Use of Chemical Agents or Other Less-Than-Lethal Force in Immediate Use of Force Situations, 10153-10155 [2016-04069]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules Notice of proposed rulemaking; public meetings. ACTION: The Department of Energy (DOE) announces public meetings and webinars for the DPPP Working Group. The Federal Advisory Committee Act requires that agencies publish notice of an advisory committee meeting in the Federal Register. On July 30, 2015, ASRAC met and unanimously passed the recommendation to form a dedicated purpose pool pumps (DPPP) working group to meet and discuss and, if possible, reach consensus on proposed Federal rules that would apply to this equipment. The ASRAC Charter allowed for 3 months of working group meetings to establish the scope, metric, definitions, and test procedure for dedicated purpose pool pumps and decide on a path forward at that time. The working group met this requirement and now more time is required to discuss potential energy conservation standards for this equipment. On January 20, 2016, ASRAC met and recommended that the DPPP Working Group continue its work to develop and recommend potential energy conservation standards for this equipment. This notice announces the next series of meetings for this working group. DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for meeting dates. ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585 unless otherwise stated in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. Individuals will also have the opportunity to participate by webinar. To register for the webinars and receive call-in information, please register at DOE’s Web site https:// www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ appliance_standards/rulemaking.aspx/ ruleid/14. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John Cymbalsky, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies, EE–5B, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 287–1692. Email: asrac@ee.doe.gov. Ms. Johanna Jochum, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General Counsel, GC–33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586–9496. Email: Johanna.Jochum@Hq.Doe.Gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE will host public meetings and webinars on the below dates. Meetings will be hosted asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Feb 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 at DOE’s Forrestal Building, unless otherwise stated. • March 21, 2016; 9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m. at 955 L’Enfant Plaza, 8th Floor • March 22, 2016; 9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m. at Navigant, 1200 19th St. NW., #700, Washington, DC 20036 • April 18, 2016; 9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m. at DOE’s Forrestal Building, Room 6E– 069 • April 19, 2016; 9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m. at DOE’s Forrestal Building, Room 6A– 110 Members of the public are welcome to observe the business of the meeting and, if time allows, may make oral statements during the specified period for public comment. To attend the meeting and/or to make oral statements regarding any of the items on the agenda, email asrac@ee.doe.gov . In the email, please indicate your name, organization (if appropriate), citizenship, and contact information. Please note that foreign nationals participating in the public meeting are subject to advance security screening procedures which require advance notice prior to attendance at the public meeting. If you are a foreign national, and wish to participate in the public meeting, please inform DOE as soon as possible by contacting Ms. Regina Washington at (202) 586–1214 or by email: Regina.Washington@ee.doe.gov so that the necessary procedures can be completed. Anyone attending the meeting will be required to present a government photo identification, such as a passport, driver’s license, or government identification. Due to the required security screening upon entry, individuals attending should arrive early to allow for the extra time needed. Due to the REAL ID Act implemented by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) recent changes have been made regarding ID requirements for individuals wishing to enter Federal buildings from specific states and U.S. territories. Driver’s licenses from the following states or territory will not be accepted for building entry and one of the alternate forms of ID listed below will be required. DHS has determined that regular driver’s licenses (and ID cards) from the following jurisdictions are not acceptable for entry into DOE facilities: Alaska, Louisiana, New York, American Samoa, Maine, Oklahoma, Arizona, Massachusetts, Washington, and Minnesota. Acceptable alternate forms of PhotoID include: U.S. Passport or Passport Card; an Enhanced Driver’s License or Enhanced ID-Card issued by the states of Minnesota, New York or Washington PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 10153 (Enhanced licenses issued by these states are clearly marked Enhanced or Enhanced Driver’s License); A military ID or other Federal government issued Photo-ID card. Docket: The docket is available for review at www.regulations.gov, including Federal Register notices, public meeting attendee lists and transcripts, comments, and other supporting documents/materials. All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. However, not all documents listed in the index may be publicly available, such as information that is exempt from public disclosure. Issued in Washington, DC, on February 19, 2016. Kathleen B. Hogan, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. [FR Doc. 2016–04321 Filed 2–26–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450–01–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Bureau of Prisons 28 CFR Part 552 [BOP–1167–P] RIN 1120–AB67 Use of Chemical Agents or Other LessThan-Lethal Force in Immediate Use of Force Situations Bureau of Prisons, Justice. Proposed rule. AGENCY: ACTION: In this document, the Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) proposes to amend its regulation on the use of chemical agents or other less-than-lethal force to provide that such use is authorized for staff in immediate use of force (emergency) situations. DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before April 29, 2016. ADDRESSES: Rules Unit, Office of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street NW., Washington, DC 20534. SUMMARY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah N. Qureshi, Rules Unit, Office of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202) 353–8248. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Posting of Public Comments. Please note that all comments received are considered part of the public record and made available for public inspection online at https://www.regulations.gov. Such information includes personal identifying information (such as your E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM 29FEP1 10154 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter. If you want to submit personal identifying information (such as your name, address, etc.) as part of your comment, but do not want it to be posted online, you must include the phrase ‘‘PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph of your comment. You must also locate all the personal identifying information you do not want posted online in the first paragraph of your comment and identify what information you want redacted. If you want to submit confidential business information as part of your comment but do not want it to be posted online, you must include the phrase ‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph of your comment. You must also prominently identify confidential business information to be redacted within the comment. If a comment has so much confidential business information that it cannot be effectively redacted, all or part of that comment may not be posted on https:// www.regulations.gov. Personal identifying information identified and located as set forth above will be placed in the agency’s public docket file, but not posted online. Confidential business information identified and located as set forth above will not be placed in the public docket file. If you wish to inspect the agency’s public docket file in person by appointment, please see the ‘‘For Additional Information’’ paragraph. Discussion In this document, the Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) proposes to amend its regulations to explicitly authorize staff to utilize chemical agents or other lessthan-lethal force in immediate use of force (emergency) situations. We also make a few minor edits for clarification and organization. We describe the proposed changes in further detail below. At the outset, we note that we are replacing the term ‘‘weapons’’ with the term ‘‘devices’’ both in the title and the body of the regulation. This is consistent with terminology used in Department of Justice policy describing the use of less-than-lethal force. § 552.25 Use of Less-Than-Lethal Devices, Including Chemical Agents— New Paragraph (a) Currently § 552.25 allows the Warden to authorize the use of less-than-lethal devices, including chemical agents, when the situation is such that a delay in action would constitute a serious VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Feb 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 hazard to the inmate or others, or would result in a major disturbance or serious property damage, and the inmate is either armed and/or barricaded; or cannot be approached without a danger to self or others. The Warden may delegate his authority to one or more supervisors on duty and physically present, but not below the position of Lieutenant. In addition, under current § 552.21(d), the use of less-than-lethal devices could also be appropriate ‘‘where the facts and circumstances known to the staff member would warrant a person using sound correctional judgment to reasonably believe other action is necessary (as a last resort) to prevent serious physical injury, or serious property damage which would immediately endanger the safety of staff, inmates, or others.’’ Although this language indicates that a staff member in a situation where he or she reasonably believed action was necessary could use less-than-lethal force to ‘‘prevent serious physical injury, or serious property damage which would immediately endanger the safety of staff, inmates or others,’’ use of less-than-lethal devices, including chemical agents, by staff in immediate use of force (emergency) situations is not explicitly authorized. The Bureau therefore proposes to amend § 552.25 by adding a new paragraph (a), clearly indicating that ‘‘Staff are authorized to use chemical agents or other less-than-lethal devices in immediate use of force situations pursuant to this subpart.’’ Current BOP regulations already define the parameters for immediate use of force situations. Section 552.21(a)currently defines ‘‘immediate use of force,’’ stating that ‘‘[st]aff may immediately use force and/or apply restraints when the behavior described in § 552.20 constitutes an immediate, serious threat to the inmate, staff, others, property, or to institution security and good order.’’ Section 552.20 authorizes Bureau staff to use force only as a last alternative, and only to the extent necessary to address the inmate behavior which threatens the safety, security and good order of the facility, or protection of the public. Bureau of Prisons staff frequently respond to critical incidents and dangerous situations in Bureau facilities. Several incidents in recent years have resulted in injury to Bureau staff. Inmate attacks on staff continue to escalate, evolve and diversify, recent attacks have proceeded quickly, with more planning than in previous dangerous encounters. Sudden violent large-scale incidents involving large PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 numbers of inmates, require immediate action. Measures are therefore necessary to ensure that staff are clearly authorized to promptly and safely control inmates during violent situations and mitigate the risk of serious bodily harm. This rule change would directly authorize staff to carry less-than-lethal devices for deployment in immediate use of force (emergency) situations. The goal of the proposed rule is to increase the safety of staff and inmates when staff respond to incidents involving violence, and to prevent injury to staff and inmates due to an assault or serious resistance to staff control. The rule will provide staff with immediate access to a less-than lethaldevice, enabling quick containment of incidents, reducing opportunities for injuries to staff and inmates. Currently, responders to dangerous encounters do not have self-protection capability without direct physical contact with involved inmates. There have been occasions where disruptive inmates have resisted control techniques by responding staff. In some instances, inmates armed with weapons have turned their attacks on staff. Staff have also responded to critical incidents on recreation yards which were not successfully interrupted by verbal commands and the non-immediate discharge of one or more less-than-lethal devices and warning shots. These dangers increase the potential for assaults and injury, both to staff and to other inmates, and pose a general risk to the safety and security of the facility. The use of less-than-lethal devices has become accepted throughout the law enforcement community. Correctional staff at the majority of state and local correctional facilities routinely carry and utilize less-than-lethal devices to protect themselves from inmate attacks and prevent dangerous encounters from escalating. Several of these state agencies have allowed line staff to utilize less-than-lethal devices for more than a decade. National Institute of Justice (NIJ) studies of the use of chemical agents published in 1997 (Evaluation of Pepper Spray. NJC 162358, February 1997, by Steven M. Edwards, John Granfield, and Jamie Onnen (8 pages).) and 2003 (The Effectiveness and Safety of Pepper Spray. NJC 195739, April 2003, by National Institute of Justice (19 pages).) documented similar increases in compliance and reductions in injuries in community law enforcement situations. Although the study did not examine use of chemical agents in correctional settings, the long term studies by NIJ show that the use of force E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM 29FEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules explicitly authorize the use of less-thanlethal devices in immediate use of force (emergency) situations. Further, both Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. The Department has assessed the costs and benefits of this regulation and believes that the regulatory approach selected maximizes net benefits. § 552.25 Use of Less-Than-Lethal Devices, Including Chemical Agents— Paragraph (b) The Bureau also proposes to redesignate current § 552.25(a) and (b) into paragraph (b) and (c), respectively. The only changes made are nonsubstantive conforming changes to accommodate new paragraph (a), as described above. The wording and intent of this language remains the same. asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS complaints, injuries to officers, and injuries to aggressive persons have fallen significantly anywhere less-thanlethal force is an option. Based on the above information and the authority already provided in § 552.21(d), the Bureau conducted a limited test of the usefulness and effectiveness of staff use of less-thanlethal devices (Oleoresin Capsicum [OC, or MK–4]) in select Bureau facilities. During the period from October 15, 2012 to March 14, 2013, the Bureau found that the average containment time in facilities using OC in immediate use of force situations was 2.93 minutes, as compared to the 5.48 minutes in facilities which did not use any lessthan lethal weapon in immediate use of force situations. In other words, the use of OC resulted in an average containment time that was a full 2.55 minutes faster. We therefore make this change to increase the safety of staff and inmates when staff respond to incidents involving violence, and to prevent injury to staff and inmates due to an assault or serious resistance to staff control, by providing staff with immediate access to a less-than lethaldevice, thereby enabling quick containment of incidents and reducing opportunities for injuries to staff and inmates. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Director of the Bureau of Prisons, under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), reviewed this regulation and certifies that it will not have a significant economic impact upon a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This regulation pertains to the correctional management of offenders committed to the custody of the Attorney General or the Director of the Bureau of Prisons. Its economic impact is limited to the Bureau’s appropriated funds. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563— Regulatory Review This regulation has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ section 1(b), Principles of Regulation and in accordance with Executive Order 13563 ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review’’ section 1(b) General Principles of Regulation. The Department of Justice has determined that this rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review, and accordingly this rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This rule is a delegation of authority from the Director of BOP to VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:29 Feb 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 Executive Order 13132 This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, under Executive Order 13132, we determine that this regulation does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 This regulation will not result in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 This regulation is not a major rule as defined by § 804 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 10155 1996. This regulation will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and export markets. List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 571. Prisoners. Kathleen M. Kenney, Assistant Director/General Counsel, Federal Bureau of Prisons. Under rulemaking authority vested in the Attorney General in 5 U.S.C. 301, 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, and delegated to the Director, Bureau of Prisons in 28 CFR 0.96, we propose to amend 28 CFR part 552, chapter V, subchapter C, as follows: Subchapter C—Institutional Management PART 552—CUSTODY 1. The authority citation for part 552 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 18 U.S.C. 3621, 3622, 3624, 4001, 4042, 4081, 4082 (Repealed in part as to offenses committed on or after November 1, 1987), 5006–5024 (Repealed October 12, 1984 as to offenses committed after that date), 5039; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510; 28 CFR 0.95–0.99. ■ 2. Revise § 552.25 to read as follows: § 552.25 Use of less-than-lethal devices, including chemical agents. (a) Staff are authorized to use chemical agents or other less-than-lethal devices in immediate use of force situations pursuant to this subpart. (b) For situations other than immediate use of force situations, the Warden may authorize the use of lessthan-lethal devices, including those containing chemical agents, only when a delay in bringing the situation under control would constitute a serious hazard to the inmate or others, or would result in a major disturbance or serious property damage, and the situation is such that the inmate: (1) Is armed and/or barricaded; or (2) Cannot be approached without danger to self or others. (c) The Warden may delegate the authority under paragraph (b) to one or more supervisors on duty and physically present, but not below the position of Lieutenant. [FR Doc. 2016–04069 Filed 2–26–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–05–P E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM 29FEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 39 (Monday, February 29, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10153-10155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04069]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Bureau of Prisons

28 CFR Part 552

[BOP-1167-P]
RIN 1120-AB67


Use of Chemical Agents or Other Less-Than-Lethal Force in 
Immediate Use of Force Situations

AGENCY: Bureau of Prisons, Justice.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this document, the Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) proposes to 
amend its regulation on the use of chemical agents or other less-than-
lethal force to provide that such use is authorized for staff in 
immediate use of force (emergency) situations.

DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before April 29, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Rules Unit, Office of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, 
320 First Street NW., Washington, DC 20534.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah N. Qureshi, Rules Unit, Office 
of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202) 353-8248.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Posting of Public Comments. Please note that all comments received 
are considered part of the public record and made available for public 
inspection online at https://www.regulations.gov. Such information 
includes personal identifying information (such as your

[[Page 10154]]

name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter.
    If you want to submit personal identifying information (such as 
your name, address, etc.) as part of your comment, but do not want it 
to be posted online, you must include the phrase ``PERSONAL IDENTIFYING 
INFORMATION'' in the first paragraph of your comment. You must also 
locate all the personal identifying information you do not want posted 
online in the first paragraph of your comment and identify what 
information you want redacted.
    If you want to submit confidential business information as part of 
your comment but do not want it to be posted online, you must include 
the phrase ``CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION'' in the first paragraph 
of your comment. You must also prominently identify confidential 
business information to be redacted within the comment. If a comment 
has so much confidential business information that it cannot be 
effectively redacted, all or part of that comment may not be posted on 
https://www.regulations.gov.
    Personal identifying information identified and located as set 
forth above will be placed in the agency's public docket file, but not 
posted online. Confidential business information identified and located 
as set forth above will not be placed in the public docket file. If you 
wish to inspect the agency's public docket file in person by 
appointment, please see the ``For Additional Information'' paragraph.

Discussion

    In this document, the Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) proposes to amend 
its regulations to explicitly authorize staff to utilize chemical 
agents or other less-than-lethal force in immediate use of force 
(emergency) situations. We also make a few minor edits for 
clarification and organization. We describe the proposed changes in 
further detail below.
    At the outset, we note that we are replacing the term ``weapons'' 
with the term ``devices'' both in the title and the body of the 
regulation. This is consistent with terminology used in Department of 
Justice policy describing the use of less-than-lethal force.

Sec.  552.25 Use of Less-Than-Lethal Devices, Including Chemical 
Agents--New Paragraph (a)

    Currently Sec.  552.25 allows the Warden to authorize the use of 
less-than-lethal devices, including chemical agents, when the situation 
is such that a delay in action would constitute a serious hazard to the 
inmate or others, or would result in a major disturbance or serious 
property damage, and the inmate is either armed and/or barricaded; or 
cannot be approached without a danger to self or others. The Warden may 
delegate his authority to one or more supervisors on duty and 
physically present, but not below the position of Lieutenant.
    In addition, under current Sec.  552.21(d), the use of less-than-
lethal devices could also be appropriate ``where the facts and 
circumstances known to the staff member would warrant a person using 
sound correctional judgment to reasonably believe other action is 
necessary (as a last resort) to prevent serious physical injury, or 
serious property damage which would immediately endanger the safety of 
staff, inmates, or others.'' Although this language indicates that a 
staff member in a situation where he or she reasonably believed action 
was necessary could use less-than-lethal force to ``prevent serious 
physical injury, or serious property damage which would immediately 
endanger the safety of staff, inmates or others,'' use of less-than-
lethal devices, including chemical agents, by staff in immediate use of 
force (emergency) situations is not explicitly authorized.
    The Bureau therefore proposes to amend Sec.  552.25 by adding a new 
paragraph (a), clearly indicating that ``Staff are authorized to use 
chemical agents or other less-than-lethal devices in immediate use of 
force situations pursuant to this subpart.''
    Current BOP regulations already define the parameters for immediate 
use of force situations. Section 552.21(a)currently defines ``immediate 
use of force,'' stating that ``[st]aff may immediately use force and/or 
apply restraints when the behavior described in Sec.  552.20 
constitutes an immediate, serious threat to the inmate, staff, others, 
property, or to institution security and good order.'' Section 552.20 
authorizes Bureau staff to use force only as a last alternative, and 
only to the extent necessary to address the inmate behavior which 
threatens the safety, security and good order of the facility, or 
protection of the public.
    Bureau of Prisons staff frequently respond to critical incidents 
and dangerous situations in Bureau facilities. Several incidents in 
recent years have resulted in injury to Bureau staff. Inmate attacks on 
staff continue to escalate, evolve and diversify, recent attacks have 
proceeded quickly, with more planning than in previous dangerous 
encounters. Sudden violent large-scale incidents involving large 
numbers of inmates, require immediate action. Measures are therefore 
necessary to ensure that staff are clearly authorized to promptly and 
safely control inmates during violent situations and mitigate the risk 
of serious bodily harm. This rule change would directly authorize staff 
to carry less-than-lethal devices for deployment in immediate use of 
force (emergency) situations.
    The goal of the proposed rule is to increase the safety of staff 
and inmates when staff respond to incidents involving violence, and to 
prevent injury to staff and inmates due to an assault or serious 
resistance to staff control. The rule will provide staff with immediate 
access to a less-than lethal-device, enabling quick containment of 
incidents, reducing opportunities for injuries to staff and inmates. 
Currently, responders to dangerous encounters do not have self-
protection capability without direct physical contact with involved 
inmates. There have been occasions where disruptive inmates have 
resisted control techniques by responding staff. In some instances, 
inmates armed with weapons have turned their attacks on staff. Staff 
have also responded to critical incidents on recreation yards which 
were not successfully interrupted by verbal commands and the non-
immediate discharge of one or more less-than-lethal devices and warning 
shots. These dangers increase the potential for assaults and injury, 
both to staff and to other inmates, and pose a general risk to the 
safety and security of the facility.
    The use of less-than-lethal devices has become accepted throughout 
the law enforcement community. Correctional staff at the majority of 
state and local correctional facilities routinely carry and utilize 
less-than-lethal devices to protect themselves from inmate attacks and 
prevent dangerous encounters from escalating. Several of these state 
agencies have allowed line staff to utilize less-than-lethal devices 
for more than a decade.
    National Institute of Justice (NIJ) studies of the use of chemical 
agents published in 1997 (Evaluation of Pepper Spray. NJC 162358, 
February 1997, by Steven M. Edwards, John Granfield, and Jamie Onnen (8 
pages).) and 2003 (The Effectiveness and Safety of Pepper Spray. NJC 
195739, April 2003, by National Institute of Justice (19 pages).) 
documented similar increases in compliance and reductions in injuries 
in community law enforcement situations. Although the study did not 
examine use of chemical agents in correctional settings, the long term 
studies by NIJ show that the use of force

[[Page 10155]]

complaints, injuries to officers, and injuries to aggressive persons 
have fallen significantly anywhere less-than-lethal force is an option.
    Based on the above information and the authority already provided 
in Sec.  552.21(d), the Bureau conducted a limited test of the 
usefulness and effectiveness of staff use of less-than-lethal devices 
(Oleoresin Capsicum [OC, or MK-4]) in select Bureau facilities. During 
the period from October 15, 2012 to March 14, 2013, the Bureau found 
that the average containment time in facilities using OC in immediate 
use of force situations was 2.93 minutes, as compared to the 5.48 
minutes in facilities which did not use any less-than lethal weapon in 
immediate use of force situations. In other words, the use of OC 
resulted in an average containment time that was a full 2.55 minutes 
faster.
    We therefore make this change to increase the safety of staff and 
inmates when staff respond to incidents involving violence, and to 
prevent injury to staff and inmates due to an assault or serious 
resistance to staff control, by providing staff with immediate access 
to a less-than lethal-device, thereby enabling quick containment of 
incidents and reducing opportunities for injuries to staff and inmates.

Sec.  552.25 Use of Less-Than-Lethal Devices, Including Chemical 
Agents--Paragraph (b)

    The Bureau also proposes to redesignate current Sec.  552.25(a) and 
(b) into paragraph (b) and (c), respectively. The only changes made are 
non-substantive conforming changes to accommodate new paragraph (a), as 
described above. The wording and intent of this language remains the 
same.

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563--Regulatory Review

    This regulation has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with 
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' section 1(b), 
Principles of Regulation and in accordance with Executive Order 13563 
``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review'' section 1(b) General 
Principles of Regulation.
    The Department of Justice has determined that this rule is not a 
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, section 
3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review, and accordingly this rule has 
been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This rule is a 
delegation of authority from the Director of BOP to explicitly 
authorize the use of less-than-lethal devices in immediate use of force 
(emergency) situations.
    Further, both Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to 
assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, 
if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that 
maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, 
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). 
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both 
costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of 
promoting flexibility. The Department has assessed the costs and 
benefits of this regulation and believes that the regulatory approach 
selected maximizes net benefits.

Executive Order 13132

    This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the 
States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
States, or on distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government. Therefore, under Executive Order 13132, 
we determine that this regulation does not have sufficient federalism 
implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Director of the Bureau of Prisons, under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), reviewed this regulation and 
certifies that it will not have a significant economic impact upon a 
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This 
regulation pertains to the correctional management of offenders 
committed to the custody of the Attorney General or the Director of the 
Bureau of Prisons. Its economic impact is limited to the Bureau's 
appropriated funds.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    This regulation will not result in the expenditure by State, local 
and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of 
$100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed 
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 
1995.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996

    This regulation is not a major rule as defined by Sec.  804 of the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This 
regulation will not result in an annual effect on the economy of 
$100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or 
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, 
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based 
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and 
export markets.

List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 571.

    Prisoners.

Kathleen M. Kenney,
Assistant Director/General Counsel, Federal Bureau of Prisons.

    Under rulemaking authority vested in the Attorney General in 5 
U.S.C. 301, 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, and delegated to the Director, Bureau 
of Prisons in 28 CFR 0.96, we propose to amend 28 CFR part 552, chapter 
V, subchapter C, as follows:

Subchapter C--Institutional Management

PART 552--CUSTODY

0
1. The authority citation for part 552 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 18 U.S.C. 3621, 3622, 3624, 4001, 4042, 
4081, 4082 (Repealed in part as to offenses committed on or after 
November 1, 1987), 5006-5024 (Repealed October 12, 1984 as to 
offenses committed after that date), 5039; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510; 28 
CFR 0.95-0.99.

0
2. Revise Sec.  552.25 to read as follows:


Sec.  552.25  Use of less-than-lethal devices, including chemical 
agents.

    (a) Staff are authorized to use chemical agents or other less-than-
lethal devices in immediate use of force situations pursuant to this 
subpart.
    (b) For situations other than immediate use of force situations, 
the Warden may authorize the use of less-than-lethal devices, including 
those containing chemical agents, only when a delay in bringing the 
situation under control would constitute a serious hazard to the inmate 
or others, or would result in a major disturbance or serious property 
damage, and the situation is such that the inmate:
    (1) Is armed and/or barricaded; or
    (2) Cannot be approached without danger to self or others.
    (c) The Warden may delegate the authority under paragraph (b) to 
one or more supervisors on duty and physically present, but not below 
the position of Lieutenant.

[FR Doc. 2016-04069 Filed 2-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-05-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.