Use of Chemical Agents or Other Less-Than-Lethal Force in Immediate Use of Force Situations, 10153-10155 [2016-04069]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
public meetings.
ACTION:
The Department of Energy
(DOE) announces public meetings and
webinars for the DPPP Working Group.
The Federal Advisory Committee Act
requires that agencies publish notice of
an advisory committee meeting in the
Federal Register.
On July 30, 2015, ASRAC met and
unanimously passed the
recommendation to form a dedicated
purpose pool pumps (DPPP) working
group to meet and discuss and, if
possible, reach consensus on proposed
Federal rules that would apply to this
equipment. The ASRAC Charter allowed
for 3 months of working group meetings
to establish the scope, metric,
definitions, and test procedure for
dedicated purpose pool pumps and
decide on a path forward at that time.
The working group met this requirement
and now more time is required to
discuss potential energy conservation
standards for this equipment. On
January 20, 2016, ASRAC met and
recommended that the DPPP Working
Group continue its work to develop and
recommend potential energy
conservation standards for this
equipment. This notice announces the
next series of meetings for this working
group.
DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for meeting dates.
ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at
U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal
Building, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585 unless
otherwise stated in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section. Individuals will
also have the opportunity to participate
by webinar. To register for the webinars
and receive call-in information, please
register at DOE’s Web site https://
www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/
appliance_standards/rulemaking.aspx/
ruleid/14.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
John Cymbalsky, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies, EE–5B, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 287–1692. Email:
asrac@ee.doe.gov.
Ms. Johanna Jochum, U.S. Department
of Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
GC–33, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–9496. Email:
Johanna.Jochum@Hq.Doe.Gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DOE will
host public meetings and webinars on
the below dates. Meetings will be hosted
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
at DOE’s Forrestal Building, unless
otherwise stated.
• March 21, 2016; 9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m.
at 955 L’Enfant Plaza, 8th Floor
• March 22, 2016; 9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m.
at Navigant, 1200 19th St. NW., #700,
Washington, DC 20036
• April 18, 2016; 9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m. at
DOE’s Forrestal Building, Room 6E–
069
• April 19, 2016; 9:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m. at
DOE’s Forrestal Building, Room 6A–
110
Members of the public are welcome to
observe the business of the meeting and,
if time allows, may make oral
statements during the specified period
for public comment. To attend the
meeting and/or to make oral statements
regarding any of the items on the
agenda, email asrac@ee.doe.gov . In the
email, please indicate your name,
organization (if appropriate),
citizenship, and contact information.
Please note that foreign nationals
participating in the public meeting are
subject to advance security screening
procedures which require advance
notice prior to attendance at the public
meeting. If you are a foreign national,
and wish to participate in the public
meeting, please inform DOE as soon as
possible by contacting Ms. Regina
Washington at (202) 586–1214 or by
email: Regina.Washington@ee.doe.gov
so that the necessary procedures can be
completed. Anyone attending the
meeting will be required to present a
government photo identification, such
as a passport, driver’s license, or
government identification. Due to the
required security screening upon entry,
individuals attending should arrive
early to allow for the extra time needed.
Due to the REAL ID Act implemented
by the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) recent changes have
been made regarding ID requirements
for individuals wishing to enter Federal
buildings from specific states and U.S.
territories. Driver’s licenses from the
following states or territory will not be
accepted for building entry and one of
the alternate forms of ID listed below
will be required.
DHS has determined that regular
driver’s licenses (and ID cards) from the
following jurisdictions are not
acceptable for entry into DOE facilities:
Alaska, Louisiana, New York, American
Samoa, Maine, Oklahoma, Arizona,
Massachusetts, Washington, and
Minnesota.
Acceptable alternate forms of PhotoID include: U.S. Passport or Passport
Card; an Enhanced Driver’s License or
Enhanced ID-Card issued by the states
of Minnesota, New York or Washington
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10153
(Enhanced licenses issued by these
states are clearly marked Enhanced or
Enhanced Driver’s License); A military
ID or other Federal government issued
Photo-ID card.
Docket: The docket is available for
review at www.regulations.gov,
including Federal Register notices,
public meeting attendee lists and
transcripts, comments, and other
supporting documents/materials. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov index.
However, not all documents listed in
the index may be publicly available,
such as information that is exempt from
public disclosure.
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 19,
2016.
Kathleen B. Hogan,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy
Efficiency, Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy.
[FR Doc. 2016–04321 Filed 2–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Prisons
28 CFR Part 552
[BOP–1167–P]
RIN 1120–AB67
Use of Chemical Agents or Other LessThan-Lethal Force in Immediate Use of
Force Situations
Bureau of Prisons, Justice.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In this document, the Bureau
of Prisons (Bureau) proposes to amend
its regulation on the use of chemical
agents or other less-than-lethal force to
provide that such use is authorized for
staff in immediate use of force
(emergency) situations.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before April 29, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Rules Unit, Office of
General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, 320
First Street NW., Washington, DC
20534.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah N. Qureshi, Rules Unit, Office of
General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons,
phone (202) 353–8248.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments. Please
note that all comments received are
considered part of the public record and
made available for public inspection
online at https://www.regulations.gov.
Such information includes personal
identifying information (such as your
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
10154
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
name, address, etc.) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter.
If you want to submit personal
identifying information (such as your
name, address, etc.) as part of your
comment, but do not want it to be
posted online, you must include the
phrase ‘‘PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also locate
all the personal identifying information
you do not want posted online in the
first paragraph of your comment and
identify what information you want
redacted.
If you want to submit confidential
business information as part of your
comment but do not want it to be posted
online, you must include the phrase
‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also
prominently identify confidential
business information to be redacted
within the comment. If a comment has
so much confidential business
information that it cannot be effectively
redacted, all or part of that comment
may not be posted on https://
www.regulations.gov.
Personal identifying information
identified and located as set forth above
will be placed in the agency’s public
docket file, but not posted online.
Confidential business information
identified and located as set forth above
will not be placed in the public docket
file. If you wish to inspect the agency’s
public docket file in person by
appointment, please see the ‘‘For
Additional Information’’ paragraph.
Discussion
In this document, the Bureau of
Prisons (Bureau) proposes to amend its
regulations to explicitly authorize staff
to utilize chemical agents or other lessthan-lethal force in immediate use of
force (emergency) situations. We also
make a few minor edits for clarification
and organization. We describe the
proposed changes in further detail
below.
At the outset, we note that we are
replacing the term ‘‘weapons’’ with the
term ‘‘devices’’ both in the title and the
body of the regulation. This is
consistent with terminology used in
Department of Justice policy describing
the use of less-than-lethal force.
§ 552.25 Use of Less-Than-Lethal
Devices, Including Chemical Agents—
New Paragraph (a)
Currently § 552.25 allows the Warden
to authorize the use of less-than-lethal
devices, including chemical agents,
when the situation is such that a delay
in action would constitute a serious
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
hazard to the inmate or others, or would
result in a major disturbance or serious
property damage, and the inmate is
either armed and/or barricaded; or
cannot be approached without a danger
to self or others. The Warden may
delegate his authority to one or more
supervisors on duty and physically
present, but not below the position of
Lieutenant.
In addition, under current § 552.21(d),
the use of less-than-lethal devices could
also be appropriate ‘‘where the facts and
circumstances known to the staff
member would warrant a person using
sound correctional judgment to
reasonably believe other action is
necessary (as a last resort) to prevent
serious physical injury, or serious
property damage which would
immediately endanger the safety of staff,
inmates, or others.’’ Although this
language indicates that a staff member
in a situation where he or she
reasonably believed action was
necessary could use less-than-lethal
force to ‘‘prevent serious physical
injury, or serious property damage
which would immediately endanger the
safety of staff, inmates or others,’’ use of
less-than-lethal devices, including
chemical agents, by staff in immediate
use of force (emergency) situations is
not explicitly authorized.
The Bureau therefore proposes to
amend § 552.25 by adding a new
paragraph (a), clearly indicating that
‘‘Staff are authorized to use chemical
agents or other less-than-lethal devices
in immediate use of force situations
pursuant to this subpart.’’
Current BOP regulations already
define the parameters for immediate use
of force situations. Section
552.21(a)currently defines ‘‘immediate
use of force,’’ stating that ‘‘[st]aff may
immediately use force and/or apply
restraints when the behavior described
in § 552.20 constitutes an immediate,
serious threat to the inmate, staff,
others, property, or to institution
security and good order.’’ Section
552.20 authorizes Bureau staff to use
force only as a last alternative, and only
to the extent necessary to address the
inmate behavior which threatens the
safety, security and good order of the
facility, or protection of the public.
Bureau of Prisons staff frequently
respond to critical incidents and
dangerous situations in Bureau
facilities. Several incidents in recent
years have resulted in injury to Bureau
staff. Inmate attacks on staff continue to
escalate, evolve and diversify, recent
attacks have proceeded quickly, with
more planning than in previous
dangerous encounters. Sudden violent
large-scale incidents involving large
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
numbers of inmates, require immediate
action. Measures are therefore necessary
to ensure that staff are clearly
authorized to promptly and safely
control inmates during violent
situations and mitigate the risk of
serious bodily harm. This rule change
would directly authorize staff to carry
less-than-lethal devices for deployment
in immediate use of force (emergency)
situations.
The goal of the proposed rule is to
increase the safety of staff and inmates
when staff respond to incidents
involving violence, and to prevent
injury to staff and inmates due to an
assault or serious resistance to staff
control. The rule will provide staff with
immediate access to a less-than lethaldevice, enabling quick containment of
incidents, reducing opportunities for
injuries to staff and inmates. Currently,
responders to dangerous encounters do
not have self-protection capability
without direct physical contact with
involved inmates. There have been
occasions where disruptive inmates
have resisted control techniques by
responding staff. In some instances,
inmates armed with weapons have
turned their attacks on staff. Staff have
also responded to critical incidents on
recreation yards which were not
successfully interrupted by verbal
commands and the non-immediate
discharge of one or more less-than-lethal
devices and warning shots. These
dangers increase the potential for
assaults and injury, both to staff and to
other inmates, and pose a general risk to
the safety and security of the facility.
The use of less-than-lethal devices has
become accepted throughout the law
enforcement community. Correctional
staff at the majority of state and local
correctional facilities routinely carry
and utilize less-than-lethal devices to
protect themselves from inmate attacks
and prevent dangerous encounters from
escalating. Several of these state
agencies have allowed line staff to
utilize less-than-lethal devices for more
than a decade.
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
studies of the use of chemical agents
published in 1997 (Evaluation of Pepper
Spray. NJC 162358, February 1997, by
Steven M. Edwards, John Granfield, and
Jamie Onnen (8 pages).) and 2003 (The
Effectiveness and Safety of Pepper
Spray. NJC 195739, April 2003, by
National Institute of Justice (19 pages).)
documented similar increases in
compliance and reductions in injuries
in community law enforcement
situations. Although the study did not
examine use of chemical agents in
correctional settings, the long term
studies by NIJ show that the use of force
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
explicitly authorize the use of less-thanlethal devices in immediate use of force
(emergency) situations.
Further, both Executive Orders 12866
and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. The
Department has assessed the costs and
benefits of this regulation and believes
that the regulatory approach selected
maximizes net benefits.
§ 552.25 Use of Less-Than-Lethal
Devices, Including Chemical Agents—
Paragraph (b)
The Bureau also proposes to
redesignate current § 552.25(a) and (b)
into paragraph (b) and (c), respectively.
The only changes made are nonsubstantive conforming changes to
accommodate new paragraph (a), as
described above. The wording and
intent of this language remains the
same.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
complaints, injuries to officers, and
injuries to aggressive persons have
fallen significantly anywhere less-thanlethal force is an option.
Based on the above information and
the authority already provided in
§ 552.21(d), the Bureau conducted a
limited test of the usefulness and
effectiveness of staff use of less-thanlethal devices (Oleoresin Capsicum [OC,
or MK–4]) in select Bureau facilities.
During the period from October 15, 2012
to March 14, 2013, the Bureau found
that the average containment time in
facilities using OC in immediate use of
force situations was 2.93 minutes, as
compared to the 5.48 minutes in
facilities which did not use any lessthan lethal weapon in immediate use of
force situations. In other words, the use
of OC resulted in an average
containment time that was a full 2.55
minutes faster.
We therefore make this change to
increase the safety of staff and inmates
when staff respond to incidents
involving violence, and to prevent
injury to staff and inmates due to an
assault or serious resistance to staff
control, by providing staff with
immediate access to a less-than lethaldevice, thereby enabling quick
containment of incidents and reducing
opportunities for injuries to staff and
inmates.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Director of the Bureau of Prisons,
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605(b)), reviewed this regulation
and certifies that it will not have a
significant economic impact upon a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: This regulation
pertains to the correctional management
of offenders committed to the custody of
the Attorney General or the Director of
the Bureau of Prisons. Its economic
impact is limited to the Bureau’s
appropriated funds.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563—
Regulatory Review
This regulation has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review’’ section 1(b), Principles of
Regulation and in accordance with
Executive Order 13563 ‘‘Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review’’
section 1(b) General Principles of
Regulation.
The Department of Justice has
determined that this rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866, section 3(f),
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
accordingly this rule has been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget. This rule is a delegation of
authority from the Director of BOP to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, under
Executive Order 13132, we determine
that this regulation does not have
sufficient federalism implications to
warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This regulation will not result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This regulation is not a major rule as
defined by § 804 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
10155
1996. This regulation will not result in
an annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more; a major increase
in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 571.
Prisoners.
Kathleen M. Kenney,
Assistant Director/General Counsel, Federal
Bureau of Prisons.
Under rulemaking authority vested in
the Attorney General in 5 U.S.C. 301, 28
U.S.C. 509, 510, and delegated to the
Director, Bureau of Prisons in 28 CFR
0.96, we propose to amend 28 CFR part
552, chapter V, subchapter C, as follows:
Subchapter C—Institutional Management
PART 552—CUSTODY
1. The authority citation for part 552
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 18 U.S.C. 3621,
3622, 3624, 4001, 4042, 4081, 4082 (Repealed
in part as to offenses committed on or after
November 1, 1987), 5006–5024 (Repealed
October 12, 1984 as to offenses committed
after that date), 5039; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510; 28
CFR 0.95–0.99.
■
2. Revise § 552.25 to read as follows:
§ 552.25 Use of less-than-lethal devices,
including chemical agents.
(a) Staff are authorized to use
chemical agents or other less-than-lethal
devices in immediate use of force
situations pursuant to this subpart.
(b) For situations other than
immediate use of force situations, the
Warden may authorize the use of lessthan-lethal devices, including those
containing chemical agents, only when
a delay in bringing the situation under
control would constitute a serious
hazard to the inmate or others, or would
result in a major disturbance or serious
property damage, and the situation is
such that the inmate:
(1) Is armed and/or barricaded; or
(2) Cannot be approached without
danger to self or others.
(c) The Warden may delegate the
authority under paragraph (b) to one or
more supervisors on duty and
physically present, but not below the
position of Lieutenant.
[FR Doc. 2016–04069 Filed 2–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–05–P
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 39 (Monday, February 29, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10153-10155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04069]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Prisons
28 CFR Part 552
[BOP-1167-P]
RIN 1120-AB67
Use of Chemical Agents or Other Less-Than-Lethal Force in
Immediate Use of Force Situations
AGENCY: Bureau of Prisons, Justice.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) proposes to
amend its regulation on the use of chemical agents or other less-than-
lethal force to provide that such use is authorized for staff in
immediate use of force (emergency) situations.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before April 29, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Rules Unit, Office of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons,
320 First Street NW., Washington, DC 20534.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah N. Qureshi, Rules Unit, Office
of General Counsel, Bureau of Prisons, phone (202) 353-8248.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments. Please note that all comments received
are considered part of the public record and made available for public
inspection online at https://www.regulations.gov. Such information
includes personal identifying information (such as your
[[Page 10154]]
name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter.
If you want to submit personal identifying information (such as
your name, address, etc.) as part of your comment, but do not want it
to be posted online, you must include the phrase ``PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION'' in the first paragraph of your comment. You must also
locate all the personal identifying information you do not want posted
online in the first paragraph of your comment and identify what
information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential business information as part of
your comment but do not want it to be posted online, you must include
the phrase ``CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION'' in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also prominently identify confidential
business information to be redacted within the comment. If a comment
has so much confidential business information that it cannot be
effectively redacted, all or part of that comment may not be posted on
https://www.regulations.gov.
Personal identifying information identified and located as set
forth above will be placed in the agency's public docket file, but not
posted online. Confidential business information identified and located
as set forth above will not be placed in the public docket file. If you
wish to inspect the agency's public docket file in person by
appointment, please see the ``For Additional Information'' paragraph.
Discussion
In this document, the Bureau of Prisons (Bureau) proposes to amend
its regulations to explicitly authorize staff to utilize chemical
agents or other less-than-lethal force in immediate use of force
(emergency) situations. We also make a few minor edits for
clarification and organization. We describe the proposed changes in
further detail below.
At the outset, we note that we are replacing the term ``weapons''
with the term ``devices'' both in the title and the body of the
regulation. This is consistent with terminology used in Department of
Justice policy describing the use of less-than-lethal force.
Sec. 552.25 Use of Less-Than-Lethal Devices, Including Chemical
Agents--New Paragraph (a)
Currently Sec. 552.25 allows the Warden to authorize the use of
less-than-lethal devices, including chemical agents, when the situation
is such that a delay in action would constitute a serious hazard to the
inmate or others, or would result in a major disturbance or serious
property damage, and the inmate is either armed and/or barricaded; or
cannot be approached without a danger to self or others. The Warden may
delegate his authority to one or more supervisors on duty and
physically present, but not below the position of Lieutenant.
In addition, under current Sec. 552.21(d), the use of less-than-
lethal devices could also be appropriate ``where the facts and
circumstances known to the staff member would warrant a person using
sound correctional judgment to reasonably believe other action is
necessary (as a last resort) to prevent serious physical injury, or
serious property damage which would immediately endanger the safety of
staff, inmates, or others.'' Although this language indicates that a
staff member in a situation where he or she reasonably believed action
was necessary could use less-than-lethal force to ``prevent serious
physical injury, or serious property damage which would immediately
endanger the safety of staff, inmates or others,'' use of less-than-
lethal devices, including chemical agents, by staff in immediate use of
force (emergency) situations is not explicitly authorized.
The Bureau therefore proposes to amend Sec. 552.25 by adding a new
paragraph (a), clearly indicating that ``Staff are authorized to use
chemical agents or other less-than-lethal devices in immediate use of
force situations pursuant to this subpart.''
Current BOP regulations already define the parameters for immediate
use of force situations. Section 552.21(a)currently defines ``immediate
use of force,'' stating that ``[st]aff may immediately use force and/or
apply restraints when the behavior described in Sec. 552.20
constitutes an immediate, serious threat to the inmate, staff, others,
property, or to institution security and good order.'' Section 552.20
authorizes Bureau staff to use force only as a last alternative, and
only to the extent necessary to address the inmate behavior which
threatens the safety, security and good order of the facility, or
protection of the public.
Bureau of Prisons staff frequently respond to critical incidents
and dangerous situations in Bureau facilities. Several incidents in
recent years have resulted in injury to Bureau staff. Inmate attacks on
staff continue to escalate, evolve and diversify, recent attacks have
proceeded quickly, with more planning than in previous dangerous
encounters. Sudden violent large-scale incidents involving large
numbers of inmates, require immediate action. Measures are therefore
necessary to ensure that staff are clearly authorized to promptly and
safely control inmates during violent situations and mitigate the risk
of serious bodily harm. This rule change would directly authorize staff
to carry less-than-lethal devices for deployment in immediate use of
force (emergency) situations.
The goal of the proposed rule is to increase the safety of staff
and inmates when staff respond to incidents involving violence, and to
prevent injury to staff and inmates due to an assault or serious
resistance to staff control. The rule will provide staff with immediate
access to a less-than lethal-device, enabling quick containment of
incidents, reducing opportunities for injuries to staff and inmates.
Currently, responders to dangerous encounters do not have self-
protection capability without direct physical contact with involved
inmates. There have been occasions where disruptive inmates have
resisted control techniques by responding staff. In some instances,
inmates armed with weapons have turned their attacks on staff. Staff
have also responded to critical incidents on recreation yards which
were not successfully interrupted by verbal commands and the non-
immediate discharge of one or more less-than-lethal devices and warning
shots. These dangers increase the potential for assaults and injury,
both to staff and to other inmates, and pose a general risk to the
safety and security of the facility.
The use of less-than-lethal devices has become accepted throughout
the law enforcement community. Correctional staff at the majority of
state and local correctional facilities routinely carry and utilize
less-than-lethal devices to protect themselves from inmate attacks and
prevent dangerous encounters from escalating. Several of these state
agencies have allowed line staff to utilize less-than-lethal devices
for more than a decade.
National Institute of Justice (NIJ) studies of the use of chemical
agents published in 1997 (Evaluation of Pepper Spray. NJC 162358,
February 1997, by Steven M. Edwards, John Granfield, and Jamie Onnen (8
pages).) and 2003 (The Effectiveness and Safety of Pepper Spray. NJC
195739, April 2003, by National Institute of Justice (19 pages).)
documented similar increases in compliance and reductions in injuries
in community law enforcement situations. Although the study did not
examine use of chemical agents in correctional settings, the long term
studies by NIJ show that the use of force
[[Page 10155]]
complaints, injuries to officers, and injuries to aggressive persons
have fallen significantly anywhere less-than-lethal force is an option.
Based on the above information and the authority already provided
in Sec. 552.21(d), the Bureau conducted a limited test of the
usefulness and effectiveness of staff use of less-than-lethal devices
(Oleoresin Capsicum [OC, or MK-4]) in select Bureau facilities. During
the period from October 15, 2012 to March 14, 2013, the Bureau found
that the average containment time in facilities using OC in immediate
use of force situations was 2.93 minutes, as compared to the 5.48
minutes in facilities which did not use any less-than lethal weapon in
immediate use of force situations. In other words, the use of OC
resulted in an average containment time that was a full 2.55 minutes
faster.
We therefore make this change to increase the safety of staff and
inmates when staff respond to incidents involving violence, and to
prevent injury to staff and inmates due to an assault or serious
resistance to staff control, by providing staff with immediate access
to a less-than lethal-device, thereby enabling quick containment of
incidents and reducing opportunities for injuries to staff and inmates.
Sec. 552.25 Use of Less-Than-Lethal Devices, Including Chemical
Agents--Paragraph (b)
The Bureau also proposes to redesignate current Sec. 552.25(a) and
(b) into paragraph (b) and (c), respectively. The only changes made are
non-substantive conforming changes to accommodate new paragraph (a), as
described above. The wording and intent of this language remains the
same.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563--Regulatory Review
This regulation has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' section 1(b),
Principles of Regulation and in accordance with Executive Order 13563
``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review'' section 1(b) General
Principles of Regulation.
The Department of Justice has determined that this rule is not a
``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, section
3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review, and accordingly this rule has
been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This rule is a
delegation of authority from the Director of BOP to explicitly
authorize the use of less-than-lethal devices in immediate use of force
(emergency) situations.
Further, both Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to
assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental,
public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both
costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of
promoting flexibility. The Department has assessed the costs and
benefits of this regulation and believes that the regulatory approach
selected maximizes net benefits.
Executive Order 13132
This regulation will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, under Executive Order 13132,
we determine that this regulation does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Director of the Bureau of Prisons, under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), reviewed this regulation and
certifies that it will not have a significant economic impact upon a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
regulation pertains to the correctional management of offenders
committed to the custody of the Attorney General or the Director of the
Bureau of Prisons. Its economic impact is limited to the Bureau's
appropriated funds.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This regulation will not result in the expenditure by State, local
and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This regulation is not a major rule as defined by Sec. 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This
regulation will not result in an annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 571.
Prisoners.
Kathleen M. Kenney,
Assistant Director/General Counsel, Federal Bureau of Prisons.
Under rulemaking authority vested in the Attorney General in 5
U.S.C. 301, 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, and delegated to the Director, Bureau
of Prisons in 28 CFR 0.96, we propose to amend 28 CFR part 552, chapter
V, subchapter C, as follows:
Subchapter C--Institutional Management
PART 552--CUSTODY
0
1. The authority citation for part 552 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 18 U.S.C. 3621, 3622, 3624, 4001, 4042,
4081, 4082 (Repealed in part as to offenses committed on or after
November 1, 1987), 5006-5024 (Repealed October 12, 1984 as to
offenses committed after that date), 5039; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510; 28
CFR 0.95-0.99.
0
2. Revise Sec. 552.25 to read as follows:
Sec. 552.25 Use of less-than-lethal devices, including chemical
agents.
(a) Staff are authorized to use chemical agents or other less-than-
lethal devices in immediate use of force situations pursuant to this
subpart.
(b) For situations other than immediate use of force situations,
the Warden may authorize the use of less-than-lethal devices, including
those containing chemical agents, only when a delay in bringing the
situation under control would constitute a serious hazard to the inmate
or others, or would result in a major disturbance or serious property
damage, and the situation is such that the inmate:
(1) Is armed and/or barricaded; or
(2) Cannot be approached without danger to self or others.
(c) The Warden may delegate the authority under paragraph (b) to
one or more supervisors on duty and physically present, but not below
the position of Lieutenant.
[FR Doc. 2016-04069 Filed 2-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-05-P