Motor Carriers of Passengers That Serve Primarily Urban Areas With High Passenger Loads, 6925-6927 [2016-02510]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Notices
The meeting will be held at
RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street NW., Suite
910, Washington, DC 20036, Tel: (202)
330–0655.
ADDRESSES:
The
RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW.,
Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by
telephone at (202) 833–9339, fax at (202)
833–9434, or Web site at https://
www.rtca.org or Trin Mitra, TOC
Secretary, RTCA, Inc., tmitra@rtca.org,
(202) 330–0655.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pursuant
to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is hereby
given for a meeting of RTCA Tactical
Operations Committee. The agenda will
include the following:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Thursday, March 3, 2016
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Opening of Meeting/Introduction of
TOC Members—Co Chairs Dale
Wright and Bryan Quigley
2. Official Statement of Designated
Federal Official—Elizabeth Ray
3. Approval of November 12, 2015
Meeting Summary
4. FAA Update—Elizabeth Ray
5. FAA Response to Previous TOC
Recommendations: Caribbean
Operations and Class B Airspace
6. Recommendations from the Airport
Construction Task Group.
7. Recommendations from the National
Procedure Assessment Task Group
8. Introduction to new PBN Route
Structure Task
9. Discussion on potential task on
Graphical TFRs
10. Update on the NextGen Advisory
Committee (NAC)
11. FAA briefing on One Engine
Inoperative (OEI) procedures
12. Anticipated Issues for TOC
consideration and action at the next
meeting
13. Other Business
14. Adjourn
Attendance is open to the interested
public but limited to space availability.
With the approval of the chairman,
members of the public may present oral
statements at the meeting. Plenary
information will be provided upon
request. Persons who wish to present
statements or obtain information should
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Members of the public may present a
written statement to the committee at
any time.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
Issued in Washington, DC, on February 4,
2016.
Latasha Robinson,
Management & Program Analyst, NextGen,
Enterprise Support Services Division, Federal
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016–02550 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2015–0481]
Motor Carriers of Passengers That
Serve Primarily Urban Areas With High
Passenger Loads
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of information and
request for comments.
AGENCY:
This request for comments is
related to the implementation of a
specific provision in section 32707 of
the Moving Ahead for Progress in the
21st Century Act (MAP–21) that
requires an annual safety fitness
assessment of certain motor carriers of
passengers that serve primarily urban
areas with high passenger loads.
FMCSA requests comments about an
appropriate definition of a ‘‘curbside
bus operator’’ that will be subject to this
annual safety fitness assessment and
will be consistent with Congressional
intent.
SUMMARY:
You must submit comments by
April 11, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
bearing the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) Docket ID FMCSA–
2015–0481 using any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Each submission must include the
Agency name and the docket number for
this notice. Note that DOT posts all
comments received without change to
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information included in a
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6925
comment. Please see the Privacy Act
heading below.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments, go to www.regulations.gov at
any time or visit Room W12–140 on the
ground level of the West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The on-line Federal document
management system is available 24
hours each day, 365 days each year. If
you want acknowledgment that we
received your comments, please include
a self-addressed, stamped envelope or
postcard or print the acknowledgement
page that appears after submitting
comments on-line.
Privacy Act: All comments received
were posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov. In accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT previously
solicited comments from the public to
better inform its rulemaking process.
DOT posted these comments, without
edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–
14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Loretta Bitner, (202) 385–2428,
loretta.bitner@dot.gov. FMCSA office
hours are from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, contact Docket Operations,
telephone (202) 366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Motorcoach safety received increased
public attention after several serious
crashes during 2011, some of which
involved ‘‘curbside’’ bus operators,
passenger carrier operations often
characterized by high passenger loads
with service between urban areas. As a
result, the National Transportation
Safety Board (NTSB) conducted an
investigation of motorcoach safety with
an emphasis on curbside operations.
One objective of the investigation was to
describe the characteristics of the
curbside business model among
interstate motorcoach carriers. The
NTSB examined a population of 4,172
active interstate motorcoach carriers
operating in the United States and
identified 71 of them as scheduled
motorcoach carriers providing curbside
service.
In its ‘‘Executive Report on Curbside
Motorcoach Safety’’ that was published
on October 12, 2011, the NTSB stated
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
6926
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Notices
the following in describing curbside bus
operators:
The term ‘‘curbside operations’’ refers to a
business model (that is, the means by which
motorcoach service is provided) rather than
a type of motorcoach carrier. In fact, no
formal definition of curbside carriers exists,
and federal and state oversight authorities
have no unique categorization or tracking
mechanism for these carriers. For the
purpose of this report, curbside motorcoach
operations are those in which interstate
motorcoach carriers conduct scheduled trips
from one city to another city or a destination
and originate or terminate at a location other
than a traditional bus terminal; most of these
operations discharge passengers at one or
more curbside locations.
Although curbside motorcoach carriers
apply a similar business model, they vary
greatly in other characteristics. Some carriers
operate large fleets of motorcoaches
throughout the United States, whereas others
have a fleet of only a few buses that operate
in local regions.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
MAP–21 was signed into law on July
6, 2012. Section 32707, codified at 49
U.S.C. 31144(i)(4)(B), addresses
improved oversight of motorcoach
service providers. A ’’motorcoach’’ is
defined in section 32707(b) of MAP–21
as an ‘‘over-the-road bus;’’ one with an
elevated passenger deck over a baggage
compartment. A motorcoach does not
include a bus used in public
transportation provided by a State or
local government, or a school bus. The
statute requires an annual assessment of
the safety fitness of certain motor
carriers of passengers that serve
primarily urban areas with high
passenger loads.
Implementation of Statutory Provision
Section 31144(i)(4) requires that the
Secretary:
• Reassess the safety fitness rating of
each motor carrier of passengers at no
less than once every 3 years; and
• Annually assess the safety fitness of
certain motor carriers of passengers that
serve primarily urban areas with high
passenger loads.
The language indicates Congress’
intent to have two levels of oversight for
motor carrier of passengers, a safety
fitness rating every 3 years for each
passenger carrier and, a safety fitness
assessment annually for passenger
carriers that serve primarily urban areas
with high passenger loads. To
effectively implement 49 U.S.C.
31144(i)(4)(B), FMCSA must define
which passenger carriers will be subject
to the annual safety fitness assessment
requirement. While Congress directed
that carriers of passengers that serve
primarily urban areas with high
passenger loads be subject to this
requirement, FMCSA does not collect
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
urban area service or passenger volume
information from motor carriers of
passengers that are subject to the
Agency’s safety oversight.
FMCSA believes Congress intends for
the Agency to have increased safety
oversight of the bus operators that
generally provide low-cost, regularly
scheduled passenger transportation
service between major cities with
curbside boarding and/or disembarking.
Although some carriers purport to have
a bus terminal/facility/station, the
location used for passengers is a waiting
area only outside of an office building
and the passenger pickups and drop-offs
occur at the curbside or in a parking lot.
Request for Comments
Because FMCSA does not include in
its regulations or regulatory guidance a
definition of the term ‘‘curbside bus
operator,’’ the Agency believes it is
imperative that one be adopted in order
to effectively implement 49 U.S.C.
31144(i)(4)(B). Therefore, the Agency
proposes the following definition for
identifying motor carriers of passengers
that must undergo an annual
assessment:
‘‘Curbside Bus Operator’’ means a motor
carrier of passengers that serves primarily
urban areas with high passenger loads, and
uses 25% or more of its motorcoaches for
operations with passenger pickups and dropoffs occuring at the curbside or in a parking
lot.
FMCSA would use this definition in
identifying, tracking, and conducting
the annual safety fitness assessments of
every identified curbside bus operators.
This definition would not have any
impact on the enforcement of the
applicable safety regulations. It would
only be used to identify those carriers
that Congress intends the Agency
conduct annual safety assessments.
FMCSA is considering the use of the
following questions during the motor
carrier registration process to identify
curbside bus operators that transport
high passenger loads:
Does your company operate 25% or more of
its motorcoaches between cities providing
for-hire passenger transportation that
originates or terminates at locations other
than terminals, such as street corners or
outside a retail business?
Is your company required to obtain a permit
from a local government to pick up or drop
off at locations other than terminals, such as
street corners or outside a retail business?
The operation of a motorcoach to
transport passengers is the FMCSA’s
interpretation of a high passenger load
with implementation of 49 U.S.C.
31144(i)(4)(B). Motorcoaches are large
capacity passenger vehicles that are
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
frequently operated by curbside bus
operators.
FMCSA requests public comments
whether the proposed definition and
questions are appropriate for idenitying
curbside operators for implementation
of the statutorily mandated annual
safety fitness assessments.
In addition to motor carriers of
passengers that identify themselves as
curbside bus operators through the
motor carrier registration process,
FMCSA will direct its enforcement
personnel to designate passenger
carriers as a curbside bus operators in
the Agency’s database when there is
evidence that the carriers are
conducting curbside bus operations, but
fail to report it to the Agency or began
curbside bus operations subsequent to
registration. With this in mind, FMCSA
is seeking input to the following
questions.
1. Should FMCSA identify all motor
carriers of passengers that have both
curbside operations and operations that
originate/terminate at a traditional bus
terminal as curbside bus operators
requiring an annual safety assessment?
2. Should a motor carrier of
passengers that uses 25% or more of its
motorcoaches for curbside operations be
identified by FMCSA as a curbside bus
operator requiring an annual safety
assessment?
3. Should FMCSA base the percentage
of curbside operations on the number of
motorcoaches used in that type of
service? If not, then what measure
should be used?
4. Should FMCSA include passenger
carrier operations that pick up
passengers at the curbside in vehicles
smaller than motorcoaches with the
intent of transferring the passengers to
a larger passenger vehicle such as a
motorcoach as curbside bus operators
requiring an annual safety assessment?
5. Should a motor carrier of
passengers applicant be required to selfidentify as a curbside operator during
registration with FMCSA?
6. Should a motor carrier of
passengers previously registered with
FMCSA be required to self-identify as a
curbside operator when updating its
registration information as required by
49 CFR 390.201?
7. Should FMCSA base the definition
of an urban area on population,
incorporated land area, defined
commercial zones, urbanized area as
defined by the U. S. Census Bureau, or
some other criteria?
8. Should a motor carrier of
passengers with 25% or more of its
motorcoach operation taking place in
primarily urban areas be identified by
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Notices
FMCSA as a curbside bus operator
requiring an annual safety assessment?
9. Is there any additional criteria we
should consider to identify which motor
carrier of passenger should be defined
as a curbside bus operator requiring an
annual safety assessment?
Issued under the authority delegated in 49
CFR 1.87 on: January 29, 2016.
T.F. Scott Darling, III,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–02510 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2015–0238]
Parts and Accessories Necessary for
Safe Operation; TowMate, LLC
Application for an Exemption
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
AGENCY:
The Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration (FMCSA)
announces its decision to grant
TowMate, LLC’s (TowMate) application
for a limited two-year exemption to
allow motor carriers to operate
rechargeable wireless temporary stop,
turn, and tail lighting systems during
temporary towing operations. Under the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs), all required
lamps, with the exception of batterypowered lamps used on projecting
loads, must be powered by the electrical
system of the motor vehicle. The
Agency has determined that use of
rechargeable wireless temporary stop,
turn, and tail lighting systems during
temporary towing operations would not
have an adverse impact on safety, and
use of these systems under the terms
and conditions of the exemption would
achieve a level of safety equivalent to or
greater than the level of safety provided
by the regulation. This decision is
consistent with an August 2005
amendment to the FMCSRs to allow
battery powered lamps on the rear of
projecting loads.
DATES: This exemption is effective
February 9, 2016 and ending February 9,
2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Luke Loy, Vehicle and Roadside
Operations Division, Office of Carrier,
Driver, and Vehicle Safety, MC–PSV,
(202) 366–0676, Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:54 Feb 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments submitted to notice
requesting public comments on the
exemption application, go to
www.regulations.gov at any time or visit
Room W12–140 on the ground level of
the West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The online Federal document management
system is available 24 hours each day,
365 days each year. The docket number
is listed at the beginning of this notice.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315 to grant exemptions
from certain parts of the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Regulations. FMCSA must
publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(a)). The Agency must provide
the public an opportunity to inspect the
information relevant to the application,
including any safety analyses that have
been conducted. The Agency must also
provide an opportunity for public
comment on the request.
The Agency reviews safety analyses
and public comments submitted, and
determines whether granting the
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety equivalent to, or greater than,
the level that would be achieved by the
current regulation (49 CFR 381.305).
The decision of the Agency must be
published in the Federal Register (49
CFR 381.315(b)) with the reasons for
denying or granting the application and,
if granted, the name of the person or
class of persons receiving the
exemption, and the regulatory provision
from which the exemption is granted.
The notice must also specify the
effective period and explain the terms
and conditions of the exemption. The
exemption may be renewed (49 CFR
381.300(b)).
TowMate’s Application for Exemption
TowMate applied for an exemption
from 49 CFR 393.23 to allow motor
carriers to operate rechargeable wireless
temporary stop, turn, and tail lighting
systems during temporary towing
operations. A copy of the application is
included in the docket referenced at the
beginning of this notice.
Section 393.23, ‘‘Power Supply for
Lamps,’’ provides that ‘‘All required
lamps must be powered by the electrical
system of the motor vehicle with the
exception of battery powered lamps
used on projecting loads.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6927
The application stated:
TowMate is making this request because
the use of conventional hard wired
temporary stop, turn, and tail lights has many
drawbacks that wireless tow lights solve.
These include broken connections, frayed
wires, burnt out incandescent bulbs, and the
potential to be snagged or pulled from the
tow light receptacle due to improper running
of wires, and road hazards, along with the
safety hazard of increasing the amount of
time spent on the roadside or the scene of an
accident by stringing wired lighting systems
between vehicles and securing the wires.
With the advent of LED technology coupled
with advancements in battery technologies,
wireless tow lights are more reliable and
better equipped for the rigors of daily
temporary use.
Temporary wireless stop, turn, tail lighting
systems can operate for 10+ hours of
continuous use on a full charge, and in-cab
wire-less monitoring systems give the driver
constant information on the functioning of
the system, displaying state of charge of the
battery inside the unit, displaying the
functioning of the system during operation,
and warning the driver if the unit is no
longer functioning. In this sense, wireless
tow lights provide a level of safety and
redundancy that is not currently required on
wired temporary lighting systems. In an
emergency situation with a drained battery,
power can be directly connected to the
temporary wireless stop, turn, and tail
lighting system from a standard 4 pin or 7
pin electrical connection.
Without the proposed temporary
exemption, tow and haul away operators will
be forced to continue to use cumbersome
wired temporary towing light systems,
placing an unnecessary burden on their daily
operations. The current temporary lighting
requirements for stop, tail, and turn lamps
require that the lamps receive their power
from a direct wired connection to the towing
vehicle with no ascertainable benefit from
doing such. Wireless tow lights afford
benefits that wired systems are unable to,
such as redundancies like monitoring the
status of the unit in real time, thus assuring
their proper operation at all times.
Comments
On August 6, 2015, FMCSA published
notice of the TowMate application and
requested public comment (80 FR
47031). The Agency received thirteen
comments, all in support of TowMate’s
application.
The Towing and Recovery
Association of America, Inc., and the
Wisconsin Towing Association
commented that hard-wired temporary
stop, tail and turn signal lighting
systems take additional time to install
on the side of the road or highway as
compared to wireless systems, leaving
tow operators vulnerable and at greater
risk of being struck and injured by
passing motorists These commenters
stated that use of rechargeable wireless
temporary stop, turn, and tail lighting
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6925-6927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02510]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2015-0481]
Motor Carriers of Passengers That Serve Primarily Urban Areas
With High Passenger Loads
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of information and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This request for comments is related to the implementation of
a specific provision in section 32707 of the Moving Ahead for Progress
in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) that requires an annual safety fitness
assessment of certain motor carriers of passengers that serve primarily
urban areas with high passenger loads. FMCSA requests comments about an
appropriate definition of a ``curbside bus operator'' that will be
subject to this annual safety fitness assessment and will be consistent
with Congressional intent.
DATES: You must submit comments by April 11, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments bearing the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Docket ID FMCSA-2015-0481 using any of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Each submission must include the Agency name and the docket number
for this notice. Note that DOT posts all comments received without
change to www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
included in a comment. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to www.regulations.gov at any time or visit Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The on-line Federal document management system
is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. If you want
acknowledgment that we received your comments, please include a self-
addressed, stamped envelope or postcard or print the acknowledgement
page that appears after submitting comments on-line.
Privacy Act: All comments received were posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov. In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT
previously solicited comments from the public to better inform its
rulemaking process. DOT posted these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/
ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Loretta Bitner, (202) 385-2428,
loretta.bitner@dot.gov. FMCSA office hours are from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact
Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Motorcoach safety received increased public attention after several
serious crashes during 2011, some of which involved ``curbside'' bus
operators, passenger carrier operations often characterized by high
passenger loads with service between urban areas. As a result, the
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) conducted an investigation
of motorcoach safety with an emphasis on curbside operations. One
objective of the investigation was to describe the characteristics of
the curbside business model among interstate motorcoach carriers. The
NTSB examined a population of 4,172 active interstate motorcoach
carriers operating in the United States and identified 71 of them as
scheduled motorcoach carriers providing curbside service.
In its ``Executive Report on Curbside Motorcoach Safety'' that was
published on October 12, 2011, the NTSB stated
[[Page 6926]]
the following in describing curbside bus operators:
The term ``curbside operations'' refers to a business model
(that is, the means by which motorcoach service is provided) rather
than a type of motorcoach carrier. In fact, no formal definition of
curbside carriers exists, and federal and state oversight
authorities have no unique categorization or tracking mechanism for
these carriers. For the purpose of this report, curbside motorcoach
operations are those in which interstate motorcoach carriers conduct
scheduled trips from one city to another city or a destination and
originate or terminate at a location other than a traditional bus
terminal; most of these operations discharge passengers at one or
more curbside locations.
Although curbside motorcoach carriers apply a similar business
model, they vary greatly in other characteristics. Some carriers
operate large fleets of motorcoaches throughout the United States,
whereas others have a fleet of only a few buses that operate in
local regions.
MAP-21 was signed into law on July 6, 2012. Section 32707, codified
at 49 U.S.C. 31144(i)(4)(B), addresses improved oversight of motorcoach
service providers. A ''motorcoach'' is defined in section 32707(b) of
MAP-21 as an ``over-the-road bus;'' one with an elevated passenger deck
over a baggage compartment. A motorcoach does not include a bus used in
public transportation provided by a State or local government, or a
school bus. The statute requires an annual assessment of the safety
fitness of certain motor carriers of passengers that serve primarily
urban areas with high passenger loads.
Implementation of Statutory Provision
Section 31144(i)(4) requires that the Secretary:
Reassess the safety fitness rating of each motor carrier
of passengers at no less than once every 3 years; and
Annually assess the safety fitness of certain motor
carriers of passengers that serve primarily urban areas with high
passenger loads.
The language indicates Congress' intent to have two levels of
oversight for motor carrier of passengers, a safety fitness rating
every 3 years for each passenger carrier and, a safety fitness
assessment annually for passenger carriers that serve primarily urban
areas with high passenger loads. To effectively implement 49 U.S.C.
31144(i)(4)(B), FMCSA must define which passenger carriers will be
subject to the annual safety fitness assessment requirement. While
Congress directed that carriers of passengers that serve primarily
urban areas with high passenger loads be subject to this requirement,
FMCSA does not collect urban area service or passenger volume
information from motor carriers of passengers that are subject to the
Agency's safety oversight.
FMCSA believes Congress intends for the Agency to have increased
safety oversight of the bus operators that generally provide low-cost,
regularly scheduled passenger transportation service between major
cities with curbside boarding and/or disembarking. Although some
carriers purport to have a bus terminal/facility/station, the location
used for passengers is a waiting area only outside of an office
building and the passenger pickups and drop-offs occur at the curbside
or in a parking lot.
Request for Comments
Because FMCSA does not include in its regulations or regulatory
guidance a definition of the term ``curbside bus operator,'' the Agency
believes it is imperative that one be adopted in order to effectively
implement 49 U.S.C. 31144(i)(4)(B). Therefore, the Agency proposes the
following definition for identifying motor carriers of passengers that
must undergo an annual assessment:
``Curbside Bus Operator'' means a motor carrier of passengers
that serves primarily urban areas with high passenger loads, and
uses 25% or more of its motorcoaches for operations with passenger
pickups and drop-offs occuring at the curbside or in a parking lot.
FMCSA would use this definition in identifying, tracking, and
conducting the annual safety fitness assessments of every identified
curbside bus operators. This definition would not have any impact on
the enforcement of the applicable safety regulations. It would only be
used to identify those carriers that Congress intends the Agency
conduct annual safety assessments.
FMCSA is considering the use of the following questions during the
motor carrier registration process to identify curbside bus operators
that transport high passenger loads:
Does your company operate 25% or more of its motorcoaches between
cities providing for-hire passenger transportation that originates
or terminates at locations other than terminals, such as street
corners or outside a retail business?
Is your company required to obtain a permit from a local government
to pick up or drop off at locations other than terminals, such as
street corners or outside a retail business?
The operation of a motorcoach to transport passengers is the
FMCSA's interpretation of a high passenger load with implementation of
49 U.S.C. 31144(i)(4)(B). Motorcoaches are large capacity passenger
vehicles that are frequently operated by curbside bus operators.
FMCSA requests public comments whether the proposed definition and
questions are appropriate for idenitying curbside operators for
implementation of the statutorily mandated annual safety fitness
assessments.
In addition to motor carriers of passengers that identify
themselves as curbside bus operators through the motor carrier
registration process, FMCSA will direct its enforcement personnel to
designate passenger carriers as a curbside bus operators in the
Agency's database when there is evidence that the carriers are
conducting curbside bus operations, but fail to report it to the Agency
or began curbside bus operations subsequent to registration. With this
in mind, FMCSA is seeking input to the following questions.
1. Should FMCSA identify all motor carriers of passengers that have
both curbside operations and operations that originate/terminate at a
traditional bus terminal as curbside bus operators requiring an annual
safety assessment?
2. Should a motor carrier of passengers that uses 25% or more of
its motorcoaches for curbside operations be identified by FMCSA as a
curbside bus operator requiring an annual safety assessment?
3. Should FMCSA base the percentage of curbside operations on the
number of motorcoaches used in that type of service? If not, then what
measure should be used?
4. Should FMCSA include passenger carrier operations that pick up
passengers at the curbside in vehicles smaller than motorcoaches with
the intent of transferring the passengers to a larger passenger vehicle
such as a motorcoach as curbside bus operators requiring an annual
safety assessment?
5. Should a motor carrier of passengers applicant be required to
self-identify as a curbside operator during registration with FMCSA?
6. Should a motor carrier of passengers previously registered with
FMCSA be required to self-identify as a curbside operator when updating
its registration information as required by 49 CFR 390.201?
7. Should FMCSA base the definition of an urban area on population,
incorporated land area, defined commercial zones, urbanized area as
defined by the U. S. Census Bureau, or some other criteria?
8. Should a motor carrier of passengers with 25% or more of its
motorcoach operation taking place in primarily urban areas be
identified by
[[Page 6927]]
FMCSA as a curbside bus operator requiring an annual safety assessment?
9. Is there any additional criteria we should consider to identify
which motor carrier of passenger should be defined as a curbside bus
operator requiring an annual safety assessment?
Issued under the authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.87 on: January
29, 2016.
T.F. Scott Darling, III,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016-02510 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P