Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Revision of U.S. Munitions List Category XII, 8438-8446 [2016-03197]
Download as PDF
8438
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
modified for underwater use incorporating
image intensifier tubes specified by
6A002.a.2.a or 6A002.a.2.b, see 6A003.b.3.
(4) For electronic imaging systems
‘‘specially designed’’ or modified for
underwater use incorporating ‘‘focal plane
arrays’’ specified by 6A002.a.3.g, see
6A003.b.4.c. (5) Section 744.9 imposes a
license requirement on commodities
described in 8A002.d.1.c or .d.2 if being
exported, reexported, or transferred (incountry) for use by a military end-user or
for incorporation into an item controlled
by ECCN 0A919.
*
*
*
*
*
52. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774,
Category 9, ECCN 9A991 is amended by:
■ a. Removing the License Requirement
Notes paragraph in the License
Requirements section, and
■ b. Revising the Related Controls
paragraph in the List of Items Controlled
section to read as follows:
■
9A991 ‘‘Aircraft’’, n.e.s., and gas turbine
engines not controlled by 9A001 or
9A101 and ‘‘parts’’ and ‘‘components,’’
n.e.s. (see List of Items Controlled).
*
*
*
*
*
List of Items Controlled
*
*
*
*
*
Related Controls: N/A
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: February 11, 2016.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016–03182 Filed 2–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 121
[Public Notice: 9445]
RIN 1400–AD32
Amendment to the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations: Revision of U.S.
Munitions List Category XII
Department of State.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
As part of the President’s
Export Control Reform effort, the
Department of State proposes to amend
the International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR) to revise Category
XII (fire control, laser, imaging, and
guidance and control equipment) of the
U.S. Munitions List (USML) to describe
more precisely the articles warranting
control on the USML. The Department
also proposes to amend USML
Categories VIII, XIII, and XV to reflect
that items now described in those
Categories will be in the revised
Category XII.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
The Department of State will
accept comments on this proposed rule
until April 4, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
submit comments within 45 days of the
date of publication by one of the
following methods:
• Email: DDTCPublicComments@
state.gov with the subject line, ‘‘ITAR
Amendment—Category XII Second
Proposed.’’
• Internet: At www.regulations.gov,
search for this notice by using this rule’s
RIN (1400–AD32).
Comments received after that date
will be considered if feasible, but
consideration cannot be assured. Those
submitting comments should not
include any personally identifying
information they do not desire to be
made public or any information for
which a claim of confidentiality is
asserted. All comments and transmittal
emails will be made available for public
inspection and copying after the close of
the comment period via the Directorate
of Defense Trade Controls Web site at
www.pmddtc.state.gov. Parties who
wish to comment anonymously may do
so by submitting their comments via
www.regulations.gov, leaving the fields
that would identify the commenter
blank and including no identifying
information in the comment itself.
Comments submitted via
www.regulations.gov are immediately
available for public inspection.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
C. Edward Peartree, Director, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Policy,
Department of State, telephone (202)
663–2792; email
DDTCPublicComments@state.gov.
ATTN: Regulatory Change, USML
Category XII.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Directorate of Defense Trade Controls
(DDTC), U.S. Department of State,
administers the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR parts
120–130). The items subject to the
jurisdiction of the ITAR, i.e., defense
articles, are identified on the ITAR’s
U.S. Munitions List (USML) (22 CFR
121.1). With few exceptions, items not
subject to the export control jurisdiction
of the ITAR are subject to the
jurisdiction of the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR), 15
CFR parts 730–774, which includes the
Commerce Control List (CCL) in
Supplement No. 1 to Part 774),
administered by the Bureau of Industry
and Security (BIS), U.S. Department of
Commerce. Both the ITAR and the EAR
impose license requirements on exports
and reexports. Items not subject to the
ITAR or to the exclusive licensing
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
jurisdiction of any other set of
regulations are subject to the EAR.
The revisions contained in this rule
are part of the Department of State’s
retrospective plan under E.O. 13563.
All references to the USML in this
rule are to the list of defense articles
that are controlled for the purpose of
export or temporary import pursuant to
the ITAR, and not to the defense articles
on the USML that are controlled by the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives (ATF) for the purpose of
permanent import under its regulations
(see 27 CFR part 447). Pursuant to
§ 38(a)(1) of the Arms Export Control
Act (AECA), all defense articles
controlled for export or import are part
of the USML under the AECA. For the
sake of clarity, the list of defense articles
controlled by ATF for the purpose of
permanent import is the United States
Munitions Import List (USMIL). The
transfer of defense articles from the
ITAR’s USML to the EAR’s CCL for the
purpose of export control does not affect
the list of defense articles controlled on
the USMIL under the AECA for the
purpose of permanent import.
Revision of Category XII
The revision of USML Category XII
was first published as a proposed rule
(RIN 1400–AD32) on May 5, 2015, for
public comment (see 80 FR 25821) (first
proposed rule). The comment period
ended July 6, 2015. One hundred twenty
parties submitted public comments,
which were reviewed and considered by
the Department and other agencies.
The majority of the public comments
stated that the proposed controls in
USML Category XII included items that
are in commercial and civil
applications, identifying items that
would largely be controlled under
paragraphs (b), (c), (d), and (e), and
requested that the Department limit the
USML controls for most paragraphs to
items specially designed for the
military. The comments varied in level
of detail and specific paragraphs
addressed, if any, but the general tenor
of the public comments was consistent.
These comments led the Department to
reevaluate USML Category XII in its
entirety and to draft this second
proposed rule to allow for public
feedback on new proposed changes.
Given the thorough redrafting of USML
Category XII, the Department does not
address each public comment in detail.
This second proposed rule revises
USML Category XII, covering fire
control, range finder, optical and
guidance and control equipment, to
advance the national security objectives
of the President’s Export Control Reform
initiative and to more accurately
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
describe the articles within the category,
in order to establish a ‘‘bright line’’
between the USML and the CCL for the
control of these articles. The revisions to
Category XII being proposed in this
second proposed rule are described
below, along with a description of any
changes from the first proposed rule.
The most significant change from the
first proposed rule to this second
proposed rule is that, in response to a
high number of substantive public
comments, certain articles will be
controlled based on the design intent of
the manufacturer. This was decided
because the Department found that
certain articles could be used as
components or as end items for the
same military application. While
applying the standard terminology
‘‘specially designed for a defense
article’’ would apply to articles that
operate as a component for a higherlevel assembly, that terminology would
not describe the same articles when
used as end items on their own for the
same military purpose. To address this
concern, paragraphs (b)(6) and (c)(2)(iii)
control articles if they are specially
designed for a military end user. A
military end user is defined in the new
Note to Category XII as the national
armed services, National Guard,
national police, government intelligence
or reconnaissance organizations, or any
person or entity whose actions or
functions are intended to support
military end uses. An item is specially
designed for a military end user if it was
created for use by a military end user or
users. If an item is created for both
military and non-military end users, or
if the item was created for no specific
end user, then it is not specially
designed for a military end user.
Contemporaneous documents are
required to support the design intent;
otherwise, use by a military end user
will establish that the item was
specially designed for a military end
user.
Paragraph (a) is revised to add
subparagraphs (1) through (10) to more
clearly describe the articles controlled
in (a).
Paragraph (a)(1) is added for fire
control systems. In response to one
comment, the Department moved the
control on ‘‘specially designed parts and
components’’ to paragraph (e) for this
paragraph and others, so that all parts
and components are described in
paragraph (e). None of the parts and
components in paragraph (e) are
designated significant military
equipment. One comment requested
clarification on the classification of
defense articles enumerated elsewhere
in the USML that are specially designed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
components of a fire control system,
such as fire control computers for
aircraft, described in USML Category
VIII(h)(16). A control on ‘‘specially
designed parts and components’’ is a
catch all control for items that are not
elsewhere specified in the USML, and
items that are explicitly described
elsewhere, such as USML Category
VIII(h)(16), are controlled by that entry.
Paragraph (a)(2) is added for weapons
sights and weapons aiming or imaging
systems, with certain infrared focal
plane arrays, image intensifier tubes,
ballistic computers, or lasers, when
specially designed for a defense article.
The Department received multiple
comments requesting revisions to this
paragraph. These comments were not
adopted, as these weapons sights and
weapon aiming and imaging systems all
relate to the sighting, aiming, or imaging
for a defense article and therefore
warrant USML control.
Paragraph (a)(3) is added for
electronic or optical weapon
positioning, laying, or spotting systems.
Paragraph (a)(4) is added for certain
laser spot trackers and laser spot
detectors that are for laser target
designators or coded laser target
markers controlled in paragraph (b)(1).
The Department revised this control
from the first proposed rule by tying it
to paragraph (b)(1) to more specifically
describe the kinds of items controlled
by this paragraph.
Paragraph (a)(5) is added for bomb
sights and bombing computers.
Paragraph (a)(6) is added for electrooptical missile or ordnance tracking
systems.
Paragraph (a)(7) is added for electrooptical ordnance guidance systems.
Paragraph (a)(8) is added for electrooptical systems that automatically
detect and locate weapons launch or
fire.
Paragraph (a)(9) is added for remote
wind sensing systems specially
designed for ballistic-corrected aiming.
Paragraph (a)(10) is added for certain
helmet mounted display (HMD)
systems. In response to comments, the
Department limited the scope of the
control for HMD’s with optical sights or
slewing devices that control infrared
imaging systems and end items from the
first proposed rule, to those infrared
systems and end items that are also
defense articles themselves. This
clarifies that HMDs for civilian
firefighter systems are not described in
this control.
Paragraph (b) is revised to add
subparagraphs (1) through (7) to more
clearly describe the articles controlled
in (b). Controls on lasers and others
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8439
parts and components of laser systems
are moved to paragraph (e).
Paragraph (b)(1) is added for laser
target designators or coded target
markers that mediate the delivery of
ordnance to a target. The Department
made the control language from the first
proposed rule more specific to more
completely describe the defense articles
controlled by this paragraph.
Paragraph (b)(2) is added for infrared
laser target illumination systems having
a variable beam divergence. The
Department made the control language
from the first proposed rule more
specific to more completely describe the
defense articles controlled by this
paragraph.
Paragraph (b)(3) is added for certain
laser range finders. In response to
comments, the Department revised the
control language from the first proposed
rule to specify only laser ranger finders
operating at a wavelength of 1064 nm
and having a Q-switched pulse output,
and laser ranger finders operating in
excess of 1064 nm and meeting certain
technical parameters.
Paragraph (b)(4) is added for certain
targeting or target location systems. In
response to public comments, the
Department revised the control from the
first proposed rule to require that the
system use a Global Navigation Satellite
System (GNSS), guidance, or navigation
defense article.
Paragraph (b)(5) is added for optical
augmentation systems.
Paragraph (b)(6) is added for light
detection and ranging (LIDAR), laser
detection and ranging (LADAR), or
range-gated systems specially designed
for a military end user.
Paragraph (b)(7) is added for
developmental lasers and laser systems
funded by the Department of Defense,
with certain exceptions.
Paragraph (c) is revised to add
subparagraphs (1) through (9) to more
clearly describe the articles controlled
in (c). Controls on image intensifier
tubes (IITs), infrared focal plane arrays
(IRFPAs), IRFPA dewar cooler
assemblies (IDCAs), gimbals, and other
parts and components of imaging
systems are moved to paragraph (e).
Paragraph (c)(1) is added for night
vision or infrared cameras specially
designed for defense articles. The
Department revised this entry in
response to comments regarding nonmilitary uses of cameras and imaging
systems described in the first proposed
rule. As a specially designed component
of another defense article, a camera, as
defined in the Note to paragraph (c)(1),
is eligible for paragraph (b) of specially
designed in § 120.41.
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8440
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Paragraph (c)(2) is added for certain
binoculars, bioculars, monoculars,
goggles, or head or helmet-mounted
imaging systems. The Department
revised this entry in response to
comments regarding non-military uses
of binocular, goggles, and other close
eye systems described in the first
proposed rule. For articles that employ
third generation IITs or are sensor fused,
the Department described the articles
based on their technical characteristics.
For articles with an IRFPA or infrared
imaging camera, the articles are
controlled if specially designed for a
military end user.
Paragraph (c)(3) is added for targeting
systems specially designed for defense
articles.
Paragraph (c)(4) is added for infrared
search and track (IRST) systems that
utilize a longwave IRFPA and maintain
positional or angular state of a target
through time. The Department revised
this control from the first proposed rule
in response to public comments
regarding non-military IRST systems.
Paragraph (c)(5) is added for certain
infrared imaging systems, described in
nine subparagraphs: (1) Mobile systems
that provide real-time target location at
ranges greater than 5 km; (2) airborne
stabilized systems specially designed for
military reconnaissance; (3)
multispectral imaging systems that
classify or identify military or
intelligence targets or characteristics; (4)
automated missile detection or warning
systems; (5) systems hardened to
withstand electromagnetic pulse (EMP)
or chemical, biological, or radiological
threats; (6) systems incorporating
mechanisms to reduce signature; (7)
certain aerial persistent surveillance
systems; (8) certain gimbaled infrared
systems; (9) systems specially designed
for USML platforms. The Department
revised this entry from the first
proposed rule in response to comments
regarding non-military imaging systems
described in the proposed rule.
Paragraph (c)(6) is added for certain
terahertz imaging systems. In response
to public comments, the Department
revised the technical parameter from the
first proposed rule from 0.3 milliradians
to 0.1 milliradians.
Paragraph (c)(7) is added for systems
or equipment incorporating an infrared
beacon or emitter specially designed for
Combat Identification. The Department
revised this entry to Combat
Identification from Identification Friend
or Foe (IFF) in the first proposed rule in
response to public confusion regarding
IFF.
Paragraph (c)(8) is added for systems
that project radiometrically calibrated
scenes directly into the entrance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
aperture of an electro-optical or infrared
(EO/IR) sensor controlled in this
subchapter within either the spectral
band exceeding 10 nm but not
exceeding 400 nm, or the spectral band
exceeding 900 nm but not exceeding
30,000 nm.
Paragraph (c)(9) is added for
developmental imaging systems funded
by the Department of Defense.
Paragraph (d) is revised to include
controls on GNSS equipment previously
controlled in Category XV and to add
subparagraphs (1) through (6) to more
clearly describe the articles controlled
in (d). Controls on inertial measurement
units, accelerometers, gyroscopes,
GNNS security devices, and other parts
and components of navigation systems
are moved to paragraph (e).
Paragraph (d)(1) is added for certain
guidance or navigation systems. The
Department did not adopt public
comments to revise this entry to items
specially designed for the military.
Rather the Department has revised the
technical parameters from the first
proposed rule to a level that more
clearly describes the military critical
technology.
Paragraph (d)(2) is added for GNSS
receiving equipment, moved from
Category XV.
Paragraph (d)(3) is added for GNSS
anti-jam systems specially designed for
use with the anti-jam antennae
described in USML Category XI(c)(10).
In response to public comments, the
Department revised the entry for antijam GNNS systems from the first
proposed rule by expressly linking the
control to the anti-jam antennae
described in USML Category XI(c)(10).
Paragraph (d)(4) is added for certain
mobile relative gravimeters.
Paragraph (d)(5) is added for certain
mobile gravity gradiometers.
Paragraph (d)(6) is added for
developmental guidance, navigation, or
control systems funded by the
Department of Defense.
Paragraph (e) is revised to add
subparagraphs (1) through (23) to more
clearly describe the parts and
components for the systems in (a)–(d)
that are controlled in (e).
Paragraph (e)(1) is added for parts and
components specially designed for
articles described in paragraph (a)(1) or
(a)(8).
Paragraph (e)(2) is added for lasers
specially designed for defense articles.
In response to public comments
regarding the non-military uses of lasers
described in the first proposed rule, the
Department limited this entry to lasers
that are specially designed for defense
articles.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Paragraph (e)(3) is added for laser
stacked arrays specially designed for
defense articles. In response to public
comments regarding the non-military
uses of laser stacked arrays described in
the first proposed rule, the Department
limited this entry to laser stacked arrays
that are unique to defense articles.
Paragraph (e)(4) is added for IRFPAs
specially designed for defense articles.
In response to public comments, the
Department completely revised the
controls on IRFPAs from the first
proposed rule, limiting the USML
control to those that are unique to
defense articles.
Paragraph (e)(5) is added for certain
charge multiplication focal plane arrays
specially designed for defense articles.
In response to public comments, the
Department completely revised the
controls on charge multiplication focal
plane arrays from the first proposed
rule, limiting the USML control to those
that are unique to defense articles.
Paragraph (e)(6) is added for second
generation and greater IITs specially
designed for defense articles, and
specially designed parts and
components therefor. This control
includes third generation IITs, EBAPS,
night vision and thermal fused IITs, and
all subsequent IIT designs. In response
to public comments, the Department
completely revised the controls on IITs
from the first proposed rule, limiting the
USML control to those that are unique
to defense articles.
Paragraph (e)(7) is added for parts and
components specially designed for
articles described in paragraph (c)(3),
(c)(4), or (c)(5)(vi)–(vii).
Paragraph (e)(8) is added for inertial
measurement units specially designed
for defense articles. In response to
public comments, the Department
revised the controls on inertial
measurement units from the first
proposed rule to a technical parameter
based control to a control on all inertial
measurement units that are unique to
defense articles.
Paragraph (e)(9) is added for GNSS
security devices, Selective Availability
Anti-Spoofing Module (SAASM),
Security Module (SM), and Auxiliary
Output Chip (AOC) chips.
Paragraph (e)(10) is added for certain
accelerometers that meet the technical
parameters. In response to public
comments regarding the non-military
uses of accelerometers described in the
first proposed rule, the Department
revised this entry to more specifically
describe the items warranting control on
the USML.
Paragraph (e)(11) is added for certain
gyroscopes and angular rate sensors that
meet the technical parameters. In
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
response to public comments regarding
the non-military uses of gyroscopes and
angular rate sensors described in the
first proposed rule, the Department
revised this entry to more specifically
describe the items warranting control on
the USML.
Paragraph (e)(12) is added for optical
sensors that have a spectral filter that is
specially designed for items controlled
in USML Category XI(a)(4) and optical
sensor assemblies that provide threat
warning or tracking for those items
controlled in USML Category XI(a)(4). In
response to public comments, the
Department revised the control from the
first proposed rule to add the specially
designed control parameter.
Paragraph (e)(13) is added for read-out
integrated circuits (ROICs) specially
designed for defense articles.
Paragraph (e)(14) is added for IDCAs,
with or without an IRFPA, specially
designed for defense articles, other than
those in USML Category XV, and
specially designed parts and
components therefor.
Paragraph (e)(15) is added for gimbals
specially designed for defense articles in
this category.
Paragraph (e)(16) is added for IRFPA
Joule-Thomson (JT) self-regulating
cryostats specially designed for defense
articles.
Paragraph (e)(17) is added for infrared
lenses, mirrors, beam splitters or
combiners, filters, and treatments and
coatings, specially designed for defense
articles.
Paragraph (e)(18) is added for drive,
control, signal, or image processing
electronics specially designed for
defense articles in this category.
Paragraph (e)(19) is added for near-toeye displays specially designed for
defense articles in this category.
Paragraph (e)(20) is added for
resonators, receivers, transmitters,
modulators, gain media, and drive
electronics or frequency converters
specially designed for defense articles in
this category.
Paragraph (e)(21) is added for twodimensional infrared scene projector
emitter arrays (i.e., resistive arrays)
specially designed for infrared scene
generators controlled in USML Category
IX(a)(10).
Paragraph (e)(22) is added for
classified parts, components,
accessories, attachments, and associated
equipment.
Paragraph (e)(23) is added for
developmental IITs, FPAs, ROICs,
accelerometers, gyroscopes, angular rate
sensors, and inertial measurement units
funded by the Department of Defense.
Paragraph (f) is revised to more
clearly describe the technical data and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
defense services controlled in paragraph
(f). In response to public comments, the
Department significantly revised
paragraph (f), so that it now mirrors the
other technical data and defense
services paragraphs in ECR-revised
USML Categories.
A new (x) paragraph has been added
to USML Category XII, allowing ITAR
licensing for commodities, software, and
technology subject to the EAR provided
those commodities, software, and
technology are to be used in or with
defense articles controlled in USML
Category XII and are described in the
purchase documentation submitted with
the application.
Finally, articles common to the
Missile Technology Control Regime
(MTCR) Annex and the USML are to be
identified on the USML with the
parenthetical ‘‘(MT)’’ at the end of each
section containing such articles. A
separate proposed rule will address the
sections in the ITAR that include MTCR
definitions.
The following definitions explain and
amplify terms used in this Category and
are provided to assist exporters in
understanding the scope of the
proposed control.
Charge multiplication is a form of
electronic image amplification, the
generation of charge carriers as a result
of an impact ionization gain process.
Focal plane array is a linear or twodimensional planar layer, or
combination of planar layers, of
individual detector elements, with or
without readout electronics, which
work in the focal plane.
Note: This definition does not include a
stack of single detector elements or any two,
three, or four element detectors provided
time delay and integration is not performed
within the element.
Image intensifier tube refers to an
imaging device that incorporates a
photoemissive transducer (i.e.,
photocathode) and achieves electron
image amplification in the vacuum
space.
Multispectral refers to producing
discrete outputs associated with more
than one spectral band of response.
Request for Comments
As the U.S. Government works
through the proposed revisions to the
USML, some control parameters are
proposed recognizing that they may
control items in normal commercial use
and on the Wassenaar Arrangement’s
Dual Use List. With the thought that
multiple perspectives would be
beneficial to the USML revision process,
the Department welcomes the assistance
of users of the lists and requests input
on the following:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8441
(1) A key goal of this rulemaking is to
ensure the USML and the CCL together
control all the items that meet
Wassenaar Arrangement commitments
embodied in Munitions List Categories
5, 11 and 15 (WA–ML15) and the
relevant Dual Use List Categories
including the IRFPAs in Category 6
(WA–DU 6.A.2). To that end, the public
is asked to identify any potential lack of
coverage brought about by the proposed
rules for Category XII contained in this
notice and the new and revised ECCNs
published separately by the Department
of Commerce when reviewed together.
(2) Another key goal of this
rulemaking is to identify items proposed
for control on the USML or the CCL that
are not controlled on the Wassenaar
Arrangement’s Munitions or Dual Use
List. The public is asked to identify any
items proposed for control on the USML
that are not controlled on the Wassenaar
Arrangement’s Munitions or Dual Use
List.
(3) A third key goal of this rulemaking
is to establish a ‘‘bright line’’ between
the USML and the CCL for the control
of these materials. The public is asked
to provide specific examples of control
criteria that do not clearly describe
items that would be defense articles and
thus do not establish a ‘‘bright line’’
between the USML and the CCL.
(4) Although the proposed revisions
to the USML do not preclude the
possibility that items in normal
commercial use would or should be
ITAR-controlled because, e.g., they
provide the United States with a critical
military or intelligence advantage, the
U.S. government does not want to
inadvertently control items on the ITAR
that are in normal commercial use.
Items that would be controlled on the
USML in this proposed rule have been
identified as possessing parameters or
characteristics that provide a critical
military or intelligence advantage. The
public is thus asked to provide specific
examples of items, if any, that would be
controlled by the revised USML
Category XII that are now in normal
commercial use. The examples should
demonstrate actual commercial use, not
just potential or theoretical use, with
supporting documents, as well as
foreign availability of such items.
(5) For any criteria the public believes
control items in normal commercial use,
the public is asked to identify
parameters or characteristics that
differentiate such items from items
exclusively or primarily in military use.
(6) For any criteria the public believes
control items in normal commercial use,
the public is asked to identify the
multilateral controls (such as the
Wassenaar Arrangement’s Dual Use
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
8442
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
List), if any, for such items, and the
consequences of such items being
controlled on the USML.
(7) The Department seeks public
comment on each paragraph of the
proposed USML Category XII.
statement. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and
activities do not apply to this proposed
amendment.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributed impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ although not economically
significant, under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the rule has been reviewed by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB).
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the
opinion that controlling the import and
export of defense articles and services is
a foreign affairs function of the United
States Government and that rules
implementing this function are exempt
from sections 553 (rulemaking) and 554
(adjudications) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA). Although the
Department is of the opinion that this
rule is exempt from the rulemaking
provisions of the APA, the Department
is publishing this rule with a 45-day
provision for public comment and
without prejudice to its determination
that controlling the import and export of
defense services is a foreign affairs
function.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since this rule is exempt from the
rulemaking provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553,
it does not require analysis under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed amendment does not
involve a mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This proposed amendment has been
found not to be a major rule within the
meaning of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This proposed amendment will not
have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this proposed
amendment does not have sufficient
federalism implications to require
consultations or warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed
the proposed amendment in light of
Executive Order 12988 to eliminate
ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish
clear legal standards, and reduce
burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has
determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and
will not preempt tribal law.
Accordingly, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Following is a listing of approved
Department of State information
collections that will be affected by
revision of the U.S. Munitions List
(USML) and the Commerce Control List
pursuant to the President’s Export
Control Reform (ECR) initiative. The list
of collections and the description of the
manner in which they will be affected
pertains to revision of the USML in its
entirety, not only to the categories
published in this rule. In accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Department of State will request
comment on these collections from all
interested persons at the appropriate
time. In particular, the Department will
seek comment on changes to licensing
burden based on implementation of
regulatory changes pursuant to ECR, and
on projected changes based on
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
continued implementation of regulatory
changes pursuant to ECR. The
information collections are as follows:
(1) Statement of Registration, DS–
2032, OMB No. 1405–0002. The
Department estimates that between
3,000 and 5,000 of the currently
registered persons will not need to
maintain registration following full
revision of the USML. This would result
in a burden reduction of between 6,000
and 10,000 hours annually, based on a
revised time burden of two hours to
complete a Statement of Registration.
(2) Application/License for Permanent
Export of Unclassified Defense Articles
and Related Unclassified Technical
Data, DSP–5, OMB No. 1405–0003. The
Department estimates that there will be
35,000 fewer DSP–5 submissions
annually following full revision of the
USML. This would result in a burden
reduction of 35,000 hours annually.
(3) Application/License for
Temporary Import of Unclassified
Defense Articles, DSP–61, OMB No.
1405–0013. The Department estimates
that there will be 200 fewer DSP–61
submissions annually following full
revision of the USML. This would result
in a burden reduction of 100 hours
annually.
(4) Application/License for
Temporary Export of Unclassified
Defense Articles, DSP–73, OMB No.
1405–0023. The Department estimates
that there will be 800 fewer DSP–73
submissions annually following full
revision of the USML. This would result
in a burden reduction of 800 hours
annually.
(5) Application for Amendment to
License for Export or Import of
Classified or Unclassified Defense
Articles and Related Technical Data,
DSP–6, –62, –74, –119, OMB No. 1405–
0092. The Department estimates that
there will be 2,000 fewer amendment
submissions annually following full
revision of the USML. This would result
in a burden reduction of 1,000 hours
annually.
(6) Request for Approval of
Manufacturing License Agreements,
Technical Assistance Agreements, and
Other Agreements, DSP–5, OMB No.
1405–0093. The Department estimates
that there will be 1,000 fewer agreement
submissions annually following full
revision of the USML. This would result
in a burden reduction of 2,000 hours
annually.
(7) Maintenance of Records by
Registrants, OMB No. 1405–0111. The
requirement to actively maintain
records pursuant to provisions of the
ITAR will decline commensurate with
the drop in the number of persons who
will be required to register with the
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Department pursuant to the ITAR. As
stated above, the Department estimates
that up to 5,000 of the currentlyregistered persons will not need to
maintain registration following full
revision of the USML. This would result
in a burden reduction of 100,000 hours
annually. However, the ITAR does
provide for the maintenance of records
for a period of five years. Therefore,
persons newly relieved of the
requirement to register with the
Department may still be required to
maintain records.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 121
Arms and munitions, Exports.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
above, title 22, chapter I, subchapter M,
part 121 is proposed to be amended as
follows:
PART 121—THE UNITED STATES
MUNITIONS LIST
1. The authority citation for part 121
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90–
629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2797); 22 U.S.C. 2651a; Pub. L. 105–261, 112
Stat. 1920; Section 1261, Pub. L. 112–239;
E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129.
§ 121.1
[Amended]
2. Section 121.1 is amended by:
a. Removing and reserving paragraph
(e) in U.S. Munitions List Category VIII.
■ b. Revising U.S. Munitions List
Category XII:
■ c. Removing and reserving paragraph
(a) in U.S. Munitions List Category XIII.
■ d. Removing and reserving paragraph
(c) in U.S. Munitions List Category XV.
The revision to read as follows:
■
■
§ 121.1
*
*
The United States Munitions List.
*
*
*
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Category XII—Fire Control, Laser,
Imaging, and Guidance and Control
Equipment
* (a) Fire control and aiming systems,
as follows:
(1) Fire control systems;
(2) Weapon sights, weapon aiming
systems, and weapon imaging systems
(e.g., clip-on), with or without an
integrated viewer, display, or reticle,
specially designed for an article subject
to this subchapter and also
incorporating or specially designed to
incorporate any of the following:
(i) An infrared focal plane array
having a peak response at a wavelength
exceeding 1,000 nm;
(ii) Second generation or greater
image intensifier tubes;
(iii) A ballistic computer for adjusting
the aim point display; or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
(iv) Infrared laser having a wavelength
exceeding 710 nm;
(3) Electronic or optical weapon
positioning, laying, or spotting systems;
(4) Laser spot trackers and laser spot
detection, location, or imaging systems,
with an operational wavelength shorter
than 400 nm or longer than 710 nm and
that are for laser target designators or
coded laser target markers controlled in
paragraph (b)(1);
Note to paragraph (a)(4): For controls
on LIDAR, see paragraph (b)(6) of this
category.
(5) Bomb sights or bombing
computers;
(6) Electro-optical missile or ordnance
tracking systems,
(7) Electro-optical ordnance guidance
systems;
(8) Electro-optical systems that
automatically detect and locate weapons
launch or fire;
(9) Remote wind-sensing systems
specially designed for ballistic-corrected
aiming; or
(10) Helmet mounted display (HMD)
systems or end items, incorporating
optical sights or slewing devices that
aim, launch, track, or manage
munitions, or control infrared imaging
systems or end items described in this
category, other than such items
controlled in Category VIII (e.g., Combat
Vehicle Crew HMD, Mounted Warrior
HMD, Integrated Helmet Assembly
Subsystem, Drivers Head Tracked
Vision System);
* (b) Laser systems and end items, as
follows:
(1) Laser target designators or coded
target markers that mediate the delivery
of ordnance to a target;
(2) Target illumination systems
having a variable beam divergence, and
a laser output wavelength exceeding 710
nm, to artificially light an area to search
for or locate a target;
(3) Laser rangefinders having any of
the following:
(i) Output wavelength of 1064 nm and
any Q-switched pulse output; or
(ii) Output wavelength exceeding
1064 nm and any of the following:
(A) Single shot ranging capability of 3
km or greater against a standard 2.3 m
x 2.3 m NATO target having 10%
reflectivity and 23 km visibility; or
(B) Multiple shot ranging capability at
3 Hz or greater of 1 km or greater against
a standard 2.3 m x 2.3 m NATO target
having 10% reflectivity and 23 km
visibility;
(4) Targeting systems and target
location systems, incorporating or
specially designed to incorporate a laser
rangefinder and incorporating or
specially designed to incorporate a
Global Navigation Satellite System
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8443
(GNSS), guidance, or navigation defense
article controlled in paragraph (d) of
this category (MT if designed or
modified for rockets, missiles, space
launch vehicles (SLVs), drones, or
unmanned aerial vehicle systems
capable of delivering at least a 500 kg
payload to a range of at least 300 km);
(5) Systems specially designed to use
laser energy with an output wavelength
exceeding 710 nm to exploit differential
target-background retroreflectance in
order to detect personnel or optical/
electro-optical equipment (e.g., optical
augmentation systems);
(6) Light detection and ranging
(LIDAR), laser detection and ranging
(LADAR), or range-gated systems
specially designed for a military end
user (MT if designed or modified for
rockets, missiles, SLVs, drones, or
unmanned aerial vehicle systems
capable of delivering at least a 500 kg
payload to a range of at least 300 km);
or
(7) Developmental lasers or laser
systems funded by the Department of
Defense via contract or other funding
authorization;
Note 1 to paragraph (b)(7): This paragraph
does not control lasers or laser systems: (a)
In production, (b) determined to be subject to
the EAR via a commodity jurisdiction
determination (see § 120.4 of this
subchapter), or (c) identified in the relevant
Department of Defense contract or other
funding authorization as being developed for
both civil and military applications.
Note 2 to paragraph (b)(7): Note 1 does not
apply to defense articles enumerated on the
U.S. Munitions List, whether in production
or development.
Note 3 to paragraph (b)(7): This provision
is applicable to those contracts or other
funding authorizations that are dated XXXX,
2017 or later.
* (c) Night vision, infrared, or
terahertz imaging systems or end items,
as follows:
(1) Night vision or infrared cameras
specially designed for articles in this
subchapter;
Note to paragraph (c)(1): The articles
controlled by this paragraph have sufficient
electronics to enable at a minimum the
output of an analog or digital signal once
power is applied.
(2) Binoculars, bioculars, monoculars,
goggles, or head or helmet-mounted
imaging systems (including video-based
articles having a separate near-to-eye
display), as follows:
(i) Incorporating an autogated third
generation image intensifier tube or a
higher generation image intensifier tube;
(ii) Fusing output of an image
intensifier tube and an infrared focal
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8444
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
plane array having a peak response
greater than 1,000 nm; or
(iii) Having an infrared focal plane
array or imaging camera, and is
specially designed for a military end
user;
(3) Targeting systems specially
designed for articles in this subchapter;
(4) Infrared search and track (IRST)
systems, that:
(i) Incorporate or are specially
designed to incorporate an infrared focal
plane array or imaging camera, having a
peak response within the wavelength
range exceeding 3 microns or greater;
and
(ii) Maintain positional or angular
state of a target through time;
(5) Infrared imaging systems, as
follows:
(i) Mobile reconnaissance, scout, or
surveillance systems providing real-time
target location at ranges greater than 5
km (e.g., LRAS, CIV, HTI, SeeSpot,
MMS);
(ii) Airborne stabilized systems
specially designed for military
reconnaissance (e.g., DB–110, C–B4);
(iii) Multispectral imaging systems
that classify or identify military or
intelligence targets or characteristics;
(iv) Automated missile detection or
warning systems;
(v) Systems hardened to withstand
electromagnetic pulse (EMP) or
chemical, biological, or radiological
threats;
(vi) Systems incorporating
mechanism(s) to reduce signature;
(vii) Persistent surveillance systems
with a ground sample distance (GSD) of
0.5 m or better (smaller) at 10,000 ft
AGL and a simultaneous coverage area
of 3 km2 or greater;
(viii) Gimbaled infrared systems, as
follows:
(A) Having a stabilization better (less)
than 30 microradians RMS and a turret
with a ball diameter of 15 inches or
greater; or
(B) Specially designed for articles in
this subchapter; or
(ix) Systems specially designed for
military platforms controlled in this
subchapter (MT if for determining
bearings to specific electromagnetic
sources (direction finding equipment) or
terrain characteristics and designed or
modified for rockets, missiles, SLVs,
drones, or unmanned aerial vehicle
systems capable of delivering at least a
500 kg payload to a range of at least 300
km);
(6) Terahertz imaging systems having
a peak response in the frequency range
exceeding 30 GHz but not exceeding
3000 GHz, and having a resolution less
(better) than 0.1 milliradians at a
standoff range of 100 m;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
(7) Systems or equipment,
incorporating an infrared (IR) beacon or
emitter, specially designed for Combat
Identification;
(8) Systems that project
radiometrically calibrated scenes at a
frame rate greater than 30 Hz directly
into the entrance aperture of an electrooptical or infrared (EO/IR) sensor
controlled in this subchapter within
either the spectral band exceeding 10
nm but not exceeding 400 nm, or the
spectral band exceeding 900 nm but not
exceeding 30,000 nm;
(9) Developmental electro-optical,
infrared, or terahertz systems funded by
the Department of Defense.
Note 1 to paragraph (c)(9): This paragraph
does not control electro-optical, infrared, or
terahertz imaging systems: (a) In production,
(b) determined to be subject to the EAR via
a commodity jurisdiction determination (see
§ 120.4 of this subchapter, or (c) identified in
the relevant Department of Defense contract
or other funding authorization as being
developed for both civil and military
applications.
Note 2 to paragraph (c)(9): Note 1 does not
apply to defense articles enumerated on the
U.S. Munitions List, whether in production
or development.
Note 3 to paragraph (c)(9): This provision
is applicable to those contracts or other
funding authorizations that are dated XXXX,
2017 or later.
(d) Guidance, navigation, and control
systems or end items, as follows:
(1) Guidance or navigation systems
(e.g., inertial navigation systems, inertial
reference units, attitude and heading
reference systems) as follows (MT if
designed or modified for rockets,
missiles, SLVs, drones, or unmanned
aerial vehicle systems capable of a range
greater than or equal to 300 km);
(i) Having a circle of equal probability
(CEP) of position error rate less (better)
than 0.28 nautical miles per hour,
without the use of positional aiding
references;
(ii) Having a heading error or true
north determination of less (better) than
0.28 mrad secant (latitude) (0.016043
degrees secant (latitude));
(iii) Having a CEP of position error
rate less than 0.2 nautical miles in an 8
hour period, without the use of
positional aiding references; or
(iv) Specified to function at linear
acceleration levels exceeding 25 g;
Note 1 to paragraph (d)(1): For rocket,
SLV, or missile flight control and guidance
systems (including guidance sets), see
Category IV(h).
Note 2 to paragraph (d)(1): Inertial
measurement units are described in
paragraph (e) of this category.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2) Global Navigation Satellite System
(GNSS) receiving equipment, as follows:
(i) GNSS receiving equipment
specially designed for military
applications (MT if designed or
modified for airborne applications and
capable of providing navigation
information at speeds in excess of 600
m/s);
(ii) Global Positioning System (GPS)
receiving equipment specially designed
for encryption or decryption (e.g., YCode, M-Code) of GPS precise
positioning service (PPS) signals (MT if
designed or modified for airborne
applications);
(iii) GPS receiving equipment
specially designed for use with an
antenna described in Category XI(c)(10)
(MT if designed or modified for airborne
applications); or
(iv) GPS receiving equipment
specially designed for use with rockets,
missiles, SLVs, drones, or unmanned air
vehicle systems capable of delivering at
least a 500 kg payload to a range of at
least 300 km (MT);
Note to paragraph (d)(2)(iv): ‘‘Payload’’ is
the total mass that can be carried or delivered
by the specified rocket, missile, SLV, drone
or unmanned aerial vehicle that is not used
to maintain flight. For definition of ‘‘range’’
as it pertains to rocket systems, see note 1 to
paragraph (a) of USML Category IV. For
definition of ‘‘range’’ as it pertains to aircraft
systems, see note to paragraph (a) of USML
Category VIII.
(3) GNSS anti-jam systems specially
designed for use with an antenna
described in Category XI(c)(10);
(4) Mobile relative gravimeters having
automatic motion compensation, with
an in-service accuracy of less (better)
than 0.4 mGal (MT if designed or
modified for airborne or marine use and
having a time to steady-state registration
of two minutes or less);
(5) Mobile gravity gradiometers
having an accuracy of less (better) than
10 Eotvos squared per radian per second
for any component of the gravity
gradient tensor, and having a spatial
gravity wavelength resolution of 50 m or
less (MT if designed or modified for
airborne or marine use);
Note to paragraph (d)(5): ‘‘Eotvos’’ is a unit
of acceleration divided by distance that was
used in conjunction with the older
centimeter-gram-second system of units. The
Eotvos is defined as 1/1,000,000,000 Galileo
(Gal) per centimeter.
(6) Developmental guidance,
navigation, or control systems funded
by the Department of Defense (MT if
designed or modified for rockets,
missiles, SLVs, drones, or unmanned
aerial vehicle systems capable of a range
equal to or greater than 300 km);
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Note 1 to paragraph (d)(6): This paragraph
does not control guidance, navigation, or
control systems: (a) In production, (b)
determined to be subject to the EAR via a
commodity jurisdiction determination (see
§ 120.4 of this subchapter), or (c) identified
in the relevant Department of Defense
contract or other funding authorization as
being developed for both civil and military
applications.
Modules (SAASM), Security Modules
(SM), and Auxiliary Output Chips
(AOC);
(10) Accelerometers having a bias
repeatability of less (better) than 10 mg
and a scale factor repeatability of less
(better) than 10 parts per million, or
capable of measuring greater than
100,000 g (MT);
Note 2 to paragraph (d)(6): Note 1 does not
apply to defense articles enumerated on the
U.S. Munitions List, whether in production
or development.
Note 1 to paragraph (e)(10): For weapon
fuze accelerometers, see Category III(d) or
IV(h).
Note 3 to paragraph (d)(6): This provision
is applicable to those contracts or other
funding authorizations that are dated XXXX,
2017, or later.
Note 4 to paragraph (d)(6): For definition
of ‘‘range’’ as it pertains to rocket systems,
see note 1 to paragraph (a) of USML Category
IV. For definition of ‘‘range’’ as it pertains to
aircraft systems, see note to paragraph (a) of
USML Category VIII.
(e) Parts, components, accessories, or
attachments, as follows:
(1) Parts and components specially
designed for articles described in
paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(8) of this section;
(2) Lasers specially designed for
articles in this subchapter;
(3) Laser stacked arrays specially
designed for articles in this category;
(4) Infrared focal plane arrays
(IRFPAs) specially designed for articles
in this subchapter;
(5) Charge multiplication focal plane
arrays exceeding 50 mA/W for any
wavelength exceeding 760 nm and
specially designed for articles described
in this subchapter;
(6) Second generation and greater
image intensifier tubes specially
designed for articles in this subchapter,
and specially designed parts and
components therefore;
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Note to paragraph (e)(6): Second and third
generation image intensifier tubes are defined
as having a peak response within the 0.4 to
1.05 micron wavelength range and
incorporating a microchannel plate for
electron image amplification having a hole
pitch (center-to-center spacing) of less than
25 microns and having either: (a) An S–20,
S–25, or multialkali photo cathode; or (b) a
GaAs, GaInAs, or other III–V compound
semiconductor photocathode.
(7) Parts and components specially
designed for articles described in
paragraph (c)(3), (c)(4), or (c)(5)(vi)–(vii);
(8) Inertial measurement units
specially designed for articles in this
subchapter (MT for systems
incorporating accelerometers specified
in (e)(10) or gyroscopes or angular rate
sensors specified in (e)(11) that are
designated MT);
(9) GNSS security devices (e.g.,
Selective Availability Anti-Spoofing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
Note 2 to paragraph (e)(10): MT
designation does not include accelerometers
that are designed to measure vibration or
shock.
(11) Gyroscopes or angular rate
sensors as follows (MT if having a rated
drift stability of less than 0.5 degrees (1
sigma or rms) per hour in a 1 g
environment or specified to function at
acceleration levels greater than 100 g):
(i) Having an angle random walk of
less (better) than 0.001 degrees per
square root hour; or
(ii) Mechanical gyroscopes or rate
sensors having a bias repeatability less
(better) than 0.0015 degrees per hour;
Note to paragraphs (e)(10) and (e)(11):
‘‘Repeatability’’ is the closeness of agreement
among repeated measurements of the same
variable under the same operating conditions
when changes in conditions or non-operating
periods occur between measurements.
‘‘Bias’’ is the accelerometer output when
no acceleration is applied.
‘‘Scale factor’’ is the ratio of change in
output to a change in the input.
The measurement of ‘‘bias’’ and ‘‘scale
factor’’ refers to one sigma standard deviation
with respect to a fixed calibration over a
period of one year.
‘‘Drift Rate’’ is the component of gyro
output that is functionally independent of
input rotation and is expressed as an angular
rate.
‘‘Stability’’ is a measure of the ability of a
specific mechanism or performance
coefficient to remain invariant when
continuously exposed to a fixed operating
condition. (This definition does not refer to
dynamic or servo stability.)
(12) Optical sensors having a spectral
filter specially designed for systems or
equipment controlled in USML Category
XI(a)(4), or optical sensor assemblies
that provide threat warning or tracking
for systems or equipment controlled in
Category XI(a)(4);
(13) Read-out integrated circuits
(ROICs) specially designed for articles
in this subchapter;
(14) Integrated IRFPA dewar cooler
assemblies (IDCAs), with or without an
IRFPA, specially designed for articles in
this subchapter other than Category XV,
and specially designed parts and
components therefore;
(15) Gimbals specially designed for
articles in this category;
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8445
(16) IRFPA Joule-Thomson (JT) selfregulating cryostats specially designed
for articles controlled in this
subchapter;
(17) Infrared lenses, mirrors, beam
splitters or combiners, filters, and
treatments and coatings, specially
designed for articles controlled in this
category;
(18) Drive, control, signal, or image
processing electronics, specially
designed for articles controlled in this
category;
(19) Near-to-eye displays specially
designed for articles controlled in this
category;
(20) Resonators, receivers,
transmitters, modulators, gain media,
drive electronics, and frequency
converters specially designed for laser
systems controlled in this category;
(21) Two-dimensional infrared scene
projector emitter arrays (i.e., resistive
arrays) specially designed for infrared
scene generators controlled in USML
Category IX(a)(10);
* (22) Any part, component,
accessory, attachment, or associated
equipment, that:
(i) Is classified;
(ii) Contains classified software;
(iii) Is manufactured using classified
production data; or
(iv) Is being developed using
classified information.
Note to paragraph (e)(22): ‘‘Classified’’
means classified pursuant to Executive Order
13526, or predecessor order, and a security
classification guide developed pursuant
thereto or equivalent, or to the corresponding
classification rules of another government.
(23) Developmental image
intensification tubes, focal plane arrays,
read-out-integrated circuits,
accelerometers, gyroscopes, angular rate
sensors and inertial measurement units
funded by the Department of Defense
(MT if designed or modified for rockets,
missiles, SLVs, drones, or unmanned
aerial vehicle systems capable of a range
equal to or greater than 300 km);
Note 1 to paragraph (e)(23): This
paragraph does not control items: (a) In
production, (b) determined to be subject to
the EAR via a commodity jurisdiction
determination (see § 120.4 of this
subchapter), or (c) identified in the relevant
Department of Defense contract or other
funding authorization as being developed for
both civil and military applications.
Note 2 to paragraph (e)(23): Note 1 does
not apply to defense articles enumerated on
the U.S. Munitions List, whether in
production or development.
Note 3 to paragraph (e)(23): This provision
is applicable to those contracts or other
funding authorizations that are dated XXXX,
2017, or later.
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
8446
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(f) Technical data (see § 120.10) and
defense services (see § 120.9) directly
related to the defense articles
enumerated in paragraphs (a) through
(e) of this category and classified
technical data directly related to items
controlled in ECCNs 7A611, 7B611, and
7D611. (See § 125.4 for exemptions.)
(MT for technical data and defense
services related to articles designated as
such.) Technical data directly related to
manufacture or production of any
defense articles enumerated elsewhere
in this category that are designated as
Significant Military Equipment (SME)
shall itself be designated as SME.
(g)–(w) [Reserved]
(x) Commodities, software, and
technology subject to the EAR (see
§ 120.42 of this subchapter) used in or
with defense articles controlled in this
category.
Note to paragraph (x): Use of this
paragraph is limited to license applications
for defense articles controlled in this category
where the purchase documentation includes
commodities, software, or technology subject
to the EAR (see § 123.1(b) of this subchapter).
Note to Category XII: For purposes of
determining whether an item (i.e., system,
end item, part, component, accessory,
attachment, or software) is specially designed
for a military end user, a ‘‘military end user’’
means the national armed services (army,
navy, marine, air force, or coast guard),
national guard, national police, government
intelligence or reconnaissance organizations,
or any person or entity whose actions or
functions are intended to support military
end uses. A system or end item is not
specially designed for a military end user if
the item was developed with knowledge that
it is or would be for use by both military end
users and non-military end users, or if the
item was or is being developed with no
knowledge for use by a particular end user.
In such instances, documents
contemporaneous with the development
must establish such knowledge.
*
*
*
*
*
Rose E. Gottemoeller,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and
International Security, Department of State.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
[FR Doc. 2016–03197 Filed 2–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[REG–118867–10]
RIN 1545–BJ53
Requirements for Type I and Type III
Supporting Organizations
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
This document contains
proposed regulations regarding the
prohibition on certain contributions to
Type I and Type III supporting
organizations and the requirements for
Type III supporting organizations. The
regulations reflect changes to the law
made by the Pension Protection Act of
2006. The regulations will affect Type I
and Type III supporting organizations
and their supported organizations.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must
be received by May 19, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–118867–10), Room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8:00 a.m.
and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–
118867–10), Courier’s Desk, Internal
Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC, 20224 or
sent electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov/ (IRS REG–
118867–10).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Jonathan Carter at (202) 317–5800 or
Mike Repass at (202) 317–4086;
concerning submissions of comments
and requests for a public hearing,
Regina Johnson at (202) 317–6901 (not
toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information
contained in this notice of proposed
rulemaking has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507(d)). Comments on the
collection of information should be sent
to the Office of Management and
Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for the
Department of the Treasury, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Washington, DC 20503, with copies to
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the Internal Revenue Service, Attn: IRS
Reports Clearance Officer,
SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP, Washington, DC
20224. Comments on the collection of
information should be received by April
19, 2016.
Comments are specifically requested
concerning:
• Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the IRS,
including whether the information will
have practical utility;
• The accuracy of the estimated
burden associated with the proposed
collection of information;
• How the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected may
be enhanced;
• How the burden of complying with
the proposed collection of information
may be minimized, including through
forms of information technology; and
• Estimates of capital or start-up costs
and costs of operation, maintenance,
and purchase of services to provide
information.
The collection of information in these
proposed regulations is in § 1.509(a)–
4(i)(4)(iv)(D) (written record of close
cooperation and coordination by the
governmental supported organizations)
and § 1.509(a)–4(i)(6)(iii)(B) (written
record of contributions received by the
supported organization). Requiring the
supporting organization to collect
written records of its governmental
supported organizations’ close
cooperation and coordination with each
other and written records of the
contributions its supported
organizations directly received in
response to solicitations by the
supporting organization permits the IRS
to determine whether the supporting
organization satisfies the requirements
to be a functionally integrated or nonfunctionally integrated Type III
supporting organization. The record
keepers are Type III supporting
organizations.
Estimated number of recordkeepers:
7,872.
Estimated average annual burden
hours per recordkeeper: 2 hours.
Estimated total annual recordkeeping
burden: 15,744.
Estimated frequency of collection of
such information: Annual.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid control
number assigned by the Office of
Management and Budget.
Books or records relating to a
collection of information must be
retained as long as their contents may
become material in the administration
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8438-8446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03197]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 121
[Public Notice: 9445]
RIN 1400-AD32
Amendment to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations:
Revision of U.S. Munitions List Category XII
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of the President's Export Control Reform effort, the
Department of State proposes to amend the International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR) to revise Category XII (fire control, laser,
imaging, and guidance and control equipment) of the U.S. Munitions List
(USML) to describe more precisely the articles warranting control on
the USML. The Department also proposes to amend USML Categories VIII,
XIII, and XV to reflect that items now described in those Categories
will be in the revised Category XII.
DATES: The Department of State will accept comments on this proposed
rule until April 4, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments within 45 days of the
date of publication by one of the following methods:
Email: DDTCPublicComments@state.gov with the subject line,
``ITAR Amendment--Category XII Second Proposed.''
Internet: At www.regulations.gov, search for this notice
by using this rule's RIN (1400-AD32).
Comments received after that date will be considered if feasible,
but consideration cannot be assured. Those submitting comments should
not include any personally identifying information they do not desire
to be made public or any information for which a claim of
confidentiality is asserted. All comments and transmittal emails will
be made available for public inspection and copying after the close of
the comment period via the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls Web
site at www.pmddtc.state.gov. Parties who wish to comment anonymously
may do so by submitting their comments via www.regulations.gov, leaving
the fields that would identify the commenter blank and including no
identifying information in the comment itself. Comments submitted via
www.regulations.gov are immediately available for public inspection.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. C. Edward Peartree, Director,
Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy, Department of State, telephone
(202) 663-2792; email DDTCPublicComments@state.gov. ATTN: Regulatory
Change, USML Category XII.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Directorate of Defense Trade Controls
(DDTC), U.S. Department of State, administers the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR parts 120-130). The items subject to
the jurisdiction of the ITAR, i.e., defense articles, are identified on
the ITAR's U.S. Munitions List (USML) (22 CFR 121.1). With few
exceptions, items not subject to the export control jurisdiction of the
ITAR are subject to the jurisdiction of the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR), 15 CFR parts 730-774, which includes the Commerce
Control List (CCL) in Supplement No. 1 to Part 774), administered by
the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), U.S. Department of Commerce.
Both the ITAR and the EAR impose license requirements on exports and
reexports. Items not subject to the ITAR or to the exclusive licensing
jurisdiction of any other set of regulations are subject to the EAR.
The revisions contained in this rule are part of the Department of
State's retrospective plan under E.O. 13563.
All references to the USML in this rule are to the list of defense
articles that are controlled for the purpose of export or temporary
import pursuant to the ITAR, and not to the defense articles on the
USML that are controlled by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives (ATF) for the purpose of permanent import under its
regulations (see 27 CFR part 447). Pursuant to Sec. 38(a)(1) of the
Arms Export Control Act (AECA), all defense articles controlled for
export or import are part of the USML under the AECA. For the sake of
clarity, the list of defense articles controlled by ATF for the purpose
of permanent import is the United States Munitions Import List (USMIL).
The transfer of defense articles from the ITAR's USML to the EAR's CCL
for the purpose of export control does not affect the list of defense
articles controlled on the USMIL under the AECA for the purpose of
permanent import.
Revision of Category XII
The revision of USML Category XII was first published as a proposed
rule (RIN 1400-AD32) on May 5, 2015, for public comment (see 80 FR
25821) (first proposed rule). The comment period ended July 6, 2015.
One hundred twenty parties submitted public comments, which were
reviewed and considered by the Department and other agencies.
The majority of the public comments stated that the proposed
controls in USML Category XII included items that are in commercial and
civil applications, identifying items that would largely be controlled
under paragraphs (b), (c), (d), and (e), and requested that the
Department limit the USML controls for most paragraphs to items
specially designed for the military. The comments varied in level of
detail and specific paragraphs addressed, if any, but the general tenor
of the public comments was consistent. These comments led the
Department to reevaluate USML Category XII in its entirety and to draft
this second proposed rule to allow for public feedback on new proposed
changes. Given the thorough redrafting of USML Category XII, the
Department does not address each public comment in detail.
This second proposed rule revises USML Category XII, covering fire
control, range finder, optical and guidance and control equipment, to
advance the national security objectives of the President's Export
Control Reform initiative and to more accurately
[[Page 8439]]
describe the articles within the category, in order to establish a
``bright line'' between the USML and the CCL for the control of these
articles. The revisions to Category XII being proposed in this second
proposed rule are described below, along with a description of any
changes from the first proposed rule.
The most significant change from the first proposed rule to this
second proposed rule is that, in response to a high number of
substantive public comments, certain articles will be controlled based
on the design intent of the manufacturer. This was decided because the
Department found that certain articles could be used as components or
as end items for the same military application. While applying the
standard terminology ``specially designed for a defense article'' would
apply to articles that operate as a component for a higher-level
assembly, that terminology would not describe the same articles when
used as end items on their own for the same military purpose. To
address this concern, paragraphs (b)(6) and (c)(2)(iii) control
articles if they are specially designed for a military end user. A
military end user is defined in the new Note to Category XII as the
national armed services, National Guard, national police, government
intelligence or reconnaissance organizations, or any person or entity
whose actions or functions are intended to support military end uses.
An item is specially designed for a military end user if it was created
for use by a military end user or users. If an item is created for both
military and non-military end users, or if the item was created for no
specific end user, then it is not specially designed for a military end
user. Contemporaneous documents are required to support the design
intent; otherwise, use by a military end user will establish that the
item was specially designed for a military end user.
Paragraph (a) is revised to add subparagraphs (1) through (10) to
more clearly describe the articles controlled in (a).
Paragraph (a)(1) is added for fire control systems. In response to
one comment, the Department moved the control on ``specially designed
parts and components'' to paragraph (e) for this paragraph and others,
so that all parts and components are described in paragraph (e). None
of the parts and components in paragraph (e) are designated significant
military equipment. One comment requested clarification on the
classification of defense articles enumerated elsewhere in the USML
that are specially designed components of a fire control system, such
as fire control computers for aircraft, described in USML Category
VIII(h)(16). A control on ``specially designed parts and components''
is a catch all control for items that are not elsewhere specified in
the USML, and items that are explicitly described elsewhere, such as
USML Category VIII(h)(16), are controlled by that entry.
Paragraph (a)(2) is added for weapons sights and weapons aiming or
imaging systems, with certain infrared focal plane arrays, image
intensifier tubes, ballistic computers, or lasers, when specially
designed for a defense article. The Department received multiple
comments requesting revisions to this paragraph. These comments were
not adopted, as these weapons sights and weapon aiming and imaging
systems all relate to the sighting, aiming, or imaging for a defense
article and therefore warrant USML control.
Paragraph (a)(3) is added for electronic or optical weapon
positioning, laying, or spotting systems.
Paragraph (a)(4) is added for certain laser spot trackers and laser
spot detectors that are for laser target designators or coded laser
target markers controlled in paragraph (b)(1). The Department revised
this control from the first proposed rule by tying it to paragraph
(b)(1) to more specifically describe the kinds of items controlled by
this paragraph.
Paragraph (a)(5) is added for bomb sights and bombing computers.
Paragraph (a)(6) is added for electro-optical missile or ordnance
tracking systems.
Paragraph (a)(7) is added for electro-optical ordnance guidance
systems.
Paragraph (a)(8) is added for electro-optical systems that
automatically detect and locate weapons launch or fire.
Paragraph (a)(9) is added for remote wind sensing systems specially
designed for ballistic-corrected aiming.
Paragraph (a)(10) is added for certain helmet mounted display (HMD)
systems. In response to comments, the Department limited the scope of
the control for HMD's with optical sights or slewing devices that
control infrared imaging systems and end items from the first proposed
rule, to those infrared systems and end items that are also defense
articles themselves. This clarifies that HMDs for civilian firefighter
systems are not described in this control.
Paragraph (b) is revised to add subparagraphs (1) through (7) to
more clearly describe the articles controlled in (b). Controls on
lasers and others parts and components of laser systems are moved to
paragraph (e).
Paragraph (b)(1) is added for laser target designators or coded
target markers that mediate the delivery of ordnance to a target. The
Department made the control language from the first proposed rule more
specific to more completely describe the defense articles controlled by
this paragraph.
Paragraph (b)(2) is added for infrared laser target illumination
systems having a variable beam divergence. The Department made the
control language from the first proposed rule more specific to more
completely describe the defense articles controlled by this paragraph.
Paragraph (b)(3) is added for certain laser range finders. In
response to comments, the Department revised the control language from
the first proposed rule to specify only laser ranger finders operating
at a wavelength of 1064 nm and having a Q-switched pulse output, and
laser ranger finders operating in excess of 1064 nm and meeting certain
technical parameters.
Paragraph (b)(4) is added for certain targeting or target location
systems. In response to public comments, the Department revised the
control from the first proposed rule to require that the system use a
Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), guidance, or navigation
defense article.
Paragraph (b)(5) is added for optical augmentation systems.
Paragraph (b)(6) is added for light detection and ranging (LIDAR),
laser detection and ranging (LADAR), or range-gated systems specially
designed for a military end user.
Paragraph (b)(7) is added for developmental lasers and laser
systems funded by the Department of Defense, with certain exceptions.
Paragraph (c) is revised to add subparagraphs (1) through (9) to
more clearly describe the articles controlled in (c). Controls on image
intensifier tubes (IITs), infrared focal plane arrays (IRFPAs), IRFPA
dewar cooler assemblies (IDCAs), gimbals, and other parts and
components of imaging systems are moved to paragraph (e).
Paragraph (c)(1) is added for night vision or infrared cameras
specially designed for defense articles. The Department revised this
entry in response to comments regarding non-military uses of cameras
and imaging systems described in the first proposed rule. As a
specially designed component of another defense article, a camera, as
defined in the Note to paragraph (c)(1), is eligible for paragraph (b)
of specially designed in Sec. 120.41.
[[Page 8440]]
Paragraph (c)(2) is added for certain binoculars, bioculars,
monoculars, goggles, or head or helmet-mounted imaging systems. The
Department revised this entry in response to comments regarding non-
military uses of binocular, goggles, and other close eye systems
described in the first proposed rule. For articles that employ third
generation IITs or are sensor fused, the Department described the
articles based on their technical characteristics. For articles with an
IRFPA or infrared imaging camera, the articles are controlled if
specially designed for a military end user.
Paragraph (c)(3) is added for targeting systems specially designed
for defense articles.
Paragraph (c)(4) is added for infrared search and track (IRST)
systems that utilize a longwave IRFPA and maintain positional or
angular state of a target through time. The Department revised this
control from the first proposed rule in response to public comments
regarding non-military IRST systems.
Paragraph (c)(5) is added for certain infrared imaging systems,
described in nine subparagraphs: (1) Mobile systems that provide real-
time target location at ranges greater than 5 km; (2) airborne
stabilized systems specially designed for military reconnaissance; (3)
multispectral imaging systems that classify or identify military or
intelligence targets or characteristics; (4) automated missile
detection or warning systems; (5) systems hardened to withstand
electromagnetic pulse (EMP) or chemical, biological, or radiological
threats; (6) systems incorporating mechanisms to reduce signature; (7)
certain aerial persistent surveillance systems; (8) certain gimbaled
infrared systems; (9) systems specially designed for USML platforms.
The Department revised this entry from the first proposed rule in
response to comments regarding non-military imaging systems described
in the proposed rule.
Paragraph (c)(6) is added for certain terahertz imaging systems. In
response to public comments, the Department revised the technical
parameter from the first proposed rule from 0.3 milliradians to 0.1
milliradians.
Paragraph (c)(7) is added for systems or equipment incorporating an
infrared beacon or emitter specially designed for Combat
Identification. The Department revised this entry to Combat
Identification from Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) in the first
proposed rule in response to public confusion regarding IFF.
Paragraph (c)(8) is added for systems that project radiometrically
calibrated scenes directly into the entrance aperture of an electro-
optical or infrared (EO/IR) sensor controlled in this subchapter within
either the spectral band exceeding 10 nm but not exceeding 400 nm, or
the spectral band exceeding 900 nm but not exceeding 30,000 nm.
Paragraph (c)(9) is added for developmental imaging systems funded
by the Department of Defense.
Paragraph (d) is revised to include controls on GNSS equipment
previously controlled in Category XV and to add subparagraphs (1)
through (6) to more clearly describe the articles controlled in (d).
Controls on inertial measurement units, accelerometers, gyroscopes,
GNNS security devices, and other parts and components of navigation
systems are moved to paragraph (e).
Paragraph (d)(1) is added for certain guidance or navigation
systems. The Department did not adopt public comments to revise this
entry to items specially designed for the military. Rather the
Department has revised the technical parameters from the first proposed
rule to a level that more clearly describes the military critical
technology.
Paragraph (d)(2) is added for GNSS receiving equipment, moved from
Category XV.
Paragraph (d)(3) is added for GNSS anti-jam systems specially
designed for use with the anti-jam antennae described in USML Category
XI(c)(10). In response to public comments, the Department revised the
entry for anti-jam GNNS systems from the first proposed rule by
expressly linking the control to the anti-jam antennae described in
USML Category XI(c)(10).
Paragraph (d)(4) is added for certain mobile relative gravimeters.
Paragraph (d)(5) is added for certain mobile gravity gradiometers.
Paragraph (d)(6) is added for developmental guidance, navigation,
or control systems funded by the Department of Defense.
Paragraph (e) is revised to add subparagraphs (1) through (23) to
more clearly describe the parts and components for the systems in (a)-
(d) that are controlled in (e).
Paragraph (e)(1) is added for parts and components specially
designed for articles described in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(8).
Paragraph (e)(2) is added for lasers specially designed for defense
articles. In response to public comments regarding the non-military
uses of lasers described in the first proposed rule, the Department
limited this entry to lasers that are specially designed for defense
articles.
Paragraph (e)(3) is added for laser stacked arrays specially
designed for defense articles. In response to public comments regarding
the non-military uses of laser stacked arrays described in the first
proposed rule, the Department limited this entry to laser stacked
arrays that are unique to defense articles.
Paragraph (e)(4) is added for IRFPAs specially designed for defense
articles. In response to public comments, the Department completely
revised the controls on IRFPAs from the first proposed rule, limiting
the USML control to those that are unique to defense articles.
Paragraph (e)(5) is added for certain charge multiplication focal
plane arrays specially designed for defense articles. In response to
public comments, the Department completely revised the controls on
charge multiplication focal plane arrays from the first proposed rule,
limiting the USML control to those that are unique to defense articles.
Paragraph (e)(6) is added for second generation and greater IITs
specially designed for defense articles, and specially designed parts
and components therefor. This control includes third generation IITs,
EBAPS, night vision and thermal fused IITs, and all subsequent IIT
designs. In response to public comments, the Department completely
revised the controls on IITs from the first proposed rule, limiting the
USML control to those that are unique to defense articles.
Paragraph (e)(7) is added for parts and components specially
designed for articles described in paragraph (c)(3), (c)(4), or
(c)(5)(vi)-(vii).
Paragraph (e)(8) is added for inertial measurement units specially
designed for defense articles. In response to public comments, the
Department revised the controls on inertial measurement units from the
first proposed rule to a technical parameter based control to a control
on all inertial measurement units that are unique to defense articles.
Paragraph (e)(9) is added for GNSS security devices, Selective
Availability Anti-Spoofing Module (SAASM), Security Module (SM), and
Auxiliary Output Chip (AOC) chips.
Paragraph (e)(10) is added for certain accelerometers that meet the
technical parameters. In response to public comments regarding the non-
military uses of accelerometers described in the first proposed rule,
the Department revised this entry to more specifically describe the
items warranting control on the USML.
Paragraph (e)(11) is added for certain gyroscopes and angular rate
sensors that meet the technical parameters. In
[[Page 8441]]
response to public comments regarding the non-military uses of
gyroscopes and angular rate sensors described in the first proposed
rule, the Department revised this entry to more specifically describe
the items warranting control on the USML.
Paragraph (e)(12) is added for optical sensors that have a spectral
filter that is specially designed for items controlled in USML Category
XI(a)(4) and optical sensor assemblies that provide threat warning or
tracking for those items controlled in USML Category XI(a)(4). In
response to public comments, the Department revised the control from
the first proposed rule to add the specially designed control
parameter.
Paragraph (e)(13) is added for read-out integrated circuits (ROICs)
specially designed for defense articles.
Paragraph (e)(14) is added for IDCAs, with or without an IRFPA,
specially designed for defense articles, other than those in USML
Category XV, and specially designed parts and components therefor.
Paragraph (e)(15) is added for gimbals specially designed for
defense articles in this category.
Paragraph (e)(16) is added for IRFPA Joule-Thomson (JT) self-
regulating cryostats specially designed for defense articles.
Paragraph (e)(17) is added for infrared lenses, mirrors, beam
splitters or combiners, filters, and treatments and coatings, specially
designed for defense articles.
Paragraph (e)(18) is added for drive, control, signal, or image
processing electronics specially designed for defense articles in this
category.
Paragraph (e)(19) is added for near-to-eye displays specially
designed for defense articles in this category.
Paragraph (e)(20) is added for resonators, receivers, transmitters,
modulators, gain media, and drive electronics or frequency converters
specially designed for defense articles in this category.
Paragraph (e)(21) is added for two-dimensional infrared scene
projector emitter arrays (i.e., resistive arrays) specially designed
for infrared scene generators controlled in USML Category IX(a)(10).
Paragraph (e)(22) is added for classified parts, components,
accessories, attachments, and associated equipment.
Paragraph (e)(23) is added for developmental IITs, FPAs, ROICs,
accelerometers, gyroscopes, angular rate sensors, and inertial
measurement units funded by the Department of Defense.
Paragraph (f) is revised to more clearly describe the technical
data and defense services controlled in paragraph (f). In response to
public comments, the Department significantly revised paragraph (f), so
that it now mirrors the other technical data and defense services
paragraphs in ECR-revised USML Categories.
A new (x) paragraph has been added to USML Category XII, allowing
ITAR licensing for commodities, software, and technology subject to the
EAR provided those commodities, software, and technology are to be used
in or with defense articles controlled in USML Category XII and are
described in the purchase documentation submitted with the application.
Finally, articles common to the Missile Technology Control Regime
(MTCR) Annex and the USML are to be identified on the USML with the
parenthetical ``(MT)'' at the end of each section containing such
articles. A separate proposed rule will address the sections in the
ITAR that include MTCR definitions.
The following definitions explain and amplify terms used in this
Category and are provided to assist exporters in understanding the
scope of the proposed control.
Charge multiplication is a form of electronic image amplification,
the generation of charge carriers as a result of an impact ionization
gain process.
Focal plane array is a linear or two-dimensional planar layer, or
combination of planar layers, of individual detector elements, with or
without readout electronics, which work in the focal plane.
Note: This definition does not include a stack of single
detector elements or any two, three, or four element detectors
provided time delay and integration is not performed within the
element.
Image intensifier tube refers to an imaging device that
incorporates a photoemissive transducer (i.e., photocathode) and
achieves electron image amplification in the vacuum space.
Multispectral refers to producing discrete outputs associated with
more than one spectral band of response.
Request for Comments
As the U.S. Government works through the proposed revisions to the
USML, some control parameters are proposed recognizing that they may
control items in normal commercial use and on the Wassenaar
Arrangement's Dual Use List. With the thought that multiple
perspectives would be beneficial to the USML revision process, the
Department welcomes the assistance of users of the lists and requests
input on the following:
(1) A key goal of this rulemaking is to ensure the USML and the CCL
together control all the items that meet Wassenaar Arrangement
commitments embodied in Munitions List Categories 5, 11 and 15 (WA-
ML15) and the relevant Dual Use List Categories including the IRFPAs in
Category 6 (WA-DU 6.A.2). To that end, the public is asked to identify
any potential lack of coverage brought about by the proposed rules for
Category XII contained in this notice and the new and revised ECCNs
published separately by the Department of Commerce when reviewed
together.
(2) Another key goal of this rulemaking is to identify items
proposed for control on the USML or the CCL that are not controlled on
the Wassenaar Arrangement's Munitions or Dual Use List. The public is
asked to identify any items proposed for control on the USML that are
not controlled on the Wassenaar Arrangement's Munitions or Dual Use
List.
(3) A third key goal of this rulemaking is to establish a ``bright
line'' between the USML and the CCL for the control of these materials.
The public is asked to provide specific examples of control criteria
that do not clearly describe items that would be defense articles and
thus do not establish a ``bright line'' between the USML and the CCL.
(4) Although the proposed revisions to the USML do not preclude the
possibility that items in normal commercial use would or should be
ITAR-controlled because, e.g., they provide the United States with a
critical military or intelligence advantage, the U.S. government does
not want to inadvertently control items on the ITAR that are in normal
commercial use. Items that would be controlled on the USML in this
proposed rule have been identified as possessing parameters or
characteristics that provide a critical military or intelligence
advantage. The public is thus asked to provide specific examples of
items, if any, that would be controlled by the revised USML Category
XII that are now in normal commercial use. The examples should
demonstrate actual commercial use, not just potential or theoretical
use, with supporting documents, as well as foreign availability of such
items.
(5) For any criteria the public believes control items in normal
commercial use, the public is asked to identify parameters or
characteristics that differentiate such items from items exclusively or
primarily in military use.
(6) For any criteria the public believes control items in normal
commercial use, the public is asked to identify the multilateral
controls (such as the Wassenaar Arrangement's Dual Use
[[Page 8442]]
List), if any, for such items, and the consequences of such items being
controlled on the USML.
(7) The Department seeks public comment on each paragraph of the
proposed USML Category XII.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the opinion that controlling the
import and export of defense articles and services is a foreign affairs
function of the United States Government and that rules implementing
this function are exempt from sections 553 (rulemaking) and 554
(adjudications) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Although the
Department is of the opinion that this rule is exempt from the
rulemaking provisions of the APA, the Department is publishing this
rule with a 45-day provision for public comment and without prejudice
to its determination that controlling the import and export of defense
services is a foreign affairs function.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since this rule is exempt from the rulemaking provisions of 5
U.S.C. 553, it does not require analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This proposed amendment does not involve a mandate that will result
in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any
year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the
provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This proposed amendment has been found not to be a major rule
within the meaning of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This proposed amendment will not have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this proposed amendment does not
have sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this proposed amendment.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess costs
and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributed impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This rule has been designated a ``significant regulatory action,''
although not economically significant, under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed the proposed amendment in
light of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not preempt
tribal law. Accordingly, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this
rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Following is a listing of approved Department of State information
collections that will be affected by revision of the U.S. Munitions
List (USML) and the Commerce Control List pursuant to the President's
Export Control Reform (ECR) initiative. The list of collections and the
description of the manner in which they will be affected pertains to
revision of the USML in its entirety, not only to the categories
published in this rule. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Department of State will request comment on these collections from
all interested persons at the appropriate time. In particular, the
Department will seek comment on changes to licensing burden based on
implementation of regulatory changes pursuant to ECR, and on projected
changes based on continued implementation of regulatory changes
pursuant to ECR. The information collections are as follows:
(1) Statement of Registration, DS-2032, OMB No. 1405-0002. The
Department estimates that between 3,000 and 5,000 of the currently
registered persons will not need to maintain registration following
full revision of the USML. This would result in a burden reduction of
between 6,000 and 10,000 hours annually, based on a revised time burden
of two hours to complete a Statement of Registration.
(2) Application/License for Permanent Export of Unclassified
Defense Articles and Related Unclassified Technical Data, DSP-5, OMB
No. 1405-0003. The Department estimates that there will be 35,000 fewer
DSP-5 submissions annually following full revision of the USML. This
would result in a burden reduction of 35,000 hours annually.
(3) Application/License for Temporary Import of Unclassified
Defense Articles, DSP-61, OMB No. 1405-0013. The Department estimates
that there will be 200 fewer DSP-61 submissions annually following full
revision of the USML. This would result in a burden reduction of 100
hours annually.
(4) Application/License for Temporary Export of Unclassified
Defense Articles, DSP-73, OMB No. 1405-0023. The Department estimates
that there will be 800 fewer DSP-73 submissions annually following full
revision of the USML. This would result in a burden reduction of 800
hours annually.
(5) Application for Amendment to License for Export or Import of
Classified or Unclassified Defense Articles and Related Technical Data,
DSP-6, -62, -74, -119, OMB No. 1405-0092. The Department estimates that
there will be 2,000 fewer amendment submissions annually following full
revision of the USML. This would result in a burden reduction of 1,000
hours annually.
(6) Request for Approval of Manufacturing License Agreements,
Technical Assistance Agreements, and Other Agreements, DSP-5, OMB No.
1405-0093. The Department estimates that there will be 1,000 fewer
agreement submissions annually following full revision of the USML.
This would result in a burden reduction of 2,000 hours annually.
(7) Maintenance of Records by Registrants, OMB No. 1405-0111. The
requirement to actively maintain records pursuant to provisions of the
ITAR will decline commensurate with the drop in the number of persons
who will be required to register with the
[[Page 8443]]
Department pursuant to the ITAR. As stated above, the Department
estimates that up to 5,000 of the currently-registered persons will not
need to maintain registration following full revision of the USML. This
would result in a burden reduction of 100,000 hours annually. However,
the ITAR does provide for the maintenance of records for a period of
five years. Therefore, persons newly relieved of the requirement to
register with the Department may still be required to maintain records.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 121
Arms and munitions, Exports.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, title 22, chapter I,
subchapter M, part 121 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 121--THE UNITED STATES MUNITIONS LIST
0
1. The authority citation for part 121 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat. 744 (22
U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2797); 22 U.S.C. 2651a; Pub. L. 105-261, 112
Stat. 1920; Section 1261, Pub. L. 112-239; E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129.
Sec. 121.1 [Amended]
0
2. Section 121.1 is amended by:
0
a. Removing and reserving paragraph (e) in U.S. Munitions List Category
VIII.
0
b. Revising U.S. Munitions List Category XII:
0
c. Removing and reserving paragraph (a) in U.S. Munitions List Category
XIII.
0
d. Removing and reserving paragraph (c) in U.S. Munitions List Category
XV.
The revision to read as follows:
Sec. 121.1 The United States Munitions List.
* * * * *
Category XII--Fire Control, Laser, Imaging, and Guidance and Control
Equipment
* (a) Fire control and aiming systems, as follows:
(1) Fire control systems;
(2) Weapon sights, weapon aiming systems, and weapon imaging
systems (e.g., clip-on), with or without an integrated viewer, display,
or reticle, specially designed for an article subject to this
subchapter and also incorporating or specially designed to incorporate
any of the following:
(i) An infrared focal plane array having a peak response at a
wavelength exceeding 1,000 nm;
(ii) Second generation or greater image intensifier tubes;
(iii) A ballistic computer for adjusting the aim point display; or
(iv) Infrared laser having a wavelength exceeding 710 nm;
(3) Electronic or optical weapon positioning, laying, or spotting
systems;
(4) Laser spot trackers and laser spot detection, location, or
imaging systems, with an operational wavelength shorter than 400 nm or
longer than 710 nm and that are for laser target designators or coded
laser target markers controlled in paragraph (b)(1);
Note to paragraph (a)(4): For controls on LIDAR, see paragraph
(b)(6) of this category.
(5) Bomb sights or bombing computers;
(6) Electro-optical missile or ordnance tracking systems,
(7) Electro-optical ordnance guidance systems;
(8) Electro-optical systems that automatically detect and locate
weapons launch or fire;
(9) Remote wind-sensing systems specially designed for ballistic-
corrected aiming; or
(10) Helmet mounted display (HMD) systems or end items,
incorporating optical sights or slewing devices that aim, launch,
track, or manage munitions, or control infrared imaging systems or end
items described in this category, other than such items controlled in
Category VIII (e.g., Combat Vehicle Crew HMD, Mounted Warrior HMD,
Integrated Helmet Assembly Subsystem, Drivers Head Tracked Vision
System);
* (b) Laser systems and end items, as follows:
(1) Laser target designators or coded target markers that mediate
the delivery of ordnance to a target;
(2) Target illumination systems having a variable beam divergence,
and a laser output wavelength exceeding 710 nm, to artificially light
an area to search for or locate a target;
(3) Laser rangefinders having any of the following:
(i) Output wavelength of 1064 nm and any Q-switched pulse output;
or
(ii) Output wavelength exceeding 1064 nm and any of the following:
(A) Single shot ranging capability of 3 km or greater against a
standard 2.3 m x 2.3 m NATO target having 10% reflectivity and 23 km
visibility; or
(B) Multiple shot ranging capability at 3 Hz or greater of 1 km or
greater against a standard 2.3 m x 2.3 m NATO target having 10%
reflectivity and 23 km visibility;
(4) Targeting systems and target location systems, incorporating or
specially designed to incorporate a laser rangefinder and incorporating
or specially designed to incorporate a Global Navigation Satellite
System (GNSS), guidance, or navigation defense article controlled in
paragraph (d) of this category (MT if designed or modified for rockets,
missiles, space launch vehicles (SLVs), drones, or unmanned aerial
vehicle systems capable of delivering at least a 500 kg payload to a
range of at least 300 km);
(5) Systems specially designed to use laser energy with an output
wavelength exceeding 710 nm to exploit differential target-background
retroreflectance in order to detect personnel or optical/electro-
optical equipment (e.g., optical augmentation systems);
(6) Light detection and ranging (LIDAR), laser detection and
ranging (LADAR), or range-gated systems specially designed for a
military end user (MT if designed or modified for rockets, missiles,
SLVs, drones, or unmanned aerial vehicle systems capable of delivering
at least a 500 kg payload to a range of at least 300 km); or
(7) Developmental lasers or laser systems funded by the Department
of Defense via contract or other funding authorization;
Note 1 to paragraph (b)(7): This paragraph does not control
lasers or laser systems: (a) In production, (b) determined to be
subject to the EAR via a commodity jurisdiction determination (see
Sec. 120.4 of this subchapter), or (c) identified in the relevant
Department of Defense contract or other funding authorization as
being developed for both civil and military applications.
Note 2 to paragraph (b)(7): Note 1 does not apply to defense
articles enumerated on the U.S. Munitions List, whether in
production or development.
Note 3 to paragraph (b)(7): This provision is applicable to
those contracts or other funding authorizations that are dated XXXX,
2017 or later.
* (c) Night vision, infrared, or terahertz imaging systems or end
items, as follows:
(1) Night vision or infrared cameras specially designed for
articles in this subchapter;
Note to paragraph (c)(1): The articles controlled by this
paragraph have sufficient electronics to enable at a minimum the
output of an analog or digital signal once power is applied.
(2) Binoculars, bioculars, monoculars, goggles, or head or helmet-
mounted imaging systems (including video-based articles having a
separate near-to-eye display), as follows:
(i) Incorporating an autogated third generation image intensifier
tube or a higher generation image intensifier tube;
(ii) Fusing output of an image intensifier tube and an infrared
focal
[[Page 8444]]
plane array having a peak response greater than 1,000 nm; or
(iii) Having an infrared focal plane array or imaging camera, and
is specially designed for a military end user;
(3) Targeting systems specially designed for articles in this
subchapter;
(4) Infrared search and track (IRST) systems, that:
(i) Incorporate or are specially designed to incorporate an
infrared focal plane array or imaging camera, having a peak response
within the wavelength range exceeding 3 microns or greater; and
(ii) Maintain positional or angular state of a target through time;
(5) Infrared imaging systems, as follows:
(i) Mobile reconnaissance, scout, or surveillance systems providing
real-time target location at ranges greater than 5 km (e.g., LRAS, CIV,
HTI, SeeSpot, MMS);
(ii) Airborne stabilized systems specially designed for military
reconnaissance (e.g., DB-110, C-B4);
(iii) Multispectral imaging systems that classify or identify
military or intelligence targets or characteristics;
(iv) Automated missile detection or warning systems;
(v) Systems hardened to withstand electromagnetic pulse (EMP) or
chemical, biological, or radiological threats;
(vi) Systems incorporating mechanism(s) to reduce signature;
(vii) Persistent surveillance systems with a ground sample distance
(GSD) of 0.5 m or better (smaller) at 10,000 ft AGL and a simultaneous
coverage area of 3 km\2\ or greater;
(viii) Gimbaled infrared systems, as follows:
(A) Having a stabilization better (less) than 30 microradians RMS
and a turret with a ball diameter of 15 inches or greater; or
(B) Specially designed for articles in this subchapter; or
(ix) Systems specially designed for military platforms controlled
in this subchapter (MT if for determining bearings to specific
electromagnetic sources (direction finding equipment) or terrain
characteristics and designed or modified for rockets, missiles, SLVs,
drones, or unmanned aerial vehicle systems capable of delivering at
least a 500 kg payload to a range of at least 300 km);
(6) Terahertz imaging systems having a peak response in the
frequency range exceeding 30 GHz but not exceeding 3000 GHz, and having
a resolution less (better) than 0.1 milliradians at a standoff range of
100 m;
(7) Systems or equipment, incorporating an infrared (IR) beacon or
emitter, specially designed for Combat Identification;
(8) Systems that project radiometrically calibrated scenes at a
frame rate greater than 30 Hz directly into the entrance aperture of an
electro-optical or infrared (EO/IR) sensor controlled in this
subchapter within either the spectral band exceeding 10 nm but not
exceeding 400 nm, or the spectral band exceeding 900 nm but not
exceeding 30,000 nm;
(9) Developmental electro-optical, infrared, or terahertz systems
funded by the Department of Defense.
Note 1 to paragraph (c)(9): This paragraph does not control
electro-optical, infrared, or terahertz imaging systems: (a) In
production, (b) determined to be subject to the EAR via a commodity
jurisdiction determination (see Sec. 120.4 of this subchapter, or
(c) identified in the relevant Department of Defense contract or
other funding authorization as being developed for both civil and
military applications.
Note 2 to paragraph (c)(9): Note 1 does not apply to defense
articles enumerated on the U.S. Munitions List, whether in
production or development.
Note 3 to paragraph (c)(9): This provision is applicable to
those contracts or other funding authorizations that are dated XXXX,
2017 or later.
(d) Guidance, navigation, and control systems or end items, as
follows:
(1) Guidance or navigation systems (e.g., inertial navigation
systems, inertial reference units, attitude and heading reference
systems) as follows (MT if designed or modified for rockets, missiles,
SLVs, drones, or unmanned aerial vehicle systems capable of a range
greater than or equal to 300 km);
(i) Having a circle of equal probability (CEP) of position error
rate less (better) than 0.28 nautical miles per hour, without the use
of positional aiding references;
(ii) Having a heading error or true north determination of less
(better) than 0.28 mrad secant (latitude) (0.016043 degrees secant
(latitude));
(iii) Having a CEP of position error rate less than 0.2 nautical
miles in an 8 hour period, without the use of positional aiding
references; or
(iv) Specified to function at linear acceleration levels exceeding
25 g;
Note 1 to paragraph (d)(1): For rocket, SLV, or missile flight
control and guidance systems (including guidance sets), see Category
IV(h).
Note 2 to paragraph (d)(1): Inertial measurement units are
described in paragraph (e) of this category.
(2) Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiving equipment,
as follows:
(i) GNSS receiving equipment specially designed for military
applications (MT if designed or modified for airborne applications and
capable of providing navigation information at speeds in excess of 600
m/s);
(ii) Global Positioning System (GPS) receiving equipment specially
designed for encryption or decryption (e.g., Y-Code, M-Code) of GPS
precise positioning service (PPS) signals (MT if designed or modified
for airborne applications);
(iii) GPS receiving equipment specially designed for use with an
antenna described in Category XI(c)(10) (MT if designed or modified for
airborne applications); or
(iv) GPS receiving equipment specially designed for use with
rockets, missiles, SLVs, drones, or unmanned air vehicle systems
capable of delivering at least a 500 kg payload to a range of at least
300 km (MT);
Note to paragraph (d)(2)(iv): ``Payload'' is the total mass that
can be carried or delivered by the specified rocket, missile, SLV,
drone or unmanned aerial vehicle that is not used to maintain
flight. For definition of ``range'' as it pertains to rocket
systems, see note 1 to paragraph (a) of USML Category IV. For
definition of ``range'' as it pertains to aircraft systems, see note
to paragraph (a) of USML Category VIII.
(3) GNSS anti-jam systems specially designed for use with an
antenna described in Category XI(c)(10);
(4) Mobile relative gravimeters having automatic motion
compensation, with an in-service accuracy of less (better) than 0.4
mGal (MT if designed or modified for airborne or marine use and having
a time to steady-state registration of two minutes or less);
(5) Mobile gravity gradiometers having an accuracy of less (better)
than 10 Eotvos squared per radian per second for any component of the
gravity gradient tensor, and having a spatial gravity wavelength
resolution of 50 m or less (MT if designed or modified for airborne or
marine use);
Note to paragraph (d)(5): ``Eotvos'' is a unit of acceleration
divided by distance that was used in conjunction with the older
centimeter-gram-second system of units. The Eotvos is defined as 1/
1,000,000,000 Galileo (Gal) per centimeter.
(6) Developmental guidance, navigation, or control systems funded
by the Department of Defense (MT if designed or modified for rockets,
missiles, SLVs, drones, or unmanned aerial vehicle systems capable of a
range equal to or greater than 300 km);
[[Page 8445]]
Note 1 to paragraph (d)(6): This paragraph does not control
guidance, navigation, or control systems: (a) In production, (b)
determined to be subject to the EAR via a commodity jurisdiction
determination (see Sec. 120.4 of this subchapter), or (c)
identified in the relevant Department of Defense contract or other
funding authorization as being developed for both civil and military
applications.
Note 2 to paragraph (d)(6): Note 1 does not apply to defense
articles enumerated on the U.S. Munitions List, whether in
production or development.
Note 3 to paragraph (d)(6): This provision is applicable to
those contracts or other funding authorizations that are dated XXXX,
2017, or later.
Note 4 to paragraph (d)(6): For definition of ``range'' as it
pertains to rocket systems, see note 1 to paragraph (a) of USML
Category IV. For definition of ``range'' as it pertains to aircraft
systems, see note to paragraph (a) of USML Category VIII.
(e) Parts, components, accessories, or attachments, as follows:
(1) Parts and components specially designed for articles described
in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(8) of this section;
(2) Lasers specially designed for articles in this subchapter;
(3) Laser stacked arrays specially designed for articles in this
category;
(4) Infrared focal plane arrays (IRFPAs) specially designed for
articles in this subchapter;
(5) Charge multiplication focal plane arrays exceeding 50 mA/W for
any wavelength exceeding 760 nm and specially designed for articles
described in this subchapter;
(6) Second generation and greater image intensifier tubes specially
designed for articles in this subchapter, and specially designed parts
and components therefore;
Note to paragraph (e)(6): Second and third generation image
intensifier tubes are defined as having a peak response within the
0.4 to 1.05 micron wavelength range and incorporating a microchannel
plate for electron image amplification having a hole pitch (center-
to-center spacing) of less than 25 microns and having either: (a) An
S-20, S-25, or multialkali photo cathode; or (b) a GaAs, GaInAs, or
other III-V compound semiconductor photocathode.
(7) Parts and components specially designed for articles described
in paragraph (c)(3), (c)(4), or (c)(5)(vi)-(vii);
(8) Inertial measurement units specially designed for articles in
this subchapter (MT for systems incorporating accelerometers specified
in (e)(10) or gyroscopes or angular rate sensors specified in (e)(11)
that are designated MT);
(9) GNSS security devices (e.g., Selective Availability Anti-
Spoofing Modules (SAASM), Security Modules (SM), and Auxiliary Output
Chips (AOC);
(10) Accelerometers having a bias repeatability of less (better)
than 10 [mu]g and a scale factor repeatability of less (better) than 10
parts per million, or capable of measuring greater than 100,000 g (MT);
Note 1 to paragraph (e)(10): For weapon fuze accelerometers, see
Category III(d) or IV(h).
Note 2 to paragraph (e)(10): MT designation does not include
accelerometers that are designed to measure vibration or shock.
(11) Gyroscopes or angular rate sensors as follows (MT if having a
rated drift stability of less than 0.5 degrees (1 sigma or rms) per
hour in a 1 g environment or specified to function at acceleration
levels greater than 100 g):
(i) Having an angle random walk of less (better) than 0.001 degrees
per square root hour; or
(ii) Mechanical gyroscopes or rate sensors having a bias
repeatability less (better) than 0.0015 degrees per hour;
Note to paragraphs (e)(10) and (e)(11): ``Repeatability'' is the
closeness of agreement among repeated measurements of the same
variable under the same operating conditions when changes in
conditions or non-operating periods occur between measurements.
``Bias'' is the accelerometer output when no acceleration is
applied.
``Scale factor'' is the ratio of change in output to a change in
the input.
The measurement of ``bias'' and ``scale factor'' refers to one
sigma standard deviation with respect to a fixed calibration over a
period of one year.
``Drift Rate'' is the component of gyro output that is
functionally independent of input rotation and is expressed as an
angular rate.
``Stability'' is a measure of the ability of a specific
mechanism or performance coefficient to remain invariant when
continuously exposed to a fixed operating condition. (This
definition does not refer to dynamic or servo stability.)
(12) Optical sensors having a spectral filter specially designed
for systems or equipment controlled in USML Category XI(a)(4), or
optical sensor assemblies that provide threat warning or tracking for
systems or equipment controlled in Category XI(a)(4);
(13) Read-out integrated circuits (ROICs) specially designed for
articles in this subchapter;
(14) Integrated IRFPA dewar cooler assemblies (IDCAs), with or
without an IRFPA, specially designed for articles in this subchapter
other than Category XV, and specially designed parts and components
therefore;
(15) Gimbals specially designed for articles in this category;
(16) IRFPA Joule-Thomson (JT) self-regulating cryostats specially
designed for articles controlled in this subchapter;
(17) Infrared lenses, mirrors, beam splitters or combiners,
filters, and treatments and coatings, specially designed for articles
controlled in this category;
(18) Drive, control, signal, or image processing electronics,
specially designed for articles controlled in this category;
(19) Near-to-eye displays specially designed for articles
controlled in this category;
(20) Resonators, receivers, transmitters, modulators, gain media,
drive electronics, and frequency converters specially designed for
laser systems controlled in this category;
(21) Two-dimensional infrared scene projector emitter arrays (i.e.,
resistive arrays) specially designed for infrared scene generators
controlled in USML Category IX(a)(10);
* (22) Any part, component, accessory, attachment, or associated
equipment, that:
(i) Is classified;
(ii) Contains classified software;
(iii) Is manufactured using classified production data; or
(iv) Is being developed using classified information.
Note to paragraph (e)(22): ``Classified'' means classified
pursuant to Executive Order 13526, or predecessor order, and a
security classification guide developed pursuant thereto or
equivalent, or to the corresponding classification rules of another
government.
(23) Developmental image intensification tubes, focal plane arrays,
read-out-integrated circuits, accelerometers, gyroscopes, angular rate
sensors and inertial measurement units funded by the Department of
Defense (MT if designed or modified for rockets, missiles, SLVs,
drones, or unmanned aerial vehicle systems capable of a range equal to
or greater than 300 km);
Note 1 to paragraph (e)(23): This paragraph does not control
items: (a) In production, (b) determined to be subject to the EAR
via a commodity jurisdiction determination (see Sec. 120.4 of this
subchapter), or (c) identified in the relevant Department of Defense
contract or other funding authorization as being developed for both
civil and military applications.
Note 2 to paragraph (e)(23): Note 1 does not apply to defense
articles enumerated on the U.S. Munitions List, whether in
production or development.
Note 3 to paragraph (e)(23): This provision is applicable to
those contracts or other funding authorizations that are dated XXXX,
2017, or later.
[[Page 8446]]
(f) Technical data (see Sec. 120.10) and defense services (see
Sec. 120.9) directly related to the defense articles enumerated in
paragraphs (a) through (e) of this category and classified technical
data directly related to items controlled in ECCNs 7A611, 7B611, and
7D611. (See Sec. 125.4 for exemptions.) (MT for technical data and
defense services related to articles designated as such.) Technical
data directly related to manufacture or production of any defense
articles enumerated elsewhere in this category that are designated as
Significant Military Equipment (SME) shall itself be designated as SME.
(g)-(w) [Reserved]
(x) Commodities, software, and technology subject to the EAR (see
Sec. 120.42 of this subchapter) used in or with defense articles
controlled in this category.
Note to paragraph (x): Use of this paragraph is limited to
license applications for defense articles controlled in this
category where the purchase documentation includes commodities,
software, or technology subject to the EAR (see Sec. 123.1(b) of
this subchapter).
Note to Category XII: For purposes of determining whether an
item (i.e., system, end item, part, component, accessory,
attachment, or software) is specially designed for a military end
user, a ``military end user'' means the national armed services
(army, navy, marine, air force, or coast guard), national guard,
national police, government intelligence or reconnaissance
organizations, or any person or entity whose actions or functions
are intended to support military end uses. A system or end item is
not specially designed for a military end user if the item was
developed with knowledge that it is or would be for use by both
military end users and non-military end users, or if the item was or
is being developed with no knowledge for use by a particular end
user. In such instances, documents contemporaneous with the
development must establish such knowledge.
* * * * *
Rose E. Gottemoeller,
Under Secretary, Arms Control and International Security, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 2016-03197 Filed 2-18-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P