Missouri Regulatory Program, 78657-78664 [2015-31674]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 242 / Thursday, December 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
§ 1251.2
Wood.
(a) Unfinished and untreated wood
does not exceed the limits for the heavy
elements established in the toy standard
with a high degree of assurance as that
term is defined in 16 CFR part 1107,
provided that the material has been
neither treated nor adulterated with
materials that could result in the
addition of any of the heavy elements
listed in the toy standard at levels above
their respective solubility limits.
(b) For purposes of this section,
unfinished and untreated wood means
wood harvested from the trunks of trees
with no added surface coatings (such as,
varnish, paint, shellac, or polyurethane)
and no materials added to the wood
substrate (such as, stains, dyes,
preservatives, antifungals, or
insecticides). Unfinished and untreated
wood does not include manufactured or
engineered woods (such as pressed
wood, plywood, particle board, or
fiberboard).
document corrects the final rule by
removing this paragraph.
DATES: Effective December 17, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
R. Scherbenske, Office of Diversion
Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152, Telephone: (202) 598–6812.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc.
2015–28718 appearing on page 69864 in
the Federal Register of Thursday,
November 12, 2015, the following
correction is made:
Administrative Procedure Act
[Corrected]
1. On page 69864, in the preamble, at
the bottom of the first and top of the
second columns, the section titled
Administrative Procedure Act is
removed entirely.
Dated: December 11, 2015.
Chuck Rosenberg,
Acting Administrator.
Dated: December 9, 2015.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–31843 Filed 12–16–15; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2015–31723 Filed 12–16–15; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
30 CFR Part 925
Drug Enforcement Administration
[SATS No. MO–041–FOR; Docket ID: OSM–
2013–0008; S1D1S SS08011000 SX064A000
167S180110; S2D2S SS08011000
SX064A000 16XS501520]
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–419F]
Missouri Regulatory Program
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Placement of Eluxadoline Into
Schedule IV; Correction
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) is correcting a
final rule that appeared in the Federal
Register of November 12, 2015 (80 FR
69861). The document issued an action
placing the substance 5-[[[(2S)-2-amino3-[4-aminocarbonyl)-2,6dimethylphenyl]-1-oxopropyl][(1S)-1-(4phenyl-1H-imidazol-2yl)ethyl]amino]methyl]-2methoxybenzoic acid (eluxadoline),
including its salts, isomers, and salts of
isomers, into schedule IV of the
Controlled Substances Act. This
document inadvertently included a
paragraph in the regulatory text that was
not intended for publication, and was
unable to be removed before being
placed on public inspection. This
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Dec 16, 2015
Jkt 238001
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of
amendment.
AGENCY:
We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), are approving an amendment
to the Missouri regulatory program
(Missouri program) under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of
1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Missouri
proposed revisions to its regulations
concerning several topics regarding:
Valid Existing Rights; Protection of
Hydrologic Balance; Post-mining Land
Use; Permit Applications; and Air
Resource Protection. Missouri intends to
revise its program to be no less effective
than the Federal regulations, to clarify
ambiguities, and to improve operational
efficiency.
DATES: Effective Date: December 17,
2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Len
Meier, Director Alton Field Division,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78657
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, 501 Belle Street, Suite
216, Alton, IL 62002, Telephone: (618)
463–6460, Email: lmeier@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Missouri Program
II. Submission of the Amendment
III. OSMRE’s Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSMRE’s Decision
VI. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Missouri Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its State program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of this Act . . .; and rules
and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to this Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Missouri
program on November 21, 1980. You
can find background information on the
Missouri program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and conditions of approval,
in the November 21, 1980, Federal
Register (45 FR 77017). You can find
later actions concerning the Missouri
program and program amendments at 30
CFR 925.10, 925.12, 925.15, and 925.16.
II. Submission of the Amendment
By letter dated August 12, 2013
(Administrative Record No. MO–678),
Missouri sent us an amendment to its
Program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201
et seq.). Missouri sent the amendment in
response to a January 31, 2008, letter
(Administrative Record No. MO–669)
we sent to Missouri in accordance with
30 CFR 732.17(c) concerning changes to
valid existing rights requirements.
Missouri also made changes to eliminate
required program amendments recorded
at 30 CFR 925.16(p)(4), (p)(20) and (v);
and program disapprovals at 30 CFR
925.12(d). Missouri revised other
sections of its regulations at its own
initiative. Missouri proposed revisions
to title 10 of its Code of State
Regulations (CSR) under Division 40
Land Reclamation Commission. The
specific sections of 10 CSR 40 in
Missouri’s amendment are discussed in
Part III OSMRE’s Findings. Missouri
intends to revise its program to be no
less effective than the Federal
regulations, to clarify ambiguities, and
improve operational efficiency.
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
78658
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 242 / Thursday, December 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
We announced receipt of the
proposed amendment in the October 25,
2013, Federal Register (78 FR 63909). In
the same document, we opened the
public comment period and provided an
opportunity for a public hearing or
meeting on the adequacy of the
amendment. We did not hold a public
hearing or meeting because no one
requested one. The public comment
period ended November 24, 2013. We
did not receive any public comments.
III. OSMRE’s Findings
We are approving the amendment as
described below. The following are the
findings we made concerning Missouri’s
amendment under SMCRA and the
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 732.15
and 732.17. Any revisions that we do
not specifically discuss below
concerning non-substantive wording or
editorial changes can be found in the
full text of the program amendment
available at www.regulations.gov.
1. Missouri proposed to revise the
sections listed below to make numerous
non-substantive edits for clarity and
update its rules to current editions of
the Missouri Statutes:
MINOR REFERENCE CHANGE TABLE
10 CSR
Title
40–3.040
40–3.060
40–3.170
40–3.180
40–3.200
40–3.210
40–3.220
40–3.230
40–3.240
40–3.260
40–3.300
40–5.010
40–5.020
40–6.020
40–6.030
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
40–6.040
40–6.050
40–6.060
40–6.070
40–6.100
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
40–6.110 .........................................
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
40–6.120
40–7.050
40–8.010
40–8.020
40–8.070
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
.........................................
Requirements for Protection of the Hydrologic Balance.
Requirements for the Disposal of Excess Spoil.
Signs and Markers for Underground Operations.
Casing and Sealing of Exposed Underground Openings.
Requirements for the Protection of the Hydrologic Balance for Underground Operations.
Requirements for the Use of Explosives for Underground Operations.
Disposal of Underground Development Waste and Excess Spoil.
Requirements for the Disposal of Coal Processing Waste for Underground Operations.
Air Resource Protection.
Requirements for Backfilling and Grading for Underground Operations.
Postmining Land Use Requirements for Underground Operations.
Prohibitions and Limitations on Mining in Certain Areas.
State Designation of Areas as Unsuitable for Mining.
General Requirement for Coal Exploration, Permits.
Surface Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Legal, Financial, Compliance, and Related Information.
Surface Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Information on Environmental Resources.
Surface Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Reclamation and Operations Plan.
Requirements for Permits for Special Categories of Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations.
Review, Public Participation and Approval of Permit Applications and Permit Terms and Conditions.
Underground Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Legal, Financial, Compliance, and
Related Information.
Underground Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Information on Environmental Resources.
Underground Mining Permit Applications—Minimum Requirements for Reclamation and Operations Plan.
Requirements, Conditions and Terms of Liability Insurance.
Definitions.
Exemption for Coal Extraction Incident to Government-Financed Highway or Other Construction.
Applicability and General Requirements.
We find that Missouri’s proposed
revisions will make its regulations no
less effective than the Federal
regulations. Therefore, we are approving
Missouri’s revisions.
2. 10 CSR 40–3.040 Requirements for
Protection of the Hydrologic Balance
(6)(A)1., (6)(R), and (6)(U) Siltation
Structures and 10 CSR 40–3.200
Underground Mining (6)(A)1., (6)(R),
and (6)(U) Siltation Structures
Missouri proposed to replace the
word ‘‘pond’’ with ‘‘structure’’ at 10
CSR 40–3.040 (6)(A)1., (6)(R), and (6)(U)
Siltation Structures and at 10 CSR 40–
3.200 (6)(A)1., (6)(R), and (6)(U)
Siltation Structures. The corresponding
Federal Regulations at 30 CFR 816.46
and 817.46 uses the same term. We find
that Missouri’s proposed revision will
make its regulations no less effective
than the Federal regulations. Therefore,
we are approving Missouri’s revision.
3. 10 CSR 40–3.040 Requirements for
Protection of the Hydrologic Balance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Dec 16, 2015
Jkt 238001
(10)(B)5. and 10 CSR 40–3.200
Requirements for Protection of the
Hydrologic Balance for Underground
Operations (6)(T) and (10)(B)5.
Permanent and Temporary
Impoundments
Missouri proposed to revise these
sections to clarify that requirements for
impoundments that meet the size or
other criteria of the MSHA, 30 CFR
77.216(a) are contained in United States
Soil Conservation Service Technical
Release No. 60, Earth Dams and
Reservoirs, July 2005, incorporated by
reference. Requirements for
impoundments that do not meet the size
or other criteria contained in 30 CFR
77.216(a) are contained in United States
Natural Resources Conservation Service,
Conservation Practice Standard, POND,
No. CODE 378, January 2004, by
reference. The corresponding Federal
Regulation at 30 CFR 780.25(a)(2)(i)
provides similar requirements. We find
that Missouri’s proposed revision will
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
make its regulations no less effective
than the Federal regulations. Therefore,
we are approving Missouri’s revision.
4. 10 CSR 40–3.040 Requirements for
Protection of the Hydrologic Balance
(10)(O)3.C. and 10 CSR 40–3.200
Requirements for Protection of the
Hydrologic Balance for Underground
Operations (10)(O)3.C. Permanent
and Temporary Impoundments and
Spillways
Missouri removes these design
requirements in response to the
disapproval recorded at 30 CFR
925.12(d) in order to be no less effective
than the counterpart Federal regulations
for surface mining at 30 CFR 780.25(c)
and for underground mining at 30 CFR
784.16(c). Therefore, we are approving
Missouri’s revision and removing the
disapproval at 30 CFR 925.12(d).
5. 10 CSR 40–3.060 Requirements for
the Disposal of Excess Spoil (1)(K)2.
Fill Inspection and 10 CSR 40–3.220
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 242 / Thursday, December 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Disposal of Underground
Development Waste and Excess Spoil
(1)(L) Certified Report
Missouri proposed to revise these
sections to require a registered
professional engineer or other qualified
professional specialist under the
direction of a registered professional
engineer to provide the director with a
certified report stating that the fill has
been constructed as specified in the
design approved in the permit and plan.
The corresponding Federal Regulation
at 30 CFR 816.71(i)(2) contains a similar
requirement. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
6. 10 CSR 40–3.180 Casing and Sealing
of Exposed Underground Openings (3)
Permanent Casing and Sealing of
Underground Openings
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to correct various regulatory
citations and to include a reference to
the Wellhead Protection Section,
Division of Geology and Land Survey at
10 CSR 23 Chapter 6 for approval of
water well transfers. We find that
Missouri’s proposed revision will make
its regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations.
However, OSMRE received a letter
from the Mining Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) on October 25,
2013 (Missouri Administrative Record
No. 678.09), which noted that the
MSHA citation referenced (30 CFR
75.1771) was incorrect. The correct
MSHA regulation is 30 CFR 75.1711. We
are approving the amendment with the
condition that Missouri correct this
typographical error through their State
administrative process.
7. 10 CSR 40–3.200 Requirements for
Protection of the Hydrologic Balance
for Underground Operations
(12)(A)1.(A) Groundwater Monitoring
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to correct the references for
remedial measures taken by the operator
when analysis of any groundwater
sample indicates noncompliance with
the permit conditions to 10 CSR 40–
6.070(14) and 10 CSR 40–6.120(5). The
corresponding Federal Regulation at 30
CFR 816.41 provides similar
requirements. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
8. 10 CSR 40–3.200 Requirements for
Protection of the Hydrologic Balance
for Underground Operations (17)(B)
Stream Buffer Zones
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Dec 16, 2015
Jkt 238001
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to correct the references for the
marking of stream buffer zones that are
not to be disturbed to meet the
regulatory requirements at 10 CSR 40–
3.170(6). The corresponding Federal
Regulation at 30 CFR 817.11 provides
similar requirements. We find that
Missouri’s proposed revision will make
its regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
9. 10 CSR 40–3.220 Disposal of
Underground Development Waste and
Excess Spoil (1)(K) and (L) General
Requirements
Missouri proposed to revise these
sections to clarify at (K) that fill be
inspected by or under the direction of
a professional engineer and at (L) only
the registered engineer shall provide the
certified report by removing the ‘‘. . . or
other qualified professional specialist
. . .’’ verbiage from their rule. The
corresponding Federal Regulation at 30
CFR 817.71(h)(2) provides similar
requirements. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
10. 10 CSR 40–3.230 Requirements for
the Disposal of Coal Processing Waste
for Underground Operations (1)(A)
General Requirements
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to state that all coal processing
waste disposed of in an area other than
the mine workings or excavations shall
be hauled or conveyed and placed for
final placement in new or existing
disposal areas approved in the permit
and plan for this purpose. The
corresponding Federal Regulation at 30
CFR 817.81(a) provides similar
requirements. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
11. 10 CSR 40–3.230 Requirements for
the Disposal of Coal Processing Waste
for Underground Operations (3)(D)
Water Control Measures
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to correct the references to
regulatory requirements that discharges
of all water from a coal processing waste
bank shall comply with 10 CSR 40–
3.200(15). The corresponding Federal
Regulation at 30 CFR 817.41(h) provides
similar requirements. We find that
Missouri’s proposed revision will make
its regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78659
12. 10 CSR 40–3.240 Air Resource
Protection (1)
On May 8, 1984, OSMRE notified
Missouri in the Federal Register (49 FR
19476 as amended at 64 FR 57981) and
recorded at 30 CFR 925.16(p)(4) that this
requirement must be revised to provide
performance standards that address air
quality in a manner no less effective
than the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
817.95(a). Missouri proposed to revise
this section to require that all exposed
surface areas be protected and stabilized
to effectively control erosion and air
pollution attendant to erosion according
to 10 CSR 40–3.200(5)(A). The
corresponding Federal Regulation at 30
CFR 817.95(a) provides similar
requirements. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision and
removing the required program
amendment at 30 CFR 925.16(p)(4).
13. 10 CSR 40–3.260 Requirements for
Backfilling and Grading for
Underground Operations (4)
Regrading or Stabilizing Rills and
Gullies
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to replace the existing
requirements with more specific
guidelines, including time frames, for
regrading or stabilizing rills and gullies.
Missouri proposed to add a section on
regrading or stabilizing rills and gullies
on areas that have been previously
mined. The corresponding Federal
Regulation at 30 CFR 816.95(b) provides
similar, but less specific requirements.
We find that Missouri’s proposed
revision will make its regulations no
less effective than the Federal
regulations. Therefore, we are approving
Missouri’s revision.
14. 10 CSR 40–3.300 Postmining Land
Use Requirements for Underground
Operations
Missouri proposed to revise
subsection (3) of this section to correct
the references to regulatory
requirements at this section to require
that prior to the release of lands from
the permit area in accordance with 10
CSR 40–7.021(2)(C), the permit area
shall be restored, in a timely manner,
either to conditions capable of
supporting the uses they were capable
of supporting before any mining or to
conditions capable of supporting
approved alternative land uses.
Although there is no Federal Equivalent
under the requirements for postmining
land use, the corresponding Federal
regulation for bond release at 30 CFR
800.40(c) provides similar requirements
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
78660
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 242 / Thursday, December 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
to the Missouri citation. We find that
Missouri’s proposed revision will make
its regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
15. 10 CSR 40–5.010 Prohibitions and
Limitations on Mining in Certain
Areas (1)(A) Definition of Valid
Existing Rights
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to replace the definition of Valid
Existing Rights with language that is
consistent with the corresponding
Federal regulation at 30 CFR 761.5. We
find that Missouri’s proposed revision
will make its regulations substantively
the same as the Federal regulations.
Therefore, we are approving Missouri’s
revision.
16. 10 CSR 40–5.010 Prohibitions and
Limitations on Mining in Certain
Areas (2) Areas Where Mining is
Prohibited or Limited
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to require that surface coal
mining operations may not be
conducted on the following lands,
unless the permit applicant either has
valid existing rights as determined
under section (7) or qualifies for the
exception for existing operations under
section (3). Missouri also revises this
section at 10 CSR 40–5.010 (2)(E)2. to
state that concerning the prohibition
within 300 feet measured horizontally
from an occupied dwelling, the
prohibition does not apply when the
part of the operation to be located closer
than 300 feet to the dwelling is an
access or haul road that connects with
an existing public road on the side of
the public road opposite the dwelling.
The corresponding Federal regulation
at 30 CFR 761.11 provides similar
requirements. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
17. 10 CSR 40–5.010 Prohibitions and
Limitations on Mining in Certain
Areas (3) Exception for Existing
Operations
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to require that the prohibitions
and limitations of section (2) do not
apply to surface coal mining operations
for which a valid permit, issued under
10 CSR 40–6, exists when the land
within the permit area comes under the
protection of section 444.890.4, Revised
Statute of Missouri (RSMo), or this rule.
The corresponding Federal regulation at
30 CFR 761.12 provides similar
requirements. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Dec 16, 2015
Jkt 238001
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
18. 10 CSR 40–5.010 Prohibitions and
Limitations on Mining in Certain
Areas (4) Procedures for Compatibility
Findings for Surface Coal Mining
Operations on Federal Lands in
National Forests
Missouri proposed to revise this
section at (4)(A) to correct references to
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 761.13
concerning Federal lands in a national
forest. Missouri added language at (4)(B)
that the applicant may submit a request
to the regional director of OSMRE for a
determination before preparing and
submitting an application for a permit
or boundary revision. Additionally, the
applicant must explain how the
proposed operation would not damage
the values listed in the definition of
‘‘significant recreational, timber,
economic, or other values incompatible
with surface coal mining operations’’ in
subsection (1)(B) and must include a
map and sufficient information about
the nature of the proposed operation for
the Secretary of the Interior to make
adequately documented findings.
Missouri proposed to revise section
(4)(C) to require that when a proposed
surface coal mining operation or
proposed boundary revision for an
existing surface coal mining operation
includes Federal lands within a national
forest, the commission or director may
not issue the permit or approve the
boundary revision before the Secretary
of the Interior makes the findings
required by subsection (2)(B).
The corresponding Federal regulation
at 30 CFR 761.13, provides similar
requirements. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
19. 10 CSR 40–5.010 Prohibitions and
Limitations on Mining in Certain
Areas (5) Procedures for Relocating or
Closing a Public Road or Waiving the
Prohibition on Surface Coal Mining
Operations Within the Buffer Zone of
a Public Road
Missouri proposed to revise this
section at (5)(A) to emphasize that the
requirements of this section do not
apply to lands for which a person has
valid existing rights, that are within the
scope of existing operations as defined
in Section (3), or roads that join an
existing public road.
Missouri proposed to revise the
section at (5)(B)(3) to provide a public
comment period if a mining operation
may affect a right-of-way or public road.
The corresponding Federal regulation
at 30 CFR 761.14 provides similar
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
requirements. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
20. 10 CSR 40–5.010 Prohibitions and
Limitations on Mining in Certain
Areas (6) Procedures for Waiving the
Prohibition on Surface Coal Mining
Operations within the Buffer Zone of
an Occupied Dwelling
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to identify three situations
where this section does not apply, and
to require waivers to clarify who has a
legal right to deny mining and
knowingly waived that right. The
waiver will act as consent for the
mining. Missouri adds language similar
to the requirements in the
corresponding Federal regulation at 30
CFR 761.15. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
21. 10 CSR 40–5.010 Prohibitions and
Limitations on Mining in Certain
Areas (7) Submission and Processing
of Requests for Valid Existing Rights
Determinations
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to require that an applicant must
request a valid existing rights
determination from OSMRE for Federal
lands and for those features on Federal
lands protected under subsections (2)(C)
through (G). An applicant must request
a valid existing rights determination for
non-Federal lands and for those features
on non-Federal lands protected under
subsections (2)(C) through (G) from the
regulatory authority. The regulatory
authority must use the Federal
definition of valid existing rights at 30
CFR 761.5 when making a
determination for non-Federal lands and
the definition of valid existing rights at
subsection (1)(A) when making a
determination for those features
protected under subsections (2)(C)
through (G).
At (7)(B), Missouri requires that an
applicant must request a valid existing
rights determination from the
appropriate agency under subsection
(7)(A) if the applicant intends to
conduct surface coal mining operations
on the basis of valid existing rights
under section (2) or wishes to confirm
the right to do so. The applicant may
submit this request before preparing and
submitting an application for a permit
or boundary revision for the land. If
OSMRE is the appropriate agency, the
applicant must request the
determination in accordance with the
requirements of the Federal regulations
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 242 / Thursday, December 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
at 30 CFR 761.16. If the regulatory
authority is the appropriate agency, the
applicant must request the
determination in accordance with the
requirements of 10 CSR 40–5.010.
The corresponding Federal regulation
at 30 CFR 761.16, provides similar
requirements. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
22. 10 CSR 40–5.010 Prohibitions and
Limitations on Mining in Certain
Areas (8) Regulatory Authority
Obligations at Time of Permit
Application Review
Missouri proposed to revise this
section at (8)(A) to require that the
commission or director review the
application to determine whether the
proposed surface coal mining operation
would be located on any lands protected
under section 444.890.4, RSMo., or
Missouri regulations.
At (8)(B), Missouri requires that the
commission or director reject any
portion of the application that would
locate surface coal mining operations on
land protected under section 444.890.4,
RSMo., or Missouri regulation, unless:
the site qualifies for the exception for
existing operations under section (3); a
person has valid existing rights; the
applicant obtains a waiver or exception
from the prohibitions of section
444.890.4, RSMo., or Missouri
regulation; and for lands protected by
subsection (2)(C), both the commission
or director and the agency with
jurisdiction over the park or place
jointly approve the proposed operation
in accordance with subsection (8)(D).
At (8)(C), Missouri added language to
this section that if the commission or
director has difficulty determining
whether an application includes land
within an area specified in subsection
(2)(A), the commission or director shall
request that the Federal, state, or local
governmental agency verify the location.
At (8)(D), if the commission or
director determines that the proposed
surface coal mining operation will
adversely affect any publicly-owned
park or any place included in the
National Register of Historic Places, the
director shall request that the Federal,
state, or local agency with jurisdiction
over the park or place either approve or
object to the proposed operation. The
regulations contain requirements on
how this request will be submitted and
processed.
The corresponding Federal regulation
at 30 CFR 761.17 provides similar
requirements. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Dec 16, 2015
Jkt 238001
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
23. 10 CSR 40–5.020 State Designation
of Areas as Unsuitable for Mining (3)
Applicability to Lands Designated as
Unsuitable by Congress; and (4)
Exploration on Land Designated as
Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining
Operations
Missouri proposed new language at
section (3) Applicability to Lands
Designated as Unsuitable by Congress;
pursuant to appropriate petitions, lands
listed under 10 CSR 40–5.010(2) are
subject to designation as unsuitable for
all or certain types of surface coal
mining operations under this rule.
Missouri’s proposed new language is
consistent with the corresponding
Federal regulation at 30 CFR 762.14.
Therefore, we find that Missouri’s new
language is no less effective than the
Federal regulation. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s new language.
Additionally, Missouri proposed to
revise section (4) by adding a new title:
Exploration on Land Designated as
Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining
Operations and added the word
‘‘unsuitable’’ in this section. Missouri’s
proposed revisions are consistent with
corresponding Federal regulation at 30
CFR 762.15. We find that Missouri’s
revisions are no less effective than the
corresponding the Federal regulation.
Therefore, we are approving Missouri’s
revisions.
24. 10 CSR 40–6.020 General
Requirements for Coal Exploration
Permits (3)(B)14. Permit requirements
for explorations removing more than
two hundred fifty tons of coal or
where explorations will substantially
disturb the natural land surface
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to require that for any lands
listed in 10 CSR 40–5.010(2), a
demonstration that the proposed
exploration activities have been
designed to minimize interference with
the values for which those lands were
designated as unsuitable for surface coal
mining operations. The corresponding
Federal regulation at 30 CFR
772.12(b)(14) provides similar
requirements. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
25. 10 CSR 40–6.020 General
Requirements for Coal Exploration
Permits (3)(D) Decisions on
Applications for Exploration
Removing More Than Two Hundred
Fifty Tons of Coal
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78661
Missouri proposed to add paragraph
2.D. to this section requiring minimal
interference, to the extent possible, with
the values for which those lands were
designated as unsuitable for surface coal
mining with exploration activities. This
section also requires reasonable
opportunity for comment by the owner
or agency with primary jurisdiction over
the feature causing the land to come
under the protection of 10 CSR 40–
5.010(2) on whether the finding by the
commission under (3)(D)1 and 2 is
appropriate.
The corresponding Federal regulation
at 30 CFR 772.12(d)(2)(iv), provides
similar requirements. We find that
Missouri’s proposed revision will make
its regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
26. 10 CSR 40–6.030 Surface Mining
Permit Applications—Minimum
Requirements for Legal, Financial,
Compliance, and Related Information
(4)(C) Relationship to Areas
Designated Unsuitable for Mining
Missouri proposed to revise this
subsection to require that if an applicant
proposed to conduct surface mining
activities within one hundred feet (100′)
of the outside right-of-way of a public
road or within three hundred feet (300′)
of an occupied dwelling, the application
shall meet the requirements of 10 CSR
40–5.010(5) or (6), respectively. The
corresponding Federal regulation at 30
CFR 778.16(c), provides similar
requirements. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
27. 10 CSR 40–6.050 Surface Mining
Permit Applications—Minimum
Requirements for Reclamation and
Operations Plan (14)(B) Protection of
Public Parks and Historic Places
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to correct the references to
regulatory requirements to make it
similar to the provisions of the
corresponding Federal regulation at 30
CFR 780.31(a). We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
28. 10 CSR 40–6.050 Surface Mining
Permit Applications—Minimum
Requirements for Reclamation and
Operations Plan (15) Relocation or
Use of Public Roads
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to correct the references to
regulatory requirements to make it
similar to the provisions of the
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
78662
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 242 / Thursday, December 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
corresponding Federal regulation at 30
CFR 780.33. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
29. 10 CSR 40–6.060 Requirements for
Permits for Special Categories of
Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation
Operations
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to correct the address of the
Land Reclamation Program at (4)(C)1.A.
and references to regulatory
requirements to make it similar to the
provisions of the corresponding Federal
regulation at 30 CFR 785.17(e)(2). We
find that Missouri’s proposed revision
will make its regulations no less
effective than the Federal regulations.
Therefore, we are approving Missouri’s
revision.
30. 10 CSR 40–6.070 Review, Public
Participation and Approval of Permit
Applications and Permit Terms and
Conditions (2)(A)5. Public Notices of
Filing of Permit Applications
Missouri proposed to revise this
subsection to require that if an applicant
seeks a permit to mine within one
hundred feet (100′) of the outside rightof-way of a public road or to relocate a
public road, a concise statement
describing the mine-related activities
must be submitted. The corresponding
Federal regulation at 30 CFR
773.6(a)(1)(v) provides similar
requirements. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
Additionally, Missouri proposed to
revise this section to add ‘‘mine-related
activities’’ to the concise statement
requirement if an applicant seeks a
permit under this section of the rule.
The corresponding Federal regulation at
30 CFR 773.15(c)(2), provides similar
requirements. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
31. 10 CSR 40–6.100 Underground
Mining Permit Applications—
Minimum Requirements for Legal,
Financial, Compliance, and Related
Information (1)(C) and (D)
Identification of Interests
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to clarify that required
information concerning an applicant’s
ownership or control as defined in 10
CSR 40–6.010(2)(C) must be contained
in each application. The corresponding
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 778.11
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Dec 16, 2015
Jkt 238001
and 778.12 provide similar
requirements. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
32. 10 CSR 40–6.120 Underground
Mining Permit Applications—
Minimum Requirements for
Reclamation and Operations Plan
(5)(C) Reclamation Plan—Protection
of Hydrologic Balance
Missouri proposed to revise
subparagraph (C) to clarify that the
supplemental information required by
this section shall include the plans
listed at (C)1. through (C)3. The
corresponding Federal regulation at 30
CFR 784.14(g), provides similar
requirements. We find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
33. 10 CSR 40–6.120 Underground
Mining Permit Applications—
Minimum Requirements for
Reclamation and Operations Plan
(7)(A)1.A. Reclamation Plan-Ponds,
Impoundments, Banks, Dams, and
Embankments
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to clarify that the general plan
shall be prepared by or under the
direction of and certified by only a
qualified registered professional
engineer by removing the ‘‘ . . . or by
a professional geologist. . .’’ verbiage
from their rule. The corresponding
Federal regulation at 30 CFR 784.16(a)
provides similar requirements. We find
that Missouri’s proposed revision will
make its regulations no less effective
than the Federal regulations. Therefore,
we are approving Missouri’s revision.
34. 10 CSR 40–6.120 Underground
Mining Permit Applications—
Minimum Requirements for
Reclamation and Operations Plan
(9)(A) Relocation or Use of Public
Roads
Missouri proposed to revise this
section to change from ‘‘underground
mining activities’’ to ‘‘surface coal
mining operations.’’ The corresponding
Federal regulation at 30 CFR 784.18(a)
provides similar requirements. We find
that Missouri’s proposed revision will
make its regulations no less effective
than the Federal regulations. Therefore,
we are approving Missouri’s revision.
35. 10 CSR 40–8.010 Definitions
Missouri proposed to revise the
definition of several terms to provide
similar definitions to the corresponding
Federal regulation at 30 CFR 701.5,
including adding a definition for
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
‘‘Replacement of water supply.’’ We
find that Missouri’s proposed revisions
will make its regulations substantively
the same as the corresponding Federal
regulations.
However, we noted in the definition
at 89 Significant, imminent
environmental harm to land, air or
water resources, the reference needs to
be changed from 444.855.2, RSMo to the
valid reference 444.885.2, RSMo.
Missouri needs to correct this citation in
a future program amendment. We are
approving the amendment with the
condition that Missouri prepare a
required program amendment at 30 CFR
925.16 to correct the regulation citation.
36. 10 CSR 40–8.020 Exemption for
Coal Extraction Incident to
Government-Financed Highway or
Other Construction (2)(C) Definitions
Missouri proposed to revise this
definition to be substantively the same
as the corresponding Federal regulation
at 30 CFR 707.5. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
37. 10 CSR 40–8.070 Applicability and
General Requirements (2)(C)1.A.(II)
Missouri proposed to correct the
reporting dates at (a) and (b) of this
subparagraph. These dates were
corrected to clearly require separate
cumulative coal production and revenue
data from mining prior to October 1,
1992, and after October 1, 1992. This
action corrects the disapproval of the
Missouri regulations recorded at 30 CFR
925.12(f). The corresponding Federal
regulation at 30 CFR 702.5(a)(2)
provides a similar requirement. We find
that Missouri’s proposed revision will
make its regulations no less effective
than the Federal regulations. Therefore,
we are approving Missouri’s revision
and removing the disapproval at 30 CFR
925.12(f) and the required program
amendment at 30 CFR 925.16(p)(20).
38. 10 CSR 40–8.070 Applicability and
General Requirements (2)(C)8.B
Missouri removes this subparagraph
as redundant to the previously approved
subparagraph at (2)(C)8.A. Since this
action merely removes redundant
language from a previously approved
requirement, we find that Missouri’s
proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri’s revision.
IV. Summary and Disposition of
Comments
Public Comments
We asked for public comments on the
amendment, but did not receive any.
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 242 / Thursday, December 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Federal Agency Comments
VI. Procedural Determinations
On August 23, 2013, under 30 CFR
732.17(h)(11)(i) and section 503(b) of
SMCRA, we requested comments on the
amendment from various Federal
agencies with an actual or potential
interest in the Missouri program
(Administrative Record Nos. MO–
678.03 through MO–678.08). We
received one comment from MSHA
(Administrative Record No. MO–
678.09). MSHA pointed out that at 10
CSR 40–3.180(3), Missouri had
incorrectly cited the MSHA regulation
as 30 CFR 75.1771, when the correct
MSHA regulation is 30 CFR 75.1711.
Missouri was notified of this
typographical error and will make this
correction through its State
administrative process.
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rule does not have takings
implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the
counterpart Federal regulation.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Concurrence and Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), we
are required to get a written concurrence
from EPA for those provisions of the
program amendment that relate to air or
water quality standards issued under
the authority of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act
(42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). None of the
revisions that Missouri proposed to
make in this amendment pertain to air
or water quality standards. Therefore,
we did not ask EPA to concur on the
amendment. However, on August 23,
2013, under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), we
requested comments on the amendment
from EPA (Administrative Record No.
MO–678.04). The EPA did not respond
to our request.
State Historic Preservation Officer
(SHPO) and the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation (ACHP)
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), we are
required to request comments from the
SHPO and ACHP on amendments that
may have an effect on historic
properties. On August 23, 2013, we
requested comments on Missouri’s
amendment (Administrative Record No.
MO–678.06 and MO–678.07), but
neither the SHPO nor ACHP responded
to our request.
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
V. OSMRE’s Decision
Based on the above findings, we
approve the amendment Missouri sent
us on August 12, 2013.
To implement this decision, we are
amending the Federal regulations at 30
CFR part 925, which codify decisions
concerning the Missouri program to
include the original amendment
submission date and the date of final
publication for this rulemaking.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Dec 16, 2015
Jkt 238001
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
Section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a)
and (b) of that section. Because each
program is drafted and promulgated by
a specific State, not by OSMRE, these
standards are not applicable to the
actual language of State regulatory
programs and program amendments.
Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA
(30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and the
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11,
732.15 and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on
proposed State regulatory programs and
program amendments submitted by the
States must be based solely on a
determination of whether the submittal
is consistent with SMCRA and its
implementing Federal regulations and
whether the other requirements of 30
CFR parts 730, 731 and 732 have been
met.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of
SMCRA requires State laws regulating
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations be’’ in accordance with’’ the
requirements of SMCRA. Section
503(a)(7) requires that State programs
contain rules and regulations
‘‘consistent with’’ regulations issued by
the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on federally
recognized Indian tribes. We have
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78663
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
This determination was reached because
the Missouri program does not regulate
coal exploration and surface coal
mining or reclamation operations on
Indian lands. Therefore, the Missouri
program has no effect on federally
recognized Indian tribes.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 200,1 the President issued
Executive Order 13211, which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is, (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866 and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution or use of energy. A
Statement of Energy Effects is not
required because this rule is exempt
from review under Executive Order
12866 and is not expected to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution or use of energy.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because Section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) states that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute
major Federal actions within the
meaning of Section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
78664
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 242 / Thursday, December 17, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule (a) does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with
foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is founded upon the State
submittal, which is the subject of this
rule. The State submittal is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations, for
which an analysis was prepared, and a
Original amendment
submission date
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, tribal
governments or the private sector of
$100 million or more in any given year.
This determination is based upon the
fact that the State submittal, which is
the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations, for
which an analysis was prepared, and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation did not impose an unfunded
mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 925
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Date of final
publication
[Amended]
[FR Doc. 2015–31674 Filed 12–16–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR PART 571
[Docket No. NHTSA–2015–0057]
Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
RIN 2127–AL41
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
Lamps, Reflective Devices, and
Associated Equipment
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:06 Dec 16, 2015
Jkt 238001
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 30 CFR part 925 is amended
as set forth below:
PART 925—MISSOURI
1. The authority citation for part 925
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
2. Section 925.15 is amended in the
table by adding an entry in
chronological order by ‘‘Date of final
publication’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 925.15 Approval of Missouri regulatory
program amendments.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
10 CSR 40–3.040(6)(A)1., (6)(R), (6)(U), (10)(B)5., and (10)(O)3.C.; 10 CSR 40–
3.060(1)(K)2.; 10 CSR 40–3.180(3); 10 CSR 40–3.200(6)(A)1., (6)(R), (6)(U),
(6)(T), (10)(B)5., (10)(O)3.C., (12)(A)1.(A), and (17)(B); 10 CSR 40–3.220(1)(K)
and (L);10 CSR 40–3.230(1)(A) and (3)(D); 10 CSR 40–3.240(1); 10 CSR 40–
3.260(4); 10 CSR 40–3.300; 10 CSR 40–5.010(1)(A), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7),
and (8); 10 CSR 40–5.020(3) and (4); 10 CSR 40–6.020(3)(B)14., and (3)(D); 10
CSR 40–6.030(4)(C); 10 CSR 40–6.050(14)(B) and (15); 10 CSR 40–6.060; 10
CSR 40–6.070(2)(A)5.; 10 CSR 40–6.100(1)(C) and (D); 10 CSR 40–
6.120(5)(C), (7)(A)1.A., and (9)(A); 10 CSR 40–8.010; 10 CSR 40 8.020(2)(C);
10 CSR 40–8.070(2)(C)1.A.(II) and (2)(C)8.B.
This final rule amends the
rear license plate holder requirements
contained in Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 108;
‘‘Lamps, reflective devices, and
associated equipment.’’ The final rule
expands upon the proposal in the
NPRM and allows license plates on all
motor vehicles to be mounted on a
plane up to 30 degrees upward from
vertical if the upper edge of the license
plate is not more than 1.2 meters (47.25
inches) from the ground. Previously, the
maximum allowable upward mounting
angle was 15 degrees beyond vertical.
This final rule increases harmonization
with existing requirements in European
regulations. Additionally, this final rule
increases a manufacturer’s design
flexibility while providing opportunity
to decrease cost without compromising
safety.
DATES: Effective June 14, 2016, with
optional early compliance as discussed
below.
Petitions for Reconsideration:
Petitions for reconsideration of this final
PO 00000
*
Citation/description
SUMMARY:
3. Section 925.16 is amended by
removing and reserving paragraphs
(p)(4) and (20) and removing paragraph
(v).
■
Editorial Note: This document was
received for publication by the Office of the
Federal Register on December 11, 2015.
*
*
*
*
August 12, 2013 ................... December 17, 2015 ...........
§ 925.16
Dated: July 16, 2015.
Len Meier,
Acting Regional Director, Mid-Continent
Region.
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
rule must be received not later than
February 1, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Petitions for reconsideration
of this final rule must refer to the docket
and notice number set forth above and
be submitted to the Administrator,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical issues: Mr. David Beck, Office
of Crash Avoidance Standards,
Telephone: 202–366–6813, Facsimile:
202–366–7002.
For legal issues: Mr. John Piazza,
Office of the Chief Counsel, Telephone:
202–366–2992, Facsimile: 202–366–
3820.
The mailing address for these officials
is: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 242 (Thursday, December 17, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78657-78664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31674]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 925
[SATS No. MO-041-FOR; Docket ID: OSM-2013-0008; S1D1S SS08011000
SX064A000 167S180110; S2D2S SS08011000 SX064A000 16XS501520]
Missouri Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), are approving an amendment to the Missouri regulatory program
(Missouri program) under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act
of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Missouri proposed revisions to its
regulations concerning several topics regarding: Valid Existing Rights;
Protection of Hydrologic Balance; Post-mining Land Use; Permit
Applications; and Air Resource Protection. Missouri intends to revise
its program to be no less effective than the Federal regulations, to
clarify ambiguities, and to improve operational efficiency.
DATES: Effective Date: December 17, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Len Meier, Director Alton Field
Division, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 501
Belle Street, Suite 216, Alton, IL 62002, Telephone: (618) 463-6460,
Email: lmeier@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Missouri Program
II. Submission of the Amendment
III. OSMRE's Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSMRE's Decision
VI. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Missouri Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its State program includes, among other things, ``a State law which
provides for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the requirements of this Act . . .; and
rules and regulations consistent with regulations issued by the
Secretary pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On
the basis of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Missouri program on November 21, 1980. You
can find background information on the Missouri program, including the
Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of
approval, in the November 21, 1980, Federal Register (45 FR 77017). You
can find later actions concerning the Missouri program and program
amendments at 30 CFR 925.10, 925.12, 925.15, and 925.16.
II. Submission of the Amendment
By letter dated August 12, 2013 (Administrative Record No. MO-678),
Missouri sent us an amendment to its Program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1201 et seq.). Missouri sent the amendment in response to a January 31,
2008, letter (Administrative Record No. MO-669) we sent to Missouri in
accordance with 30 CFR 732.17(c) concerning changes to valid existing
rights requirements. Missouri also made changes to eliminate required
program amendments recorded at 30 CFR 925.16(p)(4), (p)(20) and (v);
and program disapprovals at 30 CFR 925.12(d). Missouri revised other
sections of its regulations at its own initiative. Missouri proposed
revisions to title 10 of its Code of State Regulations (CSR) under
Division 40 Land Reclamation Commission. The specific sections of 10
CSR 40 in Missouri's amendment are discussed in Part III OSMRE's
Findings. Missouri intends to revise its program to be no less
effective than the Federal regulations, to clarify ambiguities, and
improve operational efficiency.
[[Page 78658]]
We announced receipt of the proposed amendment in the October 25,
2013, Federal Register (78 FR 63909). In the same document, we opened
the public comment period and provided an opportunity for a public
hearing or meeting on the adequacy of the amendment. We did not hold a
public hearing or meeting because no one requested one. The public
comment period ended November 24, 2013. We did not receive any public
comments.
III. OSMRE's Findings
We are approving the amendment as described below. The following
are the findings we made concerning Missouri's amendment under SMCRA
and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 732.15 and 732.17. Any revisions
that we do not specifically discuss below concerning non-substantive
wording or editorial changes can be found in the full text of the
program amendment available at www.regulations.gov.
1. Missouri proposed to revise the sections listed below to make
numerous non-substantive edits for clarity and update its rules to
current editions of the Missouri Statutes:
Minor Reference Change Table
------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 CSR Title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
40-3.040.......................... Requirements for Protection of the
Hydrologic Balance.
40-3.060.......................... Requirements for the Disposal of
Excess Spoil.
40-3.170.......................... Signs and Markers for Underground
Operations.
40-3.180.......................... Casing and Sealing of Exposed
Underground Openings.
40-3.200.......................... Requirements for the Protection of
the Hydrologic Balance for
Underground Operations.
40-3.210.......................... Requirements for the Use of
Explosives for Underground
Operations.
40-3.220.......................... Disposal of Underground Development
Waste and Excess Spoil.
40-3.230.......................... Requirements for the Disposal of
Coal Processing Waste for
Underground Operations.
40-3.240.......................... Air Resource Protection.
40-3.260.......................... Requirements for Backfilling and
Grading for Underground Operations.
40-3.300.......................... Postmining Land Use Requirements for
Underground Operations.
40-5.010.......................... Prohibitions and Limitations on
Mining in Certain Areas.
40-5.020.......................... State Designation of Areas as
Unsuitable for Mining.
40-6.020.......................... General Requirement for Coal
Exploration, Permits.
40-6.030.......................... Surface Mining Permit Applications--
Minimum Requirements for Legal,
Financial, Compliance, and Related
Information.
40-6.040.......................... Surface Mining Permit Applications--
Minimum Requirements for
Information on Environmental
Resources.
40-6.050.......................... Surface Mining Permit Applications--
Minimum Requirements for
Reclamation and Operations Plan.
40-6.060.......................... Requirements for Permits for Special
Categories of Surface Coal Mining
and Reclamation Operations.
40-6.070.......................... Review, Public Participation and
Approval of Permit Applications and
Permit Terms and Conditions.
40-6.100.......................... Underground Mining Permit
Applications--Minimum Requirements
for Legal, Financial, Compliance,
and Related Information.
40-6.110.......................... Underground Mining Permit
Applications--Minimum Requirements
for Information on Environmental
Resources.
40-6.120.......................... Underground Mining Permit
Applications--Minimum Requirements
for Reclamation and Operations
Plan.
40-7.050.......................... Requirements, Conditions and Terms
of Liability Insurance.
40-8.010.......................... Definitions.
40-8.020.......................... Exemption for Coal Extraction
Incident to Government-Financed
Highway or Other Construction.
40-8.070.......................... Applicability and General
Requirements.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
We find that Missouri's proposed revisions will make its
regulations no less effective than the Federal regulations. Therefore,
we are approving Missouri's revisions.
2. 10 CSR 40-3.040 Requirements for Protection of the Hydrologic
Balance (6)(A)1., (6)(R), and (6)(U) Siltation Structures and 10 CSR
40-3.200 Underground Mining (6)(A)1., (6)(R), and (6)(U) Siltation
Structures
Missouri proposed to replace the word ``pond'' with ``structure''
at 10 CSR 40-3.040 (6)(A)1., (6)(R), and (6)(U) Siltation Structures
and at 10 CSR 40-3.200 (6)(A)1., (6)(R), and (6)(U) Siltation
Structures. The corresponding Federal Regulations at 30 CFR 816.46 and
817.46 uses the same term. We find that Missouri's proposed revision
will make its regulations no less effective than the Federal
regulations. Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
3. 10 CSR 40-3.040 Requirements for Protection of the Hydrologic
Balance (10)(B)5. and 10 CSR 40-3.200 Requirements for Protection of
the Hydrologic Balance for Underground Operations (6)(T) and (10)(B)5.
Permanent and Temporary Impoundments
Missouri proposed to revise these sections to clarify that
requirements for impoundments that meet the size or other criteria of
the MSHA, 30 CFR 77.216(a) are contained in United States Soil
Conservation Service Technical Release No. 60, Earth Dams and
Reservoirs, July 2005, incorporated by reference. Requirements for
impoundments that do not meet the size or other criteria contained in
30 CFR 77.216(a) are contained in United States Natural Resources
Conservation Service, Conservation Practice Standard, POND, No. CODE
378, January 2004, by reference. The corresponding Federal Regulation
at 30 CFR 780.25(a)(2)(i) provides similar requirements. We find that
Missouri's proposed revision will make its regulations no less
effective than the Federal regulations. Therefore, we are approving
Missouri's revision.
4. 10 CSR 40-3.040 Requirements for Protection of the Hydrologic
Balance (10)(O)3.C. and 10 CSR 40-3.200 Requirements for Protection of
the Hydrologic Balance for Underground Operations (10)(O)3.C. Permanent
and Temporary Impoundments and Spillways
Missouri removes these design requirements in response to the
disapproval recorded at 30 CFR 925.12(d) in order to be no less
effective than the counterpart Federal regulations for surface mining
at 30 CFR 780.25(c) and for underground mining at 30 CFR 784.16(c).
Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision and removing the
disapproval at 30 CFR 925.12(d).
5. 10 CSR 40-3.060 Requirements for the Disposal of Excess Spoil
(1)(K)2. Fill Inspection and 10 CSR 40-3.220
[[Page 78659]]
Disposal of Underground Development Waste and Excess Spoil (1)(L)
Certified Report
Missouri proposed to revise these sections to require a registered
professional engineer or other qualified professional specialist under
the direction of a registered professional engineer to provide the
director with a certified report stating that the fill has been
constructed as specified in the design approved in the permit and plan.
The corresponding Federal Regulation at 30 CFR 816.71(i)(2) contains a
similar requirement. We find that Missouri's proposed revision will
make its regulations no less effective than the Federal regulations.
Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
6. 10 CSR 40-3.180 Casing and Sealing of Exposed Underground Openings
(3) Permanent Casing and Sealing of Underground Openings
Missouri proposed to revise this section to correct various
regulatory citations and to include a reference to the Wellhead
Protection Section, Division of Geology and Land Survey at 10 CSR 23
Chapter 6 for approval of water well transfers. We find that Missouri's
proposed revision will make its regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations.
However, OSMRE received a letter from the Mining Safety and Health
Administration (MSHA) on October 25, 2013 (Missouri Administrative
Record No. 678.09), which noted that the MSHA citation referenced (30
CFR 75.1771) was incorrect. The correct MSHA regulation is 30 CFR
75.1711. We are approving the amendment with the condition that
Missouri correct this typographical error through their State
administrative process.
7. 10 CSR 40-3.200 Requirements for Protection of the Hydrologic
Balance for Underground Operations (12)(A)1.(A) Groundwater Monitoring
Missouri proposed to revise this section to correct the references
for remedial measures taken by the operator when analysis of any
groundwater sample indicates noncompliance with the permit conditions
to 10 CSR 40-6.070(14) and 10 CSR 40-6.120(5). The corresponding
Federal Regulation at 30 CFR 816.41 provides similar requirements. We
find that Missouri's proposed revision will make its regulations no
less effective than the Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri's revision.
8. 10 CSR 40-3.200 Requirements for Protection of the Hydrologic
Balance for Underground Operations (17)(B) Stream Buffer Zones
Missouri proposed to revise this section to correct the references
for the marking of stream buffer zones that are not to be disturbed to
meet the regulatory requirements at 10 CSR 40-3.170(6). The
corresponding Federal Regulation at 30 CFR 817.11 provides similar
requirements. We find that Missouri's proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the Federal regulations. Therefore,
we are approving Missouri's revision.
9. 10 CSR 40-3.220 Disposal of Underground Development Waste and Excess
Spoil (1)(K) and (L) General Requirements
Missouri proposed to revise these sections to clarify at (K) that
fill be inspected by or under the direction of a professional engineer
and at (L) only the registered engineer shall provide the certified
report by removing the ``. . . or other qualified professional
specialist . . .'' verbiage from their rule. The corresponding Federal
Regulation at 30 CFR 817.71(h)(2) provides similar requirements. We
find that Missouri's proposed revision will make its regulations no
less effective than the Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri's revision.
10. 10 CSR 40-3.230 Requirements for the Disposal of Coal Processing
Waste for Underground Operations (1)(A) General Requirements
Missouri proposed to revise this section to state that all coal
processing waste disposed of in an area other than the mine workings or
excavations shall be hauled or conveyed and placed for final placement
in new or existing disposal areas approved in the permit and plan for
this purpose. The corresponding Federal Regulation at 30 CFR 817.81(a)
provides similar requirements. We find that Missouri's proposed
revision will make its regulations no less effective than the Federal
regulations. Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
11. 10 CSR 40-3.230 Requirements for the Disposal of Coal Processing
Waste for Underground Operations (3)(D) Water Control Measures
Missouri proposed to revise this section to correct the references
to regulatory requirements that discharges of all water from a coal
processing waste bank shall comply with 10 CSR 40-3.200(15). The
corresponding Federal Regulation at 30 CFR 817.41(h) provides similar
requirements. We find that Missouri's proposed revision will make its
regulations no less effective than the Federal regulations. Therefore,
we are approving Missouri's revision.
12. 10 CSR 40-3.240 Air Resource Protection (1)
On May 8, 1984, OSMRE notified Missouri in the Federal Register (49
FR 19476 as amended at 64 FR 57981) and recorded at 30 CFR 925.16(p)(4)
that this requirement must be revised to provide performance standards
that address air quality in a manner no less effective than the Federal
regulations at 30 CFR 817.95(a). Missouri proposed to revise this
section to require that all exposed surface areas be protected and
stabilized to effectively control erosion and air pollution attendant
to erosion according to 10 CSR 40-3.200(5)(A). The corresponding
Federal Regulation at 30 CFR 817.95(a) provides similar requirements.
We find that Missouri's proposed revision will make its regulations no
less effective than the Federal regulations. Therefore, we are
approving Missouri's revision and removing the required program
amendment at 30 CFR 925.16(p)(4).
13. 10 CSR 40-3.260 Requirements for Backfilling and Grading for
Underground Operations (4) Regrading or Stabilizing Rills and Gullies
Missouri proposed to revise this section to replace the existing
requirements with more specific guidelines, including time frames, for
regrading or stabilizing rills and gullies. Missouri proposed to add a
section on regrading or stabilizing rills and gullies on areas that
have been previously mined. The corresponding Federal Regulation at 30
CFR 816.95(b) provides similar, but less specific requirements. We find
that Missouri's proposed revision will make its regulations no less
effective than the Federal regulations. Therefore, we are approving
Missouri's revision.
14. 10 CSR 40-3.300 Postmining Land Use Requirements for Underground
Operations
Missouri proposed to revise subsection (3) of this section to
correct the references to regulatory requirements at this section to
require that prior to the release of lands from the permit area in
accordance with 10 CSR 40-7.021(2)(C), the permit area shall be
restored, in a timely manner, either to conditions capable of
supporting the uses they were capable of supporting before any mining
or to conditions capable of supporting approved alternative land uses.
Although there is no Federal Equivalent under the requirements for
postmining land use, the corresponding Federal regulation for bond
release at 30 CFR 800.40(c) provides similar requirements
[[Page 78660]]
to the Missouri citation. We find that Missouri's proposed revision
will make its regulations no less effective than the Federal
regulations. Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
15. 10 CSR 40-5.010 Prohibitions and Limitations on Mining in Certain
Areas (1)(A) Definition of Valid Existing Rights
Missouri proposed to revise this section to replace the definition
of Valid Existing Rights with language that is consistent with the
corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 761.5. We find that
Missouri's proposed revision will make its regulations substantively
the same as the Federal regulations. Therefore, we are approving
Missouri's revision.
16. 10 CSR 40-5.010 Prohibitions and Limitations on Mining in Certain
Areas (2) Areas Where Mining is Prohibited or Limited
Missouri proposed to revise this section to require that surface
coal mining operations may not be conducted on the following lands,
unless the permit applicant either has valid existing rights as
determined under section (7) or qualifies for the exception for
existing operations under section (3). Missouri also revises this
section at 10 CSR 40-5.010 (2)(E)2. to state that concerning the
prohibition within 300 feet measured horizontally from an occupied
dwelling, the prohibition does not apply when the part of the operation
to be located closer than 300 feet to the dwelling is an access or haul
road that connects with an existing public road on the side of the
public road opposite the dwelling.
The corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 761.11 provides
similar requirements. We find that Missouri's proposed revision will
make its regulations no less effective than the Federal regulations.
Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
17. 10 CSR 40-5.010 Prohibitions and Limitations on Mining in Certain
Areas (3) Exception for Existing Operations
Missouri proposed to revise this section to require that the
prohibitions and limitations of section (2) do not apply to surface
coal mining operations for which a valid permit, issued under 10 CSR
40-6, exists when the land within the permit area comes under the
protection of section 444.890.4, Revised Statute of Missouri (RSMo), or
this rule. The corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 761.12
provides similar requirements. We find that Missouri's proposed
revision will make its regulations no less effective than the Federal
regulations. Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
18. 10 CSR 40-5.010 Prohibitions and Limitations on Mining in Certain
Areas (4) Procedures for Compatibility Findings for Surface Coal Mining
Operations on Federal Lands in National Forests
Missouri proposed to revise this section at (4)(A) to correct
references to the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 761.13 concerning
Federal lands in a national forest. Missouri added language at (4)(B)
that the applicant may submit a request to the regional director of
OSMRE for a determination before preparing and submitting an
application for a permit or boundary revision. Additionally, the
applicant must explain how the proposed operation would not damage the
values listed in the definition of ``significant recreational, timber,
economic, or other values incompatible with surface coal mining
operations'' in subsection (1)(B) and must include a map and sufficient
information about the nature of the proposed operation for the
Secretary of the Interior to make adequately documented findings.
Missouri proposed to revise section (4)(C) to require that when a
proposed surface coal mining operation or proposed boundary revision
for an existing surface coal mining operation includes Federal lands
within a national forest, the commission or director may not issue the
permit or approve the boundary revision before the Secretary of the
Interior makes the findings required by subsection (2)(B).
The corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 761.13, provides
similar requirements. We find that Missouri's proposed revision will
make its regulations no less effective than the Federal regulations.
Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
19. 10 CSR 40-5.010 Prohibitions and Limitations on Mining in Certain
Areas (5) Procedures for Relocating or Closing a Public Road or Waiving
the Prohibition on Surface Coal Mining Operations Within the Buffer
Zone of a Public Road
Missouri proposed to revise this section at (5)(A) to emphasize
that the requirements of this section do not apply to lands for which a
person has valid existing rights, that are within the scope of existing
operations as defined in Section (3), or roads that join an existing
public road.
Missouri proposed to revise the section at (5)(B)(3) to provide a
public comment period if a mining operation may affect a right-of-way
or public road.
The corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 761.14 provides
similar requirements. We find that Missouri's proposed revision will
make its regulations no less effective than the Federal regulations.
Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
20. 10 CSR 40-5.010 Prohibitions and Limitations on Mining in Certain
Areas (6) Procedures for Waiving the Prohibition on Surface Coal Mining
Operations within the Buffer Zone of an Occupied Dwelling
Missouri proposed to revise this section to identify three
situations where this section does not apply, and to require waivers to
clarify who has a legal right to deny mining and knowingly waived that
right. The waiver will act as consent for the mining. Missouri adds
language similar to the requirements in the corresponding Federal
regulation at 30 CFR 761.15. We find that Missouri's proposed revision
will make its regulations no less effective than the Federal
regulations. Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
21. 10 CSR 40-5.010 Prohibitions and Limitations on Mining in Certain
Areas (7) Submission and Processing of Requests for Valid Existing
Rights Determinations
Missouri proposed to revise this section to require that an
applicant must request a valid existing rights determination from OSMRE
for Federal lands and for those features on Federal lands protected
under subsections (2)(C) through (G). An applicant must request a valid
existing rights determination for non-Federal lands and for those
features on non-Federal lands protected under subsections (2)(C)
through (G) from the regulatory authority. The regulatory authority
must use the Federal definition of valid existing rights at 30 CFR
761.5 when making a determination for non-Federal lands and the
definition of valid existing rights at subsection (1)(A) when making a
determination for those features protected under subsections (2)(C)
through (G).
At (7)(B), Missouri requires that an applicant must request a valid
existing rights determination from the appropriate agency under
subsection (7)(A) if the applicant intends to conduct surface coal
mining operations on the basis of valid existing rights under section
(2) or wishes to confirm the right to do so. The applicant may submit
this request before preparing and submitting an application for a
permit or boundary revision for the land. If OSMRE is the appropriate
agency, the applicant must request the determination in accordance with
the requirements of the Federal regulations
[[Page 78661]]
at 30 CFR 761.16. If the regulatory authority is the appropriate
agency, the applicant must request the determination in accordance with
the requirements of 10 CSR 40-5.010.
The corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 761.16, provides
similar requirements. We find that Missouri's proposed revision will
make its regulations no less effective than the Federal regulations.
Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
22. 10 CSR 40-5.010 Prohibitions and Limitations on Mining in Certain
Areas (8) Regulatory Authority Obligations at Time of Permit
Application Review
Missouri proposed to revise this section at (8)(A) to require that
the commission or director review the application to determine whether
the proposed surface coal mining operation would be located on any
lands protected under section 444.890.4, RSMo., or Missouri
regulations.
At (8)(B), Missouri requires that the commission or director reject
any portion of the application that would locate surface coal mining
operations on land protected under section 444.890.4, RSMo., or
Missouri regulation, unless: the site qualifies for the exception for
existing operations under section (3); a person has valid existing
rights; the applicant obtains a waiver or exception from the
prohibitions of section 444.890.4, RSMo., or Missouri regulation; and
for lands protected by subsection (2)(C), both the commission or
director and the agency with jurisdiction over the park or place
jointly approve the proposed operation in accordance with subsection
(8)(D).
At (8)(C), Missouri added language to this section that if the
commission or director has difficulty determining whether an
application includes land within an area specified in subsection
(2)(A), the commission or director shall request that the Federal,
state, or local governmental agency verify the location.
At (8)(D), if the commission or director determines that the
proposed surface coal mining operation will adversely affect any
publicly-owned park or any place included in the National Register of
Historic Places, the director shall request that the Federal, state, or
local agency with jurisdiction over the park or place either approve or
object to the proposed operation. The regulations contain requirements
on how this request will be submitted and processed.
The corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 761.17 provides
similar requirements. We find that Missouri's proposed revision will
make its regulations no less effective than the Federal regulations.
Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
23. 10 CSR 40-5.020 State Designation of Areas as Unsuitable for Mining
(3) Applicability to Lands Designated as Unsuitable by Congress; and
(4) Exploration on Land Designated as Unsuitable for Surface Coal
Mining Operations
Missouri proposed new language at section (3) Applicability to
Lands Designated as Unsuitable by Congress; pursuant to appropriate
petitions, lands listed under 10 CSR 40-5.010(2) are subject to
designation as unsuitable for all or certain types of surface coal
mining operations under this rule. Missouri's proposed new language is
consistent with the corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 762.14.
Therefore, we find that Missouri's new language is no less effective
than the Federal regulation. Therefore, we are approving Missouri's new
language.
Additionally, Missouri proposed to revise section (4) by adding a
new title: Exploration on Land Designated as Unsuitable for Surface
Coal Mining Operations and added the word ``unsuitable'' in this
section. Missouri's proposed revisions are consistent with
corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 762.15. We find that
Missouri's revisions are no less effective than the corresponding the
Federal regulation. Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revisions.
24. 10 CSR 40-6.020 General Requirements for Coal Exploration Permits
(3)(B)14. Permit requirements for explorations removing more than two
hundred fifty tons of coal or where explorations will substantially
disturb the natural land surface
Missouri proposed to revise this section to require that for any
lands listed in 10 CSR 40-5.010(2), a demonstration that the proposed
exploration activities have been designed to minimize interference with
the values for which those lands were designated as unsuitable for
surface coal mining operations. The corresponding Federal regulation at
30 CFR 772.12(b)(14) provides similar requirements. We find that
Missouri's proposed revision will make its regulations no less
effective than the Federal regulations. Therefore, we are approving
Missouri's revision.
25. 10 CSR 40-6.020 General Requirements for Coal Exploration Permits
(3)(D) Decisions on Applications for Exploration Removing More Than Two
Hundred Fifty Tons of Coal
Missouri proposed to add paragraph 2.D. to this section requiring
minimal interference, to the extent possible, with the values for which
those lands were designated as unsuitable for surface coal mining with
exploration activities. This section also requires reasonable
opportunity for comment by the owner or agency with primary
jurisdiction over the feature causing the land to come under the
protection of 10 CSR 40-5.010(2) on whether the finding by the
commission under (3)(D)1 and 2 is appropriate.
The corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 772.12(d)(2)(iv),
provides similar requirements. We find that Missouri's proposed
revision will make its regulations no less effective than the Federal
regulations. Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
26. 10 CSR 40-6.030 Surface Mining Permit Applications--Minimum
Requirements for Legal, Financial, Compliance, and Related Information
(4)(C) Relationship to Areas Designated Unsuitable for Mining
Missouri proposed to revise this subsection to require that if an
applicant proposed to conduct surface mining activities within one
hundred feet (100') of the outside right-of-way of a public road or
within three hundred feet (300') of an occupied dwelling, the
application shall meet the requirements of 10 CSR 40-5.010(5) or (6),
respectively. The corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 778.16(c),
provides similar requirements. We find that Missouri's proposed
revision will make its regulations no less effective than the Federal
regulations. Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
27. 10 CSR 40-6.050 Surface Mining Permit Applications--Minimum
Requirements for Reclamation and Operations Plan (14)(B) Protection of
Public Parks and Historic Places
Missouri proposed to revise this section to correct the references
to regulatory requirements to make it similar to the provisions of the
corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 780.31(a). We find that
Missouri's proposed revision will make its regulations no less
effective than the Federal regulations. Therefore, we are approving
Missouri's revision.
28. 10 CSR 40-6.050 Surface Mining Permit Applications--Minimum
Requirements for Reclamation and Operations Plan (15) Relocation or Use
of Public Roads
Missouri proposed to revise this section to correct the references
to regulatory requirements to make it similar to the provisions of the
[[Page 78662]]
corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 780.33. We find that
Missouri's proposed revision will make its regulations no less
effective than the Federal regulations. Therefore, we are approving
Missouri's revision.
29. 10 CSR 40-6.060 Requirements for Permits for Special Categories of
Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations
Missouri proposed to revise this section to correct the address of
the Land Reclamation Program at (4)(C)1.A. and references to regulatory
requirements to make it similar to the provisions of the corresponding
Federal regulation at 30 CFR 785.17(e)(2). We find that Missouri's
proposed revision will make its regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
30. 10 CSR 40-6.070 Review, Public Participation and Approval of Permit
Applications and Permit Terms and Conditions (2)(A)5. Public Notices of
Filing of Permit Applications
Missouri proposed to revise this subsection to require that if an
applicant seeks a permit to mine within one hundred feet (100') of the
outside right-of-way of a public road or to relocate a public road, a
concise statement describing the mine-related activities must be
submitted. The corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR
773.6(a)(1)(v) provides similar requirements. We find that Missouri's
proposed revision will make its regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
Additionally, Missouri proposed to revise this section to add
``mine-related activities'' to the concise statement requirement if an
applicant seeks a permit under this section of the rule. The
corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 773.15(c)(2), provides
similar requirements. We find that Missouri's proposed revision will
make its regulations no less effective than the Federal regulations.
Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
31. 10 CSR 40-6.100 Underground Mining Permit Applications--Minimum
Requirements for Legal, Financial, Compliance, and Related Information
(1)(C) and (D) Identification of Interests
Missouri proposed to revise this section to clarify that required
information concerning an applicant's ownership or control as defined
in 10 CSR 40-6.010(2)(C) must be contained in each application. The
corresponding Federal regulations at 30 CFR 778.11 and 778.12 provide
similar requirements. We find that Missouri's proposed revision will
make its regulations no less effective than the Federal regulations.
Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
32. 10 CSR 40-6.120 Underground Mining Permit Applications--Minimum
Requirements for Reclamation and Operations Plan (5)(C) Reclamation
Plan--Protection of Hydrologic Balance
Missouri proposed to revise subparagraph (C) to clarify that the
supplemental information required by this section shall include the
plans listed at (C)1. through (C)3. The corresponding Federal
regulation at 30 CFR 784.14(g), provides similar requirements. We find
that Missouri's proposed revision will make its regulations no less
effective than the Federal regulations. Therefore, we are approving
Missouri's revision.
33. 10 CSR 40-6.120 Underground Mining Permit Applications--Minimum
Requirements for Reclamation and Operations Plan (7)(A)1.A. Reclamation
Plan-Ponds, Impoundments, Banks, Dams, and Embankments
Missouri proposed to revise this section to clarify that the
general plan shall be prepared by or under the direction of and
certified by only a qualified registered professional engineer by
removing the `` . . . or by a professional geologist. . .'' verbiage
from their rule. The corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR
784.16(a) provides similar requirements. We find that Missouri's
proposed revision will make its regulations no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
34. 10 CSR 40-6.120 Underground Mining Permit Applications--Minimum
Requirements for Reclamation and Operations Plan (9)(A) Relocation or
Use of Public Roads
Missouri proposed to revise this section to change from
``underground mining activities'' to ``surface coal mining
operations.'' The corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 784.18(a)
provides similar requirements. We find that Missouri's proposed
revision will make its regulations no less effective than the Federal
regulations. Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
35. 10 CSR 40-8.010 Definitions
Missouri proposed to revise the definition of several terms to
provide similar definitions to the corresponding Federal regulation at
30 CFR 701.5, including adding a definition for ``Replacement of water
supply.'' We find that Missouri's proposed revisions will make its
regulations substantively the same as the corresponding Federal
regulations.
However, we noted in the definition at 89 Significant, imminent
environmental harm to land, air or water resources, the reference needs
to be changed from 444.855.2, RSMo to the valid reference 444.885.2,
RSMo. Missouri needs to correct this citation in a future program
amendment. We are approving the amendment with the condition that
Missouri prepare a required program amendment at 30 CFR 925.16 to
correct the regulation citation.
36. 10 CSR 40-8.020 Exemption for Coal Extraction Incident to
Government-Financed Highway or Other Construction (2)(C) Definitions
Missouri proposed to revise this definition to be substantively the
same as the corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 707.5.
Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision.
37. 10 CSR 40-8.070 Applicability and General Requirements
(2)(C)1.A.(II)
Missouri proposed to correct the reporting dates at (a) and (b) of
this subparagraph. These dates were corrected to clearly require
separate cumulative coal production and revenue data from mining prior
to October 1, 1992, and after October 1, 1992. This action corrects the
disapproval of the Missouri regulations recorded at 30 CFR 925.12(f).
The corresponding Federal regulation at 30 CFR 702.5(a)(2) provides a
similar requirement. We find that Missouri's proposed revision will
make its regulations no less effective than the Federal regulations.
Therefore, we are approving Missouri's revision and removing the
disapproval at 30 CFR 925.12(f) and the required program amendment at
30 CFR 925.16(p)(20).
38. 10 CSR 40-8.070 Applicability and General Requirements (2)(C)8.B
Missouri removes this subparagraph as redundant to the previously
approved subparagraph at (2)(C)8.A. Since this action merely removes
redundant language from a previously approved requirement, we find that
Missouri's proposed revision will make its regulations no less
effective than the Federal regulations. Therefore, we are approving
Missouri's revision.
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
Public Comments
We asked for public comments on the amendment, but did not receive
any.
[[Page 78663]]
Federal Agency Comments
On August 23, 2013, under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and section
503(b) of SMCRA, we requested comments on the amendment from various
Federal agencies with an actual or potential interest in the Missouri
program (Administrative Record Nos. MO-678.03 through MO-678.08). We
received one comment from MSHA (Administrative Record No. MO-678.09).
MSHA pointed out that at 10 CSR 40-3.180(3), Missouri had incorrectly
cited the MSHA regulation as 30 CFR 75.1771, when the correct MSHA
regulation is 30 CFR 75.1711. Missouri was notified of this
typographical error and will make this correction through its State
administrative process.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Concurrence and Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), we are required to get a written
concurrence from EPA for those provisions of the program amendment that
relate to air or water quality standards issued under the authority of
the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act (42
U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). None of the revisions that Missouri proposed to
make in this amendment pertain to air or water quality standards.
Therefore, we did not ask EPA to concur on the amendment. However, on
August 23, 2013, under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), we requested comments
on the amendment from EPA (Administrative Record No. MO-678.04). The
EPA did not respond to our request.
State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation (ACHP)
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), we are required to request comments from
the SHPO and ACHP on amendments that may have an effect on historic
properties. On August 23, 2013, we requested comments on Missouri's
amendment (Administrative Record No. MO-678.06 and MO-678.07), but
neither the SHPO nor ACHP responded to our request.
V. OSMRE's Decision
Based on the above findings, we approve the amendment Missouri sent
us on August 12, 2013.
To implement this decision, we are amending the Federal regulations
at 30 CFR part 925, which codify decisions concerning the Missouri
program to include the original amendment submission date and the date
of final publication for this rulemaking.
VI. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by Section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that this rule
meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that
section. Because each program is drafted and promulgated by a specific
State, not by OSMRE, these standards are not applicable to the actual
language of State regulatory programs and program amendments. Under
sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and the Federal
regulations at 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15 and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on
proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments submitted by
the States must be based solely on a determination of whether the
submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing Federal
regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR parts 730, 731
and 732 have been met.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires State laws
regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be'' in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA. Section 503(a)(7) requires
that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent with''
regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on federally recognized Indian tribes.
We have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
This determination was reached because the Missouri program does not
regulate coal exploration and surface coal mining or reclamation
operations on Indian lands. Therefore, the Missouri program has no
effect on federally recognized Indian tribes.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 200,1 the President issued Executive Order 13211, which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is, (1) considered significant under Executive Order 12866 and (2)
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution
or use of energy. A Statement of Energy Effects is not required because
this rule is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution or use of energy.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because Section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) states that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of Section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact, the Department relied
[[Page 78664]]
upon the data and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule (a) does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic
regions; and (c) does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is founded upon the State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule. The State submittal is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations, for which an analysis was prepared,
and a determination made that the Federal regulation was not considered
a major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local,
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
given year. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations, for which an analysis was prepared, and a
determination made that the Federal regulation did not impose an
unfunded mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 925
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: July 16, 2015.
Len Meier,
Acting Regional Director, Mid-Continent Region.
Editorial Note: This document was received for publication by
the Office of the Federal Register on December 11, 2015.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 30 CFR part 925 is amended
as set forth below:
PART 925--MISSOURI
0
1. The authority citation for part 925 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
0
2. Section 925.15 is amended in the table by adding an entry in
chronological order by ``Date of final publication'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 925.15 Approval of Missouri regulatory program amendments.
* * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original amendment submission date Date of final publication Citation/description
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
August 12, 2013......................... December 17, 2015.......... 10 CSR 40-3.040(6)(A)1., (6)(R), (6)(U),
(10)(B)5., and (10)(O)3.C.; 10 CSR 40-
3.060(1)(K)2.; 10 CSR 40-3.180(3); 10
CSR 40-3.200(6)(A)1., (6)(R), (6)(U),
(6)(T), (10)(B)5., (10)(O)3.C.,
(12)(A)1.(A), and (17)(B); 10 CSR 40-
3.220(1)(K) and (L);10 CSR 40-
3.230(1)(A) and (3)(D); 10 CSR 40-
3.240(1); 10 CSR 40-3.260(4); 10 CSR 40-
3.300; 10 CSR 40-5.010(1)(A), (2), (3),
(4), (5), (6), (7), and (8); 10 CSR 40-
5.020(3) and (4); 10 CSR 40-
6.020(3)(B)14., and (3)(D); 10 CSR 40-
6.030(4)(C); 10 CSR 40-6.050(14)(B) and
(15); 10 CSR 40-6.060; 10 CSR 40-
6.070(2)(A)5.; 10 CSR 40-6.100(1)(C) and
(D); 10 CSR 40-6.120(5)(C), (7)(A)1.A.,
and (9)(A); 10 CSR 40-8.010; 10 CSR 40
8.020(2)(C); 10 CSR 40-
8.070(2)(C)1.A.(II) and (2)(C)8.B.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 925.16 [Amended]
0
3. Section 925.16 is amended by removing and reserving paragraphs
(p)(4) and (20) and removing paragraph (v).
[FR Doc. 2015-31674 Filed 12-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P