Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 9370-9374 [2016-03690]
Download as PDF
9370
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Service Bulletin 767–53A0260, dated August
26, 2014. Do all applicable corrective actions
before further flight. Repeat the inspections
thereafter at the applicable times specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 767–53A0260, dated
August 26, 2014. If any existing external
repair is found in the inspection area, then
the inspections in Part 1 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 767–53A0260, dated August
26, 2014, are not required in the area hidden
by the repair, provided that the repair was
previously approved by the Manager, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), or by the
Authorized Representative of the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA), or
installed as specified in Part 2 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 767–53A0260, dated August
26, 2014. Inspections in Part 1 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 767–53A0260, dated August
26, 2014, remain applicable in areas not
hidden by the repair.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) Exception to the Service Information
Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–
53A0260, dated August 26, 2014, specifies a
compliance time ‘‘after the original issue date
of this service bulletin,’’ this AD requires
compliance within the specified compliance
time after the effective date of this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD,
if requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (i) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes ODA that has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. To be approved, the
repair method, modification deviation, or
alteration deviation must meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Except as required by paragraph (h) of
this AD: For service information that
contains steps that are labeled as Required
for Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. An AMOC is required
for any deviations to RC steps, including
substeps and identified figures.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:27 Feb 24, 2016
Jkt 238001
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Wayne Lockett, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle
ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6447; fax: 425–
917–6590; email: wayne.lockett@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone: 206–
544–5000, extension 1; fax: 206–766–5680;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
15, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–03698 Filed 2–24–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–3702; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NM–103–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013–24–
12, which applies to all The Boeing
Company Model 747–8 and 747–8F
airplanes. AD 2013–24–12 currently
requires repetitive ultrasonic or dye
penetrant inspections for cracking of the
barrel nuts and bolts on each forward
engine mount, and related investigative
and corrective actions if necessary.
Since we issued AD 2013–24–12, we
have determined that it is necessary to
mandate the installation of new barrel
nuts or new inspections to adequately
address the unsafe condition. This
proposed AD would retain the
requirements of AD 2013–24–12 and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
add requirements to install new barrel
nuts at the forward engine mounts; or
identify the part number of the barrel
nuts, inspect affected barrel nuts for
gaps of the strut bulkhead and forward
engine mount, and do related
investigative and corrective actions if
necessary. This proposed AD would
also remove airplanes from the
applicability. We are proposing this AD
to detect and correct cracked barrel nuts
on a forward engine mount, which
could result in reduced load capacity of
the forward engine mount, separation of
an engine under power from the
airplane, and consequent loss of control
of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 11, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H–
65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone:
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax: 206–
766–5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view
this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221. It is also available
on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
3702.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
3702; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
E:\FR\FM\25FEP1.SGM
25FEP1
9371
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nathan Weigand, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6428;
fax: 425–917–6590; email:
Nathan.p.weigand@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
under power from the airplane, and
consequent loss of control of the
airplane.
Comments Invited
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed the following service
information:
• Boeing Service Bulletin 747–
71A2329, Revision 1, dated May 28,
2015. The service information describes
procedures for inspecting for cracked
bolts and barrel nuts on the forward
engine mounts, replacing cracked bolts
and barrel nuts, and sending the
inspection results and cracked parts to
Boeing.
• Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 747–71–2332, Revision 1, dated
May 28, 2015. The service information
describes procedures for installing new
barrel nuts, inspecting the barrel nuts at
the forward engine mount to determine
the part number (P/N), inspecting for
gaps of the strut bulkhead and forward
engine mount, and doing applicable
related investigative and corrective
actions.
• 747–8/–8F Airworthiness
Limitation (AWL), Document Number
D011U721–02–01, dated September
2015, which includes a limitation for
Structurally Significant Item (SSI) 54–
50–003c, which describes procedures
for structural inspections.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2016–3702; Directorate Identifier
2015–NM–103–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
On November 19, 2013, we issued AD
2013–24–12, Amendment 39–17686 (78
FR 71989, December 2, 2013) (‘‘AD
2013–24–12’’), for all The Boeing
Company Model 747–8 and 747–8F
airplanes. AD 2013–24–12 requires
repetitive ultrasonic or dye penetrant
inspections for cracking of the barrel
nuts and bolts, as applicable, on each
forward engine mount, and related
investigative and corrective actions if
necessary. AD 2013–24–12 resulted
from a report of cracked barrel nuts
found on a forward engine mount. We
issued AD 2013–24–12 to detect and
correct cracked barrel nuts on a forward
engine mount, which could result in
reduced load capacity of the forward
engine mount, separation of an engine
Proposed AD Requirements
Actions Since AD 2013–24–12 Was
Issued
The preamble to AD 2013–24–12
explains that we considered the
requirements ‘‘interim action’’ and were
considering further rulemaking. We now
have determined that further
rulemaking is indeed necessary, and
this proposed AD follows from that
determination.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
This proposed AD would retain all
requirements of AD 2013–24–12. This
proposed AD would also require
accomplishing the actions specified in
Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 747–71–2332, Revision 1, dated
May 28, 2015, described previously,
except as discussed under ‘‘Differences
Between Proposed AD and Service
Information.’’ For information on the
procedures and compliance times, see
this service information at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
3702.
The phrase ‘‘related investigative
actions’’ is used in this proposed AD.
‘‘Related investigative actions’’ are
follow-on actions that (1) are related to
the primary action, and (2) further
investigate the nature of any condition
found. Related investigative actions in
an AD could include, for example,
inspections.
The phrase ‘‘corrective actions’’ is
used in this proposed AD. ‘‘Corrective
actions’’ are actions that correct or
address any condition found. Corrective
actions in an AD could include, for
example, repairs.
Differences Between Proposed AD and
Service Information
Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 747–71–2332, Revision 1, dated
May 28, 2015, specifies to contact the
manufacturer for instructions on how to
repair certain conditions, but this
proposed AD would require repairing
those conditions in one of the following
ways:
• In accordance with a method that
we approve; or
• Using data that meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and
that have been approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) whom
we have authorized to make those
findings.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 7 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Inspections (retained actions from AD 2013–
24–12).
Up to 24 work-hours × $85 per
hour = $2,040 per inspection
cycle.
17 work-hours × $85 per hour =
$1,445.
Installation (new proposed action) .................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:27 Feb 24, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Parts cost
Sfmt 4702
$0
6,384
Cost per product
Cost on U.S.
operators
Up to $2,040 per inspection cycle.
Up to $14,280 per inspection cycle.
$7,829 .......................
Up to $54,803.
E:\FR\FM\25FEP1.SGM
25FEP1
9372
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2016 / Proposed Rules
ESTIMATED COSTS—Continued
Action
Labor cost
Inspections (new proposed alternative actions).
Maintenance program revision (new proposed requirement).
4 work-hours × $85 per hour =
$340.
1 work-hour × $85 per hour =
$85.
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the bootstrap installation
specified in this proposed AD. We
Parts cost
Cost on U.S.
operators
Cost per product
0
$340 ..........................
Up to $2,380.
0
$85 ............................
$595.
estimate the following costs to do other
necessary related investigative and
corrective actions that would be
required based on the results of the
proposed inspection. We have no way of
determining the number of aircraft that
might need these actions:
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Ultrasonic inspection .........................................................
5 work-hours × $85 per hour = $425 ...............................
$0
$425
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this proposed AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby
reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty
coverage for affected individuals. As a
result, we have included all costs in our
cost estimate.
Paperwork Reduction Act
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject
to penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. The control
number for the collection of information
required by this AD is 2120–0056. The
paperwork cost associated with this AD
has been detailed in the Costs of
Compliance section of this document
and includes time for reviewing
instructions, as well as completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
Therefore, all reporting associated with
this AD is mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden
and suggestions for reducing the burden
should be directed to the FAA at 800
Independence Ave. SW., Washington,
DC 20591. ATTN: Information
Collection Clearance Officer, AES–200.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:27 Feb 24, 2016
Jkt 238001
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
We have determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
PO 00000
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Sfmt 4702
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2013–24–12, Amendment 39–17686 (78
FR 71989, December 2, 2013), and
adding the following new AD:
■
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2016–3702; Directorate Identifier 2015–
NM–103–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
AD action by April 11, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2013–24–12,
Amendment 39–17686 (78 FR 71989,
December 2, 2013).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 747–8F and 747–8 airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Service Bulletin 747–71A2329,
Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 71, Powerplant.
E:\FR\FM\25FEP1.SGM
25FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of
cracked barrel nuts found on a forward
engine mount, and by the determination that
additional actions are necessary to address
the unsafe condition. We are issuing this AD
to detect and correct cracked barrel nuts on
a forward engine mount, which could result
in reduced load capacity of the forward
engine mount, separation of an engine under
power from the airplane, and consequent loss
of control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(g) Retained Repetitive Inspections and
Corrective Actions, With Revised Service
Information
This paragraph restates the actions
required by paragraph (g) of AD 2013–24–12,
Amendment 39–17686 (78 FR 71989,
December 2, 2013) (‘‘AD 2013–24–12’’), with
revised service information: Except as
required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, at the
time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–71A2329, dated September 27,
2013: Do the inspection specified in
paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, and do
all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–71A2329, dated
September 27, 2013; or Boeing Service
Bulletin 747–71A2329, Revision 1, dated
May 28, 2015. Do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before
further flight. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at the times specified in paragraph
1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–71A2329, dated September 27,
2013. As of the effective date of this AD, use
only Boeing Service Bulletin 747–71A2329,
Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015.
(1) Ultrasonic inspection for cracking of the
barrel nuts on each forward engine mount,
except as required by paragraph (h)(2) of this
AD.
(2) Dye penetrant inspection for cracking of
the bolts and barrel nuts. Whenever a dye
penetrant inspection is done, all the bolts
and barrel nuts on that engine mount must
be removed and replaced with new or
serviceable parts.
(h) Retained Exceptions to Service
Information Specifications, With Revised
Service Information References
(1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747–71A2329, dated September 27, 2013; or
Boeing Service Bulletin 747–71A2329,
Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015; specify a
compliance time ‘‘after the original issue date
of this service bulletin,’’ this AD requires
compliance within the specified compliance
time after December 17, 2013 (the effective
date of AD 2013–24–12).
(2) Where Appendix B of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–71A2329, dated
September 27, 2013, and Appendix B of
Boeing Service Bulletin 747–71A2329,
Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015, state that
alternate instruments and transducers can be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:27 Feb 24, 2016
Jkt 238001
used, this AD requires that only equivalent
instruments and transducers can be used.
(3) Where Appendix A of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–71A2329, dated
September 27, 2013, and Appendix A of
Boeing Service Bulletin 747–71A2329,
Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015, state to
record flight hours and flight cycles, record
the flight hours and flight cycles on the
airplane and the flight hours and flight cycles
for each engine since change or removal.
(i) Retained Reporting and Sending Parts,
With Revised Service Information
After any inspection required by paragraph
(g) of this AD: Submit a report of the
inspection results (both positive and
negative), and return all cracked bolts and
barrel nuts, at the applicable time specified
in paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD. The
report must include the information
requested in Appendix A of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–71A2329, dated
September 27, 2013, or Appendix A of
Boeing Service Bulletin 747–71A2329,
Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015, except as
required by paragraph (h)(3) of this AD. Both
the report and all cracked bolts and barrel
nuts must be sent to the address specified in
Appendix A of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747–71A2329, dated September 27, 2013, or
Appendix A of Boeing Service Bulletin 747–
71A2329, Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015.
(1) For airplanes on which an ultrasonic
inspection was done and no cracking was
found, do the required actions at the time
specified in paragraph (i)(1)(i) or (i)(1)(ii) of
this AD, as applicable.
(i) If the inspection was done on or after
December 17, 2013 (the effective date of AD
2013–24–12): Submit the report within 10
days after the inspection.
(ii) If the inspection was done before
December 17, 2013 (the effective date of AD
2013–24–12): Submit the report within 10
days after December 17, 2013 (the effective
date of AD 2013–24–12).
(2) For airplanes on which a dye penetrant
inspection was done, do the required actions
at the time specified in paragraph (i)(2)(i) or
(i)(2)(ii) of this AD, as applicable.
(i) If the inspection was done on or after
December 17, 2013 (the effective date of AD
2013–24–12): Submit the report and return
all cracked bolts and barrel nuts within 10
days after replacing the bolts and barrel nuts
with new or serviceable bolts and barrel nuts
in accordance with Part 2 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 747–71A2329, dated
September 27, 2013; or Boeing Service
Bulletin 747–71A2329, Revision 1, dated
May 28, 2015.
(ii) If the inspection was done before
December 17, 2013 (the effective date of AD
2013–24–12): Submit the report and return
all cracked bolts and barrel nuts within 10
days after December 17, 2013 (the effective
date of AD 2013–24–12).
(j) Retained Paperwork Reduction Act
Burden Statement, With No Changes
A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject to
a penalty for failure to comply with a
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
9373
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this
information collection is 2120–0056. Public
reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per
response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to
this collection of information are mandatory.
Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the
burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800
Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC
20591, Attn: Information Collection
Clearance Officer, AES–200.
(k) New Installation or Inspections
At the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 747–71–
2332, Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015, except
as required by paragraph (o)(1) of this AD: Do
the actions specified in paragraph (k)(1) or
(k)(2) of this AD, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 747–71–
2332, Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015, except
as required by paragraph (o)(2) of this AD.
(1) Install new barrel nuts using the
bootstrap installation method identified in
Part 1 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
747–71–2332, Revision 1, dated May 28,
2015.
(2) Do a general visual inspection to
determine the part number (P/N) of the barrel
nuts at the forward engine mount. If any
barrel nut P/N SL4081C14SP1 is installed,
before further flight, do a general visual
inspection for gaps of the strut bulkhead and
forward engine mount to determine if the
nut-by-but method identified in Part 4 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 747–71–
2332, Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015, can be
used, and do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions. Do all
applicable related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight,
including the nut-by-nut replacement
identified in Part 4 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 747–71–2332, Revision 1,
dated May 28, 2015. If the nut-by-nut
replacement identified in Part 4 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 747–71–
2332, Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015 cannot
be accomplished, install new nuts, in
accordance with paragraph (k)(1) of this AD.
(l) Maintenance Program Revision
Within 30 days after accomplishment of
the actions required by paragraph (k) of this
AD, or within 30 days after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs later: Revise the
maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate the 747–8/–8F
Airworthiness Limitation (AWL), Document
Number D011U721–02–01, Structurally
Significant Item (SSI) 54–50–003c.
E:\FR\FM\25FEP1.SGM
25FEP1
9374
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 37 / Thursday, February 25, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(m) Terminating Action
Accomplishment of the actions required by
paragraphs (k) and (l) of this AD terminate
the requirements of paragraphs (g) and (i) of
this AD.
(n) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install or reinstall any barrel nut
P/N SL4081C14SP1 at the forward engine
mount assembly on any airplane, and only P/
N SL4750NA may be installed.
(o) New Exceptions to Service Information
Specifications
(1) Where Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 747–71–2332, Revision 1, dated May
28, 2015, specifies a compliance time ‘‘after
the original issue date of this service
bulletin,’’ this AD requires compliance
within the specified compliance time after
the effective date of this AD.
(2) Where Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 747–71–2332, Revision 1, dated May
28, 2015, specifies to contact Boeing for
appropriate action: Before further flight,
repair using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (r) of this AD.
(p) No Alternative Actions or Intervals
After the maintenance or inspection
program has been revised as required by
paragraph (l) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be
used unless the actions or intervals are
approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (r) of this
AD.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(q) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the
actions specified in paragraph (k) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 747–71–2332,
dated May 30, 2014, which is not
incorporated by reference in this AD.
(r) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (s)(1) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:27 Feb 24, 2016
Jkt 238001
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved for AD 2013–24–12
are approved as AMOCs for the
corresponding provisions of this AD.
(5) Except as required by paragraph (o)(2)
of this AD: For service information that
contains steps that are labeled as Required
for Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (r)(5)(i) and (r)(5)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. An AMOC is required
for any deviations to RC steps, including
substeps and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(s) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Nathan Weigand, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S,
FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–
6428; fax: 425–917–6590; email:
Nathan.p.weigand@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone: 206–
544–5000, extension 1; fax: 206–766–5680;
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February
15, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–03690 Filed 2–24–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–3701; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NM–015–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
ACTION:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013–25–
08, for all Airbus Model A330–200,
–200 Freighter, and –300 series
airplanes; and Model A340–200 and
–300 series airplanes. AD 2013–25–08
currently requires a repetitive
inspection program on certain check
valves in the hydraulic systems that
includes, among other things,
inspections for lock wire presence and
integrity, traces of seepage or black
deposits, proper torque, alignment of
the check valve and manifold,
installation of new lock wire, and
corrective actions if needed. Since we
issued AD 2013–25–08, Airbus has
developed an improved check valve.
This proposed AD would add airplanes
to the applicability, and require
modifying the green, blue and yellow
high pressure hydraulic manifolds by
replacing certain check valves with
improved check valves, which would
terminate the repetitive inspections
required by this proposed AD. We are
proposing this AD to detect and correct
hydraulic check valve loosening;
loosened valves could result in
hydraulic leaks, possibly leading to the
loss of all three hydraulic systems and
consequent loss of control of the
airplane.
SUMMARY:
We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by April 11, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Airbus SAS—
Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330–A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\25FEP1.SGM
25FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 37 (Thursday, February 25, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9370-9374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03690]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2016-3702; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-103-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013-24-
12, which applies to all The Boeing Company Model 747-8 and 747-8F
airplanes. AD 2013-24-12 currently requires repetitive ultrasonic or
dye penetrant inspections for cracking of the barrel nuts and bolts on
each forward engine mount, and related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. Since we issued AD 2013-24-12, we have determined
that it is necessary to mandate the installation of new barrel nuts or
new inspections to adequately address the unsafe condition. This
proposed AD would retain the requirements of AD 2013-24-12 and add
requirements to install new barrel nuts at the forward engine mounts;
or identify the part number of the barrel nuts, inspect affected barrel
nuts for gaps of the strut bulkhead and forward engine mount, and do
related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. This
proposed AD would also remove airplanes from the applicability. We are
proposing this AD to detect and correct cracked barrel nuts on a
forward engine mount, which could result in reduced load capacity of
the forward engine mount, separation of an engine under power from the
airplane, and consequent loss of control of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 11, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P. O. Box
3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone: 206-544-5000,
extension 1; fax: 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It
is also available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-3702.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
3702; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office
[[Page 9371]]
(phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathan Weigand, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6428; fax: 425-917-6590; email: Nathan.p.weigand@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-3702;
Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-103-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On November 19, 2013, we issued AD 2013-24-12, Amendment 39-17686
(78 FR 71989, December 2, 2013) (``AD 2013-24-12''), for all The Boeing
Company Model 747-8 and 747-8F airplanes. AD 2013-24-12 requires
repetitive ultrasonic or dye penetrant inspections for cracking of the
barrel nuts and bolts, as applicable, on each forward engine mount, and
related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. AD 2013-24-
12 resulted from a report of cracked barrel nuts found on a forward
engine mount. We issued AD 2013-24-12 to detect and correct cracked
barrel nuts on a forward engine mount, which could result in reduced
load capacity of the forward engine mount, separation of an engine
under power from the airplane, and consequent loss of control of the
airplane.
Actions Since AD 2013-24-12 Was Issued
The preamble to AD 2013-24-12 explains that we considered the
requirements ``interim action'' and were considering further
rulemaking. We now have determined that further rulemaking is indeed
necessary, and this proposed AD follows from that determination.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed the following service information:
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-71A2329, Revision 1, dated May
28, 2015. The service information describes procedures for inspecting
for cracked bolts and barrel nuts on the forward engine mounts,
replacing cracked bolts and barrel nuts, and sending the inspection
results and cracked parts to Boeing.
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-71-2332,
Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015. The service information describes
procedures for installing new barrel nuts, inspecting the barrel nuts
at the forward engine mount to determine the part number (P/N),
inspecting for gaps of the strut bulkhead and forward engine mount, and
doing applicable related investigative and corrective actions.
747-8/-8F Airworthiness Limitation (AWL), Document Number
D011U721-02-01, dated September 2015, which includes a limitation for
Structurally Significant Item (SSI) 54-50-003c, which describes
procedures for structural inspections.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would retain all requirements of AD 2013-24-12.
This proposed AD would also require accomplishing the actions specified
in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-71-2332, Revision 1,
dated May 28, 2015, described previously, except as discussed under
``Differences Between Proposed AD and Service Information.'' For
information on the procedures and compliance times, see this service
information at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2016-3702.
The phrase ``related investigative actions'' is used in this
proposed AD. ``Related investigative actions'' are follow-on actions
that (1) are related to the primary action, and (2) further investigate
the nature of any condition found. Related investigative actions in an
AD could include, for example, inspections.
The phrase ``corrective actions'' is used in this proposed AD.
``Corrective actions'' are actions that correct or address any
condition found. Corrective actions in an AD could include, for
example, repairs.
Differences Between Proposed AD and Service Information
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-71-2332, Revision 1,
dated May 28, 2015, specifies to contact the manufacturer for
instructions on how to repair certain conditions, but this proposed AD
would require repairing those conditions in one of the following ways:
In accordance with a method that we approve; or
Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) whom we have
authorized to make those findings.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 7 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections (retained actions Up to 24 work-hours $0 Up to $2,040 per Up to $14,280 per
from AD 2013-24-12). x $85 per hour = inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
$2,040 per
inspection cycle.
Installation (new proposed 17 work-hours x $85 6,384 $7,829.............. Up to $54,803.
action). per hour = $1,445.
[[Page 9372]]
Inspections (new proposed 4 work-hours x $85 0 $340................ Up to $2,380.
alternative actions). per hour = $340.
Maintenance program revision (new 1 work-hour x $85 0 $85................. $595.
proposed requirement). per hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the bootstrap installation specified in this
proposed AD. We estimate the following costs to do other necessary
related investigative and corrective actions that would be required
based on the results of the proposed inspection. We have no way of
determining the number of aircraft that might need these actions:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ultrasonic inspection........................... 5 work-hours x $85 per hour = $425 $0 $425
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. The control number for the collection of
information required by this AD is 2120-0056. The paperwork cost
associated with this AD has been detailed in the Costs of Compliance
section of this document and includes time for reviewing instructions,
as well as completing and reviewing the collection of information.
Therefore, all reporting associated with this AD is mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the
burden should be directed to the FAA at 800 Independence Ave. SW.,
Washington, DC 20591. ATTN: Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES-200.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2013-24-12, Amendment 39-17686 (78 FR 71989, December 2, 2013), and
adding the following new AD:
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2016-3702; Directorate Identifier
2015-NM-103-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by April 11,
2016.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2013-24-12, Amendment 39-17686 (78 FR 71989,
December 2, 2013).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-8F and 747-8
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing
Service Bulletin 747-71A2329, Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 71, Powerplant.
[[Page 9373]]
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a report of cracked barrel nuts found on
a forward engine mount, and by the determination that additional
actions are necessary to address the unsafe condition. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct cracked barrel nuts on a
forward engine mount, which could result in reduced load capacity of
the forward engine mount, separation of an engine under power from
the airplane, and consequent loss of control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Retained Repetitive Inspections and Corrective Actions, With
Revised Service Information
This paragraph restates the actions required by paragraph (g) of
AD 2013-24-12, Amendment 39-17686 (78 FR 71989, December 2, 2013)
(``AD 2013-24-12''), with revised service information: Except as
required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, at the time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-71A2329, dated September 27, 2013: Do the inspection specified
in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, and do all applicable
related investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
71A2329, dated September 27, 2013; or Boeing Service Bulletin 747-
71A2329, Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015. Do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions before further flight. Repeat
the inspection thereafter at the times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-71A2329, dated
September 27, 2013. As of the effective date of this AD, use only
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-71A2329, Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015.
(1) Ultrasonic inspection for cracking of the barrel nuts on
each forward engine mount, except as required by paragraph (h)(2) of
this AD.
(2) Dye penetrant inspection for cracking of the bolts and
barrel nuts. Whenever a dye penetrant inspection is done, all the
bolts and barrel nuts on that engine mount must be removed and
replaced with new or serviceable parts.
(h) Retained Exceptions to Service Information Specifications, With
Revised Service Information References
(1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-71A2329, dated
September 27, 2013; or Boeing Service Bulletin 747-71A2329, Revision
1, dated May 28, 2015; specify a compliance time ``after the
original issue date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires
compliance within the specified compliance time after December 17,
2013 (the effective date of AD 2013-24-12).
(2) Where Appendix B of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
71A2329, dated September 27, 2013, and Appendix B of Boeing Service
Bulletin 747-71A2329, Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015, state that
alternate instruments and transducers can be used, this AD requires
that only equivalent instruments and transducers can be used.
(3) Where Appendix A of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-
71A2329, dated September 27, 2013, and Appendix A of Boeing Service
Bulletin 747-71A2329, Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015, state to
record flight hours and flight cycles, record the flight hours and
flight cycles on the airplane and the flight hours and flight cycles
for each engine since change or removal.
(i) Retained Reporting and Sending Parts, With Revised Service
Information
After any inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD:
Submit a report of the inspection results (both positive and
negative), and return all cracked bolts and barrel nuts, at the
applicable time specified in paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD.
The report must include the information requested in Appendix A of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-71A2329, dated September 27, 2013,
or Appendix A of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-71A2329, Revision 1,
dated May 28, 2015, except as required by paragraph (h)(3) of this
AD. Both the report and all cracked bolts and barrel nuts must be
sent to the address specified in Appendix A of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747-71A2329, dated September 27, 2013, or Appendix A of
Boeing Service Bulletin 747-71A2329, Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015.
(1) For airplanes on which an ultrasonic inspection was done and
no cracking was found, do the required actions at the time specified
in paragraph (i)(1)(i) or (i)(1)(ii) of this AD, as applicable.
(i) If the inspection was done on or after December 17, 2013
(the effective date of AD 2013-24-12): Submit the report within 10
days after the inspection.
(ii) If the inspection was done before December 17, 2013 (the
effective date of AD 2013-24-12): Submit the report within 10 days
after December 17, 2013 (the effective date of AD 2013-24-12).
(2) For airplanes on which a dye penetrant inspection was done,
do the required actions at the time specified in paragraph (i)(2)(i)
or (i)(2)(ii) of this AD, as applicable.
(i) If the inspection was done on or after December 17, 2013
(the effective date of AD 2013-24-12): Submit the report and return
all cracked bolts and barrel nuts within 10 days after replacing the
bolts and barrel nuts with new or serviceable bolts and barrel nuts
in accordance with Part 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-71A2329, dated September 27, 2013;
or Boeing Service Bulletin 747-71A2329, Revision 1, dated May 28,
2015.
(ii) If the inspection was done before December 17, 2013 (the
effective date of AD 2013-24-12): Submit the report and return all
cracked bolts and barrel nuts within 10 days after December 17, 2013
(the effective date of AD 2013-24-12).
(j) Retained Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement, With No Changes
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to
the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current valid Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. The OMB Control Number
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5
minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of information. All
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing
the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave.
SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance
Officer, AES-200.
(k) New Installation or Inspections
At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-71-
2332, Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015, except as required by
paragraph (o)(1) of this AD: Do the actions specified in paragraph
(k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-71-
2332, Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015, except as required by
paragraph (o)(2) of this AD.
(1) Install new barrel nuts using the bootstrap installation
method identified in Part 1 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-71-2332, Revision 1,
dated May 28, 2015.
(2) Do a general visual inspection to determine the part number
(P/N) of the barrel nuts at the forward engine mount. If any barrel
nut P/N SL4081C14SP1 is installed, before further flight, do a
general visual inspection for gaps of the strut bulkhead and forward
engine mount to determine if the nut-by-but method identified in
Part 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 747-71-2332, Revision 1, dated May 28,
2015, can be used, and do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions. Do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight, including the nut-by-nut
replacement identified in Part 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-71-2332, Revision
1, dated May 28, 2015. If the nut-by-nut replacement identified in
Part 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 747-71-2332, Revision 1, dated May 28,
2015 cannot be accomplished, install new nuts, in accordance with
paragraph (k)(1) of this AD.
(l) Maintenance Program Revision
Within 30 days after accomplishment of the actions required by
paragraph (k) of this AD, or within 30 days after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs later: Revise the maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate the 747-8/-8F
Airworthiness Limitation (AWL), Document Number D011U721-02-01,
Structurally Significant Item (SSI) 54-50-003c.
[[Page 9374]]
(m) Terminating Action
Accomplishment of the actions required by paragraphs (k) and (l)
of this AD terminate the requirements of paragraphs (g) and (i) of
this AD.
(n) Parts Installation Prohibition
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install or
reinstall any barrel nut P/N SL4081C14SP1 at the forward engine
mount assembly on any airplane, and only P/N SL4750NA may be
installed.
(o) New Exceptions to Service Information Specifications
(1) Where Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-71-2332,
Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015, specifies a compliance time ``after
the original issue date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires
compliance within the specified compliance time after the effective
date of this AD.
(2) Where Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-71-2332,
Revision 1, dated May 28, 2015, specifies to contact Boeing for
appropriate action: Before further flight, repair using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph
(r) of this AD.
(p) No Alternative Actions or Intervals
After the maintenance or inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (l) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections) or intervals may be used unless the actions or
intervals are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (r) of this
AD.
(q) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for the actions specified in
paragraph (k) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 747-71-2332, dated May 30, 2014, which is not incorporated
by reference in this AD.
(r) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (s)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. To be approved, the
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(4) AMOCs approved for AD 2013-24-12 are approved as AMOCs for
the corresponding provisions of this AD.
(5) Except as required by paragraph (o)(2) of this AD: For
service information that contains steps that are labeled as Required
for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs (r)(5)(i) and
(r)(5)(ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. An AMOC is required for any deviations to RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(s) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Nathan Weigand,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle ACO,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6428;
fax: 425-917-6590; email: Nathan.p.weigand@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone: 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax: 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 15, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-03690 Filed 2-24-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P