Notice of Availability of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Final Programmatic Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan and Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Final PDARP/PEIS), 8483-8485 [2016-03299]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Notices
3. The Committee will receive an
overview of the Implementation Plan for
Commercial Logbook Electronic
Reporting, the status of eTrips, discuss
and provide direction to staff.
4. The Committee will also receive an
overview of the Atlantic For-Hire
Reporting Amendment, a demonstration
of the South Carolina Department of
Natural Resources’ Electronic For-Hire
Logbook reporting process, review
public hearing input, discuss and
modify the document as appropriate
and approve all actions.
5. The Committee will receive an
update on the Council’s Citizen Science
Workshop, an overview of the draft
Citizen Science Blueprint, discuss and
take action as appropriate.
Executive Finance Committee,
Thursday, March 10, 2016, 2:30 p.m.
until 3:30 p.m.
1. The Committee will receive an
update on the Calendar Year (CY) 2015
budget expenditures, the Draft Activity
Schedule, the Status of the CY 2016
budget, and the Council Follow-up and
priorities, and take action as
appropriate.
2. The Committee will discuss
standards and procedures for
participating in Council webinar
meetings, receive a report from the
Council Coordinating Committee
meeting, address other issues, and take
action as appropriate.
Council Session: Thursday, March 10,
2016, 3:45 p.m. until 5 p.m. and Friday,
March 11, 2016, 8:30 a.m. until 12 p.m.
Council Session: March 10, 2016
3:45–4 p.m.: Call the meeting to order,
adopt the agenda, and approve the
December 2015 meeting minutes.
4–5 p.m.: The Council will receive a
report from the Snapper Grouper
Committee, approve/disapprove
Snapper Grouper Amendment 36
(Spawning Special Management Zones)
for formal Secretarial Review; approve/
disapprove the Oculina Review Report,
and approve/disapprove the System
Management Plan for Marine Protected
Areas. The Council will consider other
Committee recommendations and take
action as appropriate.
Council Session: March 11, 2016
8:30–9 a.m.: The Council will receive
a report from the Mackerel Committee,
approve/disapprove Amendment 26 to
the Coastal Migratory Pelagics FMP for
formal Secretarial review, consider
other Committee recommendations, and
take action as appropriate.
9–9:10 a.m.: The Council will receive
a report from the Law Enforcement
Committee, consider recommendations
and take actions as appropriate.
9:10–9:30 a.m.: The Council will
receive a report from the Joint Dolphin
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
Wahoo and Snapper Grouper
Committees, consider recommendations
and take action as appropriate.
9:30–9:40 a.m.: The Council will
receive a report from the Protected
Resources Committee, approve/
disapprove the ESA/MSA Integration
Agreement, consider other
recommendations and take action as
appropriate.
9:40–9:50 a.m.: The Council will
receive a report from the SEDAR
Committee, consider Committee
recommendations and take action as
appropriate.
9:50–10 a.m.: The Council will
receive a report from the Data Collection
Committee, consider Committee
recommendations and take action as
appropriate.
10–10:10 a.m.: The Council will
receive a report from the AP Selection
Committee, consider committee
recommendations and take action as
appropriate.
10:10–10:30 a.m.: The Council will
receive a report from the Executive
Finance Committee, approve the
Council activity schedule, approve the
Council Follow-Up and Priorities,
consider other Committee
recommendations and take action as
appropriate.
10:30–12 noon: The Council will
receive a presentation on proposed
scoping measures for the Monitor
National Marine Sanctuary, status
reports from NOAA Fisheries Southeast
Regional Office and the Southeast
Fisheries Science Center; review and
develop recommendations on
Experimental Fishing Permits as
necessary; receive agency and liaison
reports; and discuss other business and
upcoming meetings.
Documents regarding these issues are
available from the Council office (see
ADDRESSES).
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in this agenda may come
before this group for discussion, those
issues may not be the subject of formal
action during these meetings. Action
will be restricted to those issues
specifically identified in this notice and
any issues arising after publication of
this notice that require emergency
action under section 305(c) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act,
provided the public has been notified of
the Council’s intent to take final action
to address the emergency.
Special Accommodations
These meetings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for auxiliary aids should be
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8483
directed to the council office (see
ADDRESSES) 3 days prior to the meeting.
Note: The times and sequence specified in
this agenda are subject to change.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: February 16, 2016.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–03470 Filed 2–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE201
Notice of Availability of the Deepwater
Horizon Oil Spill Final Programmatic
Damage Assessment and Restoration
Plan and Final Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement (Final
PDARP/PEIS)
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a Final
Programmatic Damage Assessment and
Restoration Plan and Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) and the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), the Deepwater Horizon Federal
and State natural resource trustee
agencies (Trustees) have prepared a
Final Programmatic Damage Assessment
and Restoration Plan and Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (Final PDARP/PEIS). As
required by OPA, in this Final PDARP/
PEIS, the Trustees present the
assessment of impacts of the Deepwater
Horizon oil spill on natural resources in
the Gulf of Mexico and on the services
those resources provide, and determine
the restoration needed to compensate
the public for these impacts. The Final
PDARP/PEIS describes the Trustees’
programmatic alternatives considered to
restore natural resources, ecological
services, and recreational use services
injured or lost as a result of the
Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The
Trustees evaluate these alternatives
under criteria set forth in the OPA
natural resource damage assessment
regulations, and also evaluate the
environmental consequences of the
restoration alternatives in accordance
with NEPA. The purpose of this notice
is to inform the public of the availability
of the Final PDARP/PEIS.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
8484
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Notices
Obtaining Documents: You
may download the Final PDARP/PEIS at
https://www.gulfspillrestoration
.noaa.gov. Alternatively, you may
request a CD of the Final PDARP/PEIS
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
You may also view the document at any
of the public facilities listed at https://
www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov. The
Final PDARP/PEIS also will be available
for download at https://www.justice.gov/
enrd/deepwater-horizon.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Courtney Groeneveld at
gulfspill.restoration@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Introduction
On April 20, 2010, the Deepwater
Horizon mobile drilling unit exploded,
caught fire, and eventually sank in the
Gulf of Mexico, resulting in a massive
release of oil and other substances from
BP’s Macondo well. Tragically, 11
workers were killed and 17 injured by
the explosion and fire. Initial efforts to
cap the well following the explosion
were unsuccessful, and for 87 days after
the explosion, the well continuously
and uncontrollably discharged oil and
natural gas into the northern Gulf of
Mexico. Approximately 3.19 million
barrels (134 million gallons) of oil were
released into the ocean, by far the
largest offshore oil spill in the history of
the United States.
Oil spread from the deep ocean to the
surface and nearshore environment,
from Texas to Florida. The oil came into
contact with and injured natural
resources as diverse as deep-sea coral,
fish and shellfish, productive wetland
habitats, sandy beaches, birds,
endangered sea turtles, and protected
marine life. The oil spill prevented
people from fishing, going to the beach,
and enjoying their typical recreational
activities along the Gulf. Extensive
response actions, including use of
dispersants, cleanup activities, and
actions to try to prevent the oil from
reaching sensitive resources, were
undertaken to try to reduce harm to
people and the environment. However,
many of these response actions had
collateral impacts on the environment.
The oil and other substances released
from the well in combination with the
extensive response actions together
make up the Deepwater Horizon
incident.
The Trustees conducted the natural
resource damage assessment for the
Deepwater Horizon incident under the
Oil Pollution Act 1990 (OPA; 33 U.S.C.
2701 et seq.). Pursuant to OPA, Federal
and State agencies act as trustees on
behalf of the public to assess natural
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
resource injuries and losses and to
determine the actions required to
compensate the public for those injuries
and losses. OPA further instructs the
designated trustees to develop and
implement a plan for the restoration,
rehabilitation, replacement, or
acquisition of the equivalent of the
injured natural resources under their
trusteeship, including the loss of use of
those resources and the loss of services
they provide from the time of injury
until the time restoration to baseline
(the resource quality and conditions that
would exist if the spill had not
occurred) is complete.
The Trustees 1 are as follows:
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, on behalf of the U.S.
Department of Commerce;
• U.S. Department of the Interior, as
represented by the National Park
Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
and Bureau of Land Management;
• U.S. Department of Agriculture;
• U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency;
• State of Louisiana Coastal
Protection and Restoration Authority,
Oil Spill Coordinator’s Office,
Department of Environmental Quality,
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries,
and Department of Natural Resources;
• State of Mississippi Department of
Environmental Quality;
• State of Alabama Department of
Conservation and Natural Resources and
Geological Survey of Alabama;
• State of Florida Department of
Environmental Protection and Fish and
Wildlife Conservation Commission; and
• For the State of Texas: Texas Parks
and Wildlife Department, Texas General
Land Office, and Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality.
Background
Notice of availability of the Draft
PDARP/PEIS was published in the
Federal Register on October 5, 2015 (80
FR 60126). The Draft PDARP/PEIS
presented the assessment of impacts of
the Deepwater Horizon incident on
natural resources in the Gulf of Mexico
and on the services those resources
provide, and determined the restoration
needed to compensate the public for
these impacts. The Trustees provided
the public with 60 days to review and
comment on the Draft PDARP/PEIS. The
Trustees also held public meetings in
Houma, LA; Long Beach, MS; New
Orleans, LA; Mobile, AL; Pensacola, FL;
1 Although a trustee under OPA by virtue of the
proximity of its facilities to the Deepwater Horizon
oil spill, the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) is
not a member of the Trustee Council and did not
participate in development of this Final PDARP/
PEIS.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
St. Petersburg, FL; Galveston, TX; and
Washington, DC, to facilitate public
understanding of the document and
provide opportunity for public
comment. The Trustees considered the
public comments received, which
informed the Trustees’ analysis of
programmatic alternatives in the Final
PDARP/PEIS. The Trustees actively
solicited public input through a variety
of mechanisms, including convening
public meetings, distributing electronic
communications, and using the Trusteewide public Web site and database to
share information and receive public
input. A summary of the public
comments received and the Trustees’
responses to those comments are
addressed in Chapter 8 of the Final
PDARP/PEIS.
Overview of the Final PDARP/PEIS
The Final PDARP/PEIS is being
released in accordance with the OPA,
the Natural Resources Damage
Assessment (NRDA) regulations found
in the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) at 15 CFR part 990, and the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
In the Final PDARP/PEIS, the
Deepwater Horizon Trustees present to
the public their findings on the
extensive injuries to multiple habitats,
biological species, ecological functions,
and geographic regions across the
northern Gulf of Mexico that occurred
as a result of the Deepwater Horizon
incident, as well as their programmatic
plan for restoring those resources and
the services they provide. The injuries
caused by the Deepwater Horizon
incident cannot be fully described at the
level of a single species, a single habitat
type, or a single region. Rather, the
injuries affected such a wide array of
linked resources over such an enormous
area that the effects of the Deepwater
Horizon incident constitute an
ecosystem-level injury. The Final
PDARP/PEIS presents four
programmatic alternatives evaluated in
accordance with OPA and NEPA.
The four alternatives under the Final
PDARP/PEIS are as follows:
• Alternative A (Preferred
Alternative): Comprehensive Integrated
Ecosystem Restoration Plan based on
programmatic Trustee goals;
• Alternative B: Resource-Specific
Restoration Plan based on programmatic
Trustee goals;
• Alternative C: Continued Injury
Assessment and Defer Comprehensive
Restoration Plan; and
• Alternative D: No Action/Natural
Recovery.
These programmatic alternatives are
comprised of restoration types and
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Notices
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
approaches to restore, replace,
rehabilitate, or acquire the equivalent of
the injured natural resources and
services. The Trustees’ preferred
alternative for a restoration plan utilizes
a comprehensive integrated ecosystem
approach to best address these
ecosystem-level injuries. The Trustees’
evaluation determined this alternative is
best, among several other alternatives, at
compensating the public for the losses
to natural resources and services caused
by the Deepwater Horizon incident.
The Trustees’ proposed decision is to
select a comprehensive restoration plan
to guide and direct subsequent
restoration planning and
implementation during the coming
decades. The Final PDARP/PEIS is
programmatic; it describes the
framework by which subsequent project
specific restoration plans will be
identified and developed, and sets forth
the types of projects the Trustees will
consider in each of the described
restoration areas. The subsequent
restoration plans will identify, evaluate,
and select specific restoration projects
for implementation that are consistent
with the restoration framework laid out
by the Final PDARP/PEIS.
The Trustees considered this
programmatic restoration planning
decision in light of the proposed
settlement among BP, the United States,
and the States of Louisiana, Mississippi,
Alabama, Florida, and Texas to resolve
BP’s liability for natural resource
damages associated with the Deepwater
Horizon incident. Under this proposed
settlement, BP would pay a total of $8.1
billion for restoration to address natural
resource injuries (this includes $1
billion already committed for early
restoration), plus up to an additional
$700 million to respond to natural
resource damages unknown at the time
of the settlement and/or to provide for
adaptive management. The proposed
Consent Decree for the proposed
settlement was the subject of a separate
public notice and comment process; the
Notice of Lodging of the proposed
Consent Decree under the Clean Water
Act and Oil Pollution Act was
published in the Federal Register on
October 5, 2015 (80 FR 60180).
Next Steps
In accordance with NEPA, a Federal
agency must prepare a concise public
Record of Decision (ROD) at the time the
agency makes a decision in cases
involving an EIS (40 CFR 1505.2). The
Trustees will issue a ROD pursuant to
NEPA regulations at 40 CFR 1505.2 and
OPA regulations at 15 CFR 990.23.
Accordingly, the ROD for the Final
PDARP/PEIS will provide and explain
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:59 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
the Trustees’ decisions regarding the
selection of a preferred alternative. The
Trustees will issue the ROD no earlier
than 30 days after the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes a notice in
the Federal Register announcing the
availability of the Final PDARP/PEIS (40
CFR 1506.10).
Administrative Record
The documents included in the
Administrative Record can be viewed
electronically at the following location:
https://www.doi.gov/deepwaterhorizon/
adminrecord.
The Trustees opened a publicly
available Administrative Record for the
NRDA for the Deepwater Horizon oil
spill, including restoration planning
activities, concurrently with publication
of the 2011 Notice of Intent (NOI) to
Begin Restoration Scoping and Prepare
a Gulf Spill Restoration Planning PEIS
(pursuant to 15 CFR 990.45). The
Administrative Record includes the
February 17, 2011, NOI for a 90-day
formal scoping (76 FR 9327) and public
comment period for this Final PDARP/
PEIS. The Trustees conducted the
scoping in accordance with OPA (15
CFR 990.14(d)), NEPA (40 CFR 1501.7),
and State authorities. As part of the
scoping process, the Trustees hosted
public meetings across all the Gulf
States during spring 2011.
Authority
The authority of this action is the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2701 et
seq.) and the implementing NRDA
regulations found at 15 CFR part 990.
Dated: February 11, 2016.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–03299 Filed 2–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request: Socioeconomics of
Recreational Fishing in Florida’s Gulf
Coast
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8485
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before April 19, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Dr. Danielle Schwarzmann,
301–713–7254 danielle.schwarzmann@
noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
This request is for a new information
collection.
Through a partnership with The
Rosenstiel School of Marine and
Atmospheric Science at the University
of Miami, we will collect information
from recreational fishers to complete
quantitative economic valuations of
ecosystem goods and services produced
for recreational fisheries in Florida’s
Gulf Coast. The survey will utilize the
stated choice method to estimate the
marginal value of a change in catch rates
and other biological or economic
attributes of the recreational fishery.
These may include; size, type of fish
and/or method of fishing.
This information will be utilized by
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation
Commission (FFWCC) and the National
Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast
Fisheries Science Center (SEFSC)
fisheries scientists and managers to
enhance the scope of information used
for stock assessment. Additionally, this
economic data will be integrated into
the recreational fisheries management
decision-making processes. The
information will directly benefit Office
of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS),
as it will help us to identify
socioeconomic indicators for
recreational fishing that we can
incorporate into management process/
decisions and future condition reports
to evaluate the status and trends of the
recreational fishing ecosystem service.
II. Method of Collection
Internet and mail.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0648–XXXX.
Form Number: None.
E:\FR\FM\19FEN1.SGM
19FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8483-8485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03299]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XE201
Notice of Availability of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Final
Programmatic Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan and Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Final PDARP/PEIS)
AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a Final Programmatic Damage
Assessment and Restoration Plan and Final Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) and the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Deepwater Horizon Federal
and State natural resource trustee agencies (Trustees) have prepared a
Final Programmatic Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan and Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (Final PDARP/PEIS). As
required by OPA, in this Final PDARP/PEIS, the Trustees present the
assessment of impacts of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on natural
resources in the Gulf of Mexico and on the services those resources
provide, and determine the restoration needed to compensate the public
for these impacts. The Final PDARP/PEIS describes the Trustees'
programmatic alternatives considered to restore natural resources,
ecological services, and recreational use services injured or lost as a
result of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The Trustees evaluate these
alternatives under criteria set forth in the OPA natural resource
damage assessment regulations, and also evaluate the environmental
consequences of the restoration alternatives in accordance with NEPA.
The purpose of this notice is to inform the public of the availability
of the Final PDARP/PEIS.
[[Page 8484]]
ADDRESSES: Obtaining Documents: You may download the Final PDARP/PEIS
at https://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov. Alternatively, you may
request a CD of the Final PDARP/PEIS (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT). You may also view the document at any of the public
facilities listed at https://www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov. The
Final PDARP/PEIS also will be available for download at https://www.justice.gov/enrd/deepwater-horizon.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Courtney Groeneveld at
gulfspill.restoration@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
On April 20, 2010, the Deepwater Horizon mobile drilling unit
exploded, caught fire, and eventually sank in the Gulf of Mexico,
resulting in a massive release of oil and other substances from BP's
Macondo well. Tragically, 11 workers were killed and 17 injured by the
explosion and fire. Initial efforts to cap the well following the
explosion were unsuccessful, and for 87 days after the explosion, the
well continuously and uncontrollably discharged oil and natural gas
into the northern Gulf of Mexico. Approximately 3.19 million barrels
(134 million gallons) of oil were released into the ocean, by far the
largest offshore oil spill in the history of the United States.
Oil spread from the deep ocean to the surface and nearshore
environment, from Texas to Florida. The oil came into contact with and
injured natural resources as diverse as deep-sea coral, fish and
shellfish, productive wetland habitats, sandy beaches, birds,
endangered sea turtles, and protected marine life. The oil spill
prevented people from fishing, going to the beach, and enjoying their
typical recreational activities along the Gulf. Extensive response
actions, including use of dispersants, cleanup activities, and actions
to try to prevent the oil from reaching sensitive resources, were
undertaken to try to reduce harm to people and the environment.
However, many of these response actions had collateral impacts on the
environment. The oil and other substances released from the well in
combination with the extensive response actions together make up the
Deepwater Horizon incident.
The Trustees conducted the natural resource damage assessment for
the Deepwater Horizon incident under the Oil Pollution Act 1990 (OPA;
33 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.). Pursuant to OPA, Federal and State agencies
act as trustees on behalf of the public to assess natural resource
injuries and losses and to determine the actions required to compensate
the public for those injuries and losses. OPA further instructs the
designated trustees to develop and implement a plan for the
restoration, rehabilitation, replacement, or acquisition of the
equivalent of the injured natural resources under their trusteeship,
including the loss of use of those resources and the loss of services
they provide from the time of injury until the time restoration to
baseline (the resource quality and conditions that would exist if the
spill had not occurred) is complete.
The Trustees \1\ are as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Although a trustee under OPA by virtue of the proximity of
its facilities to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, the U.S.
Department of Defense (DOD) is not a member of the Trustee Council
and did not participate in development of this Final PDARP/PEIS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, on behalf
of the U.S. Department of Commerce;
U.S. Department of the Interior, as represented by the
National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Bureau of
Land Management;
U.S. Department of Agriculture;
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency;
State of Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration
Authority, Oil Spill Coordinator's Office, Department of Environmental
Quality, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, and Department of
Natural Resources;
State of Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality;
State of Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural
Resources and Geological Survey of Alabama;
State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection
and Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; and
For the State of Texas: Texas Parks and Wildlife
Department, Texas General Land Office, and Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality.
Background
Notice of availability of the Draft PDARP/PEIS was published in the
Federal Register on October 5, 2015 (80 FR 60126). The Draft PDARP/PEIS
presented the assessment of impacts of the Deepwater Horizon incident
on natural resources in the Gulf of Mexico and on the services those
resources provide, and determined the restoration needed to compensate
the public for these impacts. The Trustees provided the public with 60
days to review and comment on the Draft PDARP/PEIS. The Trustees also
held public meetings in Houma, LA; Long Beach, MS; New Orleans, LA;
Mobile, AL; Pensacola, FL; St. Petersburg, FL; Galveston, TX; and
Washington, DC, to facilitate public understanding of the document and
provide opportunity for public comment. The Trustees considered the
public comments received, which informed the Trustees' analysis of
programmatic alternatives in the Final PDARP/PEIS. The Trustees
actively solicited public input through a variety of mechanisms,
including convening public meetings, distributing electronic
communications, and using the Trustee-wide public Web site and database
to share information and receive public input. A summary of the public
comments received and the Trustees' responses to those comments are
addressed in Chapter 8 of the Final PDARP/PEIS.
Overview of the Final PDARP/PEIS
The Final PDARP/PEIS is being released in accordance with the OPA,
the Natural Resources Damage Assessment (NRDA) regulations found in the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 15 CFR part 990, and the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
In the Final PDARP/PEIS, the Deepwater Horizon Trustees present to
the public their findings on the extensive injuries to multiple
habitats, biological species, ecological functions, and geographic
regions across the northern Gulf of Mexico that occurred as a result of
the Deepwater Horizon incident, as well as their programmatic plan for
restoring those resources and the services they provide. The injuries
caused by the Deepwater Horizon incident cannot be fully described at
the level of a single species, a single habitat type, or a single
region. Rather, the injuries affected such a wide array of linked
resources over such an enormous area that the effects of the Deepwater
Horizon incident constitute an ecosystem-level injury. The Final PDARP/
PEIS presents four programmatic alternatives evaluated in accordance
with OPA and NEPA.
The four alternatives under the Final PDARP/PEIS are as follows:
Alternative A (Preferred Alternative): Comprehensive
Integrated Ecosystem Restoration Plan based on programmatic Trustee
goals;
Alternative B: Resource-Specific Restoration Plan based on
programmatic Trustee goals;
Alternative C: Continued Injury Assessment and Defer
Comprehensive Restoration Plan; and
Alternative D: No Action/Natural Recovery.
These programmatic alternatives are comprised of restoration types
and
[[Page 8485]]
approaches to restore, replace, rehabilitate, or acquire the equivalent
of the injured natural resources and services. The Trustees' preferred
alternative for a restoration plan utilizes a comprehensive integrated
ecosystem approach to best address these ecosystem-level injuries. The
Trustees' evaluation determined this alternative is best, among several
other alternatives, at compensating the public for the losses to
natural resources and services caused by the Deepwater Horizon
incident.
The Trustees' proposed decision is to select a comprehensive
restoration plan to guide and direct subsequent restoration planning
and implementation during the coming decades. The Final PDARP/PEIS is
programmatic; it describes the framework by which subsequent project
specific restoration plans will be identified and developed, and sets
forth the types of projects the Trustees will consider in each of the
described restoration areas. The subsequent restoration plans will
identify, evaluate, and select specific restoration projects for
implementation that are consistent with the restoration framework laid
out by the Final PDARP/PEIS.
The Trustees considered this programmatic restoration planning
decision in light of the proposed settlement among BP, the United
States, and the States of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, and
Texas to resolve BP's liability for natural resource damages associated
with the Deepwater Horizon incident. Under this proposed settlement, BP
would pay a total of $8.1 billion for restoration to address natural
resource injuries (this includes $1 billion already committed for early
restoration), plus up to an additional $700 million to respond to
natural resource damages unknown at the time of the settlement and/or
to provide for adaptive management. The proposed Consent Decree for the
proposed settlement was the subject of a separate public notice and
comment process; the Notice of Lodging of the proposed Consent Decree
under the Clean Water Act and Oil Pollution Act was published in the
Federal Register on October 5, 2015 (80 FR 60180).
Next Steps
In accordance with NEPA, a Federal agency must prepare a concise
public Record of Decision (ROD) at the time the agency makes a decision
in cases involving an EIS (40 CFR 1505.2). The Trustees will issue a
ROD pursuant to NEPA regulations at 40 CFR 1505.2 and OPA regulations
at 15 CFR 990.23. Accordingly, the ROD for the Final PDARP/PEIS will
provide and explain the Trustees' decisions regarding the selection of
a preferred alternative. The Trustees will issue the ROD no earlier
than 30 days after the Environmental Protection Agency publishes a
notice in the Federal Register announcing the availability of the Final
PDARP/PEIS (40 CFR 1506.10).
Administrative Record
The documents included in the Administrative Record can be viewed
electronically at the following location: https://www.doi.gov/deepwaterhorizon/adminrecord.
The Trustees opened a publicly available Administrative Record for
the NRDA for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, including restoration
planning activities, concurrently with publication of the 2011 Notice
of Intent (NOI) to Begin Restoration Scoping and Prepare a Gulf Spill
Restoration Planning PEIS (pursuant to 15 CFR 990.45). The
Administrative Record includes the February 17, 2011, NOI for a 90-day
formal scoping (76 FR 9327) and public comment period for this Final
PDARP/PEIS. The Trustees conducted the scoping in accordance with OPA
(15 CFR 990.14(d)), NEPA (40 CFR 1501.7), and State authorities. As
part of the scoping process, the Trustees hosted public meetings across
all the Gulf States during spring 2011.
Authority
The authority of this action is the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (33
U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) and the implementing NRDA regulations found at 15
CFR part 990.
Dated: February 11, 2016.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-03299 Filed 2-18-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P