National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions: Petroleum Refinery Sector Amendments, 6814-6824 [2016-02306]
Download as PDF
6814
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0784, FRL–9940–18–
Region 9]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Santa Barbara
County Air Pollution Control District;
Permit Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the Santa Barbara County
Air Pollution Control District
(SBCAPCD or District) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These revisions concern
administrative and procedural
requirements to obtain preconstruction
permits which regulate emission
sources under the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).
DATES: Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by March 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number [EPA–R09–
OAR–2015–0784, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. Email: R9airpermits@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Gerardo Rios (Air3), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send email
directly to EPA, your email address will
be automatically captured and included
as part of the public comment. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Feb 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at www.regulations.gov
and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California 94105–3901. While all
documents in the docket are listed at
www.regulations.gov, some information
may be publicly available only at the
hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material, large maps), and some may not
be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
YaTing (Sheila) Tsai, EPA Region IX, (415)
972–3328, Tsai.Ya-Ting@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. This
proposal addresses the following local
rules: 201, 203, 204, and 206. In the
Rules and Regulations section of this
Federal Register, we are approving
these local rules in a direct final action
without prior proposal because we
believe these SIP revisions are not
controversial. If we receive adverse
comments, however, we will publish a
timely withdrawal of the direct final
rule and address the comments in
subsequent action based on this
proposed rule. Please note that if we
receive adverse comment on a particular
rule, we may adopt as final those rules
that are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
We do not plan to open a second
comment period, so anyone interested
in commenting should do so at this
time. If we do not receive adverse
comments, no further activity is
planned. For further information, please
see the direct final action.
Dated: December 3, 2015.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2016–02419 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 60 and 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0682; FRL–9940–66–
OAR]
RIN 2016–AS83
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions:
Petroleum Refinery Sector
Amendments
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This action proposes
amendments to the National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) Refinery MACT 1 and
Refinery MACT 2 regulations and the
New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) for petroleum refineries, which
were published on December 1, 2015. In
that action, as a result of a risk and
technology review, the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) finalized
amendments to Refinery MACT 1 and
Refinery MACT 2. In this action, the
EPA is proposing to amend the
compliance date in Refinery MACT 1 for
maintenance vent standards that apply
during periods of startup, shutdown,
maintenance or inspection for sources
constructed or reconstructed on or
before June 30, 2014. In this action, the
EPA is also proposing to revise the
compliance dates in Refinery MACT 2
for the standards that apply during
startup, shutdown, or hot standby for
fluid catalytic cracking units (FCCU)
and startup and shutdown for sulfur
recovery units (SRU) constructed or
reconstructed on or before June 30,
2014. These proposed revisions do not
affect requirements that apply during
normal operations. Finally, the EPA is
proposing technical corrections and
clarifications to the NESHAP and the
NSPS for petroleum refineries. This
action will have an insignificant effect
on emissions reductions and costs.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 25, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2010–0682, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
09FEP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA is seeking comment
only on the issues specifically identified
in this notice. The EPA will not respond
to any comments addressing other
aspects of the final rules or any other
related rulemakings. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e. on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
Instructions. All submissions must
include the agency name and Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0682. The
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and will be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. Send or
deliver information identified as CBI
only to the following address: OAQPS
Document Control Officer (C404–02),
Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711, Attention
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–
0682. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI.
For CBI information on a disk or CD–
ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the
outside of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI
and then identify electronically within
the disk or CD–ROM the specific
information you claim as CBI. In
addition to one complete version of the
comment that includes information
claimed as CBI, you must submit a copy
of the comment that does not contain
the information claimed as CBI for
inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
The https://www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means the EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Feb 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to the EPA without
going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, the EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If the EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, the EPA may not
be able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should not include
special characters or any form of
encryption and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket. All documents in the docket
are listed in the regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA Docket Center, EPA WJC West
Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the EPA Docket Center is
(202) 566–1742. Visit the EPA Docket
Center homepage at https://www.epa.
gov/epahome/dockets.htm for
additional information about the EPA’s
public docket.
Public hearing. A public hearing will
be held if requested by February 16,
2016 to accept oral comments on this
proposed action. The hearing will be
held, if requested, on February 24, 2016
at the EPA’s North Carolina Campus
located at 109 T.W. Alexander Drive,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. The
hearing, if requested, will begin at 9:00
a.m. (local time) and will conclude at
1:00 p.m. (local time). To request a
hearing, to register to speak at a hearing,
or to inquire if a hearing will be held,
please contact Ms. Virginia Hunt at
(919) 541–0832 or by email at
hunt.virginia@epa.gov. The last day to
pre-register to speak at a hearing, if one
is held, will be February 22, 2016.
Additionally, requests to speak will be
taken the day of the hearing at the
hearing registration desk, although
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6815
preferences on speaking times may not
be able to be fulfilled. Please note that
registration requests received before the
hearing will be confirmed by the EPA
via email.
Please note that any updates made to
any aspect of the hearing, including
whether or not a hearing will be held,
will be posted online at https://www3.
epa.gov/airtoxics/petref.html. We ask
that you contact Ms. Virginia Hunt at
(919) 541–0832 or by email at
hunt.virginia@epa.gov or monitor our
Web site to determine if a hearing will
be held. The EPA does not intend to
publish a notice in the Federal Register
announcing any such updates. Please go
to https://www3.epa.gov/airtoxics/
petref.html for more information on the
public hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Brenda Shine, Sector Policies and
Programs Division, Refining and
Chemicals Group (E143–01), Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina,
27711; telephone number: (919) 541–
3608; facsimile number: (919) 541–0246;
and email address:
shine.brenda@epa.gov. For information
about the applicability of the NESHAP
to a particular entity, contact Ms. Maria
Malave, Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Assurance, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
WJC South Building, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number: (202)564–7027;
facsimile number: (202)564–0050; and
email address: malave.maria@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Preamble Acronyms and
Abbreviations. We use multiple
acronyms and terms in this preamble.
While this list may not be exhaustive, to
ease the reading of this preamble and for
reference purposes, the EPA defines the
following terms and acronyms here:
CAA Clean Air Act
CBI confidential business information
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CEMS continuous emission monitoring
system
COMS continuous opacity monitoring
system
CPMS continuous parameter monitoring
system
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FCCU fluid catalytic cracking unit
HAP hazardous air pollutants
LEL lower explosive limit
NESHAP National Emissions Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants
NTTAA National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
OAQPS Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards
OECA Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Assurance
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
09FEP1
6816
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
OMB Office of Management and Budget
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
PRA Paperwork Reduction Act
PSM Process Safety Management
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act
RMP Risk Management Plan
SRU sulfur recovery unit
TTN Technology Transfer Network
UMRA Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
entities likely to be affected by the final
action for the source categories listed.
To determine whether your facility is
affected, you should examine the
applicability criteria in the appropriate
NESHAP or NSPS. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
any aspect of these NESHAP or NSPS,
please contact the appropriate person
listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble.
Organization of this Document. The
information in this preamble is
organized as follows:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. Where can I get a copy of this document
and other related information?
II. Background Information
III. What actions are we proposing?
A. Compliance Dates for Standards
Applicable to Maintenance Vents, FCCU
and SRU during Startup and Shutdown
and during Hot Standby for FCCU
B. Clarifications and Technical Corrections
C. Impacts
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Orders 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
to Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
Regulated Entities. Categories and
entities potentially regulated by this
action are shown in Table 1 of this
preamble.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
TABLE 1—INDUSTRIAL SOURCE CATEGORIES AFFECTED BY THIS FINAL
ACTION
NESHAP and source
category
Petroleum Refining Industry
a North
American
Industry
NAICS a Code
324110
Classification
System.
Table 1 of this preamble is not
intended to be exhaustive, but rather to
provide a guide for readers regarding
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Feb 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
B. Where can I get a copy of this
document and other related
information?
In addition to being available in the
docket, an electronic copy of this
proposal will also be available on the
Internet through the Technology
Transfer Network (TTN) Web site, a
forum for information and technology
exchange in various areas of air
pollution control. Following signature
by the EPA Administrator, the EPA will
post a copy of this proposed action at:
https://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/petref.html.
Following publication in the Federal
Register, the EPA will post the Federal
Register version and key technical
documents at this same Web site.
II. Background Information
On December 1, 2015 (80 FR 75178),
the EPA finalized amendments to the
Petroleum Refinery NESHAP in 40 CFR
part 63, subparts CC and UUU, referred
to as Refinery MACT 1 and 2,
respectively. The final amendments to
Refinery MACT 1 and 2 include a
number of provisions establishing
emissions limitations during startup and
shutdown for emissions sources at
petroleum refineries, including specific
provisions for maintenance vents,
FCCU, and SRU, which are the focus of
this proposed action.
The Refinery MACT 1 standards
regulate emissions of hazardous air
pollutants (HAP) from miscellaneous
process vents. Prior to the December
2015 amendments, the definition of
miscellaneous process vents excluded
episodic or non-routine releases such as
those associated with startup,
shutdown, and maintenance. The
December 2015 Refinery MACT 1 rule
eliminates this exclusion from the
definition of miscellaneous process vent
and establishes standards for these
‘‘maintenance vents’’ in 40 CFR
63.643(c). Maintenance vents are only
used as a result of startup, shutdown,
maintenance or inspection of equipment
when such equipment is emptied,
depressurized, degassed, or placed into
service. The rule specifies that refinery
owners or operators may only release
HAP from these maintenance vents in
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
order to open process equipment
provided that the equipment is drained
and purged to a closed system until the
hydrocarbon content is less than or
equal to a lower explosive limit (LEL) of
10 percent prior to venting to the
atmosphere. As a secondary limit, if the
LEL cannot be measured due to design
constraints of the equipment, the rule
requires that the pressure in the
equipment be reduced to 5 pounds (lbs)
per square inch gauge or less prior to
venting to the atmosphere. The rule also
contains additional limits such as a low
emission threshold (less than 72 lbs/
day), and requirements for catalyst
changeout activities where hydrotreater
pyrophoric catalyst must be purged.
The Refinery MACT 2 standards
regulate HAP emissions from the FCCU
by specifying carbon monoxide (CO)
limits as a surrogate for organic HAP
and by specifying particulate matter
(PM) limits (or nickel limits) as a
surrogate for metal HAP. In the rule,
compliance with the organic HAP
emissions limit is demonstrated using a
continuous CO monitor; compliance
with the metal HAP emissions limit is
demonstrated either using continuous
opacity monitoring system (COMS) or
continuous parameter monitoring
system (CPMS). Owners or operators of
FCCU are provided two options for
demonstrating compliance with the PM
limit during periods of startup,
shutdown, or hot standby in 40 CFR
63.1564(a)(5): Meeting the emission
limit that applies during times other
than startup, shutdown, or hot standby,
or meeting a minimum cyclone face
velocity limit. Similarly, the rule
provides two options for demonstrating
compliance with the CO limit during
periods of startup and shutdown in 40
CFR 63.1565(a)(5): Meeting the emission
limit that applies during times other
than startup, shutdown, or hot standby,
or meeting an excess oxygen limit in the
exhaust from the catalyst regenerator.
The Refinery MACT 2 standards also
regulate HAP emissions from SRU vents
by specifying sulfur dioxide (SO2),
reduced sulfur compound, or total
reduced sulfur limits as a surrogate for
SRU HAP emissions. In the rule,
compliance with the SRU HAP
emissions limit is demonstrated using a
continuous emission monitoring system
(CEMS) or, when a thermal incinerator/
oxidizer is used, compliance with the
SRU HAP emissions limits is
demonstrated using CPMS. The rule
removes previous requirements to
operate according to a site-specific
startup, shutdown, and malfunction
plan and instead finalizes standards that
apply during all times, including
additional standards that apply during
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
09FEP1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
startup and shutdown periods. Three
compliance options were provided for
SRU owners or operators to demonstrate
compliance during periods of startup
and shutdown in 40 CFR 63.1568(a)(4)
including: Meeting the emission limit
that applies during times other than
startup or shutdown, sending purge
gases to a flare that meets the operating
requirements contained in 40 CFR
63.670, or sending purge gases to a
thermal oxidizer or incinerator that
meets specific temperature and excess
oxygen requirements.
For owners or operators complying
with any of the limits for startup,
shutdown, or hot standby for FCCU and
for startup or shutdown for SRU, the
compliance date is the effective date of
the rule (February 1, 2016, 60 days after
the publication date of the rule). The
compliance date for the maintenance
vent provisions is also the effective date
of the rule. In the next section of this
preamble, we discuss some additional
clarifications and technical corrections
we are proposing to Table 11 of subpart
CC to 40 CFR part 63, which is where
the maintenance vent compliance times
and other subpart CC compliance times
are delineated.
The EPA has received new
information that the compliance dates
for standards for maintenance vents and
startup, shutdown, or hot standby for
FCCU and for startup or shutdown for
SRU do not allow sufficient time to
install additional control equipment, if
needed, and to complete the
management of change process, which
includes addressing safety concerns
associated with potential operational or
procedural changes. The management of
change process, which is discussed in
further detail in the next section of this
preamble, includes the following:
Evaluating the change, forming an
internal team to accomplish the change,
engineering the change, which could
include developing new set points,
installing new controls or alarms,
assessing risk of chemical accidents and
catastrophic events, updating associated
plans and procedures, providing
training, performing pre-startup safety
reviews, and implementing the change
as required by other regulatory
programs. In order to accommodate
these steps, we are proposing to amend
the compliance dates for these
provisions to 18 months after the
effective date of the standards (i.e.,
August 1, 2017). These proposed
revisions are limited to periods of
maintenance, startup, and shutdown
which are expected to occur relatively
infrequently as compared to normal
operations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Feb 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
III. What actions are we proposing?
A. Compliance Dates for Standards
Applicable to Maintenance Vents, FCCU
and SRU During Startup and Shutdown
and During Hot Standby for FCCU
The EPA has received additional
information (see Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OAR–2010–0682) that indicates
that the compliance dates for standards
for maintenance vents and periods of
startup, shutdown, and hot standby for
FCCU and for startup or shutdown for
SRU do not provide facilities sufficient
time to go through their management of
change process, which includes
addressing safety concerns associated
with potential operational or procedural
changes and coordinating any changes
with other applicable regulatory
requirements. The process equipment
associated with maintenance vents,
FCCU, and SRU are subject to
requirements under the Risk
Management Program regulation in 40
CFR part 68 and the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) Process Safety Management
(PSM) standard in 29 CFR part 1910.
Thus, any operational or procedural
changes resulting from complying with
the applicable standards must follow
the management of change procedures
in these respective regulatory programs.
The Risk Management Program and
OSHA PSM regulations provide that
owners or operators follow a
management of change process, as
codified in 40 CFR 68.75, 29 CFR
1910.119(l) and appendix C of 29 CFR
1910.119, to ensure that the following
are considered prior to making a change:
• The technical basis for the proposed
change;
• Impact of change on safety and
health;
• Modifications to operating
procedures;
• Necessary time period for the
change; and
• Authorization requirements for the
proposed change.
As part of the management of change
process, the EPA expects that facilities
will have to perform an upfront
assessment to determine what changes
are required to meet the new
maintenance vent requirements and
standards for FCCU and SRU. Based on
our review of information brought
forward by industry representatives,
refinery owners or operators may have
to adjust or install new instrumentation,
including alarms, closed drain headers,
equipment blowdown drums, and other
new or revised processes and controls in
order to comply with these new
provisions. Facilities may also have to
hire a vendor to assist with the project
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6817
and complete the procurement process.
Additionally, we anticipate that
facilities will have to assess risk of
chemical accidents and catastrophic
events and review and revise standard
operating procedures, as necessary.
Further, the management of change
provisions also require that employees
who are involved in operating a process
and maintenance and contract
employees whose job tasks are affected
by the change must be trained prior to
startup of the affected process.
Finally, facilities are required to
conduct pre-startup safety reviews and
obtain authorization for use to fully
implement and startup the modified
process and/or equipment.
Therefore, to account for the
applicable requirements in the Risk
Management Program regulation and
OSHA PSM standard, the EPA is
proposing to require owners and
operators of sources that were
constructed or reconstructed on or
before June 30, 2014, to comply with the
maintenance vent provisions and limits
for startup, shutdown, or hot standby for
FCCU and for startup or shutdown for
SRU no later than 18 months after the
effective date of the December 2015
rule. We believe that this additional
time is both appropriate and sufficient
to accomplish the necessary
compliance-related tasks discussed
above.
Although not common, the possibility
exists that some facilities may have to
install new controls or otherwise invest
in capital projects in order to comply
with these new regulatory provisions.
As provided in the General Provisions
to part 63, owners or operators of these
facilities can request an additional 12
months to comply with the standards
using the provisions in 40 CFR 63.6(i).
Owners and operators must comply
with the general duty requirements in
40 CFR 63.642(n) for maintenance vents
and 40 CFR 63.1570 for FCCU or SRU
during periods of startup, shutdown
and, for FCCU only, hot standby from
the effective date of the December 2015
final rule until they comply with the
new requirements on or before the
applicable compliance dates. Records of
compliance with the general duty
requirements must be maintained as
specified in 40 CFR 63.643(d), 63.642(n)
and 63.1570(c).
B. Clarifications and Technical
Corrections
We are proposing to make clarifying
revisions to Table 11 in 40 CFR part 63,
subpart CC. We received numerous
questions regarding the compliance date
for maintenance vents and some owners
or operators are interpreting Table 11 to
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
09FEP1
6818
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
provide 3 years to comply with the
maintenance vent provisions
established in the rule as well as with
other requirements that were not
amended in the rule. This was not our
intent, and we do not interpret Table 11
to allow 3 years to comply with the
provisions in 40 CFR 63.643, or 3 years
to comply with any of the requirements
in subpart CC that were not amended in
the December 2015 rule. However, in
reviewing Table 11, we do understand
the confusion, and we are proposing a
revised version of Table 11 to more
clearly delineate the compliance dates
for the various provisions in subpart CC
and to reflect the compliance date
proposed for the maintenance vent
provisions in the previous section of
this preamble.
The EPA is also proposing to make
several clarifications and technical
corrections as described here and
summarized in the table below. The first
sentence in § 60.102a(f)(1)(i) is being
changed to incorporate the pollutant of
concern, SO2, directly into the
regulatory text rather than inside a
parenthesis within the sentence for
clarity. A grammatical correction is
being made to the closed blowdown
system definition in § 63.641 by adding
an ‘‘a’’ before the phrase, ‘‘. . . process
vessel to a control device or back into
the process.’’ The term ‘‘relief valve’’
and ‘‘valve’’ are being replaced with
‘‘pressure relief device’’ and ‘‘device’’ in
the force majeure event definition in
§§ 63.641 and 63.670(o)(1)(ii)(B),
respectively. These changes are being
made to improve consistency in the use
of the term ‘‘pressure relief device’’ as
it pertains to the work practice
requirements in § 63.648(j) and
associated provisions. The list of
exceptions for equipment leak
requirements in § 63.648(a) is being
expanded to ensure the intent of the
rulemaking is clear, that pressure relief
devices subject to the requirements in
either 40 CFR part 60, subpart VV or
part 63, subpart H and the requirements
in 40 CFR part 63, subpart CC are to
comply with the requirements in
§ 63.648(j)(1) and (2), instead of the
pressure relief device requirements in
40 CFR part 60, subpart VV and 40 CFR
part 63, subpart H. The reporting and
recordkeeping requirements related to
fenceline monitoring contained in
§ 63.655(h)(8) are being edited to
provide clarity that compliance reports
are due 45 days after the end of each
reporting period. The term ‘‘periodic’’ in
the context of the report for fenceline
monitoring has been removed to avoid
confusion concerning the due dates of
other periodic reports contained in 40
CFR part 63, subpart CC such as those
specified in § 63.655(g). The siting
requirements for passive monitors near
known sources of volatile organic
compounds (VOC) contained in
§ 63.658(c)(1) are being edited to clarify
that a monitor should be placed on the
shoreline adjacent to the dock for
marine vessel loading operations. The
phrase ‘‘that are located offshore’’ was
removed because the intent is to require
a monitor on the shoreline adjacent to
the dock for marine vessel loading
operations, and is not dependent on
whether the location of the marine
vessel loading operation is onshore or
offshore.
The EPA is also proposing to add
language to clarify the effective dates of
two specific provisions in 40 CFR part
63, subpart UUU. First, we are
proposing to revise the catalytic
reforming unit (CRU) pressure limit
exclusion provision in 40 CFR
63.1566(a)(4) to specify that refiners
have 3 years to comply with the
requirements to meet emission
limitations in Tables 15 and 16 if they
actively purge or depressurize at vessel
pressures of 5 psig or less. Although
both the proposal and the final
preambles (at 79 FR 36950 and 80 FR
75185) indicated that we intended to
provide a 3-year compliance period,
language in § 63.1566(a)(4) did not
specifically provide 3 years. This was an
inadvertent omission and in this action
we are proposing to add rule language
to reflect our intent.
Similarly, we are proposing to revise
the entry for item 1 in Table 2 of subpart
UUU to clarify that refineries have 18
months to comply with the 20 percent
opacity operating limit for units subject
to Refinery NSPS subpart J or electing
to comply with Refinery NSPS subpart
J provisions for PM. Although both the
proposal and the final preambles (at 79
FR 36950 and 80 FR 75185) indicated
that we intended to provide an 18month compliance period for new or
revised operating limits for FCCU, the
language in Table 2 of subpart UUU did
not specifically provide this 18 month
compliance period. Again, this was an
inadvertent omission and in this action
we are proposing to add rule language
to reflect our intent.
Additionally, the reference to
§ 60.102a(b)(1) in § 63.1564(a)(1)(iv) is
being removed as this provision should
only reference Option 2 in Table 1 (Item
7 in Table 1 of part 63, subpart UUU),
providing owners or operators with the
option to comply with the Refinery
MACT 2 p.m. option when they choose
not to comply with one of the NSPS
options. A typographical correction is
being made to the reference to
§ 63.1566(a)(5)(iii) in 40 CFR part 63,
subpart UUU, Table 3, Item 12 to
correctly reference § 63.1564(a)(5)(ii).
Finally, an editorial correction is being
made to add the word ‘‘and’’ in place of
a semicolon in 40 CFR part 63, subpart
UUU, Table 5, Item 2.
Provision
Proposed revision
§ 60.102a(f)(1)(i) .......................................................................
Add the phrase ‘‘containing SO2’’ after ‘‘. . . the discharge of any gases . . .’’ in
the first sentence of this paragraph. Remove ‘‘(SO2)’’ in the first sentence of
this paragraph.
Add the word ‘‘a’’ before the phrase, ‘‘. . . process vessel to a control device or
back into the process.’’
Change ‘‘relief valve’’ to ‘‘pressure relief device.’’
Edit the list of exceptions to include paragraphs (j)(1) and (2) of this section.
Remove the word ‘‘periodic’’ and edit to require submittal within 45 days after the
end of each reporting period.
Delete the phrase ‘‘that are located offshore.’’
Change the word ‘‘valve’’ to ‘‘device.’’
Remove the reference to § 60.102a(b)(1).
Revise the paragraph to allow 3 years to comply with Tables 15 and 16 for active
depressuring and purging, when the reactor vent pressure is 5 psig or less.
Add specific text to clarify that the 20 percent opacity operating limit becomes effective ‘‘On and after August 1, 2017. . . .’’
Correct the citation to § 63.1564(a)(5)(ii).
Replace the second semicolon with the word ‘‘and.’’
§ 63.641 Closed blowdown system definition ..........................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 63.641 Force majeure event definition ..................................
§ 63.648(a) ................................................................................
§ 63.655(h)(8) ...........................................................................
§ 63.658(c)(1) ...........................................................................
§ 63.670(o)(1)(ii)(B) ..................................................................
§ 63.1564(a)(1)(iv) ....................................................................
§ 63.1566 (a)(4) ........................................................................
40 CFR part 63, subpart UUU, Table 2, Item 1 ......................
40 CFR part 63, subpart UUU, Table 3, Item 12 ....................
40 CFR part 63, subpart UUU, Table 5, Item 2 ......................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Feb 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
09FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
C. Impacts
We expect the additional compliance
time will have an insignificant effect on
emission reductions and costs, as many
refiners already have measures in place
due to state and other federal
requirements to minimize emissions
during these periods. Further, these
periods are relatively infrequent (some
only occur on a 5-year cycle) and are
usually of short duration.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive Orders can be
found at https://www2.epa.gov/lawsregulations//laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was, therefore, not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose any new
information collection burden under the
PRA. OMB has previously approved the
information collection activities
contained in the existing regulations at
40 CFR part 63, subparts CC and UUU
under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
and has assigned OMB control numbers
2060–0340 and 2060–0554. The
proposed amendments are revisions to
compliance dates, clarifications and
technical corrections that do not affect
the estimated burden of the existing
rule. Therefore, we have not revised the
information collection request for the
existing rule.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. In making this
determination, the impact of concern is
any significant adverse economic
impact on small entities. An agency may
certify that a rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities if
the rule relieves regulatory burden, has
no net burden, or otherwise has a
positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. The action
consists of revisions to compliance
dates, clarifications, and technical
corrections which do not change the
expected economic impact analysis
performed for the existing rule. We
have, therefore, concluded that this
action will have no net regulatory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Feb 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
burden for all directly regulated small
entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. The action imposes no
enforceable duty on any state, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. It will not have substantial
direct effect on tribal governments, on
the relationship between the federal
government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the federal
government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13045 because it is not
economically significant as defined in
Executive Order 12866, and because the
EPA does not believe the environmental
health or safety risks addressed by this
action present a disproportionate risk to
children. The proposed amendments
serve to revise compliance dates and
make technical clarifications and
corrections. We expect the additional
compliance time will have an
insignificant effect on emission
reductions as many refiners already
have measures in place due to state and
other federal requirements to minimize
emissions during these periods. Further,
these periods are relatively infrequent
and are usually of short duration.
Therefore, the proposed amendments
should not appreciably increase risk for
any populations. Further, this action
will allow more time for refiners to
implement procedures to safely start up
and shut down equipment which
should minimize safety risks for all
populations.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6819
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes the human health or
environmental risk addressed by this
action will not have potential
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority, low-income, or indigenous
populations. The proposed amendments
serve to revise compliance dates and
make technical clarifications and
corrections. We expect the additional
compliance time will have an
insignificant effect on emission
reductions as many refiners already
have measures in place due to state and
other federal requirements to minimize
emissions during these periods. Further,
these periods are relatively infrequent
and are usually of short duration.
Therefore, the proposed amendments
should not appreciably increase risk for
any populations. Further, this action
will allow more time for refiners to
implement procedures to safely start up
and shut down equipment which
should minimize safety risks for all
populations.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 60
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: January 29, 2016.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, title 40, chapter I, of the Code
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
09FEP1
6820
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
of Federal Regulations is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 60—STANDARDS OF
PERFORMANCE FOR NEW
STATIONARY SOURCES
1. The authority citation for part 60
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart Ja—Standards of Performance
for Petroleum Refineries for Which
Construction, Reconstruction, or
Modification Commenced After May 14,
2007
2. Section 60.102a is amended by
revising the first sentence of paragraph
(f)(1)(i) to read as follows:
■
§ 60.102a
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) For a sulfur recovery plant with an
oxidation control system or a reduction
control system followed by incineration,
the owner or operator shall not
discharge or cause the discharge of any
gases containing SO2 into the
atmosphere in excess of the emission
limit calculated using Equation 1 of this
section. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
PART 63—NATIONAL EMISSION
STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR
POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE
CATEGORIES
3. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart CC—National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
From Petroleum Refineries
4. Section 63.641 is amended by
revising the definitions of ‘‘Closed
blowdown system’’ and ‘‘Force majeure
event’’ to read as follows:
■
Definitions.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
Closed blowdown system means a
system used for depressuring process
vessels that is not open to the
atmosphere and is configured of piping,
ductwork, connections, accumulators/
knockout drums, and, if necessary, flow
inducing devices that transport gas or
vapor from a process vessel to a control
device or back into the process.
*
*
*
*
*
Force majeure event means a release
of HAP, either directly to the
atmosphere from a pressure relief device
or discharged via a flare, that is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Feb 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
§ 63.643 Miscellaneous process vent
provisions.
*
Emissions limitations.
*
§ 63.641
demonstrated to the satisfaction of the
Administrator to result from an event
beyond the refinery owner or operator’s
control, such as natural disasters; acts of
war or terrorism; loss of a utility
external to the refinery (e.g., external
power curtailment), excluding power
curtailment due to an interruptible
service agreement; and fire or explosion
originating at a near or adjoining facility
outside of the refinery that impacts the
refinery’s ability to operate.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Section 63.643 is amended by
revising paragraph (c) introductory text
and adding paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
*
*
*
*
(c) An owner or operator may
designate a process vent as a
maintenance vent if the vent is only
used as a result of startup, shutdown,
maintenance, or inspection of
equipment where equipment is emptied,
depressurized, degassed or placed into
service. The owner or operator does not
need to designate a maintenance vent as
a Group 1 or Group 2 miscellaneous
process vent. The owner of operator
must comply with the applicable
requirements in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (3) of this section for each
maintenance vent according to the
compliance dates specified in table 11
of this subpart, unless an extension is
requested in accordance with the
provisions in § 63.6(i).
*
*
*
*
*
(d) After February 1, 2016 and prior
to the date of compliance with the
maintenance vent provisions in
paragraph (c) of this section, the owner
or operator must comply with the
requirements in § 63.642(n) for each
maintenance venting event and
maintain records necessary to
demonstrate compliance with the
requirements in § 63.642(n) including, if
appropriate, records of existing standard
site procedures used to deinventory
equipment for safety purposes.
■ 6. Section 63.648 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) introductory text
as follows:
§ 63.648
Equipment leak standards.
(a) Each owner or operator of an
existing source subject to the provisions
of this subpart shall comply with the
provisions of 40 CFR part 60, subpart
VV, and paragraph (b) of this section
except as provided in paragraphs (a)(1)
and (2), (c) through (i), and (j)(1) and (2)
of this section. Each owner or operator
of a new source subject to the provisions
of this subpart shall comply with
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
subpart H of this part except as
provided in paragraphs (c) through (i)
and (j)(1) and (2) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. Section 63.655 is amended by
revising paragraph (h)(8) introductory
text to read as follows:
§ 63.655 Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(8) For fenceline monitoring systems
subject to § 63.658, within 45 calendar
days after the end of each reporting
period, each owner or operator shall
submit the following information to the
EPA’s Compliance and Emissions Data
Reporting Interface (CEDRI). (CEDRI can
be accessed through the EPA’s Central
Data Exchange (CDX) (https://
cdx.epa.gov/). The owner or operator
need not transmit these data prior to
obtaining 12 months of data.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Section 63.658 is amended by
revising paragraph (c)(1) to read as
follows:
§ 63.658
Fenceline monitoring provisions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) As it pertains to this subpart,
known sources of VOCs, as used in
Section 8.2.1.3 in Method 325A of
appendix A of this part for siting
passive monitors, means a wastewater
treatment unit, process unit, or any
emission source requiring control
according to the requirements of this
subpart, including marine vessel
loading operations. For marine vessel
loading operations, one passive monitor
should be sited on the shoreline
adjacent to the dock.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Section 63.670 is amended by
revising paragraph (o)(1)(ii)(B) to read as
follows:
§ 63.670 Requirements for flare control
devices.
*
*
*
*
*
(o) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) Implementation of prevention
measures listed for pressure relief
devices in § 63.648(j)(5) for each
pressure relief device that can discharge
to the flare.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. The appendix to subpart CC is
amended by revising table 11 to read as
follows:
Appendix to Subpart CC of Part 63—
Tables
*
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
*
*
09FEP1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
6821
TABLE 11—COMPLIANCE DATES AND REQUIREMENTS
If the construction/reconstruction
date is . . .
Then the owner or operator must
comply with . . .
And the owner or operator must
achieve compliance . . .
Except as provided in . . .
(1) After June 30, 2014 .................
(i) Requirements for new sources
in §§ 63.643(a) and (b); 63.644,
63.645, and 63.647; 63.648(a)
through (i) and (j)(1) and (2);
63.649 through 63.651; and
63.654 through 63.656.
(ii) Requirements for new sources
in
§§ 63.642(n),
63.643(c),
63.648(j)(3), (6) and (7); and
63.657 through 63.660.
(i) Requirements for new sources
in §§ 63.643(a) and (b); 63.644,
63.645, and 63.647; 63.648(a)
through (i) and (j)(1) and (2);
and 63.649 through 63.651,
63.655 and 63.656.
(ii) Requirements for new sources
in § 63.654.
(iii) Requirements for new sources
in either § 63.646 or § 63.660.
Upon initial startup ........................
§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m).
Upon initial startup or February 1,
2016, whichever is later.
§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m).
Upon initial startup ........................
§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m).
Upon initial startup or October 28,
2009, whichever is later.
Upon initial startup, but you must
transition to comply with only
the requirements in § 63.660 on
or before April 29, 2016.
On or before August 1, 2017 .......
§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m).
(2) After September 4, 2007 but on
or before June 30, 2014.
(iv) Requirements for existing
sources in § 63.643(c).
(v) Requirements for existing
sources in § 63.658.
(vi) Requirements for existing
sources in § 63.648 (j)(3), (6)
and (7) and § 63.657.
(vii) Requirements in § 63.642(n)
(3) After July 14, 1994 but on or
before September 4, 2007.
(i) Requirements for new sources
in §§ 63.643(a) and (b); 63.644,
63.645, and 63.647; 63.648(a)
through (i) and (j)(1) and (2);
and 63.649 through 63.651,
63.655 and 63.656.
(ii) Requirements for existing
sources in § 63.654.
(iii) Requirements for new sources
in either § 63.646 or § 63.660.
(iv) Requirements for existing
sources in § 63.643(c).
(v) Requirements for existing
sources in § 63.658.
(vi) Requirements for existing
sources in §§ 63.648(j)(3), (6)
and (7) and 63.657.
(vii) Requirements in § 63.642(n)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(4) On or before July 14, 1994 ......
(i)
Requirements for existing
sources in §§ 63.648(a) through
(i) and (j)(1) and (2); and
63.649, 63.655 and 63.656.
(ii) Either the requirements for existing sources in §§ 63.643(a)
and
(b);
63.644,
63.645,
63.647, 63.650 and 63.651; and
item (4)(v) of this table.
OR ................................................
The requirements in §§ 63.652
and 63.653.
(iii) Requirements for existing
sources in either § 63.646 or
§ 63.660.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Feb 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
§§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m) and
63.660(d).
On or before January 30, 2018 ....
§§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m) and
63.643(d).
§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m).
On or before January 30, 2019 ....
§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m).
Upon initial startup or February 1,
2016, whichever is later.
Upon initial startup or August 18,
1995, whichever is later.
§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m).
On or before October 29, 2012 ....
§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m).
Upon initial startup, but you must
transition to comply with only
the requirements in § 63.660 on
or before April 29, 2016.
On or before August 1, 2017 .......
§§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m) and
63.660(d).
On or before January 30, 2018 ....
§§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m) and
63.643(d).
§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m).
On or before January 30, 2019 ....
§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m).
Upon initial startup or February 1,
2016, whichever is later.
(a) On or before August 18, 1998
(a) On or before August 18, 1998
On or before August 18, 1998,
but you must transition to comply with only the requirements
in § 63.660 on or before April
29, 2016.
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
(1) § 63.640(k), (l) and (m).
(2) § 63.6(c)(5) or unless an extension has been granted by
the Administrator as provided in
§ 63.6(i).
(1) § 63.640(k), (l) and (m).
(2) § 63.6(c)(5) or unless an extension has been granted by
the Administrator as provided in
§ 63.6(i).
§§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m) and
63.660(d).
09FEP1
6822
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 11—COMPLIANCE DATES AND REQUIREMENTS—Continued
If the construction/reconstruction
date is . . .
*
*
*
And the owner or operator must
achieve compliance . . .
Except as provided in . . .
(iv) Requirements for existing
sources in § 63.654.
(v) Requirements for existing
sources in § 63.643(c).
(vi) Requirements for existing
sources in § 63.658.
(vii) Requirements for existing
sources in §§ 63.648(j)(3), (6)
and (7) and 63.657.
(viii) Requirements in § 63.642(n)
*
Then the owner or operator must
comply with . . .
On or before October 29, 2012 ....
§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m).
On or before August 1, 2017 .......
On or before January 30, 2018 ....
§§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m) and
63.643(d).
§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m).
On or before January 30, 2019 ....
§ 63.640(k), (l) and (m).
*
Subpart UUU—National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Petroleum Refineries: Catalytic
Cracking Units, Catalytic Reforming
Units, and Sulfur Recovery Units
11. Section 63.1563 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (2)
and (b);
■ b. Redesignating paragraphs (d) and
(e) as paragraphs (e) and (f),
respectively;
■ c. Adding paragraph (d); and
■ d. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (e) introductory text.
The revisions and additions to read as
follows:
■
■
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 63.1563 When do I have to comply with
this subpart?
(a) * * *
(1) If you startup your affected source
before April 11, 2002, then you must
comply with the emission limitations
and work practice standards for new
and reconstructed sources in this
subpart no later than April 11, 2002
except as provided in paragraph (d) of
this section.
(2) If you startup your affected source
after April 11, 2002, you must comply
with the emission limitations and work
practice standards for new and
reconstructed sources in this subpart
upon startup of your affected source
except as provided in paragraph (d) of
this section.
(b) If you have an existing affected
source, you must comply with the
emission limitations and work practice
standards for existing affected sources
in this subpart by no later than April 11,
2005 except as specified in paragraphs
(c) and (d) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) You must comply with the
applicable requirements in
§§ 63.1564(a)(5), 63.1565(a)(5) and
63.1568(a)(4) as specified in paragraph
(d)(1) or (2), as applicable.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Feb 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
Upon initial startup or February 1,
2016, whichever is later.
(1) For sources which commenced
construction or reconstruction before
June 30, 2014, you must comply with
the applicable requirements in
§§ 63.1564(a)(5), 63.1565(a)(5) and
63.1568(a)(4) on or before August 1,
2017 unless an extension is requested
and approved in accordance with the
provisions in § 63.6(i). After February 1,
2016 and prior to the date of compliance
with the provisions in §§ 63.1564(a)(5),
63.1565(a)(5) and 63.1568(a)(4), you
must comply with the requirements in
§ 63.1570(c) and (d).
(2) For sources which commenced
construction or reconstruction on or
after June 30, 2014, you must comply
with the applicable requirements in
§§ 63.1564(a)(5), 63.1565(a)(5) and
63.1568(a)(4) on or before February 1,
2016 or upon startup, whichever is later.
(e) If you have an area source that
increases its emissions or its potential to
emit such that it becomes a major source
of HAP, the requirements in paragraphs
(e)(1) and (2) of this section apply.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. Section 63.1564 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a)(1)(iv), (a)(5)
introductory text and (c)(5) introductory
text to read as follows:
§ 63.1564 What are my requirements for
metal HAP emissions from catalytic
cracking units?
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) You can elect to comply with the
PM per coke burn-off emission limit of
this chapter (Option 2);
*
*
*
*
*
(5) On or before the date specified in
§ 63.1563(d), you must comply with one
of the two options in paragraphs (a)(5)(i)
and (ii) of this section during periods of
startup, shutdown and hot standby:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) If you elect to comply with the
alternative limit in paragraph (a)(5)(ii) of
this section during periods of startup,
shutdown and hot standby, demonstrate
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
continuous compliance on or before the
date specified in § 63.1563(d) by:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. Section 63.1565 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(5) introductory
text to read as follows:
§ 63.1565 What are my requirements for
organic HAP emissions from catalytic
cracking units?
(a) * * *
(5) On or before the date specified in
§ 63.1563(d), you must comply with one
of the two options in paragraphs (a)(5)(i)
and (ii) of this section during periods of
startup, shutdown and hot standby:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 14. Section 63.1566 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(4) to read as
follows:
§ 63.1566 What are my requirements for
organic HAP emissions from catalytic
reforming units?
(a) * * *
(4) The emission limitations in Tables
15 and 16 of this subpart do not apply
to emissions from process vents during
passive depressuring when the reactor
vent pressure is 5 pounds per square
inch gauge (psig) or less or during active
depressuring or purging prior to January
30, 2019, when the reactor vent pressure
is 5 psig or less. On and after January
30, 2019, the emission limitations in
Tables 15 and 16 of this subpart do
apply to emissions from process vents
during active purging operations (when
nitrogen or other purge gas is actively
introduced to the reactor vessel) or
active depressuring (using a vacuum
pump, ejector system, or similar device)
regardless of the reactor vent pressure.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 15. Section 63.1568 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(4) introductory
text to read as follows:
§ 63.1568 What are my requirements for
organic HAP emissions from sulfur
recovery units?
(a) * * *
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
09FEP1
6823
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(4) On or before the date specified in
§ 63.1563(d), you must comply with one
of the three options in paragraphs
(a)(4)(i) through (iii) of this section
during periods of startup and shutdown.
*
*
*
*
*
16. Table 2 to subpart UUU of part 63
is amended by revising the entry for
item 1 to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
TABLE 2 TO SUBPART UUU OF PART 63—OPERATING LIMITS FOR METAL HAP EMISSIONS FROM CATALYTIC CRACKING
UNITS
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
For each new or existing catalytic
cracking unit . . .
For this type of continuous monitoring system . . .
For this type of control device
. . .
You shall meet this operating limit
. . .
1. Subject to the NSPS for PM in
40 CFR 60.102 and not elect
§ 60.100(e).
Continuous
system.
Any ................................................
On and after August 1, 2017,
maintain the 3-hour rolling average opacity of emissions from
your catalyst regenerator vent
no higher than 20 percent.
*
*
*
opacity
*
*
*
monitoring
*
*
*
*
*
*
17. Table 3 to subpart UUU of part 63
is amended by revising the entry for
item 12 to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
TABLE 3 TO SUBPART UUU OF PART 63—CONTINUOUS MONITORING SYSTEMS FOR METAL HAP EMISSIONS FROM
CATALYTIC CRACKING UNITS
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
For each new or existing catalytic cracking unit
. . .
If you use this type of control device for your
vent . . .
You shall install, operate, and maintain a . . .
*
*
12. Electing to comply with the operating limits
in § 63.1564(a)(5)(ii) during periods of startup, shutdown, or hot standby.
*
*
*
Any ....................................................................
*
*
Continuous parameter monitoring system to
measure and record the gas flow rate
exiting the catalyst regenerator.1
1 If
*
applicable, you can use the alternative in § 63.1573(a)(1) instead of a continuous parameter monitoring system for gas flow rate.
*
*
*
*
18. Table 5 to subpart UUU of part 63
is amended by revising the entry for
item 2 to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
TABLE 5 TO SUBPART UUU OF PART 63—INITIAL COMPLIANCE WITH METAL HAP EMISSION LIMITS FOR CATALYTIC
CRACKING UNITS
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
For the following emission limit . . .
You have demonstrated initial compliance if
. . .
*
*
2. Subject to NSPS for PM in 40 CFR
60.102a(b)(1)(i); or in § 60.102 and electing
§ 60.100(e) and electing to meet the PM per
coke burn-off limit.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
For each new and existing catalytic cracking
unit catalyst regenerator vent . . .
*
*
*
PM emissions must not exceed 1.0 g/kg (1.0
lb PM/1,000 lb) of coke burn-off.
*
*
You have already conducted a performance
test to demonstrate initial compliance with
the NSPS and the measured PM emission
rate is less than or equal to 1.0 g/kg (1.0 lb/
1,000 lb) of coke burn-off in the catalyst regenerator. As part of the Notification of
Compliance Status, you must certify that
your vent meets the PM limit. You are not
required to do another performance test to
demonstrate initial compliance. As part of
your Notification of Compliance Status, you
certify that your BLD; CO2, O2, or CO monitor; or continuous opacity monitoring system meets the requirements in § 63.1572.
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
17:10 Feb 08, 2016
*
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
*
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
*
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
*
09FEP1
*
6824
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Proposed Rules
[FR Doc. 2016–02306 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 82
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2015–0309; FRL–9941–81–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AS68
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone:
Revisions to Reporting and
Recordkeeping for Imports and
Exports
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is proposing to make
minor conforming edits to the
stratospheric protection regulations to
implement the International Trade Data
System. In the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’
section of this Federal Register, we are
making these edits as a direct final rule
without a prior proposed rule. If we
receive no adverse comment, we will
not take further action on this proposed
rule. This system allows businesses to
transmit the transactional data required
by multiple Federal agencies for the
import and export of cargo through a
single ‘‘window.’’ As businesses
currently must submit trade data to
multiple agencies, in multiple ways,
and often on paper, the transition to
electronic filing is expected to save
businesses time and money.
Specifically, this rulemaking would
remove the requirement that the petition
for used ozone-depleting substances
accompany the shipment through U.S.
Customs and remove references to
Customs forms that are obsolete under
the new system.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by March 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2015–0309, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Feb 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
Jeremy Arling by regular mail: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Stratospheric Protection Division
(6205T), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20460; by
telephone: (202) 343–9055; or by email:
arling.jeremy@epa.gov. You may also
visit the EPA’s Ozone Protection Web
site at www.epa.gov/ozone/
strathome.html for further information
about EPA’s Stratospheric Ozone
Protection regulations, the science of
ozone layer depletion, and other related
topics.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
II. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
I. General Information
A. Why is EPA issuing this proposed
rule?
This document proposes to make
minor conforming edits to the
stratospheric protection regulations to
implement the International Trade Data
System primarily by removing
references to specific Customs forms
that will become obsolete under the new
system. EPA has published a direct final
rule making these edits in the ‘‘Rules
and Regulations’’ section of this Federal
Register. We view this as a
noncontroversial action and anticipate
no adverse comment. We have
explained our reasons for this action in
the preamble to the direct final rule. For
additional information on the action
being taken, see the direct final rule
published in the Rules and Regulations
section of this Federal Register.
If we receive no adverse comment, we
will not take further action on this
proposed rule. If we receive adverse
comment, we will withdraw the direct
final rule and it will not take effect. We
would address all public comments in
any subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule.
We do not intend to institute a second
comment period on this action. Any
parties interested in commenting must
do so at this time. For further
information, please see the information
provided in the ADDRESSES section of
this document.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
B. Does this action apply to me?
This rulemaking may affect the
following categories: Industrial Gas
Manufacturing entities (NAICS code
325120), including fluorinated
hydrocarbon gas manufacturers,
importers, and exporters; Other
Chemical and Allied Products Merchant
Wholesalers (NAICS code 424690),
including chemical gases and
compressed gases merchant importers
and exporters; and refrigerant reclaimers
or other such entities that might import
virgin, recovered, or reclaimed
refrigerant gas.
This list is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather to provide a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
regulated by this action. To determine
whether your facility, company,
business, or organization could be
regulated by this action, you should
carefully examine the regulations
promulgated at 40 CFR part 82, subpart
A. If you have questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person
listed in the preceding section.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was therefore not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose any new
information collection burden under the
PRA because the requirements to
maintain entry numbers and EINs are a
subset of the previous requirements to
maintain forms containing this
information. OMB has previously
approved the information collection
activities contained in the existing
regulations and has assigned OMB
control number 2060–0170 and 2060–
0438.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. In making this
determination, the impact of concern is
any significant adverse economic
impact on small entities. An agency may
certify that a rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities if
the rule relieves regulatory burden, has
no net burden or otherwise has a
positive economic effect on the small
E:\FR\FM\09FEP1.SGM
09FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6814-6824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02306]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 60 and 63
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0682; FRL-9940-66-OAR]
RIN 2016-AS83
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant
Emissions: Petroleum Refinery Sector Amendments
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes amendments to the National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Refinery MACT 1 and
Refinery MACT 2 regulations and the New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) for petroleum refineries, which were published on December 1,
2015. In that action, as a result of a risk and technology review, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized amendments to Refinery
MACT 1 and Refinery MACT 2. In this action, the EPA is proposing to
amend the compliance date in Refinery MACT 1 for maintenance vent
standards that apply during periods of startup, shutdown, maintenance
or inspection for sources constructed or reconstructed on or before
June 30, 2014. In this action, the EPA is also proposing to revise the
compliance dates in Refinery MACT 2 for the standards that apply during
startup, shutdown, or hot standby for fluid catalytic cracking units
(FCCU) and startup and shutdown for sulfur recovery units (SRU)
constructed or reconstructed on or before June 30, 2014. These proposed
revisions do not affect requirements that apply during normal
operations. Finally, the EPA is proposing technical corrections and
clarifications to the NESHAP and the NSPS for petroleum refineries.
This action will have an insignificant effect on emissions reductions
and costs.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 25, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2010-0682, at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
[[Page 6815]]
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you
wish to make. The EPA is seeking comment only on the issues
specifically identified in this notice. The EPA will not respond to any
comments addressing other aspects of the final rules or any other
related rulemakings. The EPA will generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the
web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
Instructions. All submissions must include the agency name and
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0682. The EPA's policy is that all
comments received will be included in the public docket without change,
and will be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes information claimed to be confidential business information
(CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://www.regulations.gov or email. Send or deliver
information identified as CBI only to the following address: OAQPS
Document Control Officer (C404-02), Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711,
Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0682. Clearly mark the part or
all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information on
a disk or CD-ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the outside of the disk
or CD-ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or
CD-ROM the specific information you claim as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, you must submit a copy of the comment that does not contain the
information claimed as CBI for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means the EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an email comment directly to the EPA without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, the EPA recommends that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or
CD-ROM you submit. If the EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, the EPA may not
be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should not include
special characters or any form of encryption and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket. All documents in the docket are listed in the
regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information
is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center, EPA WJC
West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC.
The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the
EPA Docket Center is (202) 566-1742. Visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm for additional
information about the EPA's public docket.
Public hearing. A public hearing will be held if requested by
February 16, 2016 to accept oral comments on this proposed action. The
hearing will be held, if requested, on February 24, 2016 at the EPA's
North Carolina Campus located at 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27711. The hearing, if requested, will begin at 9:00
a.m. (local time) and will conclude at 1:00 p.m. (local time). To
request a hearing, to register to speak at a hearing, or to inquire if
a hearing will be held, please contact Ms. Virginia Hunt at (919) 541-
0832 or by email at hunt.virginia@epa.gov. The last day to pre-register
to speak at a hearing, if one is held, will be February 22, 2016.
Additionally, requests to speak will be taken the day of the hearing at
the hearing registration desk, although preferences on speaking times
may not be able to be fulfilled. Please note that registration requests
received before the hearing will be confirmed by the EPA via email.
Please note that any updates made to any aspect of the hearing,
including whether or not a hearing will be held, will be posted online
at https://www3.epa.gov/airtoxics/petref.html. We ask that you contact
Ms. Virginia Hunt at (919) 541-0832 or by email at
hunt.virginia@epa.gov or monitor our Web site to determine if a hearing
will be held. The EPA does not intend to publish a notice in the
Federal Register announcing any such updates. Please go to https://www3.epa.gov/airtoxics/petref.html for more information on the public
hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Brenda Shine, Sector Policies and
Programs Division, Refining and Chemicals Group (E143-01), Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711; telephone
number: (919) 541-3608; facsimile number: (919) 541-0246; and email
address: shine.brenda@epa.gov. For information about the applicability
of the NESHAP to a particular entity, contact Ms. Maria Malave, Office
of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, EPA WJC South Building, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number: (202)564-7027; facsimile number: (202)564-
0050; and email address: malave.maria@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Preamble Acronyms and Abbreviations. We use multiple acronyms and
terms in this preamble. While this list may not be exhaustive, to ease
the reading of this preamble and for reference purposes, the EPA
defines the following terms and acronyms here:
CAA Clean Air Act
CBI confidential business information
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CEMS continuous emission monitoring system
COMS continuous opacity monitoring system
CPMS continuous parameter monitoring system
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FCCU fluid catalytic cracking unit
HAP hazardous air pollutants
LEL lower explosive limit
NESHAP National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
NTTAA National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
OAQPS Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
OECA Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance
[[Page 6816]]
OMB Office of Management and Budget
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PRA Paperwork Reduction Act
PSM Process Safety Management
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act
RMP Risk Management Plan
SRU sulfur recovery unit
TTN Technology Transfer Network
UMRA Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Organization of this Document. The information in this preamble is
organized as follows:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. Where can I get a copy of this document and other related
information?
II. Background Information
III. What actions are we proposing?
A. Compliance Dates for Standards Applicable to Maintenance
Vents, FCCU and SRU during Startup and Shutdown and during Hot
Standby for FCCU
B. Clarifications and Technical Corrections
C. Impacts
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Orders 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
Regulated Entities. Categories and entities potentially regulated
by this action are shown in Table 1 of this preamble.
Table 1--Industrial Source Categories Affected By This Final Action
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NESHAP and source category NAICS \a\ Code
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Petroleum Refining Industry............................ 324110
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ North American Industry Classification System.
Table 1 of this preamble is not intended to be exhaustive, but
rather to provide a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by the final action for the source categories listed. To
determine whether your facility is affected, you should examine the
applicability criteria in the appropriate NESHAP or NSPS. If you have
any questions regarding the applicability of any aspect of these NESHAP
or NSPS, please contact the appropriate person listed in the preceding
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble.
B. Where can I get a copy of this document and other related
information?
In addition to being available in the docket, an electronic copy of
this proposal will also be available on the Internet through the
Technology Transfer Network (TTN) Web site, a forum for information and
technology exchange in various areas of air pollution control.
Following signature by the EPA Administrator, the EPA will post a copy
of this proposed action at: https://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/petref.html.
Following publication in the Federal Register, the EPA will post the
Federal Register version and key technical documents at this same Web
site.
II. Background Information
On December 1, 2015 (80 FR 75178), the EPA finalized amendments to
the Petroleum Refinery NESHAP in 40 CFR part 63, subparts CC and UUU,
referred to as Refinery MACT 1 and 2, respectively. The final
amendments to Refinery MACT 1 and 2 include a number of provisions
establishing emissions limitations during startup and shutdown for
emissions sources at petroleum refineries, including specific
provisions for maintenance vents, FCCU, and SRU, which are the focus of
this proposed action.
The Refinery MACT 1 standards regulate emissions of hazardous air
pollutants (HAP) from miscellaneous process vents. Prior to the
December 2015 amendments, the definition of miscellaneous process vents
excluded episodic or non-routine releases such as those associated with
startup, shutdown, and maintenance. The December 2015 Refinery MACT 1
rule eliminates this exclusion from the definition of miscellaneous
process vent and establishes standards for these ``maintenance vents''
in 40 CFR 63.643(c). Maintenance vents are only used as a result of
startup, shutdown, maintenance or inspection of equipment when such
equipment is emptied, depressurized, degassed, or placed into service.
The rule specifies that refinery owners or operators may only release
HAP from these maintenance vents in order to open process equipment
provided that the equipment is drained and purged to a closed system
until the hydrocarbon content is less than or equal to a lower
explosive limit (LEL) of 10 percent prior to venting to the atmosphere.
As a secondary limit, if the LEL cannot be measured due to design
constraints of the equipment, the rule requires that the pressure in
the equipment be reduced to 5 pounds (lbs) per square inch gauge or
less prior to venting to the atmosphere. The rule also contains
additional limits such as a low emission threshold (less than 72 lbs/
day), and requirements for catalyst changeout activities where
hydrotreater pyrophoric catalyst must be purged.
The Refinery MACT 2 standards regulate HAP emissions from the FCCU
by specifying carbon monoxide (CO) limits as a surrogate for organic
HAP and by specifying particulate matter (PM) limits (or nickel limits)
as a surrogate for metal HAP. In the rule, compliance with the organic
HAP emissions limit is demonstrated using a continuous CO monitor;
compliance with the metal HAP emissions limit is demonstrated either
using continuous opacity monitoring system (COMS) or continuous
parameter monitoring system (CPMS). Owners or operators of FCCU are
provided two options for demonstrating compliance with the PM limit
during periods of startup, shutdown, or hot standby in 40 CFR
63.1564(a)(5): Meeting the emission limit that applies during times
other than startup, shutdown, or hot standby, or meeting a minimum
cyclone face velocity limit. Similarly, the rule provides two options
for demonstrating compliance with the CO limit during periods of
startup and shutdown in 40 CFR 63.1565(a)(5): Meeting the emission
limit that applies during times other than startup, shutdown, or hot
standby, or meeting an excess oxygen limit in the exhaust from the
catalyst regenerator.
The Refinery MACT 2 standards also regulate HAP emissions from SRU
vents by specifying sulfur dioxide (SO2), reduced sulfur
compound, or total reduced sulfur limits as a surrogate for SRU HAP
emissions. In the rule, compliance with the SRU HAP emissions limit is
demonstrated using a continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) or,
when a thermal incinerator/oxidizer is used, compliance with the SRU
HAP emissions limits is demonstrated using CPMS. The rule removes
previous requirements to operate according to a site-specific startup,
shutdown, and malfunction plan and instead finalizes standards that
apply during all times, including additional standards that apply
during
[[Page 6817]]
startup and shutdown periods. Three compliance options were provided
for SRU owners or operators to demonstrate compliance during periods of
startup and shutdown in 40 CFR 63.1568(a)(4) including: Meeting the
emission limit that applies during times other than startup or
shutdown, sending purge gases to a flare that meets the operating
requirements contained in 40 CFR 63.670, or sending purge gases to a
thermal oxidizer or incinerator that meets specific temperature and
excess oxygen requirements.
For owners or operators complying with any of the limits for
startup, shutdown, or hot standby for FCCU and for startup or shutdown
for SRU, the compliance date is the effective date of the rule
(February 1, 2016, 60 days after the publication date of the rule). The
compliance date for the maintenance vent provisions is also the
effective date of the rule. In the next section of this preamble, we
discuss some additional clarifications and technical corrections we are
proposing to Table 11 of subpart CC to 40 CFR part 63, which is where
the maintenance vent compliance times and other subpart CC compliance
times are delineated.
The EPA has received new information that the compliance dates for
standards for maintenance vents and startup, shutdown, or hot standby
for FCCU and for startup or shutdown for SRU do not allow sufficient
time to install additional control equipment, if needed, and to
complete the management of change process, which includes addressing
safety concerns associated with potential operational or procedural
changes. The management of change process, which is discussed in
further detail in the next section of this preamble, includes the
following: Evaluating the change, forming an internal team to
accomplish the change, engineering the change, which could include
developing new set points, installing new controls or alarms, assessing
risk of chemical accidents and catastrophic events, updating associated
plans and procedures, providing training, performing pre-startup safety
reviews, and implementing the change as required by other regulatory
programs. In order to accommodate these steps, we are proposing to
amend the compliance dates for these provisions to 18 months after the
effective date of the standards (i.e., August 1, 2017). These proposed
revisions are limited to periods of maintenance, startup, and shutdown
which are expected to occur relatively infrequently as compared to
normal operations.
III. What actions are we proposing?
A. Compliance Dates for Standards Applicable to Maintenance Vents, FCCU
and SRU During Startup and Shutdown and During Hot Standby for FCCU
The EPA has received additional information (see Docket ID No. EPA-
HQ-OAR-2010-0682) that indicates that the compliance dates for
standards for maintenance vents and periods of startup, shutdown, and
hot standby for FCCU and for startup or shutdown for SRU do not provide
facilities sufficient time to go through their management of change
process, which includes addressing safety concerns associated with
potential operational or procedural changes and coordinating any
changes with other applicable regulatory requirements. The process
equipment associated with maintenance vents, FCCU, and SRU are subject
to requirements under the Risk Management Program regulation in 40 CFR
part 68 and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Process Safety Management (PSM) standard in 29 CFR part 1910. Thus, any
operational or procedural changes resulting from complying with the
applicable standards must follow the management of change procedures in
these respective regulatory programs.
The Risk Management Program and OSHA PSM regulations provide that
owners or operators follow a management of change process, as codified
in 40 CFR 68.75, 29 CFR 1910.119(l) and appendix C of 29 CFR 1910.119,
to ensure that the following are considered prior to making a change:
The technical basis for the proposed change;
Impact of change on safety and health;
Modifications to operating procedures;
Necessary time period for the change; and
Authorization requirements for the proposed change.
As part of the management of change process, the EPA expects that
facilities will have to perform an upfront assessment to determine what
changes are required to meet the new maintenance vent requirements and
standards for FCCU and SRU. Based on our review of information brought
forward by industry representatives, refinery owners or operators may
have to adjust or install new instrumentation, including alarms, closed
drain headers, equipment blowdown drums, and other new or revised
processes and controls in order to comply with these new provisions.
Facilities may also have to hire a vendor to assist with the project
and complete the procurement process. Additionally, we anticipate that
facilities will have to assess risk of chemical accidents and
catastrophic events and review and revise standard operating
procedures, as necessary.
Further, the management of change provisions also require that
employees who are involved in operating a process and maintenance and
contract employees whose job tasks are affected by the change must be
trained prior to startup of the affected process.
Finally, facilities are required to conduct pre-startup safety
reviews and obtain authorization for use to fully implement and startup
the modified process and/or equipment.
Therefore, to account for the applicable requirements in the Risk
Management Program regulation and OSHA PSM standard, the EPA is
proposing to require owners and operators of sources that were
constructed or reconstructed on or before June 30, 2014, to comply with
the maintenance vent provisions and limits for startup, shutdown, or
hot standby for FCCU and for startup or shutdown for SRU no later than
18 months after the effective date of the December 2015 rule. We
believe that this additional time is both appropriate and sufficient to
accomplish the necessary compliance-related tasks discussed above.
Although not common, the possibility exists that some facilities
may have to install new controls or otherwise invest in capital
projects in order to comply with these new regulatory provisions. As
provided in the General Provisions to part 63, owners or operators of
these facilities can request an additional 12 months to comply with the
standards using the provisions in 40 CFR 63.6(i).
Owners and operators must comply with the general duty requirements
in 40 CFR 63.642(n) for maintenance vents and 40 CFR 63.1570 for FCCU
or SRU during periods of startup, shutdown and, for FCCU only, hot
standby from the effective date of the December 2015 final rule until
they comply with the new requirements on or before the applicable
compliance dates. Records of compliance with the general duty
requirements must be maintained as specified in 40 CFR 63.643(d),
63.642(n) and 63.1570(c).
B. Clarifications and Technical Corrections
We are proposing to make clarifying revisions to Table 11 in 40 CFR
part 63, subpart CC. We received numerous questions regarding the
compliance date for maintenance vents and some owners or operators are
interpreting Table 11 to
[[Page 6818]]
provide 3 years to comply with the maintenance vent provisions
established in the rule as well as with other requirements that were
not amended in the rule. This was not our intent, and we do not
interpret Table 11 to allow 3 years to comply with the provisions in 40
CFR 63.643, or 3 years to comply with any of the requirements in
subpart CC that were not amended in the December 2015 rule. However, in
reviewing Table 11, we do understand the confusion, and we are
proposing a revised version of Table 11 to more clearly delineate the
compliance dates for the various provisions in subpart CC and to
reflect the compliance date proposed for the maintenance vent
provisions in the previous section of this preamble.
The EPA is also proposing to make several clarifications and
technical corrections as described here and summarized in the table
below. The first sentence in Sec. 60.102a(f)(1)(i) is being changed to
incorporate the pollutant of concern, SO2, directly into the
regulatory text rather than inside a parenthesis within the sentence
for clarity. A grammatical correction is being made to the closed
blowdown system definition in Sec. 63.641 by adding an ``a'' before
the phrase, ``. . . process vessel to a control device or back into the
process.'' The term ``relief valve'' and ``valve'' are being replaced
with ``pressure relief device'' and ``device'' in the force majeure
event definition in Sec. Sec. 63.641 and 63.670(o)(1)(ii)(B),
respectively. These changes are being made to improve consistency in
the use of the term ``pressure relief device'' as it pertains to the
work practice requirements in Sec. 63.648(j) and associated
provisions. The list of exceptions for equipment leak requirements in
Sec. 63.648(a) is being expanded to ensure the intent of the
rulemaking is clear, that pressure relief devices subject to the
requirements in either 40 CFR part 60, subpart VV or part 63, subpart H
and the requirements in 40 CFR part 63, subpart CC are to comply with
the requirements in Sec. 63.648(j)(1) and (2), instead of the pressure
relief device requirements in 40 CFR part 60, subpart VV and 40 CFR
part 63, subpart H. The reporting and recordkeeping requirements
related to fenceline monitoring contained in Sec. 63.655(h)(8) are
being edited to provide clarity that compliance reports are due 45 days
after the end of each reporting period. The term ``periodic'' in the
context of the report for fenceline monitoring has been removed to
avoid confusion concerning the due dates of other periodic reports
contained in 40 CFR part 63, subpart CC such as those specified in
Sec. 63.655(g). The siting requirements for passive monitors near
known sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC) contained in Sec.
63.658(c)(1) are being edited to clarify that a monitor should be
placed on the shoreline adjacent to the dock for marine vessel loading
operations. The phrase ``that are located offshore'' was removed
because the intent is to require a monitor on the shoreline adjacent to
the dock for marine vessel loading operations, and is not dependent on
whether the location of the marine vessel loading operation is onshore
or offshore.
The EPA is also proposing to add language to clarify the effective
dates of two specific provisions in 40 CFR part 63, subpart UUU. First,
we are proposing to revise the catalytic reforming unit (CRU) pressure
limit exclusion provision in 40 CFR 63.1566(a)(4) to specify that
refiners have 3 years to comply with the requirements to meet emission
limitations in Tables 15 and 16 if they actively purge or depressurize
at vessel pressures of 5 psig or less. Although both the proposal and
the final preambles (at 79 FR 36950 and 80 FR 75185) indicated that we
intended to provide a 3-year compliance period, language in Sec.
63.1566(a)(4) did not specifically provide 3 years. This was an
inadvertent omission and in this action we are proposing to add rule
language to reflect our intent.
Similarly, we are proposing to revise the entry for item 1 in Table
2 of subpart UUU to clarify that refineries have 18 months to comply
with the 20 percent opacity operating limit for units subject to
Refinery NSPS subpart J or electing to comply with Refinery NSPS
subpart J provisions for PM. Although both the proposal and the final
preambles (at 79 FR 36950 and 80 FR 75185) indicated that we intended
to provide an 18-month compliance period for new or revised operating
limits for FCCU, the language in Table 2 of subpart UUU did not
specifically provide this 18 month compliance period. Again, this was
an inadvertent omission and in this action we are proposing to add rule
language to reflect our intent.
Additionally, the reference to Sec. 60.102a(b)(1) in Sec.
63.1564(a)(1)(iv) is being removed as this provision should only
reference Option 2 in Table 1 (Item 7 in Table 1 of part 63, subpart
UUU), providing owners or operators with the option to comply with the
Refinery MACT 2 p.m. option when they choose not to comply with one of
the NSPS options. A typographical correction is being made to the
reference to Sec. 63.1566(a)(5)(iii) in 40 CFR part 63, subpart UUU,
Table 3, Item 12 to correctly reference Sec. 63.1564(a)(5)(ii).
Finally, an editorial correction is being made to add the word ``and''
in place of a semicolon in 40 CFR part 63, subpart UUU, Table 5, Item
2.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Provision Proposed revision
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 60.102a(f)(1)(i)................ Add the phrase ``containing
SO2'' after ``. . . the
discharge of any gases . . .''
in the first sentence of this
paragraph. Remove ``(SO2)'' in
the first sentence of this
paragraph.
Sec. 63.641 Closed blowdown system Add the word ``a'' before the
definition. phrase, ``. . . process vessel
to a control device or back
into the process.''
Sec. 63.641 Force majeure event Change ``relief valve'' to
definition. ``pressure relief device.''
Sec. 63.648(a)....................... Edit the list of exceptions to
include paragraphs (j)(1) and
(2) of this section.
Sec. 63.655(h)(8).................... Remove the word ``periodic''
and edit to require submittal
within 45 days after the end
of each reporting period.
Sec. 63.658(c)(1).................... Delete the phrase ``that are
located offshore.''
Sec. 63.670(o)(1)(ii)(B)............. Change the word ``valve'' to
``device.''
Sec. 63.1564(a)(1)(iv)............... Remove the reference to Sec.
60.102a(b)(1).
Sec. 63.1566 (a)(4).................. Revise the paragraph to allow 3
years to comply with Tables 15
and 16 for active depressuring
and purging, when the reactor
vent pressure is 5 psig or
less.
40 CFR part 63, subpart UUU, Table 2, Add specific text to clarify
Item 1. that the 20 percent opacity
operating limit becomes
effective ``On and after
August 1, 2017. . . .''
40 CFR part 63, subpart UUU, Table 3, Correct the citation to Sec.
Item 12. 63.1564(a)(5)(ii).
40 CFR part 63, subpart UUU, Table 5, Replace the second semicolon
Item 2. with the word ``and.''
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 6819]]
C. Impacts
We expect the additional compliance time will have an insignificant
effect on emission reductions and costs, as many refiners already have
measures in place due to state and other federal requirements to
minimize emissions during these periods. Further, these periods are
relatively infrequent (some only occur on a 5-year cycle) and are
usually of short duration.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at https://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations//laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was,
therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose any new information collection burden
under the PRA. OMB has previously approved the information collection
activities contained in the existing regulations at 40 CFR part 63,
subparts CC and UUU under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and has assigned OMB control numbers 2060-
0340 and 2060-0554. The proposed amendments are revisions to compliance
dates, clarifications and technical corrections that do not affect the
estimated burden of the existing rule. Therefore, we have not revised
the information collection request for the existing rule.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In
making this determination, the impact of concern is any significant
adverse economic impact on small entities. An agency may certify that a
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, has no
net burden, or otherwise has a positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. The action consists of revisions to
compliance dates, clarifications, and technical corrections which do
not change the expected economic impact analysis performed for the
existing rule. We have, therefore, concluded that this action will have
no net regulatory burden for all directly regulated small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. It will not have substantial direct effect on
tribal governments, on the relationship between the federal government
and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the federal government and Indian tribes, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to
this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is
not economically significant as defined in Executive Order 12866, and
because the EPA does not believe the environmental health or safety
risks addressed by this action present a disproportionate risk to
children. The proposed amendments serve to revise compliance dates and
make technical clarifications and corrections. We expect the additional
compliance time will have an insignificant effect on emission
reductions as many refiners already have measures in place due to state
and other federal requirements to minimize emissions during these
periods. Further, these periods are relatively infrequent and are
usually of short duration. Therefore, the proposed amendments should
not appreciably increase risk for any populations. Further, this action
will allow more time for refiners to implement procedures to safely
start up and shut down equipment which should minimize safety risks for
all populations.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed
by this action will not have potential disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income,
or indigenous populations. The proposed amendments serve to revise
compliance dates and make technical clarifications and corrections. We
expect the additional compliance time will have an insignificant effect
on emission reductions as many refiners already have measures in place
due to state and other federal requirements to minimize emissions
during these periods. Further, these periods are relatively infrequent
and are usually of short duration. Therefore, the proposed amendments
should not appreciably increase risk for any populations. Further, this
action will allow more time for refiners to implement procedures to
safely start up and shut down equipment which should minimize safety
risks for all populations.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 60
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures,
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: January 29, 2016.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, of the
Code
[[Page 6820]]
of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 60--STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES
0
1. The authority citation for part 60 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart Ja--Standards of Performance for Petroleum Refineries for
Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced After
May 14, 2007
0
2. Section 60.102a is amended by revising the first sentence of
paragraph (f)(1)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.102a Emissions limitations.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) For a sulfur recovery plant with an oxidation control system or
a reduction control system followed by incineration, the owner or
operator shall not discharge or cause the discharge of any gases
containing SO2 into the atmosphere in excess of the emission
limit calculated using Equation 1 of this section. * * *
* * * * *
PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
0
3. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart CC--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants From Petroleum Refineries
0
4. Section 63.641 is amended by revising the definitions of ``Closed
blowdown system'' and ``Force majeure event'' to read as follows:
Sec. 63.641 Definitions.
* * * * *
Closed blowdown system means a system used for depressuring process
vessels that is not open to the atmosphere and is configured of piping,
ductwork, connections, accumulators/knockout drums, and, if necessary,
flow inducing devices that transport gas or vapor from a process vessel
to a control device or back into the process.
* * * * *
Force majeure event means a release of HAP, either directly to the
atmosphere from a pressure relief device or discharged via a flare,
that is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Administrator to result
from an event beyond the refinery owner or operator's control, such as
natural disasters; acts of war or terrorism; loss of a utility external
to the refinery (e.g., external power curtailment), excluding power
curtailment due to an interruptible service agreement; and fire or
explosion originating at a near or adjoining facility outside of the
refinery that impacts the refinery's ability to operate.
* * * * *
0
5. Section 63.643 is amended by revising paragraph (c) introductory
text and adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.643 Miscellaneous process vent provisions.
* * * * *
(c) An owner or operator may designate a process vent as a
maintenance vent if the vent is only used as a result of startup,
shutdown, maintenance, or inspection of equipment where equipment is
emptied, depressurized, degassed or placed into service. The owner or
operator does not need to designate a maintenance vent as a Group 1 or
Group 2 miscellaneous process vent. The owner of operator must comply
with the applicable requirements in paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of
this section for each maintenance vent according to the compliance
dates specified in table 11 of this subpart, unless an extension is
requested in accordance with the provisions in Sec. 63.6(i).
* * * * *
(d) After February 1, 2016 and prior to the date of compliance with
the maintenance vent provisions in paragraph (c) of this section, the
owner or operator must comply with the requirements in Sec. 63.642(n)
for each maintenance venting event and maintain records necessary to
demonstrate compliance with the requirements in Sec. 63.642(n)
including, if appropriate, records of existing standard site procedures
used to deinventory equipment for safety purposes.
0
6. Section 63.648 is amended by revising paragraph (a) introductory
text as follows:
Sec. 63.648 Equipment leak standards.
(a) Each owner or operator of an existing source subject to the
provisions of this subpart shall comply with the provisions of 40 CFR
part 60, subpart VV, and paragraph (b) of this section except as
provided in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2), (c) through (i), and (j)(1) and
(2) of this section. Each owner or operator of a new source subject to
the provisions of this subpart shall comply with subpart H of this part
except as provided in paragraphs (c) through (i) and (j)(1) and (2) of
this section.
* * * * *
0
7. Section 63.655 is amended by revising paragraph (h)(8) introductory
text to read as follows:
Sec. 63.655 Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(8) For fenceline monitoring systems subject to Sec. 63.658,
within 45 calendar days after the end of each reporting period, each
owner or operator shall submit the following information to the EPA's
Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI). (CEDRI can
be accessed through the EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) (https://cdx.epa.gov/). The owner or operator need not transmit these data prior
to obtaining 12 months of data.
* * * * *
0
8. Section 63.658 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 63.658 Fenceline monitoring provisions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) As it pertains to this subpart, known sources of VOCs, as used
in Section 8.2.1.3 in Method 325A of appendix A of this part for siting
passive monitors, means a wastewater treatment unit, process unit, or
any emission source requiring control according to the requirements of
this subpart, including marine vessel loading operations. For marine
vessel loading operations, one passive monitor should be sited on the
shoreline adjacent to the dock.
* * * * *
0
9. Section 63.670 is amended by revising paragraph (o)(1)(ii)(B) to
read as follows:
Sec. 63.670 Requirements for flare control devices.
* * * * *
(o) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(B) Implementation of prevention measures listed for pressure
relief devices in Sec. 63.648(j)(5) for each pressure relief device
that can discharge to the flare.
* * * * *
0
10. The appendix to subpart CC is amended by revising table 11 to read
as follows:
Appendix to Subpart CC of Part 63--Tables
* * * * *
[[Page 6821]]
Table 11--Compliance Dates and Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Then the owner or And the owner or
If the construction/reconstruction operator must comply operator must achieve Except as provided in .
date is . . . with . . . compliance . . . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) After June 30, 2014.............. (i) Requirements for Upon initial startup... Sec. 63.640(k), (l)
new sources in Sec. and (m).
Sec. 63.643(a) and
(b); 63.644, 63.645,
and 63.647; 63.648(a)
through (i) and (j)(1)
and (2); 63.649
through 63.651; and
63.654 through 63.656.
(ii) Requirements for Upon initial startup or Sec. 63.640(k), (l)
new sources in Sec. February 1, 2016, and (m).
Sec. 63.642(n), whichever is later.
63.643(c),
63.648(j)(3), (6) and
(7); and 63.657
through 63.660.
(2) After September 4, 2007 but on or (i) Requirements for Upon initial startup... Sec. 63.640(k), (l)
before June 30, 2014. new sources in Sec. and (m).
Sec. 63.643(a) and
(b); 63.644, 63.645,
and 63.647; 63.648(a)
through (i) and (j)(1)
and (2); and 63.649
through 63.651, 63.655
and 63.656.
(ii) Requirements for Upon initial startup or Sec. 63.640(k), (l)
new sources in Sec. October 28, 2009, and (m).
63.654. whichever is later.
(iii) Requirements for Upon initial startup, Sec. Sec. 63.640(k),
new sources in either but you must (l) and (m) and
Sec. 63.646 or Sec. transition to comply 63.660(d).
63.660. with only the
requirements in Sec.
63.660 on or before
April 29, 2016.
(iv) Requirements for On or before August 1, Sec. Sec. 63.640(k),
existing sources in 2017. (l) and (m) and
Sec. 63.643(c). 63.643(d).
(v) Requirements for On or before January Sec. 63.640(k), (l)
existing sources in 30, 2018. and (m).
Sec. 63.658.
(vi) Requirements for On or before January Sec. 63.640(k), (l)
existing sources in 30, 2019. and (m).
Sec. 63.648 (j)(3),
(6) and (7) and Sec.
63.657.
(vii) Requirements in Upon initial startup or .......................
Sec. 63.642(n). February 1, 2016,
whichever is later.
(3) After July 14, 1994 but on or (i) Requirements for Upon initial startup or Sec. 63.640(k), (l)
before September 4, 2007. new sources in Sec. August 18, 1995, and (m).
Sec. 63.643(a) and whichever is later.
(b); 63.644, 63.645,
and 63.647; 63.648(a)
through (i) and (j)(1)
and (2); and 63.649
through 63.651, 63.655
and 63.656.
(ii) Requirements for On or before October Sec. 63.640(k), (l)
existing sources in 29, 2012. and (m).
Sec. 63.654.
(iii) Requirements for Upon initial startup, Sec. Sec. 63.640(k),
new sources in either but you must (l) and (m) and
Sec. 63.646 or Sec. transition to comply 63.660(d).
63.660. with only the
requirements in Sec.
63.660 on or before
April 29, 2016.
(iv) Requirements for On or before August 1, Sec. Sec. 63.640(k),
existing sources in 2017. (l) and (m) and
Sec. 63.643(c). 63.643(d).
(v) Requirements for On or before January Sec. 63.640(k), (l)
existing sources in 30, 2018. and (m).
Sec. 63.658.
(vi) Requirements for On or before January Sec. 63.640(k), (l)
existing sources in 30, 2019. and (m).
Sec. Sec.
63.648(j)(3), (6) and
(7) and 63.657.
(vii) Requirements in Upon initial startup or .......................
Sec. 63.642(n). February 1, 2016,
whichever is later.
(4) On or before July 14, 1994....... (i) Requirements for (a) On or before August (1) Sec. 63.640(k),
existing sources in 18, 1998. (l) and (m).
Sec. Sec. 63.648(a) (2) Sec. 63.6(c)(5)
through (i) and (j)(1) or unless an extension
and (2); and 63.649, has been granted by
63.655 and 63.656. the Administrator as
provided in Sec.
63.6(i).
(ii) Either the (a) On or before August (1) Sec. 63.640(k),
requirements for 18, 1998. (l) and (m).
existing sources in (2) Sec. 63.6(c)(5)
Sec. Sec. 63.643(a) or unless an extension
and (b); 63.644, has been granted by
63.645, 63.647, 63.650 the Administrator as
and 63.651; and item provided in Sec.
(4)(v) of this table. 63.6(i).
OR.....................
The requirements in
Sec. Sec. 63.652
and 63.653.
(iii) Requirements for On or before August 18, Sec. Sec. 63.640(k),
existing sources in 1998, but you must (l) and (m) and
either Sec. 63.646 transition to comply 63.660(d).
or Sec. 63.660. with only the
requirements in Sec.
63.660 on or before
April 29, 2016.
[[Page 6822]]
(iv) Requirements for On or before October Sec. 63.640(k), (l)
existing sources in 29, 2012. and (m).
Sec. 63.654.
(v) Requirements for On or before August 1, Sec. Sec. 63.640(k),
existing sources in 2017. (l) and (m) and
Sec. 63.643(c). 63.643(d).
(vi) Requirements for On or before January Sec. 63.640(k), (l)
existing sources in 30, 2018. and (m).
Sec. 63.658.
(vii) Requirements for On or before January Sec. 63.640(k), (l)
existing sources in 30, 2019. and (m).
Sec. Sec.
63.648(j)(3), (6) and
(7) and 63.657.
(viii) Requirements in Upon initial startup or .......................
Sec. 63.642(n). February 1, 2016,
whichever is later.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Subpart UUU--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Petroleum Refineries: Catalytic Cracking Units,
Catalytic Reforming Units, and Sulfur Recovery Units
0
11. Section 63.1563 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) and (b);
0
b. Redesignating paragraphs (d) and (e) as paragraphs (e) and (f),
respectively;
0
c. Adding paragraph (d); and
0
d. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (e) introductory text.
The revisions and additions to read as follows:
Sec. 63.1563 When do I have to comply with this subpart?
(a) * * *
(1) If you startup your affected source before April 11, 2002, then
you must comply with the emission limitations and work practice
standards for new and reconstructed sources in this subpart no later
than April 11, 2002 except as provided in paragraph (d) of this
section.
(2) If you startup your affected source after April 11, 2002, you
must comply with the emission limitations and work practice standards
for new and reconstructed sources in this subpart upon startup of your
affected source except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section.
(b) If you have an existing affected source, you must comply with
the emission limitations and work practice standards for existing
affected sources in this subpart by no later than April 11, 2005 except
as specified in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section.
* * * * *
(d) You must comply with the applicable requirements in Sec. Sec.
63.1564(a)(5), 63.1565(a)(5) and 63.1568(a)(4) as specified in
paragraph (d)(1) or (2), as applicable.
(1) For sources which commenced construction or reconstruction
before June 30, 2014, you must comply with the applicable requirements
in Sec. Sec. 63.1564(a)(5), 63.1565(a)(5) and 63.1568(a)(4) on or
before August 1, 2017 unless an extension is requested and approved in
accordance with the provisions in Sec. 63.6(i). After February 1, 2016
and prior to the date of compliance with the provisions in Sec. Sec.
63.1564(a)(5), 63.1565(a)(5) and 63.1568(a)(4), you must comply with
the requirements in Sec. 63.1570(c) and (d).
(2) For sources which commenced construction or reconstruction on
or after June 30, 2014, you must comply with the applicable
requirements in Sec. Sec. 63.1564(a)(5), 63.1565(a)(5) and
63.1568(a)(4) on or before February 1, 2016 or upon startup, whichever
is later.
(e) If you have an area source that increases its emissions or its
potential to emit such that it becomes a major source of HAP, the
requirements in paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) of this section apply.
* * * * *
0
12. Section 63.1564 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1)(iv),
(a)(5) introductory text and (c)(5) introductory text to read as
follows:
Sec. 63.1564 What are my requirements for metal HAP emissions from
catalytic cracking units?
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) You can elect to comply with the PM per coke burn-off emission
limit of this chapter (Option 2);
* * * * *
(5) On or before the date specified in Sec. 63.1563(d), you must
comply with one of the two options in paragraphs (a)(5)(i) and (ii) of
this section during periods of startup, shutdown and hot standby:
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) If you elect to comply with the alternative limit in paragraph
(a)(5)(ii) of this section during periods of startup, shutdown and hot
standby, demonstrate continuous compliance on or before the date
specified in Sec. 63.1563(d) by:
* * * * *
0
13. Section 63.1565 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(5)
introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 63.1565 What are my requirements for organic HAP emissions from
catalytic cracking units?
(a) * * *
(5) On or before the date specified in Sec. 63.1563(d), you must
comply with one of the two options in paragraphs (a)(5)(i) and (ii) of
this section during periods of startup, shutdown and hot standby:
* * * * *
0
14. Section 63.1566 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(4) to read as
follows:
Sec. 63.1566 What are my requirements for organic HAP emissions from
catalytic reforming units?
(a) * * *
(4) The emission limitations in Tables 15 and 16 of this subpart do
not apply to emissions from process vents during passive depressuring
when the reactor vent pressure is 5 pounds per square inch gauge (psig)
or less or during active depressuring or purging prior to January 30,
2019, when the reactor vent pressure is 5 psig or less. On and after
January 30, 2019, the emission limitations in Tables 15 and 16 of this
subpart do apply to emissions from process vents during active purging
operations (when nitrogen or other purge gas is actively introduced to
the reactor vessel) or active depressuring (using a vacuum pump,
ejector system, or similar device) regardless of the reactor vent
pressure.
* * * * *
0
15. Section 63.1568 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(4)
introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 63.1568 What are my requirements for organic HAP emissions from
sulfur recovery units?
(a) * * *
[[Page 6823]]
(4) On or before the date specified in Sec. 63.1563(d), you must
comply with one of the three options in paragraphs (a)(4)(i) through
(iii) of this section during periods of startup and shutdown.
* * * * *
0
16. Table 2 to subpart UUU of part 63 is amended by revising the entry
for item 1 to read as follows:
* * * * *
Table 2 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Operating Limits for Metal HAP Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For this type of
For each new or existing catalytic continuous monitoring For this type of You shall meet this
cracking unit . . . system . . . control device . . . operating limit . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Subject to the NSPS for PM in 40 Continuous opacity Any.................... On and after August 1,
CFR 60.102 and not elect Sec. monitoring system. 2017, maintain the 3-
60.100(e). hour rolling average
opacity of emissions
from your catalyst
regenerator vent no
higher than 20
percent.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
17. Table 3 to subpart UUU of part 63 is amended by revising the entry
for item 12 to read as follows:
* * * * *
Table 3 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Continuous Monitoring Systems for
Metal HAP Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you use this type
For each new or existing of control device You shall install,
catalytic cracking unit . . for your vent . . . operate, and
. maintain a . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
12. Electing to comply with Any................. Continuous parameter
the operating limits in monitoring system
Sec. 63.1564(a)(5)(ii) to measure and
during periods of startup, record the gas flow
shutdown, or hot standby. rate exiting the
catalyst
regenerator.\1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ If applicable, you can use the alternative in Sec. 63.1573(a)(1)
instead of a continuous parameter monitoring system for gas flow rate.
* * * * *
0
18. Table 5 to subpart UUU of part 63 is amended by revising the entry
for item 2 to read as follows:
* * * * *
Table 5 to Subpart UUU of Part 63--Initial Compliance With Metal HAP
Emission Limits for Catalytic Cracking Units
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each new and existing
catalytic cracking unit For the following You have
catalyst regenerator vent . emission limit . . . demonstrated initial
. . compliance if . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
2. Subject to NSPS for PM in PM emissions must You have already
40 CFR 60.102a(b)(1)(i); or not exceed 1.0 g/kg conducted a
in Sec. 60.102 and (1.0 lb PM/1,000 performance test to
electing Sec. 60.100(e) lb) of coke burn- demonstrate initial
and electing to meet the PM off. compliance with the
per coke burn-off limit. NSPS and the
measured PM
emission rate is
less than or equal
to 1.0 g/kg (1.0 lb/
1,000 lb) of coke
burn-off in the
catalyst
regenerator. As
part of the
Notification of
Compliance Status,
you must certify
that your vent
meets the PM limit.
You are not
required to do
another performance
test to demonstrate
initial compliance.
As part of your
Notification of
Compliance Status,
you certify that
your BLD; CO2, O2,
or CO monitor; or
continuous opacity
monitoring system
meets the
requirements in
Sec. 63.1572.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 6824]]
[FR Doc. 2016-02306 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P