Medical Devices; Obstetrical and Gynecological Devices; Classification of the Intravaginal Culture System, 378-380 [2015-33264]
Download as PDF
378
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Amendment Number 6 Effective Date:
August 17, 2009.
Amendment Number 7 Effective Date:
December 28, 2009.
Amendment Number 8 Effective Date:
May 2, 2012, as corrected on November
16, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML12213A170).
Amendment Number 9 Effective Date:
March 11, 2014, superseded by
Amendment Number 9, Revision 1, on
March 21, 2016.
xxxx
Amendment Number 9, Revision 1,
Effective Date: March 21, 2016.
Safety Analysis Report (SAR)
Submitted by: Holtec International.
SAR Title: Final Safety Analysis
Report for the HI–STORM 100 Cask
System.
Docket Number: 72–1014.
Certificate Expiration Date: May 31,
2020.
Model Number: HI–STORM 100.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd
day of December, 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Glenn M. Tracy,
Acting, Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015–33280 Filed 1–5–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 884
[Docket No. FDA–2015–N–4408]
Medical Devices; Obstetrical and
Gynecological Devices; Classification
of the Intravaginal Culture System
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is classifying the
intravaginal culture system into class II
(special controls). The special controls
that will apply to the device are
identified in this order and will be part
of the codified language for the
intravaginal culture system’s
classification. The Agency is classifying
the device into class II (special controls)
in order to provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness of
the device.
DATES: This order is effective January 6,
2015. The classification was applicable
on November 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jason Roberts, Center for Devices and
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:07 Jan 05, 2016
Jkt 238001
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G218, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 240–402–6400,
jason.roberts@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)), devices that were not in
commercial distribution before May 28,
1976 (the date of enactment of the
Medical Device Amendments of 1976),
generally referred to as postamendments
devices, are classified automatically by
statute into class III without any FDA
rulemaking process. These devices
remain in class III and require
premarket approval, unless and until
the device is classified or reclassified
into class I or II, or FDA issues an order
finding the device to be substantially
equivalent, in accordance with section
513(i) of the FD&C Act, to a predicate
device that does not require premarket
approval. The Agency determines
whether new devices are substantially
equivalent to predicate devices by
means of premarket notification
procedures in section 510(k) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part
807 (21 CFR part 807) of the regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, as
amended by section 607 of the Food and
Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112–144),
provides two procedures by which a
person may request FDA to classify a
device under the criteria set forth in
section 513(a)(1). Under the first
procedure, the person submits a
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act for a device that
has not previously been classified and,
within 30 days of receiving an order
classifying the device into class III
under section 513(f)(1) of the FD&CAct,
the person requests a classification
under section 513(f)(2). Under the
second procedure, rather than first
submitting a premarket notification
under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act
and then a request for classification
under the first procedure, the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence and requests a classification
under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
If the person submits a request to
classify the device under this second
procedure, FDA may decline to
undertake the classification request if
FDA identifies a legally marketed device
that could provide a reasonable basis for
review of substantial equivalence with
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the device or if FDA determines that the
device submitted is not of ‘‘lowmoderate risk’’ or that general controls
would be inadequate to control the risks
and special controls to mitigate the risks
cannot be developed.
In response to a request to classify a
device under either procedure provided
by section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act,
FDA will classify the device by written
order within 120 days. This
classification will be the initial
classification of the device.
On February 23, 2015, INVO
Bioscience, submitted a request for
classification of the INVOcellTM
Intravaginal Culture System under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. The
manufacturer recommended that the
device be classified into class II (Ref. 1).
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed the
request for de novo classification in
order to classify the device under the
criteria for classification set forth in
section 513(a)(1). FDA classifies devices
into class II if general controls by
themselves are insufficient to provide
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient
information to establish special controls
to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use. After review of the
information submitted in the request,
FDA determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
believes these special controls, in
addition to general controls, will
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on November 2, 2015, FDA
issued an order to the requestor
classifying the device into class II. FDA
is codifying the classification of the
device by adding § 884.6165 (21 CFR
884.6165).
Following the effective date of this
final classification order, any firm
submitting a premarket notification
(510(k)) for an intravaginal culture
system will need to comply with the
special controls named in this final
order. The device is assigned the generic
name intravaginal culture system, and it
is identified as a prescription device
intended for preparing, holding, and
transferring human gametes or embryos
during intravaginal in vitro fertilization
(IVF) or intravaginal culture procedures.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device, as well as the
measures required to mitigate these
risks in table 1:
E:\FR\FM\06JAR1.SGM
06JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
379
TABLE 1—INTRAVAGINAL CULTURE SYSTEM RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Identified risks
Mitigation measures
Damage to gametes and/or embryos or disruption of the IVF process ................................................................
Nonclinical performance testing.
Shelf life testing.
Clinical testing.
Sterilization validation.
Labeling.
Nonclinical performance testing.
Shelf life testing.
Biocompatibility.
Clinical testing.
Sterilization validation.
Labeling.
Sterilization validation.
Reprocessing validation.
Nonclinical performance testing.
Shelf life testing.
Clinical testing.
Labeling.
Labeling.
Patient injury (e.g., hypersensitivity, toxicity, abrasion, discomfort) ......................................................................
Infection .................................................................................................................................................................
Transfer of incorrect embryos to patient ...............................................................................................................
FDA believes that special controls, in
combination with the general controls,
address these risks to health and
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness.
Intravaginal culture system devices
are prescription devices restricted to
patient use only upon the authorization
of a practitioner licensed by law to
administer or use the device; see 21 CFR
801.109 (Prescription devices).
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act
provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k), if
FDA determines that premarket
notification is not necessary to provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device. For this type
of device, FDA has determined that
premarket notification is necessary to
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, this device type is not
exempt from premarket notification
requirements. Persons who intend to
market this type of device must submit
to FDA a premarket notification, prior to
marketing the device, which contains
information about the intravaginal
culture system they intend to market.
IV. Reference
The following reference is on display
in the Division of Dockets Management
(HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852, and is
available for viewing by interested
persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday; it is also
available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov.
1. DEN150008: De novo Request per 513(f)(2)
from INVO Bioscience, dated February
23, 2015.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 884
Medical devices.
II. Environmental Impact, No
Significant Impact
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations. These
collections of information are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). The collections of information in
part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket
notification submissions have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0120, and the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 801,
regarding labeling have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0485.
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 884 is
amended as follows:
PART 884—OBSTETRICAL AND
GYNECOLOGICAL DEVICES
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 884 continues to read as follows:
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 371.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:07 Jan 05, 2016
Jkt 238001
■
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2. Add § 884.6165 to subpart G to read
as follows:
■
§ 884.6165
Intravaginal culture system.
(a) Identification. An intravaginal
culture system is a prescription device
intended for preparing, holding, and
transferring human gametes or embryos
during intravaginal in vitro fertilization
or intravaginal culture procedures.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) Clinical performance testing must
demonstrate the following:
(i) Comfort and retention of the
intravaginal culture device;
(ii) Adverse vaginal tissue reactions
associated with intravaginal culture;
(iii) Maximum number of gametes
and/or embryos that can be placed in a
device; and
(iv) Rates of embryo development to
the designated stage, implantation rates,
clinical pregnancy rates, live birth rates,
and any adverse events or outcomes.
(2) Nonclinical performance testing
must demonstrate that the device
performs as intended under anticipated
conditions of use. The following
performance characteristics must be
demonstrated:
(i) Mouse embryo assay testing to
assess embryotoxicity by evaluating the
gamete and embryo-contacting device
components effect on the growth and
development of mouse embryos to the
blastocyst stage;
(ii) Endotoxin testing on gamete and
embryo-contacting components of the
device;
(iii) Cleaning and disinfection
validation of reusable device
components;
(iv) Sterility maintenance of the
culture media within the device
throughout the vaginal incubation
E:\FR\FM\06JAR1.SGM
06JAR1
380
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
wgreen on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
period and subsequent embryo
extraction; and
(v) Ability of the device to permit
oxygen and carbon dioxide exchange
between the media contained within the
device and the external environment
throughout the vaginal incubation
period.
(3) The patient-contacting
components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Performance data must
demonstrate the sterility of the device
components intended to be provided
sterile.
(5) Shelf life testing must demonstrate
that the device maintains its
performance characteristics and the
packaging of device components labeled
as sterile maintain integrity and sterility
for the duration of the shelf life.
(6) Labeling for the device must
include:
(i) A detailed summary of the clinical
testing, including device effectiveness,
device-related complications, and
adverse events;
(ii) Validated methods and
instructions for reprocessing of reusable
components;
(iii) The maximum number of gametes
or embryos that can be loaded into the
device;
(iv) A warning that informs users that
the embryo development is first
evaluated following intravaginal
culture; and
(v) A statement that instructs the user
to use legally marketed assisted
reproductive technology media that
contain elements to mitigate the
contamination risk (e.g., antibiotics) and
to support continued embryonic
development over the intravaginal
culture period.
(7) Patient labeling must be provided
and must include:
(i) Relevant warnings, precautions,
and adverse effects and complications;
(ii) Information on how to use the
device;
(iii) The risks and benefits associated
with the use of the device; and
(iv) A summary of the principal
clinical device effectiveness results.
Dated: December 30, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–33264 Filed 1–5–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:07 Jan 05, 2016
Jkt 238001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Approval and Promulgation of State
Plans for Designated Facilities and
Pollutants; Nebraska; Sewage Sludge
Incinerators
Paula Higbee, Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development
Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 913–551–7028
or by email at higbee.paula@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section
provides additional information by
addressing the following:
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
I. Background
II. Analysis of State Submittal
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve the Clean Air Act
(CAA) section 111(d)/129 negative
declaration for the state of Nebraska, for
existing sewage sludge incinerator (SSI)
units. This negative declaration certifies
that existing SSI units subject to
sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA do
not exist within the jurisdiction of
Nebraska. EPA is accepting the negative
declaration in accordance with the
requirements of the CAA.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective March 7, 2016, without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
comment by February 5, 2016. If EPA
receives adverse comment, we will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2015–0733, to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
I. Background
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0733; FRL–9941–06–
Region 7]
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The CAA requires that state regulatory
agencies implement the emission
guidelines and compliance times using
a state plan developed under sections
111(d) and 129 of the CAA. The general
provisions for the submittal and
approval of state plans are codified in
40 CFR part 60, subpart B and 40 CFR
part 62, subpart A. Section 111(d)
establishes general requirements and
procedures on state plan submittals for
the control of designated pollutants.
Section 129 requires emission
guidelines to be promulgated for all
categories of solid waste incineration
units, including SSI units. Section 129
mandates that all plan requirements be
at least as protective and restrictive as
the promulgated emission guidelines.
This includes fixed final compliance
dates, fixed compliance schedules, and
Title V permitting requirements for all
affected sources. Section 129 also
requires that state plans be submitted to
EPA within one year after EPA’s
promulgation of the emission guidelines
and compliance times.
States have options other than
submitting a state plan in order to fulfill
their obligations under CAA sections
111(d) and 129. If a State does not have
any existing Sewage Sludge Incineration
(SSI) units for the relevant emissions
guidelines, a letter can be submitted
certifying that no such units exist
within the State (i.e., negative
declaration) in lieu of a state plan. The
negative declaration exempts the State
from the requirements of subpart B that
would otherwise require the submittal
of a CAA section 111(d)/129 plan.
On March 21, 2011 (76 FR 15372), the
EPA established emission guidelines
and compliance times for existing SSI
units. The emission guidelines and
compliance times are codified at 40 CFR
60, Subpart MMMM. In order to fulfill
obligations under CAA sections 111(d)
and 129, NDEQ submitted a negative
declaration letter to EPA on December 6,
2012. The submittal of this declaration
exempts NDEQ from the requirement to
E:\FR\FM\06JAR1.SGM
06JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 6, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 378-380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-33264]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 884
[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-4408]
Medical Devices; Obstetrical and Gynecological Devices;
Classification of the Intravaginal Culture System
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is classifying the
intravaginal culture system into class II (special controls). The
special controls that will apply to the device are identified in this
order and will be part of the codified language for the intravaginal
culture system's classification. The Agency is classifying the device
into class II (special controls) in order to provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device.
DATES: This order is effective January 6, 2015. The classification was
applicable on November 2, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Roberts, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G218, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-402-6400,
jason.roberts@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with section 513(f)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)), devices that were
not in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 (the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976), generally referred
to as postamendments devices, are classified automatically by statute
into class III without any FDA rulemaking process. These devices remain
in class III and require premarket approval, unless and until the
device is classified or reclassified into class I or II, or FDA issues
an order finding the device to be substantially equivalent, in
accordance with section 513(i) of the FD&C Act, to a predicate device
that does not require premarket approval. The Agency determines whether
new devices are substantially equivalent to predicate devices by means
of premarket notification procedures in section 510(k) of the FD&C Act
(21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807) of the regulations.
Section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, as amended by section 607 of the
Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-
144), provides two procedures by which a person may request FDA to
classify a device under the criteria set forth in section 513(a)(1).
Under the first procedure, the person submits a premarket notification
under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act for a device that has not
previously been classified and, within 30 days of receiving an order
classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of the
FD&CAct, the person requests a classification under section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a premarket
notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act and then a request
for classification under the first procedure, the person determines
that there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial equivalence and requests a classification
under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. If the person submits a
request to classify the device under this second procedure, FDA may
decline to undertake the classification request if FDA identifies a
legally marketed device that could provide a reasonable basis for
review of substantial equivalence with the device or if FDA determines
that the device submitted is not of ``low-moderate risk'' or that
general controls would be inadequate to control the risks and special
controls to mitigate the risks cannot be developed.
In response to a request to classify a device under either
procedure provided by section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA will
classify the device by written order within 120 days. This
classification will be the initial classification of the device.
On February 23, 2015, INVO Bioscience, submitted a request for
classification of the INVOcellTM Intravaginal Culture System
under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. The manufacturer recommended
that the device be classified into class II (Ref. 1).
In accordance with section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act, FDA reviewed
the request for de novo classification in order to classify the device
under the criteria for classification set forth in section 513(a)(1).
FDA classifies devices into class II if general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device for its intended use. After review of the
information submitted in the request, FDA determined that the device
can be classified into class II with the establishment of special
controls. FDA believes these special controls, in addition to general
controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on November 2, 2015, FDA issued an order to the
requestor classifying the device into class II. FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding Sec. 884.6165 (21 CFR
884.6165).
Following the effective date of this final classification order,
any firm submitting a premarket notification (510(k)) for an
intravaginal culture system will need to comply with the special
controls named in this final order. The device is assigned the generic
name intravaginal culture system, and it is identified as a
prescription device intended for preparing, holding, and transferring
human gametes or embryos during intravaginal in vitro fertilization
(IVF) or intravaginal culture procedures.
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device, as well as the measures required
to mitigate these risks in table 1:
[[Page 379]]
Table 1--Intravaginal Culture System Risks and Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Damage to gametes and/or Nonclinical performance testing.
embryos or disruption of the Shelf life testing.
IVF process. Clinical testing.
Sterilization validation.
Labeling.
Patient injury (e.g., Nonclinical performance testing.
hypersensitivity, toxicity, Shelf life testing.
abrasion, discomfort). Biocompatibility.
Clinical testing.
Sterilization validation.
Labeling.
Infection.................... Sterilization validation.
Reprocessing validation.
Nonclinical performance testing.
Shelf life testing.
Clinical testing.
Labeling.
Transfer of incorrect embryos Labeling.
to patient.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA believes that special controls, in combination with the general
controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness.
Intravaginal culture system devices are prescription devices
restricted to patient use only upon the authorization of a practitioner
licensed by law to administer or use the device; see 21 CFR 801.109
(Prescription devices).
Section 510(m) of the FD&C Act provides that FDA may exempt a class
II device from the premarket notification requirements under section
510(k), if FDA determines that premarket notification is not necessary
to provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the
device. For this type of device, FDA has determined that premarket
notification is necessary to provide reasonable assurance of the safety
and effectiveness of the device. Therefore, this device type is not
exempt from premarket notification requirements. Persons who intend to
market this type of device must submit to FDA a premarket notification,
prior to marketing the device, which contains information about the
intravaginal culture system they intend to market.
II. Environmental Impact, No Significant Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations. These collections of information are subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of information in
part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket notification submissions have
been approved under OMB control number 0910-0120, and the collections
of information in 21 CFR part 801, regarding labeling have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0485.
IV. Reference
The following reference is on display in the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, and is available for viewing by
interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday; it
is also available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov.
1. DEN150008: De novo Request per 513(f)(2) from INVO Bioscience,
dated February 23, 2015.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 884
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
884 is amended as follows:
PART 884--OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 884 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 884.6165 to subpart G to read as follows:
Sec. 884.6165 Intravaginal culture system.
(a) Identification. An intravaginal culture system is a
prescription device intended for preparing, holding, and transferring
human gametes or embryos during intravaginal in vitro fertilization or
intravaginal culture procedures.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) Clinical performance testing must demonstrate the following:
(i) Comfort and retention of the intravaginal culture device;
(ii) Adverse vaginal tissue reactions associated with intravaginal
culture;
(iii) Maximum number of gametes and/or embryos that can be placed
in a device; and
(iv) Rates of embryo development to the designated stage,
implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates, live birth rates, and any
adverse events or outcomes.
(2) Nonclinical performance testing must demonstrate that the
device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The
following performance characteristics must be demonstrated:
(i) Mouse embryo assay testing to assess embryotoxicity by
evaluating the gamete and embryo-contacting device components effect on
the growth and development of mouse embryos to the blastocyst stage;
(ii) Endotoxin testing on gamete and embryo-contacting components
of the device;
(iii) Cleaning and disinfection validation of reusable device
components;
(iv) Sterility maintenance of the culture media within the device
throughout the vaginal incubation
[[Page 380]]
period and subsequent embryo extraction; and
(v) Ability of the device to permit oxygen and carbon dioxide
exchange between the media contained within the device and the external
environment throughout the vaginal incubation period.
(3) The patient-contacting components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(4) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of the device
components intended to be provided sterile.
(5) Shelf life testing must demonstrate that the device maintains
its performance characteristics and the packaging of device components
labeled as sterile maintain integrity and sterility for the duration of
the shelf life.
(6) Labeling for the device must include:
(i) A detailed summary of the clinical testing, including device
effectiveness, device-related complications, and adverse events;
(ii) Validated methods and instructions for reprocessing of
reusable components;
(iii) The maximum number of gametes or embryos that can be loaded
into the device;
(iv) A warning that informs users that the embryo development is
first evaluated following intravaginal culture; and
(v) A statement that instructs the user to use legally marketed
assisted reproductive technology media that contain elements to
mitigate the contamination risk (e.g., antibiotics) and to support
continued embryonic development over the intravaginal culture period.
(7) Patient labeling must be provided and must include:
(i) Relevant warnings, precautions, and adverse effects and
complications;
(ii) Information on how to use the device;
(iii) The risks and benefits associated with the use of the device;
and
(iv) A summary of the principal clinical device effectiveness
results.
Dated: December 30, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-33264 Filed 1-5-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P