Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Mexico/Albuquerque-Bernalillo County; Infrastructure and Interstate Transport State Implementation Plan for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards, 7976-7978 [2016-03117]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
7976
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 17, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting 6 hours that will prohibit
entry within 700 yards on the surface
and 1400 underwater of vessels and
machinery being used by Navy
personnel. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:42 Feb 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191,
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T14–1096 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165. T14–1096 Safety Zone; Navy
UNDET, Apra Outer Harbor, GU.
(a) Location. The following areas,
within the Guam Captain of the Port
(COTP) Zone (See 33 CFR 3.70–15),
from the surface of the water to the
ocean floor, are safety zones:
(1) Seven-hundred-yard-radius-zone.
All surface waters bounded by a circle
with a 700-yard radius centered at 13
degrees 27 minutes 42 seconds North
Latitude and 144 degrees 38 minutes 30
seconds East Longitude, (NAD 1983).
(2) Fourteen-hundred-yard-radiuszone. All underwater areas bounded by
a circle with a 1400 yard radius
centered at 13 degrees 27 minutes 42
seconds North Latitude and 144 degrees
38 minutes 30 seconds East Longitude,
(NAD 1983).
(b) Effective period. This section is
effective from 10 a.m. through 4 p.m. on
February 19, 2016.
(c) Regulations. The general
regulations governing safety zones
contained in 33 CFR 165.23 apply. No
vessels may enter or transit safety zone
(a)(1) and no persons in the water may
enter or transit safety zone (a)(2) unless
authorized by the COTP or a designated
representative thereof.
(d) Enforcement. Any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer,
and any other COTP representative
permitted by law, may enforce these
temporary safety zones.
(e) Waiver. The COTP may waive any
of the requirements of this section for
any person, vessel, or class of vessel
upon finding that application of the
safety zone is unnecessary or
impractical for the purpose of maritime
security.
(f) Penalties. Vessels or persons
violating this rule are subject to the
penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and
50 U.S.C. 192.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: January 27, 2016.
James B. Pruett,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Guam.
[FR Doc. 2016–03224 Filed 2–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0431; FRL–9942–29–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; New Mexico/
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County;
Infrastructure and Interstate Transport
State Implementation Plan for the 2010
Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air
Quality Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission
from the Governor of New Mexico for
the City of Albuquerque-Bernalillo
County for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide
(SO2) National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS). The submittal
addresses how the existing SIP provides
for implementation, maintenance, and
enforcement of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS
(infrastructure SIP or i-SIP). This i-SIP
ensures that the State’s SIP for
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County is
adequate to meet the state’s
responsibilities under the Federal Clean
Air Act (CAA or Act), including the four
CAA requirements for interstate
transport of SO2 emissions.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
March 18, 2016.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0431. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17FER1.SGM
17FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 17, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tracie Donaldson, 214–665–6633,
donaldon.tracie@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ means the EPA.
I. Background
The background for this action is
discussed in detail in our November 12,
2015 Proposal (80 FR 69925). In that
notice, we proposed that the
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County New
Mexico i-SIP submittal for the 2010 SO2
NAAQS met the requirements for an iSIP, including the requirements for
interstate transport of SO2 emissions.
Our Proposal and the technical support
documents (TSDs) that accompanied the
proposed rule provide detailed
descriptions of the revisions and the
rationale for our proposed decisions.
Please see the docket for these and other
documents regarding our Proposal. The
public comment period for our Proposal
closed on December 14, 2015.
II. Comment Received
We received one comment, which is
posted in the docket, but is not relevant
to the subject of this rulemaking.
III. Final Action
We are approving the June 11, 2015 iSIP submission from AlbuquerqueBernalillo County New Mexico, which
address the requirements of CAA
sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as applicable
to the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. Specifically,
we are approving the following
infrastructure elements: 110(a)(2)(A),
(B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L),
and (M). We are also approving the New
Mexico-Albuquerque-Bernalillo County
demonstration as it meets the four
statutory requirements for interstate
transport of SO2 emissions.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:42 Feb 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, described in
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7977
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by April 18, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposed of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide (SO2).
Dated: February 4, 2016.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart GG—New Mexico
2. The second table in § 52.1620(e)
entitled ‘‘EPA Approved Nonregulatory
Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory
Measures in the New Mexico SIP’’ is
amended by adding a new entry at the
end of the table ‘‘Infrastructure and
Interstate Transport for the 2010 SO2
NAAQS’’.
The addition reads as follows:
■
§ 52.1620
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
E:\FR\FM\17FER1.SGM
17FER1
*
*
7978
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 31 / Wednesday, February 17, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
EPA APPROVED NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE NEW MEXICO SIP
Applicable geographic
or nonattainment area
Name of SIP provision
State
submittal/
effective date
*
*
*
*
Infrastructure and Interstate Transport for the Albuquerque-Bernalillo
2010 SO2 NAAQS.
County.
[FR Doc. 2016–03117 Filed 2–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2016–0045; FRL–9942–37–
Region 7]
Approval of Iowa’s Air Quality
Implementation Plans; Polk County
Board of Health Rules and
Regulations, Chapter V, Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving revisions to
the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for
the State of Iowa. The purpose of these
revisions is to update the Polk County
Board of Health Rules and Regulations,
Chapter V, Air Pollution. The revisions
reflect updates to the Iowa statewide
rules previously approved by EPA and
will ensure consistency between the
applicable local agency rules and
Federally-approved rules.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective April 18, 2016, without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
comment by March 18, 2016. If EPA
receives adverse comment, we will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2016–0045, to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:42 Feb 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
*
*
6/11/2015 2/17/16 [Insert FR page
number where document begins].
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e. on the Web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather Hamilton, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
(913) 551–7039, or by email at
hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section
provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
III. What action is EPA taking?
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
The State of Iowa has requested EPA
approval of revisions to the local
agency’s rules and regulations, Chapter
V, Air Pollution, as a revision to the SIP.
In order for the local program’s Air
Pollution rules to be incorporated into
the Federally-enforceable SIP, on behalf
of the local agency, the state must
submit the formally adopted regulations
and control strategies, which are
consistent with the state and Federal
requirements, to EPA for inclusion in
the SIP. The regulation adoption process
generally includes public notice, a
public comment period and a public
hearing, and formal adoption of the rule
by the state authorized rulemaking
body. In this case, that rulemaking body
is the local agency. After the local
agency formally adopts the rule, the
local agency submits the rulemaking to
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
EPA approval date
Explanation
*
the state, and then the state submits the
rulemaking to EPA for consideration for
formal action (inclusion of the
rulemaking into the SIP). EPA must
provide public notice and seek
additional public comment regarding
the proposed Federal action on the
state’s submission.
EPA received the request from the
state to adopt revisions to the local air
agency rules into the SIP on December
8, 2015. The revisions were adopted by
the local agency on October 6, 2015, and
became effective on October 12, 2015.
EPA is approving the requested
revisions to the Iowa SIP relating to the
following:
• Article I. In General, Section 5–1.
Purpose and Ambient Air Quality
Standards;
• Article I. In General, Section 5–2.
Definitions;
• Article X. Permits, Division 1.
Construction Permits, Section 5–33.
Exemptions from Permit Requirements;
• Article X. Permits, Division 2.
Operating Permits, Section 5–39.
Exemptions from Permit Requirement.
EPA’s action does not cover revisions to:
• Article VI. Emission of Air
Contaminants from Industrial Processes,
New Source Performance Standards,
Section 5–16(n),
• Article VIII. National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Source Categories, Section 5–16(p),
and,
• Article VIII. National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Source Categories, Section 5–20.
EPA is also approving the definition
of Maximum Achievable Control
Technology that was inadvertently
omitted from the January 12, 2015,
Federal Register notice that approved
the September 2013 revisions to the
Polk County Board of Health Rules and
Regulations, Chapter V, Air Pollution.
80 FR 1471.
II. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
E:\FR\FM\17FER1.SGM
17FER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 17, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7976-7978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03117]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0431; FRL-9942-29-Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Mexico/
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County; Infrastructure and Interstate Transport
State Implementation Plan for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient
Air Quality Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from the Governor of New Mexico
for the City of Albuquerque-Bernalillo County for the 2010 Sulfur
Dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS). The submittal addresses how the existing SIP provides for
implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the 2010 SO2
NAAQS (infrastructure SIP or i-SIP). This i-SIP ensures that the
State's SIP for Albuquerque-Bernalillo County is adequate to meet the
state's responsibilities under the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or Act),
including the four CAA requirements for interstate transport of
SO2 emissions.
DATES: This final rule is effective on March 18, 2016.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0431. All documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not
placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733.
[[Page 7977]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tracie Donaldson, 214-665-6633,
donaldon.tracie@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' means the EPA.
I. Background
The background for this action is discussed in detail in our
November 12, 2015 Proposal (80 FR 69925). In that notice, we proposed
that the Albuquerque-Bernalillo County New Mexico i-SIP submittal for
the 2010 SO2 NAAQS met the requirements for an i-SIP,
including the requirements for interstate transport of SO2
emissions. Our Proposal and the technical support documents (TSDs) that
accompanied the proposed rule provide detailed descriptions of the
revisions and the rationale for our proposed decisions. Please see the
docket for these and other documents regarding our Proposal. The public
comment period for our Proposal closed on December 14, 2015.
II. Comment Received
We received one comment, which is posted in the docket, but is not
relevant to the subject of this rulemaking.
III. Final Action
We are approving the June 11, 2015 i-SIP submission from
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County New Mexico, which address the
requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as applicable to the
2010 SO2 NAAQS. Specifically, we are approving the following
infrastructure elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G),
(H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We are also approving the New Mexico-
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County demonstration as it meets the four
statutory requirements for interstate transport of SO2
emissions.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by April 18, 2016. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposed of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide (SO2).
Dated: February 4, 2016.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart GG--New Mexico
0
2. The second table in Sec. 52.1620(e) entitled ``EPA Approved
Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the New
Mexico SIP'' is amended by adding a new entry at the end of the table
``Infrastructure and Interstate Transport for the 2010 SO2
NAAQS''.
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 52.1620 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
[[Page 7978]]
EPA Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the New Mexico SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable
geographic or State EPA approval
Name of SIP provision nonattainment submittal/ date Explanation
area effective date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Infrastructure and Interstate Albuquerque- 6/11/2015 2/17/16 [Insert ...........................
Transport for the 2010 SO2 Bernalillo FR page number
NAAQS. County. where document
begins].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2016-03117 Filed 2-16-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
