Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Control of Air Pollution From Nitrogen Compounds State Implementation Plan, 79279-79283 [2015-31662]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 244 / Monday, December 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
for quality case studies in addition to
those already being conducted by
OPQA. The USPTO will use the results
of the studies to improve its
understanding of the quality of its work
products and, where appropriate, to take
action to remediate quality issues or to
formulate best practices to further
enhance quality. For example, if a case
study reveals a training issue, the
USPTO will develop and deliver the
appropriate training.
This pilot program will help the
USPTO determine the usefulness of this
manner of public submission for case
study topics as compared to currentlyexisting methods, such as public fora
and external quality surveys. In
addition, this pilot program will allow
the USPTO to communicate to the
public the case studies determined to be
useful and the results of those studies.
IV. Example of a Topic Submission
The following example is provided to
assist the public in providing highquality submissions that best
communicate a focused case study topic
for consideration:
Title: ‘‘Pre-first action interviews and
quality of the resulting patent
prosecution.’’
Proposal for study: ‘‘Pre-first action
interviews result in a shorter time-toissuance in such applications that are
issued as patents.’’
Explanation: In my experience as a
patent practitioner, interviews with
examiners lead to better understanding
of the claimed invention by both parties.
In particular, interviews can reveal that
the parties are operating under differing
understandings of the scope of the
claims, the meaning of a claim term, or
interpretation of a teaching of the prior
art. When performed early in
prosecution, these can provide the
opportunity to resolve such differences
before the mutual misunderstanding or
miscommunication results in extended
prosecution. This permits more efficient
examination as reflected by a shorter
prosecution time for those applications
that eventually mature into patents.
These efficiency gains are most
noticeable after April 1, 2011, when the
Full First Action Interview Pilot
Program went into effect. The USPTO
should study what effect an interview
before the first action on the merits in
a new application has on time-toallowance in applications that are
eventually issued as patents, and if
there are any particular features of the
interview that strongly correlate with
the time-to-allowance. Discovery of
such correlations could lead to USPTO
process changes or changes in
applicants’ approach to prosecution that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:25 Dec 18, 2015
Jkt 238001
could improve the overall efficiency and
effectiveness of patent prosecution.
Dated: December 15, 2015.
Michelle K. Lee,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2015–31897 Filed 12–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0497; FRL–9940–17–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Texas; Control
of Air Pollution From Nitrogen
Compounds State Implementation Plan
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of
revisions to the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of
Texas through the Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality (TCEQ) on July
10, 2015. The Texas SIP submission
revises 30 Texas Administrative Code
(TAC) Chapter 117 rules for control of
nitrogen compounds to assist the DallasFort Worth (DFW) moderate
nonattainment area (NAA) in attaining
the 2008 eight-hour ozone (O3) National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS).
SUMMARY:
Written comments must be
received on or before January 20, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2015–0497, by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions.
• Email: Mr. Guy Donaldson at
donaldson.guy@epa.gov.
• Mail or delivery: Mr. Guy
Donaldson, Chief, Air Branch (6MM–
AA), Environmental Protection Agency,
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas,
Texas 75202–2733.
Instructions: Direct comments to
Docket No. EPA–R06–OAR–2015–0497.
The EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and made
available online at www.regulations.gov.
The EPA includes any personal
information provided, unless a
comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
79279
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do
not submit any information
electronically that is considered CBI or
any other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means the EPA will not know one’s
identity or contact information unless it
is provided in the body of a comment.
If a comment is emailed directly to the
EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, then the sender’s
email address will automatically be
captured and included as part of the
public docket comment and made
available on the Internet. If a comment
is submitted electronically, then the
EPA recommends that one’s name and
other contact information be included in
the body of the comment, and with any
disk or CD–ROM submitted. If the EPA
cannot read a particular comment due to
technical difficulties and is unable to
contact for clarification, the EPA may
not be able to consider the comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. Multimedia submissions (audio,
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment
will be considered the official comment
with multimedia submissions and
should include all discussion points
desired. The EPA will generally not
consider a comment or its contents
submitted outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional information on submitting
comments, please visit https://
www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available at
either location (e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
James E. Grady, (214) 665–6745;
grady.james@epa.gov. To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment with Mr. Grady or Mr. Bill
Deese at (214) 665–7253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ means ‘‘the EPA.’’
Table of Contents
I. Background on DFW 2008 Eight-Hour O3
NAA Designation and Classification
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
79280
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 244 / Monday, December 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules
II. Background on Chapter 117 Proposed Rule
Revisions
III. Evaluation of Texas’ Proposed Chapter
117 NOX Control SIP
IV. The EPA’s Proposed Action
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background on DFW 2008 Eight-Hour
O3 NAA Designation and Classification
On March 27, 2008, the EPA revised
the primary and secondary O3 standard
to a level of 75 parts per billion (ppb).
Promulgation of a NAAQS triggers a
requirement for the EPA to designate
areas as nonattainment, attainment, or
unclassifiable, and to classify the NAAs
at the time of designation.
On May 21, 2012, the EPA established
initial area designations for most areas
of the country with respect to the 2008
primary and secondary eight-hour O3
NAAQS. The EPA published two rules
addressing final implementation 1 and
air quality designations.2 The
implementation rule established
classifications, associated attainment
deadlines, and revoked the 1997 O3
standards for transportation conformity
purposes. The designation rule finalized
the NAA boundaries for areas that did
not meet the 75 ppb standard.
Furthermore, the finalized boundaries
were classified according to the severity
of their O3 air quality problems as
determined by each area’s design
value.3 The O3 classification categories
were defined as Marginal, Moderate,
Serious, Severe, or Extreme.
Effective July 20, 2012, the DFW 2008
eight-hour O3 NAA was classified as
moderate, consisting of ten counties:
Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson,
Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, Tarrant,
and Wise County. With the exception of
Wise County, all of these counties were
designated as nonattainment with a
serious classification under the 1997 O3
standard. Although the NAA was most
recently classified as moderate, the first
nine counties are still required to meet
their more stringent serious
classification requirements previously
designated under the 1997 O3 standard.
Wise County, however, is required to
meet the moderate classification
requirements since it is newly
designated as nonattainment for the
DFW area.4 Previously, Wise County
was classified as an attainment area and
was exempt from the O3 NAA
requirements under the 1997 eight-hour
O3 standard.
States are required to adopt control
measures that implement Reasonably
Available Control Technology (RACT)
on major sources of NOX emissions.5
The major source emission threshold
level for the first nine counties (Collin,
Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman,
Parker, Rockwall, and Tarrant) remains
at a potential to emit (PTE) of fifty tons
per year (tpy) NOX based on its serious
classification under the 1997 standard.
Wise County major source threshold is
100 tpy NOX based on the moderate
classification requirement.
II. Background on Chapter 117
Proposed Rule Revisions
On July 10, 2015 the EPA received,
the TCEQ submitted rule revisions to 30
TAC, Chapter 117 ‘‘Control of Air
Pollution from Nitrogen Compounds.’’
The State revised Chapter 117 for all
major sources of NOX in the 2008 DFW
O3 NAA for the implementation of
RACT requirements in all counties as
required by CAA, section 172(c)(1) and
section 182(f). The state previously
adopted Chapter 117 NOX rules for
sources in the DFW area as part of the
SIP submitted on May 30, 2007, for the
1997 eight-hour O3 standard. The EPA
approved those rules on December 8,
2008.6 The scope of the Chapter 117
rule revisions implement the
following: 7
• Add NOX emission limits and
control requirements to major sources in
newly designated Wise County.
• Revoke an exemption for utility
turbines and auxiliary steam boilers
installed after November 15, 1992 in the
DFW area;
• Provide compliance flexibility to
affected units in all areas covered by
Chapter 117 for owners or operators of
boilers and process heaters used on a
temporary basis (<60 calendar days);
• Repeal certain major source
industrial rules and utility rules for the
DFW area that are now obsolete due to
the passing of compliance dates;
• Add compliance schedules for the
new or revised RACT rules and add
compliance dates for sources that
become subject to these rules after the
initial compliance date;
• Add definitions to reflect the
change in attainment status of Wise
County;
• Implement work practice standards
or operating requirements
• Update associated monitoring,
recordkeeping, and reporting
requirements
• Establish exemptions
Table 2 contains a list of the sections
of Chapter 117 with adopted
subchapters, divisions, and key sections
with modifications associated with the
July 10, 2015 DFW 2008 eight-hour O3
SIP submittal.
TABLE 2—DESCRIPTION AND SECTIONS OF 30 TAC, CHAPTER 117 PROPOSED FOR MODIFICATION
Description
Section
Subchapter A: Definitions .........................................................................
Subchapter B, Division 4, DFW Eight-Hour O3 NAA Major Sources ......
117.10.
117.400, 117.403, 117.410, 117.423, 117.425, 117.430, 117.435,
117.440, 117.445, 117.450, 117.454, and 117.456.
117.1303, 117.1310, 117.1325, 117.1335, 117.1340, 117.1345,
117.1350, and 117.1354.
117.8000
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Subchapter C, Division 4, DFW Eight-Hour O3 NAA Utility Electric Generation Sources.
Subchapter G, Division 1, General Monitoring and Testing Requirements.
Subchapter H, Division 1, Compliance Schedules and Division 2, Compliance Flexibility.
1 See 77 FR 30160 ‘‘Implementation of the 2008
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone:
Nonattainment Area Classifications Approach,
Attainment Deadlines and Revocation of the 1997
Ozone Standards for Transportation Conformity
Purposes.’’
2 See 77 FR 30088, ‘‘Air Quality Designations for
the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standards.’’
3 The air quality design value for the 8-hour
ozone NAAQS is the three-year average of the
annual fourth highest daily maximum eight-hour
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:25 Dec 18, 2015
Jkt 238001
117.9030 and 117.9130, 117.9800 and 117.9810.
average ozone concentration. See 40 CFR part 50,
appendix I.
4 In pursuant to the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruling
in favor of the EPA’s inclusion of Wise County in
the DFW 2008 eight-hour ozone nonattainment area
as lawful (see USCA Case #12–1309).
5 The EPA is not making a determination that the
TCEQ rules included in these revisions will meet
the RACT requirements of the CAA section 182(b)
for the 2008 O3 NAAQS. The EPA will make that
review in a separate action. The EPA is only finding
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that these rule changes will strengthen the SIP by
achieving NOX reductions in the DFW NAA.
6 See 73 FR 73562.
7 This is not an exhaustive list of changes to the
30 TAC Chapter 117 rules. For a complete summary
of all Chapter 117 sections associated with this SIP
revision, please refer to the Technical Support
Document (TSD), ‘‘30 Texas Administrative Code
(TAC) Chapter 117 Control of Air Pollution from
Nitrogen Compounds,’’ a copy of which is posted
in the docket of this proposal.
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
79281
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 244 / Monday, December 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Table 3 contains a list of the sections
of Chapter 117 with adopted
subchapters, divisions, and key sections
with new requirements associated with
the July 10, 2015 DFW 2008 eight-hour
O3 SIP submittal.
TABLE 3—DESCRIPTION AND SECTIONS OF 30 TAC, CHAPTER 117 PROPOSED NEW
Description
Section
Subchapter B, Division 4, DFW Eight-Hour O3 NAA Major Sources ......
Per TCEQ’s request, the following
sections listed in Table 4 below will not
become a part of the EPA-approved
Texas SIP. These rules pertain mainly to
117.405, 117.452.
the control of carbon monoxide and
ammonia emissions, which are not O3
precursors and, therefore, not necessary
components of the DFW SIP. The EPA
concurs that these rules can remain
outside of the SIP.
TABLE 4—DESCRIPTION AND SECTIONS OF 30 TAC, CHAPTER 117 NOT IN TEXAS SIP
Description
Sections
Previously excluded and the TCEQ continues to ask that these remain
outside the SIP.
Adopted new and will not be submitted as a SIP revision ......................
117.210(c), 117.225, 117.410(d), 117.425, 117.1110(b), 117.1125,
117.1310(b), and 117.1325.
117.405(d).
Table 5 contains subchapters,
divisions, and key sections proposed for
repeal from the SIP by the TCEQ. The
TCEQ adopts the repeal of existing
Subchapters B and C in Division 2 as
well as sections 117.9010 and 117.9110
of Subchapter H in Division 1 because
compliance dates for sources of NOX
subject to these have passed and are
now considered obsolete. Furthermore,
sources previously subject are now
required to comply with more stringent
rules in existing Subchapter B and C,
Division 4 and in revised sections
117.9030, 117.9130.
TABLE 5—DESCRIPTION AND SECTIONS OF 30 TAC, CHAPTER 117 PROPOSED FOR REPEAL
Description
Section
Subchapter B, Division 2, DFW O3 NAA Major Sources .........................
117.200, 117.203, 117.205, 117.210, 117.215, 117.223, 117.225,
117.230, 117.235, 117.240, 117.245, 117.252, 117.254, 117.256.
117.1100, 117.1103, 117.1105, 117.1110, 117.1115, 117.1120,
117.1125, 117.1135, 117.1140, 117.1145, 117.1152, 117.1154,
117.1156.
117.9010, 117.9110.
Subchapter C, Division 2, DFW O3 NAA Utility Electric Generation
Sources.
Subchapter H, Division 1, Compliance Schedules ..................................
A complete summary along with all
non-substantive changes pertaining to
reformatting, restructuring,
reorganizing, and administrative
revisions will be referenced in the
Technical Support Document (TSD),
‘‘30 Texas Administrative Code (TAC)
Chapter 117 Control of Air Pollution
from Nitrogen Compounds,’’ a copy of
which is posted in the docket of this
proposal.
III. Evaluation of Texas’ Proposed
Chapter 117 NOX Control SIP
sources in newly designated Wise
County. The new NOX emission limits
will assure that each source listed will
not exceed the 75 ppb O3 NAAQS
standard.
Please refer to Table 6 for a list of
NOX emissions specifications for major
TABLE 6—NOX EMISSION LIMITS FOR 2008 DFW 8-HOUR O3 NAA FOR MAJOR SOURCES IN WISE COUNTY
Type
Capacity
NOX Limit
Process Heaters ........
...................................
Max Rated Capacity ≥40 MMBtu/hr .............
An option ......................................................
Gas-Fired Rich-Burn
Gas-Fired Lean-Burn
.......................................................................
White Superior four-cycle units that have
been placed into service, modified, reconstructed, or relocated before June 1,
2015.
White Superior four-cycle units that have
been placed into service, modified, reconstructed, or relocated on or after June 1,
2015.
Clark two-cycle units that have been placed
into service, modified, reconstructed, or
relocated before June 1, 2015.
0.10 lb/MMBtu; ..........
or 82 ppmv NOX at
3% O2 dry basis.
0.50 g/hp-hr ..............
12.0 g/hp-hr ..............
117.405(b)(1).
117.405(b)(1).
Stationary, Reciprocating Internal
Combustion Engines.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Source
2.0 g/hp-hr ................
117.405(b)(2)(B)(i)(II).
12.0 g/hp-hr ..............
117.405(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:25 Dec 18, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
Citation
117.405(b)(2)(A).
117.405(b)(2)(B)(i)(I).
79282
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 244 / Monday, December 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 6—NOX EMISSION LIMITS FOR 2008 DFW 8-HOUR O3 NAA FOR MAJOR SOURCES IN WISE COUNTY—Continued
Source
Type
Turbines ....................
Capacity
Stationary Gas ..........
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Various controls for each major source
in Wise County are needed to achieve
the required NOX limits. Process heaters
are expected to achieve compliance after
installing dry low-NOX combustors with
the proposed 0.10 lb/MMBtu emission
specification. Gas-fired, rich-burn,
combustion engines are anticipated to
reach compliance using nonselective
catalytic reduction (NSCR) as primary
control technology with air-to-fuel ratio
regulators. The addition of a secondary
catalyst module may be required to meet
the proposed emission specification of
0.50 g/hp-hr, for gas-fired, lean-burn,
combustion engines. All other lean-burn
engines are estimated to reach
compliance after combustion
modifications with the proposed 2.0 g/
hp-hr emission specification. New gasfired, lean-burn engines can meet the
proposed2.0 g/hp-hr standard without
modification or installation of
additional controls.
It is estimated that the adopted rules
will reduce the amount of NOX in the
DFW area by 1.17 tons per day (tpd).
The resulting emission reductions will
assist Texas in demonstrating
attainment of the eight-hour O3 standard
within the DFW NAA. As a result, the
EPA is proposing to approve the NOX
emission requirements for affected
major sources in the DFW NAA.
IV. The EPAs Proposed Action
The EPA is proposing to approve the
submitted TAC Chapter 117 SIP
revisions into the SIP because they will
assist the DFW area into attainment
under the 2008 8-Hour O3 NAAQS by
keeping each emissions source below 75
ppb. The EPA is proposing to approve
all amended, repealed, and new sections
of Chapter 117 that are being submitted
as part of this SIP revision. The EPA is
not making a determination that the
TCEQ rules included in these revisions
will meet the RACT requirements of the
CAA § 182(b) for the 2008 O3 NAAQS.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:25 Dec 18, 2015
Jkt 238001
NOX Limit
Clark two-cycle units that have been placed
into service, modified, reconstructed, or
relocated on or after June 1, 2015.
Fairbanks Morse MEP two-cycle units that
have been placed into service, modified,
reconstructed, or relocated before June
1, 2015.
Fairbanks Morse MEP two-cycle units that
have been placed into service, modified,
reconstructed, or relocated on or after
June 1, 2015.
All others ......................................................
hp rating ≤10,000 hp ....................................
hp rating ≥10,000 hp ....................................
2.0 g/hp-hr ................
117.405(b)(2)(B)(ii)(II).
4.0 g/hp-hr ................
117.405(b)(2)(B)(iii)(I).
2.0 g/hp-hr ................
117.405(b)(2)(B)(iii)(II).
2.0 g/hp-hr ................
0.55 lb/MMBtu ...........
0.15 lb/MMBtu ...........
117.405(b)(2)(B)(iv).
117.405(b)(3)(A).
117.405(b)(3)(B).
The EPA will make that review in a
separate action. The EPA is only finding
that these rule changes will strengthen
the SIP by achieving NOX reductions in
the DFW NAA.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this action, the EPA is proposing to
include in a final rule regulatory text
that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with the
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
revisions to the Texas regulations as
described in the Proposed Action
section above. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents
generally available electronically
through www.regulations.gov and/or in
hard copy at the EPA Region 6 office.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that states meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Citation
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the proposed rule does
not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
oxides, Ozone, Reasonably available
control technology, Reporting and
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 244 / Monday, December 21, 2015 / Proposed Rules
• Individuals with a Disability: We
will provide an appropriate
accommodation, including alternative
formats, upon request. To make such a
request, please contact Marlina MosesGaither, (202) 795–7409 (Voice) or at
marlina.moses-gaither@acl.hhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg
Pugh, Administration for Community
Living, telephone (202) 795–7422
(Voice). This is not a toll-free number.
This document will be made available
in alternative formats upon request.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 8, 2015.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2015–31662 Filed 12–18–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
45 CFR Part 1330
RIN 0985–AA12
National Institute on Disability,
Independent Living, and Rehabilitation
Research
National Institute on Disability,
Independent Living, and Rehabilitation
Research; Administration for
Community Living; HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
implement the Workforce Innovation
and Opportunity Act of 2014 and reflect
the transfer of the National Institute on
Disability, Independent Living, and
Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) from
the Department of Education to the
Department of Health and Human
Services. The previous regulations were
issued by the Department of Education.
The rulemaking will consolidate the
NIDILRR regulations into a single part,
align the regulations with the current
statute and HHS policies, and will
provide guidance to NIDILRR grantees.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
February 19, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
in one of following ways (no duplicates,
please): Written comments may be
submitted through any of the methods
specified below. Please do not submit
duplicate comments.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: You
may (and we encourage you to) submit
electronic comments on this regulation
at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions under the ‘‘submit a
comment’’ tab. Attachments should be
in Microsoft Word, WordPerfect, or
Excel; however, we prefer Microsoft
Word.
• Regular, Express, or Overnight Mail:
You may mail written comments to the
following address only: Administration
for Community Living, Attention:
NIDILRR NPRM, U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services,
Washington, DC 20201. Please allow
sufficient time for mailed comments to
be received before the close of the
comment period.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:25 Dec 18, 2015
Jkt 238001
I. Workforce Innovation and
Opportunity Act of 2014
The Workforce Innovation and
Opportunity Act of 2014 (‘‘WIOA,’’ Pub.
L. 113–128), signed into law on July 22,
2014, included significant changes to
Title II of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
The first of these is the insertion of a
new name, the National Institute on
Disability, Independent Living, and
Rehabilitation Research (‘‘NIDILRR,’’
which was previously the National
Institute on Disability and
Rehabilitation Research). WIOA also
relocates NIDILRR from the Department
of Education (‘‘ED’’) to the
Administration for Community Living
(‘‘ACL’’) of the Department of Health
and Human Services.
II. Programs Authorized by Title II of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
Amended by WIOA
A. Disability, Independent Living, and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers
The purpose of the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers program is to plan and conduct
research, development, demonstrations,
training, dissemination, and related
activities, including international
activities, to maximize the full inclusion
and integration into society,
employment, independent living, family
support, and economic and social selfsufficiency of individuals with
disabilities, especially individuals with
the most severe disabilities, and
improve the effectiveness of services
authorized under the Rehabilitation Act
of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 701 et seq.
To this end, NIDILRR provides grants
to establish and support:
• Disability, Independent Living, and
Rehabilitation Research Projects;
• Field Initiated Projects;
• Advanced Rehabilitation Research
Training Projects;
• Rehabilitation Research and
Training Centers; and
• Rehabilitation Engineering Research
Centers.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
79283
Eligible entities for awards under this
program include States, public or
private agencies and organizations,
institutions of higher education, and
Indian tribes and tribal organizations.
B. Research Fellowships
The purpose of the Research
Fellowships program is to build
research capacity by providing support
to highly qualified individuals,
including those who are individuals
with disabilities, to perform research on
rehabilitation and independent living of
individuals with disabilities. Any
individual is eligible for assistance
under this program who has training
and experience that indicate a potential
for engaging in scientific research
related to the solution of rehabilitation
problems of individuals with
disabilities. The program provides
grants to support two categories of
Fellowships: Distinguished Fellowships
(for those with seven or more years of
relevant research experience) and Merit
Fellowships (for individuals in earlier
stages of their careers in research).
C. Special Projects and Demonstrations
for Spinal Cord Injuries
The Special Projects and
Demonstrations for Spinal Cord Injuries
program provides assistance to establish
innovative projects for the delivery,
demonstration, and evaluation of
comprehensive medical, vocational, and
other rehabilitation services to meet the
wide range of needs, including
independent living, of individuals with
spinal cord injuries. The entities eligible
for an award under these Projects and
Demonstrations are the same as for
Disability and Rehabilitation Research
Projects and Centers.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
Department of Education regulations
governing the National Institute on
Disability and Rehabilitation Research
are found at 34 CFR parts 350, 356, and
359. Part 350 sets forth regulations
addressing the Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Projects and
Centers Program; part 356 sets forth
regulations addressing Disability and
Rehabilitation Research Fellowships;
and part 359 sets forth regulations
addressing Special Projects and
Demonstrations for Spinal Cord Injuries.
ACL proposes to streamline the
NIDILRR regulations and to consolidate
them into one part, 45 CFR part 1330.
In our regulations, we propose to
eliminate regulatory language included
in the corresponding ED regulations that
does not add further interpretation to
the statutory language. We also propose
to eliminate unnecessary regulatory
E:\FR\FM\21DEP1.SGM
21DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 244 (Monday, December 21, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 79279-79283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31662]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0497; FRL-9940-17-Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Control
of Air Pollution From Nitrogen Compounds State Implementation Plan
AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing
approval of revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted
by the State of Texas through the Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality (TCEQ) on July 10, 2015. The Texas SIP submission revises 30
Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 117 rules for control of
nitrogen compounds to assist the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) moderate
nonattainment area (NAA) in attaining the 2008 eight-hour ozone
(O3) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before January 20, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2015-0497, by one of the following methods:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions.
Email: Mr. Guy Donaldson at donaldson.guy@epa.gov.
Mail or delivery: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Branch
(6MM-AA), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite
1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
Instructions: Direct comments to Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0497.
The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change and made available online at
www.regulations.gov. The EPA includes any personal information
provided, unless a comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit any information
electronically that is considered CBI or any other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. The www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means the EPA will not know
one's identity or contact information unless it is provided in the body
of a comment. If a comment is emailed directly to the EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, then the sender's email address will
automatically be captured and included as part of the public docket
comment and made available on the Internet. If a comment is submitted
electronically, then the EPA recommends that one's name and other
contact information be included in the body of the comment, and with
any disk or CD-ROM submitted. If the EPA cannot read a particular
comment due to technical difficulties and is unable to contact for
clarification, the EPA may not be able to consider the comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment will be considered the official comment
with multimedia submissions and should include all discussion points
desired. The EPA will generally not consider a comment or its contents
submitted outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For additional information on submitting
comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the EPA
Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material), and some may not be publicly available at either location
(e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James E. Grady, (214) 665-6745;
grady.james@epa.gov. To inspect the hard copy materials, please
schedule an appointment with Mr. Grady or Mr. Bill Deese at (214) 665-
7253.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' means ``the EPA.''
Table of Contents
I. Background on DFW 2008 Eight-Hour O3 NAA Designation
and Classification
[[Page 79280]]
II. Background on Chapter 117 Proposed Rule Revisions
III. Evaluation of Texas' Proposed Chapter 117 NOX
Control SIP
IV. The EPA's Proposed Action
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background on DFW 2008 Eight-Hour O3 NAA Designation and
Classification
On March 27, 2008, the EPA revised the primary and secondary
O3 standard to a level of 75 parts per billion (ppb).
Promulgation of a NAAQS triggers a requirement for the EPA to designate
areas as nonattainment, attainment, or unclassifiable, and to classify
the NAAs at the time of designation.
On May 21, 2012, the EPA established initial area designations for
most areas of the country with respect to the 2008 primary and
secondary eight-hour O3 NAAQS. The EPA published two rules
addressing final implementation \1\ and air quality designations.\2\
The implementation rule established classifications, associated
attainment deadlines, and revoked the 1997 O3 standards for
transportation conformity purposes. The designation rule finalized the
NAA boundaries for areas that did not meet the 75 ppb standard.
Furthermore, the finalized boundaries were classified according to the
severity of their O3 air quality problems as determined by
each area's design value.\3\ The O3 classification
categories were defined as Marginal, Moderate, Serious, Severe, or
Extreme.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 77 FR 30160 ``Implementation of the 2008 National
Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Nonattainment Area
Classifications Approach, Attainment Deadlines and Revocation of the
1997 Ozone Standards for Transportation Conformity Purposes.''
\2\ See 77 FR 30088, ``Air Quality Designations for the 2008
Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards.''
\3\ The air quality design value for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS is
the three-year average of the annual fourth highest daily maximum
eight-hour average ozone concentration. See 40 CFR part 50, appendix
I.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective July 20, 2012, the DFW 2008 eight-hour O3 NAA
was classified as moderate, consisting of ten counties: Collin, Dallas,
Denton, Ellis, Johnson, Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, Tarrant, and Wise
County. With the exception of Wise County, all of these counties were
designated as nonattainment with a serious classification under the
1997 O3 standard. Although the NAA was most recently
classified as moderate, the first nine counties are still required to
meet their more stringent serious classification requirements
previously designated under the 1997 O3 standard. Wise
County, however, is required to meet the moderate classification
requirements since it is newly designated as nonattainment for the DFW
area.\4\ Previously, Wise County was classified as an attainment area
and was exempt from the O3 NAA requirements under the 1997
eight-hour O3 standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ In pursuant to the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit ruling in favor of the EPA's inclusion
of Wise County in the DFW 2008 eight-hour ozone nonattainment area
as lawful (see USCA Case #12-1309).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
States are required to adopt control measures that implement
Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) on major sources of
NOX emissions.\5\ The major source emission threshold level
for the first nine counties (Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson,
Kaufman, Parker, Rockwall, and Tarrant) remains at a potential to emit
(PTE) of fifty tons per year (tpy) NOX based on its serious
classification under the 1997 standard. Wise County major source
threshold is 100 tpy NOX based on the moderate
classification requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The EPA is not making a determination that the TCEQ rules
included in these revisions will meet the RACT requirements of the
CAA section 182(b) for the 2008 O3 NAAQS. The EPA will
make that review in a separate action. The EPA is only finding that
these rule changes will strengthen the SIP by achieving
NOX reductions in the DFW NAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Background on Chapter 117 Proposed Rule Revisions
On July 10, 2015 the EPA received, the TCEQ submitted rule
revisions to 30 TAC, Chapter 117 ``Control of Air Pollution from
Nitrogen Compounds.'' The State revised Chapter 117 for all major
sources of NOX in the 2008 DFW O3 NAA for the
implementation of RACT requirements in all counties as required by CAA,
section 172(c)(1) and section 182(f). The state previously adopted
Chapter 117 NOX rules for sources in the DFW area as part of
the SIP submitted on May 30, 2007, for the 1997 eight-hour
O3 standard. The EPA approved those rules on December 8,
2008.\6\ The scope of the Chapter 117 rule revisions implement the
following: \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See 73 FR 73562.
\7\ This is not an exhaustive list of changes to the 30 TAC
Chapter 117 rules. For a complete summary of all Chapter 117
sections associated with this SIP revision, please refer to the
Technical Support Document (TSD), ``30 Texas Administrative Code
(TAC) Chapter 117 Control of Air Pollution from Nitrogen
Compounds,'' a copy of which is posted in the docket of this
proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Add NOX emission limits and control
requirements to major sources in newly designated Wise County.
Revoke an exemption for utility turbines and auxiliary
steam boilers installed after November 15, 1992 in the DFW area;
Provide compliance flexibility to affected units in all
areas covered by Chapter 117 for owners or operators of boilers and
process heaters used on a temporary basis (<60 calendar days);
Repeal certain major source industrial rules and utility
rules for the DFW area that are now obsolete due to the passing of
compliance dates;
Add compliance schedules for the new or revised RACT rules
and add compliance dates for sources that become subject to these rules
after the initial compliance date;
Add definitions to reflect the change in attainment status
of Wise County;
Implement work practice standards or operating
requirements
Update associated monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting
requirements
Establish exemptions
Table 2 contains a list of the sections of Chapter 117 with adopted
subchapters, divisions, and key sections with modifications associated
with the July 10, 2015 DFW 2008 eight-hour O3 SIP submittal.
Table 2--Description and Sections of 30 TAC, Chapter 117 Proposed for
Modification
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description Section
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter A: Definitions.............. 117.10.
Subchapter B, Division 4, DFW Eight- 117.400, 117.403, 117.410,
Hour O3 NAA Major Sources. 117.423, 117.425, 117.430,
117.435, 117.440, 117.445,
117.450, 117.454, and 117.456.
Subchapter C, Division 4, DFW Eight- 117.1303, 117.1310, 117.1325,
Hour O3 NAA Utility Electric 117.1335, 117.1340, 117.1345,
Generation Sources. 117.1350, and 117.1354.
Subchapter G, Division 1, General 117.8000
Monitoring and Testing Requirements.
Subchapter H, Division 1, Compliance 117.9030 and 117.9130, 117.9800
Schedules and Division 2, Compliance and 117.9810.
Flexibility.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 79281]]
Table 3 contains a list of the sections of Chapter 117 with adopted
subchapters, divisions, and key sections with new requirements
associated with the July 10, 2015 DFW 2008 eight-hour O3 SIP
submittal.
Table 3--Description and Sections of 30 TAC, Chapter 117 Proposed New
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description Section
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter B, Division 4, DFW Eight- 117.405, 117.452.
Hour O3 NAA Major Sources.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per TCEQ's request, the following sections listed in Table 4 below
will not become a part of the EPA-approved Texas SIP. These rules
pertain mainly to the control of carbon monoxide and ammonia emissions,
which are not O3 precursors and, therefore, not necessary
components of the DFW SIP. The EPA concurs that these rules can remain
outside of the SIP.
Table 4--Description and Sections of 30 TAC, Chapter 117 Not in Texas
SIP
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description Sections
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Previously excluded and the TCEQ 117.210(c), 117.225,
continues to ask that these remain 117.410(d), 117.425,
outside the SIP. 117.1110(b), 117.1125,
117.1310(b), and 117.1325.
Adopted new and will not be submitted 117.405(d).
as a SIP revision.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 5 contains subchapters, divisions, and key sections proposed
for repeal from the SIP by the TCEQ. The TCEQ adopts the repeal of
existing Subchapters B and C in Division 2 as well as sections 117.9010
and 117.9110 of Subchapter H in Division 1 because compliance dates for
sources of NOX subject to these have passed and are now
considered obsolete. Furthermore, sources previously subject are now
required to comply with more stringent rules in existing Subchapter B
and C, Division 4 and in revised sections 117.9030, 117.9130.
Table 5--Description and Sections of 30 TAC, Chapter 117 Proposed for
Repeal
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description Section
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter B, Division 2, DFW O3 NAA 117.200, 117.203, 117.205,
Major Sources. 117.210, 117.215, 117.223,
117.225, 117.230, 117.235,
117.240, 117.245, 117.252,
117.254, 117.256.
Subchapter C, Division 2, DFW O3 NAA 117.1100, 117.1103, 117.1105,
Utility Electric Generation Sources. 117.1110, 117.1115, 117.1120,
117.1125, 117.1135, 117.1140,
117.1145, 117.1152, 117.1154,
117.1156.
Subchapter H, Division 1, Compliance 117.9010, 117.9110.
Schedules.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A complete summary along with all non-substantive changes
pertaining to reformatting, restructuring, reorganizing, and
administrative revisions will be referenced in the Technical Support
Document (TSD), ``30 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 117
Control of Air Pollution from Nitrogen Compounds,'' a copy of which is
posted in the docket of this proposal.
III. Evaluation of Texas' Proposed Chapter 117 NOX Control
SIP
Please refer to Table 6 for a list of NOX emissions
specifications for major sources in newly designated Wise County. The
new NOX emission limits will assure that each source listed
will not exceed the 75 ppb O3 NAAQS standard.
Table 6--NOX Emission Limits for 2008 DFW 8-Hour O3 NAA for Major Sources in Wise County
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Type Capacity NOX Limit Citation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Process Heaters..................... ...................... Max Rated Capacity >=40 0.10 lb/MMBtu;........ 117.405(b)(1).
MMBtu/hr.
An option.................. or 82 ppmv NOX at 3% 117.405(b)(1).
O2 dry basis.
Stationary, Reciprocating Internal Gas-Fired Rich-Burn... ........................... 0.50 g/hp-hr.......... 117.405(b)(2)(A).
Combustion Engines. Gas-Fired Lean-Burn... White Superior four-cycle 12.0 g/hp-hr.......... 117.405(b)(2)(B)(i)(I).
units that have been
placed into service,
modified, reconstructed,
or relocated before June
1, 2015.
White Superior four-cycle 2.0 g/hp-hr........... 117.405(b)(2)(B)(i)(II).
units that have been
placed into service,
modified, reconstructed,
or relocated on or after
June 1, 2015.
Clark two-cycle units that 12.0 g/hp-hr.......... 117.405(b)(2)(B)(ii)(I).
have been placed into
service, modified,
reconstructed, or
relocated before June 1,
2015.
[[Page 79282]]
Clark two-cycle units that 2.0 g/hp-hr........... 117.405(b)(2)(B)(ii)(II).
have been placed into
service, modified,
reconstructed, or
relocated on or after June
1, 2015.
Fairbanks Morse MEP two- 4.0 g/hp-hr........... 117.405(b)(2)(B)(iii)(I).
cycle units that have been
placed into service,
modified, reconstructed,
or relocated before June
1, 2015.
Fairbanks Morse MEP two- 2.0 g/hp-hr........... 117.405(b)(2)(B)(iii)(II).
cycle units that have been
placed into service,
modified, reconstructed,
or relocated on or after
June 1, 2015.
All others................. 2.0 g/hp-hr........... 117.405(b)(2)(B)(iv).
Turbines............................ Stationary Gas........ hp rating <=10,000 hp...... 0.55 lb/MMBtu......... 117.405(b)(3)(A).
hp rating >=10,000 hp...... 0.15 lb/MMBtu......... 117.405(b)(3)(B).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Various controls for each major source in Wise County are needed to
achieve the required NOX limits. Process heaters are
expected to achieve compliance after installing dry low-NOX
combustors with the proposed 0.10 lb/MMBtu emission specification. Gas-
fired, rich-burn, combustion engines are anticipated to reach
compliance using nonselective catalytic reduction (NSCR) as primary
control technology with air-to-fuel ratio regulators. The addition of a
secondary catalyst module may be required to meet the proposed emission
specification of 0.50 g/hp-hr, for gas-fired, lean-burn, combustion
engines. All other lean-burn engines are estimated to reach compliance
after combustion modifications with the proposed 2.0 g/hp-hr emission
specification. New gas-fired, lean-burn engines can meet the proposed
2.0 g/hp-hr standard without modification or installation of additional
controls.
It is estimated that the adopted rules will reduce the amount of
NOX in the DFW area by 1.17 tons per day (tpd). The
resulting emission reductions will assist Texas in demonstrating
attainment of the eight-hour O3 standard within the DFW NAA.
As a result, the EPA is proposing to approve the NOX
emission requirements for affected major sources in the DFW NAA.
IV. The EPAs Proposed Action
The EPA is proposing to approve the submitted TAC Chapter 117 SIP
revisions into the SIP because they will assist the DFW area into
attainment under the 2008 8-Hour O3 NAAQS by keeping each
emissions source below 75 ppb. The EPA is proposing to approve all
amended, repealed, and new sections of Chapter 117 that are being
submitted as part of this SIP revision. The EPA is not making a
determination that the TCEQ rules included in these revisions will meet
the RACT requirements of the CAA Sec. 182(b) for the 2008
O3 NAAQS. The EPA will make that review in a separate
action. The EPA is only finding that these rule changes will strengthen
the SIP by achieving NOX reductions in the DFW NAA.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this action, the EPA is proposing to include in a final rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference revisions to the Texas regulations as
described in the Proposed Action section above. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents generally available
electronically through www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the
EPA Region 6 office.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that states meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will
not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
oxides, Ozone, Reasonably available control technology, Reporting and
[[Page 79283]]
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 8, 2015.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2015-31662 Filed 12-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P