Approval of Regional Haze BART Alternative Measure: Washington, 7710-7712 [2016-02953]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
7710
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
§ 52.820
*
Subpart Q—Iowa
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
2. Amend § 52.820(c) by revising entry
567–21.1 to read as follows:
■
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
EPA-APPROVED IOWA REGULATIONS
Iowa citation
State effective
date
Title
EPA Approval date
Explanation
Iowa Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Commission [567]
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 21—Compliance
567–21.1 ...........................
*
*
*
Compliance Schedule .................................................
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–02957 Filed 2–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0398; FRL–9942–15–
Region 10]
Approval of Regional Haze BART
Alternative Measure: Washington
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Feb 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
*
All documents in the docket are listed
on the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information may not be publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and is publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available
at https://www.regulations.gov or at EPA
Region 10, Office of Air, Waste and
Toxics, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle,
Washington 98101. The EPA requests
that you contact the person listed in the
section to schedule your inspection. The
Regional Office’s official hours of
business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information please contact John Chi at
(206) 553–1185, or chi.john@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
II. Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
I. Background Information
On May 14, 2015, Washington
submitted the BART alternative measure
and the EPA proposed to approve it on
November 16, 2015 (80 FR 70718). An
explanation of the CAA requirements, a
detailed analysis of the submittal, and
the EPA’s reasons for approval were
provided in the notice of proposed
rulemaking, and will not be restated
here. The public comment period for
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
02/16/16 and [Insert Federal Register citation].
*
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve the Best Available Retrofit
Technology (BART) alternative measure
for the BP Cherry Point Refinery located
near Ferndale, Washington. The BART
alternative measure increases the oxides
of nitrogen (NOX) emission limit from
the R–1 HC Reactor Heater (R–1 Heater),
a BART-eligible source currently subject
to BART emission limits on NOX. To
offset the increase in NOX emissions
from this emission unit, the NOX
emission limits on the 1st Stage
Hydrocracker Fractionator Reboiler (R–
1 Reboiler), also a BART-eligible source
subject to BART emission limits on
NOX, will be reduced. The net effect of
these changes is a decrease of 10.4 tons
per year (tpy) of allowable NOX
emissions from sources subject to BART
at the BP Cherry Point Refinery.
DATES: This final rule is effective March
17, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0398.
SUMMARY:
10/15/08
Sfmt 4700
*
*
this proposed rule ended on December
16, 2015. The EPA received one
comment in support of this action and
no adverse comments.
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving the BART
alternative measure for the BP Cherry
Point Refinery located near Ferndale,
Washington by incorporating by
reference the conditions of Revision 2
identified below. The EPA is removing
the BP Cherry Point Refinery, BART
Compliance Order No. 7836 currently in
the Federally approved SIP at 40 CFR
52.2470(d) and replacing it with
provisions of the BP Cherry Point
Refinery, BART Compliance Order No.
7836 Revision 2. The EPA is also
approving new Condition 9 of the BART
Compliance Order 7836 Revision 2
relating to decommissioned units. The
conditions of the BP BART Compliance
Order Revision 2 that are proposed for
incorporation by reference are:
Condition 1: 1.1, 1.1.1, 1.2, 1.2.1,
1.2.2;
Condition 2: 2.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3,
2.1.4, 2.1.5, 2.2, 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.3, 2.3.1,
2.3.2, 2.4, 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.2.1, 2.5, 2.5.1,
2.5.1.1, 2.5.1.2, 2.5.2, 2.5.3, 2.5.4, 2.6,
2.6.1, 2.6.2, 2.6.3, 2.7, 2.7.1, 2.7.2, 2.7.3,
2.7.4, 2.8, 2.8.1, 2.8.2,2.8.3, 2.8.4, 2.8.5,
2.8.6;
Condition 3, 3.1, 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2,
3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4;
Condition 4, 4.1, 4.1.1, 4.1.1.1, 4.1.1.2,
4.1.1.3, 4.1.1.4;
Condition 5, 5.1, 5.2;
Condition 6, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3;
Condition 7; and
Condition 9.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In accordance with requirements of 1
CFR 51.5, the EPA is revising our
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
incorporation by reference located in 40
CFR 52.2470(d)—‘‘EPA-Approved State
Source-Specific Requirements’’ to
reflect the approval of the BART
alternative measure for the BP Cherry
Point Refinery and the provision
relating to decommissioned units. Due
to the fact that the conditions in the
original BART Order were renumbered
in Revision 1, which was not submitted
as a SIP revision, the EPA is removing
the original IBR entry for ‘‘BP Cherry
Point Refinery’’ in its entirety and
incorporating in its place the specified
conditions of Revision 2 included in the
docket for this action. The end result is
that all of the conditions in the Original
BART order remain in the SIP (but with
different numbers) except as discussed
in the notice of the proposed
rulemaking with respect to the BART
alternative measure and the addition of
Condition 9. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents
generally available electronically
through www.regulations.gov and/or in
hard copy at the appropriate EPA office
(see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble for more information).
IV. Statutory and Executive Orders
Review
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under Executive
Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993)
and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.);
• is certified as not having a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Feb 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
7711
small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded mandate
or significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law
104–4);
• does not have Federalism implications as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or safety
risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of Section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because this action does not involve
technical standards; and
• does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human health
or environmental effects, using practicable
and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February
16, 1994).
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by April 18, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section
307(b)(2).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land in
Washington except as specifically noted
below and is also not approved to apply
in any other area where the EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
Dated: January 27, 2016.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart WW—Washington
2. In § 52.2470:
a. In paragraph (d), the table is
amended by revising the entry for ‘‘BP
Cherry Point Refinery.’’
■ b. In paragraph (e), table 2 is amended
by adding an entry entitled ‘‘Regional
Haze State Implementation Plan—BP
Cherry Point Refinery BART Revision’’
to the end of the table.
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
§ 52.2470
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(d) * * *
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
*
*
7712
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED STATE OF WASHINGTON SOURCE-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
Name of source
*
BP Cherry Point Refinery.
*
State effective
date
Order/Permit number
*
*
Administrative Order
No. 7836, Revision 2.
*
5/13/15
*
EPA approval date
Explanation
*
*
2/16/16 [Insert Federal
Register citation].
*
*
The following conditions: 1.1, 1.1.1, 1.2, 1.2.1,
1.2.2, 2.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.1.4, 2.1.5,
2.2, 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.3, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, 2.4, 2.4.1,
2.4.2, 2.4.2.1, 2.5, 2.5.1, 2.5.1.1, 2.5.1.2,
2.5.2, 2.5.3, 2.5.4, 2.6, 2.6.1, 2.6.2, 2.6.3,
2.7, 2.7.1, 2.7.2, 2.7.3, 2.7.4, 2.8, 2.8.1,
2.8.2,2.8.3, 2.8.4, 2.8.5, 2.8.6, 3, 3.1, 3.1.1,
3.1.2, 3.2, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 4, 4.1,
4.1.1, 4.1.1.1, 4.1.1.2, 4.1.1.3, 4.1.1.4, 5, 5.1,
5.2, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 7, 9
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
TABLE 2—ATTAINMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND OTHER PLANS
Name of SIP provision
*
Regional Haze State Implementation Plan—BP
Cherry Point Refinery
BART Revision.
Applicable geographic or nonattainment area
*
*
*
Statewide ....................................................................
[FR Doc. 2016–02953 Filed 2–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 64
[Docket ID FEMA–2015–0001; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–8419]
Suspension of Community Eligibility
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule identifies
communities where the sale of flood
insurance has been authorized under
the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP) that are scheduled for
suspension on the effective dates listed
within this rule because of
noncompliance with the floodplain
management requirements of the
program. If the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) receives
documentation that the community has
adopted the required floodplain
management measures prior to the
effective suspension date given in this
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Feb 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
State submittal
date
EPA approval date
*
5/14/15
*
2/16/16 [Insert Federal
Register citation].
rule, the suspension will not occur and
a notice of this will be provided by
publication in the Federal Register on a
subsequent date. Also, information
identifying the current participation
status of a community can be obtained
from FEMA’s Community Status Book
(CSB). The CSB is available at https://
www.fema.gov/fema/csb.shtm.
DATES: The effective date of each
community’s scheduled suspension is
the third date (‘‘Susp.’’) listed in the
third column of the following tables.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you want to determine whether a
particular community was suspended
on the suspension date or for further
information, contact Patricia Suber,
Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administration, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NFIP
enables property owners to purchase
Federal flood insurance that is not
otherwise generally available from
private insurers. In return, communities
agree to adopt and administer local
floodplain management measures aimed
at protecting lives and new construction
from future flooding. Section 1315 of
the National Flood Insurance Act of
1968, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4022,
prohibits the sale of NFIP flood
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Comments
*
insurance unless an appropriate public
body adopts adequate floodplain
management measures with effective
enforcement measures. The
communities listed in this document no
longer meet that statutory requirement
for compliance with program
regulations, 44 CFR part 59.
Accordingly, the communities will be
suspended on the effective date in the
third column. As of that date, flood
insurance will no longer be available in
the community. We recognize that some
of these communities may adopt and
submit the required documentation of
legally enforceable floodplain
management measures after this rule is
published but prior to the actual
suspension date. These communities
will not be suspended and will continue
to be eligible for the sale of NFIP flood
insurance. A notice withdrawing the
suspension of such communities will be
published in the Federal Register.
In addition, FEMA publishes a Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that
identifies the Special Flood Hazard
Areas (SFHAs) in these communities.
The date of the FIRM, if one has been
published, is indicated in the fourth
column of the table. No direct Federal
financial assistance (except assistance
pursuant to the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act not in connection with a
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 16, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7710-7712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02953]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2015-0398; FRL-9942-15-Region 10]
Approval of Regional Haze BART Alternative Measure: Washington
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve the Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART)
alternative measure for the BP Cherry Point Refinery located near
Ferndale, Washington. The BART alternative measure increases the oxides
of nitrogen (NOX) emission limit from the R-1 HC Reactor
Heater (R-1 Heater), a BART-eligible source currently subject to BART
emission limits on NOX. To offset the increase in
NOX emissions from this emission unit, the NOX
emission limits on the 1st Stage Hydrocracker Fractionator Reboiler (R-
1 Reboiler), also a BART-eligible source subject to BART emission
limits on NOX, will be reduced. The net effect of these
changes is a decrease of 10.4 tons per year (tpy) of allowable
NOX emissions from sources subject to BART at the BP Cherry
Point Refinery.
DATES: This final rule is effective March 17, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-EPA-R10-OAR-2015-0398. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed
in the index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information the disclosure
of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and is publicly
available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials
are available at https://www.regulations.gov or at EPA Region 10, Office
of Air, Waste and Toxics, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101.
The EPA requests that you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to
4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information please contact John
Chi at (206) 553-1185, or chi.john@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
II. Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
I. Background Information
On May 14, 2015, Washington submitted the BART alternative measure
and the EPA proposed to approve it on November 16, 2015 (80 FR 70718).
An explanation of the CAA requirements, a detailed analysis of the
submittal, and the EPA's reasons for approval were provided in the
notice of proposed rulemaking, and will not be restated here. The
public comment period for this proposed rule ended on December 16,
2015. The EPA received one comment in support of this action and no
adverse comments.
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving the BART alternative measure for the BP Cherry
Point Refinery located near Ferndale, Washington by incorporating by
reference the conditions of Revision 2 identified below. The EPA is
removing the BP Cherry Point Refinery, BART Compliance Order No. 7836
currently in the Federally approved SIP at 40 CFR 52.2470(d) and
replacing it with provisions of the BP Cherry Point Refinery, BART
Compliance Order No. 7836 Revision 2. The EPA is also approving new
Condition 9 of the BART Compliance Order 7836 Revision 2 relating to
decommissioned units. The conditions of the BP BART Compliance Order
Revision 2 that are proposed for incorporation by reference are:
Condition 1: 1.1, 1.1.1, 1.2, 1.2.1, 1.2.2;
Condition 2: 2.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.1.4, 2.1.5, 2.2, 2.2.1,
2.2.2, 2.3, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, 2.4, 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.2.1, 2.5, 2.5.1,
2.5.1.1, 2.5.1.2, 2.5.2, 2.5.3, 2.5.4, 2.6, 2.6.1, 2.6.2, 2.6.3, 2.7,
2.7.1, 2.7.2, 2.7.3, 2.7.4, 2.8, 2.8.1, 2.8.2,2.8.3, 2.8.4, 2.8.5,
2.8.6;
Condition 3, 3.1, 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2, 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4;
Condition 4, 4.1, 4.1.1, 4.1.1.1, 4.1.1.2, 4.1.1.3, 4.1.1.4;
Condition 5, 5.1, 5.2;
Condition 6, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3;
Condition 7; and
Condition 9.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is revising
our
[[Page 7711]]
incorporation by reference located in 40 CFR 52.2470(d)--``EPA-Approved
State Source-Specific Requirements'' to reflect the approval of the
BART alternative measure for the BP Cherry Point Refinery and the
provision relating to decommissioned units. Due to the fact that the
conditions in the original BART Order were renumbered in Revision 1,
which was not submitted as a SIP revision, the EPA is removing the
original IBR entry for ``BP Cherry Point Refinery'' in its entirety and
incorporating in its place the specified conditions of Revision 2
included in the docket for this action. The end result is that all of
the conditions in the Original BART order remain in the SIP (but with
different numbers) except as discussed in the notice of the proposed
rulemaking with respect to the BART alternative measure and the
addition of Condition 9. The EPA has made, and will continue to make,
these documents generally available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office
(see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information).
IV. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January
21, 2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly
or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action
based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62
FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) because this action does not involve technical standards;
and
does not provide the EPA with the discretionary
authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health
or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land in
Washington except as specifically noted below and is also not approved
to apply in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by April 18, 2016. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: January 27, 2016.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart WW--Washington
0
2. In Sec. 52.2470:
0
a. In paragraph (d), the table is amended by revising the entry for
``BP Cherry Point Refinery.''
0
b. In paragraph (e), table 2 is amended by adding an entry entitled
``Regional Haze State Implementation Plan--BP Cherry Point Refinery
BART Revision'' to the end of the table.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 52.2470 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
[[Page 7712]]
EPA-Approved State of Washington Source-Specific Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order/Permit State
Name of source number effective date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
BP Cherry Point Refinery....... Administrative 5/13/15 2/16/16 [Insert The following
Order No. 7836, Federal Register conditions: 1.1,
Revision 2. citation]. 1.1.1, 1.2, 1.2.1,
1.2.2, 2.1, 2.1.1,
2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.1.4,
2.1.5, 2.2, 2.2.1,
2.2.2, 2.3, 2.3.1,
2.3.2, 2.4, 2.4.1,
2.4.2, 2.4.2.1, 2.5,
2.5.1, 2.5.1.1,
2.5.1.2, 2.5.2, 2.5.3,
2.5.4, 2.6, 2.6.1,
2.6.2, 2.6.3, 2.7,
2.7.1, 2.7.2, 2.7.3,
2.7.4, 2.8, 2.8.1,
2.8.2,2.8.3, 2.8.4,
2.8.5, 2.8.6, 3, 3.1,
3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.2,
3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3,
3.2.4, 4, 4.1, 4.1.1,
4.1.1.1, 4.1.1.2,
4.1.1.3, 4.1.1.4, 5,
5.1, 5.2, 6, 6.1, 6.2,
6.3, 7, 9
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) * * *
Table 2--Attainment, Maintenance, and Other Plans
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable geographic State
Name of SIP provision or nonattainment area submittal date EPA approval date Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Regional Haze State Statewide.............. 5/14/15 2/16/16 [Insert ...................
Implementation Plan--BP Cherry Federal Register
Point Refinery BART Revision. citation].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2016-02953 Filed 2-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
