Choline Chloride; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance, 78146-78149 [2015-31464]
Download as PDF
78146
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 241 / Wednesday, December 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
number: (703) 305–7090; email address:
BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
*
[FR Doc. 2015–31518 Filed 12–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
I. General Information
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
A. Does this action apply to me?
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0023; FRL–9935–81]
Choline Chloride; Exemption From the
Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of the Choline
Chloride (Acetyl Choline) in or on all
food commodities when applied/used
pre-harvest and used in accordance with
label directions and good agricultural
practices. CP Bio, Inc., submitted a
petition to EPA under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
requesting an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of Choline Chloride.
DATES: This regulation is effective
December 16, 2015. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before February 16, 2016, and
must be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0023, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; main telephone
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Dec 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2015–0023 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before February 16, 2016. Addresses for
mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2015–0023, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting
or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of March 4,
2015 (80 FR 11611) (FRL–9922–68),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide tolerance petition (PP 4F8287)
by CP Bio, Inc., 4802 Murrieta Street,
Chino, CA 91710. The petition
requested that 40 CFR part 180 be
amended by establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of Choline Chloride in or on all
food commodities (when applied preharvest). That document referenced a
summary of the petition prepared by the
petitioner CP Bio, Inc., which is
available in the docket, https://
www.regulations.gov. There were no
substantive comments received in
response to the notice of filing.
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in
establishing or maintaining in effect an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance, EPA must take into account
the factors set forth in FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give
special consideration to exposure of
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 241 / Wednesday, December 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue.–. . . ’’ Additionally,
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D) requires
that the Agency consider ‘‘available
information concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide’s
residues’’ and ‘‘other substances that
have a common mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA performs a number of analyses to
determine the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide residues. First,
EPA determines the toxicity of
pesticides. Second, EPA examines
exposure to the pesticide through food,
drinking water, and through other
exposures that occur as a result of
pesticide use in residential settings.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Toxicological Profile
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other
relevant information in support of this
action and considered its validity,
completeness and reliability, and the
relationship of this information to
human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the
variability of the sensitivities of major
identifiable subgroups of consumers,
including infants and children.
A. Overview of Choline Chloride
Choline Chloride is an ammonium
salt that readily dissociates into two
constituents—Choline and Chloride. It
presents as a white crystalline solid that
is odorless. Each constituent is
ubiquitous in the environment,
constitutes a regular part of the human
diet, and serves many critical functions
in the human body. Choline is found in
such foods as egg yolk, vegetables and
animal fat. It is a precursor of a vital
neurotransmitter; and it is critical for
the structural integrity of cell
membranes and various metabolic
functions. Chloride is also a regular part
of the human diet, particularly as a
constituent of edible salt, and serves
many functions in human biology.
Chiefly, Chloride is an essential
electrolyte responsible for maintaining
acid/base balance, transmitting nerve
impulses and regulating fluid in and out
of cells.
Choline Chloride is already approved
for use by EPA as an inert ingredient in
pesticide products without numerical
limitation for pre-harvest use (40 CFR
180.920). Additionally, Choline
Chloride is designated as GRAS
(Generally Recognized as Safe) and is
approved by the Food and Drug
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Dec 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
Administration (FDA) as a human
nutrient under 21 CFR 182.8252 and as
a nutrient in animal feeds under 21 CFR
582.5252.
As a biopesticide, Choline Chloride is
considered a plant growth regulator
(PGR) intended for use to increase
growth and decrease stress in growing
crops. It has a non-toxic mode of action;
and as with most PGRs, it is applied at
low concentrations because use at high
concentrations result in detrimental
effects to the plant.
B. Biochemical Pesticide Toxicology
Data Requirements
All applicable mammalian toxicology
data requirements supporting the
petition to establish an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance for the
use of Choline Chloride as an active
ingredient for use as a PGR on food
crops have been fulfilled. All acute
toxicology data requirements were
fulfilled through guideline studies. The
Acute Oral Toxicity Category is III; all
other categories are IV. Additionally, the
information submitted in support of the
application indicate that Choline
Chloride is non-mutagenic and that it is
not subchronically or developmentally
toxic. Subchronic oral toxicity,
mutagenicity and developmental
toxicity data requirements were satisfied
through scientific literature. Subchronic
dermal and inhalation requirements
were waived for lack of exposure. (A
complete assessment of the toxicology
submission for Choline Chloride can be
found in the docket.)
C. EPA’s Safety Determination
EPA evaluated the available toxicity
and exposure data on Choline Chloride
and considered its validity,
completeness, and reliability, as well as
the relationship of this information to
human risk. A full explanation of the
data upon which EPA relied and its risk
assessment based on that data can be
found within the August 11, 2015,
document entitled ‘‘Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
Considerations for Choline Chloride.’’
This document, as well as other relevant
information, is available in the docket
for this action as described under
ADDRESSES. Based upon its evaluation,
EPA concludes that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the
U.S. population, including infants and
children, from aggregate exposure to
residues of Choline Chloride. Therefore,
an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance is established for residues of
Choline Chloride in or on all food
commodities when applied pre-harvest
and used in accordance with label
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78147
directions and good agricultural
practices.
IV. Aggregate Exposures
In examining aggregate exposure,
FFDCA section 408 directs EPA to
consider available information
concerning exposures from the pesticide
residue in food and all other nonoccupational exposures, including
drinking water from ground water or
surface water and exposure through
pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or
buildings (residential and other indoor
uses).
A. Dietary Exposure
Food Exposure. Dietary exposure to
the pesticidal residues of Choline
Chloride is expected to be negligible. (1)
Choline Chloride is a PGR and is
necessarily applied at low
concentrations. (High concentrations
result in detrimental effects to the
plant). (2) Choline Chloride biodegrades
rapidly. A MITI–I test demonstrated that
Choline Chloride is 93% degraded
within 14 days. (3) As a salt, Choline
Chloride dissociates readily when in
contact with water, making its
persistence as a residue even more
unlikely.
Should exposure occur, however,
minimal to no risk is expected for the
general population, including infants
and children. Notably, humans are
already dietarily exposed to Choline
Chloride. It is produced endogenously,
and is found naturally in foods in the
human diet. Indeed, it is considered an
essential human dietary component,
serving critical functions in nerve
transmission, cell membrane integrity
and lipid metabolism.
Drinking Water Exposure. No
significant residues of Choline Chloride
are expected in drinking water when
products are used according to label
instructions. The active ingredient is
applied terrestrially at low
concentrations; it is very soluble in
water; and it biodegrades rapidly, once
applied. As such, any residues of
Choline Chloride in drinking water are
anticipated to be negligible.
It should be additionally noted that
both Choline and Chloride, the
constituents of Choline Chloride, are
ubiquitous in the environment; and
there is a long history of incidental, but
minor, exposure through drinking
water.
B. Other Non-Occupational Exposure
Non-occupational exposure to
Choline Chloride residues are not
expected. Choline Chloride is not
intended for use in residential settings;
it is intended for agricultural use only.
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
78148
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 241 / Wednesday, December 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Nonetheless, even in the event of
incidental exposure, minimal to no risk
is expected due to the low toxicity of
the chemical as explained in the risk
assessment found in the docket.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
V. Cumulative Effects From Substances
With a Common Mechanism of Toxicity
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance, the Agency consider
‘‘available information’’ concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular
pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA has not found Choline Chloride
to share a common mechanism of
toxicity with any other substances, and
Choline Chloride does not appear to
produce a toxic metabolite produced by
other substances. For the purposes of
this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has
assumed that Choline Chloride does not
have a common mechanism of toxicity
with other substances. For information
regarding EPA’s efforts to determine
which chemicals have a common
mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate
the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see EPA’s Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
VI. Determination of Safety for U.S.
Population, Infants and Children
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides
that, in considering the establishment of
a tolerance or tolerance exemption for a
pesticide chemical residue, the EPA
shall assess the available information
about consumption patterns among
infants and children, special
susceptibility of infants and children to
pesticide chemical residues, and the
cumulative effects on infants and
children of the residues and other
substances with a common mechanism
of toxicity. In addition, FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(C) provides that the EPA shall
apply an additional tenfold (10X)
margin of safety for infants and children
in the case of threshold effects to
account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the
database on toxicity and exposure,
unless the EPA determines that a
different margin of safety will be safe for
infants and children. This additional
margin of safety is commonly referred to
as the Food Quality Protection Act
Safety Factor. In applying this
provision, the EPA either retains the
default value of 10X, or uses a different
additional or no safety factor when
reliable data are available to support a
different additional or no safety factor.
Because there are no threshold effects
associated with this biochemical, an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Dec 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
additional margin of safety for infants
and children is not necessary.
EPA has determined that there are no
foreseeable dietary risks to the U.S.
population, including infants and
children, from the pesticidal use of
Choline Chloride. Exposure to the
residues of Choline Chloride is expected
to be negligible due to the low
concentrations associated with its use as
a PGR, its high solubility and its rapid
biodegradability. Moreover, any
exposure to Choline Chloride residues
are not expected to pose a risk. No toxic
endpoints have been identified for
Choline Chloride. There has been a long
history of significant human dietary and
endogenous exposure without
documented incident. And the
constituents of Choline Chloride are
known to be readily metabolized.
VII. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required
for enforcement purposes since the
Agency is establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance
without any numerical limitation.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
The Codex Alimentarius is a joint
United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health
Organization food standards program,
and it is recognized as an international
food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to
which the United States is a party. EPA
may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that
EPA explain the reasons for departing
from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established a MRL
for Choline Chloride.
VIII. Conclusions
Based on its assessment of Choline
Chloride, EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population, or to
infants and children, from aggregate
exposure to Choline Chloride. EPA is
therefore establishing an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of Choline Chloride in or on all
food commodities when applied pre-
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
harvest in accordance with label
directions and good agricultural
practices.
IX. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes a tolerance
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 241 / Wednesday, December 16, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
■
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
■
X. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
Dated: December 1, 2015.
Jack E. Housenger,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
78149
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:18 Dec 15, 2015
Jkt 238001
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Add § 180.1334 to subpart D to read
as follows:
§ 180.1334 Choline Chloride; Exemption
from the Requirement of a Tolerance.
An exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance is established for residues
of Choline Chloride in or on all food
commodities when Choline Chloride is
applied pre-harvest and used in
accordance with label directions and
good agricultural practices.
[FR Doc. 2015–31464 Filed 12–15–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 241 (Wednesday, December 16, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78146-78149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31464]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0023; FRL-9935-81]
Choline Chloride; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of the Choline Chloride (Acetyl Choline) in
or on all food commodities when applied/used pre-harvest and used in
accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices. CP
Bio, Inc., submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a
maximum permissible level for residues of Choline Chloride.
DATES: This regulation is effective December 16, 2015. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before February 16, 2016,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0023, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email
address: BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0023 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
February 16, 2016. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0023, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of March 4, 2015 (80 FR 11611) (FRL-9922-
68), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance
petition (PP 4F8287) by CP Bio, Inc., 4802 Murrieta Street, Chino, CA
91710. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be amended by
establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of Choline Chloride in or on all food commodities (when
applied pre-harvest). That document referenced a summary of the
petition prepared by the petitioner CP Bio, Inc., which is available in
the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. There were no substantive
comments received in response to the notice of filing.
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in
establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of
[[Page 78147]]
infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing
a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to
the pesticide chemical residue.-. . . '' Additionally, FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D) requires that the Agency consider ``available information
concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's
residues'' and ``other substances that have a common mechanism of
toxicity.''
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. First, EPA determines the
toxicity of pesticides. Second, EPA examines exposure to the pesticide
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as
a result of pesticide use in residential settings.
III. Toxicological Profile
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action and considered its validity, completeness and reliability,
and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children.
A. Overview of Choline Chloride
Choline Chloride is an ammonium salt that readily dissociates into
two constituents--Choline and Chloride. It presents as a white
crystalline solid that is odorless. Each constituent is ubiquitous in
the environment, constitutes a regular part of the human diet, and
serves many critical functions in the human body. Choline is found in
such foods as egg yolk, vegetables and animal fat. It is a precursor of
a vital neurotransmitter; and it is critical for the structural
integrity of cell membranes and various metabolic functions. Chloride
is also a regular part of the human diet, particularly as a constituent
of edible salt, and serves many functions in human biology. Chiefly,
Chloride is an essential electrolyte responsible for maintaining acid/
base balance, transmitting nerve impulses and regulating fluid in and
out of cells.
Choline Chloride is already approved for use by EPA as an inert
ingredient in pesticide products without numerical limitation for pre-
harvest use (40 CFR 180.920). Additionally, Choline Chloride is
designated as GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) and is approved by
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a human nutrient under 21 CFR
182.8252 and as a nutrient in animal feeds under 21 CFR 582.5252.
As a biopesticide, Choline Chloride is considered a plant growth
regulator (PGR) intended for use to increase growth and decrease stress
in growing crops. It has a non-toxic mode of action; and as with most
PGRs, it is applied at low concentrations because use at high
concentrations result in detrimental effects to the plant.
B. Biochemical Pesticide Toxicology Data Requirements
All applicable mammalian toxicology data requirements supporting
the petition to establish an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for the use of Choline Chloride as an active ingredient for
use as a PGR on food crops have been fulfilled. All acute toxicology
data requirements were fulfilled through guideline studies. The Acute
Oral Toxicity Category is III; all other categories are IV.
Additionally, the information submitted in support of the application
indicate that Choline Chloride is non-mutagenic and that it is not
subchronically or developmentally toxic. Subchronic oral toxicity,
mutagenicity and developmental toxicity data requirements were
satisfied through scientific literature. Subchronic dermal and
inhalation requirements were waived for lack of exposure. (A complete
assessment of the toxicology submission for Choline Chloride can be
found in the docket.)
C. EPA's Safety Determination
EPA evaluated the available toxicity and exposure data on Choline
Chloride and considered its validity, completeness, and reliability, as
well as the relationship of this information to human risk. A full
explanation of the data upon which EPA relied and its risk assessment
based on that data can be found within the August 11, 2015, document
entitled ``Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) Considerations
for Choline Chloride.'' This document, as well as other relevant
information, is available in the docket for this action as described
under ADDRESSES. Based upon its evaluation, EPA concludes that there is
a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the U.S. population,
including infants and children, from aggregate exposure to residues of
Choline Chloride. Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance is established for residues of Choline Chloride in or on all
food commodities when applied pre-harvest and used in accordance with
label directions and good agricultural practices.
IV. Aggregate Exposures
In examining aggregate exposure, FFDCA section 408 directs EPA to
consider available information concerning exposures from the pesticide
residue in food and all other non-occupational exposures, including
drinking water from ground water or surface water and exposure through
pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or buildings (residential and other
indoor uses).
A. Dietary Exposure
Food Exposure. Dietary exposure to the pesticidal residues of
Choline Chloride is expected to be negligible. (1) Choline Chloride is
a PGR and is necessarily applied at low concentrations. (High
concentrations result in detrimental effects to the plant). (2) Choline
Chloride biodegrades rapidly. A MITI-I test demonstrated that Choline
Chloride is 93% degraded within 14 days. (3) As a salt, Choline
Chloride dissociates readily when in contact with water, making its
persistence as a residue even more unlikely.
Should exposure occur, however, minimal to no risk is expected for
the general population, including infants and children. Notably, humans
are already dietarily exposed to Choline Chloride. It is produced
endogenously, and is found naturally in foods in the human diet.
Indeed, it is considered an essential human dietary component, serving
critical functions in nerve transmission, cell membrane integrity and
lipid metabolism.
Drinking Water Exposure. No significant residues of Choline
Chloride are expected in drinking water when products are used
according to label instructions. The active ingredient is applied
terrestrially at low concentrations; it is very soluble in water; and
it biodegrades rapidly, once applied. As such, any residues of Choline
Chloride in drinking water are anticipated to be negligible.
It should be additionally noted that both Choline and Chloride, the
constituents of Choline Chloride, are ubiquitous in the environment;
and there is a long history of incidental, but minor, exposure through
drinking water.
B. Other Non-Occupational Exposure
Non-occupational exposure to Choline Chloride residues are not
expected. Choline Chloride is not intended for use in residential
settings; it is intended for agricultural use only.
[[Page 78148]]
Nonetheless, even in the event of incidental exposure, minimal to no
risk is expected due to the low toxicity of the chemical as explained
in the risk assessment found in the docket.
V. Cumulative Effects From Substances With a Common Mechanism of
Toxicity
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering
whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency
consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of
a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances that have a
common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA has not found Choline Chloride to share a common mechanism of
toxicity with any other substances, and Choline Chloride does not
appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For
the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has assumed that
Choline Chloride does not have a common mechanism of toxicity with
other substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine
which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the
cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's Web site at https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
VI. Determination of Safety for U.S. Population, Infants and Children
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides that, in considering the
establishment of a tolerance or tolerance exemption for a pesticide
chemical residue, the EPA shall assess the available information about
consumption patterns among infants and children, special susceptibility
of infants and children to pesticide chemical residues, and the
cumulative effects on infants and children of the residues and other
substances with a common mechanism of toxicity. In addition, FFDCA
section 408(b)(2)(C) provides that the EPA shall apply an additional
tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants and children in the case of
threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal toxicity and
the completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure, unless the
EPA determines that a different margin of safety will be safe for
infants and children. This additional margin of safety is commonly
referred to as the Food Quality Protection Act Safety Factor. In
applying this provision, the EPA either retains the default value of
10X, or uses a different additional or no safety factor when reliable
data are available to support a different additional or no safety
factor.
Because there are no threshold effects associated with this
biochemical, an additional margin of safety for infants and children is
not necessary.
EPA has determined that there are no foreseeable dietary risks to
the U.S. population, including infants and children, from the
pesticidal use of Choline Chloride. Exposure to the residues of Choline
Chloride is expected to be negligible due to the low concentrations
associated with its use as a PGR, its high solubility and its rapid
biodegradability. Moreover, any exposure to Choline Chloride residues
are not expected to pose a risk. No toxic endpoints have been
identified for Choline Chloride. There has been a long history of
significant human dietary and endogenous exposure without documented
incident. And the constituents of Choline Chloride are known to be
readily metabolized.
VII. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since
the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance without any numerical limitation.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established a MRL for Choline Chloride.
VIII. Conclusions
Based on its assessment of Choline Chloride, EPA concludes that
there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general
population, or to infants and children, from aggregate exposure to
Choline Chloride. EPA is therefore establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues of Choline Chloride in or on
all food commodities when applied pre-harvest in accordance with label
directions and good agricultural practices.
IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
[[Page 78149]]
to this action. In addition, this action does not impose any
enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
X. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 1, 2015.
Jack E. Housenger,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 180.1334 to subpart D to read as follows:
Sec. 180.1334 Choline Chloride; Exemption from the Requirement of a
Tolerance.
An exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established for
residues of Choline Chloride in or on all food commodities when Choline
Chloride is applied pre-harvest and used in accordance with label
directions and good agricultural practices.
[FR Doc. 2015-31464 Filed 12-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P