Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review, 78234-78236 [2015-31581]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
78234
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 241 / Wednesday, December 16, 2015 / Notices
notice was published in the Federal
Register at 80 FR 58253 on September
28, 2015. No comments were received.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
January 15, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this
burden to: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs of OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for GSA, Room 10236,
NEOB, Washington, DC 20503.
Additionally submit a copy to GSA by
any of the following methods:
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
searching the OMB control number.
Select the link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’
that corresponds with ‘‘Information
Collection 9000–0107, Notice of
Radioactive Materials’’. Follow the
instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit a
Comment’’ screen. Please include your
name, company name (if any), and
‘‘Information Collection 9000–0107,
Notice of Radioactive Materials’’ on
your attached document.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
Division (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20405. ATTN: Ms.
Flowers/IC 9000–0107, Notice of
Radioactive Materials.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite Information Collection
9000–0107, Notice of Radioactive
Materials, in all correspondence related
to this collection. Comments received
generally will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal and/or business
confidential information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Charles Gray, Procurement Analyst,
Office of Acquisition Policy, GSA, 703–
795–6328 or email charles.gray@
gsa.gov.
tkelley on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES
A. Purpose
The clause at FAR 52.223–7, Notice of
Radioactive Materials, requires
contractors to notify the Government
prior to delivery of items containing
radioactive materials. The purpose of
the notification is to alert receiving
activities that appropriate safeguards
may need to be instituted. The notice
shall specify the part or parts of the
items which contain radioactive
materials, a description of the materials,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Dec 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
the name and activity of the isotope, the
manufacturer of the materials, and any
other information known to the
contractor which will put users of the
items on notice as to the hazards
involved.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 535.
Responses per Respondent: 5.
Annual Responses: 2,675.
Hours per Response: 1.
Total Burden Hours: 2,675.
C. Public Comments
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of functions of the FAR,
and whether it will have practical
utility; whether our estimate of the
public burden of this collection of
information is accurate, and based on
valid assumptions and methodology;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways in which we can
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, through the use of appropriate
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat Division (MVCB),
1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC
20405, telephone 202–501–4755. Please
cite OMB Control No. 9000–0107,
Notice of Radioactive Materials, in all
correspondence.
Edward Loeb,
Acting Director, Federal Acquisition Policy
Division, Office of Governmentwide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015–31562 Filed 12–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day–16–0048]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) has submitted the
following information collection request
to the Office of Management and Budget
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The notice for
the proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address any of the
following: (a) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agencies estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) Minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses; and (e) Assess information
collection costs.
To request additional information on
the proposed project or to obtain a copy
of the information collection plan and
instruments, call (404) 639–7570 or
send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Direct
written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this
notice to the Attention: CDC Desk
Officer, Office of Management and
Budget, Washington, DC 20503 or by fax
to (202) 395–5806. Written comments
should be received within 30 days of
this notice.
Proposed Project
ATSDR Exposure Investigations (EIs)
(OMB Control No. 0923–0048,
Expiration Date 5/31/2016)—
Extension—Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR).
Background and Brief Description
The Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR) is requesting
a three-year extension of this generic
clearance to allow the agency to conduct
exposure investigations (EIs), through
methods developed by ATSDR. After a
chemical release or suspected release
into the environment, EIs are usually
requested by officials of a state health
agency, county health departments, the
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), the general public, and ATSDR
staff.
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 241 / Wednesday, December 16, 2015 / Notices
EI results are used by public health
professionals, environmental risk
managers, and other decision makers to
determine if current conditions warrant
intervention strategies to minimize or
eliminate human exposure. For
example, three of the EIs that ATSDR
conducted in the past three years
include the Colorado Smelter (CO—
blood lead and urine arsenic), ASARCO
Hayden Smelter Site (AZ—blood lead
and urine arsenic), and Decatur (AL—
perfluorochemicals [PFCs] in serum).
Example 1: Colorado Smelter Blood
Lead and Urine Arsenic Sampling, CO
The site is a former smelter located in
Pueblo, Colorado. Past sampling found
elevated levels of lead and arsenic in
residential soils and a slag pile
associated with the smelter. ATSDR
sampled blood lead levels (BLLs) in
children and adults and found seven
children that had BLLs near or
exceeding the level of 5 micrograms per
deciliter (mg/dL)(a level identified by
ATSDR as a level of concern for lead
effects in children). One adult had an
elevated level of arsenic in their urine.
Speciation of the sample determined
that it was primarily organic arsenic,
probably resulting from eating seafood.
• The local health department
conducted a Healthy Homes Inspection
for these families having children with
elevated BLLs and ATSDR
recommended that the children follow
up with their primary care provider.
• On June 10, 2014, the local health
department obtained a six year grant
from the EPA Region 8 to conduct
health education, BLL screening, assist
in the coordination of developmental
and cognitive evaluations in affected
children from a designated area of
Pueblo, and conduct other public health
actions/investigations as stipulated in
the grant.
• On December 11, 2014, EPA listed
the Colorado Smelter site on the
National Priority List (NPL).
Example 2: ASARCO Hayden Smelter
Site, AZ
The community is located in the
vicinity of the ASARCO Hayden
Smelter, which has been operating for
100 years as a copper ore processer. The
processing has resulted in lead and
78235
• Calculate the biological half-life for
each PFC species using paired blood
and urine PFC concentrations to
improve the understanding of the
pharmacokinetic behavior of these
compounds in humans.
• Evaluate the potential existence of
non-drinking water PFC exposure
pathways through physiologically-based
pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling.
All of ATSDR’s targeted biological
assessments (e.g., urine, blood) and
some of the environmental
investigations (e.g., air, water, soil, or
food sampling) involve participants to
determine whether they are or have
Example 3: Perfluorochemical Serum
been exposed to unusual levels of
Sampling, Decatur, AL
pollutants at specific locations (e.g.,
Perfluorochemicals (PFC) are a class
where people live, spend leisure time,
of organofluorine compounds that are
or anywhere they might come into
used in a variety of industrial and
contact with contaminants under
consumer products including fireinvestigation).
fighting foams; personal care and
Questionnaires, appropriate to the
cleaning products; and oil, stain, grease, specific contaminant, are generally
and water repellent coatings. These
needed in about half of the EIs (at most
coatings are used on carpet, textiles,
approximately 12 per year) to assist in
leather, ‘‘non-stick’’ cookware, and
interpreting the biological or
paper wrappers used on fast food items. environmental sampling results. ATSDR
As a result, United States (U.S.) general
collects contact information (e.g., name,
population exposure to PFCs is
address, phone number) to provide the
common.
participant with their individual results.
In 2007, PFCs were released by a
ATSDR also collects information on
chemical manufacturer near Decatur,
other possible confounding sources of
AL, and impacted environmental media chemical(s) exposure such as medicines
in the area. In 2010, ATSDR conducted
taken, foods eaten, hobbies, jobs, etc. In
an EI to assess exposure of residents to
addition, ATSDR asks questions on
PFCs in blood. PFCs were found in the
recreational or occupational activities
serum of people that regularly used the
that could increase a participant’s
public water system in the area as their
exposure potential. That information
primary drinking water source.
represents an individual’s exposure
Recommendations of the EI included
history.
continued monitoring for PFCs in the
The number of questions can vary
public water supply and continued
depending on the number of chemicals
biological PFC testing in the community being investigated, the route of exposure
to determine if PFCs in the community
(e.g., breathing, eating, touching), and
had been reduced.
number of other sources of the
Based on the results of the 2010 EI,
chemical(s) (e.g., products used, jobs).
ATSDR is preparing to conduct another
We use approximately 12–20 questions
EI at the site in 2016 (approved by OMB about the pertinent environmental
on 8/10/2015), including biological
exposures per investigation. Typically,
sampling of serum and urine to:
the number of participants in an
• Compare individuals’ current serum individual EI ranges from 10 to 100.
PFC concentrations with their 2010
Participation is completely voluntary,
serum PFC concentrations.
and there are no costs to participants
other than their time. Based on a
• Compare individuals’ serum PFC
maximum of 12 EIs per year and 100
concentrations to the national
participants each, the estimated
population reference values (NHANES
annualized burden hours are 600.
2011–2012).
arsenic contamination in the
surrounding residential area and in
tailing piles used for recreation. Limited
sampling of the community in the past
found elevated BLLs and arsenic in
urine. Based on community concerns,
EPA requested that ATSDR conduct an
EI to assess potential exposure of the
community to lead and arsenic.
• In April, 2015, ATSDR collected 83
BLL and 58 urine arsenic samples from
the community.
• Participants have been notified of
their results and the EI report is being
prepared.
tkelley on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Type of respondents
Form name
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in hrs.)
Exposure Investigation Participants ................
Chemical Exposure Questions .......................
1,200
1
30/60
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Dec 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
78236
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 241 / Wednesday, December 16, 2015 / Notices
Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the
Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015–31581 Filed 12–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Health Resources and Services
Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Public Comment
Request
Health Resources and Services
Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with Section
3507(a)(1)(D) of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Health
Resources and Services Administration
(HRSA) has submitted an Information
Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval. Comments
submitted during the first public review
of this ICR will be provided to OMB.
OMB will accept further comments from
the public during the review and
approval period.
DATES: Comments on this ICR should be
received no later than January 15, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
including the Information Collection
Request Title, to the desk officer for
HRSA, either by email to OIRA_
submission@omb.eop.gov or by fax to
202–395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request a copy of the clearance requests
submitted to OMB for review, email the
HRSA Information Collection Clearance
Officer at paperwork@hrsa.gov or call
(301) 443–1984.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Information Collection Request Title:
Shortage Designation Management
System
OMB No. 0915–xxxx—NEW
Abstract: HRSA’s Bureau of Health
Workforce (BHW) is committed to
improving the health of the nation’s
underserved communities and
vulnerable populations by developing,
tkelley on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Dec 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
implementing, evaluating, and refining
programs that strengthen the nation’s
health workforce. The Department of
Health and Human Services relies on
two federal shortage designations to
identify and dedicate resources to areas
and populations in greatest need of
providers: Health Professional Shortage
Area (HPSA) designations and
Medically Underserved Area/Medically
Underserved Population (MUA/P)
designations. HPSA designations are
geographic areas, population groups,
and facilities that are experiencing a
shortage of health professionals. MUA/
P designations are areas, or populations
within areas, that are experiencing a
shortage of health care services. MUAs
are designated for the entire population
of a particular geographic area. MUP
designations are limited to particular
groups of underserved people within an
area. These designations are currently
used in a number of Departmental
programs that provide both federal and
state government grant/program benefits
for communities, health care facilities,
and providers. BHW has the
responsibility for designating and dedesignating HPSAs and MUA/Ps on
behalf of the Secretary.
HPSA designations are required to be
reviewed and updated annually to
reflect current data. Individual states—
through their Primary Care Office
(PCO)—have primary responsibility for
initiating an application for a new or
updated HPSA designation, or
withdrawing HPSAs that no longer meet
the designation criteria. HRSA reviews
the application and makes the final
determination on the HPSA designation.
Requests come from the PCOs who have
access to the online application and
review system, Shortage Designation
Management System (SDMS). Requests
that come from other sources are
referred to the PCOs for their review and
concurrence. In addition, interested
parties, including the Governor, the
State Primary Care Association, and
state professional associations are
notified of each request submitted for
their comments and recommendations.
In order to obtain a federal shortage
designation for an area, population, or
facility, PCOs must submit a shortage
designation application through SDMS
for review and approval by BHW. Both
the HPSA and MUA/P applications
request local, state, and national data on
the population that is experiencing a
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
shortage of health professionals and the
number of health professionals relative
to the population covered by the
proposed designation. The information
collected on the applications is used to
determine which areas, populations,
and facilities have shortages.
The lists of designated HPSAs are
annually published in the Federal
Register. In addition, lists of HPSAs are
updated on the HRSA Web site, https://
www.hrsa.gov/shortage/, so that
interested parties can access the
information.
Need and Proposed Use of the
Information: The need and purpose of
this information collection is to obtain
information to designate HPSAs and
MUA/Ps. The information obtained
from the SDMS is used to determine
which areas, populations, and facilities
have critical shortages of health
professionals. The SDMS HPSA
application and SDMS MUA/P
application are used for these
designation determinations. Applicants
must submit a SDMS application to
BHW to obtain a federal shortage
designation. The application asks for
local, state, and national data required
for determining the application’s
eligibility to obtain a federal shortage
designation. In addition, applicants
must enter detailed information
explaining how the area, population, or
facility faces a critical shortage of health
professionals.
Likely Respondents: State PCOs
interested in obtaining a primary care,
dental, or mental HPSA designation or
a MUA/P in their state.
Burden Statement: Burden in this
context means the time expended by
persons to generate, maintain, retain,
disclose or provide the information
requested. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; to
develop, acquire, install and utilize
technology and systems for the purpose
of collecting, validating and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; to train
personnel and to be able to respond to
a collection of information; to search
data sources; to complete and review
the collection of information; and to
transmit or otherwise disclose the
information. The total annual burden
hours estimated for this ICR are
summarized in the table below.
E:\FR\FM\16DEN1.SGM
16DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 241 (Wednesday, December 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78234-78236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31581]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[30Day-16-0048]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has submitted
the following information collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The notice for the proposed
information collection is published to obtain comments from the public
and affected agencies.
Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should address any of the following: (a)
Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agencies estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology
and assumptions used; (c) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; (d) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses; and
(e) Assess information collection costs.
To request additional information on the proposed project or to
obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, call
(404) 639-7570 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Direct written comments
and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice to the
Attention: CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget,
Washington, DC 20503 or by fax to (202) 395-5806. Written comments
should be received within 30 days of this notice.
Proposed Project
ATSDR Exposure Investigations (EIs) (OMB Control No. 0923-0048,
Expiration Date 5/31/2016)--Extension--Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR).
Background and Brief Description
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) is
requesting a three-year extension of this generic clearance to allow
the agency to conduct exposure investigations (EIs), through methods
developed by ATSDR. After a chemical release or suspected release into
the environment, EIs are usually requested by officials of a state
health agency, county health departments, the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), the general public, and ATSDR staff.
[[Page 78235]]
EI results are used by public health professionals, environmental
risk managers, and other decision makers to determine if current
conditions warrant intervention strategies to minimize or eliminate
human exposure. For example, three of the EIs that ATSDR conducted in
the past three years include the Colorado Smelter (CO--blood lead and
urine arsenic), ASARCO Hayden Smelter Site (AZ--blood lead and urine
arsenic), and Decatur (AL--perfluorochemicals [PFCs] in serum).
Example 1: Colorado Smelter Blood Lead and Urine Arsenic Sampling, CO
The site is a former smelter located in Pueblo, Colorado. Past
sampling found elevated levels of lead and arsenic in residential soils
and a slag pile associated with the smelter. ATSDR sampled blood lead
levels (BLLs) in children and adults and found seven children that had
BLLs near or exceeding the level of 5 micrograms per deciliter (mg/
dL)(a level identified by ATSDR as a level of concern for lead effects
in children). One adult had an elevated level of arsenic in their
urine. Speciation of the sample determined that it was primarily
organic arsenic, probably resulting from eating seafood.
The local health department conducted a Healthy Homes
Inspection for these families having children with elevated BLLs and
ATSDR recommended that the children follow up with their primary care
provider.
On June 10, 2014, the local health department obtained a
six year grant from the EPA Region 8 to conduct health education, BLL
screening, assist in the coordination of developmental and cognitive
evaluations in affected children from a designated area of Pueblo, and
conduct other public health actions/investigations as stipulated in the
grant.
On December 11, 2014, EPA listed the Colorado Smelter site
on the National Priority List (NPL).
Example 2: ASARCO Hayden Smelter Site, AZ
The community is located in the vicinity of the ASARCO Hayden
Smelter, which has been operating for 100 years as a copper ore
processer. The processing has resulted in lead and arsenic
contamination in the surrounding residential area and in tailing piles
used for recreation. Limited sampling of the community in the past
found elevated BLLs and arsenic in urine. Based on community concerns,
EPA requested that ATSDR conduct an EI to assess potential exposure of
the community to lead and arsenic.
In April, 2015, ATSDR collected 83 BLL and 58 urine
arsenic samples from the community.
Participants have been notified of their results and the
EI report is being prepared.
Example 3: Perfluorochemical Serum Sampling, Decatur, AL
Perfluorochemicals (PFC) are a class of organofluorine compounds
that are used in a variety of industrial and consumer products
including fire-fighting foams; personal care and cleaning products; and
oil, stain, grease, and water repellent coatings. These coatings are
used on carpet, textiles, leather, ``non-stick'' cookware, and paper
wrappers used on fast food items. As a result, United States (U.S.)
general population exposure to PFCs is common.
In 2007, PFCs were released by a chemical manufacturer near
Decatur, AL, and impacted environmental media in the area. In 2010,
ATSDR conducted an EI to assess exposure of residents to PFCs in blood.
PFCs were found in the serum of people that regularly used the public
water system in the area as their primary drinking water source.
Recommendations of the EI included continued monitoring for PFCs in
the public water supply and continued biological PFC testing in the
community to determine if PFCs in the community had been reduced.
Based on the results of the 2010 EI, ATSDR is preparing to conduct
another EI at the site in 2016 (approved by OMB on 8/10/2015),
including biological sampling of serum and urine to:
Compare individuals' current serum PFC concentrations with
their 2010 serum PFC concentrations.
Compare individuals' serum PFC concentrations to the
national population reference values (NHANES 2011-2012).
Calculate the biological half-life for each PFC species
using paired blood and urine PFC concentrations to improve the
understanding of the pharmacokinetic behavior of these compounds in
humans.
Evaluate the potential existence of non-drinking water PFC
exposure pathways through physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK)
modeling.
All of ATSDR's targeted biological assessments (e.g., urine, blood)
and some of the environmental investigations (e.g., air, water, soil,
or food sampling) involve participants to determine whether they are or
have been exposed to unusual levels of pollutants at specific locations
(e.g., where people live, spend leisure time, or anywhere they might
come into contact with contaminants under investigation).
Questionnaires, appropriate to the specific contaminant, are
generally needed in about half of the EIs (at most approximately 12 per
year) to assist in interpreting the biological or environmental
sampling results. ATSDR collects contact information (e.g., name,
address, phone number) to provide the participant with their individual
results. ATSDR also collects information on other possible confounding
sources of chemical(s) exposure such as medicines taken, foods eaten,
hobbies, jobs, etc. In addition, ATSDR asks questions on recreational
or occupational activities that could increase a participant's exposure
potential. That information represents an individual's exposure
history.
The number of questions can vary depending on the number of
chemicals being investigated, the route of exposure (e.g., breathing,
eating, touching), and number of other sources of the chemical(s)
(e.g., products used, jobs). We use approximately 12-20 questions about
the pertinent environmental exposures per investigation. Typically, the
number of participants in an individual EI ranges from 10 to 100.
Participation is completely voluntary, and there are no costs to
participants other than their time. Based on a maximum of 12 EIs per
year and 100 participants each, the estimated annualized burden hours
are 600.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Average burden
Type of respondents Form name Number of responses per per response
respondents respondent (in hrs.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exposure Investigation Participants. Chemical Exposure 1,200 1 30/60
Questions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 78236]]
Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific
Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015-31581 Filed 12-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
