Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review, 1424-1426 [2016-00383]

Download as PDF 1424 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2016 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION [OMB Control No. 9000–0059; Docket 2015– 0055; Sequence 20] Submission for OMB Review; North Carolina Sales Tax Certification Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Notice of request for public comments regarding an extension to an existing OMB clearance. AGENCY: Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Regulatory Secretariat Division will be submitting to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request to review and approve a reinstatement of a previously approved information collection requirement concerning North Carolina sales tax certification. A notice was published in the Federal Register at 80 FR 58254 on September 28, 2015. No comments were received. DATES: Submit comments on or before February 11, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for GSA, Room 10236, NEOB, Washington, DC 20503. Additionally submit a copy to GSA by any of the following methods: • Regulations.gov: http:// www.regulations.gov. Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching the OMB control number. Select the link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds with ‘‘Information Collection 9000– 0059, North Carolina Sales Tax Certification’’. Follow the instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and ‘‘Information Collection 9000–0059, North Carolina Sales Tax Certification’’ on your attached document. • Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405. ATTN: Ms. Flowers/IC 9000–0059, North Carolina Sales Tax Certification. Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite Information Collection 9000–0059, North Carolina Sales Tax tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:14 Jan 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 Certification, in all correspondence related to this collection. Comments received generally will be posted without change to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal and/or business confidential information provided. To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov, approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting (except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathlyn Hopkins, Procurement Analyst, Office of Acquisition Policy, GSA 202– 969–7226 or email kathlyn.hopkins@ gsa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Purpose The North Carolina Sales and Use Tax Act authorizes counties and incorporated cities and towns to obtain each year, from the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of North Carolina, a refund of sales and use taxes indirectly paid on building materials, supplies, fixtures, and equipment that become a part of or are annexed to any building or structure in North Carolina. However, to substantiate a refund claim for sales or use taxes paid on purchases of building materials, supplies, fixtures, or equipment by a contractor, the Government must secure from the contractor certified statements setting forth the cost of the property purchased from each vendor and the amount of sales or use taxes paid. Similar certified statements by subcontractors must be obtained by the general contractor and furnished to the Government. The information is used as evidence to establish exemption from State and local taxes. B. Annual Reporting Burden Respondents: 314. Responses per Respondent: 1. Annual Responses: 314. Hours per Response: 1.25. Total Burden Hours: 392. C. Public Comments Public comments are particularly invited on: Whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of functions of the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), and whether it will have practical utility; whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and methodology; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways in which we can minimize the PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, through the use of appropriate technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Obtaining Copies of Proposals: Requesters may obtain a copy of the information collection documents from the General Services Administration, Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405, telephone 202–501–4755. Please cite OMB Control No. 9000– 0059, North Carolina Sales Tax Certification, in all correspondence. Dated: January 7, 2016. Lorin S. Curit, Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division, Office of Governmentwide Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy. [FR Doc. 2016–00396 Filed 1–11–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [30Day–16–15ADW] Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has submitted the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The notice for the proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address any of the following: (a) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2016 / Notices other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses; and (e) Assess information collection costs. To request additional information on the proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, call (404) 639–7570 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice should be directed to the Attention: CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395–5806. Written comments should be received within 30 days of this notice. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Proposed Project Employer Perspective of an InsurerSponsored Wellness Grant—New— National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description The mission of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) is to promote safety and health at work for all people through research and prevention. Under Public Law 91– 596, sections 20 and 22 (Section 20–22, Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970), NIOSH has the responsibility to conduct research to advance the health and safety of workers. In this capacity, NIOSH proposes to conduct a study among employers in Ohio insured by the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (OHBWC) to: (1) Assess the effectiveness and cost-benefit of an intervention that funds workplace wellness programs and (2) understand the impact of integrating of wellness with traditional occupational safety and health (OSH) programs. Work-related injuries and illnesses are common among US workers and result in pain, disability, and substantial cost to workers and employers. A recent, comprehensive analysis of the economic burden of work-related injuries and illnesses estimated that in 2007, alone, medical and indirect costs for workrelated injuries and illnesses were $250 billion. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were 4,609 occupational fatalities in 2011 and approximately 2 million work-related injuries and illnesses that involved some lost work in 2010. Workers’ health is affected not only by workplace safety and health hazards but also workers’ own health behaviors. Reflecting this, two different, yet, complementary approaches exist in the workplace: OSH programs and wellness programs. Both types of programs aim to improve worker health and reduce costs VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:14 Jan 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 to employers, workers’ compensation (WC) insurers, and society. Since 2004, NIOSH has advocated an approach that coordinates wellness programs with OSH programs because emerging evidence suggests that integrating these two fields may have a synergistic effect on worker safety and health. NIOSH has established an intramural program for protecting and promoting Total Worker HealthTM. The NIOSH Total Worker HealthTM Cross-Sector Program promotes the integration of health and safety protection with health and wellness promotion through research, interventions, partnerships, and capacity building to meet the needs of the 21st century workforce. The proposed project addresses three priority goals of the NIOSH Total Worker HealthTM Program: (1) Investigate the costs/benefits associated with comprehensive, coordinated workbased health protection/health promotion interventions, (2) improve the understanding of how the work environment influences the effectiveness of health programs and identify opportunities for workplace interventions to prevent, control, recognize and manage common chronic conditions, and (3) conduct scientific research that more holistically investigates organizational and worker health and safety outcomes associated with emerging issues and addresses gaps in knowledge in the health protection/health promotion field. There is a need for research to demonstrate a ‘business case’ for both wellness programs and integrated OSHwellness programs and identify OSH organizational and management policies, programs and practices that effectively reduce work-related injuries, illnesses, disabilities and WC costs. To date, small employers have been largely ignored in these areas and many studies have focused on the manufacturing industry. Real-world examples of effective interventions that apply to employers of all sizes and industries will ultimately improve workers’ health and safety. For the current study, NIOSH and OHBWC are collaborating on a project to determine the effectiveness and economic return of the Workplace Wellness Grant Program (WWGP) and to understand the impact of integrating of wellness with traditional OSH programs. In early 2012 OHBWC took steps to integrate wellness and OSH programs by launching the WWGP, in which an estimated 400 (currently 321) employers and 13,000 employees will be provided a total of $4 million in funds over four years to implement wellness programs. PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 1425 The majority of the study aims will be accomplished through secondary analysis of pre- and post-intervention data being collected by OHBWC and shared with NIOSH. For the overall study, data for participating employers will include aggregate health risk appraisal data; aggregate biometric data; turnover data; health care utilization costs; information about occupational safety and health, wellness, and integrated occupational safety and health-wellness program elements; OHBWC WWGP expense records; yearly WC claims and cost data; data that details employer participation in other OHBWC programs; industry codes, and employer size. For the annual case study verification interviews, a sample of no more than 50 employers will be selected among grantees for 1–2 brief phone calls to confirm responses on an annual survey administered by OHBWC. Therefore, up to 100 key informants may be contacted if we do not speak to the same person each time, as reflected in the Estimated Annualized Burden table below. In addition, NIOSH will supplement the cost data extracted from existing sources with information collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with no more than 25, randomly selected, participating employers. Data gathered from these employer interviews are critical to compute ratios of total savings to total costs for the grant-supported wellness programs from the perspective of the participating employers. NIOSH will ask key informant from the employer a series of questions that will be used to estimate direct and indirect costs that were not directly funded by the WWGP during and after the grant funding period. This will be accomplished by collecting as detailed information as possible about the employer’s wellness program and occupational and safety program costs. Topics will include questions about: The timeline and confirmation of grant funding, non-grant funds used for wellness program costs after receiving the first grant, and other questions about their wellness program. The results of these interviewsupplemented case studies will be used to estimate the proportion by which total employer costs exceed the cost of the primary wellness program vendor, as well as the proportion of these costs attributable to establishing the program in the first year versus operating the program in subsequent years. These estimates will be applied to generate total employer costs for all of the WWGP recipients, with sensitivity analysis based on the observed E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1 1426 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2016 / Notices variability of employer costs in the case studies. If the WWGP is effective at improving worker health, reducing WC claims and demonstrating a positive economic return, then other employers and insurance carriers may develop similar programs and drive the optimization of integrated OSH-wellness approaches. NIOSH expects to complete data collection in 2017. It is estimated that a maximum of 100 individuals will be interviewed (up to 50 for the semistructured economic interviews and up to 100 for the annual case study verification interviews). The hour- burden estimates include the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and participating in the interview. There are no costs to interviewees other than their time. The total estimated annual burden hours are 150. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Type of respondents Wellness Program Coordinators. Occupational Safety and Health Specialists. The person in charge of the employer’s wellness program. Employers interview on cost of wellness and occupational safety and health program. Employers interview on cost of wellness and occupational safety and health program. Annual case study verification interview ................................ Leroy A. Richardson, Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2016–00383 Filed 1–11–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2015–N–4990] Next Generation Sequencing-Based Oncology Panels; Public Workshop; Request for Comments AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Notice of public workshop; request for comments. ACTION: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a public workshop entitled ‘‘Next Generation Sequencing-Based Oncology Panels.’’ The purpose of this workshop is to obtain feedback on analytical and clinical validation approaches for next generation sequencing (NGS)-based oncology panels. Comments and suggestions generated through this workshop will help guide the development of appropriate regulatory standards for evaluation of NGS-based oncology panels in cancer patient management. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: The public workshop will be held on February 25, 2016, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Submit either electronic or written comments on the public workshop by March 28, 2016. DATES: VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:14 Jan 11, 2016 Number of respondents Form name Jkt 238001 The public workshop will be held at FDA’s White Oak Campus, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, Rm. 1503 B and C (the Great Room), Silver Spring, MD 20993. Entrance for the public workshop participants (nonFDA employees) is through Building 1 where routine security check procedures will be performed. For parking and security information, please refer to http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/ WorkingatFDA/BuildingsandFacilities/ WhiteOakCampusInformation/ ucm241740.htm. You may submit comments as follows: ADDRESSES: Electronic Submissions Submit electronic comments in the following way: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted electronically, including attachments, to http:// www.regulations.gov will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment does not include any confidential information that you or a third party may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone else’s Social Security number, or confidential business information, such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in the body of your comments, that information will be posted on http://www.regulations.gov. • If you want to submit a comment with confidential information that you do not wish to be made available to the public, submit the comment as a PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Number of responses per respondent Average burden per response (in hrs.) 25 1 2 25 1 2 100 1 30/60 written/paper submission and in the manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’). Written/Paper Submissions Submit written/paper submissions as follows: • Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. • For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified, as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’ Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No. FDA– 2015–N–4990 for ‘‘Next Generation Sequencing-Based Oncology Panels.’’ Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as ‘‘Confidential Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. • Confidential Submissions—To submit a comment with confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states ‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The Agency will review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in E:\FR\FM\12JAN1.SGM 12JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1424-1426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-00383]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[30Day-16-15ADW]


Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review

    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has submitted 
the following information collection request to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The notice for the proposed 
information collection is published to obtain comments from the public 
and affected agencies.
    Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected 
agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are 
encouraged. Your comments should address any of the following: (a) 
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary 
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
whether the information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the 
accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed 
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology 
and assumptions used; (c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of 
the information to be collected; (d) Minimize the burden of the 
collection of information on those who are to respond, including 
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or 
other technological collection techniques or

[[Page 1425]]

other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic 
submission of responses; and (e) Assess information collection costs.
    To request additional information on the proposed project or to 
obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, call 
(404) 639-7570 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Written comments and/or 
suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice should be 
directed to the Attention: CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and 
Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395-5806. Written 
comments should be received within 30 days of this notice.

Proposed Project

    Employer Perspective of an Insurer-Sponsored Wellness Grant--New--
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers 
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Background and Brief Description

    The mission of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and 
Health (NIOSH) is to promote safety and health at work for all people 
through research and prevention. Under Public Law 91-596, sections 20 
and 22 (Section 20-22, Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970), 
NIOSH has the responsibility to conduct research to advance the health 
and safety of workers. In this capacity, NIOSH proposes to conduct a 
study among employers in Ohio insured by the Ohio Bureau of Workers' 
Compensation (OHBWC) to: (1) Assess the effectiveness and cost-benefit 
of an intervention that funds workplace wellness programs and (2) 
understand the impact of integrating of wellness with traditional 
occupational safety and health (OSH) programs.
    Work-related injuries and illnesses are common among US workers and 
result in pain, disability, and substantial cost to workers and 
employers. A recent, comprehensive analysis of the economic burden of 
work-related injuries and illnesses estimated that in 2007, alone, 
medical and indirect costs for work-related injuries and illnesses were 
$250 billion. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were 
4,609 occupational fatalities in 2011 and approximately 2 million work-
related injuries and illnesses that involved some lost work in 2010.
    Workers' health is affected not only by workplace safety and health 
hazards but also workers' own health behaviors. Reflecting this, two 
different, yet, complementary approaches exist in the workplace: OSH 
programs and wellness programs. Both types of programs aim to improve 
worker health and reduce costs to employers, workers' compensation (WC) 
insurers, and society. Since 2004, NIOSH has advocated an approach that 
coordinates wellness programs with OSH programs because emerging 
evidence suggests that integrating these two fields may have a 
synergistic effect on worker safety and health.
    NIOSH has established an intramural program for protecting and 
promoting Total Worker Health\TM\. The NIOSH Total Worker Health\TM\ 
Cross-Sector Program promotes the integration of health and safety 
protection with health and wellness promotion through research, 
interventions, partnerships, and capacity building to meet the needs of 
the 21st century workforce. The proposed project addresses three 
priority goals of the NIOSH Total Worker Health\TM\ Program: (1) 
Investigate the costs/benefits associated with comprehensive, 
coordinated work-based health protection/health promotion 
interventions, (2) improve the understanding of how the work 
environment influences the effectiveness of health programs and 
identify opportunities for workplace interventions to prevent, control, 
recognize and manage common chronic conditions, and (3) conduct 
scientific research that more holistically investigates organizational 
and worker health and safety outcomes associated with emerging issues 
and addresses gaps in knowledge in the health protection/health 
promotion field.
    There is a need for research to demonstrate a `business case' for 
both wellness programs and integrated OSH-wellness programs and 
identify OSH organizational and management policies, programs and 
practices that effectively reduce work-related injuries, illnesses, 
disabilities and WC costs. To date, small employers have been largely 
ignored in these areas and many studies have focused on the 
manufacturing industry. Real-world examples of effective interventions 
that apply to employers of all sizes and industries will ultimately 
improve workers' health and safety.
    For the current study, NIOSH and OHBWC are collaborating on a 
project to determine the effectiveness and economic return of the 
Workplace Wellness Grant Program (WWGP) and to understand the impact of 
integrating of wellness with traditional OSH programs. In early 2012 
OHBWC took steps to integrate wellness and OSH programs by launching 
the WWGP, in which an estimated 400 (currently 321) employers and 
13,000 employees will be provided a total of $4 million in funds over 
four years to implement wellness programs.
    The majority of the study aims will be accomplished through 
secondary analysis of pre- and post-intervention data being collected 
by OHBWC and shared with NIOSH. For the overall study, data for 
participating employers will include aggregate health risk appraisal 
data; aggregate biometric data; turnover data; health care utilization 
costs; information about occupational safety and health, wellness, and 
integrated occupational safety and health-wellness program elements; 
OHBWC WWGP expense records; yearly WC claims and cost data; data that 
details employer participation in other OHBWC programs; industry codes, 
and employer size. For the annual case study verification interviews, a 
sample of no more than 50 employers will be selected among grantees for 
1-2 brief phone calls to confirm responses on an annual survey 
administered by OHBWC. Therefore, up to 100 key informants may be 
contacted if we do not speak to the same person each time, as reflected 
in the Estimated Annualized Burden table below.
    In addition, NIOSH will supplement the cost data extracted from 
existing sources with information collected through in-depth, semi-
structured interviews with no more than 25, randomly selected, 
participating employers. Data gathered from these employer interviews 
are critical to compute ratios of total savings to total costs for the 
grant-supported wellness programs from the perspective of the 
participating employers.
    NIOSH will ask key informant from the employer a series of 
questions that will be used to estimate direct and indirect costs that 
were not directly funded by the WWGP during and after the grant funding 
period. This will be accomplished by collecting as detailed information 
as possible about the employer's wellness program and occupational and 
safety program costs. Topics will include questions about: The timeline 
and confirmation of grant funding, non-grant funds used for wellness 
program costs after receiving the first grant, and other questions 
about their wellness program.
    The results of these interview-supplemented case studies will be 
used to estimate the proportion by which total employer costs exceed 
the cost of the primary wellness program vendor, as well as the 
proportion of these costs attributable to establishing the program in 
the first year versus operating the program in subsequent years. These 
estimates will be applied to generate total employer costs for all of 
the WWGP recipients, with sensitivity analysis based on the observed

[[Page 1426]]

variability of employer costs in the case studies.
    If the WWGP is effective at improving worker health, reducing WC 
claims and demonstrating a positive economic return, then other 
employers and insurance carriers may develop similar programs and drive 
the optimization of integrated OSH-wellness approaches. NIOSH expects 
to complete data collection in 2017. It is estimated that a maximum of 
100 individuals will be interviewed (up to 50 for the semi-structured 
economic interviews and up to 100 for the annual case study 
verification interviews). The hour-burden estimates include the time 
for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering 
and maintaining the data needed, and participating in the interview. 
There are no costs to interviewees other than their time. The total 
estimated annual burden hours are 150.

                                        Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                      Average
                                                                     Number of       Number of      burden per
        Type of  respondents                  Form name             respondents    responses per   response  (in
                                                                                    respondent         hrs.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wellness Program Coordinators......  Employers interview on cost              25               1               2
                                      of wellness and
                                      occupational safety and
                                      health program.
Occupational Safety and Health       Employers interview on cost              25               1               2
 Specialists.                         of wellness and
                                      occupational safety and
                                      health program.
The person in charge of the          Annual case study                       100               1           30/60
 employer's wellness program.         verification interview.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific 
Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the 
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2016-00383 Filed 1-11-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P