Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company, 8756-8758 [2016-03590]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
8756
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2016 / Notices
Maryland, 20852, Attention:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff.
Participants filing a document in this
manner are responsible for serving the
document on all other participants.
Filing is considered complete by firstclass mail as of the time of deposit in
the mail, or by courier, express mail, or
expedited delivery service upon
depositing the document with the
provider of the service. A presiding
officer, having granted an exemption
request from using E-Filing, may require
a participant or party to use E-Filing if
the presiding officer subsequently
determines that the reason for granting
the exemption from use of E-Filing no
longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory
proceedings will appear in NRC’s
electronic hearing docket which is
available to the public at https://ehd1.
nrc.gov/ehd/, unless excluded pursuant
to an order of the Commission, or the
presiding officer. Participants are
requested not to include personal
privacy information, such as social
security numbers, home addresses, or
home phone numbers in their filings,
unless an NRC regulation or other law
requires submission of such
information. However, in some
instances, a request to intervene will
require including information on local
residence in order to demonstrate a
proximity assertion of interest in the
proceeding. With respect to copyrighted
works, except for limited excerpts that
serve the purpose of the adjudicatory
filings and would constitute a Fair Use
application, participants are requested
not to include copyrighted materials in
their submission.
Petitions for leave to intervene must
be filed no later than 60 days from the
date of publication of this notice.
Requests for hearing, petitions for leave
to intervene, and motions for leave to
file new or amended contentions that
are filed after the 60-day deadline will
not be entertained absent a
determination by the presiding officer
that the filing demonstrates good cause
by satisfying the three factors in 10 CFR
2.309(c)(1)(i)–(iii).
For further details with respect to this
action, see the application for
amendment, dated March 2, 2015, as
supplemented by letter dated August 31,
2015, in ADAMS.
Attorney for licensee: Lillian M.
Cuoco, Senior Counsel, Dominion
Resources Services, Inc., 120 Tredegar
Street, RS–2, Richmond, VA 23219.
NRC Branch Chief: Travis L. Tate.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day
of February 2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:03 Feb 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Richard V. Guzman,
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing
Branch I–1, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2016–03592 Filed 2–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50–213, and 72–1025; NRC–
2016–0031]
Independent Spent Fuel Storage
Installation, Connecticut Yankee
Atomic Power Company
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to an August 31,
2015, request from Connecticut Yankee
Atomic Power Company, (CYAPC or
licensee) from NRC’s requirement to
comply with the terms, conditions, and
specifications in Amendment 5 of the
NAC International, (NAC),—MultiPurpose Canister (MPC) System
Certificate of Compliance (CoC) No.
1025, Appendix A ‘‘Technical
Specifications for NAC–MPC System,’’
Technical Specifications (TS) A.5.3
‘‘Surveillance After an Off-Normal,
Accident, or Natural Phenomena Event’’
at the Haddam Neck Plant (HNP)
independent spent fuel storage
installation (ISFSI). The exemption
request seeks a modification of TS A.5.3
inspection requirements for the inlet
and outlet vents following off-normal,
accident, and natural phenomena
events.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2016–0031 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2016–0031. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in
ADAMS) is provided the first time that
a document is referenced.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Goshen, Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards, telephone: 301–
415–6933, email: John.Goshen@nrc.gov;
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The licensee, the holder of Facility
Operating License No. DPR–61, is
CYAPC, which authorizes operation of
the HNP in Haddam, Connecticut,
pursuant to part 50 of title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR).
The facility is in decommissioned
status. The license provides, among
other things, that the facility is subject
to all rules, regulations, and orders of
the NRC now or hereafter in effect.
Under subpart K of 10 CFR part 72,
a general license has been issued for the
storage of spent fuel in an ISFSI at
power reactor sites to persons
authorized to possess or operate nuclear
power reactors under 10 CFR part 50.
The licensee, CYAPC, is licensed to
operate a nuclear power reactor under
10 CFR part 50 and authorized under
the 10 CFR part 72 general license to
store spent fuel at the HNP ISFSI. Under
the terms of the general license, CYAPC
stores spent fuel using Amendment 5 of
the NAC–MPC CoC No. 1025.
II. Request/Action
The licensee requests an exemption
from 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3), 10 CFR
72.212(b)(5)(i), and 10 CFR 72.214 for
the HNP ISFSI.
• Section 72.212(b)(3) requires that a
general licensee use casks that conform
to the terms, conditions, and
specifications of a CoC or amended CoC
listed in § 72.214. The NAC–MPC CoC
No. 1025 is listed in 10 CFR 72.214.
• Section 72.212(b)(5)(i) requires, in
relevant part, that a general licensee
demonstrate a loaded cask will conform
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2016 / Notices
to the terms, conditions, and
specifications of a CoC for a cask listed
in § 72.214.
• Section 72.214 lists casks which are
approved for storage of spent fuel under
conditions specified in their CoCs,
including CoC 1025 and Amendment
No. 5.
The licensee, as a 10 CFR 72 general
licensee, is required to use the NAC–
MPC System according to the technical
specifications of the NAC–MPC System
CoC No. 1025. Amendment 5 of the
NAC–MPC CoC No. 1025, Appendix A,
‘‘Technical Specifications for the NAC–
MPC System,’’ Technical Specification
(TS) A 5.3, ‘‘Surveillance After an OffNormal, Accident, or Natural
Phenomena Event’’ requires that a
general licensee undertake a visual
surveillance of the NAC–MPC casks
within 4 hours after the occurrence of
an off-normal, accident or natural
phenomena event in the area of the
ISFSI. This NAC–MPC cask inspection
is part of the general licensee’s
surveillance response to verify that all
the CONCRETE CASK inlets and outlets
are not blocked or obstructed. The
NAC–MPC TS A 5.3 also requires that
at least one-half of the inlets and outlets
on each CONCRETE CASK be cleared of
blockage or debris within 24 hours to
restore air circulation.
The licensee seeks the NRC’s
authorization to use NAC–MPC TS A
3.1.6 as an alternative to the visual
surveillance method specified in NAC–
MPC TS A 5.3. Technical Specification
A 3.1.6 permits either visual
surveillance of the inlets and outlets
screens or temperature monitoring of
each cask to establish the operability of
the Concrete Cask Heat Removal System
for each NAC–MPC cask and to show
that the limiting conditions for
operation under 3.1.6 are met. Technical
Specification A 3.1.6 establishes
ongoing requirements that HNP must
comply with during all phases of the
cask storage operations, not only after
an unusual event in the area of the
ISFSI. In effect, TS A 3.1.6 provides
continuous temperature monitoring or
visual verification to establish
operability of the Concrete Cask Heat
Removal System for all NAC–MPC No.
1025 casks.
The proposed alternative for
implementing TS A 5.3 provides that
Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.1.6.1 is
required following off-normal, accident
or natural phenomena events. The
NAC–MPC Systems in use at an ISFSI
shall be inspected in accordance with
SR 3.1.6.1 within 4 hours after the
occurrence of an off-normal, accident or
natural phenomena event in the area of
the ISFSI to confirm operability of the
CONCRETE CASK Heat Removal
System for each NAC–MPC System.
Additionally, if a CONCRETE CASK
Heat Removal System(s) for one or more
NAC–MPC Systems is determined to be
8757
inoperable, Required Action A.1 of TS
A 3.1.6 requires the licensee to restore
the affected Concrete Cask Heat
Removal System(s) to an operable
condition within 8 hours.
The NAC–MPC Final Safety Analysis
Report (FSAR) supports the use of either
method defined in SR 3.1.6.1 to
establish operability to comply with
NAC–MPC TS A 3.1.6 or NAC–MPC TS
A 5.3. Section 11.1.1 of the FSAR states,
‘‘Blockage of Half of the Air Inlets
would be detected by the daily concrete
cask operability inspection, which is
performed either by the outlet air
temperature measurements or by visual
inspection of the inlet and outlet
screens for blockage and integrity.’’
III. Discussion
Under 10 CFR 72.7, the Commission
may, upon application by any interested
person or upon its own initiative, grant
an exemption from the requirements of
10 CFR part 72, provided the exemption
is authorized by law, will not endanger
life or property or the common defense
and security and is otherwise in the
public interest. As explained in
following paragraphs, the proposed
exemption is lawful, will not endanger
life or property, or the common defense
and security, and is otherwise in the
public interest. The ADAMS accession
numbers for the applicable documents
are:
Date
ADAMS
accession
No.
Exemption Request ....................................................................
Letter of transmittal .....................................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Document
August 31, 2015 .........................................................................
NA ..............................................................................................
ML15254A051
ML16042A395
The Exemption Is Authorized by Law
The exemption would permit the
licensee to use either of the inspection
methods permitted by NAC–MPC TS A
3.1.6 as an alternative to the single
surveillance method in NAC–MPC TS A
5.3. The licensee would conduct a
surveillance response within 4 hours
after the occurrence of an off-normal,
accident, or natural phenomena event,
as required by NAC–MPC TS A 5.3, but
would be permitted to use either
temperature monitoring or visual
inspection to ensure the Concrete Cask
Heat Removal Systems are within the
limiting conditions for operation. The
exemption is limited to off-normal,
accident, or natural phenomena events,
specifically major snow or icing events
(snow/ice events that have the potential
to or that exceed blockage of greater
than one-half of the inlet or outlet
vents).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:03 Feb 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
The licensee requested an exemption
from the provisions in 10 CFR part 72
that requires the licensee to comply
with the terms, conditions, and
specifications of the CoC for the
approved cask model that it uses.
Section 72.7 allows the NRC to grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10
CFR part 72. Issuance of this exemption
is consistent with the Atomic Energy
Act of 1954, as amended, and is not
inconsistent with NRC regulations or
other applicable laws. Therefore, the
exemption is authorized by law.
The Exemption Is Consistent With the
Common Defense and Security
The requested exemption would
allow the licensee to use the SR,
conditions, required actions, and
completion times defined in NAC–MPC
TS A 3.1.6 as an alternative to the
single-method surveillance response in
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NAC–MPC TS A 5.3. Technical
Specifications A 3.1.6 permits either
visual inspection of the inlet and outlet
screens or temperature monitoring to
establish the operability of the Concrete
Cask Heat Removal System for each
NAC–MPC System and to comply with
the limiting conditions for operation for
TS A 3.1.6. Surveillance Requirement
3.1.6.1 permits temperature monitoring
or visual inspection of the inlet and
outlet screens to be utilized to establish
the operability of the Concrete Cask
Heat Removal System for each NAC–
MPS System to meet Limiting Condition
for Operation 3.1.6. In the event the
applicable acceptance criterion of SR
3.1.6.1 is not met, Required Action A.1
requires the licensee to restore the
affected Concrete Cask Heat Removal
System(s) to an operable condition
within 8 hours.
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
8758
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 34 / Monday, February 22, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The NRC staff reviewed the licensee’s
request and finds allowing the use of
either visual surveillance of the inlet
and outlet screens or temperature
monitoring of the inlets and outlets
within 4 hours of the occurrence of offnormal, accident, or natural phenomena
events, when limited to major snow and
icing events, does not compromise
safety. The exemption still requires the
licensee to perform SR 3.1.6.1 to
establish the operability of the Concrete
Cask Heat Removal Systems every 24
hours via temperature monitoring or
visual inspection of the inlet and outlet
screens. In addition, the exemption
provides no additional time to complete
the required surveillance of the inlets
and outlets screens in accordance with
TS A 5.3. The use of either method will
ensure that adequate air flows past the
storage canisters and that heat transfer
occurs. For these reasons, NRC the staff
found the same level of safety is
obtained by using either of the TS A
3.1.6 methods to comply with NAC–
MPC TS A 5.3 during limited types offnormal, accident, or natural
phenomena.
The NRC staff has determined that the
thermal, structural, criticality,
retrievability, and radiation protection
requirements of 10 CFR part 72 and the
offsite dose limits of 10 CFR part 20 will
be maintained For these reasons, the
NRC staff finds the same level of safety
is obtained by using either of the TS A
3.1.6 methods to comply with NAC–
MPC TS A 5.3. Therefore, the NRC
concludes that the exemption will not
endanger life or property or the common
defense and security.
The Exemption Presents No Undue Risk
to Public Health and Safety
As described in the application,
exempting the licensee from visual
surveillance of cask inlet and outlet
vents within 4 hours of a major
snowstorm would allow the licensee to
prioritize more effectively important
storm-related activities at the HNP site.
Snow and ice blockage of the inlet and
outlet vents is unusual. Moreover, snow
and ice blockages are identified reliably
by temperature monitoring of individual
casks. The NRC staff recognizes there is
a risk to the safety of workers
responsible for clearing snow and ice
from cask pads during extreme winter
conditions when visual surveillance of
casks must be undertaken within 4
hours. The NRC staff finds this risk to
workers can be reduced by using SR
3.1.6.1 to establish the operability of the
Concrete Cask Heat Removal Systems
via temperature monitoring or visual
inspection of the inlet and outlet
screens. In addition, the limiting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:03 Feb 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
conditions for operation of the NAC–
MPC System require the Concrete Cask
Heat Removal System for each cask to
be operable during storage operation,
therefore ensuring public health and
safety are not reduced.
Therefore, the NRC staff finds that
allowing the licensee to use the SR,
conditions, required actions, and
completion times defined in NAC–MPC
TS A 3.1.6 as an alternative to the
single-method surveillance response in
NAC–MPC TS A 5.3, would reduce
worker safety risks to plant workers
involved in snow removal. Therefore,
granting the exemption is otherwise in
the public interest.
Environmental Considerations
The NRC staff evaluated whether
there would be significant
environmental impacts associated with
the issuance of the requested
exemption. The NRC staff determined
the proposed action fits a category of
actions that do not require an
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement. The
exemption meets the categorical
exclusion requirements of 10 CFR
51.22(c)(25)(i)–(vi).
Granting an exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3), 10
CFR 72.212(b)(5)(i), and 10 CFR 72.214
for the CYAPC ISFSI involves the visual
surveillance requirement associated
with TS A 5.3. A categorical exclusion
for inspection and SRs is provided
under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi)(C), if the
criteria in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i)–(v) are
also satisfied.
The granting of the exemption: (i)
Would not involve a significant hazards
consideration because it does not reduce
a margin of safety, create a new or
different kind of accident not previously
evaluated, or significantly increase the
probability or consequences of an
unevaluated accident; (ii) would not
create a significant change in the types
or significant increase in the amounts of
any effluents that may be released
offsite because the exemption does not
change or produce additional avenues of
effluent release; (iii) would not
significantly increase individual or
cumulative public or occupational
radiation exposure because the
exemption does not introduce new or
increased radiological hazards; (iv)
would not result in significant
construction impacts because the
exemption would not involve
construction or other ground disturbing
activities, nor change the footprint of
the existing ISFSI; (v) would not
significantly increase the potential for or
consequences from radiological
accidents because the exemption
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requires a surveillance method that
ensures the heat removal system of
casks is maintained within the limiting
conditions for operation; and (vi) the
request seeks exemption from
inspection or surveillance requirements,
specifically, the single-method SR in
NAC–MPC TS A 5.3, may be substituted
with the SR, conditions, required
actions, and completion times defined
in NAC–MPC TS A 3.1.6.
In its review of the exemption request,
the staff determined the proposed
exemption meets the eligibility criterion
for categorical exclusion in 10 CFR
51.22(c)(25). Therefore, there are no
significant radiological environmental
impacts associated with the proposed
action.
IV. Conclusion
The NRC has determined that, under
10 CFR 72.7, the exemption is
authorized by law, will not endanger
life or property or the common defense
and security, and is otherwise in the
public interest. Therefore, the NRC
grants CYAPC an exemption from the
requirements in 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3), 10
CFR 72.212(b)(5)(i), 10 CFR 72.214, and
to TS A.5.3 for the NAC–MPC System
CoC No. 1025 storage casks at the HNP
ISFSI. The exemption authorizes the
licensee to use the SR, conditions,
required actions, and completion times
defined in NAC–MPC TS A 3.1.6 to
comply with NAC–MPC TS A 5.3 after
off-normal, accident, or natural
phenomena events, but is specifically
limited to major snow or icing events
(snow/ice events that have the potential
to or that exceed blockage of greater
than one-half of the inlet or outlet
vents).
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day
of February, 2016.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Bernard H. White IV,
Acting Chief, Spent Fuel Licensing Branch,
Division of Spent Fuel Management, Office
of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2016–03590 Filed 2–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
Privacy Act of 1974; Computer
Matching Program
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Notice—computer matching
between the Office of Personnel
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM
22FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 34 (Monday, February 22, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8756-8758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03590]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos. 50-213, and 72-1025; NRC-2016-0031]
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Connecticut Yankee
Atomic Power Company
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in response to an August 31, 2015, request from Connecticut
Yankee Atomic Power Company, (CYAPC or licensee) from NRC's requirement
to comply with the terms, conditions, and specifications in Amendment 5
of the NAC International, (NAC),--Multi-Purpose Canister (MPC) System
Certificate of Compliance (CoC) No. 1025, Appendix A ``Technical
Specifications for NAC-MPC System,'' Technical Specifications (TS)
A.5.3 ``Surveillance After an Off-Normal, Accident, or Natural
Phenomena Event'' at the Haddam Neck Plant (HNP) independent spent fuel
storage installation (ISFSI). The exemption request seeks a
modification of TS A.5.3 inspection requirements for the inlet and
outlet vents following off-normal, accident, and natural phenomena
events.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2016-0031 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2016-0031. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this document
(if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time
that a document is referenced.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Goshen, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, telephone: 301-415-6933, email:
John.Goshen@nrc.gov; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The licensee, the holder of Facility Operating License No. DPR-61,
is CYAPC, which authorizes operation of the HNP in Haddam, Connecticut,
pursuant to part 50 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR). The facility is in decommissioned status. The license provides,
among other things, that the facility is subject to all rules,
regulations, and orders of the NRC now or hereafter in effect.
Under subpart K of 10 CFR part 72, a general license has been
issued for the storage of spent fuel in an ISFSI at power reactor sites
to persons authorized to possess or operate nuclear power reactors
under 10 CFR part 50. The licensee, CYAPC, is licensed to operate a
nuclear power reactor under 10 CFR part 50 and authorized under the 10
CFR part 72 general license to store spent fuel at the HNP ISFSI. Under
the terms of the general license, CYAPC stores spent fuel using
Amendment 5 of the NAC-MPC CoC No. 1025.
II. Request/Action
The licensee requests an exemption from 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3), 10 CFR
72.212(b)(5)(i), and 10 CFR 72.214 for the HNP ISFSI.
Section 72.212(b)(3) requires that a general licensee use
casks that conform to the terms, conditions, and specifications of a
CoC or amended CoC listed in Sec. 72.214. The NAC-MPC CoC No. 1025 is
listed in 10 CFR 72.214.
Section 72.212(b)(5)(i) requires, in relevant part, that a
general licensee demonstrate a loaded cask will conform
[[Page 8757]]
to the terms, conditions, and specifications of a CoC for a cask listed
in Sec. 72.214.
Section 72.214 lists casks which are approved for storage
of spent fuel under conditions specified in their CoCs, including CoC
1025 and Amendment No. 5.
The licensee, as a 10 CFR 72 general licensee, is required to use
the NAC-MPC System according to the technical specifications of the
NAC-MPC System CoC No. 1025. Amendment 5 of the NAC-MPC CoC No. 1025,
Appendix A, ``Technical Specifications for the NAC-MPC System,''
Technical Specification (TS) A 5.3, ``Surveillance After an Off-Normal,
Accident, or Natural Phenomena Event'' requires that a general licensee
undertake a visual surveillance of the NAC-MPC casks within 4 hours
after the occurrence of an off-normal, accident or natural phenomena
event in the area of the ISFSI. This NAC-MPC cask inspection is part of
the general licensee's surveillance response to verify that all the
CONCRETE CASK inlets and outlets are not blocked or obstructed. The
NAC-MPC TS A 5.3 also requires that at least one-half of the inlets and
outlets on each CONCRETE CASK be cleared of blockage or debris within
24 hours to restore air circulation.
The licensee seeks the NRC's authorization to use NAC-MPC TS A
3.1.6 as an alternative to the visual surveillance method specified in
NAC-MPC TS A 5.3. Technical Specification A 3.1.6 permits either visual
surveillance of the inlets and outlets screens or temperature
monitoring of each cask to establish the operability of the Concrete
Cask Heat Removal System for each NAC-MPC cask and to show that the
limiting conditions for operation under 3.1.6 are met. Technical
Specification A 3.1.6 establishes ongoing requirements that HNP must
comply with during all phases of the cask storage operations, not only
after an unusual event in the area of the ISFSI. In effect, TS A 3.1.6
provides continuous temperature monitoring or visual verification to
establish operability of the Concrete Cask Heat Removal System for all
NAC-MPC No. 1025 casks.
The proposed alternative for implementing TS A 5.3 provides that
Surveillance Requirement (SR) 3.1.6.1 is required following off-normal,
accident or natural phenomena events. The NAC-MPC Systems in use at an
ISFSI shall be inspected in accordance with SR 3.1.6.1 within 4 hours
after the occurrence of an off-normal, accident or natural phenomena
event in the area of the ISFSI to confirm operability of the CONCRETE
CASK Heat Removal System for each NAC-MPC System. Additionally, if a
CONCRETE CASK Heat Removal System(s) for one or more NAC-MPC Systems is
determined to be inoperable, Required Action A.1 of TS A 3.1.6 requires
the licensee to restore the affected Concrete Cask Heat Removal
System(s) to an operable condition within 8 hours.
The NAC-MPC Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) supports the use of
either method defined in SR 3.1.6.1 to establish operability to comply
with NAC-MPC TS A 3.1.6 or NAC-MPC TS A 5.3. Section 11.1.1 of the FSAR
states, ``Blockage of Half of the Air Inlets would be detected by the
daily concrete cask operability inspection, which is performed either
by the outlet air temperature measurements or by visual inspection of
the inlet and outlet screens for blockage and integrity.''
III. Discussion
Under 10 CFR 72.7, the Commission may, upon application by any
interested person or upon its own initiative, grant an exemption from
the requirements of 10 CFR part 72, provided the exemption is
authorized by law, will not endanger life or property or the common
defense and security and is otherwise in the public interest. As
explained in following paragraphs, the proposed exemption is lawful,
will not endanger life or property, or the common defense and security,
and is otherwise in the public interest. The ADAMS accession numbers
for the applicable documents are:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADAMS accession
Document Date No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exemption Request............ August 31, 2015...... ML15254A051
Letter of transmittal........ NA................... ML16042A395
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exemption Is Authorized by Law
The exemption would permit the licensee to use either of the
inspection methods permitted by NAC-MPC TS A 3.1.6 as an alternative to
the single surveillance method in NAC-MPC TS A 5.3. The licensee would
conduct a surveillance response within 4 hours after the occurrence of
an off-normal, accident, or natural phenomena event, as required by
NAC-MPC TS A 5.3, but would be permitted to use either temperature
monitoring or visual inspection to ensure the Concrete Cask Heat
Removal Systems are within the limiting conditions for operation. The
exemption is limited to off-normal, accident, or natural phenomena
events, specifically major snow or icing events (snow/ice events that
have the potential to or that exceed blockage of greater than one-half
of the inlet or outlet vents).
The licensee requested an exemption from the provisions in 10 CFR
part 72 that requires the licensee to comply with the terms,
conditions, and specifications of the CoC for the approved cask model
that it uses. Section 72.7 allows the NRC to grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 72. Issuance of this exemption is
consistent with the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and is not
inconsistent with NRC regulations or other applicable laws. Therefore,
the exemption is authorized by law.
The Exemption Is Consistent With the Common Defense and Security
The requested exemption would allow the licensee to use the SR,
conditions, required actions, and completion times defined in NAC-MPC
TS A 3.1.6 as an alternative to the single-method surveillance response
in NAC-MPC TS A 5.3. Technical Specifications A 3.1.6 permits either
visual inspection of the inlet and outlet screens or temperature
monitoring to establish the operability of the Concrete Cask Heat
Removal System for each NAC-MPC System and to comply with the limiting
conditions for operation for TS A 3.1.6. Surveillance Requirement
3.1.6.1 permits temperature monitoring or visual inspection of the
inlet and outlet screens to be utilized to establish the operability of
the Concrete Cask Heat Removal System for each NAC-MPS System to meet
Limiting Condition for Operation 3.1.6. In the event the applicable
acceptance criterion of SR 3.1.6.1 is not met, Required Action A.1
requires the licensee to restore the affected Concrete Cask Heat
Removal System(s) to an operable condition within 8 hours.
[[Page 8758]]
The NRC staff reviewed the licensee's request and finds allowing
the use of either visual surveillance of the inlet and outlet screens
or temperature monitoring of the inlets and outlets within 4 hours of
the occurrence of off-normal, accident, or natural phenomena events,
when limited to major snow and icing events, does not compromise
safety. The exemption still requires the licensee to perform SR 3.1.6.1
to establish the operability of the Concrete Cask Heat Removal Systems
every 24 hours via temperature monitoring or visual inspection of the
inlet and outlet screens. In addition, the exemption provides no
additional time to complete the required surveillance of the inlets and
outlets screens in accordance with TS A 5.3. The use of either method
will ensure that adequate air flows past the storage canisters and that
heat transfer occurs. For these reasons, NRC the staff found the same
level of safety is obtained by using either of the TS A 3.1.6 methods
to comply with NAC-MPC TS A 5.3 during limited types off-normal,
accident, or natural phenomena.
The NRC staff has determined that the thermal, structural,
criticality, retrievability, and radiation protection requirements of
10 CFR part 72 and the offsite dose limits of 10 CFR part 20 will be
maintained For these reasons, the NRC staff finds the same level of
safety is obtained by using either of the TS A 3.1.6 methods to comply
with NAC-MPC TS A 5.3. Therefore, the NRC concludes that the exemption
will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security.
The Exemption Presents No Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety
As described in the application, exempting the licensee from visual
surveillance of cask inlet and outlet vents within 4 hours of a major
snowstorm would allow the licensee to prioritize more effectively
important storm-related activities at the HNP site. Snow and ice
blockage of the inlet and outlet vents is unusual. Moreover, snow and
ice blockages are identified reliably by temperature monitoring of
individual casks. The NRC staff recognizes there is a risk to the
safety of workers responsible for clearing snow and ice from cask pads
during extreme winter conditions when visual surveillance of casks must
be undertaken within 4 hours. The NRC staff finds this risk to workers
can be reduced by using SR 3.1.6.1 to establish the operability of the
Concrete Cask Heat Removal Systems via temperature monitoring or visual
inspection of the inlet and outlet screens. In addition, the limiting
conditions for operation of the NAC-MPC System require the Concrete
Cask Heat Removal System for each cask to be operable during storage
operation, therefore ensuring public health and safety are not reduced.
Therefore, the NRC staff finds that allowing the licensee to use
the SR, conditions, required actions, and completion times defined in
NAC-MPC TS A 3.1.6 as an alternative to the single-method surveillance
response in NAC-MPC TS A 5.3, would reduce worker safety risks to plant
workers involved in snow removal. Therefore, granting the exemption is
otherwise in the public interest.
Environmental Considerations
The NRC staff evaluated whether there would be significant
environmental impacts associated with the issuance of the requested
exemption. The NRC staff determined the proposed action fits a category
of actions that do not require an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement. The exemption meets the categorical
exclusion requirements of 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i)-(vi).
Granting an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR 72.212(b)(3),
10 CFR 72.212(b)(5)(i), and 10 CFR 72.214 for the CYAPC ISFSI involves
the visual surveillance requirement associated with TS A 5.3. A
categorical exclusion for inspection and SRs is provided under 10 CFR
51.22(c)(25)(vi)(C), if the criteria in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i)-(v) are
also satisfied.
The granting of the exemption: (i) Would not involve a significant
hazards consideration because it does not reduce a margin of safety,
create a new or different kind of accident not previously evaluated, or
significantly increase the probability or consequences of an
unevaluated accident; (ii) would not create a significant change in the
types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may
be released offsite because the exemption does not change or produce
additional avenues of effluent release; (iii) would not significantly
increase individual or cumulative public or occupational radiation
exposure because the exemption does not introduce new or increased
radiological hazards; (iv) would not result in significant construction
impacts because the exemption would not involve construction or other
ground disturbing activities, nor change the footprint of the existing
ISFSI; (v) would not significantly increase the potential for or
consequences from radiological accidents because the exemption requires
a surveillance method that ensures the heat removal system of casks is
maintained within the limiting conditions for operation; and (vi) the
request seeks exemption from inspection or surveillance requirements,
specifically, the single-method SR in NAC-MPC TS A 5.3, may be
substituted with the SR, conditions, required actions, and completion
times defined in NAC-MPC TS A 3.1.6.
In its review of the exemption request, the staff determined the
proposed exemption meets the eligibility criterion for categorical
exclusion in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25). Therefore, there are no significant
radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
IV. Conclusion
The NRC has determined that, under 10 CFR 72.7, the exemption is
authorized by law, will not endanger life or property or the common
defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest.
Therefore, the NRC grants CYAPC an exemption from the requirements in
10 CFR 72.212(b)(3), 10 CFR 72.212(b)(5)(i), 10 CFR 72.214, and to TS
A.5.3 for the NAC-MPC System CoC No. 1025 storage casks at the HNP
ISFSI. The exemption authorizes the licensee to use the SR, conditions,
required actions, and completion times defined in NAC-MPC TS A 3.1.6 to
comply with NAC-MPC TS A 5.3 after off-normal, accident, or natural
phenomena events, but is specifically limited to major snow or icing
events (snow/ice events that have the potential to or that exceed
blockage of greater than one-half of the inlet or outlet vents).
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day of February, 2016.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Bernard H. White IV,
Acting Chief, Spent Fuel Licensing Branch, Division of Spent Fuel
Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2016-03590 Filed 2-19-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P