Registration Review Interim Decisions; Notice of Availability, 481-484 [2015-33300]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2016 / Notices
a selective, systemic, pre-and postemergence herbicide registered for the
control of grasses and broadleaf weeds
in several food and feed crops as well
as woody ornamentals, Christmas trees,
grasses grown for seed or turf (sod), golf
course turf, recreational area turf, and
fallow land. EPA conducted a human
health risk assessment and did not
identify any risks of concern for dietary,
residential, occupational, or aggregate
exposure. EPA also conducted an
ecological risk assessment and
identified potential risks to birds,
mammals, and plants. An endangered
species and pollinator assessment has
not been completed for pronamide at
this time. Pronamide was evaluated for
its potential to affect endocrine systems
in mammals and wildlife and the results
of the Agency’s review are found in the
weight of evidence review in this
registration review docket.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.53(c), EPA is
providing an opportunity, through this
notice of availability, for interested
parties to provide comments and input
concerning the Agency’s draft human
health and ecological risk assessments
for the pesticides identified in this
document. Such comments and input
could address, among other things, the
Agency’s risk assessment methodologies
and assumptions, as applied to this draft
risk assessment. The Agency will
consider all comments received during
the public comment period and make
changes, as appropriate, to the draft
human health and ecological risk
assessments. EPA may then issue a
revised risk assessment, explain any
changes to the draft risk assessment, and
respond to comments. In the Federal
Register notice announcing the
availability of the revised risk
assessment, if the revised risk
assessment indicates risks of concern,
the Agency may provide a comment
period for the public to submit
suggestions for mitigating the risk
identified in the revised risk assessment
before developing a proposed
registration review decision on the
pesticides identified in this document.
1. Other related information.
Additional information on pesticides
identified in this document is available
on the Pesticide Registration Review
Status Web page. Information on the
Agency’s registration review program
and its implementing regulation is
available at https://www.epa.gov/
pesticide-reevaluation/registrationreview-process.
2. Information submission
requirements. Anyone may submit data
or information in response to this
document. To be considered during a
pesticide’s registration review, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Jan 05, 2016
Jkt 238001
submitted data or information must
meet the following requirements:
• To ensure that EPA will consider
data or information submitted,
interested persons must submit the data
or information during the comment
period. The Agency may, at its
discretion, consider data or information
submitted at a later date.
• The data or information submitted
must be presented in a legible and
useable form. For example, an English
translation must accompany any
material that is not in English and a
written transcript must accompany any
information submitted as an
audiographic or videographic record.
Written material may be submitted in
paper or electronic form.
• Submitters must clearly identify the
source of any submitted data or
information.
• Submitters may request the Agency
to reconsider data or information that
the Agency rejected in a previous
review. However, submitters must
explain why they believe the Agency
should reconsider the data or
information in the pesticide’s
registration review.
As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the
registration review docket for each
pesticide case will remain publicly
accessible through the duration of the
registration review process; that is, until
all actions required in the final decision
on the registration review case have
been completed.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: December 24, 2015.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015–33298 Filed 1–5–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0393; FRL–9939–58]
Registration Review Interim Decisions;
Notice of Availability
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
availability of EPA’s interim registration
review decision for the pesticides listed
in Unit II of this notice. Registration
review is EPA’s periodic review of
pesticide registrations to ensure that
each pesticide continues to satisfy the
statutory standard for registration, that
is, that the pesticide can perform its
intended function without causing
SUMMARY:
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
unreasonable adverse effects to human
health or the environment. Through this
program, EPA is ensuring that each
pesticide’s registration is based on
current scientific and other knowledge,
including its effects on human health
and the environment.
For
pesticide specific information, contact
the Chemical Review Manager
identified in the table in Unit II for the
pesticide of interest.
For general information on the
registration review program, contact:
Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone
number: (703) 308–8015; email address:
dumas.richard@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public
in general, and may be of interest to a
wide range of stakeholders including
environmental, human health, farm
worker, and agricultural advocates; the
chemical industry; pesticide users; and
members of the public interested in the
sale, distribution, or use of pesticides.
Since others also may be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all
the specific entities that may be affected
by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the
pesticide specific contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How can I get copies of this document
and other related information?
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
PO 00000
481
Sfmt 4703
The docket for this action, identified
by docket identification (ID) number
EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0393, is available
at https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the
Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
482
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2016 / Notices
II. What action is the Agency taking?
EPA’s interim registration review
decisions for the pesticides in the
following table:
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), this
notice announces the availability of
TABLE—REGISTRATION REVIEW INTERIM DECISIONS
Docket ID No.
Contact and contact information
2-Propen-1-aminium, N,Ndimethyl-N–2propenyl-, chloride, Homopolymer
(Case 5024).
Daminozide (Case 0032) ........................
EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0255 ...................
Donna Kamarei, (703) 347–0443, kamarei.donna@epa.gov.
EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0242 ...................
Dipropyl isocinchomeronate (Case 2215)
EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0578 ...................
Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (Case 7209) ............
Imazapyr (Case 3078) ............................
EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–0437 ...................
EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0200 ...................
Isoxaben (Case 7219) ............................
Paclobutrazol (Case 7002) .....................
Silica and Silcates (Case 4081) .............
Sulfentrazone (Case 7231) .....................
EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–1038
EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0109
EPA–HQ–OPP–2007–1140
EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0624
Tributyltin Oxide (Case 2620) .................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Registration review case name and No.
EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0801 ...................
Margaret Hathaway, (703) 305–5076, hathaway.margaret@
epa.gov.
Marianne Mannix, (703) 347–0275, mannix.marianne@
epa.gov.
Miguel Zavala, (703) 347–0504, zavala.miguel@epa.gov.
Matthew Manupella, (703) 347–0411, manupella.matthew@
epa.gov.
Nathan Sell, (703) 347–8020, sell.nathan@epa.gov.
Khue Nguyen, (703) 347–0248, nguyen.khue@epa.gov.
James Parker, (703) 306–0469, parker.james@epa.gov.
Christina Scheltema, (703) 308–2201,
scheltema.christina@epa.gov.
Sandra O’Neill, (703) 347–0141, oneill.sandra@epa.gov.
The registration review final decisions
for several of these cases are dependent
on the assessment of listed species and
designated critical habitats under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA),
determinations on the potential for
endocrine disruption, and/or evaluation
of risks to pollinators.
2-Propen-1-aminium, N, N-dimethylN-2-propenyl-, chloride, homopolymer
(Interim Decision). The registration
review docket for 2-propen-1-aminium,
N, N-dimethyl-N-2-propenyl-, chloride,
homopolymer opened in August 2015.
The Agency did not receive any
comments. There is one product
containing this active ingredient; which
is registered to control mollusks in
potable water supplies. The Agency did
not call-in any data in support of this
registration review case. Additionally,
the Agency did not conduct a human
health or an environmental risk
assessment since label instructions
minimize exposure from the product’s
registered use. Based on the lack of
potential exposure, the Agency is
making a ‘‘no effect’’ determination for
listed species. The final decision on the
registration review for this case will
occur after an Endocrine Disruption
Screen Program (EDSP) Federal Food
Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) section
408(p) determination is made.
Daminozide (Interim Decision). EPA
is announcing the availability of the
daminozide interim registration review
decision. Daminozide is a plant growth
regulator (PGR) used to control the
development of commercially grown
container plants. It is used in nurseries,
shade houses, and greenhouses and is
applied as a foliage spray that is
systemically distributed throughout the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Jan 05, 2016
Jkt 238001
...................
...................
...................
...................
plant, a use pattern resulting in little or
no potential for off-site drift.
Daminozide has no registered food uses
and no registered residential uses. EPA
conducted both an ecological risk
assessment and human health risk
assessment for daminozide, and there
were no human health risks of concern
with registered daminozide uses. The
Agency is not calling for mitigation for
either ecological or human health risks
from daminozide at this time. Except for
ongoing ESA consultation, a pollinator
risk assessment, and EDSP component
of this registration review case, the
Agency is proposing that no additional
data and no further risk mitigation is
needed for daminozide. The Agency’s
final registration review decision is
dependent upon the assessment of risks
to threatened and endangered species,
pollinators, and an EDSP determination.
Dipropyl isocinchomeronate (Interim
Decision). This notice announces the
publication of the registration review
interim decision for dipropyl
isocinchomeronate. Dipropyl
isocinchomeronate is registered for use
as an insect repellent for use on humans
and companion animals to repel flies,
gnats, and other flying and biting
insects. It is never the sole active
ingredient; it is always co-formulated
with other insecticides/repellents to
broaden their spectrum of repellency.
The Agency has concluded that there
are no human health risk concerns
associated with the use of dipropyl
isocinchomeronate. Based on the
limited usage, diffusion over a large
treatment area, and the low probability
of non-target organism exposure, the
Agency has not found any ecological
risks of concern associated with
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
dipropyl isocinchomeronate and is
making a ‘‘no effect’’ determination for
all federally listed species and a ‘‘no
habitat modification’’ determination for
all designated critical habitat for listed
species. The Agency concludes that no
risk reduction measures or additional
data are needed at this time. Dipropyl
isocinchomeronate has not been
evaluated under the EDSP. The
Agency’s final registration review
decision is dependent upon the result of
the evaluation of potential endocrine
effects.
Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (Interim
Decision). Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (FPE) is a
selective aryloxy phenoxy-propionate
herbicide registered for use on barley,
cotton, rice, soybeans, and wheat for
post-emergence control of grassy weeds.
Additional non-agricultural use sites
include conservation reserves,
ornamentals, rights-of-way, and turf. In
this interim registration review decision
for fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, EPA has
determined that no additional data are
required at this time; however, certain
risk reduction measures are necessary at
this time. To address potential risk to
non-target terrestrial monocots, spray
drift management language is required
for all fenoxaprop-p-ethyl product
registrations used on agricultural, wide
area, or rights-of-way use sites. The
Agency also is requiring the
implementation of label language
clarifying use rates, to which the
registrants have already agreed. In
addition, EPA is requiring label
language to include recommended
herbicide-resistance management
measures. The final registration review
decision for fenoxaprop-p-ethyl is
dependent upon an assessment of listed
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2016 / Notices
species and designated critical habitats
under the ESA, a determination of the
potential for endocrine disruption, and
a pollinator risk assessment.
Imazapyr (Interim Decision). The
registration review docket for imazapyr
opened in June 2014. Imazapyr is a nonselective systemic herbicide registered
for use as pre- and post-emergent
treatments to control broad spectrum
terrestrial and aquatic weeds including
terrestrial annual and perennial grasses,
broadleaf weeds, herbs, woody species,
and riparian and emergent aquatic weed
species. EPA published draft human
health and ecological risk assessments
at the time of the docket opening for a
60-day public comment period. In this
imazapyr interim decision, the Agency
has determined that no additional data
are required and no changes to the
affected registrations or their labeling
are needed at this time. In this interim
registration review decision, EPA is
making no human health or
environmental safety findings
associated with the EDSP screening of
imazapyr, nor is it making an
endangered species finding. EPA’s
registration review decision for
imazapyr will depend upon the result of
an EDSP FFDCA section 408(p)
determination, complete pollinator
determination, and ESA determination.
Isoxaben (Interim Decision). Isoxaben
is a pre-emergent benzamide herbicide
registered for use to control broadleaf
weeds. It is classified as a Group 21
herbicide that inhibits cell wall
biosynthesis. It is registered for nonagricultural uses such as turf grass,
ornamentals, and landscape mulch. It is
also registered for agricultural use on
bearing fruit and nut trees and
vineyards. There are no human health
risk concerns for isoxaben. However,
there are potential ecological risks to
aquatic and terrestrial plants and
potential chronic risk to mammals. In
this interim registration review decision
for isoxaben, EPA has determined that
no additional data are required at this
time and that certain risk reduction
measures are necessary, including
uniform spray drift management and
herbicide resistance management label
language. The final registration review
decision for isoxaben is dependent upon
an assessment of listed species and
designated critical habitats under the
ESA, a determination of the potential for
endocrine disruption, and a pollinator
risk assessment.
Paclobutrazol (Interim Decision).
Paclobutrazol is a systemic PGR that
slows vegetative growth by inhibiting
cell elongation. Paclobutrazol is
currently registered for use on turf grass
(including in parks, athletic fields, golf
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Jan 05, 2016
Jkt 238001
courses, and rights-of-ways), on
ornamentals, as a tree injection, as a soil
injection/basal tree drench, and as a
seed treatment for various vegetables.
There are no registered residential uses
of paclobutrazol. EPA conducted a risk
assessment for both human health and
ecological risk. No human health risks
were identified. The ecological risk
assessment indicated potential risks to
birds, reptiles, and terrestrial-phase
amphibians, mammals, terrestrial and
aquatic plants, and other aquatic
organisms. In the paclobutrazol interim
decision, the Agency has determined
that certain additional data are required
and certain changes to product labeling
to address risk from runoff are needed
at this time. EPA is making no human
health or environmental safety findings
associated with the EDSP screening of
paclobutrazol, nor is it making an
endangered species finding. EPA’s
registration review decision for
paclobutrazol will depend upon the
result of an EDSP FFDCA section 408(p)
determination, complete pollinator
determination, and ESA determination.
The silicates (silica gel and silicon
dioxide) (Interim Decision). Silica gel
and silicon dioxide are commonly
referred to as the silicates, silica
silicates or diatomaceous earth (DE) and
are found in most soils. Silica gel and
silicon dioxide are registered for use as
insecticides on a variety of indoor and
outdoor areas including crop and
residential use sites to treat pests
(including ants, boxelder bugs,
cockroaches, crickets, slugs, flies, fleas,
millipedes, silver-fish, sowbugs and
ticks). EPA conducted an ecological risk
assessment, including an endangered
species assessment. EPA reached a ‘‘no
effect’’ determination for all listed
species, excluding 57 listed terrestrial
invertebrate species, for which a ‘‘not
likely to adversely affect’’ determination
was made. EPA also concluded that
there would be no modification of
designated critical habitat. EPA engaged
in informal consultation with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) seeking
concurrence on the ‘‘not likely to
adversely affect’’ findings. FWS
concurred with EPA’s ‘‘not likely to
adversely affect’’ determination, thus
completing consultation. No human
health risk assessment was conducted
for silica gel and silicon dioxide because
no toxicological endpoints were
identified to conduct a human health
risk assessment. No risk mitigation
measures for human health or ecological
effects are included in the silica gel and
silicon dioxide registration review
interim decision. This interim decision
does not include the EDSP component
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
483
of this registration review case. The
Agency’s final registration review
decision will depend upon the result of
an EDSP FFDCA section 408(p)
determination.
Sulfentrazone (Interim Decision).
Sulfentrazone is a broad spectrum, preemergence, soil-directed proto
porphyrinogen herbicide used to control
a variety of weeds. It is registered for
use on field crops, specialty vegetable
crops, fruit trees, ornamentals, and turf
grass. EPA completed quantitative
human health and ecological risk
assessments for sulfentrazone in 2014,
and amended the ecological risk
assessment in 2015. The Agency has
risk concerns for pesticide handlers that
can be adequately mitigated by
requiring use of chemical-resistant
gloves. In addition, there are potential
risk concerns for terrestrial plants. In
this interim registration review decision
for sulfentrazone, EPA has determined
that no additional data are required at
this time and that certain risk reduction
measures are necessary. These measures
include uniform spray drift management
language on sulfentrazone labels for
products applied by spraying and
herbicide resistance management
language on all product labels. The
Agency’s final registration review
decision is dependent upon an
assessment of listed species and
designated critical habitats under the
ESA, a determination of the potential for
endocrine disruption, and a pollinator
risk assessment.
Tributyltin oxide (Interim Decision).
There are four EPA registrations for
tributyltin oxide for rubber coatings on
the sonar domes of nuclear submarines
and for oceanographic conductivity
sensors. Based on the lack of potential
for dietary exposure and no residential
uses, the Agency did not conduct a
human health risk assessment. Exposure
to aquatic organisms would occur only
from the small amount of tributyltin
oxide potentially leaching from sonar
domes, and the Agency believes that
risks to non-target, non-listed species
are minimal. Tributyltin oxide use as an
antifoulant on sonar domes is
undergoing ESA consultation with the
Department of Defense, EPA, and the
Services for compounds covered under
EPA’s Uniform National Discharge
Standards. No EDSP determination has
been made at this time. Except for the
EDSP component of the tributyltin
oxide registration review case, the
Agency is not requiring additional data
and is not proposing any risk reduction
measures for this case. The final
decision on the registration review for
tributyltin oxide will occur after the
ESA consultation and the EDSP FFDCA
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
484
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2016 / Notices
section 408(p) determination have been
made.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.57, a
registration review decision is the
Agency’s determination whether a
pesticide meets, or does not meet, the
standard for registration in FIFRA. EPA
has considered the pesticides listed in
light of the FIFRA standard for
registration. The interim decision
documents in the docket describe the
Agency’s rationale for issuing
registration review interim decisions for
these pesticides.
In addition to the interim registration
review decision document, the
registration review docket for these
pesticides also includes other relevant
documents related to the registration
review of these cases. The proposed
interim registration review decisions
were posted to the docket and the
public was invited to submit any
comments or new information. EPA has
addressed the substantive comments or
information received during the 60-day
comment period in the interim decision
document for each pesticide listed in
this document.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), the
registration review case docket for each
pesticide discussed in this notice will
remain open until all actions required in
the interim decision have been
completed.
Background on the registration review
program is provided at: https://
www2.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation.
Links to earlier documents related to the
registration review of this pesticide are
provided in the Pesticide Chemical
Search data base accessible at: https://
iaspub.epa.gov/apex/pesticides/
f?p=chemicalsearch.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: December 23, 2015.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015–33300 Filed 1–5–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[EPA–HQ–OW–2015–0613; FRL–9940–96–
OW]
Proposed Information Collection
Request; Comment Request; Title I of
the Marine Protection, Research, and
Sanctuaries Act
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency is planning to submit an
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 Jan 05, 2016
Jkt 238001
information collection request (ICR),
‘‘Title I of the Marine Protection,
Research, and Sanctuaries Act’’ (EPA
ICR No. 0824.06, OMB Control No.
2040–0008) to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.). Before doing so, EPA is
soliciting public comments on specific
aspects of the proposed information
collection as described below. This is a
proposed renewal of the ICR (formerly
known as ‘‘Ocean Dumping
Regulations—reports and record
keeping to obtain a permit, request
designation, and report on permitted
dumping activities’’), which is currently
expired. An Agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before March 7, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
referencing Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OW–2015–0613, online using
www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), by email to ow-docket@
epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA Docket
Center, Environmental Protection
Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes profanity, threats,
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Redford, Oceans and Coastal
Protection Division, Environmental
Protection Agency, 4504T 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20460; telephone 202–566–1288; fax
number: 202–566–1546; email address:
redford.david@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Supporting documents which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will
be collecting are available in the public
docket for this ICR. The docket can be
viewed online at www.regulations.gov
or in person at the EPA Docket Center,
WJC West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington,
DC. The telephone number for the
Docket Center is 202–566–1744. For
additional information about EPA’s
public docket, visit https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the PRA, EPA is soliciting comments
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and information to enable it to: (i)
Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (ii) evaluate the
accuracy of the Agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (iv) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses. EPA will consider the
comments received and amend the ICR
as appropriate. The final ICR package
will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval. At that time, EPA
will issue another Federal Register
notice to announce the submission of
the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to
submit additional comments to OMB.
Abstract: Ocean dumping—the
transportation of any material for the
purpose of dumping in ocean waters—
cannot occur unless a permit is issued
under the Marine Protection, Research,
and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA). EPA is
responsible for issuing ocean dumping
permits for all materials except dredged
material. The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) is responsible for
issuing ocean dumping permits for
dredged material using EPA’s
environmental criteria. Ocean dumping
permits for dredged material are subject
to EPA review and concurrence. EPA is
also responsible for designating and
managing ocean sites for the disposal of
wastes and other materials, and
establishing Site Management and
Monitoring Plans for ocean disposal
sites. EPA collects or sponsors the
collection of information for the
purposes of permit issuance, reporting
of emergency dumping to safety of life
at sea, compliance with permit
requirements, including specifically
general permits for burial at sea and for
transportation and disposal of vessels.
EPA collects this information to
ensure that ocean dumping is
appropriately regulated and will not
harm human health and the marine
environment, based on applying the
Ocean Dumping Criteria. The Ocean
Dumping Criteria consider, among other
things: The environmental impact of the
dumping; the need for the dumping; the
effect of the dumping on esthetic,
recreational, or economic values; land-
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 6, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 481-484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-33300]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0393; FRL-9939-58]
Registration Review Interim Decisions; Notice of Availability
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's interim
registration review decision for the pesticides listed in Unit II of
this notice. Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide
registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the
statutory standard for registration, that is, that the pesticide can
perform its intended function without causing unreasonable adverse
effects to human health or the environment. Through this program, EPA
is ensuring that each pesticide's registration is based on current
scientific and other knowledge, including its effects on human health
and the environment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For pesticide specific information,
contact the Chemical Review Manager identified in the table in Unit II
for the pesticide of interest.
For general information on the registration review program,
contact: Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P),
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(703) 308-8015; email address: dumas.richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the pesticide specific contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?
The docket for this action, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0393, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
[[Page 482]]
II. What action is the Agency taking?
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), this notice announces the
availability of EPA's interim registration review decisions for the
pesticides in the following table:
Table--Registration Review Interim Decisions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact and
Registration review case name Docket ID No. contact
and No. information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2-Propen-1-aminium, N,Ndimethyl- EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-02 Donna Kamarei,
N-2-propenyl-, chloride, 55. (703) 347-0443,
Homopolymer (Case 5024). kamarei.donna@epa.gov.
Daminozide (Case 0032).......... EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-02 Margaret Hathaway,
42. (703) 305-5076,
hathaway.margaret@epa.gov.
Dipropyl isocinchomeronate (Case EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-05 Marianne Mannix,
2215). 78. (703) 347-0275,
mannix.marianne@epa.gov.
Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (Case 7209).. EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-04 Miguel Zavala,
37. (703) 347-0504,
zavala.miguel@epa.gov.
Imazapyr (Case 3078)............ EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-02 Matthew Manupella,
00. (703) 347-0411,
manupella.matthew@epa.gov.
Isoxaben (Case 7219)............ EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-10 Nathan Sell, (703)
38. 347-8020,
sell.nathan@epa.gov.
Paclobutrazol (Case 7002)....... EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-01 Khue Nguyen, (703)
09. 347-0248,
nguyen.khue@epa.gov.
Silica and Silcates (Case 4081). EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-11 James Parker,
40. (703) 306-0469,
parker.james@epa.gov.
Sulfentrazone (Case 7231)....... EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-06 Christina
24. Scheltema, (703)
308-2201,
scheltema.christina@epa.gov.
Tributyltin Oxide (Case 2620)... EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-08 Sandra O'Neill,
01. (703) 347-0141,
oneill.sandra@epa.gov.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The registration review final decisions for several of these cases
are dependent on the assessment of listed species and designated
critical habitats under the Endangered Species Act (ESA),
determinations on the potential for endocrine disruption, and/or
evaluation of risks to pollinators.
2-Propen-1-aminium, N, N-dimethyl-N-2-propenyl-, chloride,
homopolymer (Interim Decision). The registration review docket for 2-
propen-1-aminium, N, N-dimethyl-N-2-propenyl-, chloride, homopolymer
opened in August 2015. The Agency did not receive any comments. There
is one product containing this active ingredient; which is registered
to control mollusks in potable water supplies. The Agency did not call-
in any data in support of this registration review case. Additionally,
the Agency did not conduct a human health or an environmental risk
assessment since label instructions minimize exposure from the
product's registered use. Based on the lack of potential exposure, the
Agency is making a ``no effect'' determination for listed species. The
final decision on the registration review for this case will occur
after an Endocrine Disruption Screen Program (EDSP) Federal Food Drug
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) section 408(p) determination is made.
Daminozide (Interim Decision). EPA is announcing the availability
of the daminozide interim registration review decision. Daminozide is a
plant growth regulator (PGR) used to control the development of
commercially grown container plants. It is used in nurseries, shade
houses, and greenhouses and is applied as a foliage spray that is
systemically distributed throughout the plant, a use pattern resulting
in little or no potential for off-site drift. Daminozide has no
registered food uses and no registered residential uses. EPA conducted
both an ecological risk assessment and human health risk assessment for
daminozide, and there were no human health risks of concern with
registered daminozide uses. The Agency is not calling for mitigation
for either ecological or human health risks from daminozide at this
time. Except for ongoing ESA consultation, a pollinator risk
assessment, and EDSP component of this registration review case, the
Agency is proposing that no additional data and no further risk
mitigation is needed for daminozide. The Agency's final registration
review decision is dependent upon the assessment of risks to threatened
and endangered species, pollinators, and an EDSP determination.
Dipropyl isocinchomeronate (Interim Decision). This notice
announces the publication of the registration review interim decision
for dipropyl isocinchomeronate. Dipropyl isocinchomeronate is
registered for use as an insect repellent for use on humans and
companion animals to repel flies, gnats, and other flying and biting
insects. It is never the sole active ingredient; it is always co-
formulated with other insecticides/repellents to broaden their spectrum
of repellency. The Agency has concluded that there are no human health
risk concerns associated with the use of dipropyl isocinchomeronate.
Based on the limited usage, diffusion over a large treatment area, and
the low probability of non-target organism exposure, the Agency has not
found any ecological risks of concern associated with dipropyl
isocinchomeronate and is making a ``no effect'' determination for all
federally listed species and a ``no habitat modification''
determination for all designated critical habitat for listed species.
The Agency concludes that no risk reduction measures or additional data
are needed at this time. Dipropyl isocinchomeronate has not been
evaluated under the EDSP. The Agency's final registration review
decision is dependent upon the result of the evaluation of potential
endocrine effects.
Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (Interim Decision). Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (FPE) is
a selective aryloxy phenoxy-propionate herbicide registered for use on
barley, cotton, rice, soybeans, and wheat for post-emergence control of
grassy weeds. Additional non-agricultural use sites include
conservation reserves, ornamentals, rights-of-way, and turf. In this
interim registration review decision for fenoxaprop-p-ethyl, EPA has
determined that no additional data are required at this time; however,
certain risk reduction measures are necessary at this time. To address
potential risk to non-target terrestrial monocots, spray drift
management language is required for all fenoxaprop-p-ethyl product
registrations used on agricultural, wide area, or rights-of-way use
sites. The Agency also is requiring the implementation of label
language clarifying use rates, to which the registrants have already
agreed. In addition, EPA is requiring label language to include
recommended herbicide-resistance management measures. The final
registration review decision for fenoxaprop-p-ethyl is dependent upon
an assessment of listed
[[Page 483]]
species and designated critical habitats under the ESA, a determination
of the potential for endocrine disruption, and a pollinator risk
assessment.
Imazapyr (Interim Decision). The registration review docket for
imazapyr opened in June 2014. Imazapyr is a non-selective systemic
herbicide registered for use as pre- and post-emergent treatments to
control broad spectrum terrestrial and aquatic weeds including
terrestrial annual and perennial grasses, broadleaf weeds, herbs, woody
species, and riparian and emergent aquatic weed species. EPA published
draft human health and ecological risk assessments at the time of the
docket opening for a 60-day public comment period. In this imazapyr
interim decision, the Agency has determined that no additional data are
required and no changes to the affected registrations or their labeling
are needed at this time. In this interim registration review decision,
EPA is making no human health or environmental safety findings
associated with the EDSP screening of imazapyr, nor is it making an
endangered species finding. EPA's registration review decision for
imazapyr will depend upon the result of an EDSP FFDCA section 408(p)
determination, complete pollinator determination, and ESA
determination.
Isoxaben (Interim Decision). Isoxaben is a pre-emergent benzamide
herbicide registered for use to control broadleaf weeds. It is
classified as a Group 21 herbicide that inhibits cell wall
biosynthesis. It is registered for non-agricultural uses such as turf
grass, ornamentals, and landscape mulch. It is also registered for
agricultural use on bearing fruit and nut trees and vineyards. There
are no human health risk concerns for isoxaben. However, there are
potential ecological risks to aquatic and terrestrial plants and
potential chronic risk to mammals. In this interim registration review
decision for isoxaben, EPA has determined that no additional data are
required at this time and that certain risk reduction measures are
necessary, including uniform spray drift management and herbicide
resistance management label language. The final registration review
decision for isoxaben is dependent upon an assessment of listed species
and designated critical habitats under the ESA, a determination of the
potential for endocrine disruption, and a pollinator risk assessment.
Paclobutrazol (Interim Decision). Paclobutrazol is a systemic PGR
that slows vegetative growth by inhibiting cell elongation.
Paclobutrazol is currently registered for use on turf grass (including
in parks, athletic fields, golf courses, and rights-of-ways), on
ornamentals, as a tree injection, as a soil injection/basal tree
drench, and as a seed treatment for various vegetables. There are no
registered residential uses of paclobutrazol. EPA conducted a risk
assessment for both human health and ecological risk. No human health
risks were identified. The ecological risk assessment indicated
potential risks to birds, reptiles, and terrestrial-phase amphibians,
mammals, terrestrial and aquatic plants, and other aquatic organisms.
In the paclobutrazol interim decision, the Agency has determined that
certain additional data are required and certain changes to product
labeling to address risk from runoff are needed at this time. EPA is
making no human health or environmental safety findings associated with
the EDSP screening of paclobutrazol, nor is it making an endangered
species finding. EPA's registration review decision for paclobutrazol
will depend upon the result of an EDSP FFDCA section 408(p)
determination, complete pollinator determination, and ESA
determination.
The silicates (silica gel and silicon dioxide) (Interim Decision).
Silica gel and silicon dioxide are commonly referred to as the
silicates, silica silicates or diatomaceous earth (DE) and are found in
most soils. Silica gel and silicon dioxide are registered for use as
insecticides on a variety of indoor and outdoor areas including crop
and residential use sites to treat pests (including ants, boxelder
bugs, cockroaches, crickets, slugs, flies, fleas, millipedes, silver-
fish, sowbugs and ticks). EPA conducted an ecological risk assessment,
including an endangered species assessment. EPA reached a ``no effect''
determination for all listed species, excluding 57 listed terrestrial
invertebrate species, for which a ``not likely to adversely affect''
determination was made. EPA also concluded that there would be no
modification of designated critical habitat. EPA engaged in informal
consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) seeking
concurrence on the ``not likely to adversely affect'' findings. FWS
concurred with EPA's ``not likely to adversely affect'' determination,
thus completing consultation. No human health risk assessment was
conducted for silica gel and silicon dioxide because no toxicological
endpoints were identified to conduct a human health risk assessment. No
risk mitigation measures for human health or ecological effects are
included in the silica gel and silicon dioxide registration review
interim decision. This interim decision does not include the EDSP
component of this registration review case. The Agency's final
registration review decision will depend upon the result of an EDSP
FFDCA section 408(p) determination.
Sulfentrazone (Interim Decision). Sulfentrazone is a broad
spectrum, pre-emergence, soil-directed proto porphyrinogen herbicide
used to control a variety of weeds. It is registered for use on field
crops, specialty vegetable crops, fruit trees, ornamentals, and turf
grass. EPA completed quantitative human health and ecological risk
assessments for sulfentrazone in 2014, and amended the ecological risk
assessment in 2015. The Agency has risk concerns for pesticide handlers
that can be adequately mitigated by requiring use of chemical-resistant
gloves. In addition, there are potential risk concerns for terrestrial
plants. In this interim registration review decision for sulfentrazone,
EPA has determined that no additional data are required at this time
and that certain risk reduction measures are necessary. These measures
include uniform spray drift management language on sulfentrazone labels
for products applied by spraying and herbicide resistance management
language on all product labels. The Agency's final registration review
decision is dependent upon an assessment of listed species and
designated critical habitats under the ESA, a determination of the
potential for endocrine disruption, and a pollinator risk assessment.
Tributyltin oxide (Interim Decision). There are four EPA
registrations for tributyltin oxide for rubber coatings on the sonar
domes of nuclear submarines and for oceanographic conductivity sensors.
Based on the lack of potential for dietary exposure and no residential
uses, the Agency did not conduct a human health risk assessment.
Exposure to aquatic organisms would occur only from the small amount of
tributyltin oxide potentially leaching from sonar domes, and the Agency
believes that risks to non-target, non-listed species are minimal.
Tributyltin oxide use as an antifoulant on sonar domes is undergoing
ESA consultation with the Department of Defense, EPA, and the Services
for compounds covered under EPA's Uniform National Discharge Standards.
No EDSP determination has been made at this time. Except for the EDSP
component of the tributyltin oxide registration review case, the Agency
is not requiring additional data and is not proposing any risk
reduction measures for this case. The final decision on the
registration review for tributyltin oxide will occur after the ESA
consultation and the EDSP FFDCA
[[Page 484]]
section 408(p) determination have been made.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.57, a registration review decision is the
Agency's determination whether a pesticide meets, or does not meet, the
standard for registration in FIFRA. EPA has considered the pesticides
listed in light of the FIFRA standard for registration. The interim
decision documents in the docket describe the Agency's rationale for
issuing registration review interim decisions for these pesticides.
In addition to the interim registration review decision document,
the registration review docket for these pesticides also includes other
relevant documents related to the registration review of these cases.
The proposed interim registration review decisions were posted to the
docket and the public was invited to submit any comments or new
information. EPA has addressed the substantive comments or information
received during the 60-day comment period in the interim decision
document for each pesticide listed in this document.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), the registration review case docket
for each pesticide discussed in this notice will remain open until all
actions required in the interim decision have been completed.
Background on the registration review program is provided at:
https://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation. Links to earlier documents
related to the registration review of this pesticide are provided in
the Pesticide Chemical Search data base accessible at: https://iaspub.epa.gov/apex/pesticides/f?p=chemicalsearch.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: December 23, 2015.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-33300 Filed 1-5-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P