Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone off Alaska; Fixed-Gear Commercial Halibut and Sablefish Fisheries; Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab Rationalization Program; Cost Recovery Authorized Payment Methods, 81798-81804 [2015-32966]
Download as PDF
81798
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2015 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Parts 679 and 680
[Docket No. 150904826–5826–01]
RIN 0648–BF35
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone off Alaska; Fixed-Gear
Commercial Halibut and Sablefish
Fisheries; Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands Crab Rationalization Program;
Cost Recovery Authorized Payment
Methods
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues a proposed rule
to revise the authorized methods for
payment of cost recovery fees for the
Halibut and Sablefish Individual
Fishing Quota Program and the Bering
Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab
Rationalization Program. This proposed
rule is necessary to improve data
security procedures and to reduce
administrative costs of processing cost
recovery fee payments. The proposed
rule is intended to promote the goals
and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of
1982, the Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands, the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Gulf of Alaska, the Fishery Management
Plan for Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands
King and Tanner Crabs, and other
applicable laws.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
February 1, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by NOAA–NMFS–2015–0113,
by any of the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150113, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O.
Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802–1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Dec 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
Electronic copies of the following
documents are available from https://
www.regulations.gov or from the NMFS
Alaska Region Web site at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov:
• The Regulatory Impact Review/
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(RIR/IRFA) (collectively referred to as
the ‘‘Analysis’’) and the Categorical
Exclusion prepared for this action.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this action
may be submitted by mail to NMFS at
the above address; by email to OIRA_
Submission@omb.eop.gov; or by fax to
202–395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keeley Kent, 907–586–7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for Action
NMFS manages the groundfish
fisheries in the Federal exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) off Alaska under
the Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands and under the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Gulf of Alaska. The North Pacific
Fishery Management Council (Council)
prepared the fishery management plans
(FMPs) under the authority of the
Magnuson Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (MagnusonStevens Act), 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Regulations governing U.S. fisheries and
implementing the FMPs appear at 50
CFR parts 600 and 679.
The International Pacific Halibut
Commission (IPHC) and NMFS manage
fishing for Pacific halibut through
regulations established under the
authority of the Northern Pacific Halibut
Act of 1982 (Halibut Act). The IPHC
promulgates regulations governing the
halibut fishery under the Convention
between the United States and Canada
for the Preservation of the Halibut
Fishery of the Northern Pacific Ocean
and Bering Sea (Convention). The
IPHC’s regulations are subject to
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
approval by the Secretary of State with
the concurrence of the Secretary of
Commerce (Secretary). NMFS publishes
the IPHC’s regulations as annual
management measures pursuant to 50
CFR 300.62. The Halibut Act, at sections
773c(a) and (b), provides the Secretary
with general responsibility to carry out
the Convention and the Halibut Act.
The Halibut Act, at section 773c(c), also
provides the Council with authority to
develop regulations, including limited
access regulations, that are in addition
to, and not in conflict with, approved
IPHC regulations. Regulations
developed by the Council may be
implemented by NMFS only after
approval by the Secretary. The Council
developed the Individual Fishing Quota
Program (IFQ Program) for the
commercial halibut and sablefish
fisheries, codified at 50 CFR part 679,
under the authority of section 773 of the
Halibut Act and section 303(b) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act.
The king and Tanner crab fisheries in
the EEZ of the Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands are managed under the Fishery
Management Plan for Bering Sea/
Aleutian Islands King and Tanner Crabs
(Crab FMP). The Crab FMP was
prepared by the Council under the
Magnuson-Stevens Act as amended by
the Consolidated Appropriations Act of
2004 (Public Law 108–199, section 801).
Regulations implementing the Crab
FMP, including the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Crab Rationalization
Program (CR Program), are located at 50
CFR part 680.
Background
This proposed rule would revise
authorized payment methods in the cost
recovery fee programs for the IFQ
Program and the CR Program. The
proposed rule would improve data
security procedures for protecting
financial information submitted to
NMFS for payment of cost recovery fees
by eliminating manual processing of
credit card payments by NMFS and
requiring use of the Federal
Government’s online payment system,
pay.gov, for all credit card payments.
This proposed rule would also reduce
administrative costs for the cost
recovery programs by eliminating
manual processing of paper check and
money order payments and requiring
electronic payment of all cost recovery
fee payments to NMFS using pay.gov or
Fedwire Funds Service (Fedwire)
beginning with the cost recovery fee
payment due in 2020. Reduced
administrative costs to NMFS would
result in lower expenses subject to cost
recovery fees. Therefore, this action
would be expected to reduce fees for
E:\FR\FM\31DEP1.SGM
31DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2015 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
participants in the IFQ Program and CR
Program subject to a cost recovery fee
relative to the status quo.
The following sections describe
authorities for and operation of cost
recovery programs, the cost recovery
program for the IFQ Program, the cost
recovery program for the CR Program,
the current authorized cost recovery fee
payment methods, the need for this
proposed rule, and the proposed rule to
improve administration of the cost
recovery programs.
Cost Recovery—General
Section 304(d) of the MagnusonStevens Act specifies that the Secretary
is authorized, and shall collect a fee, to
recover the actual costs directly related
to the management, data collection, and
enforcement of any limited access
privilege program (LAPP) and
community development quota program
(CDQ) that allocates a percentage of the
total allowable catch of a fishery to such
program. Section 304(d) also specifies
that such fee shall not exceed three
percent of the ex-vessel value of fish
harvested under any such program.
The IFQ Program is a LAPP as defined
in section 304(d) of the MagnusonStevens Act. NMFS implemented a cost
recovery fee program for the IFQ
Program in 2000 (65 FR 14919, March
20, 2000). Regulations implementing the
IFQ Program cost recovery program are
located at § 679.45. The CR Program is
also a LAPP as defined in section 304(d)
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Section
313(j) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act
provided supplementary authority to
section 304(d) and additional detail for
cost recovery provisions specific to the
CR Program. NMFS implemented a cost
recovery fee program with the final rule
to implement the CR Program in 2005
(70 FR 10174, March 2, 2005).
Regulations implementing the CR
Program cost recovery program are
located at § 680.44.
NMFS recovers the incremental costs
of managing and enforcing the IFQ
Program and CR Program annually
through a fee paid by persons who hold
a permit granting an exclusive access
privilege to a portion of the total
allowable catches in IFQ Program and
CR Program fisheries. NMFS calculates
cost recovery fees for fish that are
landed and deducted from the total
allowable catch in the fisheries subject
to cost recovery.
To calculate the annual cost recovery
fee for each permit holder in the IFQ
Program and the CR Program, NMFS (1)
calculates the ex-vessel value for each
landing of a fishery species allocated
under the program; (2) calculates the
total ex-vessel value of all fish landed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Dec 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
under the program by adding together
the ex-vessel values of each fishery
species under the program; (3)
calculates the total program cost by
adding together the incremental costs of
management, data collection, and
enforcement for each fishery under the
program that would not have been
incurred but for the implementation of
the program; (4) calculates a fee
percentage (not to exceed three percent
of the ex-vessel value of fish harvested
under any such program) for the
program by dividing total program costs
by the total ex-vessel value for all
fishery species under the program; and
(5) calculates the fee amount that will be
assessed for each permit holder by
multiplying the fee percentage by the
permit holder’s total ex-vessel value of
landings under the program. The final
figure is the annual cost recovery fee
owed by each permit holder. The
amount of cost recovery fees collected
varies annually because total ex-vessel
value and total program costs fluctuate
from year to year.
Cost Recovery for the IFQ Program
The Council recommended the IFQ
Program in 1992, and NMFS published
a final rule to implement the IFQ
Program on November 9, 1993 (58 FR
59375). Fishing under the program
began on March 15, 1995. The IFQ
Program limits access to the halibut and
sablefish fisheries to those persons
holding quota shares (QS) in specific
regulatory areas. QS equate to
individual harvesting privileges that are
given effect annually through the
issuance of IFQ permits. An annual IFQ
permit authorizes the permit holder to
harvest a specified amount of IFQ
halibut or sablefish in a regulatory area.
The final rule to implement the cost
recovery program for the IFQ fishery
was published in March 2000 (65 FR
14919, March 20, 2000). Section 679.45
specifies the process that NMFS uses to
determine, assess, and collect cost
recovery fees for the IFQ Program. As
described above in the ‘‘Cost Recovery—
General’’ section, NMFS annually
calculates the cost recovery fee
percentage for halibut and sablefish IFQ
permit holders by dividing total
program costs for the IFQ Program by
the total ex-vessel value of the catch
subject to the IFQ cost recovery fee for
the current year. The IFQ Program
fishing year takes place within a
calendar year, generally beginning in
March and ending in November. The
method used by NMFS to calculate the
IFQ cost recovery fee percentage is
described at § 679.45(d)(2)(ii).
Regulations at § 679.45(d)(1) and
(d)(3)(i) require NMFS to publish the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
81799
IFQ cost recovery fee percentage and the
IFQ standard prices used to calculate
the total ex-vessel value of IFQ halibut
and sablefish landed in the Federal
Register during the last quarter of each
calendar year. NMFS published the
2014 IFQ cost recovery fee percentage
and IFQ standard prices on December 9,
2014 (79 FR 73045).
Each December, NMFS sends IFQ
permit holders a bill for the cost
recovery fee liability with an
itemization of their IFQ halibut and
sablefish landings for the year. The IFQ
permit holder is responsible for
submitting this payment to NMFS on or
before the due date of January 31
following the year in which the IFQ
halibut and sablefish landings were
made.
If an IFQ permit holder who owes a
fee fails to submit payment in full by
January 31 following the year in which
the landings were made, NMFS sends
the permit holder an Initial
Administrative Determination (IAD)
with the amount of fee liability owed. If
a permit holder fails to make payment
after receiving the IAD, NMFS may
disapprove any transfer of IFQ or QS to
or from the permit holder until the fee
liability is reconciled. If further action is
necessary, NMFS may invalidate any
IFQ fishing permits held by the permit
holder. Additional information on the
administration of the IFQ Program cost
recovery program is provided in Section
3.5.1.2 of the Analysis.
Cost Recovery for the CR Program
NMFS published the final rule to
implement the CR Program in 2005 (70
FR 10174, March 2, 2005). The CR
Program allocates QS for nine crab
fisheries under the Crab FMP: Bristol
Bay red king crab, Bering Sea C. opilio
(snow crab), Eastern Bering Sea C. bairdi
(Tanner crab), Western Bering Sea C.
bairdi (Tanner crab), Pribilof Islands
blue and red king crab, St. Matthew
Island blue king crab, Western Aleutian
Islands (Adak) golden king crab, Eastern
Aleutian Islands (Dutch Harbor) golden
king crab, and Western Aleutian Islands
(Adak) red king crab.
NMFS originally issued QS to eligible
harvesters as determined by eligibility
criteria and participation in the CR
Program fisheries during qualifying
years. Additionally, NMFS issued
processor quota shares (PQS) to eligible
processing entities that met the criteria
based on crab processing activities
during the qualifying years. Each year,
individual QS holders are issued IFQ to
harvest a portion of the annual total
allowable catch in a CR Program fishery.
PQS holders are similarly issued annual
individual processing quota (IPQ) that
E:\FR\FM\31DEP1.SGM
31DEP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
81800
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2015 / Proposed Rules
allow entities to receive deliveries of CR
Program crab.
NMFS issues three classes of IFQ: A
shares, B shares, and C shares. Three
percent of the total IFQ pool for each
fishery is issued as C shares for captains
and crew. The remaining IFQ pool is
split with 90 percent issued as A shares
and 10 percent issued as B shares. Class
A shares carry the requirement of
matching, on a one-to-one basis, with
IPQ. Both Class B and Class C shares do
not have a matching requirement and
may be delivered to any registered crab
receiver (RCR). RCRs include shoreside
processors, catcher/processors, entities
holding PQS with custom processing
agreements with other shoreside
processors, and communities holding
PQS.
The cost recovery regulations for the
CR Program were published in the final
rule to implement the CR Program on
March 2, 2005 (70 FR 10174). Section
680.44 specifies the process that NMFS
uses to determine, assess, and collect
cost recovery fees for the CR Program.
As described above in the ‘‘Cost
Recovery—General’’ section, NMFS
annually calculates the cost recovery fee
percentage for the CR Program by
dividing total program costs for the CR
Program by the total ex-vessel value of
the catch subject to the CR Program cost
recovery fee for the current year. The CR
Program cost recovery billing cycle
matches that of the crab fishing year—
July 1 to June 30. The method used by
NMFS to calculate the CR Program cost
recovery fee percentage is described at
§ 680.44(c)(2). As specified in the final
rule to implement the CR Program, the
CR Program processing sector,
specifically RCRs, are responsible for
collecting cost recovery fee payments
from the harvesters and submitting this
payment and their own self-collected
fee payments to NMFS by the specified
deadline. Catcher/processors, vessels
that harvest and process crab, pay the
full CR Program cost recovery fee for
every pound of crab harvested and
processed.
Regulations at § 680.44(c)(1) require
NMFS to publish the CR Program cost
recovery fee percentage in the Federal
Register during the first quarter of the
crab fishing year, which is used by CR
Program permit holders and RCRs to
collect cost recovery fees throughout the
crab fishing year. This is different from
the IFQ Program, which applies the fee
percentage to the landings that occurred
during the most recent fishing year.
NMFS published the 2015/2016 CR
Program cost recovery fee percentage in
July 2015 (80 FR 42792, July 20, 2015).
NMFS provides an itemized bill of cost
recovery fee liabilities to all RCRs
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Dec 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
during the last quarter of the crab
fishing year. The RCR is responsible for
submitting payment to NMFS on or
before the due date of July 31, following
the crab fishing year in which payment
for the crab is made.
If an RCR owes fees and fails to
submit full payment for the previous
crab fishing year by July 31, the
Regional Administrator may disapprove
any transfer of IFQ, IPQ, QS, or PQS to
or from the RCR and may withhold
issuance of any new CR crab permits,
including IFQ, IPQ, or RCR permits for
the subsequent crab fishing year.
Additional information on the
administration of the CR Program cost
recovery program is provided in Section
3.5.2.2 of the Analysis.
Authorized Cost Recovery Payment
Methods
Cost recovery regulations for the IFQ
Program and CR Program
(§ 679.45(a)(4)(iv) and § 680.44(a)(4)(iv),
respectively) currently allow permit
holders to pay their fee in U.S. dollars
by personal check drawn on a U.S. bank
account, money order, bank-certified
check, or credit card. NMFS has
established specific procedures for
processing payments. IFQ Program and
CR Program permit holders may submit
cost recovery fee payments either
electronically or non-electronically.
Electronic payments can be made using
credit card or electronic check via the
pay.gov web-based system, or by wiring
payment directly from the permit
holder’s financial institution via the
Fedwire funds transfer system. Nonelectronic payments can be made by
submitting a paper form to NMFS with
credit card information via mail or
facsimile, or by submitting a paper
check or money order via mail. This
section provides additional detail on
each authorized payment method
regarding the security of permit holders’
financial information and the
administrative costs incurred by NMFS
to process the payments.
Electronic Payments
Electronic payments via the pay.gov
system and the Fedwire system are the
most secure methods of transmitting
financial information and result in the
lowest administrative costs for NMFS.
Permit holders may make electronic cost
recovery payments directly through
pay.gov. Pay.gov is operated by the U.S.
Department of the Treasury (Treasury)
and offers the highest level of security
for the personal and financial
information submitted to pay fees to
NMFS. Pay.gov uses the latest industrystandard methods and encryption to
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
safely collect, store, and transmit
information that is submitted.
IFQ Program and CR Program permit
holders can access pay.gov through the
NMFS Alaska Region online system
called eFISH. The eFISH system is a
web-based application that provides
permit holders with access to their
NMFS permit accounts (https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/webapps/efish/
login). When an IFQ Program or CR
Program permit holder logs on to eFISH
to pay a cost recovery fee liability, the
system automatically loads the amount
owed by that permit holder into
pay.gov.
Through pay.gov, permit holders can
make cost recovery payments using a
credit card, debit card, or direct debit
(electronic check). Due to the
transaction fee incurred by the Treasury,
there is a payment limit of $24,999.99
on credit card transactions through
pay.gov (see notice online at: https://
tfm.fiscal.treasury.gov/v1/announc/a14-04.html). There is currently no
payment limit on debit card or direct
debit payments. Payments made
through pay.gov automatically update
the NMFS internal cost recovery
payment tracking system to reflect the
payment.
Under the current regulations, permit
holders may also make cost recovery fee
payments through Fedwire. Fedwire is a
real-time transfer system that allows
financial institutions to electronically
transfer funds. Fedwire allows wire
transfers of fee payments from any bank
or wire transfer service to NMFS to
fulfill cost recovery fee obligations. To
make a Fedwire payment, a permit
holder must provide his or her financial
institution the routing number and
account information for the Treasury,
the beneficiary name and account
number for NMFS, and the amount
owed. The permit holder’s financial
institution then initiates the transaction.
Payments are made directly to the
Federal Reserve Bank, which then
notifies NMFS of the payment.
Payments are processed individually
through Fedwire, which uses a highly
secure electronic network. NMFS must
log Fedwire payments in the internal
cost recovery payment tracking system.
Non-Electronic Payments
Non-electronic submission of
payment information to NMFS via mail
or facsimile is less secure and results in
higher administrative costs than
electronic payments because it results in
transmission of permit holders’
financial information over the NMFS
information network and requires
NMFS to manually process payments.
Under current regulations, permit
E:\FR\FM\31DEP1.SGM
31DEP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2015 / Proposed Rules
holders may pay a cost recovery fee
with a credit card by submitting a form
via mail or facsimile with their credit
card information to NMFS. Manual
credit card processing results in the
possession and transmission of IFQ
Program and CR Program permit
holders’ credit card information over the
NMFS information network. Manual
credit card processing is a less secure
method of payment than the permit
holder directly entering their credit card
information into pay.gov, and results in
higher administrative costs for NMFS.
Administrative costs to collect fees are
subject to cost recovery. Therefore, the
higher administrative costs to process
credit cards manually results in an
increased fee liability for the IFQ and
CR Programs relative to electronic
payments.
Permit holders may also pay a cost
recovery fee with a paper check, money
order, or bank-certified check. NMFS
processes these payments using a
Treasury web-based application
(https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/
fsservices/gov/rvnColl/otcnet/rvnColl_
otcnet.htm). The checks are scanned
into the internal cost recovery payment
tracking system and batched for deposit
the following day. NMFS must then
check the system to ensure that each
check has cleared. NMFS manually
updates the internal cost recovery
payment tracking system to reflect the
payment. Discrepancies or errors
between the cost recovery amount owed
and the amount paid by check must be
addressed by NMFS. Payment with
paper check, money order, or bankcertified check results in higher
administrative costs for NMFS, and
those additional costs increase the fee
liability for the IFQ and CR Programs
relative to electronic payments.
In 2014 for the IFQ Program, NMFS
received 2,038 total cost recovery fee
payments from IFQ permit holders, with
an average payment size of $2,440
(Table 4 of the Analysis). Of the total
payments made, 528 cost recovery fee
payments required manual credit card
processing (Table 2 of the Analysis),
which represented 26 percent of the
total cost recovery payments made that
year. The number of payments requiring
manual credit card processing increased
slightly from 2013 to 2014. In 2014,
there were 986 payments made by paper
check (48 percent of payments) and 19
made by money order (0.9 percent of
payments). Overall, manual processing
for credit card, paper check, and money
order payments was required for 75
percent of cost recovery fee payments
made under the IFQ Program for 2014
(1,533 payments); the remaining 25
percent of payments were made
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Dec 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
electronically primarily via pay.gov
(Table 4 of Analysis).
In 2014 for the CR Program, NMFS
received 20 total cost recovery fee
payments from CR Program permit
holders, with an average payment size
of $78,310 (Table 5 of the Analysis).
There were no cost recovery payments
made from 2012 through 2014 by CR
Program RCRs that required manual
credit card processing (Table 3 of the
Analysis). This may be because the CR
Program payments are considerably
larger than the IFQ Program payments
due to the payment liability structure
that requires RCRs to submit cost
recovery fee payments on behalf of the
CR Program harvesting and processing
sectors. In 2014, 50 percent of payments
(10 payments) were made with paper
checks and required manual processing
(Table 3 of the Analysis), and the
remaining 50 percent of payments (10
payments) were made electronically
using pay.gov and Fedwire.
Need for This Proposed Rule
The purpose of this proposed rule is
to improve security procedures for
protecting financial information and to
reduce costs associated with
administering the cost recovery
programs. The current regulations for
the IFQ Program and the CR Program
cost recovery programs allow permit
holders to submit credit card
information for manual credit card
processing by NMFS. This results in the
possession and electronic transmission
of financial information on the NMFS
information network, which is a
security vulnerability and an
administrative cost to both the permit
holder and to NMFS. As a result of this
security vulnerability, the NMFS Alaska
Region has been directed by the NOAA
Office of the Chief Information Officer
to cease manual processing of credit
card payments for cost recovery fees.
This proposed rule would also reduce
administrative costs for the IFQ Program
and CR Program by eliminating other
non-electronic payment methods that
require manual processing. As described
in the previous section, all manual
processing of cost recovery fee
payments made by check and money
order generates significant costs for the
administration of these programs.
Eliminating these non-electronic
payment methods from authorized
payment method options would reduce
the staffing burden for processing cost
recovery fee payments and further
reduce the costs of administering the
cost recovery programs. Reduced
administrative costs would result in
lower overall fee liabilities for the IFQ
and CR Programs.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
81801
Proposed Rule
NMFS proposes to revise the
authorized cost recovery fee payment
methods for the IFQ and CR Programs
by revising regulations at
§ 679.45(a)(4)(ii) through (iv) and
§ 680.44(a)(4)(iii) and (iv). This
proposed rule would eliminate the
option for IFQ permit holders and CR
Program RCRs to submit credit card
payment information by mail or
facsimile upon the effective date of the
final rule, if approved. NMFS
anticipates the final rule, if approved,
would be effective prior to the date cost
recovery fee payments are due for the
2015/2016 CR Program crab fishing year
and the 2016 IFQ Program fishing year.
The cost recovery fee payment for the
CR Program 2015/2016 crab fishing year
would be due on July 31, 2016. The cost
recovery fee payment for the 2016 IFQ
Program fishing year would be due on
January 31, 2017.
This proposed rule would also revise
the cost recovery regulations to
eliminate paper checks, money orders,
and bank-certified checks as authorized
payment methods beginning with the
cost recovery fee payment that would be
due by January 31, 2020 for the IFQ
Program and July 31, 2020 for the CR
Program. If approved, the final rule
would require all permit holders to
submit payments through pay.gov or
Fedwire beginning with the cost
recovery fee payment due for the 2019
fishing year for IFQ Program permit
holders and for the 2019/2020 CR
Program crab fishing year for CR
Program RCRs. To implement this
provision, NMFS proposes that all cost
recovery fee payments must be made
electronically for any payment made on
or after the first day of the billing cycle
for IFQ Program and CR Program cost
recovery fee payments that would be
due in 2020. The billing cycle is
considered the time period that begins
when NMFS calculates cost recovery
fees and mails out cost recovery
payment notices and ends when the cost
recovery fee payment is due. The first
day of the 2020 IFQ Program cost
recovery billing cycle would be
December 1, 2019. The first day of the
2019/2020 CR Program cost recovery
billing cycle would be June 1, 2020.
NMFS is proposing allowing nonelectronic payments via paper check or
money order until the 2020 cost
recovery fee cycle to provide a
transition period for those permit
holders who do not make electronic
payments to become familiar with, and
begin transitioning to, electronic
payment methods.
E:\FR\FM\31DEP1.SGM
31DEP1
81802
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Table 1 contains the anticipated
implementation schedule for the
proposed rule to revise authorized cost
recovery fee payment methods.
TABLE 1—IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR PROPOSED CHANGES TO AUTHORIZED COST RECOVERY FEE PAYMENT
METHODS
Payment type
Current authorized options
2016–2019 fee payment cycle
authorized options
Non-electronic .............
Credit card form.
Paper check ....................................................
Money order ....................................................
Pay.gov ...........................................................
Fedwire ...........................................................
.
Paper check.
Money order.
Pay.gov ...........................................................
Fedwire ...........................................................
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Electronic .....................
NMFS anticipates that this proposed
rule would affect 1,533 IFQ Program
permit holders and 10 CR Program RCRs
who would need to change their
payment method. This proposed rule
would require the 528 IFQ permit
holders who made non-electronic credit
card payments in 2014 to change to an
alternative payment method upon the
effective date of the final rule, if
approved. Beginning with the 2020 cost
recovery billing cycle, the 1,005 IFQ
permit holders and 10 CR Program RCRs
who paid by paper check or money
order in 2014 would be required to use
an alternative payment method.
Under this proposed rule, permit
holders paying cost recovery fees would
benefit from the increased security of
their financial information and a
reduction in the total amount of cost
recovery fees collected due to the
reduced administrative costs of
processing fee payments. The actual
administrative cost savings of this
proposed rule are difficult to predict
due to the unknown staff costs required
to help permit holders transition to new
payment methods and how quickly
permit holders may change payment
methods prior to the 2020 fee collection
cycle. After 2020, NMFS expects the
administrative costs of processing
payments to decrease as compared to
the current costs. The costs to permit
holders of changing payment methods
are difficult to assess. However, both
IFQ Program permit holders and CR
Program RCRs are currently required to
submit fishery landings information to
NMFS using electronic reporting
methods; so it is expected that requiring
electronic cost recovery fee payments
would be a manageable cost for most
participants.
NMFS anticipates that this proposed
rule would have minimal impacts on
net benefits to the Nation. Overall, this
action would likely result in a small net
benefit from the reduction in the total
amount of cost recovery fees collected
due to the reduced administrative costs
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Dec 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
of processing cost recovery fee
payments.
Classification
Pursuant to section 305(d) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined
this proposed rule is consistent with the
FMPs, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further
consideration of comments received
during the public comment period.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
An IRFA was prepared, as required by
section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act. The IRFA describes the economic
impact this proposed rule, if adopted,
would have on small entities. Copies of
the IRFA prepared for this proposed
rule are available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES).
The IRFA describes the action, why
this action is being proposed, the
objectives and legal basis for this
proposed rule, the type and number of
small entities to which this proposed
rule would apply, and the projected
reporting, recordkeeping, and other
compliance requirements of this
proposed rule. It also identifies any
overlapping, duplicative, or conflicting
Federal rules and describes any
significant alternatives to this proposed
rule that would accomplish the stated
objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Act
and other applicable statues and that
would minimize any significant adverse
economic impact of this proposed rule
on small entities. The description of this
proposed rule, its purpose, and its legal
basis are described in the preamble and
are not repeated here.
Number and Description of Small
Entities Directly Regulated by the
Proposed Rule
The entities directly regulated by this
proposed rule are permit holders who
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2020 and future year
fee payment cycle
authorized options
Pay.gov.
Fedwire.
make halibut and sablefish landings in
the IFQ Program fisheries and RCRs
who receive landings of crab in the CR
Program fisheries. The universe of
entities was defined based on who is
directly billed by NMFS for cost
recovery fees, and therefore who would
be directly impacted by a change in the
authorized payment methods. The
Small Business Administration defines
a small commercial finfish fishing entity
as one that has annual gross receipts,
from all activities of all affiliates, of less
than $20.5 million (79 FR 33647, June
12, 2014). Based upon available data,
and more general information
concerning the probable economic
activity of vessels in the IFQ Program
fisheries, no entity could have landed
more than $20.5 million in combined
gross receipts in 2014. Therefore, all
2,038 IFQ permit holders are classified
as small entities. Under the CR Program,
11 RCRs are classified as small entities.
Section 4.6 of the IRFA prepared for this
proposed rule provides more
information on these entities.
Recordkeeping and Reporting
Requirements
This proposed rule would require
modifications to the current
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements for the IFQ Program and
CR Program cost recovery programs in
the Alaska Cost Recovery and Observer
Fee collection (OMB Control Number
0648–0711). Specifically, this proposed
rule would eliminate the option for
payment by credit card using the paper
fee submission form submitted to NMFS
by mail or facsimile. Beginning with the
2020 cost recovery fee billing cycle, the
paper fee submission form will be
eliminated completely for the CR
Program as permit holders will be
required to submit all cost recovery fee
payments electronically through the
pay.gov or Fedwire systems. For the IFQ
Program, beginning in 2020, the paper
fee submission form would be revised to
specify that all fee payments must be
E:\FR\FM\31DEP1.SGM
31DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2015 / Proposed Rules
made electronically through pay.gov or
the Fedwire systems.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Rules That May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With This Proposed
Rule
The Analysis did not reveal any
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this proposed rule.
Description of Significant Alternatives
to This Proposed Rule That Minimize
Economic Impacts on Small Entities
The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires
that participants in LAPP and CDQ
programs pay up to three percent of the
ex-vessel value of the fish they are
allocated to cover specific costs that are
incurred by the management agencies as
a direct result of implementing the
programs. NMFS has identified this
proposed rule as necessary to improve
data security procedures for permit
holders’ financial information and to
reduce administrative costs of
processing cost recovery payments.
There are no alternatives outside those
evaluated in the Analysis that,
consistent with applicable law, will
accomplish the objectives of this rule,
and result in lower adverse economic
impacts on directly regulated small
entities.
NMFS considered eliminating the
submission of credit card payment
information by phone, in person,
facsimile, and mail and retaining the
use of paper checks and money orders
as authorized payment methods under
Alternative 2 in the Analysis. However,
Alternative 2 failed to meet the objective
of reducing administrative costs
associated with administering the cost
recovery programs because processing
these payments results in a greater staff
burden than processing payments made
by the pay.gov or Fedwire systems (see
Section 3.7 of the Analysis). NMFS also
considered Alternative 3, which would
have simultaneously implemented both
the elimination of credit card payment
by phone, in person, facsimile, and
mail, and the elimination of paper check
and money order payment (see Section
3.8 of the Analysis). However, NMFS
rejected Alternative 3 in favor of
Alternative 3 Option 1 which
accommodated for the transition costs to
permit holders in complying with the
proposed rule by delaying full
implementation of the proposed
changes until the applicable cost
recovery fee payment due date in 2020.
NMFS determined that Alternative 3
Option 1 would provide an opportunity
for the permit holders to become
familiar with either pay.gov or Fedwire
and change to a new payment method.
Additionally, Alternative 3 Option 1
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Dec 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
would spread out any transition costs
for NMFS staff in providing customer
service to help permit holders affected
by the change (see Section 3.8.1 of the
Analysis).
Collection-of-Information Requirements
This proposed rule contains
collection-of-information requirements
subject to review and approval by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA). NMFS has submitted these
requirements to OMB for approval
under Control Number 0648–0711.
Public reporting burden per response is
estimated to average one minute for
electronic fee submission and 30
minutes for non-electronic fee
submission. Estimates for public
reporting burden include the time for
reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection
of information.
Public comment is sought regarding
whether these proposed collections of
information are necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimate;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments
on these or any other aspects of the
collection of information to NMFS at the
ADDRESSES above and by email to OIRA_
Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
(202) 395–5806.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
All currently approved NOAA
collections of information may be
viewed at: https://www.cio.noaa.gov/
services_programs/prasubs.html.
81803
Dated: December 22, 2015
Eileen Sobeck,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 679 and 50 CFR part 680 as
follows:
PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE
EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF
ALASKA
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR
part 679 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et
seq.; 3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 108–447; Pub. L.
111–281.
2. In § 679.45, revise paragraphs
(a)(4)(ii) through (iv) to read as follows:
■
§ 679.45
IFQ cost recovery program.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) Payment recipient. Make payment
payable to NMFS.
(iii) Payment address. Submit
payment and related documents as
instructed on the fee submission form.
Payments may be made electronically
through the NMFS Alaska Region Web
site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
Instructions for electronic payment will
be made available on both the payment
Web site and a fee liability summary
letter mailed to the IFQ permit holder.
(iv) Payment method—(A) Prior to
December 1, 2019, payment must be
made in U.S. dollars by personal check
drawn on a U.S. bank account, money
order, bank-certified check, or
electronically by credit card.
(B) On or after December 1, 2019,
payment must be made electronically in
U.S. dollars by automated clearing
house, credit card, or electronic check
drawn on a U.S. bank account.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 680—SHELLFISH FISHERIES OF
THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE
OFF ALASKA
3. The authority citation for 50 CFR
part 680 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1862; Pub. L. 109–
241; Pub. L. 109–479.
List of Subjects
4. In § 680.44, revise paragraphs
(a)(4)(iii) and (iv) to read as follows:
50 CFR Part 679
§ 680.44
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
50 CFR Part 680
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
■
Cost recovery.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(iii) Payment address. Submit
payment and related documents as
instructed on the fee submission form.
Payments may be made electronically
through the NMFS Alaska Region Web
E:\FR\FM\31DEP1.SGM
31DEP1
81804
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 251 / Thursday, December 31, 2015 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
Instructions for electronic payment will
be made available on both the payment
Web site and a fee liability summary
letter mailed to the RCR permit holder.
(iv) Payment method—(A) Prior to
June 1, 2020, payment must be made in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Dec 30, 2015
Jkt 238001
U.S. dollars by personal check drawn on
a U.S. bank account, money order, bankcertified check, or electronically by
credit card.
(B) On or after June 1, 2020, payment
must be made electronically in U.S.
dollars by automated clearing house,
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
credit card, or electronic check drawn
on a U.S. bank account.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2015–32966 Filed 12–30–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\31DEP1.SGM
31DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 251 (Thursday, December 31, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 81798-81804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32966]
[[Page 81798]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Parts 679 and 680
[Docket No. 150904826-5826-01]
RIN 0648-BF35
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone off Alaska; Fixed-Gear
Commercial Halibut and Sablefish Fisheries; Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands Crab Rationalization Program; Cost Recovery Authorized Payment
Methods
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues a proposed rule to revise the authorized methods
for payment of cost recovery fees for the Halibut and Sablefish
Individual Fishing Quota Program and the Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands Crab Rationalization Program. This proposed rule is necessary
to improve data security procedures and to reduce administrative costs
of processing cost recovery fee payments. The proposed rule is intended
to promote the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of
1982, the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands, the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Gulf of Alaska, the Fishery Management Plan for Bering Sea/Aleutian
Islands King and Tanner Crabs, and other applicable laws.
DATES: Submit comments on or before February 1, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2015-0113,
by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015-0113, click the ``Comment Now!'' icon,
complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Glenn Merrill, Assistant
Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region
NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau,
AK 99802-1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address), confidential business information,
or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender
will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter
``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
Electronic copies of the following documents are available from
https://www.regulations.gov or from the NMFS Alaska Region Web site at
https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov:
The Regulatory Impact Review/Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (RIR/IRFA) (collectively referred to as the
``Analysis'') and the Categorical Exclusion prepared for this action.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
action may be submitted by mail to NMFS at the above address; by email
to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov; or by fax to 202-395-5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keeley Kent, 907-586-7228.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for Action
NMFS manages the groundfish fisheries in the Federal exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) off Alaska under the Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands and under the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska. The North Pacific
Fishery Management Council (Council) prepared the fishery management
plans (FMPs) under the authority of the Magnuson Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq. Regulations governing U.S. fisheries and implementing the FMPs
appear at 50 CFR parts 600 and 679.
The International Pacific Halibut Commission (IPHC) and NMFS manage
fishing for Pacific halibut through regulations established under the
authority of the Northern Pacific Halibut Act of 1982 (Halibut Act).
The IPHC promulgates regulations governing the halibut fishery under
the Convention between the United States and Canada for the
Preservation of the Halibut Fishery of the Northern Pacific Ocean and
Bering Sea (Convention). The IPHC's regulations are subject to approval
by the Secretary of State with the concurrence of the Secretary of
Commerce (Secretary). NMFS publishes the IPHC's regulations as annual
management measures pursuant to 50 CFR 300.62. The Halibut Act, at
sections 773c(a) and (b), provides the Secretary with general
responsibility to carry out the Convention and the Halibut Act. The
Halibut Act, at section 773c(c), also provides the Council with
authority to develop regulations, including limited access regulations,
that are in addition to, and not in conflict with, approved IPHC
regulations. Regulations developed by the Council may be implemented by
NMFS only after approval by the Secretary. The Council developed the
Individual Fishing Quota Program (IFQ Program) for the commercial
halibut and sablefish fisheries, codified at 50 CFR part 679, under the
authority of section 773 of the Halibut Act and section 303(b) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act.
The king and Tanner crab fisheries in the EEZ of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands are managed under the Fishery Management Plan for
Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner Crabs (Crab FMP). The Crab
FMP was prepared by the Council under the Magnuson-Stevens Act as
amended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-
199, section 801). Regulations implementing the Crab FMP, including the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab Rationalization Program (CR
Program), are located at 50 CFR part 680.
Background
This proposed rule would revise authorized payment methods in the
cost recovery fee programs for the IFQ Program and the CR Program. The
proposed rule would improve data security procedures for protecting
financial information submitted to NMFS for payment of cost recovery
fees by eliminating manual processing of credit card payments by NMFS
and requiring use of the Federal Government's online payment system,
pay.gov, for all credit card payments. This proposed rule would also
reduce administrative costs for the cost recovery programs by
eliminating manual processing of paper check and money order payments
and requiring electronic payment of all cost recovery fee payments to
NMFS using pay.gov or Fedwire Funds Service (Fedwire) beginning with
the cost recovery fee payment due in 2020. Reduced administrative costs
to NMFS would result in lower expenses subject to cost recovery fees.
Therefore, this action would be expected to reduce fees for
[[Page 81799]]
participants in the IFQ Program and CR Program subject to a cost
recovery fee relative to the status quo.
The following sections describe authorities for and operation of
cost recovery programs, the cost recovery program for the IFQ Program,
the cost recovery program for the CR Program, the current authorized
cost recovery fee payment methods, the need for this proposed rule, and
the proposed rule to improve administration of the cost recovery
programs.
Cost Recovery--General
Section 304(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act specifies that the
Secretary is authorized, and shall collect a fee, to recover the actual
costs directly related to the management, data collection, and
enforcement of any limited access privilege program (LAPP) and
community development quota program (CDQ) that allocates a percentage
of the total allowable catch of a fishery to such program. Section
304(d) also specifies that such fee shall not exceed three percent of
the ex-vessel value of fish harvested under any such program.
The IFQ Program is a LAPP as defined in section 304(d) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. NMFS implemented a cost recovery fee program for
the IFQ Program in 2000 (65 FR 14919, March 20, 2000). Regulations
implementing the IFQ Program cost recovery program are located at Sec.
679.45. The CR Program is also a LAPP as defined in section 304(d) of
the Magnuson-Stevens Act. Section 313(j) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act
provided supplementary authority to section 304(d) and additional
detail for cost recovery provisions specific to the CR Program. NMFS
implemented a cost recovery fee program with the final rule to
implement the CR Program in 2005 (70 FR 10174, March 2, 2005).
Regulations implementing the CR Program cost recovery program are
located at Sec. 680.44.
NMFS recovers the incremental costs of managing and enforcing the
IFQ Program and CR Program annually through a fee paid by persons who
hold a permit granting an exclusive access privilege to a portion of
the total allowable catches in IFQ Program and CR Program fisheries.
NMFS calculates cost recovery fees for fish that are landed and
deducted from the total allowable catch in the fisheries subject to
cost recovery.
To calculate the annual cost recovery fee for each permit holder in
the IFQ Program and the CR Program, NMFS (1) calculates the ex-vessel
value for each landing of a fishery species allocated under the
program; (2) calculates the total ex-vessel value of all fish landed
under the program by adding together the ex-vessel values of each
fishery species under the program; (3) calculates the total program
cost by adding together the incremental costs of management, data
collection, and enforcement for each fishery under the program that
would not have been incurred but for the implementation of the program;
(4) calculates a fee percentage (not to exceed three percent of the ex-
vessel value of fish harvested under any such program) for the program
by dividing total program costs by the total ex-vessel value for all
fishery species under the program; and (5) calculates the fee amount
that will be assessed for each permit holder by multiplying the fee
percentage by the permit holder's total ex-vessel value of landings
under the program. The final figure is the annual cost recovery fee
owed by each permit holder. The amount of cost recovery fees collected
varies annually because total ex-vessel value and total program costs
fluctuate from year to year.
Cost Recovery for the IFQ Program
The Council recommended the IFQ Program in 1992, and NMFS published
a final rule to implement the IFQ Program on November 9, 1993 (58 FR
59375). Fishing under the program began on March 15, 1995. The IFQ
Program limits access to the halibut and sablefish fisheries to those
persons holding quota shares (QS) in specific regulatory areas. QS
equate to individual harvesting privileges that are given effect
annually through the issuance of IFQ permits. An annual IFQ permit
authorizes the permit holder to harvest a specified amount of IFQ
halibut or sablefish in a regulatory area.
The final rule to implement the cost recovery program for the IFQ
fishery was published in March 2000 (65 FR 14919, March 20, 2000).
Section 679.45 specifies the process that NMFS uses to determine,
assess, and collect cost recovery fees for the IFQ Program. As
described above in the ``Cost Recovery--General'' section, NMFS
annually calculates the cost recovery fee percentage for halibut and
sablefish IFQ permit holders by dividing total program costs for the
IFQ Program by the total ex-vessel value of the catch subject to the
IFQ cost recovery fee for the current year. The IFQ Program fishing
year takes place within a calendar year, generally beginning in March
and ending in November. The method used by NMFS to calculate the IFQ
cost recovery fee percentage is described at Sec. 679.45(d)(2)(ii).
Regulations at Sec. 679.45(d)(1) and (d)(3)(i) require NMFS to publish
the IFQ cost recovery fee percentage and the IFQ standard prices used
to calculate the total ex-vessel value of IFQ halibut and sablefish
landed in the Federal Register during the last quarter of each calendar
year. NMFS published the 2014 IFQ cost recovery fee percentage and IFQ
standard prices on December 9, 2014 (79 FR 73045).
Each December, NMFS sends IFQ permit holders a bill for the cost
recovery fee liability with an itemization of their IFQ halibut and
sablefish landings for the year. The IFQ permit holder is responsible
for submitting this payment to NMFS on or before the due date of
January 31 following the year in which the IFQ halibut and sablefish
landings were made.
If an IFQ permit holder who owes a fee fails to submit payment in
full by January 31 following the year in which the landings were made,
NMFS sends the permit holder an Initial Administrative Determination
(IAD) with the amount of fee liability owed. If a permit holder fails
to make payment after receiving the IAD, NMFS may disapprove any
transfer of IFQ or QS to or from the permit holder until the fee
liability is reconciled. If further action is necessary, NMFS may
invalidate any IFQ fishing permits held by the permit holder.
Additional information on the administration of the IFQ Program cost
recovery program is provided in Section 3.5.1.2 of the Analysis.
Cost Recovery for the CR Program
NMFS published the final rule to implement the CR Program in 2005
(70 FR 10174, March 2, 2005). The CR Program allocates QS for nine crab
fisheries under the Crab FMP: Bristol Bay red king crab, Bering Sea C.
opilio (snow crab), Eastern Bering Sea C. bairdi (Tanner crab), Western
Bering Sea C. bairdi (Tanner crab), Pribilof Islands blue and red king
crab, St. Matthew Island blue king crab, Western Aleutian Islands
(Adak) golden king crab, Eastern Aleutian Islands (Dutch Harbor) golden
king crab, and Western Aleutian Islands (Adak) red king crab.
NMFS originally issued QS to eligible harvesters as determined by
eligibility criteria and participation in the CR Program fisheries
during qualifying years. Additionally, NMFS issued processor quota
shares (PQS) to eligible processing entities that met the criteria
based on crab processing activities during the qualifying years. Each
year, individual QS holders are issued IFQ to harvest a portion of the
annual total allowable catch in a CR Program fishery. PQS holders are
similarly issued annual individual processing quota (IPQ) that
[[Page 81800]]
allow entities to receive deliveries of CR Program crab.
NMFS issues three classes of IFQ: A shares, B shares, and C shares.
Three percent of the total IFQ pool for each fishery is issued as C
shares for captains and crew. The remaining IFQ pool is split with 90
percent issued as A shares and 10 percent issued as B shares. Class A
shares carry the requirement of matching, on a one-to-one basis, with
IPQ. Both Class B and Class C shares do not have a matching requirement
and may be delivered to any registered crab receiver (RCR). RCRs
include shoreside processors, catcher/processors, entities holding PQS
with custom processing agreements with other shoreside processors, and
communities holding PQS.
The cost recovery regulations for the CR Program were published in
the final rule to implement the CR Program on March 2, 2005 (70 FR
10174). Section 680.44 specifies the process that NMFS uses to
determine, assess, and collect cost recovery fees for the CR Program.
As described above in the ``Cost Recovery--General'' section, NMFS
annually calculates the cost recovery fee percentage for the CR Program
by dividing total program costs for the CR Program by the total ex-
vessel value of the catch subject to the CR Program cost recovery fee
for the current year. The CR Program cost recovery billing cycle
matches that of the crab fishing year--July 1 to June 30. The method
used by NMFS to calculate the CR Program cost recovery fee percentage
is described at Sec. 680.44(c)(2). As specified in the final rule to
implement the CR Program, the CR Program processing sector,
specifically RCRs, are responsible for collecting cost recovery fee
payments from the harvesters and submitting this payment and their own
self-collected fee payments to NMFS by the specified deadline. Catcher/
processors, vessels that harvest and process crab, pay the full CR
Program cost recovery fee for every pound of crab harvested and
processed.
Regulations at Sec. 680.44(c)(1) require NMFS to publish the CR
Program cost recovery fee percentage in the Federal Register during the
first quarter of the crab fishing year, which is used by CR Program
permit holders and RCRs to collect cost recovery fees throughout the
crab fishing year. This is different from the IFQ Program, which
applies the fee percentage to the landings that occurred during the
most recent fishing year. NMFS published the 2015/2016 CR Program cost
recovery fee percentage in July 2015 (80 FR 42792, July 20, 2015). NMFS
provides an itemized bill of cost recovery fee liabilities to all RCRs
during the last quarter of the crab fishing year. The RCR is
responsible for submitting payment to NMFS on or before the due date of
July 31, following the crab fishing year in which payment for the crab
is made.
If an RCR owes fees and fails to submit full payment for the
previous crab fishing year by July 31, the Regional Administrator may
disapprove any transfer of IFQ, IPQ, QS, or PQS to or from the RCR and
may withhold issuance of any new CR crab permits, including IFQ, IPQ,
or RCR permits for the subsequent crab fishing year. Additional
information on the administration of the CR Program cost recovery
program is provided in Section 3.5.2.2 of the Analysis.
Authorized Cost Recovery Payment Methods
Cost recovery regulations for the IFQ Program and CR Program (Sec.
679.45(a)(4)(iv) and Sec. 680.44(a)(4)(iv), respectively) currently
allow permit holders to pay their fee in U.S. dollars by personal check
drawn on a U.S. bank account, money order, bank-certified check, or
credit card. NMFS has established specific procedures for processing
payments. IFQ Program and CR Program permit holders may submit cost
recovery fee payments either electronically or non-electronically.
Electronic payments can be made using credit card or electronic check
via the pay.gov web-based system, or by wiring payment directly from
the permit holder's financial institution via the Fedwire funds
transfer system. Non-electronic payments can be made by submitting a
paper form to NMFS with credit card information via mail or facsimile,
or by submitting a paper check or money order via mail. This section
provides additional detail on each authorized payment method regarding
the security of permit holders' financial information and the
administrative costs incurred by NMFS to process the payments.
Electronic Payments
Electronic payments via the pay.gov system and the Fedwire system
are the most secure methods of transmitting financial information and
result in the lowest administrative costs for NMFS. Permit holders may
make electronic cost recovery payments directly through pay.gov.
Pay.gov is operated by the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury)
and offers the highest level of security for the personal and financial
information submitted to pay fees to NMFS. Pay.gov uses the latest
industry-standard methods and encryption to safely collect, store, and
transmit information that is submitted.
IFQ Program and CR Program permit holders can access pay.gov
through the NMFS Alaska Region online system called eFISH. The eFISH
system is a web-based application that provides permit holders with
access to their NMFS permit accounts (https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/webapps/efish/login). When an IFQ Program or CR Program permit holder
logs on to eFISH to pay a cost recovery fee liability, the system
automatically loads the amount owed by that permit holder into pay.gov.
Through pay.gov, permit holders can make cost recovery payments
using a credit card, debit card, or direct debit (electronic check).
Due to the transaction fee incurred by the Treasury, there is a payment
limit of $24,999.99 on credit card transactions through pay.gov (see
notice online at: https://tfm.fiscal.treasury.gov/v1/announc/a-14-04.html). There is currently no payment limit on debit card or direct
debit payments. Payments made through pay.gov automatically update the
NMFS internal cost recovery payment tracking system to reflect the
payment.
Under the current regulations, permit holders may also make cost
recovery fee payments through Fedwire. Fedwire is a real-time transfer
system that allows financial institutions to electronically transfer
funds. Fedwire allows wire transfers of fee payments from any bank or
wire transfer service to NMFS to fulfill cost recovery fee obligations.
To make a Fedwire payment, a permit holder must provide his or her
financial institution the routing number and account information for
the Treasury, the beneficiary name and account number for NMFS, and the
amount owed. The permit holder's financial institution then initiates
the transaction. Payments are made directly to the Federal Reserve
Bank, which then notifies NMFS of the payment. Payments are processed
individually through Fedwire, which uses a highly secure electronic
network. NMFS must log Fedwire payments in the internal cost recovery
payment tracking system.
Non-Electronic Payments
Non-electronic submission of payment information to NMFS via mail
or facsimile is less secure and results in higher administrative costs
than electronic payments because it results in transmission of permit
holders' financial information over the NMFS information network and
requires NMFS to manually process payments. Under current regulations,
permit
[[Page 81801]]
holders may pay a cost recovery fee with a credit card by submitting a
form via mail or facsimile with their credit card information to NMFS.
Manual credit card processing results in the possession and
transmission of IFQ Program and CR Program permit holders' credit card
information over the NMFS information network. Manual credit card
processing is a less secure method of payment than the permit holder
directly entering their credit card information into pay.gov, and
results in higher administrative costs for NMFS. Administrative costs
to collect fees are subject to cost recovery. Therefore, the higher
administrative costs to process credit cards manually results in an
increased fee liability for the IFQ and CR Programs relative to
electronic payments.
Permit holders may also pay a cost recovery fee with a paper check,
money order, or bank-certified check. NMFS processes these payments
using a Treasury web-based application (https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsservices/gov/rvnColl/otcnet/rvnColl_otcnet.htm). The checks are scanned into the internal cost
recovery payment tracking system and batched for deposit the following
day. NMFS must then check the system to ensure that each check has
cleared. NMFS manually updates the internal cost recovery payment
tracking system to reflect the payment. Discrepancies or errors between
the cost recovery amount owed and the amount paid by check must be
addressed by NMFS. Payment with paper check, money order, or bank-
certified check results in higher administrative costs for NMFS, and
those additional costs increase the fee liability for the IFQ and CR
Programs relative to electronic payments.
In 2014 for the IFQ Program, NMFS received 2,038 total cost
recovery fee payments from IFQ permit holders, with an average payment
size of $2,440 (Table 4 of the Analysis). Of the total payments made,
528 cost recovery fee payments required manual credit card processing
(Table 2 of the Analysis), which represented 26 percent of the total
cost recovery payments made that year. The number of payments requiring
manual credit card processing increased slightly from 2013 to 2014. In
2014, there were 986 payments made by paper check (48 percent of
payments) and 19 made by money order (0.9 percent of payments).
Overall, manual processing for credit card, paper check, and money
order payments was required for 75 percent of cost recovery fee
payments made under the IFQ Program for 2014 (1,533 payments); the
remaining 25 percent of payments were made electronically primarily via
pay.gov (Table 4 of Analysis).
In 2014 for the CR Program, NMFS received 20 total cost recovery
fee payments from CR Program permit holders, with an average payment
size of $78,310 (Table 5 of the Analysis). There were no cost recovery
payments made from 2012 through 2014 by CR Program RCRs that required
manual credit card processing (Table 3 of the Analysis). This may be
because the CR Program payments are considerably larger than the IFQ
Program payments due to the payment liability structure that requires
RCRs to submit cost recovery fee payments on behalf of the CR Program
harvesting and processing sectors. In 2014, 50 percent of payments (10
payments) were made with paper checks and required manual processing
(Table 3 of the Analysis), and the remaining 50 percent of payments (10
payments) were made electronically using pay.gov and Fedwire.
Need for This Proposed Rule
The purpose of this proposed rule is to improve security procedures
for protecting financial information and to reduce costs associated
with administering the cost recovery programs. The current regulations
for the IFQ Program and the CR Program cost recovery programs allow
permit holders to submit credit card information for manual credit card
processing by NMFS. This results in the possession and electronic
transmission of financial information on the NMFS information network,
which is a security vulnerability and an administrative cost to both
the permit holder and to NMFS. As a result of this security
vulnerability, the NMFS Alaska Region has been directed by the NOAA
Office of the Chief Information Officer to cease manual processing of
credit card payments for cost recovery fees.
This proposed rule would also reduce administrative costs for the
IFQ Program and CR Program by eliminating other non-electronic payment
methods that require manual processing. As described in the previous
section, all manual processing of cost recovery fee payments made by
check and money order generates significant costs for the
administration of these programs. Eliminating these non-electronic
payment methods from authorized payment method options would reduce the
staffing burden for processing cost recovery fee payments and further
reduce the costs of administering the cost recovery programs. Reduced
administrative costs would result in lower overall fee liabilities for
the IFQ and CR Programs.
Proposed Rule
NMFS proposes to revise the authorized cost recovery fee payment
methods for the IFQ and CR Programs by revising regulations at Sec.
679.45(a)(4)(ii) through (iv) and Sec. 680.44(a)(4)(iii) and (iv).
This proposed rule would eliminate the option for IFQ permit holders
and CR Program RCRs to submit credit card payment information by mail
or facsimile upon the effective date of the final rule, if approved.
NMFS anticipates the final rule, if approved, would be effective prior
to the date cost recovery fee payments are due for the 2015/2016 CR
Program crab fishing year and the 2016 IFQ Program fishing year. The
cost recovery fee payment for the CR Program 2015/2016 crab fishing
year would be due on July 31, 2016. The cost recovery fee payment for
the 2016 IFQ Program fishing year would be due on January 31, 2017.
This proposed rule would also revise the cost recovery regulations
to eliminate paper checks, money orders, and bank-certified checks as
authorized payment methods beginning with the cost recovery fee payment
that would be due by January 31, 2020 for the IFQ Program and July 31,
2020 for the CR Program. If approved, the final rule would require all
permit holders to submit payments through pay.gov or Fedwire beginning
with the cost recovery fee payment due for the 2019 fishing year for
IFQ Program permit holders and for the 2019/2020 CR Program crab
fishing year for CR Program RCRs. To implement this provision, NMFS
proposes that all cost recovery fee payments must be made
electronically for any payment made on or after the first day of the
billing cycle for IFQ Program and CR Program cost recovery fee payments
that would be due in 2020. The billing cycle is considered the time
period that begins when NMFS calculates cost recovery fees and mails
out cost recovery payment notices and ends when the cost recovery fee
payment is due. The first day of the 2020 IFQ Program cost recovery
billing cycle would be December 1, 2019. The first day of the 2019/2020
CR Program cost recovery billing cycle would be June 1, 2020. NMFS is
proposing allowing non-electronic payments via paper check or money
order until the 2020 cost recovery fee cycle to provide a transition
period for those permit holders who do not make electronic payments to
become familiar with, and begin transitioning to, electronic payment
methods.
[[Page 81802]]
Table 1 contains the anticipated implementation schedule for the
proposed rule to revise authorized cost recovery fee payment methods.
Table 1--Implementation Schedule for Proposed Changes to Authorized Cost Recovery Fee Payment Methods
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2020 and future year
Payment type Current authorized options 2016-2019 fee payment fee payment cycle
cycle authorized options authorized options
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-electronic.................... Credit card form. ..........................
Paper check............... Paper check...............
Money order............... Money order...............
Electronic........................ Pay.gov................... Pay.gov................... Pay.gov.
Fedwire................... Fedwire................... Fedwire.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NMFS anticipates that this proposed rule would affect 1,533 IFQ
Program permit holders and 10 CR Program RCRs who would need to change
their payment method. This proposed rule would require the 528 IFQ
permit holders who made non-electronic credit card payments in 2014 to
change to an alternative payment method upon the effective date of the
final rule, if approved. Beginning with the 2020 cost recovery billing
cycle, the 1,005 IFQ permit holders and 10 CR Program RCRs who paid by
paper check or money order in 2014 would be required to use an
alternative payment method.
Under this proposed rule, permit holders paying cost recovery fees
would benefit from the increased security of their financial
information and a reduction in the total amount of cost recovery fees
collected due to the reduced administrative costs of processing fee
payments. The actual administrative cost savings of this proposed rule
are difficult to predict due to the unknown staff costs required to
help permit holders transition to new payment methods and how quickly
permit holders may change payment methods prior to the 2020 fee
collection cycle. After 2020, NMFS expects the administrative costs of
processing payments to decrease as compared to the current costs. The
costs to permit holders of changing payment methods are difficult to
assess. However, both IFQ Program permit holders and CR Program RCRs
are currently required to submit fishery landings information to NMFS
using electronic reporting methods; so it is expected that requiring
electronic cost recovery fee payments would be a manageable cost for
most participants.
NMFS anticipates that this proposed rule would have minimal impacts
on net benefits to the Nation. Overall, this action would likely result
in a small net benefit from the reduction in the total amount of cost
recovery fees collected due to the reduced administrative costs of
processing cost recovery fee payments.
Classification
Pursuant to section 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined this proposed rule is consistent
with the FMPs, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further consideration of comments received
during the public comment period.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
An IRFA was prepared, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. The IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed
rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. Copies of the IRFA
prepared for this proposed rule are available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES).
The IRFA describes the action, why this action is being proposed,
the objectives and legal basis for this proposed rule, the type and
number of small entities to which this proposed rule would apply, and
the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other compliance
requirements of this proposed rule. It also identifies any overlapping,
duplicative, or conflicting Federal rules and describes any significant
alternatives to this proposed rule that would accomplish the stated
objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable statues and
that would minimize any significant adverse economic impact of this
proposed rule on small entities. The description of this proposed rule,
its purpose, and its legal basis are described in the preamble and are
not repeated here.
Number and Description of Small Entities Directly Regulated by the
Proposed Rule
The entities directly regulated by this proposed rule are permit
holders who make halibut and sablefish landings in the IFQ Program
fisheries and RCRs who receive landings of crab in the CR Program
fisheries. The universe of entities was defined based on who is
directly billed by NMFS for cost recovery fees, and therefore who would
be directly impacted by a change in the authorized payment methods. The
Small Business Administration defines a small commercial finfish
fishing entity as one that has annual gross receipts, from all
activities of all affiliates, of less than $20.5 million (79 FR 33647,
June 12, 2014). Based upon available data, and more general information
concerning the probable economic activity of vessels in the IFQ Program
fisheries, no entity could have landed more than $20.5 million in
combined gross receipts in 2014. Therefore, all 2,038 IFQ permit
holders are classified as small entities. Under the CR Program, 11 RCRs
are classified as small entities. Section 4.6 of the IRFA prepared for
this proposed rule provides more information on these entities.
Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements
This proposed rule would require modifications to the current
recordkeeping and reporting requirements for the IFQ Program and CR
Program cost recovery programs in the Alaska Cost Recovery and Observer
Fee collection (OMB Control Number 0648-0711). Specifically, this
proposed rule would eliminate the option for payment by credit card
using the paper fee submission form submitted to NMFS by mail or
facsimile. Beginning with the 2020 cost recovery fee billing cycle, the
paper fee submission form will be eliminated completely for the CR
Program as permit holders will be required to submit all cost recovery
fee payments electronically through the pay.gov or Fedwire systems. For
the IFQ Program, beginning in 2020, the paper fee submission form would
be revised to specify that all fee payments must be
[[Page 81803]]
made electronically through pay.gov or the Fedwire systems.
Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With This
Proposed Rule
The Analysis did not reveal any Federal rules that duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this proposed rule.
Description of Significant Alternatives to This Proposed Rule That
Minimize Economic Impacts on Small Entities
The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires that participants in LAPP and CDQ
programs pay up to three percent of the ex-vessel value of the fish
they are allocated to cover specific costs that are incurred by the
management agencies as a direct result of implementing the programs.
NMFS has identified this proposed rule as necessary to improve data
security procedures for permit holders' financial information and to
reduce administrative costs of processing cost recovery payments. There
are no alternatives outside those evaluated in the Analysis that,
consistent with applicable law, will accomplish the objectives of this
rule, and result in lower adverse economic impacts on directly
regulated small entities.
NMFS considered eliminating the submission of credit card payment
information by phone, in person, facsimile, and mail and retaining the
use of paper checks and money orders as authorized payment methods
under Alternative 2 in the Analysis. However, Alternative 2 failed to
meet the objective of reducing administrative costs associated with
administering the cost recovery programs because processing these
payments results in a greater staff burden than processing payments
made by the pay.gov or Fedwire systems (see Section 3.7 of the
Analysis). NMFS also considered Alternative 3, which would have
simultaneously implemented both the elimination of credit card payment
by phone, in person, facsimile, and mail, and the elimination of paper
check and money order payment (see Section 3.8 of the Analysis).
However, NMFS rejected Alternative 3 in favor of Alternative 3 Option 1
which accommodated for the transition costs to permit holders in
complying with the proposed rule by delaying full implementation of the
proposed changes until the applicable cost recovery fee payment due
date in 2020. NMFS determined that Alternative 3 Option 1 would provide
an opportunity for the permit holders to become familiar with either
pay.gov or Fedwire and change to a new payment method. Additionally,
Alternative 3 Option 1 would spread out any transition costs for NMFS
staff in providing customer service to help permit holders affected by
the change (see Section 3.8.1 of the Analysis).
Collection-of-Information Requirements
This proposed rule contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to review and approval by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). NMFS has submitted these
requirements to OMB for approval under Control Number 0648-0711. Public
reporting burden per response is estimated to average one minute for
electronic fee submission and 30 minutes for non-electronic fee
submission. Estimates for public reporting burden include the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information.
Public comment is sought regarding whether these proposed
collections of information are necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; the accuracy of the burden estimate; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Send comments on
these or any other aspects of the collection of information to NMFS at
the ADDRESSES above and by email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax
to (202) 395-5806.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number. All currently approved NOAA
collections of information may be viewed at: https://www.cio.noaa.gov/services_programs/prasubs.html.
List of Subjects
50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
50 CFR Part 680
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 22, 2015
Eileen Sobeck,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 679 and 50 CFR part 680 as follows:
PART 679--FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA
0
1. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 679 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et seq.; 3631 et seq.;
Pub. L. 108-447; Pub. L. 111-281.
0
2. In Sec. 679.45, revise paragraphs (a)(4)(ii) through (iv) to read
as follows:
Sec. 679.45 IFQ cost recovery program.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) Payment recipient. Make payment payable to NMFS.
(iii) Payment address. Submit payment and related documents as
instructed on the fee submission form. Payments may be made
electronically through the NMFS Alaska Region Web site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov. Instructions for electronic payment will be
made available on both the payment Web site and a fee liability summary
letter mailed to the IFQ permit holder.
(iv) Payment method--(A) Prior to December 1, 2019, payment must be
made in U.S. dollars by personal check drawn on a U.S. bank account,
money order, bank-certified check, or electronically by credit card.
(B) On or after December 1, 2019, payment must be made
electronically in U.S. dollars by automated clearing house, credit
card, or electronic check drawn on a U.S. bank account.
* * * * *
PART 680--SHELLFISH FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF
ALASKA
0
3. The authority citation for 50 CFR part 680 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1862; Pub. L. 109-241; Pub. L. 109-479.
0
4. In Sec. 680.44, revise paragraphs (a)(4)(iii) and (iv) to read as
follows:
Sec. 680.44 Cost recovery.
(a) * * *
(4) * * *
(iii) Payment address. Submit payment and related documents as
instructed on the fee submission form. Payments may be made
electronically through the NMFS Alaska Region Web
[[Page 81804]]
site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov. Instructions for electronic
payment will be made available on both the payment Web site and a fee
liability summary letter mailed to the RCR permit holder.
(iv) Payment method--(A) Prior to June 1, 2020, payment must be
made in U.S. dollars by personal check drawn on a U.S. bank account,
money order, bank-certified check, or electronically by credit card.
(B) On or after June 1, 2020, payment must be made electronically
in U.S. dollars by automated clearing house, credit card, or electronic
check drawn on a U.S. bank account.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-32966 Filed 12-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P