Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District, 6763-6765 [2016-02421]
Download as PDF
6763
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(7) Rule 9410, ‘‘Employer Based Trip
Reduction,’’ adopted on December 17,
2009.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–02411 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0756; FRL–9941–11–
Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the YoloSolano Air Quality Management District
(YSAQMD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides
of nitrogen (NOX) from gasoline
dispensing facilities and stationary gas
turbines. We are approving local rules
that regulate these emission sources
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the
Act).
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective on April 11,
2016 without further notice, unless the
EPA receives adverse comments by
March 10, 2016. If we receive such
comments, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to
notify the public that this direct final
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2015–0756 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
DATES:
section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Gong, EPA Region IX, (415) 972
3073, Gong.Kevin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the rule
revisions?
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
C. EPA Recommendations to Further
Improve the Rules
D. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rules addressed by
this action with the dates that they were
adopted by the local air agency and
submitted by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Local agency
Rule No.
YSAQMD ...........
YSAQMD ...........
Rule title
2.22
2.34
Gasoline Dispensing Facilities .....................................................................
Stationary Gas Turbines ..............................................................................
On August 13, 2015, the EPA
determined that the submittal for
YSAQMD Rules 2.22 and 2.34 met the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51,
appendix V, which must be met before
formal EPA review.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. Are there other versions of these
rules?
We approved an earlier version of
Rule 2.22 into the SIP on January 23,
2003 (68 FR 3190), and an earlier
version of Rule 2.34 into the SIP on
September 3, 1998 (63 FR 46892).
C. What is the purpose of the rule
revisions?
VOCs help produce ground-level
ozone, smog and PM, which harm
human health and the environment.
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires
States to submit regulations that control
VOC emissions. The revisions to Rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Feb 08, 2016
Revised
Jkt 238001
2.22 exempt certain categories of
facilities that have other vapor recovery
control measures in place, require
aboveground storage tanks to install
additional approved vapor recovery
systems, require Phase II enhanced
vapor recovery systems at all dispensing
facilities, and require operators to
conduct appropriate inspection and
maintenance procedures.
NOX helps produce ground-level
ozone, smog and PM, which harm
human health and the environment.
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires
States to submit regulations that control
NOX emissions. The revisions to Rule
2.34 define new operation requirements
during start-up and shut-down of units
and during short-term exceedances
under specific circumstances, and
require facilities to install continuous
emissions monitoring systems.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Submitted
01/14/14
11/12/14
06/26/15
06/26/15
The EPA’s technical support
documents (TSDs) have more
information about these rules.
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
SIP rules must be enforceable (see
CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not
interfere with applicable requirements
concerning attainment and reasonable
further progress or other CAA
requirements (see CAA section 110(l)),
and must not modify certain SIP control
requirements in nonattainment areas
without ensuring equivalent or greater
emissions reductions (see CAA section
193).
Generally, SIP rules must require
Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) for each category of
sources covered by a Control
Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
6764
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
as well as each major source of VOCs
and NOX in ozone nonattainment areas
classified as moderate or above (see
CAA sections 182(b)(2)). YSAQMD
regulates an ozone nonattainment area
classified as Severe for the 2008 8-hour
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(40 CFR 81.305). Therefore, Rules 2.22
and 2.34 must implement RACT.
Guidance and policy documents that
we use to evaluate enforceability,
revision/relaxation and rule stringency
requirements for the applicable criteria
pollutants include the following:
1. ‘‘State Implementation Plans; General
Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of
the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,’’ (57
FR 13498, April 16, 1992 and 57 FR 18070,
April 28, 1992).
2. ‘‘Issues Relating to VOC Regulation
Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations’’
(‘‘the Bluebook,’’ U.S. EPA, May 25, 1988;
revised January 11, 1990).
3. ‘‘Guidance Document for Correcting
Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies’’
(‘‘the Little Bluebook’’, EPA Region 9, August
21, 2001).
4. ‘‘State Implementation Plans; Nitrogen
Oxides Supplement to the General Preamble;
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Implementation of Title I; Proposed Rule’’
(‘‘the NOX Supplement,’’ 57 FR 55620,
November 25, 1992).
5. ‘‘Design Criteria for Stage 1 Vapor
Control Systems,’’ (EPA–450/R–75–102).
6. ‘‘Technical Guidance—Stage II Vapor
Recovery Systems for Control of Refueling
Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities,’’
(EPA–450/3–91–022).
7. ‘‘Restatement to Update of EPA’s SSM
Policy Applicable to SIPs,’’ (80 FR 33839,
June 12, 2015).
8. ‘‘Alternative Control Techniques
Document—NOX Emissions from Stationary
Gas Turbines,’’ (EPA–453/R–93–007).
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
We believe these rules are consistent
with the relevant policy and guidance
regarding enforceability, RACT,
Reasonably Available Control Measures,
and SIP relaxations. The TSDs have
more information on our evaluation.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
C. EPA Recommendations to Further
Improve the Rule(s)
The TSDs describe additional rule
revisions that we recommend for the
next time the local agency modifies the
rules but are not currently the basis for
rule disapproval.
D. Public Comment and Final Action
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of
the Act, the EPA is fully approving the
submitted rules because we believe they
fulfill all relevant requirements. We do
not think anyone will object to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without
proposing it in advance. However, in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Feb 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
the Proposed Rules section of this
Federal Register, we are simultaneously
proposing approval of the same
submitted rules. If we receive adverse
comments by March 10, 2016, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public
that the direct final approval will not
take effect and we will address the
comments in a subsequent final action
based on the proposal. If we do not
receive timely adverse comments, the
direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on April 11,
2016. This will incorporate these rules
into the federally enforceable SIP. These
rules will supersede the existing SIPapproved rules.
Please note that if the EPA receives
adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if
that provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, the EPA may
adopt as final those provisions of the
rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
YSAQMD rules described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents
available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at the appropriate EPA office (see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble for
more information).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by April 11, 2016.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the Proposed Rules section
of this Federal Register, rather than file
an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
the EPA can withdraw this direct final
rule and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2015–0309; FRL–9941–82–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AS68
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone:
Revisions To Reporting and
Recordkeeping for Imports and
Exports
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(199)(i)(E)(3),
(c)(303)(i)(B)(3), and (c)(463)(i)(B)(2) and
(3) to read as follows:
■
Identification of plan.
*
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is taking direct final
action on minor conforming edits to the
stratospheric protection regulations to
implement the International Trade Data
System. This system allows businesses
to transmit the transactional data
required by multiple Federal agencies
for the import and export of cargo
through a single ‘‘window.’’ As
businesses currently must submit trade
data to multiple agencies, in multiple
ways, and often on paper, the transition
to electronic filing is expected to save
businesses time and money.
Specifically, this rule removes the
requirement that the petition for used
ozone-depleting substances accompany
the shipment through U.S. Customs and
removes references to Customs forms
that are obsolete under the new system.
DATES: This rule is effective on May 9,
2016 without further notice, unless EPA
receives adverse comment by March 10,
2016. If EPA receives adverse comment,
SUMMARY:
■
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(199) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) * * *
(3) Previously approved on September
3, 1998, in paragraph (c)(199)(i)(E)(1) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
(c)(463)(i)(B)(3) of this section, Rule
16:23 Feb 08, 2016
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
40 CFR Part 82
Dated: December 24, 2015.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
[FR Doc. 2016–02421 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
§ 52.220
2.34, ‘‘Stationary Gas Turbines,’’
adopted on July 13, 1994.
*
*
*
*
*
(303) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(3) Previously approved on January
23, 2003, in paragraph (c)(303)(i)(B)(1)
of this section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
(c)(463)(i)(B)(2) of this section, Rule
2.22, ‘‘Gasoline Dispensing Facilities,’’
revised on June 12, 2002.
*
*
*
*
*
(463) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(2) Rule 2.22, ‘‘Gasoline Dispensing
Facilities,’’ revised on January 14, 2015.
(3) Rule 2.34, ‘‘Stationary Gas
Turbines,’’ revised on November 12,
2014.
*
*
*
*
*
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6765
we will publish a timely withdrawal in
the Federal Register informing the
public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2015–0309, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeremy Arling by regular mail: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Stratospheric Protection Division
(6205T), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC, 20460; by
telephone: (202) 343–9055; or by email:
arling.jeremy@epa.gov. You may also
visit the EPA’s Ozone Protection Web
site at www.epa.gov/ozone/
strathome.html for further information
about EPA’s Stratospheric Ozone
Protection regulations, the science of
ozone layer depletion, and other related
topics.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
EPA is publishing this rule without a
prior proposed rule because we view
this as a noncontroversial action and
anticipate no adverse comment. This
rule is intended to make minor changes
like the removal of references to U.S.
Customs forms that will no longer be
available when the electronic
International Trade Data System is
implemented. However, in the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of today’s
Federal Register, we are publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposed rule to make these edits if
adverse comments are received on this
direct final rule. We will not institute a
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6763-6765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02421]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0756; FRL-9941-11-Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Yolo-Solano Air
Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve revisions to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District (YSAQMD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern emissions of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) from gasoline dispensing facilities and stationary gas
turbines. We are approving local rules that regulate these emission
sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on April 11, 2016 without further notice,
unless the EPA receives adverse comments by March 10, 2016. If we
receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2015-0756 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Gong, EPA Region IX, (415) 972
3073, Gong.Kevin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the rule revisions?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
C. EPA Recommendations to Further Improve the Rules
D. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this action with the dates
that they were adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB).
Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Revised Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YSAQMD......................... 2.22 Gasoline Dispensing Facilities. 01/14/14 06/26/15
YSAQMD......................... 2.34 Stationary Gas Turbines........ 11/12/14 06/26/15
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 13, 2015, the EPA determined that the submittal for
YSAQMD Rules 2.22 and 2.34 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part
51, appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review.
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
We approved an earlier version of Rule 2.22 into the SIP on January
23, 2003 (68 FR 3190), and an earlier version of Rule 2.34 into the SIP
on September 3, 1998 (63 FR 46892).
C. What is the purpose of the rule revisions?
VOCs help produce ground-level ozone, smog and PM, which harm human
health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States
to submit regulations that control VOC emissions. The revisions to Rule
2.22 exempt certain categories of facilities that have other vapor
recovery control measures in place, require aboveground storage tanks
to install additional approved vapor recovery systems, require Phase II
enhanced vapor recovery systems at all dispensing facilities, and
require operators to conduct appropriate inspection and maintenance
procedures.
NOX helps produce ground-level ozone, smog and PM, which
harm human health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA
requires States to submit regulations that control NOX
emissions. The revisions to Rule 2.34 define new operation requirements
during start-up and shut-down of units and during short-term
exceedances under specific circumstances, and require facilities to
install continuous emissions monitoring systems.
The EPA's technical support documents (TSDs) have more information
about these rules.
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not
interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section
110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in
nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions
reductions (see CAA section 193).
Generally, SIP rules must require Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control
Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document
[[Page 6764]]
as well as each major source of VOCs and NOX in ozone
nonattainment areas classified as moderate or above (see CAA sections
182(b)(2)). YSAQMD regulates an ozone nonattainment area classified as
Severe for the 2008 8-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard (40
CFR 81.305). Therefore, Rules 2.22 and 2.34 must implement RACT.
Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate
enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements
for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following:
1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the
Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,''
(57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992 and 57 FR 18070, April 28, 1992).
2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies,
and Deviations'' (``the Bluebook,'' U.S. EPA, May 25, 1988; revised
January 11, 1990).
3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies'' (``the Little Bluebook'', EPA Region 9, August 21,
2001).
4. ``State Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to
the General Preamble; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Implementation of Title I; Proposed Rule'' (``the NOX
Supplement,'' 57 FR 55620, November 25, 1992).
5. ``Design Criteria for Stage 1 Vapor Control Systems,'' (EPA-
450/R-75-102).
6. ``Technical Guidance--Stage II Vapor Recovery Systems for
Control of Refueling Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities,''
(EPA-450/3-91-022).
7. ``Restatement to Update of EPA's SSM Policy Applicable to
SIPs,'' (80 FR 33839, June 12, 2015).
8. ``Alternative Control Techniques Document--NOX
Emissions from Stationary Gas Turbines,'' (EPA-453/R-93-007).
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and
guidance regarding enforceability, RACT, Reasonably Available Control
Measures, and SIP relaxations. The TSDs have more information on our
evaluation.
C. EPA Recommendations to Further Improve the Rule(s)
The TSDs describe additional rule revisions that we recommend for
the next time the local agency modifies the rules but are not currently
the basis for rule disapproval.
D. Public Comment and Final Action
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all
relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance.
However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are
simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rules. If we
receive adverse comments by March 10, 2016, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct
final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in
a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive
timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on April 11, 2016. This will incorporate these
rules into the federally enforceable SIP. These rules will supersede
the existing SIP-approved rules.
Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final
those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
YSAQMD rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble for more information).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
[[Page 6765]]
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 11, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed
Rules section of this Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that the EPA
can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: December 24, 2015.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(199)(i)(E)(3),
(c)(303)(i)(B)(3), and (c)(463)(i)(B)(2) and (3) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(199) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) * * *
(3) Previously approved on September 3, 1998, in paragraph
(c)(199)(i)(E)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
paragraph (c)(463)(i)(B)(3) of this section, Rule 2.34, ``Stationary
Gas Turbines,'' adopted on July 13, 1994.
* * * * *
(303) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(3) Previously approved on January 23, 2003, in paragraph
(c)(303)(i)(B)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
paragraph (c)(463)(i)(B)(2) of this section, Rule 2.22, ``Gasoline
Dispensing Facilities,'' revised on June 12, 2002.
* * * * *
(463) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(2) Rule 2.22, ``Gasoline Dispensing Facilities,'' revised on
January 14, 2015.
(3) Rule 2.34, ``Stationary Gas Turbines,'' revised on November 12,
2014.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-02421 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P