Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-UHD Alliance, Inc., 80810 [2015-32621]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
80810
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 248 / Monday, December 28, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ongoing basis to comply with Section IX
of this Final Judgment. Defendants shall
deliver to the United States an affidavit
describing any changes to the efforts
and actions outlined in their earlier
affidavits filed pursuant to this section
within fifteen (15) calendar days after
the change is implemented.
C. Defendants shall keep all records of
all efforts made to preserve and divest
the Divestiture Assets until one year
after such divestitures have been
completed.
XI. COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
A. For the purposes of determining or
securing compliance with this Final
Judgment or of any related orders such
as any Hold Separate Stipulation and
Order, or of determining whether the
Final Judgment should be modified or
vacated, and subject to any legally
recognized privilege, from time to time
authorized representatives of the United
States Department of Justice, including
consultants and other persons retained
by the United States, shall, upon written
request of an authorized representative
of the Assistant Attorney General in
charge of the Antitrust Division, and on
reasonable notice to Defendants, be
permitted:
(1) access during Defendants’ office
hours to inspect and copy, or at the
option of the United States, to require
Defendants to provide hard copy or
electronic copies of, all books, ledgers,
accounts, records, data, and documents
in the possession, custody, or control of
Defendants, relating to any matters
contained in this Final Judgment; and
(2) to interview, either informally or
on the record, Defendants’ officers,
employees, or agents, who may have
their individual counsel present,
regarding such matters. The interviews
shall be subject to the reasonable
convenience of the interviewee and
without restraint or interference by
Defendants.
B. Upon the written request of an
authorized representative of the
Assistant Attorney General in charge of
the Antitrust Division, Defendants shall
submit written reports or responses to
written interrogatories, under oath if
requested, relating to any of the matters
contained in this Final Judgment as may
be requested.
C. No information or documents
obtained by the means provided in this
section shall be divulged by the United
States to any person other than an
authorized representative of the
executive branch of the United States, or
an authorized representative of the State
of Connecticut, as appropriate, except in
the course of legal proceedings to which
the United States is a party (including
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:31 Dec 24, 2015
Jkt 238001
grand jury proceedings), or for the
purpose of securing compliance with
this Final Judgment, or as otherwise
required by law.
D. If at the time information or
documents are furnished by Defendants
to the United States, Defendants
represent and identify in writing the
material in any such information or
documents to which a claim of
protection may be asserted under Rule
26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, and Defendants mark each
pertinent page of such material,
‘‘Subject to claim of protection under
Rule 26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure,’’ then the United States
shall give Defendants ten (10) calendar
days notice prior to divulging such
material in any legal proceeding (other
than a grand jury proceeding).
XII. NO REACQUISITION
Defendants may not reacquire any
part of the Divestiture Assets during the
term of this Final Judgment.
XIII. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION
This Court retains jurisdiction to
enable any party to this Final Judgment
to apply to this Court at any time for
further orders and directions as may be
necessary or appropriate to carry out or
construe this Final Judgment, to modify
any of its provisions, to enforce
compliance, and to punish violations of
its provisions.
XIV. EXPIRATION OF FINAL
JUDGMENT
Unless this Court grants an extension,
this Final Judgment shall expire ten (10)
years from the date of its entry.
XV. PUBLIC INTEREST
DETERMINATION
Entry of this Final Judgment is in the
public interest. The parties have
complied with the requirements of the
Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,
15 U.S.C. 16, including making copies
available to the public of this Final
Judgment, the Competitive Impact
Statement, and any comments thereon
and the United States’ responses to
comments. Based upon the record
before the Court, which includes the
Competitive Impact Statement and any
comments and response to comments
filed with the Court, entry of this Final
Judgment is in the public interest.
Date: llllllllll, 2015
United States District Judge
[FR Doc. 2015–32629 Filed 12–24–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—UHD Alliance, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on
November 27, 2015, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), UHD
Alliance, Inc. (‘‘UHD Alliance’’) filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
Orange, Sevigne, FRANCE; Shenzhen
TCL New Technology Co., Ltd.,
Shenzhen, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF
CHINA; Koninklijke Philips N.V.,
Eindhoven, NETHERLANDS;
DreamWorks Animation L.L.C.,
Glendale, CA; THX Ltd., San Francisco,
CA; and Hisense Electric Co., Ltd.,
Qingdao, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF
CHINA, have been added as parties to
this venture.
Also, MediaTek Inc., Hsinchu,
TAIWAN, was mistakenly reported as a
member of UHD Alliance on the initial
filing.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and UHD Alliance
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On June 17, 2015, UHD Alliance filed
its original notification pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
of Justice published a notice in the
Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on July 17, 2015 (80 FR
42537).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on September 10, 2015.
A notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on September 29, 2015 (80 FR
58506).
Patricia A. Brink,
Court approval subject to procedures of
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,
Division.
15 U.S.C. 16
[FR Doc. 2015–32621 Filed 12–24–15; 8:45 am]
llllllllllllllllll
l BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 248 (Monday, December 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 80810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32621]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993--UHD Alliance, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on November 27, 2015, pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), UHD Alliance, Inc. (``UHD
Alliance'') filed written notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Orange, Sevigne, FRANCE; Shenzhen TCL New Technology Co.,
Ltd., Shenzhen, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Koninklijke Philips N.V.,
Eindhoven, NETHERLANDS; DreamWorks Animation L.L.C., Glendale, CA; THX
Ltd., San Francisco, CA; and Hisense Electric Co., Ltd., Qingdao,
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, have been added as parties to this venture.
Also, MediaTek Inc., Hsinchu, TAIWAN, was mistakenly reported as a
member of UHD Alliance on the initial filing.
No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group
research project remains open, and UHD Alliance intends to file
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
On June 17, 2015, UHD Alliance filed its original notification
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of
the Act on July 17, 2015 (80 FR 42537).
The last notification was filed with the Department on September
10, 2015. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to
Section 6(b) of the Act on September 29, 2015 (80 FR 58506).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-32621 Filed 12-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
