Notice Establishing Post-Technical Conference Comments, 7781 [2016-03018]

Download as PDF 7781 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2016 / Notices Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: Rate Schedule No. 274—Planning Participation Agreement to be effective 4/9/2016. Filed Date: 2/8/16. Accession Number: 20160208–5160. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/29/16. Docket Numbers: ER16–913–000. Applicants: NextEra Energy Transmission West, LLC. Description: Compliance filing: NextEra Energy Transmission West, LLC Compliance Filing-2 to be effective 10/20/2015. Filed Date: 2/8/16. Accession Number: 20160208–5170. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/29/16. Docket Numbers: ER16–914–000. Applicants: Axpo U.S. LLC. Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Axpo U.S. LLC Application for Market- Based Rate Authorization to be effective 4/5/2016. Filed Date: 2/4/16. Accession Number: 20160204–5238. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/25/16. The filings are accessible in the Commission’s eLibrary system by clicking on the links or querying the docket number. Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding. eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/ docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Dated: February 9, 2016. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016–03017 Filed 2–12–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Notice Establishing Post-Technical Conference Comments Docket Nos. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C .......................................................................................................................................................... mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C ...................................................................... Linden VFT, LLC v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C ......................................................................................................................... Delaware Public Service Commission and Maryland Public Service Commission v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C .................... PJM Interconnection, L.L.C .......................................................................................................................................................... PJM Interconnection, L.L.C .......................................................................................................................................................... In an order dated November 24, 2015,1 the Commission found that the assignment of cost allocation for the projects in the filings and complaints listed in the caption using PJM’s solution-based distribution factor (DFAX) cost allocation method had not been shown to be just and reasonable and may be unjust, unreasonable, or unduly discriminatory or preferential. The Commission directed its staff to establish a technical conference to explore both whether there is a definable category of reliability projects within PJM for which the solution-based DFAX cost allocation method may not be just and reasonable, such as projects addressing reliability violations that are not related to flow on the planned transmission facility, and whether an alternative just and reasonable ex ante cost allocation method could be established for any such category of projects. The technical conference was held on January 12, 2016. At the technical conference, staff indicated that it would establish a schedule for post-technical conference comments after reviewing the technical conference transcript. A revised technical conference transcript 1 PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., et al., 153 FERC ¶ 61,245 (2015) (November 2015 Order). VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:15 Feb 12, 2016 Jkt 238001 was placed in the above-referenced dockets on February 9, 2016. Post-technical conference comments, not to exceed 20 pages, are due on or before March 1, 2016. For more information about this technical conference, please contact PJMDFAXconfDL@ferc.gov; or Sarah McKinley, 202–502–8368, sarah.mckinley@ferc.gov, regarding logistical issues. Dated: February 9, 2016. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016–03018 Filed 2–12–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. RM98–1–000] Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public Notice This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications. Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ER15–2562–000 ER15–2563–000. EL15–18–001. EL15–67–000. EL15–95–000. ER14–972–003. ER14–1485–005 Not Consolidated. off-the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any oral communication. Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional file associated with, but not a part of, the decisional record of the proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited communication and any responses thereto should become a part of the decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication, and may request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant such a request only when it determines that fairness so requires. Any person identified below as having made a prohibited off-the-record communication shall serve the document on all parties listed on the official service list for the applicable proceeding in accordance with Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010. E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM 16FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 7781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03018]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice Establishing Post-Technical Conference Comments

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C............  ER15-2562-000
                                        ER15-2563-000.
Consolidated Edison Company of New      EL15-18-001.
 York, Inc. v. PJM Interconnection,
 L.L.C.
Linden VFT, LLC v. PJM                  EL15-67-000.
 Interconnection, L.L.C.
Delaware Public Service Commission and  EL15-95-000.
 Maryland Public Service Commission v.
 PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C............  ER14-972-003.
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C............  ER14-1485-005
                                        Not Consolidated.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In an order dated November 24, 2015,\1\ the Commission found that 
the assignment of cost allocation for the projects in the filings and 
complaints listed in the caption using PJM's solution-based 
distribution factor (DFAX) cost allocation method had not been shown to 
be just and reasonable and may be unjust, unreasonable, or unduly 
discriminatory or preferential. The Commission directed its staff to 
establish a technical conference to explore both whether there is a 
definable category of reliability projects within PJM for which the 
solution-based DFAX cost allocation method may not be just and 
reasonable, such as projects addressing reliability violations that are 
not related to flow on the planned transmission facility, and whether 
an alternative just and reasonable ex ante cost allocation method could 
be established for any such category of projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., et al., 153 FERC ] 61,245 
(2015) (November 2015 Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The technical conference was held on January 12, 2016. At the 
technical conference, staff indicated that it would establish a 
schedule for post-technical conference comments after reviewing the 
technical conference transcript. A revised technical conference 
transcript was placed in the above-referenced dockets on February 9, 
2016.
    Post-technical conference comments, not to exceed 20 pages, are due 
on or before March 1, 2016.
    For more information about this technical conference, please 
contact PJMDFAXconfDL@ferc.gov; or Sarah McKinley, 202-502-8368, 
sarah.mckinley@ferc.gov, regarding logistical issues.

    Dated: February 9, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-03018 Filed 2-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P