Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California; San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Employer Based Trip Reduction Programs, 6761-6763 [2016-02411]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by April 11, 2016.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the Proposed Rules section
of this Federal Register, rather than file
an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
the EPA can withdraw this direct final
rule and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 3, 2015.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
and (G), (c)(187)(i)(E), (c)(254)(i)(C)(6)
and (7), and (c)(361)(i)(A)(4) to read as
follows:
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(51) * * *
(xiii) * * *
(E) Previously approved on May 18,
1981 in paragraph (c)(51)(xiii)(A) of this
section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
(c)(187)(i)(E)(1) of this section, Rule 206.
(F) Previously approved on May 18,
1981 in paragraph (c)(51)(xiii)(A) of this
section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph (c)(254)(i)(C)
of this section, Rules 203 and 204.
(G) Previously approved on May 18,
1981 in paragraph (c)(51)(xiii)(A) of this
section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
(c)(361)(i)(A)(4) of this section, Rule
201.
*
*
*
*
*
(187) * * *
(i) * * *
(E) Santa Barbara County Air
Pollution Control District.
(1) Rule 206, ‘‘Conditional Approval
of Authority to Construct or Permit to
Operate,’’ Revised October 15, 1991.
*
*
*
*
*
(254) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
(6) Rule 203, ‘‘Transfer,’’ revised April
17, 1997.
(7) Rule 204, ‘‘Applications,’’ revised
April 17, 1997.
*
*
*
*
*
(361) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(4) Rule 201, ‘‘Permits Required,’’
revised June 19, 2008.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–02417 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ACTION:
6761
Final rule.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a regulation
submitted for incorporation into the San
Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution
Control District (SJVUAPCD or District)
portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The
regulation, Rule 9410 (Employer Based
Trip Reduction), establishes
requirements for employers in the San
Joaquin Valley to implement programs
encouraging employees to use
ridesharing and alternative
transportation methods to reduce air
pollution. The effect of this action is to
make the requirements of Rule 9410
federally enforceable as part of the
California SIP.
SUMMARY:
This rule will be effective on
March 10, 2016.
DATES:
The EPA has established
docket number EPA–R09–OAR–2014–
0715 for this action. Generally,
documents in the docket for this action
are available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California 94105–3901.
While all documents in the docket are
listed at https://www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location
(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps,
multi-volume reports), and some may
not be available in either location (e.g.,
confidential business information
(CBI)). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
4152, buss.jeffrey@epa.gov.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
40 CFR Part 52
Table of Contents
[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0715; FRL–9941–16–
Region 9]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; California; San
Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution
Control District; Employer Based Trip
Reduction Programs
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
■
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(51)(xiii)(E), (F),
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Feb 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
I. Proposed Action
On August 24, 2015 at 80 FR 51153,
the EPA proposed to approve the
following rule into the California SIP.
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
6762
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULE
Local agency
Rule No.
Rule title
Adopted
Submitted
SJVUAPCD .......
9410
Employer Based Trip Reduction ..................................................................
12/17/09
05/17/10
We proposed to approve this rule
because we determined that it complied
with the relevant Clean Air Act (‘‘CAA’’
or ‘‘Act’’) requirements. Our proposed
action contains more information on the
rule and our evaluation.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, which ended on September
23, 2015, we received one comment
from a member of the public. We are
summarizing that comment and
providing our response below.
Comment: The commenter supports
the rule and the District’s goal of
encouraging transportation alternatives
to driving to work alone. But the
commenter states that, although the
supporting documents provide
satisfactory information about how
commuter programs can reduce air
pollution, ‘‘when reviewing the
available information in the docket
folder, [the commenter] noticed a lack of
solutions to the problem of this
particular facet of pollution in the
primary document.’’ The commenter
asks whether this means that ‘‘solutions
have yet to be identified or fully
planned.’’
Response: Section 5 of Rule 9410
suggests trip reduction strategies that
covered employers may choose to
implement, including transit programs
and ride-sharing opportunities, among
others. Employers must identify which
of these specific trip reduction strategies
they will adopt, and report the results
of their efforts annually to the
SJVUAPCD. In today’s action, EPA is
not approving specific trip reduction
plans for individual employers, but is
approving the general requirements in
Rule 9410 that direct employers to
develop trip reduction plans.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment of the rule as
described in our proposed action.
Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving this rule into the California
SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Feb 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
SJVUAPCD rule described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA had made, and will
continue to make, these documents
available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at the appropriate EPA office (see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble for
more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the proposed rule does
not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Oxides of
nitrogen, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: December 11, 2015.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(379)(i)(C)(7) to
read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
(379) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
*
*
6763
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(7) Rule 9410, ‘‘Employer Based Trip
Reduction,’’ adopted on December 17,
2009.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–02411 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0756; FRL–9941–11–
Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the YoloSolano Air Quality Management District
(YSAQMD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides
of nitrogen (NOX) from gasoline
dispensing facilities and stationary gas
turbines. We are approving local rules
that regulate these emission sources
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the
Act).
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective on April 11,
2016 without further notice, unless the
EPA receives adverse comments by
March 10, 2016. If we receive such
comments, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to
notify the public that this direct final
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2015–0756 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
DATES:
section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Gong, EPA Region IX, (415) 972
3073, Gong.Kevin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the rule
revisions?
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
C. EPA Recommendations to Further
Improve the Rules
D. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rules addressed by
this action with the dates that they were
adopted by the local air agency and
submitted by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Local agency
Rule No.
YSAQMD ...........
YSAQMD ...........
Rule title
2.22
2.34
Gasoline Dispensing Facilities .....................................................................
Stationary Gas Turbines ..............................................................................
On August 13, 2015, the EPA
determined that the submittal for
YSAQMD Rules 2.22 and 2.34 met the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51,
appendix V, which must be met before
formal EPA review.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. Are there other versions of these
rules?
We approved an earlier version of
Rule 2.22 into the SIP on January 23,
2003 (68 FR 3190), and an earlier
version of Rule 2.34 into the SIP on
September 3, 1998 (63 FR 46892).
C. What is the purpose of the rule
revisions?
VOCs help produce ground-level
ozone, smog and PM, which harm
human health and the environment.
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires
States to submit regulations that control
VOC emissions. The revisions to Rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:23 Feb 08, 2016
Revised
Jkt 238001
2.22 exempt certain categories of
facilities that have other vapor recovery
control measures in place, require
aboveground storage tanks to install
additional approved vapor recovery
systems, require Phase II enhanced
vapor recovery systems at all dispensing
facilities, and require operators to
conduct appropriate inspection and
maintenance procedures.
NOX helps produce ground-level
ozone, smog and PM, which harm
human health and the environment.
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires
States to submit regulations that control
NOX emissions. The revisions to Rule
2.34 define new operation requirements
during start-up and shut-down of units
and during short-term exceedances
under specific circumstances, and
require facilities to install continuous
emissions monitoring systems.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Submitted
01/14/14
11/12/14
06/26/15
06/26/15
The EPA’s technical support
documents (TSDs) have more
information about these rules.
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
SIP rules must be enforceable (see
CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not
interfere with applicable requirements
concerning attainment and reasonable
further progress or other CAA
requirements (see CAA section 110(l)),
and must not modify certain SIP control
requirements in nonattainment areas
without ensuring equivalent or greater
emissions reductions (see CAA section
193).
Generally, SIP rules must require
Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) for each category of
sources covered by a Control
Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document
E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM
09FER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6761-6763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02411]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0715; FRL-9941-16-Region 9]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California;
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Employer
Based Trip Reduction Programs
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a
regulation submitted for incorporation into the San Joaquin Valley
Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD or District) portion
of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The regulation, Rule
9410 (Employer Based Trip Reduction), establishes requirements for
employers in the San Joaquin Valley to implement programs encouraging
employees to use ridesharing and alternative transportation methods to
reduce air pollution. The effect of this action is to make the
requirements of Rule 9410 federally enforceable as part of the
California SIP.
DATES: This rule will be effective on March 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0715
for this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-
3901. While all documents in the docket are listed at https://www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at
the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi-
volume reports), and some may not be available in either location
(e.g., confidential business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4152, buss.jeffrey@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On August 24, 2015 at 80 FR 51153, the EPA proposed to approve the
following rule into the California SIP.
[[Page 6762]]
Table 1--Submitted Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SJVUAPCD...................... 9410 Employer Based Trip Reduction 12/17/09 05/17/10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve this rule because we determined that it
complied with the relevant Clean Air Act (``CAA'' or ``Act'')
requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on the rule
and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, which ended on September 23, 2015, we received one
comment from a member of the public. We are summarizing that comment
and providing our response below.
Comment: The commenter supports the rule and the District's goal of
encouraging transportation alternatives to driving to work alone. But
the commenter states that, although the supporting documents provide
satisfactory information about how commuter programs can reduce air
pollution, ``when reviewing the available information in the docket
folder, [the commenter] noticed a lack of solutions to the problem of
this particular facet of pollution in the primary document.'' The
commenter asks whether this means that ``solutions have yet to be
identified or fully planned.''
Response: Section 5 of Rule 9410 suggests trip reduction strategies
that covered employers may choose to implement, including transit
programs and ride-sharing opportunities, among others. Employers must
identify which of these specific trip reduction strategies they will
adopt, and report the results of their efforts annually to the
SJVUAPCD. In today's action, EPA is not approving specific trip
reduction plans for individual employers, but is approving the general
requirements in Rule 9410 that direct employers to develop trip
reduction plans.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rule
as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in
section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving this rule into
the California SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
SJVUAPCD rule described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA had made, and will continue to make, these documents
available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
proposed action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will
not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Oxides of
nitrogen, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: December 11, 2015.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(379)(i)(C)(7) to
read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(379) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
[[Page 6763]]
(7) Rule 9410, ``Employer Based Trip Reduction,'' adopted on
December 17, 2009.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-02411 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
