30-Day Notice of Application for New Information Collection Request, 993-995 [2016-159]

Download as PDF asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 5 / Friday, January 8, 2016 / Notices g. Personal financial statements; h. Schedule of work in progress (WIP); i. Signed and dated copy of transportation-related contracts; j. Business debt schedule; k. Cash flow projections; l. Owner(s) and key management resumes. Respondents: Small Businesses, 100. Frequency: Once. Estimated Average Burden per Response: 12 hours. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1200 hours. SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU), invites public comments on our intention to request the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) approval to renew a collection of the STLP Participating Lender (PL) forms. The collection involves the use of the ‘‘Short Term Lending Program Bank Verification Loan Activation Form’’; ‘‘Short Term Lending Program Bank Acknowledgement Extension Request Form’’; ‘‘Short Term Lending Program Bank Acknowledgement Loan Close-Out Form’’; ‘‘Guaranty Loan Status Report’’; ‘‘Pending Loan Status Report’’; ‘‘DrugFree Workplace Act Certification for a Grantee Other than an Individual’’; ‘‘Certification Regarding Lobbying for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements’’; ‘‘Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization U.S. Department of Transportation Short Term Lending Program Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension’’; ‘‘Cooperative Agreement between the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Participating Lender’’; and ‘‘U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Small and Disadvantaged Utilization Short Term Lending Program Guarantee Agreement’’. The information collected administers the loans guaranteed under the STLP. The information collected keeps the Participating Lender’s (PLs) in compliance with the terms established in the Cooperative Agreement between DOT and the PLs. OMB Control No: 2105–0555. Background: STLP loans are provided through lenders that serve as STLP participating Lenders (PL). The STLP provides PLs a guarantee, up to 75%, on a revolving line of credit up to a $750,000 maximum. As part of the requirements for approval as a PL, lenders must submit the following certifications: Drug-Free Workplace Act Certification for a Grantee Other Than An Individual; Certification Regarding Lobbying for Contracts, Grants, Loans, & VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:40 Jan 07, 2016 Jkt 238001 Cooperative Agreement; Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization U.S. Department of Transportation Short Term Lending Program Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension. The STLP is subject to budgeting and accounting requirements of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (FCRA). The PL must carry out processes to activate, monitor, service and close out STLP loans. To fulfill the requirements of FCRA, the PL submits reports and the following forms to OSDBU. Respondents: Participating Lenders that are in the process or have entered into cooperative agreements with DOT’s OSDBU under 49 CFR part 22 DOT– OST–2008–0236 entitled, ‘‘Short Term Lending Program’’. DOT Form 2303–1: Short Term Lending Program Bank Verification Loan Activation Form. The PL must submit a Loan Activation Form to OSDBU that indicates the date in which the loan has been activated. Respondents: 100. Frequency: Annually, up to five years. Estimated Average Burden per Response: 1⁄2 hour. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 50 hours. DOT Form 2310–1: Short Term Lending Program Bank Acknowledgement Extension Request Form. An extension of the original loan guarantee for a maximum period of ninety (90) days may be requested, in writing, by the PL using the STLP Extension Request Form. Respondents: 100. Frequency: Annually. Estimated Average Burden per Response: 1⁄2 hour. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 50 hours. DOT Form 2304–1: Short Term Lending Program Bank Acknowledgement Loan Close-Out Form. The PL must submit the Loan Close-Out Form to OSDBU upon full repayment of the STLP loan or when the loan guarantee expires. Respondents: 100. Frequency: Annually. Estimated Average Burden per Response: 1⁄2 hour. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 50 hours. DOT Form 2305–1: Guaranty Loan Status Report. The PL submits a monthly status of active guaranteed loans to OSDBU. Respondents: 100. Frequency: Monthly. Estimated Average Burden per Response: 1 hour. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 100 hours. DOT Form 2306–1: Pending Loan Status Report. The PL submits a PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 993 monthly loan(s) in process report to OSDBU. Respondents: 100. Frequency: Monthly. Estimated Average Burden per Response: 1 hour. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 100 hours. DOT Form 2307–1: Drug-Free Workplace Act Certification for a Grantee Other than an Individual. The PL certifies it is a drug-free workplace by executing this certification. Respondents: 100. Frequency: Once. Estimated Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 25 hours. DOT Form 2308–1. Certification Regarding Lobbying for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreement. The PL certifies that no Federal funds will be utilized for lobbying by executing this form. Respondents: 100. Frequency: Once. Estimated Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 25 hours. DOT Form 2309–1. Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization U.S. Department of Transportation Short Term Lending Program Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension. The PL must not currently be debarred or suspended from participation in a government contract or delinquent on a government debt by submitting this form. Respondents: 100. Frequency: Once. Estimated Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 25 hours. Grand Total Annual Estimation of Burden Hours: 1825. Issued in Washington, DC, on December 30, 2015. Habib Azarsina, OST Privacy and PRA Officer. [FR Doc. 2015–33272 Filed 1–7–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary [Docket No. DOT–OST–2015–0153] 30-Day Notice of Application for New Information Collection Request Office of the Secretary (OST), Department of Transportation (Department) or (DOT). AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\08JAN1.SGM 08JAN1 994 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 5 / Friday, January 8, 2016 / Notices Notice and request for comments. ACTION: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below is being forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comments. A Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting comments on the following information collection was published on Aug 5, 2015 (80 FR 46646). SUMMARY: Comments must be submitted on or before February 8, 2016. ADDRESSES: Your comments should be identified by Docket No. DOT–OST– 2015–0153 and may be submitted through one of the following methods: • Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503. • email: oira_submission@ omb.eop.gov. • Fax: (202) 395–5806. Attention: DOT/OST Desk Officer. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Burton, Office of Policy, Office of the Secretary, W84–230, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366–2278 or anthony.burton@ dot.gov (Email). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title: Mayors’ Challenge for Safer People and Safer Streets Survey. Type of Request: Application for New Information Collection Request. Abstract: Approximately 260 cities are voluntarily participating in the ‘‘Mayors’ Challenge’’ and through locally-driven efforts they are improving bike/ped safety policies, infrastructure, and awareness. This survey will collect DATES: information on the accomplishments of the Mayors’ Challenge, and will be used to identify best practices and to improve future DOT outreach to cities. Each city has already identified a point-of-contact for the Mayors’ Challenge. This survey will be distributed electronically to these POCs through an online survey tool, and the proposed questions are attached. Affected Public: The 260 cities that voluntarily signed up to Mayor’s Challenge. Estimated Number of Respondents: 260. Estimated Number of Responses: 260. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 30 minutes/respondent; Cumulative 130 hours. Frequency of Collection: Once. Comments are invited on: whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Department, including whether the information will have practical utility; the accuracy of the Department’s estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1:48. Issued in Washington, DC on December 23, 2015. Habib Azarsina, OST Privacy and PRA Officer. Mayors’ Challenge for Safer People and Safer Streets Survey Abstract: Approximately 260 cities are voluntarily participating in the ‘‘Mayors’ Challenge’’ and through locally-driven efforts they are improving bike/ped safety policies, infrastructure, and awareness. This survey will collect information on the accomplishments of the Mayors’ Challenge, and will be used to identify best practices and to improve future DOT outreach to cities. Each city has already identified a point-of-contact for the Mayors’ Challenge. This survey will be distributed electronically to these POCs through an online survey tool. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 30 minutes/respondent; Cumulative 130 hours. Frequency of Collection: Once. For Further Information Contact: Anthony Burton, Office of Policy, Office of the Secretary, W84–230, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366–2278 or anthony.burton@ dot.gov (Email). 1. Which of the seven goals have you adopted, and what activities have you undertaken to meet those goals? For reference, the seven goals are: (1) Take a Complete Streets approach; (2) Identify and address barriers; (3) Gather and track data; (4) Use context-sensitive designs; (5) Complete bike-ped networks; (6) Improve laws and regulations; and (7) Educate and enforce proper road use. 2. What have been the primary challenges and obstacles to bicycle and pedestrian safety in your community, and what if any actions have you taken to address these challenges and obstacles? 3. What if any changes have resulted from the challenge activities? (1) Changes to physical infrastructure, (2) Decision-making processes, (3) Policies or procedures, (4) Enforcement, (5) Education and awareness of your community (6) Other: 4. Please use the following table to indicate whether you have data on the impact of the Mayors’ Challenge activities, and what the extent of that impact is. asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Data available? (E.g. yes/no, and if yes, type of data) event attendance ................................................................................................. survey results ....................................................................................................... crash data ............................................................................................................ walking and bicycle counts .................................................................................. bike lanes, sidewalks, other infrastructure .......................................................... new plans, policies, laws, or campaigns ............................................................. other indications of political and community support .......................................... 5. Which DOT resources, tools, and data have been most useful in your challenge? VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:40 Jan 07, 2016 Jkt 238001 Extent of impact (E.g. number of bicyclists, compared to previous years) .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. 6. Which non-DOT resources, tools, and data have been most useful in your challenge? PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 7. What resources, tools, and data do you wish were available? E:\FR\FM\08JAN1.SGM 08JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 5 / Friday, January 8, 2016 / Notices 8. What are the most useful formats for receiving information from USDOT, and why (e.g. webinars, in-person meetings, conference calls, etc.)? 9. What efforts in your city to improve bicycle and pedestrian safety in your community were already underway at the time of the Mayors’ Challenge? How has the Mayors’ Challenge added value and/or helped to fill any gaps in your city’s efforts to improve bicycle and pedestrian safety? 10. In planning and project delivery of pedestrian and/or bicycle infrastructure projects, to what extent has your city coordinated with your Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Regional Planning Organization (RPO), State Department of Transportation (DOT), and Federal Regional/Division office partners? Please note type of outreach and coordination, and outcomes it led to. 11. What have been the key benefits and lessons learned as a result of the Mayors’ Challenge? 12. Do you think the Mayors’ challenge has helped make any permanent changes in pedestrian and bike safety and accommodation in your city/town? [FR Doc. 2016–159 Filed 1–7–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [OMB Control Nos., 2900–0782,, 2900–0770, 2900–0609, 2900–0701, 2900–0712, 2900– 0773, 2900–0838, 2900–0834, 2900–0836, 2900–0837, 2900–0835] Proposed Information Collection (Voice of Veteran Surveys, Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery (National Cemetery Administration, Veterans Benefits Affairs, Veterans Health Administration), Survey of Veteran Enrollees’ Health and Reliance Upon VA, Bereaved Family Member Satisfaction Survey, Nation-Wide Customer Satisfaction Surveys (Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients), Veterans Health Benefits Handbook Satisfaction Survey, Veterans Transportation Service Data Collection, Center for Verification and Evaluation Site Inspections, Post Engagement, Awards & Return on Investment, Center for Verification and Evaluation Verification Survey) Activity: Comment Request Veteran’s Experience Office, Department of Veterans Affairs. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:40 Jan 07, 2016 Jkt 238001 The Veteran’s Experience Office, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), is announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed nonsubstantive change request of a currently approved collection, and allow 60 days for public comment in response to the notice. This notice solicits comments on 11 Information collections for the Veteran’s Experience Agency Priority Goal, which specifies that four survey questions will be incorporated into existing customer experience surveys by Q1 FY2016. The information collected will be used by VA departmental leadership to track enterprise performance improvements as experienced by our Veterans. This notice will serve as notification for any future Non-substantive Change Information Collection Request adding these four customer service questions in the Information Collection Requests. DATES: Written comments and recommendations on the proposed collection of information should be received on or before March 8, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the collection of information through Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at www.Regulations.gov or to Thomas Pasakarnis, Veteran’s Experience Office (008VE), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420 or email to Thomas.pasakarnis@va.gov. Please refer to ‘‘OMB Control No. 2900– VE’’ in any correspondence. During the comment period, comments may be viewed online through the FDMS. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Pasakarnis at (202) 461–5869 or FAX (202) 495–5401. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13; 44 U.S.C. 3501–21), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. This request for comment is being made pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA. With respect to the following collection of information, Veteran’s Experience invites comments on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of VBA’s functions, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of VA’s estimate of the burden of the SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 995 proposed collection of information; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or the use of other forms of information technology. Type of Review: Non-Substantive Change of currently approved collections. Abstract: For FY16–17, VA set Veterans Experience as an agency priority goal to improve Veterans Experience with VA. Because this is a new measure, VA developed one brand and three experience measures to support the Veterans Experience Agency Priority Goal (APG). VA will add four APG questions to each survey identified below. One question deals with VA brand, and three questions deal with Veterans experience. ‘‘I got the service I needed.’’ ‘‘It was easy to get what I needed.’’ ‘‘I felt like a valued customer.’’ ‘‘I trust VA to fulfill our country’s commitment to veterans.’’ Strongly agree Agree Neither Agree nor Disagree Disagree Strongly disagree Adding these questions is necessary to establish an enterprise measure of VA’s performance as experienced by our Veterans, as is needed to support VA’s Veterans Experience FY16–17 APG. VA’s goal is to incorporate these four survey questions into VA’s existing customer experience by Q1 FY2016. The information collected will be used by VA departmental leadership to track enterprise performance improvements as experienced by our Veterans. VA expects that it will take approximately one minute for each survey respondent to answer these new questions. As set forth below, this change is expected to affect approximately 132 instruments approved under eleven different OMB control numbers. Together, these instruments are nearly 1.5 million times per year. The cumulative annual burden of this change is more than 24,000 hours ((1 minute per submission * 1,462,937 submissions)/60 minutes per hour = 24,382.28 hours). There is also some annual cost burden associated with this request. Specifically, some of these instruments are administered by thirdparty contractors, who will need to revise the instruments. VA has provided a table detailing the full burden information for each information collection located at https:// www.oprm.va.gov/ers/ers_reports.aspx. E:\FR\FM\08JAN1.SGM 08JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 993-995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-159]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DOT-OST-2015-0153]


30-Day Notice of Application for New Information Collection 
Request

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), Department of Transportation 
(Department) or (DOT).

[[Page 994]]


ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information 
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below is being forwarded to the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comments. A 
Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting 
comments on the following information collection was published on Aug 
5, 2015 (80 FR 46646).

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 8, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Your comments should be identified by Docket No. DOT-OST-
2015-0153 and may be submitted through one of the following methods:
     Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer 
for U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, 
Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503.
     email: oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.
     Fax: (202) 395-5806. Attention: DOT/OST Desk Officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Burton, Office of Policy, 
Office of the Secretary, W84-230, Department of Transportation, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-2278 or 
anthony.burton@dot.gov (Email).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Mayors' Challenge for Safer People and Safer Streets Survey.
    Type of Request: Application for New Information Collection 
Request.
    Abstract: Approximately 260 cities are voluntarily participating in 
the ``Mayors' Challenge'' and through locally-driven efforts they are 
improving bike/ped safety policies, infrastructure, and awareness. This 
survey will collect information on the accomplishments of the Mayors' 
Challenge, and will be used to identify best practices and to improve 
future DOT outreach to cities. Each city has already identified a 
point-of-contact for the Mayors' Challenge. This survey will be 
distributed electronically to these POCs through an online survey tool, 
and the proposed questions are attached.
    Affected Public: The 260 cities that voluntarily signed up to 
Mayor's Challenge.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 260.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 260.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 30 minutes/respondent; 
Cumulative 130 hours.
    Frequency of Collection: Once.
    Comments are invited on: whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Department, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility 
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize 
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including 
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.

    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. 
chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1:48.

    Issued in Washington, DC on December 23, 2015.
Habib Azarsina,
OST Privacy and PRA Officer.

Mayors' Challenge for Safer People and Safer Streets Survey

    Abstract: Approximately 260 cities are voluntarily participating in 
the ``Mayors' Challenge'' and through locally-driven efforts they are 
improving bike/ped safety policies, infrastructure, and awareness. This 
survey will collect information on the accomplishments of the Mayors' 
Challenge, and will be used to identify best practices and to improve 
future DOT outreach to cities. Each city has already identified a 
point-of-contact for the Mayors' Challenge. This survey will be 
distributed electronically to these POCs through an online survey tool.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 30 minutes/respondent; 
Cumulative 130 hours.
    Frequency of Collection: Once.
    For Further Information Contact: Anthony Burton, Office of Policy, 
Office of the Secretary, W84-230, Department of Transportation, 1200 
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-2278 or 
anthony.burton@dot.gov (Email).
    1. Which of the seven goals have you adopted, and what activities 
have you undertaken to meet those goals? For reference, the seven goals 
are:
    (1) Take a Complete Streets approach;
    (2) Identify and address barriers;
    (3) Gather and track data;
    (4) Use context-sensitive designs;
    (5) Complete bike-ped networks;
    (6) Improve laws and regulations; and
    (7) Educate and enforce proper road use.
    2. What have been the primary challenges and obstacles to bicycle 
and pedestrian safety in your community, and what if any actions have 
you taken to address these challenges and obstacles?
    3. What if any changes have resulted from the challenge activities?
    (1) Changes to physical infrastructure,
    (2) Decision-making processes,
    (3) Policies or procedures,
    (4) Enforcement,
    (5) Education and awareness of your community
    (6) Other:
    4. Please use the following table to indicate whether you have data 
on the impact of the Mayors' Challenge activities, and what the extent 
of that impact is.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Data available? (E.g. yes/      Extent of impact (E.g.
                                                         no, and if yes, type of        number of bicyclists,
                                                                  data)              compared to previous years)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
event attendance....................................  ............................  ............................
survey results......................................  ............................  ............................
crash data..........................................  ............................  ............................
walking and bicycle counts..........................  ............................  ............................
bike lanes, sidewalks, other infrastructure.........  ............................  ............................
new plans, policies, laws, or campaigns.............  ............................  ............................
other indications of political and community support  ............................  ............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. Which DOT resources, tools, and data have been most useful in 
your challenge?
    6. Which non-DOT resources, tools, and data have been most useful 
in your challenge?
    7. What resources, tools, and data do you wish were available?

[[Page 995]]

    8. What are the most useful formats for receiving information from 
USDOT, and why (e.g. webinars, in-person meetings, conference calls, 
etc.)?
    9. What efforts in your city to improve bicycle and pedestrian 
safety in your community were already underway at the time of the 
Mayors' Challenge? How has the Mayors' Challenge added value and/or 
helped to fill any gaps in your city's efforts to improve bicycle and 
pedestrian safety?
    10. In planning and project delivery of pedestrian and/or bicycle 
infrastructure projects, to what extent has your city coordinated with 
your Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), Regional Planning 
Organization (RPO), State Department of Transportation (DOT), and 
Federal Regional/Division office partners? Please note type of outreach 
and coordination, and outcomes it led to.
    11. What have been the key benefits and lessons learned as a result 
of the Mayors' Challenge?
    12. Do you think the Mayors' challenge has helped make any 
permanent changes in pedestrian and bike safety and accommodation in 
your city/town?

[FR Doc. 2016-159 Filed 1-7-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.