Guidelines for Carrying Out Section 221(a)(4) of the Flood Control Act of 1970, as Amended, 78200-78206 [2015-31654]
Download as PDF
78200
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 241 / Wednesday, December 16, 2015 / Notices
Comments and recommendations on
the proposed information collection
should be emailed to Ms. Jasmeet
Seehra, DoD Desk Officer, at Oira_
submission@omb.eop.gov. Please
identify the proposed information
collection by DoD Desk Officer and the
Docket ID number and title of the
information collection.
You may also submit comments and
recommendations, identified by Docket
ID number and title, by the following
method:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, Docket
ID number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Frederick
Licari.
Written requests for copies of the
information collection proposal should
be sent to Mr. Licari at WHS/ESD
Directives Division, 4800 Mark Center
Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09,
Alexandria, VA 22350–3100.
Dated: December 10, 2015.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2015–31531 Filed 12–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
Guidelines for Carrying Out Section
221(a)(4) of the Flood Control Act of
1970, as Amended
United States Army Corps of
Engineers, Department of Defense.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) has updated the
existing guidance for providing in-kind
credit under Section 221(a)(4) of the
Flood Control Act of 1970, as further
amended by Section 1018 of the Water
Resources Reform and Development Act
of 2014.
tkelley on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
DATES:
U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, 441 G Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20314–1000.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janice E. Rasgus, Planning and Policy
Division, Washington, DC at 202–761–
7674.
ER 1165–
2–208 will be posted on the Corps Web
site in the very near future.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Response to Comments
The draft ER was published in the
August 28, 2015, issue of the Federal
Register (80 FR 52258) for a 30-day
comment period. The comment period
was extended by 30 days (see 50 FR
60135). The regulations.gov docket
number is COE–2015–0013. Sixteen
comments were received.
In response to one commenter, the
guidance was expanded to clarify that
in-kind contributions can be provided
once the feasibility cost sharing
agreement is executed and the project
management plan is developed.
Several commenters noted that the
non-Federal sponsor’s costs of
Coordination Team participation and
audits are no longer considered in-kind
contributions that are included as a
study or project cost subject to cost
sharing. The guidance was expanded to
clarify that likewise the Federal
Government’s cost of Coordination
Team participation and audits are not
included in study or project costs for
cost sharing purposes although these
costs are included in calculating any
limit on Federal participation.
One commenter requested that the
guidance be modified to allow the value
of in-kind contributions to be accepted
as cash payments toward the additional
10 percent payment required for
navigation projects. This request cannot
be accommodated. The law is explicit
that credit for in-kind contributions
shall not alter any requirement for the
non-Federal sponsor to pay 5 percent
cash for flood damage reduction project
and pay the additional 10 percent cash
for navigation projects. This
requirement was also specified in the
in-kind contribution authority as
enacted in WRDA 2007 and identified
in the implementing guidance for that
earlier provision.
Additional minor, non-substantive,
edits were made to provide further
clarity.
Effective date: December 16,
2015.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Dec 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: December 10, 2015.
Theodore A. Brown,
Chief, Planning and Policy Division,
Directorate of Civil Works.
ER 1165–2–208
1. Purpose. This regulation provides
guidance on the implementation of the
in-kind contribution credit provisions of
Section 221(a)(4) of the Flood Control
Act of 1970, as further amended by
Section 1018 of the Water Resources
Reform and Development Act of 2014
(WRRDA 2014) (42 U.S.C. 1962d–
5b(a)(4)) (hereinafter referred to as
‘‘Section 221’’). Section 221(a)(4) of the
Flood Control Act of 1970, as amended,
and Section 1018 of WRRDA 2014 are
provided in Appendix A.
2. Distribution Statement. Approved
for public release. Distribution is
unlimited.
3. Applicability. This regulation
applies to all HQUSACE elements,
Major Subordinate Commands (MSCs),
and district commands having Civil
Works responsibility and is effective
immediately.
a. The Section 221 crediting
provisions apply to the study, design,
and construction of water resources
development projects authorized in the
Water Resources Development Act
(WRDA) of 1986 or later laws, including
projects initiated after November 16,
1986 without specific authorization in
law. In addition, the crediting
provisions apply to the correction of
design deficiencies for projects
authorized prior to WRDA of 1986.
Finally, these provisions are also
applicable to a project under an
environmental infrastructure assistance
program.
(1) For a project with a project
partnership agreement (PPA) that was
executed on or after November 8, 2007,
such PPA may be amended to include
work by the non-Federal sponsor that
has not yet been initiated for credit
toward any remaining non-Federal cost
share under that agreement.
(2) Furthermore, in general, the
crediting provisions of Section 221 will
be used in lieu of Section 104 of WRDA
1986 and Section 215 of the Flood
Control Act of 1968. However, any
eligibility for credit under Section 104
of WRDA 1986 that was approved
previously by the Secretary will be
honored.
b. The authority for credit under
Section 221 is in addition to any other
authority to provide credit for in-kind
contributions. Section 221 credit may be
applied in lieu of other crediting
provisions if requested by the nonFederal sponsor.
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
tkelley on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 241 / Wednesday, December 16, 2015 / Notices
This regulation supersedes ER 1165–
2–208 dated 17 February 2012.
4. Key Principles.
a. In General. Section 221 is a
comprehensive authority that addresses
the affording of credit for the value of
in-kind contributions provided by a
non-Federal sponsor toward its required
cost share (excluding the required 5
percent cash for structural flood damage
reduction projects and the additional 10
percent cash payment over 30 years for
navigation projects) if those in-kind
contributions are determined to be
integral to a study or project.
b. Types of In-Kind Contributions. The
types of in-kind contributions eligible
for credit include planning activities
(including data collection and other
services needed for a feasibility study);
design related to construction; and
construction (including management;
mitigation; and construction materials
and services).
c. Compliance with Applicable
Federal Laws, Regulations, and Policies.
Eligibility for credit is subject to the
non-Federal sponsor complying with all
applicable Federal laws and
implementing regulations, including,
but not limited to Section 601 of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42
U.S.C. 2000d), and Department of
Defense Directive 5500.11 issued
pursuant thereto; the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C.
6102); the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended (29 U.S.C. 794), and Army
Regulation 600–7 issued pursuant
thereto; and 40 U.S.C. 3141–3148 and
40 U.S.C. 3701–3708 (labor standards
originally enacted as the Davis-Bacon
Act, the Contract Work Hours and
Safety Standards Act, the Copeland
Anti-Kickback Act); and the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4321–4347) and other environmental
laws and regulations.
d. In-Kind Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU).
(1) Construction. Section 221 provides
that any construction work that has not
been carried out as of November 8, 2007
is eligible for credit only if the nonFederal sponsor executes an agreement
with the Secretary prior to carrying out
such work. For purposes of Section 221
crediting only, ‘‘carrying out’’
construction work means initiation of
construction using the non-Federal
sponsor’s labor force or issuance of the
notice to proceed for such construction
if undertaken by contract. Therefore, in
those cases where there is not yet an
executed PPA, the non-Federal sponsor
must execute an in-kind MOU with the
Corps of Engineers prior to initiating
construction or issuing the notice to
proceed. Design work associated with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Dec 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
that construction is eligible for credit as
long as an in-kind MOU or PPA is
executed prior to the construction being
carried out. In addition, the
construction carried out by the nonFederal sponsor is not considered as
part of the future without project
condition.
(a) Projects Specifically Authorized.
For projects that are or will be
specifically authorized for construction,
an In-Kind MOU for construction may
be executed once there is vertical team
concurrence with the Tentatively
Selected Plan (TSP) at the TSP
Milestone. The TSP Milestone is the
point at which there is vertical team
concurrence on the plan that will be
released in the draft study report for
public and agency review. Given the
new SMART Planning Process, the TSP
Milestone should occur much earlier in
the planning process than what was
previously achieved. Requests from
non-Federal sponsors to execute an inkind MOU for construction prior to the
TSP Milestone will be considered on a
case-by-case basis and must be
approved by the Assistant Secretary of
the Army (Civil Works). Since each
project presents its own unique
combination of circumstances, each
request will require an individual
evaluation that will include
consideration of, but not limited to, the
following criteria:
(i) Whether the proposed work is a
modification of an existing Federal
project;
(ii) Whether the proposed work will
follow an existing levee alignment in
the case of a flood risk management
project;
(iii) Whether the proposed work
balances and integrates the wise use of
the flood plain to ensure public safety;
(iv) Whether the proposed work
significantly reduces flood damage risk
to human life, property or critical
infrastructure; and
(iv) Whether the proposed work will
likely be included in the final project
recommendation.
(b) Continuing Authority Program. For
projects implemented under the
Continuing Authority Program or a
regional authority that does not require
additional authorization to implement
the project, an In-Kind MOU for design
and implementation may be executed
after the MSC Commander approves the
decision document for the project.
(2) Design. For projects that are or will
be specifically authorized for
construction, an In-Kind MOU for
design may be executed after the TSP
Milestone.
(3) Planning.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78201
(a) Projects Specifically Authorized.
For projects that are or will be
specifically authorized for construction,
Section 1002 of WRRDA 2014
eliminated the full Federal
reconnaissance phase that used to be
undertaken prior to execution of a
feasibility cost sharing agreement
(FCSA). In the past, a project
management plan (PMP), which
established the scope of the planning,
including activities needed to carry out
the study, was developed during this
reconnaissance phase. Under the new
single phase study process mandated by
WRRDA 2014, the project management
plan will not be developed until after
execution of FCSA. As the PMP,
including a determination of the scope
of the study, will not be developed until
after execution of the FCSA, no In-Kind
MOU for planning is permitted.
Following execution of the FCSA and
development of the PMP, the provision
of in-kind contributions is allowed
under the FCSA.
(b) Continuing Authority Program. For
projects implemented under the
Continuing Authority Program or a
regional authority that does not require
additional authorization to implement
the project, sections 905(c) and 105(a)(3)
of WRDA 1986, as amended, provide
that the first $100,000 of these studies
is a Federal expense. Therefore, once a
PMP has been developed and the MSC
Commander has approved initiation of
the feasibility study, an In-Kind MOU
for planning may be executed.
(4) Any work undertaken by a nonFederal sponsor pursuant to an In-Kind
MOU is at its own risk and
responsibility. An In-Kind MOU
provides no assurance that the nonFederal sponsor’s work will be
determined to be integral to the Federal
project or that any construction
undertaken by the non-Federal sponsor
will be included as part of any
ultimately recommended Federal
project. Execution of an In-Kind MOU
in no way obligates the Corps to enter
into any future agreement for the
project.
(5) In general, once a FCSA, design
agreement, or PPA is executed, further
use of In-Kind MOUs is not appropriate
for inclusion of additional in-kind
contributions under that FCSA, design
agreement, or PPA, respectively. Special
circumstances requiring expedited
review and execution of an amendment
to an executed agreement should be
coordinated with the HQUSACE RIT.
(6) MSC Commanders may approve a
District Engineer’s execution of Model
In-Kind MOUs for Construction or for
Design, provided that the In-Kind MOUs
do not include any deviations. Any
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
78202
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 241 / Wednesday, December 16, 2015 / Notices
tkelley on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES
proposed deviations must be submitted
to HQUSACE for approval prior to
execution. Models for the In-Kind MOU
for construction, including design work,
and for design work only are available
at https://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/
CivilWorks/
ProjectPartnershipAgreements/model_
other.aspx.
e. Integral Determinations.
(1) Section 221 provides that credit
may be afforded only if the Secretary
determines that the material or service
provided as an in-kind contribution by
a non-Federal sponsor is integral to the
study or project.1 To be integral to the
study or project, the material or service
must be part of the work that the
Federal Government would otherwise
have undertaken for the study or for
construction of what is ultimately
determined to be the Federal project.
See Appendix B for additional guidance
on criteria and procedures for
processing integral determinations.
(2) The approval of integral
determinations is delegated to the MSC
Commander. The approval authority
delegated to the MSC Commander is
subject to the full compliance of each
integral determination to law and policy
and may not be further delegated within
the MSC or to the District Commander.
A separate integral determination is not
required for planning activities included
in the PMP, approved by the MSC
Commander, as required for the study
effort.
f. Determining the Amount of Credit.
(1) The amount of in-kind
contributions that may be eligible for
inclusion in shared costs for cost
sharing purposes under the applicable
cost sharing agreement will be subject to
an audit by the Government to
determine the reasonableness,
allocability, and allowability of such
amount.
(2) The creditable amount is the lesser
of the costs incurred by the non-Federal
sponsor to obtain such materials or
services; the market value of such
materials or services as of the date that
the non-Federal sponsor provides such
materials or services for use in the study
or project; or the Government’s estimate
1 The non-Federal Sponsor’s costs of
Coordination Team participation and audits are not
in-kind contributions and are not included in
‘‘shared costs’’ for cost sharing purposes. Likewise,
the Federal Government’s cost of Coordination
Team participation and audits are not included in
‘‘shared costs’’ for cost sharing purposes although
these costs are included in calculating any limit on
Federal participation. The costs of the non-Federal
Sponsor’s performance of investigations for
hazardous substances are eligible for inclusion as a
shared costs and for credit as an in-kind
contribution and do not require a separate integral
determination.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Dec 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
of the cost for such work if it had been
accomplished by the Government. This
amount is not subject to interest charges
or to adjustment to reflect changes in
price levels between the time the inkind contributions were completed and
the time the amount is credited.
(3) Any in-kind contributions
performed or paid for by the nonFederal sponsor using funds provided
by another Federal agency (as well as
any non-Federal matching share or
contribution that was required by such
Federal agency for such program or
grant) are not eligible for credit unless
the Federal agency providing the
Federal portion of such funds verifies in
writing that the funds are authorized to
be used to carry out the study or project.
(4) After execution of the applicable
FCSA, Design Agreement (DA), or PPA,
the non-Federal sponsor will submit to
the Government (not less frequently
than every 6 months or as provided in
the agreement) credit request(s) for
eligible in-kind contributions under that
agreement. The credit requests will
contain the following: written
certification by the non-Federal sponsor
of the payments made to contractors,
suppliers, or employees for in-kind
contributions; copies of all relevant
invoices and evidence of such
payments; written identification of costs
that have been paid with funds or grants
provided by a Federal agency as well as
any non-Federal matching share or
contribution that was required by such
Federal agency for such program or
grant; and a written request for credit of
a specific amount not in excess of such
specified payments. Failure to provide
sufficient documentation supporting the
credit request will result in a denial of
credit in accordance with the terms of
the applicable cost sharing agreement.
(5) In-kind contributions are subject to
a review (for feasibility level and design
activities) or on-site inspection
(construction), as applicable, and
certification by the Government that the
work was accomplished in a satisfactory
manner and in accordance with
applicable Federal laws, regulations,
and policies. The Government will not
include in the costs to be shared under
the applicable cost sharing agreement or
afford credit for any work the
Government determines was not
accomplished in a satisfactory manner
or in accordance with applicable
Federal laws, regulations, and policies.
(6) In general, the amount of credit for
in-kind contributions that can be
afforded under a FCSA or a PPA is
limited to the amount of the nonFederal sponsor’s cost share under that
agreement. As the costs of design under
a DA are included in total project costs
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
under a PPA, credit for in-kind
contributions under a DA is carried over
to the PPA, and the maximum amount
of credit for in-kind contributions under
a PPA is limited to the non-Federal
sponsor’s required cost share under the
PPA. Credit for in-kind contributions
may not be afforded toward the required
5 percent cash payment for structural
flood damage reduction projects or the
additional 10 percent cash payment for
navigation projects.
(7) Credit for in-kind contributions for
planning is limited to credit that can be
afforded under a specific FCSA. In other
words, excess credit may not be carried
over to design or construction of the
project. Credit for planning work by the
non-Federal sponsor is limited to its 50
percent of planning costs and will be
done in accordance with the PMP,
under the terms and conditions in the
FCSA.
(8) Credit for in-kind contributions
provided by a non-Federal sponsor for
the construction of a project, or
separable element thereof, that are in
excess of the non-Federal cost share for
an authorized separable element of a
project may be applied toward the nonfederal cost share for a different
authorized separable element of the
same project. Additional Federal
appropriations will be required to offset
the application of any excess credit to
another separable element.
(9) If the value of eligible in-kind
contributions exceeds the amount of
credit that can be afforded pursuant to
the provisions of a PPA (i.e., exceeds the
required non-Federal cost share for all
features covered by that PPA), only the
amount of credit afforded should be
included in total project costs.
Recalculation of total project costs will
be required to exclude from total project
costs the value of in-kind contributions
that exceed the amount of credit that
can be afforded. In addition, the amount
excluded will not be considered part of
total costs for the purposes of Section
902 of WRDA 1986 calculations.
(10) No reimbursements are
authorized for in-kind contributions
under Section 221 except as provided in
paragraph 4 g., below.
g. Lands, Easements, Relocations,
Rights-of-Way, and Areas for Disposal of
Dredged Material (LERRDs). Section 221
does not alter any other requirement for
the non-Federal sponsor to provide
LERRDs for a project, and the nonFederal sponsor should coordinate with
the District to ensure that appropriate
real estate interests for the project are
acquired. Any LERRDs associated with
in-kind contributions determined to be
integral to the project will be credited to
the project as LERRDs except the LERRs
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
tkelley on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 241 / Wednesday, December 16, 2015 / Notices
needed for fish and wildlife mitigation.
(The costs of LERRs needed for fish and
wildlife mitigation are assigned to the
project purpose(s) causing the need for
such mitigation and are subject to
construction cost sharing established for
that project purpose.) In addition, for a
navigation project, LERRs are creditable
only toward the requirement for the
non-Federal sponsor to pay an
additional 10 percent of the cost of the
general navigation features.
(1) Previously, credit for in-kind
contributions was afforded only toward
the non-Federal sponsor’s required cash
contribution after consideration of the
value of LERRDs provided by the nonFederal sponsor. WRRDA 2014 changes
how credit for in-kind contributions is
calculated. For projects other than
navigation projects, to the extent that
credit for LERRDs combined with credit
for the value of in-kind contributions
exceed the non-Federal share of the cost
of a project, WRRDA 2014 provides that
the Secretary, subject to the availability
of funds, shall enter into a separate
reimbursement agreement to reimburse
the non-Federal sponsor for the
difference between creditable LERRDs
and in-kind contributions and the nonFederal cost share. Therefore, at the
final accounting for the project, to the
extent funds for the project remain
available, the Secretary shall execute an
agreement with the non-Federal sponsor
for reimbursement of the difference.
(2) If funds remaining on a project are
insufficient to provide full
reimbursement under paragraph g.(1),
the non-Federal sponsor may request
reimbursement. The Secretary shall
prioritize such requests, and enter into
reimbursements agreements, in the
order the requests were received, as
funds become available for
reimbursements.
5. Design. Design by the non-Federal
sponsor must be performed in
accordance with the requirements in ER
1110–2–1150, reviewed in accordance
with ER 1110–1–12, and subject to the
applicable peer review guidance. In
accordance with section 105(c) of
WRDA 1986, the costs of design shall be
shared in the same percentages as the
purposes of such project.
a. If the value of eligible in-kind
contributions is less than the nonFederal sponsor’s share of design costs,
the non-Federal sponsor must
contribute sufficient funds to equal its
share of total design costs.
b. If the value of eligible in-kind
contributions is greater than the nonFederal sponsor’s share of total design
costs, then no cash payment from the
non-Federal sponsor is required. The
value of all of the non-Federal sponsor’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Dec 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
eligible in-kind contributions (including
those in excess of its share of total
design costs) will be included in total
project costs in the PPA. The maximum
amount of credit that may be afforded
pursuant to the PPA is limited to the
non-Federal sponsor’s cost share under
that agreement.
6. Construction.
a. To be eligible for credit, in-kind
contributions prior to execution of the
PPA must have been provided or
performed after execution of an In-Kind
MOU. Credit for in-kind contributions
will not be afforded toward the nonFederal sponsor’s requirement to
provide in cash 5 percent of the costs for
structural flood damage reduction
projects (either specifically authorized
or implemented pursuant to Continuing
Authority Program Sections 14, 205, or
208 projects); the non-Federal sponsor’s
requirement to pay for betterments or
any other work performed by the
Government on behalf of the nonFederal sponsor; the non-Federal
sponsor’s requirement to provide lands,
easements, rights-of-way, relocations, or
improvements to enable the disposal of
dredged or excavated material required
for the project or separable element of
the project; or the non-Federal sponsor’s
additional payment of 10 percent of the
cost of general navigation features for a
navigation project.
b. The non-Federal sponsor may not
initiate construction following
execution of a PPA until the designs,
detailed plans and specifications, and
arrangements for such work have been
approved by the Government. In
addition, any proposed changes to
approved designs and plans and
specifications must be approved by the
Government in advance of such
construction. Upon completion of
construction, the non-Federal sponsor
will furnish to the Government a copy
of all final as-built drawings.
c. For CAP authorities and regional
authorities that are implemented with a
single agreement covering design and
implementation, if a non-Federal
sponsor proposes to provide or perform
all or a portion of the design for a
project as in-kind contributions, a PPA
addressing both design and construction
is required.
FOR THE COMMANDER:
Colonel, Corps of Engineers Chief of Staff
Enclosures: 2 Appendices
Appendix A—Section 221(a)(4) of the Flood
Control Act of 1970, as amended (42
U.S.C. 1962d-5b(a)(4) Section 221(a)(4)
of the Flood Control Act of 1970, as
amended, and Section 1018 of WRRDA
2014
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78203
Appendix B—Criteria for In-Kind
Contribution Integral Determinations
Appendix A
Section 221(a)(4) of the Flood Control Act of
1970, as Amended (42 U.S.C. 1962d–5b(a)(4))
SEC. 221. WRITTEN AGREEMENT
REQUIREMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES
PROJECTS.
(a) COOPERATION OF NON-FEDERAL
INTEREST.—
(4) Credit for in-kind contributions.
(A) In general. A partnership agreement
described in paragraph (1) may provide with
respect to a project that the Secretary shall
credit toward the non-Federal share of the
cost of the project, including a project
implemented without specific authorization
in law or a project under an environmental
infrastructure assistance program, the value
of in-kind contributions made by the nonFederal interest, including—
(i) the costs of planning (including data
collection), design, management, mitigation,
construction, and construction services that
are provided by the non-Federal interest for
implementation of the project;
(ii) the value of materials or services
provided before execution of the partnership
agreement, including efforts on constructed
elements incorporated into the project; and
(iii) the value of materials and services
provided after execution of the partnership
agreement.
(B) Condition. The Secretary may credit an
in-kind contribution under subparagraph (A)
only if the Secretary determines that the
material or service provided as an in-kind
contribution is integral to the project.
(C) Work performed before partnership
agreement.
(i) Construction.
(I) In general. In any case in which the nonFederal interest is to receive credit under
subparagraph (A) for the cost of construction
carried out by the non-Federal interest before
execution of a partnership agreement and
that construction has not been carried out as
of November 8, 2007, the Secretary and the
non-Federal interest shall enter into an
agreement under which the non-Federal
interest shall carry out such work and shall
do so prior to the non-Federal interest
initiating construction or issuing a written
notice to proceed for the construction.
(II) Eligibility. Construction that is carried
out after the execution of an agreement to
carry out work described in subclause (I) and
any design activities that are required for that
construction, even if the design activity is
carried out prior to the execution of the
agreement to carry out work, shall be eligible
for credit.
(ii) Planning.
(I) In general. In any case in which the nonFederal interest is to receive credit under
subparagraph (A) for the cost of planning
carried out by the non-Federal interest before
execution of a feasibility cost-sharing
agreement, the Secretary and the non-Federal
interest shall enter into an agreement under
which the non-Federal interest shall carry
out such work and shall do so prior to the
non-Federal interest initiating that planning.
(II) Eligibility. Planning that is carried out
by the non-Federal interest after the
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
tkelley on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES
78204
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 241 / Wednesday, December 16, 2015 / Notices
execution of an agreement to carry out work
described in subclause (I) shall be eligible for
credit.
(D) Limitations. Credit authorized under
this paragraph for a project—
(i) shall not exceed the non-Federal share
of the cost of the project;
(ii) shall not alter any other requirement
that a non-Federal interest provide lands,
easements, relocations, rights-of-way, or
areas for disposal of dredged material for the
project;
(iii) shall not alter any requirement that a
non-Federal interest pay a portion of the
costs of construction of the project under
sections 101(a)(2) and 103(a)(1)(A) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1986
(33 U.S.C. 2211(a)(2); 33 U.S.C. 2213(a)(1)(A))
of the Water Resources Development Act of
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211; 33 U.S.C. 2213); and
(iv) shall not exceed the actual and
reasonable costs of the materials, services, or
other things provided by the non-Federal
interest, as determined by the Secretary.
(E) Analysis of costs and benefits. In the
evaluation of the costs and benefits of a
project, the Secretary shall not consider
construction carried out by a non-Federal
interest under this subsection as part of the
future without project condition.
(F) Transfer of credit between separable
elements of a project. Credit for in-kind
contributions provided by a non-Federal
interest that are in excess of the non-Federal
cost share for an authorized separable
element of a project may be applied toward
the non-Federal cost share for a different
authorized separable element of the same
project.
(G) Application of credit.
(i) In general. To the extent that credit for
in-kind contributions, as limited by
subparagraph (D), and credit for required
land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged
material disposal areas, and relocations
provided by the non-Federal interest exceed
the non-Federal share of the cost of
construction of a project other than a
navigation project, the Secretary, subject to
the availability of funds, shall enter into a
reimbursement agreement with the nonFederal interest, which shall be in addition
to a partnership agreement under
subparagraph (A), to reimburse the difference
to the non-Federal interest.
(ii) Priority. If appropriated funds are
insufficient to cover the full cost of all
requested reimbursement agreements under
clause (i), the Secretary shall enter into
reimbursement agreements in the order in
which requests for such agreements are
received.’’; and
(H) Applicability.
(i) In general. This paragraph shall apply
to water resources projects authorized after
November 16, 1986, including projects
initiated after November 16, 1986, without
specific authorization in law, and to water
resources projects authorized prior to the
date of enactment of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (Pub. L. 99–662)
[enacted June 10, 2014], if correction of
design deficiencies is necessary.
(ii) Authorization as addition to other
authorizations. The authority of the Secretary
to provide credit for in-kind contributions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Dec 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
pursuant to this paragraph shall be in
addition to any other authorization to
provide credit for in-kind contributions and
shall not be construed as a limitation on such
other authorization. The Secretary shall
apply the provisions of this paragraph, in
lieu of provisions under other crediting
authority, only if so requested by the nonFederal interest.
Section 1018 of the Water Resources Reform
and Development Act of 2014
Sec. 1018. CREDIT FOR IN-KIND
CONTRIBUTIONS.
(a) In General.—Section 221(a)(4) of the
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d–
5b(a)(4)) is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (A), in the matter
preceding clause (i), by inserting ‘‘or a project
under an environmental infrastructure
assistance program’’ after ‘‘law’’;
(2) in subparagraph (C) by striking ‘‘In any
case’’ and all that follows through the period
at the end and inserting the following:
‘‘(i) CONSTRUCTION.—
‘‘(I) In General.—In any case in which the
non-Federal interest is to receive credit under
subparagraph (A) for the cost of construction
carried out by the non-Federal interest before
execution of a partnership agreement and
that construction has not been carried out as
of November 8, 2007, the Secretary and the
non-Federal interest shall enter into an
agreement under which the non-Federal
interest shall carry out such work and shall
do so prior to the non-Federal interest
initiating construction or issuing a written
notice to proceed for the construction.
‘‘(II) Eligibility.—Construction that is
carried out after the execution of an
agreement to carry out work described in
subclause (I) and any design activities that
are required for that construction, even if the
design activity is carried out prior to the
execution of the agreement to carry out work,
shall be eligible for credit.
‘‘(ii) PLANNING.—
‘‘(I) In General.—In any case in which the
non-Federal interest is to receive credit under
subparagraph (A) for the cost of planning
carried out by the non-Federal interest before
execution of a feasibility cost-sharing
agreement, the Secretary and the non-Federal
interest shall enter into an agreement under
which the non-Federal interest shall carry
out such work and shall do so prior to the
non-Federal interest initiating that planning.
‘‘(II) Eligibility.—Planning that is carried
out by the non-Federal interest after the
execution of an agreement to carry out work
described in subclause (I) shall be eligible for
credit.’’;
(3) in subparagraph (D)(iii) by striking
‘‘sections 101 and 103’’ and inserting
‘‘sections 101(a)(2) and 103(a)(1)(A) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1986
(33 U.S.C. 2211(a)(2); 33 U.S.C.
2213(a)(1)(A))’’;
(4) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as
subparagraph (H);
(5) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the
following:
‘‘(E) Analysis of Costs and Benefits.—In the
evaluation of the costs and benefits of a
project, the Secretary shall not consider
construction carried out by a non-Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
interest under this subsection as part of the
future without project condition.
‘‘(F) Transfer of Credit Between Separable
Elements of a Project.—Credit for in-kind
contributions provided by a non-Federal
interest that are in excess of the non-Federal
cost share for an authorized separable
element of a project may be applied toward
the non-Federal cost share for a different
authorized separable element of the same
project.
‘‘(G) APPLICATION OF CREDIT.—
‘‘(i) In General.—To the extent that credit
for in-kind contributions, as limited by
subparagraph (D), and credit for required
land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged
material disposal areas, and relocations
provided by the non-Federal interest exceed
the non-Federal share of the cost of
construction of a project other than a
navigation project, the Secretary, subject to
the availability of funds, shall enter into a
reimbursement agreement with the nonFederal interest, which shall be in addition
to a partnership agreement under
subparagraph (A), to reimburse the difference
to the non-Federal interest.
‘‘(ii) Priority.—If appropriated funds are
insufficient to cover the full cost of all
requested reimbursement agreements under
clause (i), the Secretary shall enter into
reimbursement agreements in the order in
which requests for such agreements are
received.’’; and
(6) in subparagraph (H) (as redesignated by
paragraph (4))—
(A) in clause (i) by inserting ‘‘, and to water
resources projects authorized prior to the
date of enactment of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99–
662), if correction of design deficiencies is
necessary’’ before the period at the end; and
(B) by striking clause (ii) and inserting the
following:
‘‘(ii) Authorization As Addition to Other
Authorizations.—The authority of the
Secretary to provide credit for in-kind
contributions pursuant to this paragraph
shall be in addition to any other
authorization to provide credit for in-kind
contributions and shall not be construed as
a limitation on such other authorization. The
Secretary shall apply the provisions of this
paragraph, in lieu of provisions under other
crediting authority, only if so requested by
the non-Federal interest.’’.
(b) Applicability.—Section 2003(e) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 2007
(42 U.S.C. 1962d–5b note) is amended—
(1) by inserting ‘‘, or construction of design
deficiency corrections on the project,’’ after
‘‘construction on the project’’; and
(2) by inserting ‘‘, or under which
construction of the project has not been
completed and the work to be performed by
the non-Federal interests has not been carried
out and is creditable only toward any
remaining non-Federal cost share,’’ after ‘‘has
not been initiated’’.
(c) Effective Date.—The amendments made
by subsections (a) and (b) take effect on
November 8, 2007.
(d) Guidelines.—
(1) In General.—Not later than 1 year after
the date of enactment of this Act, the
Secretary shall update any guidance or
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 241 / Wednesday, December 16, 2015 / Notices
regulations for carrying out section 221(a)(4)
of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C.
1962d–5b(a)(4)) (as amended by subsection
(a)) that are in existence on the date of
enactment of this Act or issue new
guidelines, as determined to be appropriate
by the Secretary.
(2) Inclusions.—Any guidance, regulations,
or guidelines updated or issued under
paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum—
(A) the milestone for executing an in-kind
memorandum of understanding for
construction by a non-Federal interest;
(B) criteria and procedures for evaluating a
request to execute an in-kind memorandum
of understanding for construction by a nonFederal interest that is earlier than the
milestone under subparagraph (A) for that
execution; and
(C) criteria and procedures for determining
whether work carried out by a non-Federal
interest is integral to a project.
(3) Public and Stakeholder Participation.—
Before issuing any new or revised guidance,
regulations, or guidelines or any subsequent
updates to those documents, the Secretary
shall—
(A) consult with affected non-Federal
interests;
(B) publish the proposed guidelines
developed under this subsection in the
Federal Register; and
(C) provide the public with an opportunity
to comment on the proposed guidelines.
(e) Other Credit.—Nothing in section
221(a)(4) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42
U.S.C. 1962d–5b(a)(4)) (as amended by
subsection (a)) affects any eligibility for
credit under section 104 of the Water
Resources Development of 1986 (33 U.S.C.
2214) that was approved by the Secretary
prior to the date of enactment of this Act.
tkelley on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES
Appendix B
Criteria and Procedures for In-Kind
Contribution Integral Determinations
B–1. Determining if In-Kind Contributions
Are Integral to the Study/Project.
Establishing and allowing credit is a two-step
process whereby: (1) Eligibility for credit is
determined based on whether the in-kind
contribution is integral to the study or
project, and (2) actual affording of credit is
accomplished based on an audit of the nonFederal work by the District Engineer under
the terms of the FCSA, DA, or PPA, as
appropriate. The level of analysis to
determine if work is integral to the project is
scalable. For instance, work accomplished by
the non-Federal sponsor on its own under an
In-Kind MOU must be fully analyzed to
determine whether it is integral to the
project, i.e., work that the Government
otherwise would have performed for the
project. In general, for work that will be
accomplished after execution of a DA or PPA,
it will be clearer what work is required for
the project and therefore integral to the
project; furthermore, the Government will be
approving plans and specifications prior to
the work being undertaken by the nonFederal sponsor.
a. Approval Level of Integral
Determinations. Under the terms of
Paragraph 4.e. of this regulation, approval of
integral determinations is delegated to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Dec 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
MSC Commander. This authority may not be
further delegated.
b. Timing of Integral Determinations.
(1) In general, the integral determination
should be completed immediately prior to
review and approval of a DA or PPA, or
amendment as applicable, that provides for
the affording of credit. The integral
determination for planning efforts is
accomplished as part of the development of
the PMP.
(2) Include at least 30 days in the project
schedule for processing at the MSC of the
Integral Determinations by the MSC
Commander. These times are recommended
for scheduling purposes and should be
extended if processing identifies significant
issues requiring resolution.
c. Procedures for Processing.
(1) For a feasibility study, planning
activities, including data collection, must be
included in the approved Project
Management Plan in order for those
contributions to be eligible for credit.
(2) The District will prepare an Integral
Determination Report (IDR) for design and
construction work that includes at a
minimum the information contained in the
following paragraphs. A suggested format for
an IDR can be found at https://
www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/
ProjectPartnershipAgreements/model_
other.aspx. The IDR should contain a
description of the activities required to
perform the design or construction, as
applicable, of the Federal project or separable
element in sufficient detail to allow a
comparison with the description of the
proposed in-kind contributions; a detailed
description of the work items proposed to be
provided or performed as in-kind
contributions; a discussion of how each work
item proposed to be provided or performed
as an in-kind contribution is integral to the
project; an estimate of the costs of each work
item proposed to be provided or performed
as an in-kind contribution; the estimated
amount of credit to be afforded for each work
item proposed to be provided or performed
as an in-kind contribution; and a District
Commander recommendation identifying
which of the proposed in-kind contributions
should be considered integral to the project.
If the in-kind contributions were provided or
performed prior to execution of the
applicable cost sharing agreement, then also
include in the IDR the results of the review
or inspection, as applicable, and certification
by the District Commander on whether the
work was accomplished in a satisfactory
manner and in accordance with applicable
Federal laws, regulations, and policies; and
documentation of satisfactory environmental
compliance for the construction portion of
the in-kind contributions.
(3) The district will submit the IDR to the
MSC District Support Team for action. The
MSC District Support Team will perform the
MSC review of the IDR. The MSC review
team also will include members from the
MSC Office of Counsel and from the MSC
Planning Community of Practice (CoP), MSC
Engineering and Construction CoP, MSC Real
Estate CoP, and other CoPs, as needed. In
addition, if the proposed in-kind
contributions consist of design or
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78205
construction of dams, levees, or bridges, the
MSC review team must include the MSC
Dam, Levee, or Bridge Safety Officer. After
satisfactory resolution of all comments on the
IDR and a determination that the IDR
complies with all applicable law and policy,
the MSC District Support Team shall prepare
an Integral Determination memo for approval
and signature by the MSC Commander.
(4) The Integral Determination approval
memo will state whether the work identified
in the IDR, or a portion thereof, has been
determined to be integral to the project. In
addition, the memo should state that the
determination of the actual value of the inkind contributions and affording credit for
such amount will be accomplished by the
Government in accordance with the
limitations, conditions, and terms of the
applicable cost sharing agreement.
B–2. Considerations in determining
whether the work is integral and creditable:
The proposed in-kind contributions consist
of work that the Government would have
otherwise provided or performed for the
project, except for performance of activities
that are inherently governmental
responsibilities (see paragraph B–3 below).
Examples of activities that are acceptable inkind contributions: Performance of design of
all or a portion of the Federal project,
including data collection related to design
work; demolition of buildings on lands
required for the project; performance of
design or construction related studies for
historic preservation activities except data
recovery; performance of cost shared
monitoring and adaptive management; and
construction of a portion of the project.
a. For proposed in-kind contributions
performed prior to execution of the
applicable cost sharing agreement, the inkind contributions have been reviewed or
inspected, as applicable, and certified by the
Government that the work was accomplished
in a satisfactory manner and in accordance
with applicable Federal laws, regulations,
and policies.
b. For any proposed in-kind contributions
proposed to be performed after execution of
the PPA, the plans and specifications must be
approved by the District Commander prior to
initiation of the construction work.
c. For materials provided for use in
construction work managed by the
Government, the materials must meet the
minimum Government requirements for
materials and any substitute materials have
been determined by the Government to be a
functional equivalent in accordance with
policies governing contractor substitution of
materials.
d. The non-Federal sponsor should
coordinate with the District to ensure that
appropriate real estate interests to support
the in-kind contributions and project are
acquired.
B–3. The following will not be accepted as
in-kind contributions:
a. The proposed in-kind contributions are
not part of the Federal project.
b. The proposed in-kind contributions
consist of performance of activities that are
inherently Governmental responsibilities
(e.g., management of Government contracts;
performance of District Quality Review,
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
78206
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 241 / Wednesday, December 16, 2015 / Notices
Agency Technical Review, Independent
External Peer Review, or Policy Compliance
Review; determining if Value Engineering
evaluations are acceptable; determining the
LERRD required for the project or separable
element of the project; determining the value
of LERRD for crediting purposes; or making
determinations as to compliance with
applicable environmental laws and
regulations).
c. The proposed in-kind contributions are
features or obligations that are a 100 percent
non-Federal sponsor responsibility (e.g.,
purposes of land reclamation, local drainage,
to protect against land or bank erosion, and/
or the removal of hazardous, toxic, or
radioactive wastes; local service facilities;
betterments; acquisition and performance of
LERRD, except for the provision of dredged
or excavated material disposal facilities for
commercial navigation projects; and
performance of operation, maintenance,
repair, rehabilitation, or replacement
(OMRR&R);
d. The proposed in-kind contributions
have or will create a hazard to human life or
property.
e. The proposed in-kind contributions have
been determined to be environmentally
unacceptable.
f. For proposed in-kind contributions
performed prior to execution of the
applicable cost sharing agreement, after
review or inspection, as applicable, the
Government cannot certify the proposed inkind contributions were accomplished in a
satisfactory manner and in accordance with
applicable Federal laws, regulations, and
policies.
g. For proposed in-kind contributions
performed prior to execution of the
applicable cost sharing agreement, the nonFederal sponsor has not performed the
necessary OMRR&R, resulting in the work no
longer functioning as needed for the project.
[FR Doc. 2015–31654 Filed 12–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No. ED–2015–ICCD–0140]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request; Federal
Direct Stafford/Ford Loan and Federal
Direct Subsidized/Unsubsidized
Stafford/Ford Loan Master Promissory
Note
Federal Student Aid (FSA),
Department of Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 3501 et seq.), ED is
proposing a revision of an existing
information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before February
16, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
tkelley on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Dec 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2015–ICCD–0140. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
Please note that comments submitted by
fax or email and those submitted after
the comment period will not be
accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the Director of the
Information Collection Clearance
Division, U.S. Department of Education,
400 Maryland Avenue SW., LBJ, Room
2E115, Washington, DC 20202–4537.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact Jon Utz, 202–
377–4040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: Federal Direct
Stafford/Ford Loan and Federal Direct
Subsidized/Unsubsidized Stafford/Ford
Loan Master Promissory Note.
OMB Control Number: 1845–0007.
Type of Review: A revision of an
existing information collection.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Respondents/Affected Public:
Individuals or Households.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 5,027,286.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 2,513,643.
Abstract: The Federal Direct Stafford/
Ford Loan (Direct Subsidized Loan) and
Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford/
Ford Loan (Direct Unsubsidized Loan)
Master Promissory Note (MPN) serves as
the means by which an individual
agrees to repay a Direct Subsidized Loan
and/or Direct Unsubsidized Loan. An
MPN is a promissory note under which
a borrower may receive loans for a
single or multiple academic years. This
revision incorporates changes to
information based on regulatory
changes, expands repayment plan
information, and clarifies information
through updated language.
Dated: December 10, 2015.
Tomakie Washington,
Acting Director, Information Collection
Clearance Division, Office of the Chief Privacy
Officer, Office of Management.
[FR Doc. 2015–31571 Filed 12–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No. ED–2015–ICCD–0141]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request; William
D. Ford Federal Direct Loan (Direct
Loan) Program Federal Direct PLUS
Loan Master Promissory Note and
Endorser Addendum
Federal Student Aid (FSA),
Department of Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 3501 et seq.), ED is
proposing a revision of an existing
information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before February
16, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2015–ICCD–0141. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
Please note that comments submitted by
fax or email and those submitted after
the comment period will not be
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 241 (Wednesday, December 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78200-78206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31654]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
Guidelines for Carrying Out Section 221(a)(4) of the Flood
Control Act of 1970, as Amended
AGENCY: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) has updated the
existing guidance for providing in-kind credit under Section 221(a)(4)
of the Flood Control Act of 1970, as further amended by Section 1018 of
the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014.
DATES: Effective date: December 16, 2015.
ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 441 G Street NW., Washington,
DC 20314-1000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice E. Rasgus, Planning and Policy
Division, Washington, DC at 202-761-7674.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ER 1165-2-208 will be posted on the Corps
Web site in the very near future.
Response to Comments
The draft ER was published in the August 28, 2015, issue of the
Federal Register (80 FR 52258) for a 30-day comment period. The comment
period was extended by 30 days (see 50 FR 60135). The regulations.gov
docket number is COE-2015-0013. Sixteen comments were received.
In response to one commenter, the guidance was expanded to clarify
that in-kind contributions can be provided once the feasibility cost
sharing agreement is executed and the project management plan is
developed.
Several commenters noted that the non-Federal sponsor's costs of
Coordination Team participation and audits are no longer considered in-
kind contributions that are included as a study or project cost subject
to cost sharing. The guidance was expanded to clarify that likewise the
Federal Government's cost of Coordination Team participation and audits
are not included in study or project costs for cost sharing purposes
although these costs are included in calculating any limit on Federal
participation.
One commenter requested that the guidance be modified to allow the
value of in-kind contributions to be accepted as cash payments toward
the additional 10 percent payment required for navigation projects.
This request cannot be accommodated. The law is explicit that credit
for in-kind contributions shall not alter any requirement for the non-
Federal sponsor to pay 5 percent cash for flood damage reduction
project and pay the additional 10 percent cash for navigation projects.
This requirement was also specified in the in-kind contribution
authority as enacted in WRDA 2007 and identified in the implementing
guidance for that earlier provision.
Additional minor, non-substantive, edits were made to provide
further clarity.
Dated: December 10, 2015.
Theodore A. Brown,
Chief, Planning and Policy Division, Directorate of Civil Works.
ER 1165-2-208
1. Purpose. This regulation provides guidance on the implementation
of the in-kind contribution credit provisions of Section 221(a)(4) of
the Flood Control Act of 1970, as further amended by Section 1018 of
the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 (WRRDA 2014) (42
U.S.C. 1962d-5b(a)(4)) (hereinafter referred to as ``Section 221'').
Section 221(a)(4) of the Flood Control Act of 1970, as amended, and
Section 1018 of WRRDA 2014 are provided in Appendix A.
2. Distribution Statement. Approved for public release.
Distribution is unlimited.
3. Applicability. This regulation applies to all HQUSACE elements,
Major Subordinate Commands (MSCs), and district commands having Civil
Works responsibility and is effective immediately.
a. The Section 221 crediting provisions apply to the study, design,
and construction of water resources development projects authorized in
the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 or later laws,
including projects initiated after November 16, 1986 without specific
authorization in law. In addition, the crediting provisions apply to
the correction of design deficiencies for projects authorized prior to
WRDA of 1986. Finally, these provisions are also applicable to a
project under an environmental infrastructure assistance program.
(1) For a project with a project partnership agreement (PPA) that
was executed on or after November 8, 2007, such PPA may be amended to
include work by the non-Federal sponsor that has not yet been initiated
for credit toward any remaining non-Federal cost share under that
agreement.
(2) Furthermore, in general, the crediting provisions of Section
221 will be used in lieu of Section 104 of WRDA 1986 and Section 215 of
the Flood Control Act of 1968. However, any eligibility for credit
under Section 104 of WRDA 1986 that was approved previously by the
Secretary will be honored.
b. The authority for credit under Section 221 is in addition to any
other authority to provide credit for in-kind contributions. Section
221 credit may be applied in lieu of other crediting provisions if
requested by the non-Federal sponsor.
[[Page 78201]]
This regulation supersedes ER 1165-2-208 dated 17 February 2012.
4. Key Principles.
a. In General. Section 221 is a comprehensive authority that
addresses the affording of credit for the value of in-kind
contributions provided by a non-Federal sponsor toward its required
cost share (excluding the required 5 percent cash for structural flood
damage reduction projects and the additional 10 percent cash payment
over 30 years for navigation projects) if those in-kind contributions
are determined to be integral to a study or project.
b. Types of In-Kind Contributions. The types of in-kind
contributions eligible for credit include planning activities
(including data collection and other services needed for a feasibility
study); design related to construction; and construction (including
management; mitigation; and construction materials and services).
c. Compliance with Applicable Federal Laws, Regulations, and
Policies. Eligibility for credit is subject to the non-Federal sponsor
complying with all applicable Federal laws and implementing
regulations, including, but not limited to Section 601 of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000d), and Department of
Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto; the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6102); the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 794), and Army Regulation 600-7 issued
pursuant thereto; and 40 U.S.C. 3141-3148 and 40 U.S.C. 3701-3708
(labor standards originally enacted as the Davis-Bacon Act, the
Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, the Copeland Anti-
Kickback Act); and the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4321-4347) and other environmental laws and regulations.
d. In-Kind Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).
(1) Construction. Section 221 provides that any construction work
that has not been carried out as of November 8, 2007 is eligible for
credit only if the non-Federal sponsor executes an agreement with the
Secretary prior to carrying out such work. For purposes of Section 221
crediting only, ``carrying out'' construction work means initiation of
construction using the non-Federal sponsor's labor force or issuance of
the notice to proceed for such construction if undertaken by contract.
Therefore, in those cases where there is not yet an executed PPA, the
non-Federal sponsor must execute an in-kind MOU with the Corps of
Engineers prior to initiating construction or issuing the notice to
proceed. Design work associated with that construction is eligible for
credit as long as an in-kind MOU or PPA is executed prior to the
construction being carried out. In addition, the construction carried
out by the non-Federal sponsor is not considered as part of the future
without project condition.
(a) Projects Specifically Authorized. For projects that are or will
be specifically authorized for construction, an In-Kind MOU for
construction may be executed once there is vertical team concurrence
with the Tentatively Selected Plan (TSP) at the TSP Milestone. The TSP
Milestone is the point at which there is vertical team concurrence on
the plan that will be released in the draft study report for public and
agency review. Given the new SMART Planning Process, the TSP Milestone
should occur much earlier in the planning process than what was
previously achieved. Requests from non-Federal sponsors to execute an
in-kind MOU for construction prior to the TSP Milestone will be
considered on a case-by-case basis and must be approved by the
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works). Since each project
presents its own unique combination of circumstances, each request will
require an individual evaluation that will include consideration of,
but not limited to, the following criteria:
(i) Whether the proposed work is a modification of an existing
Federal project;
(ii) Whether the proposed work will follow an existing levee
alignment in the case of a flood risk management project;
(iii) Whether the proposed work balances and integrates the wise
use of the flood plain to ensure public safety;
(iv) Whether the proposed work significantly reduces flood damage
risk to human life, property or critical infrastructure; and
(iv) Whether the proposed work will likely be included in the final
project recommendation.
(b) Continuing Authority Program. For projects implemented under
the Continuing Authority Program or a regional authority that does not
require additional authorization to implement the project, an In-Kind
MOU for design and implementation may be executed after the MSC
Commander approves the decision document for the project.
(2) Design. For projects that are or will be specifically
authorized for construction, an In-Kind MOU for design may be executed
after the TSP Milestone.
(3) Planning.
(a) Projects Specifically Authorized. For projects that are or will
be specifically authorized for construction, Section 1002 of WRRDA 2014
eliminated the full Federal reconnaissance phase that used to be
undertaken prior to execution of a feasibility cost sharing agreement
(FCSA). In the past, a project management plan (PMP), which established
the scope of the planning, including activities needed to carry out the
study, was developed during this reconnaissance phase. Under the new
single phase study process mandated by WRRDA 2014, the project
management plan will not be developed until after execution of FCSA. As
the PMP, including a determination of the scope of the study, will not
be developed until after execution of the FCSA, no In-Kind MOU for
planning is permitted. Following execution of the FCSA and development
of the PMP, the provision of in-kind contributions is allowed under the
FCSA.
(b) Continuing Authority Program. For projects implemented under
the Continuing Authority Program or a regional authority that does not
require additional authorization to implement the project, sections
905(c) and 105(a)(3) of WRDA 1986, as amended, provide that the first
$100,000 of these studies is a Federal expense. Therefore, once a PMP
has been developed and the MSC Commander has approved initiation of the
feasibility study, an In-Kind MOU for planning may be executed.
(4) Any work undertaken by a non-Federal sponsor pursuant to an In-
Kind MOU is at its own risk and responsibility. An In-Kind MOU provides
no assurance that the non-Federal sponsor's work will be determined to
be integral to the Federal project or that any construction undertaken
by the non-Federal sponsor will be included as part of any ultimately
recommended Federal project. Execution of an In-Kind MOU in no way
obligates the Corps to enter into any future agreement for the project.
(5) In general, once a FCSA, design agreement, or PPA is executed,
further use of In-Kind MOUs is not appropriate for inclusion of
additional in-kind contributions under that FCSA, design agreement, or
PPA, respectively. Special circumstances requiring expedited review and
execution of an amendment to an executed agreement should be
coordinated with the HQUSACE RIT.
(6) MSC Commanders may approve a District Engineer's execution of
Model In-Kind MOUs for Construction or for Design, provided that the
In-Kind MOUs do not include any deviations. Any
[[Page 78202]]
proposed deviations must be submitted to HQUSACE for approval prior to
execution. Models for the In-Kind MOU for construction, including
design work, and for design work only are available at https://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/ProjectPartnershipAgreements/model_other.aspx.
e. Integral Determinations.
(1) Section 221 provides that credit may be afforded only if the
Secretary determines that the material or service provided as an in-
kind contribution by a non-Federal sponsor is integral to the study or
project.\1\ To be integral to the study or project, the material or
service must be part of the work that the Federal Government would
otherwise have undertaken for the study or for construction of what is
ultimately determined to be the Federal project. See Appendix B for
additional guidance on criteria and procedures for processing integral
determinations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The non-Federal Sponsor's costs of Coordination Team
participation and audits are not in-kind contributions and are not
included in ``shared costs'' for cost sharing purposes. Likewise,
the Federal Government's cost of Coordination Team participation and
audits are not included in ``shared costs'' for cost sharing
purposes although these costs are included in calculating any limit
on Federal participation. The costs of the non-Federal Sponsor's
performance of investigations for hazardous substances are eligible
for inclusion as a shared costs and for credit as an in-kind
contribution and do not require a separate integral determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) The approval of integral determinations is delegated to the MSC
Commander. The approval authority delegated to the MSC Commander is
subject to the full compliance of each integral determination to law
and policy and may not be further delegated within the MSC or to the
District Commander. A separate integral determination is not required
for planning activities included in the PMP, approved by the MSC
Commander, as required for the study effort.
f. Determining the Amount of Credit.
(1) The amount of in-kind contributions that may be eligible for
inclusion in shared costs for cost sharing purposes under the
applicable cost sharing agreement will be subject to an audit by the
Government to determine the reasonableness, allocability, and
allowability of such amount.
(2) The creditable amount is the lesser of the costs incurred by
the non-Federal sponsor to obtain such materials or services; the
market value of such materials or services as of the date that the non-
Federal sponsor provides such materials or services for use in the
study or project; or the Government's estimate of the cost for such
work if it had been accomplished by the Government. This amount is not
subject to interest charges or to adjustment to reflect changes in
price levels between the time the in-kind contributions were completed
and the time the amount is credited.
(3) Any in-kind contributions performed or paid for by the non-
Federal sponsor using funds provided by another Federal agency (as well
as any non-Federal matching share or contribution that was required by
such Federal agency for such program or grant) are not eligible for
credit unless the Federal agency providing the Federal portion of such
funds verifies in writing that the funds are authorized to be used to
carry out the study or project.
(4) After execution of the applicable FCSA, Design Agreement (DA),
or PPA, the non-Federal sponsor will submit to the Government (not less
frequently than every 6 months or as provided in the agreement) credit
request(s) for eligible in-kind contributions under that agreement. The
credit requests will contain the following: written certification by
the non-Federal sponsor of the payments made to contractors, suppliers,
or employees for in-kind contributions; copies of all relevant invoices
and evidence of such payments; written identification of costs that
have been paid with funds or grants provided by a Federal agency as
well as any non-Federal matching share or contribution that was
required by such Federal agency for such program or grant; and a
written request for credit of a specific amount not in excess of such
specified payments. Failure to provide sufficient documentation
supporting the credit request will result in a denial of credit in
accordance with the terms of the applicable cost sharing agreement.
(5) In-kind contributions are subject to a review (for feasibility
level and design activities) or on-site inspection (construction), as
applicable, and certification by the Government that the work was
accomplished in a satisfactory manner and in accordance with applicable
Federal laws, regulations, and policies. The Government will not
include in the costs to be shared under the applicable cost sharing
agreement or afford credit for any work the Government determines was
not accomplished in a satisfactory manner or in accordance with
applicable Federal laws, regulations, and policies.
(6) In general, the amount of credit for in-kind contributions that
can be afforded under a FCSA or a PPA is limited to the amount of the
non-Federal sponsor's cost share under that agreement. As the costs of
design under a DA are included in total project costs under a PPA,
credit for in-kind contributions under a DA is carried over to the PPA,
and the maximum amount of credit for in-kind contributions under a PPA
is limited to the non-Federal sponsor's required cost share under the
PPA. Credit for in-kind contributions may not be afforded toward the
required 5 percent cash payment for structural flood damage reduction
projects or the additional 10 percent cash payment for navigation
projects.
(7) Credit for in-kind contributions for planning is limited to
credit that can be afforded under a specific FCSA. In other words,
excess credit may not be carried over to design or construction of the
project. Credit for planning work by the non-Federal sponsor is limited
to its 50 percent of planning costs and will be done in accordance with
the PMP, under the terms and conditions in the FCSA.
(8) Credit for in-kind contributions provided by a non-Federal
sponsor for the construction of a project, or separable element
thereof, that are in excess of the non-Federal cost share for an
authorized separable element of a project may be applied toward the
non-federal cost share for a different authorized separable element of
the same project. Additional Federal appropriations will be required to
offset the application of any excess credit to another separable
element.
(9) If the value of eligible in-kind contributions exceeds the
amount of credit that can be afforded pursuant to the provisions of a
PPA (i.e., exceeds the required non-Federal cost share for all features
covered by that PPA), only the amount of credit afforded should be
included in total project costs. Recalculation of total project costs
will be required to exclude from total project costs the value of in-
kind contributions that exceed the amount of credit that can be
afforded. In addition, the amount excluded will not be considered part
of total costs for the purposes of Section 902 of WRDA 1986
calculations.
(10) No reimbursements are authorized for in-kind contributions
under Section 221 except as provided in paragraph 4 g., below.
g. Lands, Easements, Relocations, Rights-of-Way, and Areas for
Disposal of Dredged Material (LERRDs). Section 221 does not alter any
other requirement for the non-Federal sponsor to provide LERRDs for a
project, and the non-Federal sponsor should coordinate with the
District to ensure that appropriate real estate interests for the
project are acquired. Any LERRDs associated with in-kind contributions
determined to be integral to the project will be credited to the
project as LERRDs except the LERRs
[[Page 78203]]
needed for fish and wildlife mitigation. (The costs of LERRs needed for
fish and wildlife mitigation are assigned to the project purpose(s)
causing the need for such mitigation and are subject to construction
cost sharing established for that project purpose.) In addition, for a
navigation project, LERRs are creditable only toward the requirement
for the non-Federal sponsor to pay an additional 10 percent of the cost
of the general navigation features.
(1) Previously, credit for in-kind contributions was afforded only
toward the non-Federal sponsor's required cash contribution after
consideration of the value of LERRDs provided by the non-Federal
sponsor. WRRDA 2014 changes how credit for in-kind contributions is
calculated. For projects other than navigation projects, to the extent
that credit for LERRDs combined with credit for the value of in-kind
contributions exceed the non-Federal share of the cost of a project,
WRRDA 2014 provides that the Secretary, subject to the availability of
funds, shall enter into a separate reimbursement agreement to reimburse
the non-Federal sponsor for the difference between creditable LERRDs
and in-kind contributions and the non-Federal cost share. Therefore, at
the final accounting for the project, to the extent funds for the
project remain available, the Secretary shall execute an agreement with
the non-Federal sponsor for reimbursement of the difference.
(2) If funds remaining on a project are insufficient to provide
full reimbursement under paragraph g.(1), the non-Federal sponsor may
request reimbursement. The Secretary shall prioritize such requests,
and enter into reimbursements agreements, in the order the requests
were received, as funds become available for reimbursements.
5. Design. Design by the non-Federal sponsor must be performed in
accordance with the requirements in ER 1110-2-1150, reviewed in
accordance with ER 1110-1-12, and subject to the applicable peer review
guidance. In accordance with section 105(c) of WRDA 1986, the costs of
design shall be shared in the same percentages as the purposes of such
project.
a. If the value of eligible in-kind contributions is less than the
non-Federal sponsor's share of design costs, the non-Federal sponsor
must contribute sufficient funds to equal its share of total design
costs.
b. If the value of eligible in-kind contributions is greater than
the non-Federal sponsor's share of total design costs, then no cash
payment from the non-Federal sponsor is required. The value of all of
the non-Federal sponsor's eligible in-kind contributions (including
those in excess of its share of total design costs) will be included in
total project costs in the PPA. The maximum amount of credit that may
be afforded pursuant to the PPA is limited to the non-Federal sponsor's
cost share under that agreement.
6. Construction.
a. To be eligible for credit, in-kind contributions prior to
execution of the PPA must have been provided or performed after
execution of an In-Kind MOU. Credit for in-kind contributions will not
be afforded toward the non-Federal sponsor's requirement to provide in
cash 5 percent of the costs for structural flood damage reduction
projects (either specifically authorized or implemented pursuant to
Continuing Authority Program Sections 14, 205, or 208 projects); the
non-Federal sponsor's requirement to pay for betterments or any other
work performed by the Government on behalf of the non-Federal sponsor;
the non-Federal sponsor's requirement to provide lands, easements,
rights-of-way, relocations, or improvements to enable the disposal of
dredged or excavated material required for the project or separable
element of the project; or the non-Federal sponsor's additional payment
of 10 percent of the cost of general navigation features for a
navigation project.
b. The non-Federal sponsor may not initiate construction following
execution of a PPA until the designs, detailed plans and
specifications, and arrangements for such work have been approved by
the Government. In addition, any proposed changes to approved designs
and plans and specifications must be approved by the Government in
advance of such construction. Upon completion of construction, the non-
Federal sponsor will furnish to the Government a copy of all final as-
built drawings.
c. For CAP authorities and regional authorities that are
implemented with a single agreement covering design and implementation,
if a non-Federal sponsor proposes to provide or perform all or a
portion of the design for a project as in-kind contributions, a PPA
addressing both design and construction is required.
FOR THE COMMANDER:
Colonel, Corps of Engineers Chief of Staff
Enclosures: 2 Appendices
Appendix A--Section 221(a)(4) of the Flood Control Act of 1970, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(a)(4) Section 221(a)(4) of the Flood
Control Act of 1970, as amended, and Section 1018 of WRRDA 2014
Appendix B--Criteria for In-Kind Contribution Integral
Determinations
Appendix A
Section 221(a)(4) of the Flood Control Act of 1970, as Amended (42
U.S.C. 1962d-5b(a)(4))
SEC. 221. WRITTEN AGREEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR WATER RESOURCES
PROJECTS.
(a) COOPERATION OF NON-FEDERAL INTEREST.--
(4) Credit for in-kind contributions.
(A) In general. A partnership agreement described in paragraph
(1) may provide with respect to a project that the Secretary shall
credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project,
including a project implemented without specific authorization in
law or a project under an environmental infrastructure assistance
program, the value of in-kind contributions made by the non-Federal
interest, including--
(i) the costs of planning (including data collection), design,
management, mitigation, construction, and construction services that
are provided by the non-Federal interest for implementation of the
project;
(ii) the value of materials or services provided before
execution of the partnership agreement, including efforts on
constructed elements incorporated into the project; and
(iii) the value of materials and services provided after
execution of the partnership agreement.
(B) Condition. The Secretary may credit an in-kind contribution
under subparagraph (A) only if the Secretary determines that the
material or service provided as an in-kind contribution is integral
to the project.
(C) Work performed before partnership agreement.
(i) Construction.
(I) In general. In any case in which the non-Federal interest is
to receive credit under subparagraph (A) for the cost of
construction carried out by the non-Federal interest before
execution of a partnership agreement and that construction has not
been carried out as of November 8, 2007, the Secretary and the non-
Federal interest shall enter into an agreement under which the non-
Federal interest shall carry out such work and shall do so prior to
the non-Federal interest initiating construction or issuing a
written notice to proceed for the construction.
(II) Eligibility. Construction that is carried out after the
execution of an agreement to carry out work described in subclause
(I) and any design activities that are required for that
construction, even if the design activity is carried out prior to
the execution of the agreement to carry out work, shall be eligible
for credit.
(ii) Planning.
(I) In general. In any case in which the non-Federal interest is
to receive credit under subparagraph (A) for the cost of planning
carried out by the non-Federal interest before execution of a
feasibility cost-sharing agreement, the Secretary and the non-
Federal interest shall enter into an agreement under which the non-
Federal interest shall carry out such work and shall do so prior to
the non-Federal interest initiating that planning.
(II) Eligibility. Planning that is carried out by the non-
Federal interest after the
[[Page 78204]]
execution of an agreement to carry out work described in subclause
(I) shall be eligible for credit.
(D) Limitations. Credit authorized under this paragraph for a
project--
(i) shall not exceed the non-Federal share of the cost of the
project;
(ii) shall not alter any other requirement that a non-Federal
interest provide lands, easements, relocations, rights-of-way, or
areas for disposal of dredged material for the project;
(iii) shall not alter any requirement that a non-Federal
interest pay a portion of the costs of construction of the project
under sections 101(a)(2) and 103(a)(1)(A) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a)(2); 33 U.S.C.
2213(a)(1)(A)) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
U.S.C. 2211; 33 U.S.C. 2213); and
(iv) shall not exceed the actual and reasonable costs of the
materials, services, or other things provided by the non-Federal
interest, as determined by the Secretary.
(E) Analysis of costs and benefits. In the evaluation of the
costs and benefits of a project, the Secretary shall not consider
construction carried out by a non-Federal interest under this
subsection as part of the future without project condition.
(F) Transfer of credit between separable elements of a project.
Credit for in-kind contributions provided by a non-Federal interest
that are in excess of the non-Federal cost share for an authorized
separable element of a project may be applied toward the non-Federal
cost share for a different authorized separable element of the same
project.
(G) Application of credit.
(i) In general. To the extent that credit for in-kind
contributions, as limited by subparagraph (D), and credit for
required land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged material disposal
areas, and relocations provided by the non-Federal interest exceed
the non-Federal share of the cost of construction of a project other
than a navigation project, the Secretary, subject to the
availability of funds, shall enter into a reimbursement agreement
with the non-Federal interest, which shall be in addition to a
partnership agreement under subparagraph (A), to reimburse the
difference to the non-Federal interest.
(ii) Priority. If appropriated funds are insufficient to cover
the full cost of all requested reimbursement agreements under clause
(i), the Secretary shall enter into reimbursement agreements in the
order in which requests for such agreements are received.''; and
(H) Applicability.
(i) In general. This paragraph shall apply to water resources
projects authorized after November 16, 1986, including projects
initiated after November 16, 1986, without specific authorization in
law, and to water resources projects authorized prior to the date of
enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Pub. L.
99-662) [enacted June 10, 2014], if correction of design
deficiencies is necessary.
(ii) Authorization as addition to other authorizations. The
authority of the Secretary to provide credit for in-kind
contributions pursuant to this paragraph shall be in addition to any
other authorization to provide credit for in-kind contributions and
shall not be construed as a limitation on such other authorization.
The Secretary shall apply the provisions of this paragraph, in lieu
of provisions under other crediting authority, only if so requested
by the non-Federal interest.
Section 1018 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014
Sec. 1018. CREDIT FOR IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS.
(a) In General.--Section 221(a)(4) of the Flood Control Act of
1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(a)(4)) is amended--
(1) in subparagraph (A), in the matter preceding clause (i), by
inserting ``or a project under an environmental infrastructure
assistance program'' after ``law'';
(2) in subparagraph (C) by striking ``In any case'' and all that
follows through the period at the end and inserting the following:
``(i) CONSTRUCTION.--
``(I) In General.--In any case in which the non-Federal interest
is to receive credit under subparagraph (A) for the cost of
construction carried out by the non-Federal interest before
execution of a partnership agreement and that construction has not
been carried out as of November 8, 2007, the Secretary and the non-
Federal interest shall enter into an agreement under which the non-
Federal interest shall carry out such work and shall do so prior to
the non-Federal interest initiating construction or issuing a
written notice to proceed for the construction.
``(II) Eligibility.--Construction that is carried out after the
execution of an agreement to carry out work described in subclause
(I) and any design activities that are required for that
construction, even if the design activity is carried out prior to
the execution of the agreement to carry out work, shall be eligible
for credit.
``(ii) PLANNING.--
``(I) In General.--In any case in which the non-Federal interest
is to receive credit under subparagraph (A) for the cost of planning
carried out by the non-Federal interest before execution of a
feasibility cost-sharing agreement, the Secretary and the non-
Federal interest shall enter into an agreement under which the non-
Federal interest shall carry out such work and shall do so prior to
the non-Federal interest initiating that planning.
``(II) Eligibility.--Planning that is carried out by the non-
Federal interest after the execution of an agreement to carry out
work described in subclause (I) shall be eligible for credit.'';
(3) in subparagraph (D)(iii) by striking ``sections 101 and
103'' and inserting ``sections 101(a)(2) and 103(a)(1)(A) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a)(2); 33
U.S.C. 2213(a)(1)(A))'';
(4) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (H);
(5) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following:
``(E) Analysis of Costs and Benefits.--In the evaluation of the
costs and benefits of a project, the Secretary shall not consider
construction carried out by a non-Federal interest under this
subsection as part of the future without project condition.
``(F) Transfer of Credit Between Separable Elements of a
Project.--Credit for in-kind contributions provided by a non-Federal
interest that are in excess of the non-Federal cost share for an
authorized separable element of a project may be applied toward the
non-Federal cost share for a different authorized separable element
of the same project.
``(G) APPLICATION OF CREDIT.--
``(i) In General.--To the extent that credit for in-kind
contributions, as limited by subparagraph (D), and credit for
required land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged material disposal
areas, and relocations provided by the non-Federal interest exceed
the non-Federal share of the cost of construction of a project other
than a navigation project, the Secretary, subject to the
availability of funds, shall enter into a reimbursement agreement
with the non-Federal interest, which shall be in addition to a
partnership agreement under subparagraph (A), to reimburse the
difference to the non-Federal interest.
``(ii) Priority.--If appropriated funds are insufficient to
cover the full cost of all requested reimbursement agreements under
clause (i), the Secretary shall enter into reimbursement agreements
in the order in which requests for such agreements are received.'';
and
(6) in subparagraph (H) (as redesignated by paragraph (4))--
(A) in clause (i) by inserting ``, and to water resources
projects authorized prior to the date of enactment of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662), if correction
of design deficiencies is necessary'' before the period at the end;
and
(B) by striking clause (ii) and inserting the following:
``(ii) Authorization As Addition to Other Authorizations.--The
authority of the Secretary to provide credit for in-kind
contributions pursuant to this paragraph shall be in addition to any
other authorization to provide credit for in-kind contributions and
shall not be construed as a limitation on such other authorization.
The Secretary shall apply the provisions of this paragraph, in lieu
of provisions under other crediting authority, only if so requested
by the non-Federal interest.''.
(b) Applicability.--Section 2003(e) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b note) is amended--
(1) by inserting ``, or construction of design deficiency
corrections on the project,'' after ``construction on the project'';
and
(2) by inserting ``, or under which construction of the project
has not been completed and the work to be performed by the non-
Federal interests has not been carried out and is creditable only
toward any remaining non-Federal cost share,'' after ``has not been
initiated''.
(c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and
(b) take effect on November 8, 2007.
(d) Guidelines.--
(1) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall update any guidance or
[[Page 78205]]
regulations for carrying out section 221(a)(4) of the Flood Control
Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(a)(4)) (as amended by subsection
(a)) that are in existence on the date of enactment of this Act or
issue new guidelines, as determined to be appropriate by the
Secretary.
(2) Inclusions.--Any guidance, regulations, or guidelines
updated or issued under paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum--
(A) the milestone for executing an in-kind memorandum of
understanding for construction by a non-Federal interest;
(B) criteria and procedures for evaluating a request to execute
an in-kind memorandum of understanding for construction by a non-
Federal interest that is earlier than the milestone under
subparagraph (A) for that execution; and
(C) criteria and procedures for determining whether work carried
out by a non-Federal interest is integral to a project.
(3) Public and Stakeholder Participation.--Before issuing any
new or revised guidance, regulations, or guidelines or any
subsequent updates to those documents, the Secretary shall--
(A) consult with affected non-Federal interests;
(B) publish the proposed guidelines developed under this
subsection in the Federal Register; and
(C) provide the public with an opportunity to comment on the
proposed guidelines.
(e) Other Credit.--Nothing in section 221(a)(4) of the Flood
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(a)(4)) (as amended by
subsection (a)) affects any eligibility for credit under section 104
of the Water Resources Development of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2214) that was
approved by the Secretary prior to the date of enactment of this
Act.
Appendix B
Criteria and Procedures for In-Kind Contribution Integral
Determinations
B-1. Determining if In-Kind Contributions Are Integral to the
Study/Project. Establishing and allowing credit is a two-step
process whereby: (1) Eligibility for credit is determined based on
whether the in-kind contribution is integral to the study or
project, and (2) actual affording of credit is accomplished based on
an audit of the non-Federal work by the District Engineer under the
terms of the FCSA, DA, or PPA, as appropriate. The level of analysis
to determine if work is integral to the project is scalable. For
instance, work accomplished by the non-Federal sponsor on its own
under an In-Kind MOU must be fully analyzed to determine whether it
is integral to the project, i.e., work that the Government otherwise
would have performed for the project. In general, for work that will
be accomplished after execution of a DA or PPA, it will be clearer
what work is required for the project and therefore integral to the
project; furthermore, the Government will be approving plans and
specifications prior to the work being undertaken by the non-Federal
sponsor.
a. Approval Level of Integral Determinations. Under the terms of
Paragraph 4.e. of this regulation, approval of integral
determinations is delegated to the MSC Commander. This authority may
not be further delegated.
b. Timing of Integral Determinations.
(1) In general, the integral determination should be completed
immediately prior to review and approval of a DA or PPA, or
amendment as applicable, that provides for the affording of credit.
The integral determination for planning efforts is accomplished as
part of the development of the PMP.
(2) Include at least 30 days in the project schedule for
processing at the MSC of the Integral Determinations by the MSC
Commander. These times are recommended for scheduling purposes and
should be extended if processing identifies significant issues
requiring resolution.
c. Procedures for Processing.
(1) For a feasibility study, planning activities, including data
collection, must be included in the approved Project Management Plan
in order for those contributions to be eligible for credit.
(2) The District will prepare an Integral Determination Report
(IDR) for design and construction work that includes at a minimum
the information contained in the following paragraphs. A suggested
format for an IDR can be found at https://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/ProjectPartnershipAgreements/model_other.aspx.
The IDR should contain a description of the activities required to
perform the design or construction, as applicable, of the Federal
project or separable element in sufficient detail to allow a
comparison with the description of the proposed in-kind
contributions; a detailed description of the work items proposed to
be provided or performed as in-kind contributions; a discussion of
how each work item proposed to be provided or performed as an in-
kind contribution is integral to the project; an estimate of the
costs of each work item proposed to be provided or performed as an
in-kind contribution; the estimated amount of credit to be afforded
for each work item proposed to be provided or performed as an in-
kind contribution; and a District Commander recommendation
identifying which of the proposed in-kind contributions should be
considered integral to the project. If the in-kind contributions
were provided or performed prior to execution of the applicable cost
sharing agreement, then also include in the IDR the results of the
review or inspection, as applicable, and certification by the
District Commander on whether the work was accomplished in a
satisfactory manner and in accordance with applicable Federal laws,
regulations, and policies; and documentation of satisfactory
environmental compliance for the construction portion of the in-kind
contributions.
(3) The district will submit the IDR to the MSC District Support
Team for action. The MSC District Support Team will perform the MSC
review of the IDR. The MSC review team also will include members
from the MSC Office of Counsel and from the MSC Planning Community
of Practice (CoP), MSC Engineering and Construction CoP, MSC Real
Estate CoP, and other CoPs, as needed. In addition, if the proposed
in-kind contributions consist of design or construction of dams,
levees, or bridges, the MSC review team must include the MSC Dam,
Levee, or Bridge Safety Officer. After satisfactory resolution of
all comments on the IDR and a determination that the IDR complies
with all applicable law and policy, the MSC District Support Team
shall prepare an Integral Determination memo for approval and
signature by the MSC Commander.
(4) The Integral Determination approval memo will state whether
the work identified in the IDR, or a portion thereof, has been
determined to be integral to the project. In addition, the memo
should state that the determination of the actual value of the in-
kind contributions and affording credit for such amount will be
accomplished by the Government in accordance with the limitations,
conditions, and terms of the applicable cost sharing agreement.
B-2. Considerations in determining whether the work is integral
and creditable: The proposed in-kind contributions consist of work
that the Government would have otherwise provided or performed for
the project, except for performance of activities that are
inherently governmental responsibilities (see paragraph B-3 below).
Examples of activities that are acceptable in-kind contributions:
Performance of design of all or a portion of the Federal project,
including data collection related to design work; demolition of
buildings on lands required for the project; performance of design
or construction related studies for historic preservation activities
except data recovery; performance of cost shared monitoring and
adaptive management; and construction of a portion of the project.
a. For proposed in-kind contributions performed prior to
execution of the applicable cost sharing agreement, the in-kind
contributions have been reviewed or inspected, as applicable, and
certified by the Government that the work was accomplished in a
satisfactory manner and in accordance with applicable Federal laws,
regulations, and policies.
b. For any proposed in-kind contributions proposed to be
performed after execution of the PPA, the plans and specifications
must be approved by the District Commander prior to initiation of
the construction work.
c. For materials provided for use in construction work managed
by the Government, the materials must meet the minimum Government
requirements for materials and any substitute materials have been
determined by the Government to be a functional equivalent in
accordance with policies governing contractor substitution of
materials.
d. The non-Federal sponsor should coordinate with the District
to ensure that appropriate real estate interests to support the in-
kind contributions and project are acquired.
B-3. The following will not be accepted as in-kind
contributions:
a. The proposed in-kind contributions are not part of the
Federal project.
b. The proposed in-kind contributions consist of performance of
activities that are inherently Governmental responsibilities (e.g.,
management of Government contracts; performance of District Quality
Review,
[[Page 78206]]
Agency Technical Review, Independent External Peer Review, or Policy
Compliance Review; determining if Value Engineering evaluations are
acceptable; determining the LERRD required for the project or
separable element of the project; determining the value of LERRD for
crediting purposes; or making determinations as to compliance with
applicable environmental laws and regulations).
c. The proposed in-kind contributions are features or
obligations that are a 100 percent non-Federal sponsor
responsibility (e.g., purposes of land reclamation, local drainage,
to protect against land or bank erosion, and/or the removal of
hazardous, toxic, or radioactive wastes; local service facilities;
betterments; acquisition and performance of LERRD, except for the
provision of dredged or excavated material disposal facilities for
commercial navigation projects; and performance of operation,
maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, or replacement (OMRR&R);
d. The proposed in-kind contributions have or will create a
hazard to human life or property.
e. The proposed in-kind contributions have been determined to be
environmentally unacceptable.
f. For proposed in-kind contributions performed prior to
execution of the applicable cost sharing agreement, after review or
inspection, as applicable, the Government cannot certify the
proposed in-kind contributions were accomplished in a satisfactory
manner and in accordance with applicable Federal laws, regulations,
and policies.
g. For proposed in-kind contributions performed prior to
execution of the applicable cost sharing agreement, the non-Federal
sponsor has not performed the necessary OMRR&R, resulting in the
work no longer functioning as needed for the project.
[FR Doc. 2015-31654 Filed 12-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P