Pecans Grown in the States of Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas; Secretary's Decision and Referendum Order on Proposed Marketing Agreement and Order No. 986, 10138-10152 [2016-04043]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
10138
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(ii) Packer-Owned source (12). Enter ‘‘1’’,
domestic, if packer-owned lambs are from
within the 50 States or ‘‘2’’, imported, if
lambs are from outside of the 50 States.
(iii) Packer-Owned head count (13). Enter
the quantity of packer-owned lambs in the lot
in number of head.
(iv) Packer-Owned actual carcass weight
range (14a 14b). Enter the lowest (14a) and
highest (14b) actual carcass weights for lambs
in the lot in pounds.
(v) Packer-Owned actual average carcass
weight (15). Enter the actual average carcass
weight of the lot of packer-owned lambs in
pounds.
(vi) Packer-Owned average dressing
percentage (16). Enter the average dressing
percentage of the lot of packer-owned lambs.
(vii) Percentage yield grade 3 or better (17).
Enter the percentage of packer-owned lambs
in the lot of a yield grade of 3 or better.
(viii) Quality grade percentage (18). Enter
the percentage of packer-owned lambs in the
lot of a quality grade of Choice or better.
(ix) Prior week slaughtered lambs head
counts (19–24). Enter the total number of
head of lambs slaughtered for the prior week
that were purchased through forward
contracts, the total number of head for lambs
purchased through formula arrangements,
and the total number of head of lambs
purchased through negotiated cash,
categorized by domestic or imported sources.
Enter this information once per each week’s
submission.
(x) Forward contract purchases lot
identification (25). Enter code used to
identify forward contracted lambs to the
packer.
(xi) Forward contract purchases head count
(26). Enter quantity of forward contracted
lambs in the lot in number of head.
(xii) Forward contract purchases basis level
(27). Enter the agreed upon adjustment to a
future price to establish the final price of the
forward contracted lambs in dollars per one
hundred pounds.
(xiii) Forward contract purchases delivery
month (28). Enter the delivery month of the
lambs purchased through forward contracts
as a 3-letter abbreviation.
(xiv) Committed lambs (29). Enter quantity
of lambs committed to be delivered to the
packer in number of head.
(xv) Committed delivery month (30). Enter
the delivery month of the lambs committed
for delivery to the packer as a 3-letter
abbreviation.
(xvi) Committed delivery year (31). Enter
the delivery year of the lambs committed for
delivery to the packer as a 4-digit number.
(2) LS–133—Lamb Pelts Weekly Report.
(i) Lot identification (11). Enter code used
to identify the lot of pelts.
(ii) Source (12). Enter ‘‘1’’, packer owned,
if the pelts were from packer owned lambs
or ‘‘2’’, producer owned, if the pelts are from
producer owned lambs.
(iii) Length of Wool (13). Enter ‘‘1’’,
unshorn. Enter ‘‘2’’, shorn.
(iv) Price (14). Enter the price per piece
paid by the packer for each classification
category of pelts in the lot.
(v) Volume (15). Enter the quantity in
number of pieces or pelts in each
classification category of the lot.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
(vi) Classification (16). Enter the
classification code that describes the
classification category for the pelts in the lot.
Appendix D—Mandatory Reporting
Forms
The swine and lamb mandatory forms
follow the docket.
[FR Doc. 2016–03956 Filed 2–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 986
[Docket No. AO–FV–15–0139; AMS–FV–15–
0023; FV15–986–1]
Pecans Grown in the States of
Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas,
Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, North
Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma,
South Carolina, and Texas; Secretary’s
Decision and Referendum Order on
Proposed Marketing Agreement and
Order No. 986
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum
order.
AGENCY:
This Secretary’s Decision
proposes the issuance of a marketing
agreement and order (order) under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937 to cover pecans grown in the
states of Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas,
Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, North
Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma,
South Carolina, and Texas, and provides
growers with the opportunity to vote in
a referendum to determine if they favor
its establishment. The proposed order
would provide authority to collect
industry data and to conduct research
and promotion activities. In addition,
the order would provide authority for
the industry to recommend grade,
quality and size regulation, as well as
pack and container regulation, subject to
approval by the Department of
Agriculture (USDA). The program
would be financed by assessments on
pecan handlers and would be locally
administered, under USDA oversight, by
a Council of seventeen growers and
shellers (handlers) nominated by the
industry and appointed by USDA.
DATES: The referendum will be
conducted from March 9 through March
30, 2016. Ballot materials will be sent to
all known pecan growers in the
proposed fifteen-state production area.
To be eligible to vote, a grower must
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
have produced a minimum average,
annual amount of 50,000 pounds of
inshell pecans between August 1, 2011
and July 31, 2015, or must own a
minimum of 30 pecan acres.
ADDRESSES: Marketing Order and
Agreement Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Schmaedick, Senior Marketing
Specialist; Telephone: (202) 557–4783,
Fax: (435) 259–1502, or Michelle
Sharrow, Rulemaking Branch Chief;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938, or Email:
Melissa.Schmaedick@ams.usda.gov or
Michelle.Sharrow@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on this proceeding by
contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing
Order and Agreement Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW., Stop
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938, or Email: Antoinette.Carter@
ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prior
documents in this proceeding: Notice of
Hearing issued on June 26, 2015, and
published in the July 2, 2015, issue of
the Federal Register (80 FR 38021);
Recommended Decision and
Opportunity to File Written Exceptions
issued on October 20, 2015, and
published in the October 28, 2015, issue
of the Federal Register (80 FR 66372).
This administrative action is governed
by the provisions of sections 556 and
557 of title 5 of the United States Code
and, therefore, is excluded from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866,
13563, and 13175. Notice of this
rulemaking action was provided to
tribal governments through USDA’s
Office of Tribal Relations; no comments
have been received.
Preliminary Statement
This Secretary’s Decision is issued
pursuant to the provisions of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act,’’ and
the applicable rules of practice and
procedure governing the formulation of
marketing agreements and orders (7 CFR
part 900). The proposed marketing order
is authorized under section 8(c) of the
Act.
The proposed marketing agreement
and order are based on the record of a
public hearing held July 20 through July
21, 2015, in Las Cruces, New Mexico;
July 23 through July 24, 2015, in Dallas,
Texas; and, July 27 through July 29,
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
2015, in Tifton, Georgia. The hearing
was held to receive evidence on the
proposed marketing order from growers,
handlers, and other interested parties
located throughout the proposed
production area. Notice of this hearing
was published in the Federal Register
on July 2, 2015.
A request for public hearing on the
proposed program was submitted to
USDA on May 22, 2015, by the
American Pecan Board (Board), a
proponent group established in 2013 to
represent the interests of growers and
handlers throughout the proposed
fifteen-state production area. A
subsequent, modified draft of the
proposed regulatory text was submitted
on June 10, 2015.
Witnesses at the hearing explained
that the provisions of this proposal aim
to assist the industry in addressing a
number of challenges, namely: A lack of
organized representation of industrywide interests in a single organization;
a lack of accurate data to assist the
industry in its analysis of production,
demand and prices; a lack of
coordinated domestic promotion or
research; and a forecasted increase in
production as a result of new plantings.
Witnesses believed that these factors
combined have resulted in the underperformance of the pecan industry
compared to other nut industries.
Upon the basis of evidence
introduced at the hearing and the record
thereof, the Administrator of AMS on
October 20, 2015, filed with the Hearing
Clerk, USDA, a Recommended Decision
and Opportunity to File Written
Exceptions thereto by November 27,
2015. No exceptions were filed. That
document also announced AMS’s intent
to request approval of new information
collection requirements to implement
the program. Written comments on the
proposed information collection
requirements were due by December 28,
2015. None were filed.
USDA is providing two additional
conforming changes to the proposed
order language as published in the
Recommended Decision. These
conforming changes replace the word
‘‘redefining’’ in § 986.55 (c)(6) with
‘‘reestablishment,’’ and the word
‘‘redefining’’ in § 986.33(b) with
‘‘reestablishment,’’ thereby conforming
to the terminology used in § 986.58. The
regulatory text included in this
Secretary’s Decision reflects these
changes.
Further, USDA is providing a
correction to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) analysis published in the
Recommended Decision. The RFA
incorrectly referenced a Small Business
Administration (SBA) threshold of $7
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
million in annual receipts to identify
small handler entities, while hearing
testimony correctly identified a $7.5
million threshold. The RFA included in
this Secretary’s Decision uses the
correct SBA threshold of $7.5 million.
The material issues presented on the
record of hearing and addressed in the
Recommended Decision are as follows:
1. Whether the handling of pecans
produced in the proposed production
area is in the current of interstate or
foreign commerce or directly burdens,
obstructs, or affects such commerce;
2. Whether the economic and
marketing conditions are such that they
justify a need for a Federal marketing
agreement and order which would tend
to effectuate the declared policy of the
Act;
3. What the definition of the
production area and the commodity to
be covered by the order should be;
4. What the identity of the persons
and the marketing transactions to be
regulated should be;
5. What the specific terms and
provisions of the order should be,
including:
(a) The definitions of terms used
therein which are necessary and
incidental to attain the declared
objectives and policy of the Act and
order;
(b) The establishment, composition,
maintenance, procedures, powers and
duties of an administrative Council for
pecans that would be the local
administrative agency for assisting
USDA in the administration of the
order;
(c) The authority to incur expenses
and the procedure to levy assessments
on handlers to obtain revenue for paying
such expenses;
(d) The authority to conduct research
and promotion activities;
(e) The authority to recommend grade,
quality and size regulation, as well as
pack and container regulation, for
pecans grown and handled in the
proposed production area;
(f) The establishment of requirements
for handler reporting and
recordkeeping;
(g) The requirement for compliance
with all provisions of the order and with
any regulation issued under it;
(h) An exemption for handlers of noncommercial quantities of pecans;
(i) The requirement for periodic
continuance referenda; and
(j) Additional terms and conditions as
set forth in § 986.88 through § 986.93,
and § 986.97 through § 986.99 that are
common to marketing agreements only.
Small Business Considerations
Pursuant to the requirements set forth
in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10139
the Agricultural Marketing Service
(AMS) has considered the economic
impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, the AMS has prepared this
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions so that
small businesses will not be unduly or
disproportionately burdened. Small
agricultural producers have been
defined by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.201)
as those having annual receipts of less
than $750,000. Small agricultural
service firms, which include handlers
that would be regulated under the
proposed pecan order, are defined as
those with annual receipts of less than
$7,500,000.
Interested persons were invited to
present evidence at the hearing on the
probable regulatory and informational
impact of the proposed pecan marketing
order program on small businesses. The
record evidence is that while the
program would impose some costs on
the regulated parties, those costs would
be outweighed by the benefits expected
to accrue to the U. S. pecan industry.
Specific evidence on the number of
large and small pecan farms (above and
below the SBA threshold figure of
$750,000 in annual sales) was not
presented at the hearing. However,
percentages can be estimated based on
record evidence.
The 2014 season average grower
prices per pound for improved and
native seedling pecans were $2.12 and
$0.88, respectively. A weighted grower
price of $1.85 is computed by applying
as weights the percentage split between
improved and native acreage on a
representative U.S. pecan farm, which
are 78 and 22 percent, respectively. The
average yield on the representative farm
is 1,666.67 pounds per acre. Multiplying
the $1.85 price by the average yield
gives a total revenue per acre figure of
$3,080. Dividing the $750,000 SBA
annual sales threshold figure by the
revenue per acre figure of $3,080 gives
an estimate of 243 acres as the size of
farm that would have annual sales about
equal to $750,000, given the previous
assumptions. Any farm of that size or
larger would qualify as a large farm
under the SBA definition.
Data presented in the record show
that about 52 percent of commercial
U.S. pecan farms have 250 or more acres
of pecans. Since the 243 acre estimate
above is close to 250 acres, it can be
extrapolated that 52 percent is a
reasonable approximation of the
proportion of large farms and 48 percent
is the proportion of small pecan farms.
According to the record, this estimate
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
10140
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
does not include ‘‘backyard’’
production.
According to record evidence, there
are an estimated 250 handlers in the
U.S. Of these handlers, which include
accumulators, there are an estimated 50
commercially viable shellers with
production over 1 million pounds of
inshell pecans operating within the
proposed production area. Fourteen of
these shellers meet the SBA definition
for large business entity and the
remaining 36 are small business entities.
Record evidence indicates that
implementing the proposed order would
not represent a disproportionate burden
on small businesses. An economic
impact study of the proposed authority
for generic promotion presented at the
hearing provided that the proposed
program would likely benefit all
industry participants.
Impact of Generic Promotion Through
a Marketing Order
The record shows that generic
promotion over a wide variety of
agricultural products stimulates product
demand and translates into higher
prices for growers than would have been
the case without promotion.
Promotional impact studies of other
tree nuts (almonds and walnuts), and of
Texas pecans, show price increases as
high as 6 percent, but the record
indicates that 0 to 3 percent is a more
representative range. Since the other
tree nut promotion programs are well-
established, the record shows that a
representative middle (most likely)
scenario would be a price increase from
promotion of 1.5 percent for the early
years of a new pecan promotion
program. Low and high scenarios were
0.5 and 3.0 percent, respectively.
The record indicates that an analytical
method used historical yearly prices
from 1997 to 2014 in a simulation
covering that period to obtain an
expected average price without
promotion. In a subsequent step, the
simulation applied a demand increase
of 1.5 percent to the entire distribution
of prices to represent the impact of
promotion. The projected increases in
grower prices from promotion for
improved and native pecans were 6.3
and 3.6 cents per pound, respectively,
as shown in Table 1. These two price
increase projections represent a range of
results. Based on a range of simulated
price increases as high as 3 percent, the
low and high price increase projections
for improved pecans were 4.0 and 9.6
cents, respectively. For native varieties,
the results ranged from 2.7 to 4.2 cents.
The record indicates that a key
analytical step was developing an
example farm with specific
characteristics to explain market
characteristics and marketing order
impacts. An important characteristic of
this ‘‘representative farm’’ is the acreage
allocation between improved and native
pecans of 78 and 22 percent,
respectively. This is similar to the
proportion of the U.S. pecan crop in
recent years allocated to improved and
native varieties. Average yield per acre
of the representative farm (covering all
states and varieties) is 1,666.67 pounds
per acre.
The acreage split of 78 and 22 percent
are used as weights to compute
weighted average prices (combining
improved and native pecans) of 5.7 and
2.3 cents, respectively, as shown in the
fourth column of Table 1.
The record shows that the proposed
initial ranges of marketing order
assessments per pound are 2 to 3 cents
for improved pecans and 1 to 2 cents for
native pecans. The midpoints of these
ranges (2.5 and 1.5 cents, respectively)
are used to compute a benefit-cost ratio
from promotion, with a weighted
average assessment cost of 2.3 cents, as
shown in Table 2. Assessments would
be collected from handlers, not growers,
but for purposes of this analysis, it is
assumed that 100 percent of the
assessment cost would be passed
through to growers.
Table 1 shows that dividing the
projected benefit of 5.7 cents per pound
(weighted price increase from
promotion) by the estimated assessment
cost of 2.3 cents (weighted assessment
rate per pound), yields a benefit-cost
ratio of 2.5. Each dollar spent on pecan
promotion through a Federal marketing
order is expected to result in $2.50 in
increased revenue to the pecan growers
of the United States.
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED BENEFIT-COST RATIO OF PECAN PROMOTION THROUGH A FEDERAL MARKETING ORDER
Improved pecans
Benefit: Projected price increase from pecan promotion (cents per pound) ......
Cost: FMO Assessment rate (cents per pound) .................................................
Benefit-cost ratio ..................................................................................................
Native pecans
6.3
2.5
2.52
3.6
1.5
2.40
Weighted
5.7
2.3
2.50
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
* Weights for improved and native pecans are 78% and 22%, respectively, which is the acreage allocation of a representative U.S. pecan farm,
according to the record.
Examining potential costs and
benefits from promotion across different
farm sizes is done in Table 2. Record
evidence showed that the minimum size
of a commercial pecan farm is 30 acres,
and that a representative average yield
across the entire production area is
1,666.67 pounds per acre. This
combination of acreage and yield results
in a minimum threshold level of
commercial production of 50,000
pounds. Witnesses stated that
expenditures for the minimum
necessary level of inputs for commercial
pecan production cannot be justified for
any operation smaller than this.
In Table 2, a very small farm is
defined as being at the minimum
commercial threshold level of 30 acres
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
and 50,000 pounds. Small and large
farms are represented by farm size levels
of 175 and 500 acres, respectively.
Multiplying those acreage levels by the
average yield for the entire production
area gives total annual production level
estimates of 291,667 and 833,335
pounds, respectively.
Multiplying the 2014 grower price per
pound of $2.14 by the 291,677 pounds
of production from the small farm (175
acres) yields an annual crop value
estimate of about $618,000. This
computation shows that the small farm
definition from the record is consistent
with the SBA definition of a small farm
(annual sales value of up to $750,000).
Table 2 shows for the three
representative pecan farm sizes the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
allocation of total production levels
between improved and native varieties
(78 and 22 percent, respectively).
Although marketing order
assessments are paid by handlers, not
growers, it is nevertheless useful to
estimate the impact on growers, based
on the assumption that handlers may
pass part or all of the assessment cost
onto growers from whom they purchase
pecans. To compute the marketing order
burden for each farm size, the improved
and native production quantities are
multiplied by 2.5 and 1.5 cents per
pound of improved and native pecans,
respectively. For the representative
small farm (175 acres), summing the
improved and native assessments yields
a total annual assessment cost of $6,650.
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
10141
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
For the large farm, the total assessment
cost is $19,000.
A parallel computation is made to
obtain the total dollar benefit for each
farm size. The improved and native
quantities for the representative farm
small and large representative farm sizes
of $16,643 and $47,550, respectively.
The results of dividing the benefits for
each farm size by the corresponding
costs is 2.5, which equals the benefitcost ratio shown in Table 2.
sizes are multiplied by the
corresponding projected price increases
of 6.3 and 3.6 cents. Summing the
improved and native benefits for the
small and large farm size yields
projected annual total benefits for the
TABLE 2—COSTS AND BENEFITS OF PROMOTION FOR THREE SIZES OF REPRESENTATIVE U.S. PECAN FARMS
Very small farm
Representative Pecan Farms: Acres and Production:
Acres per farm ....................................................................................................
Production on Representative Farms (Acres multiplied by estimated U.S. average yield of 1666.67 pounds per acre) .......................................................
Improved pecan production (78% of farm acres) ..............................................
Native pecan production (22% of farm acres) ...................................................
Cost per farm: Grower burden of proposed program represented as cost per
pound:
Improved (2.5 cents) ..........................................................................................
Native (1.5 cents) ...............................................................................................
Small farm
Large farm
30
175
500
50,000
39,000
11,000
291,667
227,500
64,167
833,335
650,001
183,334
$975
$165
$5,688
$963
$16,250
$2,750
Total Estimated Cost per Farm ...................................................................
Benefit per farm: Price increase per pound from pecan promotion multiplied by
improved and native production:
Improved (6.3 cents) ..........................................................................................
Native (3.6 cents) ...............................................................................................
$1,140
$6,650
$19,000
$2,457
$396
$14,333
$2,310
$40,950
$6,600
Total Estimated Benefit per Farm ...............................................................
$2,853
$16,643
$47,550
The computations in Table 2 provide
an illustration, based on evidence from
the record, that there would be no
disproportionate impact on smaller size
farms from establishing a marketing
order and implementing a promotion
program. Costs are assessed per pound
and thus represent an equal burden
regardless of size. The projected benefits
from promotion are realized through
increases in price per pound and are
thus distributed proportionally among
different sizes of farms.
All of the grower and handler
witnesses, both large and small, testified
that the projected price increases from
promotion of pecans (6.3 and 3.6 cents
per pound for improved and native
pecans, respectively) were reasonable
estimates of the benefits from generic
promotion of pecans. A number of them
expressed the view that the price
increase estimates were conservative
and that, over time, the price impact
would be larger.
As mentioned above, marketing order
assessments are paid by handlers, not
growers. However, since handlers may
pass some or all of the assessment cost
onto growers, it is useful to provide this
illustration of potential impact on both
growers and handlers.
Using the most recent three years of
prices as examples of typical U.S.
annual grower prices, Table 3
summarizes evidence from the record
that shows the proposed marketing
order assessment rates as percentages of
grower and handler prices received.
Based on record evidence that a
representative handler margin is 57.5
cents per pound, handler prices are
estimated by summing the grower price
and handler margin.
TABLE 3—PROPOSED MARKETING ORDER ASSESSMENT RATES AS A PERCENTAGE OF PRICES FOR PECANS RECEIVED BY
GROWERS AND HANDLERS
Grower and handler prices
2012
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Grower price *
Improved ...........................................
Native ................................................
Handler price **
Improved ...........................................
Native ................................................
2013
Assessment
rates ***
2014
Assessment rates as a % of prices
received
2012
(%)
2013
(%)
2014
(%)
$1.73
0.88
$1.90
0.92
$2.12
0.88
$0.025
0.015
1.4
1.7
1.3
1.6
1.2
1.7
2.31
1.46
2.48
1.50
2.70
1.46
0.025
0.015
1.08
1.03
1.01
1.00
0.93
1.03
* Season average grower price per pound from NASS/USDA.
** Grower price plus average handler margin of 57.5 cents per pound, based on hearing evidence.
*** Midpoints of proposed initial marketing order assessment rates: Improved (2 to 3 cents); Native (1 to 2 cents). For growers this represents
the cost of the marketing order burden and for handlers this represents the cost of the assessment paid.
For both improved and native pecans,
using 2012 to 2014 prices as examples,
Table 3 shows that the potential burden
of the proposed program can be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
calculated at between 1 and 2 percent of
operating expenses for growers and are
approximately 1 percent of operating
expenses for handlers. Grower and
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
handler witnesses, both large and small,
covering both improved and native
pecans, testified that the proposed
initial marketing order assessment rates
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
10142
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
would not represent a significant
burden to their businesses and that the
benefits of the proposed generic
promotion program substantially
outweigh the cost. Sheller witnesses
(large and small) that would likely
become handlers under a Federal
marketing order testified that the
additional recordkeeping required to
collect assessments to send to the
marketing order board (American Pecan
Council) would not be a significant
additional burden and that the benefits
would substantially outweigh the costs.
Several witnesses stated that one reason
that collecting the assessments would
have only a minor impact is that they
already perform similar functions for
promotion and other pecan-related
programs (or other commodity
programs) organized under state law.
Additional Marketing Order Program
Benefits
Statements of support for additional
benefits that could come from a Federal
marketing order came from grower and
handler witnesses, both large and small,
covering both improved and native
pecans. The additional benefits cited
included: (1) Additional and more
accurate market information, including
data on production, inventory, and total
supplies, (2) funding of research on
health and nutrition aspects of pecans,
improved technology relating to the
pecan supply chain and crop health,
consumer trends, and other topics, and
(3) uniform, industry-wide quality
standards for pecans, as well as
packaging standards and shipping
protocols. Witnesses testified that the
burden of funding and participating in
marketing order programs with these
features would be minor, and that the
benefits would substantially outweigh
the costs.
The proposed order would impose
some reporting and recordkeeping
requirements on handlers. However,
testimony indicated that the expected
burden that would be imposed with
respect to these requirements would be
negligible. Most of the information that
would be reported to the Council is
already compiled by handlers for other
uses and is readily available. Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements issued
under other tree nut programs impose
an average annual burden on each
regulated handler of about 8 hours. It is
reasonable to expect that a similar
burden may be imposed under this
proposed marketing order on the
estimated 250 handlers of pecans in the
proposed production area.
The record evidence also indicates
that the benefits to small as well as large
handlers are likely to be greater than
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
would accrue under the alternatives to
the order proposed herein; namely, no
marketing order.
In determining that the proposed
order and its provisions would not have
a disproportionate economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities,
all of the issues discussed above were
considered. Based on hearing record
evidence and USDA’s analysis of the
economic information provided, the
proposed order provisions have been
carefully reviewed to ensure that every
effort has been made to eliminate any
unnecessary costs or requirements.
Although the proposed order may
impose some additional costs and
requirements on handlers, it is
anticipated that the order will help to
strengthen demand for pecans.
Therefore, any additional costs would
be offset by the benefits derived from
expanded sales benefiting handlers and
growers alike. Accordingly, it is
determined that the proposed order
would not have a disproportionate
economic impact on a substantial
number of small handlers or growers.
Finally, the Act requires that, prior to
the issuance of a marketing order, a
referendum be conducted among the
affected growers to determine if they
favor issuance of the order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In compliance with OMB regulations
(5 CFR part 1320) which implement the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub.
L. 104–13), the ballot material that will
be used in conducting the referendum
has been submitted to and approved by
OMB. The forms to be used for
nomination and selection of the initial
administrative committee have also
been reviewed and approved by OMB.
Any additional information collection
and recordkeeping requirements that
may be imposed under the order would
be submitted to OMB for approval.
Those requirements would not become
effective prior to OMB approval.
Civil Justice Reform
The marketing agreement and order
proposed herein have been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. They are not intended to
have retroactive effect. If adopted, the
proposed order would not preempt any
State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an
irreconcilable conflict with this
proposal.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with the Department a petition stating
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that the order, any provision of the
order, or any obligation imposed in
connection with the order is not in
accordance with law and request a
modification of the order or to be
exempted there from. A handler is
afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, the
USDA would rule on the petition. The
Act provides that the district court of
the United States in any district in
which the handler is an inhabitant, or
has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review the
Department’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
Findings and Conclusions
The findings and conclusions, rulings,
and general findings and determinations
included in the Recommended Decision
set forth in the October 28, 2015, issue
of the Federal Register (80 FR 66372),
and as further revised in this Secretary’s
Decision, are hereby approved and
adopted.
Rulings on Exceptions
In arriving at the findings and
conclusions and the regulatory
provisions of this decision, all
exceptions to the proposed order were
carefully considered in conjunction
with the record evidence. To the extent
that the findings and conclusions and
the regulatory provisions of this
decision are at variance with the
exceptions, such exceptions are denied.
Marketing Agreement and Order
Annexed hereto and made a part
hereof is the document entitled ‘‘Order
Regulating the Handling of Pecans
Grown in the States of Alabama,
Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida,
Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri,
Mississippi, North Carolina, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and
Texas.’’ This document has been
decided upon as the detailed and
appropriate means of effectuating the
foregoing findings and conclusions.
It is hereby ordered, That this entire
decision be published in the Federal
Register.
Referendum Order
It is hereby directed that a referendum
be conducted in accordance with the
procedure for the conduct of referenda
(7 CFR 900.400–407) to determine
whether the issuance of the annexed
order regulating the handling of pecans
grown in the States of Alabama,
Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida,
Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri,
Mississippi, North Carolina, New
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and
Texas is approved or favored by
producers, as defined under the terms of
the order, who during the representative
period were engaged in the production
of pecans in the production area.
The representative period for the
conduct of such referendum is hereby
determined to be August 1, 2014,
through July 31, 2015.
The agents of the Secretary to conduct
such referendum are hereby designated
to be Christian Nissen and Jennie
Varela, Southeast Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1124 First Street South,
Winter Haven, Florida 33880;
telephone: (863) 324–3375; or fax: (863)
291–8614, or Email: Christian.Nissen@
ams.usda.gov or Jennie.Varela@
ams.usda.gov, respectively.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Order Regulating the Handling of
Pecans Grown in the States of Alabama,
Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida,
Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri,
Mississippi, North Carolina, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina,
and Texas.1
Findings and Determinations
Pursuant to the provisions of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement of
1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.)and the applicable rules of practice
and procedure effective thereunder (7
CFR part 900), a public hearing was
held upon a proposed marketing
agreement and order regulation the
handling of pecans grown in the States
of Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas,
Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, North
Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma,
South Carolina, and Texas.
Upon the basis of evidence
introduced at such hearing and the
record thereof, it is found that:
(1) The proposed marketing
agreement and order, and all of the
terms and conditions thereof, will tend
to effectuate the declared policy of the
Act;
(2) The proposed marketing
agreement and order regulate the
handling of pecans grown in the
proposed production area in the same
manner as, and are applicable only to,
persons in the respective classes of
commercial and industrial activity
specified in the marketing agreement
and order upon which a hearing has
been held;
1 This order shall not become effective unless and
until the requirements of § 900.14 of the rules of
practice and procedure governing proceedings to
formulate marketing agreements and marketing
orders have been met.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
(3) The proposed marketing
agreement and order are limited in its
application to the smallest regional
production area that is practicable,
consistent with carrying out the
declared policy of the Act, and the
issuance of several orders applicable to
subdivisions of the production area
would not effectively carry out the
declared policy of the Act;
(4) The proposed marketing
agreement and order prescribe, such
different terms applicable to different
parts of the production area as are
necessary to give due recognition to the
differences in the production and
marketing of pecans grown in the
proposed production area; and
(5) All handling of pecans grown in
the proposed production area as defined
in the proposed marketing agreement
and order is in the current of interstate
or foreign commerce or directly
burdens, obstructs, or affects such
commerce.
Order Relative to Handling
It is therefore ordered, That on and
after the effective date hereof, all
handling of pecans grown in the States
of Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas,
Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, North
Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma,
South Carolina, and Texas, shall be in
conformity to, and in compliance with,
the terms and conditions of the said
order as hereby proposed to be amended
as follows:
The provisions of the proposed
marketing agreement and order
contained in the Recommended
Decision issued on October 20, 2015,
and published in the Federal Register
on October 28, 2015 (80 FR 66372), and
as further revised in this decision, shall
be and are the terms and provisions of
this proposed agreement and order and
are set forth in full herein. Sections
986.97 through 986.99 apply only to the
proposed marketing agreement and not
the proposed order.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 986
Marketing agreements, Pecans,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, The Agricultural Marketing
Service proposes to add 7 CFR part 986
to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10143
PART 986—PECANS GROWN IN THE
STATES OF ALABAMA, ARKANSAS,
ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, FLORIDA,
GEORGIA, KANSAS, LOUISIANA,
MISSOURI, MISSISSIPPI, NORTH
CAROLINA, NEW MEXICO,
OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, AND
TEXAS
Subpart A—Order Regulating Handling of
Pecans
Definitions
Sec.
986.1
986.2
986.3
986.4
986.5
986.6
986.7
986.8
986.9
986.10
986.11
986.12
986.13
986.14
986.15
986.16
986.17
986.18
986.19
986.20
986.21
986.22
986.23
986.24
986.25
986.26
986.27
986.28
986.29
986.30
986.31
986.32
986.33
986.34
986.35
986.36
986.37
986.38
986.39
986.40
986.41
986.42
986.43
Accumulator.
Act.
Affiliation.
Blowouts.
To certify.
Confidential data or information.
Container.
Council.
Crack.
Cracks.
Custom harvester.
Department or USDA.
Disappearance.
Farm Service Agency.
Fiscal year.
Grade and size.
Grower.
Grower-cleaned production.
Handler.
To handle.
Handler inventory.
Handler-cleaned production.
Hican.
Inshell pecans.
Inspection service.
Inter-handler transfer.
Merchantable pecans.
Pack.
Pecans.
Person.
Production area.
Proprietary capacity.
Regions.
Representative period.
Secretary.
Sheller.
Shelled pecans.
Stick-tights.
Trade supply.
Unassessed inventory.
Varieties.
Warehousing.
Weight.
Administrative Body
986.45 American Pecan Council.
986.46 Council nominations and voting.
986.47 Alternate members.
986.48 Eligibility.
986.49 Acceptance.
986.50 Term of office.
986.51 Vacancy.
986.52 Council expenses.
986.53 Powers.
986.54 Duties.
986.55 Procedure.
986.56 Right of the Secretary.
986.57 Funds and other property.
986.58 Reapportionment and
reestablishment of regions.
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
10144
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Expenses, Assessments and Marketing Policy
986.60 Budget.
986.61 Assessments.
986.62 Inter-handler transfers.
986.63 Contributions.
986.64 Accounting.
986.65 Marketing policy.
Authorities Relating To Research,
Promotion, Data Gathering, Packaging,
Grading, Compliance and Reporting
986.67 Recommendations for regulations.
986.68 Authority for research and
promotion activities.
986.69 Authorities regulating handling.
986.70 Handling for special purposes.
986.71 Safeguards.
986.72 Notification of regulation.
Reports, Books and Other Records
986.75 Reports of handler inventory.
986.76 Reports of merchantable pecans
handled.
986.77 Reports of pecans received by
handlers.
986.78 Other handler reports.
986.79 Verification of reports.
986.80 Certification of reports.
986.81 Confidential information.
§ 986.4
§ 986.5
§ 986.6
§ 986.7
Subpart A—Order Regulating Handling
of Pecans
Accumulator.
Accumulator means a person who
compiles inshell pecans from other
persons for the purpose of resale or
transfer.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 986.8
§ 986.9
Council.
Act.
§ 986.10
Affiliation. This term normally
appears as ‘‘affiliate of’’ or ‘‘affiliated
with,’’ and means a person such as a
grower or sheller who is: A grower or
handler that directly, or indirectly
through one or more intermediaries,
Jkt 238001
Cracks.
Cracks refer to an accumulated group
or container of pecans that have been
cracked in harvesting or handling.
§ 986.11
Affiliation.
Crack.
Crack means to break, crack, or
otherwise compromise the outer shell of
a pecan so as to expose the kernel inside
to air outside the shell.
Act means Public Act No. 10, 73d
Congress, as amended and as reenacted
and amended by the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Container.
Container means a box, bag, crate,
carton, package (including retail
packaging), or any other type of
receptacle used in the packaging or
handling of pecans.
Council means the American Pecan
Council established pursuant to
§ 986.45, American Pecan Council.
Definitions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Confidential data or information.
Confidential data or information
submitted to the Council consists of
data or information constituting a trade
secret or disclosure of the trade
position, financial condition, or
business operations of a particular
entity or its customers.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
§ 986.3
To certify.
To certify means the issuance of a
certification of inspection of pecans by
the inspection service.
Subpart B—[Reserved]
§ 986.2
Blowouts.
Blowouts mean lightweight or
underdeveloped inshell pecan nuts that
are considered of lesser quality and
market value.
Administrative Provisions
986.86 Exemptions.
986.87 Compliance.
986.88 Duration of immunities.
986.89 Separability.
986.90 Derogation.
986.91 Liability.
986.92 Agents.
986.93 Effective time.
986.94 Termination.
986.95 Proceedings after termination.
986.96 Amendments.
986.97 Counterparts.
986.98 Additional participants.
986.99 Order with marketing agreement.
§ 986.1
owns or controls, or is controlled by, or
is under common control with the
grower or handler specified; or a grower
or handler that directly, or indirectly
through one or more intermediaries, is
connected in a proprietary capacity, or
shares the ownership or control of the
specified grower or handler with one or
more other growers or handlers. As used
in this part, the term ‘‘control’’
(including the terms ‘‘controlling,’’
‘‘controlled by,’’ and ‘‘under the
common control with’’) means the
possession, direct or indirect, of the
power to direct or cause the direction of
the management and policies of a
handler or a grower, whether through
voting securities, membership in a
cooperative, by contract or otherwise.
Custom harvester.
Custom harvester means a person who
harvests inshell pecans for a fee.
§ 986.12
Department or USDA.
Department or USDA means the
United States Department of
Agriculture.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 986.13
Disappearance.
Disappearance means the difference
between the sum of grower-cleaned
production and handler-cleaned
production (whether from improved
orchards or native and seedling groves)
and the sum of inshell and shelled
merchantable pecans reported on an
inshell weight basis.
§ 986.14
Farm Service Agency.
Farm Service Agency or FSA means
that agency of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture.
§ 986.15
Fiscal year.
Fiscal year means the twelve months
from October 1 to September 30, both
inclusive, or any other such period
deemed appropriate by the Council and
approved by the Secretary.
§ 986.16
Grade and size.
Grade and size means any of the
officially established grades of pecans
and any of the officially established
sizes of pecans as set forth in the United
States standards for inshell and shelled
pecans or amendments thereto, or
modifications thereof, or other
variations of grade and size based
thereon recommended by the Council
and approved by the Secretary.
§ 986.17
Grower.
(a) Grower is synonymous with
producer and means any person
engaged within the production area in a
proprietary capacity in the production
of pecans if such person:
(1) Owns an orchard and harvests its
pecans for sale (even if a custom
harvester is used); or
(2) Is a lessee of a pecan orchard and
has the right to sell the harvest (even if
the lessee must remit a percentage of the
crop or rent to a lessor).
(b) The term ‘‘grower’’ shall only
include those who produce a minimum
of 50,000 pounds of inshell pecans
during a representative period (average
of four years) or who own a minimum
of 30 pecan acres according to the FSA,
including acres calculated by the FSA
based on pecan tree density. In the
absence of any FSA delineation of pecan
acreage, the regular definition of an acre
will apply. The Council may
recommend changes to this definition
subject to the approval of the Secretary.
§ 986.18
Grower-cleaned production.
Grower-cleaned production means
production harvested and processed
through a cleaning plant to determine
volumes of improved pecans, native and
seedling pecans, and substandard
pecans to transfer to a handler for sale.
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
§ 986.19
Handler.
Handler means any person who
handles inshell or shelled pecans in any
manner described in § 986.20.
§ 986.20
To handle.
To handle means to receive, shell,
crack, accumulate, warehouse, roast,
pack, sell, consign, transport, export, or
ship (except as a common or contract
carrier of pecans owned by another
person), or in any other way to put
inshell or shelled pecans into any and
all markets in the stream of commerce
either within the area of production or
from such area to any point outside
thereof. The term ‘‘to handle’’ shall not
include: Sales and deliveries within the
area of production by growers to
handlers; grower warehousing; custom
handling (except for selling, consigning
or exporting) or other similar activities
paid for on a fee-for-service basis by a
grower who retains the ownership of the
pecans; or transfers between handlers.
§ 986.21
Handler inventory.
Handler inventory means all pecans,
shelled or inshell, as of any date and
wherever located within the production
area, then held by a handler for their
account.
§ 986.22
Handler-cleaned production.
Handler-cleaned production is
production that is received, purchased
or consigned from the grower by a
handler prior to processing through a
cleaning plant, and then subsequently
processed through a cleaning plant so as
to determine volumes of improved
pecans, native and seedling pecans, and
substandard pecans.
§ 986.23
Hican.
Hican means a tree resulting from a
cross between a pecan and some other
type of hickory (members of the genus
Carya) or the nut from such a hybrid
tree.
§ 986.24
Inshell pecans.
Inshell pecans are nuts whose kernel
is maintained inside the shell.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 986.25
Inspection Service.
Inspection service means the FederalState Inspection Service or any other
inspection service authorized by the
Secretary.
§ 986.26
Inter-handler transfer.
Inter-handler transfer means the
movement of inshell pecans from one
handler to another inside the
production area for the purposes of
additional handling. Any assessments or
requirements under this part with
respect to inshell pecans so transferred
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
10145
may be assumed by the receiving
handler.
Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico,
Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas.
§ 986.27
§ 986.32
Merchantable pecans.
Proprietary capacity.
(a) Inshell. Merchantable inshell
pecans mean all inshell pecans meeting
the minimum grade regulations that
may be effective pursuant to § 986.69,
Authorities regulating handling.
(b) Shelled. Merchantable shelled
pecans means all shelled pecans
meeting the minimum grade regulations
that may be effective pursuant to
§ 986.69, Authorities regulating
handling.
Proprietary capacity means the
capacity or interest of a grower or
handler that, either directly or through
one or more intermediaries or affiliates,
is a property owner together with all the
appurtenant rights of an owner,
including the right to vote the interest
in that capacity as an individual, a
shareholder, member of a cooperative,
partner, trustee or in any other capacity
with respect to any other business unit.
§ 986.28
§ 986.33
Pack.
Pack means to clean, grade, or
otherwise prepare pecans for market as
inshell or shelled pecans.
§ 986.29
Pecans.
(a) Pecans means and includes any
and all varieties or subvarieties of
Genus: Carya, Species: illinoensis,
expressed also as Carya illinoinensis
(syn. C. illinoenses) including all
varieties thereof, excluding hicans, that
are produced in the production area and
are classified as:
(1) Native or seedling pecans
harvested from non-grafted or naturally
propagated tree varieties;
(2) Improved pecans harvested from
grafted tree varieties bred or selected for
superior traits of nut size, ease of
shelling, production characteristics, and
resistance to certain insects and
diseases, including but not limited to:
Desirable, Elliot, Forkert, Sumner,
Creek, Excel, Gracross, Gratex, Gloria
Grande, Kiowa, Moreland, Sioux,
Mahan, Mandan, Moneymaker, Morrill,
Cunard, Zinner, Byrd, McMillan, Stuart,
Pawnee, Eastern and Western Schley,
Wichita, Success, Cape Fear, Choctaw,
Cheyenne, Lakota, Kanza, Caddo, and
Oconee; and
(3) Substandard pecans that are
blowouts, cracks, stick-tights, and other
inferior quality pecans, whether native
or improved, that, with further
handling, can be cleaned and eventually
sold into the stream of commerce.
(b) The Council, with the approval of
the Secretary, may recognize new or
delete obsolete varieties or sub-varieties
for each category.
Regions.
(a) Regions within the production area
shall consist of the following:
(1) Eastern Region, consisting of:
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North
Carolina, South Carolina
(2) Central Region, consisting of:
Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana,
Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas
(3) Western Region, consisting of:
Arizona, California, New Mexico
(b) With the approval of the Secretary,
the boundaries of any region may be
changed pursuant to § 986.58,
Reapportionment and reestablishment
of regions.
§ 986.34
Representative period.
Representative period is the previous
four fiscal years for which a grower’s
annual average production is calculated,
or any other period recommended by
the Council and approved by the
Secretary.
§ 986.35
Secretary.
Secretary means the Secretary of
Agriculture of the United States, or any
other officer or employee of the United
States Department of Agriculture who
is, or who may be, authorized to
perform the duties of the Secretary of
Agriculture of the United States.
§ 986.36
Sheller.
Person means an individual,
partnership, corporation, association, or
any other business unit.
Sheller refers to any person who
converts inshell pecans to shelled
pecans and sells the output in any and
all markets in the stream of commerce,
both within and outside of the
production area; Provided, That the
term ‘‘sheller’’ shall only include those
who shell more than 1 million pounds
of inshell pecans in a fiscal year. The
Council may recommend changes to this
definition subject to the approval of the
Secretary.
§ 986.31
§ 986.37
§ 986.30
Person.
Production area.
Production area means the following
fifteen pecan-producing states within
the United States: Alabama, Arkansas,
Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia,
Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi,
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Shelled pecans.
Shelled pecans are pecans whose
shells have been removed leaving only
edible kernels, kernel pieces or pecan
meal. Shelled pecans are synonymous
with pecan meats.
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
10146
§ 986.38
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Stick-tights.
Stick-tights means pecans whose
outer shuck has adhered to the shell
causing their value to decrease or be
discounted.
§ 986.39
Trade supply.
Trade supply means the quantity of
merchantable inshell or shelled pecans
that growers will supply to handlers
during a fiscal year for sale in the
United States and abroad or, in the
absence of handler regulations § 986.69
setting forth minimum grade regulations
for merchantable pecans, the sum of
handler-cleaned and grower-cleaned
production.
§ 986.40
Unassessed inventory.
Unassessed inventory means inshell
pecans held by growers or handlers for
which no assessment has been paid to
the Council.
§ 986.41
Varieties.
Varieties mean and include all
cultivars, classifications, or subdivisions
of pecans.
§ 986.42
Warehousing.
Warehousing means to hold assessed
or unassessed inventory.
§ 986.43
Weight.
Weight means pounds of inshell
pecans, received by handler within each
fiscal year; Provided, That for shelled
pecans the actual weight shall be
multiplied by two to obtain an inshell
weight.
Administrative Body
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 986.45
American Pecan Council.
The American Pecan Council is
hereby established consisting of 17
members selected by the Secretary, each
of whom shall have an alternate member
nominated with the same qualifications
as the member. The 17 members shall
include nine (9) grower seats, six (6)
sheller seats, and two (2) at-large seats
allocated to one accumulator and one
public member. The grower and sheller
nominees and their alternates shall be
growers and shellers at the time of their
nomination and for the duration of their
tenure. Grower and sheller members
and their alternates shall be selected by
the Secretary from nominees submitted
by the Council. The two at-large seats
shall be nominated by the Council and
appointed by the Secretary.
(a) Each region shall be allocated the
following member seats:
(1) Eastern Region: three (3) growers
and two (2) shellers;
(2) Central Region: three (3) growers
and two (2) shellers;
(3) Western Region: three (3) growers
and two (2) shellers.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
(b) Within each region, the grower
and sheller seats shall be defined as
follows:
(1) Grower seats: Each region shall
have a grower Seat 1 and Seat 2
allocated to growers whose acreage is
equal to or exceeds 176 pecan acres.
Each region shall also have a grower
Seat 3 allocated to a grower whose
acreage is less than 176 pecan acres.
(2) Sheller seats: Each region shall
have a sheller Seat 1 allocated to a
sheller who handles more than 12.5
million pounds of inshell pecans in the
fiscal year preceding nomination, and a
sheller Seat 2 allocated to a sheller who
handles less than or equal to 12.5
million pounds of inshell pecans in the
fiscal year preceding nomination.
(c) The Council may recommend,
subject to the approval of the Secretary,
revisions to the above requirements for
grower and sheller seats to
accommodate changes within the
industry.
§ 986.46
Council nominations and voting.
Nomination of Council members and
alternate members shall follow the
procedure set forth in this section, or as
may be changed as recommended by the
Council and approved by the Secretary.
All nominees must meet the
requirements set forth in §§ 986.45,
American Pecan Council, and 986.48,
Eligibility, or as otherwise identified by
the Secretary, to serve on the Council.
(a) Initial members. Nominations for
initial Council members and alternate
members shall be conducted by the
Secretary by either holding meetings of
shellers and growers, by mail, or by
email, and shall be submitted on
approved nomination forms. Eligibility
to cast votes on nomination ballots,
accounting of nomination ballot results,
and identification of member and
alternate nominees shall follow the
procedures set forth in this section, or
by any other criteria deemed necessary
by the Secretary. The Secretary shall
select and appoint the initial members
and alternate members of the Council.
(b) Successor members. Subsequent
nominations of Council members and
alternate members shall be conducted as
follows:
(1) Call for nominations. (i)
Nominations for the grower member
seats for each region shall be received
from growers in that region on approved
forms containing the information
stipulated in this section.
(ii) If a grower is engaged in
producing pecans in more than one
region, such grower shall nominate in
the region in which they grow the
largest volume of their production.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(iii) Nominations for the sheller
member seats for each region shall be
received from shellers in that region on
approved forms containing the
information stipulated in this section.
(iv) If a sheller is engaged in handling
in more than one region, such sheller
shall nominate in the region in which
they shelled the largest volume in the
preceding fiscal year.
(2) Voting for nominees. (i) Only
growers, through duly authorized
officers or employees of growers, if
applicable, may participate in the
nomination of grower member nominees
and their alternates. Each grower shall
be entitled to cast only one nomination
ballot for each of the three grower seats
in their region.
(ii) If a grower is engaged in
producing pecans in more than one
region, such grower shall cast their
nomination ballot in the region in
which they grow the largest volume of
their production. Notwithstanding this
stipulation, such grower may vote their
volume produced in any or all of the
three regions.
(iii) Only shellers, through duly
authorized officers or employees of
shellers, if applicable, may participate
in the nomination of the sheller member
nominees and their alternates. Each
sheller shall be entitled to cast only one
nomination ballot for each of the two
sheller seats in their region.
(iv) If a sheller is engaged in handling
in more than one region, such sheller
shall cast their nomination ballot in the
region in which they shelled the largest
volume in the preceding fiscal year.
Notwithstanding this stipulation, such
sheller may vote their volume handled
in all three regions.
(v) If a person is both a grower and a
sheller of pecans, such person may not
participate in both grower and sheller
nominations. Such person must elect to
participate either as a grower or a
sheller.
(3) Nomination procedure for grower
seats. (i) The Council shall mail to all
growers who are on record with the
Council within the respective regions a
grower nomination ballot indicating the
nominees for each of the three grower
member seats, along with voting
instructions. Growers may cast ballots
on the proper ballot form either at
meetings of growers, by mail, or by
email as designated by the Council. For
ballots to be considered, they must be
submitted on the proper forms with all
required information, including
signatures.
(ii) On the ballot, growers shall
indicate their vote for the grower
nominee candidates for the grower seats
and also indicate their average annual
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
volume of inshell pecan production for
the preceding four fiscal years.
(iii) Seat 1 (growers with equal to or
more than 176 acres of pecans). The
nominee for this seat in each region
shall be the grower receiving the highest
volume of production (pounds of inshell
pecans) votes from the respective
region, and the grower receiving the
second highest volume of production
votes shall be the alternate member
nominee for this seat. In case of a tie
vote, the nominee shall be selected by
a drawing.
(iv) Seat 2 (growers with equal to or
more than 176 acres of pecans). The
nominee for this seat in each region
shall be the grower receiving the highest
number of votes from their respective
region, and the grower receiving the
second highest number of votes shall be
the alternate member nominee for this
seat. In case of a tie vote, the nominee
shall be selected by a drawing.
(v) Seat 3 (grower with less than 176
acres of pecans). The nominee for this
seat in each region shall be the grower
receiving the highest number of votes
from the respective region, and the
grower receiving the second highest
number of votes shall be the alternate
member nominee for this seat. In case of
a tie vote, the nominee shall be selected
by a drawing.
(4) Nomination procedure for sheller
seats. (i) The Council shall mail to all
shellers who are on record with the
Council within the respective regions
the sheller ballot indicating the
nominees for each of the two sheller
member seats in their respective
regions, along with voting instructions.
Shellers may cast ballots on approved
ballot forms either at meetings of
shellers, by mail, or by email as
designated by the Council. For ballots to
be considered, they must be submitted
on the approved forms with all required
information, including signatures.
(ii) Seat 1 (shellers handling more
than 12.5 million lbs. of inshell pecans
in the preceding fiscal year). The
nominee for this seat in each region
shall be assigned to the sheller receiving
the highest number of votes from the
respective region, and the sheller
receiving the second highest number of
votes shall be the alternate member
nominee for this seat. In case of a tie
vote, the nominee shall be selected by
a drawing.
(iii) Seat 2 (shellers handling equal to
or less than 12.5 million lbs. of inshell
pecans in the preceding fiscal year). The
nominee for this seat in each region
shall be assigned to the sheller receiving
the highest number of votes from the
respective region, and the sheller
receiving the second highest number of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
votes shall be the alternate member
nominee for this seat. In case of a tie
vote, the nominee shall be selected by
a drawing.
(5) Reports to the Secretary.
Nominations in the foregoing manner
received by the Council shall be
reported to the Secretary on or before 15
of each July of any year in which
nominations are held, together with a
certified summary of the results of the
nominations and other information
deemed by the Council to be pertinent
or requested by the Secretary. From
those nominations, the Secretary shall
select the fifteen grower and sheller
members of the Council and an alternate
for each member, unless the Secretary
rejects any nomination submitted. In the
event the Secretary rejects a nomination,
a second nomination process may be
conducted to identify other nominee
candidates, the resulting nominee
information may be reported to the
Secretary after July 15 and before
September 15. If the Council fails to
report nominations to the Secretary in
the manner herein specified, the
Secretary may select the members
without nomination. If nominations for
the public and accumulator at-large
members are not submitted by
September 15 of any year in which their
nomination is due, the Secretary may
select such members without
nomination.
(6) At-large members. The grower and
sheller members of the Council shall
select one public member and one
accumulator member and respective
alternates for consideration, selection
and appointment by the Secretary. The
public member and alternate public
member may not have any financial
interest, individually or corporately, or
affiliation with persons vested in the
pecan industry. The accumulator
member and alternate accumulator
member must meet the criteria set forth
in § 986.1, Accumulator, and may reside
or maintain a place of business in any
region.
(7) Nomination forms. The Council
may distribute nomination forms at
meetings, by mail, by email, or by any
other form of distribution recommended
by the Council and approved by the
Secretary.
(i) Grower nomination forms. Each
nomination form submitted by a grower
shall include the following information:
(A) The name of the nominated
grower;
(B) The name and signature of the
nominating grower;
(C) Two additional names and
respective signatures of growers in
support of the nomination;
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10147
(D) Any other such information
recommended by the Council and
approved by the Secretary.
(ii) Sheller nomination forms. Each
nomination form submitted by a sheller
shall include the following:
(A) The name of the nominated
sheller;
(B) The name and signature of the
nominating sheller;
(C) One additional name and
signature of a sheller in support of the
nomination;
(D) Any other such information
recommended by the Council and
approved by the Secretary.
(8) Changes to the nomination and
voting procedures.
The Council may recommend, subject
to the approval of the Secretary, a
change to these procedures should the
Council determine that a revision is
necessary.
§ 986.47
Alternate members.
(a) Each member of the Council shall
have an alternate member to be
nominated in the same manner as the
member.
(b) An alternate for a member of the
Council shall act in the place and stead
of such member in their absence or in
the event of their death, removal,
resignation, or disqualification, until the
next nomination and elections take
place for the Council or the vacancy has
been filled pursuant to § 986.48,
Eligibility.
(c) In the event any member of the
Council and their alternate are both
unable to attend a meeting of the
Council, any alternate for any other
member representing the same group as
the absent member may serve in the
place of the absent member.
§ 986.48
Eligibility.
(a) Each grower member and alternate
shall be, at the time of selection and
during the term of office, a grower or an
officer, or employee, of a grower in the
region and in the classification for
which nominated.
(b) Each sheller member and alternate
shall be, at the time of selection and
during the term of office, a sheller or an
officer or employee of a sheller in the
region and in the classification for
which nominated.
(c) A grower can be a nominee for
only one grower member seat. If a
grower is nominated for two grower
member seats, he or she shall select the
seat in which he or she desires to run,
and the grower ballot shall reflect that
selection.
(d) Any member or alternate member
who at the time of selection was
employed by or affiliated with the
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
10148
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
person who is nominated shall, upon
termination of that relationship, become
disqualified to serve further as a
member and that position shall be
deemed vacant.
(e) No person nominated to serve as
a public member or alternate public
member shall have a financial interest
in any pecan grower or handling
operation.
§ 986.49
Acceptance.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Each person to be selected by the
Secretary as a member or as an alternate
member of the Council shall, prior to
such selection, qualify by advising the
Secretary that if selected, such person
agrees to serve in the position for which
that nomination has been made.
least twelve consecutive months out of
office.
(c) Each member and alternate
member shall continue to serve until a
successor is selected and has qualified.
(d) A term of office shall begin as set
forth in the by-laws or as directed by the
Secretary each year for all members.
(e) The Council may recommend,
subject to approval of the Secretary,
revisions to the start day for the term of
office, the number of years in a term,
and the number of terms a member or
an alternate can serve.
§ 986.51
Vacancy.
Any vacancy on the Council occurring
by the failure of any person selected to
the Council to qualify as a member or
alternate member due to a change in
§ 986.50 Term of office.
status making the member ineligible to
(a) Selected members and alternate
serve, or due to death, removal, or
members of the Council shall serve for
resignation, shall be filled, by a majority
terms of four years: Provided, That at
vote of the Council for the unexpired
the end of the first four (4) year term and portion of the term. However, that
in the nomination and selection of the
person shall fulfill all the qualifications
second Council only, four of the grower set forth in this part as required for the
member and alternate seats and three of member whose office that person is to
the sheller member and alternate seats
fill. The qualifications of any person to
shall be seated for terms of two years so fill a vacancy on the Council shall be
that approximately half of the
certified in writing to the Secretary. The
memberships’ and alternates’ terms
Secretary shall notify the Council if the
expire every two years thereafter.
Secretary determines that any such
Member and alternate seats assigned
person is not qualified.
two-year terms for the seating of the
second Council only shall be as follows: § 986.52 Council expenses.
(1) Grower member Seat 2 in all
The members and their alternates of
regions shall be assigned a two-year
the Council shall serve without
term;
compensation, but shall be reimbursed
(2) Grower member Seat 3 in all
for the reasonable and necessary
regions shall, by drawing, identify one
expenses incurred by them in the
member seat to be assigned a two-year
performance of their duties under this
term; and,
part.
(3) Sheller Seat 2 in all regions shall
§ 986.53 Powers.
be assigned a two-year term.
(b) Council members and alternates
The Council shall have the following
may serve up to two consecutive, fourpowers:
year terms of office. Subject to section
(a) To administer the provisions of
(c) below, in no event shall any member this part in accordance with its terms;
or alternate serve more than eight
(b) To make bylaws, rules and
consecutive years on the Council as
regulations to effectuate the terms and
either a member or an alternate.
provisions of this part;
However, if selected, an alternate having
(c) To receive, investigate, and report
served up to two consecutive terms may to the Secretary complaints of violations
immediately serve as a member for two
of this part; and
consecutive terms without any
(d) To recommend to the Secretary
interruption in service. The same is true amendments to this part.
for a member who, after serving for up
§ 986.54 Duties.
to two consecutive terms, may serve as
an alternate if nominated without any
The duties of the Council shall be as
interruption in service. A person having follows:
served the maximum number of terms
(a) To act as intermediary between the
as set forth above may not serve again
Secretary and any handler or grower;
as a member or an alternate for at least
(b) To keep minute books and records
twelve consecutive months. For
which will clearly reflect all of its acts
purposes of determining when a
and transactions, and such minute
member or alternate has served two
books and records shall at any time be
consecutive terms, the accrual of terms
subject to the examination of the
shall begin following any period of at
Secretary;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(c) To furnish to the Secretary a
complete report of all meetings and
such other available information as he
or she may request;
(d) To appoint such employees as it
may deem necessary and to determine
the salaries, define the duties, and fix
the bonds of such employees;
(e) To cause the books of the Council
to be audited by one or more certified
public accountants at least once for each
fiscal year and at such other times as the
Council deems necessary or as the
Secretary may request, and to file with
the Secretary three copies of all audit
reports made;
(f) To investigate the growing,
shipping and marketing conditions with
respect to pecans and to assemble data
in connection therewith;
(g) To investigate compliance with the
provisions of this part; and,
(h) To recommend by-laws, rules and
regulations for the purpose of
administering this part.
§ 986.55
Procedure.
(a) The members of the Council shall
select a chairman from their
membership, and shall select such other
officers and adopt such rules for the
conduct of Council business as they
deem advisable.
(b) The Council may provide for
meetings by telephone, or other means
of communication, and any vote cast at
such a meeting shall be confirmed
promptly in writing. The Council shall
give the Secretary the same notice of its
meetings as is given to members of the
Council.
(c) Quorum. A quorum of the Council
shall be any twelve voting Council
members. The vote of a majority of
members present at a meeting at which
there is a quorum shall constitute the
act of the Council; Provided, That:
(1) Actions of the Council with
respect to the following issues shall
require a two-thirds (12 members)
concurring vote of the Council:
(i) Establishment of or changes to bylaws;
(ii) Appointment or administrative
issues relating to the program’s manager
or chief executive officer;
(iii) Budget;
(iv) Assessments;
(v) Compliance and audits;
(vi) Reestablishment of regions and
reapportionment or reallocation of
Council membership;
(vii) Modifying definitions of grower
and sheller;
(viii) Research or promotion activities
under § 986.68;
(ix) Grade, quality and size regulation
under § 986.69(a)(1) and (2);
(x) Pack and container regulation
under § 986.69(a)(3); and,
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(2) Actions of the Council with
respect to the securing of commercial
bank loans for the purpose of financing
start-up costs of the Council and its
activities or securing financial
assistance in emergency situations shall
require a unanimous vote of all
members present at an in-person
meeting; Provided, That in the event of
an emergency that warrants immediate
attention sooner than a face-to-face
meeting is possible, a vote for financing
may be taken. In such event, the
Council’s first preference is a
videoconference and second preference
is phone conference, both followed by
written confirmation of the members
attending the meeting.
§ 986.56
Right of the Secretary.
The members and alternates for
members and any agent or employee
appointed or employed by the Council
shall be subject to removal or
suspension by the Secretary at any time.
Each and every regulation, decision,
determination, or other act shall be
subject to the continuing right of the
Secretary to disapprove of the same at
any time, and, upon such disapproval,
shall be deemed null and void, except
as to acts done in reliance thereon or in
compliance therewith prior to such
disapproval by the Secretary.
§ 986.57
Funds and other property.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) All funds received pursuant to any
of the provisions of this part shall be
used solely for the purposes specified in
this part, and the Secretary may require
the Council and its members to account
for all receipts and disbursements.
(b) Upon the death, resignation,
removal, disqualification, or expiration
of the term of office of any member or
employee, all books, records, funds, and
other property in their possession
belonging to the Council shall be
delivered to their successor in office or
to the Council, and such assignments
and other instruments shall be executed
as may be necessary to vest in such
successor or in the Council full title to
all the books, records, funds, and other
property in the possession or under the
control of such member or employee
pursuant to this subpart.
§ 986.58 Reapportionment and
reestablishment of regions.
The Council may recommend, subject
to approval of the Secretary,
reestablishment of regions,
reapportionment of members among
regions, and may revise the groups
eligible for representation on the
Council. In recommending any such
changes, the following shall be
considered:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
(a) Shifts in acreage within regions
and within the production area during
recent years;
(b) The importance of new production
in its relation to existing regions;
(c) The equitable relationship between
Council apportionment and regions;
(d) Changes in industry structure and/
or the percentage of crop represented by
various industry entities; and
(e) Other relevant factors.
Expenses, Assessments and Marketing
Policy
§ 986.60
Budget.
As soon as practicable before the
beginning of each fiscal year, and as
may be necessary thereafter, the Council
shall prepare a budget of income and
expenditures necessary for the
administration of this part. The Council
may recommend a rate of assessment
calculated to provide adequate funds to
defray its proposed expenditures. The
Council shall present such budget to the
Secretary with an accompanying report
showing the basis for its calculations,
and all shall be subject to Secretary
approval.
§ 986.61
Assessments.
(a) Each handler who first handles
inshell pecans shall pay assessments to
the Council. Assessments collected each
fiscal year shall defray expenses which
the Secretary finds reasonable and likely
to be incurred by the Council during
that fiscal year. Each handler’s share of
assessments paid to the Council shall be
equal to the ratio between the total
quantity of inshell pecans handled by
them as the first handler thereof during
the applicable fiscal year, and the total
quantity of inshell pecans handled by
all regulated handlers in the production
area during the same fiscal year. The
payment of assessments for the
maintenance and functioning of the
Council may be required under this part
throughout the period it is in effect
irrespective of whether particular
provisions thereof are suspended or
become inoperative. Handlers may avail
themselves of an inter-handler transfer,
as provided for in § 986.62, Interhandler transfers.
(b) Based upon a recommendation of
the Council or other available data, the
Secretary shall fix three base rates of
assessment for inshell pecans handled
during each fiscal year. Such base rates
shall include one rate of assessment for
any or all varieties of pecans classified
as native and seedling; one rate of
assessment for any or all varieties of
pecans classified as improved; and one
rate of assessment for any pecans
classified as substandard.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10149
(c) Upon implementation of this part
and subject to the approval of the
Secretary, initial assessment rates per
classification shall be set within the
following prescribed ranges: Native and
seedling classified pecans shall be
assessed at one-cent to two-cents per
pound; improved classified pecans shall
be assessed at two-cents to three-cents
per pound; and, substandard classified
pecans shall be assessed at one-cent to
two-cents per pound. These assessment
ranges shall be in effect for the initial
four years of the order.
(d) Subsequent assessment rates shall
not exceed two percent of the aggregate
of all prices in each classification across
the production area based on Council
data, or the average of USDA reported
average price received by growers for
each classification, in the preceding
fiscal year as recommended by the
Council and approved by the Secretary.
After four years from the
implementation of this part, the Council
may recommend, subject to the approval
of the Secretary, revisions to this
calculation or assessment ranges.
(e) The Council, with the approval of
the Secretary, may revise the assessment
rates if it determines, based on
information including crop size and
value, that the action is necessary, and
if the revision does not exceed the
assessment limitation specified in this
section and is made prior to the final
billing of the assessment.
(f) In order to provide funds for the
administration of the provisions of this
part during the first part of a fiscal year,
before sufficient operating income is
available from assessments, the Council
may accept the payment of assessments
in advance and may also borrow money
for such purposes; Provided, That no
loan may amount to more than 50
percent of projected assessment revenue
projected for the year in which the loan
is secured, and the loan must be repaid
within five years.
(g) If a handler does not pay
assessments within the time prescribed
by the Council, the assessment may be
increased by a late payment charge and/
or an interest rate charge at amounts
prescribed by the Council with approval
of the Secretary.
(h) On August 31 of each year, every
handler warehousing inshell pecans
shall be identified as the first handler of
those pecans and shall be required to
pay the assessed rate on the category of
pecans in their possession on that date.
The terms of this paragraph may be
revised subject to the recommendation
of the Council and approval by the
Secretary.
(i) On August 31 of each year, all
inventories warehoused by growers
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
10150
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
from the current fiscal year shall cease
to be eligible for inter-handler transfer
treatment. Instead, such inventory will
require the first handler that handles
such inventory to pay the assessment
thereon in accordance with the
prevailing assessment rates at the time
of transfer from the grower to the said
handler. The terms of this paragraph
may be revised subject to the
recommendation of the Council and
approval by the Secretary.
§ 986.62
Inter-handler transfers.
Any handler inside the production
area, except as provided for in § 986.61
(h) and (i), Assessments, may transfer
inshell pecans to another handler inside
the production area for additional
handling, and any assessments or other
marketing order requirements with
respect to pecans so transferred may be
assumed by the receiving handler. The
Council, with the approval of the
Secretary, may establish methods and
procedures, including necessary reports,
to maintain accurate records for such
transfers. All inter-handler transfers will
be documented by forms or electronic
transfer receipts approved by the
Council, and all forms or electronic
transfer receipts used for inter-handler
transfers shall require that copies be
sent to the selling party, the receiving
party, and the Council. Such forms must
state which handler has the assessment
responsibilities.
§ 986.63
Contributions.
The Council may accept voluntary
contributions. Such contributions may
only be accepted if they are free from
any encumbrances or restrictions on
their use and the Council shall retain
complete control of their use. The
Council may receive contributions from
both within and outside of the
production area.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 986.64
Accounting.
(a) Assessments collected in excess of
expenses incurred shall be accounted
for in accordance with one of the
following:
(1) Excess funds not retained in a
reserve, as provided in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section shall be refunded
proportionately to the persons from
whom they were collected; or
(2) The Council, with the approval of
the Secretary, may carry over excess
funds into subsequent fiscal periods as
reserves: Provided, That funds already
in reserves do not equal approximately
three fiscal years’ expenses. Such
reserve funds may be used:
(i) To defray expenses during any
fiscal period prior to the time
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
assessment income is sufficient to cover
such expenses;
(ii) To cover deficits incurred during
any fiscal period when assessment
income is less than expenses;
(iii) To defray expenses incurred
during any period when any or all
provisions of this part are suspended or
are inoperative; and
(iv) To cover necessary expenses of
liquidation in the event of termination
of this part.
(b) Upon such termination, any funds
not required to defray the necessary
expenses of liquidation shall be
disposed of in such manner as the
Secretary may determine to be
appropriate. To the extent practical,
such funds shall be returned pro rata to
the persons from whom such funds
were collected.
(c) All funds received by the Council
pursuant to the provisions of this part
shall be used solely for the purposes
specified in this part and shall be
accounted for in the manner provided
for in this part. The Secretary may at
any time require the Council and its
members to account for all receipts and
disbursements.
(d) Upon the removal or expiration of
the term of office of any member of the
Council, such member shall account for
all receipts and disbursements and
deliver all property and funds in their
possession to the Council, and shall
execute such assignments and other
instruments as may be necessary or
appropriate to vest in the Council full
title to all of the property, funds, and
claims vested in such member pursuant
to this part.
(e) The Council may make
recommendations to the Secretary for
one or more of the members thereof, or
any other person, to act as a trustee for
holding records, funds, or any other
Council property during periods of
suspension of this subpart, or during
any period or periods when regulations
are not in effect and if the Secretary
determines such action appropriate, he
or she may direct that such person or
persons shall act as trustee or trustees
for the Council.
§ 986.65
Marketing policy.
By the end of each fiscal year, the
Council shall make a report and
recommendation to the Secretary on the
Council’s proposed marketing policy for
the next fiscal year. Each year such
report and recommendation shall be
adopted by the affirmative vote of at
least two-thirds (2/3) of the members of
the Council and shall include the
following and, where applicable, on an
inshell basis:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(a) Estimate of the grower-cleaned
production and handler-cleaned
production in the area of production for
the fiscal year;
(b) Estimate of disappearance;
(c) Estimate of the improved, native,
and substandard pecans;
(d) Estimate of the handler inventory
on August 31, of inshell and shelled
pecans;
(e) Estimate of unassessed inventory;
(f) Estimate of the trade supply, taking
into consideration imports, and other
factors;
(g) Preferable handler inventory of
inshell and shelled pecans on August 31
of the following year;
(h) Projected prices in the new fiscal
year;
(i) Competing nut supplies; and
(j) Any other relevant factors.
Authorities Relating to Research,
Promotion, Data Gathering, Packaging,
Grading, Compliance and Reporting
§ 986.67 Recommendations for
regulations.
Upon complying with § 986.65,
Marketing policy, the Council may
propose regulations to the Secretary
whenever it finds that such proposed
regulations may assist in effectuating
the declared policy of the Act.
§ 986.68 Authority for research and
promotion activities.
The Council, with the approval of the
Secretary, may establish or provide for
the establishment of production
research, marketing research and
development projects, and marketing
promotion, including paid generic
advertising, designed to assist, improve,
or promote the marketing, distribution,
and consumption or efficient
production of pecans including product
development, nutritional research, and
container development. The expenses of
such projects shall be paid from funds
collected pursuant to this part.
§ 986.69
Authorities regulating handling.
(a) The Council may recommend,
subject to the approval of the Secretary,
regulations that:
(1) Establish handling requirements or
minimum tolerances for particular
grades, sizes, or qualities, or any
combination thereof, of any or all
varieties or classifications of pecans
during any period;
(2) Establish different handling
requirements or minimum tolerances for
particular grades, sizes, or qualities, or
any combination thereof for different
varieties or classifications, for different
containers, for different portions of the
production area, or any combination of
the foregoing, during any period;
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(3) Fix the size, capacity, weight,
dimensions, or pack of the container or
containers, which may be used in the
packaging, transportation, sale,
preparation for market, shipment, or
other handling of pecans; and
(4) Establish inspection and
certification requirements for the
purposes of paragraphs (a)(1) through
(3) of this section.
(b) Regulations issued hereunder may
be amended, modified, suspended, or
terminated whenever it is determined:
(1) That such action is warranted
upon recommendation of the Council
and approval by the Secretary, or other
available information; or
(2) That regulations issued hereunder
no longer tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
(c) The authority to regulate as put
forward in this subsection shall not in
any way constitute authority for the
Council to recommend volume
regulation, such as reserve pools,
producer allotments, or handler
withholding requirements which limit
the flow of product to market for the
purpose of reducing market supply.
(d) The Council may recommend,
subject to the approval of the Secretary,
rules and regulations to effectuate this
subpart.
§ 986.70
Handling for special purposes.
Regulations in effect pursuant to
§ 986.69, Authorities regulating
handling, may be modified, suspended,
or terminated to facilitate handling of
pecans for:
(a) Relief or charity;
(b) Experimental purposes; and
(c) Other purposes which may be
recommended by the Council and
approved by the Secretary.
§ 986.71
Safeguards.
The Council, with the approval of the
Secretary, may establish through rules
such requirements as may be necessary
to establish that shipments made
pursuant to § 986.70, Handling for
special purposes, were handled and
used for the purpose stated.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 986.72
Notification of regulation.
The Secretary shall promptly notify
the Council of regulations issued or of
any modification, suspension, or
termination thereof. The Council shall
give reasonable notice thereof to
industry participants.
Reports, Books and Other Records
§ 986.75
Each handler shall submit to the
Council in such form and on such dates
as the Council may prescribe, reports
showing their inventory of inshell and
shelled pecans.
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
Each handler who handles
merchantable pecans at any time during
a fiscal year shall submit to the Council
in such form and at such intervals as the
Council may prescribe, reports showing
the quantity so handled and such other
information pertinent thereto as the
Council may specify.
§ 986.77 Reports of pecans received by
handlers.
Each handler shall file such reports of
their pecan receipts from growers,
handlers, or others in such form and at
such times as may be required by the
Council with the approval of the
Secretary.
§ 986.78
Other handler reports.
Upon request of the Council made
with the approval of the Secretary each
handler shall furnish such other reports
and information as are needed to enable
the Council to perform its duties and
exercise its powers under this part.
§ 986.79
Verification of reports.
For the purpose of verifying and
checking reports filed by handlers on
their operations, the Secretary and the
Council, through their duly authorized
representatives, shall have access to any
premises where pecans and pecan
records are held. Such access shall be
available at any time during reasonable
business hours. Authorized
representatives of the Council or the
Secretary shall be permitted to inspect
any pecans held and any and all records
of the handler with respect to matters
within the purview of this part. Each
handler shall maintain complete records
on the receiving, holding, and
disposition of all pecans. Each handler
shall furnish all labor necessary to
facilitate such inspections at no expense
to the Council or the Secretary. Each
handler shall store all pecans held by
him in such manner as to facilitate
inspection and shall maintain adequate
storage records which will permit
accurate identification with respect to
inspection certificates of respective lots
and of all such pecans held or disposed
of theretofore. The Council, with the
approval of the Secretary, may establish
any methods and procedures needed to
verify reports.
§ 986.80
Reports of handler inventory.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
§ 986.76 Reports of merchantable pecans
handled.
Certification of reports.
All reports submitted to the Council
as required in this part shall be certified
to the Secretary and the Council as to
the completeness and correctness of the
information contained therein.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 986.81
10151
Confidential information.
All reports and records submitted by
handlers to the Council, which include
data or information constituting a trade
secret or disclosing the trade position,
or financial condition or business
operations of the handler shall be kept
in the custody of one or more employees
of the Council and shall be disclosed to
no person except the Secretary.
§ 986.82
Books and other records.
Each handler shall maintain such
records of pecans received, held and
disposed of by them as may be
prescribed by the Council for the
purpose of performing its duties under
this part. Such books and records shall
be retained and be available for
examination by authorized
representatives of the Council and the
Secretary for the current fiscal year and
the preceding three (3) fiscal years.
Additional Provisions
§ 986.86
Exemptions.
(a) Any handler may handle inshell
pecans within the production area free
of the requirements of this part if such
pecans are handled in quantities not
exceeding 1,000 inshell pounds during
any fiscal year.
(b) Any handler may handle shelled
pecans within the production area free
of the requirements of this part if such
pecans are handled in quantities not
exceeding 500 shelled pounds during
any fiscal year.
(c) Mail order sales are not exempt
sales under this part.
(d) The Council, with the approval of
the Secretary, may establish such rules,
regulations, and safeguards, and require
such reports, certifications, and other
conditions, as are necessary to ensure
compliance with this part.
§ 986.87
Compliance.
Except as provided in this subpart, no
handler shall handle pecans, the
handling of which has been prohibited
by the Secretary in accordance with
provisions of this part, or the rules and
regulations thereunder.
§ 986.88
Duration of immunities.
The benefits, privileges, and
immunities conferred by virtue of this
part shall cease upon termination
hereof, except with respect to acts done
under and during the existence of this
part.
§ 986.89
Separability.
If any provision of this part is
declared invalid, or the applicability
thereof to any person, circumstance, or
thing is held invalid, the validity of the
remaining provisions and the
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
10152
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 39 / Monday, February 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
applicability thereof to any other
person, circumstance, or thing shall not
be affected thereby.
§ 986.90
Derogation.
Nothing contained in this part is or
shall be construed to be in derogation
of, or in modification of, the rights of
the Secretary or of the United States to
exercise any powers granted by the Act
or otherwise, or, in accordance with
such powers, to act in the premises
whenever such action is deemed
advisable.
§ 986.91
Liability.
No member or alternate of the Council
nor any employee or agent thereof, shall
be held personally responsible, either
individually or jointly with others, in
any way whatsoever, to any party under
this part or to any other person for
errors in judgment, mistakes, or other
acts, either of commission or omission,
as such member, alternate, agent or
employee, except for acts of dishonesty,
willful misconduct, or gross negligence.
The Council may purchase liability
insurance for its members and officers.
§ 986.92
Agents.
The Secretary may name, by
designation in writing, any person,
including any officer or employee of the
USDA or the United States to act as
their agent or representative in
connection with any of the provisions of
this part.
§ 986.93
Effective time.
The provisions of this part and of any
amendment thereto shall become
effective at such time as the Secretary
may declare, and shall continue in force
until terminated in one of the ways
specified in § 986.94.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 986.94
Termination.
(a) The Secretary may at any time
terminate this part.
(b) The Secretary shall terminate or
suspend the operation of any or all of
the provisions of this part whenever he
or she finds that such operation
obstructs or does not tend to effectuate
the declared policy of the Act.
(c) The Secretary shall terminate the
provisions of this part applicable to
pecans for market or pecans for
handling at the end of any fiscal year
whenever the Secretary finds, by
referendum or otherwise, that such
termination is favored by a majority of
growers; Provided, That such majority of
growers has produced more than 50
percent of the volume of pecans in the
production area during such fiscal year.
Such termination shall be effective only
if announced on or before the last day
of the then current fiscal year.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
(d) The Secretary shall conduct a
referendum within every five-year
period beginning from the
implementation of this part, to ascertain
whether continuance of the provisions
of this part applicable to pecans are
favored by two-thirds by number or
volume of growers voting in the
referendum. The Secretary may
terminate the provisions of this part at
the end of any fiscal year in which the
Secretary has found that continuance of
this part is not favored by growers who,
during an appropriate period of time
determined by the Secretary, have been
engaged in the production of pecans in
the production area: Provided, That
termination of this part shall be effective
only if announced on or before the last
day of the then current fiscal year.
(e) The provisions of this part shall,
in any event, terminate whenever the
provisions of the Act authorizing them
cease to be in effect.
§ 986.95
Proceedings after termination.
(a) Upon the termination of this part,
the Council members serving shall
continue as joint trustees for the
purpose of liquidating all funds and
property then in the possession or under
the control of the Council, including
claims for any funds unpaid or property
not delivered at the time of such
termination.
(b) The joint trustees shall continue in
such capacity until discharged by the
Secretary; from time to time accounting
for all receipts and disbursements;
delivering all funds and property on
hand, together with all books and
records of the Council and of the joint
trustees to such person as the Secretary
shall direct; and, upon the request of the
Secretary, executing such assignments
or other instruments necessary and
appropriate to vest in such person full
title and right to all of the funds,
property, or claims vested in the
Council or in said joint trustees.
(c) Any funds collected pursuant to
this part and held by such joint trustees
or such person over and above the
amounts necessary to meet outstanding
obligations and the expenses necessarily
incurred by the joint trustees or such
other person in the performance of their
duties under this subpart, as soon as
practicable after the termination hereof,
shall be returned to the handlers pro
rata in proportion to their contributions
thereto.
(d) Any person to whom funds,
property, or claims have been
transferred or delivered by the Council,
upon direction of the Secretary, as
provided in this part, shall be subject to
the same obligations and duties with
respect to said funds, property, or
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
claims as are imposed upon said joint
trustees.
§ 986.96
Amendments.
Amendments to this part may be
proposed from time to time by the
Council or by the Secretary.
§ 986.97
Counterparts.
Handlers may sign an agreement with
the Secretary indicating their support
for this marketing order. This agreement
may be executed in multiple
counterparts by each handler. If more
than fifty percent of the handlers,
weighted by the volume of pecans
handled during an appropriate period of
time determined by the Secretary, enter
into such an agreement, then a
marketing agreement shall exist for the
pecans marketing order. This marketing
agreement shall not alter the terms of
this part. Upon the termination of this
part, the marketing agreement has no
further force or effect.
§ 986.98
Additional parties.
After this part becomes effective, any
handler may become a party to the
marketing agreement if a counterpart is
executed by the handler and delivered
to the Secretary.
§ 986.99
Order with marketing agreement.
Each signatory handler hereby
requests the Secretary to issue, pursuant
to the Act, an order for regulating the
handling of pecans in the same manner
as is provided for in this agreement.
Subpart B—[Reserved]
Dated: February 22, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–04043 Filed 2–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[Docket Number EERE–2015–BT–STD–
0008]
RIN 1904–AD52
Appliance Standards and Rulemaking
Federal Advisory Committee: Notice of
Open Meetings for the Dedicated
Purpose Pool Pumps (DPPP) Working
Group To Negotiate a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) for
Energy Conservation Standards
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\29FEP1.SGM
29FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 39 (Monday, February 29, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10138-10152]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04043]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 986
[Docket No. AO-FV-15-0139; AMS-FV-15-0023; FV15-986-1]
Pecans Grown in the States of Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi,
North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas;
Secretary's Decision and Referendum Order on Proposed Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 986
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule and referendum order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This Secretary's Decision proposes the issuance of a marketing
agreement and order (order) under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937 to cover pecans grown in the states of Alabama, Arkansas,
Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri,
Mississippi, North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and
Texas, and provides growers with the opportunity to vote in a
referendum to determine if they favor its establishment. The proposed
order would provide authority to collect industry data and to conduct
research and promotion activities. In addition, the order would provide
authority for the industry to recommend grade, quality and size
regulation, as well as pack and container regulation, subject to
approval by the Department of Agriculture (USDA). The program would be
financed by assessments on pecan handlers and would be locally
administered, under USDA oversight, by a Council of seventeen growers
and shellers (handlers) nominated by the industry and appointed by
USDA.
DATES: The referendum will be conducted from March 9 through March 30,
2016. Ballot materials will be sent to all known pecan growers in the
proposed fifteen-state production area. To be eligible to vote, a
grower must have produced a minimum average, annual amount of 50,000
pounds of inshell pecans between August 1, 2011 and July 31, 2015, or
must own a minimum of 30 pecan acres.
ADDRESSES: Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Stop 0237,
Washington, DC 20250-0237.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Schmaedick, Senior Marketing
Specialist; Telephone: (202) 557-4783, Fax: (435) 259-1502, or Michelle
Sharrow, Rulemaking Branch Chief; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202)
720-8938, or Email: Melissa.Schmaedick@ams.usda.gov or
Michelle.Sharrow@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on this proceeding by
contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing Order and Agreement Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Stop
0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202)
720-8938, or Email: Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prior documents in this proceeding: Notice
of Hearing issued on June 26, 2015, and published in the July 2, 2015,
issue of the Federal Register (80 FR 38021); Recommended Decision and
Opportunity to File Written Exceptions issued on October 20, 2015, and
published in the October 28, 2015, issue of the Federal Register (80 FR
66372).
This administrative action is governed by the provisions of
sections 556 and 557 of title 5 of the United States Code and,
therefore, is excluded from the requirements of Executive Order 12866,
13563, and 13175. Notice of this rulemaking action was provided to
tribal governments through USDA's Office of Tribal Relations; no
comments have been received.
Preliminary Statement
This Secretary's Decision is issued pursuant to the provisions of
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C.
601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act,'' and the applicable
rules of practice and procedure governing the formulation of marketing
agreements and orders (7 CFR part 900). The proposed marketing order is
authorized under section 8(c) of the Act.
The proposed marketing agreement and order are based on the record
of a public hearing held July 20 through July 21, 2015, in Las Cruces,
New Mexico; July 23 through July 24, 2015, in Dallas, Texas; and, July
27 through July 29,
[[Page 10139]]
2015, in Tifton, Georgia. The hearing was held to receive evidence on
the proposed marketing order from growers, handlers, and other
interested parties located throughout the proposed production area.
Notice of this hearing was published in the Federal Register on July 2,
2015.
A request for public hearing on the proposed program was submitted
to USDA on May 22, 2015, by the American Pecan Board (Board), a
proponent group established in 2013 to represent the interests of
growers and handlers throughout the proposed fifteen-state production
area. A subsequent, modified draft of the proposed regulatory text was
submitted on June 10, 2015.
Witnesses at the hearing explained that the provisions of this
proposal aim to assist the industry in addressing a number of
challenges, namely: A lack of organized representation of industry-wide
interests in a single organization; a lack of accurate data to assist
the industry in its analysis of production, demand and prices; a lack
of coordinated domestic promotion or research; and a forecasted
increase in production as a result of new plantings. Witnesses believed
that these factors combined have resulted in the under-performance of
the pecan industry compared to other nut industries.
Upon the basis of evidence introduced at the hearing and the record
thereof, the Administrator of AMS on October 20, 2015, filed with the
Hearing Clerk, USDA, a Recommended Decision and Opportunity to File
Written Exceptions thereto by November 27, 2015. No exceptions were
filed. That document also announced AMS's intent to request approval of
new information collection requirements to implement the program.
Written comments on the proposed information collection requirements
were due by December 28, 2015. None were filed.
USDA is providing two additional conforming changes to the proposed
order language as published in the Recommended Decision. These
conforming changes replace the word ``redefining'' in Sec. 986.55
(c)(6) with ``reestablishment,'' and the word ``redefining'' in Sec.
986.33(b) with ``reestablishment,'' thereby conforming to the
terminology used in Sec. 986.58. The regulatory text included in this
Secretary's Decision reflects these changes.
Further, USDA is providing a correction to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) analysis published in the Recommended Decision.
The RFA incorrectly referenced a Small Business Administration (SBA)
threshold of $7 million in annual receipts to identify small handler
entities, while hearing testimony correctly identified a $7.5 million
threshold. The RFA included in this Secretary's Decision uses the
correct SBA threshold of $7.5 million.
The material issues presented on the record of hearing and
addressed in the Recommended Decision are as follows:
1. Whether the handling of pecans produced in the proposed
production area is in the current of interstate or foreign commerce or
directly burdens, obstructs, or affects such commerce;
2. Whether the economic and marketing conditions are such that they
justify a need for a Federal marketing agreement and order which would
tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act;
3. What the definition of the production area and the commodity to
be covered by the order should be;
4. What the identity of the persons and the marketing transactions
to be regulated should be;
5. What the specific terms and provisions of the order should be,
including:
(a) The definitions of terms used therein which are necessary and
incidental to attain the declared objectives and policy of the Act and
order;
(b) The establishment, composition, maintenance, procedures, powers
and duties of an administrative Council for pecans that would be the
local administrative agency for assisting USDA in the administration of
the order;
(c) The authority to incur expenses and the procedure to levy
assessments on handlers to obtain revenue for paying such expenses;
(d) The authority to conduct research and promotion activities;
(e) The authority to recommend grade, quality and size regulation,
as well as pack and container regulation, for pecans grown and handled
in the proposed production area;
(f) The establishment of requirements for handler reporting and
recordkeeping;
(g) The requirement for compliance with all provisions of the order
and with any regulation issued under it;
(h) An exemption for handlers of non-commercial quantities of
pecans;
(i) The requirement for periodic continuance referenda; and
(j) Additional terms and conditions as set forth in Sec. 986.88
through Sec. 986.93, and Sec. 986.97 through Sec. 986.99 that are
common to marketing agreements only.
Small Business Considerations
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, the AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions so that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened. Small agricultural producers
have been defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000. Small
agricultural service firms, which include handlers that would be
regulated under the proposed pecan order, are defined as those with
annual receipts of less than $7,500,000.
Interested persons were invited to present evidence at the hearing
on the probable regulatory and informational impact of the proposed
pecan marketing order program on small businesses. The record evidence
is that while the program would impose some costs on the regulated
parties, those costs would be outweighed by the benefits expected to
accrue to the U. S. pecan industry.
Specific evidence on the number of large and small pecan farms
(above and below the SBA threshold figure of $750,000 in annual sales)
was not presented at the hearing. However, percentages can be estimated
based on record evidence.
The 2014 season average grower prices per pound for improved and
native seedling pecans were $2.12 and $0.88, respectively. A weighted
grower price of $1.85 is computed by applying as weights the percentage
split between improved and native acreage on a representative U.S.
pecan farm, which are 78 and 22 percent, respectively. The average
yield on the representative farm is 1,666.67 pounds per acre.
Multiplying the $1.85 price by the average yield gives a total revenue
per acre figure of $3,080. Dividing the $750,000 SBA annual sales
threshold figure by the revenue per acre figure of $3,080 gives an
estimate of 243 acres as the size of farm that would have annual sales
about equal to $750,000, given the previous assumptions. Any farm of
that size or larger would qualify as a large farm under the SBA
definition.
Data presented in the record show that about 52 percent of
commercial U.S. pecan farms have 250 or more acres of pecans. Since the
243 acre estimate above is close to 250 acres, it can be extrapolated
that 52 percent is a reasonable approximation of the proportion of
large farms and 48 percent is the proportion of small pecan farms.
According to the record, this estimate
[[Page 10140]]
does not include ``backyard'' production.
According to record evidence, there are an estimated 250 handlers
in the U.S. Of these handlers, which include accumulators, there are an
estimated 50 commercially viable shellers with production over 1
million pounds of inshell pecans operating within the proposed
production area. Fourteen of these shellers meet the SBA definition for
large business entity and the remaining 36 are small business entities.
Record evidence indicates that implementing the proposed order
would not represent a disproportionate burden on small businesses. An
economic impact study of the proposed authority for generic promotion
presented at the hearing provided that the proposed program would
likely benefit all industry participants.
Impact of Generic Promotion Through a Marketing Order
The record shows that generic promotion over a wide variety of
agricultural products stimulates product demand and translates into
higher prices for growers than would have been the case without
promotion.
Promotional impact studies of other tree nuts (almonds and
walnuts), and of Texas pecans, show price increases as high as 6
percent, but the record indicates that 0 to 3 percent is a more
representative range. Since the other tree nut promotion programs are
well-established, the record shows that a representative middle (most
likely) scenario would be a price increase from promotion of 1.5
percent for the early years of a new pecan promotion program. Low and
high scenarios were 0.5 and 3.0 percent, respectively.
The record indicates that an analytical method used historical
yearly prices from 1997 to 2014 in a simulation covering that period to
obtain an expected average price without promotion. In a subsequent
step, the simulation applied a demand increase of 1.5 percent to the
entire distribution of prices to represent the impact of promotion. The
projected increases in grower prices from promotion for improved and
native pecans were 6.3 and 3.6 cents per pound, respectively, as shown
in Table 1. These two price increase projections represent a range of
results. Based on a range of simulated price increases as high as 3
percent, the low and high price increase projections for improved
pecans were 4.0 and 9.6 cents, respectively. For native varieties, the
results ranged from 2.7 to 4.2 cents.
The record indicates that a key analytical step was developing an
example farm with specific characteristics to explain market
characteristics and marketing order impacts. An important
characteristic of this ``representative farm'' is the acreage
allocation between improved and native pecans of 78 and 22 percent,
respectively. This is similar to the proportion of the U.S. pecan crop
in recent years allocated to improved and native varieties. Average
yield per acre of the representative farm (covering all states and
varieties) is 1,666.67 pounds per acre.
The acreage split of 78 and 22 percent are used as weights to
compute weighted average prices (combining improved and native pecans)
of 5.7 and 2.3 cents, respectively, as shown in the fourth column of
Table 1.
The record shows that the proposed initial ranges of marketing
order assessments per pound are 2 to 3 cents for improved pecans and 1
to 2 cents for native pecans. The midpoints of these ranges (2.5 and
1.5 cents, respectively) are used to compute a benefit-cost ratio from
promotion, with a weighted average assessment cost of 2.3 cents, as
shown in Table 2. Assessments would be collected from handlers, not
growers, but for purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that 100
percent of the assessment cost would be passed through to growers.
Table 1 shows that dividing the projected benefit of 5.7 cents per
pound (weighted price increase from promotion) by the estimated
assessment cost of 2.3 cents (weighted assessment rate per pound),
yields a benefit-cost ratio of 2.5. Each dollar spent on pecan
promotion through a Federal marketing order is expected to result in
$2.50 in increased revenue to the pecan growers of the United States.
Table 1--Estimated Benefit-Cost Ratio of Pecan Promotion Through a Federal Marketing Order
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Improved pecans Native pecans Weighted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefit: Projected price increase from pecan 6.3 3.6 5.7
promotion (cents per pound)........................
Cost: FMO Assessment rate (cents per pound)......... 2.5 1.5 2.3
Benefit-cost ratio.................................. 2.52 2.40 2.50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Weights for improved and native pecans are 78% and 22%, respectively, which is the acreage allocation of a
representative U.S. pecan farm, according to the record.
Examining potential costs and benefits from promotion across
different farm sizes is done in Table 2. Record evidence showed that
the minimum size of a commercial pecan farm is 30 acres, and that a
representative average yield across the entire production area is
1,666.67 pounds per acre. This combination of acreage and yield results
in a minimum threshold level of commercial production of 50,000 pounds.
Witnesses stated that expenditures for the minimum necessary level of
inputs for commercial pecan production cannot be justified for any
operation smaller than this.
In Table 2, a very small farm is defined as being at the minimum
commercial threshold level of 30 acres and 50,000 pounds. Small and
large farms are represented by farm size levels of 175 and 500 acres,
respectively. Multiplying those acreage levels by the average yield for
the entire production area gives total annual production level
estimates of 291,667 and 833,335 pounds, respectively.
Multiplying the 2014 grower price per pound of $2.14 by the 291,677
pounds of production from the small farm (175 acres) yields an annual
crop value estimate of about $618,000. This computation shows that the
small farm definition from the record is consistent with the SBA
definition of a small farm (annual sales value of up to $750,000).
Table 2 shows for the three representative pecan farm sizes the
allocation of total production levels between improved and native
varieties (78 and 22 percent, respectively).
Although marketing order assessments are paid by handlers, not
growers, it is nevertheless useful to estimate the impact on growers,
based on the assumption that handlers may pass part or all of the
assessment cost onto growers from whom they purchase pecans. To compute
the marketing order burden for each farm size, the improved and native
production quantities are multiplied by 2.5 and 1.5 cents per pound of
improved and native pecans, respectively. For the representative small
farm (175 acres), summing the improved and native assessments yields a
total annual assessment cost of $6,650.
[[Page 10141]]
For the large farm, the total assessment cost is $19,000.
A parallel computation is made to obtain the total dollar benefit
for each farm size. The improved and native quantities for the
representative farm sizes are multiplied by the corresponding projected
price increases of 6.3 and 3.6 cents. Summing the improved and native
benefits for the small and large farm size yields projected annual
total benefits for the small and large representative farm sizes of
$16,643 and $47,550, respectively. The results of dividing the benefits
for each farm size by the corresponding costs is 2.5, which equals the
benefit-cost ratio shown in Table 2.
Table 2--Costs and Benefits of Promotion for Three Sizes of Representative U.S. Pecan Farms
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Very small farm Small farm Large farm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Representative Pecan Farms: Acres and Production:
Acres per farm..................................... 30 175 500
Production on Representative Farms (Acres 50,000 291,667 833,335
multiplied by estimated U.S. average yield of
1666.67 pounds per acre)..........................
Improved pecan production (78% of farm acres)...... 39,000 227,500 650,001
Native pecan production (22% of farm acres)........ 11,000 64,167 183,334
Cost per farm: Grower burden of proposed program
represented as cost per pound:
Improved (2.5 cents)............................... $975 $5,688 $16,250
Native (1.5 cents)................................. $165 $963 $2,750
--------------------------------------------------------
Total Estimated Cost per Farm.................. $1,140 $6,650 $19,000
Benefit per farm: Price increase per pound from pecan
promotion multiplied by improved and native
production:
Improved (6.3 cents)............................... $2,457 $14,333 $40,950
Native (3.6 cents)................................. $396 $2,310 $6,600
--------------------------------------------------------
Total Estimated Benefit per Farm............... $2,853 $16,643 $47,550
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The computations in Table 2 provide an illustration, based on
evidence from the record, that there would be no disproportionate
impact on smaller size farms from establishing a marketing order and
implementing a promotion program. Costs are assessed per pound and thus
represent an equal burden regardless of size. The projected benefits
from promotion are realized through increases in price per pound and
are thus distributed proportionally among different sizes of farms.
All of the grower and handler witnesses, both large and small,
testified that the projected price increases from promotion of pecans
(6.3 and 3.6 cents per pound for improved and native pecans,
respectively) were reasonable estimates of the benefits from generic
promotion of pecans. A number of them expressed the view that the price
increase estimates were conservative and that, over time, the price
impact would be larger.
As mentioned above, marketing order assessments are paid by
handlers, not growers. However, since handlers may pass some or all of
the assessment cost onto growers, it is useful to provide this
illustration of potential impact on both growers and handlers.
Using the most recent three years of prices as examples of typical
U.S. annual grower prices, Table 3 summarizes evidence from the record
that shows the proposed marketing order assessment rates as percentages
of grower and handler prices received. Based on record evidence that a
representative handler margin is 57.5 cents per pound, handler prices
are estimated by summing the grower price and handler margin.
Table 3--Proposed Marketing Order Assessment Rates as a Percentage of Prices for Pecans Received by Growers and Handlers
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grower and handler prices Assessment rates as a % of prices
--------------------------------------- Assessment received
rates *** --------------------------------------
2012 2013 2014 2012 (%) 2013 (%) 2014 (%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grower price *
Improved................................................. $1.73 $1.90 $2.12 $0.025 1.4 1.3 1.2
Native................................................... 0.88 0.92 0.88 0.015 1.7 1.6 1.7
Handler price **
Improved................................................. 2.31 2.48 2.70 0.025 1.08 1.01 0.93
Native................................................... 1.46 1.50 1.46 0.015 1.03 1.00 1.03
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Season average grower price per pound from NASS/USDA.
** Grower price plus average handler margin of 57.5 cents per pound, based on hearing evidence.
*** Midpoints of proposed initial marketing order assessment rates: Improved (2 to 3 cents); Native (1 to 2 cents). For growers this represents the cost
of the marketing order burden and for handlers this represents the cost of the assessment paid.
For both improved and native pecans, using 2012 to 2014 prices as
examples, Table 3 shows that the potential burden of the proposed
program can be calculated at between 1 and 2 percent of operating
expenses for growers and are approximately 1 percent of operating
expenses for handlers. Grower and handler witnesses, both large and
small, covering both improved and native pecans, testified that the
proposed initial marketing order assessment rates
[[Page 10142]]
would not represent a significant burden to their businesses and that
the benefits of the proposed generic promotion program substantially
outweigh the cost. Sheller witnesses (large and small) that would
likely become handlers under a Federal marketing order testified that
the additional recordkeeping required to collect assessments to send to
the marketing order board (American Pecan Council) would not be a
significant additional burden and that the benefits would substantially
outweigh the costs. Several witnesses stated that one reason that
collecting the assessments would have only a minor impact is that they
already perform similar functions for promotion and other pecan-related
programs (or other commodity programs) organized under state law.
Additional Marketing Order Program Benefits
Statements of support for additional benefits that could come from
a Federal marketing order came from grower and handler witnesses, both
large and small, covering both improved and native pecans. The
additional benefits cited included: (1) Additional and more accurate
market information, including data on production, inventory, and total
supplies, (2) funding of research on health and nutrition aspects of
pecans, improved technology relating to the pecan supply chain and crop
health, consumer trends, and other topics, and (3) uniform, industry-
wide quality standards for pecans, as well as packaging standards and
shipping protocols. Witnesses testified that the burden of funding and
participating in marketing order programs with these features would be
minor, and that the benefits would substantially outweigh the costs.
The proposed order would impose some reporting and recordkeeping
requirements on handlers. However, testimony indicated that the
expected burden that would be imposed with respect to these
requirements would be negligible. Most of the information that would be
reported to the Council is already compiled by handlers for other uses
and is readily available. Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
issued under other tree nut programs impose an average annual burden on
each regulated handler of about 8 hours. It is reasonable to expect
that a similar burden may be imposed under this proposed marketing
order on the estimated 250 handlers of pecans in the proposed
production area.
The record evidence also indicates that the benefits to small as
well as large handlers are likely to be greater than would accrue under
the alternatives to the order proposed herein; namely, no marketing
order.
In determining that the proposed order and its provisions would not
have a disproportionate economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities, all of the issues discussed above were considered.
Based on hearing record evidence and USDA's analysis of the economic
information provided, the proposed order provisions have been carefully
reviewed to ensure that every effort has been made to eliminate any
unnecessary costs or requirements.
Although the proposed order may impose some additional costs and
requirements on handlers, it is anticipated that the order will help to
strengthen demand for pecans. Therefore, any additional costs would be
offset by the benefits derived from expanded sales benefiting handlers
and growers alike. Accordingly, it is determined that the proposed
order would not have a disproportionate economic impact on a
substantial number of small handlers or growers.
Finally, the Act requires that, prior to the issuance of a
marketing order, a referendum be conducted among the affected growers
to determine if they favor issuance of the order.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In compliance with OMB regulations (5 CFR part 1320) which
implement the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13), the
ballot material that will be used in conducting the referendum has been
submitted to and approved by OMB. The forms to be used for nomination
and selection of the initial administrative committee have also been
reviewed and approved by OMB.
Any additional information collection and recordkeeping
requirements that may be imposed under the order would be submitted to
OMB for approval. Those requirements would not become effective prior
to OMB approval.
Civil Justice Reform
The marketing agreement and order proposed herein have been
reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. They are
not intended to have retroactive effect. If adopted, the proposed order
would not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies,
unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this proposal.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Department a
petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance
with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted
there from. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the
petition. After the hearing, the USDA would rule on the petition. The
Act provides that the district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her
principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the
Department's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not
later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
Findings and Conclusions
The findings and conclusions, rulings, and general findings and
determinations included in the Recommended Decision set forth in the
October 28, 2015, issue of the Federal Register (80 FR 66372), and as
further revised in this Secretary's Decision, are hereby approved and
adopted.
Rulings on Exceptions
In arriving at the findings and conclusions and the regulatory
provisions of this decision, all exceptions to the proposed order were
carefully considered in conjunction with the record evidence. To the
extent that the findings and conclusions and the regulatory provisions
of this decision are at variance with the exceptions, such exceptions
are denied.
Marketing Agreement and Order
Annexed hereto and made a part hereof is the document entitled
``Order Regulating the Handling of Pecans Grown in the States of
Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas,
Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma,
South Carolina, and Texas.'' This document has been decided upon as the
detailed and appropriate means of effectuating the foregoing findings
and conclusions.
It is hereby ordered, That this entire decision be published in the
Federal Register.
Referendum Order
It is hereby directed that a referendum be conducted in accordance
with the procedure for the conduct of referenda (7 CFR 900.400-407) to
determine whether the issuance of the annexed order regulating the
handling of pecans grown in the States of Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi,
North Carolina, New
[[Page 10143]]
Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas is approved or favored by
producers, as defined under the terms of the order, who during the
representative period were engaged in the production of pecans in the
production area.
The representative period for the conduct of such referendum is
hereby determined to be August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015.
The agents of the Secretary to conduct such referendum are hereby
designated to be Christian Nissen and Jennie Varela, Southeast
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1124 First Street South, Winter
Haven, Florida 33880; telephone: (863) 324-3375; or fax: (863) 291-
8614, or Email: Christian.Nissen@ams.usda.gov or
Jennie.Varela@ams.usda.gov, respectively.
Order Regulating the Handling of Pecans Grown in the States of Alabama,
Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana,
Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, and Texas.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This order shall not become effective unless and until the
requirements of Sec. 900.14 of the rules of practice and procedure
governing proceedings to formulate marketing agreements and
marketing orders have been met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Findings and Determinations
Pursuant to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)and the applicable rules of
practice and procedure effective thereunder (7 CFR part 900), a public
hearing was held upon a proposed marketing agreement and order
regulation the handling of pecans grown in the States of Alabama,
Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana,
Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, and Texas.
Upon the basis of evidence introduced at such hearing and the
record thereof, it is found that:
(1) The proposed marketing agreement and order, and all of the
terms and conditions thereof, will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act;
(2) The proposed marketing agreement and order regulate the
handling of pecans grown in the proposed production area in the same
manner as, and are applicable only to, persons in the respective
classes of commercial and industrial activity specified in the
marketing agreement and order upon which a hearing has been held;
(3) The proposed marketing agreement and order are limited in its
application to the smallest regional production area that is
practicable, consistent with carrying out the declared policy of the
Act, and the issuance of several orders applicable to subdivisions of
the production area would not effectively carry out the declared policy
of the Act;
(4) The proposed marketing agreement and order prescribe, such
different terms applicable to different parts of the production area as
are necessary to give due recognition to the differences in the
production and marketing of pecans grown in the proposed production
area; and
(5) All handling of pecans grown in the proposed production area as
defined in the proposed marketing agreement and order is in the current
of interstate or foreign commerce or directly burdens, obstructs, or
affects such commerce.
Order Relative to Handling
It is therefore ordered, That on and after the effective date
hereof, all handling of pecans grown in the States of Alabama,
Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana,
Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, and Texas, shall be in conformity to, and in compliance with,
the terms and conditions of the said order as hereby proposed to be
amended as follows:
The provisions of the proposed marketing agreement and order
contained in the Recommended Decision issued on October 20, 2015, and
published in the Federal Register on October 28, 2015 (80 FR 66372),
and as further revised in this decision, shall be and are the terms and
provisions of this proposed agreement and order and are set forth in
full herein. Sections 986.97 through 986.99 apply only to the proposed
marketing agreement and not the proposed order.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 986
Marketing agreements, Pecans, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, The Agricultural Marketing
Service proposes to add 7 CFR part 986 to read as follows:
PART 986--PECANS GROWN IN THE STATES OF ALABAMA, ARKANSAS, ARIZONA,
CALIFORNIA, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, KANSAS, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI,
MISSISSIPPI, NORTH CAROLINA, NEW MEXICO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA,
AND TEXAS
Subpart A--Order Regulating Handling of Pecans
Definitions
Sec.
986.1 Accumulator.
986.2 Act.
986.3 Affiliation.
986.4 Blowouts.
986.5 To certify.
986.6 Confidential data or information.
986.7 Container.
986.8 Council.
986.9 Crack.
986.10 Cracks.
986.11 Custom harvester.
986.12 Department or USDA.
986.13 Disappearance.
986.14 Farm Service Agency.
986.15 Fiscal year.
986.16 Grade and size.
986.17 Grower.
986.18 Grower-cleaned production.
986.19 Handler.
986.20 To handle.
986.21 Handler inventory.
986.22 Handler-cleaned production.
986.23 Hican.
986.24 Inshell pecans.
986.25 Inspection service.
986.26 Inter-handler transfer.
986.27 Merchantable pecans.
986.28 Pack.
986.29 Pecans.
986.30 Person.
986.31 Production area.
986.32 Proprietary capacity.
986.33 Regions.
986.34 Representative period.
986.35 Secretary.
986.36 Sheller.
986.37 Shelled pecans.
986.38 Stick-tights.
986.39 Trade supply.
986.40 Unassessed inventory.
986.41 Varieties.
986.42 Warehousing.
986.43 Weight.
Administrative Body
986.45 American Pecan Council.
986.46 Council nominations and voting.
986.47 Alternate members.
986.48 Eligibility.
986.49 Acceptance.
986.50 Term of office.
986.51 Vacancy.
986.52 Council expenses.
986.53 Powers.
986.54 Duties.
986.55 Procedure.
986.56 Right of the Secretary.
986.57 Funds and other property.
986.58 Reapportionment and reestablishment of regions.
[[Page 10144]]
Expenses, Assessments and Marketing Policy
986.60 Budget.
986.61 Assessments.
986.62 Inter-handler transfers.
986.63 Contributions.
986.64 Accounting.
986.65 Marketing policy.
Authorities Relating To Research, Promotion, Data Gathering, Packaging,
Grading, Compliance and Reporting
986.67 Recommendations for regulations.
986.68 Authority for research and promotion activities.
986.69 Authorities regulating handling.
986.70 Handling for special purposes.
986.71 Safeguards.
986.72 Notification of regulation.
Reports, Books and Other Records
986.75 Reports of handler inventory.
986.76 Reports of merchantable pecans handled.
986.77 Reports of pecans received by handlers.
986.78 Other handler reports.
986.79 Verification of reports.
986.80 Certification of reports.
986.81 Confidential information.
Administrative Provisions
986.86 Exemptions.
986.87 Compliance.
986.88 Duration of immunities.
986.89 Separability.
986.90 Derogation.
986.91 Liability.
986.92 Agents.
986.93 Effective time.
986.94 Termination.
986.95 Proceedings after termination.
986.96 Amendments.
986.97 Counterparts.
986.98 Additional participants.
986.99 Order with marketing agreement.
Subpart B--[Reserved]
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
Subpart A--Order Regulating Handling of Pecans
Definitions
Sec. 986.1 Accumulator.
Accumulator means a person who compiles inshell pecans from other
persons for the purpose of resale or transfer.
Sec. 986.2 Act.
Act means Public Act No. 10, 73d Congress, as amended and as
reenacted and amended by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of
1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Sec. 986.3 Affiliation.
Affiliation. This term normally appears as ``affiliate of'' or
``affiliated with,'' and means a person such as a grower or sheller who
is: A grower or handler that directly, or indirectly through one or
more intermediaries, owns or controls, or is controlled by, or is under
common control with the grower or handler specified; or a grower or
handler that directly, or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries, is connected in a proprietary capacity, or shares the
ownership or control of the specified grower or handler with one or
more other growers or handlers. As used in this part, the term
``control'' (including the terms ``controlling,'' ``controlled by,''
and ``under the common control with'') means the possession, direct or
indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the
management and policies of a handler or a grower, whether through
voting securities, membership in a cooperative, by contract or
otherwise.
Sec. 986.4 Blowouts.
Blowouts mean lightweight or underdeveloped inshell pecan nuts that
are considered of lesser quality and market value.
Sec. 986.5 To certify.
To certify means the issuance of a certification of inspection of
pecans by the inspection service.
Sec. 986.6 Confidential data or information.
Confidential data or information submitted to the Council consists
of data or information constituting a trade secret or disclosure of the
trade position, financial condition, or business operations of a
particular entity or its customers.
Sec. 986.7 Container.
Container means a box, bag, crate, carton, package (including
retail packaging), or any other type of receptacle used in the
packaging or handling of pecans.
Sec. 986.8 Council.
Council means the American Pecan Council established pursuant to
Sec. 986.45, American Pecan Council.
Sec. 986.9 Crack.
Crack means to break, crack, or otherwise compromise the outer
shell of a pecan so as to expose the kernel inside to air outside the
shell.
Sec. 986.10 Cracks.
Cracks refer to an accumulated group or container of pecans that
have been cracked in harvesting or handling.
Sec. 986.11 Custom harvester.
Custom harvester means a person who harvests inshell pecans for a
fee.
Sec. 986.12 Department or USDA.
Department or USDA means the United States Department of
Agriculture.
Sec. 986.13 Disappearance.
Disappearance means the difference between the sum of grower-
cleaned production and handler-cleaned production (whether from
improved orchards or native and seedling groves) and the sum of inshell
and shelled merchantable pecans reported on an inshell weight basis.
Sec. 986.14 Farm Service Agency.
Farm Service Agency or FSA means that agency of the U.S. Department
of Agriculture.
Sec. 986.15 Fiscal year.
Fiscal year means the twelve months from October 1 to September 30,
both inclusive, or any other such period deemed appropriate by the
Council and approved by the Secretary.
Sec. 986.16 Grade and size.
Grade and size means any of the officially established grades of
pecans and any of the officially established sizes of pecans as set
forth in the United States standards for inshell and shelled pecans or
amendments thereto, or modifications thereof, or other variations of
grade and size based thereon recommended by the Council and approved by
the Secretary.
Sec. 986.17 Grower.
(a) Grower is synonymous with producer and means any person engaged
within the production area in a proprietary capacity in the production
of pecans if such person:
(1) Owns an orchard and harvests its pecans for sale (even if a
custom harvester is used); or
(2) Is a lessee of a pecan orchard and has the right to sell the
harvest (even if the lessee must remit a percentage of the crop or rent
to a lessor).
(b) The term ``grower'' shall only include those who produce a
minimum of 50,000 pounds of inshell pecans during a representative
period (average of four years) or who own a minimum of 30 pecan acres
according to the FSA, including acres calculated by the FSA based on
pecan tree density. In the absence of any FSA delineation of pecan
acreage, the regular definition of an acre will apply. The Council may
recommend changes to this definition subject to the approval of the
Secretary.
Sec. 986.18 Grower-cleaned production.
Grower-cleaned production means production harvested and processed
through a cleaning plant to determine volumes of improved pecans,
native and seedling pecans, and substandard pecans to transfer to a
handler for sale.
[[Page 10145]]
Sec. 986.19 Handler.
Handler means any person who handles inshell or shelled pecans in
any manner described in Sec. 986.20.
Sec. 986.20 To handle.
To handle means to receive, shell, crack, accumulate, warehouse,
roast, pack, sell, consign, transport, export, or ship (except as a
common or contract carrier of pecans owned by another person), or in
any other way to put inshell or shelled pecans into any and all markets
in the stream of commerce either within the area of production or from
such area to any point outside thereof. The term ``to handle'' shall
not include: Sales and deliveries within the area of production by
growers to handlers; grower warehousing; custom handling (except for
selling, consigning or exporting) or other similar activities paid for
on a fee-for-service basis by a grower who retains the ownership of the
pecans; or transfers between handlers.
Sec. 986.21 Handler inventory.
Handler inventory means all pecans, shelled or inshell, as of any
date and wherever located within the production area, then held by a
handler for their account.
Sec. 986.22 Handler-cleaned production.
Handler-cleaned production is production that is received,
purchased or consigned from the grower by a handler prior to processing
through a cleaning plant, and then subsequently processed through a
cleaning plant so as to determine volumes of improved pecans, native
and seedling pecans, and substandard pecans.
Sec. 986.23 Hican.
Hican means a tree resulting from a cross between a pecan and some
other type of hickory (members of the genus Carya) or the nut from such
a hybrid tree.
Sec. 986.24 Inshell pecans.
Inshell pecans are nuts whose kernel is maintained inside the
shell.
Sec. 986.25 Inspection Service.
Inspection service means the Federal-State Inspection Service or
any other inspection service authorized by the Secretary.
Sec. 986.26 Inter-handler transfer.
Inter-handler transfer means the movement of inshell pecans from
one handler to another inside the production area for the purposes of
additional handling. Any assessments or requirements under this part
with respect to inshell pecans so transferred may be assumed by the
receiving handler.
Sec. 986.27 Merchantable pecans.
(a) Inshell. Merchantable inshell pecans mean all inshell pecans
meeting the minimum grade regulations that may be effective pursuant to
Sec. 986.69, Authorities regulating handling.
(b) Shelled. Merchantable shelled pecans means all shelled pecans
meeting the minimum grade regulations that may be effective pursuant to
Sec. 986.69, Authorities regulating handling.
Sec. 986.28 Pack.
Pack means to clean, grade, or otherwise prepare pecans for market
as inshell or shelled pecans.
Sec. 986.29 Pecans.
(a) Pecans means and includes any and all varieties or subvarieties
of Genus: Carya, Species: illinoensis, expressed also as Carya
illinoinensis (syn. C. illinoenses) including all varieties thereof,
excluding hicans, that are produced in the production area and are
classified as:
(1) Native or seedling pecans harvested from non-grafted or
naturally propagated tree varieties;
(2) Improved pecans harvested from grafted tree varieties bred or
selected for superior traits of nut size, ease of shelling, production
characteristics, and resistance to certain insects and diseases,
including but not limited to: Desirable, Elliot, Forkert, Sumner,
Creek, Excel, Gracross, Gratex, Gloria Grande, Kiowa, Moreland, Sioux,
Mahan, Mandan, Moneymaker, Morrill, Cunard, Zinner, Byrd, McMillan,
Stuart, Pawnee, Eastern and Western Schley, Wichita, Success, Cape
Fear, Choctaw, Cheyenne, Lakota, Kanza, Caddo, and Oconee; and
(3) Substandard pecans that are blowouts, cracks, stick-tights, and
other inferior quality pecans, whether native or improved, that, with
further handling, can be cleaned and eventually sold into the stream of
commerce.
(b) The Council, with the approval of the Secretary, may recognize
new or delete obsolete varieties or sub-varieties for each category.
Sec. 986.30 Person.
Person means an individual, partnership, corporation, association,
or any other business unit.
Sec. 986.31 Production area.
Production area means the following fifteen pecan-producing states
within the United States: Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California,
Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North
Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas.
Sec. 986.32 Proprietary capacity.
Proprietary capacity means the capacity or interest of a grower or
handler that, either directly or through one or more intermediaries or
affiliates, is a property owner together with all the appurtenant
rights of an owner, including the right to vote the interest in that
capacity as an individual, a shareholder, member of a cooperative,
partner, trustee or in any other capacity with respect to any other
business unit.
Sec. 986.33 Regions.
(a) Regions within the production area shall consist of the
following:
(1) Eastern Region, consisting of: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North
Carolina, South Carolina
(2) Central Region, consisting of: Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana,
Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas
(3) Western Region, consisting of: Arizona, California, New Mexico
(b) With the approval of the Secretary, the boundaries of any
region may be changed pursuant to Sec. 986.58, Reapportionment and
reestablishment of regions.
Sec. 986.34 Representative period.
Representative period is the previous four fiscal years for which a
grower's annual average production is calculated, or any other period
recommended by the Council and approved by the Secretary.
Sec. 986.35 Secretary.
Secretary means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States,
or any other officer or employee of the United States Department of
Agriculture who is, or who may be, authorized to perform the duties of
the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States.
Sec. 986.36 Sheller.
Sheller refers to any person who converts inshell pecans to shelled
pecans and sells the output in any and all markets in the stream of
commerce, both within and outside of the production area; Provided,
That the term ``sheller'' shall only include those who shell more than
1 million pounds of inshell pecans in a fiscal year. The Council may
recommend changes to this definition subject to the approval of the
Secretary.
Sec. 986.37 Shelled pecans.
Shelled pecans are pecans whose shells have been removed leaving
only edible kernels, kernel pieces or pecan meal. Shelled pecans are
synonymous with pecan meats.
[[Page 10146]]
Sec. 986.38 Stick-tights.
Stick-tights means pecans whose outer shuck has adhered to the
shell causing their value to decrease or be discounted.
Sec. 986.39 Trade supply.
Trade supply means the quantity of merchantable inshell or shelled
pecans that growers will supply to handlers during a fiscal year for
sale in the United States and abroad or, in the absence of handler
regulations Sec. 986.69 setting forth minimum grade regulations for
merchantable pecans, the sum of handler-cleaned and grower-cleaned
production.
Sec. 986.40 Unassessed inventory.
Unassessed inventory means inshell pecans held by growers or
handlers for which no assessment has been paid to the Council.
Sec. 986.41 Varieties.
Varieties mean and include all cultivars, classifications, or
subdivisions of pecans.
Sec. 986.42 Warehousing.
Warehousing means to hold assessed or unassessed inventory.
Sec. 986.43 Weight.
Weight means pounds of inshell pecans, received by handler within
each fiscal year; Provided, That for shelled pecans the actual weight
shall be multiplied by two to obtain an inshell weight.
Administrative Body
Sec. 986.45 American Pecan Council.
The American Pecan Council is hereby established consisting of 17
members selected by the Secretary, each of whom shall have an alternate
member nominated with the same qualifications as the member. The 17
members shall include nine (9) grower seats, six (6) sheller seats, and
two (2) at-large seats allocated to one accumulator and one public
member. The grower and sheller nominees and their alternates shall be
growers and shellers at the time of their nomination and for the
duration of their tenure. Grower and sheller members and their
alternates shall be selected by the Secretary from nominees submitted
by the Council. The two at-large seats shall be nominated by the
Council and appointed by the Secretary.
(a) Each region shall be allocated the following member seats:
(1) Eastern Region: three (3) growers and two (2) shellers;
(2) Central Region: three (3) growers and two (2) shellers;
(3) Western Region: three (3) growers and two (2) shellers.
(b) Within each region, the grower and sheller seats shall be
defined as follows:
(1) Grower seats: Each region shall have a grower Seat 1 and Seat 2
allocated to growers whose acreage is equal to or exceeds 176 pecan
acres. Each region shall also have a grower Seat 3 allocated to a
grower whose acreage is less than 176 pecan acres.
(2) Sheller seats: Each region shall have a sheller Seat 1
allocated to a sheller who handles more than 12.5 million pounds of
inshell pecans in the fiscal year preceding nomination, and a sheller
Seat 2 allocated to a sheller who handles less than or equal to 12.5
million pounds of inshell pecans in the fiscal year preceding
nomination.
(c) The Council may recommend, subject to the approval of the
Secretary, revisions to the above requirements for grower and sheller
seats to accommodate changes within the industry.
Sec. 986.46 Council nominations and voting.
Nomination of Council members and alternate members shall follow
the procedure set forth in this section, or as may be changed as
recommended by the Council and approved by the Secretary. All nominees
must meet the requirements set forth in Sec. Sec. 986.45, American
Pecan Council, and 986.48, Eligibility, or as otherwise identified by
the Secretary, to serve on the Council.
(a) Initial members. Nominations for initial Council members and
alternate members shall be conducted by the Secretary by either holding
meetings of shellers and growers, by mail, or by email, and shall be
submitted on approved nomination forms. Eligibility to cast votes on
nomination ballots, accounting of nomination ballot results, and
identification of member and alternate nominees shall follow the
procedures set forth in this section, or by any other criteria deemed
necessary by the Secretary. The Secretary shall select and appoint the
initial members and alternate members of the Council.
(b) Successor members. Subsequent nominations of Council members
and alternate members shall be conducted as follows:
(1) Call for nominations. (i) Nominations for the grower member
seats for each region shall be received from growers in that region on
approved forms containing the information stipulated in this section.
(ii) If a grower is engaged in producing pecans in more than one
region, such grower shall nominate in the region in which they grow the
largest volume of their production.
(iii) Nominations for the sheller member seats for each region
shall be received from shellers in that region on approved forms
containing the information stipulated in this section.
(iv) If a sheller is engaged in handling in more than one region,
such sheller shall nominate in the region in which they shelled the
largest volume in the preceding fiscal year.
(2) Voting for nominees. (i) Only growers, through duly authorized
officers or employees of growers, if applicable, may participate in the
nomination of grower member nominees and their alternates. Each grower
shall be entitled to cast only one nomination ballot for each of the
three grower seats in their region.
(ii) If a grower is engaged in producing pecans in more than one
region, such grower shall cast their nomination ballot in the region in
which they grow the largest volume of their production. Notwithstanding
this stipulation, such grower may vote their volume produced in any or
all of the three regions.
(iii) Only shellers, through duly authorized officers or employees
of shellers, if applicable, may participate in the nomination of the
sheller member nominees and their alternates. Each sheller shall be
entitled to cast only one nomination ballot for each of the two sheller
seats in their region.
(iv) If a sheller is engaged in handling in more than one region,
such sheller shall cast their nomination ballot in the region in which
they shelled the largest volume in the preceding fiscal year.
Notwithstanding this stipulation, such sheller may vote their volume
handled in all three regions.
(v) If a person is both a grower and a sheller of pecans, such
person may not participate in both grower and sheller nominations. Such
person must elect to participate either as a grower or a sheller.
(3) Nomination procedure for grower seats. (i) The Council shall
mail to all growers who are on record with the Council within the
respective regions a grower nomination ballot indicating the nominees
for each of the three grower member seats, along with voting
instructions. Growers may cast ballots on the proper ballot form either
at meetings of growers, by mail, or by email as designated by the
Council. For ballots to be considered, they must be submitted on the
proper forms with all required information, including signatures.
(ii) On the ballot, growers shall indicate their vote for the
grower nominee candidates for the grower seats and also indicate their
average annual
[[Page 10147]]
volume of inshell pecan production for the preceding four fiscal years.
(iii) Seat 1 (growers with equal to or more than 176 acres of
pecans). The nominee for this seat in each region shall be the grower
receiving the highest volume of production (pounds of inshell pecans)
votes from the respective region, and the grower receiving the second
highest volume of production votes shall be the alternate member
nominee for this seat. In case of a tie vote, the nominee shall be
selected by a drawing.
(iv) Seat 2 (growers with equal to or more than 176 acres of
pecans). The nominee for this seat in each region shall be the grower
receiving the highest number of votes from their respective region, and
the grower receiving the second highest number of votes shall be the
alternate member nominee for this seat. In case of a tie vote, the
nominee shall be selected by a drawing.
(v) Seat 3 (grower with less than 176 acres of pecans). The nominee
for this seat in each region shall be the grower receiving the highest
number of votes from the respective region, and the grower receiving
the second highest number of votes shall be the alternate member
nominee for this seat. In case of a tie vote, the nominee shall be
selected by a drawing.
(4) Nomination procedure for sheller seats. (i) The Council shall
mail to all shellers who are on record with the Council within the
respective regions the sheller ballot indicating the nominees for each
of the two sheller member seats in their respective regions, along with
voting instructions. Shellers may cast ballots on approved ballot forms
either at meetings of shellers, by mail, or by email as designated by
the Council. For ballots to be considered, they must be submitted on
the approved forms with all required information, including signatures.
(ii) Seat 1 (shellers handling more than 12.5 million lbs. of
inshell pecans in the preceding fiscal year). The nominee for this seat
in each region shall be assigned to the sheller receiving the highest
number of votes from the respective region, and the sheller receiving
the second highest number of votes shall be the alternate member
nominee for this seat. In case of a tie vote, the nominee shall be
selected by a drawing.
(iii) Seat 2 (shellers handling equal to or less than 12.5 million
lbs. of inshell pecans in the preceding fiscal year). The nominee for
this seat in each region shall be assigned to the sheller receiving the
highest number of votes from the respective region, and the sheller
receiving the second highest number of votes shall be the alternate
member nominee for this seat. In case of a tie vote, the nominee shall
be selected by a drawing.
(5) Reports to the Secretary. Nominations in the foregoing manner
received by the Council shall be reported to the Secretary on or before
15 of each July of any year in which nominations are held, together
with a certified summary of the results of the nominations and other
information deemed by the Council to be pertinent or requested by the
Secretary. From those nominations, the Secretary shall select the
fifteen grower and sheller members of the Council and an alternate for
each member, unless the Secretary rejects any nomination submitted. In
the event the Secretary rejects a nomination, a second nomination
process may be conducted to identify other nominee candidates, the
resulting nominee information may be reported to the Secretary after
July 15 and before September 15. If the Council fails to report
nominations to the Secretary in the manner herein specified, the
Secretary may select the members without nomination. If nominations for
the public and accumulator at-large members are not submitted by
September 15 of any year in which their nomination is due, the
Secretary may select such members without nomination.
(6) At-large members. The grower and sheller members of the Council
shall select one public member and one accumulator member and
respective alternates for consideration, selection and appointment by
the Secretary. The public member and alternate public member may not
have any financial interest, individually or corporately, or
affiliation with persons vested in the pecan industry. The accumulator
member and alternate accumulator member must meet the criteria set
forth in Sec. 986.1, Accumulator, and may reside or maintain a place
of business in any region.
(7) Nomination forms. The Council may distribute nomination forms
at meetings, by mail, by email, or by any other form of distribution
recommended by the Council and approved by the Secretary.
(i) Grower nomination forms. Each nomination form submitted by a
grower shall include the following information:
(A) The name of the nominated grower;
(B) The name and signature of the nominating grower;
(C) Two additional names and respective signatures of growers in
support of the nomination;
(D) Any other such information recommended by the Council and
approved by the Secretary.
(ii) Sheller nomination forms. Each nomination form submitted by a
sheller shall include the following:
(A) The name of the nominated sheller;
(B) The name and signature of the nominating sheller;
(C) One additional name and signature of a sheller in support of
the nomination;
(D) Any other such information recommended by the Council and
approved by the Secretary.
(8) Changes to the nomination and voting procedures.
The Council may recommend, subject to the approval of the
Secretary, a change to these procedures should the Council determine
that a revision is necessary.
Sec. 986.47 Alternate members.
(a) Each member of the Council shall have an alternate member to be
nominated in the same manner as the member.
(b) An alternate for a member of the Council shall act in the place
and stead of such member in their absence or in the event of their
death, removal, resignation, or disqualification, until the next
nomination and elections take place for the Council or the vacancy has
been filled pursuant to Sec. 986.48, Eligibility.
(c) In the event any member of the Council and their alternate are
both unable to attend a meeting of the Council, any alternate for any
other member representing the same group as the absent member may serve
in the place of the absent member.
Sec. 986.48 Eligibility.
(a) Each grower member and alternate shall be, at the time of
selection and during the term of office, a grower or an officer, or
employee, of a grower in the region and in the classification for which
nominated.
(b) Each sheller member and alternate shall be, at the time of
selection and during the term of office, a sheller or an officer or
employee of a sheller in the region and in the classification for which
nominated.
(c) A grower can be a nominee for only one grower member seat. If a
grower is nominated for two grower member seats, he or she shall select
the seat in which he or she desires to run, and the grower ballot shall
reflect that selection.
(d) Any member or alternate member who at the time of selection was
employed by or affiliated with the
[[Page 10148]]
person who is nominated shall, upon termination of that relationship,
become disqualified to serve further as a member and that position
shall be deemed vacant.
(e) No person nominated to serve as a public member or alternate
public member shall have a financial interest in any pecan grower or
handling operation.
Sec. 986.49 Acceptance.
Each person to be selected by the Secretary as a member or as an
alternate member of the Council shall, prior to such selection, qualify
by advising the Secretary that if selected, such person agrees to serve
in the position for which that nomination has been made.
Sec. 986.50 Term of office.
(a) Selected members and alternate members of the Council shall
serve for terms of four years: Provided, That at the end of the first
four (4) year term and in the nomination and selection of the second
Council only, four of the grower member and alternate seats and three
of the sheller member and alternate seats shall be seated for terms of
two years so that approximately half of the memberships' and
alternates' terms expire every two years thereafter. Member and
alternate seats assigned two-year terms for the seating of the second
Council only shall be as follows:
(1) Grower member Seat 2 in all regions shall be assigned a two-
year term;
(2) Grower member Seat 3 in all regions shall, by drawing, identify
one member seat to be assigned a two-year term; and,
(3) Sheller Seat 2 in all regions shall be assigned a two-year
term.
(b) Council members and alternates may serve up to two consecutive,
four-year terms of office. Subject to section (c) below, in no event
shall any member or alternate serve more than eight consecutive years
on the Council as either a member or an alternate. However, if
selected, an alternate having served up to two consecutive terms may
immediately serve as a member for two consecutive terms without any
interruption in service. The same is true for a member who, after
serving for up to two consecutive terms, may serve as an alternate if
nominated without any interruption in service. A person having served
the maximum number of terms as set forth above may not serve again as a
member or an alternate for at least twelve consecutive months. For
purposes of determining when a member or alternate has served two
consecutive terms, the accrual of terms shall begin following any
period of at least twelve consecutive months out of office.
(c) Each member and alternate member shall continue to serve until
a successor is selected and has qualified.
(d) A term of office shall begin as set forth in the by-laws or as
directed by the Secretary each year for all members.
(e) The Council may recommend, subject to approval of the
Secretary, revisions to the start day for the term of office, the
number of years in a term, and the number of terms a member or an
alternate can serve.
Sec. 986.51 Vacancy.
Any vacancy on the Council occurring by the failure of any person
selected to the Council to qualify as a member or alternate member due
to a change in status making the member ineligible to serve, or due to
death, removal, or resignation, shall be filled, by a majority vote of
the Council for the unexpired portion of the term. However, that person
shall fulfill all the qualifications set forth in this part as required
for the member whose office that person is to fill. The qualifications
of any person to fill a vacancy on the Council shall be certified in
writing to the Secretary. The Secretary shall notify the Council if the
Secretary determines that any such person is not qualified.
Sec. 986.52 Council expenses.
The members and their alternates of the Council shall serve without
compensation, but shall be reimbursed for the reasonable and necessary
expenses incurred by them in the performance of their duties under this
part.
Sec. 986.53 Powers.
The Council shall have the following powers:
(a) To administer the provisions of this part in accordance with
its terms;
(b) To make bylaws, rules and regulations to effectuate the terms
and provisions of this part;
(c) To receive, investigate, and report to the Secretary complaints
of violations of this part; and
(d) To recommend to the Secretary amendments to this part.
Sec. 986.54 Duties.
The duties of the Council shall be as follows:
(a) To act as intermediary between the Secretary and any handler or
grower;
(b) To keep minute books and records which will clearly reflect all
of its acts and transactions, and such minute books and records shall
at any time be subject to the examination of the Secretary;
(c) To furnish to the Secretary a complete report of all meetings
and such other available information as he or she may request;
(d) To appoint such employees as it may deem necessary and to
determine the salaries, define the duties, and fix the bonds of such
employees;
(e) To cause the books of the Council to be audited by one or more
certified public accountants at least once for each fiscal year and at
such other times as the Council deems necessary or as the Secretary may
request, and to file with the Secretary three copies of all audit
reports made;
(f) To investigate the growing, shipping and marketing conditions
with respect to pecans and to assemble data in connection therewith;
(g) To investigate compliance with the provisions of this part;
and,
(h) To recommend by-laws, rules and regulations for the purpose of
administering this part.
Sec. 986.55 Procedure.
(a) The members of the Council shall select a chairman from their
membership, and shall select such other officers and adopt such rules
for the conduct of Council business as they deem advisable.
(b) The Council may provide for meetings by telephone, or other
means of communication, and any vote cast at such a meeting shall be
confirmed promptly in writing. The Council shall give the Secretary the
same notice of its meetings as is given to members of the Council.
(c) Quorum. A quorum of the Council shall be any twelve voting
Council members. The vote of a majority of members present at a meeting
at which there is a quorum shall constitute the act of the Council;
Provided, That:
(1) Actions of the Council with respect to the following issues
shall require a two-thirds (12 members) concurring vote of the Council:
(i) Establishment of or changes to by-laws;
(ii) Appointment or administrative issues relating to the program's
manager or chief executive officer;
(iii) Budget;
(iv) Assessments;
(v) Compliance and audits;
(vi) Reestablishment of regions and reapportionment or reallocation
of Council membership;
(vii) Modifying definitions of grower and sheller;
(viii) Research or promotion activities under Sec. 986.68;
(ix) Grade, quality and size regulation under Sec. 986.69(a)(1)
and (2);
(x) Pack and container regulation under Sec. 986.69(a)(3); and,
[[Page 10149]]
(2) Actions of the Council with respect to the securing of
commercial bank loans for the purpose of financing start-up costs of
the Council and its activities or securing financial assistance in
emergency situations shall require a unanimous vote of all members
present at an in-person meeting; Provided, That in the event of an
emergency that warrants immediate attention sooner than a face-to-face
meeting is possible, a vote for financing may be taken. In such event,
the Council's first preference is a videoconference and second
preference is phone conference, both followed by written confirmation
of the members attending the meeting.
Sec. 986.56 Right of the Secretary.
The members and alternates for members and any agent or employee
appointed or employed by the Council shall be subject to removal or
suspension by the Secretary at any time. Each and every regulation,
decision, determination, or other act shall be subject to the
continuing right of the Secretary to disapprove of the same at any
time, and, upon such disapproval, shall be deemed null and void, except
as to acts done in reliance thereon or in compliance therewith prior to
such disapproval by the Secretary.
Sec. 986.57 Funds and other property.
(a) All funds received pursuant to any of the provisions of this
part shall be used solely for the purposes specified in this part, and
the Secretary may require the Council and its members to account for
all receipts and disbursements.
(b) Upon the death, resignation, removal, disqualification, or
expiration of the term of office of any member or employee, all books,
records, funds, and other property in their possession belonging to the
Council shall be delivered to their successor in office or to the
Council, and such assignments and other instruments shall be executed
as may be necessary to vest in such successor or in the Council full
title to all the books, records, funds, and other property in the
possession or under the control of such member or employee pursuant to
this subpart.
Sec. 986.58 Reapportionment and reestablishment of regions.
The Council may recommend, subject to approval of the Secretary,
reestablishment of regions, reapportionment of members among regions,
and may revise the groups eligible for representation on the Council.
In recommending any such changes, the following shall be considered:
(a) Shifts in acreage within regions and within the production area
during recent years;
(b) The importance of new production in its relation to existing
regions;
(c) The equitable relationship between Council apportionment and
regions;
(d) Changes in industry structure and/or the percentage of crop
represented by various industry entities; and
(e) Other relevant factors.
Expenses, Assessments and Marketing Policy
Sec. 986.60 Budget.
As soon as practicable before the beginning of each fiscal year,
and as may be necessary thereafter, the Council shall prepare a budget
of income and expenditures necessary for the administration of this
part. The Council may recommend a rate of assessment calculated to
provide adequate funds to defray its proposed expenditures. The Council
shall present such budget to the Secretary with an accompanying report
showing the basis for its calculations, and all shall be subject to
Secretary approval.
Sec. 986.61 Assessments.
(a) Each handler who first handles inshell pecans shall pay
assessments to the Council. Assessments collected each fiscal year
shall defray expenses which the Secretary finds reasonable and likely
to be incurred by the Council during that fiscal year. Each handler's
share of assessments paid to the Council shall be equal to the ratio
between the total quantity of inshell pecans handled by them as the
first handler thereof during the applicable fiscal year, and the total
quantity of inshell pecans handled by all regulated handlers in the
production area during the same fiscal year. The payment of assessments
for the maintenance and functioning of the Council may be required
under this part throughout the period it is in effect irrespective of
whether particular provisions thereof are suspended or become
inoperative. Handlers may avail themselves of an inter-handler
transfer, as provided for in Sec. 986.62, Inter-handler transfers.
(b) Based upon a recommendation of the Council or other available
data, the Secretary shall fix three base rates of assessment for
inshell pecans handled during each fiscal year. Such base rates shall
include one rate of assessment for any or all varieties of pecans
classified as native and seedling; one rate of assessment for any or
all varieties of pecans classified as improved; and one rate of
assessment for any pecans classified as substandard.
(c) Upon implementation of this part and subject to the approval of
the Secretary, initial assessment rates per classification shall be set
within the following prescribed ranges: Native and seedling classified
pecans shall be assessed at one-cent to two-cents per pound; improved
classified pecans shall be assessed at two-cents to three-cents per
pound; and, substandard classified pecans shall be assessed at one-cent
to two-cents per pound. These assessment ranges shall be in effect for
the initial four years of the order.
(d) Subsequent assessment rates shall not exceed two percent of the
aggregate of all prices in each classification across the production
area based on Council data, or the average of USDA reported average
price received by growers for each classification, in the preceding
fiscal year as recommended by the Council and approved by the
Secretary. After four years from the implementation of this part, the
Council may recommend, subject to the approval of the Secretary,
revisions to this calculation or assessment ranges.
(e) The Council, with the approval of the Secretary, may revise the
assessment rates if it determines, based on information including crop
size and value, that the action is necessary, and if the revision does
not exceed the assessment limitation specified in this section and is
made prior to the final billing of the assessment.
(f) In order to provide funds for the administration of the
provisions of this part during the first part of a fiscal year, before
sufficient operating income is available from assessments, the Council
may accept the payment of assessments in advance and may also borrow
money for such purposes; Provided, That no loan may amount to more than
50 percent of projected assessment revenue projected for the year in
which the loan is secured, and the loan must be repaid within five
years.
(g) If a handler does not pay assessments within the time
prescribed by the Council, the assessment may be increased by a late
payment charge and/or an interest rate charge at amounts prescribed by
the Council with approval of the Secretary.
(h) On August 31 of each year, every handler warehousing inshell
pecans shall be identified as the first handler of those pecans and
shall be required to pay the assessed rate on the category of pecans in
their possession on that date. The terms of this paragraph may be
revised subject to the recommendation of the Council and approval by
the Secretary.
(i) On August 31 of each year, all inventories warehoused by
growers
[[Page 10150]]
from the current fiscal year shall cease to be eligible for inter-
handler transfer treatment. Instead, such inventory will require the
first handler that handles such inventory to pay the assessment thereon
in accordance with the prevailing assessment rates at the time of
transfer from the grower to the said handler. The terms of this
paragraph may be revised subject to the recommendation of the Council
and approval by the Secretary.
Sec. 986.62 Inter-handler transfers.
Any handler inside the production area, except as provided for in
Sec. 986.61 (h) and (i), Assessments, may transfer inshell pecans to
another handler inside the production area for additional handling, and
any assessments or other marketing order requirements with respect to
pecans so transferred may be assumed by the receiving handler. The
Council, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish methods and
procedures, including necessary reports, to maintain accurate records
for such transfers. All inter-handler transfers will be documented by
forms or electronic transfer receipts approved by the Council, and all
forms or electronic transfer receipts used for inter-handler transfers
shall require that copies be sent to the selling party, the receiving
party, and the Council. Such forms must state which handler has the
assessment responsibilities.
Sec. 986.63 Contributions.
The Council may accept voluntary contributions. Such contributions
may only be accepted if they are free from any encumbrances or
restrictions on their use and the Council shall retain complete control
of their use. The Council may receive contributions from both within
and outside of the production area.
Sec. 986.64 Accounting.
(a) Assessments collected in excess of expenses incurred shall be
accounted for in accordance with one of the following:
(1) Excess funds not retained in a reserve, as provided in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be refunded proportionately to
the persons from whom they were collected; or
(2) The Council, with the approval of the Secretary, may carry over
excess funds into subsequent fiscal periods as reserves: Provided, That
funds already in reserves do not equal approximately three fiscal
years' expenses. Such reserve funds may be used:
(i) To defray expenses during any fiscal period prior to the time
assessment income is sufficient to cover such expenses;
(ii) To cover deficits incurred during any fiscal period when
assessment income is less than expenses;
(iii) To defray expenses incurred during any period when any or all
provisions of this part are suspended or are inoperative; and
(iv) To cover necessary expenses of liquidation in the event of
termination of this part.
(b) Upon such termination, any funds not required to defray the
necessary expenses of liquidation shall be disposed of in such manner
as the Secretary may determine to be appropriate. To the extent
practical, such funds shall be returned pro rata to the persons from
whom such funds were collected.
(c) All funds received by the Council pursuant to the provisions of
this part shall be used solely for the purposes specified in this part
and shall be accounted for in the manner provided for in this part. The
Secretary may at any time require the Council and its members to
account for all receipts and disbursements.
(d) Upon the removal or expiration of the term of office of any
member of the Council, such member shall account for all receipts and
disbursements and deliver all property and funds in their possession to
the Council, and shall execute such assignments and other instruments
as may be necessary or appropriate to vest in the Council full title to
all of the property, funds, and claims vested in such member pursuant
to this part.
(e) The Council may make recommendations to the Secretary for one
or more of the members thereof, or any other person, to act as a
trustee for holding records, funds, or any other Council property
during periods of suspension of this subpart, or during any period or
periods when regulations are not in effect and if the Secretary
determines such action appropriate, he or she may direct that such
person or persons shall act as trustee or trustees for the Council.
Sec. 986.65 Marketing policy.
By the end of each fiscal year, the Council shall make a report and
recommendation to the Secretary on the Council's proposed marketing
policy for the next fiscal year. Each year such report and
recommendation shall be adopted by the affirmative vote of at least
two-thirds (2/3) of the members of the Council and shall include the
following and, where applicable, on an inshell basis:
(a) Estimate of the grower-cleaned production and handler-cleaned
production in the area of production for the fiscal year;
(b) Estimate of disappearance;
(c) Estimate of the improved, native, and substandard pecans;
(d) Estimate of the handler inventory on August 31, of inshell and
shelled pecans;
(e) Estimate of unassessed inventory;
(f) Estimate of the trade supply, taking into consideration
imports, and other factors;
(g) Preferable handler inventory of inshell and shelled pecans on
August 31 of the following year;
(h) Projected prices in the new fiscal year;
(i) Competing nut supplies; and
(j) Any other relevant factors.
Authorities Relating to Research, Promotion, Data Gathering, Packaging,
Grading, Compliance and Reporting
Sec. 986.67 Recommendations for regulations.
Upon complying with Sec. 986.65, Marketing policy, the Council may
propose regulations to the Secretary whenever it finds that such
proposed regulations may assist in effectuating the declared policy of
the Act.
Sec. 986.68 Authority for research and promotion activities.
The Council, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish or
provide for the establishment of production research, marketing
research and development projects, and marketing promotion, including
paid generic advertising, designed to assist, improve, or promote the
marketing, distribution, and consumption or efficient production of
pecans including product development, nutritional research, and
container development. The expenses of such projects shall be paid from
funds collected pursuant to this part.
Sec. 986.69 Authorities regulating handling.
(a) The Council may recommend, subject to the approval of the
Secretary, regulations that:
(1) Establish handling requirements or minimum tolerances for
particular grades, sizes, or qualities, or any combination thereof, of
any or all varieties or classifications of pecans during any period;
(2) Establish different handling requirements or minimum tolerances
for particular grades, sizes, or qualities, or any combination thereof
for different varieties or classifications, for different containers,
for different portions of the production area, or any combination of
the foregoing, during any period;
[[Page 10151]]
(3) Fix the size, capacity, weight, dimensions, or pack of the
container or containers, which may be used in the packaging,
transportation, sale, preparation for market, shipment, or other
handling of pecans; and
(4) Establish inspection and certification requirements for the
purposes of paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section.
(b) Regulations issued hereunder may be amended, modified,
suspended, or terminated whenever it is determined:
(1) That such action is warranted upon recommendation of the
Council and approval by the Secretary, or other available information;
or
(2) That regulations issued hereunder no longer tend to effectuate
the declared policy of the Act.
(c) The authority to regulate as put forward in this subsection
shall not in any way constitute authority for the Council to recommend
volume regulation, such as reserve pools, producer allotments, or
handler withholding requirements which limit the flow of product to
market for the purpose of reducing market supply.
(d) The Council may recommend, subject to the approval of the
Secretary, rules and regulations to effectuate this subpart.
Sec. 986.70 Handling for special purposes.
Regulations in effect pursuant to Sec. 986.69, Authorities
regulating handling, may be modified, suspended, or terminated to
facilitate handling of pecans for:
(a) Relief or charity;
(b) Experimental purposes; and
(c) Other purposes which may be recommended by the Council and
approved by the Secretary.
Sec. 986.71 Safeguards.
The Council, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish
through rules such requirements as may be necessary to establish that
shipments made pursuant to Sec. 986.70, Handling for special purposes,
were handled and used for the purpose stated.
Sec. 986.72 Notification of regulation.
The Secretary shall promptly notify the Council of regulations
issued or of any modification, suspension, or termination thereof. The
Council shall give reasonable notice thereof to industry participants.
Reports, Books and Other Records
Sec. 986.75 Reports of handler inventory.
Each handler shall submit to the Council in such form and on such
dates as the Council may prescribe, reports showing their inventory of
inshell and shelled pecans.
Sec. 986.76 Reports of merchantable pecans handled.
Each handler who handles merchantable pecans at any time during a
fiscal year shall submit to the Council in such form and at such
intervals as the Council may prescribe, reports showing the quantity so
handled and such other information pertinent thereto as the Council may
specify.
Sec. 986.77 Reports of pecans received by handlers.
Each handler shall file such reports of their pecan receipts from
growers, handlers, or others in such form and at such times as may be
required by the Council with the approval of the Secretary.
Sec. 986.78 Other handler reports.
Upon request of the Council made with the approval of the Secretary
each handler shall furnish such other reports and information as are
needed to enable the Council to perform its duties and exercise its
powers under this part.
Sec. 986.79 Verification of reports.
For the purpose of verifying and checking reports filed by handlers
on their operations, the Secretary and the Council, through their duly
authorized representatives, shall have access to any premises where
pecans and pecan records are held. Such access shall be available at
any time during reasonable business hours. Authorized representatives
of the Council or the Secretary shall be permitted to inspect any
pecans held and any and all records of the handler with respect to
matters within the purview of this part. Each handler shall maintain
complete records on the receiving, holding, and disposition of all
pecans. Each handler shall furnish all labor necessary to facilitate
such inspections at no expense to the Council or the Secretary. Each
handler shall store all pecans held by him in such manner as to
facilitate inspection and shall maintain adequate storage records which
will permit accurate identification with respect to inspection
certificates of respective lots and of all such pecans held or disposed
of theretofore. The Council, with the approval of the Secretary, may
establish any methods and procedures needed to verify reports.
Sec. 986.80 Certification of reports.
All reports submitted to the Council as required in this part shall
be certified to the Secretary and the Council as to the completeness
and correctness of the information contained therein.
Sec. 986.81 Confidential information.
All reports and records submitted by handlers to the Council, which
include data or information constituting a trade secret or disclosing
the trade position, or financial condition or business operations of
the handler shall be kept in the custody of one or more employees of
the Council and shall be disclosed to no person except the Secretary.
Sec. 986.82 Books and other records.
Each handler shall maintain such records of pecans received, held
and disposed of by them as may be prescribed by the Council for the
purpose of performing its duties under this part. Such books and
records shall be retained and be available for examination by
authorized representatives of the Council and the Secretary for the
current fiscal year and the preceding three (3) fiscal years.
Additional Provisions
Sec. 986.86 Exemptions.
(a) Any handler may handle inshell pecans within the production
area free of the requirements of this part if such pecans are handled
in quantities not exceeding 1,000 inshell pounds during any fiscal
year.
(b) Any handler may handle shelled pecans within the production
area free of the requirements of this part if such pecans are handled
in quantities not exceeding 500 shelled pounds during any fiscal year.
(c) Mail order sales are not exempt sales under this part.
(d) The Council, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish
such rules, regulations, and safeguards, and require such reports,
certifications, and other conditions, as are necessary to ensure
compliance with this part.
Sec. 986.87 Compliance.
Except as provided in this subpart, no handler shall handle pecans,
the handling of which has been prohibited by the Secretary in
accordance with provisions of this part, or the rules and regulations
thereunder.
Sec. 986.88 Duration of immunities.
The benefits, privileges, and immunities conferred by virtue of
this part shall cease upon termination hereof, except with respect to
acts done under and during the existence of this part.
Sec. 986.89 Separability.
If any provision of this part is declared invalid, or the
applicability thereof to any person, circumstance, or thing is held
invalid, the validity of the remaining provisions and the
[[Page 10152]]
applicability thereof to any other person, circumstance, or thing shall
not be affected thereby.
Sec. 986.90 Derogation.
Nothing contained in this part is or shall be construed to be in
derogation of, or in modification of, the rights of the Secretary or of
the United States to exercise any powers granted by the Act or
otherwise, or, in accordance with such powers, to act in the premises
whenever such action is deemed advisable.
Sec. 986.91 Liability.
No member or alternate of the Council nor any employee or agent
thereof, shall be held personally responsible, either individually or
jointly with others, in any way whatsoever, to any party under this
part or to any other person for errors in judgment, mistakes, or other
acts, either of commission or omission, as such member, alternate,
agent or employee, except for acts of dishonesty, willful misconduct,
or gross negligence. The Council may purchase liability insurance for
its members and officers.
Sec. 986.92 Agents.
The Secretary may name, by designation in writing, any person,
including any officer or employee of the USDA or the United States to
act as their agent or representative in connection with any of the
provisions of this part.
Sec. 986.93 Effective time.
The provisions of this part and of any amendment thereto shall
become effective at such time as the Secretary may declare, and shall
continue in force until terminated in one of the ways specified in
Sec. 986.94.
Sec. 986.94 Termination.
(a) The Secretary may at any time terminate this part.
(b) The Secretary shall terminate or suspend the operation of any
or all of the provisions of this part whenever he or she finds that
such operation obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
(c) The Secretary shall terminate the provisions of this part
applicable to pecans for market or pecans for handling at the end of
any fiscal year whenever the Secretary finds, by referendum or
otherwise, that such termination is favored by a majority of growers;
Provided, That such majority of growers has produced more than 50
percent of the volume of pecans in the production area during such
fiscal year. Such termination shall be effective only if announced on
or before the last day of the then current fiscal year.
(d) The Secretary shall conduct a referendum within every five-year
period beginning from the implementation of this part, to ascertain
whether continuance of the provisions of this part applicable to pecans
are favored by two-thirds by number or volume of growers voting in the
referendum. The Secretary may terminate the provisions of this part at
the end of any fiscal year in which the Secretary has found that
continuance of this part is not favored by growers who, during an
appropriate period of time determined by the Secretary, have been
engaged in the production of pecans in the production area: Provided,
That termination of this part shall be effective only if announced on
or before the last day of the then current fiscal year.
(e) The provisions of this part shall, in any event, terminate
whenever the provisions of the Act authorizing them cease to be in
effect.
Sec. 986.95 Proceedings after termination.
(a) Upon the termination of this part, the Council members serving
shall continue as joint trustees for the purpose of liquidating all
funds and property then in the possession or under the control of the
Council, including claims for any funds unpaid or property not
delivered at the time of such termination.
(b) The joint trustees shall continue in such capacity until
discharged by the Secretary; from time to time accounting for all
receipts and disbursements; delivering all funds and property on hand,
together with all books and records of the Council and of the joint
trustees to such person as the Secretary shall direct; and, upon the
request of the Secretary, executing such assignments or other
instruments necessary and appropriate to vest in such person full title
and right to all of the funds, property, or claims vested in the
Council or in said joint trustees.
(c) Any funds collected pursuant to this part and held by such
joint trustees or such person over and above the amounts necessary to
meet outstanding obligations and the expenses necessarily incurred by
the joint trustees or such other person in the performance of their
duties under this subpart, as soon as practicable after the termination
hereof, shall be returned to the handlers pro rata in proportion to
their contributions thereto.
(d) Any person to whom funds, property, or claims have been
transferred or delivered by the Council, upon direction of the
Secretary, as provided in this part, shall be subject to the same
obligations and duties with respect to said funds, property, or claims
as are imposed upon said joint trustees.
Sec. 986.96 Amendments.
Amendments to this part may be proposed from time to time by the
Council or by the Secretary.
Sec. 986.97 Counterparts.
Handlers may sign an agreement with the Secretary indicating their
support for this marketing order. This agreement may be executed in
multiple counterparts by each handler. If more than fifty percent of
the handlers, weighted by the volume of pecans handled during an
appropriate period of time determined by the Secretary, enter into such
an agreement, then a marketing agreement shall exist for the pecans
marketing order. This marketing agreement shall not alter the terms of
this part. Upon the termination of this part, the marketing agreement
has no further force or effect.
Sec. 986.98 Additional parties.
After this part becomes effective, any handler may become a party
to the marketing agreement if a counterpart is executed by the handler
and delivered to the Secretary.
Sec. 986.99 Order with marketing agreement.
Each signatory handler hereby requests the Secretary to issue,
pursuant to the Act, an order for regulating the handling of pecans in
the same manner as is provided for in this agreement.
Subpart B--[Reserved]
Dated: February 22, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-04043 Filed 2-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P