Draft Programmatic Candidate Conservation Agreement With Assurances, Draft Environmental Assessment, and Receipt of Application for Enhancement of Survival Permit for the Fisher in Western Washington, 10269-10271 [2016-04294]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Notices
directed to the OMB USCIS Desk Officer
via email at oira_submission@
omb.eop.gov. Comments may also be
submitted via fax at (202) 395–5806
(This is not a toll-free number). All
submissions received must include the
agency name and the OMB Control
Number 1615–0014.
You may wish to consider limiting the
amount of personal information that you
provide in any voluntary submission
you make. For additional information
please read the Privacy Act notice that
is available via the link in the footer of
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
USCIS, Office of Policy and Strategy,
Regulatory Coordination Division,
Samantha Deshommes, Acting Chief, 20
Massachusetts Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20529–2140,
Telephone number (202) 272–8377
(This is not a toll-free number.
Comments are not accepted via
telephone message). Please note contact
information provided here is solely for
questions regarding this notice. It is not
for individual case status inquiries.
Applicants seeking information about
the status of their individual cases can
check Case Status Online, available at
the USCIS Web site at https://
www.uscis.gov, or call the USCIS
National Customer Service Center at
(800) 375–5283; TTY (800) 767–1833.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Comments
You may access the information
collection instrument with instructions,
or additional information by visiting the
Federal eRulemaking Portal site at:
https://www.regulations.gov and enter
USCIS–2006–0072 in the search box.
Written comments and suggestions from
the public and affected agencies should
address one or more of the following
four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:23 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection
Request: Revision of a Currently
Approved Collection. This is a change
from the type of collection indicated in
the 60-day Federal Register Notice
published December 30, 2015 at 80 FR
81556.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Affidavit of Support.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the DHS
sponsoring the collection: I–134; USCIS.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Individuals or
households. This information collection
is necessary to determine if at the time
of application into the United States, the
applicant is likely to become a public
charge.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: The estimated total number of
respondents for the information
collection I–134 is 18,460 and the
estimated hour burden per response is
1.5 hours.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The total estimated annual
hour burden associated with this
collection is 27,690 hours.
(7) An estimate of the total public
burden (in cost) associated with the
collection: The total estimated annual
cost burden associated with this
collection is $69,225.
Samantha Deshommes,
Acting Chief, Regulatory Coordination
Division, Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services,
Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2016–04089 Filed 2–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R1–ES–2016–N019;
FXES11120100000–167–FF01E00000]
Draft Programmatic Candidate
Conservation Agreement With
Assurances, Draft Environmental
Assessment, and Receipt of
Application for Enhancement of
Survival Permit for the Fisher in
Western Washington
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10269
Receipt of application; notice of
availability and request for comments.
ACTION:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), received an
application from the Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife
(WDFW) for an enhancement of survival
(EOS) permit under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA).
The permit application includes a draft
programmatic candidate conservation
agreement with assurances (CCAAs) for
the fisher in western Washington. The
Service also announces the availability
of a draft environmental assessment
(EA) addressing the draft CCAA and
issuance of the requested EOS permit in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended (NEPA). We invite comments
from all interested parties on the
application, the draft CCAA, and the
draft EA.
DATES: To ensure consideration, written
comments must be received from
interested parties by March 30, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To request further
information or submit written
comments, please use one of the
following methods, and note that your
information request or comments are in
reference to the ‘‘Fisher CCAA.’’
• Internet: You may view or
download copies of the draft CCAA and
the draft EA and obtain additional
information on the Internet at https://
www.fws.gov/wafwo/.
• Email: wfwocomments@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Fisher CCAA’’ in the subject
line of the message or comments.
• U.S. Mail: Tim Romanski, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service; Washington Fish
and Wildlife Office; 510 Desmond Drive
SE., Suite 102; Lacey, WA 98503.
• In-Person Drop-off, Viewing or
Pickup: Please call 360–753–5823 to
make an appointment (necessary for
viewing or picking up documents only)
during normal business hours at the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service;
Washington Fish and Wildlife Office;
510 Desmond Drive SE., Suite 102;
Lacey, WA 98503. Written comments
can be dropped off during regular
business hours at the above address on
or before the closing date of the public
comment period (see DATES).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Romanski, Conservation Planning and
Hydropower Branch Manager, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Washington Fish
and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES);
telephone: 360–753–5823. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf,
please call the Federal Information
Relay Service at 800–877–8339.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29FEN1.SGM
29FEN1
10270
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Notices
We
received an application from the
Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife (WDFW) for an enhancement of
survival (EOS) permit under section
10(a)(1)(A) of the ESA for incidental
take of the fisher (Pekania pennanti), a
species currently considered a
candidate for listing as threatened or
endangered under the ESA. The permit
application includes a draft
programmatic candidate conservation
agreement with assurances (CCAAs) for
the fisher in western Washington. The
Service also announces the availability
of a draft environmental assessment
(EA) addressing the draft CCAA and
issuance of the requested EOS permit in
accordance with NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq.). We invite comments from all
interested parties on the application, the
draft CCAA, and the draft EA.
The application includes a CCAA
covering fisher and its habitat on private
lands in western Washington. The
Service and WDFW prepared the CCAA
to provide non-Federal landowners with
the opportunity to voluntarily conserve
the fisher and its habitat while carrying
out specific land management activities
commonly practiced on forest lands, as
defined in the Washington State Forest
Practices Act as of February 1, 2015.
Covered activities include but are not
limited to timber harvest, reforestation,
road and trail construction, water
crossing structure construction, and
other forest practice hydraulic projects,
transport of timber and rock, site
preparation, collection of minor forest
products, fire suppression, and
recreation, as defined in the draft
CCAA.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Private and other non-Federal
property owners are encouraged to enter
into CCAAs, in which they voluntarily
undertake management activities on
their properties to enhance, restore, or
maintain habitat benefiting species that
are proposed for listing under the ESA,
candidates for listing, or species that
may become candidates or proposed for
listing. EOS permits are issued to
applicants in association with approved
CCAAs to authorize incidental take of
the covered species from covered
activities, should the species become
listed. Through a CCAA and its
associated EOS permit, the Service
provides assurances to property owners
that they will not be subjected to
increased land use restrictions if the
covered species become listed under the
ESA in the future, provided certain
conditions are met.
Application requirements and
issuance criteria for EOS permits for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:23 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
CCAAs are found in the Code of
Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17.22(d)
and 17.32(d), respectively. See also our
joint policy on CCAAs, which we
published in the Federal Register with
the Department of Commerce’s National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, National Marine
Fisheries Service (64 FR 32726; June 17,
1999).
On April 8, 2004, the Service
published a 12–month status review (69
FR 18769) finding that listing the West
Coast Distinct Population Segment
(DPS) of fisher as threatened or
endangered under the ESA (16 U.S.C.
1538) was warranted, but precluded by
higher priority actions. On October 7,
2014, we published a proposed rule (79
FR 60419) to list the West Coast DPS of
fisher as threatened under the ESA. Due
to substantial disagreement regarding
available information, the Service
issued a 6–month extension to collect
and review additional information and
make a final determination (80 FR
19953). A regulation implementing the
proposed rule or a notice that the
proposed regulation is being withdrawn
will be issued no later than April 7,
2016. In anticipation of the potential
listing of fisher under the ESA, WDFW
requested assistance from the Service in
developing a CCAA on behalf of private
landowners in western Washington.
Proposed Action
The Proposed Action Alternative is
the issuance of the requested EOS
permit with a 20–year term based on
WDFW’s commitment to implement the
proposed CCAA including issuance of
Certificates of Inclusion (CI) to
participating non-Federal landowners.
The proposed CCAA would implement
conservation measures that contribute to
the recovery of the fisher. Take
authorization would become effective if
the species becomes listed, as long as
the enrolled landowner is in compliance
with the terms and conditions of the
CCAA, CI, and the EOS permit. The
CCAA, the ESO permit, and the CIs
would provide incentives for nonFederal landowners to participate in
conservation efforts expected to support
reintroduction of the fisher within the
western portions of its historical range
in Washington.
National Environmental Policy Act
Compliance
Approval of a programmatic CCAA
and issuance of the associated EOS
permit are Federal actions that trigger
the need for compliance with NEPA.
Pursuant to NEPA, we prepared a draft
EA to analyze the environmental
impacts related to the issuance of the
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requested EOS permit and
implementation of the associated
programmatic CCAA. The EA analyses
two alternatives: A ‘‘No-action’’
alternative, and the proposed action.
No-action alternative: Under the Noaction alternative, the Service would not
issue the requested EOS permit and the
proposed CCAA would not be
implemented. Under this alternative,
WDFW would not enroll landowners in
the CCAA and no voluntary
conservation measures would be
implemented. WDFW would likely
continue their efforts to recover fishers
in the State, focusing on the protection
and monitoring of previously
reintroduced individuals. Non-Federal
landowners would not receive
assurances that additional conservation
measures or any additional land, water,
or resource use restrictions could be
required if the covered species becomes
listed as threatened or endangered
under the ESA.
Proposed action alternative: The
proposed action alternative is a
programmatic approach, in which the
Service would issue the requested EOS
permit with a 20-year term to WDFW.
The WDFW would implement the
proposed CCAA including issuance of
CIs to participating non-Federal
landowners. The proposed CCAA
provides conservation measures that
would contribute to the recovery of the
fisher while providing coverage
exempting take that may occur
incidental to activities covered under
the CCAA if the species becomes listed.
Public Comments
You may submit your comments by
one of the methods listed in the
ADDRESSES section. We specifically
request information, views, opinions, or
suggestions from the public on our
proposed Federal action, including
identification of any other aspects of the
human environment not already
identified in the EA pursuant to NEPA
regulations at 40 CFR 1506.6. Further,
we specifically solicit information
regarding the adequacy of the draft
CCAA pursuant to the requirements for
permits at 50 CFR parts 13 and 17, and
information and comments regarding
the following issues:
1. The direct, indirect, and
cumulative effects that implementation
of the CCAA could have on endangered
and threatened species;
2. Other reasonable alternatives
consistent with the purpose of the
proposed CCAA as described above, and
their associated effects;
3. Measures that would minimize and
mitigate potentially adverse effects of
the proposed action;
E:\FR\FM\29FEN1.SGM
29FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Notices
4. Identification of any impacts on the
human environment that should have
been analyzed in the draft EA pursuant
to NEPA;
5. Other plans or projects that might
be relevant to this action;
6. The proposed term of the
enhancement of survival permit; and
7. Any other information pertinent to
evaluating the effects of the proposed
action on the human environment.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Public Availability of Comments
All comments and materials we
receive become part of the public record
associated with this action. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personally
identifiable information in your
comments, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personally identifiable information—
may be made publicly available at any
time. While you can ask us in your
comment to withhold your personally
identifiable information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so. All submissions
from organizations or businesses, and
from individuals identifying themselves
as representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, will be
made available for public disclosure in
their entirety. Comments and materials
we receive, as well as supporting
documentation we used in preparing the
draft EA, will be available for public
inspection by appointment, during
normal business hours, at our
Washington Fish and Wildlife Office
(see ADDRESSES).
Next Steps
After completion of the EA based on
consideration of public comments, we
will determine whether approval and
implementation of the draft
programmatic CCAA warrants a finding
of no significant impact or whether an
environmental impact statement should
be prepared pursuant to NEPA. We will
evaluate the programmatic CCAA, the
permit application, associated
documents, and any comments we
receive to determine if the permit
application meets the criteria for
issuance of an EOS permit under section
10(a)(1)(A) of the ESA. We will also
evaluate whether the proposed permit
action would comply with section 7 of
the ESA by conducting an intra-Service
section 7 consultation. We will consider
the results of this consultation, in
combination with the above findings, in
our final analysis to determine whether
or not to issue an EOS permit to WDFW.
We will not make the final NEPA and
permit decisions until after the end of
the 30-day public comment period
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:23 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
described in this notice, and we will
fully consider all comments we receive
during the public comment period.
If we determine that the permit
issuance requirements are met, the
Service will issue an EOS permit to
WDFW. The WDFW would then begin
enrolling non-Federal landowners that
agree to implement the actions
described in the CCAA in order to
receive coverage for incidental take of
fisher in western Washington under the
WDFW EOS permit if the species
becomes listed under the ESA.
Authority
We provide this notice in accordance
with the requirements of section 10 of
the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and
NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and their
implementing regulations (50 CFR 17.22
and 40 CFR 1506.6, respectively).
Dated: February 10, 2016.
Stephen Zylstra,
Acting Deputy Regional Director, Pacific
Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2016–04294 Filed 2–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R2–ES–2016–N003;
FXES11130200000–167–FF02ENEH00]
Endangered and Threatened Species
Permit Applications
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of applications;
request for public comment.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, invite the public to
comment on the following applications
to conduct certain activities with
endangered or threatened species. The
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act), prohibits activities with
endangered and threatened species
unless a Federal permit allows such
activities. Both the Act and the National
Environmental Policy Act require that
we invite public comment before
issuing these permits.
DATES: To ensure consideration, written
comments must be received on or before
March 30, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Susan Jacobsen, Chief,
Division of Classification and
Restoration, by U.S. mail at Division of
Classification and Recovery, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306,
Albuquerque, NM 87103; or by
telephone at 505–248–6920. Please refer
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10271
to the respective permit number for each
application when submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Jacobsen, Chief, Division of
Classification and Restoration, by U.S.
mail at P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque,
NM 87103; or by telephone at 505–248–
6920.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Act
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) prohibits
activities with endangered and
threatened species unless a Federal
permit allows such activities. Along
with our implementing regulations in
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at
50 CFR 17, the Act provides for permits,
and requires that we invite public
comment before issuing these permits.
A permit granted by us under section
10(a)(1)(A) of the Act authorizes
applicants to conduct activities with
U.S. endangered or threatened species
for scientific purposes, enhancement of
survival or propagation, or interstate
commerce. Our regulations regarding
implementation of section 10(a)(1)(A)
permits are found at 50 CFR 17.22 for
endangered wildlife species, 50 CFR
17.32 for threatened wildlife species, 50
CFR 17.62 for endangered plant species,
and 50 CFR 17.72 for threatened plant
species.
Applications Available for Review and
Comment
We invite local, State, Tribal, and
Federal agencies and the public to
comment on the following applications.
Please refer to the appropriate permit
number (e.g., Permit No. TE–123456)
when requesting application documents
and when submitting comments.
Documents and other information the
applicants have submitted with these
applications are available for review,
subject to the requirements of the
Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) and
Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552).
Permit TE–81811B
Applicant: Jeremy Henson, Round Rock,
Texas.
Applicant requests a new permit for
research and recovery purposes to
conduct presence/absence surveys for
the following species in Arizona, New
Mexico, Texas, and Oklahoma:
• Interior least tern (Sterna
antillarum)
• northern aplomado falcon (Falco
femoralis septentrionalis)
• red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides
borealis)
• Houston toad (Bufo houstonensis)
• golden-cheeked warbler (Dendroica
chrysoparia)
• Navasota ladies’-tresses (Spiranthes
parksii)
E:\FR\FM\29FEN1.SGM
29FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 39 (Monday, February 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10269-10271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04294]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R1-ES-2016-N019; FXES11120100000-167-FF01E00000]
Draft Programmatic Candidate Conservation Agreement With
Assurances, Draft Environmental Assessment, and Receipt of Application
for Enhancement of Survival Permit for the Fisher in Western Washington
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Receipt of application; notice of availability and request for
comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), received an
application from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW)
for an enhancement of survival (EOS) permit under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA). The permit application includes
a draft programmatic candidate conservation agreement with assurances
(CCAAs) for the fisher in western Washington. The Service also
announces the availability of a draft environmental assessment (EA)
addressing the draft CCAA and issuance of the requested EOS permit in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended (NEPA). We invite comments from all interested parties on the
application, the draft CCAA, and the draft EA.
DATES: To ensure consideration, written comments must be received from
interested parties by March 30, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To request further information or submit written comments,
please use one of the following methods, and note that your information
request or comments are in reference to the ``Fisher CCAA.''
Internet: You may view or download copies of the draft
CCAA and the draft EA and obtain additional information on the Internet
at https://www.fws.gov/wafwo/.
Email: wfwocomments@fws.gov. Include ``Fisher CCAA'' in
the subject line of the message or comments.
U.S. Mail: Tim Romanski, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service;
Washington Fish and Wildlife Office; 510 Desmond Drive SE., Suite 102;
Lacey, WA 98503.
In-Person Drop-off, Viewing or Pickup: Please call 360-
753-5823 to make an appointment (necessary for viewing or picking up
documents only) during normal business hours at the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; Washington Fish and Wildlife Office; 510 Desmond
Drive SE., Suite 102; Lacey, WA 98503. Written comments can be dropped
off during regular business hours at the above address on or before the
closing date of the public comment period (see DATES).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Romanski, Conservation Planning
and Hydropower Branch Manager, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Washington Fish and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES); telephone: 360-
753-5823. If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf, please
call the Federal Information Relay Service at 800-877-8339.
[[Page 10270]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We received an application from the
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) for an enhancement of
survival (EOS) permit under section 10(a)(1)(A) of the ESA for
incidental take of the fisher (Pekania pennanti), a species currently
considered a candidate for listing as threatened or endangered under
the ESA. The permit application includes a draft programmatic candidate
conservation agreement with assurances (CCAAs) for the fisher in
western Washington. The Service also announces the availability of a
draft environmental assessment (EA) addressing the draft CCAA and
issuance of the requested EOS permit in accordance with NEPA (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.). We invite comments from all interested parties on the
application, the draft CCAA, and the draft EA.
The application includes a CCAA covering fisher and its habitat on
private lands in western Washington. The Service and WDFW prepared the
CCAA to provide non-Federal landowners with the opportunity to
voluntarily conserve the fisher and its habitat while carrying out
specific land management activities commonly practiced on forest lands,
as defined in the Washington State Forest Practices Act as of February
1, 2015. Covered activities include but are not limited to timber
harvest, reforestation, road and trail construction, water crossing
structure construction, and other forest practice hydraulic projects,
transport of timber and rock, site preparation, collection of minor
forest products, fire suppression, and recreation, as defined in the
draft CCAA.
Background
Private and other non-Federal property owners are encouraged to
enter into CCAAs, in which they voluntarily undertake management
activities on their properties to enhance, restore, or maintain habitat
benefiting species that are proposed for listing under the ESA,
candidates for listing, or species that may become candidates or
proposed for listing. EOS permits are issued to applicants in
association with approved CCAAs to authorize incidental take of the
covered species from covered activities, should the species become
listed. Through a CCAA and its associated EOS permit, the Service
provides assurances to property owners that they will not be subjected
to increased land use restrictions if the covered species become listed
under the ESA in the future, provided certain conditions are met.
Application requirements and issuance criteria for EOS permits for
CCAAs are found in the Code of Regulations (CFR) at 50 CFR 17.22(d) and
17.32(d), respectively. See also our joint policy on CCAAs, which we
published in the Federal Register with the Department of Commerce's
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine
Fisheries Service (64 FR 32726; June 17, 1999).
On April 8, 2004, the Service published a 12-month status review
(69 FR 18769) finding that listing the West Coast Distinct Population
Segment (DPS) of fisher as threatened or endangered under the ESA (16
U.S.C. 1538) was warranted, but precluded by higher priority actions.
On October 7, 2014, we published a proposed rule (79 FR 60419) to list
the West Coast DPS of fisher as threatened under the ESA. Due to
substantial disagreement regarding available information, the Service
issued a 6-month extension to collect and review additional information
and make a final determination (80 FR 19953). A regulation implementing
the proposed rule or a notice that the proposed regulation is being
withdrawn will be issued no later than April 7, 2016. In anticipation
of the potential listing of fisher under the ESA, WDFW requested
assistance from the Service in developing a CCAA on behalf of private
landowners in western Washington.
Proposed Action
The Proposed Action Alternative is the issuance of the requested
EOS permit with a 20-year term based on WDFW's commitment to implement
the proposed CCAA including issuance of Certificates of Inclusion (CI)
to participating non-Federal landowners. The proposed CCAA would
implement conservation measures that contribute to the recovery of the
fisher. Take authorization would become effective if the species
becomes listed, as long as the enrolled landowner is in compliance with
the terms and conditions of the CCAA, CI, and the EOS permit. The CCAA,
the ESO permit, and the CIs would provide incentives for non-Federal
landowners to participate in conservation efforts expected to support
reintroduction of the fisher within the western portions of its
historical range in Washington.
National Environmental Policy Act Compliance
Approval of a programmatic CCAA and issuance of the associated EOS
permit are Federal actions that trigger the need for compliance with
NEPA. Pursuant to NEPA, we prepared a draft EA to analyze the
environmental impacts related to the issuance of the requested EOS
permit and implementation of the associated programmatic CCAA. The EA
analyses two alternatives: A ``No-action'' alternative, and the
proposed action.
No-action alternative: Under the No-action alternative, the Service
would not issue the requested EOS permit and the proposed CCAA would
not be implemented. Under this alternative, WDFW would not enroll
landowners in the CCAA and no voluntary conservation measures would be
implemented. WDFW would likely continue their efforts to recover
fishers in the State, focusing on the protection and monitoring of
previously reintroduced individuals. Non-Federal landowners would not
receive assurances that additional conservation measures or any
additional land, water, or resource use restrictions could be required
if the covered species becomes listed as threatened or endangered under
the ESA.
Proposed action alternative: The proposed action alternative is a
programmatic approach, in which the Service would issue the requested
EOS permit with a 20-year term to WDFW. The WDFW would implement the
proposed CCAA including issuance of CIs to participating non-Federal
landowners. The proposed CCAA provides conservation measures that would
contribute to the recovery of the fisher while providing coverage
exempting take that may occur incidental to activities covered under
the CCAA if the species becomes listed.
Public Comments
You may submit your comments by one of the methods listed in the
ADDRESSES section. We specifically request information, views,
opinions, or suggestions from the public on our proposed Federal
action, including identification of any other aspects of the human
environment not already identified in the EA pursuant to NEPA
regulations at 40 CFR 1506.6. Further, we specifically solicit
information regarding the adequacy of the draft CCAA pursuant to the
requirements for permits at 50 CFR parts 13 and 17, and information and
comments regarding the following issues:
1. The direct, indirect, and cumulative effects that implementation
of the CCAA could have on endangered and threatened species;
2. Other reasonable alternatives consistent with the purpose of the
proposed CCAA as described above, and their associated effects;
3. Measures that would minimize and mitigate potentially adverse
effects of the proposed action;
[[Page 10271]]
4. Identification of any impacts on the human environment that
should have been analyzed in the draft EA pursuant to NEPA;
5. Other plans or projects that might be relevant to this action;
6. The proposed term of the enhancement of survival permit; and
7. Any other information pertinent to evaluating the effects of the
proposed action on the human environment.
Public Availability of Comments
All comments and materials we receive become part of the public
record associated with this action. Before including your address,
phone number, email address, or other personally identifiable
information in your comments, you should be aware that your entire
comment--including your personally identifiable information--may be
made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your
comment to withhold your personally identifiable information from
public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. All
submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations
or businesses, will be made available for public disclosure in their
entirety. Comments and materials we receive, as well as supporting
documentation we used in preparing the draft EA, will be available for
public inspection by appointment, during normal business hours, at our
Washington Fish and Wildlife Office (see ADDRESSES).
Next Steps
After completion of the EA based on consideration of public
comments, we will determine whether approval and implementation of the
draft programmatic CCAA warrants a finding of no significant impact or
whether an environmental impact statement should be prepared pursuant
to NEPA. We will evaluate the programmatic CCAA, the permit
application, associated documents, and any comments we receive to
determine if the permit application meets the criteria for issuance of
an EOS permit under section 10(a)(1)(A) of the ESA. We will also
evaluate whether the proposed permit action would comply with section 7
of the ESA by conducting an intra-Service section 7 consultation. We
will consider the results of this consultation, in combination with the
above findings, in our final analysis to determine whether or not to
issue an EOS permit to WDFW. We will not make the final NEPA and permit
decisions until after the end of the 30-day public comment period
described in this notice, and we will fully consider all comments we
receive during the public comment period.
If we determine that the permit issuance requirements are met, the
Service will issue an EOS permit to WDFW. The WDFW would then begin
enrolling non-Federal landowners that agree to implement the actions
described in the CCAA in order to receive coverage for incidental take
of fisher in western Washington under the WDFW EOS permit if the
species becomes listed under the ESA.
Authority
We provide this notice in accordance with the requirements of
section 10 of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), and NEPA (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.) and their implementing regulations (50 CFR 17.22 and 40
CFR 1506.6, respectively).
Dated: February 10, 2016.
Stephen Zylstra,
Acting Deputy Regional Director, Pacific Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. 2016-04294 Filed 2-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
