Revised Recommendations for Reducing the Risk of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission by Blood and Blood Products; Guidance for Industry; Availability, 79913-79915 [2015-32250]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 23, 2015 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2015–D–1211]
Revised Recommendations for
Reducing the Risk of Human
Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission
by Blood and Blood Products;
Guidance for Industry; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
announcing the availability of a
document entitled ‘‘Revised
Recommendations for Reducing the Risk
of Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Transmission by Blood and Blood
Products; Guidance for Industry.’’ The
guidance document provides blood
establishments that collect blood or
blood components, including Source
Plasma, with revised donor deferral
recommendations for individuals at
increased risk for transmitting human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
infection. The guidance document
recommends corresponding revisions to
donor educational materials, donor
history questionnaires and
accompanying materials, along with
revisions to donor requalification,
product management, and testing
procedures. The guidance announced in
this notice finalizes the draft guidance
of the same title dated May 2015 and
supersedes the memorandum to blood
establishments entitled ‘‘Revised
Recommendations for the Prevention of
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
Transmission by Blood and Blood
Products’’ dated April 23, 1992 (1992
blood memo). While this guidance
represents FDA’s current thinking on
the subject, our recommendations may
evolve over time as new scientific
evidence becomes available.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Dec 22, 2015
Jkt 238001
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2015–D–1211 for ‘‘Revised
Recommendations for Reducing the Risk
of Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Transmission by Blood and Blood
Products; Guidance for Industry.’’
Received comments will be placed in
the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION’’. The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
79913
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit written requests for single
copies of the guidance to the Office of
Communication, Outreach, and
Development, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist the office in processing your
requests. The guidance may also be
obtained by mail by calling CBER at 1–
800–835–4709 or 240–402–8010. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for electronic access to the guidance
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Valerie A. Butler, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 240–
402–7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a document entitled, ‘‘Revised
Recommendations for Reducing the Risk
of Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Transmission by Blood and Blood
Products; Guidance for Industry.’’ The
emergence of Acquired Immune
Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) in the
early 1980s and the recognition that it
could be transmitted by blood and blood
products had profound effects on the
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
79914
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 23, 2015 / Notices
U.S. blood system. Although initially
identified in men who have sex with
men (MSM) and associated with maleto-male sexual contact, AIDS was soon
noted to be potentially transmitted by
transfusion of blood products, and by
infusion of clotting factor concentrates
in individuals with hemophilia.
Beginning in 1983, FDA issued
recommendations for providing donors
with educational material on risk factors
for AIDS and for deferring donors at
increased risk for AIDS in an effort to
prevent transmission of the agent
responsible for AIDS (later understood
to be caused by HIV) by blood and blood
products. MSM (originally identified as
gay or bisexual men) were deferred due
to the strong clustering of AIDS illness
among MSM and the subsequent
discovery of high rates of HIV infection
in that population. FDA’s
recommendation for deferral of MSM
was modified over time to improve its
clarity and to promote compliance,
including a shift of focus from a deferral
based on group identification to a
deferral based on specific behavior
(male sex with another male).
Since September 1985, FDA has
recommended that blood establishments
indefinitely defer male donors who have
had sex with another male, even one
time, since 1977. On April 23, 1992,
FDA issued the 1992 blood memo,
which consolidated its
recommendations regarding the deferral
of donors at risk of HIV, including the
deferral for MSM, as well as deferral
recommendations for other persons with
behaviors associated with high rates of
HIV exposure, namely commercial sex
workers, those who inject nonprescription drugs, and certain other
individuals with HIV risk factors.
The use of donor educational
material, specific deferral questions, and
advances in HIV donor testing have
reduced the risk of HIV transmission
from blood transfusion from about 1 in
2500 transfusions prior to HIV testing to
a current estimated residual risk of
about 1 in 1.47 million transfusions.
Since the implementation in 1985 of
donor testing for antibodies to HIV, FDA
and the U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS) have held a
number of public meetings, including
public scientific workshops and
meetings of the Blood Products
Advisory Committee and the HHS
Advisory Committee on Blood Safety
and Availability (ACBSA) to further
review evidence and discuss FDA’s
blood donor deferral policies to reduce
the risk of transmission of HIV by blood
and blood products. Consistent with
recommendations of the ACBSA in June
2010, studies that might support a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Dec 22, 2015
Jkt 238001
policy change were carried out by the
Public Health Service in 2011 to 2014.
A recommendation for a policy change
to the blood donor deferral period for
MSM from indefinite deferral to 1 year
since the last sexual contact was
announced by the Commissioner of
Food and Drugs in December 2014. This
guidance implements that
recommended policy change.
In addition, the guidance provides
donor deferral recommendations for
other individuals at increased risk for
transmitting HIV infection, including
commercial sex workers, nonprescription injection drug users,
women who have sex with MSM, and
certain other individuals with other risk
factors. The guidance provides revised
recommendations for donor educational
materials, donor history questionnaires
and accompanying materials, as well as
for donor requalification and product
management procedures.
In the Federal Register of May 15,
2015 (80 FR 27973), FDA announced the
availability of the draft guidance of the
same title dated May 2015. FDA
received over 700 comments on the
draft guidance and those comments
were carefully considered as the
guidance was finalized. Comments were
received from a variety of organizations,
including patient advocacy groups
representing users of blood products;
lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender
advocacy groups; medical and
professional societies; academic
institutions; human rights organizations;
local governments; members of
Congress; and, the blood industry.
Comments were also received from
hundreds of individual commenters.
Approximately one-half of the
comments opposed FDA’s time-based
deferral policy for MSM and considered
the proposed policy to be
discriminatory and lacking a scientific
rationale. Many of these comments
recommended that FDA adopt an
individual risk assessment based
approach, regardless of an individual’s
sexual orientation or gender identity.
Other comments supported a time-based
deferral policy shorter than 1year, or no
deferral period at all, because of
advances in blood donor testing
technologies that permit earlier
detection of new HIV infections.
Comments requested that FDA commit
to reexamining its deferral policies as
new technologies, such as pathogen
reduction technology are implemented
and data regarding compliance with the
revised policies become available.
Most of the remaining comments
advocated for the continuation of the
indefinite deferral policy for MSM and
expressed concern regarding the safety
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the blood should the revised policy
for MSM donors be adopted. Opponents
of the proposed change commented on
the HIV incidence and prevalence rates
among MSM; the potential failure of
HIV tests to capture window-period
infections; the risk of emerging
pathogens for which testing does not
exist; and, the potential for decreased
compliance rates with the new deferral
policy. Other comments argued that
FDA should not compromise public
health and the safety of the blood
supply to satisfy special interest groups.
A smaller number of comments,
including those from certain patient
advocacy organizations, supported the
proposed 1-year deferral policy for
MSM predicated on the establishment of
a transfusion-transmitted infectious
disease monitoring system to enhance
safety monitoring and allow rapid
responses to emerging threats to the
blood supply. Further, similar
comments advocated for an evaluation
of the effectiveness of the donor
educational materials and donor history
questionnaires prior to the
implementation of new donor deferral
policies.
Finally, comments received from the
blood industry were generally
supportive of the revised MSM donor
deferral policy. However, some
comments noted that manufacturers of
plasma for further manufacturing use
(i.e., to make injectable products),
including Source Plasma, collected in
the United States and intended for
further manufacturing use in other
countries, may need to retain an
indefinite deferral policy for MSM to
comply with the indefinite deferral
policies established in other countries.
Industry commenters also requested
revisions to certain other donor deferral
criteria for HIV risk and disagreed with
FDA’s proposal to include the signs and
symptoms associated with HIV infection
in the donor educational materials.
Comments requested clarification
regarding the eligibility of donors with
false-positive HIV tests and on
recommendations for product retrieval
and notification of consignees of
distributed blood components collected
from a donor who should have been
deferred for HIV risk factors. Some
comments were also supportive of the
additional guidance provided by FDA
regarding transgender donors.
Finally numerous commenters
requested FDA to clarify the
recommendation for deferral of women
who have had sex with MSM.
FDA carefully considered all of the
comments received in response to the
draft guidance and the available
scientific data, including the results of
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 246 / Wednesday, December 23, 2015 / Notices
recent studies conducted by the Public
Health Service and revised the guidance
accordingly. FDA considered several
options to address the comments in
response to the revised MSM donor
deferral policy. Because evidence
indicates that the indefinite deferral
policy for MSM may have become less
effective over time, FDA has determined
that a change in policy is warranted at
this time. Data on the limitations of
nucleic acid tests to identify antibody
negative window period HIV infections
suggests that donor testing alone, absent
any deferral for MSM, would result in
an unacceptable increased risk of
transfusion-transmitted HIV. Similarly,
pretesting at risk donors with a rapid
HIV test prior to donation would be
logistically challenging and would not
necessarily identify newly HIV-infected
individuals. While individual donor
assessment for risk has been
implemented in a few countries, the
implementation of this strategy in the
United States would present significant
practical challenges and currently there
is no validated and accepted individual
risk assessment tool or questionnaire.
Therefore, FDA concluded a time-based
deferral for history of male-male sex is
the most appropriate policy to maintain
the safety of the U.S. blood supply.
Scientific data regarding the
effectiveness of a 1-year deferral in
Australia, a country with similar HIV
epidemiology to the United States,
supports FDA’s policy change to the
blood donor deferral period for MSM
from indefinite deferral to 1 year since
the last sexual contact. Scientifically
robust data are not available for timebased deferrals of less than 1 year. FDA
also concluded that scientific data are
not currently available that would
support revisions to the indefinite
deferral policy for commercial sex
workers or intravenous drug users.
In response to comments, FDA made
the following changes when finalizing
the guidance: (1) Amended the
recommendations regarding the
inclusion of signs and symptoms
associated with HIV in the donor
educational materials; (2) revised the
recommendation for the deferral of
female donors who have had sex with
MSM; (3) stated that FDA no longer
recommends deferral for individuals
who have had sex with an individual
with hemophilia or related clotting
deficiencies requiring treatment with
clotting factor concentrates; and (4)
revised the recommendations regarding
product retrieval and consignee
notification of distributed blood
products collected from a donor who
should have been deferred for HIV risk
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 Dec 22, 2015
Jkt 238001
factors. In addition, FDA made the
following changes to clarify certain
recommendations in the guidance,
which are consistent with current
policy: (1) Clarified that donors who
have been determined to have a falsepositive HIV test may be reentered
according to a requalification method
found acceptable to FDA; (2) noted that
recipients of allogeneic blood
transfusions (i.e., not autologous
transfusions), should be temporarily
deferred; (3) provided reference to an
FDA guidance on the collection of blood
components from donors at risk of HIV
infection; and (4) clarified the deferral
by the responsible physician of a blood
establishment of any donor if the
donation could affect the health of the
donor or the safety of the blood
component. Additionally, the
background section has been expanded
to summarize FDA’s evaluation of the
available policy options under the
available evidence relevant to the MSM
deferral policy. Minor editorial changes
have also been made to the guidance.
FDA remains committed to exploring
options and engaging in public
discussions regarding enhancements to
donor and public education regarding
safe blood donors and evaluating the
effectiveness of the donor history
questionnaire. Further, with the
implementation of a transfusion
transmitted infectious disease
monitoring system, FDA will be able to
monitor donor risk factors and the safety
of the blood supply, as well as
investigate and refine blood safety
measures in the future. FDA’s
recommendations may evolve over time
as new scientific data become available
on strategies to maintain or improve
blood safety.
The guidance announced in this
notice finalizes the draft guidance dated
May 2015 and supersedes the 1992
blood memo.
This guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The guidance represents the current
thinking of FDA on recommendations
for reducing the risk of HIV
transmission by blood and blood
products. It does not establish any rights
for any person and is not binding on
FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The guidance refers to previously
approved collections of information
found in FDA regulations. These
collections of information are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
79915
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). The collections of information in
21 CFR 601.12 have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0338;
the collections of information in 21 CFR
606.171 have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0458; and
the collections of information in 21 CFR
610.46, 630.6, 640.3 and 640.63 have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0116.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the guidance at either
https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBlood
Vaccines/GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
default.htm or https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: December 17, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–32250 Filed 12–22–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection; Public
Comment Request
Health Resources and Services
Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
requirement for opportunity for public
comment on proposed data collection
projects (Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995), the
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA) announces
plans to submit an Information
Collection Request (ICR), described
below, to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Prior to submitting the
ICR to OMB, HRSA seeks comments
from the public regarding the burden
estimate, below, or any other aspect of
the ICR.
DATES: Comments on this ICR should be
received no later than February 22,
2016.
SUMMARY:
Submit your comments to
paperwork@hrsa.gov or mail the HRSA
Information Collection Clearance
Officer, Room 10C–16, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Rockville, MD 20857.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79913-79915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32250]
[[Page 79913]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2015-D-1211]
Revised Recommendations for Reducing the Risk of Human
Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission by Blood and Blood Products;
Guidance for Industry; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a document entitled ``Revised Recommendations for
Reducing the Risk of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission by Blood
and Blood Products; Guidance for Industry.'' The guidance document
provides blood establishments that collect blood or blood components,
including Source Plasma, with revised donor deferral recommendations
for individuals at increased risk for transmitting human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The guidance document
recommends corresponding revisions to donor educational materials,
donor history questionnaires and accompanying materials, along with
revisions to donor requalification, product management, and testing
procedures. The guidance announced in this notice finalizes the draft
guidance of the same title dated May 2015 and supersedes the memorandum
to blood establishments entitled ``Revised Recommendations for the
Prevention of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Transmission by Blood
and Blood Products'' dated April 23, 1992 (1992 blood memo). While this
guidance represents FDA's current thinking on the subject, our
recommendations may evolve over time as new scientific evidence becomes
available.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2015-D-1211 for ``Revised Recommendations for Reducing the Risk of
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission by Blood and Blood Products;
Guidance for Industry.'' Received comments will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION''. The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit written requests for single copies of the guidance to the
Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist the office in
processing your requests. The guidance may also be obtained by mail by
calling CBER at 1-800-835-4709 or 240-402-8010. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic access to the guidance document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Valerie A. Butler, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
240-402-7911.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of a document entitled,
``Revised Recommendations for Reducing the Risk of Human
Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission by Blood and Blood Products;
Guidance for Industry.'' The emergence of Acquired Immune Deficiency
Syndrome (AIDS) in the early 1980s and the recognition that it could be
transmitted by blood and blood products had profound effects on the
[[Page 79914]]
U.S. blood system. Although initially identified in men who have sex
with men (MSM) and associated with male-to-male sexual contact, AIDS
was soon noted to be potentially transmitted by transfusion of blood
products, and by infusion of clotting factor concentrates in
individuals with hemophilia. Beginning in 1983, FDA issued
recommendations for providing donors with educational material on risk
factors for AIDS and for deferring donors at increased risk for AIDS in
an effort to prevent transmission of the agent responsible for AIDS
(later understood to be caused by HIV) by blood and blood products. MSM
(originally identified as gay or bisexual men) were deferred due to the
strong clustering of AIDS illness among MSM and the subsequent
discovery of high rates of HIV infection in that population. FDA's
recommendation for deferral of MSM was modified over time to improve
its clarity and to promote compliance, including a shift of focus from
a deferral based on group identification to a deferral based on
specific behavior (male sex with another male).
Since September 1985, FDA has recommended that blood establishments
indefinitely defer male donors who have had sex with another male, even
one time, since 1977. On April 23, 1992, FDA issued the 1992 blood
memo, which consolidated its recommendations regarding the deferral of
donors at risk of HIV, including the deferral for MSM, as well as
deferral recommendations for other persons with behaviors associated
with high rates of HIV exposure, namely commercial sex workers, those
who inject non-prescription drugs, and certain other individuals with
HIV risk factors.
The use of donor educational material, specific deferral questions,
and advances in HIV donor testing have reduced the risk of HIV
transmission from blood transfusion from about 1 in 2500 transfusions
prior to HIV testing to a current estimated residual risk of about 1 in
1.47 million transfusions. Since the implementation in 1985 of donor
testing for antibodies to HIV, FDA and the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) have held a number of public meetings,
including public scientific workshops and meetings of the Blood
Products Advisory Committee and the HHS Advisory Committee on Blood
Safety and Availability (ACBSA) to further review evidence and discuss
FDA's blood donor deferral policies to reduce the risk of transmission
of HIV by blood and blood products. Consistent with recommendations of
the ACBSA in June 2010, studies that might support a policy change were
carried out by the Public Health Service in 2011 to 2014. A
recommendation for a policy change to the blood donor deferral period
for MSM from indefinite deferral to 1 year since the last sexual
contact was announced by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs in December
2014. This guidance implements that recommended policy change.
In addition, the guidance provides donor deferral recommendations
for other individuals at increased risk for transmitting HIV infection,
including commercial sex workers, non-prescription injection drug
users, women who have sex with MSM, and certain other individuals with
other risk factors. The guidance provides revised recommendations for
donor educational materials, donor history questionnaires and
accompanying materials, as well as for donor requalification and
product management procedures.
In the Federal Register of May 15, 2015 (80 FR 27973), FDA
announced the availability of the draft guidance of the same title
dated May 2015. FDA received over 700 comments on the draft guidance
and those comments were carefully considered as the guidance was
finalized. Comments were received from a variety of organizations,
including patient advocacy groups representing users of blood products;
lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender advocacy groups; medical and
professional societies; academic institutions; human rights
organizations; local governments; members of Congress; and, the blood
industry. Comments were also received from hundreds of individual
commenters.
Approximately one-half of the comments opposed FDA's time-based
deferral policy for MSM and considered the proposed policy to be
discriminatory and lacking a scientific rationale. Many of these
comments recommended that FDA adopt an individual risk assessment based
approach, regardless of an individual's sexual orientation or gender
identity. Other comments supported a time-based deferral policy shorter
than 1year, or no deferral period at all, because of advances in blood
donor testing technologies that permit earlier detection of new HIV
infections. Comments requested that FDA commit to reexamining its
deferral policies as new technologies, such as pathogen reduction
technology are implemented and data regarding compliance with the
revised policies become available.
Most of the remaining comments advocated for the continuation of
the indefinite deferral policy for MSM and expressed concern regarding
the safety of the blood should the revised policy for MSM donors be
adopted. Opponents of the proposed change commented on the HIV
incidence and prevalence rates among MSM; the potential failure of HIV
tests to capture window-period infections; the risk of emerging
pathogens for which testing does not exist; and, the potential for
decreased compliance rates with the new deferral policy. Other comments
argued that FDA should not compromise public health and the safety of
the blood supply to satisfy special interest groups.
A smaller number of comments, including those from certain patient
advocacy organizations, supported the proposed 1-year deferral policy
for MSM predicated on the establishment of a transfusion-transmitted
infectious disease monitoring system to enhance safety monitoring and
allow rapid responses to emerging threats to the blood supply. Further,
similar comments advocated for an evaluation of the effectiveness of
the donor educational materials and donor history questionnaires prior
to the implementation of new donor deferral policies.
Finally, comments received from the blood industry were generally
supportive of the revised MSM donor deferral policy. However, some
comments noted that manufacturers of plasma for further manufacturing
use (i.e., to make injectable products), including Source Plasma,
collected in the United States and intended for further manufacturing
use in other countries, may need to retain an indefinite deferral
policy for MSM to comply with the indefinite deferral policies
established in other countries. Industry commenters also requested
revisions to certain other donor deferral criteria for HIV risk and
disagreed with FDA's proposal to include the signs and symptoms
associated with HIV infection in the donor educational materials.
Comments requested clarification regarding the eligibility of donors
with false-positive HIV tests and on recommendations for product
retrieval and notification of consignees of distributed blood
components collected from a donor who should have been deferred for HIV
risk factors. Some comments were also supportive of the additional
guidance provided by FDA regarding transgender donors.
Finally numerous commenters requested FDA to clarify the
recommendation for deferral of women who have had sex with MSM.
FDA carefully considered all of the comments received in response
to the draft guidance and the available scientific data, including the
results of
[[Page 79915]]
recent studies conducted by the Public Health Service and revised the
guidance accordingly. FDA considered several options to address the
comments in response to the revised MSM donor deferral policy. Because
evidence indicates that the indefinite deferral policy for MSM may have
become less effective over time, FDA has determined that a change in
policy is warranted at this time. Data on the limitations of nucleic
acid tests to identify antibody negative window period HIV infections
suggests that donor testing alone, absent any deferral for MSM, would
result in an unacceptable increased risk of transfusion-transmitted
HIV. Similarly, pretesting at risk donors with a rapid HIV test prior
to donation would be logistically challenging and would not necessarily
identify newly HIV-infected individuals. While individual donor
assessment for risk has been implemented in a few countries, the
implementation of this strategy in the United States would present
significant practical challenges and currently there is no validated
and accepted individual risk assessment tool or questionnaire.
Therefore, FDA concluded a time-based deferral for history of male-male
sex is the most appropriate policy to maintain the safety of the U.S.
blood supply. Scientific data regarding the effectiveness of a 1-year
deferral in Australia, a country with similar HIV epidemiology to the
United States, supports FDA's policy change to the blood donor deferral
period for MSM from indefinite deferral to 1 year since the last sexual
contact. Scientifically robust data are not available for time-based
deferrals of less than 1 year. FDA also concluded that scientific data
are not currently available that would support revisions to the
indefinite deferral policy for commercial sex workers or intravenous
drug users.
In response to comments, FDA made the following changes when
finalizing the guidance: (1) Amended the recommendations regarding the
inclusion of signs and symptoms associated with HIV in the donor
educational materials; (2) revised the recommendation for the deferral
of female donors who have had sex with MSM; (3) stated that FDA no
longer recommends deferral for individuals who have had sex with an
individual with hemophilia or related clotting deficiencies requiring
treatment with clotting factor concentrates; and (4) revised the
recommendations regarding product retrieval and consignee notification
of distributed blood products collected from a donor who should have
been deferred for HIV risk factors. In addition, FDA made the following
changes to clarify certain recommendations in the guidance, which are
consistent with current policy: (1) Clarified that donors who have been
determined to have a false-positive HIV test may be reentered according
to a requalification method found acceptable to FDA; (2) noted that
recipients of allogeneic blood transfusions (i.e., not autologous
transfusions), should be temporarily deferred; (3) provided reference
to an FDA guidance on the collection of blood components from donors at
risk of HIV infection; and (4) clarified the deferral by the
responsible physician of a blood establishment of any donor if the
donation could affect the health of the donor or the safety of the
blood component. Additionally, the background section has been expanded
to summarize FDA's evaluation of the available policy options under the
available evidence relevant to the MSM deferral policy. Minor editorial
changes have also been made to the guidance.
FDA remains committed to exploring options and engaging in public
discussions regarding enhancements to donor and public education
regarding safe blood donors and evaluating the effectiveness of the
donor history questionnaire. Further, with the implementation of a
transfusion transmitted infectious disease monitoring system, FDA will
be able to monitor donor risk factors and the safety of the blood
supply, as well as investigate and refine blood safety measures in the
future. FDA's recommendations may evolve over time as new scientific
data become available on strategies to maintain or improve blood
safety.
The guidance announced in this notice finalizes the draft guidance
dated May 2015 and supersedes the 1992 blood memo.
This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
current thinking of FDA on recommendations for reducing the risk of HIV
transmission by blood and blood products. It does not establish any
rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can
use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
collections of information in 21 CFR 601.12 have been approved under
OMB control number 0910-0338; the collections of information in 21 CFR
606.171 have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0458; and the
collections of information in 21 CFR 610.46, 630.6, 640.3 and 640.63
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0116.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the guidance at
either https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: December 17, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-32250 Filed 12-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P