Environmental Impact Statement; Pennington County, SD; Pennington County, Maine, 78816-78817 [2015-31698]
Download as PDF
78816
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 242 / Thursday, December 17, 2015 / Notices
communication with an FAA private,
recreational, or sport licensed pilot, who
acts as a visual observer. The petitioner
is also seeking relief to permit the
following operations: Over nonparticipating persons for breaking news
flights with a UAS weighing no more
than 4.4 pounds; above private, or
controlled access property, without
permission from the owner/controller or
authorized representative;
contemporaneous issuance of notice to
airmen for breaking news instead of the
current requirement for 24 hour
advanced notification; night flight
operations for closed set filmmaking;
and the pilot in command to operate the
UAS from a moving platform for closed
set filmmaking. In addition, the
petitioner requests approval for the UAS
Aerobo X12, which, including payload,
exceeds the FAA’s max weight limit of
55lbs for a small UAS.
[FR Doc. 2015–31640 Filed 12–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Notice of Intent To Release Certain
Properties From All Terms, Conditions,
Reservations and Restrictions of a
Quitclaim Deed Agreement Between
the City of Orlando and the Federal
Aviation Administration for the
Orlando Executive Airport, Orlando, FL
The FAA hereby provides
notice of intent to release approximately
20.05 acres at the Orlando Executive
Airport, Orlando, FL from the
conditions, reservations, and
restrictions as contained in a Quitclaim
Deed agreement between the FAA and
the City of Orlando, dated August 9,
1961. The release of property will allow
the City of Orlando to dispose of the
property for other than aeronautical
purposes. The property is located
within the Southeast quandrant of the
airport. The parcel is currently
designated as non-aeronautical use. The
property will be released of its federal
obligations for municipal purposes. The
fair market value of this parcel has been
determined to be $3,880,000.
Documents reflecting the Sponsor’s
request are available, by appointment
only, for inspection at the Greater
Orlando Aviation Authority at Orlando
International Airport and the FAA
Airports District Office.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
16:53 Dec 16, 2015
[FR Doc. 2015–31751 Filed 12–16–15; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Federal Highway Administration
Request for public comment.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Issued in Orlando, Florida, on December
11, 2015.
Rebecca R. Freeman,
Acting Manager, Orlando Airports District
Office Southern Region.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Comments are due on or before
January 19, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Documents are available for
review at the Greater Orlando Aviation
Authority at Orlando International
Airport, and the FAA Airports District
Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive,
Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822. Written
comments on the Sponsor’s request
must be delivered or mailed to: Marisol
C. Elliott, Program Manager, Orlando
Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine
National Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL
32822–5024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marisol C. Elliott, Program Manager,
Orlando Airports District Office, 5950
Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400,
Orlando, FL 32822–5024.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st
Century (AIR–21) requires the FAA to
provide an opportunity for public notice
and comment prior to the ‘‘waiver’’ or
‘‘modification’’ of a sponsor’s Federal
obligation to use certain airport land for
non-aeronautical purposes.
DATES:
Jkt 238001
Environmental Impact Statement;
Pennington County, SD; Pennington
County, Maine
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice to rescind Environmental
Impact Statement.
AGENCY:
The FHWA is issuing this
notice to advise the public that we are
rescinding the Notice of Intent (NOI) to
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for roadway
improvements proposed for South
Rochford Road in Pennington County,
South Dakota. The NOI was published
in the Federal Register on January 30,
2012. A Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS) was not released. This
rescission is based on changes to the
design standards that have brought the
proposed action below the threshold of
an EIS.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marion Barber, Environmental
Specialist, FHWA, 116 East Dakota
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Avenue, Suite A, Pierre, SD 57501, (605)
224–8033. Further information can be
found and comments can be submitted
via the project Web site at: https://
www.southrochfordroad.com/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
FHWA, in cooperation with the South
Dakota Department of Transportation
(SDDOT) and Pennington County, is
rescinding the NOI for a proposal to
make improvements to the South
Rochford Road in Pennington County,
South Dakota. The previous proposed
action provided for reconstruction of
approximately 10 miles of roadway
between the Town of Rochford and the
intersection with Deerfield Road in
accordance with the SDDOT Road
Design Manual. The NOI is being
rescinded due to modifications to the
design standards that will provide for
historic preservation, reduced wetland
impacts, and preservation of sensitive
plant species currently protected by the
United States Forest Service.
The current proposed action would
reconstruct the same 10 miles of
roadway using the American
Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
Guidelines for Geometric Design of Very
Low-Volume Local Roads. These
guidelines provide for a reduced
roadway width that is more consistent
with similar low volume surfaced
roadways in Pennington County. The
proposed action would maintain the
intended purpose of this action to
improve year-round access to the Town
of Rochford from the Deerfield Lake area
by reconstructing the two-lane roadway,
providing an all-weather surface, and
improving drainage and drainage
structures. SDDOT will offer an
opportunity for a public meeting on the
proposal to rescind the EIS which will
be advertised through the local media
along with a notification on the to the
project Web site. Given the reduction in
scope and the associated potential
impacts of the proposed action, FHWA
intends to prepare a lower-level NEPA
document to determine if the project has
the potential to significantly affect the
quality of the human environment. If, at
a future time, FHWA determines that
the proposed action is likely to have a
significant impact on the environment,
a new NOI to prepare an EIS will be
published.
Comments or questions concerning
this rescission or the proposed action
should be submitted through the project
Web site at https://
www.southrochfordroad.com or directed
to the address provided above under the
caption FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 242 / Thursday, December 17, 2015 / Notices
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: December 10, 2015.
Mark J. Clausen,
Engineering and Operations Supervisor,
Federal Highway Administration, Pierre,
South Dakota.
[FR Doc. 2015–31698 Filed 12–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0125]
Columbia Body Manufacturing Co.;
Receipt of Petition for Temporary
Exemption From FMVSS No. 224
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for
temporary exemption from FMVSS No.
224, Rear Impact Protection; request for
comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with 49 CFR
part 555, NHTSA seeks comments on a
petition for exemption from Federal
Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
No. 224, Rear impact protection by
Columbia Body Manufacturing Co.
(‘‘Columbia Body’’ or ‘‘petitioner’’) of
Clackamas, Oregon. Columbia Body is
seeking a three year exemption from the
standard, asserting that compliance with
the standard would cause substantial
economic hardship to a manufacturer
that has tried in good faith to comply
with the standard. We are publishing
this notice of receipt of the application
in accordance with our exemption
regulations. This action does not mean
that we have made a judgment about the
merits of the application.
DATES: Comments on this petition must
be submitted by January 4, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
legal questions, contact Mr. Ryan Hagen,
Office of the Chief Counsel, NCC–112,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building 4th Floor,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone:
(202) 366–2992; Fax: (202) 366–3820.
For technical questions, contact Mr.
Robert Mazurowski, Office of
Crashworthiness Standards, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building 4th Floor, Washington, DC
20590. Telephone: (202) 366–1012; Fax:
(202) 493–2990.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
comment, identified by the docket
number in the heading of this
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Dec 16, 2015
Jkt 238001
document, by any of the following
methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on the electronic docket site by clicking
on ‘‘Help and Information’’ or ‘‘Help/
Info.’’
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act discussion
below. We will consider all comments
received before the close of business on
the comment closing date indicated
above. To the extent possible, we will
also consider comments filed after the
closing date.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov at any time or to
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays. Telephone:
(202) 366–9826.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you
may visit https://www.dot.gov/
privacy.html.
Confidential Business Information: If
you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, you
should submit three copies of your
complete submission, including the
information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Chief
Counsel, NHTSA, at the address given
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. In addition, you should
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78817
submit a copy, from which you have
deleted the claimed confidential
business information, to the Docket at
the address given above. When you send
a comment containing information
claimed to be confidential business
information, you should include a cover
letter setting forth the information
specified in our confidential business
information regulation (49 CFR part
512).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Statutory Authority for Temporary
Exemptions
The National Traffic and Motor
Vehicle Safety Act (Safety Act), codified
at 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301, provides the
Secretary of Transportation authority to
exempt, on a temporary basis and under
specified circumstances, motor vehicles
from a motor vehicle safety standard or
bumper standard. This authority is set
forth at 49 U.S.C. 30113. The Secretary
of Transportation has delegated the
authority for implementing this section
to NHTSA.
In recognition of the more limited
resources and capabilities of small
manufacturers, authority to grant
exemptions based on substantial
economic hardship and good faith
efforts is provided in the Safety Act to
enable the agency to give those
manufacturers additional time to
comply with the Federal safety
standards. The Safety Act authorizes the
Secretary to grant a temporary
exemption to a manufacturer whose
total motor vehicle production in the
most recent year of production is not
more than 10,000 motor vehicles, on
such terms as the Secretary deems
appropriate, if the exemption would be
consistent with the public interest and
the Safety Act and ‘‘compliance with
the standard would cause substantial
economic hardship to a manufacturer
that has tried to comply with the
standard in good faith.’’ (49 U.S.C.
§ 30113(b)(3)(B)(i)).
NHTSA established 49 CFR part 555,
Temporary Exemption from Motor
Vehicle Safety and Bumper Standards,
to implement the statutory provisions
concerning temporary exemptions.
Under Part 555, a petitioner must
provide specified information in
submitting a petition for exemption.
These requirements are specified in 49
CFR 555.5, and include a number of
items. Foremost among them are that
the petitioner must set forth the basis of
the application under § 555.6, and the
reasons why the exemption would be in
the public interest and consistent with
the objectives of the Safety Act (49
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 242 (Thursday, December 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78816-78817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31698]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statement; Pennington County, SD; Pennington
County, Maine
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice to rescind Environmental Impact Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that we
are rescinding the Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for roadway improvements proposed for South
Rochford Road in Pennington County, South Dakota. The NOI was published
in the Federal Register on January 30, 2012. A Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (DEIS) was not released. This rescission is based on
changes to the design standards that have brought the proposed action
below the threshold of an EIS.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marion Barber, Environmental
Specialist, FHWA, 116 East Dakota Avenue, Suite A, Pierre, SD 57501,
(605) 224-8033. Further information can be found and comments can be
submitted via the project Web site at: https://www.southrochfordroad.com/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA, in cooperation with the South
Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT) and Pennington County, is
rescinding the NOI for a proposal to make improvements to the South
Rochford Road in Pennington County, South Dakota. The previous proposed
action provided for reconstruction of approximately 10 miles of roadway
between the Town of Rochford and the intersection with Deerfield Road
in accordance with the SDDOT Road Design Manual. The NOI is being
rescinded due to modifications to the design standards that will
provide for historic preservation, reduced wetland impacts, and
preservation of sensitive plant species currently protected by the
United States Forest Service.
The current proposed action would reconstruct the same 10 miles of
roadway using the American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Guidelines for Geometric Design of
Very Low-Volume Local Roads. These guidelines provide for a reduced
roadway width that is more consistent with similar low volume surfaced
roadways in Pennington County. The proposed action would maintain the
intended purpose of this action to improve year-round access to the
Town of Rochford from the Deerfield Lake area by reconstructing the
two-lane roadway, providing an all-weather surface, and improving
drainage and drainage structures. SDDOT will offer an opportunity for a
public meeting on the proposal to rescind the EIS which will be
advertised through the local media along with a notification on the to
the project Web site. Given the reduction in scope and the associated
potential impacts of the proposed action, FHWA intends to prepare a
lower-level NEPA document to determine if the project has the potential
to significantly affect the quality of the human environment. If, at a
future time, FHWA determines that the proposed action is likely to have
a significant impact on the environment, a new NOI to prepare an EIS
will be published.
Comments or questions concerning this rescission or the proposed
action should be submitted through the project Web site at https://www.southrochfordroad.com or directed to the address provided above
under the caption FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
[[Page 78817]]
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 315; 49 CFR 1.48.
Issued on: December 10, 2015.
Mark J. Clausen,
Engineering and Operations Supervisor, Federal Highway Administration,
Pierre, South Dakota.
[FR Doc. 2015-31698 Filed 12-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P