FY 2015 Annual Compliance Report, 523-525 [2015-33192]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2016 / Notices Schedules issued by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) or a PBGC records disposition schedule approved by NARA. Records existing on paper are destroyed beyond recognition. Records existing on computer storage media are destroyed according to the applicable PBGC media sanitization practice. SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS: Director, Benefits Administration and Payments Department, PBGC, 1200 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20005. NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE: Individuals wishing to learn whether this system of records contains information about them should submit a written request to the Disclosure Officer, PBGC, 1200 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20005, and provide the following information: a. Full name. b. Any available information regarding the type of record involved. c. The address to which the record information should be sent. d. You must sign your request. Attorneys or other persons acting on behalf of an individual must provide written authorization from that individual for the representative to act on their behalf. Individuals requesting access must also comply with PBGC’s Privacy Act regulations regarding verification of identity and access to records (29 CFR 4902.3). mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURE: Individuals wishing to request access to their records should submit a written request to the Disclosure Officer, PBGC, 1200 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20005, and provide the following information: a. Full name. b. Any available information regarding the type of record involved. c. The address to which the record information should be sent. d. You must sign your request. Attorneys or other persons acting on behalf of an individual must provide written authorization from that individual for the representative to act on their behalf. Individuals requesting access must also comply with PBGC’s Privacy Act regulations regarding verification of identity and access to records (29 CFR 4902.3). CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURE: Individuals wishing to request an amendment to their records should submit a written request to the Disclosure Officer, PBGC, 1200 K Street VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 Jan 05, 2016 Jkt 238001 NW., Washington, DC 20005, and provide the following information: a. Full name. b. Any available information regarding the type of record involved. c. A statement specifying the changes to be made in the records and the justification therefor. d. The address to which the response should be sent. e. You must sign your request. Attorneys or other persons acting on behalf of an individual must provide written authorization from that individual for the representative to act on their behalf. RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: PBGC–6; the SSA; the IRS; labor organization officials; firms or agencies providing locator services; USPS licensees; field benefit administrator offices; and any other individual that provides PBGC with information regarding a missing participant, beneficiary, or alternate payee. EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM: None. [FR Doc. 2015–33294 Filed 1–5–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7709–02–P POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. ACR2015; Order No. 2968] FY 2015 Annual Compliance Report Postal Regulatory Commission. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: The Postal Service has filed an Annual Compliance Report on the costs, revenues, rates, and quality of service associated with its products in fiscal year 2015. Within 90 days, the Commission must evaluate that information and issue its determination as to whether rates were in compliance with title 39, chapter 36, and whether service standards in effect were met. To assist in this, the Commission seeks public comments on the Postal Service’s Annual Compliance Report. DATES: Comments are due: February 2, 2016. Reply Comments are due: February 12, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission’s Filing Online system at https:// www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing alternatives. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202–789–6820. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 523 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Overview of the Postal Service’s FY 2015 ACR III. Procedural Steps IV. Ordering Paragraphs I. Introduction On December 29, 2015, the United States Postal Service (Postal Service) filed with the Commission, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3652, its Annual Compliance Report (ACR) for fiscal year (FY) 2015.1 Section 3652 requires submission of data and information on the costs, revenues, rates, and quality of service associated with postal products within 90 days of the closing of each fiscal year. In conformance with other statutory provisions and Commission rules, the ACR includes the Postal Service’s FY 2015 Comprehensive Statement, its FY 2015 annual report to the Secretary of the Treasury on the Competitive Products Fund, and certain related Competitive Products Fund material. See respectively, 39 U.S.C. 3652(g), 39 U.S.C. 2011(i), and 39 CFR 3060.20–23. In line with past practice, some of the material in the FY 2015 ACR appears in non-public annexes. The filing begins a review process that results in an Annual Compliance Determination (ACD) issued by the Commission to determine whether Postal Service products offered during FY 2015 were in compliance with applicable title 39 requirements. II. Overview of the Postal Service’s FY 2015 ACR Contents of the filing. The Postal Service’s FY 2015 ACR consists of a 73page narrative; extensive additional material appended as separate folders and identified in Attachment One; and an application for non-public treatment of certain materials, along with supporting rationale, filed as Attachment Two. The filing also includes the Comprehensive Statement,2 Report to the Secretary of the Treasury, and information on the Competitive Products Fund filed in response to Commission rules. This 1 United States Postal Service FY 2015 Annual Compliance Report, December 29, 2015 (FY 2015 ACR). Public portions of the Postal Service’s filing are available on the Commission’s Web site at https://www.prc.gov. 2 In years prior to 2013, the Commission reviewed the Postal Service’s reports prepared pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 2803 and 39 U.S.C. 2804 (filed as the Comprehensive Statement by the Postal Service) in its Annual Compliance Determination. However, as it did last year, the Commission intends to issue a separate notice soliciting comments on the comprehensive statement and provide its related analysis in a separate report from the ACD. E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 524 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2016 / Notices material has been filed electronically with the Commission, and some also has been filed in hard-copy form. Scope of filing. The material appended to the narrative consists of: (1) Domestic product costing material filed on an annual basis summarized in the Cost and Revenue Analysis (CRA); (2) comparable international costing material summarized in the International Cost and Revenue Analysis (ICRA); (3) worksharing-related cost studies; and (4) billing determinant information for both domestic and international mail. FY 2015 ACR at 2. Inclusion of these four data sets is consistent with the Postal Service’s past ACR practices. As with past ACRs, the Postal Service has split certain materials into public and non-public versions. Id. at 2–3. ‘‘Roadmap’’ document. A roadmap to the FY 2015 ACR can be found in Library Reference USPS–FY15–9. This document provides brief descriptions of the materials submitted, as well as the flow of inputs and outputs among them; a discussion of differences in methodology relative to Commission methodologies in last year’s ACD; and a list of special studies and a discussion of obsolescence, as required by Commission rule 3050.12. Id. at 3. Methodology. The Postal Service states that it has adhered to the methodologies historically used by the Commission subject to changes identified and discussed in Library Reference USPS–FY15–9 and in prefaces accompanying the appended folders. Id. at 4. Changes in analytical principles proposed by the Postal Service for use in the FY 2015 ACR are identified and summarized in a table. Id. at 4–6. Market dominant product-by-product costs, revenues, and volumes. Comprehensive cost, revenue, and volume data for all market dominant products of general applicability are shown directly in the FY 2015 CRA or ICRA. Id. at 7. The FY 2015 ACR includes a discussion by class of each market dominant product, including costs, revenues, and volumes, workshare discounts and passthroughs responsive to 39 U.S.C. 3652(b), and FY 2015 incentive programs. Id. at 7–55.3 In response to the Commission’s FY 2010 ACD directives, the Postal Service states that it is providing information regarding: (a) All operational changes 3 The Postal Service states that it ‘‘would be inefficient and unduly disruptive . . . to immediately adjust prices to correct passthroughs that exceed 100 percent.’’ Id. It further states its intent to address such passthroughs in its next general price adjustment. Id. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 Jan 05, 2016 Jkt 238001 designed to reduce flats costs and the estimated financial effects of such changes, id. at 18–28; (b) all costing methodology improvements made in FY 2014 and the estimated financial effects of such changes, id. at 28–31; and (c) a statement summarizing the historical and current year subsidy of the flats product, id. In addition, in response to Order No. 1427,4 the Postal Service states that in the next general marketdominant price change, it plans to increase the price of Standard Mail Flats by at least CPI times 1.05. FY 2015 ACR at 30. Also, in response to the FY 2014 ACD, the Postal Service states that it provides an analysis of progress being made in the improvement of Periodicals cost coverage. Id. at 44–46. Market dominant negotiated service agreements. The FY 2015 ACR presents information on market dominant negotiated service agreements (NSAs). Id. at 53–55. Service performance. The Postal Service notes that the Commission issued rules on periodic reporting of service performance measurement and customer satisfaction in FY 2010. Responsive information appears in Library Reference USPS–FY15–29. Id. at 56–57. Customer satisfaction. The FY 2015 ACR discusses the Postal Service’s approach for measuring customer experience and satisfaction; describes the methodology; presents a table with survey results; compares the results from FY 2014 to FY 2015; and provides information regarding customer access to postal services. Id. at 56–60. The Postal Service also states that it responds to the Commission’s directive in the July 7, 2015, ‘‘Analysis of the Postal Service’s FY 2014 Program Performance Report and FY 2015 Performance Plan’’ that the Postal Service provide comparable results for each performance indicator over Fiscal Years 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015, by using the same measurement methodology or by explaining how the results under different methodologies can be compared. Id. at 60–62. Competitive products. The FY 2015 ACR provides costs, revenues, and volumes for competitive products of general applicability in the FY 2015 CRA or ICRA. For competitive products not of general applicability, data is provided in non-public Library References USPS–FY15–NP2 and USPS–FY15–NP27. Id. at 63. The FY 2015 ACR also addresses the competitive product pricing standards of 39 U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 63–69. 4 Docket No. ACR2010–R, Order on Remand, August 9, 2012 (Order No. 1427). PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Market tests; nonpostal services. The Postal Service discusses the three competitive market tests conducted during FY 2015, and nonpostal services. Id. at 70. III. Procedural Steps Statutory requirements. Section 3653 of title 39 requires the Commission to provide interested persons with an opportunity to comment on the ACR and to appoint an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent the interests of the general public. The Commission hereby solicits public comment on the Postal Service’s FY 2015 ACR and on whether any rates or fees in effect during FY 2015 (for products individually or collectively) were not in compliance with applicable provisions of chapter 36 of title 39 (or regulations promulgated thereunder). Commenters addressing market dominant products are referred in particular to the applicable requirements (39 U.S.C. 3622(d) and (e) and 3626); objectives (39 U.S.C. 3622(b)); and factors (39 U.S.C. 3622(c)). Commenters addressing competitive products are referred to 39 U.S.C. 3633. The Commission also invites public comment on the cost coverage matters the Postal Service addresses in its filing; service performance results; levels of customer satisfaction achieved; and such other matters that may be relevant to the Commission’s review. Access to filing. The Commission has posted the publicly available portions of the FY 2015 ACR on its Web site at https://www.prc.gov. Comment deadlines. Comments by interested persons are due on or before February 2, 2016. Reply comments are due on or before February 12, 2016. The Commission, upon completion of its review of the FY 2015 ACR, public comments, and other data and information submitted in this proceeding, will issue its ACD. Public Representative. James Waclawski is designated to serve as the Public Representative to represent the interests of the general public in this proceeding. Neither the Public Representative nor any additional persons assigned to assist him shall participate in or advise as to any Commission decision in this proceeding other than in their designated capacity. IV. Ordering Paragraphs It is ordered: 1. The Commission establishes Docket No. ACR2015 to consider matters raised by the United States Postal Service’s FY 2015 Annual Compliance Report. 2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints James Waclawski E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2016 / Notices as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) in this proceeding to represent the interests of the general public. 3. Comments on the United States Postal Service’s FY 2015 Annual Compliance Report to the Commission are due on or before February 2, 2016. 4. Reply comments are due on or before February 12, 2016. 5. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the Federal Register. By the Commission. Stacy L. Ruble, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–33192 Filed 1–5–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [SEC File No. 270–441, OMB Control No. 3235–0497] Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–2736. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Extension: Rule 15c3–4. Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (‘‘PRA’’), the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) a request for approval of extension of the previously approved collection of information provided for in Rule 15c3–4 (17 CFR 240.15c3–4) (the ‘‘Rule’’) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.). Rule 15c3–4 requires certain brokerdealers that are registered with the Commission as OTC derivatives dealers, or who compute their net capital charges under Appendix E to Rule 15c3–1 (17 CFR 240.15c3–1) (‘‘ANC firms’’), to establish, document, and maintain a system of internal risk management controls. The Rule sets forth the basic elements for an OTC derivatives dealer or an ANC firm to consider and include when establishing, documenting, and reviewing its internal risk management control system, which are designed to, among other things, ensure the integrity of an OTC derivatives dealer’s or an ANC firm’s risk measurement, monitoring, and management process, to clarify accountability at the appropriate VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:32 Jan 05, 2016 Jkt 238001 organizational level, and to define the permitted scope of the dealer’s activities and level of risk. The Rule also requires that management of an OTC derivatives dealer or an ANC firm must periodically review, in accordance with written procedures, the firm’s business activities for consistency with its risk management guidelines. The staff estimates that the average amount of time a new OTC derivatives dealer will spend establishing and documenting its risk management control system is 2,000 hours and that, on average, a registered OTC derivatives dealer will spend approximately 200 hours each year to maintain (e.g., reviewing and updating) its risk management control system.1 Currently, four firms are registered with the Commission as OTC derivatives dealers. The staff estimates that approximately two additional entities may become registered as OTC derivatives dealers within the next three years. Thus, the estimated annualized burden would be 800 hours for the four OTC derivatives dealers currently registered with the Commission to maintain their risk management control systems,2 1,334 hours for the two new OTC derivatives dealers to establish and document their risk management control systems,3 and 400 hours for the two new OTC derivatives dealers to maintain their risk management control systems.4 Accordingly, the staff estimates the total annualized burden associated with Rule 15c3–4 for the six OTC derivatives dealers will be approximately 2,534 hours annually. The staff believes that the internal cost of complying with Rule 15c3–4 will be approximately $283 per hour.5 This per hour cost is based upon an annual average hourly salary for a compliance manager who would be responsible for ensuring compliance with the requirements of Rule 15c3–4. Accordingly, the total annualized internal cost of compliance for all 1 This notice does not cover the hour burden associated with ANC firms, because the hour burden for ANC firms is included in the Paperwork Reduction Act collection for Rule 15c3–1, which requires ANC firms to comply with specific provisions of Rule 15c3–4 in Appendix E to Rule 15c3–1. See 17 CFR 240.15c3–1(a)(7)(iii), 17 CFR 240.15c3–1e(a)(1)(ii), and 17 CFR 240.15c3– 1e(a)(1)(viii)(C). 2 (200 hours × 4 firms) = 800. 3 ((2,000 hours/3 years) × 2 firms) = 1,334. 4 (200 hours × 2 firms) = 400. 5 The $283 per hour salary figure for a compliance manager is from SIFMA’s Management & Professional Earnings in the Securities Industry 2013, modified by Commission staff to account for an 1800-hour work-year and multiplied by 5.35 to account for bonuses, firm size, employee benefits and overhead. PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 525 affected OTC derivatives dealers is estimated to be $717,122.6 The records required to be made by OTC derivatives dealers pursuant to the Rule and the results of the periodic reviews conducted under paragraph (d) of Rule 15c3–4 must be preserved under Rule 17a–4 of the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.17a–4) for a period of not less than three years, the first two years in an easily accessible place. The Commission will not generally publish or make available to any person notice or reports received pursuant to the Rule. The statutory basis for the Commission’s refusal to disclose such information to the public is the exemption contained in section (b)(4) of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), which essentially provides that the requirement of public dissemination does not apply to commercial or financial information which is privileged or confidential. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The public may view background documentation for this information collection at the following Web site: www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to: (i) Shagufta_Ahmed@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi PavlikSimon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an email to: PRA_Mailbox@SEC.gov. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days of this notice. Dated: December 30, 2015. Jill M. Peterson, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2015–33214 Filed 1–5–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 6 2,534 E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM hours × $283 per hour = $717,122. 06JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 6, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 523-525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-33192]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. ACR2015; Order No. 2968]


FY 2015 Annual Compliance Report

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service has filed an Annual Compliance Report on 
the costs, revenues, rates, and quality of service associated with its 
products in fiscal year 2015. Within 90 days, the Commission must 
evaluate that information and issue its determination as to whether 
rates were in compliance with title 39, chapter 36, and whether service 
standards in effect were met. To assist in this, the Commission seeks 
public comments on the Postal Service's Annual Compliance Report.

DATES: Comments are due: February 2, 2016. Reply Comments are due: 
February 12, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing 
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments 
electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing 
alternatives.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 
202-789-6820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Introduction
II. Overview of the Postal Service's FY 2015 ACR
III. Procedural Steps
IV. Ordering Paragraphs

I. Introduction

    On December 29, 2015, the United States Postal Service (Postal 
Service) filed with the Commission, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3652, its 
Annual Compliance Report (ACR) for fiscal year (FY) 2015.\1\ Section 
3652 requires submission of data and information on the costs, 
revenues, rates, and quality of service associated with postal products 
within 90 days of the closing of each fiscal year. In conformance with 
other statutory provisions and Commission rules, the ACR includes the 
Postal Service's FY 2015 Comprehensive Statement, its FY 2015 annual 
report to the Secretary of the Treasury on the Competitive Products 
Fund, and certain related Competitive Products Fund material. See 
respectively, 39 U.S.C. 3652(g), 39 U.S.C. 2011(i), and 39 CFR 3060.20-
23. In line with past practice, some of the material in the FY 2015 ACR 
appears in non-public annexes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ United States Postal Service FY 2015 Annual Compliance 
Report, December 29, 2015 (FY 2015 ACR). Public portions of the 
Postal Service's filing are available on the Commission's Web site 
at https://www.prc.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The filing begins a review process that results in an Annual 
Compliance Determination (ACD) issued by the Commission to determine 
whether Postal Service products offered during FY 2015 were in 
compliance with applicable title 39 requirements.

II. Overview of the Postal Service's FY 2015 ACR

    Contents of the filing. The Postal Service's FY 2015 ACR consists 
of a 73-page narrative; extensive additional material appended as 
separate folders and identified in Attachment One; and an application 
for non-public treatment of certain materials, along with supporting 
rationale, filed as Attachment Two. The filing also includes the 
Comprehensive Statement,\2\ Report to the Secretary of the Treasury, 
and information on the Competitive Products Fund filed in response to 
Commission rules. This

[[Page 524]]

material has been filed electronically with the Commission, and some 
also has been filed in hard-copy form.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ In years prior to 2013, the Commission reviewed the Postal 
Service's reports prepared pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 2803 and 39 U.S.C. 
2804 (filed as the Comprehensive Statement by the Postal Service) in 
its Annual Compliance Determination. However, as it did last year, 
the Commission intends to issue a separate notice soliciting 
comments on the comprehensive statement and provide its related 
analysis in a separate report from the ACD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Scope of filing. The material appended to the narrative consists 
of: (1) Domestic product costing material filed on an annual basis 
summarized in the Cost and Revenue Analysis (CRA); (2) comparable 
international costing material summarized in the International Cost and 
Revenue Analysis (ICRA); (3) worksharing-related cost studies; and (4) 
billing determinant information for both domestic and international 
mail. FY 2015 ACR at 2. Inclusion of these four data sets is consistent 
with the Postal Service's past ACR practices. As with past ACRs, the 
Postal Service has split certain materials into public and non-public 
versions. Id. at 2-3.
    ``Roadmap'' document. A roadmap to the FY 2015 ACR can be found in 
Library Reference USPS-FY15-9. This document provides brief 
descriptions of the materials submitted, as well as the flow of inputs 
and outputs among them; a discussion of differences in methodology 
relative to Commission methodologies in last year's ACD; and a list of 
special studies and a discussion of obsolescence, as required by 
Commission rule 3050.12. Id. at 3.
    Methodology. The Postal Service states that it has adhered to the 
methodologies historically used by the Commission subject to changes 
identified and discussed in Library Reference USPS-FY15-9 and in 
prefaces accompanying the appended folders. Id. at 4. Changes in 
analytical principles proposed by the Postal Service for use in the FY 
2015 ACR are identified and summarized in a table. Id. at 4-6.
    Market dominant product-by-product costs, revenues, and volumes. 
Comprehensive cost, revenue, and volume data for all market dominant 
products of general applicability are shown directly in the FY 2015 CRA 
or ICRA. Id. at 7.
    The FY 2015 ACR includes a discussion by class of each market 
dominant product, including costs, revenues, and volumes, workshare 
discounts and passthroughs responsive to 39 U.S.C. 3652(b), and FY 2015 
incentive programs. Id. at 7-55.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Postal Service states that it ``would be inefficient and 
unduly disruptive . . . to immediately adjust prices to correct 
passthroughs that exceed 100 percent.'' Id. It further states its 
intent to address such passthroughs in its next general price 
adjustment. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In response to the Commission's FY 2010 ACD directives, the Postal 
Service states that it is providing information regarding: (a) All 
operational changes designed to reduce flats costs and the estimated 
financial effects of such changes, id. at 18-28; (b) all costing 
methodology improvements made in FY 2014 and the estimated financial 
effects of such changes, id. at 28-31; and (c) a statement summarizing 
the historical and current year subsidy of the flats product, id. In 
addition, in response to Order No. 1427,\4\ the Postal Service states 
that in the next general market-dominant price change, it plans to 
increase the price of Standard Mail Flats by at least CPI times 1.05. 
FY 2015 ACR at 30. Also, in response to the FY 2014 ACD, the Postal 
Service states that it provides an analysis of progress being made in 
the improvement of Periodicals cost coverage. Id. at 44-46.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Docket No. ACR2010-R, Order on Remand, August 9, 2012 (Order 
No. 1427).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Market dominant negotiated service agreements. The FY 2015 ACR 
presents information on market dominant negotiated service agreements 
(NSAs). Id. at 53-55.
    Service performance. The Postal Service notes that the Commission 
issued rules on periodic reporting of service performance measurement 
and customer satisfaction in FY 2010. Responsive information appears in 
Library Reference USPS-FY15-29. Id. at 56-57.
    Customer satisfaction. The FY 2015 ACR discusses the Postal 
Service's approach for measuring customer experience and satisfaction; 
describes the methodology; presents a table with survey results; 
compares the results from FY 2014 to FY 2015; and provides information 
regarding customer access to postal services. Id. at 56-60. The Postal 
Service also states that it responds to the Commission's directive in 
the July 7, 2015, ``Analysis of the Postal Service's FY 2014 Program 
Performance Report and FY 2015 Performance Plan'' that the Postal 
Service provide comparable results for each performance indicator over 
Fiscal Years 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015, by using the same measurement 
methodology or by explaining how the results under different 
methodologies can be compared. Id. at 60-62.
    Competitive products. The FY 2015 ACR provides costs, revenues, and 
volumes for competitive products of general applicability in the FY 
2015 CRA or ICRA. For competitive products not of general 
applicability, data is provided in non-public Library References USPS-
FY15-NP2 and USPS-FY15-NP27. Id. at 63. The FY 2015 ACR also addresses 
the competitive product pricing standards of 39 U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 63-
69.
    Market tests; nonpostal services. The Postal Service discusses the 
three competitive market tests conducted during FY 2015, and nonpostal 
services. Id. at 70.

III. Procedural Steps

    Statutory requirements. Section 3653 of title 39 requires the 
Commission to provide interested persons with an opportunity to comment 
on the ACR and to appoint an officer of the Commission (Public 
Representative) to represent the interests of the general public. The 
Commission hereby solicits public comment on the Postal Service's FY 
2015 ACR and on whether any rates or fees in effect during FY 2015 (for 
products individually or collectively) were not in compliance with 
applicable provisions of chapter 36 of title 39 (or regulations 
promulgated thereunder). Commenters addressing market dominant products 
are referred in particular to the applicable requirements (39 U.S.C. 
3622(d) and (e) and 3626); objectives (39 U.S.C. 3622(b)); and factors 
(39 U.S.C. 3622(c)). Commenters addressing competitive products are 
referred to 39 U.S.C. 3633.
    The Commission also invites public comment on the cost coverage 
matters the Postal Service addresses in its filing; service performance 
results; levels of customer satisfaction achieved; and such other 
matters that may be relevant to the Commission's review.
    Access to filing. The Commission has posted the publicly available 
portions of the FY 2015 ACR on its Web site at https://www.prc.gov.
    Comment deadlines. Comments by interested persons are due on or 
before February 2, 2016. Reply comments are due on or before February 
12, 2016. The Commission, upon completion of its review of the FY 2015 
ACR, public comments, and other data and information submitted in this 
proceeding, will issue its ACD.
    Public Representative. James Waclawski is designated to serve as 
the Public Representative to represent the interests of the general 
public in this proceeding. Neither the Public Representative nor any 
additional persons assigned to assist him shall participate in or 
advise as to any Commission decision in this proceeding other than in 
their designated capacity.

IV. Ordering Paragraphs

    It is ordered:
    1. The Commission establishes Docket No. ACR2015 to consider 
matters raised by the United States Postal Service's FY 2015 Annual 
Compliance Report.
    2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints James 
Waclawski

[[Page 525]]

as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) in this 
proceeding to represent the interests of the general public.
    3. Comments on the United States Postal Service's FY 2015 Annual 
Compliance Report to the Commission are due on or before February 2, 
2016.
    4. Reply comments are due on or before February 12, 2016.
    5. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the 
Federal Register.

    By the Commission.
Stacy L. Ruble,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-33192 Filed 1-5-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.