Medical Devices; Ear, Nose, and Throat Devices; Classification of the Tympanic Membrane Contact Hearing Aid, 3325-3327 [2016-01090]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 874
[Docket No. FDA–2015–N–4328]
Medical Devices; Ear, Nose, and Throat
Devices; Classification of the
Tympanic Membrane Contact Hearing
Aid
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is classifying the
tympanic membrane contact hearing aid
into class II (special controls). The
special controls that will apply to the
device are identified in this order and
will be part of the codified language for
the tympanic membrane contact hearing
aid’s classification. The Agency is
classifying the device into class II
(special controls) in order to provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device.
DATES: This order is effective January
21, 2016. The classification was
applicable on September 29, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cherish Giusto, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2432, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–9679,
cherish.giusto@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)), devices that were not in
commercial distribution before May 28,
1976 (the date of enactment of the
Medical Device Amendments of 1976),
generally referred to as postamendments
devices, are classified automatically by
statute into class III without any FDA
rulemaking process. These devices
remain in class III and require
premarket approval unless and until the
device is classified or reclassified into
class I or II, or FDA issues an order
finding the device to be substantially
equivalent, in accordance with section
513(i), to a predicate device that does
not require premarket approval. The
Agency determines whether new
devices are substantially equivalent to
predicate devices by means of
premarket notification procedures in
section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part
807) of the regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, as
amended by section 607 of the Food and
Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–144),
provides two procedures by which a
person may request FDA to classify a
device under the criteria set forth in
section 513(a)(1). Under the first
procedure, the person submits a
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act for a device that
has not previously been classified and,
within 30 days of receiving an order
classifying the device into class III
under section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act,
the person requests a classification
under section 513(f)(2). Under the
second procedure, rather than first
submitting a premarket notification
under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act
and then a request for classification
under the first procedure, the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence and requests a classification
under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
If the person submits a request to
classify the device under this second
procedure, FDA may decline to
undertake the classification request if
FDA identifies a legally marketed device
that could provide a reasonable basis for
review of substantial equivalence with
the device or if FDA determines that the
device submitted is not of ‘‘lowmoderate risk’’ or that general controls
would be inadequate to control the risks
and special controls to mitigate the risks
cannot be developed.
In response to a request to classify a
device under either procedure provided
by section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act,
FDA will classify the device by written
order within 120 days. This
classification will be the initial
classification of the device.
On January 5, 2015, EarLens
Corporation submitted a request for
classification of the EarLensTM Contact
Hearing Device under section 513(f)(2)
of the FD&C Act. The manufacturer
recommended that the device be
classified into class II (Ref. 1).
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed the
request in order to classify the device
under the criteria for classification set
forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C
Act. FDA classifies devices into class II
if general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device for its
intended use. After review of the
information submitted in the request,
FDA determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
believes these special controls, in
addition to general controls, will
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on September 29, 2015,
FDA issued an order to the requestor
classifying the device into class II. FDA
is codifying the classification of the
device by adding 21 CFR 874.3315.
Following the effective date of this
final classification order, any firm
submitting a premarket notification
(510(k)) for a tympanic membrane
contact hearing aid will need to comply
with the special controls named in this
final administrative order.
The device is assigned the generic
name tympanic membrane contact
hearing aid, and it is identified as a
prescription device that compensates for
impaired hearing. Amplified sound is
transmitted by vibrating the tympanic
membrane through a transducer that is
in direct contact with the tympanic
membrane.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device and the measures
required to mitigate these risks:
TABLE 1—TYMPANIC MEMBRANE CONTACT HEARING AID RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Identified risks
Mitigation methods
Adverse Tissue Reactions .......................................................................................................................
Electromagnetic Incompatibility ................................................................................................................
MRI Incompatibility ...................................................................................................................................
Overheating of Ear Canal or Skin ............................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:08 Jan 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3325
Biocompatibility.
Labeling.
Non-Clinical Performance Testing.
Labeling.
Labeling.
Non-Clinical Performance Testing.
Clinical Performance Testing.
E:\FR\FM\21JAR1.SGM
21JAR1
3326
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—TYMPANIC MEMBRANE CONTACT HEARING AID RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES—Continued
Identified risks
Mitigation methods
Damage to Eyes from Direct Laser Exposure 1 .......................................................................................
Trauma/Damage to the Ear Canal, Tympanic Membrane, or Middle Ear System .................................
Residual Hearing Loss .............................................................................................................................
Ear Infections ...........................................................................................................................................
Vertigo or Tinnitus ....................................................................................................................................
Dampening of Residual Hearing When the Device is Turned Off ...........................................................
Labeling.
Labeling.
Non-Clinical Performance Testing.
Clinical Performance Testing.
Training.
Labeling.
Non-Clinical Performance Testing.
Clinical Performance Testing.
Labeling.
Clinical Performance Testing.
Labeling.
Clinical Performance Testing.
Labeling.
Clinical Performance Testing.
Labeling.
1 A tympanic membrane contact hearing aid may contain a Class 1 laser product in its removable external component, which users will remove
from their ear when the device is not in use (for example, to sleep or bathe). When being handled off of the ear, it is possible that the user could
look directly at the laser. Thus, there is a risk of ‘‘damage to eyes from direct laser exposure.’’ As mitigation, the user should be warned in labeling not to look directly into the laser or aim it at their eyes.
FDA believes that special controls, in
combination with the general controls,
address these risks to health and
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness.
Tympanic membrane contact hearing
aids are prescription devices restricted
to patient use only upon the
authorization of a practitioner licensed
by law to administer or use the device;
see 21 CFR 801.109 (Prescription
devices).
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act
provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k), if
FDA determines that premarket
notification is not necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device. For this type
of device, FDA has determined that
premarket notification is necessary to
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, this device type is not
exempt from premarket notification
requirements. Persons who intend to
market this type of device must submit
to FDA a premarket notification, prior to
marketing the device, which contains
information about the tympanic
membrane contact hearing aid they
intend to market.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
II. Environmental Impact, No
Significant Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR
25.34(b) that this action is of a type that
does not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:08 Jan 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final administrative order
establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of
information found in other FDA
regulations. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
collections of information in part 807,
subpart E, regarding premarket
notification submissions have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0120, and the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 801,
regarding labeling have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0485.
IV. Reference
The following reference is on display
in the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) and is available for
viewing by interested persons between
9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday; it is also available electronically
at https://www.regulations.gov. FDA has
verified the Web site address, as of the
date this document publishes in the
Federal Register, but Web sites are
subject to change over time.
1. DEN150002: De novo Request per 513(f)(2)
from EarLens Corporation, dated January
5, 2015.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 874
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 874 is
amended as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 874—EAR, NOSE, AND THROAT
DEVICES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 874 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 371.
2. Add § 874.3315 to subpart D to read
as follows:
■
§ 874.3315 Tympanic membrane contact
hearing aid.
(a) Identification. A tympanic
membrane contact hearing aid is a
prescription device that compensates for
impaired hearing. Amplified sound is
transmitted by vibrating the tympanic
membrane through a transducer that is
in direct contact with the tympanic
membrane.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) The patient contacting
components must be demonstrated to be
biocompatible.
(2) Non-clinical performance testing
must demonstrate that the device
performs as intended under anticipated
conditions of use, and must include:
(i) Mechanical integrity testing;
(ii) Electrical and thermal safety
testing;
(iii) Software verification, validation,
and hazard analysis;
(iv) Reliability testing consistent with
expected device life;
(v) Electromagnetic compatibility
testing; and
(vi) Validation testing of device
output and mechanical force applied to
the tympanic membrane in a clinically
appropriate model.
(3) Clinical performance testing must
characterize any adverse events
observed during clinical use, and
E:\FR\FM\21JAR1.SGM
21JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
demonstrate that the device performs as
intended under anticipated conditions
of use.
(4) Professional training must include
the ear impression procedure, correct
placement, fitting, monitoring, care, and
maintenance of the device.
(5) Labeling must include the
following:
(i) A detailed summary of the adverse
events and effectiveness outcomes from
the clinical performance testing;
(ii) Detailed instructions on how to fit
the device to the patient;
(iii) Instructions for periodic cleaning
of any reusable components;
(iv) Information related to
electromagnetic compatibility; and
(v) Patient labeling that includes:
(A) A patient card that identifies if a
patient has been fitted with any nonself- removable components of the
device and provides relevant
information in cases of emergency;
(B) Information on how to correctly
use and maintain the device;
(C) The potential risks and benefits
associated with the use of the device;
and
(D) Alternative treatments.
Dated: January 13, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–01090 Filed 1–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2015–0004; T.D. TTB–132;
Ref: Notice No. 148]
RIN 1513–AC11
Establishment of the Los Olivos
District Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the
approximately 22,820-acre ‘‘Los Olivos
District’’ viticultural area in Santa
Barbara County, California. The
viticultural area is located within the
Santa Ynez Valley viticultural area and
the larger, multicounty Central Coast
viticultural area. TTB designates
viticultural areas to allow vintners to
better describe the origin of their wines
and to allow consumers to better
identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective
February 22, 2016.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:08 Jan 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005;
phone 202–453–1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01, dated
December 10, 2013 (superseding
Treasury Department Order 120–01,
dated January 24, 2003), to the TTB
Administrator to perform the functions
and duties in the administration and
enforcement of these provisions.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) authorizes TTB to establish
definitive viticultural areas and regulate
the use of their names as appellations of
origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth
standards for the preparation and
submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of
American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region having
distinguishing features, as described in
part 9 of the regulations, and a name
and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and
consumers to attribute a given quality,
reputation, or other characteristic of a
wine made from grapes grown in an area
to the wine’s geographic origin. The
establishment of AVAs allows vintners
to describe more accurately the origin of
their wines to consumers and helps
consumers to identify wines they may
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3327
purchase. Establishment of an AVA is
neither an approval nor an endorsement
by TTB of the wine produced in that
area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines
the procedure for proposing an AVA
and provides that any interested party
may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as an AVA. Section 9.12
of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12)
prescribes standards for petitions for the
establishment or modification of AVAs.
Petitions to establish an AVA must
include the following:
• Evidence that the area within the
proposed AVA boundary is nationally
or locally known by the AVA name
specified in the petition;
• An explanation of the basis for
defining the boundary of the proposed
AVA;
• A narrative description of the
features of the proposed AVA affecting
viticulture, such as climate, geology,
soils, physical features, and elevation,
that make the proposed AVA distinctive
and distinguish it from adjacent areas
outside the proposed AVA boundary;
• The appropriate United States
Geological Survey (USGS) map(s)
showing the location of the proposed
AVA, with the boundary of the
proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon;
and
• A detailed narrative description of
the proposed AVA boundary based on
USGS map markings.
Los Olivos District Petition
TTB received a petition from C.
Frederic Brander, owner and winemaker
of the Brander Vineyard, proposing the
establishment of the ‘‘Los Olivos
District’’ AVA in Santa Barbara County,
California. There are 12 bonded
wineries and approximately 47
commercially producing vineyards
covering a total of 1,120 acres within the
proposed AVA. The proposed Los
Olivos District AVA shares its western
boundary with the eastern boundary of
the Ballard Canyon AVA (27 CFR 9.230)
and its eastern boundary with the
western boundary of the Happy Canyon
of Santa Barbara AVA (27 CR 9.217), but
it does not overlap either of these AVAs.
It is located within the Santa Ynez
Valley viticultural area and the larger,
multicounty Central Coast viticultural
area.
According to the petition, the
distinguishing features of the proposed
Los Olivos District AVA include its
topography, soils, and climate. The
proposed AVA is located on a broad
alluvial terrace plain of the Santa Ynez
E:\FR\FM\21JAR1.SGM
21JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 13 (Thursday, January 21, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3325-3327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01090]
[[Page 3325]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 874
[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-4328]
Medical Devices; Ear, Nose, and Throat Devices; Classification of
the Tympanic Membrane Contact Hearing Aid
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the
tympanic membrane contact hearing aid into class II (special controls).
The special controls that will apply to the device are identified in
this order and will be part of the codified language for the tympanic
membrane contact hearing aid's classification. The Agency is
classifying the device into class II (special controls) in order to
provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the
device.
DATES: This order is effective January 21, 2016. The classification was
applicable on September 29, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cherish Giusto, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2432, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-9679,
cherish.giusto@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)), devices that were
not in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 (the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976), generally referred
to as postamendments devices, are classified automatically by statute
into class III without any FDA rulemaking process. These devices remain
in class III and require premarket approval unless and until the device
is classified or reclassified into class I or II, or FDA issues an
order finding the device to be substantially equivalent, in accordance
with section 513(i), to a predicate device that does not require
premarket approval. The Agency determines whether new devices are
substantially equivalent to predicate devices by means of premarket
notification procedures in section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807) of the regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, as amended by section 607 of the
Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-
144), provides two procedures by which a person may request FDA to
classify a device under the criteria set forth in section 513(a)(1).
Under the first procedure, the person submits a premarket notification
under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act for a device that has not
previously been classified and, within 30 days of receiving an order
classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of the
FD&C Act, the person requests a classification under section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a premarket
notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act and then a request
for classification under the first procedure, the person determines
that there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial equivalence and requests a classification
under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. If the person submits a
request to classify the device under this second procedure, FDA may
decline to undertake the classification request if FDA identifies a
legally marketed device that could provide a reasonable basis for
review of substantial equivalence with the device or if FDA determines
that the device submitted is not of ``low-moderate risk'' or that
general controls would be inadequate to control the risks and special
controls to mitigate the risks cannot be developed.
In response to a request to classify a device under either
procedure provided by section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA will
classify the device by written order within 120 days. This
classification will be the initial classification of the device.
On January 5, 2015, EarLens Corporation submitted a request for
classification of the EarLensTM Contact Hearing Device under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. The manufacturer recommended that
the device be classified into class II (Ref. 1).
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed
the request in order to classify the device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. FDA
classifies devices into class II if general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device for its intended use. After review of the
information submitted in the request, FDA determined that the device
can be classified into class II with the establishment of special
controls. FDA believes these special controls, in addition to general
controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on September 29, 2015, FDA issued an order to the
requestor classifying the device into class II. FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 874.3315.
Following the effective date of this final classification order,
any firm submitting a premarket notification (510(k)) for a tympanic
membrane contact hearing aid will need to comply with the special
controls named in this final administrative order.
The device is assigned the generic name tympanic membrane contact
hearing aid, and it is identified as a prescription device that
compensates for impaired hearing. Amplified sound is transmitted by
vibrating the tympanic membrane through a transducer that is in direct
contact with the tympanic membrane.
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks:
Table 1--Tympanic Membrane Contact Hearing Aid Risks and Mitigation Measures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks Mitigation methods
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adverse Tissue Reactions.................... Biocompatibility.
Labeling.
Electromagnetic Incompatibility............. Non-Clinical Performance Testing.
Labeling.
MRI Incompatibility......................... Labeling.
Overheating of Ear Canal or Skin............ Non-Clinical Performance Testing.
Clinical Performance Testing.
[[Page 3326]]
Labeling.
Damage to Eyes from Direct Laser Exposure Labeling.
\1\.
Trauma/Damage to the Ear Canal, Tympanic Non-Clinical Performance Testing.
Membrane, or Middle Ear System.
Clinical Performance Testing.
Training.
Labeling.
Residual Hearing Loss....................... Non-Clinical Performance Testing.
Clinical Performance Testing.
Labeling.
Ear Infections.............................. Clinical Performance Testing.
Labeling.
Vertigo or Tinnitus......................... Clinical Performance Testing.
Labeling.
Dampening of Residual Hearing When the Clinical Performance Testing.
Device is Turned Off.
Labeling.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A tympanic membrane contact hearing aid may contain a Class 1 laser product in its removable external
component, which users will remove from their ear when the device is not in use (for example, to sleep or
bathe). When being handled off of the ear, it is possible that the user could look directly at the laser.
Thus, there is a risk of ``damage to eyes from direct laser exposure.'' As mitigation, the user should be
warned in labeling not to look directly into the laser or aim it at their eyes.
FDA believes that special controls, in combination with the general
controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness.
Tympanic membrane contact hearing aids are prescription devices
restricted to patient use only upon the authorization of a practitioner
licensed by law to administer or use the device; see 21 CFR 801.109
(Prescription devices).
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification requirements under section
510(k), if FDA determines that premarket notification is not necessary
to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the
device. For this type of device, FDA has determined that premarket
notification is necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety
and effectiveness of the device. Therefore, this device type is not
exempt from premarket notification requirements. Persons who intend to
market this type of device must submit to FDA a premarket notification,
prior to marketing the device, which contains information about the
tympanic membrane contact hearing aid they intend to market.
II. Environmental Impact, No Significant Impact
We have determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final administrative order establishes special controls that
refer to previously approved collections of information found in other
FDA regulations. These collections of information are subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of
information in part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket notification
submissions have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0120, and
the collections of information in 21 CFR part 801, regarding labeling
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0485.
IV. Reference
The following reference is on display in the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) and is available for viewing by interested
persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday; it is also
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov. FDA has
verified the Web site address, as of the date this document publishes
in the Federal Register, but Web sites are subject to change over time.
1. DEN150002: De novo Request per 513(f)(2) from EarLens
Corporation, dated January 5, 2015.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 874
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
874 is amended as follows:
PART 874--EAR, NOSE, AND THROAT DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 874 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 874.3315 to subpart D to read as follows:
Sec. 874.3315 Tympanic membrane contact hearing aid.
(a) Identification. A tympanic membrane contact hearing aid is a
prescription device that compensates for impaired hearing. Amplified
sound is transmitted by vibrating the tympanic membrane through a
transducer that is in direct contact with the tympanic membrane.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) The patient contacting components must be demonstrated to be
biocompatible.
(2) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the
device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use, and
must include:
(i) Mechanical integrity testing;
(ii) Electrical and thermal safety testing;
(iii) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis;
(iv) Reliability testing consistent with expected device life;
(v) Electromagnetic compatibility testing; and
(vi) Validation testing of device output and mechanical force
applied to the tympanic membrane in a clinically appropriate model.
(3) Clinical performance testing must characterize any adverse
events observed during clinical use, and
[[Page 3327]]
demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated
conditions of use.
(4) Professional training must include the ear impression
procedure, correct placement, fitting, monitoring, care, and
maintenance of the device.
(5) Labeling must include the following:
(i) A detailed summary of the adverse events and effectiveness
outcomes from the clinical performance testing;
(ii) Detailed instructions on how to fit the device to the patient;
(iii) Instructions for periodic cleaning of any reusable
components;
(iv) Information related to electromagnetic compatibility; and
(v) Patient labeling that includes:
(A) A patient card that identifies if a patient has been fitted
with any non-self- removable components of the device and provides
relevant information in cases of emergency;
(B) Information on how to correctly use and maintain the device;
(C) The potential risks and benefits associated with the use of the
device; and
(D) Alternative treatments.
Dated: January 13, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-01090 Filed 1-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P