Pistachios Grown in California, Arizona, and New Mexico; Increased Assessment Rate, 9741-9743 [2016-04049]
Download as PDF
9741
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 38
Friday, February 26, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 983
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–15–0038; FV15–983–1
FR]
Pistachios Grown in California,
Arizona, and New Mexico; Increased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule implements a
recommendation from the
Administrative Committee for
Pistachios (Committee) for an increase
of the assessment rate established for
the 2015–16 and subsequent production
years from $0.0005 to $0.0035 per
pound of assessed weight pistachios
handled under the marketing order for
pistachios grown in California, Arizona,
and New Mexico. The Committee
locally administers the order and is
comprised of producers and handlers of
pistachios operating within the area of
production. Assessments upon pistachio
handlers are used by the Committee to
fund reasonable and necessary expenses
of the program. The production year
begins on September 1 and ends August
31. The assessment rate would remain
in effect indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective February 29, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter Sommers, Marketing Specialist, or
Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
PeterR.Sommers@ams.usda.gov or
Jeffrey.Smutney@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 Feb 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
regulation by contacting Antoinette
Carter, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 983, as amended (7 CFR
part 983), regulating the handling of
pistachios grown in California, Arizona,
and New Mexico, hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 13175.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, California, Arizona, and New
Mexico pistachio handlers are subject to
assessments. Funds to administer the
order are derived from such
assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be
applicable to all assessable pistachios
beginning on September 1, 2015, and
continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Committee for
the 2015–16 and subsequent production
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
years from $0.0005 to $0.0035 per
pound of assessed weight pistachios
handled.
The California, Arizona, and New
Mexico pistachio marketing order
provides authority for the Committee,
with the approval of USDA, to formulate
an annual budget of expenses and
collect assessments from handlers to
administer the program. The members
of the Committee are producers and
handlers of California, Arizona, and
New Mexico pistachios. They are
familiar with the Committee’s needs and
with the costs for goods and services in
their local area and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and
discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all
directly affected persons have an
opportunity to participate and provide
input.
For the 2011–12 and subsequent
production years, the Committee
recommended, and the USDA approved,
an assessment rate that would continue
in effect from production year to
production year unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.
The Committee met on July 9, 2015,
and October 20, 2015, and unanimously
recommended 2015–16 production year
expenditures of $1,056,402 and an
assessment rate of $0.0035 per pound of
assessed weight pistachios handled to
fund Committee expenses. This
represents an increase over the prior
year’s budget and assessment rate. In
comparison, last year’s budgeted
expenditures were $1,001,400. The
assessment rate of $0.0035 is $0.0030
higher than the rate currently in effect.
The Committee’s recommended 2015–
16 expenditures are $55,002 higher than
last year’s budgeted expenditures. The
primary reason for the increase is to
provide $560,000 in funding for Sterile
Insect Technology/Navel Orange Worm
(SIT/NOW) research. When applied to
the Committee’s crop estimate for the
2015–16 production year of 265 million
pounds, the current assessment rate of
$0.0005 would not generate sufficient
income to cover anticipated expenses.
The assessment rate of $0.0035 per
pound of assessed weight pistachios
would generate assessment income of
$927,500. Anticipated assessment
E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM
26FER1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
9742
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 38 / Friday, February 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
income combined with financial
reserves and other income would
provide sufficient revenue for the
Committee to meet its budgeted
expenses while maintaining its financial
reserve within the limit authorized
under the order.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2015–16 production year include
$560,000 for SIT/NOW research,
$92,401 for administrative expenses,
$314,000 for salary and related
employee expenses, $10,000 for
compliance expenses, and $80,000 for a
contingency fund. Budgeted expenses in
2014–15 were $360,000 for Technical
Assistance Specialty Crop (TASC)
Program research, $125,000 for other
research, $117,400 for administrative
expenses, $314,000 for salary and
related employee expenses, $10,000 for
compliance expenses, and $75,000 for a
contingency fund. Actual expenses in
2014–15 were significantly lower, at
$547,199, as the TASC research was not
funded.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee was derived by
considering anticipated expenses and
production levels of California, Arizona,
and New Mexico pistachios, and other
pertinent factors. As mentioned earlier,
pistachio production levels are
estimated at 265 million pounds, which
should generate $927,500 in assessment
income. Income derived from handler
assessments, along with other income
and financial reserves would provide
sufficient revenue for the Committee to
meet its budgeted expenses while
maintaining its financial reserve within
the limit authorized under the order.
The assessment rate established in
this rule will continue in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
based upon a recommendation and
information submitted by the
Committee or other available
information.
Although this assessment rate will be
in effect for an indefinite period, the
Committee will continue to meet prior
to or during each production year to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or
USDA. Committee meetings are open to
the public, and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
USDA will evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking would be
undertaken as necessary. The
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 Feb 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
Committee’s 2015–16 budget and those
for subsequent production years would
be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 1,152
producers of pistachios in the
production area and approximately 19
handlers subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration as those
having annual receipts of less than
$750,000, and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those whose annual
receipts are less than $7,000,000 (13
CFR 121.201).
Based on Committee data, it is
estimated that about 47 percent of the
handlers annually ship less than
$7,000,000 worth of pistachios, and it is
also estimated that 68 percent of the
producers have annual receipts less
than $750,000. Thus, the majority of
handlers in the production area may be
classified as large entities, and the
majority of the producers may be
classified as small entities.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Committee and
collected from handlers for the 2015–16
and subsequent production years from
$0.0005 to $0.0035 per pound of
assessed weight pistachios. The
Committee unanimously recommended
2015–16 expenditures of $1,056,402 and
an assessment rate of $0.0035 per pound
of assessed weight pistachios. The
assessment rate of $0.0035 is $0.0030
higher than the 2014–15 rate. The
quantity of assessable pistachios for the
2015–16 production year is estimated at
265 million pounds. Thus, the $0.0035
rate should provide $927,500 in
assessment income. Income derived
from handler assessments, along with
other income and financial reserves
would provide sufficient revenue for the
Committee to meet its budgeted
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
expenses while maintaining its financial
reserve within the limit authorized
under the order.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2015–16 production year include
$560,000 for SIT/NOW research,
$92,401 for administrative expenses,
$314,000 for salary and related
employee expenses, $10,000 for
compliance expenses, and $80,000 for a
contingency fund. Budgeted expenses in
2014–15 were $360,000 for TASC
Program research, $125,000 for other
research, $117,400 for administrative
expenses, $314,000 for salary and
related employee expenses, $10,000 for
compliance expenses, and $75,000 for a
contingency fund. The reasons for the
proposed increase include a significant
increase in budgeted expenses in 2015
over actual expenses in 2014, a
significantly smaller crop estimate in
2015, and allocation of funds for Sterile
Insect Technology/Navel Orange Worm
(SIT/NOW) research.
Prior to arriving at this budget and
assessment rate, the Committee
considered alternative expenditure
levels but ultimately determined that
2015–16 expenditures of $1,056,402
were appropriate and that the current
assessment rate would generate
insufficient revenue to meet its
expenses.
According to data from the National
Agricultural Statistics Service, the
season average producer price was $3.48
per pound of assessed weight pistachios
in 2013 and $3.10 per pound in 2014.
A review of historical information and
preliminary information pertaining to
the upcoming production year indicates
that the producer price for the 2015–16
production year could range between
$3.48 and $3.10 per pound of assessed
weight pistachios. Therefore, the
estimated assessment revenue for the
2015–16 production year as a
percentage of total producer revenue
could range between 0.10 and 0.11
percent.
This action increases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers. While
assessments impose some additional
costs on handlers, the costs are minimal
and uniform on all handlers. These
costs are offset by the benefits derived
from the operation of the marketing
order. In addition, the Committee’s
meeting was widely publicized
throughout the California, Arizona, and
New Mexico pistachio industry, and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the July 9,
2015, and October 20, 2015, meetings
were public and all entities, both large
E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM
26FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 38 / Friday, February 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
and small, were able to express views
on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0215. No
changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary.
Should any changes become necessary,
they would be submitted to OMB for
approval.
This rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large California,
Arizona, and New Mexico pistachio
handlers. As with all Federal marketing
order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. As noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on December 14, 2015. Copies
of the proposed rule were also mailed or
sent via facsimile to all California,
Arizona, and New Mexico pistachio
handlers. Finally, the proposal was
made available through the Internet by
USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. A 15-day comment period
ending December 29, 2015, was
provided for interested persons to
respond to the proposal. No comments
were received. A small business guide
on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements
and orders may be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/
moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be
sent to Antoinette Carter at the
previously mentioned address in the
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found
and determined that good cause exists
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 Feb 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
for not postponing the effective date of
this rule until 30 days after publication
in the Federal Register because: (1) The
2015–16 production year began on
September 1, 2015 and the marketing
order requires that the rate of
assessment for each production year
apply to all assessable pistachios
handled during such production year;
(2) the Committee needs to have
sufficient funds to pay its expenses,
which are incurred on a continuous
basis; (3) handlers are aware of this rule
which was recommended at a public
meeting and is similar to assessment
rate actions issued in past years. Also,
a 15-day comment period was provided
in the proposed rule, and no comments
were received.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 983
Marketing agreements, Pistachios,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 983 is amended as
follows:
PART 983—PISTACHIOS GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, and NEW
MEXICO
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 983 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In § 983.253, paragraph (a) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 983.253
Assessment rate.
(a) On and after September 1, 2015, an
assessment rate of $0.0035 per pound is
established for California, Arizona, and
New Mexico pistachios.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: February 22, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–04049 Filed 2–25–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 987
[Docket No. AMS–FV–15–0034; FV15–987–
1 FIR]
Domestic Dates Produced or Packed in
Riverside County, California;
Decreased Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as
final rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9743
The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, without change, an interim
rule that implemented a
recommendation from the California
Date Administrative Committee
(committee) to decrease the assessment
rate established for the 2015–16 and
subsequent crop years from $0.20 to
$0.10 per hundredweight of dates
handled under the marketing order
(order). The committee locally
administers the marketing order and is
comprised of producers and handlers of
dates grown or packed in Riverside
County, California. The interim rule to
decrease the assessment rate was
necessary to allow the Committee to
reduce its financial reserve while still
providing adequate funding to meet
program expenses.
DATES: Effective February 29, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terry Vawter, Senior Marketing
Specialist, or Jeff Smutny, Regional
Director, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
Terry.Vawter@ams.usda.gov or
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain
information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by
viewing a guide at the following Web
site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rulesregulations/moa/small-businesses; or by
contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing
Order and Agreement Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938, or Email: Antoinette.Carter@
ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 987, both as amended (7
CFR part 987), regulating the handling
of dates produced or packed in
Riverside County, California, hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is
effective under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 13175.
Under the order, Riverside County,
California, date handlers are subject to
assessments, which provide funds to
administer the order. Assessment rates
issued under the order are intended to
be applicable to all assessable dates for
the entire crop year and continue
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26FER1.SGM
26FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 38 (Friday, February 26, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9741-9743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04049]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 38 / Friday, February 26, 2016 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 9741]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 983
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-15-0038; FV15-983-1 FR]
Pistachios Grown in California, Arizona, and New Mexico;
Increased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule implements a recommendation from the Administrative
Committee for Pistachios (Committee) for an increase of the assessment
rate established for the 2015-16 and subsequent production years from
$0.0005 to $0.0035 per pound of assessed weight pistachios handled
under the marketing order for pistachios grown in California, Arizona,
and New Mexico. The Committee locally administers the order and is
comprised of producers and handlers of pistachios operating within the
area of production. Assessments upon pistachio handlers are used by the
Committee to fund reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The
production year begins on September 1 and ends August 31. The
assessment rate would remain in effect indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective February 29, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Sommers, Marketing Specialist,
or Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or
Email: PeterR.Sommers@ams.usda.gov or Jeffrey.Smutney@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing Order and
Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 983, as amended (7 CFR part 983), regulating
the handling of pistachios grown in California, Arizona, and New
Mexico, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is
effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule
in conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13175.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California,
Arizona, and New Mexico pistachio handlers are subject to assessments.
Funds to administer the order are derived from such assessments. It is
intended that the assessment rate as issued herein will be applicable
to all assessable pistachios beginning on September 1, 2015, and
continue until amended, suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2015-16 and subsequent production years from $0.0005
to $0.0035 per pound of assessed weight pistachios handled.
The California, Arizona, and New Mexico pistachio marketing order
provides authority for the Committee, with the approval of USDA, to
formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect assessments from
handlers to administer the program. The members of the Committee are
producers and handlers of California, Arizona, and New Mexico
pistachios. They are familiar with the Committee's needs and with the
costs for goods and services in their local area and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus,
all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and
provide input.
For the 2011-12 and subsequent production years, the Committee
recommended, and the USDA approved, an assessment rate that would
continue in effect from production year to production year unless
modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and
information submitted by the Committee or other information available
to USDA.
The Committee met on July 9, 2015, and October 20, 2015, and
unanimously recommended 2015-16 production year expenditures of
$1,056,402 and an assessment rate of $0.0035 per pound of assessed
weight pistachios handled to fund Committee expenses. This represents
an increase over the prior year's budget and assessment rate. In
comparison, last year's budgeted expenditures were $1,001,400. The
assessment rate of $0.0035 is $0.0030 higher than the rate currently in
effect. The Committee's recommended 2015-16 expenditures are $55,002
higher than last year's budgeted expenditures. The primary reason for
the increase is to provide $560,000 in funding for Sterile Insect
Technology/Navel Orange Worm (SIT/NOW) research. When applied to the
Committee's crop estimate for the 2015-16 production year of 265
million pounds, the current assessment rate of $0.0005 would not
generate sufficient income to cover anticipated expenses. The
assessment rate of $0.0035 per pound of assessed weight pistachios
would generate assessment income of $927,500. Anticipated assessment
[[Page 9742]]
income combined with financial reserves and other income would provide
sufficient revenue for the Committee to meet its budgeted expenses
while maintaining its financial reserve within the limit authorized
under the order.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2015-16
production year include $560,000 for SIT/NOW research, $92,401 for
administrative expenses, $314,000 for salary and related employee
expenses, $10,000 for compliance expenses, and $80,000 for a
contingency fund. Budgeted expenses in 2014-15 were $360,000 for
Technical Assistance Specialty Crop (TASC) Program research, $125,000
for other research, $117,400 for administrative expenses, $314,000 for
salary and related employee expenses, $10,000 for compliance expenses,
and $75,000 for a contingency fund. Actual expenses in 2014-15 were
significantly lower, at $547,199, as the TASC research was not funded.
The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by
considering anticipated expenses and production levels of California,
Arizona, and New Mexico pistachios, and other pertinent factors. As
mentioned earlier, pistachio production levels are estimated at 265
million pounds, which should generate $927,500 in assessment income.
Income derived from handler assessments, along with other income and
financial reserves would provide sufficient revenue for the Committee
to meet its budgeted expenses while maintaining its financial reserve
within the limit authorized under the order.
The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
based upon a recommendation and information submitted by the Committee
or other available information.
Although this assessment rate will be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each
production year to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA.
Committee meetings are open to the public, and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking would
be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's 2015-16 budget and those
for subsequent production years would be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 1,152 producers of pistachios in the
production area and approximately 19 handlers subject to regulation
under the marketing order. Small agricultural producers are defined by
the Small Business Administration as those having annual receipts of
less than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less than $7,000,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Based on Committee data, it is estimated that about 47 percent of
the handlers annually ship less than $7,000,000 worth of pistachios,
and it is also estimated that 68 percent of the producers have annual
receipts less than $750,000. Thus, the majority of handlers in the
production area may be classified as large entities, and the majority
of the producers may be classified as small entities.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Committee and collected from handlers for the 2015-16 and subsequent
production years from $0.0005 to $0.0035 per pound of assessed weight
pistachios. The Committee unanimously recommended 2015-16 expenditures
of $1,056,402 and an assessment rate of $0.0035 per pound of assessed
weight pistachios. The assessment rate of $0.0035 is $0.0030 higher
than the 2014-15 rate. The quantity of assessable pistachios for the
2015-16 production year is estimated at 265 million pounds. Thus, the
$0.0035 rate should provide $927,500 in assessment income. Income
derived from handler assessments, along with other income and financial
reserves would provide sufficient revenue for the Committee to meet its
budgeted expenses while maintaining its financial reserve within the
limit authorized under the order.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2015-16
production year include $560,000 for SIT/NOW research, $92,401 for
administrative expenses, $314,000 for salary and related employee
expenses, $10,000 for compliance expenses, and $80,000 for a
contingency fund. Budgeted expenses in 2014-15 were $360,000 for TASC
Program research, $125,000 for other research, $117,400 for
administrative expenses, $314,000 for salary and related employee
expenses, $10,000 for compliance expenses, and $75,000 for a
contingency fund. The reasons for the proposed increase include a
significant increase in budgeted expenses in 2015 over actual expenses
in 2014, a significantly smaller crop estimate in 2015, and allocation
of funds for Sterile Insect Technology/Navel Orange Worm (SIT/NOW)
research.
Prior to arriving at this budget and assessment rate, the Committee
considered alternative expenditure levels but ultimately determined
that 2015-16 expenditures of $1,056,402 were appropriate and that the
current assessment rate would generate insufficient revenue to meet its
expenses.
According to data from the National Agricultural Statistics
Service, the season average producer price was $3.48 per pound of
assessed weight pistachios in 2013 and $3.10 per pound in 2014. A
review of historical information and preliminary information pertaining
to the upcoming production year indicates that the producer price for
the 2015-16 production year could range between $3.48 and $3.10 per
pound of assessed weight pistachios. Therefore, the estimated
assessment revenue for the 2015-16 production year as a percentage of
total producer revenue could range between 0.10 and 0.11 percent.
This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. These costs are
offset by the benefits derived from the operation of the marketing
order. In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the California, Arizona, and New Mexico pistachio industry,
and all interested persons were invited to attend the meeting and
participate in Committee deliberations on all issues. Like all
Committee meetings, the July 9, 2015, and October 20, 2015, meetings
were public and all entities, both large
[[Page 9743]]
and small, were able to express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0215. No changes in those requirements as a
result of this action are necessary. Should any changes become
necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large California, Arizona, and New
Mexico pistachio handlers. As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector
agencies. As noted in the initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with this final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on December 14, 2015. Copies of the proposed rule were also
mailed or sent via facsimile to all California, Arizona, and New Mexico
pistachio handlers. Finally, the proposal was made available through
the Internet by USDA and the Office of the Federal Register. A 15-day
comment period ending December 29, 2015, was provided for interested
persons to respond to the proposal. No comments were received. A small
business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Antoinette Carter at the
previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found and determined that good
cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until
30 days after publication in the Federal Register because: (1) The
2015-16 production year began on September 1, 2015 and the marketing
order requires that the rate of assessment for each production year
apply to all assessable pistachios handled during such production year;
(2) the Committee needs to have sufficient funds to pay its expenses,
which are incurred on a continuous basis; (3) handlers are aware of
this rule which was recommended at a public meeting and is similar to
assessment rate actions issued in past years. Also, a 15-day comment
period was provided in the proposed rule, and no comments were
received.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 983
Marketing agreements, Pistachios, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 983 is
amended as follows:
PART 983--PISTACHIOS GROWN IN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, and NEW MEXICO
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 983 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. In Sec. 983.253, paragraph (a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 983.253 Assessment rate.
(a) On and after September 1, 2015, an assessment rate of $0.0035
per pound is established for California, Arizona, and New Mexico
pistachios.
* * * * *
Dated: February 22, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-04049 Filed 2-25-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P