Notice Establishing Post-Technical Conference Comments, 7781 [2016-03018]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
7781
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2016 / Notices
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: Rate
Schedule No. 274—Planning
Participation Agreement to be effective
4/9/2016.
Filed Date: 2/8/16.
Accession Number: 20160208–5160.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/29/16.
Docket Numbers: ER16–913–000.
Applicants: NextEra Energy
Transmission West, LLC.
Description: Compliance filing:
NextEra Energy Transmission West, LLC
Compliance Filing-2 to be effective
10/20/2015.
Filed Date: 2/8/16.
Accession Number: 20160208–5170.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/29/16.
Docket Numbers: ER16–914–000.
Applicants: Axpo U.S. LLC.
Description: Baseline eTariff Filing:
Axpo U.S. LLC Application for Market-
Based Rate Authorization to be effective
4/5/2016.
Filed Date: 2/4/16.
Accession Number: 20160204–5238.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/25/16.
The filings are accessible in the
Commission’s eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the
docket number.
Any person desiring to intervene or
protest in any of the above proceedings
must file in accordance with Rules 211
and 214 of the Commission’s
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date.
Protests may be considered, but
intervention is necessary to become a
party to the proceeding.
eFiling is encouraged. More detailed
information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests,
service, and qualifying facilities filings
can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/
docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For
other information, call (866) 208–3676
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.
Dated: February 9, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–03017 Filed 2–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Notice Establishing Post-Technical
Conference Comments
Docket Nos.
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C ..........................................................................................................................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C ......................................................................
Linden VFT, LLC v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C .........................................................................................................................
Delaware Public Service Commission and Maryland Public Service Commission v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C ....................
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C ..........................................................................................................................................................
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C ..........................................................................................................................................................
In an order dated November 24,
2015,1 the Commission found that the
assignment of cost allocation for the
projects in the filings and complaints
listed in the caption using PJM’s
solution-based distribution factor
(DFAX) cost allocation method had not
been shown to be just and reasonable
and may be unjust, unreasonable, or
unduly discriminatory or preferential.
The Commission directed its staff to
establish a technical conference to
explore both whether there is a
definable category of reliability projects
within PJM for which the solution-based
DFAX cost allocation method may not
be just and reasonable, such as projects
addressing reliability violations that are
not related to flow on the planned
transmission facility, and whether an
alternative just and reasonable ex ante
cost allocation method could be
established for any such category of
projects.
The technical conference was held on
January 12, 2016. At the technical
conference, staff indicated that it would
establish a schedule for post-technical
conference comments after reviewing
the technical conference transcript. A
revised technical conference transcript
1 PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., et al., 153 FERC
¶ 61,245 (2015) (November 2015 Order).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:15 Feb 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
was placed in the above-referenced
dockets on February 9, 2016.
Post-technical conference comments,
not to exceed 20 pages, are due on or
before March 1, 2016.
For more information about this
technical conference, please contact
PJMDFAXconfDL@ferc.gov; or Sarah
McKinley, 202–502–8368,
sarah.mckinley@ferc.gov, regarding
logistical issues.
Dated: February 9, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–03018 Filed 2–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. RM98–1–000]
Records Governing Off-the-Record
Communications; Public Notice
This constitutes notice, in accordance
with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of the receipt
of prohibited and exempt off-the-record
communications.
Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222,
September 22, 1999) requires
Commission decisional employees, who
make or receive a prohibited or exempt
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ER15–2562–000
ER15–2563–000.
EL15–18–001.
EL15–67–000.
EL15–95–000.
ER14–972–003.
ER14–1485–005
Not Consolidated.
off-the-record communication relevant
to the merits of a contested proceeding,
to deliver to the Secretary of the
Commission, a copy of the
communication, if written, or a
summary of the substance of any oral
communication.
Prohibited communications are
included in a public, non-decisional file
associated with, but not a part of, the
decisional record of the proceeding.
Unless the Commission determines that
the prohibited communication and any
responses thereto should become a part
of the decisional record, the prohibited
off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in
reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to
respond to any facts or contentions
made in a prohibited off-the-record
communication, and may request that
the Commission place the prohibited
communication and responses thereto
in the decisional record. The
Commission will grant such a request
only when it determines that fairness so
requires. Any person identified below as
having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the
document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable
proceeding in accordance with Rule
2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM
16FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 7781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03018]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Notice Establishing Post-Technical Conference Comments
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C............ ER15-2562-000
ER15-2563-000.
Consolidated Edison Company of New EL15-18-001.
York, Inc. v. PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
Linden VFT, LLC v. PJM EL15-67-000.
Interconnection, L.L.C.
Delaware Public Service Commission and EL15-95-000.
Maryland Public Service Commission v.
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C............ ER14-972-003.
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C............ ER14-1485-005
Not Consolidated.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In an order dated November 24, 2015,\1\ the Commission found that
the assignment of cost allocation for the projects in the filings and
complaints listed in the caption using PJM's solution-based
distribution factor (DFAX) cost allocation method had not been shown to
be just and reasonable and may be unjust, unreasonable, or unduly
discriminatory or preferential. The Commission directed its staff to
establish a technical conference to explore both whether there is a
definable category of reliability projects within PJM for which the
solution-based DFAX cost allocation method may not be just and
reasonable, such as projects addressing reliability violations that are
not related to flow on the planned transmission facility, and whether
an alternative just and reasonable ex ante cost allocation method could
be established for any such category of projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., et al., 153 FERC ] 61,245
(2015) (November 2015 Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The technical conference was held on January 12, 2016. At the
technical conference, staff indicated that it would establish a
schedule for post-technical conference comments after reviewing the
technical conference transcript. A revised technical conference
transcript was placed in the above-referenced dockets on February 9,
2016.
Post-technical conference comments, not to exceed 20 pages, are due
on or before March 1, 2016.
For more information about this technical conference, please
contact PJMDFAXconfDL@ferc.gov; or Sarah McKinley, 202-502-8368,
sarah.mckinley@ferc.gov, regarding logistical issues.
Dated: February 9, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-03018 Filed 2-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
