Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation of Exemptions; Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection-DHS/CBP-007 Border Crossing Information, System of Records, 79487-79490 [2015-31898]
Download as PDF
79487
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 80, No. 245
Tuesday, December 22, 2015
AGENCY:
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this rulemaking. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, please visit https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general questions, please contact: John
Connors, (202) 344–1610, Privacy
Officer, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Privacy and Diversity Office,
1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20229. For privacy
questions, please contact: Karen L.
Neuman, (202) 343–1717, Chief Privacy
Officer, Privacy Office, Department of
Homeland Security, Washington, DC
20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Department of Homeland
Security is giving notice of proposed
rulemaking pursuant to the Privacy Act
of 1974 in connection with a current
system of records titled ‘‘Department of
Homeland Security/U.S. Customs and
Border Protection-007 Border Crossing
Information (BCI) System of Records.’’
The exemptions for the system of
records notice published May 28, 2013,
continue to apply for the updated
system of records for those categories of
records listed in the previous System of
Records Notice. This document
proposes to exempt portions of certain
new categories of records ingested from
the Advance Passenger Information
System (APIS) claimed for those records
in that system pursuant to the United
States Code.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number DHS–
2015–0075 by one of the following
methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–343–4010.
• Mail: Karen L. Neuman, Chief
Privacy Officer, Privacy Office,
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528.
I. Background
In accordance with the Privacy Act of
1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) is giving
notice of a proposed rulemaking that
DHS/CBP intends to update its
regulations to exempt portions of a
system of records from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act.
Specifically, the Department proposes to
exempt portions of the ‘‘DHS/CBP–007
Border Crossing Information System of
Records’’ from one of more provisions of
the Privacy Act because of criminal,
civil, and administrative enforcement
requirements. DHS reissued the current
DHS/CBP–007 Border Crossing
Information (BCI) System of Records in
the Federal Register on May 11, 2015
(80 FR 26937), to provide notice to the
public that DHS/CBP is updating the
categories of records to include the
capture of certain biometric information
and Advance Passenger Information
System (APIS) records at the border.
CBP’s priority mission is to prevent
terrorists and terrorist weapons from
entering the country while facilitating
legitimate travel and trade. To
accomplish this mission, CBP maintains
border crossing information about all
individuals who enter, are admitted or
paroled into, and (when available), exit
from the United States regardless of
method or conveyance. Border crossing
information includes certain biographic
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS–2015–0075]
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation of
Exemptions; Department of Homeland
Security, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection—DHS/CBP–007 Border
Crossing Information, System of
Records
Department of Homeland
Security, Privacy Office.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and biometric information; photographs;
certain mandatory or voluntary itinerary
information provided by air, sea, bus,
and rail carriers or any other forms of
passenger transportation; and the time
and location of the border crossing.
Border crossing information resides on
the TECS (not an acronym) information
technology platform. DHS/CBP
provided notice to the public about the
update and expansion of the categories
of records as part of DHS’s ongoing
effort to better reflect the categories of
records in its collection of information.
DHS/CBP published this updated
system of records notice in the Federal
Register on May 11, 2015 (80 FR 26937).
CBP is responsible for collecting and
reviewing border crossing information
from travelers entering and departing
the United States as part of DHS/CBP’s
overall border security and enforcement
missions. All individuals crossing the
border are subject to CBP processing
upon arrival in the United States. Each
traveler entering the United States is
required to establish his or her identity,
nationality, and admissibility to the
satisfaction of a CBP officer during the
clearance process. To manage this
process, CBP creates a record of an
individual’s admission or parole into
the United States at a particular time
and port of entry. CBP also collects
information about U.S. citizens and
certain aliens (in-scope travelers
pursuant to 8 CFR 215.8, ‘‘requirements
for biometric identifiers from aliens on
departure from the United States’’) upon
departure from the United States for law
enforcement purposes and to document
their border crossing.
DHS is statutorily mandated to create
and integrate an automated entry and
exit system that records the arrival and
departure of aliens, verifies alien
identities, and authenticates alien travel
documents through the comparison of
biometric identifiers (8 U.S.C. 1365(b)).
Certain aliens may be required to
provide biometrics (including digital
fingerprint scans, palm prints,
photographs, facial and iris images, or
other biometric identifiers) upon arrival
in or departure from the United States.
The biometric data is stored on the
Automated Biometric Identification
System (IDENT) information technology
platform. IDENT stores and processes
biometric data (e.g., digital fingerprints,
palm prints, photographs, and iris
scans) and links biometrics with
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
79488
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
biographic information to establish and
verify identities. The IDENT
information technology platform serves
as the biometric repository for the
Department, and also stores related
biographic information.
Previously DHS established the
United States Visitor and Immigrant
Status Indicator Technology (US–VISIT)
Program to manage an automated entry
and exit system. On March 16, 2013,
US–VISIT’s entry and exit operations
(including deployment of a biometric
exit system) were transferred to CBP
through the Consolidated and Further
Continuing Appropriations Act of 2013
(Pub. L. 113–6, H.R. 933). The Act also
transferred US–VISIT’s overstay
analysis function to U.S. Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and
US–VISIT’s biometric identity
management services to the Office of
Biometric Identity Management (OBIM),
within the DHS National Protection and
Programs Directorate (NPPD). CBP
assumed biometric entry and exit
operations on April 1, 2013.
CBP has continued to develop
mechanisms to collect biometric
information from departing aliens since
assuming responsibility for US–VISIT’s
entry and exit operations. During these
operations, CBP officers may employ
technology (e.g., wireless handheld
devices or standalone kiosk) to collect
biographic and biometric information
from certain aliens determined to be inscope pursuant to 8 CFR 215.8
‘‘Requirements for biometric identifiers
from aliens on departure from the
United States’’ prior to exiting the
United States. Biometrics are checked
against the IDENT system’s watchlist of
known or suspected terrorists (KST),
criminals, and immigration violators to
help determine if a person is using an
alias or attempting to use fraudulent
identification. Biographic and biometric
data is encrypted when it is collected
and the data is transmitted in an
encrypted format to the IDENT system.
The data is automatically deleted from
the mobile device after the transmission
is complete. The handheld mobile
devices incorporate strict physical and
procedural controls, such as Federal
Information Processing Standard (FIPS)compliant data encryption; residual
information removal; and required
authorization for users to sign-in using
approved user account names and
passwords.
Collection of additional biometric
information from individuals crossing
the border (such as information
regarding scars, marks, tattoos, and
palm prints) aids biometric sharing
between the Department of Justice (DOJ)
Integrated Automated Fingerprint
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
Identification System (IAFIS)/Next
Generation Identification (NGI) and the
IDENT system. The end result is
enhanced access to (and in some cases
acquisition of) IAFIS/NGI information
by the IDENT system and its users. DHS,
DOJ/FBI, and the Department of State
(DOS)/Bureau of Consular Services
entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) for Improved
Information Sharing Services in 2008.
The MOUs established the framework
for sharing information in accordance
with an agreed-upon technical solution
for expanded IDENT/IAFIS/NGI
interoperability, which provides access
to additional data for a greater number
of authorized users.
CBP collects border crossing
information stored in this system of
records through a number of sources, for
example: (1) Travel documents (e.g., a
foreign passport) presented by an
individual at a CBP port of entry when
he or she provided no advance notice of
the border crossing to CBP; (2) carriers
that submit information in advance of
travel through APIS; (3) information
stored in the Global Enrollment System
(GES) (see DHS/CBP–002 Global
Enrollment System (GES) SORN, 78 FR
3441, (January 16, 2013)) as part of a
trusted or registered traveler program;
(4) non-federal governmental authorities
that issued valid travel documents
approved by the Secretary of DHS (e.g.,
an Enhanced Driver’s License (EDL)); (5)
another federal agency that issued a
valid travel document (e.g., data from a
DOS visa, passport including passport
card, or Border Crossing Card); or (6) the
Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA)
pursuant to the Beyond the Border
Entry/Exit Program. When a traveler
enters, is admitted to, paroled into, or
departs from the United States, his or
her biographical information,
photograph (when available), and
crossing details (time and location) is
maintained in accordance with the
DHS/CBP–007 Border Crossing
Information SORN.
DHS/CBP updated the categories of
records to provide notice that CBP is
collecting biometrics such as digital
fingerprints, photographs, and iris scans
from certain non-U.S. citizens at the
time of the border crossing or in support
of their use of Global Entry or another
trusted traveler program. In addition,
CBP updated the categories of records in
the SORN to provide notice that CBP
plans to collect information regarding
scars, marks, tattoos, and palm prints
from individuals at the border to aid
biometric interoperability between the
IAFIS/NGI and the IDENT system.
Finally, CBP updated the categories of
records associated with APIS
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
transmissions to better reflect the
information collected and maintained in
the DHS/CBP–007 BCI SORN.
Consistent with DHS’s information
sharing mission, information stored in
the DHS/CBP–007 BCI SORN may be
shared with other DHS components that
have a need to know the information to
carry out their national security, law
enforcement, immigration, intelligence,
or other homeland security functions.
The exemptions for the system of
records notice published May 28, 2013
(78 FR 31958) continue to apply for the
updated system of records for those
categories of records listed in the
previous System of Records Notice.
However, this document proposes to
exempt portions of certain new
categories of records ingested from APIS
(see DHS/CBP–005 APIS SORN, 80 FR
13407 (March 13, 2015) claimed for
those records in that system pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(2). Furthermore, to the extent
certain categories of records are ingested
from other systems, the exemptions
applicable to the source systems will
remain in effect.
DHS is issuing this Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking to exempt
portions of DHS/CBP–007 Border
Crossing Information System of Records
from certain provisions of the Privacy
Act.
II. Privacy Act
The Privacy Act embodies fair
information practice principles in a
statutory framework governing the
means by which the Federal
Government collects, maintains, uses,
and disseminates individuals’ records.
The Privacy Act applies to information
that is maintained in a ‘‘system of
records.’’ A ‘‘system of records’’ is a
group of any records under the control
of an agency from which information is
retrieved by the name of an individual
or by some identifying number, symbol,
or other identifying particular assigned
to the individual. In the Privacy Act, an
individual is defined to encompass U.S.
citizens and lawful permanent
residents. As a matter of policy, DHS
extends administrative Privacy Act
protections to all individuals when
systems of records maintain information
on U.S. citizens, lawful permanent
residents, and visitors.
The Privacy Act allows government
agencies to exempt certain records from
the access and amendment provisions. If
an agency claims an exemption,
however, it must issue a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking to make clear to
the public the reasons why a particular
exemption is claimed.
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DHS is claiming exemptions from
certain requirements of the Privacy Act
for portions of DHS/CBP–007 Border
Crossing Information System of Records.
Specifically, certain records ingested
from the DHS/CBP–005 Advance
Passenger Information System (APIS)
SORN into the DHS/CBP–007 Border
Crossing Information System of Records
will continue to be covered by the
exemptions claimed for those records in
that system pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(j)(2) and 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2).
Information in DHS/CBP–007 Border
Crossing Information System of Records
relates to official DHS national security
and law enforcement activities. These
exemptions are needed to protect
information relating to DHS law
enforcement investigations from
disclosure to subjects of investigations
and others who could interfere with
investigatory and law enforcement
activities. Specifically, the exemptions
are required to preclude subjects of
these activities from frustrating the
investigative process; to avoid
disclosure of investigative techniques;
protect the identities and physical safety
of confidential informants and of law
enforcement personnel; ensure DHS’s
and other federal agencies’ ability to
obtain information from third parties
and other sources; protect the privacy of
third parties; and safeguard sensitive
information. Disclosure of information
to the subject of the inquiry could also
permit the subject to avoid detection or
apprehension.
In appropriate circumstances, when
compliance would not appear to
interfere with or adversely affect the law
enforcement purposes of this system
and the overall law enforcement
process, the applicable exemptions may
be waived on a case by case basis.
DHS will not assert any exemption
with respect to information maintained
in the system that is collected from a
person at the time of crossing and
submitted by that person’s air, sea, bus,
or rail carriers, if that person, or his or
her agent, seeks access or amendment of
such information. The DHS/CBP–007
Border Crossing Information System of
Records Notice was published in the
Federal Register on May 11, 2015.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of Information, Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DHS proposes to amend
chapter I of title 6, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for part 5
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 2135;
(6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.); 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart
A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552. Subpart B
also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. In appendix C to part 5, revise
paragraph 46 to read as follows:
■
Appendix C to Part 5—DHS Systems of
Records Exempt From the Privacy Act
*
*
*
*
*
46. The DHS/CBP–007 Border Crossing
Information System of Records consists of
electronic and paper records and will be used
by DHS and its components. The DHS/CBP–
007 Border Crossing Information System of
Records is a repository of information held
by DHS in connection with its several and
varied missions and functions, including, but
not limited to the enforcement of civil and
criminal laws; investigations, inquiries, and
proceedings there under; law enforcement,
border security and intelligence activities.
The DHS/CBP–007 Border Crossing
Information System of Records contains
information that is collected by, on behalf of,
in support of, or in cooperation with DHS
and its components and may contain
personally identifiable information collected
by other federal, state, local, tribal, foreign,
or international government agencies. At the
time of border crossing and during the
process of determining admissibility, CBP
collects two types of data for which it claims
different exemptions.
(a) CBP will not assert any exemption to
limit an individual from accessing or
amending his or her record with respect to
information maintained in the system that is
collected from a person at the time of
crossing and submitted by that person’s air,
sea, bus, or rail carriers.
The Privacy Act requires DHS to maintain
an accounting of the disclosures made
pursuant to all routine uses. Pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), CBP will not disclose the
fact that a law enforcement or intelligence
agency has sought particular records because
it may affect ongoing law enforcement
activities. The Secretary of Homeland
Security has exempted this system from
sections (c)(3), (e)(8), and (g) of the Privacy
Act of 1974, as amended, as is necessary and
appropriate to protect this information.
Further, DHS will claim exemption from
section (c)(3) of the Privacy Act of 1974, as
amended, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) as
is necessary and appropriate to protect this
information. Exemptions from these
particular subsections are justified, on a caseby-case basis to be determined at the time a
request is made, for the following reasons:
(i) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for
Disclosures) because release of the
accounting of disclosures could alert the
subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of that investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS as well as the recipient agency.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
79489
Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
present a serious impediment to law
enforcement efforts and/or efforts to preserve
national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension, which would undermine the
entire investigative process.
(ii) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on
Individuals) because compliance would
interfere with DHS’s ability to obtain, serve,
and issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law
enforcement mechanisms that may be filed
under seal and could result in disclosure of
investigative techniques, procedures, and
evidence.
(iii) From subsection (g) (Civil Remedies)
to the extent that the system is exempt from
other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.
(b) Additionally, this system contains
records or information recompiled from or
created from information contained in other
systems of records that are exempt from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act. For
these records or information only, the
Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), has exempted this system
from the following provisions of the Privacy
Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (c)(4); (d)(1)–(4);
(e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
(e)(4)(I), (e)(5) and (e)(8); (f); and (g).
Additionally, the Secretary of Homeland
Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), has
exempted this system from the following
provisions of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3); (d)(1)–(4); (e)(1), (e)(4)(G),
(e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I); and (f). Exemptions from
these particular subsections are justified, on
a case-by-case basis to be determined at the
time a request is made, for the following
reasons:
(i) From subsection (c)(3) and (c)(4)
(Accounting for Disclosures) because release
of the accounting of disclosures could alert
the subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of that investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS as well as the recipient agency.
Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
present a serious impediment to law
enforcement efforts and/or efforts to preserve
national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension, which would undermine the
entire investigative process.
(ii) From subsection (d) (Access to Records)
because access to the records contained in
this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of that investigation
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS or another agency. Access to the
records could permit the individual who is
the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, and to avoid detection or
apprehension. Amendment of the records
could interfere with ongoing investigations
and law enforcement activities and would
impose an unreasonable administrative
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
79490
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 / Proposed Rules
burden by requiring investigations to be
continually reinvestigated. In addition,
permitting access and amendment to such
information could disclose security-sensitive
information that could be detrimental to
homeland security.
(iii) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and
Necessity of Information) because in the
course of investigations into potential
violations of federal law, the accuracy of
information obtained or introduced
occasionally may be unclear, or the
information may not be strictly relevant or
necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interests of effective law enforcement, it is
appropriate to retain all information that may
aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(iv) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of
Information from Individuals) because
requiring that information be collected from
the subject of an investigation would alert the
subject to the nature or existence of the
investigation, thereby interfering with that
investigation and related law enforcement
activities.
(v) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to
Subjects) because providing such detailed
information could impede law enforcement
by compromising the existence of a
confidential investigation or reveal the
identity of witnesses or confidential
informants.
(vi) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
and (e)(4)(I) (Agency Requirements) and (f)
(Agency Rules), because portions of this
system are exempt from the individual access
provisions of subsection (d) for the reasons
noted above, and therefore DHS is not
required to establish requirements, rules, or
procedures with respect to such access.
Providing notice to individuals with respect
to existence of records pertaining to them in
the system of records or otherwise setting up
procedures pursuant to which individuals
may access and view records pertaining to
themselves in the system would undermine
investigative efforts and reveal the identities
of witnesses, potential witnesses, and
confidential informants.
(vii) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of
Information) because with the collection of
information for law enforcement purposes, it
is impossible to determine in advance what
information is accurate, relevant, timely, and
complete. Compliance with subsection (e)(5)
would preclude DHS agents from using their
investigative training and exercise of good
judgment to both conduct and report on
investigations.
(viii) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on
Individuals) because compliance would
interfere with DHS’s ability to obtain, serve,
and issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law
enforcement mechanisms that may be filed
under seal and could result in disclosure of
investigative techniques, procedures, and
evidence.
(ix) From subsection (g) (Civil Remedies) to
the extent that the system is exempt from
other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
15:12 Dec 21, 2015
Jkt 238001
Dated: December 10, 2015.
Karen L. Neuman,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2015–31898 Filed 12–21–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration
7 CFR Part 868
United States Standards for Rough
Rice, Brown Rice for Processing, and
Milled Rice
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration, USDA.
ACTION: Request for information.
AGENCY:
The United States Department
of Agriculture’s (USDA) Grain
Inspection, Packers, and Stockyards
Administration (GIPSA) is seeking
comment from the public regarding the
United States (U.S.) Standards for
Rough Rice, Brown Rice for Processing,
and Milled Rice under the Agriculture
Marketing Act of 1946 (AMA). To
ensure that standards and official
grading practices remain relevant,
GIPSA invites interested parties to
comment on whether the current rice
standards and grading practices need to
be changed.
DATES: We will consider comments we
receive by March 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written or
electronic comments on this proposed
rule to:
• Mail: Irene Omade, GIPSA, USDA,
STOP 3642, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., Room 2530–B, Washington, DC
20250–3604.
• Fax: (202) 690–2173
• Internet: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
All comments will become a matter of
public record and should be identified
as ‘‘U.S. Standards for Rough Rice,
Brown Rice for Processing, and Milled
Rice request for information
comments,’’ making reference to the
date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register. All comments
received become the property of the
Federal government, are a part of the
public record, and will generally be
posted to www.regulations.gov without
change. If you send an email comment
directly to GIPSA without going through
www.regulations.gov, or you submit a
comment to GIPSA via fax, the
originating email address or telephone
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
number will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. Also, all
personal identifying information (for
example, name, address, etc.)
voluntarily submitted by the commenter
may be publicly accessible. Do not
submit confidential business
information or otherwise sensitive or
protected information.
Electronic submissions should avoid
the use of special characters, avoid any
form of encryption, and be free of any
defects or viruses, since these may
prevent GIPSA from being able to read
and understand, and thus consider your
comment.
GIPSA will post a transcript or report
summarizing each substantive oral
comment that we receive. This would
include comments made at any public
meetings hosted by GIPSA during the
comment period, unless GIPSA
publically announces otherwise.
All comments will also be available
for public inspection at the above
address during regular business hours (7
CFR 1.27(b)). Please call the GIPSA
Management and Budget Services
support staff (202) 720–8479 for an
appointment to view the comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly A. Whalen at GIPSA, USDA,
10383 N. Ambassador Drive, Kansas
City, MO, 64153; Telephone: (816) 659–
8410; Fax Number: (816) 872–1258;
email: Beverly.A.Whalen@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
authority of the AMA (7 U.S.C. 1621–
1627), as amended, GIPSA establishes
and maintains a variety of quality and
grade standards for agricultural
commodities that serve as a
fundamental starting point to define
commodity quality in the domestic and
global marketplace. Standards
developed by GIPSA under the AMA
include rice, whole dry peas, split peas,
feed peas, lentils, and beans. The AMA
standards are voluntary and widely
used in private contracts, government
procurement, marketing
communication, and, for some
commodities, consumer information.
The U. S. Standards for Rough Rice,
Brown Rice for Processing, and Milled
Rice standards were last revised in 2002
and appear in the AMA regulations at 7
CFR 868.202 through 868.316. The
standards facilitate the marketing of rice
in foreign and domestic trade, and
provide a uniform measure of quality by
providing a common language to
describe commodity attributes for U.S.
producers, exporters and their
customers. Official procedures for
inspections are provided in GIPSA’s
E:\FR\FM\22DEP1.SGM
22DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 245 (Tuesday, December 22, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 79487-79490]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31898]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 245 / Tuesday, December 22, 2015 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 79487]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS-2015-0075]
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation of Exemptions; Department of
Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection--DHS/CBP-007
Border Crossing Information, System of Records
AGENCY: Department of Homeland Security, Privacy Office.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security is giving notice of
proposed rulemaking pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 in connection
with a current system of records titled ``Department of Homeland
Security/U.S. Customs and Border Protection-007 Border Crossing
Information (BCI) System of Records.'' The exemptions for the system of
records notice published May 28, 2013, continue to apply for the
updated system of records for those categories of records listed in the
previous System of Records Notice. This document proposes to exempt
portions of certain new categories of records ingested from the Advance
Passenger Information System (APIS) claimed for those records in that
system pursuant to the United States Code.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number DHS-
2015-0075 by one of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-343-4010.
Mail: Karen L. Neuman, Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy
Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments received will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, please visit https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions, please contact:
John Connors, (202) 344-1610, Privacy Officer, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Privacy and Diversity Office, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20229. For privacy questions, please contact: Karen L.
Neuman, (202) 343-1717, Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office,
Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) is giving notice of a proposed rulemaking that DHS/CBP
intends to update its regulations to exempt portions of a system of
records from certain provisions of the Privacy Act. Specifically, the
Department proposes to exempt portions of the ``DHS/CBP-007 Border
Crossing Information System of Records'' from one of more provisions of
the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and administrative
enforcement requirements. DHS reissued the current DHS/CBP-007 Border
Crossing Information (BCI) System of Records in the Federal Register on
May 11, 2015 (80 FR 26937), to provide notice to the public that DHS/
CBP is updating the categories of records to include the capture of
certain biometric information and Advance Passenger Information System
(APIS) records at the border.
CBP's priority mission is to prevent terrorists and terrorist
weapons from entering the country while facilitating legitimate travel
and trade. To accomplish this mission, CBP maintains border crossing
information about all individuals who enter, are admitted or paroled
into, and (when available), exit from the United States regardless of
method or conveyance. Border crossing information includes certain
biographic and biometric information; photographs; certain mandatory or
voluntary itinerary information provided by air, sea, bus, and rail
carriers or any other forms of passenger transportation; and the time
and location of the border crossing. Border crossing information
resides on the TECS (not an acronym) information technology platform.
DHS/CBP provided notice to the public about the update and expansion of
the categories of records as part of DHS's ongoing effort to better
reflect the categories of records in its collection of information.
DHS/CBP published this updated system of records notice in the Federal
Register on May 11, 2015 (80 FR 26937).
CBP is responsible for collecting and reviewing border crossing
information from travelers entering and departing the United States as
part of DHS/CBP's overall border security and enforcement missions. All
individuals crossing the border are subject to CBP processing upon
arrival in the United States. Each traveler entering the United States
is required to establish his or her identity, nationality, and
admissibility to the satisfaction of a CBP officer during the clearance
process. To manage this process, CBP creates a record of an
individual's admission or parole into the United States at a particular
time and port of entry. CBP also collects information about U.S.
citizens and certain aliens (in-scope travelers pursuant to 8 CFR
215.8, ``requirements for biometric identifiers from aliens on
departure from the United States'') upon departure from the United
States for law enforcement purposes and to document their border
crossing.
DHS is statutorily mandated to create and integrate an automated
entry and exit system that records the arrival and departure of aliens,
verifies alien identities, and authenticates alien travel documents
through the comparison of biometric identifiers (8 U.S.C. 1365(b)).
Certain aliens may be required to provide biometrics (including digital
fingerprint scans, palm prints, photographs, facial and iris images, or
other biometric identifiers) upon arrival in or departure from the
United States. The biometric data is stored on the Automated Biometric
Identification System (IDENT) information technology platform. IDENT
stores and processes biometric data (e.g., digital fingerprints, palm
prints, photographs, and iris scans) and links biometrics with
[[Page 79488]]
biographic information to establish and verify identities. The IDENT
information technology platform serves as the biometric repository for
the Department, and also stores related biographic information.
Previously DHS established the United States Visitor and Immigrant
Status Indicator Technology (US-VISIT) Program to manage an automated
entry and exit system. On March 16, 2013, US-VISIT's entry and exit
operations (including deployment of a biometric exit system) were
transferred to CBP through the Consolidated and Further Continuing
Appropriations Act of 2013 (Pub. L. 113-6, H.R. 933). The Act also
transferred US-VISIT's overstay analysis function to U.S. Immigration
and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and US-VISIT's biometric identity
management services to the Office of Biometric Identity Management
(OBIM), within the DHS National Protection and Programs Directorate
(NPPD). CBP assumed biometric entry and exit operations on April 1,
2013.
CBP has continued to develop mechanisms to collect biometric
information from departing aliens since assuming responsibility for US-
VISIT's entry and exit operations. During these operations, CBP
officers may employ technology (e.g., wireless handheld devices or
standalone kiosk) to collect biographic and biometric information from
certain aliens determined to be in-scope pursuant to 8 CFR 215.8
``Requirements for biometric identifiers from aliens on departure from
the United States'' prior to exiting the United States. Biometrics are
checked against the IDENT system's watchlist of known or suspected
terrorists (KST), criminals, and immigration violators to help
determine if a person is using an alias or attempting to use fraudulent
identification. Biographic and biometric data is encrypted when it is
collected and the data is transmitted in an encrypted format to the
IDENT system. The data is automatically deleted from the mobile device
after the transmission is complete. The handheld mobile devices
incorporate strict physical and procedural controls, such as Federal
Information Processing Standard (FIPS)-compliant data encryption;
residual information removal; and required authorization for users to
sign-in using approved user account names and passwords.
Collection of additional biometric information from individuals
crossing the border (such as information regarding scars, marks,
tattoos, and palm prints) aids biometric sharing between the Department
of Justice (DOJ) Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System
(IAFIS)/Next Generation Identification (NGI) and the IDENT system. The
end result is enhanced access to (and in some cases acquisition of)
IAFIS/NGI information by the IDENT system and its users. DHS, DOJ/FBI,
and the Department of State (DOS)/Bureau of Consular Services entered
into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for Improved Information
Sharing Services in 2008. The MOUs established the framework for
sharing information in accordance with an agreed-upon technical
solution for expanded IDENT/IAFIS/NGI interoperability, which provides
access to additional data for a greater number of authorized users.
CBP collects border crossing information stored in this system of
records through a number of sources, for example: (1) Travel documents
(e.g., a foreign passport) presented by an individual at a CBP port of
entry when he or she provided no advance notice of the border crossing
to CBP; (2) carriers that submit information in advance of travel
through APIS; (3) information stored in the Global Enrollment System
(GES) (see DHS/CBP-002 Global Enrollment System (GES) SORN, 78 FR 3441,
(January 16, 2013)) as part of a trusted or registered traveler
program; (4) non-federal governmental authorities that issued valid
travel documents approved by the Secretary of DHS (e.g., an Enhanced
Driver's License (EDL)); (5) another federal agency that issued a valid
travel document (e.g., data from a DOS visa, passport including
passport card, or Border Crossing Card); or (6) the Canada Border
Services Agency (CBSA) pursuant to the Beyond the Border Entry/Exit
Program. When a traveler enters, is admitted to, paroled into, or
departs from the United States, his or her biographical information,
photograph (when available), and crossing details (time and location)
is maintained in accordance with the DHS/CBP-007 Border Crossing
Information SORN.
DHS/CBP updated the categories of records to provide notice that
CBP is collecting biometrics such as digital fingerprints, photographs,
and iris scans from certain non-U.S. citizens at the time of the border
crossing or in support of their use of Global Entry or another trusted
traveler program. In addition, CBP updated the categories of records in
the SORN to provide notice that CBP plans to collect information
regarding scars, marks, tattoos, and palm prints from individuals at
the border to aid biometric interoperability between the IAFIS/NGI and
the IDENT system. Finally, CBP updated the categories of records
associated with APIS transmissions to better reflect the information
collected and maintained in the DHS/CBP-007 BCI SORN.
Consistent with DHS's information sharing mission, information
stored in the DHS/CBP-007 BCI SORN may be shared with other DHS
components that have a need to know the information to carry out their
national security, law enforcement, immigration, intelligence, or other
homeland security functions.
The exemptions for the system of records notice published May 28,
2013 (78 FR 31958) continue to apply for the updated system of records
for those categories of records listed in the previous System of
Records Notice. However, this document proposes to exempt portions of
certain new categories of records ingested from APIS (see DHS/CBP-005
APIS SORN, 80 FR 13407 (March 13, 2015) claimed for those records in
that system pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2).
Furthermore, to the extent certain categories of records are ingested
from other systems, the exemptions applicable to the source systems
will remain in effect.
DHS is issuing this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to exempt
portions of DHS/CBP-007 Border Crossing Information System of Records
from certain provisions of the Privacy Act.
II. Privacy Act
The Privacy Act embodies fair information practice principles in a
statutory framework governing the means by which the Federal Government
collects, maintains, uses, and disseminates individuals' records. The
Privacy Act applies to information that is maintained in a ``system of
records.'' A ``system of records'' is a group of any records under the
control of an agency from which information is retrieved by the name of
an individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other
identifying particular assigned to the individual. In the Privacy Act,
an individual is defined to encompass U.S. citizens and lawful
permanent residents. As a matter of policy, DHS extends administrative
Privacy Act protections to all individuals when systems of records
maintain information on U.S. citizens, lawful permanent residents, and
visitors.
The Privacy Act allows government agencies to exempt certain
records from the access and amendment provisions. If an agency claims
an exemption, however, it must issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to
make clear to the public the reasons why a particular exemption is
claimed.
[[Page 79489]]
DHS is claiming exemptions from certain requirements of the Privacy
Act for portions of DHS/CBP-007 Border Crossing Information System of
Records. Specifically, certain records ingested from the DHS/CBP-005
Advance Passenger Information System (APIS) SORN into the DHS/CBP-007
Border Crossing Information System of Records will continue to be
covered by the exemptions claimed for those records in that system
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) and 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2). Information in
DHS/CBP-007 Border Crossing Information System of Records relates to
official DHS national security and law enforcement activities. These
exemptions are needed to protect information relating to DHS law
enforcement investigations from disclosure to subjects of
investigations and others who could interfere with investigatory and
law enforcement activities. Specifically, the exemptions are required
to preclude subjects of these activities from frustrating the
investigative process; to avoid disclosure of investigative techniques;
protect the identities and physical safety of confidential informants
and of law enforcement personnel; ensure DHS's and other federal
agencies' ability to obtain information from third parties and other
sources; protect the privacy of third parties; and safeguard sensitive
information. Disclosure of information to the subject of the inquiry
could also permit the subject to avoid detection or apprehension.
In appropriate circumstances, when compliance would not appear to
interfere with or adversely affect the law enforcement purposes of this
system and the overall law enforcement process, the applicable
exemptions may be waived on a case by case basis.
DHS will not assert any exemption with respect to information
maintained in the system that is collected from a person at the time of
crossing and submitted by that person's air, sea, bus, or rail
carriers, if that person, or his or her agent, seeks access or
amendment of such information. The DHS/CBP-007 Border Crossing
Information System of Records Notice was published in the Federal
Register on May 11, 2015.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Freedom of Information, Privacy.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS proposes to amend
chapter I of title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135; (6 U.S.C. 101 et
seq.); 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
0
2. In appendix C to part 5, revise paragraph 46 to read as follows:
Appendix C to Part 5--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy
Act
* * * * *
46. The DHS/CBP-007 Border Crossing Information System of
Records consists of electronic and paper records and will be used by
DHS and its components. The DHS/CBP-007 Border Crossing Information
System of Records is a repository of information held by DHS in
connection with its several and varied missions and functions,
including, but not limited to the enforcement of civil and criminal
laws; investigations, inquiries, and proceedings there under; law
enforcement, border security and intelligence activities. The DHS/
CBP-007 Border Crossing Information System of Records contains
information that is collected by, on behalf of, in support of, or in
cooperation with DHS and its components and may contain personally
identifiable information collected by other federal, state, local,
tribal, foreign, or international government agencies. At the time
of border crossing and during the process of determining
admissibility, CBP collects two types of data for which it claims
different exemptions.
(a) CBP will not assert any exemption to limit an individual
from accessing or amending his or her record with respect to
information maintained in the system that is collected from a person
at the time of crossing and submitted by that person's air, sea,
bus, or rail carriers.
The Privacy Act requires DHS to maintain an accounting of the
disclosures made pursuant to all routine uses. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(j)(2), CBP will not disclose the fact that a law enforcement or
intelligence agency has sought particular records because it may
affect ongoing law enforcement activities. The Secretary of Homeland
Security has exempted this system from sections (c)(3), (e)(8), and
(g) of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, as is necessary and
appropriate to protect this information. Further, DHS will claim
exemption from section (c)(3) of the Privacy Act of 1974, as
amended, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) as is necessary and
appropriate to protect this information. Exemptions from these
particular subsections are justified, on a case-by-case basis to be
determined at the time a request is made, for the following reasons:
(i) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for Disclosures) because
release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the subject of
an investigation of an actual or potential criminal, civil, or
regulatory violation to the existence of that investigation and
reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS as well as the
recipient agency. Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
present a serious impediment to law enforcement efforts and/or
efforts to preserve national security. Disclosure of the accounting
would also permit the individual who is the subject of a record to
impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or evidence, and
to avoid detection or apprehension, which would undermine the entire
investigative process.
(ii) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on Individuals) because
compliance would interfere with DHS's ability to obtain, serve, and
issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law enforcement mechanisms that
may be filed under seal and could result in disclosure of
investigative techniques, procedures, and evidence.
(iii) From subsection (g) (Civil Remedies) to the extent that
the system is exempt from other specific subsections of the Privacy
Act.
(b) Additionally, this system contains records or information
recompiled from or created from information contained in other
systems of records that are exempt from certain provisions of the
Privacy Act. For these records or information only, the Secretary of
Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), has exempted
this system from the following provisions of the Privacy Act: 5
U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (c)(4); (d)(1)-(4); (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3),
(e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), (e)(5) and (e)(8); (f); and (g).
Additionally, the Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), has exempted this system from the following
provisions of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3); (d)(1)-(4);
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I); and (f). Exemptions from
these particular subsections are justified, on a case-by-case basis
to be determined at the time a request is made, for the following
reasons:
(i) From subsection (c)(3) and (c)(4) (Accounting for
Disclosures) because release of the accounting of disclosures could
alert the subject of an investigation of an actual or potential
criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of that
investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS
as well as the recipient agency. Disclosure of the accounting would
therefore present a serious impediment to law enforcement efforts
and/or efforts to preserve national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual who is the subject of a
record to impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension, which would
undermine the entire investigative process.
(ii) From subsection (d) (Access to Records) because access to
the records contained in this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal,
civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of that
investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS
or another agency. Access to the records could permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the investigation, and to
avoid detection or apprehension. Amendment of the records could
interfere with ongoing investigations and law enforcement activities
and would impose an unreasonable administrative
[[Page 79490]]
burden by requiring investigations to be continually reinvestigated.
In addition, permitting access and amendment to such information
could disclose security-sensitive information that could be
detrimental to homeland security.
(iii) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of
Information) because in the course of investigations into potential
violations of federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or
introduced occasionally may be unclear, or the information may not
be strictly relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In
the interests of effective law enforcement, it is appropriate to
retain all information that may aid in establishing patterns of
unlawful activity.
(iv) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of Information from
Individuals) because requiring that information be collected from
the subject of an investigation would alert the subject to the
nature or existence of the investigation, thereby interfering with
that investigation and related law enforcement activities.
(v) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to Subjects) because
providing such detailed information could impede law enforcement by
compromising the existence of a confidential investigation or reveal
the identity of witnesses or confidential informants.
(vi) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (e)(4)(I)
(Agency Requirements) and (f) (Agency Rules), because portions of
this system are exempt from the individual access provisions of
subsection (d) for the reasons noted above, and therefore DHS is not
required to establish requirements, rules, or procedures with
respect to such access. Providing notice to individuals with respect
to existence of records pertaining to them in the system of records
or otherwise setting up procedures pursuant to which individuals may
access and view records pertaining to themselves in the system would
undermine investigative efforts and reveal the identities of
witnesses, potential witnesses, and confidential informants.
(vii) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of Information) because
with the collection of information for law enforcement purposes, it
is impossible to determine in advance what information is accurate,
relevant, timely, and complete. Compliance with subsection (e)(5)
would preclude DHS agents from using their investigative training
and exercise of good judgment to both conduct and report on
investigations.
(viii) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on Individuals) because
compliance would interfere with DHS's ability to obtain, serve, and
issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law enforcement mechanisms that
may be filed under seal and could result in disclosure of
investigative techniques, procedures, and evidence.
(ix) From subsection (g) (Civil Remedies) to the extent that the
system is exempt from other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.
* * * * *
Dated: December 10, 2015.
Karen L. Neuman,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2015-31898 Filed 12-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P