Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho: Interstate Transport of Ozone, 78981-78983 [2015-31778]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 243 / Friday, December 18, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has
a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the
fundamental federalism principles and
preemption requirements described in
E.O. 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, because it
does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Dec 17, 2015
Jkt 238001
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T14–1030 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T14–1030
Oahu, HI.
Security Zone; Kailua Bay,
(a) Location. The security zone area is
located within the Captain of the Port
(COTP) Zone (See 33 CFR 3.70–10) and
covers all U.S. navigable waters in the
Kailua Bay on the west side of a line
connecting Kapoho Point and
continuing at a bearing of 227° (true) to
21°25′11″ N., 157°44′39″ W.; as well as
the nearby channel from its entrance
near Kapoho Point to a point along the
channel 150 yards to the south of the N.
Kalaheo Avenue Road Bridge. This zone
extends from the surface of the water to
the ocean floor. This zone will include
the navigable waters of the channel
beginning at a point 21°24′56″ N.,
157°44′58″ W., then extending to
21°25′27″ N., 157°44′21″ W. (Kapoho
Point) including all the waters to the
west of a straight line to 21°25′11″ N.,
157°44′39″ W., and extending back to
the original point 21°24′56″ N.,
157°44′58″ W.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78981
(b) Effective period. 6:00 a.m. (HST)
on December 18 2015, through 10:00
p.m. (HST) on January 3, 2016.
(c) Regulations. The general
regulations governing security zones
contained in § 165.33 of subpart D of
this part apply to the security zone
created by this temporary regulations.
(1) All persons are required to comply
with the general regulations governing
security zones found in this part.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the COTP.
(3) Persons desiring to transit the
security zones identified in paragraph
(a) of this section may contact the COTP
at the Command Center telephone
number (808) 842–2600 and (808) 842–
2601, fax (808) 842–2642 or on VHF
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz) to seek
permission to transit the zones. If
permission is granted, all persons and
vessels must comply with the
instructions of the COTP or his
designated representative and proceed
at the minimum speed necessary to
maintain a safe course while in the
zone.
(4) The U.S. Coast Guard may be
assisted in the patrol and enforcement
of the security zone by Federal, State,
and local agencies.
(d) Notice of enforcement. The COTP
will cause notice of the enforcement of
the security zone described in this
section to be made by verbal broadcasts
and written notice to mariners and the
general public.
(e) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been
authorized by the COTP to assist in
enforcing the security zones described
in paragraph (a) of this section.
Dated: November 30, 2015.
S.N. Gilreath,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2015–31885 Filed 12–15–15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0258; FRL–9940–32–
Region 10]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Idaho:
Interstate Transport of Ozone
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
78982
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 243 / Friday, December 18, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
The Clean Air Act (CAA)
requires each State Implementation Plan
(SIP) to contain adequate provisions
prohibiting air emissions that will have
certain adverse air quality effects in
other states. On June 28, 2010, the State
of Idaho made a submittal to the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
to address these requirements. The EPA
is approving the submittal as meeting
the requirement that each SIP contain
adequate provisions to prohibit
emissions that will contribute
significantly to nonattainment or
interfere with maintenance of the 2008
ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS) in any other state.
DATES: This final rule is effective
January 19, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2015–0258. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information the disclosure
of which is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in
hard copy form. Publicly available
docket materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Programs Unit, Office of Air,
Waste and Toxics, EPA Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98101. The
EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the individual listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Hall at (206) 553–6357,
hall.kristin@epa.gov, or the above EPA,
Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. Background Information
On October 30, 2015, the EPA
proposed to approve Idaho’s June 28,
2010 submittal as meeting the interstate
transport requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS (80 FR 66862). An explanation
of the CAA requirements, a detailed
analysis of the submittal, and the EPA’s
reasons for approval were provided in
the notice of proposed rulemaking, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Dec 17, 2015
Jkt 238001
will not be restated here. The public
comment period for this proposed rule
ended on November 30, 2015. The EPA
received no comments on the proposal.
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving Idaho’s June 28,
2010 submittal as meeting the CAA
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) interstate
transport requirements for the 2008
ozone NAAQS.
III. Statutory and Executive Orders
Review
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
this action does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), nor will it impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by February 16, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section
307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 8, 2015.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
18DER1
78983
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 243 / Friday, December 18, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
the 2008 Ozone NAAQS’’ at the end of
the table to read as follows:
Subpart N—Idaho
2. In § 52.670, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding the entry
‘‘Interstate Transport Requirements for
■
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
§ 52.670
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED IDAHO NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
Applicable geographic or nonattainment area
Name of SIP provision
*
*
Interstate Transport Requirements for the 2008 Ozone
NAAQS.
*
State submittal
date
*
State-wide ..............................
EPA approval date
*
6/28/2010
*
12/18/2015 [insert Federal
Register citation].
[FR Doc. 2015–31778 Filed 12–17–15; 8:45 am]
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Dec 17, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\18DER1.SGM
Comments
18DER1
*
This action addresses the following CAA elements:
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I).
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 243 (Friday, December 18, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78981-78983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31778]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2015-0258; FRL-9940-32-Region 10]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho:
Interstate Transport of Ozone
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 78982]]
SUMMARY: The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires each State Implementation
Plan (SIP) to contain adequate provisions prohibiting air emissions
that will have certain adverse air quality effects in other states. On
June 28, 2010, the State of Idaho made a submittal to the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) to address these requirements. The EPA is
approving the submittal as meeting the requirement that each SIP
contain adequate provisions to prohibit emissions that will contribute
significantly to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance of the
2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) in any other
state.
DATES: This final rule is effective January 19, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2015-0258. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material,
such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Programs Unit, Office of
Air, Waste and Toxics, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA,
98101. The EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. You may view the hard copy of the
docket Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Hall at (206) 553-6357,
hall.kristin@epa.gov, or the above EPA, Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
I. Background Information
On October 30, 2015, the EPA proposed to approve Idaho's June 28,
2010 submittal as meeting the interstate transport requirements of CAA
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (80 FR 66862). An
explanation of the CAA requirements, a detailed analysis of the
submittal, and the EPA's reasons for approval were provided in the
notice of proposed rulemaking, and will not be restated here. The
public comment period for this proposed rule ended on November 30,
2015. The EPA received no comments on the proposal.
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving Idaho's June 28, 2010 submittal as meeting the
CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) interstate transport requirements for
the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because this action does not involve technical standards; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by February 16, 2016. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 8, 2015.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:
[[Page 78983]]
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart N--Idaho
0
2. In Sec. 52.670, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding the
entry ``Interstate Transport Requirements for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS'' at
the end of the table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.670 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Idaho Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable
Name of SIP provision geographic or non- State EPA approval date Comments
attainment area submittal date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interstate Transport Requirements State-wide......... 6/28/2010 12/18/2015 [insert This action
for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS. Federal Register addresses the
citation]. following CAA
elements:
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2015-31778 Filed 12-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P