Special Local Regulation; Chesapeake Bay, Between Sandy Point and Kent Island, MD, 7481-7483 [2016-02814]
Download as PDF
7481
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 29
Friday, February 12, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2015–1126]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Chesapeake
Bay, Between Sandy Point and Kent
Island, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish special local regulations for
certain waters of the Chesapeake Bay.
This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on these navigable
waters located between Sandy Point,
Anne Arundel County, MD and Kent
Island, Queen Anne’s County, MD,
during a paddling event on May 14,
2016. This proposed rulemaking would
prohibit persons and vessels from being
in the regulated area unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port Baltimore or
Coast Guard Patrol Commander. We
invite your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before March 14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2015–1126 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald
Houck, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore, MD; telephone 410–576–
2674, email Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
Coast Guard
ACTION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
17:04 Feb 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
On December 28, 2015, ABC Events,
Inc. notified the Coast Guard that it will
be conducting the Bay Bridge Paddle
from 8 a.m. until noon on May 14, 2016,
to both showcase the kayak and stand
up paddle board water sport for
intermediate and elite paddlers, and
benefit the Annapolis Chapter of the
Foundation for Community Betterment
and the Maryland Chapter of the Special
Olympics. The paddle race is to be held
under and between the north and south
spans of the William P. Lane, Jr. (US–
50/301) Memorial Bridges, located
between Sandy Point, Anne Arundel
County, MD and Kent Island, Queen
Anne’s County, MD. Elite paddlers will
depart Sandy Point and proceed easterly
along a 4.2-mile course toward Kent
Island, turn around upon reaching a
point near Kent Island, and proceed
back to Sandy Point. Intermediate
paddlers will depart Sandy Point and
proceed easterly along the same 4.2-mile
course toward Kent Island, however,
they will turn around upon reaching the
half way point (2.1 miles), and proceed
back to Sandy Point. Hazards from the
paddle race include event numerous
event participants crossing designated
shipping channels and interfering with
vessels intending to operate within
those channels. The COTP Baltimore
has determined that potential hazards
associated with the paddle race would
be a safety concern for anyone intending
to operate within certain waters of the
Chesapeake Bay between Sandy Point
and Kent Island, MD.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
protect event participants, spectators
and transiting vessels on certain waters
of the Chesapeake Bay before, during,
and after the scheduled event.
The Coast Guard proposes this
rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1233, which authorize the Coast Guard
to establish and define special local
regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP Baltimore proposes to
establish special local regulations from
7:30 a.m. until 12:30 p.m. on May 14,
2016, and, if necessary due to inclement
weather, from 7:30 a.m. until 12:30 p.m.
on May 15, 2016. The regulated area
would cover all navigable waters of the
Chesapeake Bay between and adjacent
to the spans of the William P. Lane Jr.
Memorial Bridges from shoreline to
shoreline, bounded to the north by a
line drawn parallel and 500 yards north
of the north bridge span that originates
from the western shoreline at latitude
39°00′36″ N., longitude 076°23′05″ W.
and thence eastward to the eastern
shoreline at latitude 38°59′14″ N.,
longitude 076°20′00″ W., and bounded
to the south by a line drawn parallel and
500 yards south of the south bridge span
that originates from the western
shoreline at latitude 39°00′16″ N.,
longitude 076°24′30″ W. and thence
eastward to the eastern shoreline at
latitude 38°58′38.5″ N., longitude
076°20′06″ W. The duration of the
regulated area is intended to ensure the
safety of vessels and these navigable
waters before, during, and after the
scheduled 8 a.m. until noon paddle
event. Except for Bay Bridge Paddle
participants, no vessel or person would
be permitted to enter the regulated area
without obtaining permission from the
COTP Baltimore or a designated
representative. The regulatory text we
are proposing appears at the end of this
document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders (E.O.s) related to
rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these
statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies
to assess the costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This NPRM has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under E.O. 12866. Accordingly,
E:\FR\FM\12FEP1.SGM
12FEP1
7482
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 29 / Friday, February 12, 2016 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with PROPOSALS
the NPRM has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size and duration of the
regulated area, which would impact a
small designated area of the Chesapeake
Bay for 5 hours. The Coast Guard would
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the
status of the regulated area. Moreover,
the rule would allow vessels to seek
permission to enter the regulated area,
and vessel traffic would be able to safely
transit the regulated area once the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander deems it safe
to do so.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the regulated
area may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Feb 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has
a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in E.O. 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, because it
would not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves implementation of regulations
within 33 CFR part 100 applicable to
organized marine events on the
navigable waters of the United States
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that could negatively impact the safety
of waterway users and shore side
activities in the event area lasting for 5
hours. The category of water activities
includes but is not limited to sail boat
regattas, boat parades, power boat
racing, swimming events, crew racing,
canoe and sail board racing. Normally
such actions are categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
34(h) of Figure 2–1 of Commandant
Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist and
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
E:\FR\FM\12FEP1.SGM
12FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 29 / Friday, February 12, 2016 / Proposed Rules
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add a temporary § 100.35–T05–
1126 to read as follows:
■
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 100.501–T05–1126 Special Local
Regulation; Chesapeake Bay, between
Sandy Point and Kent Island, MD.
(a) Regulated area. The following
location is a regulated area: All
navigable waters of the Chesapeake Bay
between and adjacent to the spans of the
William P. Lane Jr. Memorial Bridges
from shoreline to shoreline, bounded to
the north by a line drawn parallel and
500 yards north of the north bridge span
that originates from the western
shoreline at latitude 39°00′36″ N.,
longitude 076°23′05″ W., and thence
eastward to the eastern shoreline at
latitude 38°59′14″ N., longitude
076°20′00″ W., and bounded to the
south by a line drawn parallel and 500
yards south of the south bridge span
that originates from the western
shoreline at latitude 39°00′16″ N.,
longitude 076°24′30″ W., and thence
eastward to the eastern shoreline at
latitude 38°58′38.5″ N., longitude
076°20′06″ W. All coordinates reference
Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Captain of the Port
Baltimore means the Commander, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, Maryland
or any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer who has been
authorized by the Captain of the Port to
act on his behalf.
(2) Coast Guard Patrol Commander
means a commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard
who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore.
(3) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Feb 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
on board and displaying a Coast Guard
ensign.
(4) Participant means all persons and
vessels participating in the Bay Bridge
Paddle event under the auspices of the
Marine Event Permit issued to the event
sponsor and approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore.
(c) Special local regulations: (1) The
Coast Guard Patrol Commander may
forbid and control the movement of all
vessels and persons, including event
participants, in the regulated area.
When hailed or signaled by an official
patrol, a vessel or person in the
regulated area shall immediately
comply with the directions given.
Failure to do so may result in expulsion
from the area, citation for failure to
comply, or both. The Coast Guard Patrol
Commander may terminate the event, or
the operation of any support vessel
participating in the event, at any time it
is deemed necessary for the protection
of life or property.
(2) Except for participants and vessels
already at berth, mooring, or anchor, all
persons and vessels within the regulated
area at the time it is implemented are to
depart the regulated area.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the
regulated area must first obtain
authorization from the Captain of the
Port Baltimore or Coast Guard Patrol
Commander. Prior to the enforcement
period, to seek permission to transit the
area, the Captain of the Port Baltimore
can be contacted at telephone number
410–576–2693 or on Marine Band
Radio, VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8
MHz). During the enforcement period,
to seek permission to transit the area,
the Coast Guard Patrol Commander can
be contacted on Marine Band Radio,
VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) for
direction.
(4) The Coast Guard may be assisted
in the patrol and enforcement of the
regulated area by other Federal, State,
and local agencies. The Coast Guard
Patrol Commander and official patrol
vessels enforcing this regulated area can
be contacted on marine band radio
VHF–FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) and
channel 22A (157.1 MHz).
(5) The Coast Guard will publish a
notice in the Fifth Coast Guard District
Local Notice to Mariners and issue a
marine information broadcast on VHF–
FM marine band radio announcing
specific event date and times.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 7:30 a.m. until
12:30 p.m. on May 14, 2016, and if
necessary, due to inclement weather,
from 7:30 a.m. until 12:30 p.m. on May
15, 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7483
Dated: January 29, 2016.
Lonnie P. Harrison, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2016–02814 Filed 2–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2014–0250; FRL–9942–16–
Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; Tennessee:
Removal of I/M Program in Memphis
and Revisions to the 1997 8-Hour
Ozone Maintenance Plan for Shelby
County, Tennessee
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
the State of Tennessee’s May 23, 2014,
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision, submitted through the
Tennessee Department of Environment
and Conservation (TDEC) on behalf of
the Shelby County Health Department
(SCHD), seeking to modify the SIP by
removing the Inspection and
Maintenance (I/M) program in the City
of Memphis, Tennessee, and by
incorporating Shelby County’s revised
maintenance plan for the 1997 8-hour
ozone national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS). Among other
things, the revised maintenance plan
updates the emissions inventory
estimates and the motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) for the years
2006 and 2021 and contains an
emissions reduction measure to offset
the emissions increase expected from
the termination of City of Memphis I/M
program. EPA has preliminarily
determined that Tennessee’s May 23,
2014, SIP revision is consistent with the
applicable provisions of the Clean Air
Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before March 14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R04–OAR–2014–0250 by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: R4-ARMS@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562–9019.
4. Mail: EPA–R04–OAR–2014–0250,
Air Regulatory Management Section, Air
Planning and Implementation Branch,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12FEP1.SGM
12FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 29 (Friday, February 12, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7481-7483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02814]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 29 / Friday, February 12, 2016 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 7481]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG-2015-1126]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation; Chesapeake Bay, Between Sandy Point and
Kent Island, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish special local
regulations for certain waters of the Chesapeake Bay. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters
located between Sandy Point, Anne Arundel County, MD and Kent Island,
Queen Anne's County, MD, during a paddling event on May 14, 2016. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in
the regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
Baltimore or Coast Guard Patrol Commander. We invite your comments on
this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before March 14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2015-1126 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Ronald Houck, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, MD; telephone 410-576-2674, email
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On December 28, 2015, ABC Events, Inc. notified the Coast Guard
that it will be conducting the Bay Bridge Paddle from 8 a.m. until noon
on May 14, 2016, to both showcase the kayak and stand up paddle board
water sport for intermediate and elite paddlers, and benefit the
Annapolis Chapter of the Foundation for Community Betterment and the
Maryland Chapter of the Special Olympics. The paddle race is to be held
under and between the north and south spans of the William P. Lane, Jr.
(US-50/301) Memorial Bridges, located between Sandy Point, Anne Arundel
County, MD and Kent Island, Queen Anne's County, MD. Elite paddlers
will depart Sandy Point and proceed easterly along a 4.2-mile course
toward Kent Island, turn around upon reaching a point near Kent Island,
and proceed back to Sandy Point. Intermediate paddlers will depart
Sandy Point and proceed easterly along the same 4.2-mile course toward
Kent Island, however, they will turn around upon reaching the half way
point (2.1 miles), and proceed back to Sandy Point. Hazards from the
paddle race include event numerous event participants crossing
designated shipping channels and interfering with vessels intending to
operate within those channels. The COTP Baltimore has determined that
potential hazards associated with the paddle race would be a safety
concern for anyone intending to operate within certain waters of the
Chesapeake Bay between Sandy Point and Kent Island, MD.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to protect event participants,
spectators and transiting vessels on certain waters of the Chesapeake
Bay before, during, and after the scheduled event.
The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33
U.S.C. 1233, which authorize the Coast Guard to establish and define
special local regulations.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP Baltimore proposes to establish special local regulations
from 7:30 a.m. until 12:30 p.m. on May 14, 2016, and, if necessary due
to inclement weather, from 7:30 a.m. until 12:30 p.m. on May 15, 2016.
The regulated area would cover all navigable waters of the Chesapeake
Bay between and adjacent to the spans of the William P. Lane Jr.
Memorial Bridges from shoreline to shoreline, bounded to the north by a
line drawn parallel and 500 yards north of the north bridge span that
originates from the western shoreline at latitude 39[deg]00'36'' N.,
longitude 076[deg]23'05'' W. and thence eastward to the eastern
shoreline at latitude 38[deg]59'14'' N., longitude 076[deg]20'00'' W.,
and bounded to the south by a line drawn parallel and 500 yards south
of the south bridge span that originates from the western shoreline at
latitude 39[deg]00'16'' N., longitude 076[deg]24'30'' W. and thence
eastward to the eastern shoreline at latitude 38[deg]58'38.5'' N.,
longitude 076[deg]20'06'' W. The duration of the regulated area is
intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable waters
before, during, and after the scheduled 8 a.m. until noon paddle event.
Except for Bay Bridge Paddle participants, no vessel or person would be
permitted to enter the regulated area without obtaining permission from
the COTP Baltimore or a designated representative. The regulatory text
we are proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize
our analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly,
[[Page 7482]]
the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size and
duration of the regulated area, which would impact a small designated
area of the Chesapeake Bay for 5 hours. The Coast Guard would issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the
status of the regulated area. Moreover, the rule would allow vessels to
seek permission to enter the regulated area, and vessel traffic would
be able to safely transit the regulated area once the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander deems it safe to do so.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
regulated area may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves
implementation of regulations within 33 CFR part 100 applicable to
organized marine events on the navigable waters of the United States
that could negatively impact the safety of waterway users and shore
side activities in the event area lasting for 5 hours. The category of
water activities includes but is not limited to sail boat regattas,
boat parades, power boat racing, swimming events, crew racing, canoe
and sail board racing. Normally such actions are categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2-1 of Commandant
Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist
and Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online
[[Page 7483]]
docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following
that Web site's instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online
docket and sign up for email alerts, you will be notified when comments
are posted or a final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
0
2. Add a temporary Sec. 100.35-T05-1126 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.501-T05-1126 Special Local Regulation; Chesapeake Bay,
between Sandy Point and Kent Island, MD.
(a) Regulated area. The following location is a regulated area: All
navigable waters of the Chesapeake Bay between and adjacent to the
spans of the William P. Lane Jr. Memorial Bridges from shoreline to
shoreline, bounded to the north by a line drawn parallel and 500 yards
north of the north bridge span that originates from the western
shoreline at latitude 39[deg]00'36'' N., longitude 076[deg]23'05'' W.,
and thence eastward to the eastern shoreline at latitude 38[deg]59'14''
N., longitude 076[deg]20'00'' W., and bounded to the south by a line
drawn parallel and 500 yards south of the south bridge span that
originates from the western shoreline at latitude 39[deg]00'16'' N.,
longitude 076[deg]24'30'' W., and thence eastward to the eastern
shoreline at latitude 38[deg]58'38.5'' N., longitude 076[deg]20'06'' W.
All coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Captain of the Port Baltimore means the
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, Maryland or any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been authorized by
the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
(2) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore.
(3) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a commissioned, warrant,
or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
(4) Participant means all persons and vessels participating in the
Bay Bridge Paddle event under the auspices of the Marine Event Permit
issued to the event sponsor and approved by Commander, Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore.
(c) Special local regulations: (1) The Coast Guard Patrol Commander
may forbid and control the movement of all vessels and persons,
including event participants, in the regulated area. When hailed or
signaled by an official patrol, a vessel or person in the regulated
area shall immediately comply with the directions given. Failure to do
so may result in expulsion from the area, citation for failure to
comply, or both. The Coast Guard Patrol Commander may terminate the
event, or the operation of any support vessel participating in the
event, at any time it is deemed necessary for the protection of life or
property.
(2) Except for participants and vessels already at berth, mooring,
or anchor, all persons and vessels within the regulated area at the
time it is implemented are to depart the regulated area.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the regulated area must first
obtain authorization from the Captain of the Port Baltimore or Coast
Guard Patrol Commander. Prior to the enforcement period, to seek
permission to transit the area, the Captain of the Port Baltimore can
be contacted at telephone number 410-576-2693 or on Marine Band Radio,
VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz). During the enforcement period, to seek
permission to transit the area, the Coast Guard Patrol Commander can be
contacted on Marine Band Radio, VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz) for
direction.
(4) The Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement
of the regulated area by other Federal, State, and local agencies. The
Coast Guard Patrol Commander and official patrol vessels enforcing this
regulated area can be contacted on marine band radio VHF-FM channel 16
(156.8 MHz) and channel 22A (157.1 MHz).
(5) The Coast Guard will publish a notice in the Fifth Coast Guard
District Local Notice to Mariners and issue a marine information
broadcast on VHF-FM marine band radio announcing specific event date
and times.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 7:30
a.m. until 12:30 p.m. on May 14, 2016, and if necessary, due to
inclement weather, from 7:30 a.m. until 12:30 p.m. on May 15, 2016.
Dated: January 29, 2016.
Lonnie P. Harrison, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Baltimore.
[FR Doc. 2016-02814 Filed 2-11-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P