Approval of Missouri's Air Quality Implementation Plans; Early Progress Plan of the St. Louis Nonattainment Area for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard, 1887-1890 [2016-00428]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
1887
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
reference, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
Organic Compounds.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Dated: December 30, 2015.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
■
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory
Measures’’ is amended by adding an
entry for ‘‘Crittenden County Base Year
Emission Inventory for the 2008 Ozone
Standard’’ to the end of the table.
The addition reads as follows:
§ 52.170
Subpart E—Arkansas
*
2. In § 52.170(e), the third table titled
‘‘EPA-Approved Nonregulatory
■
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE ARKANSAS SIP
Applicable geographic or
nonattainment area
Name of SIP provision
State
submittal/
effective
date
*
*
*
*
Crittenden County Base Year Emission Inventory Crittenden County ..........
for the 2008 Ozone Standard.
[FR Doc. 2016–00559 Filed 1–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0587; FRL 9941–01–
Region 7]
Approval of Missouri’s Air Quality
Implementation Plans; Early Progress
Plan of the St. Louis Nonattainment
Area for the 2008 Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the State of Missouri consisting of the
Early Progress Plan and motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) for volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides
of nitrogen (NOX) for the St. Louis
Nonattainment area under the 2008
8-hour National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS). On August 26,
2013, EPA received from the Missouri
Department of Natural Resources
(MDNR) an Early Progress Plan for the
St. Louis area showing progress toward
attainment under the 2008 Ozone
NAAQS. This submittal was developed
to establish MVEBs for the St. Louis
8-hour ozone nonattainment area. This
approval of the Early Progress Plan for
the St. Louis 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area fulfills EPA’s
requirement to act on the MDNR SIP
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Jan 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
*
*
8/28/2015 1/13/2016 [Insert Federal Register citation].
submission and to formalize that the
MVEB is approved, and when
considered with the emissions from all
sources, demonstrates progress toward
attainment from the 2008 base year
through a 2015 target year. EPA found
these MVEBs adequate for
transportation conformity purposes in
an earlier action on March 5, 2014.
This direct final rule will be
effective March 14, 2016, without
further notice, unless EPA receives
adverse comment by February 16, 2016.
If EPA receives adverse comment, we
will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2015–0587, to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
EPA approval date
Explanation
*
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven Brown, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
913–551–7718 or by email at
brown.steven@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section
provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What is the background for this action?
II. What are the criteria for early progress
plans?
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the request?
IV. What are the MVEB’s for the St. Louis
8-hour ozone area?
V. What action is EPA taking?
I. What is the background for this
action?
EPA’s final rule designating
nonattainment areas and associated
classifications for the 2008 ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) was published in the Federal
Register on May 21, 2012 (77 FR 30088).
The St. Louis area was designated as
marginal nonattainment. The St. Louis
ozone area had previously been
designated nonattainment for the 1-hour
ozone standard and had 1-hour motor
vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for
NOX and VOC established in the St.
Louis 1-hour maintenance plan SIP (66
FR 33996). The 1-hour MVEBs were the
only approved MVEBs for St. Louis and
were based on EPA’s MOBILE6.2
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
1888
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
emissions model. Consequently, the
transportation partners in St. Louis were
required to use the 1-hour MVEB test to
demonstrate transportation conformity
for the 8-hour ozone standard until new
MVEBs were approved or found
adequate, as required by the
transportation conformity rule at 40 CFR
93.109(c)(2)(i). Missouri submitted this
plan to establish new 8 hour MVEBs
developed with EPA’s current
MOVES2014 model.
EPA allows for the establishment of
MVEBs for the 8-hour ozone standard
prior to a state submitting its first
required 8-hour ozone SIP that would
include new MVEBs. Although
voluntary, these ‘‘early’’ MVEBs must be
established through a plan, known as
the ‘‘Early Progress Plan,’’ that meets all
the requirements of a SIP submittal. The
preamble of the July 1, 2004, final
transportation conformity rule (see, 69
FR 40019) reads as follows:
‘‘The first 8-hour ozone SIP could be
a control strategy SIP required by the
Clean Air Act (e.g., rate-of-progress SIP
or attainment demonstration) or a
maintenance plan. However, 8-hour
ozone nonattainment areas are free to
establish, through the SIP process, a
motor vehicle emissions budget or
budgets that addresses the new NAAQS
in advance of a complete SIP attainment
demonstration. That is, a state could
submit a motor vehicle emission budget
that does not demonstrate attainment
but is consistent with projections and
commitments to control measures and
achieves some progress toward
attainment (August 15, 1997, 62 FR
43799). A SIP submitted earlier than
otherwise required can demonstrate a
significant level of emissions reductions
from current level of emissions, instead
of a specific percentage required by the
Clean Air Act for moderate and above
ozone areas.’’
II. What are the criteria for early
progress plans?
The Early Progress Plan must
demonstrate that the SIP revision
containing the MVEBs, when
considered with emissions from all
sources, and when projected from the
base year to a future year, shows some
progress toward attainment. EPA has
previously indicated that a 5 percent to
10 percent reduction in emissions from
all sources could represent a significant
level of emissions reductions from
current levels (69 FR 40019). This
allowance is provided so that areas have
an opportunity to use the budget test to
demonstrate conformity as opposed to
the interim conformity tests (i.e., 2002
baseline test and/or action versus
baseline test). The budget test with an
adequate or approved MVEB budget is
generally more protective of air quality
and provides a more relevant basis for
conformity determinations than the
interim emissions test. (69 FR 40026).
It should also be noted that the Early
Progress Plan is not a required plan and
does not substitute for required
submissions such as an attainment
demonstration or rate-of-progress plan,
if such plans become required for the St.
Louis 8-hour ozone area.
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the
request?
In August 2013, the State submitted to
EPA an Early Progress Plan for the
purpose of establishing MVEBs for the
St. Louis 8-hour ozone area. The
submittal utilizes a base year of 2008,
and a projected year of 2015 to establish
NOX and VOC MVEBs. The planning
assumptions used to develop the
MVEBs were discussed and agreed to by
the St. Louis interagency consultation
group, East West Gateway (EWG), which
consists of the transportation and air
quality partners in the St. Louis 8-hour
ozone nonattainment area. Tables 1 and
2 below show the differences by source
categories between the 2008 base year
and 2015 forecast year. The NOX and
VOC emissions in tons per day (tpd)
within the St. Louis nonattainment area
are expected to decrease significantly,
31 percent and 12 percent, respectively,
between 2008 and 2015. These emission
trends demonstrate that progress will be
made towards attainment of the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS.
2008 NOX
(tpd)
Source
2015 NOX
(tpd)
Point .........................................................................................................................................................................
Area .........................................................................................................................................................................
On-road ....................................................................................................................................................................
Non-road ..................................................................................................................................................................
88.84
6.52
161.25
65.18
86.32
6.64
76.70
53.72
Total ..................................................................................................................................................................
321.79
223.38
Total Percent Reduction ............................................................................................................................
31%
2008 VOC
(tpd)
Source
2015 VOC
(tpd)
Point .........................................................................................................................................................................
Area .........................................................................................................................................................................
On-road ....................................................................................................................................................................
Non-road ..................................................................................................................................................................
18.01
99.47
60.86
45.08
21.60
111.73
32.70
30.67
Total ..................................................................................................................................................................
223.42
196.70
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Total Percent Reduction ............................................................................................................................
The state submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. In addition, the revision
meets the substantive SIP requirements
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Jan 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
of the CAA, including Section 110 and
implementing regulations.
IV. What are the MVEB’s for the St.
Louis 8-hour ozone area?
Through this rulemaking, EPA is
approving the 2015 regional MVEBs for
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12%
NOX and VOC for the St. Louis 8-hour
ozone area. EPA has determined that the
MVEBs contained in the Early Progress
Plan SIP revision are consistent with
emission reductions from all sources
within the nonattainment area and are
showing progress toward attainment.
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
1889
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
The 2015 MVEBs in tpd for VOCs and
NOX for the St. Louis, Missouri area are
as follows:
2015 NOX
(tons per day)
St. Louis Area MVEB ...............................................................................................................................................
EPA found these MVEBs adequate for
transportation conformity purposes in
an earlier action (March 5, 2014, 79 FR
12504). As of March 19, 2014, the
effective date of EPA’s adequacy finding
for these MVEBs, conformity
determinations in St. Louis must meet
the budget test using these 8-hour
MVEBs, instead of the 1-hour ozone
MVEBs. It should be noted that the
previous adequacy finding does not
relate to the merits of the SIP submittal,
nor does it indicate whether the
submittal meets the requirements for
approval. This EPA rulemaking action
takes formal action on the Early Progress
Plan SIP revision.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
V. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is taking direct final action to
approve this SIP revision. We are
publishing this rule without a prior
proposed rule because we view this as
a noncontroversial action and anticipate
no adverse comment. However, in the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of this
Federal Register, we are publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposed rule to approve this SIP
revision, if adverse comments are
received on this direct final rule. We
will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at
this time. For further information about
commenting on this rule, see the
ADDRESSES section of this document. If
EPA receives adverse comment, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that this direct final rule will not take
effect. We will address all public
comments in any subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Jan 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2015 VOC
(tons per day)
76.70
32.70
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by March 14, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: December 23, 2015.
Mark Hague,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52
as set forth below:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
1890
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
§ 52.1320
Subpart AA—Missouri
2. Section 52.1320(e) is amended by
adding new entry (68) at the end of the
table to read as follows:
■
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI NONREGULATORY SIP PROVISIONS
Name of nonregulatory SIP
provision
Applicable geographic or nonattainment area
State submittal
date
*
*
*
(68) Missouri Early Progress
St. Louis .................................
Plan.
*
8/26/13
[FR Doc. 2016–00428 Filed 1–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 70
[EPA–R07–OAR–2013–0765; FRL–9940–97–
Region 7]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of
Kansas; Annual Emissions Fee and
Annual Emissions Inventory
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule; technical
amendment.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Jan 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
paragraph (f) ‘‘The Kansas Department
of Health and Environment submitted
revisions to Kansas Administrative
Record (KAR) 28–19–202 and 28–19–
517 on April 15, 2011; approval of
section (c) effective March 28, 2014.’’
This technical amendment removes
the erroneous part 52 approval of KAR
28–19–202 ‘‘Annual Emissions Fees’’
and recodifies the table. This action also
revises paragraph (f) to read as follows:
(f) ‘‘The Kansas Department of Health
and Environment submitted revisions to
Kansas Administrative Record (KAR)
28–19–202 and 28–19–517 on April 15,
2011; effective March 28, 2014.’’
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air pollution control,
Intergovernmental relations, Operating
permits, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 23, 2015.
Becky Weber,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
2. In § 52.870, paragraph(c) is
amended by removing the table entry
‘‘K.A.R. 28–19–202.’’
■
PART 70—STATE OPERATING PERMIT
PROGRAMS
3. The authority citation for part 70
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
4. Appendix A is amended by revising
paragraph (f) under Kansas to read as
follows:
■
Appendix A to Part 70—Approval
Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Kansas
*
*
(f) The Kansas Department of Health and
Environment submitted revisions to Kansas
Administrative Record (KAR) 28–19–202 and
28–19–517 on April 15, 2011; effective March
28, 2014.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–00573 Filed 1–13–16; 8:45 am]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Sfmt 4700
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0538; FRL–9939–53]
Aspergillus flavus AF36; Time Limited
Exemption From the Requirement of a
Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes a
time-limited exemption from the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA) section 408(a) requirement of a
tolerance for residues of the pesticide
Aspergillus flavus AF36 in or on dried
figs resulting from use in accordance
SUMMARY:
■
Fmt 4700
[Amended]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
40 CFR Part 70
Frm 00030
§ 52.870
*
40 CFR Part 52
PO 00000
Explanation
*
*
*
1/14/16 [Insert Federal Reg- [EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0587;
ister citation].
FRL–9941–01–Region 7].
List of Subjects
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) inadvertently approved
and codified this action under both part
52 (Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans) and part 70
(State Operating Permit Programs). This
technical amendment removes the part
52 approval and codification and makes
a clarification to part 70.
DATES: This action is effective January
14, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lachala Kemp at (913) 551–7214, or by
email at kemp.lachala@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 27, 2014 (79 FR 4274), EPA
published a direct final rule approving
a SIP revision for Kansas that included
revisions to K.A.R. 28–19–202 ‘‘Annual
Emission Fees.’’ The rule revision
amended KAR 28–19–202 ‘‘Annual
Emissions Fees’’ to align the state’s
reporting requirements with EPA’s
reporting requirements, and was
incorrectly approved and codified under
part 52 and part 70.
This rule also included revisions to
the operating permits program, K.A.R
28–19–517 ‘‘Class I Operating Permits;
Annual Emissions Inventory.’’ This part
70 appendix A revision added new
SUMMARY:
EPA approval date
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1887-1890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-00428]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2015-0587; FRL 9941-01-Region 7]
Approval of Missouri's Air Quality Implementation Plans; Early
Progress Plan of the St. Louis Nonattainment Area for the 2008 Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve revisions to the State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submitted by the State of Missouri consisting of the Early
Progress Plan and motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) for
the St. Louis Nonattainment area under the 2008 8-hour National Ambient
Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). On August 26, 2013, EPA received from the
Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) an Early Progress Plan
for the St. Louis area showing progress toward attainment under the
2008 Ozone NAAQS. This submittal was developed to establish MVEBs for
the St. Louis 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. This approval of the
Early Progress Plan for the St. Louis 8-hour ozone nonattainment area
fulfills EPA's requirement to act on the MDNR SIP submission and to
formalize that the MVEB is approved, and when considered with the
emissions from all sources, demonstrates progress toward attainment
from the 2008 base year through a 2015 target year. EPA found these
MVEBs adequate for transportation conformity purposes in an earlier
action on March 5, 2014.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective March 14, 2016, without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by February 16,
2016. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing
the public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2015-0587, to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Brown, Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 913-551-7718 or by email at
brown.steven@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. What is the background for this action?
II. What are the criteria for early progress plans?
III. What is EPA's analysis of the request?
IV. What are the MVEB's for the St. Louis 8-hour ozone area?
V. What action is EPA taking?
I. What is the background for this action?
EPA's final rule designating nonattainment areas and associated
classifications for the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) was published in the Federal Register on May 21, 2012
(77 FR 30088). The St. Louis area was designated as marginal
nonattainment. The St. Louis ozone area had previously been designated
nonattainment for the 1-hour ozone standard and had 1-hour motor
vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for NOX and VOC
established in the St. Louis 1-hour maintenance plan SIP (66 FR 33996).
The 1-hour MVEBs were the only approved MVEBs for St. Louis and were
based on EPA's MOBILE6.2
[[Page 1888]]
emissions model. Consequently, the transportation partners in St. Louis
were required to use the 1-hour MVEB test to demonstrate transportation
conformity for the 8-hour ozone standard until new MVEBs were approved
or found adequate, as required by the transportation conformity rule at
40 CFR 93.109(c)(2)(i). Missouri submitted this plan to establish new 8
hour MVEBs developed with EPA's current MOVES2014 model.
EPA allows for the establishment of MVEBs for the 8-hour ozone
standard prior to a state submitting its first required 8-hour ozone
SIP that would include new MVEBs. Although voluntary, these ``early''
MVEBs must be established through a plan, known as the ``Early Progress
Plan,'' that meets all the requirements of a SIP submittal. The
preamble of the July 1, 2004, final transportation conformity rule
(see, 69 FR 40019) reads as follows:
``The first 8-hour ozone SIP could be a control strategy SIP
required by the Clean Air Act (e.g., rate-of-progress SIP or attainment
demonstration) or a maintenance plan. However, 8-hour ozone
nonattainment areas are free to establish, through the SIP process, a
motor vehicle emissions budget or budgets that addresses the new NAAQS
in advance of a complete SIP attainment demonstration. That is, a state
could submit a motor vehicle emission budget that does not demonstrate
attainment but is consistent with projections and commitments to
control measures and achieves some progress toward attainment (August
15, 1997, 62 FR 43799). A SIP submitted earlier than otherwise required
can demonstrate a significant level of emissions reductions from
current level of emissions, instead of a specific percentage required
by the Clean Air Act for moderate and above ozone areas.''
II. What are the criteria for early progress plans?
The Early Progress Plan must demonstrate that the SIP revision
containing the MVEBs, when considered with emissions from all sources,
and when projected from the base year to a future year, shows some
progress toward attainment. EPA has previously indicated that a 5
percent to 10 percent reduction in emissions from all sources could
represent a significant level of emissions reductions from current
levels (69 FR 40019). This allowance is provided so that areas have an
opportunity to use the budget test to demonstrate conformity as opposed
to the interim conformity tests (i.e., 2002 baseline test and/or action
versus baseline test). The budget test with an adequate or approved
MVEB budget is generally more protective of air quality and provides a
more relevant basis for conformity determinations than the interim
emissions test. (69 FR 40026).
It should also be noted that the Early Progress Plan is not a
required plan and does not substitute for required submissions such as
an attainment demonstration or rate-of-progress plan, if such plans
become required for the St. Louis 8-hour ozone area.
III. What is EPA's analysis of the request?
In August 2013, the State submitted to EPA an Early Progress Plan
for the purpose of establishing MVEBs for the St. Louis 8-hour ozone
area. The submittal utilizes a base year of 2008, and a projected year
of 2015 to establish NOX and VOC MVEBs. The planning
assumptions used to develop the MVEBs were discussed and agreed to by
the St. Louis interagency consultation group, East West Gateway (EWG),
which consists of the transportation and air quality partners in the
St. Louis 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. Tables 1 and 2 below show
the differences by source categories between the 2008 base year and
2015 forecast year. The NOX and VOC emissions in tons per
day (tpd) within the St. Louis nonattainment area are expected to
decrease significantly, 31 percent and 12 percent, respectively,
between 2008 and 2015. These emission trends demonstrate that progress
will be made towards attainment of the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008 NOX 2015 NOX
Source (tpd) (tpd)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point................................... 88.84 86.32
Area.................................... 6.52 6.64
On-road................................. 161.25 76.70
Non-road................................ 65.18 53.72
-------------------------------
Total............................... 321.79 223.38
-------------------------------
Total Percent Reduction......... 31%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008 VOC 2015 VOC
Source (tpd) (tpd)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point................................... 18.01 21.60
Area.................................... 99.47 111.73
On-road................................. 60.86 32.70
Non-road................................ 45.08 30.67
-------------------------------
Total............................... 223.42 196.70
-------------------------------
Total Percent Reduction......... 12%
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The state submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In
addition, the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of the
CAA, including Section 110 and implementing regulations.
IV. What are the MVEB's for the St. Louis 8-hour ozone area?
Through this rulemaking, EPA is approving the 2015 regional MVEBs
for NOX and VOC for the St. Louis 8-hour ozone area. EPA has
determined that the MVEBs contained in the Early Progress Plan SIP
revision are consistent with emission reductions from all sources
within the nonattainment area and are showing progress toward
attainment.
[[Page 1889]]
The 2015 MVEBs in tpd for VOCs and NOX for the St. Louis,
Missouri area are as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2015 NOX (tons 2015 VOC (tons
per day) per day)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
St. Louis Area MVEB................... 76.70 32.70
------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA found these MVEBs adequate for transportation conformity
purposes in an earlier action (March 5, 2014, 79 FR 12504). As of March
19, 2014, the effective date of EPA's adequacy finding for these MVEBs,
conformity determinations in St. Louis must meet the budget test using
these 8-hour MVEBs, instead of the 1-hour ozone MVEBs. It should be
noted that the previous adequacy finding does not relate to the merits
of the SIP submittal, nor does it indicate whether the submittal meets
the requirements for approval. This EPA rulemaking action takes formal
action on the Early Progress Plan SIP revision.
V. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is taking direct final action to approve this SIP revision. We
are publishing this rule without a prior proposed rule because we view
this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment.
However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal Register, we
are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposed rule
to approve this SIP revision, if adverse comments are received on this
direct final rule. We will not institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this
time. For further information about commenting on this rule, see the
ADDRESSES section of this document. If EPA receives adverse comment, we
will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the
public that this direct final rule will not take effect. We will
address all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by March 14, 2016. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: December 23, 2015.
Mark Hague,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52
as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
[[Page 1890]]
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. Section 52.1320(e) is amended by adding new entry (68) at the end of
the table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
Epa-Approved Missouri Nonregulatory SIP Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable
Name of nonregulatory SIP geographic or State EPA approval date Explanation
provision nonattainment area submittal date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(68) Missouri Early Progress Plan St. Louis.......... 8/26/13 1/14/16 [Insert [EPA-R07-OAR-2015-0
Federal Register 587; FRL-9941-01-
citation]. Region 7].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2016-00428 Filed 1-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
