Notice of Availability of the Final White-Tailed Deer Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, Fire Island National Seashore, New York, 81856-81857 [2015-32970]
Download as PDF
81856
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2015 / Notices
the AFH with respect to another
program participant.
Through these regulatory provisions,
HUD sets out the standard for review of
AFHs. HUD is further committed to
providing technical assistance and
examples that will help guide program
participants as to what it means to have
an AFH that is substantially incomplete
or one that is inconsistent with fair
housing or civil rights laws. HUD can,
and will, provide a checklist to help
program participants ensure they have
responded to all required elements of
the Assessment Tool.
Issue: The certification statement for
the Assessment Tool is too broad. A
commenter stated that it is unreasonable
to require broad certification of AFFH
compliance without providing program
participants with the standards HUD
will use to assess that compliance.
Another commenter suggested that HUD
revise the certification language to read,
‘‘All information provided by the
signatory entity in this assessment is
true, complete, and accurate to the best
of my knowledge and belief as of the
date of this submission.’’ The
commenter stated that this will better
facilitate submissions for program
participants that will submit a single
AFH on behalf of multiple agencies.
HUD Response: Several changes were
made to both the certification language
itself to align it with the certification
provisions in the AFFH final rule and
clarifying language was also added to
the instructions accompanying the
Assessment Tool that pertain to the
certification. First, a new item was
added to the certification, reflecting the
AFFH final rule:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
By this signature, I am authorized to certify
on behalf of the program participant that the
program participant will take meaningful
actions to further the goals identified in its
AFH conducted in accordance with the
requirements in §§ 5.150 through 5.180 and
24 CFR 91.225(a)(1), 91.325(a)(1),
91.425(a)(1), 570.487(b)(1), 570.601, 903.7(o),
and 903.15(d), as applicable.
Second, an instruction was added for
the certification that states: ‘‘Please
note, for a joint or regional AFH, each
collaborating program participant must
authorize a representative to sign the
certification on the program
participant’s behalf. In a joint or
regional AFH, when responding to each
question, collaborating program
participants may provide joint analyses
and individual analyses. The authorized
representative of each program
participant certifies only to information
the program participant provides
individually or jointly in response to
each question in the assessment. The
authorized representative does not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Dec 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
certify for information applicable only
to other collaborating program
participants’ analyses, if any.’’ HUD
believes this additional instruction will
provide greater clarity and further
encourage joint and regional AFH
submissions.
As the AFFH final rule itself makes
clear, joint and regional submitting
agencies are both responsible for the
joint portions of the Assessment,
including joint goals, and for their own
individual portions of the assessment,
including their agencies individual
goals and priorities. They are therefore
not responsible for other agencies’
individual goals and priorities. As
stated in § 5.156 (a)(3) of the AFFH final
rule:
Collaborating program participants must
designate, through express written consent,
one participant as the lead entity to oversee
the submission of the joint or regional AFH
on behalf of all collaborating program
participants. When collaborating to submit a
joint or regional AFH, program participants
may divide work as they choose, but all
program participants are accountable for the
analysis and any joint goals and priorities,
and each collaborating program participant
must sign the AFH submitted to HUD.
Collaborating program participants are also
accountable for their individual analysis,
goals, and priorities to be included in the
collaborative AFH.
HUD encourages program participants
to enter into joint and regional
collaborations. Doing so can have
benefits for both the analysis of issues,
which often cross-jurisdictional
boundaries and for setting goals. HUD
will work with all joint and regional
participating entities to facilitate their
cooperation and further clarify the roles
and responsibilities of these agencies
through additional technical assistance
and guidance documents.
III. Summary
In issuing this Final Assessment Tool,
HUD has strived to reach the
appropriate balance in having program
participants produce a meaningful
assessment of fair housing that carefully
considers barriers to fair housing choice
and accessing opportunity and how
such barriers can be overcome in
respective jurisdictions and regions
without being unduly burdensome.
HUD has further committed to
addressing program participant burden
by providing data, guidance, and
technical assistance, and such
assistance will occur throughout the
AFH process.
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: December 22, 2015.
Gustavo Velasquez,
Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and
Equal Opportunity.
[FR Doc. 2015–32680 Filed 12–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–NER–FIIS–18941; PXXNR5E2150001]
Notice of Availability of the Final
White-Tailed Deer Management Plan
and Environmental Impact Statement,
Fire Island National Seashore, New
York
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Park Service
(NPS) announces the availability of the
Final White-tailed Deer Management
Plan and Environmental Impact
Statement (Final Plan/EIS) for Fire
Island National Seashore, New York.
The Final Plan/EIS identifies
Alternative D as the NPS preferred
alternative. When approved, the
management plan will guide
management of white-tailed deer at Fire
Island National Seashore through the
use of integrated tools and strategies to
control the deer population and support
preservation of the natural and cultural
landscape, protection and restoration of
native vegetation and other natural and
cultural resources.
DATES: The NPS will prepare a Record
of Decision (ROD) no sooner than 30
days following publication by the
Environmental Protection Agency of a
Notice of Availability of the Final Plan/
EIS in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: The Final Plan/EIS is
available electronically at https://
www.parkplanning.nps.gov/fiis. A
limited number of printed copies will be
available upon request by contacting the
Superintendent’s office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Morgan Elmer, NPS Denver Service
Center, 303–969–2317, Morgan_Elmer@
nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Fire Island
National Seashore (the Seashore), a unit
of the National Park System, is located
along the south shore of Long Island in
Suffolk County, New York. The
Seashore encompasses 19,579 acres of
upland, tidal, and submerged lands
along a 26-mile stretch of the 32-mile
barrier island—part of a much larger
system of barrier islands and bluffs
stretching from New York City to the
very eastern end of Long Island at
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2015 / Notices
Montauk Point. The Seashore sustains a
white-tailed deer (Odocoileus
virginianus) population that has
expanded since the late 1960s to the
extent that impacts from high densities
of deer have been, and continue to be,
a complex issue for National Park
Service (NPS) managers. As a result,
pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), the Seashore
prepared a Draft White-tailed Deer
Management Plan and Environmental
Impact Statement (Draft Plan/EIS) to
develop a deer management strategy
that supports preservation of the natural
and cultural landscape through
population management and the
protection of native vegetation. The
Draft Plan/EIS was prepared in
cooperation with the New York State
Department of Environmental
Conservation (NYS–DEC) and the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Services (APHIS).
The NPS released the Draft Plan/EIS
for public and agency review and
comment beginning July 31, 2014 and
ending October 10, 2014. The Draft
Plan/EIS evaluated a no action
alternative (A) and three action
alternatives (B, C, and D). Each action
alternative presented a different strategy
to protect native plant communities and
cultural plantings, promote forest
regeneration, further reduce undesirable
human-deer interactions, and reduce the
deer population in the Seashore.
Alternative A would continue existing
deer management and monitoring efforts
throughout the Seashore. These actions
include continued public education/
interpretation efforts, vegetation
monitoring, and deer population and
behavior surveys.
Alternative B provides a nonlethal
deer reduction option to implement
nonsurgical reproductive control of does
when an acceptable reproductive
control agent is available that meets
NPS established criteria. Large fence
exclosures would also protect forested
areas and vegetation to allow restoration
of the maritime holly forest, other
natural vegetation and the culturally
important vegetation at the William
Floyd Estate.
Alternative C provides a lethal deer
reduction option through the use of
sharpshooting with firearms, and
possible capture and euthanasia to
reduce deer populations to the target
density and maintain that level.
Alternative D, identified as the NPS
preferred alternative, provides a
combined lethal and nonlethal deer
reduction option through the use of
sharpshooting with firearms, and
possible capture and euthanasia to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Dec 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
reduce deer populations to a desirable
level. Once the target density has been
reached, use of nonsurgical
reproductive control of does may be
used to maintain that level when an
acceptable reproductive control agent is
available that meets NPS established
criteria.
Comments were accepted on the Draft
Plan/EIS during the 60-day public
comment period. After reviewing and
considering all comments received, the
NPS has prepared this Final Whitetailed Deer Management Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement (Final
Plan/EIS). The Final Plan/EIS identifies
Alternative D as the NPS preferred
alternative with no changes from the
Draft Plan/EIS and presents the likely
environmental consequences of
implementing the preferred alternative,
as well as the other alternatives
considered. The Final Plan/EIS also
discusses the comments received on the
Draft Plan/EIS and responds to
substantive comments.
Dated: August 5, 2015.
Michael A. Caldwell,
Regional Director, Northeast Region, National
Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2015–32970 Filed 12–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–WV–P
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE
UNITED STATES
Hearings of the Judicial Conference
Advisory Committee on the Federal
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
Advisory Committee on the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
Judicial Conference of the United States.
ACTION: Notice of cancellation of public
hearing.
AGENCY:
The following public hearing
on proposed amendments to the Federal
Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure has been
canceled: Bankruptcy Rules Hearing on
January 22, 2016 in Washington, DC.
Announcements for this meeting were
previously published in 80 FR 48120, 80
FR 50324 and 80 FR 51604. The public
hearing on proposed amendments to the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
scheduled for January 29, 2016, in
Pasadena, California, remains
scheduled, subject to sufficient
expressions of interest.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Rules
Committee Secretary, Rules Committee
Support Office, Administrative Office of
the United States Courts, Washington,
DC 20544, telephone (202) 502–1820.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
81857
Dated: December 28, 2015.
Rebecca A. Womeldorf,
Rules Committee Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–32923 Filed 12–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decrees Under the Clean
Water Act
On December 23, 2015, the
Department of Justice lodged two
proposed consent decrees with the
United States District Court for the
District of Puerto Rico in the lawsuit
entitled United States v. The
Municipality of San Juan, the Puerto
Rico Department of Natural and
Environmental Resources, the Puerto
Rico Department of Transportation and
Public Works, the Puerto Rico Highway
and Transportation Authority, and the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Civil
Action No. 3:14–cv–1476–CCC.
One proposed consent decree resolves
the United States’ claims against the
Puerto Rico Department of Natural and
Environmental Resources (‘‘DNER’’)
under the Clean Water Act (‘‘CWA’’), 33
U.S.C. 1251–1387, concerning CWA
violations at three of its storm water
pump stations located within San Juan.
The proposed consent decree requires
DNER to apply for a permit and
implement a Storm Water Management
Program, to undertake certain capital
and operation improvements to its
pump stations, and to provide financial
support for investigations and work
performed in the pump station service
areas. The proposed consent decree
resolves only the violations alleged
against DNER in the Complaint through
the date of lodging of the consent decree
and does not resolve claims against the
other Defendants. Due to financial
challenges currently facing the
Commonwealth, no civil penalties for
past violations will be recovered under
this consent decree.
The second proposed consent decree
resolves the United States’ claims
against the Puerto Rico Department of
Transportation and Public Works
(‘‘DTPW’’) and the Puerto Rico
Highways and Transportation Authority
(‘‘HTA’’) under the CWA, concerning
CWA violations throughout their storm
sewer systems located within San Juan.
The proposed consent decree provides
for injunctive relief to be implemented
in a two-stage, multi-phased approach
including the study and repair of their
MS4s, in addition to other infrastructure
and operational improvements. The
proposed consent decree resolves only
E:\FR\FM\31DEN1.SGM
31DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 251 (Thursday, December 31, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81856-81857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32970]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS-NER-FIIS-18941; PXXNR5E2150001]
Notice of Availability of the Final White-Tailed Deer Management
Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, Fire Island National Seashore,
New York
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Park Service (NPS) announces the availability of
the Final White-tailed Deer Management Plan and Environmental Impact
Statement (Final Plan/EIS) for Fire Island National Seashore, New York.
The Final Plan/EIS identifies Alternative D as the NPS preferred
alternative. When approved, the management plan will guide management
of white-tailed deer at Fire Island National Seashore through the use
of integrated tools and strategies to control the deer population and
support preservation of the natural and cultural landscape, protection
and restoration of native vegetation and other natural and cultural
resources.
DATES: The NPS will prepare a Record of Decision (ROD) no sooner than
30 days following publication by the Environmental Protection Agency of
a Notice of Availability of the Final Plan/EIS in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: The Final Plan/EIS is available electronically at https://www.parkplanning.nps.gov/fiis. A limited number of printed copies will
be available upon request by contacting the Superintendent's office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Morgan Elmer, NPS Denver Service
Center, 303-969-2317, Morgan_Elmer@nps.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Fire Island National Seashore (the
Seashore), a unit of the National Park System, is located along the
south shore of Long Island in Suffolk County, New York. The Seashore
encompasses 19,579 acres of upland, tidal, and submerged lands along a
26-mile stretch of the 32-mile barrier island--part of a much larger
system of barrier islands and bluffs stretching from New York City to
the very eastern end of Long Island at
[[Page 81857]]
Montauk Point. The Seashore sustains a white-tailed deer (Odocoileus
virginianus) population that has expanded since the late 1960s to the
extent that impacts from high densities of deer have been, and continue
to be, a complex issue for National Park Service (NPS) managers. As a
result, pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), the Seashore prepared a Draft White-tailed Deer Management Plan
and Environmental Impact Statement (Draft Plan/EIS) to develop a deer
management strategy that supports preservation of the natural and
cultural landscape through population management and the protection of
native vegetation. The Draft Plan/EIS was prepared in cooperation with
the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYS-DEC)
and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Services (APHIS).
The NPS released the Draft Plan/EIS for public and agency review
and comment beginning July 31, 2014 and ending October 10, 2014. The
Draft Plan/EIS evaluated a no action alternative (A) and three action
alternatives (B, C, and D). Each action alternative presented a
different strategy to protect native plant communities and cultural
plantings, promote forest regeneration, further reduce undesirable
human-deer interactions, and reduce the deer population in the
Seashore.
Alternative A would continue existing deer management and
monitoring efforts throughout the Seashore. These actions include
continued public education/interpretation efforts, vegetation
monitoring, and deer population and behavior surveys.
Alternative B provides a nonlethal deer reduction option to
implement nonsurgical reproductive control of does when an acceptable
reproductive control agent is available that meets NPS established
criteria. Large fence exclosures would also protect forested areas and
vegetation to allow restoration of the maritime holly forest, other
natural vegetation and the culturally important vegetation at the
William Floyd Estate.
Alternative C provides a lethal deer reduction option through the
use of sharpshooting with firearms, and possible capture and euthanasia
to reduce deer populations to the target density and maintain that
level.
Alternative D, identified as the NPS preferred alternative,
provides a combined lethal and nonlethal deer reduction option through
the use of sharpshooting with firearms, and possible capture and
euthanasia to reduce deer populations to a desirable level. Once the
target density has been reached, use of nonsurgical reproductive
control of does may be used to maintain that level when an acceptable
reproductive control agent is available that meets NPS established
criteria.
Comments were accepted on the Draft Plan/EIS during the 60-day
public comment period. After reviewing and considering all comments
received, the NPS has prepared this Final White-tailed Deer Management
Plan and Environmental Impact Statement (Final Plan/EIS). The Final
Plan/EIS identifies Alternative D as the NPS preferred alternative with
no changes from the Draft Plan/EIS and presents the likely
environmental consequences of implementing the preferred alternative,
as well as the other alternatives considered. The Final Plan/EIS also
discusses the comments received on the Draft Plan/EIS and responds to
substantive comments.
Dated: August 5, 2015.
Michael A. Caldwell,
Regional Director, Northeast Region, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-32970 Filed 12-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-WV-P