Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Catch Sharing Plan, 8466-8473 [2016-02991]
Download as PDF
8466
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
sensitive information submitted
voluntarily by the sender is publicly
accessible. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah Williams, phone: 206–526–4646,
fax: 206–526–6736, or email:
sarah.williams@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 160127057–6057–01]
RIN 0648–BF60
Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Catch
Sharing Plan
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes to approve
changes to the Pacific Halibut Catch
Sharing Plan (Plan) and codified
regulations for the International Pacific
Halibut Commission’s (IPHC or
Commission) regulatory Area 2A off
Washington, Oregon, and California
(Area 2A). In addition, NMFS proposes
to implement the portions of the Plan
and management measures that are not
implemented through the IPHC. These
measures include the sport fishery
allocations and management measures
for Area 2A. These actions are intended
to conserve Pacific halibut, provide
angler opportunity where available, and
minimize bycatch of overfished
groundfish species.
DATES: Comments on the proposed
changes to the Plan and the codified
regulations, and on the proposed
domestic Area 2A Pacific halibut
management measures must be received
by March 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by NOAA–NMFS–2015–0166,
by either of the following methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150166, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
William Stelle, Regional Administrator,
West Coast Region, NMFS, 7600 Sand
Point Way NE., Seattle, WA 98115–
0070.
Instructions: NMFS may not consider
comments if they are sent by any other
method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the
comment period ends. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and NMFS will post for public viewing
on www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential
business information, or otherwise
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
Electronic Access
This rule is accessible via the Internet
at the Office of the Federal Register Web
site at https://www.access.gpo.gov/su_
docs/aces/aces140.html. Background
information and documents are
available at the NMFS West Coast
Region Web site at https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
fisheries/management/pacific_halibut_
management.html and at the Council’s
Web site at https://www.pcouncil.org.
Background
The Northern Pacific Halibut Act
(Halibut Act) of 1982, 16 U.S.C. 773–
773K, gives the Secretary of Commerce
(Secretary) general responsibility for
implementing the provisions of the
Halibut Convention between the United
States and Canada (Halibut Convention)
(16 U.S.C. 773c). It requires the
Secretary to adopt regulations as may be
necessary to carry out the purposes and
objectives of the Halibut Convention
and the Halibut Act. Section 773c of the
Halibut Act also authorizes the regional
fishery management councils to develop
regulations in addition to, but not in
conflict with, regulations of the IPHC to
govern the Pacific halibut catch in their
corresponding U.S. Convention waters.
Each year between 1988 and 1995, the
Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council) developed and NMFS
implemented a catch sharing plan in
accordance with the Halibut Act to
allocate the total allowable catch (TAC)
of Pacific halibut between treaty Indian
and non-Indian harvesters and among
non-Indian commercial and sport
fisheries in Area 2A. In 1995, NMFS
implemented the Pacific Councilrecommended long-term Plan (60 FR
14651, March 20, 1995). Every year
since then, minor revisions to the Plan
have been made to adjust for the
changing needs of the fisheries.
For 2016, the Council
recommendation includes minor
modifications to sport fisheries to better
match the needs of the fishery, and
updates to the inseason procedures to
reflect current practices. The Council
also recommended changes to the
codified regulations to remove
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
coordinates that are described in
groundfish regulations, match the
changes to the Plan, and update
descriptions of tribal treaty fishing
areas. This rule does contain some dates
for the sport fisheries based on the 2016
Plan as recommended by the Council
because the affected states are holding
public meetings to gather public input
on final season dates given the final 2A
TAC. The states will submit final season
dates following their public meetings.
Incidental Halibut Retention in the
Sablefish Primary Fishery North of Pt.
Chehalis, WA
The Plan provides that incidental
halibut retention in the sablefish
primary fishery north of Pt. Chehalis,
WA, will be allowed when the Area 2A
TAC is greater than 900,000 lb (408.2
mt), provided that a minimum of 10,000
lb (4.5 mt) is available above a
Washington recreational TAC of 214,100
lb (97.1 mt). The 2016 TAC of 1,140,000
lb (517 mt) is sufficient to provide for
this opportunity; therefore the Council
will recommend landing restrictions at
its March 2016 meeting. Following this
meeting, NMFS will publish the
restrictions in the Federal Register.
Opportunity for Public Comment
Through this proposed rule, NMFS
requests public comments on the Pacific
Council’s recommended modifications
to the Plan and the resulting proposed
domestic fishing regulations by March
10, 2016. A 20 day comment period is
necessary to allow adequate time for the
final rule to be effective by April 1st
when the incidental fisheries begin. The
States of Washington, Oregon, and
California will conduct public
workshops in February to obtain input
on the sport season dates. Following the
proposed rule comment period, NMFS
will review public comments and
comments from the states, and issue a
final rule. Either that final rule or an
additional rule will include the IPHC
regulations and regulations for the West
Coast and Alaska.
Proposed Changes to the Plan
Each year, the Washington
Department of Fish and Wildlife
(WDFW), Oregon Department of Fish
and Wildlife (ODFW), California
Department of Fish and Game (CDFG),
and the tribes with treaty fishing rights
for halibut consider whether to pursue
changes to the Plan to meet the needs
of the fishery. In determining whether
changes are needed, the state agencies
hold public meetings prior to the
Council’s September meeting.
Subsequently, they recommend changes
to the Council at its September meeting.
In 2015, fishery managers from all three
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
state agencies held public meetings on
the Plan prior to the Council’s
September meeting. At the September
2015 Council meeting, NMFS, WDFW,
and ODFW recommended changes to
the Plan and codified regulations. The
tribes and CDFW did not recommend
changes to the Plan or regulations. The
Council voted to solicit public input on
all of the changes recommended by the
state agencies, several of which were
presented in the form of alternatives.
WDFW and ODFW subsequently held
public workshops on the recommended
changes.
At its November 13–19, 2015, meeting
the Council considered the results of
state-sponsored workshops on the
recommended changes to the Plan and
public input provided at the September
and November Council meetings, and
made its final recommendations for
modifications to the Plan. NMFS
proposes to adopt all of the Council’s
recommended changes to the Plan as
further discussed below. NMFS also
proposed to make changes to the
codified regulations.
Proposed Changes to the Plan
1. In section (b), Allocations, add a
statement that all allocations and
subquotas are described in net weight.
The goal of this change is to clarify that
the Plan allocations and subquotas are
described in net weight consistent with
the IPHC’s use of net weight.
2. In section (d), Treaty Indian
Fisheries, modify the description of
subarea 2A–1 to account for a recent
court order (United States v.
Washington, 2:09-sp-00001–RSM (W.D.
Wash. Sept. 3, 2015)) regarding
boundaries of tribal usual and
accustomed fishing grounds;
specifically, the western boundary for
the Quinault Tribe’s fishing area and the
northern boundary of the Quileute
Tribe’s fishing area;
3. In section (f)(1)(ii), Washington
North Coast subarea, this rule proposes
several changes. The changes would
modify the opening day in this area
from the first Thursday in May to the
first Saturday in May with a second
opening the following week on
Thursday and Saturday and a closure
during the third week of May. The goal
of this change is to allow for a longer
season while giving WDFW time to
assess the catch and provide adequate
time for public notice of any later
reopenings.
4. In section (f)(1)(v), Oregon central
coast subarea, this rule proposes several
changes to the text to implement several
measures. First, there is a change to the
Central Coast allocation so that the
Oregon sport allocation is divided
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
clearly among the Columbia River,
Central Coast, and Southern Oregon
subareas, instead of allocating to the
Columbia River subarea first then
dividing the remaining allocation
between the Southern Oregon and
Central Coast subareas. Second, the
Council is added to the list of consulting
agencies consistent with inseason
procedures. Third, the opening date for
the nearshore fishery is changed from
July 1 to June 1 to allow for a longer
season.
5. In section (f)(1)(vi), Southern
Oregon subarea, this rule proposes
changes to the allocations for this
subarea, as stated above for the Central
Coast subarea. The allocation is
modified from 4.0 to 3.91 percent of the
Oregon sport allocation. Also, incidental
retention of sablefish, Pacific cod, and
flatfish species in areas closed to fishing
targeting groundfish is allowed in this
subarea, to make incidental retention
rules consistent throughout Oregon.
6. In section (f)(5)(iii)(B), Notice
procedures, this rule proposes to
remove the Notice to Mariners
requirement because these are not used
in the halibut fishery. The proposed
change to the Plan reflects current
practice.
7. In section (f)(6), Sport fishery
closure provisions, this rule proposes to
modify this section to state that closure
determinations made by IPHC are done
after consultation with NMFS, Council,
and the affected state agencies. The goal
of this change is for the Plan to reflect
current practice.
NMFS proposes to approve the
Council’s recommendations and to
implement the changes described above.
A version of the Plan including these
changes can be found at https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
fisheries/management/pacific_halibut_
management.html.
Proposed Changes to the Regulations
1. Modify Tribal fishing area
descriptions at § 300.64(i) to account for
a recent court order (United States v.
Washington, 2:09-sp-00001–RSM (W.D.
Wash. Sept. 3, 2015)) regarding
boundaries of tribal usual and
accustomed fishing grounds;
specifically, the western boundary for
the Quinault Tribe’s fishing area and the
northern boundary of the Quileute
Tribe’s fishing area;
2. Remove the coordinates for the 30
fm depth contour at § 300.63(f) and 100
fm depth contour at § 300.63(g) and
refer to groundfish regulations at
§ 660.71 for the 30 fm depth contour
and § 660.73 for the 100 fm depth
contour. This change is necessary
because the halibut and groundfish
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8467
fisheries use the same coordinates and
they should be listed in one location;
3. Update the shoreward boundary of
the non-trawl Rockfish Conservation
Area listed in § 300.63(e) to the
boundary line approximating the 30 fm
depth contour. This closed area applies
to commercial halibut fishing when
retaining incidentally caught
groundfish. The shoreward boundary of
this closed area was modified through
the 2015–2016 groundfish harvest
specifications; and
4. Remove Notice to Mariners notice
procedures at § 300.63(c)(3)(ii) to match
modifications to Plan.
Proposed 2016 Sport Fishery
Management Measures
NMFS also proposes sport fishery
management measures, including
season dates and bag limits that are
necessary to implement the Plan in
2016. The annual domestic management
measures are published each year
through a final rule. For the 2015 fishing
season, the final rule for Area 2A sport
fisheries was published on April 1, 2015
(80 FR 17344) and the final rule for the
commercial fisheries was published on
March 17, 2015 (80 FR 13771) along
with the IPHC regulations. Therefore,
the section numbers for the commercial
fisheries below refer to sections in the
March 17 final rule, and the section
numbers for the recreational fisheries
refer to sections in the April 1 final rule.
Where season dates are not indicated,
those dates will be provided in the final
rule, following consideration of the
2016 TAC and consultation with the
states and the public.
In Section 8 of the annual domestic
management measures published on
March 17, 2015, ‘‘Fishing Periods,’’
paragraphs (2), (3), and (4) are proposed
to read as follows:
(1) * * *
(2) Each fishing period in the Area 2A
directed fishery shall begin at 0800
hours and terminate at 1800 hours local
time on June 22, July 6, July 20, August
3, August 17, August 31, September 14,
and September 28, unless the
Commission specifies otherwise.
(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (7) of
section 11, an incidental catch fishery is
authorized during the sablefish seasons
in Area 2A in accordance with
regulations promulgated by NMFS. This
fishery will occur between 1200 hours
local time on March 19 and 1200 hours
local time on November 7.
(4) Notwithstanding paragraph (2),
and paragraph (7) of section 11, an
incidental catch fishery is authorized
during salmon troll seasons in Area 2A
in accordance with regulations
promulgated by NMFS. This fishery will
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
8468
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
occur between 1200 hours local time on
March 19 and 1200 hours local time on
November 7.
In section 26 of the annual domestic
management measures, ‘‘Sport Fishing
for Halibut’’ paragraph (8) is proposed
to read as follows:
(8) * * *
(a) The area in Puget Sound and the
U.S. waters in the Strait of Juan de Fuca,
east of a line extending from 48°17.30′
N. lat., 124°23.70′ W. long. north to
48°24.10′ N. lat., 124°23.70′ W. long., is
not managed in-season relative to its
quota. This area is managed by setting
a season that is projected to result in a
catch of 57,393 lb (26.03 mt).
(i) The fishing season in eastern Puget
Sound (east of 123°49.50′ W. long., Low
Point) is (season dates will be inserted
when final rule is published). The
fishing season in western Puget Sound
(west of 123°49.50′ W. long., Low Point)
is open (season dates will be inserted
when final rule is published).
(ii) The daily bag limit is one halibut
of any size per day per person.
(b) The quota for landings into ports
in the area off the north Washington
coast, west of the line described in
paragraph (2)(a) of section 26 and north
of the Queets River (47°31.70′ N. lat.)
(North Coast subarea), is 108,030 lb (49
mt).
(i) The fishing seasons are:
(A) Fishing is open May 7, 12, and 14.
Any openings after May 14 will be
based on available quota and announced
on the NMFS hotline.
(B) If sufficient quota remains the
fishery will reopen until there is not
sufficient quota for another full day of
fishing and the area is closed by the
Commission. After May 14, any fishery
opening will be announced on the
NMFS hotline at 800–662–9825. No
halibut fishing will be allowed after
May 14 unless the date is announced on
the NMFS hotline.
(ii) The daily bag limit is one halibut
of any size per day per person.
(iii) Recreational fishing for
groundfish and halibut is prohibited
within the North Coast Recreational
Yelloweye Rockfish Conservation Area
(YRCA). It is unlawful for recreational
fishing vessels to take and retain,
possess, or land halibut taken with
recreational gear within the North Coast
Recreational YRCA. A vessel fishing
with recreational gear in the North Coast
Recreational YRCA may not be in
possession of any halibut. Recreational
vessels may transit through the North
Coast Recreational YRCA with or
without halibut on board. The North
Coast Recreational YRCA is a C-shaped
area off the northern Washington coast
intended to protect yelloweye rockfish.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
The North Coast Recreational YRCA is
defined in groundfish regulations at
§ 660.70(a).
(c) The quota for landings into ports
in the area between the Queets River,
WA (47°31.70′ N. lat.), and Leadbetter
Point, WA (46°38.17′ N. lat.)(South
Coast subarea), is 42,739 lb (19.39 mt).
(i) This subarea is divided between
the all-waters fishery (the Washington
South coast primary fishery), and the
incidental nearshore fishery in the area
from 47°31.70′ N. lat. south to 46°58.00′
N. lat. and east of a boundary line
approximating the 30 fm depth contour.
This area is defined by straight lines
connecting all of the following points in
the order stated as described by the
following coordinates (the Washington
South coast, northern nearshore area):
(1) 47°31.70′ N. lat, 124°37.03′ W.
long;
(2) 47°25.67′ N. lat, 124°34.79′ W.
long;
(3) 47°12.82′ N. lat, 124°29.12′ W.
long;
(4) 46°58.00′ N. lat, 124°24.24′ W.
long.
The south coast subarea quota will be
allocated as follows: 40,739 lb (18.48
mt) for the primary fishery and 2,000 lb
(0.91 mt) for the nearshore fishery. The
primary fishery commences on May 1,
and continues 2 days a week (Sunday
and Tuesday) until May 17. If the
primary quota is projected to be
obtained sooner than expected, the
management closure may occur earlier.
Beginning on May 29 the primary
fishery will be open at most 2 days per
week (Sunday and/or Tuesday) until the
quota for the south coast subarea
primary fishery is taken and the season
is closed by the Commission, or until
September 30, whichever is earlier. The
fishing season in the nearshore area
commences on May 1, and continues 7
days per week. Subsequent to closure of
the primary fishery, the nearshore
fishery is open 7 days per week, until
42,739 lb (19.39 mt) is projected to be
taken by the two fisheries combined and
the fishery is closed by the Commission
or September 30, whichever is earlier. If
the fishery is closed prior to September
30, and there is insufficient quota
remaining to reopen the northern
nearshore area for another fishing day,
then any remaining quota may be
transferred in-season to another
Washington coastal subarea by NMFS
via an update to the recreational halibut
hotline.
(ii) The daily bag limit is one halibut
of any size per day per person.
(iii) Seaward of the boundary line
approximating the 30-fm depth contour
and during days open to the primary
fishery, lingcod may be taken, retained
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and possessed when allowed by
groundfish regulations at 50 CFR
660.360, subpart G.
(iv) Recreational fishing for
groundfish and halibut is prohibited
within the South Coast Recreational
YRCA and Westport Offshore YRCA. It
is unlawful for recreational fishing
vessels to take and retain, possess, or
land halibut taken with recreational gear
within the South Coast Recreational
YRCA and Westport Offshore YRCA. A
vessel fishing in the South Coast
Recreational YRCA and/or Westport
Offshore YRCA may not be in
possession of any halibut. Recreational
vessels may transit through the South
Coast Recreational YRCA and Westport
Offshore YRCA with or without halibut
on board. The South Coast Recreational
YRCA and Westport Offshore YRCA are
areas off the southern Washington coast
established to protect yelloweye
rockfish. The South Coast Recreational
YRCA is defined at 50 CFR 660.70(d).
The Westport Offshore YRCA is defined
at 50 CFR 660.70(e).
(d) The quota for landings into ports
in the area between Leadbetter Point,
WA (46°38.17′ N. lat.), and Cape Falcon,
OR (45°46.00′ N. lat.) (Columbia River
subarea), is 11,009 lb (4.99 mt).
(i) This subarea is divided into an alldepth fishery and a nearshore fishery.
The nearshore fishery is allocated 500
pounds of the subarea allocation. The
nearshore fishery extends from
Leadbetter Point (46°38.17′ N. lat.,
124°15.88′ W. long.) to the Columbia
River (46°16.00′ N. lat., 124°15.88′ W.
long.) by connecting the following
coordinates in Washington 46°38.17′ N.
lat., 124°15.88′ W. long. 46°16.00′ N.
lat., 124°15.88′ W. long and connecting
to the boundary line approximating the
40 fm (73 m) depth contour in Oregon.
The nearshore fishery opens May 2, and
continues 3 days per week (Monday–
Wednesday) until the nearshore
allocation is taken, or September 30,
whichever is earlier. The all depth
fishing season commences on May 1,
and continues 4 days a week
(Thursday–Sunday) until 10,509 lb (4.77
mt) are estimated to have been taken
and the season is closed by the
Commission, or September 30,
whichever is earlier. Subsequent to this
closure, if there is insufficient quota
remaining in the Columbia River
subarea for another fishing day, then
any remaining quota may be transferred
inseason to another Washington and/or
Oregon subarea by NMFS via an update
to the recreational halibut hotline. Any
remaining quota would be transferred to
each state in proportion to its
contribution.
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(ii) The daily bag limit is one halibut
of any size per day per person.
(iii) Pacific Coast groundfish may not
be taken and retained, possessed or
landed when halibut are on board the
vessel, except sablefish, Pacific cod, and
flatfish species when allowed by Pacific
Coast groundfish regulations, during
days open to the all depth fishery only.
(iv) Taking, retaining, possessing, or
landing halibut on groundfish trips is
only allowed in the nearshore area on
days not open to all-depth Pacific
halibut fisheries.
(e) The quota for landings into ports
in the area off Oregon between Cape
Falcon (45°46.00′ N. lat.) and Humbug
Mountain (42°40.50′ N. lat.) (Oregon
Central Coast subarea), is 206,410 lb
(93.63 mt).
(i) The fishing seasons are:
(A) The first season (the ‘‘inside 40fm’’ fishery) commences June 1, and
continues 7 days a week, in the area
shoreward of a boundary line
approximating the 40-fm (73-m) depth
contour, or until the sub-quota for the
central Oregon ‘‘inside 40-fm’’ fishery of
24,769 lb (11.24 mt), or any in-season
revised subquota, is estimated to have
been taken and the season is closed by
the Commission, whichever is earlier.
The boundary line approximating the
40-fm (73-m) depth contour between
45°46.00′ N. lat. and 42°40.50′ N. lat. is
defined at § 660.71(k).
(B) The second season (spring season),
which is for the ‘‘all-depth’’ fishery, is
open (season dates will be inserted
when final rule is published). The
allocation to the all-depth fishery is
181,641 lb (82.4 mt). If sufficient
unharvested quota remains for
additional fishing days, the season will
re-open. Notice of the re-opening will be
announced on the NMFS hotline (206)
526–6667 or (800) 662–9825. No halibut
fishing will be allowed on the reopening dates unless the date is
announced on the NMFS hotline.
(C) If sufficient unharvested quota
remains, the third season (summer
season), which is for the ‘‘all-depth’’
fishery, will be open (season dates will
be inserted when final rule is published)
or until the combined spring season and
summer season quotas in the area
between Cape Falcon and Humbug
Mountain, OR, are estimated to have
been taken and the area is closed by the
Commission, or October 31, whichever
is earlier. NMFS will announce on the
NMFS hotline in July whether the
fishery will re-open for the summer
season in August. No halibut fishing
will be allowed in the summer season
fishery unless the dates are announced
on the NMFS hotline. Additional fishing
days may be opened if sufficient quota
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
remains after the last day of the first
scheduled open period. If, after this
date, an amount greater than or equal to
60,000 lb (27.2 mt) remains in the
combined all-depth and inside 40-fm
(73-m) quota, the fishery may re-open
every Friday and Saturday, beginning
(insert date of first back up dates) and
ending October 31. If after September 7,
an amount greater than or equal to
30,000 lb (13.6 mt) remains in the
combined all-depth and inside 40-fm
(73-m) quota, and the fishery is not
already open every Friday and Saturday,
the fishery may re-open every Friday
and Saturday, beginning September 9
and 10, and ending October 31. After
September 4, the bag limit may be
increased to two fish of any size per
person, per day. NMFS will announce
on the NMFS hotline whether the
summer all-depth fishery will be open
on such additional fishing days, what
days the fishery will be open and what
the bag limit is.
(ii) The daily bag limit is one halibut
of any size per day per person, unless
otherwise specified. NMFS will
announce on the NMFS hotline any bag
limit changes.
(iii) During days open to all-depth
halibut fishing, no Pacific Coast
groundfish may be taken and retained,
possessed or landed, when halibut are
on board the vessel, except sablefish,
Pacific cod, and flatfish species, when
allowed by Pacific Coast groundfish
regulations.
(iv) When the all-depth halibut
fishery is closed and halibut fishing is
permitted only shoreward of a boundary
line approximating the 40-fm (73-m)
depth contour, halibut possession and
retention by vessels operating seaward
of a boundary line approximating the
40-fm (73-m) depth contour is
prohibited.
(v) Recreational fishing for groundfish
and halibut is prohibited within the
Stonewall Bank YRCA. It is unlawful for
recreational fishing vessels to take and
retain, possess, or land halibut taken
with recreational gear within the
Stonewall Bank YRCA. A vessel fishing
in the Stonewall Bank YRCA may not
possess any halibut. Recreational
vessels may transit through the
Stonewall Bank YRCA with or without
halibut on board. The Stonewall Bank
YRCA is an area off central Oregon, near
Stonewall Bank, intended to protect
yelloweye rockfish. The Stonewall Bank
YRCA is defined at § 660.70(f).
(f) The quota for landings into ports
in the area south of Humbug Mountain,
OR (42°40.50′ N. lat.) to the Oregon/
California Border (42°00.00′ N. lat.)
(Southern Oregon subarea) is 8,605 lb
(3.9 mt).
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8469
(i) The fishing season commences on
May 1, and continues 7 days per week
until the subquota is taken, or October
31, whichever is earlier.
(ii) The daily bag limit is one halibut
per person with no size limit.
(iii) No Pacific Coast groundfish may
be taken and retained, possessed or
landed, except sablefish, Pacific cod,
and flatfish species, in areas closed to
groundfish, if halibut are on board the
vessel.
(g) The quota for landings into ports
south of the Oregon/California Border
(42°00.00′ N. lat.) and along the
California coast is 29,640 lb (13.44 mt).
(i) The fishing season will be open
(season dates will be inserted when
final rule is published), or until the
subarea quota is estimated to have been
taken and the season is closed by the
Commission, or October 31, whichever
is earlier. NMFS will announce any
closure by the Commission on the
NMFS hotline (206) 526–6667 or (800)
662–9825.
(ii) The daily bag limit is one halibut
of any size per day per person.
Classification
Regulations governing the U.S.
fisheries for Pacific halibut are
developed by the IPHC, the Pacific
Fishery Management Council, the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council,
and the Secretary of Commerce. Section
5 of the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of
1982 (Halibut Act, 16 U.S.C. 773c)
provides the Secretary of Commerce
with the general responsibility to carry
out the Convention between Canada and
the United States for the management of
Pacific halibut, including the authority
to adopt regulations as may be necessary
to carry out the purposes and objectives
of the Convention and Halibut Act. This
proposed rule is consistent with the
Secretary of Commerce’s authority
under the Halibut Act.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 603 et seq., requires
government agencies to assess the
effects that regulatory alternatives
would have on small entities, including
small businesses, and to determine ways
to minimize those effects. When an
agency proposes regulations, the RFA
requires the agency to prepare and make
available for public comment an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
that describes the impact on small
businesses, non-profit enterprises, local
governments, and other small entities.
The IRFA is to aid the agency in
considering all reasonable regulatory
alternatives that would minimize the
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
8470
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
economic impact on affected small
entities. After the public comment
period, the agency prepares a Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA)
that takes into consideration any new
information or public comments. A
summary of the IRFA is provided below.
The reasons why action by the agency
is being considered, the objectives and
legal basis for this rule are described
above.
The main management objective for
the Pacific halibut fishery in Area 2A is
to manage fisheries to remain within the
TAC for Area 2A. Another objective is
to allow each commercial, recreational
(sport), and tribal fishery to target
halibut in the manner that is
appropriate to meet both the
conservation requirements for species
that co-occur with Pacific halibut. A
third objective is to meet the needs of
fishery participants in particular
fisheries and fishing areas.
Each year, the states of Washington,
Oregon, California, and the treaty tribes
that fish for halibut meet with their
fishery participants to review halibut
management under the Plan. Based on
feedback from these meetings and
experience from the previous year’s
fishing season, the states or the tribes
may propose changes to the Plan.
Proposed changes to the Plan are
intended to remedy any problems
encountered during the previous year’s
management, problems with other
fisheries with overlapping management
jurisdiction (i.e., Pacific Coast
groundfish), or other anticipated
problems.
Changes to the Plan
The 2A Halibut Catch Sharing Plan, as
outlined above, allocates the TAC at
various levels. The commercial fishery
is further divided into a directed
commercial fishery that is allocated 85
percent of the commercial allocation of
the Pacific halibut TAC, and the other
15 percent is allocated for incidental
catch in the salmon troll fishery. The
directed commercial fishery in Area 2A
is confined to southern Washington
(south of 46°53.30′ N. lat.), Oregon, and
California. North of 46°53.30′ N. lat. (Pt.
Chehalis), the Plan allows for incidental
halibut retention in the sablefish
primary fishery when the overall Area
2A halibut TAC is above 900,000 lb
(408.2 mt). The Plan also divides the
sport fisheries into seven geographic
subareas, each with separate allocations,
seasons, and bag limits. The non-tribal
allocation is divided into four shares. At
the first level, there are specific
percentage allocations for tribal and
non-tribal fisheries. The non-tribal
portion is then allocated to commercial
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
components and to recreational
components. The commercial
component is then apportioned into
directed, incidental troll, and incidental
sablefish fisheries. The recreational
portions for Oregon and Washington are
furthered apportioned into area
subquotas, and these subquotas are
further split into seasonal or depth
fisheries (nearshore vs all depths). There
may be gear restrictions and other
management measures established as
necessary to minimize the potential of
exceeding these allocations.
At the September meeting, the
Council adopted a range of Plan
alternatives for public review. For 2016,
the Council adopted two types of
changes that are discussed separately
below. The first were the routine
recreational fishery adjustments to the
Plan proposed by the states each year to
accommodate the needs of their
fisheries. The second were changes to
the Plan and codified regulations
proposed by NMFS which do not have
alternatives, because they are either
mandated by a recent court decision or
are administrative in nature. At its
November meeting, the Council made
final Plan change recommendations
from the range of alternatives for the
recreational fishery adjustments; which
is described in detail below.
The proposed changes to the Plan are
expected to slightly increase fishing
opportunities in some areas and at some
times and to slightly decrease fishing
opportunities in other areas and at other
times. The Council’s recommended
changes to the Plan modify the opening
dates for the sport fisheries in
Washington and Oregon with the goal of
extending the seasons and increasing
opportunity. The change to the tribal
Usual &Accustomed (U&A) boundaries
is made to comply with a court order,
and NMFS has no discretion to do
otherwise. Thus this change is not
analyzed here. The Council considered
changes to the Washington North Coast,
Columbia River, Oregon Central Coast,
and Southern Oregon subareas:
(1) For the Washington North Coast the
Council considered two opening dates, the
first Thursday in May or the first Saturday in
May. The Council recommended and NMFS
proposes opening this fishery on the first
Saturday in May. This is a minor change that
will not reduce overall fishing opportunity in
this area.
(2) For the Columbia River subarea the
Council considered two season structures,
status quo (4 days per week Thursday
through Sunday) and a seven day a week
fishery. The Council recommended the status
quo season structure because ODFW did not
receive definitive public support for this
change and felt it was not necessary at this
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
time; therefore this rule does not propose
changes to the Columbia River subarea.
(3) For the Oregon Central Coast subarea
the Council considered two season allocation
alternatives, status quo (12 percent
nearshore, 63 percent spring, 25 percent
summer) and Alternative 1 (81.75 percent
spring and summer combined, 18.25 percent
nearshore). The Council recommended the
status quo season allocations because ODFW
felt given the magnitude of this change more
time was needed to allow public input;
therefore this rule does not propose any
change to the Oregon Central Coast season
allocations.
(4) For the Oregon Central Coast nearshore
fishery the Council considered a change to
the season dates: (1) Status quo fishery opens
July 1, seven days per week until October 31;
(2) fishery opens May 1, seven days per
week, until October 31; (3) fishery opens May
1, seven days per week until October 31 or
quota attainment, with 25 percent of the
nearshore fishery allocation set-aside and
available beginning July 1; and (4) fishery
opens May 1, seven days per week until
October 31 or quota attainment, with 50
percent of the nearshore fishery allocation
set-aside and available beginning July 1. The
Council recommended and NMFS proposes
an alternative that is within the range listed
above that would open the fishery on June 1,
seven days per week, until October 31. This
is a minor change that will not reduce overall
fishing opportunity in this area.
(5) For the Southern Oregon subarea the
Council considered two incidental retention
alternatives, status quo (no bottomfish
species retention outside of 30 fathoms) and
Alternative 1 (allow retention of other
species of flatfish, Pacific cod, and sablefish
outside 30 fathoms, when fishing for halibut)
and an allocation modification from 4
percent to 3.91 percent of the Oregon sport
allocation. The Council recommended and
NMFS proposes to implement the change to
the subarea allocation and Alternative 1 with
a slight modification to describe this
allowance as allowed when groundfish
retention is closed not at a specific depth.
The changes to the Southern Oregon
incidentally landed species allowances are
expected to increase recreational
opportunities by turning previously
discarded incidental flatfish catch into
landed catch.
The Small Business Administration
defines a ‘‘small’’ harvesting business as
one with annual receipts, not in excess
of $20.5 million. For related
fishprocessing businesses, a small
business is one that employs 500 or
fewer persons. For wholesale
businesses, a small business is one that
employs not more than 100 people. For
marinas and charter/party boats, a small
business is one with annual receipts,
not in excess of $7.5 million. This rule
directly affects charterboat operations,
and participants in the non-treaty
directed commercial fishery off the
coast of Washington, Oregon, and
California. Applying the SBA’s size
standard for small businesses, NMFS
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
considers all of the charterboat
operations and participants in the nontreaty directed commercial fishery
affected by this action as small
businesses.
Specific data on the economics of
halibut charter operations is
unavailable. However, in January 2004,
the Pacific States Marine Fisheries
Commission (PSMFC) completed a
report on the overall West Coast
charterboat fleet. In surveying
charterboat vessels concerning their
operations in 2000, the PSMFC
estimated that there were about 315
charterboat vessels in operation off
Washington and Oregon. In 2000, IPHC
licensed 130 vessels to fish in the
halibut sport charter fishery. Comparing
the total charterboat fleet to the 130 and
142 IPHC licenses in 2000 and 2007,
respectively, approximately 41 to 45
percent of the charterboat fleet could
participate in the halibut fishery. The
PSMFC has developed preliminary
estimates of the annual revenues earned
by this fleet and they vary by size class
of the vessels and home state. Small
charterboat vessels range from 15 to 30
feet and typically carry 5 to 6
passengers. Medium charterboat vessels
range from 31 to 49 feet in length and
typically carry 19 to 20 passengers.
(Neither state has large vessels of greater
than 49 feet in their fleet.) Average
annual revenues from all types of
recreational fishing, whalewatching and
other activities ranged from $7,000 for
small Oregon vessels to $131,000 for
medium Washington vessels. These data
confirm that charterboat vessels qualify
as small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. This analysis continues
the main conclusions developed in
previous analyses that charterboats and
the non-treaty directed commercial
fishing vessels are small businesses. See
77 FR 5477 (Feb 3, 2012) and 76 FR
2876 (Jan 18, 2011). In 2015, 512 vessels
were issued IPHC licenses to retain
halibut. IPHC issues licenses for: the
directed commercial fishery and the
incidental fishery in the sablefish
primary fishery in Area 2A (22 licenses
in 2015); incidental halibut caught in
the salmon troll fishery (363 licenses in
2015); and the charterboat fleet (127
licenses in 2013, the most recent year
available). No vessel may participate in
more than one of these three fisheries
per year. These license estimates
overstate the number of vessels that
participate in the fishery. IPHC
estimates that 60 vessels participated in
the directed commercial fishery, 100
vessels in the incidental commercial
(salmon) fishery, and 13 vessels in the
incidental commercial (sablefish)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
fishery. Although recent information on
charterboat activity is not available,
prior analysis indicated that 60 percent
of the IPHC charterboat license holders
may be affected by these regulations.
Commercial harvest vessels in West
Coast fisheries are generally ‘‘small
businesses,’’ unless they are associated
with a catcher-processor company or
affiliated with a large shorebased
processing company. Catcher-processors
cannot target halibut or keep halibut as
bycatch. NOAA is unaware that any
‘‘large’’ seafood processing companies
are affiliated with any of the IPHC
permit holders.
The major effect of halibut
management on small entities will be
from the Area 2A TAC which is set by
the IPHC, an international body. Based
on the recommendations of the states,
the Council and NMFS are proposing
minor changes to the Plan to provide
increased recreational and commercial
opportunities under the allocations that
result from the TAC. There are no large
entities involved in the halibut fisheries;
therefore, none of these changes will
have a disproportionate negative effect
on small entities versus large entities.
These minor proposed changes to the
Plan are not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule does not contain
a collection of information requirement
subject to review and approval by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA).
There are no projected reporting or
recordkeeping requirements associated
with this action.
There are no relevant Federal rules
that may duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this action.
Pursuant to Executive Order 13175,
the Secretary recognizes the sovereign
status and co-manager role of Indian
tribes over shared Federal and tribal
fishery resources. Section 302(b)(5) of
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
establishes a seat on the Pacific Council
for a representative of an Indian tribe
with federally recognized fishing rights
from California, Oregon, Washington, or
Idaho.
The U.S. Government formally
recognizes that the 13 Washington
Tribes have treaty rights to fish for
Pacific halibut. In general terms, the
quantification of those rights is 50
percent of the harvestable surplus of
Pacific halibut available in the tribes’
usual and accustomed fishing areas
(described at 50 CFR 300.64). Each of
the treaty tribes has the discretion to
administer their fisheries and to
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8471
establish their own policies to achieve
program objectives. Accordingly, tribal
allocations and regulations, including
the proposed changes to the Plan, have
been developed in consultation with the
affected tribe(s) and, insofar as possible,
with tribal consensus.
In 2014, a Biological Opinion (BiOp)
was completed for the 2014–2016 Area
2A Pacific Halibut Catch Sharing Plan.
The BiOp concluded that the continued
implementation of the Plan was not
likely to adversely affect southern
resident killer whales, leatherback sea
turtles, humpback whales, blue whales,
fin whales, Guadalupe fur seals, north
Pacific right whales, sei whales, sperm
whales, and steller sea lions. Further the
BiOp concluded that continuing
implementation of the Plan was likely to
adversely affect but not likely to
jeopardize Puget Sound/Georgia basin
bocaccio, canary rockfish, and
yelloweye rockfish, southern green
sturgeon, lower Columbia River
Chinook, and Puget Sound Chinook.
The BiOp also concluded that the
continued implementation of the Plan
was not likely to adversely modify
critical habitat of southern resident
killer whales, leatherback sea turtles,
Puget Sound/Georgia basin bocaccio,
canary rockfish, and yelloweye rockfish,
southern green sturgeon, lower
Columbia River Chinook, and Puget
Sound Chinook. Because the halibut
fishery does not overlap with the critical
habitat for the remaining listed species
it was determined that, an evaluation of
the effects on critical habitat was not
applicable. Finally, in a letter dated
March 12, 2014, NMFS determined that
fishing activities conducted under the
Plan would have no effect on eulachon.
None of the Council’s recommended
changes to the Plan proposed in this
rule change the determinations made in
the BiOp because they do not result in
changes to fishing behavior such that
the impacts to listed species is
anticipated to change. NMFS is
currently conducting informal
consultation with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service regarding the ongoing
implementation of the Catch Sharing
Plan and its effects on short-tailed and
black-footed albatross, California least
tern, marbled murrelet, bull trout, and
sea otters.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 300
Administrative practice and
procedure, Antarctica, Canada, Exports,
Fish, Fisheries, Fishing, Imports,
Indians, Labeling, Marine resources,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Russian Federation,
Transportation, Treaties, Wildlife.
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
8472
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 951 et seq., 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 5501 et seq., 16 U.S.C.
2431 et seq., 31 U.S.C. 9701 et seq.
Dated: February 9, 2016.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 300, subpart E,
is proposed to be amended as follows:
§ 300.63 Catch sharing plan and domestic
management measures in area 2A.
*
PART 300—INTERNATIONAL
FISHERIES REGULATIONS
Subpart E—Pacific Halibut Fisheries
1. The authority citation for part 300,
subpart E, continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773–773k.
2. In § 300.61 in alphabetical order,
revise the definition of ‘‘Subarea 2A–1’’
to read as follows:
■
§ 300.61
are between the Quinault River, WA
(47°21.00′ N. lat) and Point Chehalis,
WA (46°53.30′ N. lat.), and east of
125°08.50′ W. long.; and all inland
marine waters of Washington.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 300.63, revise paragraphs
(c)(3)(ii), and (e)(1), and remove
paragraphs (f) and (g) to read as follows:
Definitions
*
*
*
*
*
Subarea 2A–1 includes all waters off
the coast of Washington that are north
of the Quinault River, WA (47°21.00′ N.
lat) and east of 125°44.00′ W. long; all
waters off the coast of Washington that
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) Actual notice of inseason
management actions will be provided by
a telephone hotline administered by the
West Coast Region, NMFS, at 206–526–
6667 or 800–662–9825. Since provisions
of these regulations may be altered by
inseason actions, sport fishers should
monitor the telephone hotline for
current information for the area in
which they are fishing.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) Non-treaty commercial vessels
operating in the directed commercial
fishery for halibut in Area 2A are
required to fish outside of a closed area,
known as the Rockfish Conservation
Area (RCA), that extends along the coast
from the U.S./Canada border south to
40°10′ N. lat. Between the U.S./Canada
border and 46°16′ N. lat., the eastern
boundary of the RCA, is the shoreline.
Between 46°16′ N. lat. and 40°10′ N. lat.,
the RCA is defined along an eastern
boundary by a line approximating the
30-fm (55-m) depth contour.
Coordinates for the 30-fm (55-m)
boundary are listed at 50 CFR 660.71(e).
Between the U.S./Canada border and
40°10′ N. lat., the RCA is defined along
a western boundary approximating the
100-fm (183-m) depth contour.
Coordinates for the 100-fm (183-m)
boundary are listed at 50 CFR 660.73(a).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 300.64, revise paragraph (i) to
read as follows:
§ 300.64
tribes.
Fishing by U.S. treaty Indian
(i) The following table sets forth the
fishing areas of each of the 13 treaty
Indian tribes fishing pursuant to this
section. Within subarea 2A–1,
boundaries of a tribe’s fishing area may
be revised as ordered by a Federal
Court.
Tribe
Boundaries
HOH ....................................................................
The area between 47°54.30′ N. lat. (Quillayute River) and 47°21.00′ N. lat. (Quinault River)
and east of 125°44.00′ W. long.
Those locations in the Strait of Juan de Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or in accordance with Final Decision No. 1 and subsequent orders in United States v. Washington, 384
F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash., 1974), and particularly at 626 F. Supp. 1486, to be places at
which the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe may fish under rights secured by treaties with the
United States.
Those locations in the Strait of Juan de Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or in accordance with Final Decision No. 1 and subsequent orders in United States v. Washington, 384
F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash., 1974), and particularly at 459 F. Supp. 1049 and 1066 and 626
F. Supp. 1443, to be places at which the Lower Elwha S’Klallam Tribe may fish under rights
secured by treaties with the United States.
Those locations in the Strait of Juan de Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or in accordance with Final Decision No. 1 and subsequent orders in United States v. Washington, 384
F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash., 1974), and particularly at 384 F. Supp. 360, as modified in Subproceeding No. 89–08 (W.D. Wash., February 13, 1990) (decision and order re: cross-motions for summary judgement), to be places at which the Lummi Tribe may fish under rights
secured by treaties with the United States.
The area north of 48°02.25′ N. lat. (Norwegian Memorial) and east of 125°44.00′ W. long.
Those locations in the Strait of Juan de Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or in accordance with Final Decision No. 1 and subsequent orders in United States v. Washington, 384
F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash. 1974), and particularly at 459 F. Supp. 1049, to be places at
which the Nooksack Tribe may fish under rights secured by treaties with the United States.
Those locations in the Strait of Juan de Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or in accordance with Final Decision No. 1 and subsequent orders in United States v. Washington, 384
F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash., 1974), and particularly at 626 F. Supp. 1442, to be places at
which the Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe may fish under rights secured by treaties with the
United States.
The area between 48°10.00′ N. lat. (Cape Alava) and 47°31.70′ N. lat. (Queets River) and
east of 125°44.00′ W. long.
The area between 47°40.10′ N. lat. (Destruction Island) and 46°53.30′ N. lat. (Point Chehalis)
and east of 125°08.50′ W. long.
Those locations in the Strait of Juan de Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or in accordance with Final Decision No. 1 and subsequent orders in United States v. Washington, 384
F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash., 1974), and particularly at 384 F. Supp. 377, to be places at
which the Skokomish Tribe may fish under rights secured by treaties with the United States.
JAMESTOWN S’KLALLAM ................................
LOWER ELWHA S’KLALLAM ............................
LUMMI ................................................................
MAKAH ...............................................................
NOOKSACK ........................................................
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
PORT GAMBLE S’KLALLAM .............................
QUILEUTE ..........................................................
QUINAULT ..........................................................
SKOKOMISH ......................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2016 / Proposed Rules
8473
Tribe
Boundaries
SUQUAMISH ......................................................
Those locations in the Strait of Juan de Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or in accordance with Final Decision No. 1 and subsequent orders in United States v. Washington, 384
F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash., 1974), and particularly at 459 F. Supp. 1049, to be places at
which the Suquamish Tribe may fish under rights secured by treaties with the United States.
Those locations in the Strait of Juan de Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or in accordance with Final Decision No. 1 and subsequent orders in United States v. Washington, 384
F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash., 1974), and particularly at 459 F. Supp. 1049, to be places at
which the Swinomish Tribe may fish under rights secured by treaties with the United States.
Those locations in the Strait of Juan de Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or in accordance with Final Decision No. 1 and subsequent orders in United States v. Washington, 384
F. Supp. 312 (W.D. Wash., 1974), and particularly at 626 F. Supp. 1531–1532, to be places
at which the Tulalip Tribe may fish under rights secured by treaties with the United States.
SWINOMISH .......................................................
TULALIP .............................................................
[FR Doc. 2016–02991 Filed 2–18–16; 8:45 am]
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:51 Feb 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\19FEP1.SGM
19FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8466-8473]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02991]
[[Page 8466]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 300
[Docket No. 160127057-6057-01]
RIN 0648-BF60
Pacific Halibut Fisheries; Catch Sharing Plan
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to approve changes to the Pacific Halibut Catch
Sharing Plan (Plan) and codified regulations for the International
Pacific Halibut Commission's (IPHC or Commission) regulatory Area 2A
off Washington, Oregon, and California (Area 2A). In addition, NMFS
proposes to implement the portions of the Plan and management measures
that are not implemented through the IPHC. These measures include the
sport fishery allocations and management measures for Area 2A. These
actions are intended to conserve Pacific halibut, provide angler
opportunity where available, and minimize bycatch of overfished
groundfish species.
DATES: Comments on the proposed changes to the Plan and the codified
regulations, and on the proposed domestic Area 2A Pacific halibut
management measures must be received by March 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2015-0166, by
either of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015-0166, click the ``Comment Now!'' icon,
complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to William Stelle, Regional
Administrator, West Coast Region, NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE.,
Seattle, WA 98115-0070.
Instructions: NMFS may not consider comments if they are sent by
any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after
the comment period ends. All comments received are a part of the public
record and NMFS will post for public viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name,
address, etc.), confidential business information, or otherwise
sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender is publicly
accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the
required fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Williams, phone: 206-526-4646,
fax: 206-526-6736, or email: sarah.williams@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
This rule is accessible via the Internet at the Office of the
Federal Register Web site at https://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/aces/aces140.html. Background information and documents are available at the
NMFS West Coast Region Web site at https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/fisheries/management/pacific_halibut_management.html and at the Council's Web site at https://www.pcouncil.org.
Background
The Northern Pacific Halibut Act (Halibut Act) of 1982, 16 U.S.C.
773-773K, gives the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) general
responsibility for implementing the provisions of the Halibut
Convention between the United States and Canada (Halibut Convention)
(16 U.S.C. 773c). It requires the Secretary to adopt regulations as may
be necessary to carry out the purposes and objectives of the Halibut
Convention and the Halibut Act. Section 773c of the Halibut Act also
authorizes the regional fishery management councils to develop
regulations in addition to, but not in conflict with, regulations of
the IPHC to govern the Pacific halibut catch in their corresponding
U.S. Convention waters.
Each year between 1988 and 1995, the Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council) developed and NMFS implemented a catch sharing plan
in accordance with the Halibut Act to allocate the total allowable
catch (TAC) of Pacific halibut between treaty Indian and non-Indian
harvesters and among non-Indian commercial and sport fisheries in Area
2A. In 1995, NMFS implemented the Pacific Council-recommended long-term
Plan (60 FR 14651, March 20, 1995). Every year since then, minor
revisions to the Plan have been made to adjust for the changing needs
of the fisheries.
For 2016, the Council recommendation includes minor modifications
to sport fisheries to better match the needs of the fishery, and
updates to the inseason procedures to reflect current practices. The
Council also recommended changes to the codified regulations to remove
coordinates that are described in groundfish regulations, match the
changes to the Plan, and update descriptions of tribal treaty fishing
areas. This rule does contain some dates for the sport fisheries based
on the 2016 Plan as recommended by the Council because the affected
states are holding public meetings to gather public input on final
season dates given the final 2A TAC. The states will submit final
season dates following their public meetings. Incidental Halibut
Retention in the Sablefish Primary Fishery North of Pt. Chehalis, WA
The Plan provides that incidental halibut retention in the
sablefish primary fishery north of Pt. Chehalis, WA, will be allowed
when the Area 2A TAC is greater than 900,000 lb (408.2 mt), provided
that a minimum of 10,000 lb (4.5 mt) is available above a Washington
recreational TAC of 214,100 lb (97.1 mt). The 2016 TAC of 1,140,000 lb
(517 mt) is sufficient to provide for this opportunity; therefore the
Council will recommend landing restrictions at its March 2016 meeting.
Following this meeting, NMFS will publish the restrictions in the
Federal Register.
Opportunity for Public Comment
Through this proposed rule, NMFS requests public comments on the
Pacific Council's recommended modifications to the Plan and the
resulting proposed domestic fishing regulations by March 10, 2016. A 20
day comment period is necessary to allow adequate time for the final
rule to be effective by April 1st when the incidental fisheries begin.
The States of Washington, Oregon, and California will conduct public
workshops in February to obtain input on the sport season dates.
Following the proposed rule comment period, NMFS will review public
comments and comments from the states, and issue a final rule. Either
that final rule or an additional rule will include the IPHC regulations
and regulations for the West Coast and Alaska.
Proposed Changes to the Plan
Each year, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW),
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), California Department of
Fish and Game (CDFG), and the tribes with treaty fishing rights for
halibut consider whether to pursue changes to the Plan to meet the
needs of the fishery. In determining whether changes are needed, the
state agencies hold public meetings prior to the Council's September
meeting. Subsequently, they recommend changes to the Council at its
September meeting. In 2015, fishery managers from all three
[[Page 8467]]
state agencies held public meetings on the Plan prior to the Council's
September meeting. At the September 2015 Council meeting, NMFS, WDFW,
and ODFW recommended changes to the Plan and codified regulations. The
tribes and CDFW did not recommend changes to the Plan or regulations.
The Council voted to solicit public input on all of the changes
recommended by the state agencies, several of which were presented in
the form of alternatives. WDFW and ODFW subsequently held public
workshops on the recommended changes.
At its November 13-19, 2015, meeting the Council considered the
results of state-sponsored workshops on the recommended changes to the
Plan and public input provided at the September and November Council
meetings, and made its final recommendations for modifications to the
Plan. NMFS proposes to adopt all of the Council's recommended changes
to the Plan as further discussed below. NMFS also proposed to make
changes to the codified regulations.
Proposed Changes to the Plan
1. In section (b), Allocations, add a statement that all
allocations and subquotas are described in net weight. The goal of this
change is to clarify that the Plan allocations and subquotas are
described in net weight consistent with the IPHC's use of net weight.
2. In section (d), Treaty Indian Fisheries, modify the description
of subarea 2A-1 to account for a recent court order (United States v.
Washington, 2:09-sp-00001-RSM (W.D. Wash. Sept. 3, 2015)) regarding
boundaries of tribal usual and accustomed fishing grounds;
specifically, the western boundary for the Quinault Tribe's fishing
area and the northern boundary of the Quileute Tribe's fishing area;
3. In section (f)(1)(ii), Washington North Coast subarea, this rule
proposes several changes. The changes would modify the opening day in
this area from the first Thursday in May to the first Saturday in May
with a second opening the following week on Thursday and Saturday and a
closure during the third week of May. The goal of this change is to
allow for a longer season while giving WDFW time to assess the catch
and provide adequate time for public notice of any later reopenings.
4. In section (f)(1)(v), Oregon central coast subarea, this rule
proposes several changes to the text to implement several measures.
First, there is a change to the Central Coast allocation so that the
Oregon sport allocation is divided clearly among the Columbia River,
Central Coast, and Southern Oregon subareas, instead of allocating to
the Columbia River subarea first then dividing the remaining allocation
between the Southern Oregon and Central Coast subareas. Second, the
Council is added to the list of consulting agencies consistent with
inseason procedures. Third, the opening date for the nearshore fishery
is changed from July 1 to June 1 to allow for a longer season.
5. In section (f)(1)(vi), Southern Oregon subarea, this rule
proposes changes to the allocations for this subarea, as stated above
for the Central Coast subarea. The allocation is modified from 4.0 to
3.91 percent of the Oregon sport allocation. Also, incidental retention
of sablefish, Pacific cod, and flatfish species in areas closed to
fishing targeting groundfish is allowed in this subarea, to make
incidental retention rules consistent throughout Oregon.
6. In section (f)(5)(iii)(B), Notice procedures, this rule proposes
to remove the Notice to Mariners requirement because these are not used
in the halibut fishery. The proposed change to the Plan reflects
current practice.
7. In section (f)(6), Sport fishery closure provisions, this rule
proposes to modify this section to state that closure determinations
made by IPHC are done after consultation with NMFS, Council, and the
affected state agencies. The goal of this change is for the Plan to
reflect current practice.
NMFS proposes to approve the Council's recommendations and to
implement the changes described above. A version of the Plan including
these changes can be found at https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/fisheries/management/pacific_halibut_management.html.
Proposed Changes to the Regulations
1. Modify Tribal fishing area descriptions at Sec. 300.64(i) to
account for a recent court order (United States v. Washington, 2:09-sp-
00001-RSM (W.D. Wash. Sept. 3, 2015)) regarding boundaries of tribal
usual and accustomed fishing grounds; specifically, the western
boundary for the Quinault Tribe's fishing area and the northern
boundary of the Quileute Tribe's fishing area;
2. Remove the coordinates for the 30 fm depth contour at Sec.
300.63(f) and 100 fm depth contour at Sec. 300.63(g) and refer to
groundfish regulations at Sec. 660.71 for the 30 fm depth contour and
Sec. 660.73 for the 100 fm depth contour. This change is necessary
because the halibut and groundfish fisheries use the same coordinates
and they should be listed in one location;
3. Update the shoreward boundary of the non-trawl Rockfish
Conservation Area listed in Sec. 300.63(e) to the boundary line
approximating the 30 fm depth contour. This closed area applies to
commercial halibut fishing when retaining incidentally caught
groundfish. The shoreward boundary of this closed area was modified
through the 2015-2016 groundfish harvest specifications; and
4. Remove Notice to Mariners notice procedures at Sec.
300.63(c)(3)(ii) to match modifications to Plan.
Proposed 2016 Sport Fishery Management Measures
NMFS also proposes sport fishery management measures, including
season dates and bag limits that are necessary to implement the Plan in
2016. The annual domestic management measures are published each year
through a final rule. For the 2015 fishing season, the final rule for
Area 2A sport fisheries was published on April 1, 2015 (80 FR 17344)
and the final rule for the commercial fisheries was published on March
17, 2015 (80 FR 13771) along with the IPHC regulations. Therefore, the
section numbers for the commercial fisheries below refer to sections in
the March 17 final rule, and the section numbers for the recreational
fisheries refer to sections in the April 1 final rule. Where season
dates are not indicated, those dates will be provided in the final
rule, following consideration of the 2016 TAC and consultation with the
states and the public.
In Section 8 of the annual domestic management measures published
on March 17, 2015, ``Fishing Periods,'' paragraphs (2), (3), and (4)
are proposed to read as follows:
(1) * * *
(2) Each fishing period in the Area 2A directed fishery shall begin
at 0800 hours and terminate at 1800 hours local time on June 22, July
6, July 20, August 3, August 17, August 31, September 14, and September
28, unless the Commission specifies otherwise.
(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (7) of section 11, an incidental
catch fishery is authorized during the sablefish seasons in Area 2A in
accordance with regulations promulgated by NMFS. This fishery will
occur between 1200 hours local time on March 19 and 1200 hours local
time on November 7.
(4) Notwithstanding paragraph (2), and paragraph (7) of section 11,
an incidental catch fishery is authorized during salmon troll seasons
in Area 2A in accordance with regulations promulgated by NMFS. This
fishery will
[[Page 8468]]
occur between 1200 hours local time on March 19 and 1200 hours local
time on November 7.
In section 26 of the annual domestic management measures, ``Sport
Fishing for Halibut'' paragraph (8) is proposed to read as follows:
(8) * * *
(a) The area in Puget Sound and the U.S. waters in the Strait of
Juan de Fuca, east of a line extending from 48[deg]17.30' N. lat.,
124[deg]23.70' W. long. north to 48[deg]24.10' N. lat., 124[deg]23.70'
W. long., is not managed in-season relative to its quota. This area is
managed by setting a season that is projected to result in a catch of
57,393 lb (26.03 mt).
(i) The fishing season in eastern Puget Sound (east of
123[deg]49.50' W. long., Low Point) is (season dates will be inserted
when final rule is published). The fishing season in western Puget
Sound (west of 123[deg]49.50' W. long., Low Point) is open (season
dates will be inserted when final rule is published).
(ii) The daily bag limit is one halibut of any size per day per
person.
(b) The quota for landings into ports in the area off the north
Washington coast, west of the line described in paragraph (2)(a) of
section 26 and north of the Queets River (47[deg]31.70' N. lat.) (North
Coast subarea), is 108,030 lb (49 mt).
(i) The fishing seasons are:
(A) Fishing is open May 7, 12, and 14. Any openings after May 14
will be based on available quota and announced on the NMFS hotline.
(B) If sufficient quota remains the fishery will reopen until there
is not sufficient quota for another full day of fishing and the area is
closed by the Commission. After May 14, any fishery opening will be
announced on the NMFS hotline at 800-662-9825. No halibut fishing will
be allowed after May 14 unless the date is announced on the NMFS
hotline.
(ii) The daily bag limit is one halibut of any size per day per
person.
(iii) Recreational fishing for groundfish and halibut is prohibited
within the North Coast Recreational Yelloweye Rockfish Conservation
Area (YRCA). It is unlawful for recreational fishing vessels to take
and retain, possess, or land halibut taken with recreational gear
within the North Coast Recreational YRCA. A vessel fishing with
recreational gear in the North Coast Recreational YRCA may not be in
possession of any halibut. Recreational vessels may transit through the
North Coast Recreational YRCA with or without halibut on board. The
North Coast Recreational YRCA is a C-shaped area off the northern
Washington coast intended to protect yelloweye rockfish. The North
Coast Recreational YRCA is defined in groundfish regulations at Sec.
660.70(a).
(c) The quota for landings into ports in the area between the
Queets River, WA (47[deg]31.70' N. lat.), and Leadbetter Point, WA
(46[deg]38.17' N. lat.)(South Coast subarea), is 42,739 lb (19.39 mt).
(i) This subarea is divided between the all-waters fishery (the
Washington South coast primary fishery), and the incidental nearshore
fishery in the area from 47[deg]31.70' N. lat. south to 46[deg]58.00'
N. lat. and east of a boundary line approximating the 30 fm depth
contour. This area is defined by straight lines connecting all of the
following points in the order stated as described by the following
coordinates (the Washington South coast, northern nearshore area):
(1) 47[deg]31.70' N. lat, 124[deg]37.03' W. long;
(2) 47[deg]25.67' N. lat, 124[deg]34.79' W. long;
(3) 47[deg]12.82' N. lat, 124[deg]29.12' W. long;
(4) 46[deg]58.00' N. lat, 124[deg]24.24' W. long.
The south coast subarea quota will be allocated as follows: 40,739
lb (18.48 mt) for the primary fishery and 2,000 lb (0.91 mt) for the
nearshore fishery. The primary fishery commences on May 1, and
continues 2 days a week (Sunday and Tuesday) until May 17. If the
primary quota is projected to be obtained sooner than expected, the
management closure may occur earlier. Beginning on May 29 the primary
fishery will be open at most 2 days per week (Sunday and/or Tuesday)
until the quota for the south coast subarea primary fishery is taken
and the season is closed by the Commission, or until September 30,
whichever is earlier. The fishing season in the nearshore area
commences on May 1, and continues 7 days per week. Subsequent to
closure of the primary fishery, the nearshore fishery is open 7 days
per week, until 42,739 lb (19.39 mt) is projected to be taken by the
two fisheries combined and the fishery is closed by the Commission or
September 30, whichever is earlier. If the fishery is closed prior to
September 30, and there is insufficient quota remaining to reopen the
northern nearshore area for another fishing day, then any remaining
quota may be transferred in-season to another Washington coastal
subarea by NMFS via an update to the recreational halibut hotline.
(ii) The daily bag limit is one halibut of any size per day per
person.
(iii) Seaward of the boundary line approximating the 30-fm depth
contour and during days open to the primary fishery, lingcod may be
taken, retained and possessed when allowed by groundfish regulations at
50 CFR 660.360, subpart G.
(iv) Recreational fishing for groundfish and halibut is prohibited
within the South Coast Recreational YRCA and Westport Offshore YRCA. It
is unlawful for recreational fishing vessels to take and retain,
possess, or land halibut taken with recreational gear within the South
Coast Recreational YRCA and Westport Offshore YRCA. A vessel fishing in
the South Coast Recreational YRCA and/or Westport Offshore YRCA may not
be in possession of any halibut. Recreational vessels may transit
through the South Coast Recreational YRCA and Westport Offshore YRCA
with or without halibut on board. The South Coast Recreational YRCA and
Westport Offshore YRCA are areas off the southern Washington coast
established to protect yelloweye rockfish. The South Coast Recreational
YRCA is defined at 50 CFR 660.70(d). The Westport Offshore YRCA is
defined at 50 CFR 660.70(e).
(d) The quota for landings into ports in the area between
Leadbetter Point, WA (46[deg]38.17' N. lat.), and Cape Falcon, OR
(45[deg]46.00' N. lat.) (Columbia River subarea), is 11,009 lb (4.99
mt).
(i) This subarea is divided into an all-depth fishery and a
nearshore fishery. The nearshore fishery is allocated 500 pounds of the
subarea allocation. The nearshore fishery extends from Leadbetter Point
(46[deg]38.17' N. lat., 124[deg]15.88' W. long.) to the Columbia River
(46[deg]16.00' N. lat., 124[deg]15.88' W. long.) by connecting the
following coordinates in Washington 46[deg]38.17' N. lat.,
124[deg]15.88' W. long. 46[deg]16.00' N. lat., 124[deg]15.88' W. long
and connecting to the boundary line approximating the 40 fm (73 m)
depth contour in Oregon. The nearshore fishery opens May 2, and
continues 3 days per week (Monday-Wednesday) until the nearshore
allocation is taken, or September 30, whichever is earlier. The all
depth fishing season commences on May 1, and continues 4 days a week
(Thursday-Sunday) until 10,509 lb (4.77 mt) are estimated to have been
taken and the season is closed by the Commission, or September 30,
whichever is earlier. Subsequent to this closure, if there is
insufficient quota remaining in the Columbia River subarea for another
fishing day, then any remaining quota may be transferred inseason to
another Washington and/or Oregon subarea by NMFS via an update to the
recreational halibut hotline. Any remaining quota would be transferred
to each state in proportion to its contribution.
[[Page 8469]]
(ii) The daily bag limit is one halibut of any size per day per
person.
(iii) Pacific Coast groundfish may not be taken and retained,
possessed or landed when halibut are on board the vessel, except
sablefish, Pacific cod, and flatfish species when allowed by Pacific
Coast groundfish regulations, during days open to the all depth fishery
only.
(iv) Taking, retaining, possessing, or landing halibut on
groundfish trips is only allowed in the nearshore area on days not open
to all-depth Pacific halibut fisheries.
(e) The quota for landings into ports in the area off Oregon
between Cape Falcon (45[deg]46.00' N. lat.) and Humbug Mountain
(42[deg]40.50' N. lat.) (Oregon Central Coast subarea), is 206,410 lb
(93.63 mt).
(i) The fishing seasons are:
(A) The first season (the ``inside 40-fm'' fishery) commences June
1, and continues 7 days a week, in the area shoreward of a boundary
line approximating the 40-fm (73-m) depth contour, or until the sub-
quota for the central Oregon ``inside 40-fm'' fishery of 24,769 lb
(11.24 mt), or any in-season revised subquota, is estimated to have
been taken and the season is closed by the Commission, whichever is
earlier. The boundary line approximating the 40-fm (73-m) depth contour
between 45[deg]46.00' N. lat. and 42[deg]40.50' N. lat. is defined at
Sec. 660.71(k).
(B) The second season (spring season), which is for the ``all-
depth'' fishery, is open (season dates will be inserted when final rule
is published). The allocation to the all-depth fishery is 181,641 lb
(82.4 mt). If sufficient unharvested quota remains for additional
fishing days, the season will re-open. Notice of the re-opening will be
announced on the NMFS hotline (206) 526-6667 or (800) 662-9825. No
halibut fishing will be allowed on the re-opening dates unless the date
is announced on the NMFS hotline.
(C) If sufficient unharvested quota remains, the third season
(summer season), which is for the ``all-depth'' fishery, will be open
(season dates will be inserted when final rule is published) or until
the combined spring season and summer season quotas in the area between
Cape Falcon and Humbug Mountain, OR, are estimated to have been taken
and the area is closed by the Commission, or October 31, whichever is
earlier. NMFS will announce on the NMFS hotline in July whether the
fishery will re-open for the summer season in August. No halibut
fishing will be allowed in the summer season fishery unless the dates
are announced on the NMFS hotline. Additional fishing days may be
opened if sufficient quota remains after the last day of the first
scheduled open period. If, after this date, an amount greater than or
equal to 60,000 lb (27.2 mt) remains in the combined all-depth and
inside 40-fm (73-m) quota, the fishery may re-open every Friday and
Saturday, beginning (insert date of first back up dates) and ending
October 31. If after September 7, an amount greater than or equal to
30,000 lb (13.6 mt) remains in the combined all-depth and inside 40-fm
(73-m) quota, and the fishery is not already open every Friday and
Saturday, the fishery may re-open every Friday and Saturday, beginning
September 9 and 10, and ending October 31. After September 4, the bag
limit may be increased to two fish of any size per person, per day.
NMFS will announce on the NMFS hotline whether the summer all-depth
fishery will be open on such additional fishing days, what days the
fishery will be open and what the bag limit is.
(ii) The daily bag limit is one halibut of any size per day per
person, unless otherwise specified. NMFS will announce on the NMFS
hotline any bag limit changes.
(iii) During days open to all-depth halibut fishing, no Pacific
Coast groundfish may be taken and retained, possessed or landed, when
halibut are on board the vessel, except sablefish, Pacific cod, and
flatfish species, when allowed by Pacific Coast groundfish regulations.
(iv) When the all-depth halibut fishery is closed and halibut
fishing is permitted only shoreward of a boundary line approximating
the 40-fm (73-m) depth contour, halibut possession and retention by
vessels operating seaward of a boundary line approximating the 40-fm
(73-m) depth contour is prohibited.
(v) Recreational fishing for groundfish and halibut is prohibited
within the Stonewall Bank YRCA. It is unlawful for recreational fishing
vessels to take and retain, possess, or land halibut taken with
recreational gear within the Stonewall Bank YRCA. A vessel fishing in
the Stonewall Bank YRCA may not possess any halibut. Recreational
vessels may transit through the Stonewall Bank YRCA with or without
halibut on board. The Stonewall Bank YRCA is an area off central
Oregon, near Stonewall Bank, intended to protect yelloweye rockfish.
The Stonewall Bank YRCA is defined at Sec. 660.70(f).
(f) The quota for landings into ports in the area south of Humbug
Mountain, OR (42[deg]40.50' N. lat.) to the Oregon/California Border
(42[deg]00.00' N. lat.) (Southern Oregon subarea) is 8,605 lb (3.9 mt).
(i) The fishing season commences on May 1, and continues 7 days per
week until the subquota is taken, or October 31, whichever is earlier.
(ii) The daily bag limit is one halibut per person with no size
limit.
(iii) No Pacific Coast groundfish may be taken and retained,
possessed or landed, except sablefish, Pacific cod, and flatfish
species, in areas closed to groundfish, if halibut are on board the
vessel.
(g) The quota for landings into ports south of the Oregon/
California Border (42[deg]00.00' N. lat.) and along the California
coast is 29,640 lb (13.44 mt).
(i) The fishing season will be open (season dates will be inserted
when final rule is published), or until the subarea quota is estimated
to have been taken and the season is closed by the Commission, or
October 31, whichever is earlier. NMFS will announce any closure by the
Commission on the NMFS hotline (206) 526-6667 or (800) 662-9825.
(ii) The daily bag limit is one halibut of any size per day per
person.
Classification
Regulations governing the U.S. fisheries for Pacific halibut are
developed by the IPHC, the Pacific Fishery Management Council, the
North Pacific Fishery Management Council, and the Secretary of
Commerce. Section 5 of the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982
(Halibut Act, 16 U.S.C. 773c) provides the Secretary of Commerce with
the general responsibility to carry out the Convention between Canada
and the United States for the management of Pacific halibut, including
the authority to adopt regulations as may be necessary to carry out the
purposes and objectives of the Convention and Halibut Act. This
proposed rule is consistent with the Secretary of Commerce's authority
under the Halibut Act.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 603 et seq.,
requires government agencies to assess the effects that regulatory
alternatives would have on small entities, including small businesses,
and to determine ways to minimize those effects. When an agency
proposes regulations, the RFA requires the agency to prepare and make
available for public comment an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(IRFA) that describes the impact on small businesses, non-profit
enterprises, local governments, and other small entities. The IRFA is
to aid the agency in considering all reasonable regulatory alternatives
that would minimize the
[[Page 8470]]
economic impact on affected small entities. After the public comment
period, the agency prepares a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(FRFA) that takes into consideration any new information or public
comments. A summary of the IRFA is provided below. The reasons why
action by the agency is being considered, the objectives and legal
basis for this rule are described above.
The main management objective for the Pacific halibut fishery in
Area 2A is to manage fisheries to remain within the TAC for Area 2A.
Another objective is to allow each commercial, recreational (sport),
and tribal fishery to target halibut in the manner that is appropriate
to meet both the conservation requirements for species that co-occur
with Pacific halibut. A third objective is to meet the needs of fishery
participants in particular fisheries and fishing areas.
Each year, the states of Washington, Oregon, California, and the
treaty tribes that fish for halibut meet with their fishery
participants to review halibut management under the Plan. Based on
feedback from these meetings and experience from the previous year's
fishing season, the states or the tribes may propose changes to the
Plan. Proposed changes to the Plan are intended to remedy any problems
encountered during the previous year's management, problems with other
fisheries with overlapping management jurisdiction (i.e., Pacific Coast
groundfish), or other anticipated problems.
Changes to the Plan
The 2A Halibut Catch Sharing Plan, as outlined above, allocates the
TAC at various levels. The commercial fishery is further divided into a
directed commercial fishery that is allocated 85 percent of the
commercial allocation of the Pacific halibut TAC, and the other 15
percent is allocated for incidental catch in the salmon troll fishery.
The directed commercial fishery in Area 2A is confined to southern
Washington (south of 46[deg]53.30' N. lat.), Oregon, and California.
North of 46[deg]53.30' N. lat. (Pt. Chehalis), the Plan allows for
incidental halibut retention in the sablefish primary fishery when the
overall Area 2A halibut TAC is above 900,000 lb (408.2 mt). The Plan
also divides the sport fisheries into seven geographic subareas, each
with separate allocations, seasons, and bag limits. The non-tribal
allocation is divided into four shares. At the first level, there are
specific percentage allocations for tribal and non-tribal fisheries.
The non-tribal portion is then allocated to commercial components and
to recreational components. The commercial component is then
apportioned into directed, incidental troll, and incidental sablefish
fisheries. The recreational portions for Oregon and Washington are
furthered apportioned into area subquotas, and these subquotas are
further split into seasonal or depth fisheries (nearshore vs all
depths). There may be gear restrictions and other management measures
established as necessary to minimize the potential of exceeding these
allocations.
At the September meeting, the Council adopted a range of Plan
alternatives for public review. For 2016, the Council adopted two types
of changes that are discussed separately below. The first were the
routine recreational fishery adjustments to the Plan proposed by the
states each year to accommodate the needs of their fisheries. The
second were changes to the Plan and codified regulations proposed by
NMFS which do not have alternatives, because they are either mandated
by a recent court decision or are administrative in nature. At its
November meeting, the Council made final Plan change recommendations
from the range of alternatives for the recreational fishery
adjustments; which is described in detail below.
The proposed changes to the Plan are expected to slightly increase
fishing opportunities in some areas and at some times and to slightly
decrease fishing opportunities in other areas and at other times. The
Council's recommended changes to the Plan modify the opening dates for
the sport fisheries in Washington and Oregon with the goal of extending
the seasons and increasing opportunity. The change to the tribal Usual
&Accustomed (U&A) boundaries is made to comply with a court order, and
NMFS has no discretion to do otherwise. Thus this change is not
analyzed here. The Council considered changes to the Washington North
Coast, Columbia River, Oregon Central Coast, and Southern Oregon
subareas:
(1) For the Washington North Coast the Council considered two
opening dates, the first Thursday in May or the first Saturday in
May. The Council recommended and NMFS proposes opening this fishery
on the first Saturday in May. This is a minor change that will not
reduce overall fishing opportunity in this area.
(2) For the Columbia River subarea the Council considered two
season structures, status quo (4 days per week Thursday through
Sunday) and a seven day a week fishery. The Council recommended the
status quo season structure because ODFW did not receive definitive
public support for this change and felt it was not necessary at this
time; therefore this rule does not propose changes to the Columbia
River subarea.
(3) For the Oregon Central Coast subarea the Council considered
two season allocation alternatives, status quo (12 percent
nearshore, 63 percent spring, 25 percent summer) and Alternative 1
(81.75 percent spring and summer combined, 18.25 percent nearshore).
The Council recommended the status quo season allocations because
ODFW felt given the magnitude of this change more time was needed to
allow public input; therefore this rule does not propose any change
to the Oregon Central Coast season allocations.
(4) For the Oregon Central Coast nearshore fishery the Council
considered a change to the season dates: (1) Status quo fishery
opens July 1, seven days per week until October 31; (2) fishery
opens May 1, seven days per week, until October 31; (3) fishery
opens May 1, seven days per week until October 31 or quota
attainment, with 25 percent of the nearshore fishery allocation set-
aside and available beginning July 1; and (4) fishery opens May 1,
seven days per week until October 31 or quota attainment, with 50
percent of the nearshore fishery allocation set-aside and available
beginning July 1. The Council recommended and NMFS proposes an
alternative that is within the range listed above that would open
the fishery on June 1, seven days per week, until October 31. This
is a minor change that will not reduce overall fishing opportunity
in this area.
(5) For the Southern Oregon subarea the Council considered two
incidental retention alternatives, status quo (no bottomfish species
retention outside of 30 fathoms) and Alternative 1 (allow retention
of other species of flatfish, Pacific cod, and sablefish outside 30
fathoms, when fishing for halibut) and an allocation modification
from 4 percent to 3.91 percent of the Oregon sport allocation. The
Council recommended and NMFS proposes to implement the change to the
subarea allocation and Alternative 1 with a slight modification to
describe this allowance as allowed when groundfish retention is
closed not at a specific depth. The changes to the Southern Oregon
incidentally landed species allowances are expected to increase
recreational opportunities by turning previously discarded
incidental flatfish catch into landed catch.
The Small Business Administration defines a ``small'' harvesting
business as one with annual receipts, not in excess of $20.5 million.
For related fishprocessing businesses, a small business is one that
employs 500 or fewer persons. For wholesale businesses, a small
business is one that employs not more than 100 people. For marinas and
charter/party boats, a small business is one with annual receipts, not
in excess of $7.5 million. This rule directly affects charterboat
operations, and participants in the non-treaty directed commercial
fishery off the coast of Washington, Oregon, and California. Applying
the SBA's size standard for small businesses, NMFS
[[Page 8471]]
considers all of the charterboat operations and participants in the
non-treaty directed commercial fishery affected by this action as small
businesses.
Specific data on the economics of halibut charter operations is
unavailable. However, in January 2004, the Pacific States Marine
Fisheries Commission (PSMFC) completed a report on the overall West
Coast charterboat fleet. In surveying charterboat vessels concerning
their operations in 2000, the PSMFC estimated that there were about 315
charterboat vessels in operation off Washington and Oregon. In 2000,
IPHC licensed 130 vessels to fish in the halibut sport charter fishery.
Comparing the total charterboat fleet to the 130 and 142 IPHC licenses
in 2000 and 2007, respectively, approximately 41 to 45 percent of the
charterboat fleet could participate in the halibut fishery. The PSMFC
has developed preliminary estimates of the annual revenues earned by
this fleet and they vary by size class of the vessels and home state.
Small charterboat vessels range from 15 to 30 feet and typically carry
5 to 6 passengers. Medium charterboat vessels range from 31 to 49 feet
in length and typically carry 19 to 20 passengers. (Neither state has
large vessels of greater than 49 feet in their fleet.) Average annual
revenues from all types of recreational fishing, whalewatching and
other activities ranged from $7,000 for small Oregon vessels to
$131,000 for medium Washington vessels. These data confirm that
charterboat vessels qualify as small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. This analysis continues the main conclusions developed
in previous analyses that charterboats and the non-treaty directed
commercial fishing vessels are small businesses. See 77 FR 5477 (Feb 3,
2012) and 76 FR 2876 (Jan 18, 2011). In 2015, 512 vessels were issued
IPHC licenses to retain halibut. IPHC issues licenses for: the directed
commercial fishery and the incidental fishery in the sablefish primary
fishery in Area 2A (22 licenses in 2015); incidental halibut caught in
the salmon troll fishery (363 licenses in 2015); and the charterboat
fleet (127 licenses in 2013, the most recent year available). No vessel
may participate in more than one of these three fisheries per year.
These license estimates overstate the number of vessels that
participate in the fishery. IPHC estimates that 60 vessels participated
in the directed commercial fishery, 100 vessels in the incidental
commercial (salmon) fishery, and 13 vessels in the incidental
commercial (sablefish) fishery. Although recent information on
charterboat activity is not available, prior analysis indicated that 60
percent of the IPHC charterboat license holders may be affected by
these regulations.
Commercial harvest vessels in West Coast fisheries are generally
``small businesses,'' unless they are associated with a catcher-
processor company or affiliated with a large shorebased processing
company. Catcher-processors cannot target halibut or keep halibut as
bycatch. NOAA is unaware that any ``large'' seafood processing
companies are affiliated with any of the IPHC permit holders.
The major effect of halibut management on small entities will be
from the Area 2A TAC which is set by the IPHC, an international body.
Based on the recommendations of the states, the Council and NMFS are
proposing minor changes to the Plan to provide increased recreational
and commercial opportunities under the allocations that result from the
TAC. There are no large entities involved in the halibut fisheries;
therefore, none of these changes will have a disproportionate negative
effect on small entities versus large entities. These minor proposed
changes to the Plan are not expected to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule does not contain a collection of information
requirement subject to review and approval by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
There are no projected reporting or recordkeeping requirements
associated with this action.
There are no relevant Federal rules that may duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this action.
Pursuant to Executive Order 13175, the Secretary recognizes the
sovereign status and co-manager role of Indian tribes over shared
Federal and tribal fishery resources. Section 302(b)(5) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act establishes a
seat on the Pacific Council for a representative of an Indian tribe
with federally recognized fishing rights from California, Oregon,
Washington, or Idaho.
The U.S. Government formally recognizes that the 13 Washington
Tribes have treaty rights to fish for Pacific halibut. In general
terms, the quantification of those rights is 50 percent of the
harvestable surplus of Pacific halibut available in the tribes' usual
and accustomed fishing areas (described at 50 CFR 300.64). Each of the
treaty tribes has the discretion to administer their fisheries and to
establish their own policies to achieve program objectives.
Accordingly, tribal allocations and regulations, including the proposed
changes to the Plan, have been developed in consultation with the
affected tribe(s) and, insofar as possible, with tribal consensus.
In 2014, a Biological Opinion (BiOp) was completed for the 2014-
2016 Area 2A Pacific Halibut Catch Sharing Plan. The BiOp concluded
that the continued implementation of the Plan was not likely to
adversely affect southern resident killer whales, leatherback sea
turtles, humpback whales, blue whales, fin whales, Guadalupe fur seals,
north Pacific right whales, sei whales, sperm whales, and steller sea
lions. Further the BiOp concluded that continuing implementation of the
Plan was likely to adversely affect but not likely to jeopardize Puget
Sound/Georgia basin bocaccio, canary rockfish, and yelloweye rockfish,
southern green sturgeon, lower Columbia River Chinook, and Puget Sound
Chinook. The BiOp also concluded that the continued implementation of
the Plan was not likely to adversely modify critical habitat of
southern resident killer whales, leatherback sea turtles, Puget Sound/
Georgia basin bocaccio, canary rockfish, and yelloweye rockfish,
southern green sturgeon, lower Columbia River Chinook, and Puget Sound
Chinook. Because the halibut fishery does not overlap with the critical
habitat for the remaining listed species it was determined that, an
evaluation of the effects on critical habitat was not applicable.
Finally, in a letter dated March 12, 2014, NMFS determined that fishing
activities conducted under the Plan would have no effect on eulachon.
None of the Council's recommended changes to the Plan proposed in this
rule change the determinations made in the BiOp because they do not
result in changes to fishing behavior such that the impacts to listed
species is anticipated to change. NMFS is currently conducting informal
consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding the
ongoing implementation of the Catch Sharing Plan and its effects on
short-tailed and black-footed albatross, California least tern, marbled
murrelet, bull trout, and sea otters.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 300
Administrative practice and procedure, Antarctica, Canada, Exports,
Fish, Fisheries, Fishing, Imports, Indians, Labeling, Marine resources,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Russian Federation,
Transportation, Treaties, Wildlife.
[[Page 8472]]
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 951 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16
U.S.C. 5501 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 2431 et seq., 31 U.S.C. 9701 et seq.
Dated: February 9, 2016.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 300, subpart
E, is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 300--INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES REGULATIONS
Subpart E--Pacific Halibut Fisheries
0
1. The authority citation for part 300, subpart E, continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773-773k.
0
2. In Sec. 300.61 in alphabetical order, revise the definition of
``Subarea 2A-1'' to read as follows:
Sec. 300.61 Definitions
* * * * *
Subarea 2A-1 includes all waters off the coast of Washington that
are north of the Quinault River, WA (47[deg]21.00' N. lat) and east of
125[deg]44.00' W. long; all waters off the coast of Washington that are
between the Quinault River, WA (47[deg]21.00' N. lat) and Point
Chehalis, WA (46[deg]53.30' N. lat.), and east of 125[deg]08.50' W.
long.; and all inland marine waters of Washington.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 300.63, revise paragraphs (c)(3)(ii), and (e)(1), and
remove paragraphs (f) and (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 300.63 Catch sharing plan and domestic management measures in
area 2A.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) Actual notice of inseason management actions will be provided
by a telephone hotline administered by the West Coast Region, NMFS, at
206-526-6667 or 800-662-9825. Since provisions of these regulations may
be altered by inseason actions, sport fishers should monitor the
telephone hotline for current information for the area in which they
are fishing.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) Non-treaty commercial vessels operating in the directed
commercial fishery for halibut in Area 2A are required to fish outside
of a closed area, known as the Rockfish Conservation Area (RCA), that
extends along the coast from the U.S./Canada border south to 40[deg]10'
N. lat. Between the U.S./Canada border and 46[deg]16' N. lat., the
eastern boundary of the RCA, is the shoreline. Between 46[deg]16' N.
lat. and 40[deg]10' N. lat., the RCA is defined along an eastern
boundary by a line approximating the 30-fm (55-m) depth contour.
Coordinates for the 30-fm (55-m) boundary are listed at 50 CFR
660.71(e). Between the U.S./Canada border and 40[deg]10' N. lat., the
RCA is defined along a western boundary approximating the 100-fm (183-
m) depth contour. Coordinates for the 100-fm (183-m) boundary are
listed at 50 CFR 660.73(a).
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 300.64, revise paragraph (i) to read as follows:
Sec. 300.64 Fishing by U.S. treaty Indian tribes.
(i) The following table sets forth the fishing areas of each of the
13 treaty Indian tribes fishing pursuant to this section. Within
subarea 2A-1, boundaries of a tribe's fishing area may be revised as
ordered by a Federal Court.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tribe Boundaries
------------------------------------------------------------------------
HOH.......................... The area between 47[deg]54.30' N. lat.
(Quillayute River) and 47[deg]21.00' N.
lat. (Quinault River) and east of
125[deg]44.00' W. long.
JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM.......... Those locations in the Strait of Juan de
Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or
in accordance with Final Decision No. 1
and subsequent orders in United States
v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D.
Wash., 1974), and particularly at 626 F.
Supp. 1486, to be places at which the
Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe may fish under
rights secured by treaties with the
United States.
LOWER ELWHA S'KLALLAM........ Those locations in the Strait of Juan de
Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or
in accordance with Final Decision No. 1
and subsequent orders in United States
v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D.
Wash., 1974), and particularly at 459 F.
Supp. 1049 and 1066 and 626 F. Supp.
1443, to be places at which the Lower
Elwha S'Klallam Tribe may fish under
rights secured by treaties with the
United States.
LUMMI........................ Those locations in the Strait of Juan de
Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or
in accordance with Final Decision No. 1
and subsequent orders in United States
v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D.
Wash., 1974), and particularly at 384 F.
Supp. 360, as modified in Subproceeding
No. 89-08 (W.D. Wash., February 13,
1990) (decision and order re: cross-
motions for summary judgement), to be
places at which the Lummi Tribe may fish
under rights secured by treaties with
the United States.
MAKAH........................ The area north of 48[deg]02.25' N. lat.
(Norwegian Memorial) and east of
125[deg]44.00' W. long.
NOOKSACK..................... Those locations in the Strait of Juan de
Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or
in accordance with Final Decision No. 1
and subsequent orders in United States
v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D.
Wash. 1974), and particularly at 459 F.
Supp. 1049, to be places at which the
Nooksack Tribe may fish under rights
secured by treaties with the United
States.
PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM........ Those locations in the Strait of Juan de
Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or
in accordance with Final Decision No. 1
and subsequent orders in United States
v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D.
Wash., 1974), and particularly at 626 F.
Supp. 1442, to be places at which the
Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe may fish
under rights secured by treaties with
the United States.
QUILEUTE..................... The area between 48[deg]10.00' N. lat.
(Cape Alava) and 47[deg]31.70' N. lat.
(Queets River) and east of
125[deg]44.00' W. long.
QUINAULT..................... The area between 47[deg]40.10' N. lat.
(Destruction Island) and 46[deg]53.30'
N. lat. (Point Chehalis) and east of
125[deg]08.50' W. long.
SKOKOMISH.................... Those locations in the Strait of Juan de
Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or
in accordance with Final Decision No. 1
and subsequent orders in United States
v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D.
Wash., 1974), and particularly at 384 F.
Supp. 377, to be places at which the
Skokomish Tribe may fish under rights
secured by treaties with the United
States.
[[Page 8473]]
SUQUAMISH.................... Those locations in the Strait of Juan de
Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or
in accordance with Final Decision No. 1
and subsequent orders in United States
v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D.
Wash., 1974), and particularly at 459 F.
Supp. 1049, to be places at which the
Suquamish Tribe may fish under rights
secured by treaties with the United
States.
SWINOMISH.................... Those locations in the Strait of Juan de
Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or
in accordance with Final Decision No. 1
and subsequent orders in United States
v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D.
Wash., 1974), and particularly at 459 F.
Supp. 1049, to be places at which the
Swinomish Tribe may fish under rights
secured by treaties with the United
States.
TULALIP...................... Those locations in the Strait of Juan de
Fuca and Puget Sound as determined in or
in accordance with Final Decision No. 1
and subsequent orders in United States
v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 312 (W.D.
Wash., 1974), and particularly at 626 F.
Supp. 1531-1532, to be places at which
the Tulalip Tribe may fish under rights
secured by treaties with the United
States.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2016-02991 Filed 2-18-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P