Proposed Establishment of the Willcox Viticultural Area, 3356-3362 [2016-01150]
Download as PDF
3356
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
foreign authorities’’ to the list of entities
that the Commission may determine
appropriate to access data. For example,
should the Commission revise proposed
paragraph (b)(9)(x) of rule 13n–4 to
specifically note that it may determine
that ‘‘other foreign authorities’’ also may
access data pursuant to these
provisions?
Commenters are also invited to
address the impact of the statutory
amendments on the Commission’s
economic analysis.
By the Commission.
Dated: January 15, 2016.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–01148 Filed 1–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; or
• Hand delivery/courier in lieu of
mail: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Suite
400, Washington, DC 20005.
See the Public Participation section of
this notice for specific instructions and
requirements for submitting comments,
and for information on how to request
a public hearing or view or obtain
copies of the petition and supporting
materials.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005;
phone 202–453–1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2016–0002; Notice No.
157]
RIN 1513–AC23
Proposed Establishment of the Willcox
Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) proposes to
establish the approximately 526,000acre ‘‘Willcox’’ viticultural area in
portions of Cochise and Graham
Counties in southeastern Arizona. The
proposed viticultural area does not lie
within, nor does it contain, any other
established viticultural area. TTB
designates viticultural areas to allow
vintners to better describe the origin of
their wines and to allow consumers to
better identify wines they may
purchase. TTB invites comments on this
proposed addition to its regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received by
March 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Please send your comments
on this proposed rule to one of the
following addresses (please note that
TTB has a new address for comments
submitted by U.S. mail):
• Internet: https://www.regulations.gov
(via the online comment form for this
proposed rule as posted within Docket
No. TTB–2016–0002 at
‘‘Regulations.gov,’’ the Federal erulemaking portal);
• U.S. Mail: Director, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:09 Jan 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01 (dated
December 10, 2013, superseding
Treasury Order 120–01 (Revised),
‘‘Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau,’’ dated January 24, 2003), to the
TTB Administrator to perform the
functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of this
law.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) authorizes TTB to establish
definitive viticultural areas and regulate
the use of their names as appellations of
origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth
standards for the preparation and
submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of
American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region having
distinguishing features, as described in
part 9 of the regulations, and a name
and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and
consumers to attribute a given quality,
reputation, or other characteristic of a
wine made from grapes grown in an area
to the wine’s geographic origin. The
establishment of AVAs allows vintners
to describe more accurately the origin of
their wines to consumers and helps
consumers to identify wines they may
purchase. Establishment of an AVA is
neither an approval nor an endorsement
by TTB of the wine produced in that
area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines
the procedure for proposing an AVA
and provides that any interested party
may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as an AVA. Section 9.12
of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12)
prescribes the standards for petitions for
the establishment or modification of
AVAs. Petitions to establish an AVA
must include the following:
• Evidence that the area within the
proposed AVA boundary is nationally
or locally known by the AVA name
specified in the petition;
• An explanation of the basis for
defining the boundary of the proposed
AVA;
• A narrative description of the
features of the proposed AVA affecting
viticulture, such as climate, geology,
soils, physical features, and elevation,
that make the proposed AVA distinctive
and distinguish it from adjacent areas
outside the proposed AVA boundary;
• The appropriate United States
Geological Survey (USGS) map(s)
showing the location of the proposed
AVA, with the boundary of the
proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon;
and
• A detailed narrative description of
the proposed AVA boundary based on
USGS map markings.
Willcox Petition
TTB received a petition from Paul S.
Hagar, the special projects manager of
Dragoon Mountain Vineyard, on behalf
of Dragoon Mountain Vineyard and
other vineyard and winery owners in
Willcox, Arizona, proposing the
establishment of the ‘‘Willcox’’ AVA in
southeastern Arizona. The proposed
AVA contains approximately 526,000
acres and has 21 commercial vineyards,
covering approximately 454 acres,
distributed across the proposed AVA.
E:\FR\FM\21JAP1.SGM
21JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
According to the petition, an additional
650 acres of vineyards are planned
within the proposed AVA in the next
few years. The proposed AVA also has
18 bonded wineries. According to the
petition, the distinguishing features of
the proposed Willcox AVA include its
geology, topography, soils, and climate.
Unless otherwise noted, all information
and data pertaining to the proposed
AVA contained in this proposed rule
come from the petition for the proposed
Willcox AVA and its supporting
exhibits.
Name Evidence
The proposed Willcox AVA derives
its name from the city of Willcox, which
is located within the proposed AVA.
Within the proposed AVA is also a large
natural feature known as the Willcox
Playa, the dry bed of an ancient lake.
The phone directory for Cochise
County, where the majority of the
proposed AVA is located, lists 26
businesses and organizations within the
proposed AVA that use the name
‘‘Willcox,’’ including Willcox Rock and
Sand Inc., Willcox Travel Center,
Willcox Car Wash, Willcox Meat
Packing House, and Willcox Real Estate
Company. Additionally, the region is
served by the Willcox Chamber of
Commerce, the Willcox Rural Fire
Department, and the Willcox Unified
School District. Finally, a business
consortium created by wine industry
members in the region to promote local
wines is known by the name ‘‘Willcox
Wine Country.’’
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Boundary Evidence
The proposed Willcox AVA is
described in the petition as a large,
high-altitude valley resembling a
shallow basin. The valley of the
proposed AVA is separated from several
neighboring valleys by a series of high
mountain ranges to the north, east, and
west. The northern and northeastern
portions of the proposed AVA boundary
follow the base of the Pinalenos
Mountains, which separate the
proposed AVA from the Gila Valley.
The eastern portion of the boundary
follows the foothills of the Chiricahua
and Dos Cabezas Mountains, which
separate the proposed AVA from the
San Simon Valley. The southern portion
of the boundary approximates the slight
ridge that forms the southern edge of the
Willcox basin and separates the
proposed AVA from the Sulphur
Springs Valley and its drainage system.
The western and northwestern portions
of the boundary follow the base of the
Dragoon, Little Dragoon, and
Winchester Mountains, which separate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:09 Jan 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
the proposed AVA from the Aravaipa
and San Pedro Valleys.
Distinguishing Features
The distinguishing features of the
proposed Willcox AVA include its
geology, topography, soils, and climate.
Geology
The proposed Willcox AVA is in the
Arizona geological province known as
the ‘‘basin-and-range’’ province, which
is characterized by high mountain
ranges that are separated by valleys. The
features of the basin-and-range province
were formed over millions of years by
periods of massive volcanic explosions
and the pushing, folding, and stretching
of the Earth’s crust. The underlying
geology of the basin in which the
proposed AVA is located is primarily
composed of alluvial (water-borne) and
eolian (wind-borne) deposits. By
contrast, the underlying geology of the
surrounding mountain ranges is
composed mostly of igneous rocks
derived from volcanic materials, such as
rhyolite, granite, and tuff.
The most recent period of geologic
activity in the region of the proposed
AVA occurred between 15 and 8 million
years ago, during a period of modest
volcanic activity and intense stretching
of the crust. The stretching of the crust
caused large blocks of the mountains to
drop thousands of feet in a nearly
vertical manner. This vertical block
faulting resulted in the formation of the
Chiricahua, Dos Cabezas, Pinalenos,
Dragoon, Little Dragoon, and
Winchester Mountains that surround
the proposed Willcox AVA and contrast
with the flat, shallow basin of the
proposed AVA.
Early in this last period of major
geologic activity, existing drainage
systems such as creeks and rivers were
disrupted throughout southeastern
Arizona, and many valleys became
closed basins. A closed basin is a valley
in which no water flows in or out, and
any lakes or underground aquifers
within the closed basin are replenished
only through rainfall. Over time, many
of the closed basins near the proposed
AVA became filled with enough
erosional deposits from the surrounding
mountains to allow streams to flow once
more into and through the basins. These
basins, where streams now flow,
include the Gila Valley to the north, the
San Simon Valley to the east, the San
Pedro Valley to the west, the Aravaipa
Valley to the northwest, and the
Sulphur Springs Valley to the south.
The Willcox basin, however, was
permanently closed.
The closed nature of the Willcox
basin allowed it to retain large
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3357
quantities of rainwater during a cool,
wet period between 2 million and
15,000 years ago. Thus, an ancient lake
formed, known as Lake Cochise. Later,
as the climate became warmer and drier,
the lake began to evaporate, and the clay
sediments and alkali salts in the water
settled in the shallower southern end of
the lake. Today, the remains of the
southern end of Lake Cochise form the
Willcox Playa, a large, dry, alkali flat in
the west-central portion of the proposed
Willcox AVA.
The geologic forces that shaped the
proposed Willcox AVA have an effect
on viticulture. Because the basin system
is closed, irrigation water comes solely
from wells and the small amounts of
annual rainfall that the region receives.
The petition also notes that water is not
brought into the proposed AVA via
canals, aqueducts, or other manmade
methods. As a result, vineyard owners
within the proposed AVA must
carefully manage their water usage
through water-conserving methods such
as drip irrigation.
Topography
As previously noted, the proposed
Willcox AVA sits within a large,
shallow basin. Elevations within the
proposed AVA range from 4,135 feet in
the Willcox Playa to 4,700 feet at the
edge of the foothills of the Chiricahua
Mountains along the eastern edge of the
proposed AVA. Because the proposed
AVA is within a closed basin system,
the basin’s floor has not been cut or
eroded by flowing bodies of water such
as creeks, streams, or rivers. As a result,
the terrain within the proposed AVA is
relatively uniform and very flat, with
slope angles ranging from 0 to 1.5
percent.
The topography of the proposed
Willcox AVA affects viticulture. The
small range of elevations and the flat
terrain allow for relative uniformity of
vineyard sites and growing conditions
throughout the proposed AVA. The
shallow slopes and the lack of creeks or
streams within the proposed AVA
reduce the risk of erosion. The flat basin
floor allows for abundant sunlight to
reach the vines, which stimulates vine
growth and fruit maturation. Due to the
intense sunlight, vineyard owners
within the proposed AVA must manage
the leaf canopies carefully so that the
fruit does not become sunburnt, while
preventing the canopies from becoming
so dense and shady that the fruit does
not reach optimum ripeness. Finally,
because the proposed AVA is lower and
flatter than the neighboring mountain
ranges, cool nighttime air flowing down
from the mountains settles in the
proposed AVA. During the early spring,
E:\FR\FM\21JAP1.SGM
21JAP1
3358
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
the cooler air can reach sub-freezing
temperatures, which can damage new
growth or buds on the vines. To protect
their vines, vineyard owners often
install tall fans to mix warmer ambient
air with the cooler descending air
streams and to prevent the cold air from
pooling.
Several mountain ranges surround the
proposed AVA, including the Pinaleno
Mountains to the north and northeast,
the Dos Cabezas and Chiricahua
Mountains to the east, and the Dragoon,
Little Dragoon, and Winchester
Mountains to the west. The elevations
within these ranges are higher than
those found within the proposed
Willcox AVA. Large valleys with
elevations lower than those found in the
proposed AVA extend beyond each of
these mountain ranges. The Gila Valley
lies to the north, the San Simon Valley
lies to the east, the San Pedro Valley lies
to the west, and the Aravaipa Valley lies
to the northwest. All of these valleys,
along with the Sulphur Springs Valley
south of the proposed AVA boundary,
also are open basin systems. Because
these valleys are open basin systems,
their valley floors have been eroded by
running water. The continual erosion
results in a steady descent in elevation
along the long axis of each of the
valleys, which contrasts with the
generally level valley floor of the closed
basin system that comprises the
proposed AVA.
Soils
Although all of the valleys in
southeastern Arizona contain soils
derived from the erosion of the
surrounding mountains, the petition
notes that each mountain block has its
own specific geologic details. As a
result, each valley below will have its
own unique soil profile. The soils
within the proposed Willcox AVA are
predominately loams comprised of
sand, silt, and clay in relatively even
proportions. The petition included a list
of the 30 soil series that, together,
comprise 80 percent of the soils of the
proposed Willcox AVA. Of these 30 soil
series, 20 are specifically loams. The
Tubac, Sonoita, Forrest, and Frye soils
are the most common soils on which
viticulture occurs within the proposed
AVA and are all classified as loamy
soils. These soils are described as
slightly acidic in the first 9 to 12 inches
of the soil profile, with a gradually
increasing alkalinity below that to a
depth of 5 feet.
According to the petition, loams
generally contain high levels of
nutrients. For this reason, loams are not
typically preferred for vineyards,
because high levels of nutrients can
cause overly vigorous vine and leaf
growth. However, the petition notes that
the stress placed on the vines by the hot,
dry climate of the proposed AVA keeps
vine and leaf growth in check, so there
is little chance the vines will grow too
vigorously.
Loamy soils also retain adequate
amounts of water to hydrate vineyards
while allowing excess water to percolate
quickly through the loamy soils and into
the aquifer. Because vineyard owners
within the proposed AVA rely primarily
on the aquifer for irrigation, soils that
both retain water and allow for quick
recharging of the aquifer are beneficial.
Only 11 of the 30 most common soils
found in the proposed Willcox AVA
comprise at least one tenth of one
percent of the total soils found in at
least one of the surrounding regions.
Together, these 11 soils represent
approximately 30 percent of all the soils
within the proposed Willcox AVA. The
following table shows the percentage of
soil each of these 11 soils comprises in
the proposed AVA and the surrounding
areas. All 30 of the soils are included in
Exhibits 30 and 31 to the petition,
which are posted as part of Docket TTB–
2016–0002.
TABLE 1—SOILS FOUND IN BOTH THE PROPOSED AVA AND THE SURROUNDING REGIONS
Percentage of total soils
Willcox, AZ
(proposed AVA)
Soils
Safford, AZ
(north of
proposed AVA)
San Simon, AZ
(east of
proposed AVA)
McNeal, AZ
(south of
proposed AVA)
Chiricahua
Mountains
(SE of
proposed AVA)
10
3.3
3.2
3.1
2.6
2.1
1.5
0
0
3.4
0
0
0.3
0
4.5
0
0
0.3
0
0
0
0
0.5
0
0
5
1.3
0.3
13.1
0
0
15.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.5
1.2
1.1
0
2.2
0
0
2.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
1.8
0
0
1
0
0
7.6
1.1
0.9
5.9
7
14.7
40.5
2.7
Tubac soils, including Tubac
sandy clay loam and Tubac
sandy loam ...............................
Karro loam ...................................
Grabe loam ..................................
Pima-Grabe association ...............
McAllister loam .............................
Comoro sandy loam .....................
Guest silty clay .............................
Stronghol-McAllister-Elgin
complex ...........................................
Sonoita gravelly sandy loam ........
White House-Forrest association
Courtland-Sasabe-Diaspar complex ...........................................
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Total ......................................
30.6
The table shows that the regions to
the north, south, east, and southwest of
the proposed AVA all contain smaller
percentages of these 11 soils. The
exception is the region to the southeast
of the proposed AVA, which contains
only 4 of the 30 primary soils of the
proposed AVA but has a larger
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:09 Jan 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
percentage of those 4 soils. Frye soils,
which are among the most prevalent soil
series of the proposed AVA, are not
included in this table because they
comprise less than one tenth of one
percent of the total soils in any of the
surrounding regions.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Benson, AZ
(SW of
proposed AVA)
Climate
Southeastern Arizona, including the
region of the proposed Willcox AVA, is
generally considered to have an arid
climate. Annual precipitation amounts
in the region are very low. According to
the petition, slight amounts of rain may
fall at the end of winter, when the vines
E:\FR\FM\21JAP1.SGM
21JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
are emerging from dormancy. However,
the most significant rainfall occurs
during the monsoon season, in July and
August. During the monsoon season, the
large-scale atmospheric circulation
shifts to initiate a flow of humid air
from both the Gulf of Mexico and the
Gulf of California. This flow of humid
air brings more cloud cover and
scattered rainfall in the form of
3359
thunderstorms. The following table
summarizes the average growing season
rainfall amounts within the proposed
AVA and the surrounding areas.
TABLE 2—AVERAGE ANNUAL GROWING SEASON PRECIPITATION 1
[Inches]
Willcox, AZ
(within
proposed
AVA)
Month
March ...........................
April ..............................
May ..............................
June .............................
July ...............................
August ..........................
Sept. .............................
October ........................
Average growing season totals ..................
Chiricahua
Mountains
(SE of
proposed
AVA)
Safford
(north of
proposed
AVA)
San Simon
Valley
(east of
proposed
AVA)
Douglas
(south of
proposed
AVA)
Benson
(SW of
proposed
AVA)
Cascabel
(west of
proposed
AVA)
0.37
0.11
0.42
0.41
3.61
2.32
0.84
0.34
0.32
0.14
0.14
0.16
1.80
2.01
0.92
0.39
0.98
0.25
0.36
0.81
3.22
3.21
1.79
0.68
0.29
0.08
0.08
0.34
2.46
1.77
0.74
0.34
0.24
0.06
0.15
0.23
2.99
3.11
1.11
0.28
0.33
0.10
0.19
0.22
3.21
2.87
2.24
0.16
0.40
0.13
0.24
0.21
3.23
2.16
1.15
0.22
8.42
5.88
11.3
6.1
8.17
9.32
7.74
Annual growing season precipitation
amounts within the proposed Willcox
AVA are higher than those of all the
stations in the surrounding areas except
the Chiricahua Mountains and Benson.
The petition states that rainfall amounts
are higher in areas close to the
mountains and foothills, such as the
locations to the southeast and southwest
of the proposed AVA, because the
moisture-laden air cools as it rises over
the hills and eventually reaches the
point where it releases its moisture in
the form of rain. As the storms move
beyond the mountains and foothills,
they begin to weaken and dissipate.
Throughout the region of the
proposed AVA, temperatures are
affected by elevation. The warmest
temperatures are typically in areas with
low elevations. The warmest daytime
high temperatures typically occur in
June and are accompanied by strong
afternoon winds. The following table
shows the average annual growing
season highs for a weather station
located within the proposed AVA and
the closest weather stations in the
surrounding areas. Because elevation
plays a role in the climate in the region,
the average elevation of each location is
also included.
TABLE 3—AVERAGE ANNUAL GROWING SEASON HIGH TEMPERATURES 2
[Degrees Fahrenheit]
Willcox, AZ
(within
proposed
AVA)
Month
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Elevation ......................
March ...........................
April ..............................
May ..............................
June .............................
July ...............................
August ..........................
September ....................
October ........................
Average ........................
Safford
(north of
proposed
AVA)
4,170 ft
71.5
79.2
86.7
96.5
96.9
94.7
91.0
82.4
87.3
2,953 ft
72.5
81.6
90.2
98.7
97.8
95.2
91.6
83.6
88.9
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:09 Jan 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
San Simon
Valley
(east of
proposed
AVA)
5,400 ft
65.9
73.4
81.7
90.8
89.2
86.9
84.0
76.4
81.0
3,609 ft
72.4
81.5
89.8
98.4
97.5
95.2
91.1
82.1
88.5
Douglas
(south of
proposed
AVA)
4,104 ft
73.1
80.5
88.6
97.4
94.8
92.1
89.7
82.7
87.4
Benson
(SW of
proposed
AVA)
3,691 ft
73.4
81.0
89.4
99.2
97.6
93.6
90.3
83.6
88.5
Cascabel
(west of
proposed
AVA)
3,196 ft
74.3
82.3
90.8
100.9
99.2
95.7
92.0
83.0
89.8
Douglas, AZ, which is at a similar
elevation to the proposed AVA, are
nearly identical to those of the proposed
AVA. Of the six surrounding weather
stations, the station within the
Chiricahua Mountains, adjacent to the
southeastern boundary of the proposed
AVA, is at the highest elevation and, as
a result, has the lowest average high
temperature.
The data in the table shows that
during the months of May and June,
temperatures within the proposed
Willcox AVA are noticeably lower than
in all of the surrounding regions, with
the exception of the higher elevations of
2 Source: National Climate Data Center records
from 2005 through 2012. According to the petition,
The data shows that annual growing
season high temperatures within the
proposed Willcox AVA are lower than
those in four of the six surrounding
regions. The four regions are all at
significantly lower elevations than the
proposed AVA. Temperatures in
1 Source: National Climate Data Center records
from 2005 through 2012. Chiricahua station data
only available from 2009 through 2012.
Chiricahua
Mountains
(SE of
proposed
AVA)
some data may be missing in the record, but no
average has less than 7 years of data.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\21JAP1.SGM
21JAP1
3360
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
the Chiricahua Mountains. The petition
notes that May and June, just before the
start of the monsoon season, are the
most stressful months for vines. The air
is very dry, and most of the water stored
in the soil from late winter rains has
been depleted. Temperatures begin to
rise noticeably during these two
months, placing heat stress on the vines
and increasing the amount of water that
evaporates from their leaves. Therefore,
in such a warm region as southeastern
Arizona, average high temperatures that
are only a few degrees cooler than the
surrounding area offer respite to the
vines, particularly during the hot, dry
pre-monsoon months.
The climate of the proposed Willcox
AVA affects viticulture. The hot
temperatures, combined with extremely
dry air for much of the growing season,
put heavy stress on the vines. In order
to preserve water, the vines close the
stoma on their leaves during the hottest
parts of the day, especially when
temperatures rise above 90 degrees
Fahrenheit. When the stoma are closed,
however, photosynthesis slows
considerably, preventing the plant from
producing food efficiently. As a result,
fruit development and maturation is
delayed. The lack of cloud cover for
most of the growing season puts the
grapes at risk for sunburn. So vineyard
owners within the proposed AVA
manage canopy levels to provide shelter
for the fruit. Although the rainfall
amounts during the monsoonal season
are not heavy enough to eliminate the
need for irrigation, the rains do provide
some relief for the vines and also
replenish the aquifer, which is the only
source of water within the closed basin
system that forms the proposed AVA.
Additionally, the monsoon season
brings relief to the vines in the form of
higher humidity levels, which allow the
stoma to remain open longer and
produce food for the vine during the
peak period of fruit development.
Finally, the increased cloud cover
during the monsoon season lowers
temperatures slightly and provides the
maturing grapes some protection from
sunburn.
Summary of Distinguishing Features
In summary, the evidence provided in
the petition indicates that the
viticulturally significant geographic
features of the proposed Willcox AVA
distinguish it from the surrounding
regions in each direction. With respect
to topography, the proposed AVA is
located within a flat valley that is part
of a closed basin system. By contrast,
the regions adjacent to the northern,
eastern, and western boundaries of the
proposed AVA are all marked by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:09 Jan 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
mountainous terrain with higher,
steeper elevations. Beyond each of these
mountain ranges are large valleys with
lower elevations than the proposed
AVA. These valleys are also all open
basin systems, and the valley floors
have all been eroded to varying degrees
by flowing water. South of the proposed
AVA is the lower-elevation Sulphur
Springs Valley, which is also an open
basin system.
The soils of the surrounding regions
are primarily loams, as are the soils of
the proposed Willcox AVA. However,
the soil series that comprise the majority
of the soils within the proposed AVA
are generally present only in very small
amounts outside the proposed AVA or,
in some cases, are not present at all. The
exception is the region to the southeast
of the proposed AVA, where 4 of the 11
primary soil series of the proposed AVA
are found in higher amounts.
The climate of the proposed Willcox
AVA is hot and arid like much of the
surrounding regions. However, growing
season high temperatures within the
proposed AVA are lower than those of
most of the surrounding region, notably
during the months of May and June. The
exception is within the higher
elevations of the Chiricahua Mountains,
where growing season temperatures are
generally lower than within the
proposed AVA. Annual rainfall amounts
within the proposed AVA are higher
than those of the surrounding regions,
with the exception of the foothill
regions to the southeast and southwest
of the proposed AVA.
TTB Determination
TTB concludes that the petition to
establish the approximately 526,000acre Willcox AVA merits consideration
and public comment, as invited in this
proposed rule.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the
boundary of the petitioned-for AVA in
the proposed regulatory text published
at the end of this proposed rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required
maps, and they are listed below in the
proposed regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits
any label reference on a wine that
indicates or implies an origin other than
the wine’s true place of origin. For a
wine to be labeled with an AVA name,
at least 85 percent of the wine must be
derived from grapes grown within the
area represented by that name, and the
wine must meet the other conditions
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
listed in § 4.25(e)(3) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)). If the
wine is not eligible for labeling with an
AVA name and that name appears in the
brand name, then the label is not in
compliance and the bottler must change
the brand name and obtain approval of
a new label. Similarly, if the AVA name
appears in another reference on the
label in a misleading manner, the bottler
would have to obtain approval of a new
label. Different rules apply if a wine has
a brand name containing an AVA name
that was used as a brand name on a
label approved before July 7, 1986. See
§ 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27
CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for details.
If TTB establishes this proposed AVA,
its name, ‘‘Willcox,’’ will be recognized
as a name of viticultural significance
under § 4.39(i)(3) of the TTB regulations
(27 CFR 4.39(i)(3)). The text of the
proposed regulation clarifies this point.
Consequently, if this proposed rule is
adopted as a final rule, wine bottlers
using the name ‘‘Willcox’’ in a brand
name, including a trademark, or in
another label reference as to the origin
of the wine, would have to ensure that
the product is eligible to use the AVA
name as an appellation of origin.
Public Participation
Comments Invited
TTB invites comments from interested
members of the public on whether it
should establish the proposed AVA.
TTB is also interested in receiving
comments on the sufficiency and
accuracy of the name, boundary, soils,
climate, and other required information
submitted in support of the petition.
Please provide any available specific
information in support of your
comments.
Because of the potential impact of the
establishment of the proposed Willcox
AVA on wine labels that include the
term ‘‘Willcox,’’ as discussed above
under Impact on Current Wine Labels,
TTB is particularly interested in
comments regarding whether there will
be a conflict between the proposed area
name and currently used brand names.
If a commenter believes that a conflict
will arise, the comment should describe
the nature of that conflict, including any
anticipated negative economic impact
that approval of the proposed AVA will
have on an existing viticultural
enterprise. TTB is also interested in
receiving suggestions for ways to avoid
conflicts, for example, by adopting a
modified or different name for the AVA.
Submitting Comments
You may submit comments on this
proposed rule by using one of the
E:\FR\FM\21JAP1.SGM
21JAP1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
3361
following three methods (please note
that TTB has a new address for
comments submitted by U.S. Mail):
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: You
may send comments via the online
comment form posted with this
proposed rule within Docket No. TTB–
2016–0002 on ‘‘Regulations.gov,’’ the
Federal e-rulemaking portal, at https://
www.regulations.gov. A direct link to
that docket is available under Notice
No. 157 on the TTB Web site at
https://www.ttb.gov/wine/winerulemaking.shtml. Supplemental files
may be attached to comments submitted
via Regulations.gov. For complete
instructions on how to use
Regulations.gov, visit the site and click
on the ‘‘Help’’ tab.
• U.S. Mail: You may send comments
via postal mail to the Director,
Regulations and Rulings Division,
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Box 12,
Washington, DC 20005.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: You may
hand-carry your comments or have them
hand-carried to the Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street NW., Suite 400, Washington, DC
20005.
Please submit your comments by the
closing date shown above in this
proposed rule. Your comments must
reference Notice No. 157 and include
your name and mailing address. Your
comments also must be made in
English, be legible, and be written in
language acceptable for public
disclosure. TTB does not acknowledge
receipt of comments, and TTB considers
all comments as originals.
In your comment, please clearly
indicate if you are commenting on your
own behalf or on behalf of an
association, business, or other entity. If
you are commenting on behalf of an
entity, your comment must include the
entity’s name, as well as your name and
position title. If you comment via
Regulations.gov, please enter the
entity’s name in the ‘‘Organization’’
blank of the online comment form. If
you comment via postal mail or hand
delivery/courier, please submit your
entity’s comment on letterhead.
You may also write to the
Administrator before the comment
closing date to ask for a public hearing.
The Administrator reserves the right to
determine whether to hold a public
hearing.
that you consider to be confidential or
inappropriate for public disclosure.
1993. Therefore, no regulatory
assessment is required.
Public Disclosure
Drafting Information
Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations
and Rulings Division drafted this
proposed rule.
Confidentiality
Executive Order 12866
All submitted comments and
attachments are part of the public record
and subject to disclosure. Do not
enclose any material in your comments
It has been determined that this
proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:09 Jan 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
TTB will post, and you may view,
copies of this proposed rule, selected
supporting materials, and any online or
mailed comments received about this
proposal within Docket No. TTB–2016–
0002 on the Federal e-rulemaking
portal, Regulations.gov, at https://
www.regulations.gov. A direct link to
that docket is available on the TTB Web
site at https://www.ttb.gov/wine/winerulemaking.shtml under Notice No. 157.
You may also reach the relevant docket
through the Regulations.gov search page
at https://www.regulations.gov. For
information on how to use
Regulations.gov, click on the site’s
‘‘Help’’ tab.
All posted comments will display the
commenter’s name, organization (if
any), city, and State, and, in the case of
mailed comments, all address
information, including email addresses.
TTB may omit voluminous attachments
or material that the Bureau considers
unsuitable for posting.
You may also view copies of this
proposed rule, all related petitions,
maps and other supporting materials,
and any electronic or mailed comments
that TTB receives about this proposal by
appointment at the TTB Information
Resource Center, 1310 G Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20005. You may also
obtain copies at 20 cents per 8.5- x 11inch page. Please note that TTB is
unable to provide copies of USGS maps
or other similarly-sized documents that
may be included as part of the AVA
petition. Contact TTB’s information
specialist at the above address or by
telephone at 202–453–2270 to schedule
an appointment or to request copies of
comments or other materials.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this proposed
regulation, if adopted, would not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The proposed regulation imposes no
new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit
derived from the use of an AVA name
would be the result of a proprietor’s
efforts and consumer acceptance of
wines from that area. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
Proposed Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, TTB proposes to amend title
27, chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C—Approved American
Viticultural Areas
2. Subpart C is amended by adding
§ 9.llto read as follows:
■
§ 9.llWillcox.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural
area described in this section is
‘‘Willcox’’. For purposes of part 4 of this
chapter, ‘‘Willcox’’ is a term of
viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The 21 United
States Geological Survey (USGS)
1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to
determine the boundary of the Willcox
viticultural area are titled:
(1) Fort Grant, AZ, 1996;
(2) West of Greasewood Mountain,
AZ, 1996;
(3) Greasewood Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(4) Willcox North, AZ, 1996;
(5) Railroad Pass, Ariz., 1979;
(6) Simmons Peak, AZ, 1996;
(7) Dos Cabezas, AZ, 1996;
(8) Pat Hills North, Ariz., 1974;
(9) Pat Hills South, Ariona, 1986
provisional edition;
(10) Sulphur Hills, AZ, 1996;
(11) Pearce, AZ., 1996;
(12) Turquoise Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(13) Black Diamond Peak, AZ, 1996;
(14) Cochise Stronghold, AZ, 1996;
(15) Cochise, AZ, 1996;
(16) Red Bird Hills, AZ, 1996;
(17) Steele Hills, AZ, 1996;
(18) Square Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(19) Muskhog Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(20) Reiley Peak, AZ, 1996; and
(21) Sierra Bonita Ranch, Ariz., 1972.
(c) Boundary. The Willcox viticultural
area is located in Cochise and Graham
Counties in southeastern Arizona. The
boundary of the Willcox viticultural
area is as described below:
(1) The beginning point is on the Fort
Grant map at the intersection of State
E:\FR\FM\21JAP1.SGM
21JAP1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
3362
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Highway 266 and an unnamed lightduty road known locally as Curtis
Parkway, in Fort Grant, section 35, T9S/
R23E. From the beginning point,
proceed south-southeast in a straight
line approximately 20.4 miles, crossing
over the West of Greasewood Mountain
and the Greasewood Mountain map and
onto the Willcox North map, to the
intersection of three unnamed light-duty
roads known locally as Porters Ranch
Road, East Saguaro Road, and North
Circle I Road, near benchmark (BM)
4,243 on the Willcox North map, section
36, T12S/R24E; then
(2) Proceed east in a straight line
approximately 5 miles to Interstate
Highway 10 near the community of
Raso, section 1, T13S/R25E; then
(3) Proceed south in a straight line
approximately 0.8 mile to the 4,400-foot
elevation contour, section 1, T13S/
R25E; then
(4) Proceed southwesterly along the
4,400-foot elevation contour around the
west end of the Dos Cabezas Mountains
and continue southeasterly along the
4,400-foot elevation contour for a total
of approximately 13.3 miles, crossing
over the Railroad Pass map and onto the
Simmons Peak map, to State Highway
186 on the Simmons Peak map, section
28, T14S/R26E; then
(5) Proceed south-southeast in a
straight line approximately 15.8 miles,
crossing over the Dos Cabezas map and
onto the Pat Hills North map, to the
intersection of the 4,700-foot elevation
contour and an unnamed light-duty
road known locally as East Creasey
Ranch Road on the Pat Hills North map
near BM 4,695, section 21, T16S/R28E;
then
(6) Proceed southerly along the 4,700foot elevation contour approximately
10.6 miles, crossing onto the Pat Hills
South map, to an unnamed light-duty
road known locally as East Uncle Curtis
Lane, section 7, T18S/R28E; then
(7) Proceed west along East Uncle
Curtis Lane approximately 0.5 mile to
an unnamed light-duty road known
locally as South Single Tree Lane near
the marked 4,664-foot elevation point,
section 7, T18S/R28E; then
(8) Proceed south along South Single
Tree Lane approximately 0.5 mile to
State Highway 181, section 7, T18S/
R28E; then
(9) Proceed west along State Highway
181 approximately 9.9 miles, crossing
onto the Sulphur Hills map, to State
Highway 191, section 10, T18S/R26E;
then
(10) Proceed north-northeasterly, then
west, along State Highway 191
approximately 4.8 miles, crossing onto
the Pearce map, to an unnamed lightduty road known locally as Kansas
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:09 Jan 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
Settlement Road, near BM 4,327, section
36, T17S/R25E; then
(11) Proceed southwest in a straight
line approximately 8.9 miles, crossing
over the Turquoise Mountain map and
onto the Black Diamond Peak map, to
the southeastern-most corner of the
boundary of the Coronado National
Forest on the Black Diamond Peak map,
section 35, T18S/R24E; then
(12) Proceed north along the boundary
of the Coronado National Forest
approximately 2 miles to the marked
4,821-foot elevation point, section 26,
T18S/R24E; then
(13) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line approximately 13 miles,
crossing over the Cochise Stronghold
map and onto the Cochise map, to the
northeastern corner of the boundary of
the Coronado National Forest at the
marked 4,642 elevation point on the
Cochise map, section 26, T16S/R23E;
then
(14) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line approximately 1.2 miles to
the intersection of the 4,450-foot
elevation contour and an unnamed
secondary highway known locally as
West Dragoon Road, section 23, T16S/
R23E; then
(15) Proceed north in a straight line
approximately 1.3 miles to the 4,400foot elevation contour, section 11, T16S/
R23E; then
(16) Proceed generally northerly along
the 4,400-foot elevation contour
approximately 10 miles, crossing onto
the Red Bird Hills map, to Interstate
Highway 10, section 3, T15S/R23E; then
(17) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line approximately 5.8 miles,
crossing onto the Steele Hills map, to
the intersection of the 4,600-foot
elevation contour and an unnamed
light-duty road known locally as West
Airport Road, section 7, T14S/R23E;
then
(18) Proceed east-northeasterly, then
easterly, then northerly, then easterly
along West Airport Road approximately
7.2 miles, crossing back onto the Red
Bird Hills map and then onto the Square
Mountain map, to the 4,240-foot
elevation contour east of BM 4,264,
section 6, T14S/R24E; then
(19) Proceed north-northwest in a
straight line approximately 20.5 miles,
crossing over the Muskhog Mountain
and Reiley Peak maps and onto the
Sierra Bonita Ranch map, to the
intersection of two unnamed light-duty
roads known locally as West Ash Creek
Road and South Wells Road, near BM
4,487 on the Sierra Bonita Ranch map,
section 3, T11S/R22E; then
(20) Proceed generally northerly along
South Wells Road to BM 4,502, then
continuing northerly along the western
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
fork of the road for a total of
approximately 7.7 miles to an unnamed
light-duty road known locally as Bonita
Aravaipa Road, section 27, T9S/R22E;
then
(21) Proceed east in a straight line
approximately 8.2 miles, crossing onto
the Fort Grant map, to the beginning
point.
Signed: January 13, 2016.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016–01150 Filed 1–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2013–0272]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations; Marine
Events in the Seventh Coast Guard
District
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
update the final regulation that governs
recurring special local regulations in the
Seventh Coast Guard District. These
regulations will apply to all recurring
events held on navigable waters of the
Seventh District, such as regattas,
parades, and fireworks displays. This
update is being proposed to ensure that
all known recurring marine events are
included in the final regulation and to
allow respective Captains of the Port
greater ease in enacting or modifying
those portions of the regulation which
apply to their respective areas.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before February 22, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2013–0272 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Eugene
Stratton, Coast Guard District Seven
Waterways Management, (305) 415–
6750, email Eugene.Stratton@uscg.mil
or Lieutenant Brendan Sullivan, Coast
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\21JAP1.SGM
21JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 13 (Thursday, January 21, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3356-3362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01150]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB-2016-0002; Notice No. 157]
RIN 1513-AC23
Proposed Establishment of the Willcox Viticultural Area
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) proposes to
establish the approximately 526,000-acre ``Willcox'' viticultural area
in portions of Cochise and Graham Counties in southeastern Arizona. The
proposed viticultural area does not lie within, nor does it contain,
any other established viticultural area. TTB designates viticultural
areas to allow vintners to better describe the origin of their wines
and to allow consumers to better identify wines they may purchase. TTB
invites comments on this proposed addition to its regulations.
DATES: Comments must be received by March 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Please send your comments on this proposed rule to one of
the following addresses (please note that TTB has a new address for
comments submitted by U.S. mail):
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov (via the online
comment form for this proposed rule as posted within Docket No. TTB-
2016-0002 at ``Regulations.gov,'' the Federal e-rulemaking portal);
U.S. Mail: Director, Regulations and Rulings Division,
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Box 12,
Washington, DC 20005; or
Hand delivery/courier in lieu of mail: Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Suite 400, Washington, DC
20005.
See the Public Participation section of this notice for specific
instructions and requirements for submitting comments, and for
information on how to request a public hearing or view or obtain copies
of the petition and supporting materials.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202-453-1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt
beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among
other things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury Department Order 120-01 (dated December
10, 2013, superseding Treasury Order 120-01 (Revised), ``Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau,'' dated January 24, 2003), to the TTB
Administrator to perform the functions and duties in the administration
and enforcement of this law.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) authorizes TTB to
establish definitive viticultural areas and regulate the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets
forth standards for the preparation and submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region having distinguishing features, as described in part 9
of the regulations, and a name and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow
vintners and consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or
other characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to the
wine's geographic origin. The establishment of AVAs allows vintners to
describe more accurately the origin of their wines to consumers and
helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase. Establishment of
an AVA is neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine
produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2))
outlines the procedure for proposing an AVA and provides that any
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region
as an AVA. Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12) prescribes
the standards for petitions for the establishment or modification of
AVAs. Petitions to establish an AVA must include the following:
Evidence that the area within the proposed AVA boundary is
nationally or locally known by the AVA name specified in the petition;
An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of
the proposed AVA;
A narrative description of the features of the proposed
AVA affecting viticulture, such as climate, geology, soils, physical
features, and elevation, that make the proposed AVA distinctive and
distinguish it from adjacent areas outside the proposed AVA boundary;
The appropriate United States Geological Survey (USGS)
map(s) showing the location of the proposed AVA, with the boundary of
the proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon; and
A detailed narrative description of the proposed AVA
boundary based on USGS map markings.
Willcox Petition
TTB received a petition from Paul S. Hagar, the special projects
manager of Dragoon Mountain Vineyard, on behalf of Dragoon Mountain
Vineyard and other vineyard and winery owners in Willcox, Arizona,
proposing the establishment of the ``Willcox'' AVA in southeastern
Arizona. The proposed AVA contains approximately 526,000 acres and has
21 commercial vineyards, covering approximately 454 acres, distributed
across the proposed AVA.
[[Page 3357]]
According to the petition, an additional 650 acres of vineyards are
planned within the proposed AVA in the next few years. The proposed AVA
also has 18 bonded wineries. According to the petition, the
distinguishing features of the proposed Willcox AVA include its
geology, topography, soils, and climate. Unless otherwise noted, all
information and data pertaining to the proposed AVA contained in this
proposed rule come from the petition for the proposed Willcox AVA and
its supporting exhibits.
Name Evidence
The proposed Willcox AVA derives its name from the city of Willcox,
which is located within the proposed AVA. Within the proposed AVA is
also a large natural feature known as the Willcox Playa, the dry bed of
an ancient lake. The phone directory for Cochise County, where the
majority of the proposed AVA is located, lists 26 businesses and
organizations within the proposed AVA that use the name ``Willcox,''
including Willcox Rock and Sand Inc., Willcox Travel Center, Willcox
Car Wash, Willcox Meat Packing House, and Willcox Real Estate Company.
Additionally, the region is served by the Willcox Chamber of Commerce,
the Willcox Rural Fire Department, and the Willcox Unified School
District. Finally, a business consortium created by wine industry
members in the region to promote local wines is known by the name
``Willcox Wine Country.''
Boundary Evidence
The proposed Willcox AVA is described in the petition as a large,
high-altitude valley resembling a shallow basin. The valley of the
proposed AVA is separated from several neighboring valleys by a series
of high mountain ranges to the north, east, and west. The northern and
northeastern portions of the proposed AVA boundary follow the base of
the Pinalenos Mountains, which separate the proposed AVA from the Gila
Valley. The eastern portion of the boundary follows the foothills of
the Chiricahua and Dos Cabezas Mountains, which separate the proposed
AVA from the San Simon Valley. The southern portion of the boundary
approximates the slight ridge that forms the southern edge of the
Willcox basin and separates the proposed AVA from the Sulphur Springs
Valley and its drainage system. The western and northwestern portions
of the boundary follow the base of the Dragoon, Little Dragoon, and
Winchester Mountains, which separate the proposed AVA from the Aravaipa
and San Pedro Valleys.
Distinguishing Features
The distinguishing features of the proposed Willcox AVA include its
geology, topography, soils, and climate.
Geology
The proposed Willcox AVA is in the Arizona geological province
known as the ``basin-and-range'' province, which is characterized by
high mountain ranges that are separated by valleys. The features of the
basin-and-range province were formed over millions of years by periods
of massive volcanic explosions and the pushing, folding, and stretching
of the Earth's crust. The underlying geology of the basin in which the
proposed AVA is located is primarily composed of alluvial (water-borne)
and eolian (wind-borne) deposits. By contrast, the underlying geology
of the surrounding mountain ranges is composed mostly of igneous rocks
derived from volcanic materials, such as rhyolite, granite, and tuff.
The most recent period of geologic activity in the region of the
proposed AVA occurred between 15 and 8 million years ago, during a
period of modest volcanic activity and intense stretching of the crust.
The stretching of the crust caused large blocks of the mountains to
drop thousands of feet in a nearly vertical manner. This vertical block
faulting resulted in the formation of the Chiricahua, Dos Cabezas,
Pinalenos, Dragoon, Little Dragoon, and Winchester Mountains that
surround the proposed Willcox AVA and contrast with the flat, shallow
basin of the proposed AVA.
Early in this last period of major geologic activity, existing
drainage systems such as creeks and rivers were disrupted throughout
southeastern Arizona, and many valleys became closed basins. A closed
basin is a valley in which no water flows in or out, and any lakes or
underground aquifers within the closed basin are replenished only
through rainfall. Over time, many of the closed basins near the
proposed AVA became filled with enough erosional deposits from the
surrounding mountains to allow streams to flow once more into and
through the basins. These basins, where streams now flow, include the
Gila Valley to the north, the San Simon Valley to the east, the San
Pedro Valley to the west, the Aravaipa Valley to the northwest, and the
Sulphur Springs Valley to the south. The Willcox basin, however, was
permanently closed.
The closed nature of the Willcox basin allowed it to retain large
quantities of rainwater during a cool, wet period between 2 million and
15,000 years ago. Thus, an ancient lake formed, known as Lake Cochise.
Later, as the climate became warmer and drier, the lake began to
evaporate, and the clay sediments and alkali salts in the water settled
in the shallower southern end of the lake. Today, the remains of the
southern end of Lake Cochise form the Willcox Playa, a large, dry,
alkali flat in the west-central portion of the proposed Willcox AVA.
The geologic forces that shaped the proposed Willcox AVA have an
effect on viticulture. Because the basin system is closed, irrigation
water comes solely from wells and the small amounts of annual rainfall
that the region receives. The petition also notes that water is not
brought into the proposed AVA via canals, aqueducts, or other manmade
methods. As a result, vineyard owners within the proposed AVA must
carefully manage their water usage through water-conserving methods
such as drip irrigation.
Topography
As previously noted, the proposed Willcox AVA sits within a large,
shallow basin. Elevations within the proposed AVA range from 4,135 feet
in the Willcox Playa to 4,700 feet at the edge of the foothills of the
Chiricahua Mountains along the eastern edge of the proposed AVA.
Because the proposed AVA is within a closed basin system, the basin's
floor has not been cut or eroded by flowing bodies of water such as
creeks, streams, or rivers. As a result, the terrain within the
proposed AVA is relatively uniform and very flat, with slope angles
ranging from 0 to 1.5 percent.
The topography of the proposed Willcox AVA affects viticulture. The
small range of elevations and the flat terrain allow for relative
uniformity of vineyard sites and growing conditions throughout the
proposed AVA. The shallow slopes and the lack of creeks or streams
within the proposed AVA reduce the risk of erosion. The flat basin
floor allows for abundant sunlight to reach the vines, which stimulates
vine growth and fruit maturation. Due to the intense sunlight, vineyard
owners within the proposed AVA must manage the leaf canopies carefully
so that the fruit does not become sunburnt, while preventing the
canopies from becoming so dense and shady that the fruit does not reach
optimum ripeness. Finally, because the proposed AVA is lower and
flatter than the neighboring mountain ranges, cool nighttime air
flowing down from the mountains settles in the proposed AVA. During the
early spring,
[[Page 3358]]
the cooler air can reach sub-freezing temperatures, which can damage
new growth or buds on the vines. To protect their vines, vineyard
owners often install tall fans to mix warmer ambient air with the
cooler descending air streams and to prevent the cold air from pooling.
Several mountain ranges surround the proposed AVA, including the
Pinaleno Mountains to the north and northeast, the Dos Cabezas and
Chiricahua Mountains to the east, and the Dragoon, Little Dragoon, and
Winchester Mountains to the west. The elevations within these ranges
are higher than those found within the proposed Willcox AVA. Large
valleys with elevations lower than those found in the proposed AVA
extend beyond each of these mountain ranges. The Gila Valley lies to
the north, the San Simon Valley lies to the east, the San Pedro Valley
lies to the west, and the Aravaipa Valley lies to the northwest. All of
these valleys, along with the Sulphur Springs Valley south of the
proposed AVA boundary, also are open basin systems. Because these
valleys are open basin systems, their valley floors have been eroded by
running water. The continual erosion results in a steady descent in
elevation along the long axis of each of the valleys, which contrasts
with the generally level valley floor of the closed basin system that
comprises the proposed AVA.
Soils
Although all of the valleys in southeastern Arizona contain soils
derived from the erosion of the surrounding mountains, the petition
notes that each mountain block has its own specific geologic details.
As a result, each valley below will have its own unique soil profile.
The soils within the proposed Willcox AVA are predominately loams
comprised of sand, silt, and clay in relatively even proportions. The
petition included a list of the 30 soil series that, together, comprise
80 percent of the soils of the proposed Willcox AVA. Of these 30 soil
series, 20 are specifically loams. The Tubac, Sonoita, Forrest, and
Frye soils are the most common soils on which viticulture occurs within
the proposed AVA and are all classified as loamy soils. These soils are
described as slightly acidic in the first 9 to 12 inches of the soil
profile, with a gradually increasing alkalinity below that to a depth
of 5 feet.
According to the petition, loams generally contain high levels of
nutrients. For this reason, loams are not typically preferred for
vineyards, because high levels of nutrients can cause overly vigorous
vine and leaf growth. However, the petition notes that the stress
placed on the vines by the hot, dry climate of the proposed AVA keeps
vine and leaf growth in check, so there is little chance the vines will
grow too vigorously.
Loamy soils also retain adequate amounts of water to hydrate
vineyards while allowing excess water to percolate quickly through the
loamy soils and into the aquifer. Because vineyard owners within the
proposed AVA rely primarily on the aquifer for irrigation, soils that
both retain water and allow for quick recharging of the aquifer are
beneficial.
Only 11 of the 30 most common soils found in the proposed Willcox
AVA comprise at least one tenth of one percent of the total soils found
in at least one of the surrounding regions. Together, these 11 soils
represent approximately 30 percent of all the soils within the proposed
Willcox AVA. The following table shows the percentage of soil each of
these 11 soils comprises in the proposed AVA and the surrounding areas.
All 30 of the soils are included in Exhibits 30 and 31 to the petition,
which are posted as part of Docket TTB-2016-0002.
Table 1--Soils Found in Both the Proposed AVA and the Surrounding Regions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage of total soils
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chiricahua
Soils Willcox, AZ Safford, AZ San Simon, AZ McNeal, AZ Mountains (SE Benson, AZ (SW
(proposed AVA) (north of (east of (south of of proposed of proposed
proposed AVA) proposed AVA) proposed AVA) AVA) AVA)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tubac soils, including Tubac sandy clay loam and 10 0 4.5 0 13.1 0
Tubac sandy loam.................................
Karro loam........................................ 3.3 0 0 0.5 0 0
Grabe loam........................................ 3.2 3.4 0 0 0 0
Pima-Grabe association............................ 3.1 0 0.3 0 15.3 0
McAllister loam................................... 2.6 0 0 5 0 0
Comoro sandy loam................................. 2.1 0.3 0 1.3 0 0
Guest silty clay.................................. 1.5 0 0 0.3 0 0
Stronghol-McAllister-Elgin complex................ 1.5 0 0 0 0 1.8
Sonoita gravelly sandy loam....................... 1.2 2.2 2.2 0 0 0
White House-Forrest association................... 1.1 0 0 0 11 0
Courtland-Sasabe-Diaspar complex.................. 1 0 0 7.6 1.1 0.9
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 30.6 5.9 7 14.7 40.5 2.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The table shows that the regions to the north, south, east, and
southwest of the proposed AVA all contain smaller percentages of these
11 soils. The exception is the region to the southeast of the proposed
AVA, which contains only 4 of the 30 primary soils of the proposed AVA
but has a larger percentage of those 4 soils. Frye soils, which are
among the most prevalent soil series of the proposed AVA, are not
included in this table because they comprise less than one tenth of one
percent of the total soils in any of the surrounding regions.
Climate
Southeastern Arizona, including the region of the proposed Willcox
AVA, is generally considered to have an arid climate. Annual
precipitation amounts in the region are very low. According to the
petition, slight amounts of rain may fall at the end of winter, when
the vines
[[Page 3359]]
are emerging from dormancy. However, the most significant rainfall
occurs during the monsoon season, in July and August. During the
monsoon season, the large-scale atmospheric circulation shifts to
initiate a flow of humid air from both the Gulf of Mexico and the Gulf
of California. This flow of humid air brings more cloud cover and
scattered rainfall in the form of thunderstorms. The following table
summarizes the average growing season rainfall amounts within the
proposed AVA and the surrounding areas.
Table 2--Average Annual Growing Season Precipitation \1\
[Inches]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chiricahua San Simon
Willcox, AZ Safford (north Mountains (SE Valley (east Douglas (south Benson (SW of Cascabel (west
Month (within of proposed of proposed of proposed of proposed proposed AVA) of proposed
proposed AVA) AVA) AVA) AVA) AVA) AVA)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
March................................... 0.37 0.32 0.98 0.29 0.24 0.33 0.40
April................................... 0.11 0.14 0.25 0.08 0.06 0.10 0.13
May..................................... 0.42 0.14 0.36 0.08 0.15 0.19 0.24
June.................................... 0.41 0.16 0.81 0.34 0.23 0.22 0.21
July.................................... 3.61 1.80 3.22 2.46 2.99 3.21 3.23
August.................................. 2.32 2.01 3.21 1.77 3.11 2.87 2.16
Sept.................................... 0.84 0.92 1.79 0.74 1.11 2.24 1.15
October................................. 0.34 0.39 0.68 0.34 0.28 0.16 0.22
Average growing season totals........... 8.42 5.88 11.3 6.1 8.17 9.32 7.74
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Source: National Climate Data Center records from 2005
through 2012. Chiricahua station data only available from 2009
through 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual growing season precipitation amounts within the proposed
Willcox AVA are higher than those of all the stations in the
surrounding areas except the Chiricahua Mountains and Benson. The
petition states that rainfall amounts are higher in areas close to the
mountains and foothills, such as the locations to the southeast and
southwest of the proposed AVA, because the moisture-laden air cools as
it rises over the hills and eventually reaches the point where it
releases its moisture in the form of rain. As the storms move beyond
the mountains and foothills, they begin to weaken and dissipate.
Throughout the region of the proposed AVA, temperatures are
affected by elevation. The warmest temperatures are typically in areas
with low elevations. The warmest daytime high temperatures typically
occur in June and are accompanied by strong afternoon winds. The
following table shows the average annual growing season highs for a
weather station located within the proposed AVA and the closest weather
stations in the surrounding areas. Because elevation plays a role in
the climate in the region, the average elevation of each location is
also included.
Table 3--Average Annual Growing Season High Temperatures \2\
[Degrees Fahrenheit]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chiricahua San Simon
Willcox, AZ Safford (north Mountains (SE Valley (east Douglas (south Benson (SW of Cascabel (west
Month (within of proposed of proposed of proposed of proposed proposed AVA) of proposed
proposed AVA) AVA) AVA) AVA) AVA) AVA)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elevation............................... 4,170 ft 2,953 ft 5,400 ft 3,609 ft 4,104 ft 3,691 ft 3,196 ft
March................................... 71.5 72.5 65.9 72.4 73.1 73.4 74.3
April................................... 79.2 81.6 73.4 81.5 80.5 81.0 82.3
May..................................... 86.7 90.2 81.7 89.8 88.6 89.4 90.8
June.................................... 96.5 98.7 90.8 98.4 97.4 99.2 100.9
July.................................... 96.9 97.8 89.2 97.5 94.8 97.6 99.2
August.................................. 94.7 95.2 86.9 95.2 92.1 93.6 95.7
September............................... 91.0 91.6 84.0 91.1 89.7 90.3 92.0
October................................. 82.4 83.6 76.4 82.1 82.7 83.6 83.0
Average................................. 87.3 88.9 81.0 88.5 87.4 88.5 89.8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Source: National Climate Data Center records from 2005
through 2012. According to the petition, some data may be missing in
the record, but no average has less than 7 years of data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The data shows that annual growing season high temperatures within
the proposed Willcox AVA are lower than those in four of the six
surrounding regions. The four regions are all at significantly lower
elevations than the proposed AVA. Temperatures in Douglas, AZ, which is
at a similar elevation to the proposed AVA, are nearly identical to
those of the proposed AVA. Of the six surrounding weather stations, the
station within the Chiricahua Mountains, adjacent to the southeastern
boundary of the proposed AVA, is at the highest elevation and, as a
result, has the lowest average high temperature.
The data in the table shows that during the months of May and June,
temperatures within the proposed Willcox AVA are noticeably lower than
in all of the surrounding regions, with the exception of the higher
elevations of
[[Page 3360]]
the Chiricahua Mountains. The petition notes that May and June, just
before the start of the monsoon season, are the most stressful months
for vines. The air is very dry, and most of the water stored in the
soil from late winter rains has been depleted. Temperatures begin to
rise noticeably during these two months, placing heat stress on the
vines and increasing the amount of water that evaporates from their
leaves. Therefore, in such a warm region as southeastern Arizona,
average high temperatures that are only a few degrees cooler than the
surrounding area offer respite to the vines, particularly during the
hot, dry pre-monsoon months.
The climate of the proposed Willcox AVA affects viticulture. The
hot temperatures, combined with extremely dry air for much of the
growing season, put heavy stress on the vines. In order to preserve
water, the vines close the stoma on their leaves during the hottest
parts of the day, especially when temperatures rise above 90 degrees
Fahrenheit. When the stoma are closed, however, photosynthesis slows
considerably, preventing the plant from producing food efficiently. As
a result, fruit development and maturation is delayed. The lack of
cloud cover for most of the growing season puts the grapes at risk for
sunburn. So vineyard owners within the proposed AVA manage canopy
levels to provide shelter for the fruit. Although the rainfall amounts
during the monsoonal season are not heavy enough to eliminate the need
for irrigation, the rains do provide some relief for the vines and also
replenish the aquifer, which is the only source of water within the
closed basin system that forms the proposed AVA. Additionally, the
monsoon season brings relief to the vines in the form of higher
humidity levels, which allow the stoma to remain open longer and
produce food for the vine during the peak period of fruit development.
Finally, the increased cloud cover during the monsoon season lowers
temperatures slightly and provides the maturing grapes some protection
from sunburn.
Summary of Distinguishing Features
In summary, the evidence provided in the petition indicates that
the viticulturally significant geographic features of the proposed
Willcox AVA distinguish it from the surrounding regions in each
direction. With respect to topography, the proposed AVA is located
within a flat valley that is part of a closed basin system. By
contrast, the regions adjacent to the northern, eastern, and western
boundaries of the proposed AVA are all marked by mountainous terrain
with higher, steeper elevations. Beyond each of these mountain ranges
are large valleys with lower elevations than the proposed AVA. These
valleys are also all open basin systems, and the valley floors have all
been eroded to varying degrees by flowing water. South of the proposed
AVA is the lower-elevation Sulphur Springs Valley, which is also an
open basin system.
The soils of the surrounding regions are primarily loams, as are
the soils of the proposed Willcox AVA. However, the soil series that
comprise the majority of the soils within the proposed AVA are
generally present only in very small amounts outside the proposed AVA
or, in some cases, are not present at all. The exception is the region
to the southeast of the proposed AVA, where 4 of the 11 primary soil
series of the proposed AVA are found in higher amounts.
The climate of the proposed Willcox AVA is hot and arid like much
of the surrounding regions. However, growing season high temperatures
within the proposed AVA are lower than those of most of the surrounding
region, notably during the months of May and June. The exception is
within the higher elevations of the Chiricahua Mountains, where growing
season temperatures are generally lower than within the proposed AVA.
Annual rainfall amounts within the proposed AVA are higher than those
of the surrounding regions, with the exception of the foothill regions
to the southeast and southwest of the proposed AVA.
TTB Determination
TTB concludes that the petition to establish the approximately
526,000-acre Willcox AVA merits consideration and public comment, as
invited in this proposed rule.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the boundary of the petitioned-for
AVA in the proposed regulatory text published at the end of this
proposed rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required maps, and they are listed
below in the proposed regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. For a wine to be labeled with an AVA name, at least 85
percent of the wine must be derived from grapes grown within the area
represented by that name, and the wine must meet the other conditions
listed in Sec. 4.25(e)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)).
If the wine is not eligible for labeling with an AVA name and that name
appears in the brand name, then the label is not in compliance and the
bottler must change the brand name and obtain approval of a new label.
Similarly, if the AVA name appears in another reference on the label in
a misleading manner, the bottler would have to obtain approval of a new
label. Different rules apply if a wine has a brand name containing an
AVA name that was used as a brand name on a label approved before July
7, 1986. See Sec. 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
4.39(i)(2)) for details.
If TTB establishes this proposed AVA, its name, ``Willcox,'' will
be recognized as a name of viticultural significance under Sec.
4.39(i)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.39(i)(3)). The text of the
proposed regulation clarifies this point. Consequently, if this
proposed rule is adopted as a final rule, wine bottlers using the name
``Willcox'' in a brand name, including a trademark, or in another label
reference as to the origin of the wine, would have to ensure that the
product is eligible to use the AVA name as an appellation of origin.
Public Participation
Comments Invited
TTB invites comments from interested members of the public on
whether it should establish the proposed AVA. TTB is also interested in
receiving comments on the sufficiency and accuracy of the name,
boundary, soils, climate, and other required information submitted in
support of the petition. Please provide any available specific
information in support of your comments.
Because of the potential impact of the establishment of the
proposed Willcox AVA on wine labels that include the term ``Willcox,''
as discussed above under Impact on Current Wine Labels, TTB is
particularly interested in comments regarding whether there will be a
conflict between the proposed area name and currently used brand names.
If a commenter believes that a conflict will arise, the comment should
describe the nature of that conflict, including any anticipated
negative economic impact that approval of the proposed AVA will have on
an existing viticultural enterprise. TTB is also interested in
receiving suggestions for ways to avoid conflicts, for example, by
adopting a modified or different name for the AVA.
Submitting Comments
You may submit comments on this proposed rule by using one of the
[[Page 3361]]
following three methods (please note that TTB has a new address for
comments submitted by U.S. Mail):
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: You may send comments via the
online comment form posted with this proposed rule within Docket No.
TTB-2016-0002 on ``Regulations.gov,'' the Federal e-rulemaking portal,
at https://www.regulations.gov. A direct link to that docket is
available under Notice No. 157 on the TTB Web site at https://www.ttb.gov/wine/wine-rulemaking.shtml. Supplemental files may be
attached to comments submitted via Regulations.gov. For complete
instructions on how to use Regulations.gov, visit the site and click on
the ``Help'' tab.
U.S. Mail: You may send comments via postal mail to the
Director, Regulations and Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005.
Hand Delivery/Courier: You may hand-carry your comments or
have them hand-carried to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau,
1310 G Street NW., Suite 400, Washington, DC 20005.
Please submit your comments by the closing date shown above in this
proposed rule. Your comments must reference Notice No. 157 and include
your name and mailing address. Your comments also must be made in
English, be legible, and be written in language acceptable for public
disclosure. TTB does not acknowledge receipt of comments, and TTB
considers all comments as originals.
In your comment, please clearly indicate if you are commenting on
your own behalf or on behalf of an association, business, or other
entity. If you are commenting on behalf of an entity, your comment must
include the entity's name, as well as your name and position title. If
you comment via Regulations.gov, please enter the entity's name in the
``Organization'' blank of the online comment form. If you comment via
postal mail or hand delivery/courier, please submit your entity's
comment on letterhead.
You may also write to the Administrator before the comment closing
date to ask for a public hearing. The Administrator reserves the right
to determine whether to hold a public hearing.
Confidentiality
All submitted comments and attachments are part of the public
record and subject to disclosure. Do not enclose any material in your
comments that you consider to be confidential or inappropriate for
public disclosure.
Public Disclosure
TTB will post, and you may view, copies of this proposed rule,
selected supporting materials, and any online or mailed comments
received about this proposal within Docket No. TTB-2016-0002 on the
Federal e-rulemaking portal, Regulations.gov, at https://www.regulations.gov. A direct link to that docket is available on the
TTB Web site at https://www.ttb.gov/wine/wine-rulemaking.shtml under
Notice No. 157. You may also reach the relevant docket through the
Regulations.gov search page at https://www.regulations.gov. For
information on how to use Regulations.gov, click on the site's ``Help''
tab.
All posted comments will display the commenter's name, organization
(if any), city, and State, and, in the case of mailed comments, all
address information, including email addresses. TTB may omit voluminous
attachments or material that the Bureau considers unsuitable for
posting.
You may also view copies of this proposed rule, all related
petitions, maps and other supporting materials, and any electronic or
mailed comments that TTB receives about this proposal by appointment at
the TTB Information Resource Center, 1310 G Street NW., Washington, DC
20005. You may also obtain copies at 20 cents per 8.5- x 11-inch page.
Please note that TTB is unable to provide copies of USGS maps or other
similarly-sized documents that may be included as part of the AVA
petition. Contact TTB's information specialist at the above address or
by telephone at 202-453-2270 to schedule an appointment or to request
copies of comments or other materials.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this proposed regulation, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The proposed regulation imposes no new reporting,
recordkeeping, or other administrative requirement. Any benefit derived
from the use of an AVA name would be the result of a proprietor's
efforts and consumer acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted
this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
Proposed Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB proposes to amend
title 27, chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
0
2. Subpart C is amended by adding Sec. 9.__to read as follows:
Sec. 9.__Willcox.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this
section is ``Willcox''. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter,
``Willcox'' is a term of viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The 21 United States Geological Survey (USGS)
1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to determine the boundary of the
Willcox viticultural area are titled:
(1) Fort Grant, AZ, 1996;
(2) West of Greasewood Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(3) Greasewood Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(4) Willcox North, AZ, 1996;
(5) Railroad Pass, Ariz., 1979;
(6) Simmons Peak, AZ, 1996;
(7) Dos Cabezas, AZ, 1996;
(8) Pat Hills North, Ariz., 1974;
(9) Pat Hills South, Ariona, 1986 provisional edition;
(10) Sulphur Hills, AZ, 1996;
(11) Pearce, AZ., 1996;
(12) Turquoise Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(13) Black Diamond Peak, AZ, 1996;
(14) Cochise Stronghold, AZ, 1996;
(15) Cochise, AZ, 1996;
(16) Red Bird Hills, AZ, 1996;
(17) Steele Hills, AZ, 1996;
(18) Square Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(19) Muskhog Mountain, AZ, 1996;
(20) Reiley Peak, AZ, 1996; and
(21) Sierra Bonita Ranch, Ariz., 1972.
(c) Boundary. The Willcox viticultural area is located in Cochise
and Graham Counties in southeastern Arizona. The boundary of the
Willcox viticultural area is as described below:
(1) The beginning point is on the Fort Grant map at the
intersection of State
[[Page 3362]]
Highway 266 and an unnamed light-duty road known locally as Curtis
Parkway, in Fort Grant, section 35, T9S/R23E. From the beginning point,
proceed south-southeast in a straight line approximately 20.4 miles,
crossing over the West of Greasewood Mountain and the Greasewood
Mountain map and onto the Willcox North map, to the intersection of
three unnamed light-duty roads known locally as Porters Ranch Road,
East Saguaro Road, and North Circle I Road, near benchmark (BM) 4,243
on the Willcox North map, section 36, T12S/R24E; then
(2) Proceed east in a straight line approximately 5 miles to
Interstate Highway 10 near the community of Raso, section 1, T13S/R25E;
then
(3) Proceed south in a straight line approximately 0.8 mile to the
4,400-foot elevation contour, section 1, T13S/R25E; then
(4) Proceed southwesterly along the 4,400-foot elevation contour
around the west end of the Dos Cabezas Mountains and continue
southeasterly along the 4,400-foot elevation contour for a total of
approximately 13.3 miles, crossing over the Railroad Pass map and onto
the Simmons Peak map, to State Highway 186 on the Simmons Peak map,
section 28, T14S/R26E; then
(5) Proceed south-southeast in a straight line approximately 15.8
miles, crossing over the Dos Cabezas map and onto the Pat Hills North
map, to the intersection of the 4,700-foot elevation contour and an
unnamed light-duty road known locally as East Creasey Ranch Road on the
Pat Hills North map near BM 4,695, section 21, T16S/R28E; then
(6) Proceed southerly along the 4,700-foot elevation contour
approximately 10.6 miles, crossing onto the Pat Hills South map, to an
unnamed light-duty road known locally as East Uncle Curtis Lane,
section 7, T18S/R28E; then
(7) Proceed west along East Uncle Curtis Lane approximately 0.5
mile to an unnamed light-duty road known locally as South Single Tree
Lane near the marked 4,664-foot elevation point, section 7, T18S/R28E;
then
(8) Proceed south along South Single Tree Lane approximately 0.5
mile to State Highway 181, section 7, T18S/R28E; then
(9) Proceed west along State Highway 181 approximately 9.9 miles,
crossing onto the Sulphur Hills map, to State Highway 191, section 10,
T18S/R26E; then
(10) Proceed north-northeasterly, then west, along State Highway
191 approximately 4.8 miles, crossing onto the Pearce map, to an
unnamed light-duty road known locally as Kansas Settlement Road, near
BM 4,327, section 36, T17S/R25E; then
(11) Proceed southwest in a straight line approximately 8.9 miles,
crossing over the Turquoise Mountain map and onto the Black Diamond
Peak map, to the southeastern-most corner of the boundary of the
Coronado National Forest on the Black Diamond Peak map, section 35,
T18S/R24E; then
(12) Proceed north along the boundary of the Coronado National
Forest approximately 2 miles to the marked 4,821-foot elevation point,
section 26, T18S/R24E; then
(13) Proceed north-northwest in a straight line approximately 13
miles, crossing over the Cochise Stronghold map and onto the Cochise
map, to the northeastern corner of the boundary of the Coronado
National Forest at the marked 4,642 elevation point on the Cochise map,
section 26, T16S/R23E; then
(14) Proceed north-northwest in a straight line approximately 1.2
miles to the intersection of the 4,450-foot elevation contour and an
unnamed secondary highway known locally as West Dragoon Road, section
23, T16S/R23E; then
(15) Proceed north in a straight line approximately 1.3 miles to
the 4,400-foot elevation contour, section 11, T16S/R23E; then
(16) Proceed generally northerly along the 4,400-foot elevation
contour approximately 10 miles, crossing onto the Red Bird Hills map,
to Interstate Highway 10, section 3, T15S/R23E; then
(17) Proceed north-northwest in a straight line approximately 5.8
miles, crossing onto the Steele Hills map, to the intersection of the
4,600-foot elevation contour and an unnamed light-duty road known
locally as West Airport Road, section 7, T14S/R23E; then
(18) Proceed east-northeasterly, then easterly, then northerly,
then easterly along West Airport Road approximately 7.2 miles, crossing
back onto the Red Bird Hills map and then onto the Square Mountain map,
to the 4,240-foot elevation contour east of BM 4,264, section 6, T14S/
R24E; then
(19) Proceed north-northwest in a straight line approximately 20.5
miles, crossing over the Muskhog Mountain and Reiley Peak maps and onto
the Sierra Bonita Ranch map, to the intersection of two unnamed light-
duty roads known locally as West Ash Creek Road and South Wells Road,
near BM 4,487 on the Sierra Bonita Ranch map, section 3, T11S/R22E;
then
(20) Proceed generally northerly along South Wells Road to BM
4,502, then continuing northerly along the western fork of the road for
a total of approximately 7.7 miles to an unnamed light-duty road known
locally as Bonita Aravaipa Road, section 27, T9S/R22E; then
(21) Proceed east in a straight line approximately 8.2 miles,
crossing onto the Fort Grant map, to the beginning point.
Signed: January 13, 2016.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016-01150 Filed 1-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P