Information Collection; Contractors' Purchasing Systems Reviews, 3135-3136 [2016-00989]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2016 / Notices
related to this collection. Comments
received generally will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided. To confirm
receipt of your comment(s), please
check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Curtis E. Glover, Sr., Procurement
Analyst, Contract Policy Division, GSA,
202–501–1448 or email at curtis.glover@
gsa.gov.
A. Purpose
Per Federal Acquisition Regulation
Part 48, value engineering is the
technique by which contractors (1)
voluntarily suggest methods for
performing more economically and
share in any resulting savings or (2) are
required to establish a program to
identify and submit to the Government
methods for performing more
economically. These recommendations
are submitted to the Government as
value engineering change proposals
(VECP’s) and they must include specific
information. This information is needed
to enable the Government to evaluate
the VECP and, if accepted, to arrange for
an equitable sharing plan.
tkelley on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 3,200.
Responses per Respondent: 2.
Annual Responses: 3,200.
Hours per Response: 15.
Total Burden Hours: 48,000.
18:12 Jan 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
Dated: January 13, 2016.
Lorin S. Curit,
Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division,
Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy,
Office of Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–00988 Filed 1–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0132; Docket 2016–
0053; Sequence 1]
Information Collection; Contractors’
Purchasing Systems Reviews
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public
comments regarding an extension to an
existing OMB clearance.
AGENCY:
Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Secretariat Division will be
submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review
and approve an extension of a
previously approved information
collection requirement concerning
contractors’ purchasing systems
reviews.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments on or before
March 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by Information Collection
9000–0132, Contractors’ Purchasing
Systems Reviews, by any of the
following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Submit comments via the Federal
eRulemaking portal by searching the
OMB control number. Select the link
‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds
with ‘‘Information Collection 9000–
0132, Contractors’ Purchasing Systems
Reviews’’. Follow the instructions
provided at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’
screen. Please include your name,
company name (if any), and
‘‘Information Collection 9000–0132,
Contractors’ Purchasing Systems
Reviews’’ on your attached document.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20405. ATTN: Ms.
DATES:
C. Public Comments
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary; whether it will
have practical utility; whether our
estimate of the public burden of this
collection of information is accurate,
and based on valid assumptions and
methodology; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways in
which we can minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, through the use of
appropriate technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB),
1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC
20405, telephone 202–501–4755. Please
cite OMB Control No. 9000–0027, Value
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Engineering Requirements, in all
correspondence.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3135
Flowers/IC 9000–0132, Contractors’
Purchasing Systems Reviews.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite Information Collection
9000–0132, Contractors’ Purchasing
Systems Reviews, in all correspondence
related to this collection. Comments
received generally will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided. To confirm
receipt of your comment(s), please
check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Mahruba Uddowla, Procurement
Analyst, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, GSA, 703–605–2868
or email at mahruba.uddowla@gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
The objective of a contractor
purchasing system review (CPSR), as
discussed in Part 44 of the FAR, is to
evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness
with which the contractor spends
Government funds and complies with
Government policy when
subcontracting. The review provides the
administrative contracting officer (ACO)
a basis for granting, withholding, or
withdrawing approval of the
contractor’s purchasing system.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Number of Respondents: 1,580.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Total Responses: 1,580.
Average Burden per Response: 25.
Total Burden Hours: 39,500.
C. Public Comments
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR), and
whether it will have practical utility;
whether our estimate of the public
burden of this collection of information
is accurate, and based on valid
assumptions and methodology; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
ways in which we can minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, through
the use of appropriate technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
E:\FR\FM\20JAN1.SGM
20JAN1
3136
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2016 / Notices
Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB),
1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC
20405, telephone 202–501–4755. Please
cite OMB Control No. 9000–0132,
Contractors’ Purchasing Systems
Reviews, in all correspondence.
Dated: January 13, 2016.
Lorin S. Curit,
Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division,
Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy,
Office of Acquisition Policy, Office of
Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–00989 Filed 1–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–16–1076; Docket No. CDC–2016–
0009]
Proposed Data Collection Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
AGENCY:
The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of
its continuing efforts to reduce public
burden and maximize the utility of
government information, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing information collections, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995. This notice invites
comment on the proposed revision of
the information collection entitled
‘‘Division of Community Health (DCH)
Training and Technical Assistance:
Needs Assessment and Satisfaction
Surveys’’.
SUMMARY:
Written comments must be
received on or before March 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CDC–2016–
0009 by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal:
Regulation.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
Mail: Leroy A. Richardson,
Information Collection Review Office,
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., MS–
D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
Docket Number. All relevant comments
received will be posted without change
to Regulations.gov, including any
tkelley on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:12 Jan 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
personal information provided. For
access to the docket to read background
documents or comments received, go to
Regulations.gov.
Please note: All public comment
should be submitted through the
Federal eRulemaking portal
(Regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the
address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of
the information collection plan and
instruments, contact the Information
Collection Review Office, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 1600
Clifton Road NE., MS–D74, Atlanta,
Georgia 30329; phone: 404–639–7570;
Email: omb@cdc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal agencies
must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each
collection of information they conduct
or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also
requires Federal agencies to provide a
60-day notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each new
proposed collection, each proposed
extension of existing collection of
information, and each reinstatement of
previously approved information
collection before submitting the
collection to OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, we are
publishing this notice of a proposed
data collection as described below.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology; and (e) estimates of capital
or start-up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information. Burden means
the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal
agency. This includes the time needed
to review instructions; to develop,
acquire, install and utilize technology
and systems for the purpose of
collecting, validating and verifying
information, processing and
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; to train
personnel and to be able to respond to
a collection of information, to search
data sources, to complete and review
the collection of information; and to
transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
Proposed Project
Division of Community Health (DCH)
Training and Technical Assistance:
Needs Assessment and Satisfaction
Surveys (OMB No. 0920–1076, exp. 7/
31/2017)—Revision—National Center
for Chronic Disease Prevention and
Health Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Division of
Community Health (DCH), requests
OMB approval to revise an ongoing
information collection. The original
information collection plan was based
on two needs assessments conducted
with DCH awardees at two different
time points. In the proposed Revision,
CDC describes plans to assess awardee
satisfaction with the training and
technical assistance (TA) being
provided to them, in lieu of conducting
the second needs assessment. The
project title is being revised to reflect
changes in the information collection
plan. The original project title was
‘‘DCH Awardee Training Needs
Assessment.’’
In 2014, DCH announced the
availability of funding for two
cooperative agreement programs
authorized by the Public Health Service
Act: Partnerships for Community Health
(PICH) and Racial and Ethnic
Approaches to Community Health
(REACH). The REACH cooperative
agreement is financed in part by the
Prevention and Public Health Fund of
the Affordable Care Act. The
cooperative agreements are designed to
address chronic diseases and risk factors
for chronic diseases, including physical
inactivity, poor diet, obesity, and
tobacco use. These risk factors
contribute to chronic conditions such as
heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and
obesity. Over three-year funding
periods, PICH and REACH awardees are
providing support for implementation of
broad, evidence- and practice-based
policy and environmental
improvements in large and small cities,
urban and rural areas, tribes, multisector community coalitions, and racial
and ethnic communities experiencing
chronic disease disparities. PICH and
REACH awardees include a mix of state,
E:\FR\FM\20JAN1.SGM
20JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 20, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3135-3136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-00989]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000-0132; Docket 2016-0053; Sequence 1]
Information Collection; Contractors' Purchasing Systems Reviews
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for public comments regarding an extension to
an existing OMB clearance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Regulatory Secretariat Division will be submitting to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve an
extension of a previously approved information collection requirement
concerning contractors' purchasing systems reviews.
DATES: Submit comments on or before March 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by Information Collection 9000-
0132, Contractors' Purchasing Systems Reviews, by any of the following
methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching the
OMB control number. Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that
corresponds with ``Information Collection 9000-0132, Contractors'
Purchasing Systems Reviews''. Follow the instructions provided at the
``Submit a Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if
any), and ``Information Collection 9000-0132, Contractors' Purchasing
Systems Reviews'' on your attached document.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405.
ATTN: Ms. Flowers/IC 9000-0132, Contractors' Purchasing Systems
Reviews.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite Information
Collection 9000-0132, Contractors' Purchasing Systems Reviews, in all
correspondence related to this collection. Comments received generally
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal and/or business confidential information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting
(except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Mahruba Uddowla, Procurement
Analyst, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, GSA, 703-605-2868
or email at mahruba.uddowla@gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
The objective of a contractor purchasing system review (CPSR), as
discussed in Part 44 of the FAR, is to evaluate the efficiency and
effectiveness with which the contractor spends Government funds and
complies with Government policy when subcontracting. The review
provides the administrative contracting officer (ACO) a basis for
granting, withholding, or withdrawing approval of the contractor's
purchasing system.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Number of Respondents: 1,580.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Total Responses: 1,580.
Average Burden per Response: 25.
Total Burden Hours: 39,500.
C. Public Comments
Public comments are particularly invited on: Whether this
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
functions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), and whether it
will have practical utility; whether our estimate of the public burden
of this collection of information is accurate, and based on valid
assumptions and methodology; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and ways in which we can
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, through the use of appropriate technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals: Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from the General Services
Administration,
[[Page 3136]]
Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., Washington,
DC 20405, telephone 202-501-4755. Please cite OMB Control No. 9000-
0132, Contractors' Purchasing Systems Reviews, in all correspondence.
Dated: January 13, 2016.
Lorin S. Curit,
Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office of
Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-00989 Filed 1-19-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P