Sunlamp Products; Proposed Amendment to Performance Standard, 79505-79522 [2015-32023]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(ii) The text of the risk
acknowledgement certification shall be
at least 10-point font.
(iii) The tanning facility operator shall
provide a copy of the signed
acknowledgement certification to the
prospective user and the tanning facility
shall retain a copy of the signed risk
acknowledgement certification for 1
year or until the prospective user signs
a new risk acknowledgement
certification, whichever is earlier.
(d) Electronic product performance
standard. * * *
Dated: December 16, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–32024 Filed 12–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–C
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 1002 and 1040
[Docket No. FDA–1998–N–0880 (Formerly
1998N–1170)]
RIN 0910–AG30
Sunlamp Products; Proposed
Amendment to Performance Standard
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) is
proposing to amend the performance
standard for sunlamp products and
ultraviolet (UV) lamps intended for use
in these products. This standard was
last amended in 1985. The current
amendments seek to improve consumer
safety by requiring more effective
communication regarding the risks
posed by these products. They also
would reduce risks to consumers by
updating technical requirements to
reflect current science, and by adopting
and incorporating by reference certain
elements from the International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)
International Standard 60335–2–27, Ed.
5.0: 2009–12.
DATES: Submit either electronic or
written comments on the proposed rule
by March 21, 2016. Submit comments
on information collection issues under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 by
January 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
1998–N–0880 for ‘‘Sunlamp Products;
Proposed Amendment to Performance
Standard.’’ Received comments will be
placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
79505
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit comments on information
collection issues to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in the
following ways:
• Fax to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA
Desk Officer, FAX: 202–395–7285, or
email to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.
All comments should be identified with
the title, ‘‘Sunlamp Products; Proposed
Amendment to Performance Standard.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharon Miller, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4234, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–2471.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary
Purpose of the Regulatory Action
The Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990
(Pub. L. 101–629), enacted on November
28, 1990, transferred the provisions of
the Radiation Control for Health and
Safety Act of 1968 (Pub. L. 90–602) from
Title III of the Public Health Service Act
to Chapter V, subchapter C of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360hh et
seq.). Under these provisions, FDA
administers an electronic product
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
79506
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
radiation control program to protect the
public health and safety. This authority
provides for developing, amending, and
administering radiation safety
performance standards for electronic
products, including sunlamp products.
A sunlamp product is a device that
emits UV radiation to induce tanning.
The device incorporates one or more UV
lamps as a radiation source. Examples of
sunlamp products are tanning beds,
which are used while lying down, and
tanning booths, which are used while
standing. UV radiation-emitting
products not used for tanning would not
be affected by this proposed rule.
Devices emitting UV radiation to treat
dermatological disorders are regulated
separately and are not part of this
proposed rule. As electronic products,
sunlamp products are subject to the
regulations for electronic product
radiation control, including parts 1000
to 1010 (21 CFR parts 1000 through
1010) and § 1040.20 (21 CFR 1040.20).
Sunlamp products emit UV radiation
to induce tanning. The adverse effects of
UV radiation are well known. UV
radiation can cause acute injuries such
as sunburns and eye irritations (e.g.,
photokeratitis). Long-term UV exposure
has been associated with skin cancer
(including squamous cell carcinoma,
basal cell carcinoma, and melanoma),
skin aging, and cataracts.
Epidemiological studies of the effects of
UV radiation on incidence of cancer and
other health problems are complicated
by latency between exposure and
disease, difficulty controlling for
environmental exposure to UV
radiation, and other factors.
Nevertheless, a recent meta-analysis
found an increase in the risk of
melanoma for each additional session of
sunlamp product use per year (Ref. 1).
FDA is concerned about the safety
risks from UV radiation. Therefore, FDA
is updating our requirements for
sunlamp products which allow for
indoor exposure to UV radiation. There
have been many changes in our
understanding of how UV radiation
interacts with human skin since FDA
published the document entitled
‘‘Sunlamp Products; Performance
Standard’’ in the Federal Register of
September 6, 1985 (50 FR 36548). There
have also been many changes in the
indoor tanning industry which affect the
type of equipment on the market and
the measurement techniques used by
manufacturers. FDA is updating
requirements for sunlamp products to
bring our regulations up to date with
current science. FDA also wants to
improve consumers’ understanding of
the risks related to UV radiation
exposure.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
Summary of the Major Provisions of the
Regulatory Action in Question
The objective of this proposed rule is
to align the performance standards for
sunlamp products with current
scientific knowledge and our
understanding of how these products
are used. This proposed rule seeks to
facilitate compliance, improve
awareness among operators and
consumers about risks of use, and
ultimately improve public health.
FDA proposes to incorporate certain
elements of the International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)
International Standard 60335–2–27, Ed.
5.0: 2009–12, ‘‘Household and Similar
Electrical Appliances—Safety—Part 2–
27: Particular Requirements for
Appliances for Skin Exposure to
Ultraviolet and Infrared Radiation,’’ by
reference. Harmonizing the FDA
standard with the current IEC standard
would bring it up to date with current
science and better protect consumers
from the risks posed by these devices.
Harmonization would have benefits for
sunlamp product manufacturers as well.
Currently, many firms producing
sunlamp products for sale within the
United States and abroad have to follow
both IEC and FDA standards. Aligning
these standards would mean that such
firms would need to comply with a
single set of rules instead of two
different ones, at least for the particular
clauses which are being adopted and
incorporated by reference.
FDA proposes to amend the
requirements of part 1002 as specified
in table 1 to require that manufacturers
of UV lamps intended to be used in
sunlamp products are subject to the
same record and reporting requirements
as manufacturers of sunlamp products.
FDA wants to ensure that all test data
necessary to ensure compliance with
§ 1040.20 are collected and maintained.
Currently, manufacturers of UV lamps
are required to submit only product
reports. Under proposed § 1002.1,
manufacturers of UV lamps would also
be required to submit supplemental
reports and annual reports and to
maintain test records and distribution
records. Moreover, proposed § 1002.1
would also require that manufacturers
of protective eyewear maintain test
records demonstrating that the eyewear
complies with applicable UV and
visible transmittance requirements as
well as distribution records. In addition,
proposed § 1002.1 would also require
that manufacturers of protective
eyewear submit annual reports,
supplemental reports, and product
reports to FDA.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Proposed § 1040.20(c)(1) would set an
absolute limit for UVC radiation. An
absolute limit on UVC (200–290
nanometer (nm)) irradiance would
provide greater assurance of user safety
because a ratio permits higher doses of
UVC (as long as they correspond to
higher doses in the 260 to 320 nm
range). UVC, which is not present in
sunlight that reaches the Earth’s surface,
is potentially harmful to users while
less effective for tanning than UVA or
UVB. FDA has chosen not to adopt the
limit for UVC radiation in Ed. 5.0 of IEC
60335–2–27 because this limit is 10
times lower than the limit in Ed. 4.2 and
FDA believes that it would be difficult
for some manufacturers to measure
irradiance at this level.
Proposed § 1040.20(c)(2)(ii) would
limit the maximum timer interval to one
that would result in a biologically
effective (also referred to as erythemaleffective) dose that would not exceed
500 joules/meter2 (J/m2) which is
approximately equivalent to the 624 J/
m2 value (weighted with the CIE LYTLE
action spectrum) that was specified in
the 1986 FDA Policy Letter on
Maximum Timer Interval and Exposure
Schedule. FDA has determined that a
dose of 500 J/m2 (weighted with the CIE
erythemal action spectrum) provides a
biologically equivalent dose that is more
closely matched to the current 624 J/m2
value than does the IEC dose limit of
600 J/m2.
Proposed § 1040.20(c)(3) would add a
requirement that the control enabling
manual termination of radiation
emission (sometimes referred to as the
‘‘panic button’’ or ‘‘emergency stop’’) be
easily accessible and readily identifiable
to the user. This would ensure that
users could easily turn the sunlamp
product off for any reason.
Proposed § 1040.20(c)(4)(ii) would
expand application of the performance
requirements to all protective eyewear
intended to be used with sunlamp
products, whether sold together with a
sunlamp product or sold separately. UV
wavelengths can cause serious eye
damage, and exposure to the shorter
wavelength region of the UV spectrum
is especially dangerous. The spectral
transmittance requirements for
protective eyewear are necessary to
protect users of sunlamp products from
these risks, which directly result from
the UV radiation emitted by the
sunlamp product.
Proposed § 1040.20(d)(1)(i) would
modify the warning statement required
to appear on the label of all sunlamp
products. FDA believes that the current
warning statement is too long, not userfriendly, and that its content and format
could be improved to more effectively
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
communicate the risks of indoor tanning
to users. Based on its analysis of the
consumer testing, FDA concluded that
the current warning statement could be
made more effective by changing its
required language, formatting, and
location. FDA believes that the
proposed warning statement would
most effectively convey the risks of
indoor tanning to users.
The proposed rule would also
improve user safety by adopting the
IEC’s ‘‘equivalency code’’ system for
ensuring compatibility between
sunlamp products (e.g., tanning beds
and booths) and the UV lamps that are
used in them. Proposed
§ 1040.20(d)(1)(vi) would require the
label of all sunlamp products to indicate
the equivalency code range of the UV
lamp to be used in the sunlamp product.
Proposed § 1040.20(d)(2)(ii) would
require the label of each UV lamp to
indicate its UV lamp equivalency code.
FDA believes the adoption of the IEC’s
absolute rating system for replacement
UV lamps would eliminate confusion
regarding proper lamp replacement,
facilitate the enforcement of lamp
compatibility requirements, and
improve the safety of sunlamp products.
Proposed § 1040.20(d)(3) would retain
the requirement of the current FDA
standard that the required label
information must be legible and readily
accessible to view by a sunlamp product
user immediately prior to use. Proposed
§ 1040.20(d)(3)(i) would incorporate
specifications into the rule regarding the
location, spacing, and font of the
required warning statement. FDA
believes that these label specifications
would ensure that users see the required
warning prior to use, and would result
in a more comprehensive and effective
standard.
Proposed § 1040.20(e)(3) would add a
requirement for the provision of the
required warning statement in all
catalogs, specification sheets, and
descriptive brochures intended for
consumers in which sunlamp products
are offered for sale, and on all
consumer-directed Web pages on which
sunlamp products are offered for sale.
This requirement would ensure that
consumers are fully informed of the
risks presented by sunlamp products at
the time they consider purchasing it.
Proposed § 1040.20(g) is also modeled
after the proposed FDA Performance
Standard for Laser Products (78 FR
37723, June 24, 2013). FDA believes the
addition of these requirements, which
have been used successfully over the
past two decades for laser products,
would improve safety by ensuring that
modifications that affect performance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
would be held to the same standards as
original manufacturing.
Costs and Benefits
Estimated one-time costs are $20,917
to $113,240 and annual costs are $4,686
to $7,230. The present discounted costs
are $57,181 to $151,390 at 7 percent and
$61,498 to $165,883 at 3 percent.
Annualized at 7 percent over 10 years,
total costs are $8,141 to $21,498. At 3
percent, annualized total costs are
$7,867 to $19,447.
The primary benefit of the proposed
rule would be from reduced injuries,
including sunburn, photokeratitis, skin
cancer, cataracts and ocular melanoma,
and from reduced exposure to UV
radiation. We are unable to quantify the
benefits, but where possible,
demonstrate that they satisfy breakeven
tests using very conservative
assumptions. The benefits of this
proposed rule would justify the costs.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Contents of the Proposed Regulation
A. Overview
B. Changes to § 1002.1
C. Changes to § 1040.20
III. Legal Authority
IV. Proposed Effective Date
V. Environmental Impact
VI. Analysis of Impacts
VII. Federalism
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
A. Reporting Burden
B. Recordkeeping Burden
C. Third Party Disclosure Burden
IX. Incorporation by Reference
X. Comments
XI. References
I. Background
The Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990
(Pub. L. 101–629), enacted on November
28, 1990, transferred the provisions of
the Radiation Control for Health and
Safety Act of 1968 (Pub. L. 90–602) from
Title III of the Public Health Service Act
to Chapter V, subchapter C of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 360hh et seq.). Under
these provisions, FDA administers an
electronic product radiation control
program to protect the public health and
safety. This authority provides for
developing, amending, and
administering radiation safety
performance standards for electronic
products, including sunlamp products.
Until recently, sunlamp products
intended for tanning were class I
medical devices and exempt from
premarket notification requirements,
subject to the limitation in 21 CFR 878.9
(see 53 FR 23856, June 24, 1988; 59 FR
63005, December 7, 1994). On March 25,
2010, FDA held a meeting of the General
and Plastic Surgery Devices Panel of the
FDA/Center for Devices and
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
79507
Radiological Health (CDRH) Medical
Devices Advisory committee to seek
input on whether the classification or
regulatory controls needed to be
changed. For a summary of this meeting,
see https://www.fda.gov/downloads/
AdvisoryCommittees/Committees
MeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/
MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/
GeneralandPlasticSurgeryDevicesPanel/
UCM206522.pdf. On June 2, 2014, based
on the panel’s recommendations, among
other things, FDA reclassified UV lamps
intended to tan the skin from class I and
exempt from premarket notification to
class II and subject to premarket
notification, and renamed them
sunlamp products and UV lamps
intended for use in sunlamp products
(see 21 CFR 878.4635; 79 FR 31205,
June 2, 2014).
As electronic products, sunlamp
products are subject to the regulations
for electronic product radiation control,
including parts 1000 through 1010 and
§ 1040.20. The sunlamp products
performance standard in § 1040.20 was
originally published in the Federal
Register on November 9, 1979 (44 FR
65352). In the Federal Register of
September 6, 1985 (50 FR 36548), FDA
amended § 1040.20 and made it
applicable to all sunlamp products
manufactured on or after September 8,
1986.
FDA also issued several policy letters
pertaining to specific aspects of its
regulation of sunlamp products. On
June 25, 1985, FDA issued a policy
letter entitled ‘‘Policy on Warning Label
Required on Sunlamp Products’’
(available at https://www.fda.gov/
downloads/MedicalDevices/Device
RegulationandGuidance/
GuidanceDocuments/UCM095333.pdf)
(Ref. 2). This document pertained to the
location, spacing, and legibility of the
required warning label. On August 21,
1986, FDA issued a policy letter entitled
‘‘Policy on Maximum Timer Interval
and Exposure Schedule for Sunlamp
Products’’ (available at https://www.fda.
gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/Device
RegulationandGuidance/Guidance
Documents/UCM095333.pdf) (Ref. 3).
This document explained the criteria
FDA uses to evaluate the adequacy of
the exposure schedule and the
recommended maximum exposure time
for sunlamp products. On September 2,
1986, FDA issued another policy letter
entitled ‘‘Policy on Lamp
Compatibility,’’ (available at https://
www.fda.gov/downloads/
MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationand
Guidance/GuidanceDocuments/
UCM095325.pdf) (Ref. 4). This
document listed the criteria FDA uses to
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
79508
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
evaluate appropriate replacement lamps
for sunlamp products.
Before prescribing any electronic
product performance standards, FDA is
required to consult a statutory advisory
committee, the Technical Electronic
Product Radiation Safety Standards
Committee (TEPRSSC). See section
534(f)(1)(A) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360kk(f)(1)(A)). At the September 23
and 24, 1998, meeting of TEPRSSC, FDA
presented general concepts for
amendments to the performance
standard for sunlamp products, which
are embodied in this proposed rule. The
committee recommended that FDA
pursue development of the
amendments.
On February 9, 1999, CDRH published
an Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPRM) (Docket No. 98N–
1170), 64 FR 6288 (February 9, 1999),
for the following reasons:
1. FDA was concerned that
inadequate attention was being given to
recommended exposure schedules,
which are designed to minimize
consumer risk.
2. FDA was concerned that the
warnings for sunlamp products were not
reaching many users of sunlamp
products prior to their purchase and
use, and that purchasers may not be
aware of the risks associated with UV
exposure from sunlamp products.
3. Sunlamp products technology has
changed since the FDA Performance
Standard was amended in 1985. These
changes can affect both the intensity
and spectral characteristics of the UV
emission from sunlamps.
4. Because there is no uniform
grading/rating system, choosing a
replacement lamp can be confusing for
sunlamp product owners and tanning
facilities. It also makes the job of
tanning facility inspectors more difficult
because they cannot easily verify
whether the correct lamps are installed
in the sunlamp products. The use of
incorrect replacement lamps can lead to
sunburns.
The specific amendments under
consideration were as follows:
1. Harmonizing the sunlamp product
performance standard with IEC
Standard 60335–2–27;
2. Revising and updating the August
21, 1986, guidance entitled ‘‘Policy on
Maximum Timer Interval and Exposure
Schedule for Sunlamp Products,’’ and
incorporating the updated guidance into
the sunlamp product performance
standard;
3. Adding a provision clarifying that
‘‘manufacturing’’ under the FD&C Act
includes a modification of a sunlamp
product that affects any aspect of its
performance or intended function for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
which § 1040.20 has an applicable
requirement;
4. Updating the warning statement
required by § 1040.20(d)(1)(i) to simplify
the wording and to highlight the risk of
developing skin cancers;
5. Requiring reproduction of the text
of the warning statement specified in
§ 1040.20(d)(1)(i) in catalogs,
specification sheets, and brochures; and
6. Developing a biological efficacy
rating scale for UV lamps intended for
use in sunlamp products to simplify
appropriate lamp replacement.
In response to this ANPRM, FDA
received 26 comments from State and
local radiation control agencies,
manufacturers, the American Academy
of Dermatology, the Skin Cancer
Foundation, an industry educational
association, a tanning facility owner,
and a trade organization. FDA
considered these comments in
developing this proposal.
FDA presented recommendations for
amendments to the sunlamp
performance standard to TEPRSSC on
June 21, 2000. FDA explained to
TEPRSSC that it was prepared to move
forward with some of the amendments
at that time, but did not have sufficient
scientific data to move forward with the
lamp classification or the exposure
schedule amendment. TEPRSSC advised
FDA to develop scientifically-based
exposure schedule guidelines before
incorporating these requirements into
the Performance Standard itself. FDA
scientists obtained special funding from
FDA’s Office of Women’s Health to
conduct this research. Upon
completion, FDA presented guidelines
for exposure schedules to the IEC TC
(Technical Committee) 61, MT
(Maintenance Team) 16 that is
responsible for developing standards for
these products. The IEC accepted these
guidelines and incorporated them into
IEC 60335–2–27 standard (Ed. 5.0),
which published on December 14, 2009.
In February 2002, FDA held a 2-day
meeting with the indoor tanning
industry and representatives from the
U.S. Army Environmental Hygiene
Agency, Health Canada, the Swedish
Radiation Protection Institute, and the
North Carolina Department of Radiation
Protection. The purpose of this meeting
was to solicit input from the affected
parties on the lamp equivalence issue
and other possible amendments to the
FDA Performance Standard for Sunlamp
Products, which we considered in the
development of this proposed rule.
The IEC TC 61, MT 16 committee met
in October 2002, and decided to work
with IEC SC (subcommittee) 34A to
develop practical standardized test
methods and a classification scheme for
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
low-pressure, fluorescent tanning lamps
to facilitate replacement of these lamps
when they wear out. IEC SC 34A has
responsibility for the IEC 61228
standard entitled ‘‘Fluorescent
Ultraviolet Lamps Used for Tanning—
Measurement and Specification
Method’’ (Ref. 5). At their meeting in
2003, IEC TC 61, MT 16 and IEC SC 34A
reached a consensus position on lamp
testing and classification. This position
has now been incorporated into the IEC
60335–2–27, Ed. 5.0 standard (Ref. 6)
and the IEC 61228, Ed. 2.0 standard
(Ref. 5).
In October 2003, FDA presented six
amendments to TEPRSSC and all were
approved with modifications to two of
the proposals. These six amendments,
along with others, are being presented
in this proposed rule and are outlined
in section II.
In addition, FDA has informed
radiological health representatives from
the states of our intentions to amend the
Sunlamp Products Performance
Standard through semi-annual meetings
with the state Conference of Radiation
Control Program Directors. See Web site
at https://www.crcpd.org/.
FDA is concerned about the safety
risks from UV radiation. Therefore, FDA
is updating our requirements for
sunlamp products—which allow for
indoor exposure to UV radiation.
FDA is undertaking three initiatives to
address the risks associated with
sunlamp products. First, in a final
reclassification order that issued June 2,
2014 (79 FR 31205 at 31213), FDA
reclassified sunlamp products and UV
lamps intended for use in sunlamp
products from class I to class II, and
established special controls and
premarket notification (510(k))
requirements under the medical device
authorities of the FD&C Act. The special
controls include performance testing
and labeling requirements, including a
warning that sunlamp products are not
to be used on persons under the age of
18 years.
Second, and simultaneously with this
proposed rule, FDA is proposing device
restrictions under section 520(e) of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360j(e)), which
authorizes FDA to issue regulations
imposing restrictions on the sale,
distribution or use of a device, if,
because of its potentiality for harmful
effects or the collateral measures
necessary to its use, FDA determines
that absent such restrictions, there
cannot be a reasonable assurance of its
safety and effectiveness. As explained
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, the proposed device
restrictions would require that:
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
1. Tanning facility operators permit
use of sunlamp products only if the
prospective user is age 18 or older;
2. Tanning facility operators, upon
request by the user or prospective user,
provide a copy of the sunlamp product
user manual or name and address of the
manufacturer or distributor from who a
user manual may be obtained;
3. 510(k) holders assure that a user
manual accompanies each sunlamp
product and, upon request, provide a
copy of the user manual to any tanning
facility operator, user or prospective
user; and
4. Tanning facility operators obtain
each prospective user’s signature on a
risk acknowledgement certification
before use that states that they have
been informed of the risks to health that
may result from use of these devices.
These device restrictions would
primarily apply to tanning facility
operators, and to a lesser extent, device
manufacturers and distributors. FDA
would not consider people who use
their own tanning beds (home users) to
be tanning facility operators.
Finally, in this action, FDA is
proposing amendments to the sunlamp
products and UV lamps performance
standard at § 1040.20 (21 CFR 1040.20)
(last updated in 1985), which includes
technical and labeling requirements
issued under the radiological health
provisions of the FD&C Act. FDA is
taking this action to reflect current
scientific knowledge related to sunlamp
product use, harmonize it more closely
with IEC International Standard 60335–
2–27, Ed. 5.0: 2009–12, and strengthen
the warning statement required by
§ 1040.20(d)(1)(i) in accordance with the
results of the study FDA conducted
under section 230 of the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (Pub. L. 110–85).
II. Contents of the Proposed Regulation
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Overview
This preamble will focus on the
proposed changes to § 1002.1 and
§ 1040.20, which include:
• Requiring that UV lamp
manufacturers follow the same reporting
requirements as sunlamp product
manufacturers,
• Requiring that protective eyewear
manufacturers maintain distribution
records and test records relating to the
UV and visible transmittance of the
eyewear as well as requiring the
submission of annual reports,
supplemental reports, and product
reports to FDA,
• Changing the content, format, and
location of the required warning
statement to make it more effective at
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
communicating the risks of indoor
tanning to consumers,
• Replacing the current limit on the
ratio of UVC to UVB irradiance with an
absolute limit on UVC irradiance,
• Limiting the maximum timer
interval to one that would not exceed a
maximum dose of 500 J/m2, weighted
with the CIE Reference Action Spectrum
for Erythema (1999),
• Adopting the IEC ‘‘equivalency
code’’ system for labeling and
measuring the strength of replacement
lamps to prevent original lamps being
replaced with more powerful lamps,
which can lead to sunburn,
• Changing the current subjective
requirement regarding the visible
transmittance of protective eyewear to
an objective, quantitative requirement,
adopted from the IEC standard,
• Adding a cap on the amount of
visible transmittance allowed through
the protective eyewear, to protect the
users’ retina from intense visible light,
• Updating the guidelines for the
required manufacturer-recommended
exposure schedule, by requiring
conformity to the IEC standard, which is
based on current science,
• Requiring that a reproduction of the
warning label be provided in all
catalogs, specification sheets, brochures,
and consumer-directed Web pages on
which sunlamp products are offered for
sale, and
• Requiring that persons involved in
significant modification of sunlamp
products re-certify the product just as
the manufacturer of a new product
would. This requirement currently
exists in the FDA Laser Standard (21
CFR 1040.10(i)).
B. Changes to § 1002.1
FDA proposes to amend the
requirements of part 1002 as specified
in table 1 to require that manufacturers
of UV lamps intended to be used in
sunlamp products are subject to the
same record and reporting requirements
as manufacturers of sunlamp products.
When table 1 was first codified, it was
common for the manufacturers of UV
lamps to be the same entity that
manufactured the sunlamp product.
Today, the market has changed and
there are some manufacturers that
manufacture only UV lamps. FDA wants
to ensure that all test data necessary to
ensure compliance with § 1040.20 are
collected and maintained. Currently,
manufacturers of UV lamps are required
to submit only product reports. Under
proposed § 1002.1, manufacturers of UV
lamps would also be required to submit
supplemental reports and annual
reports and to maintain test records and
distribution records. In addition,
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
79509
manufacturers of protective eyewear
would also need to maintain
distribution records as well as test
records demonstrating that the eyewear
complies with applicable UV and
visible transmittance requirements.
Proposed § 1002.1 would also require
that manufacturers of protective
eyewear submit annual reports,
supplemental reports, and product
reports to FDA.
C. Changes to § 1040.20
1. Incorporation by Reference
FDA proposes to incorporate certain
elements of the IEC International
Standard 60335–2–27, Ed. 5.0: 2009–12
entitled ‘‘Household and Similar
Electrical Appliances—Safety—Part 2–
27: Particular Requirements for
Appliances for Skin Exposure to
Ultraviolet and Infrared Radiation,’’ by
reference (Ref. 6). See proposed
§ 1040.20(a)(2). A similar approach has
been used successfully with the FDA
standard for laser products, § 1040.10,
see FDA Guidance, ‘‘Laser Products—
Conformance With IEC 60825–1 and IEC
60601–2–22’’ (Ref. 7), and FDA has
proposed to incorporate by reference
several provisions of IEC 60825–1, Ed.
2, into the laser products performance
standard (78 FR 37723). Harmonizing
the FDA standard with the current IEC
standard would bring it up to date with
current science and better protect
consumers from the risks posed by these
devices. FDA has representation on the
IEC committee and has had significant
influence on changes made to the IEC
standard over the past decade. Working
with this committee, which includes
representatives from industry,
government, and the medical
community, has provided FDA with
useful expertise and perspectives to
which it may not otherwise have access.
Harmonization would have benefits
for sunlamp product manufacturers as
well. Currently, many firms producing
sunlamp products for sale within the
United States and abroad have to follow
both IEC and FDA standards. Aligning
these standards would mean that such
firms would need to comply with a
single set of rules instead of two
different ones, at least for the particular
clauses which are being adopted and
incorporated by reference.
2. Definitions
‘‘Protective goggles’’ would be added
to the definition of ‘‘protective eyewear’’
in proposed § 1040.20(b) since this is
the synonymous term used in the IEC
standard.
The definition of ‘‘sunlamp product’’
would be amended to make clear that
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
79510
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
tanning beds and tanning booths are
included within this term.
We propose adding a definition for
‘‘tanning course.’’ This term is used in
Annex DD of IEC 60335–2–27, Ed. 5.0,
to aid the manufacturer in the
development of its exposure schedule.
In the context of exposure schedules,
‘‘tanning course’’ means the period of
time over which a tan is developed,
starting with the first short exposure
and building up to longer exposures
over time, usually requiring a period of
3 to 4 weeks. In an effort to ensure that
a useful recommendation is provided to
the user about maximum annual
exposure, this concept is utilized in the
exposure schedule requirements at
proposed § 1040.20(d)(1)(iv) and the
example exposure schedule provided
therein. FDA is uncertain how users
might best keep track of their exposure
over many weeks and months, and is
particularly interested in comments on
the best approach for informing users
about limiting their annual exposure.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
3. Performance Requirements
Proposed § 1040.20(c)(1) would set
the irradiance limit for UVC radiation
(200–290 nm) at 0.03 Watts/meter2 (W/
m2) at the shortest recommended
exposure distance from the sunlamp
product. This limit is the same as the
one in the previous version of IEC
60335–2–27 (Ed. 4.2: 2007–04). This
requirement would replace the current
limit on the ratio of irradiance in the
200 to 260 nm wavelength range to the
irradiance in the 260 to 320 nm
wavelength range (see § 1040.20(c)(1)).
One of the comments received in
response to the 1999 ANPRM
recommended that the current ratio
limit in § 1040.20(c)(1) be dropped since
it is no longer necessary, considering
current low-pressure lamp technology,
and because a limit on the UVC/UVB
ratio provides less safety than an
absolute limit on the UVC emissions
from a sunlamp product. FDA agrees
with this comment. An absolute limit on
UVC (200–290 nm) irradiance would
provide greater assurance of user safety
because a ratio permits higher doses of
UVC (as long as they correspond to
higher doses in the 260 to 320 nm
range). UVC, which is not present in
sunlight that reaches the Earth’s surface,
is potentially harmful to users while
less effective for tanning than UVA or
UVB. FDA has chosen not to adopt the
limit for UVC radiation in Ed. 5.0 of IEC
60335–2–27 because this limit is 10
times lower than the limit in Ed. 4.2 and
FDA believes that it would be difficult
for some manufacturers to measure
irradiance at this level. FDA is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
particularly interested in comments on
this proposal.
FDA proposes to change
§ 1040.20(c)(2) by adding a dose-based
limit similar to the one in FDA’s 1986
FDA Policy Letter on Maximum Timer
Interval and Exposure Schedule (Ref. 3)
to the maximum timer interval
requirement in paragraph (c)(2)(ii). FDA
also proposes to remove paragraph (v)
from § 1040.20(c)(2).
Proposed § 1040.20(c)(2)(ii) would
incorporate by reference the action
spectrum used in figure 103 of IEC
60335–2–27, Ed. 5.0 for calculating the
effective dose that defines the maximum
timer interval. This method uses the
internationally-accepted CIE Reference
Action Spectrum for Erythema (Ref. 8)
instead of the CIE LYTLE action
spectrum that was defined in the 1986
FDA Policy Letter on Maximum Timer
Interval and Exposure Schedule (Ref. 3).
Since 1986, the CIE Action Spectrum for
Erythema has been verified and
accepted by research laboratories across
the globe. As a result, it is used
worldwide in the calculation of the UV
Index.
The 1986 FDA Policy Letter on
Maximum Timer Interval and Exposure
Schedule also recommends the use of
the Parrish 1982 melanogenesis action
spectrum, in addition to the CIE LYTLE
erythema action spectrum, as a
secondary means of calculating the
maximum timer interval. As it has been
found that the two action spectra are
highly correlated, this calculation does
not provide independent
characterization data and the
requirement is redundant. Therefore,
proposed § 1040.20(c)(2)(ii) would not
require a second calculation of the
maximum timer interval.
Proposed § 1040.20(c)(2)(ii) would
limit the maximum timer interval to one
that would result in a biologicallyeffective (also referred to as erythemaleffective) dose that would not exceed
500 J/m2, which is approximately
equivalent to the 624 J/m2 value
(weighted with the CIE LYTLE action
spectrum) that was specified in the 1986
FDA Policy Letter on Maximum Timer
Interval and Exposure Schedule (Ref. 3).
Although the FDA would like to
harmonize its standard as much as
possible with the IEC standard,
consumer safety is our main concern.
Based on spectral irradiance data
submitted to the Agency and on data
presented at the 2004 Commission
Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE)
Symposium on ‘‘Light and Health: Nonvisual effects’’ (Ref. 10), FDA has
determined that a dose of 500 J/m2
(weighted with the CIE erythemal action
spectrum) provides a biologically-
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
equivalent dose that is more closely
matched to the current 624 J/m2 value
than does the IEC dose limit of 600 J/
m2. FDA invites comment on this
proposal.
Proposed § 1040.20(c)(3) would add a
requirement that the control enabling
manual termination of radiation
emission (sometimes referred to as the
‘‘panic button’’ or ‘‘emergency stop’’) be
easily accessible and readily identifiable
to the user. This would ensure that
users can easily turn the sunlamp
product off for any reason.
Proposed § 1040.20(c)(4)(ii) would
expand application of the performance
requirements to all protective eyewear
intended to be used with sunlamp
products, whether sold together with a
sunlamp product or sold separately. As
we have previously explained, UV
wavelengths can cause serious eye
damage, and exposure to the shorter
wavelength region of the UV spectrum
is especially dangerous. (See 42 FR
65189 at 65191, December 30, 1977.)
Short-term risks include photokeratitis,
which is very painful and causes
temporary loss of vision, and there is
also a risk of retinal damage from shortterm or long-term exposure, which
could cause blind spots to form in the
retina. Repeated, long-term UV exposure
increases the risk of cataracts, and there
is evidence of an association between
UV exposure and ocular melanoma (Ref.
11).
The spectral transmittance
requirements for protective eyewear are
necessary to protect users of sunlamp
products from these risks, which
directly result from the UV radiation
emitted by the sunlamp product. Users
of sunlamp products, especially those
who tan in tanning facilities, often use
protective eyewear manufactured by an
entity other than the manufacturer of
the sunlamp product. Use of sunlamp
products with eyewear that does not
meet these requirements would increase
the risk posed by the radiation emitted
by the sunlamp product and undermine
the protection provided by the
performance standard. Therefore it is
necessary to apply the standard to all
protective eyewear intended to be used
with sunlamp products.
The proposal would also modify the
protective eyewear transmittance
requirements of § 1040.20(c)(4)(ii) to
better ensure user safety and achieve
harmony with the IEC standard. (See
clause 32.102 of IEC 60335–2–27, Ed.
5.0.) The requirements for spectral
transmittance in the UV range of 200–
400 nm would remain the same as in the
current FDA standard. The proposed
rule would adopt the limit of 5 percent
on the visible transmittance in the range
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
of 400–550 nm from clause 32.102 of the
IEC standard. This requirement would
provide additional safety to protect the
retina from intense visible light.
Currently, there is no such requirement
included in the FDA standard. The
proposed rule would abandon the
current requirement that spectral
transmittance shall be sufficient over
the wavelength range greater than 400
nm to provide visibility to the user, and
instead adopt the lower limit of 1
percent on luminous transmission from
clause 32.102 of the IEC standard.
Replacing the subjective standard with
an objective one would make
compliance easier to verify and improve
uniformity and consistency.
4. Label Requirements
Proposed § 1040.20(d)(1)(i) would
modify the warning statement required
to appear on the label of all sunlamp
products. FDA believes that the current
warning statement is too long, not userfriendly, and that its content and format
could be improved to more effectively
communicate the risks of indoor tanning
to users. As discussed in section I, FDA
has been considering updating the
required warning since 1999. In 2007,
Congress required FDA to conduct
consumer focus group testing to
evaluate the adequacy of sunlamp
product warning labels in conveying
certain risk information to consumers,
including the risk of skin cancer. (See
section 230 of the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007, Pub. L. 110–85.) Based on its
analysis of the consumer testing, FDA
concluded that the current warning
statement could be made more effective
by changing its required language,
formatting, and location. See the FDA
Report to Congress entitled ‘‘Labeling
Information on the Relationship
Between the Use of Indoor Tanning
Devices and Development of Skin
Cancer or Other Skin Damage’’ (Ref. 12).
FDA would like to harmonize its
standard as much as possible with the
IEC 60335–2–27 Ed. 5.0 standard.
However, based on the results of the
focus group testing, we believe it is
appropriate for some differences to
remain between the FDA warning
statement and the IEC warning
statement, especially since the IEC
warning statement provides only the
general substance to be conveyed (since
it is intended for use in multiple
languages) and does not provide
formatting specifications. FDA believes
that the proposed warning statement
would most effectively convey the risks
of indoor tanning to users. Specifically,
the label of each sunlamp product
would have to contain a warning
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
statement with the following language
and format:
‘‘DANGER—Ultraviolet Radiation (UV)
UV can cause:
• Skin Cancer
• Skin Burns
• Premature Skin Aging such as
wrinkles and age spots
• Eye Damage (both short- and longterm)
Wear FDA-compliant protective
eyewear to prevent eye damage, such as
burns or cataracts.
Follow the recommended exposure
schedule to avoid severe skin burns.
Talk to your doctor or pharmacist
before tanning if you use medicines
and/or cosmetics. Some of these
products can make you more sensitive
to skin and eye damage from UV.’’
Currently, § 1040.20(d)(1)(iv) requires
sunlamp product labels to include a
recommended exposure schedule
containing certain information. FDA
proposes to add a requirement that the
exposure schedule be developed in
accordance with the specific parameters
in IEC 60335–2–27, Ed. 5.0, Annex DD,
which would be incorporated by
reference. The proposed rule provides
an example of a recommended exposure
schedule that would meet the
guidelines/parameters in IEC 60335–2–
27, Ed. 5.0, Annex DD. See proposed
§ 1040.20(d)(1)(iv). These parameters are
different from those provided in the
1986 FDA Policy Letter on Maximum
Timer Interval and Exposure Schedule
(Ref. 3), and are based on current
science, including recent human
research conducted at FDA. This
requirement is aimed at reducing the
cumulative UV dose to sunlamp product
users and attaining closer
harmonization of FDA and the IEC
standard.
Proposed § 1040.20(d)(1)(iv) would
also require a warning to appear either
directly above or below the exposure
schedule stating ‘‘Skin Type I
individuals (always burns, never tans)
should never use sunlamp products.’’
This warning is based on years of
published research showing that Skin
Type I individuals sunburn easily and
cannot tan and are therefore at the
greatest risk for skin cancer. By ‘‘Skin
Type’’ we are referring to the historical
Fitzpatrick skin typing system (Ref. 13)
developed in 1975 by dermatologist
Thomas Fitzpatrick to predict skin
reactivity in phototherapy. Under this
categorization scheme, Skin Type I is
the fairest and most sensitive while Skin
Type VI is the darkest and least
sensitive to UV radiation. The Skin
Types that are most likely to tan through
the use of sunlamp products are Skin
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
79511
Types II through IV. It has been shown
(Ref. 14) that Skin Types III and IV can
attain a tan with UV doses that are
similar to what is needed for Skin Type
II. Thus, the same dose can be used to
develop and maintain a tan for all three
Skin Types. This was confirmed in
clinical studies performed at FDA (Ref.
15). This is a change from the approach
of the 1986 Policy Letter, which called
for exposure schedules to be
differentiated by Skin Type.
The proposed rule would also
improve user safety by adopting the
IEC’s ‘‘equivalency code’’ system for
ensuring compatibility between
sunlamp products (e.g., tanning beds
and booths) and the UV lamps
(sometimes referred to as light bulbs)
that are used in them. Proposed
§ 1040.20(d)(1)(vi) would require the
label of all sunlamp products to indicate
the equivalency code range of the UV
lamp to be used in the sunlamp product.
The equivalency code range would have
to be determined in accordance with
clause 22.111 and Annex CC of IEC
60335–2–27, Ed. 5.0, which would be
incorporated by reference. Proposed
§ 1040.20(d)(2)(ii) would require the
label of each UV lamp to indicate its UV
lamp equivalency code, as defined in
Annex CC of IEC 60335–2–27, Ed. 5.0.
In determining the ‘‘UV code’’
component of the UV lamp equivalency
code, output would have to be measured
in accordance with IEC 61228, Ed. 2.0,
‘‘Fluorescent Ultraviolet Lamps used for
Tanning—Measurement and
Specification Method,’’ (Ref. 5) which
would be incorporated by reference.
FDA believes the adoption of the
IEC’s absolute rating system for
replacement lamps would eliminate
confusion regarding proper lamp
replacement, facilitate the enforcement
of lamp compatibility requirements, and
improve the safety of sunlamp products.
Currently, FDA relies on a relative
system in which the lamp manufacturer
has to provide to FDA and to users a list
of lamps with which the manufacturer’s
lamp is compatible. (See §§ 1002.10 and
1040.20(e)(2)(iii).) As new lamp
manufacturers and new lamp models
enter the marketplace, while other
manufacturers abandon old models of
lamps or leave the marketplace, it is
increasingly cumbersome to keep track
of which lamps are compatible with the
lamps originally provided with the
sunlamp product. This can cause
confusion for tanning facility owners,
FDA, and State or local inspectors.
When incorrect lamps are used as
replacements, the erythema-effective
intensity may be greater, resulting in
burns. Therefore, FDA has decided that
an absolute rating system is needed,
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
79512
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
which would require that a code be
printed on the lamp to indicate its
erythema-effective output, and a code
range be printed on the sunlamp
product, to indicate which lamps to use
with it. Another advantage of adopting
the provisions in both of these IEC
standards is that they provide detailed
measurement specifications, which
would ensure consistency among
manufacturers.
Proposed § 1040.20(d)(3) would retain
the requirement of the current FDA
standard that the required label
information must be legible and readily
accessible to view by a sunlamp product
user immediately prior to use. FDA
provided details regarding compliance
with this requirement in its June 25,
1985, policy letter entitled ‘‘Policy on
Warning Label Required on Sunlamp
Products’’ (Ref. 2). Proposed
§ 1040.20(d)(3)(i) would incorporate
similar specifications into the rule
regarding the location, spacing, and font
of the required warning statement. The
proposal specifies that the warning
statement would have to be readily
accessible to view whether the tanning
bed canopy or tanning booth door is
open or closed when the user
approaches, which may necessitate that
it appear in more than one location on
the sunlamp product. FDA believes that
these label specifications would ensure
that users see the required warning prior
to use, and would result in a more
comprehensive and effective standard.
Proposed § 1040.20(d)(3)(ii) specifies
that required UV lamp information
would have to appear on the packaging
of the lamp in addition to being
permanently affixed or inscribed on the
lamp itself. This would ensure that
anyone replacing a UV lamp would be
aware of the lamp equivalency code and
required warnings before and after
purchase.
We propose revising
§ 1040.20(d)(3)(iv) to achieve
consistency with the requirement in the
device labeling regulations at 21 CFR
801.15(c)(1) that all words, statements,
and other information required by or
under authority of the FD&C Act to
appear on the label or labeling of a
device must appear in the English
language (or a foreign language for
articles distributed solely in Puerto Rico
or in a Territory where the predominant
language is not English). Since the
labeling of UV lamps must comply with
the labeling requirements of part 801
and § 1040.20, we propose to remove
the language in § 1040.20(d)(3)(iv) that
permits the manufacturer to express the
manufacturer’s name and month and
year of manufacture as code or symbols.
FDA is not aware of any request to use
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
symbols or codes for this purpose in the
past.
5. User Information
The proposal would remove
§ 1040.20(e)(1)(iv) since the
recommended exposure schedule no
longer needs to be differentiated by skin
type and would be required to be
prominently displayed at the beginning
of the users’ instructions under
proposed § 1040.20(e)(1)(i).
Proposed § 1040.20(e)(1)(v) would
add a requirement for the provision of
instructions and warnings regarding
assembly, operation, and maintenance,
which is modeled on the proposed FDA
Performance Standard for Laser
Products (78 FR 37723). This would
better protect individuals who assemble,
test, and maintain sunlamp products.
Proposed § 1040.20(e)(3) would add a
requirement for the provision of the
required warning statement in all
catalogs, specification sheets, and
descriptive brochures intended for
consumers in which sunlamp products
are offered for sale, and on all
consumer-directed Web pages on which
sunlamp products are offered for sale.
This requirement would ensure that
consumers are fully informed of the
risks presented by sunlamp products at
the time they consider purchasing it.
6. Test for Determination of Compliance
Proposed § 1040.20(f) would add a
requirement that the performance
requirements for the measuring
instrument in clause 32.101 of IEC
60335–2–27 Ed. 5.0 would apply.
7. Modification of Certified Sunlamp
Products
Proposed § 1040.20(g) is also modeled
after the proposed FDA Performance
Standard for Laser Products (78 FR
37723). FDA believes the addition of
these requirements, which have been
used successfully over the past 2
decades for laser products, would
improve safety by ensuring that
modifications that affect performance
would be held to the same standards as
original manufacturing.
III. Legal Authority
Section 532 of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 360ii) authorizes FDA to
establish and administer an electronic
product radiation control program to
protect the public health and safety.
Section 534 of the FD&C Act gives FDA
authority to issue regulations
establishing performance standards for
electronic products to control their
emission of radiation. These standards
may include requirements for product
testing and radiation measurement, the
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
attachment of warning signs and labels,
and the provision of instructions for
product installation, operation, and use.
Section 1003(b)(2)(E) of the FD&C Act
(21 U.S.C. 393(b)(2)(E)) requires FDA to
ensure that public health and safety are
protected from electronic product
radiation. In addition, section 701(a) of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 371(a))
authorizes the Agency to issue
regulations for the efficient enforcement
of the FD&C Act.
Section 230 of the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (Pub. L. 110–85) directed FDA to
determine whether changes to the
warning statement would more
effectively communicate the risks of
indoor tanning, such as skin cancer, and
to submit a report that includes an
explanation of the measures being
implemented to significantly reduce the
risks associated with indoor tanning
devices. As explained in section II,
based on consumer testing, FDA
determined that the proposed warning
statement would better communicate
the risks of indoor tanning to
consumers, and is proposing these
amendments to the sunlamp products
performance standard to significantly
reduce the risks associated with these
products.
IV. Proposed Effective Date
FDA proposes that any final rule
issued based on this proposal become
effective 1 year after the date of
publication of the final rule in the
Federal Register.
V. Environmental Impact, No
Significant Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(c) that this proposed action
is of a type that does not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect
on the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environment impact statement is
required.
VI. Economic Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the
proposed rule under Executive Order
12866, Executive Order 13563, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612), and the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct Agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity). We have
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
developed a comprehensive Economic
Analysis of Impacts that assesses the
impacts of the proposed rule. The
Agency believes that this proposed rule
is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires Agencies to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any
significant impact of a rule on small
entities. We do not believe this
proposed rule would result in a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities, but the
impacts are uncertain so we are
explicitly seeking comment on the
impacts.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that Agencies prepare a written
statement, which includes an
assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits, before proposing ‘‘any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100,000,000
or more (adjusted annually for inflation)
in any one year.’’ The current threshold
after adjustment for inflation is $144
million, using the most current (2014)
Implicit Price Deflator for the Gross
Domestic Product. FDA does not expect
this proposed rule to result in any 1year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
The proposed rule would affect
several aspects of the performance
standards to reduce risks associated
with use. The costs are summarized in
table 1. Estimated one-time costs are
79513
$20,917 to $113,240 and annual costs
are $4,686 to $7,230. The present
discounted costs are $57,181 to
$151,390 at 7 percent and $61,498 to
$165,883 at 3 percent. Annualized at 7
percent over 10 years, total costs are
$8,141 to $21,498. At 3 percent,
annualized total costs are $7,867 to
$19,447.
The primary benefit of the proposed
rule would be from reduced injuries,
including sunburn, photokeratitis, skin
cancer, cataracts and ocular melanoma
and from reduced exposure to UV
radiation. We are unable to quantify the
benefits, but demonstrate that they
satisfy breakeven tests using very
conservative assumptions. The benefits
of this proposed rule would justify the
costs.
TABLE 1—PRESENT DISCOUNTED COSTS OF THE PROPOSED RULE
Year
Low cost scenario
Discounted @7 percent ...........................................................................................................................
Discounted @3 percent ...........................................................................................................................
10-Year Annualized @7 percent .............................................................................................................
10-Year Annualized @3 percent .............................................................................................................
The full assessment of the economic
analysis is available in Docket FDA–
1998–N–0880 and at https://www.fda.
gov/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/
Reports/EconomicAnalyses/default.htm
(Ref. 16).
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
VII. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this proposed rule
in accordance with the principles set
forth in Executive Order 13132. Section
4(a) of the Executive Order requires
Agencies to ‘‘construe * * * a Federal
statute to preempt State law only where
the statute contains an express
preemption provision or there is some
other clear evidence that the Congress
intended preemption of State law, or
where the exercise of State authority
conflicts with the exercise of Federal
authority under the Federal statute.’’
Federal law includes an express
preemption provision at section 542 of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360ss) that
preempts the States from establishing,
or continuing in effect, any standard
with respect to an electronic product
which is applicable to the same aspect
of product performance as a Federal
standard prescribed under section 534
of the FD&C Act and which is not
identical to the Federal standard. If this
proposed rule is made final, the final
rule would prescribe a Federal standard
under section 534 of the FD&C Act.
However, section 542 of the FD&C Act
does not ‘‘prevent the Federal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
Government or the government of any
State or political subdivision thereof
from establishing a requirement with
respect to emission of radiation from
electronic products procured for its own
use if such requirement imposes a more
restrictive standard than that required to
comply with the otherwise applicable
Federal standard.’’ (Section 542 of the
FD&C Act.)
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This proposed rule contains
information collection provisions that
are subject to review by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520). A description of
these provisions is given in the
paragraphs that follow with an estimate
of the annual reporting, recordkeeping,
and third-party disclosure burden.
Included in the estimate is the time for
reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing each
collection of information.
FDA invites comments on these
topics: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of FDA’s
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of FDA’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
$57,181
61,498
8,141
7,867
High cost scenario
$151,390
165,883
21,498
19,447
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Title: Sunlamp Products; Proposed
Amendment to § 1002.1 (Record and
Reporting Requirements) and § 1040.20
(Performance Standard).
Description: The Safe Medical Devices
Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101–629)
transferred the provisions of the
Radiation Control for Health and Safety
Act of 1968 (Pub. L. 90–602) from Title
III of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 201 et seq.) to Chapter V,
subchapter C of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
301 et seq.). Under the FD&C Act, FDA
administers an electronic product
radiation control program to protect the
public health and safety. FDA also
develops and administers radiation
safety performance standards for
electronic products, including sunlamp
products.
Current § 1002.1 requires that
sunlamp product manufacturers submit
product reports, supplemental reports,
and annual reports and requires that test
records and distribution records are
maintained, used for summary data
submitted in the annual report, and
made available upon request. In
addition, current § 1002.1 requires UV
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
79514
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
lamp manufacturers to submit product
reports. Proposed § 1002.1 would
require that manufacturers of UV lamps
also submit supplemental reports and
annual reports and maintain test records
and distribution records.
Proposed § 1002.1 would also require
that manufacturers of protective
eyewear maintain test records and
distribution records as well as submit
annual reports, supplemental reports,
and product reports. The eyewear must
meet certain transmittance limits in the
UV and visible wavelength range. Both
manufacturers of sunlamp products that
include eyewear with their products
and manufacturers of protective
eyewear that is sold separately would be
responsible for maintaining records of
the results yielded by the testing and
reporting these results to FDA. (See
§ 1002.1.) There are no operating and
maintenance costs associated with
testing the eyewear because this
requirement reflects current market
practices.
Proposed § 1040.20(d)(2)(ii) would
require that the UV lamp labeling
include a replacement lamp code
instead of a list of compatible
replacement lamps. Although the single
UV lamp manufacturer in the United
States is already required to conduct
spectral irradiance testing of lamps in
order to demonstrate compatibility with
other model lamps (whether made by
that company or other manufacturers),
proposed § 1040.20(d)(2)(ii) would
require testing in accordance with test
methods as specified in IEC 61228, Ed.
2.0, ‘‘Fluorescent Ultraviolet Lamps
Used for Tanning—Measurement and
Specification Method.’’ The spectral
irradiance data obtained is used to
calculate the UV code that would be
required to be printed on the lamp by
proposed § 1040.20(d)(2)(ii).
Manufacturers would be responsible for
maintaining and reporting records of the
results yielded by the testing as well as
imprinting the lamp with the
replacement lamp code.
Proposed § 1040.20(d)(2)(iii) would
require that each UV lamp have a label
containing the model identification of
the lamp, if applicable. Manufacturers
would be responsible for printing the
model number on the lamp itself.
Proposed § 1040.20(d)(3)(iii) would
permit the manufacturer of the sunlamp
product or UV lamp to submit a request
to the Director, Office of In Vitro
Diagnostics and Radiological Health,
Center for Devices and Radiological
Health for an approval of alternate
labeling if the size, configuration,
design, or function of the sunlamp
product or UV lamp would preclude
compliance with the requirements for
any required label or would render the
required wording of such label
inappropriate or ineffective. In these
circumstances, manufacturers would be
responsible for reporting the request to
FDA. The operating and maintenance
costs associated with this provision are
based on correspondence costs (postage)
for non-email communications.
Proposed § 1040.20(d)(3)(iv) would
permit manufacturers of UV lamps to
permanently affix or inscribe the tags or
labels required by §§ 1010.2(b) and
1010.3(a) on the lamp packaging
associated with the UV lamps, rather
than the UV lamps themselves. The
third party disclosure burden of this
provision would be the time it takes to
inscribe the label or tag on the UV lamp
packaging.
Proposed § 1040.20(e)(1)(v) would
require instructions for sunlamp
‘‘assembly, operation, and
maintenance,’’ and would include a
schedule of maintenance. This
information would also protect those
maintaining and assembling sunlamp
products from inadvertent exposure to
UV radiation by providing adequate
instructions to avoid UV exposure
during assembly or maintenance. We
presume that the maintenance
schedules would be developed from
known information about how to
properly maintain these devices. The
third party disclosure burden of this
provision would be the time spent
bringing this known information into a
user-friendly format and disclosing it to
users. We also assume that this
information would be identical for all
units of a given model of sunlamp
products.
Proposed § 1040.20(g) would require
that those who change the function or
performance characteristics of a
sunlamp are manufacturers and would
need to recertify and re-identify the
device. This requirement applies only if
the modification affects any aspect of
the product’s performance or intended
function(s) for which § 1040.20 has an
applicable requirement. We believe
some sunlamp owners (e.g., tanning
facility owners) view such
modifications as a less expensive
alternative to purchasing a new
sunlamp product. We believe some
owners, otherwise inclined to alter their
sunlamp’s performance characteristics,
would be deterred from doing so by our
proposal because recertification would
cost a tanning facility owner more than
$30,000 in operating and maintenance
costs since tanning facility owners do
not typically have the equipment
necessary to recertify sunlamp products.
However, if a tanning facility owner
chooses to recertify the sunlamp
product, documentation must be
submitted to FDA.
Description of Respondents:
Respondents for these information
collections are manufacturers of
sunlamp products and UV lamps
intended for use in sunlamp products,
and manufacturers of protective
eyewear that is intended to be used with
sunlamp products.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Number of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
21 CFR section
Total annual
responses
Total hours
Average
burden per
response
Capital and
operating and
maintenance
costs
1002.1(b)—Lamp only ..........................
1002.1(b)—Protective eyewear ............
1040.20(d)(2)(ii) ....................................
1040.20(d)(3)(iii) ....................................
1040.20(g) .............................................
1
5
1
1
1
9
4
1
1
1
9
20
1
1
1
2
0.5
1
.17
8
18 .....................
10 .....................
1 .......................
.17 (10 minutes)
8 .......................
........................
........................
........................
........................
$43,000
Total ...............................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
37 .....................
$43,000
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
79515
TABLE 3—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN
Number of
recordkeepers
21 CFR section
Number of
records per
recordkeeper
Total annual
records
Average
burden per
recordkeeping
Total hours
Capital and
operating and
maintenance
costs
1002.1(b)—Lamp only ..........................
1002.1(b)—Protective eyewear ............
1040.20(d)(2)(ii) ....................................
1
5
1
2
3
75
2
15
75
2.5
7
0.8
5.
105.
60 .....................
$30,000
Total ...............................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
170 ...................
$30,000
TABLE 4—ESTIMATED ANNUAL THIRD PARTY DISCLOSURE BURDEN 1
Number of
disclosures
per
respondent
Number of
respondents
21 CFR section
Total annual
disclosures
Average
burden per
disclosure
Total hours
1040.20(d)(1)(vi) ..................................................................
1040.20(d)(2)(ii) ...................................................................
1040.20(d)(2)(iii) ...................................................................
1040.20(d)(3)(ii) ...................................................................
1040.20(d)(3)(iv) ..................................................................
1040.20(e)(1)(v) ...................................................................
5
1
1
1
1
5
5,200
286,000
286,000
286,000
23,833
10
26,000
286,000
286,000
286,000
23,833
50
.0034
.0017
.0017
.0017
.0017
12
88
486
486
486
41
600
Total ..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
2,187
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Reporting Burden
For § 1002.1(b)—Lamp only, we
estimate the single U.S.-based
manufacturer of UV lamps would need
to submit 2 new types of reports
(supplemental reports and an annual
report) for the 75 models. Based on
previous submissions, we estimate that
nine supplemental reports would be
submitted per year. Annual reports are
submitted once per year. We estimate
that it takes approximately 2 hours to
complete each report for a total of 18
burden hours.
For § 1002.1(b)—Protective eyewear,
we estimate that the five respondents
would need to report the information
annually and that each of the
manufacturers produces two models of
protective eyewear. Manufacturers are
not required to produce two types of
eyewear; however, FDA estimates that
each of the five respondents produces
two types of eyewear that could be
made available with sunlamp products.
Manufacturers would fill out and
submit the annual, supplemental, and
product reports demonstrating
conformance to the performance
standard, and this process is estimated
to take 30 minutes per report for a total
of 10 hours.
For § 1040.20(d)(2)(ii), we estimate
that the single U.S.-based manufacturer
of UV lamps would test 75 UV lamps
and that the time needed to incorporate
the data into the product report is 1
hour.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
For § 1040.20(d)(3)(iii), we estimate
that one sunlamp product and UV lamp
manufacturer would submit a request
for alternate labeling approval to FDA.
This task is expected to be performed by
clerical staff that prepare the request
and submit it to FDA. This process is
expected to take 10 minutes (.17 hours)
to type the request and email it. The
request is expected to be submitted
electronically and does not involve any
operating and maintenance cost.
For § 1040.20(g), we estimate that, at
most, one respondent per year would
decide to re-certify a sunlamp product
with the Agency, instead of the less
expensive alternative of purchasing a
new sunlamp product. The $43,000
capital costs for recertifying the
sunlamp product includes the required
instrumentation and calibration light
sources such as a double-grating
spectroradiometer with integrating
sphere and software. We estimate the
time needed to make the necessary
spectral measurements and compile
them into a report that would be sent to
FDA to take 8 hours.
B. Recordkeeping Burden
For § 1002.1(b)—Lamp only, we
estimate the single U.S.-based
manufacturer of UV lamps would need
to maintain 2 types of records (test
records and distribution records) for
each of the 75 models and that it takes
approximately 2 minutes per model per
record for a total of 300 minutes, or 5
burden hours.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
For § 1002.1(b)—Protective eyewear,
we estimate that there are five U.S.
manufacturers of protective eyewear
that would be affected by this
amendment. However, this number is
uncertain and we welcome comment on
this issue. We estimate that each of the
manufacturers produces 2 models of
protective eyewear and the
manufacturer would sample
approximately 10 units per model. The
time required to perform the necessary
testing, including time to verify the
instrument, set up the test and prepare
and file a report takes approximately 7
hours per model. Protective eyewear
manufacturers would also be required to
maintain distribution records for their
products. We estimate that 7 hours per
year would be necessary for the
manufacturer to log and file the
distribution data. We estimate a total of
105 hours for each manufacturer to
maintain the single distribution record
for both models of protective eyewear as
well as perform the testing for the
individual test records that are to be
maintained for each model of protective
eyewear.
For § 1040.20(d)(2)(ii), we expect that
the single U.S.-based lamp manufacturer
does not use IEC UV codes and would
have to test and label its models under
the proposed rule. The manufacturer
has an estimated 30 to 120 models and
we chose the mean number of models
(75) for our calculations. The mean cost
of testing each model is $350 and the
cost for an ink stamp is $50 per model,
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
79516
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
yielding an approximate $30,000 in
operating and maintenance cost for
§ 1040.20(d)(2)(ii). Manufacturers are
already performing similar spectral
irradiance testing to determine lamp
compatibility. We estimate that it would
take 0.8 hours per model to modify the
test setup to measure spectral irradiance
in order to determine the UV code as
well as file the results, for a total of 60
hours. We estimate that the single U.S.based lamp manufacturer is already
maintaining records of these tests, so
there should be no additional cost
associated with proposed § 1002.1 that
requires lamp manufacturers now also
to maintain test records, although FDA
is seeking comment on this
understanding.
C. Third Party Disclosure Burden
For § 1040.20(d)(1)(vi), we estimate
that the five respondents would need to
list the code range that can be used in
each of the 5,200 sunlamp products
produced annually. We estimate 2
minutes to print and affix this label on
each the 26,000 sunlamp products, for
a total of 88 hours.
For § 1040.20(d)(2)(ii), the single U.S.based lamp manufacturer would need to
inscribe the UV lamp equivalency code
onto each lamp. We estimate it would
take 1 minute to ink stamp 10 lamps
with the new UV lamp equivalency
code. The operating and maintenance
costs for this information collection are
subsumed in the recordkeeping burden
estimate for § 1040.20(d)(2)(ii). The
lamp manufacturer produces 286,000
new lamps per year so this process is
expected to take approximately 28,600
minutes per year, or about 486 hours.
For § 1040.20(d)(2)(iii), the single
U.S.-based lamp manufacturer would
need to inscribe the model
identification onto each lamp. We
estimate it would take 1 minute to ink
stamp ten lamps with the model
identifier. The operating and
maintenance costs for this information
collection are subsumed in the
recordkeeping burden estimate for
§ 1040.20(d)(2)(ii). The lamp
manufacturer produces 286,000 new
lamps per year so this process is
expected to take approximately 28,600
minutes per year, or about 486 hours.
For § 1040.20(d)(3)(iv), we estimate
that the single U.S.-based lamp
manufacturer would permanently affix
or inscribe the tags or labels required by
§§ 1010.2(b) and 1010.3(a) on the
packaging of all the UV lamps rather
than the lamps themselves. Since lamps
are typically packaged and sold in cases
of 12, this yields 23,833 packages that
must bear the third party disclosure
required by § 1040.20(d)(3)(iv). We
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
estimate it would take 1 minute to ink
stamp 10 lamp packages with the tags or
labels required by §§ 1010.2(b) and
1010.3(a) for a total of 41 hours.
For § 1040.20(d)(3)(ii), the single U.S.based lamp manufacturer would need to
inscribe or affix the UV lamp
equivalency code on the packaging of
each lamp. We estimate it would take 1
minute to ink stamp 10 lamp packages
with the new UV lamp equivalency
code. The lamp manufacturer produces
286,000 new lamps per year so this
process is expected to take 28,600
minutes per year, or about 486 hours.
For § 1040.20(e)(1)(v), we estimate the
5 respondents would need to go through
this reporting exercise once for each of
their 10 models of sunlamp products.
We estimate that 10 hours of a
technician’s time would be required to
collect all the necessary information
regarding maintenance and assembly
and 2 hours of a manager’s time to
review this information once it is reformatted into the user instructions.
Thus, we estimate a total of 12 hours per
model of sunlamp product would be
required for a total of 600 hours. This
would be a one-time cost.
This proposed rule also refers to
previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations.
These collections of information are
subject to review by OMB under the
PRA. The collections of information
found in proposed § 1040.20(d)(1)(ii);
(d)(1)(iii); (d)(1)(iv), 1st sentence;
(d)(1)(v); (e)(1)(i) to (e)(1)(iv); (e)(2)(i),
and (e)(2)(ii) have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0025
(expires January 1, 2017); the collections
of information found in
§ 1040.20(d)(3)(v) have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0485
(expires February 28, 2015).
In addition, FDA concludes that
proposed § 1040.20(d)(1)(i); (d)(1)(iv),
2nd and 3rd sentences; (d)(2)(i);
(d)(2)(iv); (d)(3)(i); and (e)(3) do not
constitute ‘‘collection[s] of information’’
under the PRA. Rather, the labeling
statements are ‘‘public disclosure[s] of
information originally supplied by the
Federal government to the recipient for
the purpose of disclosure to the public.’’
(5 CFR 1320.3(c)(2).)
To ensure that comments on
information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB (see ADDRESSES). All comments
should be identified with the title
‘‘Sunlamp Products; Proposed
Amendment to § 1002.1 (Record and
Reporting Requirements) and § 1040.20
(Performance Standard).’’
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
In compliance with the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3407(d)), the Agency has
submitted the information collection
provisions of this proposed rule to OMB
for review. These requirements will not
be effective until FDA obtains OMB
approval. FDA will publish a notice
concerning OMB approval of these
requirements in the Federal Register.
IX. Incorporation by Reference
FDA is proposing to incorporate by
reference certain portions of the IEC
International Standards 60335–2–27,
Ed. 5.0: 2009–12 entitled ‘‘Household
and Similar Electrical Appliances—
Safety—Part 2–27: Particular
Requirements for Appliances for Skin
Exposure to Ultraviolet and Infrared
Radiation’’; and 61228, Ed. 2.0,
‘‘Fluorescent Ultraviolet Lamps Used for
Tanning—Measurement and
Specification Method.’’ You may
purchase a copy of these materials from
the International Electrotechnical
Commission (EC Central Office), 3 rue
de Varembe, CH–1211 Geneva 20,
Switzerland, call +41 22–919–02–11,
https://webstore.iec.ch/. FDA is also
proposing to incorporate by reference
the American National Standard
C81.10–1976, entitled ‘‘Specifications
for Electric Lamp Bases and Holders—
Screw-Shell Types.’’ You may purchase
a copy of the material from the
American National Standards Institute,
1889 L St. NW., 11th Floor, Washington,
DC 20036, call 202–293–8020,
www.ansi.org.
The IEC 60335 standard describes
technical specifications that address the
safety of electrical appliances that
incorporate emitters for exposing the
skin to UV and infrared radiation,
including those found in tanning salons
or other facilities. The IEC 61228
standard describes the method to
measure, evaluate, and specify the
characteristics of fluorescent UV lamps
that are used in appliances for tanning
purposes. The ANSI standard describes
technical specifications that will help
ensure only appropriate bulbs can be
fitted to the appliance.
X. Comments
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding this
document to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES).
FDA is explicitly seeking comment on
how the proposed requirements would
impact small entities.
Comments on the following two
proposals listed are of special interest to
FDA:
1. The Use of the Limit on UVC
Irradiance of 0.03 W/cm2 in IEC 60335–
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
79517
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
2–27, Ed. 4.2: 2007–4 Instead of the
Limit of 0.003 W/cm2 in IEC 60335–2–
27, Ed. 5.0: 2009–12.
2. The Use of a Limit of 500 J/m2 on
the Maximum Dose Used to Calculate
the Maximum Timer Limit, Instead of
the 600 J/m2 Limit in IEC 60335–2–27,
Ed. 5.0: 2009–12.
XI. References
The following references are on
display in the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) and are
available for viewing by interested
persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday; they are also
available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov. FDA has verified
the Web site addresses, as of the date
this document publishes in the Federal
Register, but Web sites are subject to
change over time.
1. Boniol, M., P. Autier, P. Boyle, and S.
Gandini, ‘‘Cutaneous Melanoma
Attributable to Sunbed Use: Systematic
Review and Meta-analysis,’’ British
Medical Journal, 345:e8503, December
2012.
2. FDA, Policy on Warning Label Required on
Sunlamp Products, Department of Health
and Human Services, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Rockville, MD,
June 25, 1985, https://www.fda.gov/
downloads/MedicalDevices/Device
RegulationandGuidance/Guidance
Documents/UCM095333.pdf.
3. FDA, Policy on Maximum Timer Intervals
and Exposure Schedule for Sunlamps,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Rockville, MD,
August 21, 1986, https://www.fda.gov/
downloads/Radiation-EmittingProducts/
RadiationEmittingProductsand
Procedures/HomeBusinessand
Entertainment/UCM192707.pdf.
4. FDA, Policy on Lamp Compatibility,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Rockville, MD,
September 2, 1986, https://www.fda.gov/
downloads/MedicalDevices/Device
RegulationandGuidance/Guidance
Documents/UCM095325.pdf.
5. IEC 61228, Ed. 2.0, ‘‘Fluorescent
Ultraviolet Lamps Used for Tanning—
Measurement and Specification
Method,’’ IEC, Geneva, Switzerland.
6. IEC 60335–2–27, Ed. 5.0, ‘‘Household and
Similar Electrical Appliances—Safety—
Part 2–27: Particular Requirements for
Appliances for Skin Exposure to
Ultraviolet and Infrared Radiation,’’ IEC,
Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
7. FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff,
‘‘Laser Products—Conformance With IEC
60825–1 and IEC 60601–2–22 (Laser
Notice No. 50),’’ June 24, 2007, available
at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/
MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationand
Guidance/GuidanceDocuments/
ucm094366.pdf.
8. CIE S 007/E–1998/ISO 17166: 1999(E)
Erythemal Reference Action Spectrum
and Standard Erythema Dose, CIE
Vienna, Austria.
9. ‘‘Sunscreen Drug Products for Over-theCounter Human Use; Final Monograph,’’
FDA, Department of Health and Human
Services, 64 FR 27666, May 21, 1999.
10. Dowdy, J.C. and R.M. Sayre, ‘‘Comparison
of IEC and U.S. FDA Sunlamp Standards:
Critical Discrepancies in Exposure
Timers and Annual Exposure Limits,’’
Proceedings of the CIE Symposium 2004
on Light and Health: Non-Visual Effects,
Vienna, Austria, pp. 183–188.
11. Vajdic, C.M., A. Kricker, M. Giblin, et al,
‘‘Sun Exposure Predicts Risk of Ocular
Melanoma in Australia,’’ International
Journal of Cancer, 101(2): 175–182,
September 2002.
12. FDA, ‘‘Report to Congress: Labeling
Information on the Relationship Between
the Use of Indoor Tanning Devices and
Development of Skin Cancer or Other
Skin Damage,’’ submitted December
2008, available at https://www.fda.gov/
MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationand
Guidance/Overview/MedicalDeviceUser
FeeandModernizationActMDUFMA/
ucm109288.htm.
13. Fitzpatrick, T.B., ‘‘The Validity and
Practicality of Sun-Reactive Skin Type I
Through VI,’’ Archives of Dermatology,
124: 869–871, 1988.
14. Pathak, M.A. and D.L. Fanselow,
‘‘Photobiology of Melanin Pigmentation:
Dose/Response of Skin to Sunlight and
its Contents,’’ Journal of the American
Academy of Dermatology, 9: 724–733,
1983.
15. Miller, S.A., S.G. Coelho, S.W. Miller, et
al., ‘‘Evidence for a New Paradigm for
UV Exposure: A Universal Schedule
That is Skin Phototype-Independent,’’
Photoderm Photoimm Photomed, 28:
187–195, 2012.
16. https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/Reports
ManualsForms/Reports/Economic
Analyses/default.htm.
List of Subjects
21 CFR Part 1002
Electronic products, Radiation
protection, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
21 CFR Part 1040
Electronic products, Incorporation by
reference, Labeling, Lasers, Medical
devices, Radiation protection, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, it is proposed that
21 CFR parts 1002 and 1040 be
amended as follows:
PART 1002—RECORDS AND
REPORTS
1. The authority citation for part 1002
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 352, 360, 360i, 360j,
360hh–360ss, 371, 374, 393.
2. Section 1002.1 is amended by
revising Table 1 to read as follows:
■
§ 1002.1
*
*
Applicability.
*
*
*
TABLE 1—RECORD AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS BY PRODUCT
Manufacturer
Product
reports
§ 1002.10
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Products
DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY 3
(§§ 1020.30, 1020.31, 1020.32,
and 1020.33):
Computed tomography .........
X-ray system 4 ......................
Tube housing assembly .......
X-ray control .........................
X-ray high voltage generator
X-ray table or cradle .............
X-ray film changer ................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Dealer and
distributor
Supplemental
reports
§ 1002.11
Abbreviated
reports
§ 1002.12
Annual
reports
§ 1002.13
Test records
§ 1002.30(a) 1
Distribution
records
§ 1002.30(b) 2
Distribution
records
§§ 1002.40
and 1002.41
X
X
X
X
X
....................
....................
X
X
X
X
X
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
......................
......................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
X
X
X
79518
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—RECORD AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS BY PRODUCT—Continued
Manufacturer
Product
reports
§ 1002.10
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Products
Vertical cassette holders
mounted in a fixed location
and cassette holders with
front panels .......................
Beam-limiting devices ...........
Spot-film devices and image
intensifiers manufactured
after April 26, 1977 ...........
Cephalometric devices manufactured after February
25, 1978 ............................
Image receptor support devices for mammographic
X-ray systems manufactured after September 5,
1978 ..................................
CABINET X RAY (§ 1020.40):
Baggage inspection ..............
Other .....................................
PRODUCTS
INTENDED
TO
PRODUCE
PARTICULATE
RADIATION
OR
X-RAYS
OTHER THAN DIAGNOSTIC
OR CABINET DIAGNOSTIC XRAY:
Medical .................................
Analytical ..............................
Industrial ...............................
TELEVISION
PRODUCTS
(§ 1020.10):
<25 kilovolt (kV) and <0.1
milliroentgen
per
hour
(mR/hr IRLC 5 6 ..................
≥25kV and <0.1mR/hr IRLC 5
≥0.1mR/hr IRLC 5 .................
MICROWAVE/RF:
MW ovens (§ 1030.10) .........
MW diathermy ......................
MW heating, drying, security
systems .............................
RF sealers, electromagnetic
induction
and
heating
equipment, dielectric heaters (2–500 megahertz) .....
OPTICAL:
Phototherapy products .........
Laser products (§§ 1040.10
and 1040.11) .....................
Class I lasers and products
containing such lasers 7 ....
Class I laser products containing class IIa, II, IIIa, lasers 7 .................................
Class IIa, II, IIIa lasers and
products other than class I
products containing such
lasers 7 ..............................
Class IIIb and IV lasers and
products containing such
lasers 7 ..............................
Sunlamp
products
(§ 1040.20).
Lamps only ...........................
Sunlamp products ................
Protective eyewear ...............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Dealer and
distributor
Supplemental
reports
§ 1002.11
Abbreviated
reports
§ 1002.12
Annual
reports
§ 1002.13
Test records
§ 1002.30(a) 1
Distribution
records
§ 1002.30(b) 2
Distribution
records
§§ 1002.40
and 1002.41
....................
X
......................
X
X
......................
......................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
......................
X
X
X
X
....................
......................
X
......................
X
X
......................
....................
......................
X
......................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
......................
......................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
......................
....................
....................
....................
......................
......................
......................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
......................
......................
......................
....................
X
X
......................
X
X
X
......................
......................
X6
X
X
......................
......................
X
......................
......................
X
......................
......................
......................
X
....................
X
......................
......................
X
X
......................
X
......................
X
......................
......................
......................
....................
......................
X
......................
......................
......................
......................
....................
......................
X
......................
......................
......................
......................
X
X
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
....................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
X
......................
......................
X
X
......................
......................
X
......................
......................
X
X
X
......................
X
X
......................
X
X
X
X
X
X
......................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
......................
......................
......................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
......................
X
......................
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
79519
TABLE 1—RECORD AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS BY PRODUCT—Continued
Manufacturer
Dealer and
distributor
Product
reports
§ 1002.10
Products
Mercury
vapor
lamps
(§ 1040.30) ........................
T lamps .................................
R lamps ................................
ACOUSTIC:
Ultrasonic
therapy
(§ 1050.10) ........................
Diagnostic ultrasound ...........
Medical ultrasound other
than therapy or diagnostic
Nonmedical ultrasound .........
Supplemental
reports
§ 1002.11
Abbreviated
reports
§ 1002.12
Annual
reports
§ 1002.13
Test records
§ 1002.30(a) 1
Distribution
records
§ 1002.30(b) 2
Distribution
records
§§ 1002.40
and 1002.41
....................
X
....................
......................
X
......................
......................
......................
X
......................
X
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
X
....................
X
......................
......................
X
X
......................
X
......................
X
......................
X
......................
X
....................
X
......................
......................
X
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
1 However,
authority to inspect all appropriate documents supporting the adequacy of a manufacturer’s compliance testing program is retained.
requirement includes §§ 1002.31 and 1002.42, if applicable.
of Assembly (Form FDA 2579) is required for diagnostic x-ray components; see § 1020.30(d)(1) through (d)(3).
4 Systems records and reports are required if a manufacturer exercises the option and certifies the system as permitted in § 1020.30(c).
5 Determined using the isoexposure rate limit curve (IRLC) under phase III test conditions (§ 1020.10(c)(3)(iii)).
6 Annual report is for production status information only.
7 Determination of the applicable reporting category for a laser product hall be based on the worst-case hazard present within the laser
product.
2 The
3 Report
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 1040 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 352, 360, 360e–
360j, 360hh–360ss, 371, 381, 393.
2. Section 1040.20 is revised to read
as follows:
■
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1040.20 Sunlamp products and
ultraviolet lamps intended for use in
sunlamp products.
(a) Applicability. The provisions of
this section, as amended, are applicable
as specified to all sunlamp products and
ultraviolet lamps intended for use in
sunlamp products not later than [A
DATE WILL BE ADDED 1 YEAR AFTER
DATE OF PUBLICATION OF A FUTURE
FINAL RULE IN THE Federal Register].
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, the following definitions apply:
Exposure position means any
position, distance, orientation, or
location relative to the radiating
surfaces of the sunlamp product at
which the user is intended to be
exposed to ultraviolet radiation from the
sunlamp product, as recommended by
the manufacturer.
Irradiance means the radiant power
incident on a surface at a specified
location and orientation relative to the
radiating surface divided by the area of
the surface, as the area becomes
vanishingly small, expressed in units of
watts per square centimeter (W/cm2).
Maximum exposure time (Te) means
the greatest continuous exposure time
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
interval recommended by the
manufacturer of the sunlamp product.
Maximum timer interval means the
greatest time interval setting on the
timer of a sunlamp product.
Protective eyewear or protective
goggles means any device designed to be
worn by users of a sunlamp product to
reduce exposure of the eyes to radiation
emitted by the product.
Spectral irradiance (El) means the
irradiance resulting from radiation
within a wavelength range divided by
the wavelength range as the range
becomes vanishingly small, expressed
in units of watts per square centimeter
per nanometer (W/(cm2/nm)).
Spectral transmittance (Tl) means the
spectral irradiance transmitted through
protective eyewear divided by the
spectral irradiance incident on the
protective eyewear.
Sunlamp product means any device
designed to incorporate one or more
ultraviolet lamps intended for
irradiation of any part of the living
human body, by ultraviolet radiation
with wavelengths in air between 200
and 400 nanometers, to induce skin
tanning. This definition includes
tanning beds and tanning booths.
Tanning course means a consecutive
series of tanning exposures until a tan
is developed, usually spanning a period
of 3 to 4 weeks.
Timer means any device incorporated
into a sunlamp product that terminates
radiation emission after a preset time
interval.
Ultraviolet lamp means any lamp that
produces ultraviolet radiation in the
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
wavelength interval of 200 to 400
nanometers in air and that is intended
for use in any sunlamp product.
(c) Performance requirements—(1)
UVC (200–290 nm) irradiance. The total
irradiance emitted by a sunlamp
product in the wavelength range
between 200 and 290 nm (UVC) shall
not exceed 0.03 W/m2. UVC irradiance
shall be measured at the shortest
exposure distance recommended by the
manufacturer, as required to be
provided on the label of the sunlamp
product by paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this
section. UVC irradiance shall be
calculated using the following formula:
Where:
E is the total irradiance over the wavelength
range of interest
El is the spectral irradiance in W/(m2-nm)
Dl is the wavelength interval (nm).
The wavelength interval shall be 1 nm or
less.
(2) Timer system. (i) Each sunlamp
product shall incorporate a timer system
with multiple timer settings adequate
for the recommended exposure time
intervals for different exposure
positions and expected results of the
products as specified in the label
information required by paragraph (e) of
this section.
(ii) The maximum timer interval may
not exceed the manufacturer’s
recommended maximum exposure time
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
EP22DE15.001
PART 1040—PERFORMANCE
STANDARDS FOR LIGHT-EMITTING
PRODUCTS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Where:
Sl is the erythema action spectrum in figure
103 of IEC 60335–2–27, Ed. 5.0
El is the spectral irradiance in W/(m2-nm)
Dl is the wavelength interval (nm).
The wavelength interval shall be 1 nm or
less.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(iii) No timer interval may have an
error greater than 10 percent of the
maximum timer interval of the sunlamp
product.
(iv) The timer may not automatically
reset and cause radiation emission to
resume for a period greater than the
(ii) Exposure position(s) that may be
expressed either in terms of a distance
specified both in meters and in feet (or
in inches) or through the use of
markings or other means to indicate
clearly the recommended exposure
position.
(iii) Directions for achieving the
recommended exposure position(s) and
a warning that the use of other positions
may result in overexposure.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
unused portion of the timer cycle, when
emission from the sunlamp product has
been prematurely terminated.
(3) Control for termination of
radiation emission. Each sunlamp
product shall incorporate a control on
the product to enable the person being
exposed to manually terminate radiation
emission from the product at any time
without disconnecting the electrical
plug or removing the ultraviolet lamp.
This control shall be easily accessible to
the user and be readily identified by
touch and sight.
(4) Protective eyewear. (i) Each
sunlamp product shall be accompanied
by the number of sets of protective
eyewear that is equal to the maximum
number of persons that the instructions
provided under paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of
this section recommend to be exposed
simultaneously to radiation from such
product.
(ii) The spectral transmittance to the
eye of all protective eyewear intended to
be used with the sunlamp product shall
not exceed a value of 0.001 over the
wavelength range of greater than 200 nm
through 320 nm, shall not exceed a
value of 0.01 over the wavelength range
of greater than 320 nm through 400 nm,
and shall not exceed a value of 0.05 over
the wavelength range of greater than 400
nm through 550 nm. In order to ensure
adequate visibility through the
protective eyewear, the luminous
transmittance shall not be less than 1.0
percent. Spectral transmittance and
luminous transmittance must be
measured in accordance with clause
32.102 of IEC 60335–2–27, Ed. 5.0,
which is incorporated by reference.
(5) Compatibility of lamps. An
ultraviolet lamp shall not be capable of
insertion and operation in either the
‘‘single-contact medium screw’’ or the
‘‘double-contact medium screw’’
lampholders described in C81.10–1976,
which is incorporated by reference.
(d) Label requirements. In addition to
the labeling requirements in part 801 of
this chapter and the certification and
identification requirements of §§ 1010.2
and 1010.3 of this chapter, each
sunlamp product and ultraviolet lamp is
subject to the labeling requirements
prescribed in this paragraph and
paragraph (e) of this section.
(1) Labels for sunlamp products. Each
sunlamp product shall have labels
which contain:
(i) A warning statement with the
following language and format:
(iv) The manufacturer’s recommended
exposure schedule, including maximum
exposure times per session, and overall
maximum exposure time, in minutes,
and spacing of sequential exposures.
This schedule, with the following
exceptions, must be developed in
accordance with Annex DD of IEC
60335–2–27, Ed. 5.0, which is
incorporated by reference.:
(A) The maximum single dose (which
corresponds to the maximum timer
interval at 1040.20(c)(2)(ii)) is 500 J/m2
(not 600 J/m2 as stated in Annex DD).
(B) Information regarding the
maximum number of exposures per year
must be based on a maximum yearly
dose of 15 kJ/m2, weighted according to
the erythema action spectrum shown in
figure 103 of IEC 60335–2–27, Ed. 5.0.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
EP22DE15.003
(Te) that is indicated on the label, as
required by paragraph (d)(1)(iv) of this
section. In addition, the maximum timer
interval shall not result in a
biologically-effective dose that exceeds
500 J/m2, weighted with the erythema
action spectrum provided in figure 103
of IEC 60335–2–27, Ed. 5.0, which is
incorporated by reference. The
manufacturer’s recommended maximum
exposure time (Te) shall be determined
using the following formula:
EP22DE15.002
79520
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(C) The exposure schedule must also
include the following warning: ‘‘Skin
Type I individuals (always burns, never
tans) should never use sunlamp
products.’’ The exposure schedule must
also include the statement: ‘‘Maximum
sessions per week = 2.’’
(D) Example schedule. For a sunlamp
product whose maximum exposure time
(Te) = 20 minutes, the following table
79521
provides an example of what the
exposure schedule might look like
where a single tanning course covers a
4-week period:
Manufacturer-Recommended Exposure Schedule
Maximum exposure time must not exceed 20 minutes
Session #
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
16
20
20
Minutes (maximum) per session
4
6
8
10
13
Minimum time between exposures = 48 hours
Maximum sessions per week = 2 Maximum tanning courses per year = 6
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Skin Type I individuals (always burns, never tans) should never use sunlamp products
(v) A statement indicating the time it
may take before the expected results
appear.
(vi) The designation of the ultraviolet
lamp equivalency code range to be used
in the sunlamp product as defined in
Clause 22.111 and Annex CC of IEC
60335–2–27, Ed. 5.0, which is
incorporated by reference.
(2) Labels for ultraviolet lamps. Each
ultraviolet lamp shall have a label
which contains:
(i) The warning: ‘‘Sunlamp—
DANGER—Ultraviolet radiation. Follow
instructions.’’
(ii) The UV lamp equivalency code as
defined in Annex CC of IEC 60335–2–
27, Ed. 5.0, which is incorporated by
reference. The availability of this
incorporation by reference is given in
paragraph (i) of this section. In
determining the ‘‘UV code’’ component
of the UV lamp equivalency code,
output must be measured in accordance
with IEC 61228, Ed. 2.0 (iii) The model
identification, if applicable.
(iv) The words ‘‘Use ONLY in fixture
equipped with a timer.’’
(3) Label specifications. (i) The labels
prescribed in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section for sunlamp products shall be
permanently affixed or inscribed on the
product when fully assembled for use so
as to be legible and readily accessible to
view by the person who will be exposed
immediately before the use of the
product. The labels shall be of sufficient
durability to remain legible throughout
the expected lifetime of the product. To
be legible and readily accessible to
view, the sunlamp product warning
statement required by paragraph (d)(1)(i)
of this section shall comply with the
following:
(A) It shall appear on a prominent
part or panel displayed under normal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
conditions of use so that it is readily
accessible to view whether the tanning
bed canopy (or tanning booth door) is
open or closed when the person who
will be exposed approaches the
equipment;
(B) It shall be physically separate and
visually distinct from the other required
label information;
(C) It shall meet the following font
size and font color requirements: The
lettering in the word ‘‘DANGER’’ shall
be at least 10 millimeters (height), at
least double the height of the other
words in the warning statement, in all
capital letters, and in red or another font
color that is legible and distinct from
the other words in the warning
statement. The lettering in the other
words in the warning statement shall be
at least 5 millimeters (height) and in
lower case or title case.
(ii) The information prescribed in
paragraph (d)(2) of this section for
ultraviolet lamps shall be permanently
affixed or inscribed on the lamp itself so
as to be legible and readily accessible to
view, as well as on the packaging of the
lamp.
(iii) If the size, configuration, design,
or function of the sunlamp product or
ultraviolet lamp would preclude
compliance with the requirements for
any required label or would render the
required wording of such label
inappropriate or ineffective, the
Director, Office of In Vitro Diagnostics
and Radiological Health, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, on the
Director’s own initiative or upon written
application by the manufacturer, may
approve alternate means of providing
such information or alternate wording
for such label, as appropriate.
(iv) In lieu of permanently affixing or
inscribing tags or labels on the
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ultraviolet lamp as required by
§§ 1010.2(b) and 1010.3(a) of this
chapter, the manufacturer of the
ultraviolet lamp may permanently affix
or inscribe such required tags or labels
on the lamp packaging uniquely
associated with the lamp, if the name of
the manufacturer and month and year of
manufacture are permanently affixed or
inscribed on the exterior surface of the
ultraviolet lamp so as to be legible and
readily accessible to view.
(v) A label may contain statements or
illustrations in addition to those
required by this paragraph if the
additional statements are not false or
misleading in any particular, e.g., if they
do not diminish the impact of the
required statements, and are not
prohibited by this chapter.
(e) Informational requirements—User
information. Each manufacturer of a
sunlamp product or ultraviolet lamp
shall provide or cause to be provided to
purchasers and, upon request, to others
at a cost not to exceed the cost of
publication and distribution, adequate
instructions for use to minimize the
potential for injury to the user,
including the following information:
(1) Sunlamp Products. The users’
instructions for a sunlamp product shall
contain:
(i) A reproduction of all the label
information required by paragraph (d)(1)
of this section prominently displayed at
the beginning of the instructions.
(ii) A statement of the maximum
number of people who may be exposed
to the sunlamp product at the same time
and a warning that only that number of
protective eyewear has been provided.
(iii) Instructions for the proper
operation of the sunlamp product
including the function, use, and setting
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
79522
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
of the timer and other controls, and the
use of protective eyewear.
(iv) Instructions for obtaining repairs
and recommended replacement
components and accessories which are
compatible with the sunlamp product,
including compatible protective
eyewear, ultraviolet lamps, timers,
reflectors, and filters, which will, when
installed and used as instructed, result
in continued compliance with the
standard.
(v) Manufacturers of sunlamp
products shall provide as an integral
part of any user instruction or operation
manual that is regularly supplied with
the product, or, if not so supplied, shall
cause to be provided with each sunlamp
product: Adequate instructions for
assembly, operation, and maintenance,
including clear warnings concerning
precautions to avoid possible exposure
to ultraviolet radiation during assembly,
testing, and maintenance, and a
schedule of maintenance necessary to
keep the sunlamp product in
compliance with this section.
(2) Ultraviolet lamps. The users’
instructions for an ultraviolet lamp not
accompanying a sunlamp product shall
contain:
(i) A reproduction of the label
information required in paragraph (d)(2)
of this section, prominently displayed at
the beginning of the instructions.
(ii) A warning that the instructions
accompanying the sunlamp product
must always be followed to avoid or to
minimize potential injury.
(3) Promotional materials.
Manufacturers of sunlamp products
shall provide or cause to be provided in
all catalogs, specification sheets, and
descriptive brochures intended for
consumers in which sunlamp products
are offered for sale, and on all
consumer-directed Web pages on which
sunlamp products are offered for sale, a
legible reproduction (color optional) of
the warning statement required by
paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section.
(f) Test for determination of
compliance. Tests on which
certification under § 1010.2 of this
chapter is based shall account for all
errors and statistical uncertainties in the
process and, wherever applicable, for
changes in radiation emission or
degradation in radiation safety with age
of the sunlamp product. Measurements
for certification purposes shall be made
under those operational conditions,
lamp voltage, current, and position as
recommended by the manufacturer. For
these measurements, the measuring
instrument shall be positioned at the
recommended exposure position and so
oriented as to result in the maximum
detection of the radiation by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
instrument. The performance
requirements for the measuring
instrument specified in IEC 60335–2–
27, Ed. 5.0 Clause 32.101, which is
incorporated by reference, shall apply.
(g) Modification of certified sunlamp
products. The modification of a
sunlamp product, previously certified
under § 1010.2 of this chapter,
constitutes manufacturing under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act if
the modification affects any aspect of
the product’s performance or intended
function(s) for which this section has an
applicable requirement. The person who
performs such modification shall
recertify and re-identify the sunlamp
product in accordance with the
provisions of §§ 1010.2 and 1010.3 of
this chapter.
(h) Medical device classification
regulation. Sunlamp products and
ultraviolet lamps intended for use in
sunlamp products are subject to special
controls and restrictions on sale,
distribution, and use as set forth in
§ 878.4635 of this chapter.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The
standards required in this section are
incorporated by reference into this
section with the approval of the Director
of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. All approved
material is available for inspection at
the Food and Drug Administration,
Division of Dockets Management, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852, and is available from the
following sources. It is also available for
inspection at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.
(1) American National Standards
Institute (ANSI), 1889 L St. NW., 11th
Floor, Washington, DC 20036,
storemanager@ansi.org, www.ansi.org,
202–293–8020.
(i) ANSI C81.10–1976, ‘‘Specifications
for Electric Lamp Bases and Holders—
Screw-Shell Types,’’ dated September
1976.
(ii) [Reserved]
(2) International Electrotechnical
Commission (IEC), EC Central Office, 3
rue de Varembe, CH–1211 Geneva 20,
Switzerland, www.iec.ch, call 41–22–
919–02–11.
(i) IEC 60335–2–27, Ed. 5.0: 2009–12,
‘‘Household and Similar Electrical
Appliances—Safety—Part 2–27:
Particular Requirements for Appliances
for Skin Exposure to Ultraviolet and
Infrared Radiation,’’ dated December
2009.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(ii) IEC 61228, Ed. 2.0, ‘‘Fluorescent
Ultraviolet Lamps Used for Tanning—
Measurement and Specification
Method,’’ dated January 2008.
Dated: December 16, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–32023 Filed 12–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 655
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA–2015–0028]
National Standards for Traffic Control
Devices; the Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices for Streets and
Highways; Request for Comment
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Request for Comments (RFC).
AGENCY:
The Manual on Uniform
Traffic Control Devices for Streets and
Highways (MUTCD) is incorporated in
our regulations, approved by FHWA,
and recognized as the national standard
for traffic control devices used on all
streets, highways, bikeways, and private
roads open to public travel. This
document asks for responses to a series
of questions regarding the future
direction of the MUTCD. Specific topic
areas include target audience/intended
user, content and organization, process
for introducing new traffic control
devices, and frequency of MUTCD
editions.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before February 18, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Mail or hand deliver
comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Dockets Management
Facility, Room W12–140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590, or fax comments to (202) 493–
2251. Alternatively, comments may be
submitted to the Federal eRulemaking
portal at https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments must include the docket
number that appears in the heading of
this document. All comments received
will be available for examination and
copying at the above address from 9
a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. Those
desiring notification of receipt of
comments must include a selfaddressed, stamped postcard or you
may print the acknowledgment page
that appears after submitting comments
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 245 (Tuesday, December 22, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 79505-79522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-32023]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 1002 and 1040
[Docket No. FDA-1998-N-0880 (Formerly 1998N-1170)]
RIN 0910-AG30
Sunlamp Products; Proposed Amendment to Performance Standard
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is proposing
to amend the performance standard for sunlamp products and ultraviolet
(UV) lamps intended for use in these products. This standard was last
amended in 1985. The current amendments seek to improve consumer safety
by requiring more effective communication regarding the risks posed by
these products. They also would reduce risks to consumers by updating
technical requirements to reflect current science, and by adopting and
incorporating by reference certain elements from the International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) International Standard 60335-2-27,
Ed. 5.0: 2009-12.
DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the proposed
rule by March 21, 2016. Submit comments on information collection
issues under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 by January 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-1998-N-0880 for ``Sunlamp Products; Proposed Amendment to
Performance Standard.'' Received comments will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit comments on information collection issues to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in the following ways:
Fax to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX: 202-395-7285, or email to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All comments should be identified with the
title, ``Sunlamp Products; Proposed Amendment to Performance
Standard.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon Miller, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4234, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-2471.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary
Purpose of the Regulatory Action
The Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-629), enacted on
November 28, 1990, transferred the provisions of the Radiation Control
for Health and Safety Act of 1968 (Pub. L. 90-602) from Title III of
the Public Health Service Act to Chapter V, subchapter C of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360hh et seq.).
Under these provisions, FDA administers an electronic product
[[Page 79506]]
radiation control program to protect the public health and safety. This
authority provides for developing, amending, and administering
radiation safety performance standards for electronic products,
including sunlamp products.
A sunlamp product is a device that emits UV radiation to induce
tanning. The device incorporates one or more UV lamps as a radiation
source. Examples of sunlamp products are tanning beds, which are used
while lying down, and tanning booths, which are used while standing. UV
radiation-emitting products not used for tanning would not be affected
by this proposed rule. Devices emitting UV radiation to treat
dermatological disorders are regulated separately and are not part of
this proposed rule. As electronic products, sunlamp products are
subject to the regulations for electronic product radiation control,
including parts 1000 to 1010 (21 CFR parts 1000 through 1010) and Sec.
1040.20 (21 CFR 1040.20).
Sunlamp products emit UV radiation to induce tanning. The adverse
effects of UV radiation are well known. UV radiation can cause acute
injuries such as sunburns and eye irritations (e.g., photokeratitis).
Long-term UV exposure has been associated with skin cancer (including
squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and melanoma), skin
aging, and cataracts. Epidemiological studies of the effects of UV
radiation on incidence of cancer and other health problems are
complicated by latency between exposure and disease, difficulty
controlling for environmental exposure to UV radiation, and other
factors. Nevertheless, a recent meta-analysis found an increase in the
risk of melanoma for each additional session of sunlamp product use per
year (Ref. 1).
FDA is concerned about the safety risks from UV radiation.
Therefore, FDA is updating our requirements for sunlamp products which
allow for indoor exposure to UV radiation. There have been many changes
in our understanding of how UV radiation interacts with human skin
since FDA published the document entitled ``Sunlamp Products;
Performance Standard'' in the Federal Register of September 6, 1985 (50
FR 36548). There have also been many changes in the indoor tanning
industry which affect the type of equipment on the market and the
measurement techniques used by manufacturers. FDA is updating
requirements for sunlamp products to bring our regulations up to date
with current science. FDA also wants to improve consumers'
understanding of the risks related to UV radiation exposure.
Summary of the Major Provisions of the Regulatory Action in Question
The objective of this proposed rule is to align the performance
standards for sunlamp products with current scientific knowledge and
our understanding of how these products are used. This proposed rule
seeks to facilitate compliance, improve awareness among operators and
consumers about risks of use, and ultimately improve public health.
FDA proposes to incorporate certain elements of the International
Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) International Standard 60335-2-27,
Ed. 5.0: 2009-12, ``Household and Similar Electrical Appliances--
Safety--Part 2-27: Particular Requirements for Appliances for Skin
Exposure to Ultraviolet and Infrared Radiation,'' by reference.
Harmonizing the FDA standard with the current IEC standard would bring
it up to date with current science and better protect consumers from
the risks posed by these devices. Harmonization would have benefits for
sunlamp product manufacturers as well. Currently, many firms producing
sunlamp products for sale within the United States and abroad have to
follow both IEC and FDA standards. Aligning these standards would mean
that such firms would need to comply with a single set of rules instead
of two different ones, at least for the particular clauses which are
being adopted and incorporated by reference.
FDA proposes to amend the requirements of part 1002 as specified in
table 1 to require that manufacturers of UV lamps intended to be used
in sunlamp products are subject to the same record and reporting
requirements as manufacturers of sunlamp products. FDA wants to ensure
that all test data necessary to ensure compliance with Sec. 1040.20
are collected and maintained. Currently, manufacturers of UV lamps are
required to submit only product reports. Under proposed Sec. 1002.1,
manufacturers of UV lamps would also be required to submit supplemental
reports and annual reports and to maintain test records and
distribution records. Moreover, proposed Sec. 1002.1 would also
require that manufacturers of protective eyewear maintain test records
demonstrating that the eyewear complies with applicable UV and visible
transmittance requirements as well as distribution records. In
addition, proposed Sec. 1002.1 would also require that manufacturers
of protective eyewear submit annual reports, supplemental reports, and
product reports to FDA.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(c)(1) would set an absolute limit for UVC
radiation. An absolute limit on UVC (200-290 nanometer (nm)) irradiance
would provide greater assurance of user safety because a ratio permits
higher doses of UVC (as long as they correspond to higher doses in the
260 to 320 nm range). UVC, which is not present in sunlight that
reaches the Earth's surface, is potentially harmful to users while less
effective for tanning than UVA or UVB. FDA has chosen not to adopt the
limit for UVC radiation in Ed. 5.0 of IEC 60335-2-27 because this limit
is 10 times lower than the limit in Ed. 4.2 and FDA believes that it
would be difficult for some manufacturers to measure irradiance at this
level.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(c)(2)(ii) would limit the maximum timer
interval to one that would result in a biologically effective (also
referred to as erythemal-effective) dose that would not exceed 500
joules/meter\2\ (J/m\2\) which is approximately equivalent to the 624
J/m\2\ value (weighted with the CIE LYTLE action spectrum) that was
specified in the 1986 FDA Policy Letter on Maximum Timer Interval and
Exposure Schedule. FDA has determined that a dose of 500 J/m\2\
(weighted with the CIE erythemal action spectrum) provides a
biologically equivalent dose that is more closely matched to the
current 624 J/m\2\ value than does the IEC dose limit of 600 J/m\2\.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(c)(3) would add a requirement that the
control enabling manual termination of radiation emission (sometimes
referred to as the ``panic button'' or ``emergency stop'') be easily
accessible and readily identifiable to the user. This would ensure that
users could easily turn the sunlamp product off for any reason.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(c)(4)(ii) would expand application of the
performance requirements to all protective eyewear intended to be used
with sunlamp products, whether sold together with a sunlamp product or
sold separately. UV wavelengths can cause serious eye damage, and
exposure to the shorter wavelength region of the UV spectrum is
especially dangerous. The spectral transmittance requirements for
protective eyewear are necessary to protect users of sunlamp products
from these risks, which directly result from the UV radiation emitted
by the sunlamp product.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(1)(i) would modify the warning statement
required to appear on the label of all sunlamp products. FDA believes
that the current warning statement is too long, not user-friendly, and
that its content and format could be improved to more effectively
[[Page 79507]]
communicate the risks of indoor tanning to users. Based on its analysis
of the consumer testing, FDA concluded that the current warning
statement could be made more effective by changing its required
language, formatting, and location. FDA believes that the proposed
warning statement would most effectively convey the risks of indoor
tanning to users.
The proposed rule would also improve user safety by adopting the
IEC's ``equivalency code'' system for ensuring compatibility between
sunlamp products (e.g., tanning beds and booths) and the UV lamps that
are used in them. Proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(1)(vi) would require the
label of all sunlamp products to indicate the equivalency code range of
the UV lamp to be used in the sunlamp product. Proposed Sec.
1040.20(d)(2)(ii) would require the label of each UV lamp to indicate
its UV lamp equivalency code. FDA believes the adoption of the IEC's
absolute rating system for replacement UV lamps would eliminate
confusion regarding proper lamp replacement, facilitate the enforcement
of lamp compatibility requirements, and improve the safety of sunlamp
products.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(3) would retain the requirement of the
current FDA standard that the required label information must be
legible and readily accessible to view by a sunlamp product user
immediately prior to use. Proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(3)(i) would
incorporate specifications into the rule regarding the location,
spacing, and font of the required warning statement. FDA believes that
these label specifications would ensure that users see the required
warning prior to use, and would result in a more comprehensive and
effective standard.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(e)(3) would add a requirement for the
provision of the required warning statement in all catalogs,
specification sheets, and descriptive brochures intended for consumers
in which sunlamp products are offered for sale, and on all consumer-
directed Web pages on which sunlamp products are offered for sale. This
requirement would ensure that consumers are fully informed of the risks
presented by sunlamp products at the time they consider purchasing it.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(g) is also modeled after the proposed FDA
Performance Standard for Laser Products (78 FR 37723, June 24, 2013).
FDA believes the addition of these requirements, which have been used
successfully over the past two decades for laser products, would
improve safety by ensuring that modifications that affect performance
would be held to the same standards as original manufacturing.
Costs and Benefits
Estimated one-time costs are $20,917 to $113,240 and annual costs
are $4,686 to $7,230. The present discounted costs are $57,181 to
$151,390 at 7 percent and $61,498 to $165,883 at 3 percent. Annualized
at 7 percent over 10 years, total costs are $8,141 to $21,498. At 3
percent, annualized total costs are $7,867 to $19,447.
The primary benefit of the proposed rule would be from reduced
injuries, including sunburn, photokeratitis, skin cancer, cataracts and
ocular melanoma, and from reduced exposure to UV radiation. We are
unable to quantify the benefits, but where possible, demonstrate that
they satisfy breakeven tests using very conservative assumptions. The
benefits of this proposed rule would justify the costs.
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Contents of the Proposed Regulation
A. Overview
B. Changes to Sec. 1002.1
C. Changes to Sec. 1040.20
III. Legal Authority
IV. Proposed Effective Date
V. Environmental Impact
VI. Analysis of Impacts
VII. Federalism
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
A. Reporting Burden
B. Recordkeeping Burden
C. Third Party Disclosure Burden
IX. Incorporation by Reference
X. Comments
XI. References
I. Background
The Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-629), enacted on
November 28, 1990, transferred the provisions of the Radiation Control
for Health and Safety Act of 1968 (Pub. L. 90-602) from Title III of
the Public Health Service Act to Chapter V, subchapter C of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 360hh et seq.). Under these provisions, FDA administers
an electronic product radiation control program to protect the public
health and safety. This authority provides for developing, amending,
and administering radiation safety performance standards for electronic
products, including sunlamp products.
Until recently, sunlamp products intended for tanning were class I
medical devices and exempt from premarket notification requirements,
subject to the limitation in 21 CFR 878.9 (see 53 FR 23856, June 24,
1988; 59 FR 63005, December 7, 1994). On March 25, 2010, FDA held a
meeting of the General and Plastic Surgery Devices Panel of the FDA/
Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Medical Devices
Advisory committee to seek input on whether the classification or
regulatory controls needed to be changed. For a summary of this
meeting, see https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/GeneralandPlasticSurgeryDevicesPanel/UCM206522.pdf. On June 2, 2014, based on the panel's recommendations,
among other things, FDA reclassified UV lamps intended to tan the skin
from class I and exempt from premarket notification to class II and
subject to premarket notification, and renamed them sunlamp products
and UV lamps intended for use in sunlamp products (see 21 CFR 878.4635;
79 FR 31205, June 2, 2014).
As electronic products, sunlamp products are subject to the
regulations for electronic product radiation control, including parts
1000 through 1010 and Sec. 1040.20. The sunlamp products performance
standard in Sec. 1040.20 was originally published in the Federal
Register on November 9, 1979 (44 FR 65352). In the Federal Register of
September 6, 1985 (50 FR 36548), FDA amended Sec. 1040.20 and made it
applicable to all sunlamp products manufactured on or after September
8, 1986.
FDA also issued several policy letters pertaining to specific
aspects of its regulation of sunlamp products. On June 25, 1985, FDA
issued a policy letter entitled ``Policy on Warning Label Required on
Sunlamp Products'' (available at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM095333.pdf) (Ref. 2). This document pertained to the location,
spacing, and legibility of the required warning label. On August 21,
1986, FDA issued a policy letter entitled ``Policy on Maximum Timer
Interval and Exposure Schedule for Sunlamp Products'' (available at
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM095333.pdf) (Ref. 3).
This document explained the criteria FDA uses to evaluate the adequacy
of the exposure schedule and the recommended maximum exposure time for
sunlamp products. On September 2, 1986, FDA issued another policy
letter entitled ``Policy on Lamp Compatibility,'' (available at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM095325.pdf) (Ref. 4). This document listed the
criteria FDA uses to
[[Page 79508]]
evaluate appropriate replacement lamps for sunlamp products.
Before prescribing any electronic product performance standards,
FDA is required to consult a statutory advisory committee, the
Technical Electronic Product Radiation Safety Standards Committee
(TEPRSSC). See section 534(f)(1)(A) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360kk(f)(1)(A)). At the September 23 and 24, 1998, meeting of TEPRSSC,
FDA presented general concepts for amendments to the performance
standard for sunlamp products, which are embodied in this proposed
rule. The committee recommended that FDA pursue development of the
amendments.
On February 9, 1999, CDRH published an Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPRM) (Docket No. 98N-1170), 64 FR 6288 (February 9,
1999), for the following reasons:
1. FDA was concerned that inadequate attention was being given to
recommended exposure schedules, which are designed to minimize consumer
risk.
2. FDA was concerned that the warnings for sunlamp products were
not reaching many users of sunlamp products prior to their purchase and
use, and that purchasers may not be aware of the risks associated with
UV exposure from sunlamp products.
3. Sunlamp products technology has changed since the FDA
Performance Standard was amended in 1985. These changes can affect both
the intensity and spectral characteristics of the UV emission from
sunlamps.
4. Because there is no uniform grading/rating system, choosing a
replacement lamp can be confusing for sunlamp product owners and
tanning facilities. It also makes the job of tanning facility
inspectors more difficult because they cannot easily verify whether the
correct lamps are installed in the sunlamp products. The use of
incorrect replacement lamps can lead to sunburns.
The specific amendments under consideration were as follows:
1. Harmonizing the sunlamp product performance standard with IEC
Standard 60335-2-27;
2. Revising and updating the August 21, 1986, guidance entitled
``Policy on Maximum Timer Interval and Exposure Schedule for Sunlamp
Products,'' and incorporating the updated guidance into the sunlamp
product performance standard;
3. Adding a provision clarifying that ``manufacturing'' under the
FD&C Act includes a modification of a sunlamp product that affects any
aspect of its performance or intended function for which Sec. 1040.20
has an applicable requirement;
4. Updating the warning statement required by Sec.
1040.20(d)(1)(i) to simplify the wording and to highlight the risk of
developing skin cancers;
5. Requiring reproduction of the text of the warning statement
specified in Sec. 1040.20(d)(1)(i) in catalogs, specification sheets,
and brochures; and
6. Developing a biological efficacy rating scale for UV lamps
intended for use in sunlamp products to simplify appropriate lamp
replacement.
In response to this ANPRM, FDA received 26 comments from State and
local radiation control agencies, manufacturers, the American Academy
of Dermatology, the Skin Cancer Foundation, an industry educational
association, a tanning facility owner, and a trade organization. FDA
considered these comments in developing this proposal.
FDA presented recommendations for amendments to the sunlamp
performance standard to TEPRSSC on June 21, 2000. FDA explained to
TEPRSSC that it was prepared to move forward with some of the
amendments at that time, but did not have sufficient scientific data to
move forward with the lamp classification or the exposure schedule
amendment. TEPRSSC advised FDA to develop scientifically-based exposure
schedule guidelines before incorporating these requirements into the
Performance Standard itself. FDA scientists obtained special funding
from FDA's Office of Women's Health to conduct this research. Upon
completion, FDA presented guidelines for exposure schedules to the IEC
TC (Technical Committee) 61, MT (Maintenance Team) 16 that is
responsible for developing standards for these products. The IEC
accepted these guidelines and incorporated them into IEC 60335-2-27
standard (Ed. 5.0), which published on December 14, 2009.
In February 2002, FDA held a 2-day meeting with the indoor tanning
industry and representatives from the U.S. Army Environmental Hygiene
Agency, Health Canada, the Swedish Radiation Protection Institute, and
the North Carolina Department of Radiation Protection. The purpose of
this meeting was to solicit input from the affected parties on the lamp
equivalence issue and other possible amendments to the FDA Performance
Standard for Sunlamp Products, which we considered in the development
of this proposed rule.
The IEC TC 61, MT 16 committee met in October 2002, and decided to
work with IEC SC (subcommittee) 34A to develop practical standardized
test methods and a classification scheme for low-pressure, fluorescent
tanning lamps to facilitate replacement of these lamps when they wear
out. IEC SC 34A has responsibility for the IEC 61228 standard entitled
``Fluorescent Ultraviolet Lamps Used for Tanning--Measurement and
Specification Method'' (Ref. 5). At their meeting in 2003, IEC TC 61,
MT 16 and IEC SC 34A reached a consensus position on lamp testing and
classification. This position has now been incorporated into the IEC
60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0 standard (Ref. 6) and the IEC 61228, Ed. 2.0
standard (Ref. 5).
In October 2003, FDA presented six amendments to TEPRSSC and all
were approved with modifications to two of the proposals. These six
amendments, along with others, are being presented in this proposed
rule and are outlined in section II.
In addition, FDA has informed radiological health representatives
from the states of our intentions to amend the Sunlamp Products
Performance Standard through semi-annual meetings with the state
Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors. See Web site at
https://www.crcpd.org/.
FDA is concerned about the safety risks from UV radiation.
Therefore, FDA is updating our requirements for sunlamp products--which
allow for indoor exposure to UV radiation.
FDA is undertaking three initiatives to address the risks
associated with sunlamp products. First, in a final reclassification
order that issued June 2, 2014 (79 FR 31205 at 31213), FDA reclassified
sunlamp products and UV lamps intended for use in sunlamp products from
class I to class II, and established special controls and premarket
notification (510(k)) requirements under the medical device authorities
of the FD&C Act. The special controls include performance testing and
labeling requirements, including a warning that sunlamp products are
not to be used on persons under the age of 18 years.
Second, and simultaneously with this proposed rule, FDA is
proposing device restrictions under section 520(e) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 360j(e)), which authorizes FDA to issue regulations imposing
restrictions on the sale, distribution or use of a device, if, because
of its potentiality for harmful effects or the collateral measures
necessary to its use, FDA determines that absent such restrictions,
there cannot be a reasonable assurance of its safety and effectiveness.
As explained elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, the
proposed device restrictions would require that:
[[Page 79509]]
1. Tanning facility operators permit use of sunlamp products only
if the prospective user is age 18 or older;
2. Tanning facility operators, upon request by the user or
prospective user, provide a copy of the sunlamp product user manual or
name and address of the manufacturer or distributor from who a user
manual may be obtained;
3. 510(k) holders assure that a user manual accompanies each
sunlamp product and, upon request, provide a copy of the user manual to
any tanning facility operator, user or prospective user; and
4. Tanning facility operators obtain each prospective user's
signature on a risk acknowledgement certification before use that
states that they have been informed of the risks to health that may
result from use of these devices.
These device restrictions would primarily apply to tanning facility
operators, and to a lesser extent, device manufacturers and
distributors. FDA would not consider people who use their own tanning
beds (home users) to be tanning facility operators.
Finally, in this action, FDA is proposing amendments to the sunlamp
products and UV lamps performance standard at Sec. 1040.20 (21 CFR
1040.20) (last updated in 1985), which includes technical and labeling
requirements issued under the radiological health provisions of the
FD&C Act. FDA is taking this action to reflect current scientific
knowledge related to sunlamp product use, harmonize it more closely
with IEC International Standard 60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0: 2009-12, and
strengthen the warning statement required by Sec. 1040.20(d)(1)(i) in
accordance with the results of the study FDA conducted under section
230 of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Pub. L.
110-85).
II. Contents of the Proposed Regulation
A. Overview
This preamble will focus on the proposed changes to Sec. 1002.1
and Sec. 1040.20, which include:
Requiring that UV lamp manufacturers follow the same
reporting requirements as sunlamp product manufacturers,
Requiring that protective eyewear manufacturers maintain
distribution records and test records relating to the UV and visible
transmittance of the eyewear as well as requiring the submission of
annual reports, supplemental reports, and product reports to FDA,
Changing the content, format, and location of the required
warning statement to make it more effective at communicating the risks
of indoor tanning to consumers,
Replacing the current limit on the ratio of UVC to UVB
irradiance with an absolute limit on UVC irradiance,
Limiting the maximum timer interval to one that would not
exceed a maximum dose of 500 J/m\2\, weighted with the CIE Reference
Action Spectrum for Erythema (1999),
Adopting the IEC ``equivalency code'' system for labeling
and measuring the strength of replacement lamps to prevent original
lamps being replaced with more powerful lamps, which can lead to
sunburn,
Changing the current subjective requirement regarding the
visible transmittance of protective eyewear to an objective,
quantitative requirement, adopted from the IEC standard,
Adding a cap on the amount of visible transmittance
allowed through the protective eyewear, to protect the users' retina
from intense visible light,
Updating the guidelines for the required manufacturer-
recommended exposure schedule, by requiring conformity to the IEC
standard, which is based on current science,
Requiring that a reproduction of the warning label be
provided in all catalogs, specification sheets, brochures, and
consumer-directed Web pages on which sunlamp products are offered for
sale, and
Requiring that persons involved in significant
modification of sunlamp products re-certify the product just as the
manufacturer of a new product would. This requirement currently exists
in the FDA Laser Standard (21 CFR 1040.10(i)).
B. Changes to Sec. 1002.1
FDA proposes to amend the requirements of part 1002 as specified in
table 1 to require that manufacturers of UV lamps intended to be used
in sunlamp products are subject to the same record and reporting
requirements as manufacturers of sunlamp products. When table 1 was
first codified, it was common for the manufacturers of UV lamps to be
the same entity that manufactured the sunlamp product. Today, the
market has changed and there are some manufacturers that manufacture
only UV lamps. FDA wants to ensure that all test data necessary to
ensure compliance with Sec. 1040.20 are collected and maintained.
Currently, manufacturers of UV lamps are required to submit only
product reports. Under proposed Sec. 1002.1, manufacturers of UV lamps
would also be required to submit supplemental reports and annual
reports and to maintain test records and distribution records. In
addition, manufacturers of protective eyewear would also need to
maintain distribution records as well as test records demonstrating
that the eyewear complies with applicable UV and visible transmittance
requirements. Proposed Sec. 1002.1 would also require that
manufacturers of protective eyewear submit annual reports, supplemental
reports, and product reports to FDA.
C. Changes to Sec. 1040.20
1. Incorporation by Reference
FDA proposes to incorporate certain elements of the IEC
International Standard 60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0: 2009-12 entitled
``Household and Similar Electrical Appliances--Safety--Part 2-27:
Particular Requirements for Appliances for Skin Exposure to Ultraviolet
and Infrared Radiation,'' by reference (Ref. 6). See proposed Sec.
1040.20(a)(2). A similar approach has been used successfully with the
FDA standard for laser products, Sec. 1040.10, see FDA Guidance,
``Laser Products--Conformance With IEC 60825-1 and IEC 60601-2-22''
(Ref. 7), and FDA has proposed to incorporate by reference several
provisions of IEC 60825-1, Ed. 2, into the laser products performance
standard (78 FR 37723). Harmonizing the FDA standard with the current
IEC standard would bring it up to date with current science and better
protect consumers from the risks posed by these devices. FDA has
representation on the IEC committee and has had significant influence
on changes made to the IEC standard over the past decade. Working with
this committee, which includes representatives from industry,
government, and the medical community, has provided FDA with useful
expertise and perspectives to which it may not otherwise have access.
Harmonization would have benefits for sunlamp product manufacturers
as well. Currently, many firms producing sunlamp products for sale
within the United States and abroad have to follow both IEC and FDA
standards. Aligning these standards would mean that such firms would
need to comply with a single set of rules instead of two different
ones, at least for the particular clauses which are being adopted and
incorporated by reference.
2. Definitions
``Protective goggles'' would be added to the definition of
``protective eyewear'' in proposed Sec. 1040.20(b) since this is the
synonymous term used in the IEC standard.
The definition of ``sunlamp product'' would be amended to make
clear that
[[Page 79510]]
tanning beds and tanning booths are included within this term.
We propose adding a definition for ``tanning course.'' This term is
used in Annex DD of IEC 60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0, to aid the manufacturer in
the development of its exposure schedule. In the context of exposure
schedules, ``tanning course'' means the period of time over which a tan
is developed, starting with the first short exposure and building up to
longer exposures over time, usually requiring a period of 3 to 4 weeks.
In an effort to ensure that a useful recommendation is provided to the
user about maximum annual exposure, this concept is utilized in the
exposure schedule requirements at proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(1)(iv) and
the example exposure schedule provided therein. FDA is uncertain how
users might best keep track of their exposure over many weeks and
months, and is particularly interested in comments on the best approach
for informing users about limiting their annual exposure.
3. Performance Requirements
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(c)(1) would set the irradiance limit for UVC
radiation (200-290 nm) at 0.03 Watts/meter\2\ (W/m\2\) at the shortest
recommended exposure distance from the sunlamp product. This limit is
the same as the one in the previous version of IEC 60335-2-27 (Ed. 4.2:
2007-04). This requirement would replace the current limit on the ratio
of irradiance in the 200 to 260 nm wavelength range to the irradiance
in the 260 to 320 nm wavelength range (see Sec. 1040.20(c)(1)). One of
the comments received in response to the 1999 ANPRM recommended that
the current ratio limit in Sec. 1040.20(c)(1) be dropped since it is
no longer necessary, considering current low-pressure lamp technology,
and because a limit on the UVC/UVB ratio provides less safety than an
absolute limit on the UVC emissions from a sunlamp product. FDA agrees
with this comment. An absolute limit on UVC (200-290 nm) irradiance
would provide greater assurance of user safety because a ratio permits
higher doses of UVC (as long as they correspond to higher doses in the
260 to 320 nm range). UVC, which is not present in sunlight that
reaches the Earth's surface, is potentially harmful to users while less
effective for tanning than UVA or UVB. FDA has chosen not to adopt the
limit for UVC radiation in Ed. 5.0 of IEC 60335-2-27 because this limit
is 10 times lower than the limit in Ed. 4.2 and FDA believes that it
would be difficult for some manufacturers to measure irradiance at this
level. FDA is particularly interested in comments on this proposal.
FDA proposes to change Sec. 1040.20(c)(2) by adding a dose-based
limit similar to the one in FDA's 1986 FDA Policy Letter on Maximum
Timer Interval and Exposure Schedule (Ref. 3) to the maximum timer
interval requirement in paragraph (c)(2)(ii). FDA also proposes to
remove paragraph (v) from Sec. 1040.20(c)(2).
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(c)(2)(ii) would incorporate by reference the
action spectrum used in figure 103 of IEC 60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0 for
calculating the effective dose that defines the maximum timer interval.
This method uses the internationally-accepted CIE Reference Action
Spectrum for Erythema (Ref. 8) instead of the CIE LYTLE action spectrum
that was defined in the 1986 FDA Policy Letter on Maximum Timer
Interval and Exposure Schedule (Ref. 3). Since 1986, the CIE Action
Spectrum for Erythema has been verified and accepted by research
laboratories across the globe. As a result, it is used worldwide in the
calculation of the UV Index.
The 1986 FDA Policy Letter on Maximum Timer Interval and Exposure
Schedule also recommends the use of the Parrish 1982 melanogenesis
action spectrum, in addition to the CIE LYTLE erythema action spectrum,
as a secondary means of calculating the maximum timer interval. As it
has been found that the two action spectra are highly correlated, this
calculation does not provide independent characterization data and the
requirement is redundant. Therefore, proposed Sec. 1040.20(c)(2)(ii)
would not require a second calculation of the maximum timer interval.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(c)(2)(ii) would limit the maximum timer
interval to one that would result in a biologically-effective (also
referred to as erythemal-effective) dose that would not exceed 500 J/
m\2\, which is approximately equivalent to the 624 J/m\2\ value
(weighted with the CIE LYTLE action spectrum) that was specified in the
1986 FDA Policy Letter on Maximum Timer Interval and Exposure Schedule
(Ref. 3). Although the FDA would like to harmonize its standard as much
as possible with the IEC standard, consumer safety is our main concern.
Based on spectral irradiance data submitted to the Agency and on data
presented at the 2004 Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE)
Symposium on ``Light and Health: Non-visual effects'' (Ref. 10), FDA
has determined that a dose of 500 J/m\2\ (weighted with the CIE
erythemal action spectrum) provides a biologically-equivalent dose that
is more closely matched to the current 624 J/m\2\ value than does the
IEC dose limit of 600 J/m\2\. FDA invites comment on this proposal.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(c)(3) would add a requirement that the
control enabling manual termination of radiation emission (sometimes
referred to as the ``panic button'' or ``emergency stop'') be easily
accessible and readily identifiable to the user. This would ensure that
users can easily turn the sunlamp product off for any reason.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(c)(4)(ii) would expand application of the
performance requirements to all protective eyewear intended to be used
with sunlamp products, whether sold together with a sunlamp product or
sold separately. As we have previously explained, UV wavelengths can
cause serious eye damage, and exposure to the shorter wavelength region
of the UV spectrum is especially dangerous. (See 42 FR 65189 at 65191,
December 30, 1977.) Short-term risks include photokeratitis, which is
very painful and causes temporary loss of vision, and there is also a
risk of retinal damage from short-term or long-term exposure, which
could cause blind spots to form in the retina. Repeated, long-term UV
exposure increases the risk of cataracts, and there is evidence of an
association between UV exposure and ocular melanoma (Ref. 11).
The spectral transmittance requirements for protective eyewear are
necessary to protect users of sunlamp products from these risks, which
directly result from the UV radiation emitted by the sunlamp product.
Users of sunlamp products, especially those who tan in tanning
facilities, often use protective eyewear manufactured by an entity
other than the manufacturer of the sunlamp product. Use of sunlamp
products with eyewear that does not meet these requirements would
increase the risk posed by the radiation emitted by the sunlamp product
and undermine the protection provided by the performance standard.
Therefore it is necessary to apply the standard to all protective
eyewear intended to be used with sunlamp products.
The proposal would also modify the protective eyewear transmittance
requirements of Sec. 1040.20(c)(4)(ii) to better ensure user safety
and achieve harmony with the IEC standard. (See clause 32.102 of IEC
60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0.) The requirements for spectral transmittance in
the UV range of 200-400 nm would remain the same as in the current FDA
standard. The proposed rule would adopt the limit of 5 percent on the
visible transmittance in the range
[[Page 79511]]
of 400-550 nm from clause 32.102 of the IEC standard. This requirement
would provide additional safety to protect the retina from intense
visible light. Currently, there is no such requirement included in the
FDA standard. The proposed rule would abandon the current requirement
that spectral transmittance shall be sufficient over the wavelength
range greater than 400 nm to provide visibility to the user, and
instead adopt the lower limit of 1 percent on luminous transmission
from clause 32.102 of the IEC standard. Replacing the subjective
standard with an objective one would make compliance easier to verify
and improve uniformity and consistency.
4. Label Requirements
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(1)(i) would modify the warning statement
required to appear on the label of all sunlamp products. FDA believes
that the current warning statement is too long, not user-friendly, and
that its content and format could be improved to more effectively
communicate the risks of indoor tanning to users. As discussed in
section I, FDA has been considering updating the required warning since
1999. In 2007, Congress required FDA to conduct consumer focus group
testing to evaluate the adequacy of sunlamp product warning labels in
conveying certain risk information to consumers, including the risk of
skin cancer. (See section 230 of the Food and Drug Administration
Amendments Act of 2007, Pub. L. 110-85.) Based on its analysis of the
consumer testing, FDA concluded that the current warning statement
could be made more effective by changing its required language,
formatting, and location. See the FDA Report to Congress entitled
``Labeling Information on the Relationship Between the Use of Indoor
Tanning Devices and Development of Skin Cancer or Other Skin Damage''
(Ref. 12).
FDA would like to harmonize its standard as much as possible with
the IEC 60335-2-27 Ed. 5.0 standard. However, based on the results of
the focus group testing, we believe it is appropriate for some
differences to remain between the FDA warning statement and the IEC
warning statement, especially since the IEC warning statement provides
only the general substance to be conveyed (since it is intended for use
in multiple languages) and does not provide formatting specifications.
FDA believes that the proposed warning statement would most effectively
convey the risks of indoor tanning to users. Specifically, the label of
each sunlamp product would have to contain a warning statement with the
following language and format:
``DANGER--Ultraviolet Radiation (UV)
UV can cause:
Skin Cancer
Skin Burns
Premature Skin Aging such as wrinkles and age spots
Eye Damage (both short- and long-term)
Wear FDA-compliant protective eyewear to prevent eye damage, such
as burns or cataracts.
Follow the recommended exposure schedule to avoid severe skin
burns.
Talk to your doctor or pharmacist before tanning if you use
medicines and/or cosmetics. Some of these products can make you more
sensitive to skin and eye damage from UV.''
Currently, Sec. 1040.20(d)(1)(iv) requires sunlamp product labels
to include a recommended exposure schedule containing certain
information. FDA proposes to add a requirement that the exposure
schedule be developed in accordance with the specific parameters in IEC
60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0, Annex DD, which would be incorporated by
reference. The proposed rule provides an example of a recommended
exposure schedule that would meet the guidelines/parameters in IEC
60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0, Annex DD. See proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(1)(iv).
These parameters are different from those provided in the 1986 FDA
Policy Letter on Maximum Timer Interval and Exposure Schedule (Ref. 3),
and are based on current science, including recent human research
conducted at FDA. This requirement is aimed at reducing the cumulative
UV dose to sunlamp product users and attaining closer harmonization of
FDA and the IEC standard.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(1)(iv) would also require a warning to
appear either directly above or below the exposure schedule stating
``Skin Type I individuals (always burns, never tans) should never use
sunlamp products.'' This warning is based on years of published
research showing that Skin Type I individuals sunburn easily and cannot
tan and are therefore at the greatest risk for skin cancer. By ``Skin
Type'' we are referring to the historical Fitzpatrick skin typing
system (Ref. 13) developed in 1975 by dermatologist Thomas Fitzpatrick
to predict skin reactivity in phototherapy. Under this categorization
scheme, Skin Type I is the fairest and most sensitive while Skin Type
VI is the darkest and least sensitive to UV radiation. The Skin Types
that are most likely to tan through the use of sunlamp products are
Skin Types II through IV. It has been shown (Ref. 14) that Skin Types
III and IV can attain a tan with UV doses that are similar to what is
needed for Skin Type II. Thus, the same dose can be used to develop and
maintain a tan for all three Skin Types. This was confirmed in clinical
studies performed at FDA (Ref. 15). This is a change from the approach
of the 1986 Policy Letter, which called for exposure schedules to be
differentiated by Skin Type.
The proposed rule would also improve user safety by adopting the
IEC's ``equivalency code'' system for ensuring compatibility between
sunlamp products (e.g., tanning beds and booths) and the UV lamps
(sometimes referred to as light bulbs) that are used in them. Proposed
Sec. 1040.20(d)(1)(vi) would require the label of all sunlamp products
to indicate the equivalency code range of the UV lamp to be used in the
sunlamp product. The equivalency code range would have to be determined
in accordance with clause 22.111 and Annex CC of IEC 60335-2-27, Ed.
5.0, which would be incorporated by reference. Proposed Sec.
1040.20(d)(2)(ii) would require the label of each UV lamp to indicate
its UV lamp equivalency code, as defined in Annex CC of IEC 60335-2-27,
Ed. 5.0. In determining the ``UV code'' component of the UV lamp
equivalency code, output would have to be measured in accordance with
IEC 61228, Ed. 2.0, ``Fluorescent Ultraviolet Lamps used for Tanning--
Measurement and Specification Method,'' (Ref. 5) which would be
incorporated by reference.
FDA believes the adoption of the IEC's absolute rating system for
replacement lamps would eliminate confusion regarding proper lamp
replacement, facilitate the enforcement of lamp compatibility
requirements, and improve the safety of sunlamp products. Currently,
FDA relies on a relative system in which the lamp manufacturer has to
provide to FDA and to users a list of lamps with which the
manufacturer's lamp is compatible. (See Sec. Sec. 1002.10 and
1040.20(e)(2)(iii).) As new lamp manufacturers and new lamp models
enter the marketplace, while other manufacturers abandon old models of
lamps or leave the marketplace, it is increasingly cumbersome to keep
track of which lamps are compatible with the lamps originally provided
with the sunlamp product. This can cause confusion for tanning facility
owners, FDA, and State or local inspectors. When incorrect lamps are
used as replacements, the erythema-effective intensity may be greater,
resulting in burns. Therefore, FDA has decided that an absolute rating
system is needed,
[[Page 79512]]
which would require that a code be printed on the lamp to indicate its
erythema-effective output, and a code range be printed on the sunlamp
product, to indicate which lamps to use with it. Another advantage of
adopting the provisions in both of these IEC standards is that they
provide detailed measurement specifications, which would ensure
consistency among manufacturers.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(3) would retain the requirement of the
current FDA standard that the required label information must be
legible and readily accessible to view by a sunlamp product user
immediately prior to use. FDA provided details regarding compliance
with this requirement in its June 25, 1985, policy letter entitled
``Policy on Warning Label Required on Sunlamp Products'' (Ref. 2).
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(3)(i) would incorporate similar
specifications into the rule regarding the location, spacing, and font
of the required warning statement. The proposal specifies that the
warning statement would have to be readily accessible to view whether
the tanning bed canopy or tanning booth door is open or closed when the
user approaches, which may necessitate that it appear in more than one
location on the sunlamp product. FDA believes that these label
specifications would ensure that users see the required warning prior
to use, and would result in a more comprehensive and effective
standard.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(3)(ii) specifies that required UV lamp
information would have to appear on the packaging of the lamp in
addition to being permanently affixed or inscribed on the lamp itself.
This would ensure that anyone replacing a UV lamp would be aware of the
lamp equivalency code and required warnings before and after purchase.
We propose revising Sec. 1040.20(d)(3)(iv) to achieve consistency
with the requirement in the device labeling regulations at 21 CFR
801.15(c)(1) that all words, statements, and other information required
by or under authority of the FD&C Act to appear on the label or
labeling of a device must appear in the English language (or a foreign
language for articles distributed solely in Puerto Rico or in a
Territory where the predominant language is not English). Since the
labeling of UV lamps must comply with the labeling requirements of part
801 and Sec. 1040.20, we propose to remove the language in Sec.
1040.20(d)(3)(iv) that permits the manufacturer to express the
manufacturer's name and month and year of manufacture as code or
symbols. FDA is not aware of any request to use symbols or codes for
this purpose in the past.
5. User Information
The proposal would remove Sec. 1040.20(e)(1)(iv) since the
recommended exposure schedule no longer needs to be differentiated by
skin type and would be required to be prominently displayed at the
beginning of the users' instructions under proposed Sec.
1040.20(e)(1)(i).
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(e)(1)(v) would add a requirement for the
provision of instructions and warnings regarding assembly, operation,
and maintenance, which is modeled on the proposed FDA Performance
Standard for Laser Products (78 FR 37723). This would better protect
individuals who assemble, test, and maintain sunlamp products.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(e)(3) would add a requirement for the
provision of the required warning statement in all catalogs,
specification sheets, and descriptive brochures intended for consumers
in which sunlamp products are offered for sale, and on all consumer-
directed Web pages on which sunlamp products are offered for sale. This
requirement would ensure that consumers are fully informed of the risks
presented by sunlamp products at the time they consider purchasing it.
6. Test for Determination of Compliance
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(f) would add a requirement that the
performance requirements for the measuring instrument in clause 32.101
of IEC 60335-2-27 Ed. 5.0 would apply.
7. Modification of Certified Sunlamp Products
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(g) is also modeled after the proposed FDA
Performance Standard for Laser Products (78 FR 37723). FDA believes the
addition of these requirements, which have been used successfully over
the past 2 decades for laser products, would improve safety by ensuring
that modifications that affect performance would be held to the same
standards as original manufacturing.
III. Legal Authority
Section 532 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360ii) authorizes FDA to
establish and administer an electronic product radiation control
program to protect the public health and safety. Section 534 of the
FD&C Act gives FDA authority to issue regulations establishing
performance standards for electronic products to control their emission
of radiation. These standards may include requirements for product
testing and radiation measurement, the attachment of warning signs and
labels, and the provision of instructions for product installation,
operation, and use. Section 1003(b)(2)(E) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
393(b)(2)(E)) requires FDA to ensure that public health and safety are
protected from electronic product radiation. In addition, section
701(a) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 371(a)) authorizes the Agency to
issue regulations for the efficient enforcement of the FD&C Act.
Section 230 of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (Pub. L. 110-85) directed FDA to determine whether changes to the
warning statement would more effectively communicate the risks of
indoor tanning, such as skin cancer, and to submit a report that
includes an explanation of the measures being implemented to
significantly reduce the risks associated with indoor tanning devices.
As explained in section II, based on consumer testing, FDA determined
that the proposed warning statement would better communicate the risks
of indoor tanning to consumers, and is proposing these amendments to
the sunlamp products performance standard to significantly reduce the
risks associated with these products.
IV. Proposed Effective Date
FDA proposes that any final rule issued based on this proposal
become effective 1 year after the date of publication of the final rule
in the Federal Register.
V. Environmental Impact, No Significant Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(c) that this proposed
action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an environment impact statement is
required.
VI. Economic Analysis of Impacts
FDA has examined the impacts of the proposed rule under Executive
Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601-612), and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-4). Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct Agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and
equity). We have
[[Page 79513]]
developed a comprehensive Economic Analysis of Impacts that assesses
the impacts of the proposed rule. The Agency believes that this
proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires Agencies to analyze
regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule
on small entities. We do not believe this proposed rule would result in
a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities, but the
impacts are uncertain so we are explicitly seeking comment on the
impacts.
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that Agencies prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment
of anticipated costs and benefits, before proposing ``any rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year.'' The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $144 million, using the most current (2014) Implicit
Price Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product. FDA does not expect this
proposed rule to result in any 1-year expenditure that would meet or
exceed this amount.
The proposed rule would affect several aspects of the performance
standards to reduce risks associated with use. The costs are summarized
in table 1. Estimated one-time costs are $20,917 to $113,240 and annual
costs are $4,686 to $7,230. The present discounted costs are $57,181 to
$151,390 at 7 percent and $61,498 to $165,883 at 3 percent. Annualized
at 7 percent over 10 years, total costs are $8,141 to $21,498. At 3
percent, annualized total costs are $7,867 to $19,447.
The primary benefit of the proposed rule would be from reduced
injuries, including sunburn, photokeratitis, skin cancer, cataracts and
ocular melanoma and from reduced exposure to UV radiation. We are
unable to quantify the benefits, but demonstrate that they satisfy
breakeven tests using very conservative assumptions. The benefits of
this proposed rule would justify the costs.
Table 1--Present Discounted Costs of the Proposed Rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Low cost scenario High cost scenario
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discounted @7 percent........... $57,181 $151,390
Discounted @3 percent........... 61,498 165,883
10-Year Annualized @7 percent... 8,141 21,498
10-Year Annualized @3 percent... 7,867 19,447
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The full assessment of the economic analysis is available in Docket
FDA-1998-N-0880 and at https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Reports/EconomicAnalyses/default.htm (Ref. 16).
VII. Federalism
FDA has analyzed this proposed rule in accordance with the
principles set forth in Executive Order 13132. Section 4(a) of the
Executive Order requires Agencies to ``construe * * * a Federal statute
to preempt State law only where the statute contains an express
preemption provision or there is some other clear evidence that the
Congress intended preemption of State law, or where the exercise of
State authority conflicts with the exercise of Federal authority under
the Federal statute.'' Federal law includes an express preemption
provision at section 542 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360ss) that
preempts the States from establishing, or continuing in effect, any
standard with respect to an electronic product which is applicable to
the same aspect of product performance as a Federal standard prescribed
under section 534 of the FD&C Act and which is not identical to the
Federal standard. If this proposed rule is made final, the final rule
would prescribe a Federal standard under section 534 of the FD&C Act.
However, section 542 of the FD&C Act does not ``prevent the Federal
Government or the government of any State or political subdivision
thereof from establishing a requirement with respect to emission of
radiation from electronic products procured for its own use if such
requirement imposes a more restrictive standard than that required to
comply with the otherwise applicable Federal standard.'' (Section 542
of the FD&C Act.)
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This proposed rule contains information collection provisions that
are subject to review by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). A description of these provisions is given in
the paragraphs that follow with an estimate of the annual reporting,
recordkeeping, and third-party disclosure burden. Included in the
estimate is the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing
data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing
and reviewing each collection of information.
FDA invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
FDA's functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
Title: Sunlamp Products; Proposed Amendment to Sec. 1002.1 (Record
and Reporting Requirements) and Sec. 1040.20 (Performance Standard).
Description: The Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-629)
transferred the provisions of the Radiation Control for Health and
Safety Act of 1968 (Pub. L. 90-602) from Title III of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) to Chapter V, subchapter C of the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.). Under the FD&C Act, FDA administers
an electronic product radiation control program to protect the public
health and safety. FDA also develops and administers radiation safety
performance standards for electronic products, including sunlamp
products.
Current Sec. 1002.1 requires that sunlamp product manufacturers
submit product reports, supplemental reports, and annual reports and
requires that test records and distribution records are maintained,
used for summary data submitted in the annual report, and made
available upon request. In addition, current Sec. 1002.1 requires UV
[[Page 79514]]
lamp manufacturers to submit product reports. Proposed Sec. 1002.1
would require that manufacturers of UV lamps also submit supplemental
reports and annual reports and maintain test records and distribution
records.
Proposed Sec. 1002.1 would also require that manufacturers of
protective eyewear maintain test records and distribution records as
well as submit annual reports, supplemental reports, and product
reports. The eyewear must meet certain transmittance limits in the UV
and visible wavelength range. Both manufacturers of sunlamp products
that include eyewear with their products and manufacturers of
protective eyewear that is sold separately would be responsible for
maintaining records of the results yielded by the testing and reporting
these results to FDA. (See Sec. 1002.1.) There are no operating and
maintenance costs associated with testing the eyewear because this
requirement reflects current market practices.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(2)(ii) would require that the UV lamp
labeling include a replacement lamp code instead of a list of
compatible replacement lamps. Although the single UV lamp manufacturer
in the United States is already required to conduct spectral irradiance
testing of lamps in order to demonstrate compatibility with other model
lamps (whether made by that company or other manufacturers), proposed
Sec. 1040.20(d)(2)(ii) would require testing in accordance with test
methods as specified in IEC 61228, Ed. 2.0, ``Fluorescent Ultraviolet
Lamps Used for Tanning--Measurement and Specification Method.'' The
spectral irradiance data obtained is used to calculate the UV code that
would be required to be printed on the lamp by proposed Sec.
1040.20(d)(2)(ii). Manufacturers would be responsible for maintaining
and reporting records of the results yielded by the testing as well as
imprinting the lamp with the replacement lamp code.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(2)(iii) would require that each UV lamp
have a label containing the model identification of the lamp, if
applicable. Manufacturers would be responsible for printing the model
number on the lamp itself.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(3)(iii) would permit the manufacturer of
the sunlamp product or UV lamp to submit a request to the Director,
Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health for an approval of alternate labeling
if the size, configuration, design, or function of the sunlamp product
or UV lamp would preclude compliance with the requirements for any
required label or would render the required wording of such label
inappropriate or ineffective. In these circumstances, manufacturers
would be responsible for reporting the request to FDA. The operating
and maintenance costs associated with this provision are based on
correspondence costs (postage) for non-email communications.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(3)(iv) would permit manufacturers of UV
lamps to permanently affix or inscribe the tags or labels required by
Sec. Sec. 1010.2(b) and 1010.3(a) on the lamp packaging associated
with the UV lamps, rather than the UV lamps themselves. The third party
disclosure burden of this provision would be the time it takes to
inscribe the label or tag on the UV lamp packaging.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(e)(1)(v) would require instructions for
sunlamp ``assembly, operation, and maintenance,'' and would include a
schedule of maintenance. This information would also protect those
maintaining and assembling sunlamp products from inadvertent exposure
to UV radiation by providing adequate instructions to avoid UV exposure
during assembly or maintenance. We presume that the maintenance
schedules would be developed from known information about how to
properly maintain these devices. The third party disclosure burden of
this provision would be the time spent bringing this known information
into a user-friendly format and disclosing it to users. We also assume
that this information would be identical for all units of a given model
of sunlamp products.
Proposed Sec. 1040.20(g) would require that those who change the
function or performance characteristics of a sunlamp are manufacturers
and would need to recertify and re-identify the device. This
requirement applies only if the modification affects any aspect of the
product's performance or intended function(s) for which Sec. 1040.20
has an applicable requirement. We believe some sunlamp owners (e.g.,
tanning facility owners) view such modifications as a less expensive
alternative to purchasing a new sunlamp product. We believe some
owners, otherwise inclined to alter their sunlamp's performance
characteristics, would be deterred from doing so by our proposal
because recertification would cost a tanning facility owner more than
$30,000 in operating and maintenance costs since tanning facility
owners do not typically have the equipment necessary to recertify
sunlamp products. However, if a tanning facility owner chooses to
recertify the sunlamp product, documentation must be submitted to FDA.
Description of Respondents: Respondents for these information
collections are manufacturers of sunlamp products and UV lamps intended
for use in sunlamp products, and manufacturers of protective eyewear
that is intended to be used with sunlamp products.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 2--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital and
Number of Number of Total annual Average burden operating and
21 CFR section respondents responses per responses per response Total hours maintenance
respondent costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1002.1(b)--Lamp only................... 1 9 9 2 18............................. ..............
1002.1(b)--Protective eyewear.......... 5 4 20 0.5 10............................. ..............
1040.20(d)(2)(ii)...................... 1 1 1 1 1.............................. ..............
1040.20(d)(3)(iii)..................... 1 1 1 .17 .17 (10 minutes)............... ..............
1040.20(g)............................. 1 1 1 8 8.............................. $43,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.............................. .............. .............. .............. .............. 37............................. $43,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 79515]]
Table 3--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital and
Number of Number of Total annual Average burden operating and
21 CFR section recordkeepers records per records per Total hours maintenance
recordkeeper recordkeeping costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1002.1(b)--Lamp only................... 1 2 2 2.5 5..............................
1002.1(b)--Protective eyewear.......... 5 3 15 7 105............................
1040.20(d)(2)(ii)...................... 1 75 75 0.8 60............................. $30,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.............................. .............. .............. .............. .............. 170............................ $30,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 4--Estimated Annual Third Party Disclosure Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
21 CFR section Number of disclosures Total annual Average burden Total hours
respondents per respondent disclosures per disclosure
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1040.20(d)(1)(vi)............... 5 5,200 26,000 .0034 88
1040.20(d)(2)(ii)............... 1 286,000 286,000 .0017 486
1040.20(d)(2)(iii).............. 1 286,000 286,000 .0017 486
1040.20(d)(3)(ii)............... 1 286,000 286,000 .0017 486
1040.20(d)(3)(iv)............... 1 23,833 23,833 .0017 41
1040.20(e)(1)(v)................ 5 10 50 12 600
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... .............. .............. .............. .............. 2,187
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
information.
A. Reporting Burden
For Sec. 1002.1(b)--Lamp only, we estimate the single U.S.-based
manufacturer of UV lamps would need to submit 2 new types of reports
(supplemental reports and an annual report) for the 75 models. Based on
previous submissions, we estimate that nine supplemental reports would
be submitted per year. Annual reports are submitted once per year. We
estimate that it takes approximately 2 hours to complete each report
for a total of 18 burden hours.
For Sec. 1002.1(b)--Protective eyewear, we estimate that the five
respondents would need to report the information annually and that each
of the manufacturers produces two models of protective eyewear.
Manufacturers are not required to produce two types of eyewear;
however, FDA estimates that each of the five respondents produces two
types of eyewear that could be made available with sunlamp products.
Manufacturers would fill out and submit the annual, supplemental, and
product reports demonstrating conformance to the performance standard,
and this process is estimated to take 30 minutes per report for a total
of 10 hours.
For Sec. 1040.20(d)(2)(ii), we estimate that the single U.S.-based
manufacturer of UV lamps would test 75 UV lamps and that the time
needed to incorporate the data into the product report is 1 hour.
For Sec. 1040.20(d)(3)(iii), we estimate that one sunlamp product
and UV lamp manufacturer would submit a request for alternate labeling
approval to FDA. This task is expected to be performed by clerical
staff that prepare the request and submit it to FDA. This process is
expected to take 10 minutes (.17 hours) to type the request and email
it. The request is expected to be submitted electronically and does not
involve any operating and maintenance cost.
For Sec. 1040.20(g), we estimate that, at most, one respondent per
year would decide to re-certify a sunlamp product with the Agency,
instead of the less expensive alternative of purchasing a new sunlamp
product. The $43,000 capital costs for recertifying the sunlamp product
includes the required instrumentation and calibration light sources
such as a double-grating spectroradiometer with integrating sphere and
software. We estimate the time needed to make the necessary spectral
measurements and compile them into a report that would be sent to FDA
to take 8 hours.
B. Recordkeeping Burden
For Sec. 1002.1(b)--Lamp only, we estimate the single U.S.-based
manufacturer of UV lamps would need to maintain 2 types of records
(test records and distribution records) for each of the 75 models and
that it takes approximately 2 minutes per model per record for a total
of 300 minutes, or 5 burden hours.
For Sec. 1002.1(b)--Protective eyewear, we estimate that there are
five U.S. manufacturers of protective eyewear that would be affected by
this amendment. However, this number is uncertain and we welcome
comment on this issue. We estimate that each of the manufacturers
produces 2 models of protective eyewear and the manufacturer would
sample approximately 10 units per model. The time required to perform
the necessary testing, including time to verify the instrument, set up
the test and prepare and file a report takes approximately 7 hours per
model. Protective eyewear manufacturers would also be required to
maintain distribution records for their products. We estimate that 7
hours per year would be necessary for the manufacturer to log and file
the distribution data. We estimate a total of 105 hours for each
manufacturer to maintain the single distribution record for both models
of protective eyewear as well as perform the testing for the individual
test records that are to be maintained for each model of protective
eyewear.
For Sec. 1040.20(d)(2)(ii), we expect that the single U.S.-based
lamp manufacturer does not use IEC UV codes and would have to test and
label its models under the proposed rule. The manufacturer has an
estimated 30 to 120 models and we chose the mean number of models (75)
for our calculations. The mean cost of testing each model is $350 and
the cost for an ink stamp is $50 per model,
[[Page 79516]]
yielding an approximate $30,000 in operating and maintenance cost for
Sec. 1040.20(d)(2)(ii). Manufacturers are already performing similar
spectral irradiance testing to determine lamp compatibility. We
estimate that it would take 0.8 hours per model to modify the test
setup to measure spectral irradiance in order to determine the UV code
as well as file the results, for a total of 60 hours. We estimate that
the single U.S.-based lamp manufacturer is already maintaining records
of these tests, so there should be no additional cost associated with
proposed Sec. 1002.1 that requires lamp manufacturers now also to
maintain test records, although FDA is seeking comment on this
understanding.
C. Third Party Disclosure Burden
For Sec. 1040.20(d)(1)(vi), we estimate that the five respondents
would need to list the code range that can be used in each of the 5,200
sunlamp products produced annually. We estimate 2 minutes to print and
affix this label on each the 26,000 sunlamp products, for a total of 88
hours.
For Sec. 1040.20(d)(2)(ii), the single U.S.-based lamp
manufacturer would need to inscribe the UV lamp equivalency code onto
each lamp. We estimate it would take 1 minute to ink stamp 10 lamps
with the new UV lamp equivalency code. The operating and maintenance
costs for this information collection are subsumed in the recordkeeping
burden estimate for Sec. 1040.20(d)(2)(ii). The lamp manufacturer
produces 286,000 new lamps per year so this process is expected to take
approximately 28,600 minutes per year, or about 486 hours.
For Sec. 1040.20(d)(2)(iii), the single U.S.-based lamp
manufacturer would need to inscribe the model identification onto each
lamp. We estimate it would take 1 minute to ink stamp ten lamps with
the model identifier. The operating and maintenance costs for this
information collection are subsumed in the recordkeeping burden
estimate for Sec. 1040.20(d)(2)(ii). The lamp manufacturer produces
286,000 new lamps per year so this process is expected to take
approximately 28,600 minutes per year, or about 486 hours.
For Sec. 1040.20(d)(3)(iv), we estimate that the single U.S.-based
lamp manufacturer would permanently affix or inscribe the tags or
labels required by Sec. Sec. 1010.2(b) and 1010.3(a) on the packaging
of all the UV lamps rather than the lamps themselves. Since lamps are
typically packaged and sold in cases of 12, this yields 23,833 packages
that must bear the third party disclosure required by Sec.
1040.20(d)(3)(iv). We estimate it would take 1 minute to ink stamp 10
lamp packages with the tags or labels required by Sec. Sec. 1010.2(b)
and 1010.3(a) for a total of 41 hours.
For Sec. 1040.20(d)(3)(ii), the single U.S.-based lamp
manufacturer would need to inscribe or affix the UV lamp equivalency
code on the packaging of each lamp. We estimate it would take 1 minute
to ink stamp 10 lamp packages with the new UV lamp equivalency code.
The lamp manufacturer produces 286,000 new lamps per year so this
process is expected to take 28,600 minutes per year, or about 486
hours.
For Sec. 1040.20(e)(1)(v), we estimate the 5 respondents would
need to go through this reporting exercise once for each of their 10
models of sunlamp products. We estimate that 10 hours of a technician's
time would be required to collect all the necessary information
regarding maintenance and assembly and 2 hours of a manager's time to
review this information once it is re-formatted into the user
instructions. Thus, we estimate a total of 12 hours per model of
sunlamp product would be required for a total of 600 hours. This would
be a one-time cost.
This proposed rule also refers to previously approved collections
of information found in FDA regulations. These collections of
information are subject to review by OMB under the PRA. The collections
of information found in proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(1)(ii); (d)(1)(iii);
(d)(1)(iv), 1st sentence; (d)(1)(v); (e)(1)(i) to (e)(1)(iv);
(e)(2)(i), and (e)(2)(ii) have been approved under OMB control number
0910-0025 (expires January 1, 2017); the collections of information
found in Sec. 1040.20(d)(3)(v) have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0485 (expires February 28, 2015).
In addition, FDA concludes that proposed Sec. 1040.20(d)(1)(i);
(d)(1)(iv), 2nd and 3rd sentences; (d)(2)(i); (d)(2)(iv); (d)(3)(i);
and (e)(3) do not constitute ``collection[s] of information'' under the
PRA. Rather, the labeling statements are ``public disclosure[s] of
information originally supplied by the Federal government to the
recipient for the purpose of disclosure to the public.'' (5 CFR
1320.3(c)(2).)
To ensure that comments on information collection are received, OMB
recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, OMB (see ADDRESSES). All comments should be
identified with the title ``Sunlamp Products; Proposed Amendment to
Sec. 1002.1 (Record and Reporting Requirements) and Sec. 1040.20
(Performance Standard).''
In compliance with the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3407(d)), the Agency has
submitted the information collection provisions of this proposed rule
to OMB for review. These requirements will not be effective until FDA
obtains OMB approval. FDA will publish a notice concerning OMB approval
of these requirements in the Federal Register.
IX. Incorporation by Reference
FDA is proposing to incorporate by reference certain portions of
the IEC International Standards 60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0: 2009-12 entitled
``Household and Similar Electrical Appliances--Safety--Part 2-27:
Particular Requirements for Appliances for Skin Exposure to Ultraviolet
and Infrared Radiation''; and 61228, Ed. 2.0, ``Fluorescent Ultraviolet
Lamps Used for Tanning--Measurement and Specification Method.'' You may
purchase a copy of these materials from the International
Electrotechnical Commission (EC Central Office), 3 rue de Varembe, CH-
1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland, call +41 22-919-02-11, https://webstore.iec.ch/. FDA is also proposing to incorporate by reference the
American National Standard C81.10-1976, entitled ``Specifications for
Electric Lamp Bases and Holders--Screw-Shell Types.'' You may purchase
a copy of the material from the American National Standards Institute,
1889 L St. NW., 11th Floor, Washington, DC 20036, call 202-293-8020,
www.ansi.org.
The IEC 60335 standard describes technical specifications that
address the safety of electrical appliances that incorporate emitters
for exposing the skin to UV and infrared radiation, including those
found in tanning salons or other facilities. The IEC 61228 standard
describes the method to measure, evaluate, and specify the
characteristics of fluorescent UV lamps that are used in appliances for
tanning purposes. The ANSI standard describes technical specifications
that will help ensure only appropriate bulbs can be fitted to the
appliance.
X. Comments
Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to https://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). FDA is explicitly
seeking comment on how the proposed requirements would impact small
entities.
Comments on the following two proposals listed are of special
interest to FDA:
1. The Use of the Limit on UVC Irradiance of 0.03 W/cm\2\ in IEC
60335-
[[Page 79517]]
2-27, Ed. 4.2: 2007-4 Instead of the Limit of 0.003 W/cm\2\ in IEC
60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0: 2009-12.
2. The Use of a Limit of 500 J/m\2\ on the Maximum Dose Used to
Calculate the Maximum Timer Limit, Instead of the 600 J/m\2\ Limit in
IEC 60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0: 2009-12.
XI. References
The following references are on display in the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) and are available for viewing by interested
persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday; they are also
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov. FDA has
verified the Web site addresses, as of the date this document publishes
in the Federal Register, but Web sites are subject to change over time.
1. Boniol, M., P. Autier, P. Boyle, and S. Gandini, ``Cutaneous
Melanoma Attributable to Sunbed Use: Systematic Review and Meta-
analysis,'' British Medical Journal, 345:e8503, December 2012.
2. FDA, Policy on Warning Label Required on Sunlamp Products,
Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Rockville, MD, June 25, 1985, https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM095333.pdf.
3. FDA, Policy on Maximum Timer Intervals and Exposure Schedule for
Sunlamps, Department of Health and Human Services, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, MD, August 21, 1986,
https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationEmittingProductsandProcedures/HomeBusinessandEntertainment/UCM192707.pdf.
4. FDA, Policy on Lamp Compatibility, Department of Health and Human
Services, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, MD,
September 2, 1986, https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM095325.pdf.
5. IEC 61228, Ed. 2.0, ``Fluorescent Ultraviolet Lamps Used for
Tanning--Measurement and Specification Method,'' IEC, Geneva,
Switzerland.
6. IEC 60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0, ``Household and Similar Electrical
Appliances--Safety--Part 2-27: Particular Requirements for
Appliances for Skin Exposure to Ultraviolet and Infrared
Radiation,'' IEC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
7. FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, ``Laser Products--
Conformance With IEC 60825-1 and IEC 60601-2-22 (Laser Notice No.
50),'' June 24, 2007, available at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm094366.pdf.
8. CIE S 007/E-1998/ISO 17166: 1999(E) Erythemal Reference Action
Spectrum and Standard Erythema Dose, CIE Vienna, Austria.
9. ``Sunscreen Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use; Final
Monograph,'' FDA, Department of Health and Human Services, 64 FR
27666, May 21, 1999.
10. Dowdy, J.C. and R.M. Sayre, ``Comparison of IEC and U.S. FDA
Sunlamp Standards: Critical Discrepancies in Exposure Timers and
Annual Exposure Limits,'' Proceedings of the CIE Symposium 2004 on
Light and Health: Non-Visual Effects, Vienna, Austria, pp. 183-188.
11. Vajdic, C.M., A. Kricker, M. Giblin, et al, ``Sun Exposure
Predicts Risk of Ocular Melanoma in Australia,'' International
Journal of Cancer, 101(2): 175-182, September 2002.
12. FDA, ``Report to Congress: Labeling Information on the
Relationship Between the Use of Indoor Tanning Devices and
Development of Skin Cancer or Other Skin Damage,'' submitted
December 2008, available at https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/Overview/MedicalDeviceUserFeeandModernizationActMDUFMA/ucm109288.htm.
13. Fitzpatrick, T.B., ``The Validity and Practicality of Sun-
Reactive Skin Type I Through VI,'' Archives of Dermatology, 124:
869-871, 1988.
14. Pathak, M.A. and D.L. Fanselow, ``Photobiology of Melanin
Pigmentation: Dose/Response of Skin to Sunlight and its Contents,''
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 9: 724-733, 1983.
15. Miller, S.A., S.G. Coelho, S.W. Miller, et al., ``Evidence for a
New Paradigm for UV Exposure: A Universal Schedule That is Skin
Phototype-Independent,'' Photoderm Photoimm Photomed, 28: 187-195,
2012.
16. https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Reports/EconomicAnalyses/default.htm.
List of Subjects
21 CFR Part 1002
Electronic products, Radiation protection, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
21 CFR Part 1040
Electronic products, Incorporation by reference, Labeling, Lasers,
Medical devices, Radiation protection, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, it is
proposed that 21 CFR parts 1002 and 1040 be amended as follows:
PART 1002--RECORDS AND REPORTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 1002 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 352, 360, 360i, 360j, 360hh-360ss, 371,
374, 393.
0
2. Section 1002.1 is amended by revising Table 1 to read as follows:
Sec. 1002.1 Applicability.
* * * * *
Table 1--Record and Reporting Requirements by Product
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer Dealer and
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- distributor
---------------
Product Distribution
reports Sec. Supplemental Abbreviated Annual Test records Distribution records Sec.
Products 1002.10 reports Sec. reports Sec. reports Sec. Sec. records Sec. Sec. 1002.40
1002.11 1002.12 1002.13 1002.30(a) \1\ 1002.30(b) \2\ and 1002.41
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY \3\ (Sec. Sec.
1020.30, 1020.31, 1020.32, and 1020.33):
Computed tomography................... X X .............. X X X X
X-ray system \4\...................... X X .............. X X X X
Tube housing assembly................. X X .............. X X X
X-ray control......................... X X .............. X X X X
X-ray high voltage generator.......... X X .............. X X X X
X-ray table or cradle................. ............ .............. X .............. X X X
X-ray film changer.................... ............ .............. X .............. X X
[[Page 79518]]
Vertical cassette holders mounted in a ............ .............. X .............. X X X
fixed location and cassette holders
with front panels....................
Beam-limiting devices................. X X .............. X X X X
Spot-film devices and image X X .............. X X X X
intensifiers manufactured after April
26, 1977.............................
Cephalometric devices manufactured ............ .............. X .............. X X ..............
after February 25, 1978..............
Image receptor support devices for ............ .............. X .............. X X X
mammographic X-ray systems
manufactured after September 5, 1978.
CABINET X RAY (Sec. 1020.40):
Baggage inspection.................... X X .............. X X X X
Other................................. X X .............. X X X ..............
PRODUCTS INTENDED TO PRODUCE PARTICULATE
RADIATION OR X-RAYS OTHER THAN DIAGNOSTIC
OR CABINET DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY:
Medical............................... ............ .............. X X X X ..............
Analytical............................ ............ .............. X X X X ..............
Industrial............................ ............ .............. X X X X ..............
TELEVISION PRODUCTS (Sec. 1020.10):
<25 kilovolt (kV) and <0.1 ............ .............. X X \6\ .............. .............. ..............
milliroentgen per hour (mR/hr IRLC 5
6....................................
>=25kV and <0.1mR/hr IRLC \5\......... X X .............. X .............. .............. ..............
>=0.1mR/hr IRLC \5\................... X X .............. X X X ..............
MICROWAVE/RF:
MW ovens (Sec. 1030.10)............. X X .............. X X X ..............
MW diathermy.......................... ............ .............. X .............. .............. .............. ..............
MW heating, drying, security systems.. ............ .............. X .............. .............. .............. ..............
RF sealers, electromagnetic induction ............ .............. X .............. .............. .............. ..............
and heating equipment, dielectric
heaters (2-500 megahertz)............
OPTICAL:
Phototherapy products................. X X .............. .............. .............. .............. ..............
Laser products (Sec. Sec. 1040.10 ............ .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. ..............
and 1040.11).........................
Class I lasers and products containing X .............. .............. X X .............. ..............
such lasers \7\......................
Class I laser products containing X .............. .............. X X X ..............
class IIa, II, IIIa, lasers \7\......
Class IIa, II, IIIa lasers and X X .............. X X X X
products other than class I products
containing such lasers \7\...........
Class IIIb and IV lasers and products X X .............. X X X X
containing such lasers \7\...........
Sunlamp products (Sec. 1040.20).....
Lamps only............................ X X .............. X X X ..............
Sunlamp products...................... X X .............. X X X X
Protective eyewear.................... X X .............. X X X ..............
[[Page 79519]]
Mercury vapor lamps (Sec. 1040.30).. ............ .............. .............. .............. .............. .............. ..............
T lamps............................... X X .............. X .............. .............. ..............
R lamps............................... ............ .............. X .............. .............. .............. ..............
ACOUSTIC:
Ultrasonic therapy (Sec. 1050.10)... X X .............. X X X X
Diagnostic ultrasound................. ............ .............. X .............. .............. .............. ..............
Medical ultrasound other than therapy X X .............. .............. .............. .............. ..............
or diagnostic........................
Nonmedical ultrasound................. ............ .............. X .............. .............. .............. ..............
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ However, authority to inspect all appropriate documents supporting the adequacy of a manufacturer's compliance testing program is retained.
\2\ The requirement includes Sec. Sec. 1002.31 and 1002.42, if applicable.
\3\ Report of Assembly (Form FDA 2579) is required for diagnostic x-ray components; see Sec. 1020.30(d)(1) through (d)(3).
\4\ Systems records and reports are required if a manufacturer exercises the option and certifies the system as permitted in Sec. 1020.30(c).
\5\ Determined using the isoexposure rate limit curve (IRLC) under phase III test conditions (Sec. 1020.10(c)(3)(iii)).
\6\ Annual report is for production status information only.
\7\ Determination of the applicable reporting category for a laser product hall be based on the worst-case hazard present within the laser product.
PART 1040--PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR LIGHT-EMITTING PRODUCTS
0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 1040 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 352, 360, 360e-360j, 360hh-360ss, 371,
381, 393.
0
2. Section 1040.20 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 1040.20 Sunlamp products and ultraviolet lamps intended for use
in sunlamp products.
(a) Applicability. The provisions of this section, as amended, are
applicable as specified to all sunlamp products and ultraviolet lamps
intended for use in sunlamp products not later than [A DATE WILL BE
ADDED 1 YEAR AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION OF A FUTURE FINAL RULE IN THE
Federal Register].
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, the following definitions
apply:
Exposure position means any position, distance, orientation, or
location relative to the radiating surfaces of the sunlamp product at
which the user is intended to be exposed to ultraviolet radiation from
the sunlamp product, as recommended by the manufacturer.
Irradiance means the radiant power incident on a surface at a
specified location and orientation relative to the radiating surface
divided by the area of the surface, as the area becomes vanishingly
small, expressed in units of watts per square centimeter (W/cm\2\).
Maximum exposure time (Te) means the greatest continuous exposure
time interval recommended by the manufacturer of the sunlamp product.
Maximum timer interval means the greatest time interval setting on
the timer of a sunlamp product.
Protective eyewear or protective goggles means any device designed
to be worn by users of a sunlamp product to reduce exposure of the eyes
to radiation emitted by the product.
Spectral irradiance (E[lambda]) means the irradiance
resulting from radiation within a wavelength range divided by the
wavelength range as the range becomes vanishingly small, expressed in
units of watts per square centimeter per nanometer (W/(cm\2\/nm)).
Spectral transmittance (T[lambda]) means the spectral
irradiance transmitted through protective eyewear divided by the
spectral irradiance incident on the protective eyewear.
Sunlamp product means any device designed to incorporate one or
more ultraviolet lamps intended for irradiation of any part of the
living human body, by ultraviolet radiation with wavelengths in air
between 200 and 400 nanometers, to induce skin tanning. This definition
includes tanning beds and tanning booths.
Tanning course means a consecutive series of tanning exposures
until a tan is developed, usually spanning a period of 3 to 4 weeks.
Timer means any device incorporated into a sunlamp product that
terminates radiation emission after a preset time interval.
Ultraviolet lamp means any lamp that produces ultraviolet radiation
in the wavelength interval of 200 to 400 nanometers in air and that is
intended for use in any sunlamp product.
(c) Performance requirements--(1) UVC (200-290 nm) irradiance. The
total irradiance emitted by a sunlamp product in the wavelength range
between 200 and 290 nm (UVC) shall not exceed 0.03 W/m\2\. UVC
irradiance shall be measured at the shortest exposure distance
recommended by the manufacturer, as required to be provided on the
label of the sunlamp product by paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section.
UVC irradiance shall be calculated using the following formula:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP22DE15.001
Where:
E is the total irradiance over the wavelength range of interest
E[lambda] is the spectral irradiance in W/(m\2\-nm)
[Delta][lambda] is the wavelength interval (nm).
The wavelength interval shall be 1 nm or less.
(2) Timer system. (i) Each sunlamp product shall incorporate a
timer system with multiple timer settings adequate for the recommended
exposure time intervals for different exposure positions and expected
results of the products as specified in the label information required
by paragraph (e) of this section.
(ii) The maximum timer interval may not exceed the manufacturer's
recommended maximum exposure time
[[Page 79520]]
(Te) that is indicated on the label, as required by paragraph
(d)(1)(iv) of this section. In addition, the maximum timer interval
shall not result in a biologically-effective dose that exceeds 500 J/
m\2\, weighted with the erythema action spectrum provided in figure 103
of IEC 60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0, which is incorporated by reference. The
manufacturer's recommended maximum exposure time (Te) shall be
determined using the following formula:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP22DE15.002
Where:
S[lambda] is the erythema action spectrum in figure 103
of IEC 60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0
E[lambda] is the spectral irradiance in W/(m\2\-nm)
[Delta][lambda] is the wavelength interval (nm).
The wavelength interval shall be 1 nm or less.
(iii) No timer interval may have an error greater than 10 percent
of the maximum timer interval of the sunlamp product.
(iv) The timer may not automatically reset and cause radiation
emission to resume for a period greater than the unused portion of the
timer cycle, when emission from the sunlamp product has been
prematurely terminated.
(3) Control for termination of radiation emission. Each sunlamp
product shall incorporate a control on the product to enable the person
being exposed to manually terminate radiation emission from the product
at any time without disconnecting the electrical plug or removing the
ultraviolet lamp. This control shall be easily accessible to the user
and be readily identified by touch and sight.
(4) Protective eyewear. (i) Each sunlamp product shall be
accompanied by the number of sets of protective eyewear that is equal
to the maximum number of persons that the instructions provided under
paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section recommend to be exposed
simultaneously to radiation from such product.
(ii) The spectral transmittance to the eye of all protective
eyewear intended to be used with the sunlamp product shall not exceed a
value of 0.001 over the wavelength range of greater than 200 nm through
320 nm, shall not exceed a value of 0.01 over the wavelength range of
greater than 320 nm through 400 nm, and shall not exceed a value of
0.05 over the wavelength range of greater than 400 nm through 550 nm.
In order to ensure adequate visibility through the protective eyewear,
the luminous transmittance shall not be less than 1.0 percent. Spectral
transmittance and luminous transmittance must be measured in accordance
with clause 32.102 of IEC 60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0, which is incorporated by
reference.
(5) Compatibility of lamps. An ultraviolet lamp shall not be
capable of insertion and operation in either the ``single-contact
medium screw'' or the ``double-contact medium screw'' lampholders
described in C81.10-1976, which is incorporated by reference.
(d) Label requirements. In addition to the labeling requirements in
part 801 of this chapter and the certification and identification
requirements of Sec. Sec. 1010.2 and 1010.3 of this chapter, each
sunlamp product and ultraviolet lamp is subject to the labeling
requirements prescribed in this paragraph and paragraph (e) of this
section.
(1) Labels for sunlamp products. Each sunlamp product shall have
labels which contain:
(i) A warning statement with the following language and format:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP22DE15.003
(ii) Exposure position(s) that may be expressed either in terms of
a distance specified both in meters and in feet (or in inches) or
through the use of markings or other means to indicate clearly the
recommended exposure position.
(iii) Directions for achieving the recommended exposure position(s)
and a warning that the use of other positions may result in
overexposure.
(iv) The manufacturer's recommended exposure schedule, including
maximum exposure times per session, and overall maximum exposure time,
in minutes, and spacing of sequential exposures. This schedule, with
the following exceptions, must be developed in accordance with Annex DD
of IEC 60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0, which is incorporated by reference.:
(A) The maximum single dose (which corresponds to the maximum timer
interval at 1040.20(c)(2)(ii)) is 500 J/m\2\ (not 600 J/m\2\ as stated
in Annex DD).
(B) Information regarding the maximum number of exposures per year
must be based on a maximum yearly dose of 15 kJ/m\2\, weighted
according to the erythema action spectrum shown in figure 103 of IEC
60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0.
[[Page 79521]]
(C) The exposure schedule must also include the following warning:
``Skin Type I individuals (always burns, never tans) should never use
sunlamp products.'' The exposure schedule must also include the
statement: ``Maximum sessions per week = 2.''
(D) Example schedule. For a sunlamp product whose maximum exposure
time (Te) = 20 minutes, the following table provides an example of what
the exposure schedule might look like where a single tanning course
covers a 4-week period:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturer-Recommended Exposure Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum exposure time must not exceed 20 minutes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Session #
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minutes (maximum) per session
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 6 8 10 13 16 20 20
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum time between exposures = 48 hours
Maximum sessions per week = 2 Maximum tanning courses per year = 6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Skin Type I individuals (always burns, never tans) should never use
sunlamp products
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(v) A statement indicating the time it may take before the expected
results appear.
(vi) The designation of the ultraviolet lamp equivalency code range
to be used in the sunlamp product as defined in Clause 22.111 and Annex
CC of IEC 60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0, which is incorporated by reference.
(2) Labels for ultraviolet lamps. Each ultraviolet lamp shall have
a label which contains:
(i) The warning: ``Sunlamp--DANGER--Ultraviolet radiation. Follow
instructions.''
(ii) The UV lamp equivalency code as defined in Annex CC of IEC
60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0, which is incorporated by reference. The
availability of this incorporation by reference is given in paragraph
(i) of this section. In determining the ``UV code'' component of the UV
lamp equivalency code, output must be measured in accordance with IEC
61228, Ed. 2.0 (iii) The model identification, if applicable.
(iv) The words ``Use ONLY in fixture equipped with a timer.''
(3) Label specifications. (i) The labels prescribed in paragraph
(d)(1) of this section for sunlamp products shall be permanently
affixed or inscribed on the product when fully assembled for use so as
to be legible and readily accessible to view by the person who will be
exposed immediately before the use of the product. The labels shall be
of sufficient durability to remain legible throughout the expected
lifetime of the product. To be legible and readily accessible to view,
the sunlamp product warning statement required by paragraph (d)(1)(i)
of this section shall comply with the following:
(A) It shall appear on a prominent part or panel displayed under
normal conditions of use so that it is readily accessible to view
whether the tanning bed canopy (or tanning booth door) is open or
closed when the person who will be exposed approaches the equipment;
(B) It shall be physically separate and visually distinct from the
other required label information;
(C) It shall meet the following font size and font color
requirements: The lettering in the word ``DANGER'' shall be at least 10
millimeters (height), at least double the height of the other words in
the warning statement, in all capital letters, and in red or another
font color that is legible and distinct from the other words in the
warning statement. The lettering in the other words in the warning
statement shall be at least 5 millimeters (height) and in lower case or
title case.
(ii) The information prescribed in paragraph (d)(2) of this section
for ultraviolet lamps shall be permanently affixed or inscribed on the
lamp itself so as to be legible and readily accessible to view, as well
as on the packaging of the lamp.
(iii) If the size, configuration, design, or function of the
sunlamp product or ultraviolet lamp would preclude compliance with the
requirements for any required label or would render the required
wording of such label inappropriate or ineffective, the Director,
Office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health, Center for
Devices and Radiological Health, on the Director's own initiative or
upon written application by the manufacturer, may approve alternate
means of providing such information or alternate wording for such
label, as appropriate.
(iv) In lieu of permanently affixing or inscribing tags or labels
on the ultraviolet lamp as required by Sec. Sec. 1010.2(b) and
1010.3(a) of this chapter, the manufacturer of the ultraviolet lamp may
permanently affix or inscribe such required tags or labels on the lamp
packaging uniquely associated with the lamp, if the name of the
manufacturer and month and year of manufacture are permanently affixed
or inscribed on the exterior surface of the ultraviolet lamp so as to
be legible and readily accessible to view.
(v) A label may contain statements or illustrations in addition to
those required by this paragraph if the additional statements are not
false or misleading in any particular, e.g., if they do not diminish
the impact of the required statements, and are not prohibited by this
chapter.
(e) Informational requirements--User information. Each manufacturer
of a sunlamp product or ultraviolet lamp shall provide or cause to be
provided to purchasers and, upon request, to others at a cost not to
exceed the cost of publication and distribution, adequate instructions
for use to minimize the potential for injury to the user, including the
following information:
(1) Sunlamp Products. The users' instructions for a sunlamp product
shall contain:
(i) A reproduction of all the label information required by
paragraph (d)(1) of this section prominently displayed at the beginning
of the instructions.
(ii) A statement of the maximum number of people who may be exposed
to the sunlamp product at the same time and a warning that only that
number of protective eyewear has been provided.
(iii) Instructions for the proper operation of the sunlamp product
including the function, use, and setting
[[Page 79522]]
of the timer and other controls, and the use of protective eyewear.
(iv) Instructions for obtaining repairs and recommended replacement
components and accessories which are compatible with the sunlamp
product, including compatible protective eyewear, ultraviolet lamps,
timers, reflectors, and filters, which will, when installed and used as
instructed, result in continued compliance with the standard.
(v) Manufacturers of sunlamp products shall provide as an integral
part of any user instruction or operation manual that is regularly
supplied with the product, or, if not so supplied, shall cause to be
provided with each sunlamp product: Adequate instructions for assembly,
operation, and maintenance, including clear warnings concerning
precautions to avoid possible exposure to ultraviolet radiation during
assembly, testing, and maintenance, and a schedule of maintenance
necessary to keep the sunlamp product in compliance with this section.
(2) Ultraviolet lamps. The users' instructions for an ultraviolet
lamp not accompanying a sunlamp product shall contain:
(i) A reproduction of the label information required in paragraph
(d)(2) of this section, prominently displayed at the beginning of the
instructions.
(ii) A warning that the instructions accompanying the sunlamp
product must always be followed to avoid or to minimize potential
injury.
(3) Promotional materials. Manufacturers of sunlamp products shall
provide or cause to be provided in all catalogs, specification sheets,
and descriptive brochures intended for consumers in which sunlamp
products are offered for sale, and on all consumer-directed Web pages
on which sunlamp products are offered for sale, a legible reproduction
(color optional) of the warning statement required by paragraph
(d)(1)(i) of this section.
(f) Test for determination of compliance. Tests on which
certification under Sec. 1010.2 of this chapter is based shall account
for all errors and statistical uncertainties in the process and,
wherever applicable, for changes in radiation emission or degradation
in radiation safety with age of the sunlamp product. Measurements for
certification purposes shall be made under those operational
conditions, lamp voltage, current, and position as recommended by the
manufacturer. For these measurements, the measuring instrument shall be
positioned at the recommended exposure position and so oriented as to
result in the maximum detection of the radiation by the instrument. The
performance requirements for the measuring instrument specified in IEC
60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0 Clause 32.101, which is incorporated by reference,
shall apply.
(g) Modification of certified sunlamp products. The modification of
a sunlamp product, previously certified under Sec. 1010.2 of this
chapter, constitutes manufacturing under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act if the modification affects any aspect of the product's
performance or intended function(s) for which this section has an
applicable requirement. The person who performs such modification shall
recertify and re-identify the sunlamp product in accordance with the
provisions of Sec. Sec. 1010.2 and 1010.3 of this chapter.
(h) Medical device classification regulation. Sunlamp products and
ultraviolet lamps intended for use in sunlamp products are subject to
special controls and restrictions on sale, distribution, and use as set
forth in Sec. 878.4635 of this chapter.
(i) Incorporation by reference. The standards required in this
section are incorporated by reference into this section with the
approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51. All approved material is available for inspection at
the Food and Drug Administration, Division of Dockets Management, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, and is available from the
following sources. It is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to
https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
(1) American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 1889 L St. NW.,
11th Floor, Washington, DC 20036, storemanager@ansi.org, www.ansi.org,
202-293-8020.
(i) ANSI C81.10-1976, ``Specifications for Electric Lamp Bases and
Holders--Screw-Shell Types,'' dated September 1976.
(ii) [Reserved]
(2) International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), EC Central
Office, 3 rue de Varembe, CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland, www.iec.ch,
call 41-22-919-02-11.
(i) IEC 60335-2-27, Ed. 5.0: 2009-12, ``Household and Similar
Electrical Appliances--Safety--Part 2-27: Particular Requirements for
Appliances for Skin Exposure to Ultraviolet and Infrared Radiation,''
dated December 2009.
(ii) IEC 61228, Ed. 2.0, ``Fluorescent Ultraviolet Lamps Used for
Tanning--Measurement and Specification Method,'' dated January 2008.
Dated: December 16, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-32023 Filed 12-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P