Bell Bend, LLC; Combined License Application for Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant, 80398-80400 [2015-32512]
Download as PDF
80398
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 247 / Thursday, December 24, 2015 / Notices
AGENCY:
resumption of the COL application
safety review or by December 31, 2016,
whichever comes first.
DATES: The exemption is effective on
December 31, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2008–0603 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2008–0603. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if that document
is available in ADAMS) is provided the
first time that a document is referenced.
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and
purchase copies of public documents at
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patricia Vokoun, Office of New
Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555–
0001; telephone: 301–415–3470; email:
Patricia.Vokoun@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in a response to an October
7, 2015, letter from Bell Bend, LLC,
which requested an exemption from
Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR)
updates included in their combined
license (COL) application. The NRC staff
reviewed this request and determined
that it is appropriate to grant the
exemption, but stipulated that the
updates to the FSAR must be submitted
prior to, or coincident with, the
I. Background
On October 10, 2008, Bell Bend, LLC
(formerly known as PPL) submitted to
the NRC a COL application for a single
unit of AREVA NP’s U.S. Evolutionary
Power Reactor (EPR) (ADAMS
Accession No. ML082890663) in
accordance with the requirements of
subpart C of part 52 of title 10 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
‘‘Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals
for Nuclear Power Plants.’’ This reactor
is to be constructed and operated as Bell
Bend Nuclear Power Plant (BBNPP), in
Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. The
process by which a licensee makes
changes to its emergency plan, provided
in response to misinterpretations of the
NRC’s regulations by licensees, do not
constitute modifications of or additions
to systems, structures, components, or
design of a facility; or the procedures or
organization required to design,
construct or operate a facility within the
meaning of 50.109(a)(1). Accordingly,
the issuance of this regulatory guide
would not constitute ‘‘backfitting’’ as
defined in 50.109(a)(1) or otherwise be
inconsistent with the applicable issue
finality provisions in part 52.
This regulatory guide may be applied
to applications for operating licenses
and combined licenses docketed by the
NRC as of the date of issuance of the
final regulatory guide, as well as future
applications for operating licenses and
combined licenses submitted after the
issuance of this regulatory guide. Such
action would not constitute backfitting
as defined in 50.109(a)(1) or otherwise
be inconsistent with the applicable
issue finality provisions in 10 CFR part
52, inasmuch as such applicants or
potential applicants are not within the
scope of entities protected by the Backfit
Rule or the relevant issue finality
provisions in part 52.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 18th day
of December, 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Thomas H. Boyce,
Chief, Regulatory Guidance and Generic
Issues Branch, Division of Engineering, Office
of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 2015–32413 Filed 12–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 52–039; NRC–2008–0603]
Bell Bend, LLC; Combined License
Application for Bell Bend Nuclear
Power Plant
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:57 Dec 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NRC docketed the BBNPP COL
application on December 19, 2008
(Docket Number 52–039). Additionally,
the BBNPP COL application
incorporates by reference AREVA NP’s
application for a standard design
certification for the U.S. EPR. The NRC
review of the AREVA NP application for
design certification of the U.S. EPR has
been suspended.
II. Request/Action
The regulations at 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii) require that an applicant
for a COL under 10 CFR part 52 shall,
during the period from docketing of a
COL application until the Commission
makes a finding under 10 CFR 52.103(g)
pertaining to facility operation, submit
an annual update to the application’s
FSAR, which is part 2 of the COL
application. Pursuant to 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii), the next annual update
of the FSAR included in the BBNPP
COL application would be due by
December 31, 2015.
On January 9, 2014, Bell Bend, LLC
(formerly known as PPL) submitted a
request to place the safety review of the
BBNPP COL application on hold until
further notice (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14030A074). As a result of the safety
review being placed on hold, no
informational updates to the FSAR have
occurred during this time. On October 7,
2015, Bell Bend, LLC requested an
exemption from the 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii) requirements to submit
the BBNPP COL application FSAR
update in calendar year 2015 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML15300A070).
The Bell Bend, LLC’s requested
exemption is a one-time schedule
change from the requirements of 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii). The exemption would
allow Bell Bend, LLC to submit the next
FSAR update at a later date but no later
than December 31, 2016. The current
requirement to submit an FSAR update
could not be changed, absent the
exemption.
III. Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the NRC
may, upon application by any interested
person or upon its own initiative, grant
exemptions from the requirements of 10
CFR part 50, including 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii) when: (1) The
exemptions are authorized by law, will
not present an undue risk to public
health or safety, and are consistent with
the common defense and security; and
(2) special circumstances are present. As
relevant to the requested exemption,
special circumstances exist if: (1)
Application of the regulation in the
particular circumstances would not
serve the underlying purpose of the rule
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 247 / Thursday, December 24, 2015 / Notices
or is not necessary to achieve the
underlying purpose of the rule (10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii)); or (2) the exemption
would provide only temporary relief
from the applicable regulation and the
licensee or applicant has made good
faith efforts to comply with the
regulation (10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(v)).
The purpose of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii)
is to ensure that the NRC has the most
up-to-date information regarding the
COL application, in order to perform an
efficient and effective review. The rule
targeted those applications that are
being actively reviewed by the NRC. As
requested by Bell Bend, LLC (formerly
known as PPL) in the above referenced
letter dated January 9, 2014, the NRC
placed the safety review portion of the
BBNPP COL application on hold until
further notice. Therefore, updating the
BBNPP FSAR would only cause undue
hardship on Bell Bend, LLC, and the
purpose of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) would
still be achieved so long as the next
update is submitted by December 31,
2016.
The requested exemption to defer
submittal of the next update to the
FSAR included in the BBNPP COL
application would provide only
temporary relief from the regulations of
10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authorized by Law
The exemption is a one-time schedule
change from the requirements of 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii). The exemption would
allow PPL to submit the next BBNPP
COL application FSAR update on or
before December 31, 2016. Per 10 CFR
50.12, the NRC staff has determined that
granting Bell Bend, LLC the requested
one-time exemption from the
requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii)
will provide only temporary relief from
this regulation and will not result in a
violation of the Atomic Energy Act of
1954, as amended, or the NRC’s
regulations. Therefore, the exemption is
authorized by law.
No Undue Risk to Public Health and
Safety
The underlying purpose of 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii) is to provide for a timely
and comprehensive update of the FSAR
associated with a COL application in
order to support an effective and
efficient review by the NRC staff and
issuance of the NRC staff’s safety
evaluation report. The requested
exemption is solely administrative in
nature, in that it pertains to the
schedule for submittal to the NRC of
revisions to an application under 10
CFR part 52, for which a license has not
been granted. Based on the nature of the
requested exemption as described
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:57 Dec 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
above, no new accident precursors are
created by the exemption; therefore,
neither the probability, nor the
consequences, of postulated accidents
are increased. Therefore, there is no
undue risk to public health and safety.
Consistent With Common Defense and
Security
The requested exemption would
allow Bell Bend, LLC to submit the next
FSAR update on or before December 31,
2016. This schedule change has no
relation to security issues. Therefore,
the common defense and security is not
impacted by this exemption.
Special Circumstances
Special circumstances, in accordance
with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2), are present
whenever: (1) Application of the
regulation in the particular
circumstances would not serve the
underlying purpose of the rule or is not
necessary to achieve the underlying
purpose of the rule (10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii)); or (2) the exemption
would provide only temporary relief
from the applicable regulation and the
licensee or applicant has made good
faith efforts to comply with the
regulation (10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(v)).
As discussed above, the requested
one-time exemption is solely
administrative in nature, in that it
pertains to a one-time schedule change
for submittal of revisions to an
application under 10 CFR part 52, for
which a license has not been granted.
This one-time exemption will support
the NRC staff’s effective and efficient
review of the BBNPP COL application,
when resumed, as well as issuance of
the NRC staff’s safety evaluation report.
For this reason, application of 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii) in the particular
circumstances is not necessary to
achieve the underlying purpose of that
rule. Therefore, special circumstances
exist under 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii). In
addition, special circumstances are also
present under 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(v)
because granting a one-time exemption
from 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) would
provide only temporary relief. For the
above reasons, the special
circumstances required by 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2) for the granting of an
exemption from 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii)
exist.
Eligibility for Categorical Exclusion
From Environmental Review
With respect to the exemption’s
impact on the quality of the human
environment, the NRC has determined
that this specific exemption request is
eligible for categorical exclusion as
identified in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25). Under
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
80399
10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), granting of an
exemption from the requirements of any
regulation of 10 CFR Chapter 1 (which
includes 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii)) is an
action that is a categorical exclusion,
provided that:
(i) There is no significant hazards
consideration;
(ii) There is no significant change in
the types or significant increase in the
amounts of any effluents that may be
released offsite;
(iii) There is no significant increase in
individual or cumulative public or
occupational radiation exposure;
(iv) There is no significant
construction impact;
(v) There is no significant increase in
the potential for or consequences from
radiological accidents; and
(vi) The requirements from which an
exemption is sought involve:
(A) Recordkeeping requirements;
(B) Reporting requirements;
(C) Inspection or surveillance
requirements;
(D) Equipment servicing or
maintenance scheduling requirements;
(E) Education, training, experience,
qualification, requalification or other
employment suitability requirements;
(F) Safeguard plans, and materials
control and accounting inventory
scheduling requirements;
(G) Scheduling requirements;
(H) Surety, insurance or indemnity
requirements; or
(I) Other requirements of an
administrative, managerial, or
organizational nature.
The requirements from which this
exemption is sought involve only ‘‘(B)
Reporting requirements’’ or ‘‘(G)
Scheduling requirements’’ of those
required by 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi).
The NRC staff’s determination that
each of the applicable criteria for this
categorical exclusion is met as follows:
I. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i): There is no
significant hazards consideration.
Staff Analysis: The criteria for
determining if an exemption involves a
significant hazards consideration are
found in 10 CFR 50.92. The proposed
action involves only a schedule change
regarding the submission of an update
to the application for which only the
environmental portion of the licensing
review is currently underway.
Therefore, there are no significant
hazard considerations because granting
the proposed exemption would not:
(1) Involve a significant increase in
the probability or consequences of an
accident previously evaluated; or
(2) Create the possibility of a new or
different kind of accident from any
accident previously evaluated; or
(3) Involve a significant reduction in
a margin of safety.
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
80400
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 247 / Thursday, December 24, 2015 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(ii): There is no
significant change in the types or
significant increase in the amounts of
any effluents that may be released
offsite.
Staff Analysis: The proposed action
involves only a schedule change, which
is administrative in nature, and does not
involve any changes in the types or
significant increase in the amounts of
effluents that may be released offsite.
III. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iii): There is
no significant increase in individual or
cumulative public or occupational
radiation exposure.
Staff Analysis: Since the proposed
action involves only a schedule change,
which is administrative in nature, it
does not contribute to any significant
increase in occupational or public
radiation exposure.
IV. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iv): There is
no significant construction impact.
Staff Analysis: The proposed action
involves only a schedule change which
is administrative in nature. While the
environmental portion of the
application review is underway, the
safety portion of the COL application
review is on hold and no license will be
issued prior to receipt of the
aforementioned application’s December
31, 2016, submittal of the revised FSAR;
therefore, the proposed action does not
involve any construction impact.
V. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(v): There is no
significant increase in the potential for
or consequences from radiological
accidents.
Staff Analysis: The proposed action
involves only a schedule change which
is administrative in nature and does not
impact the probability or consequences
of accidents.
VI. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi): The
requirements from which this
exemption is sought involve only ‘‘(B)
Reporting requirements’’ or ‘‘(G)
Scheduling requirements.’’
Staff Analysis: The exemption request
involves requirements in both of these
categories because it involves
submitting an updated COL FSAR by
December 31, 2016, and also relates to
the schedule for submitting COL FSAR
updates to the NRC.
IV. Conclusion
The NRC has determined that,
pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the
exemption is authorized by law, will not
present an undue risk to the public
health and safety, and is consistent with
the common defense and security. Also,
special circumstances exist under 10
CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii). This one-time
exemption will support the NRC staff’s
effective and efficient review of the COL
application, when resumed, as well as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:57 Dec 23, 2015
Jkt 238001
issuance of the NRC staff’s safety
evaluation report. Therefore, the NRC
hereby grants Bell Bend, LLC a one-time
exemption from the requirements of 10
CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) pertaining to the
BBNPP COL application to allow
submittal of the next FSAR update on or
before December 31, 2016.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22, the
Commission has determined that the
exemption request meets the applicable
categorical exclusion criteria set forth in
10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), and the granting of
this exemption will not have a
significant effect on the quality of the
human environment.
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day
of December 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Frank Akstulewicz,
Director, Division of New Reactor Licensing,
Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2015–32512 Filed 12–23–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2015–0207]
Spent Fuel Transportation Package
Response to the MacArthur Maze Fire
Scenario
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Draft NUREG/CR; request for
comment.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing for public
comment a draft NUREG/CR, NUREG/
CR–7206, ‘‘Spent Fuel Transportation
Package Response to the MacArthur
Maze Fire Scenario.’’ This report
presents analyses that were performed
to examine the hypothetical effects on a
spent fuel transportation package from
conditions during the MacArthur Maze
accident in 2007. The analyses
undertaken include FDS fire modeling,
physical examination of material
samples, ANSYS and COBRA–SFS code
thermal modeling of a GA–4 package,
ANSYS and LS–DYNA structural and
thermal-structural modeling of the
roadway and package, and fuel
performance modeling using the
FRAPTRAN–1.4, FRAPCON–3.4, and
DATING codes. The estimated release
from the hypothetical scenario is below
the prescribed limit for safety.
DATES: Submit comments by February
22, 2016. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical
to do so, but the Commission is able to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ensure consideration only for comments
received before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods (unless
this document describes a different
method for submitting comments on a
specific subject):
• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2015–0207. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• Mail comments to: Cindy Bladey,
Office of Administration, Mail Stop:
OWFN–12–H08, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Borowsky, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–7407; email:
Joseph.Borowsky@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2015–
0207 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publiclyavailable information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal rulemaking Web site: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2015–0207.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then
select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC’s Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by
email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The draft
NUREG/CR, ‘‘Spent Fuel Transportation
Package Response to the MacArthur
Maze Fire Scenario’’ is available in
ADAMS under Accession No.
ML15350A213.
E:\FR\FM\24DEN1.SGM
24DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 247 (Thursday, December 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80398-80400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32512]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 52-039; NRC-2008-0603]
Bell Bend, LLC; Combined License Application for Bell Bend
Nuclear Power Plant
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Exemption; issuance.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an
exemption in a response to an October 7, 2015, letter from Bell Bend,
LLC, which requested an exemption from Final Safety Analysis Report
(FSAR) updates included in their combined license (COL) application.
The NRC staff reviewed this request and determined that it is
appropriate to grant the exemption, but stipulated that the updates to
the FSAR must be submitted prior to, or coincident with, the resumption
of the COL application safety review or by December 31, 2016, whichever
comes first.
DATES: The exemption is effective on December 31, 2015.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2008-0603 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2008-0603. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and
then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS,
please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at
1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The
ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if that document
is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is
referenced.
NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Vokoun, Office of New
Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-
0001; telephone: 301-415-3470; email: Patricia.Vokoun@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On October 10, 2008, Bell Bend, LLC (formerly known as PPL)
submitted to the NRC a COL application for a single unit of AREVA NP's
U.S. Evolutionary Power Reactor (EPR) (ADAMS Accession No. ML082890663)
in accordance with the requirements of subpart C of part 52 of title 10
of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), ``Licenses, Certifications,
and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants.'' This reactor is to be
constructed and operated as Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant (BBNPP), in
Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. The NRC docketed the BBNPP COL
application on December 19, 2008 (Docket Number 52-039). Additionally,
the BBNPP COL application incorporates by reference AREVA NP's
application for a standard design certification for the U.S. EPR. The
NRC review of the AREVA NP application for design certification of the
U.S. EPR has been suspended.
II. Request/Action
The regulations at 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) require that an
applicant for a COL under 10 CFR part 52 shall, during the period from
docketing of a COL application until the Commission makes a finding
under 10 CFR 52.103(g) pertaining to facility operation, submit an
annual update to the application's FSAR, which is part 2 of the COL
application. Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii), the next annual
update of the FSAR included in the BBNPP COL application would be due
by December 31, 2015.
On January 9, 2014, Bell Bend, LLC (formerly known as PPL)
submitted a request to place the safety review of the BBNPP COL
application on hold until further notice (ADAMS Accession No.
ML14030A074). As a result of the safety review being placed on hold, no
informational updates to the FSAR have occurred during this time. On
October 7, 2015, Bell Bend, LLC requested an exemption from the 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii) requirements to submit the BBNPP COL application FSAR
update in calendar year 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15300A070).
The Bell Bend, LLC's requested exemption is a one-time schedule
change from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii). The exemption
would allow Bell Bend, LLC to submit the next FSAR update at a later
date but no later than December 31, 2016. The current requirement to
submit an FSAR update could not be changed, absent the exemption.
III. Discussion
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the NRC may, upon application by any
interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from the
requirements of 10 CFR part 50, including 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) when:
(1) The exemptions are authorized by law, will not present an undue
risk to public health or safety, and are consistent with the common
defense and security; and (2) special circumstances are present. As
relevant to the requested exemption, special circumstances exist if:
(1) Application of the regulation in the particular circumstances would
not serve the underlying purpose of the rule
[[Page 80399]]
or is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule (10
CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii)); or (2) the exemption would provide only temporary
relief from the applicable regulation and the licensee or applicant has
made good faith efforts to comply with the regulation (10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(v)).
The purpose of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) is to ensure that the NRC
has the most up-to-date information regarding the COL application, in
order to perform an efficient and effective review. The rule targeted
those applications that are being actively reviewed by the NRC. As
requested by Bell Bend, LLC (formerly known as PPL) in the above
referenced letter dated January 9, 2014, the NRC placed the safety
review portion of the BBNPP COL application on hold until further
notice. Therefore, updating the BBNPP FSAR would only cause undue
hardship on Bell Bend, LLC, and the purpose of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii)
would still be achieved so long as the next update is submitted by
December 31, 2016.
The requested exemption to defer submittal of the next update to
the FSAR included in the BBNPP COL application would provide only
temporary relief from the regulations of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii).
Authorized by Law
The exemption is a one-time schedule change from the requirements
of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii). The exemption would allow PPL to submit the
next BBNPP COL application FSAR update on or before December 31, 2016.
Per 10 CFR 50.12, the NRC staff has determined that granting Bell Bend,
LLC the requested one-time exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR
50.71(e)(3)(iii) will provide only temporary relief from this
regulation and will not result in a violation of the Atomic Energy Act
of 1954, as amended, or the NRC's regulations. Therefore, the exemption
is authorized by law.
No Undue Risk to Public Health and Safety
The underlying purpose of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) is to provide for
a timely and comprehensive update of the FSAR associated with a COL
application in order to support an effective and efficient review by
the NRC staff and issuance of the NRC staff's safety evaluation report.
The requested exemption is solely administrative in nature, in that it
pertains to the schedule for submittal to the NRC of revisions to an
application under 10 CFR part 52, for which a license has not been
granted. Based on the nature of the requested exemption as described
above, no new accident precursors are created by the exemption;
therefore, neither the probability, nor the consequences, of postulated
accidents are increased. Therefore, there is no undue risk to public
health and safety.
Consistent With Common Defense and Security
The requested exemption would allow Bell Bend, LLC to submit the
next FSAR update on or before December 31, 2016. This schedule change
has no relation to security issues. Therefore, the common defense and
security is not impacted by this exemption.
Special Circumstances
Special circumstances, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2), are
present whenever: (1) Application of the regulation in the particular
circumstances would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule or is
not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule (10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii)); or (2) the exemption would provide only temporary
relief from the applicable regulation and the licensee or applicant has
made good faith efforts to comply with the regulation (10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(v)).
As discussed above, the requested one-time exemption is solely
administrative in nature, in that it pertains to a one-time schedule
change for submittal of revisions to an application under 10 CFR part
52, for which a license has not been granted. This one-time exemption
will support the NRC staff's effective and efficient review of the
BBNPP COL application, when resumed, as well as issuance of the NRC
staff's safety evaluation report. For this reason, application of 10
CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) in the particular circumstances is not necessary
to achieve the underlying purpose of that rule. Therefore, special
circumstances exist under 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii). In addition, special
circumstances are also present under 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(v) because
granting a one-time exemption from 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) would
provide only temporary relief. For the above reasons, the special
circumstances required by 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2) for the granting of an
exemption from 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) exist.
Eligibility for Categorical Exclusion From Environmental Review
With respect to the exemption's impact on the quality of the human
environment, the NRC has determined that this specific exemption
request is eligible for categorical exclusion as identified in 10 CFR
51.22(c)(25). Under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), granting of an exemption from
the requirements of any regulation of 10 CFR Chapter 1 (which includes
10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii)) is an action that is a categorical exclusion,
provided that:
(i) There is no significant hazards consideration;
(ii) There is no significant change in the types or significant
increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite;
(iii) There is no significant increase in individual or cumulative
public or occupational radiation exposure;
(iv) There is no significant construction impact;
(v) There is no significant increase in the potential for or
consequences from radiological accidents; and
(vi) The requirements from which an exemption is sought involve:
(A) Recordkeeping requirements;
(B) Reporting requirements;
(C) Inspection or surveillance requirements;
(D) Equipment servicing or maintenance scheduling requirements;
(E) Education, training, experience, qualification, requalification
or other employment suitability requirements;
(F) Safeguard plans, and materials control and accounting inventory
scheduling requirements;
(G) Scheduling requirements;
(H) Surety, insurance or indemnity requirements; or
(I) Other requirements of an administrative, managerial, or
organizational nature.
The requirements from which this exemption is sought involve only
``(B) Reporting requirements'' or ``(G) Scheduling requirements'' of
those required by 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi).
The NRC staff's determination that each of the applicable criteria
for this categorical exclusion is met as follows:
I. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(i): There is no significant hazards
consideration.
Staff Analysis: The criteria for determining if an exemption
involves a significant hazards consideration are found in 10 CFR 50.92.
The proposed action involves only a schedule change regarding the
submission of an update to the application for which only the
environmental portion of the licensing review is currently underway.
Therefore, there are no significant hazard considerations because
granting the proposed exemption would not:
(1) Involve a significant increase in the probability or
consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or
(2) Create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident
from any accident previously evaluated; or
(3) Involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
[[Page 80400]]
II. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(ii): There is no significant change in the
types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may
be released offsite.
Staff Analysis: The proposed action involves only a schedule
change, which is administrative in nature, and does not involve any
changes in the types or significant increase in the amounts of
effluents that may be released offsite.
III. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iii): There is no significant increase in
individual or cumulative public or occupational radiation exposure.
Staff Analysis: Since the proposed action involves only a schedule
change, which is administrative in nature, it does not contribute to
any significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure.
IV. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(iv): There is no significant construction
impact.
Staff Analysis: The proposed action involves only a schedule change
which is administrative in nature. While the environmental portion of
the application review is underway, the safety portion of the COL
application review is on hold and no license will be issued prior to
receipt of the aforementioned application's December 31, 2016,
submittal of the revised FSAR; therefore, the proposed action does not
involve any construction impact.
V. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(v): There is no significant increase in the
potential for or consequences from radiological accidents.
Staff Analysis: The proposed action involves only a schedule change
which is administrative in nature and does not impact the probability
or consequences of accidents.
VI. 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25)(vi): The requirements from which this
exemption is sought involve only ``(B) Reporting requirements'' or
``(G) Scheduling requirements.''
Staff Analysis: The exemption request involves requirements in both
of these categories because it involves submitting an updated COL FSAR
by December 31, 2016, and also relates to the schedule for submitting
COL FSAR updates to the NRC.
IV. Conclusion
The NRC has determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12, the
exemption is authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to the
public health and safety, and is consistent with the common defense and
security. Also, special circumstances exist under 10 CFR
50.12(a)(2)(ii). This one-time exemption will support the NRC staff's
effective and efficient review of the COL application, when resumed, as
well as issuance of the NRC staff's safety evaluation report.
Therefore, the NRC hereby grants Bell Bend, LLC a one-time exemption
from the requirements of 10 CFR 50.71(e)(3)(iii) pertaining to the
BBNPP COL application to allow submittal of the next FSAR update on or
before December 31, 2016.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22, the Commission has determined that the
exemption request meets the applicable categorical exclusion criteria
set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), and the granting of this exemption
will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human
environment.
This exemption is effective upon issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 16th day of December 2015.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Frank Akstulewicz,
Director, Division of New Reactor Licensing, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2015-32512 Filed 12-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P