Price Index Adjustments for Expenditure Limitations and Lobbyist Bundling Disclosure Threshold, 7101-7103 [2016-02627]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2016 / Notices
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–02661 Filed 2–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
Notice to All Interested Parties of the
Termination of the Receivership of
10376, First Peoples Bank, Port Saint
Lucie, FL
Notice is hereby given that the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (‘‘FDIC’’)
as Receiver for First Peoples Bank, Port
Saint Lucie, FL (‘‘the Receiver’’) intends
to terminate its receivership for said
institution. The FDIC was appointed
receiver of First Peoples Bank on July
15, 2011. The liquidation of the
receivership assets has been completed.
To the extent permitted by available
funds and in accordance with law, the
Receiver will be making a final dividend
payment to proven creditors.
Based upon the foregoing, the
Receiver has determined that the
continued existence of the receivership
will serve no useful purpose.
Consequently, notice is given that the
receivership shall be terminated, to be
effective no sooner than thirty days after
the date of this Notice. If any person
wishes to comment concerning the
termination of the receivership, such
comment must be made in writing and
sent within thirty days of the date of
this Notice to: Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, Division of
Resolutions and Receiverships,
Attention: Receivership Oversight
Department 32.1, 1601 Bryan Street,
Dallas, TX 75201.
No comments concerning the
termination of this receivership will be
considered which are not sent within
this time frame.
Dated: February 5, 2016.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES2
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
[Notice 2016–01]
Price Index Adjustments for
Expenditure Limitations and Lobbyist
Bundling Disclosure Threshold
Federal Election Commission.
Notice of adjustments to
expenditure limitations and lobbyist
bundling disclosure threshold.
AGENCY:
As mandated by provisions of
the Federal Election Campaign Act (‘‘the
Act’’), the Federal Election Commission
(‘‘the Commission’’) is adjusting certain
expenditure limitations and the lobbyist
bundling disclosure threshold set forth
in the Act, to index the amounts for
inflation. Additional details appear in
the supplemental information that
follows.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
Notice to All Interested Parties of the
Termination of the Receivership of;
10480, Pisgah Community Bank;
Asheville, North Carolina
Effective date: January 1, 2016.
Ms.
Elizabeth S. Kurland, Information
Division, 999 E Street NW., Washington,
DATES:
Notice is hereby given that the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (‘‘FDIC’’)
as Receiver for Pisgah Community Bank,
Jkt 238001
[FR Doc. 2016–02663 Filed 2–9–16; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
17:22 Feb 09, 2016
Dated: February 5, 2016.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
ACTION:
[FR Doc. 2016–02662 Filed 2–9–16; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Asheville, North Carolina (‘‘the
Receiver’’) intends to terminate its
receivership for said institution. The
FDIC was appointed receiver of Pisgah
Community Bank on May 10, 2013. The
liquidation of the receivership assets
has been completed. To the extent
permitted by available funds and in
accordance with law, the Receiver will
be making a final dividend payment to
proven creditors.
Based upon the foregoing, the
Receiver has determined that the
continued existence of the receivership
will serve no useful purpose.
Consequently, notice is given that the
receivership shall be terminated, to be
effective no sooner than thirty days after
the date of this Notice. If any person
wishes to comment concerning the
termination of the receivership, such
comment must be made in writing and
sent within thirty days of the date of
this Notice to: Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, Division of
Resolutions and Receiverships,
Attention: Receivership Oversight
Department 32.1, 1601 Bryan Street,
Dallas, TX 75201.
No comments concerning the
termination of this receivership will be
considered which are not sent within
this time frame.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7101
DC 20463; (202) 694–1100 or (800) 424–
9530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Federal Election Campaign Act, 52
U.S.C. 30101–46, coordinated party
expenditure limits (52 U.S.C.
30116(d)(2)–(3)) and the disclosure
threshold for contributions bundled by
lobbyists (52 U.S.C. 30104(i)(3)(A)) are
adjusted periodically to reflect changes
in the consumer price index. See 52
U.S.C. 30104(i)(3), 30116(c)(1); 11 CFR
109.32, 110.17(a), (f). The Commission
is publishing this notice to announce
the adjusted limits and disclosure
threshold for 2016.
Coordinated Party Expenditure Limits
for 2016
Under 52 U.S.C. 30116(c), the
Commission must adjust the
expenditure limitations established by
52 U.S.C. 30116(d) (the limits on
expenditures by national party
committees, state party committees, or
their subordinate committees in
connection with the general election
campaign of candidates for Federal
office) annually to account for inflation.
This expenditure limitation is increased
by the percent difference between the
price index, as certified to the
Commission by the Secretary of Labor,
for the 12 months preceding the
beginning of the calendar year and the
price index for the base period (calendar
year 1974). 52 U.S.C. 30116(c).
1. Expenditure Limitation for House of
Representatives in States With More
Than One Congressional District
Both the national and state party
committees have an expenditure
limitation for each general election held
to fill a seat in the House of
Representatives in states with more than
one congressional district. See 52 U.S.C.
30116(d)(3)(B). This limitation also
applies to the District of Columbia and
territories that elect individuals to the
office of Delegate or Resident
Commissioner.1 Id. The formula used to
calculate the expenditure limitation in
such states and territories multiplies the
base figure of $10,000 by the difference
in the price index (4.80703), rounding to
the nearest $100. See 52 U.S.C.
30116(c)(1)(B), (d)(3)(B); 11 CFR
109.32(b), 110.17. Based upon this
formula, the expenditure limitation for
2016 general elections for House
candidates in these states, districts, and
territories is $48,100.
1 Currently, these are the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, and the territories of American Samoa,
Guam, the United States Virgin Islands and the
Northern Mariana Islands. See https://
www.house.gov/representatives.
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
7102
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2016 / Notices
2. Expenditure Limitation for Senate
and for House of Representatives in
States With Only One Congressional
District
Both the national and state party
committees have an expenditure
limitation for a general election held to
fill a seat in the Senate or in the House
of Representatives in states with only
one congressional district. See 52 U.S.C.
30116(d)(3)(A). The formula used to
calculate this expenditure limitation
considers not only the price index but
also the voting age population (‘‘VAP’’)
of the state. Id. The VAP figures used to
calculate the expenditure limitations
were certified by the U.S. Census
Bureau. The VAP of each state is also
published annually in the Federal
Register by the U.S. Department of
Commerce. 11 CFR 110.18. The general
election expenditure limitation is the
greater of: The base figure ($20,000)
multiplied by the difference in the price
index, 4.80703 (which totals $96,100);
or $0.02 multiplied by the VAP of the
state, multiplied by 4.80703. Amounts
are rounded to the nearest $100. See 52
U.S.C. 30116(c)(1)(B), (d)(3)(A); 11 CFR
109.32(b), 110.17. The chart below
provides the state-by-state breakdown of
the 2016 general election expenditure
limitation for Senate elections. The
expenditure limitation for 2016 House
elections in states with only one
congressional district 2 is $96,100.
SENATE GENERAL ELECTION COORDINATED EXPENDITURE LIMITS—2016 ELECTIONS
Voting age
population
(VAP)
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES2
State
Alabama .........................................................................................................................
Alaska ............................................................................................................................
Arizona ...........................................................................................................................
Arkansas ........................................................................................................................
California ........................................................................................................................
Colorado ........................................................................................................................
Connecticut ....................................................................................................................
Delaware ........................................................................................................................
Florida ............................................................................................................................
Georgia ..........................................................................................................................
Hawaii ............................................................................................................................
Idaho ..............................................................................................................................
Illinois .............................................................................................................................
Indiana ...........................................................................................................................
Iowa ...............................................................................................................................
Kansas ...........................................................................................................................
Kentucky ........................................................................................................................
Louisiana ........................................................................................................................
Maine .............................................................................................................................
Maryland ........................................................................................................................
Massachusetts ...............................................................................................................
Michigan .........................................................................................................................
Minnesota ......................................................................................................................
Mississippi ......................................................................................................................
Missouri ..........................................................................................................................
Montana .........................................................................................................................
Nebraska ........................................................................................................................
Nevada ...........................................................................................................................
New Hampshire .............................................................................................................
New Jersey ....................................................................................................................
New Mexico ...................................................................................................................
New York .......................................................................................................................
North Carolina ................................................................................................................
North Dakota ..................................................................................................................
Ohio ...............................................................................................................................
Oklahoma .......................................................................................................................
Oregon ...........................................................................................................................
Pennsylvania ..................................................................................................................
Rhode Island ..................................................................................................................
South Carolina ...............................................................................................................
South Dakota .................................................................................................................
Tennessee .....................................................................................................................
Texas .............................................................................................................................
Utah ...............................................................................................................................
Vermont .........................................................................................................................
Virginia ...........................................................................................................................
Washington ....................................................................................................................
West Virginia ..................................................................................................................
Wisconsin .......................................................................................................................
Wyoming ........................................................................................................................
2 Currently, these states are: Alaska, Delaware,
Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Feb 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
VAP × .02 × the
price index
(4.80703)
3,755,483
552,166
5,205,215
2,272,904
30,023,902
4,199,509
2,826,827
741,548
16,166,143
7,710,688
1,120,770
1,222,093
9,901,322
5,040,224
2,395,103
2,192,084
3,413,425
3,555,911
1,072,948
4,658,175
5,407,335
7,715,272
4,205,207
2,265,485
4,692,196
806,529
1,425,853
2,221,681
1,066,610
6,959,192
1,588,201
15,584,974
7,752,234
583,001
8,984,946
2,950,017
3,166,121
10,112,229
845,254
3,804,558
647,145
5,102,688
20,257,343
2,083,423
506,119
6,512,571
5,558,509
1,464,532
4,476,711
447,212
$361,100
53,100
500,400
218,500
2,886,500
403,700
271,800
71,300
1,554,200
741,300
107,800
117,500
951,900
484,600
230,300
210,700
328,200
341,900
103,200
447,800
519,900
741,800
404,300
217,800
451,100
77,500
137,100
213,600
102,500
669,100
152,700
1,498,300
745,300
56,100
863,800
283,600
304,400
972,200
81,300
365,800
62,200
490,600
1,947,600
200,300
48,700
626,100
534,400
140,800
430,400
43,000
Wyoming. See https://www.house.gov/
representatives/.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Senate expenditure
limit (the greater of
the amount in column
3 or $96,100)
$361,100
96,100
500,400
218,500
2,886,500
403,700
271,800
96,100
1,554,200
741,300
107,800
117,500
951,900
484,600
230,300
210,700
328,200
341,900
103,200
447,800
519,900
741,800
404,300
217,800
451,100
96,100
137,100
213,600
102,500
669,100
152,700
1,498,300
745,300
96,100
863,800
283,600
304,400
972,200
96,100
365,800
96,100
490,600
1,947,600
200,300
96,100
626,100
534,400
140,800
430,400
96,100
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2016 / Notices
3. Expenditure Limitation for President
The national party committees have
an expenditure limitation for their
general election nominee for President.
52 U.S.C. 30116(d)(2). The formula used
to calculate the Presidential expenditure
limitation considers not only the price
index but also the total VAP of the
United States. The VAP figure used to
calculate the expenditure limitation was
certified by the U.S. Census Bureau. The
U.S. Department of Commerce also
publishes the total VAP of the United
States annually. 11 CFR 110.18. The
formula used to calculate this
expenditure limitation is $0.02
multiplied by the total VAP of the
United States (247,773,709), multiplied
by the price index, 4.80703. Amounts
are rounded to the nearest $100. See 52
U.S.C. 30116(d)(2) and 11 CFR
109.32(a). Based upon this formula, the
expenditure limitation for 2016
Presidential nominees is $23,821,100.
Limitations on Contributions by
Individuals, Non-Multicandidate
Committees and Certain Political Party
Committees Giving to U.S. Senate
Candidates and National Party
Committees for the 2015–2016 Election
Cycle
For the convenience of the readers,
the Commission is also republishing the
contribution limitations for individuals,
non-multicandidate committees and for
certain political party committees giving
to U.S. Senate candidates and national
party committees for the 2015–2016
election cycle:
Statutory provision
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES2
52 U.S.C.
30116(a)(1)(A) ...
52 U.S.C.
30116(a)(1)(B) ...
52 U.S.C. 30116(h)
On behalf of the Commission.
Dated: February 3, 2016.
Matthew S. Petersen,
Chairman, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–02627 Filed 2–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715–01–P
FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
EXAMINATION COUNCIL
[Docket No. AS16–02]
Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of
Meeting
Appraisal Subcommittee of the
Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
Description: In accordance with
Section 1104 (b) of Title XI of the
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery,
and Enforcement Act of 1989, as
amended, notice is hereby given that the
Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) will
meet in closed session:
Location: Federal Reserve Board—
International Square location, 1850 K
Street NW., Washington, DC 20006.
Date: February 16, 2016.
Statutory
2015–2016
Time: Immediately following the ASC
amount
limit
open session.
Status: Closed.
Matters to be Considered: State
$2,000
$2,700
Preliminary Investigation.
25,000
35,000
33,400
46,800
Lobbyist Bundling Disclosure
Threshold for 2016
The Act requires certain political
committees to disclose contributions
bundled by lobbyists/registrants and
lobbyist/registrant political action
committees once the contributions
exceed a specified threshold amount. 52
U.S.C. 30104(i)(1), (3)(A). The
Commission must adjust this threshold
amount annually to account for
inflation. The disclosure threshold is
increased by multiplying the $15,000
statutory disclosure threshold by
1.17569, the difference between the
price index, as certified to the
Commission by the Secretary of Labor,
for the 12 months preceding the
beginning of the calendar year and the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
price index for the base period (calendar
year 2006). The resulting amount is
rounded to the nearest multiple of $100.
See 52 U.S.C. 30104(i)(3),
30116(c)(1)(B); 11 CFR 104.22(g). Based
upon this formula ($15,000 × 1.17569),
the lobbyist bundling disclosure
threshold for calendar year 2016 is
$17,600, unchanged from 2015.
17:22 Feb 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
Dated: February 4, 2016.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
7103
and Enforcement Act of 1989, as
amended, notice is hereby given that the
Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) will
meet in open session for its regular
meeting:
Location: Federal Reserve Board—
International Square location, 1850 K
Street NW., Washington, DC 20006.
Date: February 16, 2016.
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Status: Open.
Reports
Chairman
Executive Director
Delegated State Compliance Reviews
Financial
Action and Discussion Items
November 4, 2015 Open Session
Minutes
Appraisal Foundation Reprogramming
Request
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on AMC
Fees
How To Attend and Observe an ASC
Meeting:
If you plan to attend the ASC Meeting
in person, we ask that you send an
email to meetings@asc.gov. You may
register until close of business three
business days before the meeting date.
You will be contacted by the Federal
Reserve Law Enforcement Unit on
security requirements. You will also be
asked to provide a valid governmentissued ID before being admitted to the
Meeting. The meeting space is intended
to accommodate public attendees.
However, if the space will not
accommodate all requests, the ASC may
refuse attendance on that reasonable
basis. The use of any video or audio
tape recording device, photographing
device, or any other electronic or
mechanical device designed for similar
purposes is prohibited at ASC meetings.
[FR Doc. 2016–02628 Filed 2–9–16; 8:45 am]
Dated: February 4, 2016.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
BILLING CODE 6700–01–P
[FR Doc. 2016–02626 Filed 2–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700–01–P
FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
EXAMINATION COUNCIL
[Docket No. AS16–01]
Notice of Agreements Filed
Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of
Meeting
Appraisal Subcommittee of the
Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
Description: In accordance with
Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery,
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
Sfmt 4703
The Commission hereby gives notice
of the filing of the following agreements
under the Shipping Act of 1984.
Interested parties may submit comments
on the agreements to the Secretary,
Federal Maritime Commission,
Washington, DC 20573, within twelve
days of the date this notice appears in
the Federal Register. Copies of the
agreement are available through the
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7101-7103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02627]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
[Notice 2016-01]
Price Index Adjustments for Expenditure Limitations and Lobbyist
Bundling Disclosure Threshold
AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.
ACTION: Notice of adjustments to expenditure limitations and lobbyist
bundling disclosure threshold.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As mandated by provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act
(``the Act''), the Federal Election Commission (``the Commission'') is
adjusting certain expenditure limitations and the lobbyist bundling
disclosure threshold set forth in the Act, to index the amounts for
inflation. Additional details appear in the supplemental information
that follows.
DATES: Effective date: January 1, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Elizabeth S. Kurland, Information
Division, 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC 20463; (202) 694-1100 or
(800) 424-9530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Election Campaign Act, 52
U.S.C. 30101-46, coordinated party expenditure limits (52 U.S.C.
30116(d)(2)-(3)) and the disclosure threshold for contributions bundled
by lobbyists (52 U.S.C. 30104(i)(3)(A)) are adjusted periodically to
reflect changes in the consumer price index. See 52 U.S.C. 30104(i)(3),
30116(c)(1); 11 CFR 109.32, 110.17(a), (f). The Commission is
publishing this notice to announce the adjusted limits and disclosure
threshold for 2016.
Coordinated Party Expenditure Limits for 2016
Under 52 U.S.C. 30116(c), the Commission must adjust the
expenditure limitations established by 52 U.S.C. 30116(d) (the limits
on expenditures by national party committees, state party committees,
or their subordinate committees in connection with the general election
campaign of candidates for Federal office) annually to account for
inflation. This expenditure limitation is increased by the percent
difference between the price index, as certified to the Commission by
the Secretary of Labor, for the 12 months preceding the beginning of
the calendar year and the price index for the base period (calendar
year 1974). 52 U.S.C. 30116(c).
1. Expenditure Limitation for House of Representatives in States With
More Than One Congressional District
Both the national and state party committees have an expenditure
limitation for each general election held to fill a seat in the House
of Representatives in states with more than one congressional district.
See 52 U.S.C. 30116(d)(3)(B). This limitation also applies to the
District of Columbia and territories that elect individuals to the
office of Delegate or Resident Commissioner.\1\ Id. The formula used to
calculate the expenditure limitation in such states and territories
multiplies the base figure of $10,000 by the difference in the price
index (4.80703), rounding to the nearest $100. See 52 U.S.C.
30116(c)(1)(B), (d)(3)(B); 11 CFR 109.32(b), 110.17. Based upon this
formula, the expenditure limitation for 2016 general elections for
House candidates in these states, districts, and territories is
$48,100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Currently, these are the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and
the territories of American Samoa, Guam, the United States Virgin
Islands and the Northern Mariana Islands. See https://www.house.gov/representatives.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 7102]]
2. Expenditure Limitation for Senate and for House of Representatives
in States With Only One Congressional District
Both the national and state party committees have an expenditure
limitation for a general election held to fill a seat in the Senate or
in the House of Representatives in states with only one congressional
district. See 52 U.S.C. 30116(d)(3)(A). The formula used to calculate
this expenditure limitation considers not only the price index but also
the voting age population (``VAP'') of the state. Id. The VAP figures
used to calculate the expenditure limitations were certified by the
U.S. Census Bureau. The VAP of each state is also published annually in
the Federal Register by the U.S. Department of Commerce. 11 CFR 110.18.
The general election expenditure limitation is the greater of: The base
figure ($20,000) multiplied by the difference in the price index,
4.80703 (which totals $96,100); or $0.02 multiplied by the VAP of the
state, multiplied by 4.80703. Amounts are rounded to the nearest $100.
See 52 U.S.C. 30116(c)(1)(B), (d)(3)(A); 11 CFR 109.32(b), 110.17. The
chart below provides the state-by-state breakdown of the 2016 general
election expenditure limitation for Senate elections. The expenditure
limitation for 2016 House elections in states with only one
congressional district \2\ is $96,100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Currently, these states are: Alaska, Delaware, Montana,
North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont and Wyoming. See https://www.house.gov/representatives/.
Senate General Election Coordinated Expenditure Limits--2016 Elections
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Senate expenditure
Voting age VAP x .02 x the limit (the greater
State population price index of the amount in
(VAP) (4.80703) column 3 or $96,100)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama................................................... 3,755,483 $361,100 $361,100
Alaska.................................................... 552,166 53,100 96,100
Arizona................................................... 5,205,215 500,400 500,400
Arkansas.................................................. 2,272,904 218,500 218,500
California................................................ 30,023,902 2,886,500 2,886,500
Colorado.................................................. 4,199,509 403,700 403,700
Connecticut............................................... 2,826,827 271,800 271,800
Delaware.................................................. 741,548 71,300 96,100
Florida................................................... 16,166,143 1,554,200 1,554,200
Georgia................................................... 7,710,688 741,300 741,300
Hawaii.................................................... 1,120,770 107,800 107,800
Idaho..................................................... 1,222,093 117,500 117,500
Illinois.................................................. 9,901,322 951,900 951,900
Indiana................................................... 5,040,224 484,600 484,600
Iowa...................................................... 2,395,103 230,300 230,300
Kansas.................................................... 2,192,084 210,700 210,700
Kentucky.................................................. 3,413,425 328,200 328,200
Louisiana................................................. 3,555,911 341,900 341,900
Maine..................................................... 1,072,948 103,200 103,200
Maryland.................................................. 4,658,175 447,800 447,800
Massachusetts............................................. 5,407,335 519,900 519,900
Michigan.................................................. 7,715,272 741,800 741,800
Minnesota................................................. 4,205,207 404,300 404,300
Mississippi............................................... 2,265,485 217,800 217,800
Missouri.................................................. 4,692,196 451,100 451,100
Montana................................................... 806,529 77,500 96,100
Nebraska.................................................. 1,425,853 137,100 137,100
Nevada.................................................... 2,221,681 213,600 213,600
New Hampshire............................................. 1,066,610 102,500 102,500
New Jersey................................................ 6,959,192 669,100 669,100
New Mexico................................................ 1,588,201 152,700 152,700
New York.................................................. 15,584,974 1,498,300 1,498,300
North Carolina............................................ 7,752,234 745,300 745,300
North Dakota.............................................. 583,001 56,100 96,100
Ohio...................................................... 8,984,946 863,800 863,800
Oklahoma.................................................. 2,950,017 283,600 283,600
Oregon.................................................... 3,166,121 304,400 304,400
Pennsylvania.............................................. 10,112,229 972,200 972,200
Rhode Island.............................................. 845,254 81,300 96,100
South Carolina............................................ 3,804,558 365,800 365,800
South Dakota.............................................. 647,145 62,200 96,100
Tennessee................................................. 5,102,688 490,600 490,600
Texas..................................................... 20,257,343 1,947,600 1,947,600
Utah...................................................... 2,083,423 200,300 200,300
Vermont................................................... 506,119 48,700 96,100
Virginia.................................................. 6,512,571 626,100 626,100
Washington................................................ 5,558,509 534,400 534,400
West Virginia............................................. 1,464,532 140,800 140,800
Wisconsin................................................. 4,476,711 430,400 430,400
Wyoming................................................... 447,212 43,000 96,100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 7103]]
3. Expenditure Limitation for President
The national party committees have an expenditure limitation for
their general election nominee for President. 52 U.S.C. 30116(d)(2).
The formula used to calculate the Presidential expenditure limitation
considers not only the price index but also the total VAP of the United
States. The VAP figure used to calculate the expenditure limitation was
certified by the U.S. Census Bureau. The U.S. Department of Commerce
also publishes the total VAP of the United States annually. 11 CFR
110.18. The formula used to calculate this expenditure limitation is
$0.02 multiplied by the total VAP of the United States (247,773,709),
multiplied by the price index, 4.80703. Amounts are rounded to the
nearest $100. See 52 U.S.C. 30116(d)(2) and 11 CFR 109.32(a). Based
upon this formula, the expenditure limitation for 2016 Presidential
nominees is $23,821,100.
Limitations on Contributions by Individuals, Non-Multicandidate
Committees and Certain Political Party Committees Giving to U.S. Senate
Candidates and National Party Committees for the 2015-2016 Election
Cycle
For the convenience of the readers, the Commission is also
republishing the contribution limitations for individuals, non-
multicandidate committees and for certain political party committees
giving to U.S. Senate candidates and national party committees for the
2015-2016 election cycle:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statutory 2015-2016
Statutory provision amount limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
52 U.S.C. 30116(a)(1)(A)........................ $2,000 $2,700
52 U.S.C. 30116(a)(1)(B)........................ 25,000 33,400
52 U.S.C. 30116(h).............................. 35,000 46,800
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lobbyist Bundling Disclosure Threshold for 2016
The Act requires certain political committees to disclose
contributions bundled by lobbyists/registrants and lobbyist/registrant
political action committees once the contributions exceed a specified
threshold amount. 52 U.S.C. 30104(i)(1), (3)(A). The Commission must
adjust this threshold amount annually to account for inflation. The
disclosure threshold is increased by multiplying the $15,000 statutory
disclosure threshold by 1.17569, the difference between the price
index, as certified to the Commission by the Secretary of Labor, for
the 12 months preceding the beginning of the calendar year and the
price index for the base period (calendar year 2006). The resulting
amount is rounded to the nearest multiple of $100. See 52 U.S.C.
30104(i)(3), 30116(c)(1)(B); 11 CFR 104.22(g). Based upon this formula
($15,000 x 1.17569), the lobbyist bundling disclosure threshold for
calendar year 2016 is $17,600, unchanged from 2015.
On behalf of the Commission.
Dated: February 3, 2016.
Matthew S. Petersen,
Chairman, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016-02627 Filed 2-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P