Establishment of the Los Olivos District Viticultural Area, 3327-3329 [2016-01155]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
demonstrate that the device performs as
intended under anticipated conditions
of use.
(4) Professional training must include
the ear impression procedure, correct
placement, fitting, monitoring, care, and
maintenance of the device.
(5) Labeling must include the
following:
(i) A detailed summary of the adverse
events and effectiveness outcomes from
the clinical performance testing;
(ii) Detailed instructions on how to fit
the device to the patient;
(iii) Instructions for periodic cleaning
of any reusable components;
(iv) Information related to
electromagnetic compatibility; and
(v) Patient labeling that includes:
(A) A patient card that identifies if a
patient has been fitted with any nonself- removable components of the
device and provides relevant
information in cases of emergency;
(B) Information on how to correctly
use and maintain the device;
(C) The potential risks and benefits
associated with the use of the device;
and
(D) Alternative treatments.
Dated: January 13, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–01090 Filed 1–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2015–0004; T.D. TTB–132;
Ref: Notice No. 148]
RIN 1513–AC11
Establishment of the Los Olivos
District Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the
approximately 22,820-acre ‘‘Los Olivos
District’’ viticultural area in Santa
Barbara County, California. The
viticultural area is located within the
Santa Ynez Valley viticultural area and
the larger, multicounty Central Coast
viticultural area. TTB designates
viticultural areas to allow vintners to
better describe the origin of their wines
and to allow consumers to better
identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective
February 22, 2016.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:08 Jan 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005;
phone 202–453–1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01, dated
December 10, 2013 (superseding
Treasury Department Order 120–01,
dated January 24, 2003), to the TTB
Administrator to perform the functions
and duties in the administration and
enforcement of these provisions.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) authorizes TTB to establish
definitive viticultural areas and regulate
the use of their names as appellations of
origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth
standards for the preparation and
submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of
American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region having
distinguishing features, as described in
part 9 of the regulations, and a name
and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and
consumers to attribute a given quality,
reputation, or other characteristic of a
wine made from grapes grown in an area
to the wine’s geographic origin. The
establishment of AVAs allows vintners
to describe more accurately the origin of
their wines to consumers and helps
consumers to identify wines they may
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3327
purchase. Establishment of an AVA is
neither an approval nor an endorsement
by TTB of the wine produced in that
area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines
the procedure for proposing an AVA
and provides that any interested party
may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as an AVA. Section 9.12
of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12)
prescribes standards for petitions for the
establishment or modification of AVAs.
Petitions to establish an AVA must
include the following:
• Evidence that the area within the
proposed AVA boundary is nationally
or locally known by the AVA name
specified in the petition;
• An explanation of the basis for
defining the boundary of the proposed
AVA;
• A narrative description of the
features of the proposed AVA affecting
viticulture, such as climate, geology,
soils, physical features, and elevation,
that make the proposed AVA distinctive
and distinguish it from adjacent areas
outside the proposed AVA boundary;
• The appropriate United States
Geological Survey (USGS) map(s)
showing the location of the proposed
AVA, with the boundary of the
proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon;
and
• A detailed narrative description of
the proposed AVA boundary based on
USGS map markings.
Los Olivos District Petition
TTB received a petition from C.
Frederic Brander, owner and winemaker
of the Brander Vineyard, proposing the
establishment of the ‘‘Los Olivos
District’’ AVA in Santa Barbara County,
California. There are 12 bonded
wineries and approximately 47
commercially producing vineyards
covering a total of 1,120 acres within the
proposed AVA. The proposed Los
Olivos District AVA shares its western
boundary with the eastern boundary of
the Ballard Canyon AVA (27 CFR 9.230)
and its eastern boundary with the
western boundary of the Happy Canyon
of Santa Barbara AVA (27 CR 9.217), but
it does not overlap either of these AVAs.
It is located within the Santa Ynez
Valley viticultural area and the larger,
multicounty Central Coast viticultural
area.
According to the petition, the
distinguishing features of the proposed
Los Olivos District AVA include its
topography, soils, and climate. The
proposed AVA is located on a broad
alluvial terrace plain of the Santa Ynez
E:\FR\FM\21JAR1.SGM
21JAR1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
3328
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
River. The topography of the proposed
AVA is relatively uniform, with nearly
flat terrain that gently slopes southward
toward the Santa Ynez River. The lack
of steeply sloped hills reduces the risk
of erosion and facilitates mechanical
tiling and harvesting in the vineyards.
Additionally, the open terrain allows
vineyards throughout the proposed
AVA to receive uniform amounts of
sunlight, rainfall, and temperaturemoderating fog because there are no
significant hills or mountains within the
proposed AVA to block the rainfall and
fog or to shade the vineyards. By
contrast, the regions surrounding the
proposed Los Olivos District all have
higher elevations and steep, rugged
terrain.
Over 95 percent of the soils within the
proposed Los Olivos District AVA are
from the Positas–Ballard–Santa Ynez
soil association and are derived from
alluvium, including Orcutt sand and
terrace deposits. The soils are
moderately to well drained gravelly fine
sandy loams and clay loams with low to
moderate fertility. The soils within the
proposed AVA drain quickly enough to
reduce the risk of root disease but do
not drain so excessively as to require
frequent irrigation. Soil nutrient levels
within the proposed AVA are adequate
to produce healthy vines and fruit
without promoting excessive growth. By
contrast, the majority of soils in the
surrounding regions are not from the
Positas–Ballard–Santa Ynez soil
association and are generally less fertile
and drain faster.
Within the Central Coast AVA, where
the proposed Los Olivos District AVA is
located, temperatures are affected by
cooling marine fog. However, the
proposed Los Olivos District AVA is
located about 30 miles inland from the
Pacific Ocean, so much of the marine
fog has diminished by the time it
reaches the proposed AVA in the late
afternoon. The thin fog within the
proposed AVA allows the daytime
temperatures to rise higher and the
nighttime temperatures to drop lower
than in the regions farther to the west,
where heavy fog is present throughout
the day. The region to the east receives
even less fog than the proposed AVA, so
daytime temperatures rise higher and
nighttime temperatures drop lower. The
warm daytime temperatures within the
proposed AVA encourage fruit
maturation and sugar production, and
the cool nighttime temperatures
minimize acid loss.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 148 in the
Federal Register on March 3, 2015 (80
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:08 Jan 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
FR 11355), proposing to establish the
Los Olivos District AVA. In the
document, TTB summarized the
evidence from the petition regarding the
name, boundary, and distinguishing
features for the proposed AVA. The
document also compared the
distinguishing features of the proposed
AVA to the surrounding areas. In Notice
No. 148, TTB solicited comments on the
accuracy of the name, boundary, and
other required information submitted in
support of the petition. In addition, TTB
solicited comments on whether the
geographic features of the proposed Los
Olivos District are so distinguishable
from the established Santa Ynez Valley
AVA and the Central Coast AVA that
the proposed AVA should not be part of
either established AVA. The comment
period closed on May 4, 2015.
In response to Notice No. 148, TTB
received 76 comments, all of which
supported the establishment of the Los
Olivos District AVA, with many citing
to its distinct topography, climate, and
soils. The comments did not raise any
new issues concerning the proposed
AVA. TTB received no comments
opposing the establishment of the Los
Olivos District AVA. TTB also did not
receive any comments in response to its
question of whether the proposed Los
Olivos District AVA is so
distinguishable from the established
Santa Ynez Valley AVA or the
established Central Coast AVA that the
proposed AVA should not be part of
either established AVA.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition
and the comment received in response
to Notice No. 148, TTB finds that the
evidence provided by the petitioner
supports the establishment of the Los
Olivos District AVA. Accordingly,
under the authority of the FAA Act,
section 1111(d) of the Homeland
Security Act of 2002, and part 4 of the
TTB regulations, TTB establishes the
‘‘Los Olivos District’’ AVA in Santa
Barbara County, California, effective 30
days from the publication date of this
document.
TTB has also determined that the Los
Olivos District AVA will remain part of
both the established Santa Ynez Valley
AVA and the established Central Coast
AVA. As discussed in Notice No. 148,
the Los Olivos District AVA receives
some of the marine breezes and fog that
are the primary characteristics of both
the Santa Ynez Valley AVA and the
Central Coast AVA. However, due to its
central location within the Santa Ynez
Valley AVA, the Los Olivos District
AVA receives less marine air and heavy
fog than the western portion of the
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Santa Ynez Valley AVA, which is closer
to the Pacific Ocean, and it receives
more cooling breezes and fog than the
eastern portion. The topography of the
Los Olivos District AVA is also more
uniform than that of the Santa Ynez
Valley AVA, which has mountains and
canyons as well as flatter terrain.
Additionally, due to its smaller size, the
Los Olivos District AVA is more
uniform in its geographical and climatic
characteristics than the much larger,
multicounty Central Coast AVA.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the
boundary of the AVA in the regulatory
text published at the end of this final
rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required
maps, and they are listed below in the
regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits
any label reference on a wine that
indicates or implies an origin other than
the wine’s true place of origin. For a
wine to be labeled with an AVA name
or with a brand name that includes an
AVA name, at least 85 percent of the
wine must be derived from grapes
grown within the area represented by
that name, and the wine must meet the
other conditions listed in 27 CFR
4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not eligible for
labeling with an AVA name and that
name appears in the brand name, then
the label is not in compliance and the
bottler must change the brand name and
obtain approval of a new label.
Similarly, if the AVA name appears in
another reference on the label in a
misleading manner, the bottler would
have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a
brand name containing an AVA name
that was used as a brand name on a
label approved before July 7, 1986. See
27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
With the establishment of this AVA,
its name, ‘‘Los Olivos District,’’ is
recognized as a name of viticultural
significance under § 4.39(i)(3) of the
TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.39(i)(3)). The
text of the regulation clarifies this point.
Consequently, wine bottlers using the
name ‘‘Los Olivos District’’ in a brand
name, including a trademark, or in
another label reference as to the origin
of the wine, will have to ensure that the
product is eligible to use the AVA name
as an appellation of origin. In Notice No.
148, TTB proposed to recognize ‘‘Los
Olivos,’’ standing alone, as a term of
viticultural significance. However TTB
is not designating ‘‘Los Olivos,’’
E:\FR\FM\21JAR1.SGM
21JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
standing alone, as a term of viticultural
significance in this final rule. We make
this change in light of new information
concerning the current use of ‘‘Los
Olivos’’ on wine labels.
The approval of the Los Olivos
District AVA does not affect any
existing AVA, and this approval does
not affect any bottlers using ‘‘Central
Coast’’ or ‘‘Santa Ynez Valley’’ as an
appellation of origin or in a brand name
for wines made from grapes grown
within the Central Coast or Santa Ynez
Valley AVAs. The establishment of the
Los Olivos District AVA allows vintners
to use ‘‘Los Olivos District,’’ ‘‘Santa
Ynez Valley,’’ and ‘‘Central Coast’’ as
appellations of origin for wines made
from grapes grown within the Los
Olivos District AVA, if the wines meet
the eligibility requirements for the
appellation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The regulation imposes no new
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit
derived from the use of an AVA name
would be the result of a proprietor’s
efforts and consumer acceptance of
wines from that area. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this final
rule is not a significant regulatory action
as defined by Executive Order 12866 of
September 30, 1993. Therefore, no
regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations
and Rulings Division drafted this final
rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter
I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C—Approved American
Viticultural Areas
2. Add § 9.253 to subpart C to read as
follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:08 Jan 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
§ 9.253
Los Olivos District.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural
area described in this section is ‘‘Los
Olivos District’’. For purposes of part 4
of this chapter, ‘‘Los Olivos District’’ is
a term of viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The four United
States Geological Survey (USGS)
1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to
determine the boundary of the Los
Olivos District viticultural area are
titled:
(1) Los Olivos, CA, 1995;
(2) Zaca Creek, Calif., 1959;
(3) Solvang, CA, 1995; and
(4) Santa Ynez, CA, 1995.
(c) Boundary. The Los Olivos District
viticultural area is located in Santa
Barbara County, California. The
boundary of the Los Olivos District
viticultural area is as described below:
(1) The beginning point is on the Los
Olivos map at the intersection of Foxen
Canyon Road with California State Road
154 (known locally as San Marcos Pass
Road/Chumash Highway), section 23,
T7N/R31W.
(2) From the beginning point, proceed
southwesterly in a straight line
approximately 0.3 mile, crossing onto
the Zaca Creek map, to the intersection
of Ballard Canyon Road and an
unnamed, unimproved road known
locally as Los Olivos Meadows Drive,
T7N/R31W; then
(3) Proceed south-southeasterly in a
straight line approximately 1 mile,
crossing onto the Los Olivos map, to a
marked, unnamed structure within a
circular-shaped 920-foot contour line in
the southwest corner of section 26, T7N/
R31W; then
(4) Proceed south-southwesterly in a
straight line approximately 1.25 miles,
crossing onto the Zaca Creek map, to the
point marked by the ‘‘Ball’’ 801-foot
elevation control point, T6N/R31W;
then
(5) Proceed south-southwesterly in a
straight line approximately 1.45 miles,
crossing onto the Solvang map, to a
marked, unnamed 775-foot peak, T6N/
R31W; then
(6) Proceed south-southwesterly in a
straight line approximately 0.55 mile to
a marked communication tower located
within the 760-foot contour line, T6N/
R31W; then
(7) Proceed south-southeasterly in a
straight line approximately 0.6 mile to
the intersection of Chalk Hill Road with
an unnamed creek descending from
Adobe Canyon, northwest of the
unnamed road known locally as
Fredensborg Canyon Road, T6N/R31W;
then
(8) Proceed southwesterly
(downstream) along the creek
approximately 1 mile to the creek’s
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
3329
intersection with the Santa Ynez River,
T6N/R31W; then
(9) Proceed easterly (upstream) along
the Santa Ynez River approximately 8
miles, crossing onto the Santa Ynez
map, to the river’s intersection with
State Highway 154, T6N/R30W; then
(10) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line approximately 1.2 miles to
the marked 924-foot elevation point,
T6R/R30W; then
(11) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line 1.2 miles to the ‘‘Y’’ in an
unimproved road 0.1 mile south of the
800-foot contour line, west of Happy
Canyon Road, T6R/R30W; then
(12) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line for 0.5 mile, crossing onto
the Los Olivos map, and continuing
approximately 2.3 miles to the third
intersection of the line with the 1,000foot contour line northwest of BM 812,
T7N/R30W; then
(13) Proceed westerly along the
meandering 1,000-foot contour line to
the contour line’s intersection with an
unnamed, unimproved road, an
unnamed light-duty road, and the
northern boundary line of section 23,
T7N/R31W; then
(14) Proceed northerly, then westerly,
along the unnamed, unimproved road to
Figueroa Mountain Road, near the
marked 895-foot elevation, T7N/R31W;
then
(15) Proceed north on Figueroa
Mountain Road approximately 400 feet
to the 920-foot contour line, T7N/R31W;
then
(16) Proceed initially south, then
northwesterly along the meandering
920-foot contour line, crossing onto the
Zaca Creek map, to Foxen Canyon Road,
T7N/R31W; then
(17) Proceed southeasterly on Foxen
Canyon Road approximately 1.7 miles,
crossing onto the Los Olivos map,
returning to the beginning point.
Signed: December 9, 2015.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: January 14, 2016.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016–01155 Filed 1–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
E:\FR\FM\21JAR1.SGM
21JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 13 (Thursday, January 21, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3327-3329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01155]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB-2015-0004; T.D. TTB-132; Ref: Notice No. 148]
RIN 1513-AC11
Establishment of the Los Olivos District Viticultural Area
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes
the approximately 22,820-acre ``Los Olivos District'' viticultural area
in Santa Barbara County, California. The viticultural area is located
within the Santa Ynez Valley viticultural area and the larger,
multicounty Central Coast viticultural area. TTB designates
viticultural areas to allow vintners to better describe the origin of
their wines and to allow consumers to better identify wines they may
purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective February 22, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202-453-1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt
beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among
other things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury Department Order 120-01, dated December
10, 2013 (superseding Treasury Department Order 120-01, dated January
24, 2003), to the TTB Administrator to perform the functions and duties
in the administration and enforcement of these provisions.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) authorizes TTB to
establish definitive viticultural areas and regulate the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets
forth standards for the preparation and submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region having distinguishing features, as described in part 9
of the regulations, and a name and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow
vintners and consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or
other characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to the
wine's geographic origin. The establishment of AVAs allows vintners to
describe more accurately the origin of their wines to consumers and
helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase. Establishment of
an AVA is neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine
produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2))
outlines the procedure for proposing an AVA and provides that any
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region
as an AVA. Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12) prescribes
standards for petitions for the establishment or modification of AVAs.
Petitions to establish an AVA must include the following:
Evidence that the area within the proposed AVA boundary is
nationally or locally known by the AVA name specified in the petition;
An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of
the proposed AVA;
A narrative description of the features of the proposed
AVA affecting viticulture, such as climate, geology, soils, physical
features, and elevation, that make the proposed AVA distinctive and
distinguish it from adjacent areas outside the proposed AVA boundary;
The appropriate United States Geological Survey (USGS)
map(s) showing the location of the proposed AVA, with the boundary of
the proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon; and
A detailed narrative description of the proposed AVA
boundary based on USGS map markings.
Los Olivos District Petition
TTB received a petition from C. Frederic Brander, owner and
winemaker of the Brander Vineyard, proposing the establishment of the
``Los Olivos District'' AVA in Santa Barbara County, California. There
are 12 bonded wineries and approximately 47 commercially producing
vineyards covering a total of 1,120 acres within the proposed AVA. The
proposed Los Olivos District AVA shares its western boundary with the
eastern boundary of the Ballard Canyon AVA (27 CFR 9.230) and its
eastern boundary with the western boundary of the Happy Canyon of Santa
Barbara AVA (27 CR 9.217), but it does not overlap either of these
AVAs. It is located within the Santa Ynez Valley viticultural area and
the larger, multicounty Central Coast viticultural area.
According to the petition, the distinguishing features of the
proposed Los Olivos District AVA include its topography, soils, and
climate. The proposed AVA is located on a broad alluvial terrace plain
of the Santa Ynez
[[Page 3328]]
River. The topography of the proposed AVA is relatively uniform, with
nearly flat terrain that gently slopes southward toward the Santa Ynez
River. The lack of steeply sloped hills reduces the risk of erosion and
facilitates mechanical tiling and harvesting in the vineyards.
Additionally, the open terrain allows vineyards throughout the proposed
AVA to receive uniform amounts of sunlight, rainfall, and temperature-
moderating fog because there are no significant hills or mountains
within the proposed AVA to block the rainfall and fog or to shade the
vineyards. By contrast, the regions surrounding the proposed Los Olivos
District all have higher elevations and steep, rugged terrain.
Over 95 percent of the soils within the proposed Los Olivos
District AVA are from the Positas-Ballard-Santa Ynez soil association
and are derived from alluvium, including Orcutt sand and terrace
deposits. The soils are moderately to well drained gravelly fine sandy
loams and clay loams with low to moderate fertility. The soils within
the proposed AVA drain quickly enough to reduce the risk of root
disease but do not drain so excessively as to require frequent
irrigation. Soil nutrient levels within the proposed AVA are adequate
to produce healthy vines and fruit without promoting excessive growth.
By contrast, the majority of soils in the surrounding regions are not
from the Positas-Ballard-Santa Ynez soil association and are generally
less fertile and drain faster.
Within the Central Coast AVA, where the proposed Los Olivos
District AVA is located, temperatures are affected by cooling marine
fog. However, the proposed Los Olivos District AVA is located about 30
miles inland from the Pacific Ocean, so much of the marine fog has
diminished by the time it reaches the proposed AVA in the late
afternoon. The thin fog within the proposed AVA allows the daytime
temperatures to rise higher and the nighttime temperatures to drop
lower than in the regions farther to the west, where heavy fog is
present throughout the day. The region to the east receives even less
fog than the proposed AVA, so daytime temperatures rise higher and
nighttime temperatures drop lower. The warm daytime temperatures within
the proposed AVA encourage fruit maturation and sugar production, and
the cool nighttime temperatures minimize acid loss.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 148 in the Federal Register on March 3,
2015 (80 FR 11355), proposing to establish the Los Olivos District AVA.
In the document, TTB summarized the evidence from the petition
regarding the name, boundary, and distinguishing features for the
proposed AVA. The document also compared the distinguishing features of
the proposed AVA to the surrounding areas. In Notice No. 148, TTB
solicited comments on the accuracy of the name, boundary, and other
required information submitted in support of the petition. In addition,
TTB solicited comments on whether the geographic features of the
proposed Los Olivos District are so distinguishable from the
established Santa Ynez Valley AVA and the Central Coast AVA that the
proposed AVA should not be part of either established AVA. The comment
period closed on May 4, 2015.
In response to Notice No. 148, TTB received 76 comments, all of
which supported the establishment of the Los Olivos District AVA, with
many citing to its distinct topography, climate, and soils. The
comments did not raise any new issues concerning the proposed AVA. TTB
received no comments opposing the establishment of the Los Olivos
District AVA. TTB also did not receive any comments in response to its
question of whether the proposed Los Olivos District AVA is so
distinguishable from the established Santa Ynez Valley AVA or the
established Central Coast AVA that the proposed AVA should not be part
of either established AVA.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition and the comment received in
response to Notice No. 148, TTB finds that the evidence provided by the
petitioner supports the establishment of the Los Olivos District AVA.
Accordingly, under the authority of the FAA Act, section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002, and part 4 of the TTB regulations, TTB
establishes the ``Los Olivos District'' AVA in Santa Barbara County,
California, effective 30 days from the publication date of this
document.
TTB has also determined that the Los Olivos District AVA will
remain part of both the established Santa Ynez Valley AVA and the
established Central Coast AVA. As discussed in Notice No. 148, the Los
Olivos District AVA receives some of the marine breezes and fog that
are the primary characteristics of both the Santa Ynez Valley AVA and
the Central Coast AVA. However, due to its central location within the
Santa Ynez Valley AVA, the Los Olivos District AVA receives less marine
air and heavy fog than the western portion of the Santa Ynez Valley
AVA, which is closer to the Pacific Ocean, and it receives more cooling
breezes and fog than the eastern portion. The topography of the Los
Olivos District AVA is also more uniform than that of the Santa Ynez
Valley AVA, which has mountains and canyons as well as flatter terrain.
Additionally, due to its smaller size, the Los Olivos District AVA is
more uniform in its geographical and climatic characteristics than the
much larger, multicounty Central Coast AVA.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the boundary of the AVA in the
regulatory text published at the end of this final rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required maps, and they are listed
below in the regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. For a wine to be labeled with an AVA name or with a
brand name that includes an AVA name, at least 85 percent of the wine
must be derived from grapes grown within the area represented by that
name, and the wine must meet the other conditions listed in 27 CFR
4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not eligible for labeling with an AVA name
and that name appears in the brand name, then the label is not in
compliance and the bottler must change the brand name and obtain
approval of a new label. Similarly, if the AVA name appears in another
reference on the label in a misleading manner, the bottler would have
to obtain approval of a new label. Different rules apply if a wine has
a brand name containing an AVA name that was used as a brand name on a
label approved before July 7, 1986. See 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
With the establishment of this AVA, its name, ``Los Olivos
District,'' is recognized as a name of viticultural significance under
Sec. 4.39(i)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.39(i)(3)). The text
of the regulation clarifies this point. Consequently, wine bottlers
using the name ``Los Olivos District'' in a brand name, including a
trademark, or in another label reference as to the origin of the wine,
will have to ensure that the product is eligible to use the AVA name as
an appellation of origin. In Notice No. 148, TTB proposed to recognize
``Los Olivos,'' standing alone, as a term of viticultural significance.
However TTB is not designating ``Los Olivos,''
[[Page 3329]]
standing alone, as a term of viticultural significance in this final
rule. We make this change in light of new information concerning the
current use of ``Los Olivos'' on wine labels.
The approval of the Los Olivos District AVA does not affect any
existing AVA, and this approval does not affect any bottlers using
``Central Coast'' or ``Santa Ynez Valley'' as an appellation of origin
or in a brand name for wines made from grapes grown within the Central
Coast or Santa Ynez Valley AVAs. The establishment of the Los Olivos
District AVA allows vintners to use ``Los Olivos District,'' ``Santa
Ynez Valley,'' and ``Central Coast'' as appellations of origin for
wines made from grapes grown within the Los Olivos District AVA, if the
wines meet the eligibility requirements for the appellation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of an AVA
name would be the result of a proprietor's efforts and consumer
acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this final rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted
this final rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB amends title 27,
chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
0
2. Add Sec. 9.253 to subpart C to read as follows:
Sec. 9.253 Los Olivos District.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this
section is ``Los Olivos District''. For purposes of part 4 of this
chapter, ``Los Olivos District'' is a term of viticultural
significance.
(b) Approved maps. The four United States Geological Survey (USGS)
1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to determine the boundary of the
Los Olivos District viticultural area are titled:
(1) Los Olivos, CA, 1995;
(2) Zaca Creek, Calif., 1959;
(3) Solvang, CA, 1995; and
(4) Santa Ynez, CA, 1995.
(c) Boundary. The Los Olivos District viticultural area is located
in Santa Barbara County, California. The boundary of the Los Olivos
District viticultural area is as described below:
(1) The beginning point is on the Los Olivos map at the
intersection of Foxen Canyon Road with California State Road 154 (known
locally as San Marcos Pass Road/Chumash Highway), section 23, T7N/R31W.
(2) From the beginning point, proceed southwesterly in a straight
line approximately 0.3 mile, crossing onto the Zaca Creek map, to the
intersection of Ballard Canyon Road and an unnamed, unimproved road
known locally as Los Olivos Meadows Drive, T7N/R31W; then
(3) Proceed south-southeasterly in a straight line approximately 1
mile, crossing onto the Los Olivos map, to a marked, unnamed structure
within a circular-shaped 920-foot contour line in the southwest corner
of section 26, T7N/R31W; then
(4) Proceed south-southwesterly in a straight line approximately
1.25 miles, crossing onto the Zaca Creek map, to the point marked by
the ``Ball'' 801-foot elevation control point, T6N/R31W; then
(5) Proceed south-southwesterly in a straight line approximately
1.45 miles, crossing onto the Solvang map, to a marked, unnamed 775-
foot peak, T6N/R31W; then
(6) Proceed south-southwesterly in a straight line approximately
0.55 mile to a marked communication tower located within the 760-foot
contour line, T6N/R31W; then
(7) Proceed south-southeasterly in a straight line approximately
0.6 mile to the intersection of Chalk Hill Road with an unnamed creek
descending from Adobe Canyon, northwest of the unnamed road known
locally as Fredensborg Canyon Road, T6N/R31W; then
(8) Proceed southwesterly (downstream) along the creek
approximately 1 mile to the creek's intersection with the Santa Ynez
River, T6N/R31W; then
(9) Proceed easterly (upstream) along the Santa Ynez River
approximately 8 miles, crossing onto the Santa Ynez map, to the river's
intersection with State Highway 154, T6N/R30W; then
(10) Proceed north-northwest in a straight line approximately 1.2
miles to the marked 924-foot elevation point, T6R/R30W; then
(11) Proceed north-northwest in a straight line 1.2 miles to the
``Y'' in an unimproved road 0.1 mile south of the 800-foot contour
line, west of Happy Canyon Road, T6R/R30W; then
(12) Proceed north-northwest in a straight line for 0.5 mile,
crossing onto the Los Olivos map, and continuing approximately 2.3
miles to the third intersection of the line with the 1,000-foot contour
line northwest of BM 812, T7N/R30W; then
(13) Proceed westerly along the meandering 1,000-foot contour line
to the contour line's intersection with an unnamed, unimproved road, an
unnamed light-duty road, and the northern boundary line of section 23,
T7N/R31W; then
(14) Proceed northerly, then westerly, along the unnamed,
unimproved road to Figueroa Mountain Road, near the marked 895-foot
elevation, T7N/R31W; then
(15) Proceed north on Figueroa Mountain Road approximately 400 feet
to the 920-foot contour line, T7N/R31W; then
(16) Proceed initially south, then northwesterly along the
meandering 920-foot contour line, crossing onto the Zaca Creek map, to
Foxen Canyon Road, T7N/R31W; then
(17) Proceed southeasterly on Foxen Canyon Road approximately 1.7
miles, crossing onto the Los Olivos map, returning to the beginning
point.
Signed: December 9, 2015.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: January 14, 2016.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016-01155 Filed 1-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P