, 404, 410, 2601, 2605, Inspector
General Act of 1978, as amended (Pub. L. 95–
452, as amended); 5 U.S.C. App. 3.
2. In § 501.16, revise paragraph (i) to
read as follows:
■
Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Postal Service proposes
to revise its rules concerning PC postage
payment methodology by adding
supplementary information to clarify
the revenue assurance guidelines.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
March 30, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Mail or deliver written
comments to the Manager, Payment
Technology, U.S. Postal Service®, 475
L’Enfant Plaza SW., Room 3500,
Washington, DC 20260. You may
inspect and photocopy all written
comments at the Payment Technology
office by appointment only between the
hours of 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday by calling 1–202–268–
7613 in advance. Email and faxed
comments are not accepted.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marlo Kay Ivey, Business Systems
Analyst, Payment Technology, U.S.
Postal Service, (202) 268–7613.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July
17, 2015, the United States Postal
Service published a final rule to revise
the rules concerning authorization to
manufacture and distribute postage
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 501.16 PC postage payment
methodology.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Revenue Assurance. (1) The
provider must support business
practices to assure Postal Service
revenue and accurate payment from
customers. For purposes of this
paragraph and the Automated Package
Verification (APV) Standard Operating
Procedure (SOP) document available at
https://ribbs.usps.gov, references to
‘‘provider’’ and ‘‘PC Postage Vendor’’
shall include postage resellers when
such resellers transmit postage revenue
to the Postal Service in any manner
other than through a PC Postage
provider. With respect to such
transactions, the resellers, and not the
PC Postage providers who provides the
labels, are responsible for complying
with these regulations. A ‘‘reseller’’ is
an entity that obtains postage through a
provider and is authorized to resell such
postage to its customers pursuant to an
agreement with the Postal Service.
(2) Specifically, the provider is
required to pay the Postage Adjustment
or to notify the customer and adjust the
balance in the postage evidencing
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 39 (Monday, February 29, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10156-10158]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04336]
[[Page 10156]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket No. USCG-2014-0142]
RIN 1625-AA01
Anchorage Regulations: Special Anchorage Areas, Marina del Rey
Harbor, California
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On May 28, 2014, the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to disestablish the special anchorage in
Marina del Rey Harbor, California. Based on the comments received in
response to that NPRM, we are now proposing to amend the shape and
reduce the size of the special anchorage in Marina del Rey Harbor,
California. Additionally, we propose to clarify the language in the
note section of the existing regulation. This SNPRM would leave
sufficient navigable water on adjacent sides of the anchorage for
vessel traffic, effectively removing this special anchorage area from a
location where it could endanger vessel traffic.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before April 14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2014-0142 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Van Vu, Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard District 11, telephone (510) 437-2978, email
van.h.vu@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
The legal basis for the proposed rule is: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221,
through 1236, and 2071; 33 CFR 1.05-1; and Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorized the Coast
Guard to define anchorage areas. A special anchorage area is a
designated water area within which vessels less than 65 feet (20
meters) in length are not required to: Sound signals required by Rule
35 of the Inland Navigation Rules (33 CFR 83.35); or exhibit the white
anchor lights or shapes required by Rule 30 of the Inland Navigation
Rules (33 CFR 83.30). By regulation, special anchorage areas should be
well removed from the fairways and located where general navigation
will not endanger or be endangered by unlighted vessels (33 CFR
109.10).
This supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) is intended
to reduce the size of the anchorage. The amended anchorage will leave
sufficient navigable water on adjacent sides of the anchorage for
vessel traffic, effectively removing the anchorage from a location
where it could endanger vessel traffic. The proposed rule would better
accommodate transiting vessels and create a clearly defined area for
anchored vessels, thus improving navigation safety.
A. Regulatory History and Information
In 1967, the Coast Guard placed the regulation for a special
anchorage area in the main channel of Marina del Rey in 33 CFR, as
anchorage regulations were transferred from the Army Corp of Engineers
to the Coast Guard (32 FR 17726, 17737, Dec. 12, 1967). The specific
regulations and boundaries for this special anchorage area are defined
by coordinates in 33 CFR 110.111.
On May 28, 2014, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Anchorage Regulations: Special Anchorage Area, Marina
del Rey, California, in the Federal Register (79 FR 30509) to
disestablish the anchorage. The purpose was to align the regulations
with the current and future configuration of the main channel and
docking facilities. On November 4, 2014, we published a notice for a
public meeting (79 FR 65361). The meeting was held in Marina del Rey,
CA on November 20, 2014. At the public meeting, we heard from six
speakers. For greater public participation, all comments submitted to
the public docket as late as January 5, 2015 were considered. In
addition to the six speakers at the public meeting, we received
comments in 44 written submissions to the docket. Based on all comments
received we have prepared this supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNPRM) which proposes to maintain the anchorage but amend
the boundaries and reduce the size of the anchorage.
B. Discussion of Comments on NPRM and Changes
The Coast Guard received 44 written submissions to the docket and
heard from six speakers at the public meeting regarding the NRPM to
disestablish the anchorage. All written submissions thru the portal,
the recorded transcript of the public meeting and all other documents
pertaining to this topic are available in the public docket for this
rulemaking, where indicated under ADDRESSES.
Below, we have summarized the received comments and our response to
these comments.
The Coast Guard received 31 comments to keep the anchorage as is or
to establish an alternate anchorage at another location in the harbor.
The Coast Guard understands the commenters' concern of the need for a
safe refuge for transiting recreational vessels during storms or other
dangerous conditions. Thus, we are proposing a smaller anchorage as an
option for mariners.
The Coast Guard received eight comments for a public hearing and
additional time for public comment. We held a public meeting in Marina
Del Rey on November 20, 2014 and considered comments received until
January 5, 2015.
The Coast Guard received nine comments in support of removing the
anchorage. Some of those comments indicated that vessels anchoring in
the existing anchorage in the main channel create an unsafe situation.
Other comments reported mariners rarely use the anchorage and there is
little knowledge of its existence. The special anchorage is clearly
marked on the chart with reference to the applicable regulation. A copy
of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Office of
Coast Survey Chart number 18744 has been posted to the docket to
illustrate this point. The Coast Guard has determined the current
special anchorage area encompassing the entire channel width at the
north end of the harbor could cause an unsafe situation. In this SNPRM,
the Coast Guard is proposing a smaller special anchorage area which
will allow vessel traffic to pass safely on all sides.
The Coast Guard received two comments and questions at the public
[[Page 10157]]
meeting in November concerning proposed projects located outside of the
anchorage area. The Coast Guard indicated these comments addressed
areas and subjects outside the anchorage that would not impact the
existing anchorage and were beyond the scope of the proposed
rulemaking.
III. Discussion of SNPRM Proposed Rule
This proposed rule would decrease the size of the current anchorage
in Marina del Rey harbor. Currently, it is a trapezoid-shaped anchorage
of approximately 0.48 square nautical miles. The Coast Guard proposes
to change the shape of the anchorage from a trapezoid to a rectangle
and decrease its size from approximately 0.48 to 0.11 square nautical
miles. The revised anchorage would be moved to the middle of the
channel across from Burton Chace Park, with its northern boundary line
approximately from the midpoint of basin G extending south to the
midpoint of Basin H. The anchorage dimensions would be 1154 feet in
length and 365 feet in width. The distance from the closest shore side
dock to the anchorage boundary would be approximately 243 feet. The
anchorage boundaries are described, using precise coordinates, in the
proposed regulatory text at the end of this document.
This proposed rule would also amend the note section for 33 CFR
110.111 to clarify the purpose of the anchorage, as well as the types
of vessels eligible to use the anchorage. It would also reflect that
the Marina del Rey Harbor Master, Los Angeles County, prescribes local
regulations for mooring and boating activities in this harbor, rather
than the Director, Department of Small Craft Harbors, Los Angeles
County, which is obsolete. This updated note will clarify the role of
the Marina del Rey Harbor Master in the administration of the special
anchorage.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule would not be
significant to the maritime and local community. The existing anchorage
is currently used only in emergency circumstances, and this proposed
change will not significantly reduce the number of vessels using the
anchorage.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. This proposed rule may affect the following entities,
some of which might be small entities: The owners or operator of
recreational vessels that have a need to anchor in Marina del Rey
special anchorage.
This proposed rule would not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Although this rule would decrease
the size of the special anchorage area, the proposed dimensions provide
sufficient space for vessels to anchor when authorized by the Harbor
Master, without presenting a hazard to vessels transiting in the
channel.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States or
local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a
substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this
rule under that Order and determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves the
amendment of a currently-existing anchorage area. Normally such actions
are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(f) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction M16475.1D. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material
[[Page 10158]]
received during the comment period. As demonstrated by this SNPRM, your
comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If you submit a
comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking, indicate
the specific section of this document to which each comment applies,
and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal erulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instruction.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this SNPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
We plan to hold a public meeting to receive oral comments on this
SNPRM and will announce the date, time, and location in a separate
document published in the Federal Register. If you signed up for docket
email alerts mentioned in the paragraph above, you will receive an
email notice when the public meeting notice is published and placed in
the docket.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2071; 33 CFR 1.05-
1; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 110.111 to read as follows:
Sec. 110.111 Marina del Rey Harbor, Calif.
An area in the main channel encompassed within the following
described boundaries: Beginning at the northeasterly corner in position
latitude 33[deg]58'41.6'' N., longtitude 118[deg]26'50.8'' W.; thence
southerly to latitude 33[deg]58'30.2'' N., longtitude 118[deg]26'50.8''
W.; thence westerly to latitude 33[deg]58'30.2'' N., longtitude
118[deg]26'55.1'' W.; thence northerly to latitude 33[deg]58'41.6'' N.,
longtitude 118[deg]26'55.1'' W.; thence easterly to the point of
origin. All coordinates referenced North American Datum 1983.
Note to Sec. 110.111: The Marina Del Rey Harbor Master, Los
Angeles County prescribes local regulations for mooring and boating
activities in this area.
Dated: February 8, 2016.
J. A. Servidio,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2016-04336 Filed 2-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P