Clarification of Requirements for Method 303 Certification Training, 9407-9410 [2016-03758]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2016 / Proposed Rules
affected by the provisions of this act,
rules, or policies of the Department.
Also, 15A NCAC 2D .2000
Transportation Conformity requires a
consultation with all affected partners to
be implemented for transportation
conformity determinations.
Furthermore, NC DAQ has
demonstrated consultation with, and
participation by, affected local entities
through its work with local political
subdivisions during the developing of
its Transportation Conformity SIP,
Regional Haze Implementation Plan,
and the 8-Hour Ozone Attainment
Demonstration for the North Carolina
portion of the Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock
Hill NC–SC nonattainment area.
Additionally, the NC DAQ organizes
stakeholder meetings to support SIP
development and rulemakings. EPA has
made the preliminary determination
that North Carolina’s SIP and practices
adequately demonstrate consultation
with affected local entities related to the
2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS, when
necessary.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve that
portions of NC DAQ’s infrastructure SIP
submission, submitted March 18, 2014,
for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS, has
met the above described infrastructure
SIP requirements. The PSD permitting
requirements for major sources of
section 110(a)(2)(C) and (J), the
interstate transport requirements of
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) and (II) (prongs
1 through 4), will not be addressed by
EPA at this time. EPA has already taken
action to approve North Carolina’s
infrastructure SIP submission related to
section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) for the 2010 SO2
NAAQS. EPA is proposing to approve
these portions of North Carolina’s
infrastructure SIP submission for the
2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS because these
aspects of the submission are consistent
with section 110 of the CAA.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:27 Feb 24, 2016
Jkt 238001
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), nor will it impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: February 11, 2016.
Heather McTeer Toney,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2016–03897 Filed 2–24–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9407
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2014–0492; FRL–9940–75–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AR97
Clarification of Requirements for
Method 303 Certification Training
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing revisions to
better define the requirements
associated with conducting Method 303
training courses. In the ‘‘Rules and
Regulations’’ section of this issue of the
Federal Register, we are approving the
revisions to Method 303 as a direct final
rule without a prior proposed rule. If we
receive no adverse comment, we will
not take further action on this proposed
rule. Method 303 is an air pollution test
method used to determine the presence
of visible emissions (VE) from coke
ovens. This action adds language that
further clarifies the criteria used by the
EPA to determine the competency of
Method 303 training providers, but does
not change the requirements for
conducting the test method. These
changes will help entities interested in
conducting the required training courses
by clearly defining the requirements
necessary to do so.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by March 28, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2014–0492, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or withdrawn. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the Web,
Cloud, or other file sharing system).
For additional submission methods,
the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25FEP1.SGM
25FEP1
9408
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2016 / Proposed Rules
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Kim Garnett, U.S. EPA, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, Air
Quality Assessment Division,
Measurement Technology Group (Mail
Code: E143–02), Research Triangle Park,
NC 27711; telephone number: (919)
541–1158; fax number: (919) 541–0516;
email address: garnett.kim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why is the EPA issuing this proposed
rule?
This document proposes to take
action on the requirements associated
with conducting Method 303 training
courses. Method 303 is an air pollution
test method used to determine the
presence of visible emissions (VE) from
coke ovens. We have published a direct
final rule approving the revisions to
Method 303 in the ‘‘Rules and
Regulations’’ section of this issue of the
Federal Register because we view this
as a non-controversial action and
anticipate no adverse comment. We
have explained our reasons for this
action in the preamble of the direct final
rule.
If we receive no adverse comment, we
will not take further action on this
proposed rule. If we receive adverse
comment, we will withdraw the direct
final rule, and it will not take effect. We
would address all public comments in
any subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule.
We do not intend to institute a second
comment period on this action. Any
parties interested in commenting must
do so at this time. For further
information, please see the information
provided in the ADDRESSES section of
this document.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Does this action apply to me?
This action applies to you if you are
a potential provider of Method 303
training services, someone seeking
training to conduct Method 303, or a
facility subject to Method 303.
Method 303 is applicable for the
determination of VE from the following
by-product coke oven battery sources:
Charging systems during charging;
doors, topside port lids, and offtake
systems on operating coke ovens; and
collecting mains. This method is also
applicable for qualifying observers for
visually determining the presence of VE.
This action adds language that further
clarifies the criteria used by the EPA to
determine the competency of Method
303 training providers, but does not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:27 Feb 24, 2016
Jkt 238001
change the requirements for conducting
the test method.
III. Environmental Justice
The EPA has determined that this
proposed rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority or low-income populations
because it does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment. This rulemaking does
not relax the control measures on
sources regulated by the proposed rule
and, therefore, will not cause emissions
increases from these sources.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was, therefore, not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA. This action better defines the
requirements associated with
conducting Method 303 training courses
and does not impose additional
regulatory requirements on sources.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities. This action better defines the
requirements associated with
conducting Method 303 training courses
and does not impose additional
regulatory requirements on sources.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain an
unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more for as described in UMRA,
2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. This action imposes no
enforceable duty on any state, local or
tribal governments or the private sector.
This action adds additional language
that clarifies the criteria used by the
EPA to determine the competency of
training providers, but does not change
the requirements for conducting the test
method.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. This action
clarifies the criteria used by the EPA to
determine the competency of training
providers, but does not change the
requirements for conducting the test
method.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175. This action clarifies the
criteria used by the EPA to determine
the competency of training providers,
but does not change the requirements
for conducting the test method. Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply
to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not concern an
environmental health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes the human health or
environmental risk addressed by this
action will not have potential
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority, low-income or indigenous
populations. The results of this
evaluation are contained in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
E:\FR\FM\25FEP1.SGM
25FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2016 / Proposed Rules
the preamble titled ‘‘III. Environmental
Justice.’’
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Test methods.
Dated: February 12, 2016.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
title 40, chapter I of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 63—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. In Appendix A, amend Method 303:
a. In section 5.0 by revising paragraph
5.2; and
■ b. In section 10.0 by:
■ i. Revising paragraphs 10.1, 10.1.1,
10.1.2, and 10.1.3;
■ ii. Adding paragraphs 10.1.4, 10.1.5,
10.1.6, and 10.1.7; and
■ iii. Revising paragraph 10.2.
The revisions and additions read as
follows.
■
■
Appendix A to Part 63—Test Methods
*
*
*
*
*
Method 303—Determination Of Visible
Emissions From By-Product Coke Oven
Batteries
*
*
*
5.0
*
*
Safety
*
*
*
*
*
5.2 Safety Training. Because coke
oven batteries have hazardous
environments, the training materials
and the field training (section 10.0) shall
cover the precautions required to
address health and safety hazards.
*
*
*
*
*
10.0
Calibration and Standardization
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
10.1 Certification Procedures. This
method requires only the determination
of whether VE occur and does not
require the determination of opacity
levels; therefore, observer certification
according to Method 9 in appendix A to
part 60 of this chapter is not required to
obtain certification under this method.
However, in order to receive Method
303 observer certification, the first-time
observer (trainee) shall have attended
the lecture portion of the Method 9
certification course. In addition, the
trainee shall successfully complete the
Method 303 training course, satisfy the
field observation requirement, and
demonstrate adequate performance and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:27 Feb 24, 2016
Jkt 238001
sufficient knowledge of Method 303.
The Method 303 training provider and
course shall be approved by the
Administrator and shall consist of
classroom instruction, field training,
and a proficiency test. In order to apply
for approval as a Method 303 training
provider, an applicant must submit their
credentials and the details of their
Method 303 training course to Group
Leader, Measurement Technology
Group (E143–02), Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.
Those details should include, at a
minimum:
(a) A detailed list of the provider’s
credentials.
(b) An outline of the classroom and
the field portions of the class.
(c) Copies of the written training and
lecture materials, to include:
(1) The classroom audio-visual
presentation(s).
(2) A classroom course manual with
instructional text and practice questions
and problems for each of the elements
of the Method 303 inspection (i.e.,
charging, doors, lids and offtakes, and
collecting mains). A copy of Method 303
and any related guidance documents
should be included as appendices.
(3) A copy of the Method 303
demonstration video, if not using the
one available on the EPA Web site:
https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/emc/methods/
method303trainingvideo.mp4.
(4) Multiple-choice certification tests,
with questions sufficient to demonstrate
knowledge of the method, as follows:
One (1) initial certification test and
three (3) third-year recertification tests
(the questions on any one recertification
test must be at least 25 percent different
from those on the other recertification
tests).
(5) A field certification checklist and
inspection forms for each of the
elements of the Method 303 inspection
(i.e., charging, doors, lids and offtakes,
and collecting mains).
(6) The criteria used to determine
proficiency.
(7) The panel members to be utilized
(see Section 10.1.3) along with their
qualifications.
(8) An example certificate of
successful course completion.
10.1.1 A trainee must verify
completion of at least 12 hours of field
observation prior to attending the
Method 303 certification course.
Trainees shall observe the operation of
a coke oven battery as it pertains to
Method 303, including topside
operations, and shall also practice
conducting Method 303 or similar
methods. During the field observations,
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9409
trainees unfamiliar with coke battery
operations shall receive instruction from
an experienced coke oven observer who
is familiar with Method 303 or similar
methods and with the operation of coke
batteries.
10.1.2 The classroom instruction
shall familiarize the trainees with
Method 303 through lecture, written
training materials, and a Method 303
demonstration video. Successful
completion of the classroom portion of
the Method 303 training course shall be
demonstrated by a perfect score on the
initial certification test. Those attending
the course for third-year recertification
must complete one of the recertification
tests selected at random.
10.1.3 All trainees must demonstrate
proficiency in the application of Method
303 to a panel of three certified Method
303 observers, including an ability to
differentiate coke oven emissions from
condensing water vapor and smoldering
coal. The panel members will be EPA,
state or local agency personnel, or
industry contractors listed in 59 FR
11960 (March 15, 1994) or qualified as
part of the training provider approval
process of Section 10.1 of this method.
Each panel member shall have at least
120 days experience in reading visible
emissions from coke ovens. The visible
emissions inspections that will satisfy
the experience requirement must be
inspections of coke oven battery fugitive
emissions from the emission points
subject to emission standards under
subpart L of this part (i.e., coke oven
doors, topside port lids, offtake
system(s), and charging operations),
using either Method 303 or predecessor
state or local test methods. A ‘‘day’s
experience’’ for a particular inspection
is a day on which one complete
inspection was performed for that
emission point under Method 303 or a
predecessor state or local method. A
‘‘day’s experience’’ does not mean 8 or
10 hours performing inspections, or any
particular time expressed in minutes or
hours that may have been spent
performing them. Thus, it would be
possible for an individual to qualify as
a Method 303 panel member for some
emission points, but not others (e.g., an
individual might satisfy the experience
requirement for coke oven doors, but
not topside port lids). Until November
15, 1994, the EPA may waive the
certification requirement (but not the
experience requirement) for panel
members. The composition of the panel
shall be approved by the EPA.
The panel shall observe the trainee in
a series of training runs and a series of
certification runs. There shall be a
minimum of 1 training run for doors,
topside port lids, and offtake systems,
E:\FR\FM\25FEP1.SGM
25FEP1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
9410
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2016 / Proposed Rules
and a minimum of 5 training runs (i.e.,
5 charges) for charging. During training
runs, the panel can advise the trainee on
proper procedures. There shall be a
minimum of 3 certification runs for
doors, topside port lids, and offtake
systems, and a minimum of 15
certification runs for charging (i.e., 15
charges). The certification runs shall be
unassisted. Following the certification
test runs, the panel shall approve or
disapprove certification based on the
trainee’s performance during the
certification runs. To obtain
certification, the trainee shall
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
panel a high degree of proficiency in
performing Method 303. To aid in
evaluating the trainee’s performance, a
checklist, approved by the EPA, will be
used by the panel members.
10.1.4 Those successfully
completing the initial certification or
third-year recertification requirements
shall receive a certificate showing
certification as a Method 303 observer
and the beginning and ending dates of
the certification period.
10.1.5 The training provider will
submit to the EPA or its designee the
following information for each trainee
successfully completing initial
certification or third-year recertification
training: Name, employer, address,
telephone, cell and/or fax numbers,
email address, beginning and ending
dates of certification, and whether
training was for 3-year certification or 1year recertification. This information
must be submitted within 30 days of the
course completion.
10.1.6 The training provider will
maintain the following records, to be
made available to EPA or its designee on
request (within 30 days of a request):
(a) A file for each Method 303
observer containing the signed
certification checklists, certification
forms and test results for their initial
certification, and any subsequent thirdyear recertifications. Initial certification
records must also include
documentation showing successful
completion of the training prerequisites.
Testing results from any interim
recertifications must also be included,
along with any relevant
communications.
(b) A searchable master electronic
database of all persons for whom initial
certification, third-year recertification or
interim recertification has been
provided. Information contained therein
must include: The observer’s name,
employer, address, telephone, cell and
fax numbers and email address, along
with the beginning and ending dates for
each successfully completed initial,
third-year and interim recertification.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:27 Feb 24, 2016
Jkt 238001
10.1.7 Failure by the training
provider to submit example training
course materials and/or requested
training records to the Administrator
may result in suspension of the
approval of the provider and course.
10.2 Observer Certification/
Recertification. The coke oven observer
certification is valid for 1 year. The
observer shall recertify annually by
reviewing the training material, viewing
the training video and answering all of
the questions on the recertification test
correctly. Every 3 years, an observer
shall be required to pass the proficiency
test in Section 10.1.3 in order to be
certified. The years between proficiency
tests are referred to as interim years.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–03758 Filed 2–24–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
45 CFR Part 1630
Cost Standards and Procedures;
Property Acquisition and Management
Manual
Legal Services Corporation.
Notice of rulemaking
workshops, request for expressions of
interest in participating in the
rulemaking workshops, initiation of
open comment period.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Operations and
Regulations Committee (Committee) of
the Board of Directors for the Legal
Services Corporation (LSC) is
conducting three rulemaking workshops
(Workshops) and is requesting public
comments on revising LSC’s Cost
Standards and Procedures rule, 45 CFR
part 1630, and LSC’s Property
Acquisition and Management Manual
(PAMM). The discussions in the
Workshops and the other comments
received will be considered in
connection with rulemaking by LSC.
LSC is soliciting expressions of interest
in participating as a panelist in the
Workshops from LSC grantees and other
interested stakeholders with relevant
experience, such as other funders of
civil legal aid programs.
DATES: Expressions of interest in
participating in the Rulemaking
Workshops for Part 1630 and the PAMM
must be received by 5:30 p.m. EST on
March 17, 2016. The dates of the
Workshops are:
1. April 20, 2016, 1:30 p.m. to 4:30
p.m. EST, Washington, DC.
2. May 18, 2016, 1:30 p.m. to 4:30
p.m. EST, Washington, DC.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3. June 15, 2016, 1:30 p.m. to 4:30
p.m. EST, Washington, DC.
See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for additional relevant dates.
ADDRESSES: Expressions of interest may
be submitted by any of the following
methods:
Email: lscrulemaking@lsc.gov. Include
‘‘1630/PAMM Workshops’’ in the
subject line of the message.
Fax: 202–337–6519.
Mail: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant
General Counsel, Legal Services
Corporation, 3333 K St. NW.,
Washington, DC 20007.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Stefanie K.
Davis, Assistant General Counsel, Legal
Services Corporation, 3333 K St. NW.,
Washington, DC 20007.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the subject ‘‘1630/PAMM
Workshops. For detailed instructions on
submitting expressions of interest in
participating as a panelist in the
Workshops or on submitting comments
about the topics to be discussed in the
Workshops, please see Sections VI. and
VII. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant General
Counsel, Legal Services Corporation,
3333 K St. NW., Washington, DC 20007;
(202) 295–1563 (phone); 202–337–6519
(fax); or sdavis@lsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On July 16, 2015, LSC management
(Management) presented the Committee
with a Justification Memorandum
recommending publication of an
advance notice of proposed rulemaking
(ANPRM) to seek public comment on
possible revisions to 45 CFR part 1630—
Cost Standards and Procedures, and
LSC’s Property Acquisition and
Management Manual (PAMM).
Management stated that collecting input
from LSC funding recipients through an
ANPRM would aid LSC significantly in
determining the scope of the rulemaking
and in developing a more accurate
understanding of the potential costs and
benefits of certain revisions. The
Committee voted to recommend that the
Board approve Management’s
recommendation and authorize LSC to
open rulemaking for Part 1630 and the
PAMM. On July 18, 2015, the LSC Board
authorized rulemaking and approved
the preparation of an ANPRM to revise
Part 1630 and the PAMM. On October
9, 2015, LSC published an ANPRM
seeking public comment on the
proposed changes to Part 1630 and the
PAMM. 80 FR 61142, Oct. 9, 2015. The
comment period closed on December 8,
2015.
E:\FR\FM\25FEP1.SGM
25FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 37 (Thursday, February 25, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9407-9410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03758]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0492; FRL-9940-75-OAR]
RIN 2060-AR97
Clarification of Requirements for Method 303 Certification
Training
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing
revisions to better define the requirements associated with conducting
Method 303 training courses. In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section
of this issue of the Federal Register, we are approving the revisions
to Method 303 as a direct final rule without a prior proposed rule. If
we receive no adverse comment, we will not take further action on this
proposed rule. Method 303 is an air pollution test method used to
determine the presence of visible emissions (VE) from coke ovens. This
action adds language that further clarifies the criteria used by the
EPA to determine the competency of Method 303 training providers, but
does not change the requirements for conducting the test method. These
changes will help entities interested in conducting the required
training courses by clearly defining the requirements necessary to do
so.
DATES: Written comments must be received by March 28, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2014-0492, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The
EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you
wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web,
Cloud, or other file sharing system).
For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia
[[Page 9408]]
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kim Garnett, U.S. EPA, Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division,
Measurement Technology Group (Mail Code: E143-02), Research Triangle
Park, NC 27711; telephone number: (919) 541-1158; fax number: (919)
541-0516; email address: garnett.kim@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why is the EPA issuing this proposed rule?
This document proposes to take action on the requirements
associated with conducting Method 303 training courses. Method 303 is
an air pollution test method used to determine the presence of visible
emissions (VE) from coke ovens. We have published a direct final rule
approving the revisions to Method 303 in the ``Rules and Regulations''
section of this issue of the Federal Register because we view this as a
non-controversial action and anticipate no adverse comment. We have
explained our reasons for this action in the preamble of the direct
final rule.
If we receive no adverse comment, we will not take further action
on this proposed rule. If we receive adverse comment, we will withdraw
the direct final rule, and it will not take effect. We would address
all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on this proposed
rule.
We do not intend to institute a second comment period on this
action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
For further information, please see the information provided in the
ADDRESSES section of this document.
II. Does this action apply to me?
This action applies to you if you are a potential provider of
Method 303 training services, someone seeking training to conduct
Method 303, or a facility subject to Method 303.
Method 303 is applicable for the determination of VE from the
following by-product coke oven battery sources: Charging systems during
charging; doors, topside port lids, and offtake systems on operating
coke ovens; and collecting mains. This method is also applicable for
qualifying observers for visually determining the presence of VE. This
action adds language that further clarifies the criteria used by the
EPA to determine the competency of Method 303 training providers, but
does not change the requirements for conducting the test method.
III. Environmental Justice
The EPA has determined that this proposed rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not
affect the level of protection provided to human health or the
environment. This rulemaking does not relax the control measures on
sources regulated by the proposed rule and, therefore, will not cause
emissions increases from these sources.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was,
therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA. This action better defines the requirements associated with
conducting Method 303 training courses and does not impose additional
regulatory requirements on sources.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This action
better defines the requirements associated with conducting Method 303
training courses and does not impose additional regulatory requirements
on sources.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more for as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This action imposes
no enforceable duty on any state, local or tribal governments or the
private sector. This action adds additional language that clarifies the
criteria used by the EPA to determine the competency of training
providers, but does not change the requirements for conducting the test
method.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. This
action clarifies the criteria used by the EPA to determine the
competency of training providers, but does not change the requirements
for conducting the test method.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This action clarifies the criteria used by the
EPA to determine the competency of training providers, but does not
change the requirements for conducting the test method. Thus, Executive
Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed
by this action will not have potential disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income
or indigenous populations. The results of this evaluation are contained
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
[[Page 9409]]
the preamble titled ``III. Environmental Justice.''
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Test methods.
Dated: February 12, 2016.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
title 40, chapter I of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 63--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. In Appendix A, amend Method 303:
0
a. In section 5.0 by revising paragraph 5.2; and
0
b. In section 10.0 by:
0
i. Revising paragraphs 10.1, 10.1.1, 10.1.2, and 10.1.3;
0
ii. Adding paragraphs 10.1.4, 10.1.5, 10.1.6, and 10.1.7; and
0
iii. Revising paragraph 10.2.
The revisions and additions read as follows.
Appendix A to Part 63--Test Methods
* * * * *
Method 303--Determination Of Visible Emissions From By-Product Coke
Oven Batteries
* * * * *
5.0 Safety
* * * * *
5.2 Safety Training. Because coke oven batteries have hazardous
environments, the training materials and the field training (section
10.0) shall cover the precautions required to address health and safety
hazards.
* * * * *
10.0 Calibration and Standardization
* * * * *
10.1 Certification Procedures. This method requires only the
determination of whether VE occur and does not require the
determination of opacity levels; therefore, observer certification
according to Method 9 in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter is not
required to obtain certification under this method. However, in order
to receive Method 303 observer certification, the first-time observer
(trainee) shall have attended the lecture portion of the Method 9
certification course. In addition, the trainee shall successfully
complete the Method 303 training course, satisfy the field observation
requirement, and demonstrate adequate performance and sufficient
knowledge of Method 303. The Method 303 training provider and course
shall be approved by the Administrator and shall consist of classroom
instruction, field training, and a proficiency test. In order to apply
for approval as a Method 303 training provider, an applicant must
submit their credentials and the details of their Method 303 training
course to Group Leader, Measurement Technology Group (E143-02), Office
of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. Those details should include,
at a minimum:
(a) A detailed list of the provider's credentials.
(b) An outline of the classroom and the field portions of the
class.
(c) Copies of the written training and lecture materials, to
include:
(1) The classroom audio-visual presentation(s).
(2) A classroom course manual with instructional text and practice
questions and problems for each of the elements of the Method 303
inspection (i.e., charging, doors, lids and offtakes, and collecting
mains). A copy of Method 303 and any related guidance documents should
be included as appendices.
(3) A copy of the Method 303 demonstration video, if not using the
one available on the EPA Web site: https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/emc/methods/method303trainingvideo.mp4.
(4) Multiple-choice certification tests, with questions sufficient
to demonstrate knowledge of the method, as follows: One (1) initial
certification test and three (3) third-year recertification tests (the
questions on any one recertification test must be at least 25 percent
different from those on the other recertification tests).
(5) A field certification checklist and inspection forms for each
of the elements of the Method 303 inspection (i.e., charging, doors,
lids and offtakes, and collecting mains).
(6) The criteria used to determine proficiency.
(7) The panel members to be utilized (see Section 10.1.3) along
with their qualifications.
(8) An example certificate of successful course completion.
10.1.1 A trainee must verify completion of at least 12 hours of
field observation prior to attending the Method 303 certification
course. Trainees shall observe the operation of a coke oven battery as
it pertains to Method 303, including topside operations, and shall also
practice conducting Method 303 or similar methods. During the field
observations, trainees unfamiliar with coke battery operations shall
receive instruction from an experienced coke oven observer who is
familiar with Method 303 or similar methods and with the operation of
coke batteries.
10.1.2 The classroom instruction shall familiarize the trainees
with Method 303 through lecture, written training materials, and a
Method 303 demonstration video. Successful completion of the classroom
portion of the Method 303 training course shall be demonstrated by a
perfect score on the initial certification test. Those attending the
course for third-year recertification must complete one of the
recertification tests selected at random.
10.1.3 All trainees must demonstrate proficiency in the application
of Method 303 to a panel of three certified Method 303 observers,
including an ability to differentiate coke oven emissions from
condensing water vapor and smoldering coal. The panel members will be
EPA, state or local agency personnel, or industry contractors listed in
59 FR 11960 (March 15, 1994) or qualified as part of the training
provider approval process of Section 10.1 of this method.
Each panel member shall have at least 120 days experience in
reading visible emissions from coke ovens. The visible emissions
inspections that will satisfy the experience requirement must be
inspections of coke oven battery fugitive emissions from the emission
points subject to emission standards under subpart L of this part
(i.e., coke oven doors, topside port lids, offtake system(s), and
charging operations), using either Method 303 or predecessor state or
local test methods. A ``day's experience'' for a particular inspection
is a day on which one complete inspection was performed for that
emission point under Method 303 or a predecessor state or local method.
A ``day's experience'' does not mean 8 or 10 hours performing
inspections, or any particular time expressed in minutes or hours that
may have been spent performing them. Thus, it would be possible for an
individual to qualify as a Method 303 panel member for some emission
points, but not others (e.g., an individual might satisfy the
experience requirement for coke oven doors, but not topside port lids).
Until November 15, 1994, the EPA may waive the certification
requirement (but not the experience requirement) for panel members. The
composition of the panel shall be approved by the EPA.
The panel shall observe the trainee in a series of training runs
and a series of certification runs. There shall be a minimum of 1
training run for doors, topside port lids, and offtake systems,
[[Page 9410]]
and a minimum of 5 training runs (i.e., 5 charges) for charging. During
training runs, the panel can advise the trainee on proper procedures.
There shall be a minimum of 3 certification runs for doors, topside
port lids, and offtake systems, and a minimum of 15 certification runs
for charging (i.e., 15 charges). The certification runs shall be
unassisted. Following the certification test runs, the panel shall
approve or disapprove certification based on the trainee's performance
during the certification runs. To obtain certification, the trainee
shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the panel a high degree of
proficiency in performing Method 303. To aid in evaluating the
trainee's performance, a checklist, approved by the EPA, will be used
by the panel members.
10.1.4 Those successfully completing the initial certification or
third-year recertification requirements shall receive a certificate
showing certification as a Method 303 observer and the beginning and
ending dates of the certification period.
10.1.5 The training provider will submit to the EPA or its designee
the following information for each trainee successfully completing
initial certification or third-year recertification training: Name,
employer, address, telephone, cell and/or fax numbers, email address,
beginning and ending dates of certification, and whether training was
for 3-year certification or 1-year recertification. This information
must be submitted within 30 days of the course completion.
10.1.6 The training provider will maintain the following records,
to be made available to EPA or its designee on request (within 30 days
of a request):
(a) A file for each Method 303 observer containing the signed
certification checklists, certification forms and test results for
their initial certification, and any subsequent third-year
recertifications. Initial certification records must also include
documentation showing successful completion of the training
prerequisites. Testing results from any interim recertifications must
also be included, along with any relevant communications.
(b) A searchable master electronic database of all persons for whom
initial certification, third-year recertification or interim
recertification has been provided. Information contained therein must
include: The observer's name, employer, address, telephone, cell and
fax numbers and email address, along with the beginning and ending
dates for each successfully completed initial, third-year and interim
recertification.
10.1.7 Failure by the training provider to submit example training
course materials and/or requested training records to the Administrator
may result in suspension of the approval of the provider and course.
10.2 Observer Certification/Recertification. The coke oven observer
certification is valid for 1 year. The observer shall recertify
annually by reviewing the training material, viewing the training video
and answering all of the questions on the recertification test
correctly. Every 3 years, an observer shall be required to pass the
proficiency test in Section 10.1.3 in order to be certified. The years
between proficiency tests are referred to as interim years.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-03758 Filed 2-24-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P