Quarterly Status Report of Water Service, Repayment, and Other Water-Related Contract Actions, 8537-8544 [2016-03464]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Notices
the proposed CPA lease sale area are
currently unleased. The estimated
amount of resources projected to be
developed as a result of the proposed
CPA lease sale is 0.460–0.894 billion
barrels of oil (BBO) and 1.939–3.903
trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of gas.
Alternative B—Exclude the Unleased
Blocks Near Biologically Sensitive
Topographic Features: This alternative
would offer for lease all unleased blocks
within the proposed CPA lease sale
area, as described for the proposed
action (Alternative A), but it would
exclude from leasing any unleased
blocks subject to the Topographic
Features Stipulation, described below.
The number of blocks that would not be
offered under Alternative B represents
only a small percentage of the total
number of blocks to be offered under
Alternative A; therefore, it is assumed
that the levels of activity for Alternative
B would be essentially the same as those
projected for the CPA proposed action.
The estimated amount of resources
projected to be developed under this
alternative is 0.460–0.894 BBO and
1.939–3.903 Tcf of gas.
Alternative C—No Action: This
alternative is the cancellation of
proposed CPA Lease Sale 241 and is
identified as the environmentally
preferred alternative.
Lease Stipulations—The CPA 241/
EPA 226 Supplemental EIS describes all
lease stipulations, which are included
in the Final Notice of Sale Package. The
10 lease stipulations for proposed CPA
Lease Sale 241 are the Topographic
Features Stipulation; the Live Bottom
(Pinnacle Trend) Stipulation; the
Military Areas Stipulation; the
Evacuation Stipulation; the
Coordination Stipulation; the Blocks
South of Baldwin County, Alabama,
Stipulation; the Protected Species
Stipulation; the United Nations
Convention on the Law of the Sea
Royalty Payment Stipulation; the Below
Seabed Operations Stipulation; and the
Stipulation on the Agreement between
the United States of America and the
United Mexican States Concerning
Transboundary Hydrocarbon Reservoirs
in the Gulf of Mexico. The stipulations
will be added as lease terms where
applicable and will therefore be
enforceable as part of the lease.
Appendix A of the CPA 241/EPA 226
Supplemental EIS provides a list and
description of standard post-lease
mitigating measures that may be
required by BOEM or BSEE as a result
of plan and permit review processes for
the Gulf of Mexico OCS Region.
After careful consideration, BOEM
has selected the proposed action, which
is identified as BOEM’s preferred
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
alternative (Alternative A) in the CPA
241/EPA 226 Supplemental EIS.
BOEM’s selection of the preferred
alternative meets the purpose and need
for the proposed action, as identified in
the CPA 241/EPA 226 Supplemental
EIS, and reflects orderly resource
development, with protection of the
human, marine, and coastal
environments, while also ensuring that
the public receives an equitable return
for these resources and that free-market
competition is maintained.
Authority: This NOA of a Record of
Decision is published pursuant to the
regulations (40 CFR part 1503) implementing
the provisions of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.).
Dated: February 10, 2016.
Abigail Ross Hopper,
Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management.
[FR Doc. 2016–03280 Filed 2–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
[RR83550000, 167R5065C6,
RX.59389832.1009676]
Quarterly Status Report of Water
Service, Repayment, and Other WaterRelated Contract Actions
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given of
contractual actions that have been
proposed to the Bureau of Reclamation
(Reclamation) and are new,
discontinued, or completed since the
last publication of this notice. This
notice is one of a variety of means used
to inform the public about proposed
contractual actions for capital recovery
and management of project resources
and facilities consistent with section 9(f)
of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939.
Additional announcements of
individual contract actions may be
published in the Federal Register and in
newspapers of general circulation in the
areas determined by Reclamation to be
affected by the proposed action.
ADDRESSES: The identity of the
approving officer and other information
pertaining to a specific contract
proposal may be obtained by calling or
writing the appropriate regional office at
the address and telephone number given
for each region in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Kelly, Reclamation Law
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8537
Administration Division, Bureau of
Reclamation, P.O. Box 25007, Denver,
Colorado 80225–0007; telephone 303–
445–2888.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Consistent
with section 9(f) of the Reclamation
Project Act of 1939, and the rules and
regulations published in 52 FR 11954,
April 13, 1987 (43 CFR 426.22),
Reclamation will publish notice of
proposed or amendatory contract
actions for any contract for the delivery
of project water for authorized uses in
newspapers of general circulation in the
affected area at least 60 days prior to
contract execution. Announcements
may be in the form of news releases,
legal notices, official letters,
memorandums, or other forms of
written material. Meetings, workshops,
and/or hearings may also be used, as
appropriate, to provide local publicity.
The public participation procedures do
not apply to proposed contracts for the
sale of surplus or interim irrigation
water for a term of 1 year or less. Either
of the contracting parties may invite the
public to observe contract proceedings.
All public participation procedures will
be coordinated with those involved in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act. Pursuant to
the ‘‘Final Revised Public Participation
Procedures’’ for water resource-related
contract negotiations, published in 47
FR 7763, February 22, 1982, a tabulation
is provided of all proposed contractual
actions in each of the five Reclamation
regions. When contract negotiations are
completed, and prior to execution, each
proposed contract form must be
approved by the Secretary of the
Interior, or pursuant to delegated or
redelegated authority, the Commissioner
of Reclamation or one of the regional
directors. In some instances,
congressional review and approval of a
report, water rate, or other terms and
conditions of the contract may be
involved.
Public participation in and receipt of
comments on contract proposals will be
facilitated by adherence to the following
procedures:
1. Only persons authorized to act on
behalf of the contracting entities may
negotiate the terms and conditions of a
specific contract proposal.
2. Advance notice of meetings or
hearings will be furnished to those
parties that have made a timely written
request for such notice to the
appropriate regional or project office of
Reclamation.
3. Written correspondence regarding
proposed contracts may be made
available to the general public pursuant
to the terms and procedures of the
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
8538
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Notices
Freedom of Information Act, as
amended.
4. Written comments on a proposed
contract or contract action must be
submitted to the appropriate regional
officials at the locations and within the
time limits set forth in the advance
public notices.
5. All written comments received and
testimony presented at any public
hearings will be reviewed and
summarized by the appropriate regional
office for use by the contract approving
authority.
6. Copies of specific proposed
contracts may be obtained from the
appropriate regional director or his or
her designated public contact as they
become available for review and
comment.
7. In the event modifications are made
in the form of a proposed contract, the
appropriate regional director shall
determine whether republication of the
notice and/or extension of the comment
period is necessary.
Factors considered in making such a
determination shall include, but are not
limited to, (i) the significance of the
modification, and (ii) the degree of
public interest which has been
expressed over the course of the
negotiations. At a minimum, the
regional director will furnish revised
contracts to all parties who requested
the contract in response to the initial
public notice.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Definitions of Abbreviations Used in the
Reports
ARRA American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009
BCP Boulder Canyon Project
Reclamation Bureau of Reclamation
CAP Central Arizona Project
CUP Central Utah Project
CVP Central Valley Project
CRSP Colorado River Storage Project
FR Federal Register
IDD Irrigation and Drainage District
ID Irrigation District
M&I Municipal and Industrial
NMISC New Mexico Interstate Stream
Commission
O&M Operation and Maintenance
OM&R Operation, Maintenance, and
Replacement
P–SMBP Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin
Program
PPR Present Perfected Right
RRA Reclamation Reform Act of 1982
SOD Safety of Dams
SRPA Small Reclamation Projects Act of
1956
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WD Water District
PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION:
Bureau of Reclamation, 1150 North
Curtis Road, Suite 100, Boise, Idaho
83706–1234, telephone 208–378–5344.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
1. Irrigation, M&I, and Miscellaneous
Water Users; Idaho, Oregon,
Washington, Montana, and Wyoming:
Temporary or interim irrigation and
M&I water service, water storage, water
right settlement, exchange,
miscellaneous use, or water replacement
contracts to provide up to 10,000 acrefeet of water annually for terms up to 5
years; long-term contracts for similar
service for up to 1,000 acre-feet of water
annually.
2. Rogue River Basin Water Users,
Rogue River Basin Project, Oregon:
Water service contracts; $8 per acre-foot
per annum.
3. Willamette Basin Water Users,
Willamette Basin Project, Oregon: Water
service contracts; $8 per acre-foot per
annum.
4. Pioneer Ditch Company, Boise
Project, Idaho; Clark and Edwards Canal
and Irrigation Company, Enterprise
Canal Company, Ltd., Lenroot Canal
Company, Liberty Park Canal Company,
Poplar ID, all in the Minidoka Project,
Idaho; and Juniper Flat District
Improvement Company, Wapinitia
Project, Oregon: Amendatory repayment
and water service contracts; purpose is
to conform to the RRA.
5. Nine water user entities of the
Arrowrock Division, Boise Project,
Idaho: Repayment agreements with
districts with spaceholder contracts for
repayment, per legislation, of the
reimbursable share of costs to
rehabilitate Arrowrock Dam Outlet
Gates under the O&M program.
6. Three irrigation water user entities,
Rogue River Basin Project, Oregon:
Long-term contracts for exchange of
water service with three entities for the
provision of up to 292 acre-feet of stored
water from Applegate Reservoir (a
USACE project) for irrigation use in
exchange for the transfer of out-ofstream water rights from the Little
Applegate River to instream flow rights
with the State of Oregon for instream
flow use.
7. Conagra Foods Lamb Weston, Inc.,
Columbia Basin Project, Washington:
Miscellaneous purposes water service
contract providing for the delivery of up
to 1,500 acre-feet of water from the
Scooteney Wasteway for effluent
management.
8. Benton ID, Yakima Project,
Washington: Replacement contract to,
among other things, withdraw the
District from the Sunnyside Division
Board of Control; provide for direct
payment of the District’s share of total
operation, maintenance, repair, and
replacement costs incurred by the
United States in operation of storage
division; and establish District
responsibility for operation,
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
maintenance, repair, and replacement
for irrigation distribution system.
9. City of Prineville and Ochoco ID,
Crooked River Project, Oregon: Longterm contract to provide the city of
Prineville with a mitigation water
supply from Prineville Reservoir; with
Ochoco ID anticipated to be a party to
the contract, as they are responsible for
O&M of the dam and reservoir.
10. Burley and Minidoka IDs,
Minidoka Project, Idaho: Supplemental
and amendatory contracts to transfer the
O&M of the Main South Side Canal
Headworks to Burley ID and transfer the
O&M of the Main North Side Canal
Headworks to the Minidoka ID.
Completed contract actions:
1. (9) Stanfield and Westland IDs and
67 individual contractors, Umatilla
Project, Oregon: Amendatory repayment
contracts and repayment agreements for
reimbursable cost of SOD repairs to
McKay Dam. Contracts executed
September 17, 2015, and October 8,
2015.
2. (10) East Columbia Basin ID,
Columbia Basin Project, Washington:
Long-term contract to renew master
water service contract No. 14–06–100–
9165, as supplemented, to authorize the
District to deliver a base quantity of up
to 90,000 acre-feet of Columbia Basin
Project water annually to up to 30,000
First Phase Continuation Acres located
within the District, and continue
delivery of additional water to land
irrigated under the District’s repayment
contract during the peak period of
irrigation water use annually. Contract
executed September 22, 2015.
MID-PACIFIC REGION: Bureau of
Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way,
Sacramento, California 95825–1898,
telephone 916–978–5250.
1. Irrigation water districts, individual
irrigators, M&I and miscellaneous water
users; California, Nevada, and Oregon:
Temporary (interim) water service
contracts for available project water for
irrigation, M&I, or fish and wildlife
purposes providing up to 10,000 acrefeet of water annually for terms up to 5
years; temporary Warren Act contracts
for use of excess capacity in project
facilities for terms up to 5 years;
temporary conveyance agreements with
the State of California for various
purposes; long-term contracts for similar
service for up to 1,000 acre-feet
annually.
2. Contractors from the American
River Division, Delta Division, Cross
Valley Canal, San Felipe Division, West
San Joaquin Division, San Luis Unit,
and Elk Creek Community Services
District; CVP; California: Renewal of 30
interim and long-term water service
contracts; water quantities for these
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Notices
contracts total in excess of 2.1M acrefeet. These contract actions will be
accomplished through long-term
renewal contracts pursuant to Public
Law 102–575. Prior to completion of
negotiation of long-term renewal
contracts, existing interim renewal
water service contracts may be renewed
through successive interim renewal of
contracts.
3. Redwood Valley County WD,
SRPA, California: Restructuring the
repayment schedule pursuant to Public
Law 100–516.
4. El Dorado County Water Agency,
CVP, California: M&I water service
contract to supplement existing water
supply. Contract will provide for an
amount not to exceed 15,000 acre-feet
annually authorized by Public Law 101–
514 (Section 206) for El Dorado County
Water Agency. The supply will be
subcontracted to El Dorado ID and
Georgetown Divide Public Utility
District.
5. Sutter Extension WD, DelanoEarlimart ID, Pixley ID, the State of
California Department of Water
Resources, and the State of California
Department of Fish and Wildlife; CVP;
California: Pursuant to Public Law 102–
575, agreements with non-Federal
entities for the purpose of providing
funding for CVPIA refuge water
conveyance and/or facilities
improvement construction to deliver
water for certain Federal wildlife
refuges, State wildlife areas, and private
wetlands.
6. CVP Service Area, California:
Temporary water acquisition
agreements for purchase of 5,000 to
200,000 acre-feet of water for fish and
wildlife purposes as authorized by
Public Law 102–575 for terms of up to
5 years.
7. El Dorado ID, CVP, California:
Long-term Warren Act contract for
conveyance of nonproject water in the
amount of up to 17,000 acre-feet
annually. The contract will allow CVP
facilities to be used to deliver
nonproject water to the District for M&I
use within its service area.
8. Horsefly, Klamath, Langell Valley,
and Tulelake IDs; Klamath Project;
Oregon: Repayment contracts for SOD
work on Clear Lake Dam. These districts
will share in repayment of costs, and
each district will have a separate
contract.
9. Casitas Municipal WD, Ventura
Project, California: Repayment contract
for SOD work on Casitas Dam.
10. Warren Act Contracts, CVP,
California: Execution of long-term
Warren Act contracts (up to 40 years)
with various entities for conveyance of
nonproject water in the CVP.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
11. Tuolumne Utilities District
(formerly Tuolumne Regional WD),
CVP, California: Long-term water
service contract for up to 9,000 acre-feet
from New Melones Reservoir, and
possibly a long-term contract for storage
of nonproject water in New Melones
Reservoir.
12. Madera-Chowchilla Water and
Power Authority, CVP, California:
Agreement to transfer the OM&R and
certain financial and administrative
activities related to the Madera Canal
and associated works.
13. Sacramento Suburban WD, CVP,
California: Execution of a long-term
Warren Act contract for conveyance of
29,000 acre-feet of nonproject water.
The contract will allow CVP facilities to
be used to deliver nonproject water
provided from the Placer County Water
Agency to the District for use within its
service area.
14. Town of Fernley, State of
California, City of Reno, City of Sparks,
Washoe County, State of Nevada,
Truckee-Carson ID, and any other local
interest or Native American Tribal
Interest who may have negotiated rights
under Public Law 101–618; Nevada and
California: Contract for the storage of
non-Federal water in Truckee River
reservoirs as authorized by Public Law
101–618 and the Preliminary Settlement
Agreement. The contracts shall be
consistent with the Truckee River Water
Quality Settlement Agreement and the
terms and conditions of the Truckee
River Operating Agreement.
15. Delta Lands Reclamation District
No. 770, CVP, California: Long-term
Warren Act contract for conveyance of
up to 300,000 acre-feet of nonproject
flood flows via the Friant-Kern Canal for
flood control purposes.
16. Pershing County Water
Conservation District, Pershing County,
Lander County, and the State of Nevada;
Humboldt Project; Nevada: Title transfer
of lands and features of the Humboldt
Project.
17. Mendota Wildlife Area, CVP,
California: Reimbursement agreement
between the California Department of
Fish and Wildlife and Reclamation for
conveyance service costs to deliver
Level 2 water to the Mendota Wildlife
Area during infrequent periods when
the Mendota Pool is down due to
unexpected but needed maintenance.
This action is taken pursuant to Public
Law 102–575, Title 34, Section
3406(d)(1), to meet full Level 2 water
needs of the Mendota Wildlife Area.
18. San Luis WD, CVP, California:
Proposed partial assignment of 2,400
acre-feet of the District’s CVP supply to
Santa Nella County WD for M&I use.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8539
19. Placer County Water Agency, CVP,
California: Proposed exchange
agreement under section 14 of the 1939
Act to exchange up to 71,000 acre-feet
annually of the Agency’s American
River Middle Fork Project water for use
by Reclamation, for a like amount of
CVP water from the Sacramento River
for use by the Agency.
20. Irrigation Contractors, Klamath
Project, Oregon: Amendment of
repayment contracts or negotiation of
new contracts to allow for recovery of
additional capital costs.
21. Orland Unit Water User’s
Association, Orland Project, California:
Repayment contract for the SOD costs
assigned to the irrigation of Stony Gorge
Dam.
22. Goleta WD, Cachuma Project,
California: An agreement to transfer title
of the federally owned distribution
system to the District subject to
approved legislation.
23. City of Santa Barbara, Cachuma
Project, California: Execution of a
temporary contract and a long-term
Warren Act contract with the City for
conveyance of nonproject water in
Cachuma Project facilities.
24. Water user entities responsible for
payment of O&M costs for Reclamation
projects in California, Nevada, and
Oregon: Contracts for extraordinary
maintenance and replacement funded
pursuant to ARRA. Added costs to rates
to be collected under irrigation and
interim M&I ratesetting policies.
25. Water user entities responsible for
payment of O&M costs for Reclamation
projects in California, Nevada, and
Oregon: Contracts for extraordinary
maintenance and replacement funded
pursuant to Subtitle G of Public Law
111–11.
26. Cachuma Operation and
Maintenance Board, Cachuma Project,
California: Amendment to SOD Contract
No. 01–WC–20–2030 to provide for
increased SOD costs associated with
Bradbury Dam.
27. Reclamation will become
signatory to a three-party conveyance
agreement with the Cross Valley
Contractors and the California State
Department of Water Resources for
conveyance of Cross Valley Contractors’
CVP water supplies that are made
available pursuant to long-term water
service contracts.
28. Westlands WD, CVP, California:
Negotiation and execution of a longterm repayment contract to provide
reimbursement of costs related to the
construction of drainage facilities. This
action is being undertaken to satisfy the
Federal Government’s obligation to
provide drainage service to Westlands
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
8540
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Notices
located within the San Luis Unit of the
CVP.
29. San Luis WD, Meyers Farms
Family Trust, and Reclamation; CVP;
California: Revision of an existing
contract between San Luis WD, Meyers
Farms Family Trust, and Reclamation
providing for an increase in the
exchange of water from 6,316 to 10,526
acre-feet annually and an increase in the
storage capacity of the bank to 60,000
acre-feet.
30. San Joaquin Valley National
Cemetery, U.S. Department of Veteran
Affairs; Delta Division, CVP; California:
Negotiation of a multi-year wheeling
agreement with a retroactive effective
date of 2011 is pending. A wheeling
agreement with the State of California
Department of Water Resources
provides for the conveyance and
delivery of CVP water through the State
of California’s water project facilities to
the San Joaquin Valley National
Cemetery.
31. Byron-Bethany ID, CVP,
California: Negotiation of a multi-year
wheeling agreement with a retroactive
effective date is pending. A wheeling
agreement with the State of California
Department of Water Resources
provides for the conveyance and
delivery of CVP water through the State
of California’s water project facilities, to
the Musco Family Olive Company, a
customer of Byron-Bethany ID.
32. Contra Costa WD, CVP, California:
Amendment to an existing O&M
agreement to transfer O&M of the Contra
Costa Rock Slough Fish Screen to the
District. Initial construction funding
provided through ARRA.
33. Irrigation water districts,
individual irrigators and M&I water
users, CVP, California: Temporary water
service contracts for terms not to exceed
1 year for up to 100,000 acre-feet of
surplus supplies of CVP water resulting
from an unusually large water supply,
not otherwise storable for project
purposes, or from infrequent and
otherwise unmanaged flood flows of
short duration.
34. Irrigation water districts,
individual irrigators, M&I and
miscellaneous water users, CVP,
California: Temporary Warren Act
contracts for terms up to 5 years
providing for use of excess capacity in
CVP facilities for annual quantities
exceeding 10,000 acre-feet.
35. City of Redding, CVP, California:
Proposed partial assignment of 30 acrefeet of the City of Redding’s CVP water
supply to the City of Shasta Lake for
M&I use.
36. Langell Valley ID, Klamath
Project; Oregon: Title transfer of lands
and facilities of the Klamath Project.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
37. Sacramento River Division, CVP,
California: Administrative assignments
of various Sacramento River Settlement
Contracts.
38. California Department of Fish and
Game, CVP, California: To extend the
term of and amend the existing water
service contract for the Department’s
San Joaquin Fish Hatchery to allow an
increase from 35 to 60 cubic feet per
second of continuous flow to pass
through the Hatchery prior to it
returning to the San Joaquin River.
39. Orland Unit Water User’s
Association, Orland Project, California:
Title transfer of lands and features of the
Orland Project.
40. Santa Clara Valley WD, CVP,
California: Second amendment to Santa
Clara Valley WD’s water service contract
to add the State of California
Department of Water Resources, State of
California’s water project facilities on
the South Bay Aqueduct as an
additional point of delivery, and to add
CVP-wide form of contract language
providing for mutually agreed upon
point or points of delivery.
41. PacifiCorp, Klamath Project,
Oregon and California: Transfer of O&M
of Link River Dam and associated
facilities. Contract will allow for the
continued O&M by PacifiCorp.
42. Tulelake ID, Klamath Project,
Oregon and California: Transfer of O&M
of Station 48 and gate on Drain #1, Lost
River Diversion Channel.
43. Fresno County Waterworks No.
18; Friant Division, CVP; California:
Execution of an agreement to provide
for the O&M of select Federal facilities
by Fresno County Waterworks No. 18.
44. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Tulelake ID; Klamath Project; Oregon
and California: Water service contract
for deliveries to Lower Klamath
National Wildlife Refuge, including
transfer of O&M responsibilities for the
P Canal system.
45. Tulelake ID, Klamath Project,
Oregon and California: Amendment of
repayment contract to eliminate
reimbursement for P Canal O&M costs.
46. East Bay Municipal Utility
District, CVP, California: Long-term
Warren Act contract for storage and
conveyance of up to 47,000 acre-feet
annually.
47. Sacramento County Water Agency,
CVP, California: Assignment of 7,000
acre-feet of CVP water to the City of
Folsom.
48. Del Puerto WD, CVP, California:
Long-term Warren Act contract, not to
exceed 40 years, for annual storage and
conveyance of up to 60,000 acre-feet of
recycled water from the cities of Turlock
and Modesto. This nonproject water
will be stored in the San Luis Reservoir
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and conveyed through the DeltaMendota Canal to agricultural lands and
wildlife refuges.
49. Gray Lodge Wildlife Area, CVP,
California: Reimbursement agreement
between the California Department of
Fish and Wildlife and Reclamation for
groundwater pumping costs.
Groundwater will provide a portion of
Gray Lodge Wildlife Area’s CVPIA Level
4 water supplies. This action is taken
pursuant to Public Law 102–575, Title
34, Section 3406(d)(1, 2 and 5), to meet
full Level 4 water needs of the Gray
Lodge Wildlife Area.
LOWER COLORADO REGION:
Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 61470
(Nevada Highway and Park Street),
Boulder City, Nevada 89006–1470,
telephone 702–293–8192.
1. Milton and Jean Phillips, BCP,
Arizona: Develop a Colorado River
water delivery contract for 60 acre-feet
of Colorado River water per year as
recommended by the Arizona
Department of Water Resources.
2. Gila Project Works, Gila Project,
Arizona: Perform title transfer of
facilities and certain lands in the
Wellton-Mohawk Division from the
United States to the Wellton-Mohawk
IDD.
3. Sherrill Ventures, LLLP and Green
Acres Mohave, LLC; BCP; Arizona: Draft
contracts for PPR No. 14 for 1,080 acrefeet of water per year as follows: Sherrill
Ventures, LLLP, a draft contract for
954.3 acre-feet per year and Green Acres
Mohave, LLC, a draft contract for 125.7
acre-feet per year.
4. Water user entities responsible for
payment of O&M costs for Reclamation
projects in Arizona, California, Nevada,
and Utah: Contracts for extraordinary
maintenance and replacement funded
pursuant to ARRA.
5. Water user entities responsible for
payment of O&M costs for Reclamation
projects in Arizona, California, Nevada,
and Utah: Contracts for extraordinary
maintenance and replacement funded
pursuant to Subtitle G of Public Law
111–11.
6. San Carlos Apache Tribe and the
Town of Gilbert, CAP, Arizona:
Proposed 100-year lease not to exceed
5,925 acre-feet per year of CAP water
from the Tribe to Gilbert.
7. City of Yuma, BCP, Arizona:
Amend the City’s contract to extend the
term (which expired October 2012) for
5 years during which time a
consolidated contract will be developed.
8. Bard WD, Yuma Project, California:
Supersede and replace the District’s
O&M contract for the Yuma Project,
California, Reservation Division, Indian
Unit, to reflect that appropriated funds
are no longer available, and to specify
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Notices
an alternate process for transfer of
funds. In addition, other miscellaneous
processes required for Reclamation’s
contractual administration and
oversight will be updated to ensure the
Federal Indian Trust obligation for
reservation water and land are met.
9. Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California, the San Diego
County Water Authority, and the Otay
WD; BCP; California: Execute a
proposed Amendment No. 2 to extend
the ‘‘Agreement for Temporary
Emergency Delivery of a Portion of the
Mexican Treaty Waters of the Colorado
River to the International Boundary in
the Vicinity of Tijuana, Baja California,
Mexico, and the Operation of Facilities
in the United States’’ until November 9,
2019.
10. Central Arizona Water
Conservation District, CAP, Arizona:
Negotiate a standard form of wheeling
agreement for the wheeling of
nonproject water, in accordance with
the District’s existing contract.
11. Ogram Farms, BCP, Arizona:
Revise Exhibit A of the contract to
change the contract service area and
points of diversion/delivery.
12. Ogram Boys Enterprises, Inc.,
BCP, Arizona: Revise Exhibit A of the
contract to change the contract service
area and points of diversion/delivery.
13. Reclamation, Davis Dam (Davis
Dam) and Big Bend WD, BCP, Arizona
and Nevada: Enter into proposed
‘‘Agreement for the Diversion,
Treatment, and Delivery of Colorado
River Water’’ in order for district to
divert, treat, and deliver to Davis Dam
the Davis Dam Secretarial Reservation
amount of up to 100 acre-feet per year
of Colorado River water.
14. Reclamation, Arizona Department
of Water Resources, Arizona Water
Banking Authority, Central Arizona
Water Conservation District, Southern
Nevada Water Authority, and The
Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California; BCP; Arizona, California and
Nevada: Begin negotiations to enter into
proposed ‘‘Storage and Interstate
Release Agreement(s)’’ for creation,
offstream storage, and release of unused
basic or surplus Colorado River
apportionment within the lower
division states pursuant to 43 CFR part
414.
15. La Paz County and Ehrenberg
Improvement Association, BCP,
Arizona: Review and approve a
proposed partial assignment to the
Association of 150 acre-feet per year of
La Paz County’s Arizona fourth priority
water entitlement amount of 500 acrefeet per year and execute the associated
amendments to La Paz County’s and the
Association’s contracts.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
16. San Carlos Apache Tribe and the
Town of Gilbert, CAP, Arizona: Execute
Amendment No. 5 to a CAP water lease
to extend the term of the lease in order
for the San Carlos Apache Tribe to lease
20,000 acre-feet of its CAP water to the
Town of Gilbert during calendar year
2016.
17. San Carlos Apache Tribe and the
Pascua Yaqui Tribe, CAP, Arizona:
Execute a CAP water lease in order for
the San Carlos Apache Tribe to lease
790 acre-feet of its CAP water to the
Pascua Yaqui Tribe during calendar year
2016.
18. Chandler Heights Citrus ID and
Central Arizona Water Conservation
District, CAP, Arizona: Execute a
proposed assignment to Central Arizona
Water Conservation District of Chandler
Heights Citrus ID’s 315 acre-foot annual
CAP water entitlement.
19. Ak-Chin Indian Community and
Del Webb Corporation, CAP, Arizona:
Execute a CAP water lease in order for
Ak-Chin Indian Community to lease
2,800 acre-feet of its CAP water to the
Del Webb Corporation during calendar
year 2016.
20. Mohave County Water Authority,
BCP, Arizona: Amend Exhibit D to the
Authority’s Colorado River water
delivery contract to update the list of
subcontractors with the Authority.
Completed contract actions:
1. (15) H2O Water Company, Inc. and
the Town of Queen Creek, CAP,
Arizona: Execute a proposed assignment
to the Town of Queen Creek of the H2O
Water Company’s 147 acre-foot annual
CAP water entitlement. Contract
executed on September 29, 2015.
2. (19) Town of Quartzsite, BCP,
Arizona: Amend the contract with the
Town of Quartzsite to extend the term
for another 15 years ending on January
28, 2029. Contract Executed on October
20, 2015.
3. (23) Yuma County Water Users’
Association, Yuma Project, Arizona:
Execute a funding agreement for
California Check and Wasteway
infrastructure improvements to improve
operational control and reduce water
spills as part of the Western Drought
Response activities in Arizona,
California, Nevada, and Mexico.
Contract executed on September 15,
2015.
UPPER COLORADO REGION: Bureau
of Reclamation, 125 South State Street,
Room 8100, Salt Lake City, Utah 84138–
1102, telephone 801–524–3864.
1. Individual irrigators, M&I, and
miscellaneous water users; Initial Units,
CRSP; Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, and
New Mexico: Temporary (interim) water
service contracts for surplus project
water for irrigation or M&I use to
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8541
provide up to 10,000 acre-feet of water
annually for terms up to 10 years; longterm contracts for similar service for up
to 1,000 acre-feet of water annually.
2. Contracts with various water user
entities responsible for payment of O&M
costs for Reclamation projects in
Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas,
Utah, and Wyoming: Contracts for
extraordinary maintenance and
replacement funded pursuant to Subtitle
G of 111–11 to be executed as project
progresses.
3. Middle Rio Grande Project, New
Mexico: Reclamation continues annual
leasing of water from various San JuanChama Project contractors to stabilize
flows in a critical reach of the Rio
Grande in order to meet the needs of
irrigators and preserve habitat for the
silvery minnow. Reclamation leased
approximately 14,423 acre-feet of water
from San Juan-Chama Project
contractors in 2015.
4. Bridger Valley Water Conservancy
District, Lyman Project, Wyoming: The
District has requested that its Meeks
Cabin repayment contract be amended
from two 25-year contacts to one 40-year
contract.
5. Uintah Water Conservancy District;
Vernal Unit, CUP; Utah: Proposed
carriage contract to both store up to
35,000 acre-feet of nonproject water in
Steinaker Reservoir and carry
nonproject water in the Steinaker
Service and Feeder Canals.
6. Weber Basin Water Conservancy
District, Weber Basin Project, Utah: The
District has requested a contract to
allow the storage of Weber Basin Project
water in Smith Morehouse Reservoir
under the authority of Section 14 of the
Reclamation Projects Act of 1939.
7. Carbon Water Conservancy District,
Scofield Project, Utah: The District has
requested Reclamation’s assistance with
O&M activities to rehabilitate certain
portions of the Scofield Dam outlet
works and surrounding area.
8. Provo Reservoir Water Users
Company, Provo River Project, Utah:
The Company has requested a contract
to store up to 5,000 acre-feet on its
nonproject water in Deer Creek
Reservoir on a space-available basis
under the authority of the Warren Act
of 1911.
9. Uintah Water Conservancy District;
Vernal Unit, CUP; Utah: The District
desires to pipe the Steinaker Service
Canal to improve public safety, decrease
O&M costs, and increase water
efficiency. This action will require a
supplementary O&M contract to modify
Federal Reclamation facilities, as well as
an agreement written under the
authority of the Civil Sundry
Appropriations Act of 1921 for
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
8542
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Notices
Reclamation to accept funds to review
designs, inspect project construction,
and any other activities requiring
Reclamation’s participation.
10. Newton Water Users Association,
Newton Project; Utah: The Association
desires to abandon the Federal canals
distributing water from Newton
Reservoir, and replace them with a
private pipeline. This requires a
supplementary O&M agreement to
approve modification to Federal
Reclamation facilities and outline the
O&M responsibilities during and after
construction.
11. Salem Canal and Irrigation
Company, Strawberry Valley Project,
Utah: The United States intends to enter
into an amendatory contract regarding
possible lost generation of power
revenues generated at the Spanish Fork
Power Plant on the Strawberry Valley
Project.
12. Weber Basin Water Conservancy
District, A.V. Watkins Dam, Utah: The
United States intends to enter into an
implementation agreement with the
District giving the District the authority
to modify Federal facilities to raise the
crest of AV Watkins Dam.
13. Uintah Water Conservancy
District; Flaming Gorge Unit, CRSP;
Utah: The District has requested a longterm water service contract to remove
up to 5,500 acre-feet of water annually
from the Green River for irrigation
purposes under the authority of Section
9(e) of the Reclamation Project Act of
1939. A short-term contract may be
executed until a long-term contract can
be completed.
14. South Cache Water Users
Association, Hyrum Project, Utah: The
Association has requested a loan under
Public Law 111–11 to pipe
approximately 2,100 linear-feet of the
Hyrum Mendon Canal.
15. Emery County Water Conservancy
District, Emery County Project, Utah:
The District has requested to convert 79
acre-feet of Cottonwood Creek
Consolidated Irrigation Company water
from irrigation to M&I uses.
16. Aamodt Litigation Settlement, San
Juan-Chama Project, New Mexico:
Contract for 1,079 acre-feet of San JuanChama Project water for M&I use with
the four Pueblos included in the
Aamodt Litigation Settlement Act, Title
VI of Public Law 111–291. The four
Pueblos are the Nambe, Pojoaque, San
Ildefonso, and Tesuque.
17. Salt River Project Agricultural
Improvement and Power District, Salt
River Project; Glen Canyon Unit, CRSP;
Arizona: The District has requested a
renewal of its existing contract from
2034 through 2044.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
18. Dolores Water Conservancy
District, Dolores Project, Colorado: The
District has requested a water service
contract for 1,402 acre-feet of newly
identified project water for irrigation.
The proposed water service contract
will provide 417 acre-feet of project
water for irrigation of the Ute Enterprise
and 985 acre-feet for use by the
District’s full-service irrigators.
19. City of Page, Arizona; Glen
Canyon Unit, CRSP; Arizona: Long-term
contract for 975 acre-feet of water for
municipal purposes.
20. Florida Water Conservancy
District, Florida Project, Colorado: The
District and the United States, pursuant
to Section 4 of the CRSP, and subsection
9(c)(2) of the Reclamation Projects Act
of 1939, propose to negotiate and
execute a water service contract for
2,500 acre-feet of Florida Project water
for M&I and other miscellaneous
beneficial uses, other than commercial
agricultural irrigation, within the
District boundaries in La Plata County,
Colorado.
21. Southern Ute Indian Tribe,
Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado:
Requested a water delivery contract for
33,519 acre-feet of M&I water; contract
terms to be consistent with the Colorado
Ute Settlement Act Amendments of
2000 (Title III of Public Law 106–554).
22. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, AnimasLa Plata Project, Colorado: Requested a
water delivery contract for 33,519 acrefeet of M&I water; contract terms to be
consistent with the Colorado Ute
Settlement Act Amendments of 2000
(Title III of Public Law 106–554).
23. Navajo-Gallup Water Supply
Project, New Mexico: Reclamation
continues negotiations on an OM&R
transfer contract with the Navajo Tribal
Utility Authority pursuant to Public
Law 111–11, Section 10602(f) which
transfers responsibilities to carry out the
OM&R of transferred works of the
Project; ensures the continuation of the
intended benefits of the Project,
distribution of water, and sets forth the
allocation and payment of annual
OM&R costs of the Project.
24. Animas-La Plata Project,
Colorado-New Mexico: (a) Navajo
Nation title transfer agreement for the
Navajo Nation Municipal Pipeline for
facilities and land outside the corporate
boundaries of the City of Farmington,
New Mexico; contract terms to be
consistent with the Colorado Ute
Settlement Act Amendments of 2000
(Title III of Public Law 106–554) and the
Northwestern New Mexico Rural Water
Projects Act (Title X of Public Law 111–
11); (b) City of Farmington, New
Mexico, title transfer agreement for the
Navajo Nation Municipal Pipeline for
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
facilities and land inside the corporate
boundaries of the City of Farmington;
New Mexico, contract terms to be
consistent with the Colorado Ute
Settlement Act Amendments of 2000
(Title III of Public Law 106–554) and the
Northwestern New Mexico Rural Water
Projects Act (Title X of Public Law 111–
11); and (c) Operations agreement
among the United States, Navajo Nation,
and City of Farmington for the Navajo
Nation Municipal Pipeline pursuant to
Public Law 111–11, Section 10605(b)(1)
that sets forth any terms and conditions
that secures an operations protocol for
the M&I water supply.
25. Aamodt Settlement, Pojoaque
Basin Region Water System: Contributed
Funding Agreements with the County of
Santa Fe for associated construction
costs will be executed in 2016.
Completed contract actions:
1. (4) Various Entities, Carlsbad
Project, New Mexico: Reclamation
leases water in the Pecos River to make
up for the water depletions caused by
changes in operations at Sumner Dam
which were made to improve conditions
for a threatened species, the Pecos
Bluntnose Shiner. Individual irrigators
enter into forbearance contracts and
lease agreements with individuals who
have privately held water rights to
divert nonproject water either directly
from the Pecos River or from shallow/
artesian wells in the Pecos River
Watershed. Reclamation contracted with
Fort Sumner ID for partial- and fullseason fallowing in 2014, and with the
NMISC to lease privately held water for
delivery to the Pecos River via the
NMISC’s Vaughn Pipeline. Contract
executed December 4, 2015.
2. (12) Weber River Water Users
Association, Weber River Project, Utah:
The Association has requested
Reclamation augment a to-be-built O&M
building near Echo Dam and is willing
to pay the difference in costs for the
larger building. The United States
would accept the money under the Civil
Sundry Appropriations Act of 1921.
Contract executed August 19, 2015.
3. (13) North Summit Pressurized
Irrigation Company, Weber Basin
Project, Utah: The Company has
requested a contract to convey and store
its privately held water on a spaceavailable basis in Rockport Reservoir
and the use of Wanship Dam to
pressurize its piped irrigation system
under the authority of the Warren Act
of 1911. Contract executed October 13,
2015.
4. (14) Metropolitan Water District of
Salt Lake and Sandy, Provo River
Project, Utah: The District has requested
a contract to store its Ontario Drain
Tunnel water in Deer Creek Reservoir
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Notices
on a space-available basis under the
authority of the Warren Act of 1911.
Contract executed May 6, 2015.
GREAT PLAINS REGION: Bureau of
Reclamation, P.O. Box 36900, Federal
Building, 2021 4th Avenue North,
Billings, Montana 59101, telephone
406–247–7752.
1. Irrigation, M&I, and miscellaneous
water users; Colorado, Kansas, Montana,
Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma,
South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming:
Water service contracts for the sale,
conveyance, storage, and exchange of
surplus project water and nonproject
water for irrigation or M&I use to
provide up to 10,000 acre-feet of water
annually for a term of up to 1 year, or
up to 1,000 acre-feet of water annually
for a term of up to 40 years.
2. Water user entities responsible for
payment of O&M costs for Reclamation
projects in Colorado, Kansas, Montana,
Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma,
South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming:
Contracts for extraordinary maintenance
and replacement funded pursuant to
Subtitle G of Public Law 111–11.
3. Green Mountain Reservoir,
Colorado-Big Thompson Project,
Colorado: Water service contracts for
irrigation and M&I; contracts for the sale
of water from the marketable yield to
water users within the Colorado River
Basin of western Colorado.
4. Garrison Diversion Conservancy
District, Garrison Diversion Unit, P–
SMBP, North Dakota: Intent to modify
long-term water service contract to add
additional irrigated acres.
5. Fryingpan-Arkansas Project,
Colorado: Consideration of excess
capacity contracting in the FryingpanArkansas Project.
6. Colorado-Big Thompson Project,
Colorado: Consideration of excess
capacity contracting in the Colorado-Big
Thompson Project.
7. Northern Integrated Supply Project,
Colorado-Big Thompson Project,
Colorado: Consideration of a new longterm contract with approximately 15
regional water suppliers and the
Northern Colorado Water Conservancy
District for the Northern Integrated
Supply Project.
8. Roger W. Evans (Individual);
Boysen Unit, P–SMBP; Wyoming:
Renewal of long-term water service
contract.
9. Busk-Ivanhoe, Inc., FryingpanArkansas Project, Colorado: Contract for
long-term carriage and storage, and/or a
new contract for an additional use of
water.
10. Southeastern Water Conservancy
District, Fryingpan-Arkansas Project,
Colorado: Consideration of an excess
capacity master storage contract.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
11. State of Kansas Department of
Wildlife and Parks; Glen Elder Unit, P–
SMBP; Kansas: Intent to enter into a
contract for the remaining conservation
storage in Waconda Lake for recreation
and fish and wildlife purposes.
12. Arkansas Valley Conduit,
Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, Colorado:
Consideration of a repayment contract
for the Arkansas Valley Conduit.
13. Northern Colorado Water
Conservancy District, Colorado-Big
Thompson Project, Colorado: Amend or
supplement the 1938 repayment
contract to include the transfer of OM&R
for Carter Lake Dam Additional Outlet
Works and Flatiron Power Plant Bypass
facilities.
14. Van Amundson; Jamestown
Reservoir, Garrison Diversion Unit, P–
SMBP; North Dakota: Intent to enter into
an individual long-term irrigation water
service contract to provide up to 285
acre-feet of water annually for a term of
up to 40 years from Jamestown
Reservoir, North Dakota.
15. Donala Water and Sanitation
District, Fryingpan-Arkansas Project,
Colorado: Consideration of a long-term
excess capacity contract.
16. Purgatoire Water Conservancy
District, Trinidad Project, Colorado:
Consideration of a request to amend the
contract.
17. State of Colorado; Armel Unit, P–
SMBP; Colorado: Consideration of a
contract action to address future OM&R
costs.
18. Central Oklahoma Master
Conservancy District, Norman Project,
Oklahoma: Amend existing contract No.
14–06–500–590 to execute a separate
contract(s) to allow for importation and
storage of nonproject water in
accordance with the Lake Thunderbird
Efficient Use Act of 2012.
19. Harlan County Dam and Reservoir;
Bostwick Division, P–SMBP; Nebraska
and Kansas: Consideration of a contract
with Bostwick ID in Nebraska and
Kansas-Bostwick ID No. 2 for repayment
of extraordinary O&M at Harlan County
Dam and Reservoir.
20. Altus Dam, W.C. Austin Project,
Oklahoma: Consideration of a
contract(s) for repayment of SOD costs.
21. Bull Lake Dam; Riverton Unit, P–
SMBP; Wyoming: Consideration of a
contract with Midvale ID for repayment
of SOD costs.
22. Helena Valley ID; Helena Valley
Unit, P–SMBP; Montana: Consideration
of a contract to allow for delivery of up
to 500 acre-feet of water for M&I
purposes within the District boundaries.
23. Savage ID; Savage Unit, P–SMBP;
Montana: Intent to renew the repayment
contract to provide for a long-term-water
supply to the District.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8543
24. Mirage Flats ID, Mirage Flats
Project, Nebraska: Consideration of a
contract action for repayment of SOD
costs.
25. Guernsey Dam, North Platte
Project, Nebraska and Wyoming: O&M
repayment contracts with North Platte
Project contractors for the repayment of
extraordinary maintenance associated
with Guernsey Dam.
26. Tom Green County Water Control
and Improvement District No. 1, San
Angelo Project, Texas: Consideration of
a potential contract(s) for use of excess
capacity by individual landowner(s) for
irrigation purposes.
27. East Larimer County Water
District, Fort Collins-Loveland Water
District, North Weld County Water
District, and Northern Colorado Water
Conservancy District, Colorado-Big
Thompson Project, Colorado:
Consideration of long-term excess
capacity contracts.
28. Western Heart River ID; Heart
Butte Unit, P–SMBP; North Dakota:
Consideration of amending the longterm irrigation repayment contract and
project-use power contract to include
additional acres.
29. Larry TenBensel; Frenchman
Cambridge, P–SMBP; Nebraska:
Consideration of a long-term Warren Act
contract.
30. Dickinson-Heart River Mutual Aid
Corporation; Dickinson Unit, Heart
Division; P–SMBP; North Dakota:
Consideration of amending the longterm irrigation water service contract to
modify the acres irrigated.
31. Buford-Trenton ID, BufordTrenton Project, P–SMBP; North Dakota:
Consideration of amending the longterm irrigation power repayment
contract and project-use power contract
to include additional acres.
32. Bostwick Division, P–SMBP:
Excess capacity contract with the State
of Nebraska and/or State of Kansas
entities and/or irrigation districts.
33. Milk River Project, Montana:
Proposed amendment to contracts to
reflect current landownership.
34. Power—Teton County Water and
Sewer District; Canyon Ferry Unit, P–
SMBP; Montana: Consideration of a
long-term contract for up to 40 acre-feet
of M&I water from Canyon Ferry
Reservoir.
35. Bryan Hauxwell, Frenchman
Cambridge Project, Nebraska:
Consideration of a long-term Warren Act
contract.
36. Glen Elder ID No. 8; Glen Elder
Unit, P–SMBP; Kansas: Consideration to
renew long-term water service contract
No. 2–07–60–W0855.
37. Mitchell County Rural Water
District No. 2; Glen Elder Unit, P–
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
8544
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Notices
SMBP; Kansas: Consideration to renew
long-term water delivery contract No. 7–
07–70–W0108.
38. City of Chinook, Milk River
Project, Montana: Consideration to
renew long-term M&I water service
Contract No. 14–06–600–2034A.
Discontinued contract actions:
1. (24) Garrison Diversion
Conservancy District; Garrison
Diversion Unit, P–SMBP; North Dakota:
Renegotiation of the master repayment
contract to conform to the Dakota Water
Resources Act of 2000; negotiation of
water service or repayment contracts
with irrigators and M&I users.
2. (62) Garrison Diversion
Conservancy District, Garrison
Diversion Unit, P–SMBP, North Dakota:
Consideration to enter into long-term
water service contract for M&I use out
of McClusky Canal.
Dated: January 6, 2016.
Roseann Gonzales,
Director, Policy and Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016–03464 Filed 2–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332–90–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–557 and 731–
TA–1312 (Preliminary)]
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip From
China; Institution of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Investigations and
Scheduling of Preliminary Phase
Investigations
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the institution of investigations
and commencement of preliminary
phase antidumping and countervailing
duty investigation Nos. 701–TA–557
and 731–TA–1312 (Preliminary)
pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the
Act’’) to determine whether there is a
reasonable indication that an industry
in the United States is materially
injured or threatened with material
injury, or the establishment of an
industry in the United States is
materially retarded, by reason of
imports of stainless steel sheet and strip
from China, provided for in subheading
7219.13.00, 7219.14.00, 7219.23.00,
7219.24.00, 7219.32.00, 7219.33.00,
7219.34.00, 7219.35.00, 7219.90.00,
7220.12.10, 7220.12.50, 7220.20.10,
7220.20.60, 7220.20.70, 7220.20.80,
7220.20.90, and 7220.90.00 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States, that are alleged to be sold
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
in the United States at less than fair
value and alleged to be subsidized by
the government of China. Unless the
Department of Commerce extends the
time for initiation, the Commission
must reach a preliminary determination
in antidumping and countervailing duty
investigations in 45 days, or in this case
by March 28, 2016. The Commission’s
views must be transmitted to Commerce
within five business days thereafter, or
by April 4, 2016.
DATES: Effective date: February 12, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher J. Cassise (202–708–5408),
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.
Hearing-impaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—These investigations
are being instituted, pursuant to
sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. §§ 1671b(a) and
1673b(a)), in response to a petition filed
on February 12, 2016, by AK Steel
Corp., West Chester, Ohio; Allegheny
Ludlum, LLC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;
North American Stainless, Inc., Ghent,
Kentucky; and Outokumpu Stainless
USA, LLC, Bannockburn, Illinois.
For further information concerning
the conduct of these investigations and
rules of general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B
(19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A and B (19 CFR part 207).
Participation in the investigations and
public service list.—Persons (other than
petitioners) wishing to participate in the
investigations as parties must file an
entry of appearance with the Secretary
to the Commission, as provided in
sections 201.11 and 207.10 of the
Commission’s rules, not later than seven
days after publication of this notice in
the Federal Register. Industrial users
and (if the merchandise under
investigation is sold at the retail level)
representative consumer organizations
have the right to appear as parties in
Commission antidumping duty and
countervailing duty investigations. The
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Secretary will prepare a public service
list containing the names and addresses
of all persons, or their representatives,
who are parties to these investigations
upon the expiration of the period for
filing entries of appearance.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and BPI service list.—Pursuant to
section 207.7(a) of the Commission’s
rules, the Secretary will make BPI
gathered in these investigations
available to authorized applicants
representing interested parties (as
defined in 19 U.S.C. § 1677(9)) who are
parties to the investigations under the
APO issued in the investigations,
provided that the application is made
not later than seven days after the
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. A separate service list will be
maintained by the Secretary for those
parties authorized to receive BPI under
the APO.
Conference.—The Commission’s
Director of Investigations has scheduled
a conference in connection with these
investigations for 9:30 a.m. on Friday,
March 4, 2016, at the U.S. International
Trade Commission Building, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC. Requests to
appear at the conference should be
emailed to William.bishop@usitc.gov
and Sharon.bellamy@usitc.gov (DO NOT
FILE ON EDIS) on or before March 2,
2016. Parties in support of the
imposition of countervailing and
antidumping duties in these
investigations and parties in opposition
to the imposition of such duties will
each be collectively allocated one hour
within which to make an oral
presentation at the conference. A
nonparty who has testimony that may
aid the Commission’s deliberations may
request permission to present a short
statement at the conference.
Written submissions.—As provided in
sections 201.8 and 207.15 of the
Commission’s rules, any person may
submit to the Commission on or before
March 9, 2016, a written brief
containing information and arguments
pertinent to the subject matter of the
investigations. Parties may file written
testimony in connection with their
presentation at the conference. All
written submissions must conform with
the provisions of section 201.8 of the
Commission’s rules; any submissions
that contain BPI must also conform with
the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s Handbook on
E-Filing, available on the Commission’s
Web site at https://edis.usitc.gov,
elaborates upon the Commission’s rules
with respect to electronic filing.
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8537-8544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03464]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
[RR83550000, 167R5065C6, RX.59389832.1009676]
Quarterly Status Report of Water Service, Repayment, and Other
Water-Related Contract Actions
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of contractual actions that have been
proposed to the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) and are new,
discontinued, or completed since the last publication of this notice.
This notice is one of a variety of means used to inform the public
about proposed contractual actions for capital recovery and management
of project resources and facilities consistent with section 9(f) of the
Reclamation Project Act of 1939. Additional announcements of individual
contract actions may be published in the Federal Register and in
newspapers of general circulation in the areas determined by
Reclamation to be affected by the proposed action.
ADDRESSES: The identity of the approving officer and other information
pertaining to a specific contract proposal may be obtained by calling
or writing the appropriate regional office at the address and telephone
number given for each region in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Kelly, Reclamation Law
Administration Division, Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 25007, Denver,
Colorado 80225-0007; telephone 303-445-2888.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Consistent with section 9(f) of the
Reclamation Project Act of 1939, and the rules and regulations
published in 52 FR 11954, April 13, 1987 (43 CFR 426.22), Reclamation
will publish notice of proposed or amendatory contract actions for any
contract for the delivery of project water for authorized uses in
newspapers of general circulation in the affected area at least 60 days
prior to contract execution. Announcements may be in the form of news
releases, legal notices, official letters, memorandums, or other forms
of written material. Meetings, workshops, and/or hearings may also be
used, as appropriate, to provide local publicity. The public
participation procedures do not apply to proposed contracts for the
sale of surplus or interim irrigation water for a term of 1 year or
less. Either of the contracting parties may invite the public to
observe contract proceedings. All public participation procedures will
be coordinated with those involved in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act. Pursuant to the ``Final Revised Public
Participation Procedures'' for water resource-related contract
negotiations, published in 47 FR 7763, February 22, 1982, a tabulation
is provided of all proposed contractual actions in each of the five
Reclamation regions. When contract negotiations are completed, and
prior to execution, each proposed contract form must be approved by the
Secretary of the Interior, or pursuant to delegated or redelegated
authority, the Commissioner of Reclamation or one of the regional
directors. In some instances, congressional review and approval of a
report, water rate, or other terms and conditions of the contract may
be involved.
Public participation in and receipt of comments on contract
proposals will be facilitated by adherence to the following procedures:
1. Only persons authorized to act on behalf of the contracting
entities may negotiate the terms and conditions of a specific contract
proposal.
2. Advance notice of meetings or hearings will be furnished to
those parties that have made a timely written request for such notice
to the appropriate regional or project office of Reclamation.
3. Written correspondence regarding proposed contracts may be made
available to the general public pursuant to the terms and procedures of
the
[[Page 8538]]
Freedom of Information Act, as amended.
4. Written comments on a proposed contract or contract action must
be submitted to the appropriate regional officials at the locations and
within the time limits set forth in the advance public notices.
5. All written comments received and testimony presented at any
public hearings will be reviewed and summarized by the appropriate
regional office for use by the contract approving authority.
6. Copies of specific proposed contracts may be obtained from the
appropriate regional director or his or her designated public contact
as they become available for review and comment.
7. In the event modifications are made in the form of a proposed
contract, the appropriate regional director shall determine whether
republication of the notice and/or extension of the comment period is
necessary.
Factors considered in making such a determination shall include,
but are not limited to, (i) the significance of the modification, and
(ii) the degree of public interest which has been expressed over the
course of the negotiations. At a minimum, the regional director will
furnish revised contracts to all parties who requested the contract in
response to the initial public notice.
Definitions of Abbreviations Used in the Reports
ARRA American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
BCP Boulder Canyon Project
Reclamation Bureau of Reclamation
CAP Central Arizona Project
CUP Central Utah Project
CVP Central Valley Project
CRSP Colorado River Storage Project
FR Federal Register
IDD Irrigation and Drainage District
ID Irrigation District
M&I Municipal and Industrial
NMISC New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission
O&M Operation and Maintenance
OM&R Operation, Maintenance, and Replacement
P-SMBP Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program
PPR Present Perfected Right
RRA Reclamation Reform Act of 1982
SOD Safety of Dams
SRPA Small Reclamation Projects Act of 1956
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
WD Water District
PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION: Bureau of Reclamation, 1150 North Curtis
Road, Suite 100, Boise, Idaho 83706-1234, telephone 208-378-5344.
1. Irrigation, M&I, and Miscellaneous Water Users; Idaho, Oregon,
Washington, Montana, and Wyoming: Temporary or interim irrigation and
M&I water service, water storage, water right settlement, exchange,
miscellaneous use, or water replacement contracts to provide up to
10,000 acre-feet of water annually for terms up to 5 years; long-term
contracts for similar service for up to 1,000 acre-feet of water
annually.
2. Rogue River Basin Water Users, Rogue River Basin Project,
Oregon: Water service contracts; $8 per acre-foot per annum.
3. Willamette Basin Water Users, Willamette Basin Project, Oregon:
Water service contracts; $8 per acre-foot per annum.
4. Pioneer Ditch Company, Boise Project, Idaho; Clark and Edwards
Canal and Irrigation Company, Enterprise Canal Company, Ltd., Lenroot
Canal Company, Liberty Park Canal Company, Poplar ID, all in the
Minidoka Project, Idaho; and Juniper Flat District Improvement Company,
Wapinitia Project, Oregon: Amendatory repayment and water service
contracts; purpose is to conform to the RRA.
5. Nine water user entities of the Arrowrock Division, Boise
Project, Idaho: Repayment agreements with districts with spaceholder
contracts for repayment, per legislation, of the reimbursable share of
costs to rehabilitate Arrowrock Dam Outlet Gates under the O&M program.
6. Three irrigation water user entities, Rogue River Basin Project,
Oregon: Long-term contracts for exchange of water service with three
entities for the provision of up to 292 acre-feet of stored water from
Applegate Reservoir (a USACE project) for irrigation use in exchange
for the transfer of out-of-stream water rights from the Little
Applegate River to instream flow rights with the State of Oregon for
instream flow use.
7. Conagra Foods Lamb Weston, Inc., Columbia Basin Project,
Washington: Miscellaneous purposes water service contract providing for
the delivery of up to 1,500 acre-feet of water from the Scooteney
Wasteway for effluent management.
8. Benton ID, Yakima Project, Washington: Replacement contract to,
among other things, withdraw the District from the Sunnyside Division
Board of Control; provide for direct payment of the District's share of
total operation, maintenance, repair, and replacement costs incurred by
the United States in operation of storage division; and establish
District responsibility for operation, maintenance, repair, and
replacement for irrigation distribution system.
9. City of Prineville and Ochoco ID, Crooked River Project, Oregon:
Long-term contract to provide the city of Prineville with a mitigation
water supply from Prineville Reservoir; with Ochoco ID anticipated to
be a party to the contract, as they are responsible for O&M of the dam
and reservoir.
10. Burley and Minidoka IDs, Minidoka Project, Idaho: Supplemental
and amendatory contracts to transfer the O&M of the Main South Side
Canal Headworks to Burley ID and transfer the O&M of the Main North
Side Canal Headworks to the Minidoka ID.
Completed contract actions:
1. (9) Stanfield and Westland IDs and 67 individual contractors,
Umatilla Project, Oregon: Amendatory repayment contracts and repayment
agreements for reimbursable cost of SOD repairs to McKay Dam. Contracts
executed September 17, 2015, and October 8, 2015.
2. (10) East Columbia Basin ID, Columbia Basin Project, Washington:
Long-term contract to renew master water service contract No. 14-06-
100-9165, as supplemented, to authorize the District to deliver a base
quantity of up to 90,000 acre-feet of Columbia Basin Project water
annually to up to 30,000 First Phase Continuation Acres located within
the District, and continue delivery of additional water to land
irrigated under the District's repayment contract during the peak
period of irrigation water use annually. Contract executed September
22, 2015.
MID-PACIFIC REGION: Bureau of Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way,
Sacramento, California 95825-1898, telephone 916-978-5250.
1. Irrigation water districts, individual irrigators, M&I and
miscellaneous water users; California, Nevada, and Oregon: Temporary
(interim) water service contracts for available project water for
irrigation, M&I, or fish and wildlife purposes providing up to 10,000
acre-feet of water annually for terms up to 5 years; temporary Warren
Act contracts for use of excess capacity in project facilities for
terms up to 5 years; temporary conveyance agreements with the State of
California for various purposes; long-term contracts for similar
service for up to 1,000 acre-feet annually.
2. Contractors from the American River Division, Delta Division,
Cross Valley Canal, San Felipe Division, West San Joaquin Division, San
Luis Unit, and Elk Creek Community Services District; CVP; California:
Renewal of 30 interim and long-term water service contracts; water
quantities for these
[[Page 8539]]
contracts total in excess of 2.1M acre-feet. These contract actions
will be accomplished through long-term renewal contracts pursuant to
Public Law 102-575. Prior to completion of negotiation of long-term
renewal contracts, existing interim renewal water service contracts may
be renewed through successive interim renewal of contracts.
3. Redwood Valley County WD, SRPA, California: Restructuring the
repayment schedule pursuant to Public Law 100-516.
4. El Dorado County Water Agency, CVP, California: M&I water
service contract to supplement existing water supply. Contract will
provide for an amount not to exceed 15,000 acre-feet annually
authorized by Public Law 101-514 (Section 206) for El Dorado County
Water Agency. The supply will be subcontracted to El Dorado ID and
Georgetown Divide Public Utility District.
5. Sutter Extension WD, Delano-Earlimart ID, Pixley ID, the State
of California Department of Water Resources, and the State of
California Department of Fish and Wildlife; CVP; California: Pursuant
to Public Law 102-575, agreements with non-Federal entities for the
purpose of providing funding for CVPIA refuge water conveyance and/or
facilities improvement construction to deliver water for certain
Federal wildlife refuges, State wildlife areas, and private wetlands.
6. CVP Service Area, California: Temporary water acquisition
agreements for purchase of 5,000 to 200,000 acre-feet of water for fish
and wildlife purposes as authorized by Public Law 102-575 for terms of
up to 5 years.
7. El Dorado ID, CVP, California: Long-term Warren Act contract for
conveyance of nonproject water in the amount of up to 17,000 acre-feet
annually. The contract will allow CVP facilities to be used to deliver
nonproject water to the District for M&I use within its service area.
8. Horsefly, Klamath, Langell Valley, and Tulelake IDs; Klamath
Project; Oregon: Repayment contracts for SOD work on Clear Lake Dam.
These districts will share in repayment of costs, and each district
will have a separate contract.
9. Casitas Municipal WD, Ventura Project, California: Repayment
contract for SOD work on Casitas Dam.
10. Warren Act Contracts, CVP, California: Execution of long-term
Warren Act contracts (up to 40 years) with various entities for
conveyance of nonproject water in the CVP.
11. Tuolumne Utilities District (formerly Tuolumne Regional WD),
CVP, California: Long-term water service contract for up to 9,000 acre-
feet from New Melones Reservoir, and possibly a long-term contract for
storage of nonproject water in New Melones Reservoir.
12. Madera-Chowchilla Water and Power Authority, CVP, California:
Agreement to transfer the OM&R and certain financial and administrative
activities related to the Madera Canal and associated works.
13. Sacramento Suburban WD, CVP, California: Execution of a long-
term Warren Act contract for conveyance of 29,000 acre-feet of
nonproject water. The contract will allow CVP facilities to be used to
deliver nonproject water provided from the Placer County Water Agency
to the District for use within its service area.
14. Town of Fernley, State of California, City of Reno, City of
Sparks, Washoe County, State of Nevada, Truckee-Carson ID, and any
other local interest or Native American Tribal Interest who may have
negotiated rights under Public Law 101-618; Nevada and California:
Contract for the storage of non-Federal water in Truckee River
reservoirs as authorized by Public Law 101-618 and the Preliminary
Settlement Agreement. The contracts shall be consistent with the
Truckee River Water Quality Settlement Agreement and the terms and
conditions of the Truckee River Operating Agreement.
15. Delta Lands Reclamation District No. 770, CVP, California:
Long-term Warren Act contract for conveyance of up to 300,000 acre-feet
of nonproject flood flows via the Friant-Kern Canal for flood control
purposes.
16. Pershing County Water Conservation District, Pershing County,
Lander County, and the State of Nevada; Humboldt Project; Nevada: Title
transfer of lands and features of the Humboldt Project.
17. Mendota Wildlife Area, CVP, California: Reimbursement agreement
between the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and Reclamation
for conveyance service costs to deliver Level 2 water to the Mendota
Wildlife Area during infrequent periods when the Mendota Pool is down
due to unexpected but needed maintenance. This action is taken pursuant
to Public Law 102-575, Title 34, Section 3406(d)(1), to meet full Level
2 water needs of the Mendota Wildlife Area.
18. San Luis WD, CVP, California: Proposed partial assignment of
2,400 acre-feet of the District's CVP supply to Santa Nella County WD
for M&I use.
19. Placer County Water Agency, CVP, California: Proposed exchange
agreement under section 14 of the 1939 Act to exchange up to 71,000
acre-feet annually of the Agency's American River Middle Fork Project
water for use by Reclamation, for a like amount of CVP water from the
Sacramento River for use by the Agency.
20. Irrigation Contractors, Klamath Project, Oregon: Amendment of
repayment contracts or negotiation of new contracts to allow for
recovery of additional capital costs.
21. Orland Unit Water User's Association, Orland Project,
California: Repayment contract for the SOD costs assigned to the
irrigation of Stony Gorge Dam.
22. Goleta WD, Cachuma Project, California: An agreement to
transfer title of the federally owned distribution system to the
District subject to approved legislation.
23. City of Santa Barbara, Cachuma Project, California: Execution
of a temporary contract and a long-term Warren Act contract with the
City for conveyance of nonproject water in Cachuma Project facilities.
24. Water user entities responsible for payment of O&M costs for
Reclamation projects in California, Nevada, and Oregon: Contracts for
extraordinary maintenance and replacement funded pursuant to ARRA.
Added costs to rates to be collected under irrigation and interim M&I
ratesetting policies.
25. Water user entities responsible for payment of O&M costs for
Reclamation projects in California, Nevada, and Oregon: Contracts for
extraordinary maintenance and replacement funded pursuant to Subtitle G
of Public Law 111-11.
26. Cachuma Operation and Maintenance Board, Cachuma Project,
California: Amendment to SOD Contract No. 01-WC-20-2030 to provide for
increased SOD costs associated with Bradbury Dam.
27. Reclamation will become signatory to a three-party conveyance
agreement with the Cross Valley Contractors and the California State
Department of Water Resources for conveyance of Cross Valley
Contractors' CVP water supplies that are made available pursuant to
long-term water service contracts.
28. Westlands WD, CVP, California: Negotiation and execution of a
long-term repayment contract to provide reimbursement of costs related
to the construction of drainage facilities. This action is being
undertaken to satisfy the Federal Government's obligation to provide
drainage service to Westlands
[[Page 8540]]
located within the San Luis Unit of the CVP.
29. San Luis WD, Meyers Farms Family Trust, and Reclamation; CVP;
California: Revision of an existing contract between San Luis WD,
Meyers Farms Family Trust, and Reclamation providing for an increase in
the exchange of water from 6,316 to 10,526 acre-feet annually and an
increase in the storage capacity of the bank to 60,000 acre-feet.
30. San Joaquin Valley National Cemetery, U.S. Department of
Veteran Affairs; Delta Division, CVP; California: Negotiation of a
multi-year wheeling agreement with a retroactive effective date of 2011
is pending. A wheeling agreement with the State of California
Department of Water Resources provides for the conveyance and delivery
of CVP water through the State of California's water project facilities
to the San Joaquin Valley National Cemetery.
31. Byron-Bethany ID, CVP, California: Negotiation of a multi-year
wheeling agreement with a retroactive effective date is pending. A
wheeling agreement with the State of California Department of Water
Resources provides for the conveyance and delivery of CVP water through
the State of California's water project facilities, to the Musco Family
Olive Company, a customer of Byron-Bethany ID.
32. Contra Costa WD, CVP, California: Amendment to an existing O&M
agreement to transfer O&M of the Contra Costa Rock Slough Fish Screen
to the District. Initial construction funding provided through ARRA.
33. Irrigation water districts, individual irrigators and M&I water
users, CVP, California: Temporary water service contracts for terms not
to exceed 1 year for up to 100,000 acre-feet of surplus supplies of CVP
water resulting from an unusually large water supply, not otherwise
storable for project purposes, or from infrequent and otherwise
unmanaged flood flows of short duration.
34. Irrigation water districts, individual irrigators, M&I and
miscellaneous water users, CVP, California: Temporary Warren Act
contracts for terms up to 5 years providing for use of excess capacity
in CVP facilities for annual quantities exceeding 10,000 acre-feet.
35. City of Redding, CVP, California: Proposed partial assignment
of 30 acre-feet of the City of Redding's CVP water supply to the City
of Shasta Lake for M&I use.
36. Langell Valley ID, Klamath Project; Oregon: Title transfer of
lands and facilities of the Klamath Project.
37. Sacramento River Division, CVP, California: Administrative
assignments of various Sacramento River Settlement Contracts.
38. California Department of Fish and Game, CVP, California: To
extend the term of and amend the existing water service contract for
the Department's San Joaquin Fish Hatchery to allow an increase from 35
to 60 cubic feet per second of continuous flow to pass through the
Hatchery prior to it returning to the San Joaquin River.
39. Orland Unit Water User's Association, Orland Project,
California: Title transfer of lands and features of the Orland Project.
40. Santa Clara Valley WD, CVP, California: Second amendment to
Santa Clara Valley WD's water service contract to add the State of
California Department of Water Resources, State of California's water
project facilities on the South Bay Aqueduct as an additional point of
delivery, and to add CVP-wide form of contract language providing for
mutually agreed upon point or points of delivery.
41. PacifiCorp, Klamath Project, Oregon and California: Transfer of
O&M of Link River Dam and associated facilities. Contract will allow
for the continued O&M by PacifiCorp.
42. Tulelake ID, Klamath Project, Oregon and California: Transfer
of O&M of Station 48 and gate on Drain #1, Lost River Diversion
Channel.
43. Fresno County Waterworks No. 18; Friant Division, CVP;
California: Execution of an agreement to provide for the O&M of select
Federal facilities by Fresno County Waterworks No. 18.
44. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Tulelake ID; Klamath Project;
Oregon and California: Water service contract for deliveries to Lower
Klamath National Wildlife Refuge, including transfer of O&M
responsibilities for the P Canal system.
45. Tulelake ID, Klamath Project, Oregon and California: Amendment
of repayment contract to eliminate reimbursement for P Canal O&M costs.
46. East Bay Municipal Utility District, CVP, California: Long-term
Warren Act contract for storage and conveyance of up to 47,000 acre-
feet annually.
47. Sacramento County Water Agency, CVP, California: Assignment of
7,000 acre-feet of CVP water to the City of Folsom.
48. Del Puerto WD, CVP, California: Long-term Warren Act contract,
not to exceed 40 years, for annual storage and conveyance of up to
60,000 acre-feet of recycled water from the cities of Turlock and
Modesto. This nonproject water will be stored in the San Luis Reservoir
and conveyed through the Delta-Mendota Canal to agricultural lands and
wildlife refuges.
49. Gray Lodge Wildlife Area, CVP, California: Reimbursement
agreement between the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and
Reclamation for groundwater pumping costs. Groundwater will provide a
portion of Gray Lodge Wildlife Area's CVPIA Level 4 water supplies.
This action is taken pursuant to Public Law 102-575, Title 34, Section
3406(d)(1, 2 and 5), to meet full Level 4 water needs of the Gray Lodge
Wildlife Area.
LOWER COLORADO REGION: Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 61470
(Nevada Highway and Park Street), Boulder City, Nevada 89006-1470,
telephone 702-293-8192.
1. Milton and Jean Phillips, BCP, Arizona: Develop a Colorado River
water delivery contract for 60 acre-feet of Colorado River water per
year as recommended by the Arizona Department of Water Resources.
2. Gila Project Works, Gila Project, Arizona: Perform title
transfer of facilities and certain lands in the Wellton-Mohawk Division
from the United States to the Wellton-Mohawk IDD.
3. Sherrill Ventures, LLLP and Green Acres Mohave, LLC; BCP;
Arizona: Draft contracts for PPR No. 14 for 1,080 acre-feet of water
per year as follows: Sherrill Ventures, LLLP, a draft contract for
954.3 acre-feet per year and Green Acres Mohave, LLC, a draft contract
for 125.7 acre-feet per year.
4. Water user entities responsible for payment of O&M costs for
Reclamation projects in Arizona, California, Nevada, and Utah:
Contracts for extraordinary maintenance and replacement funded pursuant
to ARRA.
5. Water user entities responsible for payment of O&M costs for
Reclamation projects in Arizona, California, Nevada, and Utah:
Contracts for extraordinary maintenance and replacement funded pursuant
to Subtitle G of Public Law 111-11.
6. San Carlos Apache Tribe and the Town of Gilbert, CAP, Arizona:
Proposed 100-year lease not to exceed 5,925 acre-feet per year of CAP
water from the Tribe to Gilbert.
7. City of Yuma, BCP, Arizona: Amend the City's contract to extend
the term (which expired October 2012) for 5 years during which time a
consolidated contract will be developed.
8. Bard WD, Yuma Project, California: Supersede and replace the
District's O&M contract for the Yuma Project, California, Reservation
Division, Indian Unit, to reflect that appropriated funds are no longer
available, and to specify
[[Page 8541]]
an alternate process for transfer of funds. In addition, other
miscellaneous processes required for Reclamation's contractual
administration and oversight will be updated to ensure the Federal
Indian Trust obligation for reservation water and land are met.
9. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, the San
Diego County Water Authority, and the Otay WD; BCP; California: Execute
a proposed Amendment No. 2 to extend the ``Agreement for Temporary
Emergency Delivery of a Portion of the Mexican Treaty Waters of the
Colorado River to the International Boundary in the Vicinity of
Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico, and the Operation of Facilities in
the United States'' until November 9, 2019.
10. Central Arizona Water Conservation District, CAP, Arizona:
Negotiate a standard form of wheeling agreement for the wheeling of
nonproject water, in accordance with the District's existing contract.
11. Ogram Farms, BCP, Arizona: Revise Exhibit A of the contract to
change the contract service area and points of diversion/delivery.
12. Ogram Boys Enterprises, Inc., BCP, Arizona: Revise Exhibit A of
the contract to change the contract service area and points of
diversion/delivery.
13. Reclamation, Davis Dam (Davis Dam) and Big Bend WD, BCP,
Arizona and Nevada: Enter into proposed ``Agreement for the Diversion,
Treatment, and Delivery of Colorado River Water'' in order for district
to divert, treat, and deliver to Davis Dam the Davis Dam Secretarial
Reservation amount of up to 100 acre-feet per year of Colorado River
water.
14. Reclamation, Arizona Department of Water Resources, Arizona
Water Banking Authority, Central Arizona Water Conservation District,
Southern Nevada Water Authority, and The Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California; BCP; Arizona, California and Nevada: Begin
negotiations to enter into proposed ``Storage and Interstate Release
Agreement(s)'' for creation, offstream storage, and release of unused
basic or surplus Colorado River apportionment within the lower division
states pursuant to 43 CFR part 414.
15. La Paz County and Ehrenberg Improvement Association, BCP,
Arizona: Review and approve a proposed partial assignment to the
Association of 150 acre-feet per year of La Paz County's Arizona fourth
priority water entitlement amount of 500 acre-feet per year and execute
the associated amendments to La Paz County's and the Association's
contracts.
16. San Carlos Apache Tribe and the Town of Gilbert, CAP, Arizona:
Execute Amendment No. 5 to a CAP water lease to extend the term of the
lease in order for the San Carlos Apache Tribe to lease 20,000 acre-
feet of its CAP water to the Town of Gilbert during calendar year 2016.
17. San Carlos Apache Tribe and the Pascua Yaqui Tribe, CAP,
Arizona: Execute a CAP water lease in order for the San Carlos Apache
Tribe to lease 790 acre-feet of its CAP water to the Pascua Yaqui Tribe
during calendar year 2016.
18. Chandler Heights Citrus ID and Central Arizona Water
Conservation District, CAP, Arizona: Execute a proposed assignment to
Central Arizona Water Conservation District of Chandler Heights Citrus
ID's 315 acre-foot annual CAP water entitlement.
19. Ak-Chin Indian Community and Del Webb Corporation, CAP,
Arizona: Execute a CAP water lease in order for Ak-Chin Indian
Community to lease 2,800 acre-feet of its CAP water to the Del Webb
Corporation during calendar year 2016.
20. Mohave County Water Authority, BCP, Arizona: Amend Exhibit D to
the Authority's Colorado River water delivery contract to update the
list of subcontractors with the Authority.
Completed contract actions:
1. (15) H2O Water Company, Inc. and the Town of Queen Creek, CAP,
Arizona: Execute a proposed assignment to the Town of Queen Creek of
the H2O Water Company's 147 acre-foot annual CAP water entitlement.
Contract executed on September 29, 2015.
2. (19) Town of Quartzsite, BCP, Arizona: Amend the contract with
the Town of Quartzsite to extend the term for another 15 years ending
on January 28, 2029. Contract Executed on October 20, 2015.
3. (23) Yuma County Water Users' Association, Yuma Project,
Arizona: Execute a funding agreement for California Check and Wasteway
infrastructure improvements to improve operational control and reduce
water spills as part of the Western Drought Response activities in
Arizona, California, Nevada, and Mexico. Contract executed on September
15, 2015.
UPPER COLORADO REGION: Bureau of Reclamation, 125 South State
Street, Room 8100, Salt Lake City, Utah 84138-1102, telephone 801-524-
3864.
1. Individual irrigators, M&I, and miscellaneous water users;
Initial Units, CRSP; Utah, Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico: Temporary
(interim) water service contracts for surplus project water for
irrigation or M&I use to provide up to 10,000 acre-feet of water
annually for terms up to 10 years; long-term contracts for similar
service for up to 1,000 acre-feet of water annually.
2. Contracts with various water user entities responsible for
payment of O&M costs for Reclamation projects in Arizona, Colorado, New
Mexico, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming: Contracts for extraordinary
maintenance and replacement funded pursuant to Subtitle G of 111-11 to
be executed as project progresses.
3. Middle Rio Grande Project, New Mexico: Reclamation continues
annual leasing of water from various San Juan-Chama Project contractors
to stabilize flows in a critical reach of the Rio Grande in order to
meet the needs of irrigators and preserve habitat for the silvery
minnow. Reclamation leased approximately 14,423 acre-feet of water from
San Juan-Chama Project contractors in 2015.
4. Bridger Valley Water Conservancy District, Lyman Project,
Wyoming: The District has requested that its Meeks Cabin repayment
contract be amended from two 25-year contacts to one 40-year contract.
5. Uintah Water Conservancy District; Vernal Unit, CUP; Utah:
Proposed carriage contract to both store up to 35,000 acre-feet of
nonproject water in Steinaker Reservoir and carry nonproject water in
the Steinaker Service and Feeder Canals.
6. Weber Basin Water Conservancy District, Weber Basin Project,
Utah: The District has requested a contract to allow the storage of
Weber Basin Project water in Smith Morehouse Reservoir under the
authority of Section 14 of the Reclamation Projects Act of 1939.
7. Carbon Water Conservancy District, Scofield Project, Utah: The
District has requested Reclamation's assistance with O&M activities to
rehabilitate certain portions of the Scofield Dam outlet works and
surrounding area.
8. Provo Reservoir Water Users Company, Provo River Project, Utah:
The Company has requested a contract to store up to 5,000 acre-feet on
its nonproject water in Deer Creek Reservoir on a space-available basis
under the authority of the Warren Act of 1911.
9. Uintah Water Conservancy District; Vernal Unit, CUP; Utah: The
District desires to pipe the Steinaker Service Canal to improve public
safety, decrease O&M costs, and increase water efficiency. This action
will require a supplementary O&M contract to modify Federal Reclamation
facilities, as well as an agreement written under the authority of the
Civil Sundry Appropriations Act of 1921 for
[[Page 8542]]
Reclamation to accept funds to review designs, inspect project
construction, and any other activities requiring Reclamation's
participation.
10. Newton Water Users Association, Newton Project; Utah: The
Association desires to abandon the Federal canals distributing water
from Newton Reservoir, and replace them with a private pipeline. This
requires a supplementary O&M agreement to approve modification to
Federal Reclamation facilities and outline the O&M responsibilities
during and after construction.
11. Salem Canal and Irrigation Company, Strawberry Valley Project,
Utah: The United States intends to enter into an amendatory contract
regarding possible lost generation of power revenues generated at the
Spanish Fork Power Plant on the Strawberry Valley Project.
12. Weber Basin Water Conservancy District, A.V. Watkins Dam, Utah:
The United States intends to enter into an implementation agreement
with the District giving the District the authority to modify Federal
facilities to raise the crest of AV Watkins Dam.
13. Uintah Water Conservancy District; Flaming Gorge Unit, CRSP;
Utah: The District has requested a long-term water service contract to
remove up to 5,500 acre-feet of water annually from the Green River for
irrigation purposes under the authority of Section 9(e) of the
Reclamation Project Act of 1939. A short-term contract may be executed
until a long-term contract can be completed.
14. South Cache Water Users Association, Hyrum Project, Utah: The
Association has requested a loan under Public Law 111-11 to pipe
approximately 2,100 linear-feet of the Hyrum Mendon Canal.
15. Emery County Water Conservancy District, Emery County Project,
Utah: The District has requested to convert 79 acre-feet of Cottonwood
Creek Consolidated Irrigation Company water from irrigation to M&I
uses.
16. Aamodt Litigation Settlement, San Juan-Chama Project, New
Mexico: Contract for 1,079 acre-feet of San Juan-Chama Project water
for M&I use with the four Pueblos included in the Aamodt Litigation
Settlement Act, Title VI of Public Law 111-291. The four Pueblos are
the Nambe, Pojoaque, San Ildefonso, and Tesuque.
17. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District,
Salt River Project; Glen Canyon Unit, CRSP; Arizona: The District has
requested a renewal of its existing contract from 2034 through 2044.
18. Dolores Water Conservancy District, Dolores Project, Colorado:
The District has requested a water service contract for 1,402 acre-feet
of newly identified project water for irrigation. The proposed water
service contract will provide 417 acre-feet of project water for
irrigation of the Ute Enterprise and 985 acre-feet for use by the
District's full-service irrigators.
19. City of Page, Arizona; Glen Canyon Unit, CRSP; Arizona: Long-
term contract for 975 acre-feet of water for municipal purposes.
20. Florida Water Conservancy District, Florida Project, Colorado:
The District and the United States, pursuant to Section 4 of the CRSP,
and subsection 9(c)(2) of the Reclamation Projects Act of 1939, propose
to negotiate and execute a water service contract for 2,500 acre-feet
of Florida Project water for M&I and other miscellaneous beneficial
uses, other than commercial agricultural irrigation, within the
District boundaries in La Plata County, Colorado.
21. Southern Ute Indian Tribe, Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado:
Requested a water delivery contract for 33,519 acre-feet of M&I water;
contract terms to be consistent with the Colorado Ute Settlement Act
Amendments of 2000 (Title III of Public Law 106-554).
22. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado:
Requested a water delivery contract for 33,519 acre-feet of M&I water;
contract terms to be consistent with the Colorado Ute Settlement Act
Amendments of 2000 (Title III of Public Law 106-554).
23. Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project, New Mexico: Reclamation
continues negotiations on an OM&R transfer contract with the Navajo
Tribal Utility Authority pursuant to Public Law 111-11, Section
10602(f) which transfers responsibilities to carry out the OM&R of
transferred works of the Project; ensures the continuation of the
intended benefits of the Project, distribution of water, and sets forth
the allocation and payment of annual OM&R costs of the Project.
24. Animas-La Plata Project, Colorado-New Mexico: (a) Navajo Nation
title transfer agreement for the Navajo Nation Municipal Pipeline for
facilities and land outside the corporate boundaries of the City of
Farmington, New Mexico; contract terms to be consistent with the
Colorado Ute Settlement Act Amendments of 2000 (Title III of Public Law
106-554) and the Northwestern New Mexico Rural Water Projects Act
(Title X of Public Law 111-11); (b) City of Farmington, New Mexico,
title transfer agreement for the Navajo Nation Municipal Pipeline for
facilities and land inside the corporate boundaries of the City of
Farmington; New Mexico, contract terms to be consistent with the
Colorado Ute Settlement Act Amendments of 2000 (Title III of Public Law
106-554) and the Northwestern New Mexico Rural Water Projects Act
(Title X of Public Law 111-11); and (c) Operations agreement among the
United States, Navajo Nation, and City of Farmington for the Navajo
Nation Municipal Pipeline pursuant to Public Law 111-11, Section
10605(b)(1) that sets forth any terms and conditions that secures an
operations protocol for the M&I water supply.
25. Aamodt Settlement, Pojoaque Basin Region Water System:
Contributed Funding Agreements with the County of Santa Fe for
associated construction costs will be executed in 2016.
Completed contract actions:
1. (4) Various Entities, Carlsbad Project, New Mexico: Reclamation
leases water in the Pecos River to make up for the water depletions
caused by changes in operations at Sumner Dam which were made to
improve conditions for a threatened species, the Pecos Bluntnose
Shiner. Individual irrigators enter into forbearance contracts and
lease agreements with individuals who have privately held water rights
to divert nonproject water either directly from the Pecos River or from
shallow/artesian wells in the Pecos River Watershed. Reclamation
contracted with Fort Sumner ID for partial- and full-season fallowing
in 2014, and with the NMISC to lease privately held water for delivery
to the Pecos River via the NMISC's Vaughn Pipeline. Contract executed
December 4, 2015.
2. (12) Weber River Water Users Association, Weber River Project,
Utah: The Association has requested Reclamation augment a to-be-built
O&M building near Echo Dam and is willing to pay the difference in
costs for the larger building. The United States would accept the money
under the Civil Sundry Appropriations Act of 1921. Contract executed
August 19, 2015.
3. (13) North Summit Pressurized Irrigation Company, Weber Basin
Project, Utah: The Company has requested a contract to convey and store
its privately held water on a space-available basis in Rockport
Reservoir and the use of Wanship Dam to pressurize its piped irrigation
system under the authority of the Warren Act of 1911. Contract executed
October 13, 2015.
4. (14) Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake and Sandy, Provo
River Project, Utah: The District has requested a contract to store its
Ontario Drain Tunnel water in Deer Creek Reservoir
[[Page 8543]]
on a space-available basis under the authority of the Warren Act of
1911. Contract executed May 6, 2015.
GREAT PLAINS REGION: Bureau of Reclamation, P.O. Box 36900, Federal
Building, 2021 4th Avenue North, Billings, Montana 59101, telephone
406-247-7752.
1. Irrigation, M&I, and miscellaneous water users; Colorado,
Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas,
and Wyoming: Water service contracts for the sale, conveyance, storage,
and exchange of surplus project water and nonproject water for
irrigation or M&I use to provide up to 10,000 acre-feet of water
annually for a term of up to 1 year, or up to 1,000 acre-feet of water
annually for a term of up to 40 years.
2. Water user entities responsible for payment of O&M costs for
Reclamation projects in Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North
Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming: Contracts for
extraordinary maintenance and replacement funded pursuant to Subtitle G
of Public Law 111-11.
3. Green Mountain Reservoir, Colorado-Big Thompson Project,
Colorado: Water service contracts for irrigation and M&I; contracts for
the sale of water from the marketable yield to water users within the
Colorado River Basin of western Colorado.
4. Garrison Diversion Conservancy District, Garrison Diversion
Unit, P-SMBP, North Dakota: Intent to modify long-term water service
contract to add additional irrigated acres.
5. Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, Colorado: Consideration of excess
capacity contracting in the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project.
6. Colorado-Big Thompson Project, Colorado: Consideration of excess
capacity contracting in the Colorado-Big Thompson Project.
7. Northern Integrated Supply Project, Colorado-Big Thompson
Project, Colorado: Consideration of a new long-term contract with
approximately 15 regional water suppliers and the Northern Colorado
Water Conservancy District for the Northern Integrated Supply Project.
8. Roger W. Evans (Individual); Boysen Unit, P-SMBP; Wyoming:
Renewal of long-term water service contract.
9. Busk-Ivanhoe, Inc., Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, Colorado:
Contract for long-term carriage and storage, and/or a new contract for
an additional use of water.
10. Southeastern Water Conservancy District, Fryingpan-Arkansas
Project, Colorado: Consideration of an excess capacity master storage
contract.
11. State of Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks; Glen Elder
Unit, P-SMBP; Kansas: Intent to enter into a contract for the remaining
conservation storage in Waconda Lake for recreation and fish and
wildlife purposes.
12. Arkansas Valley Conduit, Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, Colorado:
Consideration of a repayment contract for the Arkansas Valley Conduit.
13. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, Colorado-Big
Thompson Project, Colorado: Amend or supplement the 1938 repayment
contract to include the transfer of OM&R for Carter Lake Dam Additional
Outlet Works and Flatiron Power Plant Bypass facilities.
14. Van Amundson; Jamestown Reservoir, Garrison Diversion Unit, P-
SMBP; North Dakota: Intent to enter into an individual long-term
irrigation water service contract to provide up to 285 acre-feet of
water annually for a term of up to 40 years from Jamestown Reservoir,
North Dakota.
15. Donala Water and Sanitation District, Fryingpan-Arkansas
Project, Colorado: Consideration of a long-term excess capacity
contract.
16. Purgatoire Water Conservancy District, Trinidad Project,
Colorado: Consideration of a request to amend the contract.
17. State of Colorado; Armel Unit, P-SMBP; Colorado: Consideration
of a contract action to address future OM&R costs.
18. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy District, Norman Project,
Oklahoma: Amend existing contract No. 14-06-500-590 to execute a
separate contract(s) to allow for importation and storage of nonproject
water in accordance with the Lake Thunderbird Efficient Use Act of
2012.
19. Harlan County Dam and Reservoir; Bostwick Division, P-SMBP;
Nebraska and Kansas: Consideration of a contract with Bostwick ID in
Nebraska and Kansas-Bostwick ID No. 2 for repayment of extraordinary
O&M at Harlan County Dam and Reservoir.
20. Altus Dam, W.C. Austin Project, Oklahoma: Consideration of a
contract(s) for repayment of SOD costs.
21. Bull Lake Dam; Riverton Unit, P-SMBP; Wyoming: Consideration of
a contract with Midvale ID for repayment of SOD costs.
22. Helena Valley ID; Helena Valley Unit, P-SMBP; Montana:
Consideration of a contract to allow for delivery of up to 500 acre-
feet of water for M&I purposes within the District boundaries.
23. Savage ID; Savage Unit, P-SMBP; Montana: Intent to renew the
repayment contract to provide for a long-term-water supply to the
District.
24. Mirage Flats ID, Mirage Flats Project, Nebraska: Consideration
of a contract action for repayment of SOD costs.
25. Guernsey Dam, North Platte Project, Nebraska and Wyoming: O&M
repayment contracts with North Platte Project contractors for the
repayment of extraordinary maintenance associated with Guernsey Dam.
26. Tom Green County Water Control and Improvement District No. 1,
San Angelo Project, Texas: Consideration of a potential contract(s) for
use of excess capacity by individual landowner(s) for irrigation
purposes.
27. East Larimer County Water District, Fort Collins-Loveland Water
District, North Weld County Water District, and Northern Colorado Water
Conservancy District, Colorado-Big Thompson Project, Colorado:
Consideration of long-term excess capacity contracts.
28. Western Heart River ID; Heart Butte Unit, P-SMBP; North Dakota:
Consideration of amending the long-term irrigation repayment contract
and project-use power contract to include additional acres.
29. Larry TenBensel; Frenchman Cambridge, P-SMBP; Nebraska:
Consideration of a long-term Warren Act contract.
30. Dickinson-Heart River Mutual Aid Corporation; Dickinson Unit,
Heart Division; P-SMBP; North Dakota: Consideration of amending the
long-term irrigation water service contract to modify the acres
irrigated.
31. Buford-Trenton ID, Buford-Trenton Project, P-SMBP; North
Dakota: Consideration of amending the long-term irrigation power
repayment contract and project-use power contract to include additional
acres.
32. Bostwick Division, P-SMBP: Excess capacity contract with the
State of Nebraska and/or State of Kansas entities and/or irrigation
districts.
33. Milk River Project, Montana: Proposed amendment to contracts to
reflect current landownership.
34. Power--Teton County Water and Sewer District; Canyon Ferry
Unit, P-SMBP; Montana: Consideration of a long-term contract for up to
40 acre-feet of M&I water from Canyon Ferry Reservoir.
35. Bryan Hauxwell, Frenchman Cambridge Project, Nebraska:
Consideration of a long-term Warren Act contract.
36. Glen Elder ID No. 8; Glen Elder Unit, P-SMBP; Kansas:
Consideration to renew long-term water service contract No. 2-07-60-
W0855.
37. Mitchell County Rural Water District No. 2; Glen Elder Unit, P-
[[Page 8544]]
SMBP; Kansas: Consideration to renew long-term water delivery contract
No. 7-07-70-W0108.
38. City of Chinook, Milk River Project, Montana: Consideration to
renew long-term M&I water service Contract No. 14-06-600-2034A.
Discontinued contract actions:
1. (24) Garrison Diversion Conservancy District; Garrison Diversion
Unit, P-SMBP; North Dakota: Renegotiation of the master repayment
contract to conform to the Dakota Water Resources Act of 2000;
negotiation of water service or repayment contracts with irrigators and
M&I users.
2. (62) Garrison Diversion Conservancy District, Garrison Diversion
Unit, P-SMBP, North Dakota: Consideration to enter into long-term water
service contract for M&I use out of McClusky Canal.
Dated: January 6, 2016.
Roseann Gonzales,
Director, Policy and Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-03464 Filed 2-18-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332-90-P