Intent To Prepare a Draft Feasibility Study and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Navigational Improvements to Manatee Harbor in Manatee County, FL, 79035-79036 [2015-31807]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 243 / Friday, December 18, 2015 / Notices
may also require modifications to Units
2 and 3.
Pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
Marin County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District Zone 9
(MCFCWCD) is the lead agency and
local sponsor in preparing an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The
Corps and MCFCWCD have agreed to
jointly prepare a Draft EIS/EIR to
optimize efficiency and avoid
duplication. The Draft EIS/EIR is
intended to be sufficient in scope to
address the Federal, state and local
requirements and environmental issues
concerning the proposed activities and
permit approvals.
The USACE’s Corte Madera Creek
Flood Control Project is consistent and
compatible with the District’s Ross
Valley Flood Control Program, the
purpose of which is to manage flood
risk in the Ross Valley watershed.
Project Site and Background
Information: Corte Madera Creek drains
an area of approximately 28 square
miles in Marin County, CA and
discharges into the San Francisco Bay
nine miles north of the Golden Gate
Bridge. Unit 4 extends from downstream
of the Lagunitas Road Bridge, near the
upstream terminus of Unit 3, to the Sir
Francis Drake Boulevard Bridge right
before the Ross/San Anselmo town line.
Although Units 1, 2, and 3 channel
modifications were completed in 1971,
public concerns led to a delay in the
planned actions for Unit 4. In 1996,
Marin County requested the completion
of Unit 4 by the Corps, and damages
incurred by the December 2005 flood
also renewed public interest in finding
solutions to minimize the risk of future
floods.
Additional studies conducted by the
Corps focused on evaluating the design
performance of Units 3 and 4. These
studies identified the abrupt transition
between Units 3 and 4 created by the
existing Denil fish ladder, the narrow
channel condition on the east and west
bank, and the Lagunitas Road Bridge as
constrictions to flood flow. The Town of
Ross replaced the Lagunitas Road Bridge
in 2010 with a higher bridge profile to
accommodate a greater flow capacity of
approximately 5,400 cubic feet per
second.
A charrette was held in 2013 to restart
the project study under the Corps’
SMART Planning principles. SMART
Planning is intended to be Specific,
Measureable, Attainable, Risk Informed,
and Timely planning to complete
USACE feasibility studies in a costeffective and efficient manner. More
information on the SMART Planning
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:20 Dec 17, 2015
Jkt 238001
process is available at https://planning.
usace.army.mil/toolbox/smart.cfm.
Additional information on this project
can be found at https://www.marin
watersheds.org/documents_and_
reports/USACECorteMaderaCreek
Project.html.
Purpose and Need: The purpose of the
project is to manage flood risk from
Corte Madera Creek associated with
Unit 4. The need of the project is to
address channel modifications to Unit 4,
from the upstream end of the existing
Unit 3 concrete channel to Sir Francis
Drake Boulevard at the border of Ross
and San Anselmo, which may also
require modifications to Units 3 and 2.
Unit 3 extends from the upstream end
of the concrete channel in Ross
downstream to the College Avenue
Bridge. Unit 2 extends from College
Avenue Bridge downstream to Bon Air
Bridge in Larkspur.
Issues: Potentially significant issues
associated with the project may include:
hydrology, geology, land use and
planning, population and housing,
water and air quality, climate change,
biological resources, transportation,
noise, aesthetics, utilities and service
systems, cultural resources, human
health and safety, and social and
economic effects, as well as cumulative
impacts from past, present and
reasonably foreseeable future projects.
Alternative actions will be evaluated
that will consider fish passage for
threatened and endangered fish species
that migrate through the project area,
riparian habitat, as well as other
potential environmental issues of
concern.
Scoping Process: The Corps is seeking
participation of all interested Federal,
state, and local agencies, Native
American groups, and other concerned
private organizations or individuals
through this public notice.
The purpose of the public scoping
meeting is to solicit comments regarding
the potential impacts, environmental
issues, and alternatives associated with
the proposed action to be considered in
the Draft EIS/EIR. The meeting place,
date and time will be advertised in
advance in local newspapers, and
meeting announcement letters will be
sent to interested parties. The Draft
Integrated General Reevaluation Report
and EIS/EIR is expected to be available
for public review and comment in the
Fall of 2016 and a public meeting will
be held after its publication.
John C. Morrow,
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army District
Engineer.
[FR Doc. 2015–31804 Filed 12–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
79035
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft Feasibility
Study and Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for Navigational
Improvements to Manatee Harbor in
Manatee County, FL
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The purpose of the feasibility
study is to improve navigation in
Manatee Harbor.
ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Planning Division,
Environmental Branch, P.O. Box 4970,
Jacksonville, FL 32232–0019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Aubree Hershorin at (904) 232–2136 or
email at
Aubree.G.Hershorin@usace.army.mil.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Description of the Proposed Action.
Proposed navigational improvements to
Manatee Harbor include deepening the
harbor up to minus 43 feet and
widening the harbor.
2. Reasonable Alternatives. Various
increments of widening and deepening,
as well as other alternatives will be
evaluated. The dredged material is
expected to be suitable for placement in
the Ocean Dredged Material Disposal
Site (ODMDS) located approximately 30
miles from the mouth of Tampa Bay.
Some material may be suitable for
placement in dredged holes and for
other purposes, and the study may
evaluate the expansion of existing
dredged material management areas.
Other alternatives as identified during
the scoping and plan formulation
process will be considered.
3. Scoping Process:
a. Public and Agency Involvement. A
scoping letter is being sent to agencies,
commercial interests, and the public.
b. Issues to be Analyzed in Depth in
the DEIS. Important issues expected
include impacts to protected species,
seagrass, hardgrounds, socio-economic
factors, and any other factors that might
be determined during the scoping and
plan formulation process.
c. Possible Assignments for Input into
the EIS among Lead and Potential
Cooperating Agencies.
—U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Input
concerning listed species, critical
habitat, and other fish and wildlife
resources.
—National Marine Fisheries Service:
Input concerning listed species,
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
79036
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 243 / Friday, December 18, 2015 / Notices
critical habitat, and essential fish
habitat.
—U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency: Input concerning disposal in
the Tampa ODMDS.
—The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is
the Lead agency and, together with
the non-federal sponsor (Port
Manatee), will assume responsibility
for all other aspects of the EIS.
d. Other Environmental Review and
Consultation Requirements. The
proposed action is subject to the
requirements of the Endangered Species
Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act,
Essential Fish Habitat requirements,
National Historic Preservation Act,
numerous other laws and executive
orders, and any other requirements that
might be identified during the scoping
and plan formulation process.
4. Scoping Meeting. A public scoping
meeting will be held on January 20,
2016, from 3:30 to 6:30 p.m. at the Port
Manatee Intermodal Center, 1905
Intermodal Circle, Palmetto, FL 34221.
5. Date the DEIS Will Be Made
Available to the Public. Dependent on
the issues, alternatives, investigations,
and other requirements identified
during the scoping and plan formulation
process; the Draft EIS should be
available by November 2017.
Dated: December 10, 2015.
Eric P. Summa,
Chief, Planning Division.
Background
[FR Doc. 2015–31807 Filed 12–17–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Intent To Compromise Claim Against
the State of Washington Department of
Services for the Blind
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The United States Department
of Education (Department) intends to
compromise a claim against the State of
Washington Department of Services for
the Blind (Washington) now pending
before the Office of Administrative Law
Judges (OALJ), Docket No. 15–30–R.
Before compromising a claim, the
Department must publish its intent to
do so in the Federal Register and
provide the public an opportunity to
comment on this action.
DATES: We must receive your comments
on the proposed action on or before
February 1, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Address all comments
concerning the proposed action to
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:20 Dec 17, 2015
Marcus Hedrick, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room
6E220, Washington, DC 20202–2110.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marcus Hedrick. Telephone: 202–401–
8316 or by email: marcus.hedrick@
ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf or a text telephone,
you may call the Federal Relay Service,
toll free, at 1–800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Invitation To Comment: We invite
you to submit comments regarding this
proposed action. During and after the
comment period you may inspect all
public comments in Room 6E312, FB–
6, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC, between the hours of
8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Washington, DC
time, Monday through Friday of each
week except Federal holidays.
Assistance to Individuals With
Disabilities in Reviewing Comments: On
request we will provide an appropriate
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an
individual with a disability who needs
assistance to review the comments for
this notice. If you want to schedule an
appointment for this type of
accommodation or auxiliary aid, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Jkt 238001
On March 10, 2015, the Acting
Assistant Secretary for Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services
(Assistant Secretary) issued two
program determination letters (PDLs)
seeking to recover a total of $730,053 of
Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) State
grant funds from Washington. Based on
findings in single audits of Washington
(Audit Control Numbers 10–12–38440
and 10–13–48310), these funds were
determined by the Assistant Secretary to
have been expended, during the fiscal
years 2012 and 2013, in violation of the
indirect cost provisions under the
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations at 34 CFR
76.560. Specifically, the PDLs indicated
that Washington had charged indirect
costs to the VR grant program without
an approved indirect cost agreement,
and identified $621,871 for recovery in
fiscal year 2012 and $108,182 for
recovery in fiscal year 2013.
Washington filed Applications for
Review of these PDLs with the OALJ on
May 14, 2015. On June 9, 2015, the
OALJ proposed processing the two
appeals under one docket number, and
with consent of the parties subsequently
combined the appeals. On June 27,
2015, the OALJ granted the parties’ Joint
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Motion to Request Mediation, Waive
81.39(a) and Suspend the Procedural
Schedule (Joint Motion). Since the Joint
Motion was granted, Washington and
the Department have engaged in
facilitated mediation to attempt to
resolve the recovery action.
The Department proposes to
compromise the total claim to $530,053
(the fiscal year 2012 recovery will be
reduced to $451,605 and the fiscal year
2013 recovery will be reduced to
$78,447). The Department has
determined that it would not be
practical or in the public interest to
continue proceeding, based on litigation
risks and the cost of proceeding through
the administrative, and possible court,
process for this appeal. Also, in light of
corrective actions Washington has
taken, the Department does not
anticipate this violation of the indirect
cost provisions will recur. As a result,
under the authority in 20 U.S.C.
1234a(j), the Department has
determined that compromise of this
claim to $530,053 is appropriate and in
the public interest. The public is invited
to comment on the Department’s intent
to compromise this claim. Additional
information may be obtained by calling
or writing the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audio tape, or compact disc) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to this Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1234a(j).
Delegation of Authority: The Secretary
of Education has delegated authority to
Thomas P. Skelly to perform the
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 243 (Friday, December 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79035-79036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31807]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft Feasibility Study and Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for Navigational Improvements to Manatee Harbor
in Manatee County, FL
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DOD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The purpose of the feasibility study is to improve navigation
in Manatee Harbor.
ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Planning Division,
Environmental Branch, P.O. Box 4970, Jacksonville, FL 32232-0019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Aubree Hershorin at (904) 232-2136
or email at Aubree.G.Hershorin@usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Description of the Proposed Action. Proposed navigational
improvements to Manatee Harbor include deepening the harbor up to minus
43 feet and widening the harbor.
2. Reasonable Alternatives. Various increments of widening and
deepening, as well as other alternatives will be evaluated. The dredged
material is expected to be suitable for placement in the Ocean Dredged
Material Disposal Site (ODMDS) located approximately 30 miles from the
mouth of Tampa Bay. Some material may be suitable for placement in
dredged holes and for other purposes, and the study may evaluate the
expansion of existing dredged material management areas. Other
alternatives as identified during the scoping and plan formulation
process will be considered.
3. Scoping Process:
a. Public and Agency Involvement. A scoping letter is being sent to
agencies, commercial interests, and the public.
b. Issues to be Analyzed in Depth in the DEIS. Important issues
expected include impacts to protected species, seagrass, hardgrounds,
socio-economic factors, and any other factors that might be determined
during the scoping and plan formulation process.
c. Possible Assignments for Input into the EIS among Lead and
Potential Cooperating Agencies.
--U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Input concerning listed species,
critical habitat, and other fish and wildlife resources.
--National Marine Fisheries Service: Input concerning listed species,
[[Page 79036]]
critical habitat, and essential fish habitat.
--U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Input concerning disposal in
the Tampa ODMDS.
--The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is the Lead agency and, together
with the non-federal sponsor (Port Manatee), will assume responsibility
for all other aspects of the EIS.
d. Other Environmental Review and Consultation Requirements. The
proposed action is subject to the requirements of the Endangered
Species Act, Marine Mammal Protection Act, Essential Fish Habitat
requirements, National Historic Preservation Act, numerous other laws
and executive orders, and any other requirements that might be
identified during the scoping and plan formulation process.
4. Scoping Meeting. A public scoping meeting will be held on
January 20, 2016, from 3:30 to 6:30 p.m. at the Port Manatee Intermodal
Center, 1905 Intermodal Circle, Palmetto, FL 34221.
5. Date the DEIS Will Be Made Available to the Public. Dependent on
the issues, alternatives, investigations, and other requirements
identified during the scoping and plan formulation process; the Draft
EIS should be available by November 2017.
Dated: December 10, 2015.
Eric P. Summa,
Chief, Planning Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-31807 Filed 12-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P