Small Business Size Standards for Manufacturing, 4469-4492 [2016-00924]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
with a separate distinct size standard, and
that industry accounts for 50 percent or more
of the value of the entire procurement, then
the proper size standard is the one for that
particular industry, and not the
Environmental Remediation Service size
standard.
*
*
*
*
*
18. NAICS code 541519—An Information
Technology Value Added Reseller (ITVAR)
provides a total solution to information
technology acquisitions by providing multivendor hardware and software along with
significant value added services. Significant
value added services consist of, but are not
limited to, configuration consulting and
design, systems integration, installation of
multi-vendor computer equipment,
customization of hardware or software,
training, product technical support,
maintenance, and end user support. For
purposes of Government procurement, an
information technology procurement
classified under this exception and 150employee size standard must consist of at
least 15% and not more than 50% of value
added services, as measured by the total
contract price. In addition, the offeror must
comply with the manufacturing performance
requirements, or comply with the nonmanufacturer rule by supplying the products
of small business concerns, unless SBA has
issued a class or contract specific waiver of
the non-manufacturer rule. If the contract
consists of less than 15% of value added
services, then it must be classified under a
NAICS manufacturing industry. If the
contract consists of more than 50% of value
added services, then it must be classified
under the NAICS industry that best describes
the predominate service of the procurement.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend § 121.406 by revising
paragraph (b)(3) and paragraphs (b)(4)
introductory text and (b)(5) introductory
text to read as follows:
■
§ 121.406 How does a small business
concern qualify to provide manufactured
products or other supply items under a
small business set-aside, service-disabled
veteran-owned small business set-aside,
WOSB or EDWOSB set-aside, or 8(a)
contract?
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) The nonmanufacturer rule applies
only to procurements that have been
assigned a manufacturing or supply
NAICS code, or the Information
Technology Value Added Resellers
(ITVAR) exception to NAICS code
541519. The nonmanufacturer rule does
not apply to contracts that have been
assigned a service (except for the ITVAR
exception to NAICS code 541519),
construction, or specialty trade
construction NAICS code.
(4) The nonmanufacturer rule applies
only to the supply component of a
requirement classified as a
manufacturing, supply, or ITVAR
contract. If a requirement is classified as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
a service contract, but also has a supply
component, the nonmanufacturer rule
does not apply to the supply component
of the requirement.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) The Administrator or designee
may waive the requirement set forth in
paragraph (b)(1)(iv) of this section under
the following two circumstances:
*
*
*
*
*
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–00922 Filed 1–25–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 121
RIN 3245–AG50
Small Business Size Standards for
Manufacturing
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The United States Small
Business Administration (SBA) is
increasing small business size standards
for 209 industries in North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS)
Sector 31–33, Manufacturing. SBA is
also modifying the size standard for
NAICS 324110, Petroleum Refiners, by
increasing the refining capacity
component of the size standard to
200,000 barrels per calendar day for
businesses that are primarily engaged in
petroleum refining and by eliminating
the requirement that 90 percent of the
output to be delivered be refined by the
successful bidder from either crude oil
or bona fide feedstocks. The Agency is
also updating Footnote 5 to NAICS
326211 to reflect the current Census
Product Classification Codes 3262111
and 3262113. As part of its ongoing
comprehensive size standards review,
SBA evaluated employee based size
standards for all 364 industries in
NAICS Sector 31–33 to determine
whether they should be retained or
revised. This rule is one of a series of
rules that result from SBA’s review of
size standards of industries grouped by
NAICS Sector.
DATES: This rule is effective February
26, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jorge Laboy-Bruno, Ph.D., Economist,
Size Standards Division, (202) 205–6618
or sizestandards@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To
determine eligibility for Federal small
business assistance programs, SBA
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
4469
establishes small business size
definitions (referred to as size
standards) for private sector industries
in the United States. The SBA’s size
standards generally use two primary
measures of business size, average
annual receipts and average number of
employees. Financial assets, electric
output, and refining capacity are used as
size measures for a few specialized
industries. In addition, SBA’s Small
Business Investment Company (SBIC),
Certified Development Company (CDC/
504) and 7(a) Loan Programs determine
small business eligibility using either
the industry based size standards or an
alternative size standard based on both
net worth and net income. At the start
of the current comprehensive review of
size standards, there were 41 different
size standards, covering 1,141 NAICS
industries and 18 ‘‘exceptions.’’ in
SBA’s table of size standards. Of these,
31 were based on average annual
receipts, seven on average number of
employees, and three on other
measures. Presently, there are 28
different size standards, covering 1047
NAICS industries and 16 ‘‘exceptions.’’
Of these NAICS industries and
exceptions, 533 are covered by size
standards based on average annual
receipts, 509 on average number of
employees, and five on average assets.
Over the years, some members of the
public have remarked that SBA’s size
standards have not kept up with
changes in the economy, and in
particular, that they do not reflect
changes in the Federal contracting
marketplace and industry structure. The
last comprehensive size standards
review was in the late 1970s and early
1980s. Size standards reviews since
then, until this comprehensive review,
were generally limited to a few specific
industries in response to requests from
the public and from Federal agencies.
SBA also makes periodic inflation
adjustments to its monetary based size
standards. The latest inflation
adjustment to size standards was
effective July 14, 2015 (79 FR 33647
(June 12, 2014)).
Because of changes in industry
structure and the Federal marketplace
since the last overall review, current
data no longer supported existing size
standards for some industries.
Accordingly, in 2007, SBA began a
comprehensive review to determine
whether existing size standards are
consistent with current data, and to
revise them, when necessary.
In addition, on September 27, 2010,
the President of the United States signed
the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010
(Jobs Act), 111 Public Law 240, 124 Stat.
2504, Sep. 27, 2010. The Jobs Act
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
4470
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
directs SBA to conduct a detailed
review of all size standards and to make
appropriate adjustments to reflect
market conditions. Specifically, the Jobs
Act requires SBA to conduct a detailed
review of at least one-third of all size
standards during every18-month period
from the date of its enactment and
review of all size standards not less
frequently than once every 5 years
thereafter. Reviewing existing small
business size standards and making
appropriate adjustments based on
current data are also consistent with
Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review.’’
SBA has chosen not to review all size
standards at one time. Rather, the
Agency is reviewing groups of related
industries on an NAICS Sector by Sector
basis.
As part of SBA’s comprehensive size
standards review, grouped by NAICS
Sector, the Agency reviewed the 364
size standards for industries in NAICS
Sector 31–33, Manufacturing, to
determine whether they should be
retained or revised. After its review,
SBA published in the September 10,
2014 issue of the Federal Register (79
FR 54145) a proposed rule to increase
size standards for 209 industries in
NAICS Sector 31–33, Manufacturing.
SBA also proposed to amend Footnote
4 to NAICS 324110, Petroleum Refiners,
in its table of size standards in two
ways: (1) By increasing the refining
capacity component of the size standard
from 125,000 to 200,000 barrels per
calendar day total capacity for
businesses that are primarily engaged in
petroleum refining, and (2) by
eliminating the requirement that 90
percent of the output to be delivered be
refined by the successful bidder from
either crude oil or bona fide feedstocks.
SBA also proposed amending Footnote
5 to NAICS 326211, Tire Manufacturing
(except Retreading), to reflect the
current Census Product Classification
Codes 3262111 and 3262113.
As part of ongoing comprehensive
size standards review, SBA developed a
‘‘Size Standards Methodology’’ White
Paper for developing, reviewing, and
modifying size standards, when
necessary. SBA published the document
on its Web site at www.sba.gov/size for
public review and comments, and
included it as a supporting document in
the electronic docket of the proposed
rule at www.regulations.gov.
In evaluating an industry, SBA
generally examines its characteristics
(such as average firm size, startup costs,
industry competition, and distribution
of firms by size) and the level and share
of Federal contract dollars that small
businesses receive. SBA also examines
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
the potential impact a size standard
revision might have on its financial
assistance programs, and whether a
business under a revised size standard
would be dominant in its industry. SBA
analyzed the characteristics of every
industry in NAICS 31–33, using mostly
a special tabulation obtained from the
U.S. Bureau of the Census from its 2007
Economic Census (the latest available).
For the proposed rule, SBA also
evaluated the small business share of
Federal contracts in each of those
industries using data from the Federal
Procurement Data System—Next
Generation (FPDS–NG) for fiscal years
2009–2011. To evaluate the impact of
changes to size standards on its loan
programs, SBA analyzed internal data
on its guaranteed loan programs for
fiscal years 2010–2012. In this final rule,
SBA has updated the impacts of size
standards changes using the FPDS–NG
and loan data for fiscal years 2012–
2014.
SBA’s ‘‘Size Standards Methodology’’
White Paper provides a detailed
description of its analyses of various
industry and program factors and data
sources, and how the Agency uses the
results to establish and revise size
standards. In the September 10, 2014
proposed rule, SBA detailed how it
applied its ‘‘Size Standards
Methodology’’ to review and modify
when necessary, the existing size
standards for industries in NAICS
Sector 31–33. SBA sought comments
from the public on a number of issues
about its ‘‘Size Standards
Methodology,’’ such as whether SBA
should consider other approaches;
whether SBA should evaluate
alternative or additional factors or data
sources; whether SBA’s manner of
establishing small business size
standards makes sense in the current
economic environment; whether SBA’s
application of anchor size standards is
appropriate in the current economy;
whether there are gaps in SBA’s
methodology because of the lack of
current or comprehensive data; and
whether there are other facts or issues
that SBA should consider.
SBA sought comments on its
proposed size standards together with
other issues that could affect a final
determination. Specifically, SBA
requested comments on the following:
1. SBA proposed five levels of
employee based size standards for
industries in Manufacturing and for
industries in other Sectors that have
employee based size standards (except
for Wholesale Trade and Retail Trade):
500 employees, 750 employees, 1,000
employees, 1,250 employees, and 1,500
employees. SBA invited comments on
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
whether these were appropriate levels
and requested suggestions for
alternatives, if commenters thought
them more appropriate.
2. Consistent with its policy of not
lowering any size standards in its
recently completed proposed and final
rules on receipts based size standards,
SBA proposed retaining the current 500employee minimum and 1,500employee maximum size standards for
all industries in the Manufacturing
Sector. In its ‘‘Size Standards
Methodology,’’ available at
www.sba.gov/size, SBA had proposed
setting the minimum size standard for
these industries at 250 employees and
the maximum size standard at 1000
employees. That would entail lowering
size standards for some industries. SBA
invited comments on whether it should
maintain the 500-employee minimum
and the 1,500-employee maximum size
standards or lower them to 250
employees and 1,000 employees,
respectively, as the Agency proposed in
its ‘‘Size Standards Methodology.’’ SBA
requested suggestions on alternative
minimum and maximum levels, if
commenters thought them more
appropriate. For the same reason, SBA
also proposed to retain the current size
standards for 19 industries when
analytical results might support
lowering them. SBA had sought
comments on whether SBA should
lower them solely based on its analysis
or retain them at their current levels in
view of current economic conditions.
3. SBA sought feedback on whether it
should adjust employee based size
standards for labor productivity growth.
SBA periodically increases receipts
based size standards for inflation.
Should SBA take labor productivity
growth and technological change into
consideration when it reviews employee
based standards? If so, what data are
available to assist SBA in evaluating
such factors? What if such an evaluation
leads to lower size standards for some
industries? How should SBA apply the
results to its size standards?
4. SBA sought feedback on whether
its proposal to increase size standards
for 209 industries and retain current
size standards for 155 industries is
appropriate, given the economic
characteristics of each industry
reviewed in the proposed rule. SBA also
sought feedback and suggestions on
alternative size standards, if
commenters thought them more
appropriate.
5. SBA invited comments on its
proposal to increase the capacity
component of the Petroleum Refiners
(NAICS 324110) size standard from
125,000 barrels per calendar day (BPCD)
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
total Operable Atmospheric Crude Oil
Distillation capacity to 200,000 BPCD
and retain the employee component at
the current 1,500-employee level. SBA
also welcomed comments on its
proposal to allow business concerns to
qualify either under the 1,500-employee
size standard or under the 200,000
BPCD capacity size standard, if the firm,
together with its affiliates, is primarily
engaged in petroleum refining. Finally,
SBA also requested feedback on its
proposal to eliminate the requirement
that ‘‘[t]he total product to be delivered
under the contract must be at least 90
percent refined by the successful bidder
from either crude oil or bona fide
feedstocks.’’
6. SBA’s proposed size standards
were based on five primary factors—
average firm size, average assets size (as
a proxy of startup costs and entry
barriers), four-firm concentration ratio,
distribution of firms by size, and the
level and small business share of
Federal contracting dollars of the
evaluated industries. SBA invited
comments on these factors and/or
suggestions on other factors that it
should consider when evaluating or
revising employee based size standards.
SBA also sought information on relevant
data sources, other than what it uses, if
available.
7. SBA gave equal weight to each of
the five primary factors in all industries.
SBA asked for feedback on whether it
should continue giving equal weight to
each factor or whether it should give
more weight to one or more factors for
certain industries. SBA requested that
recommendations to weigh some factors
more than others include suggested
weights for each factor along with
supporting information.
8. For analytical simplicity and
efficiency, in the proposed rule, SBA
refined its size standard methodology to
obtain a single value as a proposed size
standard instead of a range of values, as
in its past size regulations. SBA
welcomed any comments on this
procedure and suggestions on
alternative methods.
Summary and Discussion of Comments
SBA received 26 comments to the
proposed rule, but only 17 were unique
comments as some commenters
submitted the same comment more than
once. All of the comments are available
at www.regulations.gov (RIN 3245–
AG50) and are summarized and
discussed below.
Comments on NAICS 324110,
Petroleum Refiners
Footnote 4 of SBA’s table of size
standards relates to NAICS 324110,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
Petroleum Refiners. SBA proposed to
amend Footnote 4 in two ways: (1) By
increasing the refining capacity
component of the size standard from
125,000 barrels per calendar day (BPCD)
total capacity to 200,000 BPCD total
capacity for businesses that are
primarily engaged in petroleum
refining, and (2) by eliminating the
requirement that 90 percent of the
output to be delivered be refined by the
successful bidder from either crude oil
or bona fide feedstocks.
SBA received only one comment on
these proposed changes. Specifically,
the commenter expressed concerns
about removing the requirement that 90
percent of the output to be delivered be
refined by the successful bidder from
either crude oil or bona fide feedstocks.
The commenter contended that the
change would have an adverse impact
on small businesses under NAICS
424720, Petroleum and Petroleum
Product Merchant Wholesalers,
particularly those wishing to participate
in the Defense Logistics Agency’s (DLA)
bulk fuel small business set aside
program. To mitigate this, the
commenter suggested a provision
allowing the procuring agency to source
refined petroleum products from small
businesses in NAICS 424720 under a
small business set-aside program.
Assuming that waivers of the
nonmanufacturer rule will be
eliminated under the proposed rule, the
commenter suggested some changes to
the waiver rule.
SBA’s Response
The changes affect only the small
business eligibility of petroleum
refiners. They do not affect the
eligibility of wholesalers and other
suppliers of petroleum products.
Companies that qualify as small for
supplying petroleum products they did
not manufacture or produce can
continue to qualify as small under
SBA’s nonmanufacturer rule (13 CFR
121.406(b)). Under the nonmanufacturer
rule, a business is deemed small if it has
500 or fewer employees (including its
affiliates), is primarily engaged in the
retail or wholesale trade and normally
sells the type of item being supplied,
takes ownership or possession of the
product, and provides the product of a
small manufacturer (in this case, the
product of a small petroleum refiner).
The proposed changes do not affect the
500-employee nonmanufacturer size
standard and hence the eligibility of
wholesalers and dealers of petroleum
products under the nonmanufacturer
rule.
Based on evaluation of relevant
industry and procurement data and
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
4471
public comments to the proposed rule,
in this final rule, SBA is adopting the
changes to the size standard for NAICS
324110, as proposed. Specifically, SBA
is increasing the refining capacity
component of the Petroleum Refiners
(NAICS 324110) size standard from
125,000 BPCD to 200,000 BPCD total
capacity for businesses that are, together
with their affiliates, primarily engaged
in refining crude petroleum into refined
petroleum products. A firm’s ‘‘primary
industry’’ is determined in accordance
with 13 CFR 121.107. In addition, the
final rule eliminates the requirement
that 90 percent of output being
delivered is refined by a successful
bidder. Accordingly, SBA also revises
Footnote 4 of SBA’s table of size
standards to reflect these changes.
Under the revised size standard, for
purposes of Federal procurement, a
petroleum refiner can qualify as small
under the 1,500-employee size standard
or under the 200,000 BPCD total
capacity size standard. To qualify under
the capacity size standard, the firm,
together with its affiliates, must be
primarily engaged in refining crude
petroleum into refined petroleum
products. SBA is removing the
requirement that 90 percent of the
output to be delivered be refined by the
successful bidder from either crude oil
or bona fide feedstocks because the
general requirement on a supply
contract that is set aside for small
business is that the small business
manufacturer must perform 50 percent
of the cost of manufacturing, or may not
subcontract more than 50 percent of the
contract to another firm.
Comments on NAICS 316210, Footwear
Manufacturing
SBA received seven comments on
NAICS 316210, Footwear
Manufacturing. The current size
standard for NAICS 316210 is 1,000
employees and SBA proposed to retain
it at the current level. Four comments
supported SBA’s proposal, while two
opposed it. The seventh comment was
ambiguous with respect to the size
standard. These comments and SBA’s
responses are discussed below.
Comments Supporting the Current
1,000-Employee Size Standard for
NAICS 316210
Three footwear manufacturers
supported maintaining the current
1,000-employee size standard for NAICS
316210. All three stated that they are the
major and continuous suppliers to the
U.S. military, and footwear products
they manufacture meet the
specifications as required by the U.S.
Department of Defense (DoD) and the
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
4472
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Berry Amendment (10 U.S.C. 2533a).
The Berry Amendment requires DoD to
give preference in procurement to
domestically produced, manufactured,
or home-grown products, most notably
food, clothing, fabrics, and specialty
metals. Normally, one would expect
special manufacturing requirements to
point to the need for a larger size
standard, not lower. Additionally, all
three argued that, unlike large footwear
manufacturers with diversified market
and product bases, they rely heavily on
small business contracts from the U.S.
Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) for
their survival. Two of these commenters
also agreed with SBA’s position of not
reducing size standards in the current
economic environment.
The first commenter explained that
footwear contractors to DoD are often
torn between two forces: (1) The need to
increase the number of employees to
meet DoD’s needs, and (2) the need to
maintain small business status to
compete for DoD contracts. The
commenter maintained that footwear
manufacturing is highly labor intensive
and DoD contract awards and their
completions are associated with
significant changes in employee
headcounts. Significant swings in
employee counts also occur with
elevated demands for footwear by DoD
during times of war, the commenter
added. The commenter argued that
retaining the current 1,000-employee
size standard enables small businesses
to meet DoD’s needs without
jeopardizing their small business status.
This would also minimize the frequency
of swings between small and large
business status among footwear
contractors and the impact on the DoD’s
supply chain, the commenter added.
The same commenter stated that it relies
on its small business status to be able
to compete with large businesses. Many
large businesses in the footwear
industry are diverse, multi-national
corporations with several thousand
employees with significantly more
resources and cost efficiencies, the
commenter explained. The commenter
asserted that DoD contracts are often
awarded based on the lowest price
where large businesses have significant
cost advantages, and would be able to
squeeze out small businesses if there
were no small business protection. The
1,000-employee size standard helps
small footwear manufacturers protect
themselves as suppliers to DoD, the
commenter concluded.
The second commenter also
maintained that many contracts it
received to supply combat boots to the
U.S. military were awarded because of
its small business status. Unless the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
small business size standard remains at
1,000 employees, its future will be in
jeopardy, the commenter added. The
commenter asserted that lowering the
size standard would have a negative
impact on its business and employees it
supports. Any change in the size
standard below the 1,000-employee
level would definitely have a negative
impact on its ability to continue
manufacturing footwear for DoD and the
industry, the commenter noted.
The third commenter, whose primary
customers include DoD/DLA, supported
keeping the 1,000-employee size
standard because it allows for
employment fluctuations during the
course of contract performance. The
commenter stated that, prior to October
1, 2012, when the size standard for
NAICS 316210 was 500 employees, the
majority of DoD contracts for combat
boots went to large businesses with
several thousand employees against
which the company had a difficult time
competing on a full and open basis.
There are significant differences in
resources available to companies with
many thousands of employees versus
those with less than 1,000 employees,
the commenter added. To demonstrate
that the company has been the foremost
innovator for military footwear, the
commenter provided numerous new
combat boots it developed over the
years. In light of the decimation of U.S.
footwear manufacturing industry by
imports reducing its share of all
footwear purchase in the U.S. to less
than 2 percent in 2013, the 500employee footwear manufacturing size
standard established more than a half
century ago has grown out of date with
the realities of the industry, the
commenter explained. This commenter
also stated that because the footwear
industry is highly labor intensive, one
DoD award can easily cause a
contractor’s employment level to
increase by 10–20 percent or more,
resulting in a change to its status from
a small business to a large business
during the course of the contract. This
can be very disruptive to the company
and its employees, the commenter
added. The commenter also provided a
detailed analysis of average firm size,
startup costs and entry barriers, industry
competition, and Federal contracting
trends in support of SBA’s proposal to
maintain the 1,000-employee size
standard for Footwear Manufacturing. If
the size standard were to revert to 500
employees for NAICS 316210, it would
have a lasting negative impact on its
business and harm the areas where its
employees live, the commenter
concluded.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
SBA also received a joint comment
from two elected officials supporting the
1,000-employee size standard for
Footwear Manufacturing on behalf of a
footwear manufacturer operating
factories in their Districts. They
maintained that the company
manufactures its Berry Amendmentcompliant footwear in the U.S. and is a
major supplier to the U.S. military. They
supported SBA’s proposal to maintain
the current 1,000-employee size
standard for Footwear Manufacturing in
light of decreases in DLA contracts for
military boots as it would help the
company remain competitive in the
market. The commenters added that
lowering the size standard is not in the
best interest of small footwear
manufacturers in the current economic
environment.
Comments Opposing the Current 1,000Employee Size Standard for NAICS
316210
SBA received two comments
opposing the 1,000-employee size
standard for footwear manufacturers.
One was from a footwear manufacturing
subsidiary of a large multi-national
company and the other was from an
elected official. These comments and
SBA’s responses are below.
The first commenter argued that in
2012, SBA, without prior notice or
opportunity to comment, issued an
interim final rule to revise size
standards to conform to NAICS 2012.
The commenter also questioned SBA’s
justification for using an interim final
rule (IFR). The commenter asserted that
the 1,000-employee size standard for
Footwear Manufacturing was adopted
solely for administrative reasons
without substantive analyses of industry
and Federal contracting data as required
by the Small Business Act or SBA’s own
size standards methodology. The
commenter further argued that SBA
consolidated five separate footwear
manufacturing NAICS codes into one
footwear manufacturing code (NAICS
316210) and changed the size standard
from 500 employees to 1,000 employees
by arbitrarily selecting the highest size
standard in the group. The commenter
added that SBA did not provide a
detailed analysis and justification to
establish a single size standard for a
group of 4-digit NAICS codes as
required by 15 U.S.C. 632(a)(7). The
commenter maintained that the increase
of size standard to 1,000 employees has
allowed one or two firms between 500
employees and 1,000 employees to
become dominant in the military
footwear industry. The commenter
contends that has harmed truly small
businesses by forcing them to compete
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
against much larger firms even in small
business set aside procurements, as well
as large businesses by forcing agencies
to use small business set asides and
precluding them from participating in
the market.
The commenter claimed that the
current proposed rule and proposed size
standards are fundamentally flawed.
The commenter contended that the
proposed rule does not meet the
requirements of the Jobs Act because the
Agency has not held two public forums
in different geographic regions of the
country as required by the Jobs Act. The
commenter claimed that the actual
industry data not only fails to support
the current 1,000-employee size
standard for Footwear Manufacturing,
but supports lowering it to below 500
employees. In addition, the commenter
argued that SBA failed to explain how
the 1,000-employee size standard is
appropriate for Footwear
Manufacturing. The commenter stated
that in addition to being based on the
faulty 2012 IFR, the proposed size
standard for Footwear Manufacturing is
based on insufficient data and is not
supported by the publicly available
data. The commenter argued that the
proposed rule provides no data for startup costs, industry competition, or size
distribution of firms relating to the
footwear manufacturing industry.
Similarly, there is no discussion on
secondary factors (such as technological
changes, industry growth trends, and
SBA financial assistance and program
factors), the commenter contended. The
commenter maintained that SBA has not
published data related to the vast
majority of the primary factors it must
consider and has not provided sufficient
analysis of the size standard. SBA’s
failure to gather and consider data on
each of the required factors
demonstrates that the rulemaking is
legally deficient, the commenter argued.
The commenter argued that the
limited data SBA provides does not
support the 1,000-employee size
standard for military footwear
manufacturing; the actual data require a
lower size standard. The commenter
stated that, with the 1,000-employee
size standard, every significant domestic
manufacturer of military footwear,
except for two companies, is now
considered a small business. The
commenter maintained that publicly
available Federal procurement data
show that SBA’s improper change to a
1,000-employee size standard has
allowed ‘‘small business’’ to take a
substantial share of the military
footwear market. The commenter
alleged that SBA’s data on Federal
contracting is inaccurate because the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
Agency has willfully and arbitrarily
excluded Federal contracting data after
October 2012 from its analysis. For
example, SBA asserts that small
businesses account for 7.8 percent of the
Federal footwear market, while FPDS–
NG demonstrates that the actual
percentage is much higher, the
commenter claimed.
The commenter contended that the
1,000-employee size standard for the
footwear manufacturing industry has
created a situation where one firm is
now dominant in the industry. By
raising the size standard from 500
employees to 1,000 employees, SBA has
allowed two previously large firms to be
reclassified as small, such that six of the
eight companies in the industry are
‘‘small’’ businesses, the commenter
maintained. Accounting for more than
28 percent of fiscal year 2014 dollars
spent in NAICS 316210 nationwide and
more than twice the share of other small
business, one small business has
become dominant in the industry, the
commenter argued. SBA cannot adopt
size standards which would cause a
concern to become dominant in its field
of operation, the commenter added. The
commenter argued that SBA has
provided no data to support its
statement that no individual firm at or
below the proposed size standards will
be large enough to dominate its field of
operation. SBA has not performed such
an analysis with respect to the footwear
manufacturing industry and failed to
comply with the statutory requirement
that small businesses are only those that
are not dominant in their field of
operation, the commenter alleged.
The commenter argued that SBA’s
position not to lower size standards,
even when its analysis might support a
reduction, is arbitrary and capricious
and violates the requirements of the Act
and SBA’s own methodology. This
‘‘policy’’ is inconsistent with
congressional intent and SBA’s mission
to aid, counsel, assist and protect the
interests of small business concerns, the
commenter maintained. The commenter
added that this policy results in
otherwise large businesses being
identified as small and being afforded
special treatment that was intended for
small businesses, with repercussions for
the entire industry that SBA is required
to consider. The commenter contended
that there is no basis to support SBA’s
assertion that not lowering size
standards would create jobs. Changing
size standards would have no impact on
the government’s demands for goods
and services and job creation, the
commenter explains. In other words, the
commenter suggested that there is no
impact on the economy and job creation
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
4473
whether the contracts are performed by
large or small businesses. The
commenter further argued that SBA
failed to consider the impacts the size
standard changes would have by
precluding certain companies from
Federal opportunities or by forcing truly
small businesses to compete against
otherwise large businesses.
The commenter argued that to comply
with U.S. military requirements and the
Berry Amendment, military footwear
manufacturing involves a very distinct
production process from commercial
footwear manufacturing. Thus, the
commenter recommended that SBA
create a military footwear
manufacturing exception to NAICS
316210, with a size standard of 500
employees. The commenter argued that,
given the special production
requirements necessary to comply with
the Berry Amendment, the military
footwear industry supports a separate
industry designation as an exception to
NAICS 316210. The commenter
recommended that SBA return the size
standard for Footwear Manufacturing to
500 employees and create a separate
size standard for the military footwear
industry as an exception to NAICS
316210 with a size standard well below
500 employees.
The second commenter, an elected
official, expressed concerns about the
size standard for Footwear
Manufacturing. The commenter
contended that the size standard for
Footwear Manufacturing, increased in
2012 from 500 employees to 1,000
employees, not only endangers an
already fragile footwear manufacturing
base, but also negatively affects the
small businesses the proposed rule is
designed to assist. The commenter
maintained that, with only a limited
number of companies remaining that
can produce Berry Amendment
compliant footwear, the size standard
change for Footwear Manufacturing will
have a detrimental impact on the
military’s ability to procure high quality
and consistent products. The
commenter added that the proposed
1,000-employee size standard for
Footwear Manufacturing has created a
dominant firm within the size standard
contradicting the intent of the proposed
rule. The commenter recommended that
SBA reconsider the proposed rule and
return the small business size standard
for Footwear Manufacturing to 500
employees. This will not only ensure
fair competition among the few
remaining Berry compliant footwear
manufacturers, but will also preserve
the military’s ability to obtain consistent
quality footwear, the commenter
concluded.
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
4474
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
Another commenter supported a
change to NAICS 316210 allowing a
separate classification for the Berry
Amendment footwear. The commenter
also supported changing the small
business classification to make the
business field more competitive.
However, it was not clear whether the
comment was for increasing or
decreasing the size standard for
Footwear Manufacturing.
SBA’s Response
Every five years, with a notice and
comment process, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) reviews
and updates the NAICS industry
definitions to reflect changes in the U.S.
economy. In each NAICS update, OMB
may create new industries and merge or
modify others. In the 2012 update,
effective January 1, 2012, OMB merged
the five footwear manufacturing
industries into a single, new NAICS
industry—NAICS 316210, Footwear
Manufacturing. Thus, the commenter’s
statement that SBA consolidated the
five industries into one category is not
accurate.
When OMB merges multiple NAICS
industries or their parts into a single
industry, SBA must determine a size
standard for the new industry when
adopting the updated NAICS to its table
of size standards. For this, as explained
in the IFR, SBA used a bright-line
approach to adopting the highest size
standard among the merged industries
as the size standard for the new
industry. Of the five merged footwear
manufacturing industries, one had a
1,000-employee size standard, while
four had a 500-employee size standard.
Accordingly, SBA adopted a 1,000employee size standard for the new
footwear manufacturing industry. SBA
applied the same approach to determine
the size standard for about 25 other new
or modified industries in NAICS 2012.
SBA had applied this approach to
update its size standards in response to
the 2002 and 2007 NAICS updates with
no adverse comments. To do otherwise
and adopt a lower size standard would
result in firms being disqualified from
small business status without any
analysis, comment or opportunity for
review. There is no evidence that SBA’s
approach has ever resulted in firms that
are dominant in the industry qualifying
as small business concerns.
After receiving no inter-agency
comments, SBA published the updated
size standards as an IFR on August 20,
2012 (77 FR 49991), with an effective
date of October 1, 2012. SBA provided
a detailed justification for using the IFR
with an effective date of October 1,
2012. The commenter’s argument that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
SBA provided no opportunity to
comment on the rule is incorrect. SBA
provided a 60-day comment period for
the public and other concerned parties
to comment on the size standards
changes adopted in the interim final
rule. SBA received only one comment
on the IFR, which was unrelated to the
1,000-employee size standard for NAICS
316210, Footwear Manufacturing.
Therefore, the 1,000-employee size
standard for NAICS 316210, Footwear
Manufacturing, has been in effect since
October 1, 2012.
SBA does not agree with the
commenter’s assertion that SBA did not
provide a detailed analysis and
justification for establishing a single size
standard for a group of industries at the
4-digit NAICS level as required by 15
U.S.C. 632(a)(7). That requirement only
applies when SBA intends to establish
a common size standard for a group of
existing 6-digit NAICS codes at the 4digit NAICS Industry Group level. It
does not apply to the size standard that
SBA adopted for NAICS 316210,
Footwear Manufacturing, the new
industry that OMB created by merging
multiple NAICS industries as part of its
NAICS 2012 updates because the five
industries have similar production
processes.
SBA disagrees with most of the
arguments from the commenter
regarding the Jobs Act and the analysis
in the proposed rule. The commenter’s
allegation that SBA has not held any
public forums under the Jobs Act is
simply not correct. To obtain public
input on numerous provisions under the
Jobs Act, in 2011, SBA presented its size
standards methodology to businesses in
13 cities in the U.S. and sought their
input. SBA also provided information
on the status of the comprehensive size
standards review and on how interested
parties can provide SBA with input and
feedback on the size standards review.
SBA does not agree with the
commenter’s claim that the Agency
failed to explain how the 1,000employee size standard is appropriate
for the footwear manufacturing
industry. In the proposed rule, SBA
detailed what industry and Federal
contracting factors the Agency
considered, how they were calculated,
what data sources it examined, and how
the results were translated to size
standards supported by each factor. The
2012 IFR had no impact on the SBA’s
September 10, 2014 proposed rule to
retain the 1,000-employee based size
standard for Footwear Manufacturing.
As explained in the September 10,
2014 proposed rule, due to the lack of
data on actual start-up costs, SBA uses
average assets as a proxy for start-up
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
costs. SBA calculates average assets by
combining the sales to total assets ratio
for an industry from the Risk
Management Association’s (RMA)
Annual eStatement Studies with average
receipts from the Economic Census data.
The 2009–2011 RMA data, the latest
available when SBA prepared the
proposed rule, did not contain the sales
to assets ratio for the Footwear
Manufacturing industries. Therefore, the
average assets factor was left blank for
Footwear Manufacturing. SBA measures
industry competition using the four-firm
concentration ratio and estimates a size
standard only if its value is 40 percent
or more. SBA did not have the data to
compute the four-firm ratio for Footwear
Manufacturing. Thus, that factor was
not included in the analysis. As
explained in the proposed rule as well
as in SBA’s size standards methodology,
SBA analyzes the size distribution of
firms using the Gini coefficient. The
Gini coefficient factor was included for
Footwear Manufacturing. As part of its
review, SBA evaluates small business
participation on Federal contracting and
SBA’s loan programs under both
existing and proposed size standards as
well.
The Federal contracting factor was
evaluated for every industry, including
Footwear Manufacturing. The impact on
loan programs was evaluated on a more
general basis as the vast majority of
businesses receiving SBA’s loans are
well below the size standards.
Aggregated impacts of proposed size
standards on SBA’s financial assistance
and Federal procurement were provided
as part of the regulatory impact analysis
of the proposed rule. It was not practical
to include the results for each of the 364
industries covered by the proposed rule.
SBA considers secondary factors on a
case by case basis. While the commenter
complained that SBA did not consider
secondary factors, it did not indicate
what secondary factors SBA should
consider in reviewing the size standard
for Footwear Manufacturing. Regarding
the publication of data, SBA provided
the results for every primary factor and
each industry, unless the data were not
available or the results were not
relevant. Additionally, the majority of
the data SBA used in the proposed rule
are publicly available.
While the commenter claimed that
actual industry data support lowering
the size standard for Footwear
Manufacturing to below 500 employees,
it did not provide any specific industry
data or analysis to support its claim.
The commenter’s allegation that SBA
willfully and arbitrarily excluded the
Federal contracting data from October
2012 is incorrect. When SBA prepared
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
the proposed rule, the latest Federal
contracting data that were available was
for fiscal year 2011. The commenter
wrongly interpreted the 7.8 percent
Federal contracting factor for Footwear
Manufacturing as the small business
share of Federal footwear market. As
explained in the proposed rule, that
value represents the difference between
small business share of total industry
receipts (36.2%) and small business
share of total contract dollars (44.0%)
for Footwear Manufacturing.
SBA disagrees with the comment that
the 1,000-employee size standard has
allowed firms that are dominant in the
footwear manufacturing industry to
qualify as small. Similarly, SBA also
disagrees with the argument that SBA
did not perform the dominant analysis
for Footwear Manufacturing. SBA
examined the market share (i.e., share of
total industry’s receipts) of firms that
would become small under the
proposed size standard in each industry
and determined that no individual firm
at or below the proposed size standard
would be large enough to dominate its
field of operation. Since it was not
practical to include the market share for
each of the 364 industries, SBA
provided a range of values. Among the
industries for which the Agency
proposed to change the size standards in
Manufacturing, the small business
market share varied from 0.02 percent to
18.9 percent, averaging 1.7 percent. For
Footwear Manufacturing, that value was
1.9 percent, suggesting that at that level
market share no individual firm would
be dominant under the proposed 1,000employee size standard. SBA looks at
the share of total industry receipts, not
Federal contract dollars, to determine if
a firm is dominant in the industry.
Again, SBA considers a firm to be
dominant when it is dominant in the
entire industry, which in this case is
NAICS 316210, Footwear
Manufacturing. It does not relate to a
specific product line manufactured by a
particular company in that industry, or
a particular agency. Otherwise, the
number of companies dominant in their
industries, based on a specific product
they manufacture, would be too
numerous to identify.
Furthermore, the data does not
support the argument that the 1,000employee size standard has harmed the
companies below 500 employees by
forcing them to compete against
companies with 500–1,000 employees
for small business set aside
procurements. The results from small
business goaling data shown in Table 1,
‘‘Contract Dollars in Footwear
Manufacturing by Business Size,’’ show
that the share of companies below 500
employees in total contract dollars in
Footwear Manufacturing related
industries increased from about 31
4475
percent during fiscal years 2011–2012
(i.e., prior to the 1,000-employee size
standard) to 46 percent during fiscal
years 2013–2014 (i.e., after the 1,000employee size standard). More
importantly, small business dollars
awarded to firms below 500 employees
increased from $32 million to $49
million, an increase of more than 50
percent. Similarly, the results also do
not support the argument that the 1,000employee size standard has reduced
Federal opportunities for firms that are
above the size standard. As can be seen
from the table, dollars awarded to firms
above 1,000 employees have increased
more than 50 percent from $18 million
per year during fiscal years 2011–2012
to more than $27 million during fiscal
years 2013–2014. It is not that firms
between 500 and 1,000 employees that
became small under the 1,000-employee
size standard are getting more contracts
now, thereby reducing opportunities for
firms below 500 employees and those
above 1,000 employees. The data shows
that they continued to get those
contracts, but as small businesses under
the 1,000-employee size standard. In
fact, firms between 500 and 1,000
employees lost some of their market
share to firms below 500 employees and
those above 1,000 employees under the
higher size standard.
TABLE 1—CONTRACT DOLLARS IN FOOTWEAR MANUFACTURING BY BUSINESS SIZE
[In $ million]
Business size
(number of employees)
Average 2011–2012
Average 2013–2014
NA ........................................................................................................................................................
3.2
0.1
>=500 ...................................................................................................................................................
>500 to >=1,000 ..................................................................................................................................
>1,000 ..................................................................................................................................................
Other than small total ..........................................................................................................................
0.3
45.4
18.4
67.3
0.5
5.3
27.6
33.4
3.3
31.6
1.8
0.3
36.9
1.0
48.6
23.1
0.2
72.9
6.5
31.9
47.2
18.7
104.3
1.1
49.1
28.4
27.8
106.4
Other than small business
Small business
NA ........................................................................................................................................................
>=500 ...................................................................................................................................................
>500 to >=1,000 ..................................................................................................................................
>1,000 ..................................................................................................................................................
Small total ............................................................................................................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
Overall
NA ........................................................................................................................................................
>=500 ...................................................................................................................................................
>500 to >=1,000 ..................................................................................................................................
>1,000 ..................................................................................................................................................
Overall total ..........................................................................................................................................
SBA is unable to verify the argument
that one previously large business that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
became small under the 1,000-employee
size standard captured more than 28
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
percent of total small business dollars
awarded under NAICS 316210 in 2014.
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
4476
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Based on the analysis of contract data
for Fiscal year 2014, SBA found no
individual firm receiving more than 12
percent of small business dollars
awarded under for NAICS 316210.
Moreover, because agencies still
continued to apply older footwear
manufacturing NAICS codes (albeit
incorrectly) for footwear contracts, the
results based on NAICS 316210 alone
would be misleading. Using the data for
all footwear manufacturing related
NAICS codes, SBA found that no
individual firm accounted for more than
19 percent of small business dollars
awarded in those NAICS codes for fiscal
year 2014. These levels of market share
do not suggest that the size standard has
classified dominant firms as small.
SBA disagrees with the comment that
the Agency’s decision not to lower any
size standards was arbitrary and
capricious and violates the statute and
Agency’s methodology. Although not
lowering small business size standards
has been SBA’s general policy to
enhance small business participation in
Federal programs in the current
economic environment, SBA does make
exceptions. For example, in a final rule
(RIN 3245–AG51) published elsewhere
in this Federal Register, SBA has
lowered size standards for three mining
industries that are not part of
Manufacturing, Wholesale Trade, or
Retail Trade. In the September 10, 2014
proposed rule, SBA provided a detailed
analysis to explain why lowering size
standards would be against the best
interests of small businesses. SBA
believes that businesses below 500
employees will be better off competing
with companies up to 1,000 employees
for small business set aside
procurements than competing for
unrestricted procurements against
companies that have several thousand
employees. Because small businesses do
not have the economies of scale
(automation, marketing, production,
technology, etc.) that larger enterprises
have, small businesses generally
increase their employees, resources, and
tools when they get a new contract. As
a result, SBA believes that small
businesses will add more to the
economy by hiring people, and
purchasing equipment, materials, and
technology that larger businesses might
already have on hand.
SBA disagrees and does not see the
need for creating an exception for
military footwear manufacturing.
According to the information provided
by the commenter, there exist numerous
firms that are already in compliance
with the Berry Amendment. SBA is not
convinced with the rationale why a
lower size standard is warranted to
comply with contracts with certain
requirements. The Berry Amendment
requires DoD to give preference in
procurement to domestically produced,
manufactured, or home-grown products,
most notably food, clothing, fabrics, and
specialty metals. Normally, one would
expect special manufacturing
requirements to point to the need for a
larger size standard, not lower.
In addition, the available industry
data does not support a 500-employee
size standard for Footwear
Manufacturing, especially for military
footwear manufacturing. Firms serving
the military footwear market are, on
average, considerably larger than the
rest of the firms in the industry. Thus,
it would be inconsistent to have a lower
size standard for the military footwear
market and a higher standard for the rest
of the industry. Furthermore,
compliance with the Berry Amendment
is not a function of the size of the
business performing a contract. Rather,
it is a function of the origin of the
products, which small businesses can
certainly manufacture. Moreover, there
are several small footwear
manufacturers that manufacture
footwear that is compliant with the
Berry Amendment.
Most importantly, SBA is concerned
that lowering the size standard would
reduce the pool of small businesses that
are available to meet the DLA/DoD
requirements under small business
procurements for military footwear.
This would cause the Government to
procure its needs through more full and
open competition, thereby forcing
smaller firms, including those between
500 employees and 1,000 employees, to
compete with firms many times their
size.
In response to the comments, SBA
updated the Federal contracting factor
for Footwear Manufacturing using
FPDS–NG data for fiscal years 2013–
2014. It should be noted that the Federal
contracting factor is calculated based on
the 1,000-employee size standard for
NAICS 316210. Following OMB’s
merging of five footwear manufacturing
industries to one industry, RMA’s
eStatement Studies started publishing
the sales to total assets ratio for the new
industry (NAICS 316210). Accordingly,
using that data for years 2012–2014,
SBA is now also able to calculate the
average assets factor for NAICS 316210,
which was not included in the proposed
rule. The updated results are shown in
Table 2 ‘‘Updated Size Standards
Analysis for Footwear Manufacturing
(No. of Employees),’’ below. As can be
seen from the table, the updated results
reconfirm the 1,000-employee size
standard for NAICS 316210, Footwear
Manufacturing.
TABLE 2—UPDATED SIZE STANDARDS ANALYSIS FOR FOOTWEAR MANUFACTURING
[Number of Employees]
Simple
average
firm size
(number of
employees)
Weighted
average
firm size
(number of
employees)
Average
assets size
($ million)
55
500
550
1,500
3.7
500
Factor ...............................
Size standard ...................
Four-firm
ratio
(%)
Four-firm
average
size
(number of
employees)*
....................
....................
NA
NA
Gini
coefficient
0.827
1,500
Federal
contract
factor
(%)
3.8
1,000
Calculated
size
standard
(number of
employees)
1,000
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
*Size standard for four-firm average size is not calculated because there is no data to compute the four-firm ratio.
Therefore, based on the analyses of all
supportive and opposing comments on
the proposed rule and latest industry
and contracting data available when this
final rule was prepared, SBA is
retaining the 1,000-employee size
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
standard for Footwear Manufacturing
(NAICS 316210), as proposed.
Comments on Subsector 315, Apparel
Manufacturing
SBA received four comments on size
standards for industries within NAICS
Subsector 315, Apparel Manufacturing.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
SBA proposed to increase the size
standard for seven industries in that
subsector from 500 employees to 750
employees.
A commenter supported proposed
increases to size standards for the
apparel manufacturing industries from
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
500 employees to 750 employees. The
commenter argued that the current 500employee size standard has been a
major deterrent in its ability to hire and
retain employees to meet unexpected
surges in demand of clothing items by
DLA from small businesses, especially
in times of war. Higher size standards
are important for small clothing
manufacturers to remain eligible to
compete for small business set aside
purchases by DoD and DLA, the
commenter observed. The commenter
pointed out that, because these
industries are labor intensive, higher
size standards will offer small
businesses greater opportunities to hire
more people in different areas of the
country.
A labor organization also supported
proposed increases to size standards for
NAICS codes 315210 (Cut and Sew
Apparel Contractors), 315220 (Men’s
and Boys’ Cut and Sew Apparel
Manufacturing), 315240 (Women’s,
Girls’, and Infants’ Cut and Sew Apparel
Manufacturing), and 315280 (Other Cut
and Sew Apparel Manufacturing) from
500 employees to 750 employees. These
NAICS codes apply to procurement of
military apparel by DoD and DLA to
support U.S. troops, and the current
500-employee size standard has made it
difficult for small business apparel
contractors to meet demands during
surges in troop support acquisitions
(also referred to as surge capability), the
commenter maintained. The 500employee size standard has created
persistent capacity and price problems
for small businesses, the commenter
added. The organization stated that
small apparel contractors find
themselves torn between the need to
maintain the surge capabilities expected
by the DLA and the need to maintain
the small business status necessary to
compete for DLA uniform contracts.
Therefore, the 750-employee size
standard will allow small apparel and
clothing contractors to expand
production temporarily when demand
surges without jeopardizing their small
business status, the commenter
maintained. The capability to meet
unexpected surges in demand for items
such as uniforms and body armor is
critical to maintaining warfighter
readiness, the organization noted. Citing
a May 2013 survey of DLA’s clothing
and apparel contractors, the
organization stated that 90 percent of
respondents were dependent on DoD
contracts for their financial viability.
An Alaska Native Corporation
representative opposed the proposed
750-employee size standard for
Subsector 315, Apparel Manufacturing.
The Corporation owns several small
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
disadvantaged businesses in the apparel
manufacturing industry, the commenter
observed. The commenter argued that
raising the size standard would
negatively affect the growth of their
company and profits of their
shareholders. Raising size standards
would make a greater number of large
companies eligible for small business
status, thereby increasing competition
in the apparel manufacturing market
and reducing opportunities for their
company and other small businesses,
the commenter explained. This would
be detrimental in light of decreases in
Federal government spending in the
apparel manufacturing market over the
last 5 years because there would be
more companies bidding on fewer
contracts and fewer opportunities for
true small businesses, the commenter
concluded.
Another commenter recommended a
250-employee size standard for several
industries within Subsector 315, namely
NAICS 315210 (Cut and Sew Apparel
Contractors), 315220 (Men’s and Boys’
Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing),
315240 (Women’s, Girls’, and Infants’
Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing),
315280 (Other Cut and Sew Apparel
Manufacturing), and 315990 (Apparel
Accessories and Other Apparel
Manufacturing). The commenter argued
that the 250-employee size standard
would offer protection for emerging
small businesses, given the fragility of
the clothing and textile industry.
However, the commenter provided no
data or analysis to support the
argument.
SBA’s Response
Based on its analysis of industry and
Federal procurement data and public
comments, SBA has determined that it
will adopt the 750-employee size
standard for the seven industries in
Subsector 315, Apparel Manufacturing,
as proposed. In recent years, DLA has
strived to increase its awards for
procuring military clothing through
small businesses. This has put strains
on many small businesses, according to
the commenters, to meet DLA’s
expected surge capabilities while
maintaining their small business size
status. The increase from 500 employees
to 750 employees will allow a number
of small businesses to take on these
contracts and to hire more workers
without jeopardizing their eligibility.
Based on data from the Economic
Census and System of Award
Management (SAM), only about 10
additional businesses that are primarily
involved in Apparel Manufacturing will
qualify as small under the 750-employee
size standard. SBA does not believe that
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
4477
the higher size standard will cause a
significant negative impact on existing
small businesses. Therefore, SBA is
adopting the 750-employee size
standard for all industries in NAICS
Subsector 315, Apparel Manufacturing.
Comments on NAICS 327993, Mineral
Wool Manufacturing
A comment from a trade association
for manufacturers of fiber glass and rock
and slag wool insulation addressed the
size standard for NAICS 327993,
Mineral Wool Manufacturing.
Specifically, the association supported
SBA’s proposal to increase the size
standard for NAICS 327993 from 750
employees to 1,500 employees.
SBA’s Response
Because there were no comments
opposed to this increase, SBA is
adopting the 1,500 employee size
standard for NAICS 327993, as
proposed.
Comments on NAICS 336412, Aircraft
Engine and Engine Parts
Manufacturing; and NAICS 336413,
Other Aircraft Part and Auxiliary
Equipment Manufacturing
SBA proposed increasing the size
standards for NAICS 336412 from 1,000
employees to 1,500 employees and for
NAICS 336413 from 1,000 employees to
1,250 employees. A military aircraft
parts and auxiliary equipment
manufacturer supported the proposed
increases to size standards for both
industries, but recommends that SBA
adopt the same 1,500-employee size
standard for NAICS 336413 as well,
instead of the proposed 1,250-employee
size standard. The commenter argued
that the differences in manufacturing
engine parts and other aircraft
equipment are minimal. The single size
standard for both industries would
provide uniform employee levels for
small business eligibility and offer them
more flexibility to adjust to the
requirements of the marketplace, the
commenter explained.
SBA’s Response
SBA has not adopted the
recommendation for three reasons. First,
although product lines and production
methods may be related, there exist
significant differences in industry
characteristics between the two
industries. For example, based on the
2007 Economic Census, the average size
of firms is 230 employees for NAICS
336412 as compared to 146 employees
for NAICS 336413. Similarly, average
assets size is about $74 million for
NAICS 336412 as opposed to only $26
million for NAICS 336413. Second, the
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
4478
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
size standards for aircraft, aircraft parts
and equipment related exceptions to
NAICS 541712 (Research and
Development in the Physical,
Engineering and Life Sciences (except
Biotechnology)) are tied to size
standards for industries within NAICS
Industry Group 3364 (Aerospace
Product and Parts Manufacturing).
Therefore, changing size standards for
any of the industries in NAICS Industry
Group 3364 would also require
changing the size standards for
exceptions under NAICS 541712. Third,
the National Defense Authorization Act
of fiscal year 2013 (NDAA 2013) limits
establishing a single or common size
standard for multiple industries without
proper justification and without
publishing such a size standard for
public comments. Obviously, given the
industry data that support different size
standards for the two industries, it
would be difficult to justify the single
size standard for them in accordance
with NDAA 2013. As part of its
quinquennial review of all size
standards required by the Jobs Act, SBA
will reevaluate the size standards for
those industries in the coming years and
consider the recommendation at that
time.
For the above reasons, in this final
rule, SBA is adopting the 1,500employee size standard for NAICS
336412 and the 1,250-employee size
standard for NAICS 336413, as
proposed.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
Comments on NAICS 611512, Flight
Training
A commenter supported increasing
size standards for NAICS Sector 31–33
manufacturing, specifically increasing
the size standard for NAICS 336413
from 1,000 employees to 1,250
employees. The commenter, operating
primarily in NAICS 611512 (Flight
Training), advocated for the creation of
a separate manufacturing NAICS code
for ‘‘Military Defense Training’’ with a
size standard of 1,500 employees.
Contracting Officers have recently been
utilizing NAICS 336413 for solicitations
for services contracts involving military
training due to its higher size standard
and technical nature of military
training, the commenter explained.
NAICS 611512 and its $27.5 million
receipts based size standard do not
reflect the requirements for military
defense training, the commenter added.
The commenter argued that flight
training can more realistically be
categorized under NAICS Sector 31–33
(Manufacturing) rather than under
Sector 61 (Education).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
SBA’s Response
SBA cannot make the suggested
change for several reasons. First, the
September 10, 2014 proposed rule and
this final rule only apply to industries
in NAICS Sector 31–33, Manufacturing.
The September 10, 2014 proposed rule
did not address NAICS 611512, Flight
Training. SBA evaluated NAICS 611512
and its size standard in a proposed rule
(76 FR 70667 (November 15, 2011)) that
was part of its comprehensive review of
Sector 61, Educational Services. In the
final rule, SBA determined that data did
not support an increase in the size
standard for NAICS 611512. The final
rule (77 FR 58739 (September 24, 2012))
fully explains and justifies how SBA
arrived at its determination that the then
existing $25.5 million size standard for
NAICS 611512 should remain
unchanged. It was increased for
inflation to $27.5 million, effective July
14, 2014, along with increases to all
other monetary based size standards (79
FR 33647 (June 12, 2014)).
Second, SBA has no authority or
expertise to create new NAICS codes or
modify existing ones. Creating or
modifying NAICS industry definitions
or codes is done through the U.S.
Economic Classification Policy
Committee under the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in
cooperation with statistical agencies
from the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. If
the commenter believes that a new
NAICS code is warranted for military
flight training, it should approach OMB
(see https://www.census.gov/eos/www/
naics/). Every five years, OMB updates
NAICS codes and definitions, the next
being the NAICS 2017 updates.
For Federal procurement, the
contracting officer must specify the
NAICS code and size standard in
accordance with the principal purpose
of the procurement (13 CFR 121.402(b)).
When the government purchases
manufactured products, the contracting
officer must assign the appropriate
NAICS code and size standard from
Sector 31–33. There may be ancillary
services that accompany the
manufactured product, but if the
principal purpose of the procurement
action is to purchase product, then the
NAICS code and small business size
standard are from the manufacturing
sector. If a service is the primary
purpose of the procurement, it should
be classified under the appropriate
services NAICS code and size standard.
When the government procures both
products and services, it must
determine which is the greater part of
the contract, and must assign the
appropriate NAICS code and size
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
standard (13 CFR 121.402(b)). Any
interested party adversely affected by a
contracting officer’s NAICS code
designation may appeal that designation
to SBA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals
(OHA) (see 13 CFR 121.1101–1103).
Comments on NAICS 321212, Softwood
Veneer and Plywood Manufacturing
A commenter opposed SBA’s
proposal to increase the size standard
for Softwood Veneer and Plywood
Manufacturing (NAICS 321212) from
500 employees to 1,250 employees. The
commenter maintained that the increase
would have an impact on the majority
of manufacturers in this industry by
affecting the availability of Federal
timber, because it would increase the
competition for the timber sale set aside
for small businesses in this industry by
enlarging the pool of eligible small
business manufacturers. The commenter
argued that the proposed size standard
increase is not warranted because
companies that qualify as small under
the current size standard already exist.
The commenter was concerned that by
allowing larger companies to qualify as
small the proposed increase to the size
standard for NAICS 321212 would
negatively impact a number of
companies that have made business
decisions to remain below the 500employee size standard to benefit from
the SBA’s timber set-aside program.
With the proposed 1,250-employee size
standard, the plywood and veneer
manufacturers below 500 employees
would lose the protection provided by
the program, the commenter concluded.
SBA’s Response
With respect to the argument that an
increase to the size standard for NAICS
321212 or any other wood product
manufacturing industry would
negatively impact firms participating in
the SBA’s Commercial Timber Sale SetAside Program, the wood manufacturing
industry size standards do not apply to
determine eligibility for purposes of that
program. Rather, the size standard for
the timber sale set-aside program
(except for salvage timber) is 500
employees (see 13 CFR 121.507), which
SBA did not propose to increase.
The arguments that there are already
small businesses under the existing size
standard, that firms have made business
decisions to remain small to benefit
from the program, and that they would
lose small business protection if
additional firms qualify as small, are not
valid reasons for not revising the size
standard when the relevant industry
data warrants doing so. Of the 14
industries in NAICS Subsector 321,
Wood Product Manufacturing, based on
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
the results of the evaluation of industry
characteristics (such as average firm
size, industry concentration, and
distribution of firms by size) and the
Federal contracting factor, SBA
proposed increasing the size standards
for NAICS 321212 and four others, and
retaining the current 500-employee size
standard for nine industries. As can be
seen from the results in Table 3 of the
September 10, 2014 proposed rule, the
industries for which SBA proposed
increasing the size standards had
significantly higher average firm size,
four-firm concentration ratio and Gini
coefficient than others. To still maintain
their size standard at the 500-employee
level would be inconsistent with SBA’s
mandate to adjust size standards based
on current industry and market data.
Moreover, based on the Economic
Census and SAM data for NAICS
321212, only about five additional firms
will qualify as small under the 1,250employee size standard, suggesting that
the higher size standard will have very
minimal impact on businesses below
the current 500-employee size standard.
For these reasons, SBA is adopting the
1,250-employee size standard for NAICS
321212, as proposed. Similarly, SBA is
adopting proposed size standards
increases for four other industries in
Subsector 321.
Other Comments
Two commenters offered general
assessments of SBA’s proposed rule.
Both supported SBA’s proposed five
employee based size standard levels for
Manufacturing and their incremental
increases of 250 employees rather than
500 employees; however, one suggested
that SBA should incorporate the sixth
level at 250 employees and set the
maximum employee based standard at
1,000 employees. A lower size standard
would protect emerging manufacturers
that are not able to compete with
established larger businesses, the
commenter explained. One opposed
proposed increases to size standards in
Manufacturing arguing that higher size
standards would allow manufacturers to
create less productive, low paying jobs,
while the other commenter supported
the increases except for industries in
Subsector 315 for which the commenter
suggested a lower 250-employee size
standard.
Both commenters argued that the
Agency should lower size standards
when the analysis supports lowering
them. One argued that not lowering size
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
standards would encourage
manufacturers not to upgrade their
facilities with advanced manufacturing
techniques and allow larger
manufacturers to compete with true
small manufacturers. While one
commenter suggested that SBA should
not adjust employee based size
standards for labor productivity growth
and focus on protecting emerging
businesses instead, the other pointed
out that the lack of data on labor
productivity would make adjusting size
standards based on labor productivity
difficult. One commenter supported
weighing all factors equally, while the
other suggested weighing some factors
more than others for certain industries.
In addition to employee counts, the
second commenter suggested other
criteria for establishing size standards,
including business tenure (5 years),
subcontracting limitations, revenue
limits ($30 million), and net worth
limits ($5 million). Lastly, both
commenters endorsed SBA’s approach
to use a single value as a size standard
as opposed to a range of values.
SBA’s Response
Some of the issues the commenters
have raised (such as lowering minimum
and maximum size standards, using
different factors and weighing them
differently from others, lowering size
standards, etc.) will be addressed when
SBA updates its ‘‘Size Standards
Methodology’’ for the next round of size
standards review. With respect to SBA’s
policy of not lowering size standards
when the data support doing so, SBA
provided a detailed explanation in the
proposed rule with respect to why
lowering size standards is not in the
best interest of small businesses in the
current economic climate. SBA is
concerned that lowering maximum and
minimum levels of size standards would
cause untold numbers of small
businesses to lose their eligibility for
Federal programs.
Incorporation of net worth into SBA’s
table of size standards is not practicable.
It is not a value that lends itself to
comparing businesses in a particular
industry. A company’s net worth can be
affected by a number of things, such as
debt, repurchased corporate stock, etc.
Furthermore, data on net worth is not
available by industry.
Other criteria proposed by the
commenter would, SBA believes, be too
nebulous, temporary, and subjective and
therefore not useful when establishing
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
4479
size standards that usually must remain
static and in place for a number of years.
Establishing small business eligibility
based on multiple criteria (such as
revenue limit, net worth limit, and
employee count), as suggested by the
commenter, would create unnecessary
complexity and confusion in size
standards.
NAICS 326211, Tire Manufacturing
(Except Retreading)
In the September 10, 2014 proposed
rule, SBA proposed amending Footnote
5 to the table of size standards relating
to NAICS 326211, Tire Manufacturing
(except Retreading). In the absence of
comments opposing the proposed
amendment, SBA is amending Footnote
5, as proposed, by replacing the former
Census classification codes 30111 and
30112 with the new Census Product
Classification Codes 3262111 and
3262113 respectively.
Conclusions
Based on the analyses of the latest
industry and Federal contracting data
available and thorough evaluation of all
public comments on the proposed rule,
SBA is adopting all size standards
changes in NAICS Sector 31–33,
Manufacturing, as proposed.
Specifically, SBA is increasing size
standards for 209 industries in NAICS
Sector 31–33. These industries, along
with their current and revised size
standards are shown in Table 3
‘‘Summary of Size Standards Revisions
in NAICS Sector 31–33.’’ SBA is also
increasing the refining capacity
component of the size standard for
NAICS 324110 (Petroleum Refiners)
from 125,000 barrels per calendar day
(BPCD) to 200,000 BPCD for businesses
that are primarily engaged in petroleum
refining and eliminating the
requirement that 90 percent of the
output to be delivered be refined by the
successful bidder from either crude oil
or bona fide feedstocks. To qualify
under the capacity size standard, the
firm, together with its affiliates, must be
primarily engaged in refining crude
petroleum into refined petroleum
products. To reflect these changes, SBA
is also amending Footnote 4 of SBA’s
table of size standards. Finally, the
Agency is also updating Footnote 5 to
NAICS 326211 to reflect the current
Census Product Classification Codes
3262111 and 3262113.
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
4480
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 3—SUMMARY OF SIZE STANDARDS REVISIONS IN NAICS SECTOR 31–33
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
NAICs code
311111
311211
311221
311314
311340
311351
311352
311411
311412
311421
311422
311423
311511
311512
311513
311514
311520
311611
311612
311613
311615
311710
311812
311813
311821
311824
311830
311911
311919
311920
311930
311941
312111
312112
312113
312120
312130
312140
312230
313110
313230
314110
314120
315110
315190
315210
315220
315240
315280
316992
321212
321213
321219
321911
321991
322121
322130
322211
322219
322220
322230
322291
323117
324191
325194
325199
325211
325312
325320
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Current size
standard
(number of
employees)
NAICS U.S. industry title
Dog and Cat Food Manufacturing .................................................................................................
Flour Milling ....................................................................................................................................
Wet Corn Milling .............................................................................................................................
Cane Sugar Manufacturing ............................................................................................................
Nonchocolate Confectionery Manufacturing ..................................................................................
Chocolate and Confectionery Manufacturing from Cacao Beans .................................................
Confectionery Manufacturing from Purchased Chocolate .............................................................
Frozen Fruit, Juice, and Vegetable Manufacturing ........................................................................
Frozen Specialty Food Manufacturing ...........................................................................................
Fruit and Vegetable Canning .........................................................................................................
Specialty Canning ..........................................................................................................................
Dried and Dehydrated Food Manufacturing ..................................................................................
Fluid Milk Manufacturing ................................................................................................................
Creamery Butter Manufacturing .....................................................................................................
Cheese Manufacturing ...................................................................................................................
Dry, Condensed, and Evaporated Dairy Product Manufacturing ..................................................
Ice Cream and Frozen Dessert Manufacturing .............................................................................
Animal (except Poultry) Slaughtering ............................................................................................
Meat Processed from Carcasses ...................................................................................................
Rendering and Meat Byproduct Processing ..................................................................................
Poultry Processing .........................................................................................................................
Seafood Product Preparation and Packaging ...............................................................................
Commercial Bakeries .....................................................................................................................
Frozen Cakes, Pies, and Other Pastries Manufacturing ...............................................................
Cookie and Cracker Manufacturing ...............................................................................................
Dry Pasta, Dough, and Flour Mixes Manufacturing from Purchased Flour ..................................
Tortilla Manufacturing .....................................................................................................................
Roasted Nuts and Peanut Butter Manufacturing ...........................................................................
Other Snack Food Manufacturing ..................................................................................................
Coffee and Tea Manufacturing ......................................................................................................
Flavoring Syrup and Concentrate Manufacturing ..........................................................................
Mayonnaise, Dressing, and Other Prepared Sauce Manufacturing ..............................................
Soft Drink Manufacturing ...............................................................................................................
Bottled Water Manufacturing .........................................................................................................
Ice Manufacturing ...........................................................................................................................
Breweries .......................................................................................................................................
Wineries .........................................................................................................................................
Distilleries .......................................................................................................................................
Tobacco Manufacturing ..................................................................................................................
Fiber, Yarn, and Thread Mills ........................................................................................................
Nonwoven Fabric Mills ...................................................................................................................
Carpet and Rug Mills .....................................................................................................................
Curtain and Linen Mills ..................................................................................................................
Hosiery and Sock Mills ..................................................................................................................
Other Apparel Knitting Mills ...........................................................................................................
Cut and Sew Apparel Contractors .................................................................................................
Men’s and Boys’ Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing .................................................................
Women’s, Girls’, and Infants’ Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing .............................................
Other Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing ...................................................................................
Women’s Handbag and Purse Manufacturing ...............................................................................
Softwood Veneer and Plywood Manufacturing ..............................................................................
Engineered Wood Member (except Truss) Manufacturing ............................................................
Reconstituted Wood Product Manufacturing .................................................................................
Wood Window and Door Manufacturing ........................................................................................
Manufactured Home (Mobile Home) Manufacturing ......................................................................
Paper (except Newsprint) Mills ......................................................................................................
Paperboard Mills ............................................................................................................................
Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box Manufacturing ............................................................................
Other Paperboard Container Manufacturing ..................................................................................
Paper Bag and Coated and Treated Paper Manufacturing ...........................................................
Stationery Product Manufacturing ..................................................................................................
Sanitary Paper Product Manufacturing ..........................................................................................
Books Printing ................................................................................................................................
Petroleum Lubricating Oil and Grease Manufacturing ..................................................................
Cyclic Crude, Intermediate, and Gum and Wood Chemical Manufacturing .................................
All Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing .........................................................................
Plastics Material and Resin Manufacturing ...................................................................................
Phosphatic Fertilizer Manufacturing ...............................................................................................
Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing ............................................................
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
500
500
750
750
500
500
500
500
500
500
1,000
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
750
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
750
1,000
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
750
750
500
750
500
500
500
500
500
750
1,000
750
500
500
Revised size
standard
(number of
employees)
1,000
1,000
1,250
1,000
1,000
1,250
1,000
1,000
1,250
1,000
1,250
750
1,000
750
1,250
750
1,000
1,000
1,000
750
1,250
750
1,000
750
1,250
750
1,250
750
1,250
750
1,000
750
1,250
1,000
750
1,250
1,000
1,000
1,500
1,250
750
1,500
750
750
750
750
750
750
750
750
1,250
750
750
1,000
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,000
750
750
1,500
1,250
750
1,250
1,250
1,250
750
1,000
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
4481
TABLE 3—SUMMARY OF SIZE STANDARDS REVISIONS IN NAICS SECTOR 31–33—Continued
NAICs code
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
325411
325412
325413
325414
325510
325611
325612
325613
325620
325992
326111
326112
326113
326122
326140
326150
326160
326191
326211
326220
326291
327110
327212
327213
327215
327310
327332
327410
327420
327910
327993
331110
331315
331511
331512
332111
332112
332215
332216
332311
332313
332321
332410
332420
332431
332510
332911
332912
332913
332919
332991
332992
333111
333112
333120
333132
333242
333244
333415
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
333611
333612
333613
333618
333911
333912
333913
333921
333923
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Current size
standard
(number of
employees)
NAICS U.S. industry title
Medicinal and Botanical Manufacturing .........................................................................................
Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing ...................................................................................
In-Vitro Diagnostic Substance Manufacturing ................................................................................
Biological Product (except Diagnostic) Manufacturing ..................................................................
Paint and Coating Manufacturing ..................................................................................................
Soap and Other Detergent Manufacturing .....................................................................................
Polish and Other Sanitation Good Manufacturing .........................................................................
Surface Active Agent Manufacturing .............................................................................................
Toilet Preparation Manufacturing ...................................................................................................
Photographic Film, Paper, Plate, and Chemical Manufacturing ....................................................
Plastics Bag and Pouch Manufacturing .........................................................................................
Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing ...................................
Unlaminated Plastics Film and Sheet (except Packaging) Manufacturing ....................................
Plastics Pipe and Pipe Fitting Manufacturing ................................................................................
Polystyrene Foam Product Manufacturing .....................................................................................
Urethane and Other Foam Product (except Polystyrene) Manufacturing .....................................
Plastics Bottle Manufacturing .........................................................................................................
Plastics Plumbing Fixture Manufacturing .......................................................................................
Tire Manufacturing (except Retreading) ........................................................................................
Rubber and Plastics Hoses and Belting Manufacturing ................................................................
Rubber Product Manufacturing for Mechanical Use ......................................................................
Pottery, Ceramics, and Plumbing Fixture Manufacturing ..............................................................
Other Pressed and Blown Glass and Glassware Manufacturing ..................................................
Glass Container Manufacturing .....................................................................................................
Glass Product Manufacturing Made of Purchased Glass .............................................................
Cement Manufacturing ...................................................................................................................
Concrete Pipe Manufacturing ........................................................................................................
Lime Manufacturing ........................................................................................................................
Gypsum Product Manufacturing ....................................................................................................
Abrasive Product Manufacturing ....................................................................................................
Mineral Wool Manufacturing ..........................................................................................................
Iron and Steel Mills and Ferroalloy Manufacturing ........................................................................
Aluminum Sheet, Plate, and Foil Manufacturing ...........................................................................
Iron Foundries ................................................................................................................................
Steel Investment Foundries ...........................................................................................................
Iron and Steel Forging ...................................................................................................................
Nonferrous Forging ........................................................................................................................
Metal Kitchen Cookware, Utensil, Cutlery, and Flatware (except Precious) Manufacturing .........
Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing .......................................................................................
Prefabricated Metal Building and Component Manufacturing .......................................................
Plate Work Manufacturing ..............................................................................................................
Metal Window and Door Manufacturing ........................................................................................
Power Boiler and Heat Exchanger Manufacturing ........................................................................
Metal Tank (Heavy Gauge) Manufacturing ....................................................................................
Metal Can Manufacturing ...............................................................................................................
Hardware Manufacturing ................................................................................................................
Industrial Valve Manufacturing .......................................................................................................
Fluid Power Valve and Hose Fitting Manufacturing ......................................................................
Plumbing Fixture Fitting and Trim Manufacturing ..........................................................................
Other Metal Valve and Pipe Fitting Manufacturing ........................................................................
Ball and Roller Bearing Manufacturing ..........................................................................................
Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing .........................................................................................
Farm Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing ............................................................................
Lawn and Garden Tractor and Home Lawn and Garden Equipment Manufacturing ...................
Construction Machinery Manufacturing .........................................................................................
Oil and Gas Field Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing ........................................................
Semiconductor Machinery Manufacturing ......................................................................................
Printing Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing ........................................................................
Air-Conditioning and Warm Air Heating Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing.
Turbine and Turbine Generator Set Units Manufacturing .............................................................
Speed Changer, Industrial High-Speed Drive, and Gear Manufacturing ......................................
Mechanical Power Transmission Equipment Manufacturing .........................................................
Other Engine Equipment Manufacturing ........................................................................................
Pump and Pumping Equipment Manufacturing .............................................................................
Air and Gas Compressor Manufacturing .......................................................................................
Measuring and Dispensing Pump Manufacturing ..........................................................................
Elevator and Moving Stairway Manufacturing ...............................................................................
Overhead Traveling Crane, Hoist, and Monorail System Manufacturing ......................................
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
Revised size
standard
(number of
employees)
750
750
500
500
500
750
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
1,000
500
500
750
750
750
500
750
500
500
1,000
500
750
1,000
750
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
1,000
500
500
500
500
500
750
1,000
500
500
750
500
500
500
750
1,000
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,000
1,000
750
750
1,250
1,500
750
1,000
750
750
1,000
750
1,250
750
1,500
750
750
1,000
1,250
1,250
1,000
1,000
750
750
1,500
750
1,500
1,500
1,250
1,000
1,000
750
750
750
750
750
750
750
750
750
1,500
750
750
1,000
1,000
750
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,500
1,250
1,250
1,500
750
1,250
1,000
500
500
1,000
500
500
500
500
500
1,500
750
750
1,500
750
1,000
750
1,000
1,250
4482
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 3—SUMMARY OF SIZE STANDARDS REVISIONS IN NAICS SECTOR 31–33—Continued
NAICs code
333992
333995
333996
334111
334112
334210
334220
334412
334413
334417
334418
334510
334511
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
334513 ........
334514
334515
334516
334517
334614
335110
335121
335210
335221
335222
335224
335228
335312
335313
335911
335932
336111
336112
336120
336212
336213
336214
336310
336320
336330
336340
336350
336360
336370
336390
336412
336413
336414
336415
336510
336611
336612
336991
336992
336999
337110
337121
337122
337124
337125
337211
337214
337910
337920
339112
339113
339114
339115
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Current size
standard
(number of
employees)
NAICS U.S. industry title
Welding and Soldering Equipment Manufacturing ........................................................................
Fluid Power Cylinder and Actuator Manufacturing ........................................................................
Fluid Power Pump and Motor Manufacturing ................................................................................
Electronic Computer Manufacturing ...............................................................................................
Computer Storage Device Manufacturing ......................................................................................
Telephone Apparatus Manufacturing .............................................................................................
Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing ...
Bare Printed Circuit Board Manufacturing .....................................................................................
Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing ......................................................................
Electronic Connector Manufacturing ..............................................................................................
Printed Circuit Assembly (Electronic Assembly) Manufacturing ....................................................
Electromedical and Electrotherapeutic Apparatus Manufacturing .................................................
Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument
Manufacturing.
Instruments and Related Products Manufacturing for Measuring, Displaying, and Controlling Industrial Process Variables.
Totalizing Fluid Meter and Counting Device Manufacturing ..........................................................
Instrument Manufacturing for Measuring and Testing Electricity and Electrical Signals ..............
Analytical Laboratory Instrument Manufacturing ...........................................................................
Irradiation Apparatus Manufacturing ..............................................................................................
Software and Other Prerecorded Compact Disc, Tape, and Record Reproducing ......................
Electric Lamp Bulb and Part Manufacturing ..................................................................................
Residential Electric Lighting Fixture Manufacturing .......................................................................
Small Electrical Appliance Manufacturing ......................................................................................
Household Cooking Appliance Manufacturing ...............................................................................
Household Refrigerator and Home Freezer Manufacturing ..........................................................
Household Laundry Equipment Manufacturing ..............................................................................
Other Major Household Appliance Manufacturing .........................................................................
Motor and Generator Manufacturing ..............................................................................................
Switchgear and Switchboard Apparatus Manufacturing ................................................................
Storage Battery Manufacturing ......................................................................................................
Noncurrent-Carrying Wiring Device Manufacturing .......................................................................
Automobile Manufacturing .............................................................................................................
Light Truck and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing ...............................................................................
Heavy Duty Truck Manufacturing ..................................................................................................
Truck Trailer Manufacturing ...........................................................................................................
Motor Home Manufacturing ...........................................................................................................
Travel Trailer and Camper Manufacturing .....................................................................................
Motor Vehicle Gasoline Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing ................................................
Motor Vehicle Electrical and Electronic Equipment Manufacturing ...............................................
Motor Vehicle Steering and Suspension Components (except Spring) Manufacturing ................
Motor Vehicle Brake System Manufacturing .................................................................................
Motor Vehicle Transmission and Power Train Parts Manufacturing .............................................
Motor Vehicle Seating and Interior Trim Manufacturing ................................................................
Motor Vehicle Metal Stamping .......................................................................................................
Other Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing .....................................................................................
Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing ..........................................................................
Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing ........................................................
Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing ........................................................................
Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Propulsion Unit and Propulsion Unit Parts Manufacturing ....
Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing ............................................................................................
Ship Building and Repairing ..........................................................................................................
Boat Building ..................................................................................................................................
Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Parts Manufacturing ...............................................................................
Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing .........................................
All Other Transportation Equipment Manufacturing ......................................................................
Wood Kitchen Cabinet and Countertop Manufacturing .................................................................
Upholstered Household Furniture Manufacturing ..........................................................................
Nonupholstered Wood Household Furniture Manufacturing .........................................................
Metal Household Furniture Manufacturing .....................................................................................
Household Furniture (except Wood and Metal) Manufacturing .....................................................
Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing ............................................................................................
Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing ..............................................................................
Mattress Manufacturing ..................................................................................................................
Blind and Shade Manufacturing .....................................................................................................
Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing ...........................................................................
Surgical Appliance and Supplies Manufacturing ...........................................................................
Dental Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing ............................................................................
Ophthalmic Goods Manufacturing .................................................................................................
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
Revised size
standard
(number of
employees)
500
500
500
1,000
1,000
1,000
750
500
500
500
500
500
750
1,250
750
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
750
1,250
1,000
750
1,250
1,250
500
750
500
500
500
500
750
1,000
500
750
750
1,000
1,000
500
1,000
750
500
500
1,000
1,000
1,000
500
1,000
500
750
750
750
750
750
500
500
750
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
500
500
1,000
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
750
750
1,000
1,000
1,250
1,250
750
1,500
1,500
1,250
1,250
1,000
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,000
1,500
1,500
1,500
1,000
1,250
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,250
1,500
1,500
1,000
1,000
1,500
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,500
1,250
1,000
1,000
1,500
1,000
750
1,000
750
750
750
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
750
750
1,000
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
4483
TABLE 3—SUMMARY OF SIZE STANDARDS REVISIONS IN NAICS SECTOR 31–33—Continued
NAICs code
339920
339940
339992
339993
339995
........
........
........
........
........
Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing ..................................................................................
Office Supplies (except Paper) Manufacturing ..............................................................................
Musical Instrument Manufacturing .................................................................................................
Fastener, Button, Needle, and Pin Manufacturing ........................................................................
Burial Casket Manufacturing ..........................................................................................................
Evaluation of Dominance in Field of
Operation
Section 3(a) of the Small Business Act
(15 U.S.C. 632(a)) defines a small
business concern as one that: (1) Is
independently owned and operated; (2)
is not dominant in its field of operation;
and (3) meets a specific small business
definition or size standard established
by SBA’s Administrator. SBA considers
as part of its evaluation whether a
business concern at a proposed or
revised size standard would be
dominant in its field of operation. SBA
has determined that for the industries
for which it has revised size standards
in this final rule, no individual firm at
or below the revised size standard will
be large enough to dominate its field of
operation. At the revised size standards
that are adopted in this final rule, the
small business share of total industry
receipts among those industries for
which SBA has revised size standards
is, on average, 1.7 percent, ranging from
a minimum of 0.02 percent to a
maximum of 18.9 percent. SBA
determines that these market shares
effectively preclude a firm at or below
the revised size standards from exerting
control on any of the industries.
Compliance With Executive Orders
12866, 13563, 12988 and 13132, the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Ch. 35) and the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this final
rule is a significant regulatory action for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, in the next section SBA
provides a Regulatory Impact Analysis
of this rule. However, this rule is not a
‘‘major rule’’ under the Congressional
Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 800.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
1. Is there a need for the regulatory
action?
SBA believes that the size standards
revisions in this rule are a better
reflection of the economic
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Current size
standard
(number of
employees)
NAICS U.S. industry title
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
characteristics of small businesses and
the Federal government marketplace in
the affected industries. SBA’s mission is
to aid and assist small businesses
through a variety of financial,
procurement, business development,
and advocacy programs. To determine
the intended beneficiaries of these
programs, SBA establishes distinct
definitions of which businesses are
deemed small businesses. The Small
Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a))
delegates to SBA’s Administrator the
responsibility for establishing small
business definitions. The Act also
requires that small business definitions
vary to reflect industry differences. The
Jobs Act further requires SBA to review
all size standards and make necessary
adjustments to reflect market
conditions. The supplementary
information section of this rule explains
SBA’s methodology for analyzing a size
standard for a particular industry.
2. What are the potential benefits and
costs of this regulatory action?
The most significant benefit to
businesses affected by this rule is their
gaining or maintaining eligibility for
Federal small business assistance
programs. These include SBA’s
financial assistance programs, economic
injury disaster loans, and Federal
procurement programs intended for
small businesses. Federal procurement
programs provide targeted opportunities
for small businesses under SBA’s
business development programs, such
as 8(a), Small Disadvantaged Businesses
(SDB), small businesses located in
Historically Underutilized Business
Zones (HUBZone), women-owned small
businesses (WOSB), economically
disadvantaged women-owned small
businesses (EDWOSB), and servicedisabled veteran-owned small
businesses (SDVOSB). Federal agencies
may also use SBA’s size standards for a
variety of other regulatory and program
purposes. These programs assist small
businesses to become more
knowledgeable, stable, and competitive.
SBA estimates that in the 209 industries
for which it is increasing size standards
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
500
500
500
500
500
Revised size
standard
(number of
employees)
750
750
1,000
750
1,000
about 1,250 firms, not small under the
current size standards, will become
small and therefore eligible for these
programs. That is about 0.4 percent of
all firms classified as small under the
current size standards in all industries
that SBA reviewed for the September
10, 2014 proposed rule and this final
rule. SBA anticipates that the small
business share of total receipts in those
industries will increase from 26 percent
to 29 percent.
Four groups can benefit from the
revised size standards: (1) Some
businesses that are above the current
size standards may gain small business
status under the higher size standards,
thereby enabling them to participate in
Federal small business assistance
programs; (2) growing small businesses
that are close to exceeding the current
size standards will be able to retain their
small business status under the higher
size standards, thereby enabling them to
continue their participation in the
programs; (3) Federal agencies that will
have a larger pool of small businesses
from which to draw for their small
business procurement programs; and,
(4) wholesalers and dealers that sell
products to the Federal government as
small businesses under the
nonmanufacturer rule (13 CFR
121.406(b)) will have additional sources
of goods to fill their orders.
SBA estimates that firms gaining
small business status under the revised
size standards might receive Federal
contracts totaling $150 million to $160
million annually under SBA’s small
business, 8(a), SDB, HUBZone, WOSB,
EDWOSB, and SDVOSB Programs, as
well as other unrestricted procurements.
The added competition for many of
these procurements can also result in
lower prices to the Government for
procurements reserved for small
businesses, but SBA cannot quantify
this benefit.
SBA provides financial assistance to
small businesses under its 7(a) and 504
Loan Programs. Under SBA’s 7(a) and
504 Loan Programs, based on the fiscal
years 2012–2014 data, SBA estimates
approximately 20 to 25 SBA loans
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
4484
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
totaling about $10 million to $15.0
million could be made to these newly
defined small businesses under the
revised size standards. However, it is
impractical to try to estimate the
number and total amount of loans with
any precision. There are two reasons for
this: (1) Under the Jobs Act, SBA can
now guarantee substantially larger loans
than in the past; and (2) as described
above, the Jobs Act established a higher
alternative size standard ($15 million in
tangible net worth and $5 million in net
income after income taxes) for business
concerns that do not meet the size
standards for their industry.
Newly defined small businesses will
also benefit from SBA’s Economic Injury
Disaster Loan (EIDL) Program. Since this
program is contingent on the occurrence
and severity of a disaster in the future,
SBA cannot make a meaningful estimate
of this impact.
In addition, newly defined small
businesses will also benefit through
reduced fees, less paperwork, and fewer
compliance requirements that are
available to small businesses throughout
the Federal government.
To the extent that 1,250 newly
defined small firms may become active
in Federal procurement programs, the
revised size standards might also add
administrative costs to the government
because there are now more businesses
eligible for Federal small business
programs. For example, there will be
more firms seeking SBA’s guaranteed
loans, more firms eligible for enrollment
in the SAM database, and more firms
seeking certification as 8(a) or HUBZone
firms or qualifying for small business,
WOSB, EDWOSB, SDVOSB, and SDB
status. Among those newly defined
small businesses seeking Federal
assistance, there could be additional
costs associated with compliance and
verification of small business status and
administration of size protests.
However, SBA believes that these added
administrative costs will be minimal
because there are mechanisms in place
to handle these requirements.
Additionally, some Federal
government contracts might have higher
costs. With a greater number of
businesses defined as small under the
revised size standards, Federal agencies
may set aside more contracts to small
businesses, rather than use full and
open competition. The movement from
unrestricted to small business set-aside
contracting might result in competition
among fewer total bidders, although
there will be more small businesses
eligible to submit offers. However, the
additional costs associated with fewer
bidders are expected to be minor since,
by law, procurements may be set aside
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
or reserved for the small business, 8(a),
HUBZone, WOSB, EDWOSB, or
SDVOSB Programs only if awards are
expected to be made at fair and
reasonable prices. In addition, there
may be higher costs when more full and
open contracts are awarded to HUBZone
businesses that receive price evaluation
preferences.
Revised size standards might have
distributional effects among large and
small business contractors. Although
SBA cannot estimate with certainty the
actual outcome of the gains and losses
among small and large businesses, it can
identify several probable impacts. Some
Federal contracts may be transferred to
small businesses from large businesses.
Large businesses may have fewer
Federal contract opportunities as
Federal agencies decide to set aside
more contracts for small businesses. In
addition, some Federal contracts may be
awarded to HUBZone concerns instead
of large businesses since they are
eligible for price evaluation preferences
when they compete on a full and open
basis.
Similarly, some businesses defined
small under the current size standards
may receive fewer Federal contracts due
to increased competition from more
businesses now defined as small under
higher size standards. This transfer may
be offset by a greater number of small
business set-aside procurements. The
number of newly defined and
expanding small businesses that are
willing and able to sell to the Federal
government will limit the potential
transfer of contracts from large and
currently defined small businesses.
Because there are so many variables
affecting the Federal market, SBA
cannot estimate the potential
distributional impacts of these transfers
with any degree of precision.
The increased size standards for 209
industries and the modification of the
size standard for NAICS 324110 in
Sector 31–33 are consistent with SBA’s
statutory mandate to assist small
business. This regulatory action
promotes the Administration’s
objectives. One of SBA’s goals in
support of the Administration’s
objectives is to help individual small
businesses succeed through fair and
equitable access to capital and credit,
Government contracts, and management
and technical assistance. Reviewing and
modifying size standards, when
appropriate, ensures that intended
beneficiaries have access to small
business programs designed to assist
them.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Executive Order 13563
Descriptions of the need for this
regulatory action and benefits and costs
associated with this action including
possible distributional impacts that
relate to Executive Order 13563 are
included in the Regulatory Impact
Analysis under Executive Order 12866,
above.
In an effort to engage interested
parties in this action, SBA presented its
size standards methodology (discussed
above under Supplementary
Information) to various industry
associations and trade groups. SBA also
met with a number of industry groups
and individual businesses to get their
feedback on its methodology and other
size standards issues. The Agency
additionally conferred with Federal
procurement officials that purchase
products manufactured by a number of
industries for which SBA proposed to
increase size standards. In addition, as
part of its Jobs Act tour SBA presented
its size standards methodology to
businesses in 13 cities in the U.S. and
sought their input. The presentations
included information on the latest status
of the comprehensive size standards
review and on how interested parties
can provide SBA with input and
feedback on size standards.
Moreover, SBA sent letters to the
Directors of the Offices of Small and
Disadvantaged Business Utilization
(OSDBU) at several Federal agencies
with considerable procurement
responsibilities requesting their
feedback on how the agencies use SBA’s
size standards and whether current size
standards meet their programmatic
needs (both procurement and nonprocurement). SBA gave appropriate
consideration to all input, suggestions,
recommendations, and relevant
information obtained from industry
groups, individual businesses, and
Federal agencies in preparing this rule.
Finally, the SBA has maintained a
roster of parties (government and
industry) that have expressed interest in
various manufacturing industries over
the last few years, and sent each of them
a copy of the September 10, 2014
proposed rule to assure they had ample
time and opportunity to provide
comments.
Increasing size standards for the
industries covered in this rule is
consistent with Executive Order 13563,
Section 6, calling for retrospective
analyses of existing rules. The last
comprehensive review of size standards
occurred during the late 1970s and early
1980s. Since then, except for periodic
adjustments for monetary based size
standards, most reviews of size
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
standards were limited to a few specific
industries in response to requests from
the public and from Federal agencies.
The majority of employee based size
standards, including those in NAICS
Sector 31–33, have not been reviewed
since they were first established. SBA
recognizes that changes in industry
structure and the Federal marketplace
over time have rendered existing size
standards for some industries no longer
supportable by current data.
Accordingly, in 2007, SBA began a
comprehensive review of its size
standards to ensure that existing size
standards have supportable bases and to
revise them when necessary. In
addition, the Jobs Act requires SBA to
conduct a detailed review of all size
standards and to make appropriate
adjustments to reflect market
conditions. Specifically, the Jobs Act
requires SBA to conduct a detailed
review of at least one-third of all size
standards during every 18-month period
from the date of its enactment and do a
complete review of all size standards
not less frequently than once every 5
years thereafter.
Executive Order 12988
This action meets applicable
standards set forth in Sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden. The action does not have
retroactive or preemptive effect.
Executive Order 13132
For purposes of Executive Order
13132, SBA has determined that this
rule has no substantial, direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, SBA
has determined that this rule has no
federalism implications warranting
preparation of a federalism assessment.
Paperwork Reduction Act
For the purpose of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Ch. 35, SBA
has determined that this rule imposes
no new reporting or record keeping
requirements.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA), this rule may have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
businesses in the industries covered by
this rule. As described above, this rule
may affect small businesses seeking
Federal contracts, loans under SBA’s
7(a), 504 and Economic Injury Disaster
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
Loan Programs, and assistance under
other Federal small business programs.
Immediately below, SBA sets forth a
final regulatory flexibility analysis
(FRFA) of this rule addressing the
following questions: (1) What are the
need for and objective of the rule? (2)
What are SBA’s description and
estimate of the number of small
businesses to which the rule applies? (3)
What are the projected reporting, record
keeping, and other compliance
requirements of the rule? (4) What are
the relevant Federal rules that may
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the
rule? and (5) What alternatives will
allow the Agency to accomplish its
regulatory objectives while minimizing
the impact on small businesses?
1. What are the need for and objective
of the rule?
Changes in industry structure,
technological changes, productivity
growth, mergers and acquisitions, and
updated industry definitions have
changed the structure of many
industries reviewed in the September
10, 2014 proposed rule and this final
rule. Such changes can be sufficient to
warrant revisions to current size
standards for some industries. Based on
the analysis of the latest data available,
SBA believes that the revised size
standards in this rule more
appropriately reflect the size of
businesses that need Federal assistance.
The Jobs Act also requires SBA to
review all size standards and make
necessary adjustments to reflect market
conditions.
2. What are SBA’s description and
estimate of the number of small
businesses to which the rule will apply?
SBA estimates that about 1,250
additional firms will become small
because of revised size standards for 209
industries in NAICS Sector 31–33. That
represents 0.4 percent of total firms that
are small under current size standards
in all industries in that Sector. This will
result in an increase in the small
business share of total industry receipts
in Sector 31–33 from 26 percent under
the current size standards to 29 percent
under the size standards adopted in this
final rule. The revised size standards
will enable more small businesses to
retain their small business status for a
longer period and many others to regain
small business status that may have
exceeded current size standards, making
it difficult for them to compete with
companies that are significantly larger
than they are. SBA believes that the
overall impact of this rule will be
positive for existing small businesses, as
well as for those that exceed the current
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
4485
size standards but are on the low end of
those that are not small. They might
otherwise be called or referred to as
mid-sized businesses, although SBA
only defines what is a small business
concern. That is, entities that do not
meet SBA’s small business size
standards are considered ‘‘other than
small.’’
3. What are the projected reporting,
record keeping and other compliance
requirements of the rule?
The size standard changes impose no
additional reporting or record keeping
requirements on small businesses.
However, qualifying for Federal
procurement and a number of other
programs requires that businesses
register in the SAM database and certify
in SAM that they are small at least once
annually. Therefore, businesses opting
to participate in those programs must
comply with SAM requirements.
Additionally, businesses affected by the
changes, if they are already registered in
SAM, must update their certifications
and affirmations. However, there are no
costs associated with SAM registration
or certification. Changing size standards
alters access to SBA’s programs
designed to assist small businesses, but
does not impose a regulatory burden
because they neither regulate nor
control business behavior.
4. What are the relevant Federal rules,
which may duplicate, overlap or conflict
with the rule?
Under § 3(a)(2)(C) of the Small
Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 632(a)(2)(c),
Federal agencies must use SBA’s size
standards to define a small business,
unless specifically authorized by statute
to do otherwise. In 1995, SBA published
in the Federal Register a ‘‘Table of
Statutory and Regulatory Size Standards
Set by Agencies Other than SBA’’ (60 FR
57988, November 24, 1995). SBA is not
aware of any Federal rule that would
duplicate or conflict with establishing
size standards.
However, the Small Business Act and
SBA’s regulations allow Federal
agencies to develop different size
standards if they believe that SBA’s size
standards are not appropriate for their
programs, with the approval of SBA’s
Administrator (13 CFR 121.903). The
Regulatory Flexibility Act authorizes an
agency to establish an alternative small
business definition for purposes of
compliance with that Act, after
consultation with the Office of
Advocacy of the U.S. Small Business
Administration (5 U.S.C. 601(3)).
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
4486
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
5. What alternatives will allow the
Agency to accomplish its regulatory
objectives while minimizing the impact
on small entities?
By law, SBA is required to develop
numerical size standards for
establishing eligibility for Federal small
business assistance programs. Other
than varying size standards by industry
and changing the size measures, no
practical alternative exists to the system
of numerical size standards.
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 121
Administrative practice and
procedure, Government procurement,
Government property, Grant programs—
business, Individuals with disabilities,
Loan programs—business, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Small
businesses.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, SBA amends 13 CFR part 121
as follows:
PART 121—SMALL BUSINESS SIZE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 121
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 662,
and 694a(9).
2. Amend § 121.201 in the table
‘‘Small Business Size Standards by
NAICS Industry’’ as follows:
a. Revise the entries for ‘‘311111’’,
‘‘311211’’, ‘‘311221’’, ‘‘311314’’,
‘‘311340’’, ‘‘311351’’, ‘‘311352’’,
‘‘311411’’, ‘‘311412’’, ‘‘311421’’,
‘‘311422’’, ‘‘311423’’, ‘‘311511’’,
‘‘311512’’, ‘‘311513’’, ‘‘311514’’,
‘‘311520’’, ‘‘311611’’, ‘‘311612’’,
‘‘311613’’, ‘‘311615’’, ‘‘311710’’,
‘‘311812’’, ‘‘311813’’, ‘‘311821’’,
‘‘311824’’, ‘‘311830’’, ‘‘311911’’,
‘‘311919’’, ‘‘311920’’, ‘‘311930’’,
‘‘311941’’, ‘‘312111’’, ‘‘312112’’,
‘‘312113’’, ‘‘312120’’, ‘‘312130’’,
‘‘312140’’, ‘‘312230’’, ‘‘313110’’,
‘‘313230’’, ‘‘314110’’, ‘‘314120’’,
‘‘315110’’, ‘‘315190’’, ‘‘315210’’,
‘‘315220’’, ‘‘315240’’, ‘‘315280’’,
‘‘316992’’, ‘‘321212’’, ‘‘321213’’,
‘‘321219’’, ‘‘321911’’, ‘‘321991’’,
‘‘322121’’, ‘‘322130’’, ‘‘322211’’,
‘‘322219’’, ‘‘322220’’, ‘‘322230’’,
‘‘322291’’, ‘‘323117’’, ‘‘324110’’,
‘‘324191’’, ‘‘325194’’, ‘‘325199’’,
‘‘325211’’, ‘‘325312’’, ‘‘325320’’,
‘‘325411’’, ‘‘325412’’, ‘‘325413’’,
‘‘325414’’, ‘‘325510’’, ‘‘325611’’,
‘‘325612’’, ‘‘325613’’, ‘‘325620’’,
‘‘325992’’, ‘‘326111’’, ‘‘326112’’,
‘‘326113’’, ‘‘326122’’, ‘‘326140’’,
‘‘326150’’, ‘‘326160’’, ‘‘326191’’,
‘‘326211’’, ‘‘326220’’, ‘‘326291’’,
‘‘327110’’, ‘‘327212’’, ‘‘327213’’,
‘‘327215’’, ‘‘327310’’, ‘‘327332’’,
‘‘327410’’, ‘‘327420’’, ‘‘327910’’,
‘‘327993’’, ‘‘331110’’, ‘‘331315’’,
‘‘331511’’, ‘‘331512’’, ‘‘332111’’,
‘‘332112’’, ‘‘332215’’, ‘‘332216’’,
‘‘332311’’, ‘‘332313’’, ‘‘332321’’,
‘‘332410’’, ‘‘332420’’, ‘‘332431’’,
‘‘332510’’, ‘‘332911’’, ‘‘332912’’,
‘‘332913’’, ‘‘332919’’, ‘‘332991’’,
‘‘332992’’, ‘‘333111’’, ‘‘333112’’,
‘‘333120’’, ‘‘333132’’, ‘‘333242’’,
‘‘333244’’, ‘‘333415’’, ‘‘333611’’,
‘‘333612’’, ‘‘333613’’, ‘‘333618’’,
‘‘333911’’, ‘‘333912’’, ‘‘333913’’,
‘‘333921’’, ‘‘333923’’, ‘‘333992’’,
‘‘333995’’, ‘‘333996’’, ‘‘334111’’,
‘‘334112’’, ‘‘334210’’, ‘‘334220’’,
‘‘334412’’, ‘‘334413’’, ‘‘334417’’,
‘‘334418’’, ‘‘334510’’, ‘‘334511’’,
‘‘334513’’, ‘‘334514’’, ‘‘334515’’,
‘‘334516’’, ‘‘334517’’, ‘‘334614’’,
‘‘335110’’, ‘‘335121’’, ‘‘335210’’,
‘‘335221’’, ‘‘335222’’, ‘‘335224’’,
‘‘335228’’, ‘‘335312’’, ‘‘335313’’,
‘‘335911’’, ‘‘335932’’, ‘‘336111’’,
‘‘336112’’, ‘‘336120’’, ‘‘336212’’,
‘‘336213’’, ‘‘336214’’, ‘‘336310’’,
‘‘336320’’, ‘‘336330’’, ‘‘336340’’,
‘‘336350’’, ‘‘336360’’, ‘‘336370’’,
‘‘336390’’, ‘‘336412’’, ‘‘336413’’,
‘‘336414’’, ‘‘336415’’, ‘‘336510’’,
‘‘336611’’, ‘‘336612’’, ‘‘336991’’,
‘‘336992’’, ‘‘336999’’, ‘‘337110’’,
‘‘337121’’, ‘‘337122’’, ‘‘337124’’,
‘‘337125’’, ‘‘337211’’, ‘‘337214’’,
‘‘337910’’, ‘‘337920’’, ‘‘339112’’,
‘‘339113’’, ‘‘339114’’, ‘‘339115’’,
‘‘339920’’, ‘‘339940’’, ‘‘339992’’,
‘‘339993’’, and ‘‘339995’’; and
■
b. Revise footnotes 3, 4, 5, and 7.
The revisions read as follows:
§ 121.201 What size standards has SBA
identified by North American Industry
Classification System codes?
*
*
*
*
*
SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARDS BY NAICS INDUSTRY
NAICS U.S. industry title
Size standards
in millions of
dollars
*
311111 .........
*
*
*
*
Dog and Cat Food Manufacturing .................................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
311211 .........
*
*
*
*
Flour Milling ....................................................................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
311221 .........
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
NAICS codes
*
*
*
*
Wet Corn Milling ............................................................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
*
*
*
*
Cane Sugar Manufacturing ............................................................................................................
Nonchocolate Confectionery Manufacturing ..................................................................................
Chocolate and Confectionery Manufacturing from Cacao Beans .................................................
Confectionery Manufacturing from Purchased Chocolate .............................................................
Frozen Fruit, Juice, and Vegetable Manufacturing .......................................................................
Frozen Specialty Food Manufacturing ...........................................................................................
Fruit and Vegetable Canning 3 .......................................................................................................
Specialty Canning ..........................................................................................................................
Dried and Dehydrated Food Manufacturing ..................................................................................
Fluid Milk Manufacturing ................................................................................................................
Creamery Butter Manufacturing .....................................................................................................
Cheese Manufacturing ...................................................................................................................
Dry, Condensed, and Evaporated Dairy Product Manufacturing ..................................................
Ice Cream and Frozen Dessert Manufacturing .............................................................................
Animal (except Poultry) Slaughtering ............................................................................................
Meat Processed from Carcasses ..................................................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
*
311314
311340
311351
311352
311411
311412
311421
311422
311423
311511
311512
311513
311514
311520
311611
311612
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
Size standards
in number of
employees
1,000
1,000
1,250
1,000
1,000
1,250
1,000
1,000
1,250
3 1,000
1,250
750
1,000
750
1,250
750
1,000
1,000
1,000
4487
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARDS BY NAICS INDUSTRY—Continued
NAICS codes
NAICS U.S. industry title
Size standards
in millions of
dollars
Size standards
in number of
employees
311613 .........
311615 .........
311710 .........
Rendering and Meat Byproduct Processing ..................................................................................
Poultry Processing .........................................................................................................................
Seafood Product Preparation and Packaging ...............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
750
1,250
750
*
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
*
*
*
*
Commercial Bakeries .....................................................................................................................
Frozen Cakes, Pies, and Other Pastries Manufacturing ...............................................................
Cookie and Cracker Manufacturing ...............................................................................................
Dry Pasta, Dough, and Flour Mixes Manufacturing from Purchased Flour ..................................
Tortilla Manufacturing ....................................................................................................................
Roasted Nuts and Peanut Butter Manufacturing ...........................................................................
Other Snack Food Manufacturing ..................................................................................................
Coffee and Tea Manufacturing ......................................................................................................
Flavoring Syrup and Concentrate Manufacturing ..........................................................................
Mayonnaise, Dressing, and Other Prepared Sauce Manufacturing ..............................................
*
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
*
311812
311813
311821
311824
311830
311911
311919
311920
311930
311941
*
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
*
*
*
*
Soft Drink Manufacturing ...............................................................................................................
Bottled Water Manufacturing .........................................................................................................
Ice Manufacturing ..........................................................................................................................
Breweries .......................................................................................................................................
Wineries .........................................................................................................................................
Distilleries .......................................................................................................................................
Tobacco Manufacturing .................................................................................................................
Fiber, Yarn, and Thread Mills ........................................................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
*
312111
312112
312113
312120
312130
312140
312230
313110
*
313230 .........
*
*
*
*
Nonwoven Fabric Mills ...................................................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
314110 .........
314120 .........
*
*
*
*
Carpet and Rug Mills .....................................................................................................................
Curtain and Linen Mills ..................................................................................................................
*
........................
........................
*
*
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
*
*
*
*
Hosiery and Sock Mills ..................................................................................................................
Other Apparel Knitting Mills ...........................................................................................................
Cut and Sew Apparel Contractors .................................................................................................
Men’s and Boys’ Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing .................................................................
Women’s, Girls’, and Infants’ Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing .............................................
Other Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing ..................................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
*
*
316992 .........
*
*
*
*
Women’s Handbag and Purse Manufacturing ...............................................................................
*
........................
*
*
321212 .........
321213 .........
*
*
*
*
Softwood Veneer and Plywood Manufacturing .............................................................................
Engineered Wood Member (except Truss) Manufacturing ............................................................
*
........................
........................
*
*
321219 .........
321911 .........
*
*
*
*
Reconstituted Wood Product Manufacturing .................................................................................
Wood Window and Door Manufacturing ........................................................................................
*
........................
........................
*
*
321991 .........
*
*
*
*
Manufactured Home (Mobile Home) Manufacturing ......................................................................
*
........................
*
*
322121 .........
*
*
*
*
Paper (except Newsprint) Mills ......................................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
322130 .........
322211 .........
*
*
*
*
Paperboard Mills ............................................................................................................................
Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box Manufacturing ............................................................................
*
........................
........................
*
*
.........
.........
.........
.........
*
*
*
*
Other Paperboard Container Manufacturing .................................................................................
Paper Bag and Coated and Treated Paper Manufacturing ..........................................................
Stationery Product Manufacturing .................................................................................................
Sanitary Paper Product Manufacturing ..........................................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
........................
*
*
323117 .........
*
*
*
*
Books Printing ................................................................................................................................
*
........................
*
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
315110
315190
315210
315220
315240
315280
322219
322220
322230
322291
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
1,000
750
1,250
750
1,250
750
1,250
750
1,000
750
1,250
1,000
750
1,250
1,000
1,000
1,500
1,250
750
1,500
750
750
750
750
750
750
750
750
1,250
750
750
1,000
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,000
750
750
1,500
1,250
4488
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARDS BY NAICS INDUSTRY—Continued
NAICS codes
NAICS U.S. industry title
Size standards
in millions of
dollars
*
324110 .........
*
*
*
*
Petroleum Refineries 4 ...................................................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
324191 .........
*
*
*
*
Petroleum Lubricating Oil and Grease Manufacturing ..................................................................
*
........................
*
*
325194 .........
325199 .........
325211 .........
*
*
*
*
Cyclic Crude, Intermediate, and Gum and Wood Chemical Manufacturing .................................
All Other Basic Organic Chemical Manufacturing .........................................................................
Plastics Material and Resin Manufacturing ...................................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
*
*
325312 .........
*
*
*
*
Phosphatic Fertilizer Manufacturing ..............................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
*
*
*
*
Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing ............................................................
Medicinal and Botanical Manufacturing .........................................................................................
Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing ...................................................................................
In-Vitro Diagnostic Substance Manufacturing ...............................................................................
Biological Product (except Diagnostic) Manufacturing ..................................................................
Paint and Coating Manufacturing ..................................................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
*
325320
325411
325412
325413
325414
325510
*
.........
.........
.........
.........
*
*
*
*
Soap and Other Detergent Manufacturing ....................................................................................
Polish and Other Sanitation Good Manufacturing .........................................................................
Surface Active Agent Manufacturing .............................................................................................
Toilet Preparation Manufacturing ...................................................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
........................
*
325611
325612
325613
325620
*
325992 .........
*
*
*
*
Photographic Film, Paper, Plate, and Chemical Manufacturing ....................................................
*
........................
*
*
326111 .........
326112 .........
326113 .........
*
*
*
*
Plastics Bag and Pouch Manufacturing .........................................................................................
Plastics Packaging Film and Sheet (including Laminated) Manufacturing ...................................
Unlaminated Plastics Film and Sheet (except Packaging) Manufacturing ....................................
*
........................
........................
........................
*
*
326122 .........
*
*
*
*
Plastics Pipe and Pipe Fitting Manufacturing ................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
.........
.........
.........
.........
*
*
*
*
Polystyrene Foam Product Manufacturing ....................................................................................
Urethane and Other Foam Product (except Polystyrene) Manufacturing .....................................
Plastics Bottle Manufacturing ........................................................................................................
Plastics Plumbing Fixture Manufacturing ......................................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
........................
*
*
326211 .........
*
*
*
*
Tire Manufacturing (except Retreading) 5 ......................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
326220 .........
326291 .........
*
*
*
*
Rubber and Plastics Hoses and Belting Manufacturing ................................................................
Rubber Product Manufacturing for Mechanical Use ......................................................................
*
........................
........................
*
*
327110 .........
*
*
*
*
Pottery, Ceramics, and Plumbing Fixture Manufacturing ..............................................................
*
........................
*
*
.........
.........
.........
.........
*
*
*
*
Other Pressed and Blown Glass and Glassware Manufacturing ..................................................
Glass Container Manufacturing .....................................................................................................
Glass Product Manufacturing Made of Purchased Glass .............................................................
Cement Manufacturing ...................................................................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
........................
*
*
327332 .........
*
*
*
*
Concrete Pipe Manufacturing ........................................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
327410 .........
327420 .........
327910 .........
*
*
*
*
Lime Manufacturing .......................................................................................................................
Gypsum Product Manufacturing ....................................................................................................
Abrasive Product Manufacturing ....................................................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
*
326140
326150
326160
326191
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
327212
327213
327215
327310
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
Size standards
in number of
employees
4 1,500
750
1,250
1,250
1,250
750
1,000
1,000
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,000
1,000
750
750
1,250
1,500
750
1,000
750
750
1,000
750
1,250
750
5 1,500
750
750
1,000
1,250
1,250
1,000
1,000
750
750
1,500
750
4489
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARDS BY NAICS INDUSTRY—Continued
NAICS codes
NAICS U.S. industry title
Size standards
in millions of
dollars
*
327993 .........
*
*
*
*
Mineral Wool Manufacturing ..........................................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
331110 .........
*
*
*
*
Iron and Steel Mills and Ferroalloy Manufacturing ........................................................................
*
........................
*
*
331315 .........
*
*
*
*
Aluminum Sheet, Plate, and Foil Manufacturing ...........................................................................
*
........................
*
*
331511 .........
331512 .........
*
*
*
*
Iron Foundries ................................................................................................................................
Steel Investment Foundries ...........................................................................................................
*
........................
........................
*
*
332111 .........
332112 .........
*
*
*
*
Iron and Steel Forging ...................................................................................................................
Nonferrous Forging ........................................................................................................................
*
........................
........................
*
*
332215 .........
332216 .........
332311 .........
*
*
*
*
Metal Kitchen Cookware, Utensil, Cutlery, and Flatware (except Precious) Manufacturing .........
Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing .......................................................................................
Prefabricated Metal Building and Component Manufacturing .......................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
*
*
332313 .........
332321 .........
*
*
*
*
Plate Work Manufacturing .............................................................................................................
Metal Window and Door Manufacturing ........................................................................................
*
........................
........................
*
*
332410 .........
332420 .........
332431 .........
*
*
*
*
Power Boiler and Heat Exchanger Manufacturing ........................................................................
Metal Tank (Heavy Gauge) Manufacturing ...................................................................................
Metal Can Manufacturing ...............................................................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
*
*
332510 .........
*
*
*
*
Hardware Manufacturing ................................................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
*
*
*
*
Industrial Valve Manufacturing ......................................................................................................
Fluid Power Valve and Hose Fitting Manufacturing ......................................................................
Plumbing Fixture Fitting and Trim Manufacturing ..........................................................................
Other Metal Valve and Pipe Fitting Manufacturing .......................................................................
Ball and Roller Bearing Manufacturing ..........................................................................................
Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing ........................................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
*
*
333111 .........
333112 .........
333120 .........
*
*
*
*
Farm Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing ............................................................................
Lawn and Garden Tractor and Home Lawn and Garden Equipment Manufacturing ...................
Construction Machinery Manufacturing .........................................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
*
*
333132 .........
*
*
*
*
Oil and Gas Field Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing ........................................................
*
........................
*
*
333242 .........
*
*
*
*
Semiconductor Machinery Manufacturing .....................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
333244 .........
*
*
*
*
Printing Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing ........................................................................
*
........................
*
*
333415 .........
*
*
*
*
Air-Conditioning and Warm Air Heating Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing.
*
........................
*
*
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
*
*
*
*
Turbine and Turbine Generator Set Units Manufacturing .............................................................
Speed Changer, Industrial High-Speed Drive, and Gear Manufacturing ......................................
Mechanical Power Transmission Equipment Manufacturing .........................................................
Other Engine Equipment Manufacturing .......................................................................................
Pump and Pumping Equipment Manufacturing .............................................................................
Air and Gas Compressor Manufacturing .......................................................................................
Measuring and Dispensing Pump Manufacturing ..........................................................................
Elevator and Moving Stairway Manufacturing ...............................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
*
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
332911
332912
332913
332919
332991
332992
333611
333612
333613
333618
333911
333912
333913
333921
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
Size standards
in number of
employees
1,500
1,500
1,250
1,000
1,000
750
750
750
750
750
750
750
750
750
1,500
750
750
1,000
1,000
750
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,500
1,250
1,250
1,500
750
1,250
1,500
750
750
1,500
750
1,000
750
1,000
4490
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARDS BY NAICS INDUSTRY—Continued
NAICS codes
NAICS U.S. industry title
Size standards
in millions of
dollars
*
333923 .........
*
*
*
*
Overhead Traveling Crane, Hoist, and Monorail System Manufacturing ......................................
*
........................
*
*
333992 .........
*
*
*
*
Welding and Soldering Equipment Manufacturing ........................................................................
*
........................
*
*
333995 .........
333996 .........
*
*
*
*
Fluid Power Cylinder and Actuator Manufacturing ........................................................................
Fluid Power Pump and Motor Manufacturing ................................................................................
*
........................
........................
*
*
334111 .........
334112 .........
*
*
*
*
Electronic Computer Manufacturing ..............................................................................................
Computer Storage Device Manufacturing .....................................................................................
*
........................
........................
*
*
334210 .........
334220 .........
*
*
*
*
Telephone Apparatus Manufacturing .............................................................................................
Radio and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment Manufacturing ...
*
........................
........................
*
*
334412 .........
334413 .........
*
*
*
*
Bare Printed Circuit Board Manufacturing .....................................................................................
Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing ......................................................................
*
........................
........................
*
*
334417 .........
334418 .........
*
*
*
*
Electronic Connector Manufacturing ..............................................................................................
Printed Circuit Assembly (Electronic Assembly) Manufacturing ....................................................
*
........................
........................
*
*
334510 .........
334511 .........
*
*
*
*
Electromedical and Electrotherapeutic Apparatus Manufacturing .................................................
Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument
Manufacturing.
*
........................
........................
*
*
334513 .........
*
........................
*
.........
.........
.........
.........
*
*
*
*
Instruments and Related Products Manufacturing for Measuring, Displaying, and Controlling
Industrial Process Variables.
Totalizing Fluid Meter and Counting Device Manufacturing ..........................................................
Instrument Manufacturing for Measuring and Testing Electricity and Electrical Signals ..............
Analytical Laboratory Instrument Manufacturing ...........................................................................
Irradiation Apparatus Manufacturing ..............................................................................................
*
334614 .........
335110 .........
335121 .........
*
*
*
*
Software and Other Prerecorded Compact Disc, Tape, and Record Reproducing ......................
Electric Lamp Bulb and Part Manufacturing ..................................................................................
Residential Electric Lighting Fixture Manufacturing .......................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
*
*
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
*
*
*
*
Small Electrical Appliance Manufacturing .....................................................................................
Household Cooking Appliance Manufacturing ...............................................................................
Household Refrigerator and Home Freezer Manufacturing ..........................................................
Household Laundry Equipment Manufacturing .............................................................................
Other Major Household Appliance Manufacturing .........................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
*
*
335312 .........
335313 .........
*
*
*
*
Motor and Generator Manufacturing .............................................................................................
Switchgear and Switchboard Apparatus Manufacturing ................................................................
*
........................
........................
*
*
335911 .........
*
*
*
*
Storage Battery Manufacturing ......................................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
335932 .........
*
*
*
*
Noncurrent-Carrying Wiring Device Manufacturing .......................................................................
*
........................
*
*
336111 .........
336112 .........
336120 .........
*
*
*
*
Automobile Manufacturing .............................................................................................................
Light Truck and Utility Vehicle Manufacturing ...............................................................................
Heavy Duty Truck Manufacturing ..................................................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
*
*
336212 .........
336213 .........
336214 .........
*
*
*
*
Truck Trailer Manufacturing ...........................................................................................................
Motor Home Manufacturing ...........................................................................................................
Travel Trailer and Camper Manufacturing .....................................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
*
334514
334515
334516
334517
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
335210
335221
335222
335224
335228
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
Size standards
in number of
employees
1,250
1,250
750
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,250
750
1,250
1,000
750
1,250
1,250
750
........................
........................
........................
........................
750
750
1,000
1,000
1,250
1,250
750
1,500
1,500
1,250
1,250
1,000
1,250
1,250
1,250
1,000
1,500
1,500
1,500
1,000
1,250
1,000
4491
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
SMALL BUSINESS SIZE STANDARDS BY NAICS INDUSTRY—Continued
NAICS U.S. industry title
NAICS codes
Size standards
in millions of
dollars
Size standards
in number of
employees
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,250
1,500
1,500
1,000
1,000
336310
336320
336330
336340
336350
336360
336370
336390
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
Motor Vehicle Gasoline Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing ................................................
Motor Vehicle Electrical and Electronic Equipment Manufacturing ...............................................
Motor Vehicle Steering and Suspension Components (except Spring) Manufacturing ................
Motor Vehicle Brake System Manufacturing .................................................................................
Motor Vehicle Transmission and Power Train Parts Manufacturing .............................................
Motor Vehicle Seating and Interior Trim Manufacturing ................................................................
Motor Vehicle Metal Stamping .......................................................................................................
Other Motor Vehicle Parts Manufacturing .....................................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
*
.........
.........
.........
.........
*
*
*
*
Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing ..........................................................................
Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing 7 ......................................................
Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing ........................................................................
Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Propulsion Unit and Propulsion Unit Parts Manufacturing ....
*
........................
........................
........................
........................
*
336412
336413
336414
336415
*
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
.........
*
*
*
*
Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing ...........................................................................................
Ship Building and Repairing ..........................................................................................................
Boat Building ..................................................................................................................................
Motorcycle, Bicycle, and Parts Manufacturing ..............................................................................
Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing .........................................
All Other Transportation Equipment Manufacturing ......................................................................
Wood Kitchen Cabinet and Countertop Manufacturing .................................................................
Upholstered Household Furniture Manufacturing ..........................................................................
Nonupholstered Wood Household Furniture Manufacturing .........................................................
Metal Household Furniture Manufacturing ....................................................................................
Household Furniture (except Wood and Metal) Manufacturing .....................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
*
336510
336611
336612
336991
336992
336999
337110
337121
337122
337124
337125
*
337211 .........
*
*
*
*
Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing ............................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
337214 .........
*
*
*
*
Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing .............................................................................
*
........................
*
*
337910 .........
337920 .........
*
*
*
*
Mattress Manufacturing .................................................................................................................
Blind and Shade Manufacturing ....................................................................................................
*
........................
........................
*
*
.........
.........
.........
.........
*
*
*
*
Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing ...........................................................................
Surgical Appliance and Supplies Manufacturing ...........................................................................
Dental Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing ............................................................................
Ophthalmic Goods Manufacturing .................................................................................................
*
........................
........................
........................
........................
*
*
339920 .........
*
*
*
*
Sporting and Athletic Goods Manufacturing ..................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
339940 .........
*
*
*
*
Office Supplies (except Paper) Manufacturing ..............................................................................
*
........................
*
*
339992 .........
339993 .........
*
*
*
*
Musical Instrument Manufacturing .................................................................................................
Fastener, Button, Needle, and Pin Manufacturing ........................................................................
*
........................
........................
*
*
339995 .........
*
*
*
*
Burial Casket Manufacturing ..........................................................................................................
*
........................
*
*
*
339112
339113
339114
339115
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Footnotes
*
*
*
*
*
3. NAICS code 311421—For purposes
of Government procurement for food
canning and preserving, the standard of
1,000 employees excludes agricultural
labor as defined in 3306(k) of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
*
*
Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.
3306(k).
4. NAICS code 324110—To qualify as
small for purposes of Government
procurement, the petroleum refiner,
including its affiliates, must be a
concern that has either no more than
1,500 employees or no more than
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
1,500
7 1,250
1,250
1,250
1,500
1,250
1,000
1,000
1,500
1,000
750
1,000
750
750
750
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
1,000
750
750
1,000
750
750
1,000
750
1,000
200,000 barrels per calendar day total
Operable Atmospheric Crude Oil
Distillation capacity. Capacity includes
all domestic and foreign affiliates, all
owned or leased facilities, and all
facilities under a processing agreement
or an arrangement such as an exchange
agreement or a throughput. To qualify
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
4492
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 16 / Tuesday, January 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3
under the capacity size standard, the
firm, together with its affiliates, must be
primarily engaged in refining crude
petroleum into refined petroleum
products. A firm’s ‘‘primary industry’’ is
determined in accordance with 13 CFR
121.107.
5. NAICS code 326211—For
Government procurement, a firm is
small for bidding on a contract for
pneumatic tires within Census NAICS
Product Classification codes 3262111
and 3262113, provided that:
(a) The value of tires within Census
NAICS Product Classification codes
3262113 that it manufactured in the
United States during the previous
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:00 Jan 25, 2016
Jkt 238001
calendar year is more than 50 percent of
the value of its total worldwide
manufacture,
(b) The value of pneumatic tires
within Census NAICS Product
Classification codes 3262113
comprising its total worldwide
manufacture during the preceding
calendar year was less than 5 percent of
the value of all such tires manufactured
in the United States during that period,
and
(c) The value of the principal product
that it manufactured, produced, or sold
worldwide during the preceding
calendar year is less than 10 percent of
the total value of such products
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
manufactured or otherwise produced or
sold in the United States during that
period.
*
*
*
*
*
7. NAICS code 336413—Contracts for
the rebuilding or overhaul of aircraft
ground support equipment on a contract
basis are classified under NAICS code
336413.
*
*
*
*
*
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–00924 Filed 1–25–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
E:\FR\FM\26JAR3.SGM
26JAR3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 26, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4469-4492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-00924]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 121
RIN 3245-AG50
Small Business Size Standards for Manufacturing
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Small Business Administration (SBA) is
increasing small business size standards for 209 industries in North
American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Sector 31-33,
Manufacturing. SBA is also modifying the size standard for NAICS
324110, Petroleum Refiners, by increasing the refining capacity
component of the size standard to 200,000 barrels per calendar day for
businesses that are primarily engaged in petroleum refining and by
eliminating the requirement that 90 percent of the output to be
delivered be refined by the successful bidder from either crude oil or
bona fide feedstocks. The Agency is also updating Footnote 5 to NAICS
326211 to reflect the current Census Product Classification Codes
3262111 and 3262113. As part of its ongoing comprehensive size
standards review, SBA evaluated employee based size standards for all
364 industries in NAICS Sector 31-33 to determine whether they should
be retained or revised. This rule is one of a series of rules that
result from SBA's review of size standards of industries grouped by
NAICS Sector.
DATES: This rule is effective February 26, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jorge Laboy-Bruno, Ph.D., Economist,
Size Standards Division, (202) 205-6618 or sizestandards@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To determine eligibility for Federal small
business assistance programs, SBA establishes small business size
definitions (referred to as size standards) for private sector
industries in the United States. The SBA's size standards generally use
two primary measures of business size, average annual receipts and
average number of employees. Financial assets, electric output, and
refining capacity are used as size measures for a few specialized
industries. In addition, SBA's Small Business Investment Company
(SBIC), Certified Development Company (CDC/504) and 7(a) Loan Programs
determine small business eligibility using either the industry based
size standards or an alternative size standard based on both net worth
and net income. At the start of the current comprehensive review of
size standards, there were 41 different size standards, covering 1,141
NAICS industries and 18 ``exceptions.'' in SBA's table of size
standards. Of these, 31 were based on average annual receipts, seven on
average number of employees, and three on other measures. Presently,
there are 28 different size standards, covering 1047 NAICS industries
and 16 ``exceptions.'' Of these NAICS industries and exceptions, 533
are covered by size standards based on average annual receipts, 509 on
average number of employees, and five on average assets.
Over the years, some members of the public have remarked that SBA's
size standards have not kept up with changes in the economy, and in
particular, that they do not reflect changes in the Federal contracting
marketplace and industry structure. The last comprehensive size
standards review was in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Size standards
reviews since then, until this comprehensive review, were generally
limited to a few specific industries in response to requests from the
public and from Federal agencies. SBA also makes periodic inflation
adjustments to its monetary based size standards. The latest inflation
adjustment to size standards was effective July 14, 2015 (79 FR 33647
(June 12, 2014)).
Because of changes in industry structure and the Federal
marketplace since the last overall review, current data no longer
supported existing size standards for some industries. Accordingly, in
2007, SBA began a comprehensive review to determine whether existing
size standards are consistent with current data, and to revise them,
when necessary.
In addition, on September 27, 2010, the President of the United
States signed the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (Jobs Act), 111
Public Law 240, 124 Stat. 2504, Sep. 27, 2010. The Jobs Act
[[Page 4470]]
directs SBA to conduct a detailed review of all size standards and to
make appropriate adjustments to reflect market conditions.
Specifically, the Jobs Act requires SBA to conduct a detailed review of
at least one-third of all size standards during every18-month period
from the date of its enactment and review of all size standards not
less frequently than once every 5 years thereafter. Reviewing existing
small business size standards and making appropriate adjustments based
on current data are also consistent with Executive Order 13563,
``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review.''
SBA has chosen not to review all size standards at one time.
Rather, the Agency is reviewing groups of related industries on an
NAICS Sector by Sector basis.
As part of SBA's comprehensive size standards review, grouped by
NAICS Sector, the Agency reviewed the 364 size standards for industries
in NAICS Sector 31-33, Manufacturing, to determine whether they should
be retained or revised. After its review, SBA published in the
September 10, 2014 issue of the Federal Register (79 FR 54145) a
proposed rule to increase size standards for 209 industries in NAICS
Sector 31-33, Manufacturing. SBA also proposed to amend Footnote 4 to
NAICS 324110, Petroleum Refiners, in its table of size standards in two
ways: (1) By increasing the refining capacity component of the size
standard from 125,000 to 200,000 barrels per calendar day total
capacity for businesses that are primarily engaged in petroleum
refining, and (2) by eliminating the requirement that 90 percent of the
output to be delivered be refined by the successful bidder from either
crude oil or bona fide feedstocks. SBA also proposed amending Footnote
5 to NAICS 326211, Tire Manufacturing (except Retreading), to reflect
the current Census Product Classification Codes 3262111 and 3262113.
As part of ongoing comprehensive size standards review, SBA
developed a ``Size Standards Methodology'' White Paper for developing,
reviewing, and modifying size standards, when necessary. SBA published
the document on its Web site at www.sba.gov/size for public review and
comments, and included it as a supporting document in the electronic
docket of the proposed rule at www.regulations.gov.
In evaluating an industry, SBA generally examines its
characteristics (such as average firm size, startup costs, industry
competition, and distribution of firms by size) and the level and share
of Federal contract dollars that small businesses receive. SBA also
examines the potential impact a size standard revision might have on
its financial assistance programs, and whether a business under a
revised size standard would be dominant in its industry. SBA analyzed
the characteristics of every industry in NAICS 31-33, using mostly a
special tabulation obtained from the U.S. Bureau of the Census from its
2007 Economic Census (the latest available). For the proposed rule, SBA
also evaluated the small business share of Federal contracts in each of
those industries using data from the Federal Procurement Data System--
Next Generation (FPDS-NG) for fiscal years 2009-2011. To evaluate the
impact of changes to size standards on its loan programs, SBA analyzed
internal data on its guaranteed loan programs for fiscal years 2010-
2012. In this final rule, SBA has updated the impacts of size standards
changes using the FPDS-NG and loan data for fiscal years 2012-2014.
SBA's ``Size Standards Methodology'' White Paper provides a
detailed description of its analyses of various industry and program
factors and data sources, and how the Agency uses the results to
establish and revise size standards. In the September 10, 2014 proposed
rule, SBA detailed how it applied its ``Size Standards Methodology'' to
review and modify when necessary, the existing size standards for
industries in NAICS Sector 31-33. SBA sought comments from the public
on a number of issues about its ``Size Standards Methodology,'' such as
whether SBA should consider other approaches; whether SBA should
evaluate alternative or additional factors or data sources; whether
SBA's manner of establishing small business size standards makes sense
in the current economic environment; whether SBA's application of
anchor size standards is appropriate in the current economy; whether
there are gaps in SBA's methodology because of the lack of current or
comprehensive data; and whether there are other facts or issues that
SBA should consider.
SBA sought comments on its proposed size standards together with
other issues that could affect a final determination. Specifically, SBA
requested comments on the following:
1. SBA proposed five levels of employee based size standards for
industries in Manufacturing and for industries in other Sectors that
have employee based size standards (except for Wholesale Trade and
Retail Trade): 500 employees, 750 employees, 1,000 employees, 1,250
employees, and 1,500 employees. SBA invited comments on whether these
were appropriate levels and requested suggestions for alternatives, if
commenters thought them more appropriate.
2. Consistent with its policy of not lowering any size standards in
its recently completed proposed and final rules on receipts based size
standards, SBA proposed retaining the current 500-employee minimum and
1,500-employee maximum size standards for all industries in the
Manufacturing Sector. In its ``Size Standards Methodology,'' available
at www.sba.gov/size, SBA had proposed setting the minimum size standard
for these industries at 250 employees and the maximum size standard at
1000 employees. That would entail lowering size standards for some
industries. SBA invited comments on whether it should maintain the 500-
employee minimum and the 1,500-employee maximum size standards or lower
them to 250 employees and 1,000 employees, respectively, as the Agency
proposed in its ``Size Standards Methodology.'' SBA requested
suggestions on alternative minimum and maximum levels, if commenters
thought them more appropriate. For the same reason, SBA also proposed
to retain the current size standards for 19 industries when analytical
results might support lowering them. SBA had sought comments on whether
SBA should lower them solely based on its analysis or retain them at
their current levels in view of current economic conditions.
3. SBA sought feedback on whether it should adjust employee based
size standards for labor productivity growth. SBA periodically
increases receipts based size standards for inflation. Should SBA take
labor productivity growth and technological change into consideration
when it reviews employee based standards? If so, what data are
available to assist SBA in evaluating such factors? What if such an
evaluation leads to lower size standards for some industries? How
should SBA apply the results to its size standards?
4. SBA sought feedback on whether its proposal to increase size
standards for 209 industries and retain current size standards for 155
industries is appropriate, given the economic characteristics of each
industry reviewed in the proposed rule. SBA also sought feedback and
suggestions on alternative size standards, if commenters thought them
more appropriate.
5. SBA invited comments on its proposal to increase the capacity
component of the Petroleum Refiners (NAICS 324110) size standard from
125,000 barrels per calendar day (BPCD)
[[Page 4471]]
total Operable Atmospheric Crude Oil Distillation capacity to 200,000
BPCD and retain the employee component at the current 1,500-employee
level. SBA also welcomed comments on its proposal to allow business
concerns to qualify either under the 1,500-employee size standard or
under the 200,000 BPCD capacity size standard, if the firm, together
with its affiliates, is primarily engaged in petroleum refining.
Finally, SBA also requested feedback on its proposal to eliminate the
requirement that ``[t]he total product to be delivered under the
contract must be at least 90 percent refined by the successful bidder
from either crude oil or bona fide feedstocks.''
6. SBA's proposed size standards were based on five primary
factors--average firm size, average assets size (as a proxy of startup
costs and entry barriers), four-firm concentration ratio, distribution
of firms by size, and the level and small business share of Federal
contracting dollars of the evaluated industries. SBA invited comments
on these factors and/or suggestions on other factors that it should
consider when evaluating or revising employee based size standards. SBA
also sought information on relevant data sources, other than what it
uses, if available.
7. SBA gave equal weight to each of the five primary factors in all
industries. SBA asked for feedback on whether it should continue giving
equal weight to each factor or whether it should give more weight to
one or more factors for certain industries. SBA requested that
recommendations to weigh some factors more than others include
suggested weights for each factor along with supporting information.
8. For analytical simplicity and efficiency, in the proposed rule,
SBA refined its size standard methodology to obtain a single value as a
proposed size standard instead of a range of values, as in its past
size regulations. SBA welcomed any comments on this procedure and
suggestions on alternative methods.
Summary and Discussion of Comments
SBA received 26 comments to the proposed rule, but only 17 were
unique comments as some commenters submitted the same comment more than
once. All of the comments are available at www.regulations.gov (RIN
3245-AG50) and are summarized and discussed below.
Comments on NAICS 324110, Petroleum Refiners
Footnote 4 of SBA's table of size standards relates to NAICS
324110, Petroleum Refiners. SBA proposed to amend Footnote 4 in two
ways: (1) By increasing the refining capacity component of the size
standard from 125,000 barrels per calendar day (BPCD) total capacity to
200,000 BPCD total capacity for businesses that are primarily engaged
in petroleum refining, and (2) by eliminating the requirement that 90
percent of the output to be delivered be refined by the successful
bidder from either crude oil or bona fide feedstocks.
SBA received only one comment on these proposed changes.
Specifically, the commenter expressed concerns about removing the
requirement that 90 percent of the output to be delivered be refined by
the successful bidder from either crude oil or bona fide feedstocks.
The commenter contended that the change would have an adverse impact on
small businesses under NAICS 424720, Petroleum and Petroleum Product
Merchant Wholesalers, particularly those wishing to participate in the
Defense Logistics Agency's (DLA) bulk fuel small business set aside
program. To mitigate this, the commenter suggested a provision allowing
the procuring agency to source refined petroleum products from small
businesses in NAICS 424720 under a small business set-aside program.
Assuming that waivers of the nonmanufacturer rule will be eliminated
under the proposed rule, the commenter suggested some changes to the
waiver rule.
SBA's Response
The changes affect only the small business eligibility of petroleum
refiners. They do not affect the eligibility of wholesalers and other
suppliers of petroleum products. Companies that qualify as small for
supplying petroleum products they did not manufacture or produce can
continue to qualify as small under SBA's nonmanufacturer rule (13 CFR
121.406(b)). Under the nonmanufacturer rule, a business is deemed small
if it has 500 or fewer employees (including its affiliates), is
primarily engaged in the retail or wholesale trade and normally sells
the type of item being supplied, takes ownership or possession of the
product, and provides the product of a small manufacturer (in this
case, the product of a small petroleum refiner). The proposed changes
do not affect the 500-employee nonmanufacturer size standard and hence
the eligibility of wholesalers and dealers of petroleum products under
the nonmanufacturer rule.
Based on evaluation of relevant industry and procurement data and
public comments to the proposed rule, in this final rule, SBA is
adopting the changes to the size standard for NAICS 324110, as
proposed. Specifically, SBA is increasing the refining capacity
component of the Petroleum Refiners (NAICS 324110) size standard from
125,000 BPCD to 200,000 BPCD total capacity for businesses that are,
together with their affiliates, primarily engaged in refining crude
petroleum into refined petroleum products. A firm's ``primary
industry'' is determined in accordance with 13 CFR 121.107. In
addition, the final rule eliminates the requirement that 90 percent of
output being delivered is refined by a successful bidder. Accordingly,
SBA also revises Footnote 4 of SBA's table of size standards to reflect
these changes.
Under the revised size standard, for purposes of Federal
procurement, a petroleum refiner can qualify as small under the 1,500-
employee size standard or under the 200,000 BPCD total capacity size
standard. To qualify under the capacity size standard, the firm,
together with its affiliates, must be primarily engaged in refining
crude petroleum into refined petroleum products. SBA is removing the
requirement that 90 percent of the output to be delivered be refined by
the successful bidder from either crude oil or bona fide feedstocks
because the general requirement on a supply contract that is set aside
for small business is that the small business manufacturer must perform
50 percent of the cost of manufacturing, or may not subcontract more
than 50 percent of the contract to another firm.
Comments on NAICS 316210, Footwear Manufacturing
SBA received seven comments on NAICS 316210, Footwear
Manufacturing. The current size standard for NAICS 316210 is 1,000
employees and SBA proposed to retain it at the current level. Four
comments supported SBA's proposal, while two opposed it. The seventh
comment was ambiguous with respect to the size standard. These comments
and SBA's responses are discussed below.
Comments Supporting the Current 1,000-Employee Size Standard for NAICS
316210
Three footwear manufacturers supported maintaining the current
1,000-employee size standard for NAICS 316210. All three stated that
they are the major and continuous suppliers to the U.S. military, and
footwear products they manufacture meet the specifications as required
by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and the
[[Page 4472]]
Berry Amendment (10 U.S.C. 2533a). The Berry Amendment requires DoD to
give preference in procurement to domestically produced, manufactured,
or home-grown products, most notably food, clothing, fabrics, and
specialty metals. Normally, one would expect special manufacturing
requirements to point to the need for a larger size standard, not
lower. Additionally, all three argued that, unlike large footwear
manufacturers with diversified market and product bases, they rely
heavily on small business contracts from the U.S. Defense Logistics
Agency (DLA) for their survival. Two of these commenters also agreed
with SBA's position of not reducing size standards in the current
economic environment.
The first commenter explained that footwear contractors to DoD are
often torn between two forces: (1) The need to increase the number of
employees to meet DoD's needs, and (2) the need to maintain small
business status to compete for DoD contracts. The commenter maintained
that footwear manufacturing is highly labor intensive and DoD contract
awards and their completions are associated with significant changes in
employee headcounts. Significant swings in employee counts also occur
with elevated demands for footwear by DoD during times of war, the
commenter added. The commenter argued that retaining the current 1,000-
employee size standard enables small businesses to meet DoD's needs
without jeopardizing their small business status. This would also
minimize the frequency of swings between small and large business
status among footwear contractors and the impact on the DoD's supply
chain, the commenter added. The same commenter stated that it relies on
its small business status to be able to compete with large businesses.
Many large businesses in the footwear industry are diverse, multi-
national corporations with several thousand employees with
significantly more resources and cost efficiencies, the commenter
explained. The commenter asserted that DoD contracts are often awarded
based on the lowest price where large businesses have significant cost
advantages, and would be able to squeeze out small businesses if there
were no small business protection. The 1,000-employee size standard
helps small footwear manufacturers protect themselves as suppliers to
DoD, the commenter concluded.
The second commenter also maintained that many contracts it
received to supply combat boots to the U.S. military were awarded
because of its small business status. Unless the small business size
standard remains at 1,000 employees, its future will be in jeopardy,
the commenter added. The commenter asserted that lowering the size
standard would have a negative impact on its business and employees it
supports. Any change in the size standard below the 1,000-employee
level would definitely have a negative impact on its ability to
continue manufacturing footwear for DoD and the industry, the commenter
noted.
The third commenter, whose primary customers include DoD/DLA,
supported keeping the 1,000-employee size standard because it allows
for employment fluctuations during the course of contract performance.
The commenter stated that, prior to October 1, 2012, when the size
standard for NAICS 316210 was 500 employees, the majority of DoD
contracts for combat boots went to large businesses with several
thousand employees against which the company had a difficult time
competing on a full and open basis. There are significant differences
in resources available to companies with many thousands of employees
versus those with less than 1,000 employees, the commenter added. To
demonstrate that the company has been the foremost innovator for
military footwear, the commenter provided numerous new combat boots it
developed over the years. In light of the decimation of U.S. footwear
manufacturing industry by imports reducing its share of all footwear
purchase in the U.S. to less than 2 percent in 2013, the 500-employee
footwear manufacturing size standard established more than a half
century ago has grown out of date with the realities of the industry,
the commenter explained. This commenter also stated that because the
footwear industry is highly labor intensive, one DoD award can easily
cause a contractor's employment level to increase by 10-20 percent or
more, resulting in a change to its status from a small business to a
large business during the course of the contract. This can be very
disruptive to the company and its employees, the commenter added. The
commenter also provided a detailed analysis of average firm size,
startup costs and entry barriers, industry competition, and Federal
contracting trends in support of SBA's proposal to maintain the 1,000-
employee size standard for Footwear Manufacturing. If the size standard
were to revert to 500 employees for NAICS 316210, it would have a
lasting negative impact on its business and harm the areas where its
employees live, the commenter concluded.
SBA also received a joint comment from two elected officials
supporting the 1,000-employee size standard for Footwear Manufacturing
on behalf of a footwear manufacturer operating factories in their
Districts. They maintained that the company manufactures its Berry
Amendment-compliant footwear in the U.S. and is a major supplier to the
U.S. military. They supported SBA's proposal to maintain the current
1,000-employee size standard for Footwear Manufacturing in light of
decreases in DLA contracts for military boots as it would help the
company remain competitive in the market. The commenters added that
lowering the size standard is not in the best interest of small
footwear manufacturers in the current economic environment.
Comments Opposing the Current 1,000-Employee Size Standard for NAICS
316210
SBA received two comments opposing the 1,000-employee size standard
for footwear manufacturers. One was from a footwear manufacturing
subsidiary of a large multi-national company and the other was from an
elected official. These comments and SBA's responses are below.
The first commenter argued that in 2012, SBA, without prior notice
or opportunity to comment, issued an interim final rule to revise size
standards to conform to NAICS 2012. The commenter also questioned SBA's
justification for using an interim final rule (IFR). The commenter
asserted that the 1,000-employee size standard for Footwear
Manufacturing was adopted solely for administrative reasons without
substantive analyses of industry and Federal contracting data as
required by the Small Business Act or SBA's own size standards
methodology. The commenter further argued that SBA consolidated five
separate footwear manufacturing NAICS codes into one footwear
manufacturing code (NAICS 316210) and changed the size standard from
500 employees to 1,000 employees by arbitrarily selecting the highest
size standard in the group. The commenter added that SBA did not
provide a detailed analysis and justification to establish a single
size standard for a group of 4-digit NAICS codes as required by 15
U.S.C. 632(a)(7). The commenter maintained that the increase of size
standard to 1,000 employees has allowed one or two firms between 500
employees and 1,000 employees to become dominant in the military
footwear industry. The commenter contends that has harmed truly small
businesses by forcing them to compete
[[Page 4473]]
against much larger firms even in small business set aside
procurements, as well as large businesses by forcing agencies to use
small business set asides and precluding them from participating in the
market.
The commenter claimed that the current proposed rule and proposed
size standards are fundamentally flawed. The commenter contended that
the proposed rule does not meet the requirements of the Jobs Act
because the Agency has not held two public forums in different
geographic regions of the country as required by the Jobs Act. The
commenter claimed that the actual industry data not only fails to
support the current 1,000-employee size standard for Footwear
Manufacturing, but supports lowering it to below 500 employees. In
addition, the commenter argued that SBA failed to explain how the
1,000-employee size standard is appropriate for Footwear Manufacturing.
The commenter stated that in addition to being based on the faulty 2012
IFR, the proposed size standard for Footwear Manufacturing is based on
insufficient data and is not supported by the publicly available data.
The commenter argued that the proposed rule provides no data for start-
up costs, industry competition, or size distribution of firms relating
to the footwear manufacturing industry. Similarly, there is no
discussion on secondary factors (such as technological changes,
industry growth trends, and SBA financial assistance and program
factors), the commenter contended. The commenter maintained that SBA
has not published data related to the vast majority of the primary
factors it must consider and has not provided sufficient analysis of
the size standard. SBA's failure to gather and consider data on each of
the required factors demonstrates that the rulemaking is legally
deficient, the commenter argued.
The commenter argued that the limited data SBA provides does not
support the 1,000-employee size standard for military footwear
manufacturing; the actual data require a lower size standard. The
commenter stated that, with the 1,000-employee size standard, every
significant domestic manufacturer of military footwear, except for two
companies, is now considered a small business. The commenter maintained
that publicly available Federal procurement data show that SBA's
improper change to a 1,000-employee size standard has allowed ``small
business'' to take a substantial share of the military footwear market.
The commenter alleged that SBA's data on Federal contracting is
inaccurate because the Agency has willfully and arbitrarily excluded
Federal contracting data after October 2012 from its analysis. For
example, SBA asserts that small businesses account for 7.8 percent of
the Federal footwear market, while FPDS-NG demonstrates that the actual
percentage is much higher, the commenter claimed.
The commenter contended that the 1,000-employee size standard for
the footwear manufacturing industry has created a situation where one
firm is now dominant in the industry. By raising the size standard from
500 employees to 1,000 employees, SBA has allowed two previously large
firms to be reclassified as small, such that six of the eight companies
in the industry are ``small'' businesses, the commenter maintained.
Accounting for more than 28 percent of fiscal year 2014 dollars spent
in NAICS 316210 nationwide and more than twice the share of other small
business, one small business has become dominant in the industry, the
commenter argued. SBA cannot adopt size standards which would cause a
concern to become dominant in its field of operation, the commenter
added. The commenter argued that SBA has provided no data to support
its statement that no individual firm at or below the proposed size
standards will be large enough to dominate its field of operation. SBA
has not performed such an analysis with respect to the footwear
manufacturing industry and failed to comply with the statutory
requirement that small businesses are only those that are not dominant
in their field of operation, the commenter alleged.
The commenter argued that SBA's position not to lower size
standards, even when its analysis might support a reduction, is
arbitrary and capricious and violates the requirements of the Act and
SBA's own methodology. This ``policy'' is inconsistent with
congressional intent and SBA's mission to aid, counsel, assist and
protect the interests of small business concerns, the commenter
maintained. The commenter added that this policy results in otherwise
large businesses being identified as small and being afforded special
treatment that was intended for small businesses, with repercussions
for the entire industry that SBA is required to consider. The commenter
contended that there is no basis to support SBA's assertion that not
lowering size standards would create jobs. Changing size standards
would have no impact on the government's demands for goods and services
and job creation, the commenter explains. In other words, the commenter
suggested that there is no impact on the economy and job creation
whether the contracts are performed by large or small businesses. The
commenter further argued that SBA failed to consider the impacts the
size standard changes would have by precluding certain companies from
Federal opportunities or by forcing truly small businesses to compete
against otherwise large businesses.
The commenter argued that to comply with U.S. military requirements
and the Berry Amendment, military footwear manufacturing involves a
very distinct production process from commercial footwear
manufacturing. Thus, the commenter recommended that SBA create a
military footwear manufacturing exception to NAICS 316210, with a size
standard of 500 employees. The commenter argued that, given the special
production requirements necessary to comply with the Berry Amendment,
the military footwear industry supports a separate industry designation
as an exception to NAICS 316210. The commenter recommended that SBA
return the size standard for Footwear Manufacturing to 500 employees
and create a separate size standard for the military footwear industry
as an exception to NAICS 316210 with a size standard well below 500
employees.
The second commenter, an elected official, expressed concerns about
the size standard for Footwear Manufacturing. The commenter contended
that the size standard for Footwear Manufacturing, increased in 2012
from 500 employees to 1,000 employees, not only endangers an already
fragile footwear manufacturing base, but also negatively affects the
small businesses the proposed rule is designed to assist. The commenter
maintained that, with only a limited number of companies remaining that
can produce Berry Amendment compliant footwear, the size standard
change for Footwear Manufacturing will have a detrimental impact on the
military's ability to procure high quality and consistent products. The
commenter added that the proposed 1,000-employee size standard for
Footwear Manufacturing has created a dominant firm within the size
standard contradicting the intent of the proposed rule. The commenter
recommended that SBA reconsider the proposed rule and return the small
business size standard for Footwear Manufacturing to 500 employees.
This will not only ensure fair competition among the few remaining
Berry compliant footwear manufacturers, but will also preserve the
military's ability to obtain consistent quality footwear, the commenter
concluded.
[[Page 4474]]
Another commenter supported a change to NAICS 316210 allowing a
separate classification for the Berry Amendment footwear. The commenter
also supported changing the small business classification to make the
business field more competitive. However, it was not clear whether the
comment was for increasing or decreasing the size standard for Footwear
Manufacturing.
SBA's Response
Every five years, with a notice and comment process, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) reviews and updates the NAICS industry
definitions to reflect changes in the U.S. economy. In each NAICS
update, OMB may create new industries and merge or modify others. In
the 2012 update, effective January 1, 2012, OMB merged the five
footwear manufacturing industries into a single, new NAICS industry--
NAICS 316210, Footwear Manufacturing. Thus, the commenter's statement
that SBA consolidated the five industries into one category is not
accurate.
When OMB merges multiple NAICS industries or their parts into a
single industry, SBA must determine a size standard for the new
industry when adopting the updated NAICS to its table of size
standards. For this, as explained in the IFR, SBA used a bright-line
approach to adopting the highest size standard among the merged
industries as the size standard for the new industry. Of the five
merged footwear manufacturing industries, one had a 1,000-employee size
standard, while four had a 500-employee size standard. Accordingly, SBA
adopted a 1,000-employee size standard for the new footwear
manufacturing industry. SBA applied the same approach to determine the
size standard for about 25 other new or modified industries in NAICS
2012. SBA had applied this approach to update its size standards in
response to the 2002 and 2007 NAICS updates with no adverse comments.
To do otherwise and adopt a lower size standard would result in firms
being disqualified from small business status without any analysis,
comment or opportunity for review. There is no evidence that SBA's
approach has ever resulted in firms that are dominant in the industry
qualifying as small business concerns.
After receiving no inter-agency comments, SBA published the updated
size standards as an IFR on August 20, 2012 (77 FR 49991), with an
effective date of October 1, 2012. SBA provided a detailed
justification for using the IFR with an effective date of October 1,
2012. The commenter's argument that SBA provided no opportunity to
comment on the rule is incorrect. SBA provided a 60-day comment period
for the public and other concerned parties to comment on the size
standards changes adopted in the interim final rule. SBA received only
one comment on the IFR, which was unrelated to the 1,000-employee size
standard for NAICS 316210, Footwear Manufacturing. Therefore, the
1,000-employee size standard for NAICS 316210, Footwear Manufacturing,
has been in effect since October 1, 2012.
SBA does not agree with the commenter's assertion that SBA did not
provide a detailed analysis and justification for establishing a single
size standard for a group of industries at the 4-digit NAICS level as
required by 15 U.S.C. 632(a)(7). That requirement only applies when SBA
intends to establish a common size standard for a group of existing 6-
digit NAICS codes at the 4-digit NAICS Industry Group level. It does
not apply to the size standard that SBA adopted for NAICS 316210,
Footwear Manufacturing, the new industry that OMB created by merging
multiple NAICS industries as part of its NAICS 2012 updates because the
five industries have similar production processes.
SBA disagrees with most of the arguments from the commenter
regarding the Jobs Act and the analysis in the proposed rule. The
commenter's allegation that SBA has not held any public forums under
the Jobs Act is simply not correct. To obtain public input on numerous
provisions under the Jobs Act, in 2011, SBA presented its size
standards methodology to businesses in 13 cities in the U.S. and sought
their input. SBA also provided information on the status of the
comprehensive size standards review and on how interested parties can
provide SBA with input and feedback on the size standards review.
SBA does not agree with the commenter's claim that the Agency
failed to explain how the 1,000-employee size standard is appropriate
for the footwear manufacturing industry. In the proposed rule, SBA
detailed what industry and Federal contracting factors the Agency
considered, how they were calculated, what data sources it examined,
and how the results were translated to size standards supported by each
factor. The 2012 IFR had no impact on the SBA's September 10, 2014
proposed rule to retain the 1,000-employee based size standard for
Footwear Manufacturing.
As explained in the September 10, 2014 proposed rule, due to the
lack of data on actual start-up costs, SBA uses average assets as a
proxy for start-up costs. SBA calculates average assets by combining
the sales to total assets ratio for an industry from the Risk
Management Association's (RMA) Annual eStatement Studies with average
receipts from the Economic Census data. The 2009-2011 RMA data, the
latest available when SBA prepared the proposed rule, did not contain
the sales to assets ratio for the Footwear Manufacturing industries.
Therefore, the average assets factor was left blank for Footwear
Manufacturing. SBA measures industry competition using the four-firm
concentration ratio and estimates a size standard only if its value is
40 percent or more. SBA did not have the data to compute the four-firm
ratio for Footwear Manufacturing. Thus, that factor was not included in
the analysis. As explained in the proposed rule as well as in SBA's
size standards methodology, SBA analyzes the size distribution of firms
using the Gini coefficient. The Gini coefficient factor was included
for Footwear Manufacturing. As part of its review, SBA evaluates small
business participation on Federal contracting and SBA's loan programs
under both existing and proposed size standards as well.
The Federal contracting factor was evaluated for every industry,
including Footwear Manufacturing. The impact on loan programs was
evaluated on a more general basis as the vast majority of businesses
receiving SBA's loans are well below the size standards. Aggregated
impacts of proposed size standards on SBA's financial assistance and
Federal procurement were provided as part of the regulatory impact
analysis of the proposed rule. It was not practical to include the
results for each of the 364 industries covered by the proposed rule.
SBA considers secondary factors on a case by case basis. While the
commenter complained that SBA did not consider secondary factors, it
did not indicate what secondary factors SBA should consider in
reviewing the size standard for Footwear Manufacturing. Regarding the
publication of data, SBA provided the results for every primary factor
and each industry, unless the data were not available or the results
were not relevant. Additionally, the majority of the data SBA used in
the proposed rule are publicly available.
While the commenter claimed that actual industry data support
lowering the size standard for Footwear Manufacturing to below 500
employees, it did not provide any specific industry data or analysis to
support its claim. The commenter's allegation that SBA willfully and
arbitrarily excluded the Federal contracting data from October 2012 is
incorrect. When SBA prepared
[[Page 4475]]
the proposed rule, the latest Federal contracting data that were
available was for fiscal year 2011. The commenter wrongly interpreted
the 7.8 percent Federal contracting factor for Footwear Manufacturing
as the small business share of Federal footwear market. As explained in
the proposed rule, that value represents the difference between small
business share of total industry receipts (36.2%) and small business
share of total contract dollars (44.0%) for Footwear Manufacturing.
SBA disagrees with the comment that the 1,000-employee size
standard has allowed firms that are dominant in the footwear
manufacturing industry to qualify as small. Similarly, SBA also
disagrees with the argument that SBA did not perform the dominant
analysis for Footwear Manufacturing. SBA examined the market share
(i.e., share of total industry's receipts) of firms that would become
small under the proposed size standard in each industry and determined
that no individual firm at or below the proposed size standard would be
large enough to dominate its field of operation. Since it was not
practical to include the market share for each of the 364 industries,
SBA provided a range of values. Among the industries for which the
Agency proposed to change the size standards in Manufacturing, the
small business market share varied from 0.02 percent to 18.9 percent,
averaging 1.7 percent. For Footwear Manufacturing, that value was 1.9
percent, suggesting that at that level market share no individual firm
would be dominant under the proposed 1,000-employee size standard. SBA
looks at the share of total industry receipts, not Federal contract
dollars, to determine if a firm is dominant in the industry. Again, SBA
considers a firm to be dominant when it is dominant in the entire
industry, which in this case is NAICS 316210, Footwear Manufacturing.
It does not relate to a specific product line manufactured by a
particular company in that industry, or a particular agency. Otherwise,
the number of companies dominant in their industries, based on a
specific product they manufacture, would be too numerous to identify.
Furthermore, the data does not support the argument that the 1,000-
employee size standard has harmed the companies below 500 employees by
forcing them to compete against companies with 500-1,000 employees for
small business set aside procurements. The results from small business
goaling data shown in Table 1, ``Contract Dollars in Footwear
Manufacturing by Business Size,'' show that the share of companies
below 500 employees in total contract dollars in Footwear Manufacturing
related industries increased from about 31 percent during fiscal years
2011-2012 (i.e., prior to the 1,000-employee size standard) to 46
percent during fiscal years 2013-2014 (i.e., after the 1,000-employee
size standard). More importantly, small business dollars awarded to
firms below 500 employees increased from $32 million to $49 million, an
increase of more than 50 percent. Similarly, the results also do not
support the argument that the 1,000-employee size standard has reduced
Federal opportunities for firms that are above the size standard. As
can be seen from the table, dollars awarded to firms above 1,000
employees have increased more than 50 percent from $18 million per year
during fiscal years 2011-2012 to more than $27 million during fiscal
years 2013-2014. It is not that firms between 500 and 1,000 employees
that became small under the 1,000-employee size standard are getting
more contracts now, thereby reducing opportunities for firms below 500
employees and those above 1,000 employees. The data shows that they
continued to get those contracts, but as small businesses under the
1,000-employee size standard. In fact, firms between 500 and 1,000
employees lost some of their market share to firms below 500 employees
and those above 1,000 employees under the higher size standard.
Table 1--Contract Dollars in Footwear Manufacturing by Business Size
[In $ million]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Business size (number of
employees) Average 2011-2012 Average 2013-2014
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other than small business
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NA............................ 3.2 0.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>=500......................... 0.3 0.5
>500 to >=1,000............... 45.4 5.3
>1,000........................ 18.4 27.6
Other than small total........ 67.3 33.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Small business
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NA............................ 3.3 1.0
>=500......................... 31.6 48.6
>500 to >=1,000............... 1.8 23.1
>1,000........................ 0.3 0.2
Small total................... 36.9 72.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NA............................ 6.5 1.1
>=500......................... 31.9 49.1
>500 to >=1,000............... 47.2 28.4
>1,000........................ 18.7 27.8
Overall total................. 104.3 106.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SBA is unable to verify the argument that one previously large
business that became small under the 1,000-employee size standard
captured more than 28 percent of total small business dollars awarded
under NAICS 316210 in 2014.
[[Page 4476]]
Based on the analysis of contract data for Fiscal year 2014, SBA found
no individual firm receiving more than 12 percent of small business
dollars awarded under for NAICS 316210. Moreover, because agencies
still continued to apply older footwear manufacturing NAICS codes
(albeit incorrectly) for footwear contracts, the results based on NAICS
316210 alone would be misleading. Using the data for all footwear
manufacturing related NAICS codes, SBA found that no individual firm
accounted for more than 19 percent of small business dollars awarded in
those NAICS codes for fiscal year 2014. These levels of market share do
not suggest that the size standard has classified dominant firms as
small.
SBA disagrees with the comment that the Agency's decision not to
lower any size standards was arbitrary and capricious and violates the
statute and Agency's methodology. Although not lowering small business
size standards has been SBA's general policy to enhance small business
participation in Federal programs in the current economic environment,
SBA does make exceptions. For example, in a final rule (RIN 3245-AG51)
published elsewhere in this Federal Register, SBA has lowered size
standards for three mining industries that are not part of
Manufacturing, Wholesale Trade, or Retail Trade. In the September 10,
2014 proposed rule, SBA provided a detailed analysis to explain why
lowering size standards would be against the best interests of small
businesses. SBA believes that businesses below 500 employees will be
better off competing with companies up to 1,000 employees for small
business set aside procurements than competing for unrestricted
procurements against companies that have several thousand employees.
Because small businesses do not have the economies of scale
(automation, marketing, production, technology, etc.) that larger
enterprises have, small businesses generally increase their employees,
resources, and tools when they get a new contract. As a result, SBA
believes that small businesses will add more to the economy by hiring
people, and purchasing equipment, materials, and technology that larger
businesses might already have on hand.
SBA disagrees and does not see the need for creating an exception
for military footwear manufacturing. According to the information
provided by the commenter, there exist numerous firms that are already
in compliance with the Berry Amendment. SBA is not convinced with the
rationale why a lower size standard is warranted to comply with
contracts with certain requirements. The Berry Amendment requires DoD
to give preference in procurement to domestically produced,
manufactured, or home-grown products, most notably food, clothing,
fabrics, and specialty metals. Normally, one would expect special
manufacturing requirements to point to the need for a larger size
standard, not lower.
In addition, the available industry data does not support a 500-
employee size standard for Footwear Manufacturing, especially for
military footwear manufacturing. Firms serving the military footwear
market are, on average, considerably larger than the rest of the firms
in the industry. Thus, it would be inconsistent to have a lower size
standard for the military footwear market and a higher standard for the
rest of the industry. Furthermore, compliance with the Berry Amendment
is not a function of the size of the business performing a contract.
Rather, it is a function of the origin of the products, which small
businesses can certainly manufacture. Moreover, there are several small
footwear manufacturers that manufacture footwear that is compliant with
the Berry Amendment.
Most importantly, SBA is concerned that lowering the size standard
would reduce the pool of small businesses that are available to meet
the DLA/DoD requirements under small business procurements for military
footwear. This would cause the Government to procure its needs through
more full and open competition, thereby forcing smaller firms,
including those between 500 employees and 1,000 employees, to compete
with firms many times their size.
In response to the comments, SBA updated the Federal contracting
factor for Footwear Manufacturing using FPDS-NG data for fiscal years
2013-2014. It should be noted that the Federal contracting factor is
calculated based on the 1,000-employee size standard for NAICS 316210.
Following OMB's merging of five footwear manufacturing industries to
one industry, RMA's eStatement Studies started publishing the sales to
total assets ratio for the new industry (NAICS 316210). Accordingly,
using that data for years 2012-2014, SBA is now also able to calculate
the average assets factor for NAICS 316210, which was not included in
the proposed rule. The updated results are shown in Table 2 ``Updated
Size Standards Analysis for Footwear Manufacturing (No. of
Employees),'' below. As can be seen from the table, the updated results
reconfirm the 1,000-employee size standard for NAICS 316210, Footwear
Manufacturing.
Table 2--Updated Size Standards Analysis for Footwear Manufacturing
[Number of Employees]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simple Weighted Four-firm Calculated
average average Average average Federal size
firm size firm size assets size Four-firm size Gini coeffi- contract standard
(number of (number of ($ million) ratio (%) (number of cient factor (%) (number of
employees) employees) employees)* employees)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Factor............................... 55 550 3.7 ........... NA 0.827 3.8 1,000
Size standard........................ 500 1,500 500 ........... NA 1,500 1,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Size standard for four-firm average size is not calculated because there is no data to compute the four-firm ratio.
Therefore, based on the analyses of all supportive and opposing
comments on the proposed rule and latest industry and contracting data
available when this final rule was prepared, SBA is retaining the
1,000-employee size standard for Footwear Manufacturing (NAICS 316210),
as proposed.
Comments on Subsector 315, Apparel Manufacturing
SBA received four comments on size standards for industries within
NAICS Subsector 315, Apparel Manufacturing. SBA proposed to increase
the size standard for seven industries in that subsector from 500
employees to 750 employees.
A commenter supported proposed increases to size standards for the
apparel manufacturing industries from
[[Page 4477]]
500 employees to 750 employees. The commenter argued that the current
500-employee size standard has been a major deterrent in its ability to
hire and retain employees to meet unexpected surges in demand of
clothing items by DLA from small businesses, especially in times of
war. Higher size standards are important for small clothing
manufacturers to remain eligible to compete for small business set
aside purchases by DoD and DLA, the commenter observed. The commenter
pointed out that, because these industries are labor intensive, higher
size standards will offer small businesses greater opportunities to
hire more people in different areas of the country.
A labor organization also supported proposed increases to size
standards for NAICS codes 315210 (Cut and Sew Apparel Contractors),
315220 (Men's and Boys' Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing), 315240
(Women's, Girls', and Infants' Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing), and
315280 (Other Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing) from 500 employees to
750 employees. These NAICS codes apply to procurement of military
apparel by DoD and DLA to support U.S. troops, and the current 500-
employee size standard has made it difficult for small business apparel
contractors to meet demands during surges in troop support acquisitions
(also referred to as surge capability), the commenter maintained. The
500-employee size standard has created persistent capacity and price
problems for small businesses, the commenter added. The organization
stated that small apparel contractors find themselves torn between the
need to maintain the surge capabilities expected by the DLA and the
need to maintain the small business status necessary to compete for DLA
uniform contracts. Therefore, the 750-employee size standard will allow
small apparel and clothing contractors to expand production temporarily
when demand surges without jeopardizing their small business status,
the commenter maintained. The capability to meet unexpected surges in
demand for items such as uniforms and body armor is critical to
maintaining warfighter readiness, the organization noted. Citing a May
2013 survey of DLA's clothing and apparel contractors, the organization
stated that 90 percent of respondents were dependent on DoD contracts
for their financial viability.
An Alaska Native Corporation representative opposed the proposed
750-employee size standard for Subsector 315, Apparel Manufacturing.
The Corporation owns several small disadvantaged businesses in the
apparel manufacturing industry, the commenter observed. The commenter
argued that raising the size standard would negatively affect the
growth of their company and profits of their shareholders. Raising size
standards would make a greater number of large companies eligible for
small business status, thereby increasing competition in the apparel
manufacturing market and reducing opportunities for their company and
other small businesses, the commenter explained. This would be
detrimental in light of decreases in Federal government spending in the
apparel manufacturing market over the last 5 years because there would
be more companies bidding on fewer contracts and fewer opportunities
for true small businesses, the commenter concluded.
Another commenter recommended a 250-employee size standard for
several industries within Subsector 315, namely NAICS 315210 (Cut and
Sew Apparel Contractors), 315220 (Men's and Boys' Cut and Sew Apparel
Manufacturing), 315240 (Women's, Girls', and Infants' Cut and Sew
Apparel Manufacturing), 315280 (Other Cut and Sew Apparel
Manufacturing), and 315990 (Apparel Accessories and Other Apparel
Manufacturing). The commenter argued that the 250-employee size
standard would offer protection for emerging small businesses, given
the fragility of the clothing and textile industry. However, the
commenter provided no data or analysis to support the argument.
SBA's Response
Based on its analysis of industry and Federal procurement data and
public comments, SBA has determined that it will adopt the 750-employee
size standard for the seven industries in Subsector 315, Apparel
Manufacturing, as proposed. In recent years, DLA has strived to
increase its awards for procuring military clothing through small
businesses. This has put strains on many small businesses, according to
the commenters, to meet DLA's expected surge capabilities while
maintaining their small business size status. The increase from 500
employees to 750 employees will allow a number of small businesses to
take on these contracts and to hire more workers without jeopardizing
their eligibility. Based on data from the Economic Census and System of
Award Management (SAM), only about 10 additional businesses that are
primarily involved in Apparel Manufacturing will qualify as small under
the 750-employee size standard. SBA does not believe that the higher
size standard will cause a significant negative impact on existing
small businesses. Therefore, SBA is adopting the 750-employee size
standard for all industries in NAICS Subsector 315, Apparel
Manufacturing.
Comments on NAICS 327993, Mineral Wool Manufacturing
A comment from a trade association for manufacturers of fiber glass
and rock and slag wool insulation addressed the size standard for NAICS
327993, Mineral Wool Manufacturing. Specifically, the association
supported SBA's proposal to increase the size standard for NAICS 327993
from 750 employees to 1,500 employees.
SBA's Response
Because there were no comments opposed to this increase, SBA is
adopting the 1,500 employee size standard for NAICS 327993, as
proposed.
Comments on NAICS 336412, Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts
Manufacturing; and NAICS 336413, Other Aircraft Part and Auxiliary
Equipment Manufacturing
SBA proposed increasing the size standards for NAICS 336412 from
1,000 employees to 1,500 employees and for NAICS 336413 from 1,000
employees to 1,250 employees. A military aircraft parts and auxiliary
equipment manufacturer supported the proposed increases to size
standards for both industries, but recommends that SBA adopt the same
1,500-employee size standard for NAICS 336413 as well, instead of the
proposed 1,250-employee size standard. The commenter argued that the
differences in manufacturing engine parts and other aircraft equipment
are minimal. The single size standard for both industries would provide
uniform employee levels for small business eligibility and offer them
more flexibility to adjust to the requirements of the marketplace, the
commenter explained.
SBA's Response
SBA has not adopted the recommendation for three reasons. First,
although product lines and production methods may be related, there
exist significant differences in industry characteristics between the
two industries. For example, based on the 2007 Economic Census, the
average size of firms is 230 employees for NAICS 336412 as compared to
146 employees for NAICS 336413. Similarly, average assets size is about
$74 million for NAICS 336412 as opposed to only $26 million for NAICS
336413. Second, the
[[Page 4478]]
size standards for aircraft, aircraft parts and equipment related
exceptions to NAICS 541712 (Research and Development in the Physical,
Engineering and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)) are tied to size
standards for industries within NAICS Industry Group 3364 (Aerospace
Product and Parts Manufacturing). Therefore, changing size standards
for any of the industries in NAICS Industry Group 3364 would also
require changing the size standards for exceptions under NAICS 541712.
Third, the National Defense Authorization Act of fiscal year 2013 (NDAA
2013) limits establishing a single or common size standard for multiple
industries without proper justification and without publishing such a
size standard for public comments. Obviously, given the industry data
that support different size standards for the two industries, it would
be difficult to justify the single size standard for them in accordance
with NDAA 2013. As part of its quinquennial review of all size
standards required by the Jobs Act, SBA will reevaluate the size
standards for those industries in the coming years and consider the
recommendation at that time.
For the above reasons, in this final rule, SBA is adopting the
1,500-employee size standard for NAICS 336412 and the 1,250-employee
size standard for NAICS 336413, as proposed.
Comments on NAICS 611512, Flight Training
A commenter supported increasing size standards for NAICS Sector
31-33 manufacturing, specifically increasing the size standard for
NAICS 336413 from 1,000 employees to 1,250 employees. The commenter,
operating primarily in NAICS 611512 (Flight Training), advocated for
the creation of a separate manufacturing NAICS code for ``Military
Defense Training'' with a size standard of 1,500 employees. Contracting
Officers have recently been utilizing NAICS 336413 for solicitations
for services contracts involving military training due to its higher
size standard and technical nature of military training, the commenter
explained. NAICS 611512 and its $27.5 million receipts based size
standard do not reflect the requirements for military defense training,
the commenter added. The commenter argued that flight training can more
realistically be categorized under NAICS Sector 31-33 (Manufacturing)
rather than under Sector 61 (Education).
SBA's Response
SBA cannot make the suggested change for several reasons. First,
the September 10, 2014 proposed rule and this final rule only apply to
industries in NAICS Sector 31-33, Manufacturing. The September 10, 2014
proposed rule did not address NAICS 611512, Flight Training. SBA
evaluated NAICS 611512 and its size standard in a proposed rule (76 FR
70667 (November 15, 2011)) that was part of its comprehensive review of
Sector 61, Educational Services. In the final rule, SBA determined that
data did not support an increase in the size standard for NAICS 611512.
The final rule (77 FR 58739 (September 24, 2012)) fully explains and
justifies how SBA arrived at its determination that the then existing
$25.5 million size standard for NAICS 611512 should remain unchanged.
It was increased for inflation to $27.5 million, effective July 14,
2014, along with increases to all other monetary based size standards
(79 FR 33647 (June 12, 2014)).
Second, SBA has no authority or expertise to create new NAICS codes
or modify existing ones. Creating or modifying NAICS industry
definitions or codes is done through the U.S. Economic Classification
Policy Committee under the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in
cooperation with statistical agencies from the U.S., Canada, and
Mexico. If the commenter believes that a new NAICS code is warranted
for military flight training, it should approach OMB (see https://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/). Every five years, OMB updates NAICS
codes and definitions, the next being the NAICS 2017 updates.
For Federal procurement, the contracting officer must specify the
NAICS code and size standard in accordance with the principal purpose
of the procurement (13 CFR 121.402(b)). When the government purchases
manufactured products, the contracting officer must assign the
appropriate NAICS code and size standard from Sector 31-33. There may
be ancillary services that accompany the manufactured product, but if
the principal purpose of the procurement action is to purchase product,
then the NAICS code and small business size standard are from the
manufacturing sector. If a service is the primary purpose of the
procurement, it should be classified under the appropriate services
NAICS code and size standard. When the government procures both
products and services, it must determine which is the greater part of
the contract, and must assign the appropriate NAICS code and size
standard (13 CFR 121.402(b)). Any interested party adversely affected
by a contracting officer's NAICS code designation may appeal that
designation to SBA's Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA) (see 13 CFR
121.1101-1103).
Comments on NAICS 321212, Softwood Veneer and Plywood Manufacturing
A commenter opposed SBA's proposal to increase the size standard
for Softwood Veneer and Plywood Manufacturing (NAICS 321212) from 500
employees to 1,250 employees. The commenter maintained that the
increase would have an impact on the majority of manufacturers in this
industry by affecting the availability of Federal timber, because it
would increase the competition for the timber sale set aside for small
businesses in this industry by enlarging the pool of eligible small
business manufacturers. The commenter argued that the proposed size
standard increase is not warranted because companies that qualify as
small under the current size standard already exist. The commenter was
concerned that by allowing larger companies to qualify as small the
proposed increase to the size standard for NAICS 321212 would
negatively impact a number of companies that have made business
decisions to remain below the 500-employee size standard to benefit
from the SBA's timber set-aside program. With the proposed 1,250-
employee size standard, the plywood and veneer manufacturers below 500
employees would lose the protection provided by the program, the
commenter concluded.
SBA's Response
With respect to the argument that an increase to the size standard
for NAICS 321212 or any other wood product manufacturing industry would
negatively impact firms participating in the SBA's Commercial Timber
Sale Set-Aside Program, the wood manufacturing industry size standards
do not apply to determine eligibility for purposes of that program.
Rather, the size standard for the timber sale set-aside program (except
for salvage timber) is 500 employees (see 13 CFR 121.507), which SBA
did not propose to increase.
The arguments that there are already small businesses under the
existing size standard, that firms have made business decisions to
remain small to benefit from the program, and that they would lose
small business protection if additional firms qualify as small, are not
valid reasons for not revising the size standard when the relevant
industry data warrants doing so. Of the 14 industries in NAICS
Subsector 321, Wood Product Manufacturing, based on
[[Page 4479]]
the results of the evaluation of industry characteristics (such as
average firm size, industry concentration, and distribution of firms by
size) and the Federal contracting factor, SBA proposed increasing the
size standards for NAICS 321212 and four others, and retaining the
current 500-employee size standard for nine industries. As can be seen
from the results in Table 3 of the September 10, 2014 proposed rule,
the industries for which SBA proposed increasing the size standards had
significantly higher average firm size, four-firm concentration ratio
and Gini coefficient than others. To still maintain their size standard
at the 500-employee level would be inconsistent with SBA's mandate to
adjust size standards based on current industry and market data.
Moreover, based on the Economic Census and SAM data for NAICS 321212,
only about five additional firms will qualify as small under the 1,250-
employee size standard, suggesting that the higher size standard will
have very minimal impact on businesses below the current 500-employee
size standard. For these reasons, SBA is adopting the 1,250-employee
size standard for NAICS 321212, as proposed. Similarly, SBA is adopting
proposed size standards increases for four other industries in
Subsector 321.
Other Comments
Two commenters offered general assessments of SBA's proposed rule.
Both supported SBA's proposed five employee based size standard levels
for Manufacturing and their incremental increases of 250 employees
rather than 500 employees; however, one suggested that SBA should
incorporate the sixth level at 250 employees and set the maximum
employee based standard at 1,000 employees. A lower size standard would
protect emerging manufacturers that are not able to compete with
established larger businesses, the commenter explained. One opposed
proposed increases to size standards in Manufacturing arguing that
higher size standards would allow manufacturers to create less
productive, low paying jobs, while the other commenter supported the
increases except for industries in Subsector 315 for which the
commenter suggested a lower 250-employee size standard.
Both commenters argued that the Agency should lower size standards
when the analysis supports lowering them. One argued that not lowering
size standards would encourage manufacturers not to upgrade their
facilities with advanced manufacturing techniques and allow larger
manufacturers to compete with true small manufacturers. While one
commenter suggested that SBA should not adjust employee based size
standards for labor productivity growth and focus on protecting
emerging businesses instead, the other pointed out that the lack of
data on labor productivity would make adjusting size standards based on
labor productivity difficult. One commenter supported weighing all
factors equally, while the other suggested weighing some factors more
than others for certain industries. In addition to employee counts, the
second commenter suggested other criteria for establishing size
standards, including business tenure (5 years), subcontracting
limitations, revenue limits ($30 million), and net worth limits ($5
million). Lastly, both commenters endorsed SBA's approach to use a
single value as a size standard as opposed to a range of values.
SBA's Response
Some of the issues the commenters have raised (such as lowering
minimum and maximum size standards, using different factors and
weighing them differently from others, lowering size standards, etc.)
will be addressed when SBA updates its ``Size Standards Methodology''
for the next round of size standards review. With respect to SBA's
policy of not lowering size standards when the data support doing so,
SBA provided a detailed explanation in the proposed rule with respect
to why lowering size standards is not in the best interest of small
businesses in the current economic climate. SBA is concerned that
lowering maximum and minimum levels of size standards would cause
untold numbers of small businesses to lose their eligibility for
Federal programs.
Incorporation of net worth into SBA's table of size standards is
not practicable. It is not a value that lends itself to comparing
businesses in a particular industry. A company's net worth can be
affected by a number of things, such as debt, repurchased corporate
stock, etc. Furthermore, data on net worth is not available by
industry.
Other criteria proposed by the commenter would, SBA believes, be
too nebulous, temporary, and subjective and therefore not useful when
establishing size standards that usually must remain static and in
place for a number of years. Establishing small business eligibility
based on multiple criteria (such as revenue limit, net worth limit, and
employee count), as suggested by the commenter, would create
unnecessary complexity and confusion in size standards.
NAICS 326211, Tire Manufacturing (Except Retreading)
In the September 10, 2014 proposed rule, SBA proposed amending
Footnote 5 to the table of size standards relating to NAICS 326211,
Tire Manufacturing (except Retreading). In the absence of comments
opposing the proposed amendment, SBA is amending Footnote 5, as
proposed, by replacing the former Census classification codes 30111 and
30112 with the new Census Product Classification Codes 3262111 and
3262113 respectively.
Conclusions
Based on the analyses of the latest industry and Federal
contracting data available and thorough evaluation of all public
comments on the proposed rule, SBA is adopting all size standards
changes in NAICS Sector 31-33, Manufacturing, as proposed.
Specifically, SBA is increasing size standards for 209 industries in
NAICS Sector 31-33. These industries, along with their current and
revised size standards are shown in Table 3 ``Summary of Size Standards
Revisions in NAICS Sector 31-33.'' SBA is also increasing the refining
capacity component of the size standard for NAICS 324110 (Petroleum
Refiners) from 125,000 barrels per calendar day (BPCD) to 200,000 BPCD
for businesses that are primarily engaged in petroleum refining and
eliminating the requirement that 90 percent of the output to be
delivered be refined by the successful bidder from either crude oil or
bona fide feedstocks. To qualify under the capacity size standard, the
firm, together with its affiliates, must be primarily engaged in
refining crude petroleum into refined petroleum products. To reflect
these changes, SBA is also amending Footnote 4 of SBA's table of size
standards. Finally, the Agency is also updating Footnote 5 to NAICS
326211 to reflect the current Census Product Classification Codes
3262111 and 3262113.
[[Page 4480]]
Table 3--Summary of Size Standards Revisions in NAICS Sector 31-33
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current size Revised size
NAICS U.S. industry standard standard
NAICs code title (number of (number of
employees) employees)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
311111........... Dog and Cat Food 500 1,000
Manufacturing.
311211........... Flour Milling........ 500 1,000
311221........... Wet Corn Milling..... 750 1,250
311314........... Cane Sugar 750 1,000
Manufacturing.
311340........... Nonchocolate 500 1,000
Confectionery
Manufacturing.
311351........... Chocolate and 500 1,250
Confectionery
Manufacturing from
Cacao Beans.
311352........... Confectionery 500 1,000
Manufacturing from
Purchased Chocolate.
311411........... Frozen Fruit, Juice, 500 1,000
and Vegetable
Manufacturing.
311412........... Frozen Specialty Food 500 1,250
Manufacturing.
311421........... Fruit and Vegetable 500 1,000
Canning.
311422........... Specialty Canning.... 1,000 1,250
311423........... Dried and Dehydrated 500 750
Food Manufacturing.
311511........... Fluid Milk 500 1,000
Manufacturing.
311512........... Creamery Butter 500 750
Manufacturing.
311513........... Cheese Manufacturing. 500 1,250
311514........... Dry, Condensed, and 500 750
Evaporated Dairy
Product
Manufacturing.
311520........... Ice Cream and Frozen 500 1,000
Dessert
Manufacturing.
311611........... Animal (except 500 1,000
Poultry)
Slaughtering.
311612........... Meat Processed from 500 1,000
Carcasses.
311613........... Rendering and Meat 500 750
Byproduct Processing.
311615........... Poultry Processing... 500 1,250
311710........... Seafood Product 500 750
Preparation and
Packaging.
311812........... Commercial Bakeries.. 500 1,000
311813........... Frozen Cakes, Pies, 500 750
and Other Pastries
Manufacturing.
311821........... Cookie and Cracker 750 1,250
Manufacturing.
311824........... Dry Pasta, Dough, and 500 750
Flour Mixes
Manufacturing from
Purchased Flour.
311830........... Tortilla 500 1,250
Manufacturing.
311911........... Roasted Nuts and 500 750
Peanut Butter
Manufacturing.
311919........... Other Snack Food 500 1,250
Manufacturing.
311920........... Coffee and Tea 500 750
Manufacturing.
311930........... Flavoring Syrup and 500 1,000
Concentrate
Manufacturing.
311941........... Mayonnaise, Dressing, 500 750
and Other Prepared
Sauce Manufacturing.
312111........... Soft Drink 500 1,250
Manufacturing.
312112........... Bottled Water 500 1,000
Manufacturing.
312113........... Ice Manufacturing.... 500 750
312120........... Breweries............ 500 1,250
312130........... Wineries............. 500 1,000
312140........... Distilleries......... 750 1,000
312230........... Tobacco Manufacturing 1,000 1,500
313110........... Fiber, Yarn, and 500 1,250
Thread Mills.
313230........... Nonwoven Fabric Mills 500 750
314110........... Carpet and Rug Mills. 500 1,500
314120........... Curtain and Linen 500 750
Mills.
315110........... Hosiery and Sock 500 750
Mills.
315190........... Other Apparel 500 750
Knitting Mills.
315210........... Cut and Sew Apparel 500 750
Contractors.
315220........... Men's and Boys' Cut 500 750
and Sew Apparel
Manufacturing.
315240........... Women's, Girls', and 500 750
Infants' Cut and Sew
Apparel
Manufacturing.
315280........... Other Cut and Sew 500 750
Apparel
Manufacturing.
316992........... Women's Handbag and 500 750
Purse Manufacturing.
321212........... Softwood Veneer and 500 1,250
Plywood
Manufacturing.
321213........... Engineered Wood 500 750
Member (except
Truss) Manufacturing.
321219........... Reconstituted Wood 500 750
Product
Manufacturing.
321911........... Wood Window and Door 500 1,000
Manufacturing.
321991........... Manufactured Home 500 1,250
(Mobile Home)
Manufacturing.
322121........... Paper (except 750 1,250
Newsprint) Mills.
322130........... Paperboard Mills..... 750 1,250
322211........... Corrugated and Solid 500 1,250
Fiber Box
Manufacturing.
322219........... Other Paperboard 750 1,000
Container
Manufacturing.
322220........... Paper Bag and Coated 500 750
and Treated Paper
Manufacturing.
322230........... Stationery Product 500 750
Manufacturing.
322291........... Sanitary Paper 500 1,500
Product
Manufacturing.
323117........... Books Printing....... 500 1,250
324191........... Petroleum Lubricating 500 750
Oil and Grease
Manufacturing.
325194........... Cyclic Crude, 750 1,250
Intermediate, and
Gum and Wood
Chemical
Manufacturing.
325199........... All Other Basic 1,000 1,250
Organic Chemical
Manufacturing.
325211........... Plastics Material and 750 1,250
Resin Manufacturing.
325312........... Phosphatic Fertilizer 500 750
Manufacturing.
325320........... Pesticide and Other 500 1,000
Agricultural
Chemical
Manufacturing.
[[Page 4481]]
325411........... Medicinal and 750 1,000
Botanical
Manufacturing.
325412........... Pharmaceutical 750 1,250
Preparation
Manufacturing.
325413........... In-Vitro Diagnostic 500 1,250
Substance
Manufacturing.
325414........... Biological Product 500 1,250
(except Diagnostic)
Manufacturing.
325510........... Paint and Coating 500 1,000
Manufacturing.
325611........... Soap and Other 750 1,000
Detergent
Manufacturing.
325612........... Polish and Other 500 750
Sanitation Good
Manufacturing.
325613........... Surface Active Agent 500 750
Manufacturing.
325620........... Toilet Preparation 500 1,250
Manufacturing.
325992........... Photographic Film, 500 1,500
Paper, Plate, and
Chemical
Manufacturing.
326111........... Plastics Bag and 500 750
Pouch Manufacturing.
326112........... Plastics Packaging 500 1,000
Film and Sheet
(including
Laminated)
Manufacturing.
326113........... Unlaminated Plastics 500 750
Film and Sheet
(except Packaging)
Manufacturing.
326122........... Plastics Pipe and 500 750
Pipe Fitting
Manufacturing.
326140........... Polystyrene Foam 500 1,000
Product
Manufacturing.
326150........... Urethane and Other 500 750
Foam Product (except
Polystyrene)
Manufacturing.
326160........... Plastics Bottle 500 1,250
Manufacturing.
326191........... Plastics Plumbing 500 750
Fixture
Manufacturing.
326211........... Tire Manufacturing 1,000 1,500
(except Retreading).
326220........... Rubber and Plastics 500 750
Hoses and Belting
Manufacturing.
326291........... Rubber Product 500 750
Manufacturing for
Mechanical Use.
327110........... Pottery, Ceramics, 750 1,000
and Plumbing Fixture
Manufacturing.
327212........... Other Pressed and 750 1,250
Blown Glass and
Glassware
Manufacturing.
327213........... Glass Container 750 1,250
Manufacturing.
327215........... Glass Product 500 1,000
Manufacturing Made
of Purchased Glass.
327310........... Cement Manufacturing. 750 1,000
327332........... Concrete Pipe 500 750
Manufacturing.
327410........... Lime Manufacturing... 500 750
327420........... Gypsum Product 1,000 1,500
Manufacturing.
327910........... Abrasive Product 500 750
Manufacturing.
327993........... Mineral Wool 750 1,500
Manufacturing.
331110........... Iron and Steel Mills 1,000 1,500
and Ferroalloy
Manufacturing.
331315........... Aluminum Sheet, 750 1,250
Plate, and Foil
Manufacturing.
331511........... Iron Foundries....... 500 1,000
331512........... Steel Investment 500 1,000
Foundries.
332111........... Iron and Steel 500 750
Forging.
332112........... Nonferrous Forging... 500 750
332215........... Metal Kitchen 500 750
Cookware, Utensil,
Cutlery, and
Flatware (except
Precious)
Manufacturing.
332216........... Saw Blade and 500 750
Handtool
Manufacturing.
332311........... Prefabricated Metal 500 750
Building and
Component
Manufacturing.
332313........... Plate Work 500 750
Manufacturing.
332321........... Metal Window and Door 500 750
Manufacturing.
332410........... Power Boiler and Heat 500 750
Exchanger
Manufacturing.
332420........... Metal Tank (Heavy 500 750
Gauge) Manufacturing.
332431........... Metal Can 1,000 1,500
Manufacturing.
332510........... Hardware 500 750
Manufacturing.
332911........... Industrial Valve 500 750
Manufacturing.
332912........... Fluid Power Valve and 500 1,000
Hose Fitting
Manufacturing.
332913........... Plumbing Fixture 500 1,000
Fitting and Trim
Manufacturing.
332919........... Other Metal Valve and 500 750
Pipe Fitting
Manufacturing.
332991........... Ball and Roller 750 1,250
Bearing
Manufacturing.
332992........... Small Arms Ammunition 1,000 1,250
Manufacturing.
333111........... Farm Machinery and 500 1,250
Equipment
Manufacturing.
333112........... Lawn and Garden 500 1,500
Tractor and Home
Lawn and Garden
Equipment
Manufacturing.
333120........... Construction 750 1,250
Machinery
Manufacturing.
333132........... Oil and Gas Field 500 1,250
Machinery and
Equipment
Manufacturing.
333242........... Semiconductor 500 1,500
Machinery
Manufacturing.
333244........... Printing Machinery 500 750
and Equipment
Manufacturing.
333415........... Air-Conditioning and 750 1,250
Warm Air Heating
Equipment and
Commercial and
Industrial
Refrigeration
Equipment
Manufacturing.
333611........... Turbine and Turbine 1,000 1,500
Generator Set Units
Manufacturing.
333612........... Speed Changer, 500 750
Industrial High-
Speed Drive, and
Gear Manufacturing.
333613........... Mechanical Power 500 750
Transmission
Equipment
Manufacturing.
333618........... Other Engine 1,000 1,500
Equipment
Manufacturing.
333911........... Pump and Pumping 500 750
Equipment
Manufacturing.
333912........... Air and Gas 500 1,000
Compressor
Manufacturing.
333913........... Measuring and 500 750
Dispensing Pump
Manufacturing.
333921........... Elevator and Moving 500 1,000
Stairway
Manufacturing.
333923........... Overhead Traveling 500 1,250
Crane, Hoist, and
Monorail System
Manufacturing.
[[Page 4482]]
333992........... Welding and Soldering 500 1,250
Equipment
Manufacturing.
333995........... Fluid Power Cylinder 500 750
and Actuator
Manufacturing.
333996........... Fluid Power Pump and 500 1,250
Motor Manufacturing.
334111........... Electronic Computer 1,000 1,250
Manufacturing.
334112........... Computer Storage 1,000 1,250
Device Manufacturing.
334210........... Telephone Apparatus 1,000 1,250
Manufacturing.
334220........... Radio and Television 750 1,250
Broadcasting and
Wireless
Communications
Equipment
Manufacturing.
334412........... Bare Printed Circuit 500 750
Board Manufacturing.
334413........... Semiconductor and 500 1,250
Related Device
Manufacturing.
334417........... Electronic Connector 500 1,000
Manufacturing.
334418........... Printed Circuit 500 750
Assembly (Electronic
Assembly)
Manufacturing.
334510........... Electromedical and 500 1,250
Electrotherapeutic
Apparatus
Manufacturing.
334511........... Search, Detection, 750 1,250
Navigation,
Guidance,
Aeronautical, and
Nautical System and
Instrument
Manufacturing.
334513........... Instruments and 500 750
Related Products
Manufacturing for
Measuring,
Displaying, and
Controlling
Industrial Process
Variables.
334514........... Totalizing Fluid 500 750
Meter and Counting
Device Manufacturing.
334515........... Instrument 500 750
Manufacturing for
Measuring and
Testing Electricity
and Electrical
Signals.
334516........... Analytical Laboratory 500 1,000
Instrument
Manufacturing.
334517........... Irradiation Apparatus 500 1,000
Manufacturing.
334614........... Software and Other 750 1,250
Prerecorded Compact
Disc, Tape, and
Record Reproducing.
335110........... Electric Lamp Bulb 1,000 1,250
and Part
Manufacturing.
335121........... Residential Electric 500 750
Lighting Fixture
Manufacturing.
335210........... Small Electrical 750 1,500
Appliance
Manufacturing.
335221........... Household Cooking 750 1,500
Appliance
Manufacturing.
335222........... Household 1,000 1,250
Refrigerator and
Home Freezer
Manufacturing.
335224........... Household Laundry 1,000 1,250
Equipment
Manufacturing.
335228........... Other Major Household 500 1,000
Appliance
Manufacturing.
335312........... Motor and Generator 1,000 1,250
Manufacturing.
335313........... Switchgear and 750 1,250
Switchboard
Apparatus
Manufacturing.
335911........... Storage Battery 500 1,250
Manufacturing.
335932........... Noncurrent-Carrying 500 1,000
Wiring Device
Manufacturing.
336111........... Automobile 1,000 1,500
Manufacturing.
336112........... Light Truck and 1,000 1,500
Utility Vehicle
Manufacturing.
336120........... Heavy Duty Truck 1,000 1,500
Manufacturing.
336212........... Truck Trailer 500 1,000
Manufacturing.
336213........... Motor Home 1,000 1,250
Manufacturing.
336214........... Travel Trailer and 500 1,000
Camper Manufacturing.
336310........... Motor Vehicle 750 1,000
Gasoline Engine and
Engine Parts
Manufacturing.
336320........... Motor Vehicle 750 1,000
Electrical and
Electronic Equipment
Manufacturing.
336330........... Motor Vehicle 750 1,000
Steering and
Suspension
Components (except
Spring)
Manufacturing.
336340........... Motor Vehicle Brake 750 1,250
System Manufacturing.
336350........... Motor Vehicle 750 1,500
Transmission and
Power Train Parts
Manufacturing.
336360........... Motor Vehicle Seating 500 1,500
and Interior Trim
Manufacturing.
336370........... Motor Vehicle Metal 500 1,000
Stamping.
336390........... Other Motor Vehicle 750 1,000
Parts Manufacturing.
336412........... Aircraft Engine and 1,000 1,500
Engine Parts
Manufacturing.
336413........... Other Aircraft Parts 1,000 1,250
and Auxiliary
Equipment
Manufacturing.
336414........... Guided Missile and 1,000 1,250
Space Vehicle
Manufacturing.
336415........... Guided Missile and 1,000 1,250
Space Vehicle
Propulsion Unit and
Propulsion Unit
Parts Manufacturing.
336510........... Railroad Rolling 1,000 1,500
Stock Manufacturing.
336611........... Ship Building and 1,000 1,250
Repairing.
336612........... Boat Building........ 500 1,000
336991........... Motorcycle, Bicycle, 500 1,000
and Parts
Manufacturing.
336992........... Military Armored 1,000 1,500
Vehicle, Tank, and
Tank Component
Manufacturing.
336999........... All Other 500 1,000
Transportation
Equipment
Manufacturing.
337110........... Wood Kitchen Cabinet 500 750
and Countertop
Manufacturing.
337121........... Upholstered Household 500 1,000
Furniture
Manufacturing.
337122........... Nonupholstered Wood 500 750
Household Furniture
Manufacturing.
337124........... Metal Household 500 750
Furniture
Manufacturing.
337125........... Household Furniture 500 750
(except Wood and
Metal) Manufacturing.
337211........... Wood Office Furniture 500 1,000
Manufacturing.
337214........... Office Furniture 500 1,000
(except Wood)
Manufacturing.
337910........... Mattress 500 1,000
Manufacturing.
337920........... Blind and Shade 500 1,000
Manufacturing.
339112........... Surgical and Medical 500 1,000
Instrument
Manufacturing.
339113........... Surgical Appliance 500 750
and Supplies
Manufacturing.
339114........... Dental Equipment and 500 750
Supplies
Manufacturing.
339115........... Ophthalmic Goods 500 1,000
Manufacturing.
[[Page 4483]]
339920........... Sporting and Athletic 500 750
Goods Manufacturing.
339940........... Office Supplies 500 750
(except Paper)
Manufacturing.
339992........... Musical Instrument 500 1,000
Manufacturing.
339993........... Fastener, Button, 500 750
Needle, and Pin
Manufacturing.
339995........... Burial Casket 500 1,000
Manufacturing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evaluation of Dominance in Field of Operation
Section 3(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)) defines a
small business concern as one that: (1) Is independently owned and
operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (3) meets
a specific small business definition or size standard established by
SBA's Administrator. SBA considers as part of its evaluation whether a
business concern at a proposed or revised size standard would be
dominant in its field of operation. SBA has determined that for the
industries for which it has revised size standards in this final rule,
no individual firm at or below the revised size standard will be large
enough to dominate its field of operation. At the revised size
standards that are adopted in this final rule, the small business share
of total industry receipts among those industries for which SBA has
revised size standards is, on average, 1.7 percent, ranging from a
minimum of 0.02 percent to a maximum of 18.9 percent. SBA determines
that these market shares effectively preclude a firm at or below the
revised size standards from exerting control on any of the industries.
Compliance With Executive Orders 12866, 13563, 12988 and 13132, the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Ch. 35) and the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612)
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
final rule is a significant regulatory action for purposes of Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, in the next section SBA provides a Regulatory
Impact Analysis of this rule. However, this rule is not a ``major
rule'' under the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 800.
Regulatory Impact Analysis
1. Is there a need for the regulatory action?
SBA believes that the size standards revisions in this rule are a
better reflection of the economic characteristics of small businesses
and the Federal government marketplace in the affected industries.
SBA's mission is to aid and assist small businesses through a variety
of financial, procurement, business development, and advocacy programs.
To determine the intended beneficiaries of these programs, SBA
establishes distinct definitions of which businesses are deemed small
businesses. The Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)) delegates to
SBA's Administrator the responsibility for establishing small business
definitions. The Act also requires that small business definitions vary
to reflect industry differences. The Jobs Act further requires SBA to
review all size standards and make necessary adjustments to reflect
market conditions. The supplementary information section of this rule
explains SBA's methodology for analyzing a size standard for a
particular industry.
2. What are the potential benefits and costs of this regulatory action?
The most significant benefit to businesses affected by this rule is
their gaining or maintaining eligibility for Federal small business
assistance programs. These include SBA's financial assistance programs,
economic injury disaster loans, and Federal procurement programs
intended for small businesses. Federal procurement programs provide
targeted opportunities for small businesses under SBA's business
development programs, such as 8(a), Small Disadvantaged Businesses
(SDB), small businesses located in Historically Underutilized Business
Zones (HUBZone), women-owned small businesses (WOSB), economically
disadvantaged women-owned small businesses (EDWOSB), and service-
disabled veteran-owned small businesses (SDVOSB). Federal agencies may
also use SBA's size standards for a variety of other regulatory and
program purposes. These programs assist small businesses to become more
knowledgeable, stable, and competitive. SBA estimates that in the 209
industries for which it is increasing size standards about 1,250 firms,
not small under the current size standards, will become small and
therefore eligible for these programs. That is about 0.4 percent of all
firms classified as small under the current size standards in all
industries that SBA reviewed for the September 10, 2014 proposed rule
and this final rule. SBA anticipates that the small business share of
total receipts in those industries will increase from 26 percent to 29
percent.
Four groups can benefit from the revised size standards: (1) Some
businesses that are above the current size standards may gain small
business status under the higher size standards, thereby enabling them
to participate in Federal small business assistance programs; (2)
growing small businesses that are close to exceeding the current size
standards will be able to retain their small business status under the
higher size standards, thereby enabling them to continue their
participation in the programs; (3) Federal agencies that will have a
larger pool of small businesses from which to draw for their small
business procurement programs; and, (4) wholesalers and dealers that
sell products to the Federal government as small businesses under the
nonmanufacturer rule (13 CFR 121.406(b)) will have additional sources
of goods to fill their orders.
SBA estimates that firms gaining small business status under the
revised size standards might receive Federal contracts totaling $150
million to $160 million annually under SBA's small business, 8(a), SDB,
HUBZone, WOSB, EDWOSB, and SDVOSB Programs, as well as other
unrestricted procurements. The added competition for many of these
procurements can also result in lower prices to the Government for
procurements reserved for small businesses, but SBA cannot quantify
this benefit.
SBA provides financial assistance to small businesses under its
7(a) and 504 Loan Programs. Under SBA's 7(a) and 504 Loan Programs,
based on the fiscal years 2012-2014 data, SBA estimates approximately
20 to 25 SBA loans
[[Page 4484]]
totaling about $10 million to $15.0 million could be made to these
newly defined small businesses under the revised size standards.
However, it is impractical to try to estimate the number and total
amount of loans with any precision. There are two reasons for this: (1)
Under the Jobs Act, SBA can now guarantee substantially larger loans
than in the past; and (2) as described above, the Jobs Act established
a higher alternative size standard ($15 million in tangible net worth
and $5 million in net income after income taxes) for business concerns
that do not meet the size standards for their industry.
Newly defined small businesses will also benefit from SBA's
Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) Program. Since this program is
contingent on the occurrence and severity of a disaster in the future,
SBA cannot make a meaningful estimate of this impact.
In addition, newly defined small businesses will also benefit
through reduced fees, less paperwork, and fewer compliance requirements
that are available to small businesses throughout the Federal
government.
To the extent that 1,250 newly defined small firms may become
active in Federal procurement programs, the revised size standards
might also add administrative costs to the government because there are
now more businesses eligible for Federal small business programs. For
example, there will be more firms seeking SBA's guaranteed loans, more
firms eligible for enrollment in the SAM database, and more firms
seeking certification as 8(a) or HUBZone firms or qualifying for small
business, WOSB, EDWOSB, SDVOSB, and SDB status. Among those newly
defined small businesses seeking Federal assistance, there could be
additional costs associated with compliance and verification of small
business status and administration of size protests. However, SBA
believes that these added administrative costs will be minimal because
there are mechanisms in place to handle these requirements.
Additionally, some Federal government contracts might have higher
costs. With a greater number of businesses defined as small under the
revised size standards, Federal agencies may set aside more contracts
to small businesses, rather than use full and open competition. The
movement from unrestricted to small business set-aside contracting
might result in competition among fewer total bidders, although there
will be more small businesses eligible to submit offers. However, the
additional costs associated with fewer bidders are expected to be minor
since, by law, procurements may be set aside or reserved for the small
business, 8(a), HUBZone, WOSB, EDWOSB, or SDVOSB Programs only if
awards are expected to be made at fair and reasonable prices. In
addition, there may be higher costs when more full and open contracts
are awarded to HUBZone businesses that receive price evaluation
preferences.
Revised size standards might have distributional effects among
large and small business contractors. Although SBA cannot estimate with
certainty the actual outcome of the gains and losses among small and
large businesses, it can identify several probable impacts. Some
Federal contracts may be transferred to small businesses from large
businesses. Large businesses may have fewer Federal contract
opportunities as Federal agencies decide to set aside more contracts
for small businesses. In addition, some Federal contracts may be
awarded to HUBZone concerns instead of large businesses since they are
eligible for price evaluation preferences when they compete on a full
and open basis.
Similarly, some businesses defined small under the current size
standards may receive fewer Federal contracts due to increased
competition from more businesses now defined as small under higher size
standards. This transfer may be offset by a greater number of small
business set-aside procurements. The number of newly defined and
expanding small businesses that are willing and able to sell to the
Federal government will limit the potential transfer of contracts from
large and currently defined small businesses. Because there are so many
variables affecting the Federal market, SBA cannot estimate the
potential distributional impacts of these transfers with any degree of
precision.
The increased size standards for 209 industries and the
modification of the size standard for NAICS 324110 in Sector 31-33 are
consistent with SBA's statutory mandate to assist small business. This
regulatory action promotes the Administration's objectives. One of
SBA's goals in support of the Administration's objectives is to help
individual small businesses succeed through fair and equitable access
to capital and credit, Government contracts, and management and
technical assistance. Reviewing and modifying size standards, when
appropriate, ensures that intended beneficiaries have access to small
business programs designed to assist them.
Executive Order 13563
Descriptions of the need for this regulatory action and benefits
and costs associated with this action including possible distributional
impacts that relate to Executive Order 13563 are included in the
Regulatory Impact Analysis under Executive Order 12866, above.
In an effort to engage interested parties in this action, SBA
presented its size standards methodology (discussed above under
Supplementary Information) to various industry associations and trade
groups. SBA also met with a number of industry groups and individual
businesses to get their feedback on its methodology and other size
standards issues. The Agency additionally conferred with Federal
procurement officials that purchase products manufactured by a number
of industries for which SBA proposed to increase size standards. In
addition, as part of its Jobs Act tour SBA presented its size standards
methodology to businesses in 13 cities in the U.S. and sought their
input. The presentations included information on the latest status of
the comprehensive size standards review and on how interested parties
can provide SBA with input and feedback on size standards.
Moreover, SBA sent letters to the Directors of the Offices of Small
and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU) at several Federal
agencies with considerable procurement responsibilities requesting
their feedback on how the agencies use SBA's size standards and whether
current size standards meet their programmatic needs (both procurement
and non-procurement). SBA gave appropriate consideration to all input,
suggestions, recommendations, and relevant information obtained from
industry groups, individual businesses, and Federal agencies in
preparing this rule.
Finally, the SBA has maintained a roster of parties (government and
industry) that have expressed interest in various manufacturing
industries over the last few years, and sent each of them a copy of the
September 10, 2014 proposed rule to assure they had ample time and
opportunity to provide comments.
Increasing size standards for the industries covered in this rule
is consistent with Executive Order 13563, Section 6, calling for
retrospective analyses of existing rules. The last comprehensive review
of size standards occurred during the late 1970s and early 1980s. Since
then, except for periodic adjustments for monetary based size
standards, most reviews of size
[[Page 4485]]
standards were limited to a few specific industries in response to
requests from the public and from Federal agencies. The majority of
employee based size standards, including those in NAICS Sector 31-33,
have not been reviewed since they were first established. SBA
recognizes that changes in industry structure and the Federal
marketplace over time have rendered existing size standards for some
industries no longer supportable by current data. Accordingly, in 2007,
SBA began a comprehensive review of its size standards to ensure that
existing size standards have supportable bases and to revise them when
necessary. In addition, the Jobs Act requires SBA to conduct a detailed
review of all size standards and to make appropriate adjustments to
reflect market conditions. Specifically, the Jobs Act requires SBA to
conduct a detailed review of at least one-third of all size standards
during every 18-month period from the date of its enactment and do a
complete review of all size standards not less frequently than once
every 5 years thereafter.
Executive Order 12988
This action meets applicable standards set forth in Sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. The action does not
have retroactive or preemptive effect.
Executive Order 13132
For purposes of Executive Order 13132, SBA has determined that this
rule has no substantial, direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. Therefore, SBA has determined that this rule has no
federalism implications warranting preparation of a federalism
assessment.
Paperwork Reduction Act
For the purpose of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Ch. 35,
SBA has determined that this rule imposes no new reporting or record
keeping requirements.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), this rule may have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small businesses in the
industries covered by this rule. As described above, this rule may
affect small businesses seeking Federal contracts, loans under SBA's
7(a), 504 and Economic Injury Disaster Loan Programs, and assistance
under other Federal small business programs.
Immediately below, SBA sets forth a final regulatory flexibility
analysis (FRFA) of this rule addressing the following questions: (1)
What are the need for and objective of the rule? (2) What are SBA's
description and estimate of the number of small businesses to which the
rule applies? (3) What are the projected reporting, record keeping, and
other compliance requirements of the rule? (4) What are the relevant
Federal rules that may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the rule?
and (5) What alternatives will allow the Agency to accomplish its
regulatory objectives while minimizing the impact on small businesses?
1. What are the need for and objective of the rule?
Changes in industry structure, technological changes, productivity
growth, mergers and acquisitions, and updated industry definitions have
changed the structure of many industries reviewed in the September 10,
2014 proposed rule and this final rule. Such changes can be sufficient
to warrant revisions to current size standards for some industries.
Based on the analysis of the latest data available, SBA believes that
the revised size standards in this rule more appropriately reflect the
size of businesses that need Federal assistance. The Jobs Act also
requires SBA to review all size standards and make necessary
adjustments to reflect market conditions.
2. What are SBA's description and estimate of the number of small
businesses to which the rule will apply?
SBA estimates that about 1,250 additional firms will become small
because of revised size standards for 209 industries in NAICS Sector
31-33. That represents 0.4 percent of total firms that are small under
current size standards in all industries in that Sector. This will
result in an increase in the small business share of total industry
receipts in Sector 31-33 from 26 percent under the current size
standards to 29 percent under the size standards adopted in this final
rule. The revised size standards will enable more small businesses to
retain their small business status for a longer period and many others
to regain small business status that may have exceeded current size
standards, making it difficult for them to compete with companies that
are significantly larger than they are. SBA believes that the overall
impact of this rule will be positive for existing small businesses, as
well as for those that exceed the current size standards but are on the
low end of those that are not small. They might otherwise be called or
referred to as mid-sized businesses, although SBA only defines what is
a small business concern. That is, entities that do not meet SBA's
small business size standards are considered ``other than small.''
3. What are the projected reporting, record keeping and other
compliance requirements of the rule?
The size standard changes impose no additional reporting or record
keeping requirements on small businesses. However, qualifying for
Federal procurement and a number of other programs requires that
businesses register in the SAM database and certify in SAM that they
are small at least once annually. Therefore, businesses opting to
participate in those programs must comply with SAM requirements.
Additionally, businesses affected by the changes, if they are already
registered in SAM, must update their certifications and affirmations.
However, there are no costs associated with SAM registration or
certification. Changing size standards alters access to SBA's programs
designed to assist small businesses, but does not impose a regulatory
burden because they neither regulate nor control business behavior.
4. What are the relevant Federal rules, which may duplicate, overlap or
conflict with the rule?
Under Sec. 3(a)(2)(C) of the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C.
632(a)(2)(c), Federal agencies must use SBA's size standards to define
a small business, unless specifically authorized by statute to do
otherwise. In 1995, SBA published in the Federal Register a ``Table of
Statutory and Regulatory Size Standards Set by Agencies Other than
SBA'' (60 FR 57988, November 24, 1995). SBA is not aware of any Federal
rule that would duplicate or conflict with establishing size standards.
However, the Small Business Act and SBA's regulations allow Federal
agencies to develop different size standards if they believe that SBA's
size standards are not appropriate for their programs, with the
approval of SBA's Administrator (13 CFR 121.903). The Regulatory
Flexibility Act authorizes an agency to establish an alternative small
business definition for purposes of compliance with that Act, after
consultation with the Office of Advocacy of the U.S. Small Business
Administration (5 U.S.C. 601(3)).
[[Page 4486]]
5. What alternatives will allow the Agency to accomplish its regulatory
objectives while minimizing the impact on small entities?
By law, SBA is required to develop numerical size standards for
establishing eligibility for Federal small business assistance
programs. Other than varying size standards by industry and changing
the size measures, no practical alternative exists to the system of
numerical size standards.
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 121
Administrative practice and procedure, Government procurement,
Government property, Grant programs--business, Individuals with
disabilities, Loan programs--business, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Small businesses.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, SBA amends 13 CFR part
121 as follows:
PART 121--SMALL BUSINESS SIZE REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 121 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 632, 634(b)(6), 662, and 694a(9).
2. Amend Sec. 121.201 in the table ``Small Business Size Standards
by NAICS Industry'' as follows:
a. Revise the entries for ``311111'', ``311211'', ``311221'',
``311314'', ``311340'', ``311351'', ``311352'', ``311411'', ``311412'',
``311421'', ``311422'', ``311423'', ``311511'', ``311512'', ``311513'',
``311514'', ``311520'', ``311611'', ``311612'', ``311613'', ``311615'',
``311710'', ``311812'', ``311813'', ``311821'', ``311824'', ``311830'',
``311911'', ``311919'', ``311920'', ``311930'', ``311941'', ``312111'',
``312112'', ``312113'', ``312120'', ``312130'', ``312140'', ``312230'',
``313110'', ``313230'', ``314110'', ``314120'', ``315110'', ``315190'',
``315210'', ``315220'', ``315240'', ``315280'', ``316992'', ``321212'',
``321213'', ``321219'', ``321911'', ``321991'', ``322121'', ``322130'',
``322211'', ``322219'', ``322220'', ``322230'', ``322291'', ``323117'',
``324110'', ``324191'', ``325194'', ``325199'', ``325211'', ``325312'',
``325320'', ``325411'', ``325412'', ``325413'', ``325414'', ``325510'',
``325611'', ``325612'', ``325613'', ``325620'', ``325992'', ``326111'',
``326112'', ``326113'', ``326122'', ``326140'', ``326150'', ``326160'',
``326191'', ``326211'', ``326220'', ``326291'', ``327110'', ``327212'',
``327213'', ``327215'', ``327310'', ``327332'', ``327410'', ``327420'',
``327910'', ``327993'', ``331110'', ``331315'', ``331511'', ``331512'',
``332111'', ``332112'', ``332215'', ``332216'', ``332311'', ``332313'',
``332321'', ``332410'', ``332420'', ``332431'', ``332510'', ``332911'',
``332912'', ``332913'', ``332919'', ``332991'', ``332992'', ``333111'',
``333112'', ``333120'', ``333132'', ``333242'', ``333244'', ``333415'',
``333611'', ``333612'', ``333613'', ``333618'', ``333911'', ``333912'',
``333913'', ``333921'', ``333923'', ``333992'', ``333995'', ``333996'',
``334111'', ``334112'', ``334210'', ``334220'', ``334412'', ``334413'',
``334417'', ``334418'', ``334510'', ``334511'', ``334513'', ``334514'',
``334515'', ``334516'', ``334517'', ``334614'', ``335110'', ``335121'',
``335210'', ``335221'', ``335222'', ``335224'', ``335228'', ``335312'',
``335313'', ``335911'', ``335932'', ``336111'', ``336112'', ``336120'',
``336212'', ``336213'', ``336214'', ``336310'', ``336320'', ``336330'',
``336340'', ``336350'', ``336360'', ``336370'', ``336390'', ``336412'',
``336413'', ``336414'', ``336415'', ``336510'', ``336611'', ``336612'',
``336991'', ``336992'', ``336999'', ``337110'', ``337121'', ``337122'',
``337124'', ``337125'', ``337211'', ``337214'', ``337910'', ``337920'',
``339112'', ``339113'', ``339114'', ``339115'', ``339920'', ``339940'',
“339992'', ``339993'', and ``339995''; and
0
b. Revise footnotes 3, 4, 5, and 7.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 121.201 What size standards has SBA identified by North American
Industry Classification System codes?
* * * * *
Small Business Size Standards by NAICS Industry
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Size standards Size standards
NAICS codes NAICS U.S. industry in millions of in number of
title dollars employees
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
311111........... Dog and Cat Food .............. 1,000
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
311211........... Flour Milling........ .............. 1,000
* * * * * * *
311221........... Wet Corn Milling..... .............. 1,250
* * * * * * *
311314........... Cane Sugar .............. 1,000
Manufacturing.
311340........... Nonchocolate .............. 1,000
Confectionery
Manufacturing.
311351........... Chocolate and .............. 1,250
Confectionery
Manufacturing from
Cacao Beans.
311352........... Confectionery .............. 1,000
Manufacturing from
Purchased Chocolate.
311411........... Frozen Fruit, Juice, .............. 1,000
and Vegetable
Manufacturing.
311412........... Frozen Specialty Food .............. 1,250
Manufacturing.
311421........... Fruit and Vegetable .............. \3\ 1,000
Canning \3\.
311422........... Specialty Canning.... .............. 1,250
311423........... Dried and Dehydrated .............. 750
Food Manufacturing.
311511........... Fluid Milk .............. 1,000
Manufacturing.
311512........... Creamery Butter .............. 750
Manufacturing.
311513........... Cheese Manufacturing. .............. 1,250
311514........... Dry, Condensed, and .............. 750
Evaporated Dairy
Product
Manufacturing.
311520........... Ice Cream and Frozen .............. 1,000
Dessert
Manufacturing.
311611........... Animal (except .............. 1,000
Poultry)
Slaughtering.
311612........... Meat Processed from .............. 1,000
Carcasses.
[[Page 4487]]
311613........... Rendering and Meat .............. 750
Byproduct Processing.
311615........... Poultry Processing... .............. 1,250
311710........... Seafood Product .............. 750
Preparation and
Packaging.
* * * * * * *
311812........... Commercial Bakeries.. .............. 1,000
311813........... Frozen Cakes, Pies, .............. 750
and Other Pastries
Manufacturing.
311821........... Cookie and Cracker .............. 1,250
Manufacturing.
311824........... Dry Pasta, Dough, and .............. 750
Flour Mixes
Manufacturing from
Purchased Flour.
311830........... Tortilla .............. 1,250
Manufacturing.
311911........... Roasted Nuts and .............. 750
Peanut Butter
Manufacturing.
311919........... Other Snack Food .............. 1,250
Manufacturing.
311920........... Coffee and Tea .............. 750
Manufacturing.
311930........... Flavoring Syrup and .............. 1,000
Concentrate
Manufacturing.
311941........... Mayonnaise, Dressing, .............. 750
and Other Prepared
Sauce Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
312111........... Soft Drink .............. 1,250
Manufacturing.
312112........... Bottled Water .............. 1,000
Manufacturing.
312113........... Ice Manufacturing.... .............. 750
312120........... Breweries............ .............. 1,250
312130........... Wineries............. .............. 1,000
312140........... Distilleries......... .............. 1,000
312230........... Tobacco Manufacturing .............. 1,500
313110........... Fiber, Yarn, and .............. 1,250
Thread Mills.
* * * * * * *
313230........... Nonwoven Fabric Mills .............. 750
* * * * * * *
314110........... Carpet and Rug Mills. .............. 1,500
314120........... Curtain and Linen .............. 750
Mills.
* * * * * * *
315110........... Hosiery and Sock .............. 750
Mills.
315190........... Other Apparel .............. 750
Knitting Mills.
315210........... Cut and Sew Apparel .............. 750
Contractors.
315220........... Men's and Boys' Cut .............. 750
and Sew Apparel
Manufacturing.
315240........... Women's, Girls', and .............. 750
Infants' Cut and Sew
Apparel
Manufacturing.
315280........... Other Cut and Sew .............. 750
Apparel
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
316992........... Women's Handbag and .............. 750
Purse Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
321212........... Softwood Veneer and .............. 1,250
Plywood
Manufacturing.
321213........... Engineered Wood .............. 750
Member (except
Truss) Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
321219........... Reconstituted Wood .............. 750
Product
Manufacturing.
321911........... Wood Window and Door .............. 1,000
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
321991........... Manufactured Home .............. 1,250
(Mobile Home)
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
322121........... Paper (except .............. 1,250
Newsprint) Mills.
* * * * * * *
322130........... Paperboard Mills..... .............. 1,250
322211........... Corrugated and Solid .............. 1,250
Fiber Box
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
322219........... Other Paperboard .............. 1,000
Container
Manufacturing.
322220........... Paper Bag and Coated .............. 750
and Treated Paper
Manufacturing.
322230........... Stationery Product .............. 750
Manufacturing.
322291........... Sanitary Paper .............. 1,500
Product
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
323117........... Books Printing....... .............. 1,250
[[Page 4488]]
* * * * * * *
324110........... Petroleum Refineries .............. \4\ 1,500
\4\.
* * * * * * *
324191........... Petroleum Lubricating .............. 750
Oil and Grease
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
325194........... Cyclic Crude, .............. 1,250
Intermediate, and
Gum and Wood
Chemical
Manufacturing.
325199........... All Other Basic .............. 1,250
Organic Chemical
Manufacturing.
325211........... Plastics Material and .............. 1,250
Resin Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
325312........... Phosphatic Fertilizer .............. 750
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
325320........... Pesticide and Other .............. 1,000
Agricultural
Chemical
Manufacturing.
325411........... Medicinal and .............. 1,000
Botanical
Manufacturing.
325412........... Pharmaceutical .............. 1,250
Preparation
Manufacturing.
325413........... In[dash]Vitro .............. 1,250
Diagnostic Substance
Manufacturing.
325414........... Biological Product .............. 1,250
(except Diagnostic)
Manufacturing.
325510........... Paint and Coating .............. 1,000
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
325611........... Soap and Other .............. 1,000
Detergent
Manufacturing.
325612........... Polish and Other .............. 750
Sanitation Good
Manufacturing.
325613........... Surface Active Agent .............. 750
Manufacturing.
325620........... Toilet Preparation .............. 1,250
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
325992........... Photographic Film, .............. 1,500
Paper, Plate, and
Chemical
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
326111........... Plastics Bag and .............. 750
Pouch Manufacturing.
326112........... Plastics Packaging .............. 1,000
Film and Sheet
(including
Laminated)
Manufacturing.
326113........... Unlaminated Plastics .............. 750
Film and Sheet
(except Packaging)
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
326122........... Plastics Pipe and .............. 750
Pipe Fitting
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
326140........... Polystyrene Foam .............. 1,000
Product
Manufacturing.
326150........... Urethane and Other .............. 750
Foam Product (except
Polystyrene)
Manufacturing.
326160........... Plastics Bottle .............. 1,250
Manufacturing.
326191........... Plastics Plumbing .............. 750
Fixture
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
326211........... Tire Manufacturing .............. \5\ 1,500
(except Retreading)
\5\.
* * * * * * *
326220........... Rubber and Plastics .............. 750
Hoses and Belting
Manufacturing.
326291........... Rubber Product .............. 750
Manufacturing for
Mechanical Use.
* * * * * * *
327110........... Pottery, Ceramics, .............. 1,000
and Plumbing Fixture
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
327212........... Other Pressed and .............. 1,250
Blown Glass and
Glassware
Manufacturing.
327213........... Glass Container .............. 1,250
Manufacturing.
327215........... Glass Product .............. 1,000
Manufacturing Made
of Purchased Glass.
327310........... Cement Manufacturing. .............. 1,000
* * * * * * *
327332........... Concrete Pipe .............. 750
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
327410........... Lime Manufacturing... .............. 750
327420........... Gypsum Product .............. 1,500
Manufacturing.
327910........... Abrasive Product .............. 750
Manufacturing.
[[Page 4489]]
* * * * * * *
327993........... Mineral Wool .............. 1,500
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
331110........... Iron and Steel Mills .............. 1,500
and Ferroalloy
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
331315........... Aluminum Sheet, .............. 1,250
Plate, and Foil
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
331511........... Iron Foundries....... .............. 1,000
331512........... Steel Investment .............. 1,000
Foundries.
* * * * * * *
332111........... Iron and Steel .............. 750
Forging.
332112........... Nonferrous Forging... .............. 750
* * * * * * *
332215........... Metal Kitchen .............. 750
Cookware, Utensil,
Cutlery, and
Flatware (except
Precious)
Manufacturing.
332216........... Saw Blade and .............. 750
Handtool
Manufacturing.
332311........... Prefabricated Metal .............. 750
Building and
Component
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
332313........... Plate Work .............. 750
Manufacturing.
332321........... Metal Window and Door .............. 750
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
332410........... Power Boiler and Heat .............. 750
Exchanger
Manufacturing.
332420........... Metal Tank (Heavy .............. 750
Gauge) Manufacturing.
332431........... Metal Can .............. 1,500
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
332510........... Hardware .............. 750
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
332911........... Industrial Valve .............. 750
Manufacturing.
332912........... Fluid Power Valve and .............. 1,000
Hose Fitting
Manufacturing.
332913........... Plumbing Fixture .............. 1,000
Fitting and Trim
Manufacturing.
332919........... Other Metal Valve and .............. 750
Pipe Fitting
Manufacturing.
332991........... Ball and Roller .............. 1,250
Bearing
Manufacturing.
332992........... Small Arms Ammunition .............. 1,250
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
333111........... Farm Machinery and .............. 1,250
Equipment
Manufacturing.
333112........... Lawn and Garden .............. 1,500
Tractor and Home
Lawn and Garden
Equipment
Manufacturing.
333120........... Construction .............. 1,250
Machinery
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
333132........... Oil and Gas Field .............. 1,250
Machinery and
Equipment
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
333242........... Semiconductor .............. 1,500
Machinery
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
333244........... Printing Machinery .............. 750
and Equipment
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
333415........... Air-Conditioning and .............. 1,250
Warm Air Heating
Equipment and
Commercial and
Industrial
Refrigeration
Equipment
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
333611........... Turbine and Turbine .............. 1,500
Generator Set Units
Manufacturing.
333612........... Speed Changer, .............. 750
Industrial High-
Speed Drive, and
Gear Manufacturing.
333613........... Mechanical Power .............. 750
Transmission
Equipment
Manufacturing.
333618........... Other Engine .............. 1,500
Equipment
Manufacturing.
333911........... Pump and Pumping .............. 750
Equipment
Manufacturing.
333912........... Air and Gas .............. 1,000
Compressor
Manufacturing.
333913........... Measuring and .............. 750
Dispensing Pump
Manufacturing.
333921........... Elevator and Moving .............. 1,000
Stairway
Manufacturing.
[[Page 4490]]
* * * * * * *
333923........... Overhead Traveling .............. 1,250
Crane, Hoist, and
Monorail System
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
333992........... Welding and Soldering .............. 1,250
Equipment
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
333995........... Fluid Power Cylinder .............. 750
and Actuator
Manufacturing.
333996........... Fluid Power Pump and .............. 1,250
Motor Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
334111........... Electronic Computer .............. 1,250
Manufacturing.
334112........... Computer Storage .............. 1,250
Device Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
334210........... Telephone Apparatus .............. 1,250
Manufacturing.
334220........... Radio and Television .............. 1,250
Broadcasting and
Wireless
Communications
Equipment
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
334412........... Bare Printed Circuit .............. 750
Board Manufacturing.
334413........... Semiconductor and .............. 1,250
Related Device
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
334417........... Electronic Connector .............. 1,000
Manufacturing.
334418........... Printed Circuit .............. 750
Assembly (Electronic
Assembly)
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
334510........... Electromedical and .............. 1,250
Electrotherapeutic
Apparatus
Manufacturing.
334511........... Search, Detection, .............. 1,250
Navigation,
Guidance,
Aeronautical, and
Nautical System and
Instrument
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
334513........... Instruments and .............. 750
Related Products
Manufacturing for
Measuring,
Displaying, and
Controlling
Industrial Process
Variables.
334514........... Totalizing Fluid .............. 750
Meter and Counting
Device Manufacturing.
334515........... Instrument .............. 750
Manufacturing for
Measuring and
Testing Electricity
and Electrical
Signals.
334516........... Analytical Laboratory .............. 1,000
Instrument
Manufacturing.
334517........... Irradiation Apparatus .............. 1,000
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
334614........... Software and Other .............. 1,250
Prerecorded Compact
Disc, Tape, and
Record Reproducing.
335110........... Electric Lamp Bulb .............. 1,250
and Part
Manufacturing.
335121........... Residential Electric .............. 750
Lighting Fixture
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
335210........... Small Electrical .............. 1,500
Appliance
Manufacturing.
335221........... Household Cooking .............. 1,500
Appliance
Manufacturing.
335222........... Household .............. 1,250
Refrigerator and
Home Freezer
Manufacturing.
335224........... Household Laundry .............. 1,250
Equipment
Manufacturing.
335228........... Other Major Household .............. 1,000
Appliance
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
335312........... Motor and Generator .............. 1,250
Manufacturing.
335313........... Switchgear and .............. 1,250
Switchboard
Apparatus
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
335911........... Storage Battery .............. 1,250
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
335932........... Noncurrent-Carrying .............. 1,000
Wiring Device
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
336111........... Automobile .............. 1,500
Manufacturing.
336112........... Light Truck and .............. 1,500
Utility Vehicle
Manufacturing.
336120........... Heavy Duty Truck .............. 1,500
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
336212........... Truck Trailer .............. 1,000
Manufacturing.
336213........... Motor Home .............. 1,250
Manufacturing.
336214........... Travel Trailer and .............. 1,000
Camper Manufacturing.
[[Page 4491]]
336310........... Motor Vehicle .............. 1,000
Gasoline Engine and
Engine Parts
Manufacturing.
336320........... Motor Vehicle .............. 1,000
Electrical and
Electronic Equipment
Manufacturing.
336330........... Motor Vehicle .............. 1,000
Steering and
Suspension
Components (except
Spring)
Manufacturing.
336340........... Motor Vehicle Brake .............. 1,250
System Manufacturing.
336350........... Motor Vehicle .............. 1,500
Transmission and
Power Train Parts
Manufacturing.
336360........... Motor Vehicle Seating .............. 1,500
and Interior Trim
Manufacturing.
336370........... Motor Vehicle Metal .............. 1,000
Stamping.
336390........... Other Motor Vehicle .............. 1,000
Parts Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
336412........... Aircraft Engine and .............. 1,500
Engine Parts
Manufacturing.
336413........... Other Aircraft Parts .............. \7\ 1,250
and Auxiliary
Equipment
Manufacturing \7\.
336414........... Guided Missile and .............. 1,250
Space Vehicle
Manufacturing.
336415........... Guided Missile and .............. 1,250
Space Vehicle
Propulsion Unit and
Propulsion Unit
Parts Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
336510........... Railroad Rolling .............. 1,500
Stock Manufacturing.
336611........... Ship Building and .............. 1,250
Repairing.
336612........... Boat Building........ .............. 1,000
336991........... Motorcycle, Bicycle, .............. 1,000
and Parts
Manufacturing.
336992........... Military Armored .............. 1,500
Vehicle, Tank, and
Tank Component
Manufacturing.
336999........... All Other .............. 1,000
Transportation
Equipment
Manufacturing.
337110........... Wood Kitchen Cabinet .............. 750
and Countertop
Manufacturing.
337121........... Upholstered Household .............. 1,000
Furniture
Manufacturing.
337122........... Nonupholstered Wood .............. 750
Household Furniture
Manufacturing.
337124........... Metal Household .............. 750
Furniture
Manufacturing.
337125........... Household Furniture .............. 750
(except Wood and
Metal) Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
337211........... Wood Office Furniture .............. 1,000
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
337214........... Office Furniture .............. 1,000
(except Wood)
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
337910........... Mattress .............. 1,000
Manufacturing.
337920........... Blind and Shade .............. 1,000
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
339112........... Surgical and Medical .............. 1,000
Instrument
Manufacturing.
339113........... Surgical Appliance .............. 750
and Supplies
Manufacturing.
339114........... Dental Equipment and .............. 750
Supplies
Manufacturing.
339115........... Ophthalmic Goods .............. 1,000
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
339920........... Sporting and Athletic .............. 750
Goods Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
339940........... Office Supplies .............. 750
(except Paper)
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
339992........... Musical Instrument .............. 1,000
Manufacturing.
339993........... Fastener, Button, .............. 750
Needle, and Pin
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
339995........... Burial Casket .............. 1,000
Manufacturing.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Footnotes
* * * * *
3. NAICS code 311421--For purposes of Government procurement for
food canning and preserving, the standard of 1,000 employees excludes
agricultural labor as defined in 3306(k) of the Internal Revenue Code,
26 U.S.C. 3306(k).
4. NAICS code 324110--To qualify as small for purposes of
Government procurement, the petroleum refiner, including its
affiliates, must be a concern that has either no more than 1,500
employees or no more than 200,000 barrels per calendar day total
Operable Atmospheric Crude Oil Distillation capacity. Capacity includes
all domestic and foreign affiliates, all owned or leased facilities,
and all facilities under a processing agreement or an arrangement such
as an exchange agreement or a throughput. To qualify
[[Page 4492]]
under the capacity size standard, the firm, together with its
affiliates, must be primarily engaged in refining crude petroleum into
refined petroleum products. A firm's ``primary industry'' is determined
in accordance with 13 CFR 121.107.
5. NAICS code 326211--For Government procurement, a firm is small
for bidding on a contract for pneumatic tires within Census NAICS
Product Classification codes 3262111 and 3262113, provided that:
(a) The value of tires within Census NAICS Product Classification
codes 3262113 that it manufactured in the United States during the
previous calendar year is more than 50 percent of the value of its
total worldwide manufacture,
(b) The value of pneumatic tires within Census NAICS Product
Classification codes 3262113 comprising its total worldwide manufacture
during the preceding calendar year was less than 5 percent of the value
of all such tires manufactured in the United States during that period,
and
(c) The value of the principal product that it manufactured,
produced, or sold worldwide during the preceding calendar year is less
than 10 percent of the total value of such products manufactured or
otherwise produced or sold in the United States during that period.
* * * * *
7. NAICS code 336413--Contracts for the rebuilding or overhaul of
aircraft ground support equipment on a contract basis are classified
under NAICS code 336413.
* * * * *
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016-00924 Filed 1-25-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P