Proposed Scope of NTIA's Authority Regarding FirstNet Fees, 77592-77598 [2015-31516]
Download as PDF
77592
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
EPA has already completed the first
round of allocations of 2015 NUSA
allowances for all four CSAPR trading
programs, as well as the second round
of 2015 NUSA allocations to units
subject to the CSAPR Ozone Season
Trading Program, as announced in
notices previously published in the
Federal Register.3 The first and secondround NUSA allocation process was
discussed in those previous notices.
This notice of availability concerns the
second round of NUSA allowance
allocations for the CSAPR NOX Annual,
SO2 Group 1, and SO2 Group 2 Trading
Programs for the 2015 control period.4
The units eligible to receive secondround NUSA allocations for the CSAPR
NOX Annual, SO2 Group 1, and SO2
Group 2 Trading Programs are defined
in §§ 97.411(b)(1)(iii) and 97.412(a)(9)(i),
97.611(b)(1)(iii) and 97.612(a)(9)(i), and
97.711(b)(1)(iii) and 97.712(a)(9)(i),
respectively. Generally, eligible units
include any CSAPR-affected unit that
commenced commercial operation
between January 1 of the year before the
control period in question and
November 30 of the year of the control
period in question. In the case of the
2015 control period, an eligible unit
therefore must have commenced
commercial operation between January
1, 2014 and November 30, 2015
(inclusive).
The total quantity of allowances to be
allocated through the 2015 NUSA
allowance allocation process for each
state and emissions trading program—in
the two rounds of the allocation process
combined—is generally the state’s 2015
emissions budget less the sum of (1) the
total of the 2015 CSAPR FIP allowance
allocations to existing units and (2) the
amount of the 2015 Indian country
NUSA, if any.5 The amounts of CSAPR
NOX Annual, SO2 Group 1, and SO2
Group 2 NUSA allowances may be
increased in certain circumstances as set
forth in §§ 97.412(a)(2), 97.612(a)(2),
and 97.712(a)(2), respectively.
Second-round NUSA allocations for a
given state, trading program, and control
period are made only if the NUSA
contains allowances after completion of
the first-round allocations.
The amounts of second-round
allocations of CSAPR NOX Annual, SO2
3 80 FR 30988 (June 1, 2015); 80 FR 44882 (July
28, 2015); 80 FR 55061 (September 14, 2015); 80 FR
69883 (November 12, 2015).
4 At this time, EPA is not aware of any unit
eligible for a second-round allocation from any
Indian country NUSA.
5 The quantities of allowances to be allocated
through the NUSA allowance allocation process
may differ slightly from the NUSA amounts set
forth in §§ 97.410(a), 97.510(a), 97.610(a), and
97.710(a) because of rounding in the spreadsheet of
CSAPR FIP allowance allocations to existing units.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:48 Dec 14, 2015
Jkt 238001
Group 1, and SO2 Group 2 allowances
to eligible new units from each NUSA
are calculated according to the
procedures set forth in §§ 97.412(a)(9),
(10) and (12), 97.612(a)(9), (10), and
(12), and 97.712(a)(9), (10), and (12),
respectively. Generally, the procedures
call for each eligible unit to receive a
second-round 2015 NUSA allocation
equal to the positive difference, if any,
between its emissions during the 2015
annual control periods (i.e., January 1,
2015 through December 31, 2015) as
reported under 40 CFR part 75 and any
first-round allocation the unit received,
unless the total of such allocations to all
eligible units would exceed the amount
of allowances in the NUSA, in which
case the allocations are reduced on a
pro-rata basis.
Any allowances remaining in the
CSAPR NOX Annual, SO2 Group 1, or
SO2 Group 2 NUSA for a given state and
control period after the second round of
NUSA allocations to new units will be
allocated to the existing units in the
state according to the procedures set
forth in §§ 97.412(a)(10) and (12),
97.612(a)(10) and (12), and 97.712(a)(10)
and (12), respectively.
EPA notes that an allocation or lack
of allocation of allowances to a given
EGU does not constitute a determination
that CSAPR does or does not apply to
the EGU. EPA also notes that allocations
are subject to potential correction if a
unit to which NUSA allowances have
been allocated for a given control period
is not actually an affected unit as of the
start of that control period.6
The preliminary lists of units eligible
for second-round 2015 NUSA allowance
allocations for the three CSAPR annual
trading programs are set forth in Excel
spreadsheets titled ‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_
2015_NOx_Annual_2nd_Round_
Prelim_Data,’’ ‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_2015_
SO2_Group_1_2nd_Round_Prelim_
Data,’’ and ‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_2015_SO2_
Group_2_2nd_Round_Prelim_Data’’
available on EPA’s Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/crossstaterule/
actions.html. Each spreadsheet contains
a separate worksheet for each state
covered by that program showing each
unit preliminarily identified as eligible
for a second-round NUSA allocation.
Each state worksheet also contains a
summary showing (1) the quantity of
allowances initially available in that
state’s 2015 NUSA, (2) the sum of the
2015 NUSA allowance allocations that
were made in the first-round to new
units in that state (if any), and (3) the
quantity of allowances in the 2015
NUSA available for distribution in
second-round allocations to new units
6 See
PO 00000
40 CFR 97.411(c), 97.611(c), and 97.711(c).
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(or ultimately for allocation to existing
units).
Objections should be strictly limited
to whether EPA has correctly identified
the new units eligible for second-round
2015 NUSA allocations of CSAPR NOX
Annual, SO2 Group 1, and SO2 Group 2
allowances according to the criteria
described above and should be emailed
to the address identified in ADDRESSES.
Objections must include: (1) Precise
identification of the specific data the
commenter believes are inaccurate, (2)
new proposed data upon which the
commenter believes EPA should rely
instead, and (3) the reasons why EPA
should rely on the commenter’s
proposed data and not the data
referenced in this notice of availability.
Authority: 40 CFR 97.411(b), 97.611(b),
and 97.711(b).
Dated: December 7, 2015.
Reid P. Harvey,
Director, Clean Air Markets Division, Office
of Atmospheric Programs, Office of Air and
Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2015–31461 Filed 12–14–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration
47 CFR Chapter V
[Docket Number: 151209999–5999–01]
RIN 0660–AA30
Proposed Scope of NTIA’s Authority
Regarding FirstNet Fees
National Telecommunications
and Information Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA) publishes this
notice of proposed rulemaking to
request public comment as it develops
rules related to its review and approval
of fees imposed by the First Responder
Network Authority (FirstNet) as
authorized by the Middle Class Tax
Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (the
Act).
DATES: Submit comments on or before
January 14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The public is invited to
submit written comments to this
proposed rule. Written comments may
be submitted electronically through
www.regulations.gov or by mail (to
Office of Public Safety Communications;
National Telecommunications and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15DEP1.SGM
15DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Proposed Rules
Information Administration; U.S.
Department of Commerce; 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230.). Comments received related
to this proposed rule will be made a part
of the public record and will be posted
to www.regulations.gov without change.
Comments should be machine readable
and should not be copy-protected.
Comments should include the name of
the person or organization filing the
comment as well as a page number on
each page of the submission. All
personally identifiable information (e.g.,
name, address) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit confidential
business information or otherwise
sensitive or protected information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patrick Sullivan; Office of Public Safety
Communications; National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration; U.S. Department of
Commerce; 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230;
psullivan@ntia.doc.gov; (202) 482–5948.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Introduction, Summary of Proposed Rules
II. Background: Relevant Statutory Provisions
A. FirstNet-Assessed Fees Must Ensure
Self-Funding and be Approved by NTIA.
B. FirstNet’s Finances are Subject to
Broader, Independent Review.
III. NTIA’s Annual Fee Review Focuses on
Whether FirstNet Fees and Other
Income, In Aggregate, Are Sufficient, and
Do Not Exceed the Amount Necessary, to
Recoup FirstNet’s Total Expense
A. Standard of NTIA Fee Review and
Approval.
B. NTIA’s Fee Review and Approval
Process Does Not Assess the
Reasonableness of a Proposed Fee.
IV. Methodology of NTIA Fee Review and
Approval Process
A. Focus of NTIA Fee Review
Methodology.
B. NTIA’s Fee Review and Approval
Process Defers to FirstNet on Necessary
Reserves.
V. FirstNet-Proposed Fees Subject to NTIA
Review Under Section 6208 Must be
Addressed Upon NTIA Disapproval
A. Fees Subject to NTIA Review and
FirstNet Reconsideration Upon NTIA
Disapproval.
B. Income Other Than Fees is Not Subject
to NTIA Fee Review.
VI. Ex Parte Communication
I. Introduction, Summary of Proposed
Rules
The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job
Creation Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112–96,
Title VI, 126 Stat. 256 (codified at 47
U.S.C. 1401 et seq.)) (Act) established
the First Responder Network Authority
(FirstNet) as an independent authority
within the National
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:48 Dec 14, 2015
Jkt 238001
Telecommunications and Information
Administration (NTIA).1 Congress
mandated FirstNet ensure the building,
deployment, and operation of an
interoperable nationwide public safety
broadband network (Network).2 In order
to meet this critical directive and
provide affordable, reliable, and
sustainable broadband services for first
responders across the United States,
FirstNet must operate as a business
enterprise. Today, public safety entities
procure broadband services from
numerous commercial service
providers. When it enters the market,
FirstNet will start with no market share
and will have to compete for customers
by distinguishing its product in terms of
features, price, and reliability from
products offered by commercial
providers. To be successful, FirstNet
will need to employ business strategies
with flexibility and agility
commonplace in the private sector.
This document proposes rules that
will enable NTIA to execute its duty to
review specific fees proposed by
FirstNet in a manner compatible with
FirstNet’s need to operate as a business
in a competitive marketplace. NTIA
proposes to execute its statutory fee
review duties to afford FirstNet as much
flexibility as possible to establish its
business and budgetary goals and to
adjust those goals as necessary to
respond to the day-to-day realities of the
broader competitive marketplace in
which FirstNet must operate.
Ultimately, NTIA intends to implement
a fee review process that allows FirstNet
to respond to changing market
conditions and the demands of its vital
and dynamic customer base: First
responders.
The Act requires FirstNet to be
permanently self-funding and
authorizes it to assess and collect
certain types of fees to assure its
sustainability. The Act requires that the
total amount of FirstNet’s annual fees
must be sufficient to recoup FirstNet’s
total expenses, but such fees must not
exceed the amount necessary to carry
out its duties under the Act.3 As part of
FirstNet’s self-funding obligations, the
Act directs NTIA to review these fees on
an annual basis; they may only be
assessed if approved by NTIA.4
This notice of proposed rulemaking
describes NTIA’s overarching scope,
boundaries, and guidelines for NTIA’s
fee review and approval process as
1 See
47 U.S.C. 1424(a).
47 U.S.C. 1426(b)(1) (stating FirstNet shall
‘‘. . . take all actions necessary to ensure the
building, deployment, and operation of the
nationwide public safety broadband network . . .’’).
3 See 47 U.S.C. 1428(b).
4 See 47 U.S.C. 1428(c).
2 See
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77593
required by law. Section II of this notice
of proposed rulemaking details relevant
statutory provisions and makes clear
that, while NTIA has a distinct role
through the fee review and approval
process to ensure that FirstNet is selffunded, NTIA’s role is a relatively
limited part of broader statutory
provisions designed to monitor
FirstNet’s financial condition and
operational status.
Section III defines the scope of NTIA’s
proposed fee review and approval
process. NTIA has determined that this
process is for a particular and limited
purpose: it must examine only whether
the proposed fees of another federal
entity—FirstNet—as set forth under
Section 6208 of the Act, are, in aggregate
and in combination with any FirstNet
non-fee-based income, sufficient, but
not in excess of, the projected funds that
FirstNet needs to recoup the total
expenses required to carry out its
statutory obligations in a given year.
NTIA acknowledges that, as authorized
by the Act, FirstNet might receive
income which is separate and distinct
from the fee categories defined in
Section 6208. NTIA recognizes that such
income will impact NTIA’s
determination whether FirstNet’s
proposed fees, in aggregate and in
combination with such non-fee-based
income, will meet but not exceed the
funds it needs on an annual basis.
However, NTIA proposes that the Act
affords NTIA no authority to review or
approve as a ‘‘fee’’ any other form of
income FirstNet may receive beyond
those fees listed in Section 6208(a).
In Section IV, NTIA proposes a
methodology for its fee review that must
by law occur annually and prior to
FirstNet’s assessment of fees. Because
NTIA’s fee review process is for
particular and limited purposes
focusing on the financial sustainability
of another federal entity within the
Department of Commerce, NTIA will
include in its review a review of
FirstNet’s projected expenses as set
forth in its approved budgets as well as
a review of FirstNet’s prior-year actual
expenses and revenues to facilitate
FirstNet’s compliance with Section
6208(b). To that end, NTIA proposes to
utilize FirstNet’s regular budget process
and financial statements. NTIA also
proposes to defer to FirstNet on any
need for reserves, working capital, or
similar fund categories. NTIA, however,
will take such fund categories into
consideration as part of its
determination of whether the total
proposed fees under Section 6208(b)
meet, but do not exceed, FirstNet’s total
expenses.
E:\FR\FM\15DEP1.SGM
15DEP1
77594
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Proposed Rules
In Section V, NTIA discusses the fees
that NTIA has specific jurisdiction to
review; if, in its review of aggregate
revenues and costs, it determines that
FirstNet has not satisfied the legal
standard, FirstNet must adjust its fees or
otherwise make budgetary changes to
ensure that the standard is met.
Specifically, NTIA proposes to define
the term ‘‘fee,’’ for purposes of its
statutory obligations under Section
6208(c) of the Act, to mean FirstNet’s
direct collection of money that is
generated from the three categories
established in Section 6208(a) of the
Act: (1) Network user fees; (2) lease fees
pursuant to a covered leasing agreement
(CLA); and (3) fees from entities seeking
access to or use of any network
equipment or infrastructure constructed
or otherwise owned by FirstNet.5 Under
this proposed rule, NTIA can direct
FirstNet to address only those proposed
fees that fall into one of these three
categories. Further, NTIA proposes that
it will not evaluate the reasonableness,
or similar subjective attributes, of the
specific fees assessed by FirstNet or its
prospective partner or partners as
contemplated in the Act. Specific NTIA
rules are proposed in new 47 CFR
Chapter V; Subchapter A will be
utilized for NTIA rules that relate to
FirstNet, and Subchapter B will be
reserved for rules promulgated by
FirstNet itself.
We seek comment on these
preliminary proposals. We also look
forward to FirstNet’s progress in its
procurement process, which may
provide additional information relevant
to NTIA’s duties under Section 6208(c).
With such information from
stakeholders and FirstNet, NTIA will be
better informed to solidify the scope of
its fee review and approval process as
appropriate.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Background: Relevant Statutory
Provisions
A. FirstNet-Assessed Fees Must Ensure
Self-Funding and Be Approved by NTIA
The Act established FirstNet as an
independent authority within NTIA.6
The Act authorizes FirstNet to take all
actions necessary to ensure the building,
deployment, and operation of the
Network.7 To achieve this significant
and unprecedented task, FirstNet must
operate in many respects as a private
sector business enterprise.8
5 See
47 U.S.C. 1428(a).
47 U.S.C. 1424(a).
7 See 47 U.S.C. 1426(b).
8 To that end, the Act set forth several key
provisions establishing FirstNet as a business
enterprise. For example, the Act requires the
creation of the FirstNet Board, which has the
6 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:48 Dec 14, 2015
Jkt 238001
FirstNet’s authority to operate as a
business can and should further its
ability to meet the Act’s mandate that it
become a self-sustaining enterprise.
Section 6208 of the Act makes clear that
FirstNet must establish permanent selffunding and is authorized to collect fees
for specified uses of the Network or its
components in furtherance of that
obligation.
The Act established specific
parameters for FirstNet’s fee
assessments described in Section
6208(a) to drive sustainability and
continual reinvestment of FirstNet
revenues into the Network. Section
6208(b), entitled, ‘‘Establishment of Fee
Amounts; Permanent Self-Funding,’’
requires that the total amount of the fees
assessed under Section 6208(c) for each
fiscal year shall be sufficient, but cannot
exceed, the amount necessary to recoup
the total expenses of FirstNet as it
carries out its duties under the Act.9
Moreover, FirstNet must reinvest
amounts received from the assessment
of fees under Section 6208 for
constructing, maintaining, operating, or
improving the Network.10 Specific to
FirstNet’s authority to assess and collect
these fees, Section 6208(c) requires that
NTIA review such fees ‘‘on an annual
basis, and such fees may only be
assessed if approved by . . . NTIA.’’ 11
Additionally, the Act makes clear that
FirstNet should consider public-private
partnerships, affording it additional
authority to creatively support the
provision of a self-funded broadband
network for use by public safety
entities.12 Such partnerships might
fiduciary and operational functions assigned to
boards of corporations. See 47 U.S.C. 1424(b).
Furthermore, Board members appointed by the
Secretary of Commerce must include individuals
with various types of business experience,
including expertise in building, deploying, and
operating commercial telecommunications
networks, and in financing and funding
telecommunications networks. See id. FirstNet may
only act as authorized by the Board to execute any
powers granted by the Act to FirstNet, spend funds,
or take other actions deemed necessary,
appropriate, or advisable to accomplish the
purposes of the Act. See 47 U.S.C. 1426(a)(1); see
also 47 U.S.C. 1426(a)(5). As a business enterprise,
FirstNet may contract with individuals; private
companies; organizations; institutions; and Federal,
State, regional, and local agencies. See 47 U.S.C.
1426(a)(3). The Act allows FirstNet to engage in
other business activities, including selecting agents,
consultants, or experts and hiring a program
manager to carry out key aspects of deploying the
NPSBN. See 47 U.S.C. 1425(b).
9 See 47 U.S.C. 1428(b).
10 See 47 U.S.C. 1428(d).
11 47 U.S.C. 1428(c).
12 See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. 1428(a) (describing publicprivate arrangements to construct, manage, and
operate the nationwide public safety broadband
network between FirstNet and a secondary user);
see also 47 U.S.C. 1426(b)(3) (requiring that FirstNet
requests for proposals, to the maximum extent
economically feasible, ‘‘include partnerships with
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
result in FirstNet’s collection of income
that does not fall within the fees
specified in Section 6208(a).13
B. FirstNet’s Finances are Subject to
Broader, Independent Review
NTIA’s approach in this proposed
rule reflects the scope of its fees review
authority in the context of other
supervision of FirstNet’s finances and
operations, which taken together, ensure
a high degree of oversight over
FirstNet’s finances under the Act. The
Act sets forth multiple methods of
oversight of FirstNet well beyond the
limited review and approval of fees
required of NTIA under Section 6208(c).
For example, FirstNet is subject to an
independent financial audit. Section
6209 of the Act requires that the
Secretary of Commerce engage an
independent auditor to conduct an
annual audit of all of FirstNet’s
commercial corporate transactions
which the auditor will submit to
Congress, the President, and FirstNet.14
In addition, the Act requires an annual,
‘‘comprehensive and detailed report of
the operations, activities, financial
condition, and accomplishments of
[FirstNet],’’ to be submitted to Congress
along with ‘‘recommendations or
proposals for legislative or
administrative action as [FirstNet]
deems appropriate.’’ 15 Furthermore,
FirstNet must comply on a day-to-day
basis with all other applicable federal
financial laws and regulations. In light
of these broader oversight provisions,
NTIA’s narrow scoping of its fee review
authority is appropriate.
III. NTIA’s Annual Fee Review Focuses
on Whether FirstNet Fees and Other
Income, in Aggregate, Are Sufficient,
and Do Not Exceed the Amount
Necessary, To Recoup FirstNet’s Total
Expenses
A. Standard of NTIA Fee Review and
Approval
The Act does not provide a specific
standard of review for NTIA’s annual
fee review and approval process under
Section 6208(c).16 However,
examination of other provisions in
Section 6208 and the Act at large inform
NTIA’s proposed approach to FirstNet
existing commercial mobile providers to utilize
cost- effective opportunities to speed deployment in
rural areas’’).
13 See, e.g., § 1426(a)(3) (referencing ‘‘grants and
funds from . . . individuals, private companies,
organizations, institutions, and Federal, State,
regional, and local agencies’’); § 1426(a)(4)
(referencing ‘‘gifts, donations, and bequests of
property, both real and personal’’).
14 See 47 U.S.C. 1429.
15 47 U.S.C. 1430.
16 See 47 U.S.C. 1428(c).
E:\FR\FM\15DEP1.SGM
15DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Proposed Rules
fee review. FirstNet has a duty under
Section 6208(b) to ensure that, during a
given fiscal year, the fees it assesses are
sufficient, and shall not exceed the
amount necessary, to recoup the ‘‘total
expenses’’ associated with carrying out
its duties as specified under the Act.17
Given this overarching directive in
Section 6208(b), which immediately
precedes the Act’s assignation of fee
review to NTIA in Section 6208(c),
NTIA proposes that the Act’s purpose
for the fee review is solely to support
FirstNet’s obligation under Section
6208(b) to be self-funding. Thus, NTIA
intends to base its decisions on
FirstNet’s proposed fees by only
examining whether the fees are, in
aggregate and combined with other nonfee-based income, sufficient, but not in
excess, of the projected funds FirstNet
needs to carry out its statutory
obligations in a given fiscal year. In this
way, NTIA’s review and approval of
FirstNet-proposed fees under Section
6208 will exclusively focus on
FirstNet’s projected income and
expenses to further the self-funding
requirements and limitations of Section
6208(b). We seek comment on this
proposed approach.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
B. NTIA’s Fee Review and Approval
Process Does Not Assess the
Reasonableness of a Proposed Fee
The scope of review of a fee is
established by the statute.18 As a result,
we propose that NTIA’s fee review is
scoped to self-sustainability and does
not include review of the
reasonableness of any fee assessed by
FirstNet or its prospective partner or
partners as contemplated in the Act.
The wording of the Act itself does not
direct NTIA to perform a reasonableness
review. Section 6208(b), entitled,
‘‘Establishment Of Fee Amounts;
Permanent Self-Funding,’’ requires that
the total amount of the fees assessed by
FirstNet for each fiscal year must be
sufficient, but cannot exceed, the
amount necessary to recoup the total
expenses of FirstNet as it carries out its
duties under the Act.19 NTIA’s mandate
to review and approve FirstNet fees
directly follows this fee structure
requirement in Section 6208(c).20 The
Act provides no other direction
regarding fee review, but the structure of
the statute clearly indicates
congressional intent to ensure that the
17 See
47 U.S.C. 1428(b).
Principles of Federal Appropriations Law,
Volume III, Third Edition, GAO, pp 12–140–12–
181. GAO 08–978 SP (Washington, DC, September
2008).
19 See 47 U.S.C. 1428(b).
20 See 47 U.S.C. 1428(c).
18 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:48 Dec 14, 2015
Jkt 238001
assessed fees drive a self-funded
network.
A review of other provisions of Title
47 demonstrates that when Congress
intends for rates to be subject to a
review for ‘‘reasonableness’’ or other
subjective standards, it states this
intention explicitly. For example,
Section 201 of the Communications Act
directs the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) to determine
whether the charges of
telecommunications carriers are ‘‘just
and reasonable.’’ 21 Similarly, Section
224 of the Communications Act directs
the FCC to regulate the rates, terms, and
conditions of pole attachments to ensure
they are ‘‘just and reasonable.’’ 22 Here,
with respect to FirstNet’s assessment of
fees under Section 6208, and NTIA’s
review and approval of such fees, the
Act established no such ‘‘just and
reasonable’’ standard.
Moreover, a reasonableness review of
FirstNet fees is unnecessary as a matter
of policy. The Act does not mandate or
require any public safety entity to
purchase services from FirstNet.
FirstNet must compete for subscribers
by offering a compelling value
proposition to prospective public safety
customers. Public safety users
themselves will determine whether
FirstNet’s proposed user fees are
reasonable in comparison to the fees
they are offered by competing providers.
Thus, NTIA proposes that it will not
assess whether individual or total fees
in any given category described in
Section 6208(a) are reasonable,
proportionate, or otherwise subjectively
appropriate in light of individual or
total fees in that category, or any other
category of fees listed in Section
6208(a). With the proposed scope of its
fee review, NTIA meets the intent of the
self-funding provisions, but does not
import ‘‘just and reasonable’’ review
parameters that Congress clearly could
have, but did not, include in the statute.
We seek comment on these preliminary
proposals.
21 See 47 U.S.C 201 (stating that, for common
carrier services, ‘‘[a]ll charges . . . for and in
connection with such communication service, shall
be just and reasonable, and any such charge,
practice, classification, or regulation that is unjust
or unreasonable is hereby declared to be
unlawful.’’).
22 See 47 U.S.C 224 (b)(1) (stating that ‘‘the
Commission shall regulate the rates, terms, and
conditions for pole attachments to provide that
such rates, terms, and conditions are just and
reasonable, and shall adopt procedures necessary
and appropriate to hear and resolve complaints
concerning such rates, terms, and conditions.’’)
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77595
IV. Methodology of NTIA Fee Review
and Approval Process
A. Focus of NTIA Fee Review
Methodology
Based on the preliminary conclusions
above, NTIA proposes to base its
approval of fees upon a determination of
whether the proposed fees, in aggregate,
when combined with any projected nonfee-based income that FirstNet receives,
meet but do not exceed FirstNet’s
anticipated total expenses associated
with carrying out its duties as specified
under the Act in a given year. As
required by the Act, NTIA will conduct
its fee review and approval process on
an annual basis. Further, NTIA’s
proposed fee review and approval
process will occur before a fee is
assessed as required by the Act, and
NTIA expects that FirstNet will propose
such fees to NTIA in writing. Because
FirstNet must compete in a broader
marketplace for the opportunity to
provide broadband service to public
safety entities, it will need the flexibility
over the course of a fiscal year to adjust
specific fees it wishes to assess pursuant
to Section 6208(a).
Thus, to empower FirstNet with the
flexibility needed to compete in the
marketplace, NTIA proposes that, as
part of its annual fee review, it will also
review FirstNet’s actual fees and
expenses from the previous four fiscal
quarters. This process will afford
FirstNet the opportunity to describe any
significant discrepancies between
projected and actual expenses and
revenue of that previous fiscal year and
detail how its projected fees and
revenues for the upcoming fiscal year
have addressed these discrepancies. In
doing so, FirstNet will have an
opportunity on an annual basis to
ensure that its duty under Section
6208(b) is met. To determine FirstNet’s
anticipated expenses, among the
specific costs areas that NTIA may
consider are: (1) Salaries and Benefits;
(2) Travel; (3) Services: Federal Sources;
(4) Services: Non-Federal Sources; (5)
Facilities Rental; (6) Supplies, Materials,
and Printing; (7) Equipment; and (8)
Other expenses or obligations incurred
for future contract award, capital
reserves, or other permitted expenses or
obligations. NTIA anticipates deferring
to FirstNet to determine the
reasonableness of projected obligations
in the aforementioned or other
categories.
Throughout the fee review and
approval process, NTIA anticipates
utilizing the budget documents and
financial statements produced in the
normal course of FirstNet’s business.
NTIA might also utilize FirstNet’s
E:\FR\FM\15DEP1.SGM
15DEP1
77596
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
annual budget reports as approved by
the FirstNet Board and submitted as part
of the President’s Budget and FirstNet’s
mandated annual report to Congress.
Therefore, NTIA proposes that it will
make, on an annual basis, one of three
determinations with regard to proposed
fees: (1) FirstNet’s proposed fees, in
aggregate, when combined with any
projected non-fee-based income to be
received by FirstNet, meet but do not
exceed FirstNet’s projected total
expenses; (2) FirstNet’s proposed fees,
in aggregate, when combined with any
projected non-fee-based income to be
received by FirstNet, do not meet
FirstNet’s projected total expenses; or
(3) FirstNet’s proposed fees, in
aggregate, when combined with any
projected non-fee-based income to be
received by FirstNet, exceed FirstNet’s
projected total expenses. Upon making
any of these determinations, NTIA will
communicate its determination in
writing to FirstNet. Should NTIA make
the second or third determination listed
above, NTIA will not approve FirstNet’s
proposed fees, and FirstNet may not
assess them. NTIA proposes that it will
accept any revised proposed fees or
FirstNet approved revised budgets when
provided by FirstNet in writing and
evaluate them consistent with the scope
and methodology proposed above.
We seek comment on this proposed
approach to NTIA’s fee review and
approval process. We also seek
comment on alternative methodologies
that will further our fee review and
approval process consistent with the
Act’s directives.
B. NTIA’s Fee Review and Approval
Process Defers to FirstNet on Necessary
Reserves
NTIA proposes that it should defer to
FirstNet, in the context of its budgetary
planning process, regarding the use and
retention of reserves or working capital
funds. By doing so, NTIA will not, in its
fee review and approval process, assess
whether or what level of funds FirstNet
should maintain in reserves, capital
accounts, or other funding categories.
FirstNet’s routine budget, auditing, and
accounting processes will presumably
determine the need for such capital
reserve funds. NTIA plans to defer to
FirstNet’s determination of need for
such funds through these processes. We
seek comment on this proposed
approach to NTIA’s fee review and
approval process.
Moreover, NTIA proposes that, in its
fee review and approval process, it will
take into consideration reserve funds at
the levels designated in FirstNet’s
budget, to determine whether FirstNet’s
proposed fees meet but not exceed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Dec 14, 2015
Jkt 238001
FirstNet’s total expenses. In doing so,
NTIA will deem such funds to be a part
of FirstNet’s projected total expenses
under Section 6208(b) of the Act. We
seek comment on this proposal.
V. FirstNet-Proposed Fees Subject to
NTIA Review Under Section 6208 Must
Be Addressed Upon NTIA Disapproval
A. Fees Subject to NTIA Review and
FirstNet Reconsideration Upon NTIA
Disapproval
The Act assigns a clear duty to NTIA
under Section 6208: approve or
disapprove the specific fees FirstNet
aspires to assess under Section 6208.
Under Section 6208(a) of the Act,
FirstNet is authorized to assess and
collect the following fees:
1. A Network User Fee: ‘‘A user or
subscription fee from each entity, including
any public safety entity or secondary user,
that seeks access to or use of the
[Network].’’ 23
2. Fees Pursuant to a Covered Leasing
Agreement: ‘‘A fee from any entity that seeks
to enter into a [CLA].’’ 24
3. Lease Fees Related to Network
Equipment and Infrastructure: ‘‘A fee from
any entity that seeks access to or use of any
equipment or infrastructure, including
antennas or towers, constructed or otherwise
owned by the First Responder Network
Authority resulting from a public-private
arrangement to construct, manage, and
operate the [Network]’’ 25
As a threshold matter for purposes of
this proposed rule and NTIA’s duty
under Section 6208 of the Act, the word
‘‘fee,’’ as used in Section 6208(c) of the
Act, must be defined. By defining the
fees NTIA is to review, NTIA identifies
the specific fees FirstNet must address
prior to NTIA approval in the event
NTIA must disapprove FirstNetapproved fees under the standards set
forth above.
To implement its fee review
obligations under the Act, NTIA must
determine the meaning of the term ‘‘fee’’
as used in Section 6208. In the case of
the Act, the three sets of fees, which
FirstNet may assess, and which NTIA
must review if assessed, are clearly
defined within Section 6208(a). Thus,
NTIA proposes that a ‘‘fee’’ that will be
subject to its review and approval under
23 47
U.S.C. 1428(a)(1).
U.S.C. 1428(a)(2)(A); See also 47 U.S.C.
1428(a)(2)(B) (stating that the Act defines a CLA as
‘‘a written agreement resulting from a public-private
arrangement to construct, manage, and operate the
nationwide public safety broadband network
between the First Responder Network Authority
and secondary user to permit—(i) access to network
capacity on a secondary basis for non-public safety
services; and (ii) the spectrum allocated to such
entity to be used for commercial transmissions
along the dark fiber of the long-haul network of
such entity.’’).
25 47 U.S.C. 1428(a)(3).
24 47
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Section 6208(c) is FirstNet’s collection
of money that falls within the three
categories in Section 6208(a): (1)
Network user fees; (2) lease fees related
to network capacity, pursuant to a
covered leasing agreement; and (3) fees
from entities seeking access to or use of
any equipment or infrastructure
constructed or otherwise owned by
FirstNet.26 Given the clear language in
Section 6208(a) defining the fees that
FirstNet may assess, and the
corresponding language in Section
6208(c) directing NTIA to review fees
‘‘assessed under [Section 6208],’’ NTIA
proposes that its fee review authority,
and FirstNet’s obligation to address fees
upon NTIA disapproval of proposed
fees, is scoped to the three abovereferenced categories. We seek comment
on this preliminary proposal.
B. Income Other Than Fees Is Not
Subject to NTIA Fee Review
As noted above, NTIA recognizes that,
under the Act, FirstNet may receive
income that is separate and distinct
from the fees defined in Section 6208(a).
Such income must be factored into
NTIA’s determination of whether
proposed fees, in aggregate, will meet
but not exceed the funds needed by
FirstNet on an annual basis. However,
as the Act limits NTIA’s review and
approval authority to ‘‘the fees assessed
in [Section 6208],’’ NTIA proposes that
the Act gives it no authority to review
or approve as a ‘‘fee’’ any other form of
income FirstNet might receive. NTIA
proposes that non-fee-based income,
emanating from arrangements allowed
by statute, is not a ‘‘fee’’ under Section
6208(a). Furthermore, NTIA proposes
that it will consider any non-fee income
only as part of its determination of
whether such income, when combined
in aggregate with the fees defined in
Section 6208(a), will be sufficient to
recoup FirstNet’s total expenses, but not
exceed the amount necessary, to carry
out its statutory duties and
responsibilities for the fiscal year
involved. Moreover, NTIA proposes that
it will not analyze the terms and
conditions of any CLA, or any other
agreement between FirstNet and another
entity, beyond those specific terms and
conditions which establish any fees that
meet the three categories described in
Section 6208(a). We seek comment on
these preliminary proposals.
VI. Ex Parte Communications
Any non-public oral presentation to
NTIA regarding the substance of this
proposed rule will be considered an ex
parte presentation, and the substance of
26 See
E:\FR\FM\15DEP1.SGM
47 U.S.C. 1428(a).
15DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Proposed Rules
the meeting will be placed on the public
record and become part of this docket.
No later than two (2) business days after
an oral presentation or meeting, an
interested party must submit a
memorandum to NTIA summarizing the
substance of the communication. NTIA
reserves the right to supplement the
memorandum with additional
information as necessary, or to request
that the party making the filing do so,
if NTIA believes that important
information was omitted or
characterized incorrectly. Any written
presentation provided in support of the
oral communication or meeting will also
be placed on the public record and
become part of this docket. Such ex
parte communications must be
submitted to this docket as provided in
the ADDRESSES section above and clearly
labeled as an ex parte presentation.
Federal entities are not subject to these
procedures.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Classification
This rule has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rulemaking, issued
under the authority of the Act, will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities as
defined under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA). If implemented, this rule
would establish regulations, as required
under the Act, for NTIA and FirstNet
regarding the process by which NTIA
reviews and approves or disapproves
fees FirstNet proposes to assess. The
RFA requires federal agencies to prepare
an analysis of a rule’s impact on small
entities whenever the agency is required
to publish a notice of proposed
rulemaking. However, a federal agency
may certify, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
that the action will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The proposed regulations are for the
particular and limited purpose of NTIA
examining only whether the proposed
fees of another federal entity—
FirstNet—are, in aggregate and in
combination with any FirstNet non-feebased income, sufficient, but not in
excess of, the projected funds that
FirstNet needs to recoup the total
expenses required to carry out its
statutory obligations in a given year. No
external entities, including any small
businesses, small organizations, or small
governments, will experience any direct
economic impacts from this proposed
rule. The only potential effect on any
external entities, large or small, would
likely be positive, as NTIA’s proposed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:48 Dec 14, 2015
Jkt 238001
rules will assist in ensuring that
FirstNet, as required under the Act, will
sustain a nationwide public safety
broadband network that provides
broadband communications to first
responders. Because this action, if
adopted, would directly affect only
federal entities—NTIA and FirstNet—
and not any small entities, the
Department of Commerce has concluded
that the action would not result in a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Thus, the Department of Commerce
Chief Counsel for Regulations has
certified to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this rule will not
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Therefore, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and
has not been prepared.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined that this
document does not contain policies
with Federalism implications as that
term is defined in Executive Order
13132.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 500
FirstNet, FirstNet Fees, Safety,
Telecommunications.
Dated: December 10, 2015.
Lawrence E. Strickling,
Assistant Secretary for Communications and
Information.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration proposes to add 47 CFR
Chapter V to read as follows:
CHAPTER V—THE FIRST RESPONDER
NETWORK AUTHORITY (Parts 500–599)
SUBCHAPTER A—NATIONAL
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND
INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION
REGULATIONS (Parts 500–549)
PART 500—REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF
FEES PROPOSED BY THE FIRST
RESPONDER NETWORK AUTHORITY
(FIRSTNET)
Sec.
500.1 Purpose and scope.
500.2 General definitions.
500.3 NTIA duty to review FirstNet
proposed fees.
500.4 Scope of NTIA review of FirstNet
proposed fees.
500.5 Methodology of NTIA fee review and
approval process.
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 1401.
§ 500.1
Purpose and scope.
Sections 500.2 through 500.5
implement 47 U.S.C. 1428(c) as codified
pursuant to the Middle Class Tax Relief
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
77597
and Job Creation Act of 2012 (Pub. L.
112–96, Title VI, 126 Stat. 256 (codified
at 47 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.) (the ‘‘Act’’),
which requires the National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration to annually review fees
the First Responder Network Authority
(FirstNet) proposes to assess.
§ 500.2
General definitions.
Fee means FirstNet’s receipt of money
from:
(1) A Network User Fee;
(2) Lease Fees Related To Network
Capacity; or
(3) Lease Fees Related To Network
Equipment And Infrastructure, as those
terms are defined under 47 U.S.C.
1428(a).
FirstNet means the First Responder
Network Authority.
Fiscal Year means the 12-month
accounting period for the federal
government, which begins on 1 October
of a given year and ends on 30
September of the subsequent year.
Non-fee-based income received by
FirstNet means FirstNet’s receipt of
money from any source, transaction,
entity, or any other means allowed
under 47 U.S.C. 1401 et seq., other than
those receipts described above in the
definition of ‘‘fee.’’
NTIA means the National
Telecommunications and Information
Administration.
NTIA’s fee review and approval
process means the process by which
NTIA executes its duties under 47
U.S.C. 1428(c).
§ 500.3 NTIA’s duty to review FirstNet
proposed fees.
As required under 47 U.S.C. 1428(c),
NTIA shall exclusively review fees,
which must be proposed by FirstNet in
writing, through NTIA’s review and
approval process conducted on an
annual basis.
§ 500.4 Scope of NTIA review of FirstNet
proposed fees.
NTIA shall approve FirstNet proposed
fees only if such fees, when combined
with any non-fee-based income
projected to be received by FirstNet, are
sufficient, but do not exceed the amount
necessary, to recoup FirstNet’s total
expenses in carrying out its duties and
responsibilities under 47 U.S.C. 1401 et
seq. for the fiscal year involved.
§ 500.5 Methodology of NTIA fee review
and approval process.
(a) Fee review approach. To execute
NTIA’s fee review and approval process,
NTIA shall utilize FirstNet’s standard
financial documentation, which may
include but is not limited to:
E:\FR\FM\15DEP1.SGM
15DEP1
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
77598
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 240 / Tuesday, December 15, 2015 / Proposed Rules
(1) FirstNet’s budget documents
produced in the normal course of its
business;
(2) FirstNet’s financial statements
produced in the normal course of its
business;
(3) FirstNet’s annual budget reports
submitted as part of the President’s
Budget; and
(4) FirstNet’s annual report to
Congress.
(b) Deference to FirstNet on necessary
reserves. In executing NTIA’s fee review
and approval process, NTIA shall defer
to FirstNet with respect to its use and
retention of reserve or working capital
funds. NTIA shall consider any such
designated funds to be a part of
FirstNet’s total expenses in carrying out
its duties and responsibilities under 47
U.S.C. 1401 et seq. for the fiscal year
involved.
(c) Determination of fee review: NTIA
shall make one of the following
determinations annually upon review of
FirstNet’s proposed fees:
(1) FirstNet’s proposed fees, in
aggregate, when combined with any
projected non-fee-based income to be
received by FirstNet, meet but do not
exceed FirstNet’s projected total
expenses;
(2) FirstNet’s proposed fees, in
aggregate, when combined with any
projected non-fee-based income to be
received by FirstNet, do not meet
FirstNet’s projected total expenses; or
(3) FirstNet’s proposed fees, in
aggregate, when combined with any
projected non-fee-based income to be
received by FirstNet, exceed FirstNet’s
projected total expenses. Upon making
any of these determinations, NTIA will
communicate its determination in
writing to FirstNet.
(d) Outcome of determination of fee
review:
(1) Should NTIA make the
determination listed in paragraph (c)(1)
of this section, FirstNet may assess the
proposed fees.
(2) Should NTIA make one of the
determinations listed in paragraph (c)(2)
or (3) of this section, NTIA will
disapprove FirstNet’s proposed fees,
and FirstNet may not assess those
proposed fees.
(e) Revision of Proposed Fees: Upon a
disapproval of FirstNet’s proposed fees
as described in paragraph (d)(2) of this
section, or upon FirstNet’s
determination that it must revise NTIAapproved fees to ensure compliance
with 47 U.S.C. 1428(b), FirstNet shall
prepare a revised written submission to
NTIA, which shall evaluate any
proposed fees therein consistent with
the rules in §§ 500.1–500.5.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:48 Dec 14, 2015
Jkt 238001
(f) Communication of NTIA fee
approval or disapproval. Approval or
disapproval of FirstNet-proposed fees
shall be communicated in writing by the
Assistant Secretary for Communications
and Information and Administrator,
National Telecommunications and
Information Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, to the Chair
of the FirstNet Board.
Subchapter B—[Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2015–31516 Filed 12–14–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R5–ES–2015–0015;
4500030113]
RIN 1018–BA85
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Endangered Species
Status for the Big Sandy Crayfish and
the Guyandotte River Crayfish
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of
comment period.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
reopening of the public comment period
on our April 7, 2015, proposed rule to
list the Big Sandy crayfish (Cambarus
callainus) and the Guyandotte River
crayfish (C. veteranus) as endangered
species under the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended. We are taking
this action to make the results of the
2015 summer surveys available for
public review and comment. The
surveys provide updated information on
the two species’ distribution and
abundance. Comments previously
submitted on the April 7, 2015,
proposed rule need not be resubmitted,
as they will be fully considered in
preparation of the final listing
determination.
SUMMARY:
We will consider comments
received or postmarked on or before
January 14, 2016. Comments submitted
electronically using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES
section, below) must be received by
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing
date.
ADDRESSES: Document availability: You
may obtain copies of the April 7, 2015,
proposed rule and supporting material
on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket No.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FWS–R5–ES–2015–0015. Documents
may also be obtained by mail from the
Northeast Regional Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Written comments: You may submit
written comments by one of the
following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
enter FWS–R5–ES–2015–0015, which is
the docket number for this rulemaking.
Then, in the Search panel on the left
side of the screen, under the Document
Type heading, click on the Proposed
Rules link to locate the document. You
may submit a comment by clicking on
‘‘Comment Now!’’
(2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail
or hand delivery to: Public Comments
Processing, Attn: FWS–R5–ES–2015–
0015, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
MS: BPHC, 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls
Church, VA 22041–3803.
We request that you send comments
only by the methods described above.
We will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see the
Public Comments section, below, for
more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martin Miller, Chief, Endangered
Species, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Northeast Regional Office, 300 Westgate
Center Drive, Hadley, MA 01035;
telephone 413–253–8615; or facsimile
413–253–8482. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In our April 7, 2015, proposed rule
(80 FR 18710), we proposed to list the
Big Sandy crayfish and the Guyandotte
River crayfish as endangered species
primarily due to the threats of landdisturbing activities that increase
erosion and sedimentation, which
degrade the stream habitat required by
both species, and the effects of small
population size. During the 60-day
public comment period on the proposed
rule, we received requests to extend the
comment period beyond the June 8,
2015, closing date. For rulemaking and
financial efficiency, we declined to
extend the comment period at that time
because we were already planning to
reopen the comment period in the fall
of 2015 to make available the results of
rangewide surveys that would be
conducted for each species in the
summer of 2015. The final reports for
the 2015 summer surveys are now
E:\FR\FM\15DEP1.SGM
15DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 240 (Tuesday, December 15, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77592-77598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31516]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Telecommunications and Information Administration
47 CFR Chapter V
[Docket Number: 151209999-5999-01]
RIN 0660-AA30
Proposed Scope of NTIA's Authority Regarding FirstNet Fees
AGENCY: National Telecommunications and Information Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Telecommunications and Information Administration
(NTIA) publishes this notice of proposed rulemaking to request public
comment as it develops rules related to its review and approval of fees
imposed by the First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) as
authorized by the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012
(the Act).
DATES: Submit comments on or before January 14, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The public is invited to submit written comments to this
proposed rule. Written comments may be submitted electronically through
www.regulations.gov or by mail (to Office of Public Safety
Communications; National Telecommunications and
[[Page 77593]]
Information Administration; U.S. Department of Commerce; 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.). Comments received
related to this proposed rule will be made a part of the public record
and will be posted to www.regulations.gov without change. Comments
should be machine readable and should not be copy-protected. Comments
should include the name of the person or organization filing the
comment as well as a page number on each page of the submission. All
personally identifiable information (e.g., name, address) voluntarily
submitted by the commenter may be publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information or otherwise sensitive or protected
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Sullivan; Office of Public
Safety Communications; National Telecommunications and Information
Administration; U.S. Department of Commerce; 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20230; psullivan@ntia.doc.gov; (202) 482-5948.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction, Summary of Proposed Rules
II. Background: Relevant Statutory Provisions
A. FirstNet-Assessed Fees Must Ensure Self-Funding and be
Approved by NTIA.
B. FirstNet's Finances are Subject to Broader, Independent
Review.
III. NTIA's Annual Fee Review Focuses on Whether FirstNet Fees and
Other Income, In Aggregate, Are Sufficient, and Do Not Exceed the
Amount Necessary, to Recoup FirstNet's Total Expense
A. Standard of NTIA Fee Review and Approval.
B. NTIA's Fee Review and Approval Process Does Not Assess the
Reasonableness of a Proposed Fee.
IV. Methodology of NTIA Fee Review and Approval Process
A. Focus of NTIA Fee Review Methodology.
B. NTIA's Fee Review and Approval Process Defers to FirstNet on
Necessary Reserves.
V. FirstNet-Proposed Fees Subject to NTIA Review Under Section 6208
Must be Addressed Upon NTIA Disapproval
A. Fees Subject to NTIA Review and FirstNet Reconsideration Upon
NTIA Disapproval.
B. Income Other Than Fees is Not Subject to NTIA Fee Review.
VI. Ex Parte Communication
I. Introduction, Summary of Proposed Rules
The Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (Pub. L.
112-96, Title VI, 126 Stat. 256 (codified at 47 U.S.C. 1401 et seq.))
(Act) established the First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) as
an independent authority within the National Telecommunications and
Information Administration (NTIA).\1\ Congress mandated FirstNet ensure
the building, deployment, and operation of an interoperable nationwide
public safety broadband network (Network).\2\ In order to meet this
critical directive and provide affordable, reliable, and sustainable
broadband services for first responders across the United States,
FirstNet must operate as a business enterprise. Today, public safety
entities procure broadband services from numerous commercial service
providers. When it enters the market, FirstNet will start with no
market share and will have to compete for customers by distinguishing
its product in terms of features, price, and reliability from products
offered by commercial providers. To be successful, FirstNet will need
to employ business strategies with flexibility and agility commonplace
in the private sector.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 47 U.S.C. 1424(a).
\2\ See 47 U.S.C. 1426(b)(1) (stating FirstNet shall ``. . .
take all actions necessary to ensure the building, deployment, and
operation of the nationwide public safety broadband network . .
.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This document proposes rules that will enable NTIA to execute its
duty to review specific fees proposed by FirstNet in a manner
compatible with FirstNet's need to operate as a business in a
competitive marketplace. NTIA proposes to execute its statutory fee
review duties to afford FirstNet as much flexibility as possible to
establish its business and budgetary goals and to adjust those goals as
necessary to respond to the day-to-day realities of the broader
competitive marketplace in which FirstNet must operate. Ultimately,
NTIA intends to implement a fee review process that allows FirstNet to
respond to changing market conditions and the demands of its vital and
dynamic customer base: First responders.
The Act requires FirstNet to be permanently self-funding and
authorizes it to assess and collect certain types of fees to assure its
sustainability. The Act requires that the total amount of FirstNet's
annual fees must be sufficient to recoup FirstNet's total expenses, but
such fees must not exceed the amount necessary to carry out its duties
under the Act.\3\ As part of FirstNet's self-funding obligations, the
Act directs NTIA to review these fees on an annual basis; they may only
be assessed if approved by NTIA.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See 47 U.S.C. 1428(b).
\4\ See 47 U.S.C. 1428(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice of proposed rulemaking describes NTIA's overarching
scope, boundaries, and guidelines for NTIA's fee review and approval
process as required by law. Section II of this notice of proposed
rulemaking details relevant statutory provisions and makes clear that,
while NTIA has a distinct role through the fee review and approval
process to ensure that FirstNet is self-funded, NTIA's role is a
relatively limited part of broader statutory provisions designed to
monitor FirstNet's financial condition and operational status.
Section III defines the scope of NTIA's proposed fee review and
approval process. NTIA has determined that this process is for a
particular and limited purpose: it must examine only whether the
proposed fees of another federal entity--FirstNet--as set forth under
Section 6208 of the Act, are, in aggregate and in combination with any
FirstNet non-fee-based income, sufficient, but not in excess of, the
projected funds that FirstNet needs to recoup the total expenses
required to carry out its statutory obligations in a given year. NTIA
acknowledges that, as authorized by the Act, FirstNet might receive
income which is separate and distinct from the fee categories defined
in Section 6208. NTIA recognizes that such income will impact NTIA's
determination whether FirstNet's proposed fees, in aggregate and in
combination with such non-fee-based income, will meet but not exceed
the funds it needs on an annual basis. However, NTIA proposes that the
Act affords NTIA no authority to review or approve as a ``fee'' any
other form of income FirstNet may receive beyond those fees listed in
Section 6208(a).
In Section IV, NTIA proposes a methodology for its fee review that
must by law occur annually and prior to FirstNet's assessment of fees.
Because NTIA's fee review process is for particular and limited
purposes focusing on the financial sustainability of another federal
entity within the Department of Commerce, NTIA will include in its
review a review of FirstNet's projected expenses as set forth in its
approved budgets as well as a review of FirstNet's prior-year actual
expenses and revenues to facilitate FirstNet's compliance with Section
6208(b). To that end, NTIA proposes to utilize FirstNet's regular
budget process and financial statements. NTIA also proposes to defer to
FirstNet on any need for reserves, working capital, or similar fund
categories. NTIA, however, will take such fund categories into
consideration as part of its determination of whether the total
proposed fees under Section 6208(b) meet, but do not exceed, FirstNet's
total expenses.
[[Page 77594]]
In Section V, NTIA discusses the fees that NTIA has specific
jurisdiction to review; if, in its review of aggregate revenues and
costs, it determines that FirstNet has not satisfied the legal
standard, FirstNet must adjust its fees or otherwise make budgetary
changes to ensure that the standard is met. Specifically, NTIA proposes
to define the term ``fee,'' for purposes of its statutory obligations
under Section 6208(c) of the Act, to mean FirstNet's direct collection
of money that is generated from the three categories established in
Section 6208(a) of the Act: (1) Network user fees; (2) lease fees
pursuant to a covered leasing agreement (CLA); and (3) fees from
entities seeking access to or use of any network equipment or
infrastructure constructed or otherwise owned by FirstNet.\5\ Under
this proposed rule, NTIA can direct FirstNet to address only those
proposed fees that fall into one of these three categories. Further,
NTIA proposes that it will not evaluate the reasonableness, or similar
subjective attributes, of the specific fees assessed by FirstNet or its
prospective partner or partners as contemplated in the Act. Specific
NTIA rules are proposed in new 47 CFR Chapter V; Subchapter A will be
utilized for NTIA rules that relate to FirstNet, and Subchapter B will
be reserved for rules promulgated by FirstNet itself.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 47 U.S.C. 1428(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We seek comment on these preliminary proposals. We also look
forward to FirstNet's progress in its procurement process, which may
provide additional information relevant to NTIA's duties under Section
6208(c). With such information from stakeholders and FirstNet, NTIA
will be better informed to solidify the scope of its fee review and
approval process as appropriate.
II. Background: Relevant Statutory Provisions
A. FirstNet-Assessed Fees Must Ensure Self-Funding and Be Approved by
NTIA
The Act established FirstNet as an independent authority within
NTIA.\6\ The Act authorizes FirstNet to take all actions necessary to
ensure the building, deployment, and operation of the Network.\7\ To
achieve this significant and unprecedented task, FirstNet must operate
in many respects as a private sector business enterprise.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See 47 U.S.C. 1424(a).
\7\ See 47 U.S.C. 1426(b).
\8\ To that end, the Act set forth several key provisions
establishing FirstNet as a business enterprise. For example, the Act
requires the creation of the FirstNet Board, which has the fiduciary
and operational functions assigned to boards of corporations. See 47
U.S.C. 1424(b). Furthermore, Board members appointed by the
Secretary of Commerce must include individuals with various types of
business experience, including expertise in building, deploying, and
operating commercial telecommunications networks, and in financing
and funding telecommunications networks. See id. FirstNet may only
act as authorized by the Board to execute any powers granted by the
Act to FirstNet, spend funds, or take other actions deemed
necessary, appropriate, or advisable to accomplish the purposes of
the Act. See 47 U.S.C. 1426(a)(1); see also 47 U.S.C. 1426(a)(5). As
a business enterprise, FirstNet may contract with individuals;
private companies; organizations; institutions; and Federal, State,
regional, and local agencies. See 47 U.S.C. 1426(a)(3). The Act
allows FirstNet to engage in other business activities, including
selecting agents, consultants, or experts and hiring a program
manager to carry out key aspects of deploying the NPSBN. See 47
U.S.C. 1425(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FirstNet's authority to operate as a business can and should
further its ability to meet the Act's mandate that it become a self-
sustaining enterprise. Section 6208 of the Act makes clear that
FirstNet must establish permanent self-funding and is authorized to
collect fees for specified uses of the Network or its components in
furtherance of that obligation.
The Act established specific parameters for FirstNet's fee
assessments described in Section 6208(a) to drive sustainability and
continual reinvestment of FirstNet revenues into the Network. Section
6208(b), entitled, ``Establishment of Fee Amounts; Permanent Self-
Funding,'' requires that the total amount of the fees assessed under
Section 6208(c) for each fiscal year shall be sufficient, but cannot
exceed, the amount necessary to recoup the total expenses of FirstNet
as it carries out its duties under the Act.\9\ Moreover, FirstNet must
reinvest amounts received from the assessment of fees under Section
6208 for constructing, maintaining, operating, or improving the
Network.\10\ Specific to FirstNet's authority to assess and collect
these fees, Section 6208(c) requires that NTIA review such fees ``on an
annual basis, and such fees may only be assessed if approved by . . .
NTIA.'' \11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See 47 U.S.C. 1428(b).
\10\ See 47 U.S.C. 1428(d).
\11\ 47 U.S.C. 1428(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the Act makes clear that FirstNet should consider
public-private partnerships, affording it additional authority to
creatively support the provision of a self-funded broadband network for
use by public safety entities.\12\ Such partnerships might result in
FirstNet's collection of income that does not fall within the fees
specified in Section 6208(a).\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See, e.g., 47 U.S.C. 1428(a) (describing public-private
arrangements to construct, manage, and operate the nationwide public
safety broadband network between FirstNet and a secondary user); see
also 47 U.S.C. 1426(b)(3) (requiring that FirstNet requests for
proposals, to the maximum extent economically feasible, ``include
partnerships with existing commercial mobile providers to utilize
cost- effective opportunities to speed deployment in rural areas'').
\13\ See, e.g., Sec. 1426(a)(3) (referencing ``grants and funds
from . . . individuals, private companies, organizations,
institutions, and Federal, State, regional, and local agencies'');
Sec. 1426(a)(4) (referencing ``gifts, donations, and bequests of
property, both real and personal'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. FirstNet's Finances are Subject to Broader, Independent Review
NTIA's approach in this proposed rule reflects the scope of its
fees review authority in the context of other supervision of FirstNet's
finances and operations, which taken together, ensure a high degree of
oversight over FirstNet's finances under the Act. The Act sets forth
multiple methods of oversight of FirstNet well beyond the limited
review and approval of fees required of NTIA under Section 6208(c). For
example, FirstNet is subject to an independent financial audit. Section
6209 of the Act requires that the Secretary of Commerce engage an
independent auditor to conduct an annual audit of all of FirstNet's
commercial corporate transactions which the auditor will submit to
Congress, the President, and FirstNet.\14\ In addition, the Act
requires an annual, ``comprehensive and detailed report of the
operations, activities, financial condition, and accomplishments of
[FirstNet],'' to be submitted to Congress along with ``recommendations
or proposals for legislative or administrative action as [FirstNet]
deems appropriate.'' \15\ Furthermore, FirstNet must comply on a day-
to-day basis with all other applicable federal financial laws and
regulations. In light of these broader oversight provisions, NTIA's
narrow scoping of its fee review authority is appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See 47 U.S.C. 1429.
\15\ 47 U.S.C. 1430.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. NTIA's Annual Fee Review Focuses on Whether FirstNet Fees and
Other Income, in Aggregate, Are Sufficient, and Do Not Exceed the
Amount Necessary, To Recoup FirstNet's Total Expenses
A. Standard of NTIA Fee Review and Approval
The Act does not provide a specific standard of review for NTIA's
annual fee review and approval process under Section 6208(c).\16\
However, examination of other provisions in Section 6208 and the Act at
large inform NTIA's proposed approach to FirstNet
[[Page 77595]]
fee review. FirstNet has a duty under Section 6208(b) to ensure that,
during a given fiscal year, the fees it assesses are sufficient, and
shall not exceed the amount necessary, to recoup the ``total expenses''
associated with carrying out its duties as specified under the Act.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See 47 U.S.C. 1428(c).
\17\ See 47 U.S.C. 1428(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given this overarching directive in Section 6208(b), which
immediately precedes the Act's assignation of fee review to NTIA in
Section 6208(c), NTIA proposes that the Act's purpose for the fee
review is solely to support FirstNet's obligation under Section 6208(b)
to be self-funding. Thus, NTIA intends to base its decisions on
FirstNet's proposed fees by only examining whether the fees are, in
aggregate and combined with other non-fee-based income, sufficient, but
not in excess, of the projected funds FirstNet needs to carry out its
statutory obligations in a given fiscal year. In this way, NTIA's
review and approval of FirstNet-proposed fees under Section 6208 will
exclusively focus on FirstNet's projected income and expenses to
further the self-funding requirements and limitations of Section
6208(b). We seek comment on this proposed approach.
B. NTIA's Fee Review and Approval Process Does Not Assess the
Reasonableness of a Proposed Fee
The scope of review of a fee is established by the statute.\18\ As
a result, we propose that NTIA's fee review is scoped to self-
sustainability and does not include review of the reasonableness of any
fee assessed by FirstNet or its prospective partner or partners as
contemplated in the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Principles of Federal Appropriations Law, Volume III,
Third Edition, GAO, pp 12-140-12-181. GAO 08-978 SP (Washington, DC,
September 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The wording of the Act itself does not direct NTIA to perform a
reasonableness review. Section 6208(b), entitled, ``Establishment Of
Fee Amounts; Permanent Self-Funding,'' requires that the total amount
of the fees assessed by FirstNet for each fiscal year must be
sufficient, but cannot exceed, the amount necessary to recoup the total
expenses of FirstNet as it carries out its duties under the Act.\19\
NTIA's mandate to review and approve FirstNet fees directly follows
this fee structure requirement in Section 6208(c).\20\ The Act provides
no other direction regarding fee review, but the structure of the
statute clearly indicates congressional intent to ensure that the
assessed fees drive a self-funded network.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See 47 U.S.C. 1428(b).
\20\ See 47 U.S.C. 1428(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A review of other provisions of Title 47 demonstrates that when
Congress intends for rates to be subject to a review for
``reasonableness'' or other subjective standards, it states this
intention explicitly. For example, Section 201 of the Communications
Act directs the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to determine
whether the charges of telecommunications carriers are ``just and
reasonable.'' \21\ Similarly, Section 224 of the Communications Act
directs the FCC to regulate the rates, terms, and conditions of pole
attachments to ensure they are ``just and reasonable.'' \22\ Here, with
respect to FirstNet's assessment of fees under Section 6208, and NTIA's
review and approval of such fees, the Act established no such ``just
and reasonable'' standard.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See 47 U.S.C 201 (stating that, for common carrier
services, ``[a]ll charges . . . for and in connection with such
communication service, shall be just and reasonable, and any such
charge, practice, classification, or regulation that is unjust or
unreasonable is hereby declared to be unlawful.'').
\22\ See 47 U.S.C 224 (b)(1) (stating that ``the Commission
shall regulate the rates, terms, and conditions for pole attachments
to provide that such rates, terms, and conditions are just and
reasonable, and shall adopt procedures necessary and appropriate to
hear and resolve complaints concerning such rates, terms, and
conditions.'')
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moreover, a reasonableness review of FirstNet fees is unnecessary
as a matter of policy. The Act does not mandate or require any public
safety entity to purchase services from FirstNet. FirstNet must compete
for subscribers by offering a compelling value proposition to
prospective public safety customers. Public safety users themselves
will determine whether FirstNet's proposed user fees are reasonable in
comparison to the fees they are offered by competing providers.
Thus, NTIA proposes that it will not assess whether individual or
total fees in any given category described in Section 6208(a) are
reasonable, proportionate, or otherwise subjectively appropriate in
light of individual or total fees in that category, or any other
category of fees listed in Section 6208(a). With the proposed scope of
its fee review, NTIA meets the intent of the self-funding provisions,
but does not import ``just and reasonable'' review parameters that
Congress clearly could have, but did not, include in the statute. We
seek comment on these preliminary proposals.
IV. Methodology of NTIA Fee Review and Approval Process
A. Focus of NTIA Fee Review Methodology
Based on the preliminary conclusions above, NTIA proposes to base
its approval of fees upon a determination of whether the proposed fees,
in aggregate, when combined with any projected non-fee-based income
that FirstNet receives, meet but do not exceed FirstNet's anticipated
total expenses associated with carrying out its duties as specified
under the Act in a given year. As required by the Act, NTIA will
conduct its fee review and approval process on an annual basis.
Further, NTIA's proposed fee review and approval process will occur
before a fee is assessed as required by the Act, and NTIA expects that
FirstNet will propose such fees to NTIA in writing. Because FirstNet
must compete in a broader marketplace for the opportunity to provide
broadband service to public safety entities, it will need the
flexibility over the course of a fiscal year to adjust specific fees it
wishes to assess pursuant to Section 6208(a).
Thus, to empower FirstNet with the flexibility needed to compete in
the marketplace, NTIA proposes that, as part of its annual fee review,
it will also review FirstNet's actual fees and expenses from the
previous four fiscal quarters. This process will afford FirstNet the
opportunity to describe any significant discrepancies between projected
and actual expenses and revenue of that previous fiscal year and detail
how its projected fees and revenues for the upcoming fiscal year have
addressed these discrepancies. In doing so, FirstNet will have an
opportunity on an annual basis to ensure that its duty under Section
6208(b) is met. To determine FirstNet's anticipated expenses, among the
specific costs areas that NTIA may consider are: (1) Salaries and
Benefits; (2) Travel; (3) Services: Federal Sources; (4) Services: Non-
Federal Sources; (5) Facilities Rental; (6) Supplies, Materials, and
Printing; (7) Equipment; and (8) Other expenses or obligations incurred
for future contract award, capital reserves, or other permitted
expenses or obligations. NTIA anticipates deferring to FirstNet to
determine the reasonableness of projected obligations in the
aforementioned or other categories.
Throughout the fee review and approval process, NTIA anticipates
utilizing the budget documents and financial statements produced in the
normal course of FirstNet's business. NTIA might also utilize
FirstNet's
[[Page 77596]]
annual budget reports as approved by the FirstNet Board and submitted
as part of the President's Budget and FirstNet's mandated annual report
to Congress.
Therefore, NTIA proposes that it will make, on an annual basis, one
of three determinations with regard to proposed fees: (1) FirstNet's
proposed fees, in aggregate, when combined with any projected non-fee-
based income to be received by FirstNet, meet but do not exceed
FirstNet's projected total expenses; (2) FirstNet's proposed fees, in
aggregate, when combined with any projected non-fee-based income to be
received by FirstNet, do not meet FirstNet's projected total expenses;
or (3) FirstNet's proposed fees, in aggregate, when combined with any
projected non-fee-based income to be received by FirstNet, exceed
FirstNet's projected total expenses. Upon making any of these
determinations, NTIA will communicate its determination in writing to
FirstNet. Should NTIA make the second or third determination listed
above, NTIA will not approve FirstNet's proposed fees, and FirstNet may
not assess them. NTIA proposes that it will accept any revised proposed
fees or FirstNet approved revised budgets when provided by FirstNet in
writing and evaluate them consistent with the scope and methodology
proposed above.
We seek comment on this proposed approach to NTIA's fee review and
approval process. We also seek comment on alternative methodologies
that will further our fee review and approval process consistent with
the Act's directives.
B. NTIA's Fee Review and Approval Process Defers to FirstNet on
Necessary Reserves
NTIA proposes that it should defer to FirstNet, in the context of
its budgetary planning process, regarding the use and retention of
reserves or working capital funds. By doing so, NTIA will not, in its
fee review and approval process, assess whether or what level of funds
FirstNet should maintain in reserves, capital accounts, or other
funding categories. FirstNet's routine budget, auditing, and accounting
processes will presumably determine the need for such capital reserve
funds. NTIA plans to defer to FirstNet's determination of need for such
funds through these processes. We seek comment on this proposed
approach to NTIA's fee review and approval process.
Moreover, NTIA proposes that, in its fee review and approval
process, it will take into consideration reserve funds at the levels
designated in FirstNet's budget, to determine whether FirstNet's
proposed fees meet but not exceed FirstNet's total expenses. In doing
so, NTIA will deem such funds to be a part of FirstNet's projected
total expenses under Section 6208(b) of the Act. We seek comment on
this proposal.
V. FirstNet-Proposed Fees Subject to NTIA Review Under Section 6208
Must Be Addressed Upon NTIA Disapproval
A. Fees Subject to NTIA Review and FirstNet Reconsideration Upon NTIA
Disapproval
The Act assigns a clear duty to NTIA under Section 6208: approve or
disapprove the specific fees FirstNet aspires to assess under Section
6208. Under Section 6208(a) of the Act, FirstNet is authorized to
assess and collect the following fees:
1. A Network User Fee: ``A user or subscription fee from each
entity, including any public safety entity or secondary user, that
seeks access to or use of the [Network].'' \23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 47 U.S.C. 1428(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Fees Pursuant to a Covered Leasing Agreement: ``A fee from
any entity that seeks to enter into a [CLA].'' \24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 47 U.S.C. 1428(a)(2)(A); See also 47 U.S.C. 1428(a)(2)(B)
(stating that the Act defines a CLA as ``a written agreement
resulting from a public-private arrangement to construct, manage,
and operate the nationwide public safety broadband network between
the First Responder Network Authority and secondary user to permit--
(i) access to network capacity on a secondary basis for non-public
safety services; and (ii) the spectrum allocated to such entity to
be used for commercial transmissions along the dark fiber of the
long-haul network of such entity.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Lease Fees Related to Network Equipment and Infrastructure:
``A fee from any entity that seeks access to or use of any equipment
or infrastructure, including antennas or towers, constructed or
otherwise owned by the First Responder Network Authority resulting
from a public-private arrangement to construct, manage, and operate
the [Network]'' \25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 47 U.S.C. 1428(a)(3).
As a threshold matter for purposes of this proposed rule and NTIA's
duty under Section 6208 of the Act, the word ``fee,'' as used in
Section 6208(c) of the Act, must be defined. By defining the fees NTIA
is to review, NTIA identifies the specific fees FirstNet must address
prior to NTIA approval in the event NTIA must disapprove FirstNet-
approved fees under the standards set forth above.
To implement its fee review obligations under the Act, NTIA must
determine the meaning of the term ``fee'' as used in Section 6208. In
the case of the Act, the three sets of fees, which FirstNet may assess,
and which NTIA must review if assessed, are clearly defined within
Section 6208(a). Thus, NTIA proposes that a ``fee'' that will be
subject to its review and approval under Section 6208(c) is FirstNet's
collection of money that falls within the three categories in Section
6208(a): (1) Network user fees; (2) lease fees related to network
capacity, pursuant to a covered leasing agreement; and (3) fees from
entities seeking access to or use of any equipment or infrastructure
constructed or otherwise owned by FirstNet.\26\ Given the clear
language in Section 6208(a) defining the fees that FirstNet may assess,
and the corresponding language in Section 6208(c) directing NTIA to
review fees ``assessed under [Section 6208],'' NTIA proposes that its
fee review authority, and FirstNet's obligation to address fees upon
NTIA disapproval of proposed fees, is scoped to the three above-
referenced categories. We seek comment on this preliminary proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ See 47 U.S.C. 1428(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Income Other Than Fees Is Not Subject to NTIA Fee Review
As noted above, NTIA recognizes that, under the Act, FirstNet may
receive income that is separate and distinct from the fees defined in
Section 6208(a). Such income must be factored into NTIA's determination
of whether proposed fees, in aggregate, will meet but not exceed the
funds needed by FirstNet on an annual basis. However, as the Act limits
NTIA's review and approval authority to ``the fees assessed in [Section
6208],'' NTIA proposes that the Act gives it no authority to review or
approve as a ``fee'' any other form of income FirstNet might receive.
NTIA proposes that non-fee-based income, emanating from arrangements
allowed by statute, is not a ``fee'' under Section 6208(a).
Furthermore, NTIA proposes that it will consider any non-fee income
only as part of its determination of whether such income, when combined
in aggregate with the fees defined in Section 6208(a), will be
sufficient to recoup FirstNet's total expenses, but not exceed the
amount necessary, to carry out its statutory duties and
responsibilities for the fiscal year involved. Moreover, NTIA proposes
that it will not analyze the terms and conditions of any CLA, or any
other agreement between FirstNet and another entity, beyond those
specific terms and conditions which establish any fees that meet the
three categories described in Section 6208(a). We seek comment on these
preliminary proposals.
VI. Ex Parte Communications
Any non-public oral presentation to NTIA regarding the substance of
this proposed rule will be considered an ex parte presentation, and the
substance of
[[Page 77597]]
the meeting will be placed on the public record and become part of this
docket. No later than two (2) business days after an oral presentation
or meeting, an interested party must submit a memorandum to NTIA
summarizing the substance of the communication. NTIA reserves the right
to supplement the memorandum with additional information as necessary,
or to request that the party making the filing do so, if NTIA believes
that important information was omitted or characterized incorrectly.
Any written presentation provided in support of the oral communication
or meeting will also be placed on the public record and become part of
this docket. Such ex parte communications must be submitted to this
docket as provided in the ADDRESSES section above and clearly labeled
as an ex parte presentation. Federal entities are not subject to these
procedures.
Classification
This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rulemaking, issued under the authority of the Act,
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA).
If implemented, this rule would establish regulations, as required
under the Act, for NTIA and FirstNet regarding the process by which
NTIA reviews and approves or disapproves fees FirstNet proposes to
assess. The RFA requires federal agencies to prepare an analysis of a
rule's impact on small entities whenever the agency is required to
publish a notice of proposed rulemaking. However, a federal agency may
certify, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), that the action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The proposed regulations are for the particular and limited purpose of
NTIA examining only whether the proposed fees of another federal
entity--FirstNet--are, in aggregate and in combination with any
FirstNet non-fee-based income, sufficient, but not in excess of, the
projected funds that FirstNet needs to recoup the total expenses
required to carry out its statutory obligations in a given year. No
external entities, including any small businesses, small organizations,
or small governments, will experience any direct economic impacts from
this proposed rule. The only potential effect on any external entities,
large or small, would likely be positive, as NTIA's proposed rules will
assist in ensuring that FirstNet, as required under the Act, will
sustain a nationwide public safety broadband network that provides
broadband communications to first responders. Because this action, if
adopted, would directly affect only federal entities--NTIA and
FirstNet--and not any small entities, the Department of Commerce has
concluded that the action would not result in a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Thus, the Department
of Commerce Chief Counsel for Regulations has certified to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration that this
rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities. Therefore, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
is not required and has not been prepared.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined that this document does not contain policies
with Federalism implications as that term is defined in Executive Order
13132.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 500
FirstNet, FirstNet Fees, Safety, Telecommunications.
Dated: December 10, 2015.
Lawrence E. Strickling,
Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the National
Telecommunications and Information Administration proposes to add 47
CFR Chapter V to read as follows:
CHAPTER V--THE FIRST RESPONDER NETWORK AUTHORITY (Parts 500-599)
SUBCHAPTER A--NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION
ADMINISTRATION REGULATIONS (Parts 500-549)
PART 500--REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF FEES PROPOSED BY THE FIRST RESPONDER
NETWORK AUTHORITY (FIRSTNET)
Sec.
500.1 Purpose and scope.
500.2 General definitions.
500.3 NTIA duty to review FirstNet proposed fees.
500.4 Scope of NTIA review of FirstNet proposed fees.
500.5 Methodology of NTIA fee review and approval process.
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 1401.
Sec. 500.1 Purpose and scope.
Sections 500.2 through 500.5 implement 47 U.S.C. 1428(c) as
codified pursuant to the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act
of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-96, Title VI, 126 Stat. 256 (codified at 47 U.S.C.
1401 et seq.) (the ``Act''), which requires the National
Telecommunications and Information Administration to annually review
fees the First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) proposes to
assess.
Sec. 500.2 General definitions.
Fee means FirstNet's receipt of money from:
(1) A Network User Fee;
(2) Lease Fees Related To Network Capacity; or
(3) Lease Fees Related To Network Equipment And Infrastructure, as
those terms are defined under 47 U.S.C. 1428(a).
FirstNet means the First Responder Network Authority.
Fiscal Year means the 12-month accounting period for the federal
government, which begins on 1 October of a given year and ends on 30
September of the subsequent year.
Non-fee-based income received by FirstNet means FirstNet's receipt
of money from any source, transaction, entity, or any other means
allowed under 47 U.S.C. 1401 et seq., other than those receipts
described above in the definition of ``fee.''
NTIA means the National Telecommunications and Information
Administration.
NTIA's fee review and approval process means the process by which
NTIA executes its duties under 47 U.S.C. 1428(c).
Sec. 500.3 NTIA's duty to review FirstNet proposed fees.
As required under 47 U.S.C. 1428(c), NTIA shall exclusively review
fees, which must be proposed by FirstNet in writing, through NTIA's
review and approval process conducted on an annual basis.
Sec. 500.4 Scope of NTIA review of FirstNet proposed fees.
NTIA shall approve FirstNet proposed fees only if such fees, when
combined with any non-fee-based income projected to be received by
FirstNet, are sufficient, but do not exceed the amount necessary, to
recoup FirstNet's total expenses in carrying out its duties and
responsibilities under 47 U.S.C. 1401 et seq. for the fiscal year
involved.
Sec. 500.5 Methodology of NTIA fee review and approval process.
(a) Fee review approach. To execute NTIA's fee review and approval
process, NTIA shall utilize FirstNet's standard financial
documentation, which may include but is not limited to:
[[Page 77598]]
(1) FirstNet's budget documents produced in the normal course of
its business;
(2) FirstNet's financial statements produced in the normal course
of its business;
(3) FirstNet's annual budget reports submitted as part of the
President's Budget; and
(4) FirstNet's annual report to Congress.
(b) Deference to FirstNet on necessary reserves. In executing
NTIA's fee review and approval process, NTIA shall defer to FirstNet
with respect to its use and retention of reserve or working capital
funds. NTIA shall consider any such designated funds to be a part of
FirstNet's total expenses in carrying out its duties and
responsibilities under 47 U.S.C. 1401 et seq. for the fiscal year
involved.
(c) Determination of fee review: NTIA shall make one of the
following determinations annually upon review of FirstNet's proposed
fees:
(1) FirstNet's proposed fees, in aggregate, when combined with any
projected non-fee-based income to be received by FirstNet, meet but do
not exceed FirstNet's projected total expenses;
(2) FirstNet's proposed fees, in aggregate, when combined with any
projected non-fee-based income to be received by FirstNet, do not meet
FirstNet's projected total expenses; or
(3) FirstNet's proposed fees, in aggregate, when combined with any
projected non-fee-based income to be received by FirstNet, exceed
FirstNet's projected total expenses. Upon making any of these
determinations, NTIA will communicate its determination in writing to
FirstNet.
(d) Outcome of determination of fee review:
(1) Should NTIA make the determination listed in paragraph (c)(1)
of this section, FirstNet may assess the proposed fees.
(2) Should NTIA make one of the determinations listed in paragraph
(c)(2) or (3) of this section, NTIA will disapprove FirstNet's proposed
fees, and FirstNet may not assess those proposed fees.
(e) Revision of Proposed Fees: Upon a disapproval of FirstNet's
proposed fees as described in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, or upon
FirstNet's determination that it must revise NTIA-approved fees to
ensure compliance with 47 U.S.C. 1428(b), FirstNet shall prepare a
revised written submission to NTIA, which shall evaluate any proposed
fees therein consistent with the rules in Sec. Sec. 500.1-500.5.
(f) Communication of NTIA fee approval or disapproval. Approval or
disapproval of FirstNet-proposed fees shall be communicated in writing
by the Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information and
Administrator, National Telecommunications and Information
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, to the Chair of the
FirstNet Board.
Subchapter B--[Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2015-31516 Filed 12-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-60-P