Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, and Diablo Canyon Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, 77672-77673 [2015-31529]

Download as PDF 77672 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Notices adequately address issues concerning software embedded in everyday products, or whether amendments or clarifications would be useful. Specific areas of interest include: a. The idea/expression dichotomy (codified in 17 U.S.C. 102(b)) b. The merger doctrine ` ` c. The scenes a faire doctrine d. Fair use (codified in 17 U.S.C. 107) e. The first-sale doctrine (codified in 17 U.S.C. 109) f. Statutory limitations on exclusive rights in computer programs (codified in 17 U.S.C. 117) ` 5. The state of contract law vis-a-vis software embedded in everyday products, and how contracts such as end user license agreements impact investment in and the dissemination and use of everyday products, including whether any legislative action in this area is needed. 6. Any additional relevant issues not raised above. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: December 9, 2015. Maria A. Pallante, Register of Copyrights, U.S. Copyright Office. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD [FR Doc. 2015–31411 Filed 12–14–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1410–30–P The purpose of this meeting is to discuss matters relating to the Classified National Security Information Program for State, Local, Tribal, and Private Sector Entities. The meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space limitations and access procedures, you must submit the name and telephone number of individuals planning to attend to the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) no later than Friday, January 22, 2016. ISOO will provide additional instructions for accessing the meeting’s location. Dated: December 8, 2015. Patrice Little Murray, Committee Management Officer. BILLING CODE 7515–01–P Notice of Appointments of Individuals To Serve as Members of Performance Review Boards; Correction Authority: 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). AGENCY: Information Security Oversight Office ACTION: National Labor Relations Board. Notice; correction. [NARA–2016–007] State, Local, Tribal, and Private Sector Policy Advisory Committee (SLTPS– PAC) Meeting National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee Meeting. AGENCY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app 2) and implementing regulation 41 CFR 101–6, NARA announces the following committee meeting. DATES: The meeting will be on January 27, 2016, from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EDT. ADDRESSES: National Archives and Records Administration; 700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.; Jefferson Room; Washington, DC 20408. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Skwirot, Senior Program Analyst, by mail at ISOO, National Archives Building; 700 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.; Washington, DC 20408, by telephone number at (202) 357–5398, or by email at robert.skwirot@nara.gov. Contact ISOO at ISOO@nara.gov. asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:55 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 The National Labor Relations Board published a document in the Federal Register of November 25, 2015, giving notice that certain named individuals had been appointed to serve as members of performance review boards in the National Labor Relations Board for the rating year beginning October 1, 2014 and ending September 30, 2015. The document failed to list one of the individuals so appointed. SUMMARY: Gary Shinners, Executive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, 1099 14th Street NW., Washington, DC 20570, (202) 273– 3737 (this is not a toll-free number), 1– 866–315–6572 (TTY/TDD). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Correction In the Federal Register of November 25, 2015, in FR Doc. 2015–30031, on page 73836, in the third column, correct the list of names of individuals appointed to serve as members of performance review boards by adding the following individual: Name and Title Deborah Yaffee—Director, Office of Appeals Dated: December 9, 2015. PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [FR Doc. 2015–31421 Filed 12–14–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7545–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 50–275, 50–323, and 72–26; NRC–2015–0244] Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, and Diablo Canyon Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Finding of no significant impact with associated environmental assessment; final issuance. AGENCY: [FR Doc. 2015–31526 Filed 12–14–15; 8:45 am] NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION By Direction of the Board. William B. Cowen, Solicitor. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an environmental assessment (EA) and finding of no significant impact (FONSI) related to a request to amend the Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–80, DPR–82, and SNM–2511 issued to Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), for operation of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, including the specific-license Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (hereinafter DCPP or the facility), located in San Luis Obispo County, California. The requested amendments would permit licensee security personnel to use certain firearms and ammunition feeding devices not previously permitted, notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal firearms laws or regulations that otherwise prohibit such actions. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2015–0244 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this document using any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2015–0244. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM 15DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Notices https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. To begin the search, select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced. The application for amendments, dated September 24, 2013, and letter dated December 18, 2013, contain sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information (SUNSI) and are being withheld from public disclosure. A redacted version of the application for amendments, dated September 24, 2013, is available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML13268A398. The supplement dated December 18, 2013, is withheld in its entirety. • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. Siva P. Lingam, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 20555– 0001; telephone: 301–415–1564, email: Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES I. Introduction The NRC is considering a request to amend the Facility Operating License Nos. DPR–80, DPR–82, and SNM–2511 issued to PG&E, for operation of DCPP, located in San Luis Obispo County, California in accordance with 10 CFR 50.90 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR). Consistent with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC has reviewed the requirements in 10 CFR 51.20(b) and 10 CFR 51.22(c) and determined that an EA is the appropriate form of environmental review. Based on the results of the EA, the NRC is issuing this final FONSI. The requested amendments would permit licensee security personnel to use certain firearms and ammunition feeding devices not previously permitted, notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal firearms laws, or regulations that otherwise prohibit such actions. The NRC published a draft EA and FONSI on the proposed action for public comment in the Federal Register on October 28, 2015 (80 FR 66054). No comments were received. VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:55 Dec 14, 2015 Jkt 238001 II. Environmental Assessment Identification of the Proposed Action The proposed action would permit security personnel at DCPP in the performance of their official duties, to transfer, receive, possess, transport, import, and use certain firearms, and large capacity ammunition feeding devices not previously permitted to be owned or possessed, notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal firearms laws, or regulations, that otherwise prohibit such actions. The proposed action is in accordance with the PG&E’s application dated September 24, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13268A398), as supplemented by letters dated December 18, 2013, May 15, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14135A379), and March 26, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15085A572). The Need for the Proposed Action The proposed action would allow the transfer, receipt, possession, transportation, importation and use of those firearms and devices needed in the performance of official duties required for the protection of an NRC designated facility and associated special nuclear materials, consistent with the NRC approved security plan. Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action and concludes that the proposed action would only allow the use of those firearms and devices necessary to protect DCPP and associated special nuclear material, consistent with the DCPP NRCapproved security plan. Therefore, the proposed action would not significantly increase the probability or consequences of accidents. In addition, the proposed action would not change the types and the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite. There would also be no significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure. Therefore, there would be no significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. The proposed action would not impact land, air, or water resources, including biota. In addition, the proposed action would not result in any socioeconomic or environmental justice impacts or impacts to historic and cultural resources. Therefore, there would also be no significant nonradiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action. Accordingly, the NRC concludes that the issuance of the requested PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 77673 amendment would not result in significant environmental impacts. Details of the NRC’s evaluation will be provided in a letter to the licensee. Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered denying the proposed action (i.e., the ‘‘no-action’’ alternative). Denial of the license amendment request would result in no change in current environmental conditions at the DCPP. Alternative Use of Resources The proposed action would not involve the use of any resources. Agencies and Persons Consulted The staff did not consult with any other Federal Agency or State of California agencies regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action. III. Finding of No Significant Impact The licensee has requested license amendments to permit licensee security personnel in the performance of official duties, to transfer, receive, possess, transport, import, and use certain firearms, and large capacity ammunition feeding devices not previously permitted to be owned or possessed notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal firearms laws, including regulations that would otherwise prohibit such actions. On the basis of the information presented in this environmental assessment, the NRC concludes that the proposed action would not cause any significant environmental impact and would not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. In addition, the NRC has determined that an environmental impact statement is not necessary for the evaluation of this proposed action. Other than the licensee’s application dated September 24, 2013, there are no other environmental documents associated with this review. These documents are available for public inspection as indicated above. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8 day of December 2015. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Robert J. Pascarelli, Chief, Plant Licensing Branch IV–1, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 2015–31529 Filed 12–14–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM 15DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 240 (Tuesday, December 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77672-77673]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31529]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 50-275, 50-323, and 72-26; NRC-2015-0244]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Diablo Canyon Power Plant, 
Units 1 and 2, and Diablo Canyon Independent Spent Fuel Storage 
Installation

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Finding of no significant impact with associated environmental 
assessment; final issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an 
environmental assessment (EA) and finding of no significant impact 
(FONSI) related to a request to amend the Facility Operating License 
Nos. DPR-80, DPR-82, and SNM-2511 issued to Pacific Gas and Electric 
Company (PG&E), for operation of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, Units 1 
and 2, including the specific-license Independent Spent Fuel Storage 
Installation (hereinafter DCPP or the facility), located in San Luis 
Obispo County, California. The requested amendments would permit 
licensee security personnel to use certain firearms and ammunition 
feeding devices not previously permitted, notwithstanding State, local, 
and certain Federal firearms laws or regulations that otherwise 
prohibit such actions.

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2015-0244 when contacting the 
NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You 
may obtain publicly-available information related to this document 
using any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2015-0244. Address 
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-
3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact 
the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this document.
     NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System 
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the 
ADAMS Public Documents collection at

[[Page 77673]]

https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select 
``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS 
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public 
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or 
by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each 
document referenced (if that document is available in ADAMS) is 
provided the first time that a document is referenced. The application 
for amendments, dated September 24, 2013, and letter dated December 18, 
2013, contain sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information (SUNSI) 
and are being withheld from public disclosure. A redacted version of 
the application for amendments, dated September 24, 2013, is available 
in ADAMS under Accession No. ML13268A398. The supplement dated December 
18, 2013, is withheld in its entirety.
     NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public 
documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Siva P. Lingam, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC 
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-1564, email: Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Introduction

    The NRC is considering a request to amend the Facility Operating 
License Nos. DPR-80, DPR-82, and SNM-2511 issued to PG&E, for operation 
of DCPP, located in San Luis Obispo County, California in accordance 
with 10 CFR 50.90 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 
CFR). Consistent with 10 CFR 51.21, the NRC has reviewed the 
requirements in 10 CFR 51.20(b) and 10 CFR 51.22(c) and determined that 
an EA is the appropriate form of environmental review. Based on the 
results of the EA, the NRC is issuing this final FONSI. The requested 
amendments would permit licensee security personnel to use certain 
firearms and ammunition feeding devices not previously permitted, 
notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal firearms laws, or 
regulations that otherwise prohibit such actions. The NRC published a 
draft EA and FONSI on the proposed action for public comment in the 
Federal Register on October 28, 2015 (80 FR 66054). No comments were 
received.

II. Environmental Assessment

Identification of the Proposed Action

    The proposed action would permit security personnel at DCPP in the 
performance of their official duties, to transfer, receive, possess, 
transport, import, and use certain firearms, and large capacity 
ammunition feeding devices not previously permitted to be owned or 
possessed, notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal firearms 
laws, or regulations, that otherwise prohibit such actions.
    The proposed action is in accordance with the PG&E's application 
dated September 24, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13268A398), as 
supplemented by letters dated December 18, 2013, May 15, 2014 (ADAMS 
Accession No. ML14135A379), and March 26, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. 
ML15085A572).

The Need for the Proposed Action

    The proposed action would allow the transfer, receipt, possession, 
transportation, importation and use of those firearms and devices 
needed in the performance of official duties required for the 
protection of an NRC designated facility and associated special nuclear 
materials, consistent with the NRC approved security plan.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action

    The NRC has completed its evaluation of the proposed action and 
concludes that the proposed action would only allow the use of those 
firearms and devices necessary to protect DCPP and associated special 
nuclear material, consistent with the DCPP NRC-approved security plan. 
Therefore, the proposed action would not significantly increase the 
probability or consequences of accidents. In addition, the proposed 
action would not change the types and the amounts of any effluents that 
may be released offsite. There would also be no significant increase in 
occupational or public radiation exposure. Therefore, there would be no 
significant radiological environmental impacts associated with the 
proposed action.
    The proposed action would not impact land, air, or water resources, 
including biota. In addition, the proposed action would not result in 
any socioeconomic or environmental justice impacts or impacts to 
historic and cultural resources. Therefore, there would also be no 
significant non-radiological environmental impacts associated with the 
proposed action.
    Accordingly, the NRC concludes that the issuance of the requested 
amendment would not result in significant environmental impacts.
    Details of the NRC's evaluation will be provided in a letter to the 
licensee.

Environmental Impacts of the Alternatives to the Proposed Action

    As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered 
denying the proposed action (i.e., the ``no-action'' alternative). 
Denial of the license amendment request would result in no change in 
current environmental conditions at the DCPP.

Alternative Use of Resources

    The proposed action would not involve the use of any resources.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

    The staff did not consult with any other Federal Agency or State of 
California agencies regarding the environmental impact of the proposed 
action.

III. Finding of No Significant Impact

    The licensee has requested license amendments to permit licensee 
security personnel in the performance of official duties, to transfer, 
receive, possess, transport, import, and use certain firearms, and 
large capacity ammunition feeding devices not previously permitted to 
be owned or possessed notwithstanding State, local, and certain Federal 
firearms laws, including regulations that would otherwise prohibit such 
actions.
    On the basis of the information presented in this environmental 
assessment, the NRC concludes that the proposed action would not cause 
any significant environmental impact and would not have a significant 
effect on the quality of the human environment. In addition, the NRC 
has determined that an environmental impact statement is not necessary 
for the evaluation of this proposed action.
    Other than the licensee's application dated September 24, 2013, 
there are no other environmental documents associated with this review. 
These documents are available for public inspection as indicated above.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8 day of December 2015.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Robert J. Pascarelli,
Chief, Plant Licensing Branch IV-1, Division of Operating Reactor 
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2015-31529 Filed 12-14-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.