Department of the Treasury Regulations for the Gulf Coast Restoration Trust Fund, 77239-77252 [2015-31431]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
31 CFR Part 34
RIN 1505–AC44
Department of the Treasury
Regulations for the Gulf Coast
Restoration Trust Fund
Office of the Fiscal Assistant
Secretary, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Treasury is issuing final regulations
concerning the investment and use of
amounts deposited in the Gulf Coast
Restoration Trust Fund, which was
established in the Treasury of the
United States by the Resources and
Ecosystem Sustainability, Tourist
Opportunities, and Revived Economies
of the Gulf Coast States Act of 2012
(RESTORE Act).
DATES: Effective date: February 12, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please send questions by electronic mail
to restoreact@treasury.gov, or contact
Janet Vail at the Office of Gulf Coast
Restoration at 202–622–6873.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. Background
The RESTORE Act makes funds
available for the restoration and
protection of the Gulf Coast Region, and
certain programs with respect to the
Gulf of Mexico, through a trust fund in
the Treasury of the United States,
known as the Gulf Coast Restoration
Trust Fund. The trust fund will contain
80 percent of the administrative and
civil penalties paid after July 6, 2012
under the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act in connection with the
Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Amounts in
the trust fund will be invested and made
available through five components of
the RESTORE Act.
The Direct Component, administered
by Treasury, sets aside 35 percent of the
penalties paid into the trust fund for
eligible activities proposed by the State
of Alabama, the State of Mississippi, the
State of Texas, the State of Louisiana
and 20 Louisiana parishes, and 23
Florida counties. The Comprehensive
Plan Component sets aside 30 percent of
the penalties, plus half of all interest
earned on trust fund investments, to be
managed by a new independent Federal
entity called the Gulf Coast Ecosystem
Restoration Council (Council). The
Council includes members from six
Federal agencies or departments and the
five Gulf Coast States. One of the
Federal members, the Secretary of
Commerce, at this time serves as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 238001
Chairperson of the Council. The Council
will direct those funds to projects and
programs for the restoration of the Gulf
Coast Region, pursuant to a
comprehensive plan that is being
developed by the Council. Under the
Spill Impact Component, entities
representing the Gulf Coast States use
an additional 30 percent of penalties in
the trust fund for eligible activities
pursuant to State Expenditure Plans
approved by the Council. The remaining
five percent of penalties, plus one-half
of all interest earned on trust fund
investments, will be divided equally
between the NOAA RESTORE Act
Science Program established by the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA), an operating
unit of the Department of Commerce,
and the Centers of Excellence Research
Grants Program, administered by
Treasury.
On August 15, 2014, Treasury
published a comprehensive interim
final rule containing procedures for
implementing the RESTORE Act.
Among its provisions, the procedures
allocated amounts to the five
components, described the activities
that could be funded and the entities
entitled to apply for funds, and set forth
compliance requirements. Treasury
accepted public comment on the
comprehensive interim final rule for
thirty days. Treasury published a
second interim final rule on October 10,
2014, which allocated amounts to
Louisiana parishes under one RESTORE
Act component, called the Direct
Component. Both interim final rules
took effect on October 14, 2014.
II. Public Comments and Summary of
Changes From the Interim Final Rules
Treasury received 21 unique comment
letters on the comprehensive interim
final rule, and no comments on the
interim final rule that allocated funds to
the Louisiana parishes. Several
commenters repeated suggestions made
on the proposed rule issued in
September 2013, and opined on matters
discussed in the preamble to the
comprehensive interim final rule, such
as the application of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to
RESTORE Act grant programs.
One commenter, a state,
acknowledged the benefits of providing
funds through grants, but encouraged
Treasury to consider using a revenue
sharing arrangement. The commenter
raised a concern that grant processes are
an inefficient means of disbursing funds
to meet the goals of the RESTORE Act.
Treasury addressed this comment when
it published the comprehensive interim
final rule. The RESTORE Act imposes
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77239
conditions on how states use funds
provided under the Act, requires
Federal oversight, and authorizes
Treasury to stop the flow of funds when
there is noncompliance. These controls
are characteristic of Federal grant
programs. The controls required by
Treasury’s regulations and Federal laws
and policies on grants hold recipients
accountable to use the funds as required
by the RESTORE Act. The public
comments Treasury received on the
proposed rule and comprehensive
interim final rule overwhelmingly
support the distribution of RESTORE
Act funds through Federal grants.
Accordingly, no change has been made
in the final rule to address this
comment.
Several commenters, particularly
public interest groups, requested that
Treasury exercise more authority over
the selection of projects funded under
the RESTORE Act. Some commenters
asked Treasury to establish substantive
criteria for evaluating project proposals,
such as performance goals and
preferences for certain kinds of
activities. Other commenters proposed
that Treasury adopt procedures, such as
independent expert reviews, for
evaluating synergies and potential
conflicts between projects proposed
under different components, or to
address project proposals that may be
controversial.
Treasury considered similar
comments during its review of
comments on the proposed rule. The
Act does not impose uniform criteria for
the selection of projects under the Direct
Component, Comprehensive Plan
Component, and Spill Impact
Component, or require the coordination
of projects across components. Each
component has different eligibility
criteria, different processes for selecting
activities, and different entities
responsible for selecting the activities to
be funded. The final rule acknowledges
these differences, while still requiring
compliance with the Act and Federal
laws and policies applying to grants.
Under these policies, Federal awards
will include an indication of the timing
and scope of performance, and may
include specific performance goals,
indicators, milestones, and expected
outcomes. The appropriate vehicle for
addressing these project specific
requirements is the Federal award
agreement.
Beyond what the Act stipulates,
Treasury cannot require the Council,
NOAA, states, counties, or parishes to
coordinate their selection of projects
across components in order to achieve
particular economic or environmental
goals. Treasury encourages voluntary
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
77240
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
efforts to coordinate work, and intends
to facilitate these efforts by publishing
Direct Component Multiyear
Implementation Plans and other
information related to the grant
programs it administers.
Several public interest groups also
asked Treasury to reconsider its views
regarding the application of NEPA to
Treasury’s activities under the Direct
Component and the Centers of
Excellence Research Grants Program. In
the preamble to the comprehensive
interim final rule, we stated that
‘‘Treasury does not anticipate that its
review of Multiyear Implementation
Plans or the issuance of individual
grants will require a NEPA review.
Other Federal actions connected with
activities funded through a RESTORE
Act grant, such as issuance of a permit,
may require NEPA review by the agency
issuing the permit.’’ 79 FR 48039, 48051
(Aug. 15, 2014).
Treasury’s view is based on its limited
statutory role for the administration of
Direct Component grants and the
Centers of Excellence Research Grants
Program. The Act gives Treasury no role
in project selection or design for the
Direct Component. The Act specifies the
activities or disciplines that are eligible
for funding, and does not explicitly
authorize Treasury to reject an activity
or discipline, or to require funding of an
alternative design, when the activity
otherwise complies with the Act and
other Federal law. Also, Treasury
neither approves nor disapproves
Multiyear Implementation Plans.
Accordingly, Treasury will review
Multiyear Implementation Plans and
grant applications to determine whether
they satisfy financial and administrative
requirements in the Act and these
regulations, and apply requirements in
the Office of Management and Budget’s
Uniform Administrative Requirements,
Cost Principles, and Audit
Requirements for Federal Awards
(OMB’s Uniform Guidance), 2 CFR part
200, in its review of grant applications.
Because Treasury has a limited role in
reviewing Multiyear Implementation
Plans and issuing grants, Treasury does
not anticipate that its actions will
require an Environmental Assessment or
Environmental Impact Statement under
NEPA. NEPA is designed to help federal
agencies consider environmental
consequences in their decision-making
process. When an agency action is nondiscretionary under a statute, the
information that a NEPA review
provides would not assist the agency’s
decision-makers. Several commenters
urged Treasury to reconsider the
application of NEPA to its RESTORE
Act grant programs, but no commenter
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 238001
offered an analysis of the RESTORE Act
or its legislative history showing where
Treasury has the discretion to consider
environmental consequences and
project alternatives when making grants.
Treasury’s limited role does not mean
that NEPA will never apply to activities
undertaken with funds provided
through the Direct Component and
Centers of Excellence Research Grants
Program. As Treasury stated in the
preamble to the comprehensive interim
final rule, other Federal actions, such as
the issuance of permits, may trigger
NEPA review by the Federal regulatory
agency. In addition, it is Treasury policy
under Treasury Directive 75–02 to fully
evaluate its actions to ensure
compliance with NEPA requirements
and regulations issued by the Council
on Environmental Quality, where
applicable. As necessary, Treasury will
consider NEPA environmental
documentation in the context of
individual grant applications, if it is
determined that Treasury has sufficient
discretion to consider environmental
consequences and project alternatives.
The final rule contains several
technical edits, some of which were
suggested by commenters. Substantive
comments and changes to the
comprehensive interim final rule are
described below.
Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 34.2 (Definitions)
Treasury received several comments
requesting a more clear definition of
administrative costs. The final rule
continues to define administrative costs
as indirect costs for administration
incurred by the Gulf Coast States,
coastal political subdivisions, and
coastal zone parishes that are allocable
to activities authorized under the Act.
Administrative costs do not include
indirect costs that are identified
specifically with, or readily assignable
to, facilities. The final rule references
the definition of facilities in OMB’s
Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.414(a).
To avoid confusion, Treasury has
removed the list of activities that may
result in administrative costs from the
final rule.
The definition of administrative costs
in the comprehensive interim final rule
also included a statement that certain
costs are direct costs. This statement
was imprecise and Treasury has deleted
it from the final rule. Grant applicants
should look to OMB’s Uniform
Guidance for general information about
direct and indirect costs. Questions
about whether particular costs are direct
or indirect costs should be addressed to
the relevant Federal awarding agency.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
One commenter asked Treasury to
clarify the definition of Gulf Coast
Region. The commenter contends that
the geographic scope of watersheds in
paragraph three of the definition is
ambiguous. Treasury’s comprehensive
interim final rule defines the Gulf Coast
Region to comprise four geographic
areas:
(1) In the Gulf Coast States, the coastal
zones defined under section 304 of the
Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972
that border the Gulf of Mexico;
(2) Land within the coastal zones
described in paragraph (1) that is held
in trust by, or the use of which is by law
subject solely to the discretion of, the
Federal Government or officers or agents
of the Federal Government;
(3) Any adjacent land, water, and
watersheds, that are within 25 miles of
the coastal zone described in paragraphs
(1) and (2); and
(4) All Federal waters in the Gulf of
Mexico.
Under paragraph 3, the Gulf Coast
Region includes those parts of adjacent
watersheds that extend up to, but no
further than, 25 miles from the coastal
zones. An activity is carried out in the
Gulf Coast Region when, in the
reasonable judgment of the entity
applying for a grant, each severable part
of the activity is primarily designed to
restore or protect that geographic area.
See 31 CFR 34.201–203.
Section 34.104 (Expenditures)
In the preamble to the comprehensive
interim final rule, Treasury stated that it
was deleting a sentence requiring grant
recipients to minimize the time between
receipt of funds and disbursement,
because this requirement is addressed
more completely in OMB’s Uniform
Guidance. A commenter noted that the
sentence was not deleted from the rule.
Treasury has corrected this inadvertent
error in the final rule. Grant recipients
with questions about the application of
OMB’s Uniform Guidance should direct
them to the relevant Federal awarding
agency.
Section 34.200 (General)
This section provides that a Gulf
Coast State, coastal political
subdivision, and coastal zone parish
may use amounts available under the
Direct Component and Spill Impact
Component to satisfy the non-Federal
cost-share of an activity that is eligible
under §§ 34.201 and 34.203 and
authorized by Federal law. Commenters
questioned why a similar opportunity is
not available for funds made available
under the Comprehensive Plan
Component and the Centers of
Excellence Research Grants Program.
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
The Act does not allow Comprehensive
Plan Component funds or Centers of
Excellence Research Grant funds to be
used for satisfying the non-Federal costshare. Those allocations are subject to
the general rule in OMB’s Uniform
Guidance, 2 CFR 200.306, which states
that a non-Federal cost share cannot be
met with funds paid by the Federal
government under a Federal award.
Another commenter noted a provision
in the Act stating that the use of trust
fund amounts to satisfy the non-Federal
share of an eligible activity ‘‘shall not
affect the priority in which other
Federal funds are allocated or
awarded.’’ 33 U.S.C. 1331(t)(1)(N)(ii).
The commenter requested that Treasury
include this provision in its regulations.
Treasury currently sees no need to
elaborate on this statutory provision,
which does not need a regulation to be
effective. If a grant recipient believes
that a Federal agency has allocated or
awarded funds in violation of this
provision, it should raise that concern
with the agency providing assistance.
Section 34.201 (Eligible Activities for
the Direct Component)
Treasury received several comments
about whether particular activities are
reimbursable under the Direct
Component, such as costs for grant
management staff and certain pre-award
and planning activity costs. Grant
applicants will find detailed
information about allowable costs in
OMB’s Uniform Guidance. In addition,
grant applicants can consult information
posted on Treasury’s RESTORE Act Web
page, or contact Treasury’s Office of
Gulf Coast Restoration for information
about particular costs at restoreact@
treasury.gov. Other than a clarifying
change to the description of planning
assistance, there are no changes to this
section.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Section 34.203 (Eligible Activities for
the Spill Impact Component)
One commenter asserted that
activities funded under the Spill Impact
Component should focus primarily on
ecosystem restoration. Treasury’s rule
closely tracks the statute. The Act
clearly provides that funds are available
under the Spill Impact Component ‘‘for
projects, programs, and activities that
will improve the ecosystems or
economy of the Gulf Coast region,’’
subject to certain criteria that are
included in Treasury’s rule. Because
Treasury’s rule is consistent with the
Act, no change is necessary.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 238001
Section 34.204 (Limitations on
Administrative Costs and
Administrative Expenses)
One commenter, a member of the Gulf
Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council,
requested clarification on how state
members of the Council can access
amounts set aside for the Council’s
administrative expenses. Treasury’s rule
does not address this issue. The Council
determines how it allocates funds for
administrative expenses. Questions
about how the Council allocates its
funds should be directed to the Council.
In a separate notice of proposed
rulemaking, Treasury plans to propose
an amendment to this section to change
when the 3% limitation is applied to the
Council. Under the Act, the Council
cannot spend more than three percent of
amounts it receives from the Trust Fund
on administrative expenses. The current
regulation states that the three percent
limit is applied to the total amount of
funds received by the Council under the
Comprehensive Plan Component,
beginning with the first fiscal year the
Council receives funds through the end
of the fourth, or most recent fiscal year,
whichever is later. This approach limits
the amounts available for administrative
expenses to a percentage of amounts
drawn down from the Trust Fund in a
particular year, which may vary
considerably. Because the Council
requires more regular and predictable
funding for its administrative expenses,
Treasury will propose to cap the
Council’s administrative expenses at
three percent of amounts the Council
receives under the Comprehensive Plan
Component before termination of the
Trust Fund. The notice of proposed
rulemaking will include a forty-five day
comment period. The current rule will
remain in effect pending review of the
public comments.
Section 34.302 (Allocation of Funds—
Direct Component)
Treasury amended this section to add
the allocations for Louisiana parishes
that Treasury published as an interim
final rule at 79 FR 61236 (Oct. 10, 2014).
The allocations did not change.
Section 34.303 (Application
Procedure—Direct Component)
A commenter requested clarification
about Treasury’s application and
disbursement process. Treasury
published detailed guidance and
application processes and posted
materials on Treasury’s RESTORE Act
Web page, available at https://
www.treasury.gov/services/restore-act/
Pages/default.aspx. Treasury also
provided on-site training to the Gulf
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77241
Coast States, eligible Florida counties,
and eligible Louisiana parishes.
Applicants with questions about these
matters should contact Treasury’s Office
of Gulf Coast Restoration at restoreact@
treasury.gov.
One commenter, a state, requested
clarification about the public review
and comment process required in 31
CFR 34.303(b)(8). The commenter stated
that it can provide adequate
opportunities for public review and
comment, but cannot guarantee that the
public will fully participate in this
process. Treasury’s rule does not require
a state to ensure full participation in the
public comment process. The rule is
clear that a state must make its
Multiyear Implementation Plan
available for public review and
comment ‘‘in a manner calculated to
obtain broad-based participation from
individuals, businesses, Indian tribes,
and non-profit organizations. . . .’’
Treasury cannot describe in detail the
steps that will satisfy this requirement
in every case, as the steps may vary for
each state, county, or parish. For
example, if a large segment of the
affected population does not have
Internet access, or does not speak
English, a state may need to employ
other methods to notify the affected
population of its plans and the
opportunity to provide comment, such
as providing reasonable access to public
meetings and presentations in language
other than English.
One commenter requested guidance
about whether modifications to a
Multiyear Implementation Plan require
a public review and comment period for
Multiyear Implementation Plans. In
response to this comment, the final rule
now requires the same public review
and comment period for material
changes as for an accepted Multiyear
Implementation Plan. Material
modifications can only be adopted after
consideration of meaningful public
comment. Applicants with questions
about which modifications are material
should contact Treasury’s Office of Gulf
Coast Restoration.
Section 34.305 (Use of Funds—Direct
Component)
One commenter requested that
Treasury add a sentence to § 34.305, as
well as other parts of the rule, requiring
a written justification for all sole source
procurements and preferences given to
individuals and companies. The
commenter also asked that Treasury
incorporate preferences for small and
minority owned businesses. OMB’s
Uniform Guidance has an extensive
discussion on the procurement
requirements applying to Federal grants,
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
77242
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
including requirements for competition
and language requiring affirmative steps
to benefit small and minority owned
businesses. 2 CFR 200.319–200.321. The
procurement requirements in OMB’s
Uniform Guidance apply to RESTORE
Act grants. Therefore, the final rule has
not been amended to address this
comment.
Some commenters discussed the need
for activities that improve the resiliency
of communities, such as funds for
workforce development and job
creation. While the Act does not require
states, counties, or parishes to fund
these activities, workforce development
and job creation are eligible activities
for funding under the Direct Component
and the Spill Impact Component. The
Act’s legislative history explains that
workforce development ‘‘is intended to
include non-profit, university, and
community college-based workforce,
career and technical training programs.
This would also include the
identification of projects, research,
programs and partnerships with federal,
state and local workforce agencies,
industry and local stakeholders from
economically and socially
disadvantaged communities.’’ S. Rep.
No. 112–100, at 8 (2011). This list of
activities, while not exclusive, describes
the kinds of activities that are eligible
for funding. Commenters with
suggestions for specific projects should
contact the states, counties, and
parishes that are developing Multiyear
Implementation Plans and Spill Impact
State Expenditure Plans.
During implementation of the
comprehensive interim final rule,
Treasury received questions about the
availability of funds for county and
local parks. One eligible activity under
the Direct Component and Spill Impact
Component is ‘‘Improvements to or on
State parks located in coastal areas
affected by the Deepwater Horizon oil
spill.’’ 33 U.S.C. 1321(t)(1)(B)(i)(V).
Treasury does not interpret this
provision to apply to county and local
parks. However, improvements to
county and local parks, such as
activities that restore and protect natural
resources under 33 U.S.C.
1321(t)(1)(B)(i)(I), may fall under other
eligible activities.
Section 34.404 (Comprehensive Plan
Component)
Treasury has made a clarifying change
to this section to indicate that assignees
must submit reports as prescribed by the
Council or Treasury, and the Council
must submit reports as prescribed by
Treasury.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 238001
Section 34.405 (Recordkeeping—
Comprehensive Plan Component)
Treasury has made a clarifying change
to this section to add that the Council
must make its records concerning the
activities of assignees available to
Treasury, including the Treasury
Inspector General. This provision will
assist Treasury in gathering the
information it needs to carry out its
supplemental compliance functions
under 31 CFR 34.804.
Section 34.503 (State Expenditure
Plans—Spill Impact Component)
A commenter requested clarification
about the public review and comment
processes for State Expenditure Plans
described in § 34.503(g). The
commenter, who submitted a similar
comment on § 34.303, is concerned that
a state cannot ensure that the public
will fully participate in the public
review and comment process. As
described above, states are not expected
to guarantee full public participation in
the public review and comment process.
Treasury’s rule is clear that states must
use methods ‘‘calculated to obtain
broad-based participation from
individuals, businesses, Indian tribes,
and non-profit organizations.’’ Treasury
cannot describe in detail the methods
that will satisfy this requirement in
every case, as they may depend on the
state and the impacted region or
population.
Another commenter asked Treasury to
clarify the public review and comment
requirements that apply to
modifications of a State Expenditure
Plan. The final rule now states that
material modifications are subject to the
same public review and comment
requirements, as well as other
requirements, that apply to the original
plan. States with questions about which
modifications are material should
contact the Council for guidance.
Section 34.506 (Reports—Spill Impact
Component)
Treasury has made a clarifying change
to this section to indicate that the
Council must submit reports as
prescribed by Treasury, in order to
assist Treasury in fulfilling its
supplemental compliance functions
under 31 CFR 34.804.
Section 34.507 (Recordkeeping—Spill
Impact Component)
Consistent with changes made to
section 34.405, Treasury has amended
this section to add that the Council must
make available its records concerning
the activities of recipients to Treasury,
including the Treasury Inspector
General.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Section 34.703 (Application
Procedure—Centers of Excellence
Research Grants Program)
One state commenter asked Treasury
to clarify that each state will receive its
full allocation provided by the Act.
Treasury’s regulations are already clear
that each state will receive an equal
share of amounts made available under
the Centers of Excellence Research
Grants Program. To receive its share,
each state will apply to Treasury for a
grant and specify how the funds will be
used, a standard requirement for all
Federal grants. Requiring states to
identify how they will use Federal
funds is necessary to assist the Federal
awarding agency in performing
oversight, one of the grant management
responsibilities described in OMB’s
Uniform Guidance.
During implementation of the
comprehensive interim final rule,
Treasury received questions about the
public notice requirements applying to
the rules and policies for the Centers of
Excellence Research Grants Program.
Treasury’s regulation requires each state
to describe the rules and policies for
grants it will issue to subrecipients.
Each state also must demonstrate the
rules and policies that became effective
after publication of the comprehensive
interim final rule were available for
public review and comment for a
minimum of 45 days. Many states have
longstanding rules and policies that
generally apply to grant programs,
including competitive project selection
and conflict of interest policies.
Treasury’s regulation does not require
states to seek public comment on rules
and policies that were effective prior to
publication of the comprehensive
interim final rule.
Section 34.802—(Certifications)
One commenter, a state, noted that
the certification in § 34.802(c) appears
to require that each activity be selected
after consideration of comments from a
diverse cross-section of the public. The
commenter stated that it can provide
opportunities for public review and
comment, but it cannot guarantee that
all segments of the public will
participate. Treasury agrees with this
comment, and has amended the
certification to be consistent with
requirements in §§ 34.303(b)(8) and
34.503(g). The amended certification
requires grant recipients to certify that
each activity is part of a plan that was
made available for public review and
comment in a manner calculated to
obtain broad-based participation from
individuals, businesses, Indian tribes,
and nonprofit organizations, and that
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
the activity was selected after
consideration of meaningful input from
the public, as described in the
recipient’s grant application.
Treasury has also amended the
certification at § 34.803(a) to conform
more closely to the language of the
statute, and to make clear that the
certification can apply to planning
activities as well as activities that carry
out the restoration or protection of the
Gulf Coast Region.
Section 34.803 (Conditions)
In the preamble to the comprehensive
interim final rule, Treasury stated that
grants must conform to the requirements
in OMB’s Uniform Guidance and other
Federal laws and policies on grants.
These requirements include reports on
how grants funds were used. To avoid
any inconsistency between these
requirements and the reporting
requirements in § 34.803(e), Treasury is
deleting certain details that were listed
in the comprehensive interim final rule.
Section 34.804 (Noncompliance)
Two commenters suggested that
Treasury impose penalties on Council
members that violate the Act or
Treasury regulations. Because the Act
does not authorize Treasury to impose
penalties, the final rule does not adopt
this suggestion.
III. Procedural Requirements
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires
agencies to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other statute,
unless the agency certifies that the rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. In the preamble to the
comprehensive interim final rule,
Treasury certified that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Small entities will incur costs to
develop the plans and projects
described in the rule, but these costs
arise from requirements in the
RESTORE Act and not Treasury
regulations. Treasury did not receive
any comments in response to the
comprehensive interim rule on the
impact to small entities and there are no
changes in the final rule that warrant a
change in this certification.
Accordingly, Treasury certifies that the
final rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 238001
entities, and no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
The collections of information
contained in the comprehensive interim
final rule were submitted to the Office
of Management and Budget for review
in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3507(d)), and approved under control
number 1505–0250. The final rule does
not contain any new collections of
information. Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act, an agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a valid
OMB control number.
C. Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
The rule affects those entities in the
five Gulf Coast States that are eligible to
receive funding under the RESTORE
Act, and is focused on the
environmental restoration and economic
recovery of the Gulf Coast Region in the
aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon oil
spill. The amounts made available from
the trust fund will continue efforts that
provide for the long-term health of the
ecosystems and economy of this region.
In accordance with Executive Order
12866, as supplemented by Executive
Order 13563, OMB has reviewed this
regulation. This rule finalizes without
significant change a comprehensive
interim final rule published on August
15, 2014 that was designated as
economically significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866. The Department
adopts without revision the regulatory
impact assessment published with the
comprehensive interim final rule at 79
FR 48052 because this final rule does
not adopt changes that require updates
in the analysis. In accordance with
Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, this rule is designated as
significant and OMB has reviewed this
regulation.
D. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined
by 5 U.S.C. 804(2) and will become
effective 60 days after publication.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77243
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
(2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires federal
agencies to assess the effects of their
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act
addresses actions that may result in the
expenditure by a state, local, or tribal
government, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted
for inflation) or more in any one year.
Treasury believes that the regulatory
impact assessment referenced in this
preamble provides the analysis required
by the Unfunded Mandates Act.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 34
Coastal zone, Fisheries, Grant
programs, Grants administration,
Intergovernmental relations, Marine
resources, Natural resources, Oil
pollution, Research, Science and
technology, Trusts and trustees,
Wildlife.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department of the
Treasury amends 31 CFR subtitle A by
revising part 34 to read as follows:
PART 34—RESOURCES AND
ECOSYSTEMS SUSTAINABILITY,
TOURIST OPPORTUNITIES, AND
REVIVED ECONOMIES OF THE GULF
COAST STATES
Subpart A—General Provisions
Sec.
34.1 Purpose.
34.2 Definitions.
Subpart B—Trust Fund
34.100 The Trust Fund.
34.101 Investments.
34.102 Interest earned.
34.103 Allocation of funds.
34.104 Expenditures.
34.105 Waiver.
Subpart C—Eligible Activities for the
Section 311(t) Gulf RESTORE Program
Components
34.200 General.
34.201 Eligible activities for the Direct
Component.
34.202 Eligible activities for the
Comprehensive Plan Component.
34.203 Eligible activities for the Spill
Impact Component.
34.204 Limitations on administrative costs
and administrative expenses.
34.205 Council’s audited financial
statements and audits.
Subpart D—Gulf RESTORE Program—
Direct Component
34.300 General.
34.301 Responsibility for administration—
Direct Component.
34.302 Allocation of funds—Direct
Component.
34.303 Application procedure—Direct
Component.
34.304 Grant award process—Direct
Component.
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
77244
34.305
34.306
34.307
34.308
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Use of funds—Direct Component.
Reports—Direct Component.
Recordkeeping—Direct Component.
Audits—Direct Component.
Subpart E—Gulf RESTORE Program—
Comprehensive Plan Component
34.400 General.
34.401 Responsibility for administration—
Comprehensive Plan Component.
34.402 Grant administration—
Comprehensive Plan Component.
34.403 Use of funds—Comprehensive Plan
Component.
34.404 Reports—Comprehensive Plan
Component.
34.405 Recordkeeping—Comprehensive
Plan Component.
34.406 Audits—Comprehensive Plan
Component.
Subpart F—Gulf RESTORE Program—Spill
Impact Component
34.500 General.
34.501 Responsibility for administration—
Spill Impact Component.
34.502 Allocation of funds—Spill Impact
Component.
34.503 State Expenditure Plans—Spill
Impact Component.
34.504 Grant administration—Spill Impact
Component.
34.505 Use of funds—Spill Impact
Component.
34.506 Reports—Spill Impact Component.
34.507 Recordkeeping—Spill Impact
Component.
34.508 Audits—Spill Impact Component.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Subpart G—NOAA RESTORE Act Science
Program
34.600 General.
34.601 Responsibility for administration—
NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program.
34.602 Use of funds and eligible activities—
NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program.
34.603 Limitations on activities—NOAA
RESTORE Act Science Program.
34.604 Limitations on administrative
expenses—NOAA RESTORE Act Science
Program.
34.605 Reports—NOAA RESTORE Act
Science Program.
34.606 Recordkeeping—NOAA RESTORE
Act Science Program.
34.607 Audits—NOAA RESTORE Act
Science Program.
Subpart H—Centers of Excellence Research
Grants Program
34.700 General.
34.701 Responsibility for administration—
Centers of Excellence Research Grants
Program.
34.702 Allocation of funds—Centers of
Excellence Research Grants Program.
34.703 Application procedure—Centers of
Excellence Research Grants Program.
34.704 Use of funds and eligible activities—
Centers of Excellence Research Grants
Program.
34.705 Ineligible activities—Centers of
Excellence Research Grants Program.
34.706 Reports—Centers of Excellence
Research Grants Program.
34.707 Recordkeeping—Centers of
Excellence Research Grants Program.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 238001
34.708 Audits—Centers of Excellence
Research Grants Program.
Subpart I—Agreements
34.800 General.
34.801 Grant agreements.
34.802 Certifications.
34.803 Conditions.
34.804 Noncompliance.
34.805 Treasury Inspector General.
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 301; 31 U.S.C. 321;
33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
Subpart A—General Provisions
§ 34.1
Purpose.
This part describes policies and
procedures applicable to the following
programs authorized under the
Resources and Ecosystems
Sustainability, Tourist Opportunities,
and Revived Economies of the Gulf
Coast States Act of 2012 (RESTORE
Act).
(a) The Gulf RESTORE Program is
authorized under section 311(t) of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33
U.S.C. 1321(t)), as amended by the
RESTORE Act, and includes the
following components:
(1) Direct Component (subpart D of
this part), administered by the
Department of the Treasury.
(2) Comprehensive Plan Component
(subpart E of this part), administered by
the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration
Council.
(3) Spill Impact Component (subpart
F of this part), administered by the Gulf
Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council.
(b) NOAA RESTORE Act Science
Program (subpart G of this part) is
administered by the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration, and
authorized by the RESTORE Act, section
1604, 33 U.S.C. 1321 note.
(c) Centers of Excellence Research
Grants Program (subpart H of this part)
is administered by the Department of
the Treasury, and authorized by the
RESTORE Act, section 1605, 33 U.S.C.
1321 note.
§ 34.2
Definitions.
As used in this part:
Act or RESTORE Act means the
Resources and Ecosystems
Sustainability, Tourist Opportunities,
and Revived Economies of the Gulf
Coast States Act of 2012.
Activity means an activity, project, or
program, including research and
monitoring, eligible for funding under
the Act.
Administrative costs means those
indirect costs for administration
incurred by the Gulf Coast States,
coastal political subdivisions, and
coastal zone parishes that are allocable
to activities authorized under the Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Administrative costs do not include
indirect costs that are identified
specifically with, or readily assignable
to, facilities as defined in 2 CFR
200.414.
Administrative expenses means those
expenses incurred for administration by
the Council or NOAA, including
expenses for general management
functions, general ledger accounting,
budgeting, human resource services,
general procurement services, and
general legal services. Administrative
expenses do not include expenses that
are identified specifically with, or
readily assignable to:
(1) Facilities;
(2) Eligible projects, programs, or
planning activities;
(3) Activities related to grant
applications, awards, audit
requirements, or post-award
management, including payments and
collections;
(4) The Council’s development,
publication, and implementation of the
Comprehensive Plan and any
subsequent amendments;
(5) The Council’s development and
publication of regulations and
procedures for implementing the Spill
Impact Component, and the review of
State Expenditure Plans submitted
under the Spill Impact Component;
(6) Preparation of reports required by
the Act;
(7) Establishment and operation of
advisory committees; or
(8) Collection and consideration of
scientific and other research associated
with restoration of the Gulf Coast
ecosystem.
Alabama Gulf Coast Recovery Council
means the entity identified in section
311(t)(1)(F)(i) of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended by
the RESTORE Act.
Assignee means a member of the Gulf
Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council
who has been assigned primary
authority and responsibility for a project
or program included in the
Comprehensive Plan through a grant or
interagency agreement.
Best available science means science
that maximizes the quality, objectivity,
and integrity of information, including
statistical information; uses peerreviewed and publicly available data;
and clearly documents and
communicates risks and uncertainties in
the scientific basis for such projects.
Centers of Excellence Research Grants
Program means the program authorized
by section 1605 of the Act.
Coastal political subdivision means
any local political jurisdiction that is
immediately below the state level of
government, including a county, parish,
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
or borough, with a coastline that is
contiguous with any portion of the
United States Gulf of Mexico. The term
includes any of the disproportionately
affected counties and
nondisproportionately impacted
counties in Florida, as defined below.
Coastal zone parishes means the
parishes of Ascension, Assumption,
Calcasieu, Cameron, Iberia, Jefferson,
Lafourche, Livingston, Orleans,
Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. Charles,
St. James, St. John the Baptist, St.
Martin, St. Mary, St. Tammany,
Tangipahoa, Terrebonne, and Vermilion
in the State of Louisiana.
Comprehensive Plan Component
means the component of the Gulf
RESTORE Program authorized by
section 311(t)(2) of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as added by
section 1603 of the Act, in which funds
are provided through the Council, in
accordance with a plan developed by
the Council, to entities to carry out the
purposes of the Act.
Council means the Gulf Coast
Ecosystem Restoration Council, an
independent entity in the Federal
Government whose members are the
Governors of the Gulf Coast States; the
Secretaries of Agriculture, the Army,
Commerce, and the Interior; the head of
the department in which the Coast
Guard is operating, and the
Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency (or their designees at
the level of Assistant Secretary or the
equivalent).
Deepwater Horizon oil spill means the
blowout and explosion of the mobile
offshore drilling unit Deepwater
Horizon that occurred on April 20,
2010, and resulting hydrocarbon
releases into the environment.
Direct Component means the
component of the Gulf RESTORE
Program authorized by section 311(t)(1)
of the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act, as added by section 1603 of the
Act, in which Gulf Coast States, coastal
zone parishes, disproportionately
affected counties, and
nondisproportionately impacted
counties are provided funds directly by
Treasury through grants to carry out the
purposes of the Act.
Disproportionately affected counties
means the counties of Bay, Escambia,
Franklin, Gulf, Okaloosa, Santa Rosa,
Wakulla, and Walton in the State of
Florida.
Federal Water Pollution Control Act
means 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
Gulf Coast Region means:
(1) In the Gulf Coast States, the coastal
zones defined under section 304 of the
Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972
that border the Gulf of Mexico;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 238001
(2) Land within the coastal zones
described in paragraph (1) of this
definition that is held in trust by, or the
use of which is by law subject solely to
the discretion of, the Federal
Government or officers or agents of the
Federal Government;
(3) Any adjacent land, water, and
watersheds, that are within 25 miles of
the coastal zone described in paragraphs
(1) and (2) of this definition; and
(4) All Federal waters in the Gulf of
Mexico.
Gulf Coast State means any of the
States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana,
Mississippi, and Texas.
Gulf Coast State entity means a party
that carries out the duties of a state for
the Centers of Excellence Research
Grants Program under § 34.702.
Infrastructure means the public
facilities or systems needed to support
commerce and economic development.
These installations and facilities span a
wide range, including highways,
airports, roads, buildings, transit
systems, port facilities, railways,
telecommunications, water and sewer
systems, public electric and gas utilities,
levees, seawalls, breakwaters, major
pumping stations, and flood gates.
Infrastructure encompasses new
construction, upgrades and repairs to
existing facilities or systems, and
associated land acquisition and
planning.
Multiyear Implementation Plan means
the plan submitted by entities eligible
for funding directly from Treasury
under the Direct Component, and
described at § 34.303.
NOAA means the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration.
NOAA RESTORE Act Science
Program means the program authorized
by section 1604 of the Act.
Nondisproportionately impacted
counties means the counties of
Charlotte, Citrus, Collier, Dixie,
Hernando, Hillsborough, Jefferson, Lee,
Levy, Manatee, Monroe, Pasco, Pinellas,
Sarasota, and Taylor in the State of
Florida.
Pass-through entity means a nonFederal entity that provides a subaward
to a subrecipient to carry out part of a
program under the Act.
Planning assistance means data
gathering, studies, modeling, analysis
and other tasks required to prepare
plans for eligible activities under
§ 34.201(a) through (i), including
environmental review and compliance
tasks and architectural and engineering
studies. Planning assistance also means
one-time preparations that will allow
the recipient to establish systems and
processes needed to review grant
applications, award grants, monitor
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77245
grants after award, and audit
compliance with respect to eligible
activities under § 34.201 in a Multiyear
Implementation Plan or State
Expenditure Plan.
Recipient means a non-Federal entity
that receives a Federal award directly
from a Federal awarding agency to carry
out an activity under the Act. As used
in these regulations, a recipient also
includes a pass-through entity. The term
recipient does not include
subrecipients.
Spill Impact Component means the
component of the Gulf RESTORE
Program authorized by section 311(t)(3)
of the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act, as added by section 1603 of the
Act, in which Gulf Coast States are
provided funds by the Council
according to a formula that the Council
establishes by regulation, using criteria
listed in the Act.
State Expenditure Plan means the
plan that each Gulf Coast State must
submit to the Council for the
expenditure of amounts disbursed
under the Spill Impact Component, and
described at § 34.503.
Subrecipient means a non-Federal
entity that receives a subaward from a
recipient to carry out an activity under
the Act.
Treasury means the U.S. Department
of the Treasury, the Secretary of the
Treasury, or his/her designee.
Trust Fund means the Gulf Coast
Restoration Trust Fund.
Subpart B—Trust Fund
§ 34.100
The Trust Fund.
Treasury will deposit into the Trust
Fund an amount equal to 80 percent of
all administrative and civil penalties
paid after July 6, 2012 by responsible
parties in connection with the explosion
on, and sinking of, the mobile offshore
drilling unit Deepwater Horizon
pursuant to a court order, negotiated
settlement, or other instrument under
section 311 of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act. After these
administrative and civil penalties have
been deposited into the Trust Fund, the
Trust Fund will terminate on the date
all amounts owed to the Trust Fund
have been returned to the Trust Fund,
and all amounts in the Trust Fund have
been expended.
§ 34.101
Investments.
The Secretary of the Treasury will
invest such amounts in the Trust Fund
that are not, in the judgment of the
Secretary, required to meet needs for
current withdrawals. The Secretary may
invest in interest-bearing obligations of
the United States, having maturities
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
77246
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
suitable to the needs of the Trust Fund
as determined by the Secretary. These
obligations will bear interest at rates
described in 31 U.S.C. 9702, unless the
Secretary determines that such rates are
unavailable for obligations with suitable
maturities. In that event, the Secretary
will select obligations of the United
States bearing interest at rates
determined by the Secretary, taking into
consideration current market yields on
outstanding marketable obligations of
the United States of comparable
maturities.
§ 34.105
§ 34.102
Subpart C—Eligible Activities for the
Section 311(t) Gulf RESTORE Program
Components
Interest earned.
Interest earned on Trust Fund
investments will be available as
described in § 34.103(b).
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 34.103
§ 34.200
Allocation of funds.
The amounts in the Trust Fund are
allocated among the programs in § 34.1.
(a) Available funds in the Trust Fund,
other than interest, are allocated as
follows:
(1) Thirty-five percent in equal shares
for the Gulf Coast States to be used for
the Direct Component of the Gulf
RESTORE Program. Section 34.302
describes the allocation for each Gulf
Coast State.
(2) Thirty percent for the Council to
be used for the Comprehensive Plan
Component of the Gulf RESTORE
Program.
(3) Thirty percent for formula
distribution to Gulf Coast States to be
used for the Spill Impact Component of
the Gulf RESTORE Program.
(4) Two and one-half percent to be
used for the NOAA RESTORE Act
Science Program.
(5) Two and one-half percent in equal
shares for the Gulf Coast States to be
used for the Centers of Excellence
Research Grants Program.
(b) Within ten days of the close of a
Federal fiscal year, available funds
equal to the interest earned on the Trust
Fund investments will be allocated, as
follows:
(1) Twenty-five percent to be used for
the NOAA RESTORE Act Science
Program.
(2) Twenty-five percent for the
Centers of Excellence Research Grants
Program.
(3) Fifty percent for the
Comprehensive Plan Component of the
Gulf RESTORE Program.
§ 34.104
Expenditures.
Subject to limitations in the Act and
these regulations, amounts in the Trust
Fund will be available for the direct and
indirect expenses of eligible activities
without fiscal year limitation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 238001
Waiver.
To the extent not inconsistent with
applicable law, Treasury may waive or
modify a requirement in the regulations
in this part in a single case or class of
cases if the Secretary determines, in his
or her sole discretion, that the
requirement is not necessary for the
deposit of amounts into, or the
expenditure of amounts from, the Trust
Fund. Treasury will provide public
notice of any waivers or modifications
granted that materially change a
regulatory requirement.
General.
This subpart describes policies and
procedures regarding eligible activities
applicable to the Direct Component,
Comprehensive Plan Component, and
Spill Impact Component of the Gulf
RESTORE Program. Subparts D, E, F,
and I of this part describe additional
requirements that must be met before an
activity can receive funding.
(a) Trust Fund amounts may be used
to carry out an activity in whole or in
part only if the following requirements
are met:
(1) Costs must comply with
administrative requirements and cost
principles in applicable Federal laws
and policies on grants.
(2) The activity must meet the
eligibility requirements of the Gulf
RESTORE Program as defined in
§ 34.201, § 34.202, or § 34.203,
according to component.
(3) Activities funded through the
Direct Component, Comprehensive Plan
Component, and Spill Impact
Component must not be included in any
claim for compensation presented after
July 6, 2012, to the Oil Spill Liability
Trust Fund authorized by 26 U.S.C.
9509.
(b) A Gulf Coast State, coastal
political subdivision, and coastal zone
parish may use funds available under
the Direct Component or Spill Impact
Component to satisfy the non-Federal
cost-share of an activity that is eligible
under §§ 34.201 and 34.203 and
authorized by Federal law.
§ 34.201 Eligible activities for the Direct
Component.
The following activities are eligible
for funding under the Direct
Component. Activities in paragraphs (a)
through (g) of this section are eligible for
funding to the extent they are carried
out in the Gulf Coast Region. Direct
Component activities are carried out in
the Gulf Coast Region when, in the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
reasonable judgment of the entity
applying to Treasury for a grant, each
severable part of the activity is primarily
designed to restore or protect that
geographic area. Applicants must
demonstrate that the activity will be
carried out in the Gulf Coast Region
when they apply for a grant. Activities
designed to protect or restore natural
resources must be based on the best
available science. All Direct Component
activities must be included in and
conform to the description in the
Multiyear Implementation Plan required
by § 34.303.
(a) Restoration and protection of the
natural resources, ecosystems, fisheries,
marine and wildlife habitats, beaches,
and coastal wetlands of the Gulf Coast
Region.
(b) Mitigation of damage to fish,
wildlife, and natural resources.
(c) Implementation of a Federallyapproved marine, coastal, or
comprehensive conservation
management plan, including fisheries
monitoring.
(d) Workforce development and job
creation.
(e) Improvements to or on state parks
located in coastal areas affected by the
Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
(f) Infrastructure projects benefitting
the economy or ecological resources,
including port infrastructure.
(g) Coastal flood protection and
related infrastructure.
(h) Promotion of tourism in the Gulf
Coast Region, including promotion of
recreational fishing.
(i) Promotion of the consumption of
seafood harvested from the Gulf Coast
Region.
(j) Planning assistance. Eligible
entities under § 34.302 may apply for
planning assistance grants to fund
preparation and amendment of the
Multiyear Implementation Plan.
(k) Administrative costs.
§ 34.202 Eligible activities for the
Comprehensive Plan Component.
The Council may expend funds that
are available under the Comprehensive
Plan Component for eligible activities
under 33 U.S.C. 1321(t)(2) and (3),
including the following:
(a) The Council may expend funds to
carry out activities in the Gulf Coast
Region that are included in the
Comprehensive Plan, as described in 33
U.S.C. 1321(t)(2). An activity selected by
the Council is carried out in the Gulf
Coast Region when, in the reasonable
judgment of the Council, each severable
part of the activity is primarily designed
to restore or protect that geographic
area. The Council must document the
basis for its judgment when it selects the
activity.
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
not more than three percent may be
used for administrative costs. The three
percent limit is applied to the total
amount of funds received by a recipient
under each grant. The three percent
limit does not apply to the
administrative costs of subrecipients.
All subrecipient costs are subject to the
cost principles in Federal laws and
policies on grants.
(b) Of the amounts received by the
Council under the Comprehensive Plan
Component, not more than three percent
may be used for administrative
expenses. The three percent limit is
applied to the total amount of funds
received by the Council, beginning with
the first fiscal year the Council receives
funds through the end of the fourth, or
most recent fiscal year, whichever is
later.
§ 34.203 Eligible activities for the Spill
Impact Component.
§ 34.205 Council’s audited financial
statements and audits.
Activities eligible for funding under
the Spill Impact Component must meet
the eligibility criteria in § 34.201(a)
through (k), as well as the following:
(a) The activities must be included in
and conform to the description in a
State Expenditure Plan required in
§ 34.503 and approved by the Council.
State entities may apply for a grant from
the total amount allocated to that state
under the Spill Impact Component
before the Council has approved the
State Expenditure Plan to fund eligible
activities that are necessary to develop
and submit that plan.
(b) The activities included in the State
Expenditure Plan must contribute to the
overall economic and ecological
recovery of the Gulf Coast.
(c) Activities listed in § 34.201(a)
through (g) are eligible for funding from
the Spill Impact Component to the
extent they are carried out in the Gulf
Coast Region. For purposes of this
component, an activity is carried out in
the Gulf Coast Region when, in the
reasonable judgment of the entity
developing the State Expenditure Plan
under § 34.503, each severable part of
the activity is primarily designed to
restore or protect that geographic area.
State Expenditure Plans must include a
demonstration that activities in the plan
will be carried out in the Gulf Coast
Region.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
(b) The Council may expend funds to
develop and publish the proposed and
initial Comprehensive Plans, and to
implement, amend, and update the
Comprehensive Plan as required by the
Act or as necessary.
(c) The Council may expend funds to
prepare annual reports to Congress, and
other reports and audits required by the
Act, these regulations, and other Federal
law.
(d) The Council may expend funds to
establish and operate one or more
advisory committees as may be
necessary to assist the Council.
(e) The Council may expend funds to
collect and consider scientific and other
research associated with restoration of
the Gulf Coast ecosystem, including
research, observation, and monitoring.
(f) Administrative expenses.
(a) Not later than December 1, 2014,
and each year thereafter, the Council
must prepare and submit to the
Secretary of the Treasury an audited
financial statement for the preceding
Federal fiscal year, covering all accounts
and associated activities of the Council.
(b) Each audited financial statement
under this section must reflect:
(1) The overall financial position of
the accounts and activities covered by
the statement, including assets and
liabilities thereof.
(2) Results of operations of the
Council.
(c) The financial statements must be
prepared in accordance with the form
and content of the financial statements
prescribed by the Director of the Office
of Management and Budget for
executive agencies pursuant to 31 U.S.C.
3515, consistent with applicable
accounting and financial reporting
principles, standards, and requirements.
(d) The Treasury Inspector General
may conduct audits and reviews of the
Council’s accounts and activities as the
Inspector General deems appropriate.
§ 34.204 Limitations on administrative
costs and administrative expenses.
(a) Of the amounts received by a Gulf
Coast State, coastal political
subdivision, or coastal zone parish in a
grant from Treasury under the Direct
Component, or in a grant from the
Council under the Comprehensive Plan
Component or Spill Impact Component,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 238001
Subpart D—Gulf RESTORE Program—
Direct Component
§ 34.300
General.
This subpart describes the policies
and procedures applicable to the Direct
Component of the Gulf RESTORE
Program. The funds made available
under this subpart will be in the form
of a grant.
§ 34.301 Responsibility for
administration—Direct Component.
Treasury is responsible for awarding
and administering grants and grant
agreements under this subpart. Treasury
will develop and apply policies and
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77247
procedures consistent with the Act and
Federal laws and policies on grants.
Treasury also will establish and
implement a program to monitor
compliance with its grant agreements.
§ 34.302 Allocation of funds—Direct
Component.
The amounts made available in any
fiscal year from the Trust Fund and
allocated to this component will be
available in equal shares for the Gulf
Coast States for expenditure on eligible
activities. The following entities are
eligible to receive Direct Component
grants.
(a) The amounts available to Alabama
will be provided directly to the Alabama
Gulf Coast Recovery Council, or such
administrative agent as it may designate.
All administrative duties of the
Alabama Gulf Coast Recovery Council
must be performed by public officials
and employees that are subject to the
ethics laws of the State of Alabama.
(b) Of the amounts available to
Florida, 75 percent of funding will be
provided directly to the eight
disproportionately affected counties.
Each disproportionately affected
county’s share is as follows: Bay
County, 15.101453044%; Escambia
County, 25.334760043%; Franklin
County, 8.441253238%; Gulf County,
6.743202296%; Okaloosa County,
15.226456794%; Santa Rosa County,
10.497314919%; Wakulla County,
4.943148294%; and Walton County,
13.712411372%.
(c) Of the amounts available to
Florida, 25 percent of funding will be
provided directly to the
nondisproportionately impacted
counties. Each nondisproportionately
impacted county’s share is as follows:
Charlotte County, 5.162%; Citrus
County, 4.692%; Collier County,
7.019%; Dixie County, 3.484%;
Hernando County, 4.982%;
Hillsborough County, 13.339%;
Jefferson County, 3.834%; Lee County,
8.776%; Levy County, 3.894%; Manatee
County, 6.809%; Monroe County,
8.297%; Pasco County, 7.079%; Pinellas
County, 11.002%; Sarasota County,
7.248%; and Taylor County, 4.383%.
(d) Of the amounts available to
Louisiana, 70 percent will be provided
directly to the Coastal Protection and
Restoration Authority Board of
Louisiana, through the Coastal
Protection and Restoration Authority of
Louisiana.
(e) Of the amounts available to
Louisiana, 30 percent will be provided
directly to the coastal zone parishes.
Each coastal zone parish’s share is as
follows: Ascension, 2.42612%;
Assumption, 0.93028%; Calcasieu,
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
77248
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
5.07063%; Cameron, 2.10096%; Iberia,
2.55018%; Jefferson, 11.95309%;
Lafourche, 7.86746%; Livingston,
3.32725%; Orleans, 7.12875%;
Plaquemines, 17.99998%; St. Bernard,
9.66743%; St. Charles, 1.35717%; St.
James, 0.75600%; St. John the Baptist,
1.11915%; St. Martin, 2.06890%; St.
Mary, 1.80223%; St. Tammany,
5.53058%; Tangipahoa, 3.40337%;
Terrebonne, 9.91281%; and Vermilion,
3.02766%.
(f) No parish will receive funds until
the parish chief executive has certified
to the Governor of Louisiana, in a form
satisfactory to the Governor or the
Governor’s designee, that the parish has
completed a comprehensive land use
plan that is consistent with, or
complementary to, the most recent
version of the state’s Coastal Master
Plan approved by the Louisiana
legislature.
(g) The amounts available to
Mississippi will be provided directly to
the Mississippi Department of
Environmental Quality.
(h) The amounts available to Texas
will be provided directly to the Office
of the Governor or to an appointee of the
Office of the Governor.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 34.303 Application procedure—Direct
Component.
The entities identified in § 34.302 are
eligible to apply for their allocation as
a grant. Treasury has developed an
application process for grants available
under this subpart that is consistent
with the Act and Federal laws and
policies on grants. The application
process includes the following
requirements:
(a) Before an eligible entity may
receive a Direct Component activity
grant, the grant applicant must submit a
Multiyear Implementation Plan
describing each activity for which it
seeks funding under the Direct
Component. Applications to fund
preparation and amendment of the
Multiyear Implementation Plan are
exempt from this requirement.
(b) For each activity, the Multiyear
Implementation Plan must include a
narrative description demonstrating:
(1) The need for, purpose, and
objectives of the activity;
(2) How the activity is eligible for
funding and meets all requirements;
(3) Location of the activity;
(4) Budget for the activity;
(5) Milestones for the activity;
(6) Projected completion dates for the
activity;
(7) Criteria the applicant will use to
evaluate the success of each activity in
helping to restore and protect the Gulf
Coast Region impacted by the
Deepwater Horizon oil spill;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 238001
(8) The plan was made available for
public review and comment for a
minimum of 45 days in a manner
calculated to obtain broad-based
participation from individuals,
businesses, Indian tribes, and non-profit
organizations; and
(9) Each activity in the plan was
approved after consideration of
meaningful input from the public.
Treasury may require a standard format
and additional information in the plans.
Plans can be phased and incremental
and may be modified later by the
applicant. If the applicant has requested
or anticipates requesting funding for any
part of the activity from other sources,
including other components in the Act,
the applicant must identify the source,
state the amount of funding, and
provide the current status of the request.
For the State of Louisiana parishes, the
applicant must submit information
demonstrating compliance with
§ 34.302(f).
(c) Material modifications to a
Multiyear Implementation Plan are
subject to all applicable requirements in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(d) The applicant must include
supporting information in each grant
application that:
(1) Proposed activities meet the
statutory requirements for eligibility;
and
(2) Each activity designed to protect
or restore natural resources is based on
best available science.
(e) An applicant may satisfy some or
all of the requirements in this section
and § 34.802(a) through (e) if it can
demonstrate in its application to
Treasury that before July 6, 2012:
(1) The applicant established
conditions to carry out activities that are
substantively the same as the
requirements in this section and
§ 34.802(a) through (e).
(2) The applicable activity qualified as
one or more of the eligible activities in
§ 34.201.
§ 34.304 Grant award process—Direct
Component.
Upon determining that the Multiyear
Implementation Plan and the grant
application meet the requirements of
these regulations and the Act, Treasury
will execute a grant agreement with the
recipient that complies with subpart I of
this part, the Act, and other Federal
laws and policies on grants.
§ 34.305
Use of funds—Direct Component.
(a) An activity may be funded in
whole or in part if the applicable
requirements of subparts C and D of this
part are met.
(b) When awarding contracts to carry
out an activity under the Direct
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Component, a Gulf Coast State, coastal
political subdivision, or coastal zone
parish may give preference to
individuals and companies that reside
in, are headquartered in, or are
principally engaged in business in the
state of project execution consistent
with Federal laws and policies on
grants.
(c) A Gulf Coast State, coastal political
subdivision, or coastal zone parish may
propose to issue subawards for eligible
activities. Recipients that propose to
issue subawards must demonstrate their
ability to conduct subrecipient
monitoring and management, as
required by Federal laws and policies
on grants.
§ 34.306
Reports—Direct Component.
Recipients must submit reports as
prescribed by Treasury.
§ 34.307 Recordkeeping—Direct
Component.
Recipients must maintain records as
prescribed by Treasury, and make the
records available to Treasury, including
the Treasury Inspector General.
§ 34.308
Audits—Direct Component.
Treasury, including the Treasury
Inspector General, may conduct audits
and reviews of recipient’s accounts and
activities relating to the Act as deemed
appropriate by Treasury.
Subpart E—Gulf RESTORE Program—
Comprehensive Plan Component
§ 34.400
General.
This subpart describes the policies
and procedures applicable to the
Comprehensive Plan Component. The
Comprehensive Plan is developed by
the Council in accordance with 33
U.S.C. 1321(t)(2) and will include
activities the Council intends to carry
out, subject to available funding. When
selecting activities to carry out in the
first three years, except for certain
projects and programs that were
authorized prior to July 6, 2012, the
Council will give highest priority to
projects meeting one or more of the
criteria in 33 U.S.C. 1321(t)(2)(D)(iii).
§ 34.401 Responsibility for
administration—Comprehensive Plan
Component.
(a) After selecting Comprehensive
Plan projects and programs to be
funded, the Council must assign
primary authority and responsibility for
overseeing and implementing projects
and programs to a Gulf Coast State or
Federal agency represented on the
Council, which are called assignees in
these regulations. In assigning
responsibility, the Council must enter
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
into a grant agreement with the Gulf
Coast State or an interagency agreement
with the Federal agency. Any grant
agreement must be consistent with
applicable Federal laws and policies on
grants. The Council must specify
whether any part of an assignee’s
responsibility may be further assigned
to another entity and under what terms.
(b) When an assignee’s grant or
subaward to, or cooperative agreement
with, a nongovernmental entity would
equal or exceed ten percent of the total
amount provided to the assignee for that
activity, the Council must publish in the
Federal Register and deliver to the
following Congressional Committees at
least 30 days prior to the assignee
entering into an agreement the name of
the recipient or subrecipient; a brief
description of the activity, including its
purpose; and the amount of the award.
(1) House of Representatives
committees: Committee on Science,
Space, and Technology; Committee on
Natural Resources; Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure;
Committee on Appropriations.
(2) Senate committees: Committee on
Environment and Public Works;
Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation; Committee on Energy
and Natural Resources; Committee on
Appropriations.
(c) The Council must establish and
implement a program to monitor
compliance with its grant agreements
and interagency agreements.
§ 34.402 Grant administration—
Comprehensive Plan Component.
The Council must publish policies
and procedures for administration of
Comprehensive Plan Component grants
that are consistent with applicable
Federal laws and policies on grants.
These grant policies and procedures
must include uniform guidelines for
assignees to use when selecting
subrecipients, awarding grants and
subawards, and monitoring compliance.
The Council must also establish and
implement a program to monitor
compliance with its grant agreements.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 34.403 Use of funds—Comprehensive
Plan Component.
An activity may be funded in whole
or in part if the applicable requirements
of subparts C and E of this part are met.
§ 34.404 Reports—Comprehensive Plan
Component.
Assignees must submit reports as
prescribed by the Council or Treasury.
In addition, the Council must submit
reports as prescribed by Treasury.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 238001
§ 34.405 Recordkeeping—Comprehensive
Plan Component.
Assignees must maintain records as
prescribed by the Council and Treasury,
and make the records available to the
Council and Treasury, including the
Treasury Inspector General. In addition,
the Council must make its records
concerning the activities of assignees
available to Treasury, including the
Treasury Inspector General.
§ 34.406 Audits—Comprehensive Plan
Component.
The Council and Treasury, including
the Treasury Inspector General, may
conduct audits and reviews of assignee’s
accounts and activities relating to the
Act as any of them deems appropriate.
Subpart F—Gulf RESTORE Program—
Spill Impact Component
§ 34.500
General.
This subpart describes the policies
and procedures applicable to the Spill
Impact Component of the Gulf
RESTORE Program. The funds made
available under this subpart will be in
the form of grants.
§ 34.501 Responsibility for
administration—Spill Impact Component.
The Council is responsible for
awarding and administering grants
under this subpart.
§ 34.502 Allocation of funds—Spill Impact
Component.
The Council will allocate amounts to
the Gulf Coast States based on the Act
and regulations promulgated by the
Council. The Council will make
allocated funds available through grants
for activities described in a State
Expenditure Plan approved by the
Council.
§ 34.503 State Expenditure Plans—Spill
Impact Component.
Each Gulf Coast State, through its
Governor or the Governor’s designee,
must submit a State Expenditure Plan to
the Council for its approval that
describes each activity for which the
state seeks funding. The Council must
develop requirements for these plans,
including the requirements below.
(a) The State Expenditure Plan must
be developed by:
(1) In Alabama, the Alabama Gulf
Coast Recovery Council.
(2) In Florida, a consortium of local
political subdivisions that includes, at a
minimum, one representative of each
county affected by the Deepwater
Horizon oil spill.
(3) In Louisiana, the Coastal
Protection and Restoration Authority of
Louisiana, as approved by the Board.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77249
(4) In Mississippi, the Office of the
Governor or an appointee of the Office
of the Governor.
(5) In Texas, the Office of the
Governor or an appointee of the Office
of the Governor.
(b) The State Expenditure Plan must
describe how it takes into consideration
the Comprehensive Plan and is
consistent with the goals and objectives
of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition,
the State Expenditure Plan must
describe the processes used:
(1) To evaluate and select activities
included in the plan;
(2) To assess the capability of third
party entities that will implement
activities in the plan;
(3) To prevent conflicts of interest in
the development and implementation of
the plan;
(4) To obtain public review and
comment in accordance with paragraph
(g) of this section; and
(5) To verify compliance with the
requirements of § 34.203 and this
subpart.
(c) For each activity in the State
Expenditure Plan, the plan must include
a narrative description demonstrating:
(1) The need for, purpose, and
objectives of the activity;
(2) How the activity is eligible for
funding and meets all requirements of
§ 34.203 and this subpart;
(3) Location of the activity;
(4) Budget for the activity;
(5) Milestones for the activity;
(6) Projected completion dates for the
activity; and
(7) Criteria the applicant will use to
evaluate the success of each activity in
helping to restore and protect the Gulf
Coast Region. Plans can be phased or
incremental and may be modified with
the Council’s approval. If funding has
been requested from other sources,
including other components of the Act,
the plan must identify the source, state
how much funding was requested, and
provide the current status of the request.
(d) The State Expenditure Plan must
demonstrate how the activities in the
plan will contribute to the overall
economic and ecological recovery of the
Gulf Coast, and how each activity that
would restore and protect natural
resources, ecosystems, fisheries, marine
and wildlife habitats, beaches, coastal
wetlands or the economy of the Gulf
Coast is based on the best available
science.
(e) The State Expenditure Plan must
demonstrate that activities described in
§ 34.201(a) through (g) will be carried
out in the Gulf Coast Region, as
described in § 34.203(c).
(f) No more than 25 percent of
funding under the Spill Impact
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
77250
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Component is available to a Gulf Coast
State under this subpart to pay for
infrastructure, unless the Governor or
the Governor’s representative on the
Council certifies that:
(1) The ecosystem restoration needs in
the state will be addressed by the
activities in the proposed plan; and
(2) Additional investment in
infrastructure is required to mitigate the
impacts of the Deepwater Horizon Oil
Spill to the ecosystem or economy.
(g) Before being submitted to the
Council for approval, a State
Expenditure Plan must be available for
public review and comment for a
minimum of 45 days, in a manner
calculated to obtain broad-based
participation from individuals,
businesses, Indian tribes, and non-profit
organizations.
(h) If the Council disapproves a State
Expenditure Plan, the Council must
notify the impacted state in writing and
consult with the state to address any
identified deficiencies with the plan. If
the Council fails to approve or take
action within 60 days after the date on
which the Council receives the plan, the
state may obtain expedited judicial
review within 90 days in a United States
district court located in the state seeking
the review.
(i) The Council must publish
guidelines explaining when
modifications to a State Expenditure
Plan require the Council’s approval.
Material modifications to a State
Expenditure Plan are subject to the
requirements of paragraphs (b) through
(g) of this section.
§ 34.504 Grant administration—Spill
Impact Component.
The Council must publish policies
and procedures for administration of the
Spill Impact Component grants that are
consistent with applicable Federal laws
and policies on grants. The Council
must also establish and implement a
program to monitor compliance with its
grant agreements.
§ 34.505 Use of funds—Spill Impact
Component.
An activity may be funded in whole
or in part if the applicable requirements
of subparts C and F of this part are met.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 34.506 Reports—Spill Impact
Component.
Recipients must submit reports as
prescribed by the Council or Treasury.
In addition, the Council must submit
reports as prescribed by Treasury.
§ 34.507 Recordkeeping—Spill Impact
Component.
Recipients must maintain records as
prescribed by the Council and make the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 238001
records available to the Council, and
Treasury, including the Treasury
Inspector General. In addition, the
Council must make its records
concerning the activities of recipients
available to Treasury, including the
Treasury Inspector General.
§ 34.508
Audits—Spill Impact Component.
The Council and Treasury, including
the Treasury Inspector General, may
conduct audits and reviews of a
recipient’s accounts and activities
relating to the Act as any of them deem
appropriate.
Subpart G—NOAA RESTORE Act
Science Program
§ 34.600
General.
This subpart describes policies and
procedures applicable to the NOAA
RESTORE Act Science Program. The
program’s purpose is to carry out
research, observation, and monitoring to
support, to the maximum extent
practicable, the long-term sustainability
of the ecosystem, fish stocks, fish
habitat, and the recreational,
commercial, and charter fishing
industries in the Gulf of Mexico.
§ 34.601 Responsibility for
administration—NOAA RESTORE Act
Science Program.
NOAA is responsible for establishing
and administering this program, in
consultation with the United States Fish
and Wildlife Service. NOAA must
develop, publish, and apply policies
and procedures for the NOAA RESTORE
Act Science Program consistent with the
Act, this subpart, and Federal laws and
policies on grants. NOAA must monitor
compliance with its grant agreements,
cooperative agreements, contracts, and
agreements funded through the Trust
Fund. NOAA and the United States Fish
and Wildlife Service will consult with
the Regional Gulf of Mexico Fishery
Management Council and the Gulf
States Marine Fisheries Commission in
carrying out the program.
§ 34.602 Use of funds and eligible
activities—NOAA RESTORE Act Science
Program.
(a) Amounts made available to NOAA
may be expended to carry out a program
comprised of activities described in
section 1604 of the Act. These activities
include coordination of science and
technology programs and stakeholder
engagement, in accordance with section
1604(f) of the Act, as well as the
following activities with respect to the
Gulf of Mexico:
(1) Marine and estuarine research.
(2) Marine and estuarine ecosystem
monitoring and ocean observation.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(3) Data collection and stock
assessments.
(4) Pilot programs for fishery
independent data and reduction of
exploitation of spawning aggregations.
(5) Cooperative research.
(b) NOAA may also expend amounts
made available from the Trust Fund for
administrative expenses connected with
the program. All funds must be
expended in compliance with the Act,
these regulations, and other applicable
law.
§ 34.603 Limitations on activities—NOAA
RESTORE Act Science Program.
None of the Trust Fund amounts may
be used for the following activities:
(a) For any existing or planned
research led by NOAA, unless agreed to
in writing by the grant recipient.
(b) To implement existing regulations
or initiate new regulations promulgated
or proposed by NOAA.
(c) To develop or approve a new
limited access privilege program (as that
term is used in section 303A of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act [16
U.S.C. 1853(a)]) for any fishery under
the jurisdiction of the South Atlantic,
Mid-Atlantic, New England, or Gulf of
Mexico Fishery Management Councils.
§ 34.604 Limitations on administrative
expenses—NOAA RESTORE Act Science
Program.
(a) Of the amounts received by NOAA
under the NOAA RESTORE Act Science
Program, not more than three percent
may be used for administrative
expenses.
(b) The three percent limit is applied
to the total amount of funds received by
NOAA, beginning with the first fiscal
year it receives funds through the end
of the fourth, or most recent fiscal year,
whichever is later.
(c) NOAA may seek reimbursement of
administrative expenses incurred after
the first deposit into the Trust Fund, to
the extent permitted by Federal law.
Administrative expenses incurred prior
to the first deposit into the Trust Fund
are not reimbursable.
§ 34.605 Reports—NOAA RESTORE Act
Science Program.
NOAA must submit reports as
prescribed by Treasury.
§ 34.606 Recordkeeping—NOAA
RESTORE Act Science Program.
Recipients and other entities receiving
funds under the NOAA RESTORE Act
Science Program must maintain records
as prescribed by NOAA and make the
records available to NOAA.
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
§ 34.607 Audits—NOAA RESTORE Act
Science Program.
NOAA and the Treasury Inspector
General may conduct audits and
reviews of recipient’s accounts and
activities relating to the Act as either of
them deems appropriate.
Subpart H—Centers of Excellence
Research Grants Program
§ 34.700
General.
This subpart describes the policies
and procedures applicable to the
Centers of Excellence Research Grants
Program. The program’s purpose is to
establish centers of excellence to
conduct research only on the Gulf Coast
Region. The funds made available to the
Gulf Coast States under this subpart will
be in the form of a grant.
§ 34.701 Responsibility for
administration—Centers of Excellence
Research Grants Program.
Treasury is responsible for awarding
grants to the Gulf Coast States, which
will use the amounts made available to
award grants to nongovernmental
entities and consortia in the Gulf Coast
Region for the establishment of Centers
of Excellence. Treasury will develop
and apply policies and procedures
consistent with this Act and Federal
laws and policies on grants. Each Gulf
Coast State entity issuing grants must
establish and implement a program to
monitor compliance with its subaward
agreements.
§ 34.702 Allocation of funds—Centers of
Excellence Research Grants Program.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
An equal share of funds will be
available to each Gulf Coast State to
carry out eligible activities. The duties
of a Gulf Coast State will be carried out
by the following entities:
(a) In Alabama, the Alabama Gulf
Coast Recovery Council, or such
administrative agent as it may designate.
(b) In Florida, the Florida Institute of
Oceanography.
(c) In Louisiana, the Coastal
Protection and Restoration Authority
Board of Louisiana, through the Coastal
Protection and Restoration Authority of
Louisiana.
(d) In Mississippi, the Mississippi
Department of Environmental Quality.
(e) In Texas, the Office of the
Governor or an appointee of the Office
of the Governor.
§ 34.703 Application procedure—Centers
of Excellence Research Grants Program.
Treasury has developed an
application process for grants available
to the Gulf Coast States under this
subpart that is consistent with the Act
and Federal laws and policies on grants.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 238001
The process includes the following
requirements:
(a) Each Gulf Coast State must
describe the competitive process that
the state will use to select one or more
Centers of Excellence. The competitive
process must allow nongovernmental
entities and consortia in the Gulf Coast
Region, including public and private
institutions of higher education, to
compete. The process must give priority
to entities and consortia that
demonstrate the ability to establish the
broadest cross-section of participants in
the grant with interest and expertise in
science, technology, and monitoring in
the discipline(s) on which the proposal
is focused. The process must also guard
against conflicts of interest.
(b) Each Gulf Coast State must
describe in its application the state rules
and policies applying to subawards it
will issue under this subpart. At a
minimum, these state rules and policies
must include the competitive selection
process and measures to guard against
conflicts of interest.
(c) Each Gulf Coast State must
demonstrate in its application that the
state rules and policies applying to
subawards it will issue under this
subpart were published and available
for public review and comment for a
minimum of 45 days, and that they were
approved after consideration of
meaningful input from the public,
including broad-based participation
from individuals, businesses, Indian
tribes, and non-profit organizations.
These requirements do not apply to
state statutes and regulations, or to
policies that were in effect prior to
August 15, 2014.
(d) Each application must state the
amount of funding requested and the
purposes for which the funds will be
used.
§ 34.704 Use of funds and eligible
activities—Centers of Excellence Research
Grants Program.
(a) A Gulf Coast State receiving funds
under this subpart must establish a
grant program that complies with the
Act and Federal laws and policies on
grants.
(b) Gulf Coast States may use funds
available under this subpart to award
competitive subawards for the
establishment of Centers of Excellence
that focus on science, technology, and
monitoring in at least one of the
following disciplines:
(1) Coastal and deltaic sustainability,
restoration, and protection, including
solutions and technology that allow
citizens to live in a safe and sustainable
manner in a coastal delta in the Gulf
Coast Region.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77251
(2) Coastal fisheries and wildlife
ecosystem research and monitoring in
the Gulf Coast Region.
(3) Offshore energy development,
including research and technology to
improve the sustainable and safe
development of energy resources in the
Gulf of Mexico.
(4) Sustainable and resilient growth
and economic and commercial
development in the Gulf Coast Region.
(5) Comprehensive observation,
monitoring, and mapping of the Gulf of
Mexico.
§ 34.705 Ineligible activities—Centers of
Excellence Research Grants Program.
Any activity that is not authorized
under the provisions of § 34.704 is
ineligible for funding under this
subpart.
§ 34.706 Reports—Centers of Excellence
Research Grants Program.
Each Gulf Coast State entity must
submit the following reports:
(a) An annual report to the Council in
a form prescribed by the Council that
includes information on subrecipients,
subaward amounts, disciplines
addressed, and any other information
required by the Council. When the
subrecipient is a consortium, the annual
report must also identify the consortium
members. This information will be
included in the Council’s annual report
to Congress.
(b) Reports as prescribed by Treasury.
§ 34.707 Recordkeeping—Centers of
Excellence Research Grants Program.
Recipients must maintain records as
prescribed by Treasury and make the
records available to Treasury, including
the Treasury Inspector General.
§ 34.708 Audits—Centers of Excellence
Research Grants Program.
Treasury, including the Treasury
Inspector General, may conduct audits
and reviews of each recipient’s accounts
and activities relating to the Act as
deemed appropriate by Treasury.
Subpart I—Agreements
§ 34.800
General.
This subpart describes procedures
applicable to grant agreements used by
Treasury, the Council (including
Federal agencies carrying out
responsibilities for the Council), NOAA,
Gulf Coast States, coastal political
subdivisions, and coastal zone parishes
in making awards under subparts D, E,
F, G, and H of this part. It also describes
Treasury’s authority to inspect records
and the Treasury Inspector General’s
authority under the Act.
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
77252
§ 34.801
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 239 / Monday, December 14, 2015 / Rules and Regulations
Grant agreements.
The grant agreements used must
conform to the Act and Federal laws
and policies on grants, including audit
requirements.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 34.802
Certifications.
At a minimum, grant applications and
agreements for the Direct Component,
Comprehensive Plan Component, and
Spill Impact Component must contain
the following certifications. The
certification must be signed by an
authorized senior official of the entity
receiving grant funds who can legally
bind the organization or entity, and who
has oversight for the administration and
use of the funds in question. The
certification in paragraph (c) of this
section does not apply to planning
assistance funds for the preparation and
amendment of the Multiyear
Implementation Plan.
(a) I certify that each activity funded
under this Agreement has been designed
to plan for or undertake activities to
restore and protect the natural
resources, ecosystems, fisheries, marine
and wildlife habitats, beaches, coastal
wetlands, or economy of the Gulf Coast
Region.
(b) I certify that each activity funded
under this Agreement is designed to
carry out one or more of the eligible
activities for this component.
(c) I certify that each activity funded
under this Agreement was part of a plan
made available for public review and
comment in a manner calculated to
obtain broad-based participation from
individuals, businesses, Indian tribes,
and nonprofit organizations, and that
the activity was selected after
consideration of meaningful input from
the public, as described in the grant
application.
(d) I certify that each activity funded
under this Agreement that protects or
restores natural resources is based on
the best available science, as that term
is defined in 31 CFR part 34.
(e) I certify that this recipient has
procedures in place for procuring
property and services under this award
that are consistent with the procurement
standards applying to Federal grants.
This recipient agrees that it will not
request funds under this award for any
contract unless this certification
remains true and accurate.
(f) I certify that a conflict of interest
policy is in effect and covering each
activity funded under this Agreement.
(g) I make each of these certifications
based on my personal knowledge and
belief after reasonable and diligent
inquiry, and I affirm that this recipient
maintains written documentation
sufficient to support each certification
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Dec 11, 2015
Jkt 238001
made above, and that this recipient’s
compliance with each of these
certifications is a condition of this
recipient’s initial and continuing receipt
and use of the funds provided under
this Agreement.
§ 34.803
Conditions.
At a minimum, each grant agreement
under subparts D, E, F, G, and H of this
part must contain the following
conditions:
(a) The recipient must immediately
report any indication of fraud, waste,
abuse, or potentially criminal activity
pertaining to grant funds to Treasury
and the Treasury Inspector General.
(b) The recipient must maintain
detailed records sufficient to account for
the receipt, obligation, and expenditure
of grant funds. The recipient must track
program income.
(c) Prior to disbursing funds to a
subrecipient, the recipient must execute
a legally binding written agreement with
the entity receiving the subaward. The
written agreement will extend all the
applicable program requirements to the
subrecipient.
(d) The recipient must use the funds
only for the purposes identified in the
agreement.
(e) The recipient must report at the
conclusion of the grant period, or other
period specified by the Federal agency
administering the grant, on the use of
funds pursuant to the agreement.
(f) Trust Fund amounts may only be
used to acquire land or interests in land
by purchase, exchange, or donation
from a willing seller.
(g) None of the Trust Fund amounts
may be used to acquire land in fee title
by the Federal Government unless the
land is acquired by exchange or
donation or the acquisition is necessary
for the restoration and protection of the
natural resources, ecosystems, fisheries,
marine and wildlife habitats, beaches,
and coastal wetlands of the Gulf Coast
Region and has the concurrence of the
Governor of the state in which the
acquisition will take place.
§ 34.804
Noncompliance.
(a) If Treasury determines that a Gulf
Coast State, coastal political
subdivision, or coastal zone parish has
expended funds received under the
Direct Component, Comprehensive Plan
Component, or Spill Impact Component
on an ineligible activity, Treasury will
make no additional funds available to
that recipient from any part of the Trust
Fund until the recipient has deposited
in the Trust Fund an amount equal to
the amount expended for an ineligible
activity, or Treasury has authorized the
recipient to expend an equal amount
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
from the recipient’s own funds for an
activity that meets the requirements of
the Act.
(b) If Treasury determines that a Gulf
Coast State, coastal political
subdivision, or coastal zone parish has
materially violated a grant agreement
under the Direct Component,
Comprehensive Plan Component, or
Spill Impact Component, Treasury will
make no additional funds available to
that recipient from any part of the Trust
Fund until the recipient corrects the
violation.
(c) As a condition of receiving funds,
recipients and subrecipients shall make
available their records and personnel to
Treasury in order to carry out the
purposes of this section.
§ 34.805
Treasury Inspector General.
In addition to other authorities
available under the Act, the Office of the
Inspector General of the Department of
the Treasury is authorized to conduct,
supervise, and coordinate audits and
investigations of activities funded
through grants under the Act.
David A. Lebryk,
Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015–31431 Filed 12–11–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2015–1066]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Hoquiam River, Hoquiam, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from drawbridge regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard has issued a
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule that governs the Simpson
Avenue Bridge across the Hoquiam
River, mile 0.5, at Hoquiam, WA. The
deviation is necessary to accommodate
Washington State Department of
Transportation’s (WSDOT) extensive
maintenance and restoration efforts on
this bridge. This deviation allows
WSDOT to open one leaf of the double
leaf bascule bridge when at least two
hours of notice is given. The vertical
clearance will be reduced to
approximately 25 feet at mean high tide,
and the horizontal clearance will be
reduced to 52 feet.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14DER1.SGM
14DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 239 (Monday, December 14, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77239-77252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31431]
[[Page 77239]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
31 CFR Part 34
RIN 1505-AC44
Department of the Treasury Regulations for the Gulf Coast
Restoration Trust Fund
AGENCY: Office of the Fiscal Assistant Secretary, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury is issuing final regulations
concerning the investment and use of amounts deposited in the Gulf
Coast Restoration Trust Fund, which was established in the Treasury of
the United States by the Resources and Ecosystem Sustainability,
Tourist Opportunities, and Revived Economies of the Gulf Coast States
Act of 2012 (RESTORE Act).
DATES: Effective date: February 12, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please send questions by electronic
mail to restoreact@treasury.gov, or contact Janet Vail at the Office of
Gulf Coast Restoration at 202-622-6873.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The RESTORE Act makes funds available for the restoration and
protection of the Gulf Coast Region, and certain programs with respect
to the Gulf of Mexico, through a trust fund in the Treasury of the
United States, known as the Gulf Coast Restoration Trust Fund. The
trust fund will contain 80 percent of the administrative and civil
penalties paid after July 6, 2012 under the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act in connection with the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Amounts
in the trust fund will be invested and made available through five
components of the RESTORE Act.
The Direct Component, administered by Treasury, sets aside 35
percent of the penalties paid into the trust fund for eligible
activities proposed by the State of Alabama, the State of Mississippi,
the State of Texas, the State of Louisiana and 20 Louisiana parishes,
and 23 Florida counties. The Comprehensive Plan Component sets aside 30
percent of the penalties, plus half of all interest earned on trust
fund investments, to be managed by a new independent Federal entity
called the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council (Council). The
Council includes members from six Federal agencies or departments and
the five Gulf Coast States. One of the Federal members, the Secretary
of Commerce, at this time serves as Chairperson of the Council. The
Council will direct those funds to projects and programs for the
restoration of the Gulf Coast Region, pursuant to a comprehensive plan
that is being developed by the Council. Under the Spill Impact
Component, entities representing the Gulf Coast States use an
additional 30 percent of penalties in the trust fund for eligible
activities pursuant to State Expenditure Plans approved by the Council.
The remaining five percent of penalties, plus one-half of all interest
earned on trust fund investments, will be divided equally between the
NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program established by the National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), an operating unit of the
Department of Commerce, and the Centers of Excellence Research Grants
Program, administered by Treasury.
On August 15, 2014, Treasury published a comprehensive interim
final rule containing procedures for implementing the RESTORE Act.
Among its provisions, the procedures allocated amounts to the five
components, described the activities that could be funded and the
entities entitled to apply for funds, and set forth compliance
requirements. Treasury accepted public comment on the comprehensive
interim final rule for thirty days. Treasury published a second interim
final rule on October 10, 2014, which allocated amounts to Louisiana
parishes under one RESTORE Act component, called the Direct Component.
Both interim final rules took effect on October 14, 2014.
II. Public Comments and Summary of Changes From the Interim Final Rules
Treasury received 21 unique comment letters on the comprehensive
interim final rule, and no comments on the interim final rule that
allocated funds to the Louisiana parishes. Several commenters repeated
suggestions made on the proposed rule issued in September 2013, and
opined on matters discussed in the preamble to the comprehensive
interim final rule, such as the application of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to RESTORE Act grant programs.
One commenter, a state, acknowledged the benefits of providing
funds through grants, but encouraged Treasury to consider using a
revenue sharing arrangement. The commenter raised a concern that grant
processes are an inefficient means of disbursing funds to meet the
goals of the RESTORE Act. Treasury addressed this comment when it
published the comprehensive interim final rule. The RESTORE Act imposes
conditions on how states use funds provided under the Act, requires
Federal oversight, and authorizes Treasury to stop the flow of funds
when there is noncompliance. These controls are characteristic of
Federal grant programs. The controls required by Treasury's regulations
and Federal laws and policies on grants hold recipients accountable to
use the funds as required by the RESTORE Act. The public comments
Treasury received on the proposed rule and comprehensive interim final
rule overwhelmingly support the distribution of RESTORE Act funds
through Federal grants. Accordingly, no change has been made in the
final rule to address this comment.
Several commenters, particularly public interest groups, requested
that Treasury exercise more authority over the selection of projects
funded under the RESTORE Act. Some commenters asked Treasury to
establish substantive criteria for evaluating project proposals, such
as performance goals and preferences for certain kinds of activities.
Other commenters proposed that Treasury adopt procedures, such as
independent expert reviews, for evaluating synergies and potential
conflicts between projects proposed under different components, or to
address project proposals that may be controversial.
Treasury considered similar comments during its review of comments
on the proposed rule. The Act does not impose uniform criteria for the
selection of projects under the Direct Component, Comprehensive Plan
Component, and Spill Impact Component, or require the coordination of
projects across components. Each component has different eligibility
criteria, different processes for selecting activities, and different
entities responsible for selecting the activities to be funded. The
final rule acknowledges these differences, while still requiring
compliance with the Act and Federal laws and policies applying to
grants. Under these policies, Federal awards will include an indication
of the timing and scope of performance, and may include specific
performance goals, indicators, milestones, and expected outcomes. The
appropriate vehicle for addressing these project specific requirements
is the Federal award agreement.
Beyond what the Act stipulates, Treasury cannot require the
Council, NOAA, states, counties, or parishes to coordinate their
selection of projects across components in order to achieve particular
economic or environmental goals. Treasury encourages voluntary
[[Page 77240]]
efforts to coordinate work, and intends to facilitate these efforts by
publishing Direct Component Multiyear Implementation Plans and other
information related to the grant programs it administers.
Several public interest groups also asked Treasury to reconsider
its views regarding the application of NEPA to Treasury's activities
under the Direct Component and the Centers of Excellence Research
Grants Program. In the preamble to the comprehensive interim final
rule, we stated that ``Treasury does not anticipate that its review of
Multiyear Implementation Plans or the issuance of individual grants
will require a NEPA review. Other Federal actions connected with
activities funded through a RESTORE Act grant, such as issuance of a
permit, may require NEPA review by the agency issuing the permit.'' 79
FR 48039, 48051 (Aug. 15, 2014).
Treasury's view is based on its limited statutory role for the
administration of Direct Component grants and the Centers of Excellence
Research Grants Program. The Act gives Treasury no role in project
selection or design for the Direct Component. The Act specifies the
activities or disciplines that are eligible for funding, and does not
explicitly authorize Treasury to reject an activity or discipline, or
to require funding of an alternative design, when the activity
otherwise complies with the Act and other Federal law. Also, Treasury
neither approves nor disapproves Multiyear Implementation Plans.
Accordingly, Treasury will review Multiyear Implementation Plans and
grant applications to determine whether they satisfy financial and
administrative requirements in the Act and these regulations, and apply
requirements in the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements
for Federal Awards (OMB's Uniform Guidance), 2 CFR part 200, in its
review of grant applications.
Because Treasury has a limited role in reviewing Multiyear
Implementation Plans and issuing grants, Treasury does not anticipate
that its actions will require an Environmental Assessment or
Environmental Impact Statement under NEPA. NEPA is designed to help
federal agencies consider environmental consequences in their decision-
making process. When an agency action is non-discretionary under a
statute, the information that a NEPA review provides would not assist
the agency's decision-makers. Several commenters urged Treasury to
reconsider the application of NEPA to its RESTORE Act grant programs,
but no commenter offered an analysis of the RESTORE Act or its
legislative history showing where Treasury has the discretion to
consider environmental consequences and project alternatives when
making grants.
Treasury's limited role does not mean that NEPA will never apply to
activities undertaken with funds provided through the Direct Component
and Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program. As Treasury stated
in the preamble to the comprehensive interim final rule, other Federal
actions, such as the issuance of permits, may trigger NEPA review by
the Federal regulatory agency. In addition, it is Treasury policy under
Treasury Directive 75-02 to fully evaluate its actions to ensure
compliance with NEPA requirements and regulations issued by the Council
on Environmental Quality, where applicable. As necessary, Treasury will
consider NEPA environmental documentation in the context of individual
grant applications, if it is determined that Treasury has sufficient
discretion to consider environmental consequences and project
alternatives.
The final rule contains several technical edits, some of which were
suggested by commenters. Substantive comments and changes to the
comprehensive interim final rule are described below.
Section-by-Section Analysis
Section 34.2 (Definitions)
Treasury received several comments requesting a more clear
definition of administrative costs. The final rule continues to define
administrative costs as indirect costs for administration incurred by
the Gulf Coast States, coastal political subdivisions, and coastal zone
parishes that are allocable to activities authorized under the Act.
Administrative costs do not include indirect costs that are identified
specifically with, or readily assignable to, facilities. The final rule
references the definition of facilities in OMB's Uniform Guidance at 2
CFR 200.414(a). To avoid confusion, Treasury has removed the list of
activities that may result in administrative costs from the final rule.
The definition of administrative costs in the comprehensive interim
final rule also included a statement that certain costs are direct
costs. This statement was imprecise and Treasury has deleted it from
the final rule. Grant applicants should look to OMB's Uniform Guidance
for general information about direct and indirect costs. Questions
about whether particular costs are direct or indirect costs should be
addressed to the relevant Federal awarding agency.
One commenter asked Treasury to clarify the definition of Gulf
Coast Region. The commenter contends that the geographic scope of
watersheds in paragraph three of the definition is ambiguous.
Treasury's comprehensive interim final rule defines the Gulf Coast
Region to comprise four geographic areas:
(1) In the Gulf Coast States, the coastal zones defined under
section 304 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 that border the
Gulf of Mexico;
(2) Land within the coastal zones described in paragraph (1) that
is held in trust by, or the use of which is by law subject solely to
the discretion of, the Federal Government or officers or agents of the
Federal Government;
(3) Any adjacent land, water, and watersheds, that are within 25
miles of the coastal zone described in paragraphs (1) and (2); and
(4) All Federal waters in the Gulf of Mexico.
Under paragraph 3, the Gulf Coast Region includes those parts of
adjacent watersheds that extend up to, but no further than, 25 miles
from the coastal zones. An activity is carried out in the Gulf Coast
Region when, in the reasonable judgment of the entity applying for a
grant, each severable part of the activity is primarily designed to
restore or protect that geographic area. See 31 CFR 34.201-203.
Section 34.104 (Expenditures)
In the preamble to the comprehensive interim final rule, Treasury
stated that it was deleting a sentence requiring grant recipients to
minimize the time between receipt of funds and disbursement, because
this requirement is addressed more completely in OMB's Uniform
Guidance. A commenter noted that the sentence was not deleted from the
rule. Treasury has corrected this inadvertent error in the final rule.
Grant recipients with questions about the application of OMB's Uniform
Guidance should direct them to the relevant Federal awarding agency.
Section 34.200 (General)
This section provides that a Gulf Coast State, coastal political
subdivision, and coastal zone parish may use amounts available under
the Direct Component and Spill Impact Component to satisfy the non-
Federal cost-share of an activity that is eligible under Sec. Sec.
34.201 and 34.203 and authorized by Federal law. Commenters questioned
why a similar opportunity is not available for funds made available
under the Comprehensive Plan Component and the Centers of Excellence
Research Grants Program.
[[Page 77241]]
The Act does not allow Comprehensive Plan Component funds or Centers of
Excellence Research Grant funds to be used for satisfying the non-
Federal cost-share. Those allocations are subject to the general rule
in OMB's Uniform Guidance, 2 CFR 200.306, which states that a non-
Federal cost share cannot be met with funds paid by the Federal
government under a Federal award.
Another commenter noted a provision in the Act stating that the use
of trust fund amounts to satisfy the non-Federal share of an eligible
activity ``shall not affect the priority in which other Federal funds
are allocated or awarded.'' 33 U.S.C. 1331(t)(1)(N)(ii). The commenter
requested that Treasury include this provision in its regulations.
Treasury currently sees no need to elaborate on this statutory
provision, which does not need a regulation to be effective. If a grant
recipient believes that a Federal agency has allocated or awarded funds
in violation of this provision, it should raise that concern with the
agency providing assistance.
Section 34.201 (Eligible Activities for the Direct Component)
Treasury received several comments about whether particular
activities are reimbursable under the Direct Component, such as costs
for grant management staff and certain pre-award and planning activity
costs. Grant applicants will find detailed information about allowable
costs in OMB's Uniform Guidance. In addition, grant applicants can
consult information posted on Treasury's RESTORE Act Web page, or
contact Treasury's Office of Gulf Coast Restoration for information
about particular costs at restoreact@treasury.gov. Other than a
clarifying change to the description of planning assistance, there are
no changes to this section.
Section 34.203 (Eligible Activities for the Spill Impact Component)
One commenter asserted that activities funded under the Spill
Impact Component should focus primarily on ecosystem restoration.
Treasury's rule closely tracks the statute. The Act clearly provides
that funds are available under the Spill Impact Component ``for
projects, programs, and activities that will improve the ecosystems or
economy of the Gulf Coast region,'' subject to certain criteria that
are included in Treasury's rule. Because Treasury's rule is consistent
with the Act, no change is necessary.
Section 34.204 (Limitations on Administrative Costs and Administrative
Expenses)
One commenter, a member of the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration
Council, requested clarification on how state members of the Council
can access amounts set aside for the Council's administrative expenses.
Treasury's rule does not address this issue. The Council determines how
it allocates funds for administrative expenses. Questions about how the
Council allocates its funds should be directed to the Council.
In a separate notice of proposed rulemaking, Treasury plans to
propose an amendment to this section to change when the 3% limitation
is applied to the Council. Under the Act, the Council cannot spend more
than three percent of amounts it receives from the Trust Fund on
administrative expenses. The current regulation states that the three
percent limit is applied to the total amount of funds received by the
Council under the Comprehensive Plan Component, beginning with the
first fiscal year the Council receives funds through the end of the
fourth, or most recent fiscal year, whichever is later. This approach
limits the amounts available for administrative expenses to a
percentage of amounts drawn down from the Trust Fund in a particular
year, which may vary considerably. Because the Council requires more
regular and predictable funding for its administrative expenses,
Treasury will propose to cap the Council's administrative expenses at
three percent of amounts the Council receives under the Comprehensive
Plan Component before termination of the Trust Fund. The notice of
proposed rulemaking will include a forty-five day comment period. The
current rule will remain in effect pending review of the public
comments.
Section 34.302 (Allocation of Funds--Direct Component)
Treasury amended this section to add the allocations for Louisiana
parishes that Treasury published as an interim final rule at 79 FR
61236 (Oct. 10, 2014). The allocations did not change.
Section 34.303 (Application Procedure--Direct Component)
A commenter requested clarification about Treasury's application
and disbursement process. Treasury published detailed guidance and
application processes and posted materials on Treasury's RESTORE Act
Web page, available at https://www.treasury.gov/services/restore-act/Pages/default.aspx. Treasury also provided on-site training to the Gulf
Coast States, eligible Florida counties, and eligible Louisiana
parishes. Applicants with questions about these matters should contact
Treasury's Office of Gulf Coast Restoration at restoreact@treasury.gov.
One commenter, a state, requested clarification about the public
review and comment process required in 31 CFR 34.303(b)(8). The
commenter stated that it can provide adequate opportunities for public
review and comment, but cannot guarantee that the public will fully
participate in this process. Treasury's rule does not require a state
to ensure full participation in the public comment process. The rule is
clear that a state must make its Multiyear Implementation Plan
available for public review and comment ``in a manner calculated to
obtain broad-based participation from individuals, businesses, Indian
tribes, and non-profit organizations. . . .'' Treasury cannot describe
in detail the steps that will satisfy this requirement in every case,
as the steps may vary for each state, county, or parish. For example,
if a large segment of the affected population does not have Internet
access, or does not speak English, a state may need to employ other
methods to notify the affected population of its plans and the
opportunity to provide comment, such as providing reasonable access to
public meetings and presentations in language other than English.
One commenter requested guidance about whether modifications to a
Multiyear Implementation Plan require a public review and comment
period for Multiyear Implementation Plans. In response to this comment,
the final rule now requires the same public review and comment period
for material changes as for an accepted Multiyear Implementation Plan.
Material modifications can only be adopted after consideration of
meaningful public comment. Applicants with questions about which
modifications are material should contact Treasury's Office of Gulf
Coast Restoration.
Section 34.305 (Use of Funds--Direct Component)
One commenter requested that Treasury add a sentence to Sec.
34.305, as well as other parts of the rule, requiring a written
justification for all sole source procurements and preferences given to
individuals and companies. The commenter also asked that Treasury
incorporate preferences for small and minority owned businesses. OMB's
Uniform Guidance has an extensive discussion on the procurement
requirements applying to Federal grants,
[[Page 77242]]
including requirements for competition and language requiring
affirmative steps to benefit small and minority owned businesses. 2 CFR
200.319-200.321. The procurement requirements in OMB's Uniform Guidance
apply to RESTORE Act grants. Therefore, the final rule has not been
amended to address this comment.
Some commenters discussed the need for activities that improve the
resiliency of communities, such as funds for workforce development and
job creation. While the Act does not require states, counties, or
parishes to fund these activities, workforce development and job
creation are eligible activities for funding under the Direct Component
and the Spill Impact Component. The Act's legislative history explains
that workforce development ``is intended to include non-profit,
university, and community college-based workforce, career and technical
training programs. This would also include the identification of
projects, research, programs and partnerships with federal, state and
local workforce agencies, industry and local stakeholders from
economically and socially disadvantaged communities.'' S. Rep. No. 112-
100, at 8 (2011). This list of activities, while not exclusive,
describes the kinds of activities that are eligible for funding.
Commenters with suggestions for specific projects should contact the
states, counties, and parishes that are developing Multiyear
Implementation Plans and Spill Impact State Expenditure Plans.
During implementation of the comprehensive interim final rule,
Treasury received questions about the availability of funds for county
and local parks. One eligible activity under the Direct Component and
Spill Impact Component is ``Improvements to or on State parks located
in coastal areas affected by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.'' 33
U.S.C. 1321(t)(1)(B)(i)(V). Treasury does not interpret this provision
to apply to county and local parks. However, improvements to county and
local parks, such as activities that restore and protect natural
resources under 33 U.S.C. 1321(t)(1)(B)(i)(I), may fall under other
eligible activities.
Section 34.404 (Comprehensive Plan Component)
Treasury has made a clarifying change to this section to indicate
that assignees must submit reports as prescribed by the Council or
Treasury, and the Council must submit reports as prescribed by
Treasury.
Section 34.405 (Recordkeeping--Comprehensive Plan Component)
Treasury has made a clarifying change to this section to add that
the Council must make its records concerning the activities of
assignees available to Treasury, including the Treasury Inspector
General. This provision will assist Treasury in gathering the
information it needs to carry out its supplemental compliance functions
under 31 CFR 34.804.
Section 34.503 (State Expenditure Plans--Spill Impact Component)
A commenter requested clarification about the public review and
comment processes for State Expenditure Plans described in Sec.
34.503(g). The commenter, who submitted a similar comment on Sec.
34.303, is concerned that a state cannot ensure that the public will
fully participate in the public review and comment process. As
described above, states are not expected to guarantee full public
participation in the public review and comment process. Treasury's rule
is clear that states must use methods ``calculated to obtain broad-
based participation from individuals, businesses, Indian tribes, and
non-profit organizations.'' Treasury cannot describe in detail the
methods that will satisfy this requirement in every case, as they may
depend on the state and the impacted region or population.
Another commenter asked Treasury to clarify the public review and
comment requirements that apply to modifications of a State Expenditure
Plan. The final rule now states that material modifications are subject
to the same public review and comment requirements, as well as other
requirements, that apply to the original plan. States with questions
about which modifications are material should contact the Council for
guidance.
Section 34.506 (Reports--Spill Impact Component)
Treasury has made a clarifying change to this section to indicate
that the Council must submit reports as prescribed by Treasury, in
order to assist Treasury in fulfilling its supplemental compliance
functions under 31 CFR 34.804.
Section 34.507 (Recordkeeping--Spill Impact Component)
Consistent with changes made to section 34.405, Treasury has
amended this section to add that the Council must make available its
records concerning the activities of recipients to Treasury, including
the Treasury Inspector General.
Section 34.703 (Application Procedure--Centers of Excellence Research
Grants Program)
One state commenter asked Treasury to clarify that each state will
receive its full allocation provided by the Act. Treasury's regulations
are already clear that each state will receive an equal share of
amounts made available under the Centers of Excellence Research Grants
Program. To receive its share, each state will apply to Treasury for a
grant and specify how the funds will be used, a standard requirement
for all Federal grants. Requiring states to identify how they will use
Federal funds is necessary to assist the Federal awarding agency in
performing oversight, one of the grant management responsibilities
described in OMB's Uniform Guidance.
During implementation of the comprehensive interim final rule,
Treasury received questions about the public notice requirements
applying to the rules and policies for the Centers of Excellence
Research Grants Program. Treasury's regulation requires each state to
describe the rules and policies for grants it will issue to
subrecipients. Each state also must demonstrate the rules and policies
that became effective after publication of the comprehensive interim
final rule were available for public review and comment for a minimum
of 45 days. Many states have longstanding rules and policies that
generally apply to grant programs, including competitive project
selection and conflict of interest policies. Treasury's regulation does
not require states to seek public comment on rules and policies that
were effective prior to publication of the comprehensive interim final
rule.
Section 34.802--(Certifications)
One commenter, a state, noted that the certification in Sec.
34.802(c) appears to require that each activity be selected after
consideration of comments from a diverse cross-section of the public.
The commenter stated that it can provide opportunities for public
review and comment, but it cannot guarantee that all segments of the
public will participate. Treasury agrees with this comment, and has
amended the certification to be consistent with requirements in
Sec. Sec. 34.303(b)(8) and 34.503(g). The amended certification
requires grant recipients to certify that each activity is part of a
plan that was made available for public review and comment in a manner
calculated to obtain broad-based participation from individuals,
businesses, Indian tribes, and nonprofit organizations, and that
[[Page 77243]]
the activity was selected after consideration of meaningful input from
the public, as described in the recipient's grant application.
Treasury has also amended the certification at Sec. 34.803(a) to
conform more closely to the language of the statute, and to make clear
that the certification can apply to planning activities as well as
activities that carry out the restoration or protection of the Gulf
Coast Region.
Section 34.803 (Conditions)
In the preamble to the comprehensive interim final rule, Treasury
stated that grants must conform to the requirements in OMB's Uniform
Guidance and other Federal laws and policies on grants. These
requirements include reports on how grants funds were used. To avoid
any inconsistency between these requirements and the reporting
requirements in Sec. 34.803(e), Treasury is deleting certain details
that were listed in the comprehensive interim final rule.
Section 34.804 (Noncompliance)
Two commenters suggested that Treasury impose penalties on Council
members that violate the Act or Treasury regulations. Because the Act
does not authorize Treasury to impose penalties, the final rule does
not adopt this suggestion.
III. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally
requires agencies to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any other statute, unless the agency
certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. In the preamble to the
comprehensive interim final rule, Treasury certified that the rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Small entities will incur costs to develop the plans and
projects described in the rule, but these costs arise from requirements
in the RESTORE Act and not Treasury regulations. Treasury did not
receive any comments in response to the comprehensive interim rule on
the impact to small entities and there are no changes in the final rule
that warrant a change in this certification. Accordingly, Treasury
certifies that the final rule will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities, and no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
The collections of information contained in the comprehensive
interim final rule were submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget for review in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)), and approved under control number 1505-0250.
The final rule does not contain any new collections of information.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
C. Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
The rule affects those entities in the five Gulf Coast States that
are eligible to receive funding under the RESTORE Act, and is focused
on the environmental restoration and economic recovery of the Gulf
Coast Region in the aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. The
amounts made available from the trust fund will continue efforts that
provide for the long-term health of the ecosystems and economy of this
region. In accordance with Executive Order 12866, as supplemented by
Executive Order 13563, OMB has reviewed this regulation. This rule
finalizes without significant change a comprehensive interim final rule
published on August 15, 2014 that was designated as economically
significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866. The Department
adopts without revision the regulatory impact assessment published with
the comprehensive interim final rule at 79 FR 48052 because this final
rule does not adopt changes that require updates in the analysis. In
accordance with Executive Order 12866, as supplemented by Executive
Order 13563, this rule is designated as significant and OMB has
reviewed this regulation.
D. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register. This action is a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2) and will become effective 60 days after
publication.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires
federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the
expenditure by a state, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Treasury believes that the regulatory impact
assessment referenced in this preamble provides the analysis required
by the Unfunded Mandates Act.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 34
Coastal zone, Fisheries, Grant programs, Grants administration,
Intergovernmental relations, Marine resources, Natural resources, Oil
pollution, Research, Science and technology, Trusts and trustees,
Wildlife.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department of the
Treasury amends 31 CFR subtitle A by revising part 34 to read as
follows:
PART 34--RESOURCES AND ECOSYSTEMS SUSTAINABILITY, TOURIST
OPPORTUNITIES, AND REVIVED ECONOMIES OF THE GULF COAST STATES
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec.
34.1 Purpose.
34.2 Definitions.
Subpart B--Trust Fund
34.100 The Trust Fund.
34.101 Investments.
34.102 Interest earned.
34.103 Allocation of funds.
34.104 Expenditures.
34.105 Waiver.
Subpart C--Eligible Activities for the Section 311(t) Gulf RESTORE
Program Components
34.200 General.
34.201 Eligible activities for the Direct Component.
34.202 Eligible activities for the Comprehensive Plan Component.
34.203 Eligible activities for the Spill Impact Component.
34.204 Limitations on administrative costs and administrative
expenses.
34.205 Council's audited financial statements and audits.
Subpart D--Gulf RESTORE Program--Direct Component
34.300 General.
34.301 Responsibility for administration--Direct Component.
34.302 Allocation of funds--Direct Component.
34.303 Application procedure--Direct Component.
34.304 Grant award process--Direct Component.
[[Page 77244]]
34.305 Use of funds--Direct Component.
34.306 Reports--Direct Component.
34.307 Recordkeeping--Direct Component.
34.308 Audits--Direct Component.
Subpart E--Gulf RESTORE Program--Comprehensive Plan Component
34.400 General.
34.401 Responsibility for administration--Comprehensive Plan
Component.
34.402 Grant administration--Comprehensive Plan Component.
34.403 Use of funds--Comprehensive Plan Component.
34.404 Reports--Comprehensive Plan Component.
34.405 Recordkeeping--Comprehensive Plan Component.
34.406 Audits--Comprehensive Plan Component.
Subpart F--Gulf RESTORE Program--Spill Impact Component
34.500 General.
34.501 Responsibility for administration--Spill Impact Component.
34.502 Allocation of funds--Spill Impact Component.
34.503 State Expenditure Plans--Spill Impact Component.
34.504 Grant administration--Spill Impact Component.
34.505 Use of funds--Spill Impact Component.
34.506 Reports--Spill Impact Component.
34.507 Recordkeeping--Spill Impact Component.
34.508 Audits--Spill Impact Component.
Subpart G--NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program
34.600 General.
34.601 Responsibility for administration--NOAA RESTORE Act Science
Program.
34.602 Use of funds and eligible activities--NOAA RESTORE Act
Science Program.
34.603 Limitations on activities--NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program.
34.604 Limitations on administrative expenses--NOAA RESTORE Act
Science Program.
34.605 Reports--NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program.
34.606 Recordkeeping--NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program.
34.607 Audits--NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program.
Subpart H--Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program
34.700 General.
34.701 Responsibility for administration--Centers of Excellence
Research Grants Program.
34.702 Allocation of funds--Centers of Excellence Research Grants
Program.
34.703 Application procedure--Centers of Excellence Research Grants
Program.
34.704 Use of funds and eligible activities--Centers of Excellence
Research Grants Program.
34.705 Ineligible activities--Centers of Excellence Research Grants
Program.
34.706 Reports--Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program.
34.707 Recordkeeping--Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program.
34.708 Audits--Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program.
Subpart I--Agreements
34.800 General.
34.801 Grant agreements.
34.802 Certifications.
34.803 Conditions.
34.804 Noncompliance.
34.805 Treasury Inspector General.
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 301; 31 U.S.C. 321; 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec. 34.1 Purpose.
This part describes policies and procedures applicable to the
following programs authorized under the Resources and Ecosystems
Sustainability, Tourist Opportunities, and Revived Economies of the
Gulf Coast States Act of 2012 (RESTORE Act).
(a) The Gulf RESTORE Program is authorized under section 311(t) of
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1321(t)), as amended
by the RESTORE Act, and includes the following components:
(1) Direct Component (subpart D of this part), administered by the
Department of the Treasury.
(2) Comprehensive Plan Component (subpart E of this part),
administered by the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council.
(3) Spill Impact Component (subpart F of this part), administered
by the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council.
(b) NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program (subpart G of this part) is
administered by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration,
and authorized by the RESTORE Act, section 1604, 33 U.S.C. 1321 note.
(c) Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program (subpart H of
this part) is administered by the Department of the Treasury, and
authorized by the RESTORE Act, section 1605, 33 U.S.C. 1321 note.
Sec. 34.2 Definitions.
As used in this part:
Act or RESTORE Act means the Resources and Ecosystems
Sustainability, Tourist Opportunities, and Revived Economies of the
Gulf Coast States Act of 2012.
Activity means an activity, project, or program, including research
and monitoring, eligible for funding under the Act.
Administrative costs means those indirect costs for administration
incurred by the Gulf Coast States, coastal political subdivisions, and
coastal zone parishes that are allocable to activities authorized under
the Act. Administrative costs do not include indirect costs that are
identified specifically with, or readily assignable to, facilities as
defined in 2 CFR 200.414.
Administrative expenses means those expenses incurred for
administration by the Council or NOAA, including expenses for general
management functions, general ledger accounting, budgeting, human
resource services, general procurement services, and general legal
services. Administrative expenses do not include expenses that are
identified specifically with, or readily assignable to:
(1) Facilities;
(2) Eligible projects, programs, or planning activities;
(3) Activities related to grant applications, awards, audit
requirements, or post-award management, including payments and
collections;
(4) The Council's development, publication, and implementation of
the Comprehensive Plan and any subsequent amendments;
(5) The Council's development and publication of regulations and
procedures for implementing the Spill Impact Component, and the review
of State Expenditure Plans submitted under the Spill Impact Component;
(6) Preparation of reports required by the Act;
(7) Establishment and operation of advisory committees; or
(8) Collection and consideration of scientific and other research
associated with restoration of the Gulf Coast ecosystem.
Alabama Gulf Coast Recovery Council means the entity identified in
section 311(t)(1)(F)(i) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as
amended by the RESTORE Act.
Assignee means a member of the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration
Council who has been assigned primary authority and responsibility for
a project or program included in the Comprehensive Plan through a grant
or interagency agreement.
Best available science means science that maximizes the quality,
objectivity, and integrity of information, including statistical
information; uses peer-reviewed and publicly available data; and
clearly documents and communicates risks and uncertainties in the
scientific basis for such projects.
Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program means the program
authorized by section 1605 of the Act.
Coastal political subdivision means any local political
jurisdiction that is immediately below the state level of government,
including a county, parish,
[[Page 77245]]
or borough, with a coastline that is contiguous with any portion of the
United States Gulf of Mexico. The term includes any of the
disproportionately affected counties and nondisproportionately impacted
counties in Florida, as defined below.
Coastal zone parishes means the parishes of Ascension, Assumption,
Calcasieu, Cameron, Iberia, Jefferson, Lafourche, Livingston, Orleans,
Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. Charles, St. James, St. John the Baptist,
St. Martin, St. Mary, St. Tammany, Tangipahoa, Terrebonne, and
Vermilion in the State of Louisiana.
Comprehensive Plan Component means the component of the Gulf
RESTORE Program authorized by section 311(t)(2) of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as added by section 1603 of the Act, in which
funds are provided through the Council, in accordance with a plan
developed by the Council, to entities to carry out the purposes of the
Act.
Council means the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council, an
independent entity in the Federal Government whose members are the
Governors of the Gulf Coast States; the Secretaries of Agriculture, the
Army, Commerce, and the Interior; the head of the department in which
the Coast Guard is operating, and the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency (or their designees at the level of
Assistant Secretary or the equivalent).
Deepwater Horizon oil spill means the blowout and explosion of the
mobile offshore drilling unit Deepwater Horizon that occurred on April
20, 2010, and resulting hydrocarbon releases into the environment.
Direct Component means the component of the Gulf RESTORE Program
authorized by section 311(t)(1) of the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act, as added by section 1603 of the Act, in which Gulf Coast States,
coastal zone parishes, disproportionately affected counties, and
nondisproportionately impacted counties are provided funds directly by
Treasury through grants to carry out the purposes of the Act.
Disproportionately affected counties means the counties of Bay,
Escambia, Franklin, Gulf, Okaloosa, Santa Rosa, Wakulla, and Walton in
the State of Florida.
Federal Water Pollution Control Act means 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
Gulf Coast Region means:
(1) In the Gulf Coast States, the coastal zones defined under
section 304 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 that border the
Gulf of Mexico;
(2) Land within the coastal zones described in paragraph (1) of
this definition that is held in trust by, or the use of which is by law
subject solely to the discretion of, the Federal Government or officers
or agents of the Federal Government;
(3) Any adjacent land, water, and watersheds, that are within 25
miles of the coastal zone described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this
definition; and
(4) All Federal waters in the Gulf of Mexico.
Gulf Coast State means any of the States of Alabama, Florida,
Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas.
Gulf Coast State entity means a party that carries out the duties
of a state for the Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program under
Sec. 34.702.
Infrastructure means the public facilities or systems needed to
support commerce and economic development. These installations and
facilities span a wide range, including highways, airports, roads,
buildings, transit systems, port facilities, railways,
telecommunications, water and sewer systems, public electric and gas
utilities, levees, seawalls, breakwaters, major pumping stations, and
flood gates. Infrastructure encompasses new construction, upgrades and
repairs to existing facilities or systems, and associated land
acquisition and planning.
Multiyear Implementation Plan means the plan submitted by entities
eligible for funding directly from Treasury under the Direct Component,
and described at Sec. 34.303.
NOAA means the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program means the program authorized by
section 1604 of the Act.
Nondisproportionately impacted counties means the counties of
Charlotte, Citrus, Collier, Dixie, Hernando, Hillsborough, Jefferson,
Lee, Levy, Manatee, Monroe, Pasco, Pinellas, Sarasota, and Taylor in
the State of Florida.
Pass-through entity means a non-Federal entity that provides a
subaward to a subrecipient to carry out part of a program under the
Act.
Planning assistance means data gathering, studies, modeling,
analysis and other tasks required to prepare plans for eligible
activities under Sec. 34.201(a) through (i), including environmental
review and compliance tasks and architectural and engineering studies.
Planning assistance also means one-time preparations that will allow
the recipient to establish systems and processes needed to review grant
applications, award grants, monitor grants after award, and audit
compliance with respect to eligible activities under Sec. 34.201 in a
Multiyear Implementation Plan or State Expenditure Plan.
Recipient means a non-Federal entity that receives a Federal award
directly from a Federal awarding agency to carry out an activity under
the Act. As used in these regulations, a recipient also includes a
pass-through entity. The term recipient does not include subrecipients.
Spill Impact Component means the component of the Gulf RESTORE
Program authorized by section 311(t)(3) of the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act, as added by section 1603 of the Act, in which Gulf Coast
States are provided funds by the Council according to a formula that
the Council establishes by regulation, using criteria listed in the
Act.
State Expenditure Plan means the plan that each Gulf Coast State
must submit to the Council for the expenditure of amounts disbursed
under the Spill Impact Component, and described at Sec. 34.503.
Subrecipient means a non-Federal entity that receives a subaward
from a recipient to carry out an activity under the Act.
Treasury means the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the Secretary
of the Treasury, or his/her designee.
Trust Fund means the Gulf Coast Restoration Trust Fund.
Subpart B--Trust Fund
Sec. 34.100 The Trust Fund.
Treasury will deposit into the Trust Fund an amount equal to 80
percent of all administrative and civil penalties paid after July 6,
2012 by responsible parties in connection with the explosion on, and
sinking of, the mobile offshore drilling unit Deepwater Horizon
pursuant to a court order, negotiated settlement, or other instrument
under section 311 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. After
these administrative and civil penalties have been deposited into the
Trust Fund, the Trust Fund will terminate on the date all amounts owed
to the Trust Fund have been returned to the Trust Fund, and all amounts
in the Trust Fund have been expended.
Sec. 34.101 Investments.
The Secretary of the Treasury will invest such amounts in the Trust
Fund that are not, in the judgment of the Secretary, required to meet
needs for current withdrawals. The Secretary may invest in interest-
bearing obligations of the United States, having maturities
[[Page 77246]]
suitable to the needs of the Trust Fund as determined by the Secretary.
These obligations will bear interest at rates described in 31 U.S.C.
9702, unless the Secretary determines that such rates are unavailable
for obligations with suitable maturities. In that event, the Secretary
will select obligations of the United States bearing interest at rates
determined by the Secretary, taking into consideration current market
yields on outstanding marketable obligations of the United States of
comparable maturities.
Sec. 34.102 Interest earned.
Interest earned on Trust Fund investments will be available as
described in Sec. 34.103(b).
Sec. 34.103 Allocation of funds.
The amounts in the Trust Fund are allocated among the programs in
Sec. 34.1.
(a) Available funds in the Trust Fund, other than interest, are
allocated as follows:
(1) Thirty-five percent in equal shares for the Gulf Coast States
to be used for the Direct Component of the Gulf RESTORE Program.
Section 34.302 describes the allocation for each Gulf Coast State.
(2) Thirty percent for the Council to be used for the Comprehensive
Plan Component of the Gulf RESTORE Program.
(3) Thirty percent for formula distribution to Gulf Coast States to
be used for the Spill Impact Component of the Gulf RESTORE Program.
(4) Two and one-half percent to be used for the NOAA RESTORE Act
Science Program.
(5) Two and one-half percent in equal shares for the Gulf Coast
States to be used for the Centers of Excellence Research Grants
Program.
(b) Within ten days of the close of a Federal fiscal year,
available funds equal to the interest earned on the Trust Fund
investments will be allocated, as follows:
(1) Twenty-five percent to be used for the NOAA RESTORE Act Science
Program.
(2) Twenty-five percent for the Centers of Excellence Research
Grants Program.
(3) Fifty percent for the Comprehensive Plan Component of the Gulf
RESTORE Program.
Sec. 34.104 Expenditures.
Subject to limitations in the Act and these regulations, amounts in
the Trust Fund will be available for the direct and indirect expenses
of eligible activities without fiscal year limitation.
Sec. 34.105 Waiver.
To the extent not inconsistent with applicable law, Treasury may
waive or modify a requirement in the regulations in this part in a
single case or class of cases if the Secretary determines, in his or
her sole discretion, that the requirement is not necessary for the
deposit of amounts into, or the expenditure of amounts from, the Trust
Fund. Treasury will provide public notice of any waivers or
modifications granted that materially change a regulatory requirement.
Subpart C--Eligible Activities for the Section 311(t) Gulf RESTORE
Program Components
Sec. 34.200 General.
This subpart describes policies and procedures regarding eligible
activities applicable to the Direct Component, Comprehensive Plan
Component, and Spill Impact Component of the Gulf RESTORE Program.
Subparts D, E, F, and I of this part describe additional requirements
that must be met before an activity can receive funding.
(a) Trust Fund amounts may be used to carry out an activity in
whole or in part only if the following requirements are met:
(1) Costs must comply with administrative requirements and cost
principles in applicable Federal laws and policies on grants.
(2) The activity must meet the eligibility requirements of the Gulf
RESTORE Program as defined in Sec. 34.201, Sec. 34.202, or Sec.
34.203, according to component.
(3) Activities funded through the Direct Component, Comprehensive
Plan Component, and Spill Impact Component must not be included in any
claim for compensation presented after July 6, 2012, to the Oil Spill
Liability Trust Fund authorized by 26 U.S.C. 9509.
(b) A Gulf Coast State, coastal political subdivision, and coastal
zone parish may use funds available under the Direct Component or Spill
Impact Component to satisfy the non-Federal cost-share of an activity
that is eligible under Sec. Sec. 34.201 and 34.203 and authorized by
Federal law.
Sec. 34.201 Eligible activities for the Direct Component.
The following activities are eligible for funding under the Direct
Component. Activities in paragraphs (a) through (g) of this section are
eligible for funding to the extent they are carried out in the Gulf
Coast Region. Direct Component activities are carried out in the Gulf
Coast Region when, in the reasonable judgment of the entity applying to
Treasury for a grant, each severable part of the activity is primarily
designed to restore or protect that geographic area. Applicants must
demonstrate that the activity will be carried out in the Gulf Coast
Region when they apply for a grant. Activities designed to protect or
restore natural resources must be based on the best available science.
All Direct Component activities must be included in and conform to the
description in the Multiyear Implementation Plan required by Sec.
34.303.
(a) Restoration and protection of the natural resources,
ecosystems, fisheries, marine and wildlife habitats, beaches, and
coastal wetlands of the Gulf Coast Region.
(b) Mitigation of damage to fish, wildlife, and natural resources.
(c) Implementation of a Federally-approved marine, coastal, or
comprehensive conservation management plan, including fisheries
monitoring.
(d) Workforce development and job creation.
(e) Improvements to or on state parks located in coastal areas
affected by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
(f) Infrastructure projects benefitting the economy or ecological
resources, including port infrastructure.
(g) Coastal flood protection and related infrastructure.
(h) Promotion of tourism in the Gulf Coast Region, including
promotion of recreational fishing.
(i) Promotion of the consumption of seafood harvested from the Gulf
Coast Region.
(j) Planning assistance. Eligible entities under Sec. 34.302 may
apply for planning assistance grants to fund preparation and amendment
of the Multiyear Implementation Plan.
(k) Administrative costs.
Sec. 34.202 Eligible activities for the Comprehensive Plan Component.
The Council may expend funds that are available under the
Comprehensive Plan Component for eligible activities under 33 U.S.C.
1321(t)(2) and (3), including the following:
(a) The Council may expend funds to carry out activities in the
Gulf Coast Region that are included in the Comprehensive Plan, as
described in 33 U.S.C. 1321(t)(2). An activity selected by the Council
is carried out in the Gulf Coast Region when, in the reasonable
judgment of the Council, each severable part of the activity is
primarily designed to restore or protect that geographic area. The
Council must document the basis for its judgment when it selects the
activity.
[[Page 77247]]
(b) The Council may expend funds to develop and publish the
proposed and initial Comprehensive Plans, and to implement, amend, and
update the Comprehensive Plan as required by the Act or as necessary.
(c) The Council may expend funds to prepare annual reports to
Congress, and other reports and audits required by the Act, these
regulations, and other Federal law.
(d) The Council may expend funds to establish and operate one or
more advisory committees as may be necessary to assist the Council.
(e) The Council may expend funds to collect and consider scientific
and other research associated with restoration of the Gulf Coast
ecosystem, including research, observation, and monitoring.
(f) Administrative expenses.
Sec. 34.203 Eligible activities for the Spill Impact Component.
Activities eligible for funding under the Spill Impact Component
must meet the eligibility criteria in Sec. 34.201(a) through (k), as
well as the following:
(a) The activities must be included in and conform to the
description in a State Expenditure Plan required in Sec. 34.503 and
approved by the Council. State entities may apply for a grant from the
total amount allocated to that state under the Spill Impact Component
before the Council has approved the State Expenditure Plan to fund
eligible activities that are necessary to develop and submit that plan.
(b) The activities included in the State Expenditure Plan must
contribute to the overall economic and ecological recovery of the Gulf
Coast.
(c) Activities listed in Sec. 34.201(a) through (g) are eligible
for funding from the Spill Impact Component to the extent they are
carried out in the Gulf Coast Region. For purposes of this component,
an activity is carried out in the Gulf Coast Region when, in the
reasonable judgment of the entity developing the State Expenditure Plan
under Sec. 34.503, each severable part of the activity is primarily
designed to restore or protect that geographic area. State Expenditure
Plans must include a demonstration that activities in the plan will be
carried out in the Gulf Coast Region.
Sec. 34.204 Limitations on administrative costs and administrative
expenses.
(a) Of the amounts received by a Gulf Coast State, coastal
political subdivision, or coastal zone parish in a grant from Treasury
under the Direct Component, or in a grant from the Council under the
Comprehensive Plan Component or Spill Impact Component, not more than
three percent may be used for administrative costs. The three percent
limit is applied to the total amount of funds received by a recipient
under each grant. The three percent limit does not apply to the
administrative costs of subrecipients. All subrecipient costs are
subject to the cost principles in Federal laws and policies on grants.
(b) Of the amounts received by the Council under the Comprehensive
Plan Component, not more than three percent may be used for
administrative expenses. The three percent limit is applied to the
total amount of funds received by the Council, beginning with the first
fiscal year the Council receives funds through the end of the fourth,
or most recent fiscal year, whichever is later.
Sec. 34.205 Council's audited financial statements and audits.
(a) Not later than December 1, 2014, and each year thereafter, the
Council must prepare and submit to the Secretary of the Treasury an
audited financial statement for the preceding Federal fiscal year,
covering all accounts and associated activities of the Council.
(b) Each audited financial statement under this section must
reflect:
(1) The overall financial position of the accounts and activities
covered by the statement, including assets and liabilities thereof.
(2) Results of operations of the Council.
(c) The financial statements must be prepared in accordance with
the form and content of the financial statements prescribed by the
Director of the Office of Management and Budget for executive agencies
pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3515, consistent with applicable accounting and
financial reporting principles, standards, and requirements.
(d) The Treasury Inspector General may conduct audits and reviews
of the Council's accounts and activities as the Inspector General deems
appropriate.
Subpart D--Gulf RESTORE Program--Direct Component
Sec. 34.300 General.
This subpart describes the policies and procedures applicable to
the Direct Component of the Gulf RESTORE Program. The funds made
available under this subpart will be in the form of a grant.
Sec. 34.301 Responsibility for administration--Direct Component.
Treasury is responsible for awarding and administering grants and
grant agreements under this subpart. Treasury will develop and apply
policies and procedures consistent with the Act and Federal laws and
policies on grants. Treasury also will establish and implement a
program to monitor compliance with its grant agreements.
Sec. 34.302 Allocation of funds--Direct Component.
The amounts made available in any fiscal year from the Trust Fund
and allocated to this component will be available in equal shares for
the Gulf Coast States for expenditure on eligible activities. The
following entities are eligible to receive Direct Component grants.
(a) The amounts available to Alabama will be provided directly to
the Alabama Gulf Coast Recovery Council, or such administrative agent
as it may designate. All administrative duties of the Alabama Gulf
Coast Recovery Council must be performed by public officials and
employees that are subject to the ethics laws of the State of Alabama.
(b) Of the amounts available to Florida, 75 percent of funding will
be provided directly to the eight disproportionately affected counties.
Each disproportionately affected county's share is as follows: Bay
County, 15.101453044%; Escambia County, 25.334760043%; Franklin County,
8.441253238%; Gulf County, 6.743202296%; Okaloosa County,
15.226456794%; Santa Rosa County, 10.497314919%; Wakulla County,
4.943148294%; and Walton County, 13.712411372%.
(c) Of the amounts available to Florida, 25 percent of funding will
be provided directly to the nondisproportionately impacted counties.
Each nondisproportionately impacted county's share is as follows:
Charlotte County, 5.162%; Citrus County, 4.692%; Collier County,
7.019%; Dixie County, 3.484%; Hernando County, 4.982%; Hillsborough
County, 13.339%; Jefferson County, 3.834%; Lee County, 8.776%; Levy
County, 3.894%; Manatee County, 6.809%; Monroe County, 8.297%; Pasco
County, 7.079%; Pinellas County, 11.002%; Sarasota County, 7.248%; and
Taylor County, 4.383%.
(d) Of the amounts available to Louisiana, 70 percent will be
provided directly to the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority
Board of Louisiana, through the Coastal Protection and Restoration
Authority of Louisiana.
(e) Of the amounts available to Louisiana, 30 percent will be
provided directly to the coastal zone parishes. Each coastal zone
parish's share is as follows: Ascension, 2.42612%; Assumption,
0.93028%; Calcasieu,
[[Page 77248]]
5.07063%; Cameron, 2.10096%; Iberia, 2.55018%; Jefferson, 11.95309%;
Lafourche, 7.86746%; Livingston, 3.32725%; Orleans, 7.12875%;
Plaquemines, 17.99998%; St. Bernard, 9.66743%; St. Charles, 1.35717%;
St. James, 0.75600%; St. John the Baptist, 1.11915%; St. Martin,
2.06890%; St. Mary, 1.80223%; St. Tammany, 5.53058%; Tangipahoa,
3.40337%; Terrebonne, 9.91281%; and Vermilion, 3.02766%.
(f) No parish will receive funds until the parish chief executive
has certified to the Governor of Louisiana, in a form satisfactory to
the Governor or the Governor's designee, that the parish has completed
a comprehensive land use plan that is consistent with, or complementary
to, the most recent version of the state's Coastal Master Plan approved
by the Louisiana legislature.
(g) The amounts available to Mississippi will be provided directly
to the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
(h) The amounts available to Texas will be provided directly to the
Office of the Governor or to an appointee of the Office of the
Governor.
Sec. 34.303 Application procedure--Direct Component.
The entities identified in Sec. 34.302 are eligible to apply for
their allocation as a grant. Treasury has developed an application
process for grants available under this subpart that is consistent with
the Act and Federal laws and policies on grants. The application
process includes the following requirements:
(a) Before an eligible entity may receive a Direct Component
activity grant, the grant applicant must submit a Multiyear
Implementation Plan describing each activity for which it seeks funding
under the Direct Component. Applications to fund preparation and
amendment of the Multiyear Implementation Plan are exempt from this
requirement.
(b) For each activity, the Multiyear Implementation Plan must
include a narrative description demonstrating:
(1) The need for, purpose, and objectives of the activity;
(2) How the activity is eligible for funding and meets all
requirements;
(3) Location of the activity;
(4) Budget for the activity;
(5) Milestones for the activity;
(6) Projected completion dates for the activity;
(7) Criteria the applicant will use to evaluate the success of each
activity in helping to restore and protect the Gulf Coast Region
impacted by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill;
(8) The plan was made available for public review and comment for a
minimum of 45 days in a manner calculated to obtain broad-based
participation from individuals, businesses, Indian tribes, and non-
profit organizations; and
(9) Each activity in the plan was approved after consideration of
meaningful input from the public. Treasury may require a standard
format and additional information in the plans. Plans can be phased and
incremental and may be modified later by the applicant. If the
applicant has requested or anticipates requesting funding for any part
of the activity from other sources, including other components in the
Act, the applicant must identify the source, state the amount of
funding, and provide the current status of the request. For the State
of Louisiana parishes, the applicant must submit information
demonstrating compliance with Sec. 34.302(f).
(c) Material modifications to a Multiyear Implementation Plan are
subject to all applicable requirements in paragraph (b) of this
section.
(d) The applicant must include supporting information in each grant
application that:
(1) Proposed activities meet the statutory requirements for
eligibility; and
(2) Each activity designed to protect or restore natural resources
is based on best available science.
(e) An applicant may satisfy some or all of the requirements in
this section and Sec. 34.802(a) through (e) if it can demonstrate in
its application to Treasury that before July 6, 2012:
(1) The applicant established conditions to carry out activities
that are substantively the same as the requirements in this section and
Sec. 34.802(a) through (e).
(2) The applicable activity qualified as one or more of the
eligible activities in Sec. 34.201.
Sec. 34.304 Grant award process--Direct Component.
Upon determining that the Multiyear Implementation Plan and the
grant application meet the requirements of these regulations and the
Act, Treasury will execute a grant agreement with the recipient that
complies with subpart I of this part, the Act, and other Federal laws
and policies on grants.
Sec. 34.305 Use of funds--Direct Component.
(a) An activity may be funded in whole or in part if the applicable
requirements of subparts C and D of this part are met.
(b) When awarding contracts to carry out an activity under the
Direct Component, a Gulf Coast State, coastal political subdivision, or
coastal zone parish may give preference to individuals and companies
that reside in, are headquartered in, or are principally engaged in
business in the state of project execution consistent with Federal laws
and policies on grants.
(c) A Gulf Coast State, coastal political subdivision, or coastal
zone parish may propose to issue subawards for eligible activities.
Recipients that propose to issue subawards must demonstrate their
ability to conduct subrecipient monitoring and management, as required
by Federal laws and policies on grants.
Sec. 34.306 Reports--Direct Component.
Recipients must submit reports as prescribed by Treasury.
Sec. 34.307 Recordkeeping--Direct Component.
Recipients must maintain records as prescribed by Treasury, and
make the records available to Treasury, including the Treasury
Inspector General.
Sec. 34.308 Audits--Direct Component.
Treasury, including the Treasury Inspector General, may conduct
audits and reviews of recipient's accounts and activities relating to
the Act as deemed appropriate by Treasury.
Subpart E--Gulf RESTORE Program--Comprehensive Plan Component
Sec. 34.400 General.
This subpart describes the policies and procedures applicable to
the Comprehensive Plan Component. The Comprehensive Plan is developed
by the Council in accordance with 33 U.S.C. 1321(t)(2) and will include
activities the Council intends to carry out, subject to available
funding. When selecting activities to carry out in the first three
years, except for certain projects and programs that were authorized
prior to July 6, 2012, the Council will give highest priority to
projects meeting one or more of the criteria in 33 U.S.C.
1321(t)(2)(D)(iii).
Sec. 34.401 Responsibility for administration--Comprehensive Plan
Component.
(a) After selecting Comprehensive Plan projects and programs to be
funded, the Council must assign primary authority and responsibility
for overseeing and implementing projects and programs to a Gulf Coast
State or Federal agency represented on the Council, which are called
assignees in these regulations. In assigning responsibility, the
Council must enter
[[Page 77249]]
into a grant agreement with the Gulf Coast State or an interagency
agreement with the Federal agency. Any grant agreement must be
consistent with applicable Federal laws and policies on grants. The
Council must specify whether any part of an assignee's responsibility
may be further assigned to another entity and under what terms.
(b) When an assignee's grant or subaward to, or cooperative
agreement with, a nongovernmental entity would equal or exceed ten
percent of the total amount provided to the assignee for that activity,
the Council must publish in the Federal Register and deliver to the
following Congressional Committees at least 30 days prior to the
assignee entering into an agreement the name of the recipient or
subrecipient; a brief description of the activity, including its
purpose; and the amount of the award.
(1) House of Representatives committees: Committee on Science,
Space, and Technology; Committee on Natural Resources; Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure; Committee on Appropriations.
(2) Senate committees: Committee on Environment and Public Works;
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation; Committee on Energy
and Natural Resources; Committee on Appropriations.
(c) The Council must establish and implement a program to monitor
compliance with its grant agreements and interagency agreements.
Sec. 34.402 Grant administration--Comprehensive Plan Component.
The Council must publish policies and procedures for administration
of Comprehensive Plan Component grants that are consistent with
applicable Federal laws and policies on grants. These grant policies
and procedures must include uniform guidelines for assignees to use
when selecting subrecipients, awarding grants and subawards, and
monitoring compliance. The Council must also establish and implement a
program to monitor compliance with its grant agreements.
Sec. 34.403 Use of funds--Comprehensive Plan Component.
An activity may be funded in whole or in part if the applicable
requirements of subparts C and E of this part are met.
Sec. 34.404 Reports--Comprehensive Plan Component.
Assignees must submit reports as prescribed by the Council or
Treasury. In addition, the Council must submit reports as prescribed by
Treasury.
Sec. 34.405 Recordkeeping--Comprehensive Plan Component.
Assignees must maintain records as prescribed by the Council and
Treasury, and make the records available to the Council and Treasury,
including the Treasury Inspector General. In addition, the Council must
make its records concerning the activities of assignees available to
Treasury, including the Treasury Inspector General.
Sec. 34.406 Audits--Comprehensive Plan Component.
The Council and Treasury, including the Treasury Inspector General,
may conduct audits and reviews of assignee's accounts and activities
relating to the Act as any of them deems appropriate.
Subpart F--Gulf RESTORE Program--Spill Impact Component
Sec. 34.500 General.
This subpart describes the policies and procedures applicable to
the Spill Impact Component of the Gulf RESTORE Program. The funds made
available under this subpart will be in the form of grants.
Sec. 34.501 Responsibility for administration--Spill Impact
Component.
The Council is responsible for awarding and administering grants
under this subpart.
Sec. 34.502 Allocation of funds--Spill Impact Component.
The Council will allocate amounts to the Gulf Coast States based on
the Act and regulations promulgated by the Council. The Council will
make allocated funds available through grants for activities described
in a State Expenditure Plan approved by the Council.
Sec. 34.503 State Expenditure Plans--Spill Impact Component.
Each Gulf Coast State, through its Governor or the Governor's
designee, must submit a State Expenditure Plan to the Council for its
approval that describes each activity for which the state seeks
funding. The Council must develop requirements for these plans,
including the requirements below.
(a) The State Expenditure Plan must be developed by:
(1) In Alabama, the Alabama Gulf Coast Recovery Council.
(2) In Florida, a consortium of local political subdivisions that
includes, at a minimum, one representative of each county affected by
the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
(3) In Louisiana, the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority
of Louisiana, as approved by the Board.
(4) In Mississippi, the Office of the Governor or an appointee of
the Office of the Governor.
(5) In Texas, the Office of the Governor or an appointee of the
Office of the Governor.
(b) The State Expenditure Plan must describe how it takes into
consideration the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the goals
and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the State
Expenditure Plan must describe the processes used:
(1) To evaluate and select activities included in the plan;
(2) To assess the capability of third party entities that will
implement activities in the plan;
(3) To prevent conflicts of interest in the development and
implementation of the plan;
(4) To obtain public review and comment in accordance with
paragraph (g) of this section; and
(5) To verify compliance with the requirements of Sec. 34.203 and
this subpart.
(c) For each activity in the State Expenditure Plan, the plan must
include a narrative description demonstrating:
(1) The need for, purpose, and objectives of the activity;
(2) How the activity is eligible for funding and meets all
requirements of Sec. 34.203 and this subpart;
(3) Location of the activity;
(4) Budget for the activity;
(5) Milestones for the activity;
(6) Projected completion dates for the activity; and
(7) Criteria the applicant will use to evaluate the success of each
activity in helping to restore and protect the Gulf Coast Region. Plans
can be phased or incremental and may be modified with the Council's
approval. If funding has been requested from other sources, including
other components of the Act, the plan must identify the source, state
how much funding was requested, and provide the current status of the
request.
(d) The State Expenditure Plan must demonstrate how the activities
in the plan will contribute to the overall economic and ecological
recovery of the Gulf Coast, and how each activity that would restore
and protect natural resources, ecosystems, fisheries, marine and
wildlife habitats, beaches, coastal wetlands or the economy of the Gulf
Coast is based on the best available science.
(e) The State Expenditure Plan must demonstrate that activities
described in Sec. 34.201(a) through (g) will be carried out in the
Gulf Coast Region, as described in Sec. 34.203(c).
(f) No more than 25 percent of funding under the Spill Impact
[[Page 77250]]
Component is available to a Gulf Coast State under this subpart to pay
for infrastructure, unless the Governor or the Governor's
representative on the Council certifies that:
(1) The ecosystem restoration needs in the state will be addressed
by the activities in the proposed plan; and
(2) Additional investment in infrastructure is required to mitigate
the impacts of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill to the ecosystem or
economy.
(g) Before being submitted to the Council for approval, a State
Expenditure Plan must be available for public review and comment for a
minimum of 45 days, in a manner calculated to obtain broad-based
participation from individuals, businesses, Indian tribes, and non-
profit organizations.
(h) If the Council disapproves a State Expenditure Plan, the
Council must notify the impacted state in writing and consult with the
state to address any identified deficiencies with the plan. If the
Council fails to approve or take action within 60 days after the date
on which the Council receives the plan, the state may obtain expedited
judicial review within 90 days in a United States district court
located in the state seeking the review.
(i) The Council must publish guidelines explaining when
modifications to a State Expenditure Plan require the Council's
approval. Material modifications to a State Expenditure Plan are
subject to the requirements of paragraphs (b) through (g) of this
section.
Sec. 34.504 Grant administration--Spill Impact Component.
The Council must publish policies and procedures for administration
of the Spill Impact Component grants that are consistent with
applicable Federal laws and policies on grants. The Council must also
establish and implement a program to monitor compliance with its grant
agreements.
Sec. 34.505 Use of funds--Spill Impact Component.
An activity may be funded in whole or in part if the applicable
requirements of subparts C and F of this part are met.
Sec. 34.506 Reports--Spill Impact Component.
Recipients must submit reports as prescribed by the Council or
Treasury. In addition, the Council must submit reports as prescribed by
Treasury.
Sec. 34.507 Recordkeeping--Spill Impact Component.
Recipients must maintain records as prescribed by the Council and
make the records available to the Council, and Treasury, including the
Treasury Inspector General. In addition, the Council must make its
records concerning the activities of recipients available to Treasury,
including the Treasury Inspector General.
Sec. 34.508 Audits--Spill Impact Component.
The Council and Treasury, including the Treasury Inspector General,
may conduct audits and reviews of a recipient's accounts and activities
relating to the Act as any of them deem appropriate.
Subpart G--NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program
Sec. 34.600 General.
This subpart describes policies and procedures applicable to the
NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program. The program's purpose is to carry out
research, observation, and monitoring to support, to the maximum extent
practicable, the long-term sustainability of the ecosystem, fish
stocks, fish habitat, and the recreational, commercial, and charter
fishing industries in the Gulf of Mexico.
Sec. 34.601 Responsibility for administration--NOAA RESTORE Act
Science Program.
NOAA is responsible for establishing and administering this
program, in consultation with the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service. NOAA must develop, publish, and apply policies and procedures
for the NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program consistent with the Act, this
subpart, and Federal laws and policies on grants. NOAA must monitor
compliance with its grant agreements, cooperative agreements,
contracts, and agreements funded through the Trust Fund. NOAA and the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service will consult with the Regional
Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council and the Gulf States Marine
Fisheries Commission in carrying out the program.
Sec. 34.602 Use of funds and eligible activities--NOAA RESTORE Act
Science Program.
(a) Amounts made available to NOAA may be expended to carry out a
program comprised of activities described in section 1604 of the Act.
These activities include coordination of science and technology
programs and stakeholder engagement, in accordance with section 1604(f)
of the Act, as well as the following activities with respect to the
Gulf of Mexico:
(1) Marine and estuarine research.
(2) Marine and estuarine ecosystem monitoring and ocean
observation.
(3) Data collection and stock assessments.
(4) Pilot programs for fishery independent data and reduction of
exploitation of spawning aggregations.
(5) Cooperative research.
(b) NOAA may also expend amounts made available from the Trust Fund
for administrative expenses connected with the program. All funds must
be expended in compliance with the Act, these regulations, and other
applicable law.
Sec. 34.603 Limitations on activities--NOAA RESTORE Act Science
Program.
None of the Trust Fund amounts may be used for the following
activities:
(a) For any existing or planned research led by NOAA, unless agreed
to in writing by the grant recipient.
(b) To implement existing regulations or initiate new regulations
promulgated or proposed by NOAA.
(c) To develop or approve a new limited access privilege program
(as that term is used in section 303A of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act [16 U.S.C. 1853(a)]) for any fishery
under the jurisdiction of the South Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, New
England, or Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Councils.
Sec. 34.604 Limitations on administrative expenses--NOAA RESTORE Act
Science Program.
(a) Of the amounts received by NOAA under the NOAA RESTORE Act
Science Program, not more than three percent may be used for
administrative expenses.
(b) The three percent limit is applied to the total amount of funds
received by NOAA, beginning with the first fiscal year it receives
funds through the end of the fourth, or most recent fiscal year,
whichever is later.
(c) NOAA may seek reimbursement of administrative expenses incurred
after the first deposit into the Trust Fund, to the extent permitted by
Federal law. Administrative expenses incurred prior to the first
deposit into the Trust Fund are not reimbursable.
Sec. 34.605 Reports--NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program.
NOAA must submit reports as prescribed by Treasury.
Sec. 34.606 Recordkeeping--NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program.
Recipients and other entities receiving funds under the NOAA
RESTORE Act Science Program must maintain records as prescribed by NOAA
and make the records available to NOAA.
[[Page 77251]]
Sec. 34.607 Audits--NOAA RESTORE Act Science Program.
NOAA and the Treasury Inspector General may conduct audits and
reviews of recipient's accounts and activities relating to the Act as
either of them deems appropriate.
Subpart H--Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program
Sec. 34.700 General.
This subpart describes the policies and procedures applicable to
the Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program. The program's
purpose is to establish centers of excellence to conduct research only
on the Gulf Coast Region. The funds made available to the Gulf Coast
States under this subpart will be in the form of a grant.
Sec. 34.701 Responsibility for administration--Centers of Excellence
Research Grants Program.
Treasury is responsible for awarding grants to the Gulf Coast
States, which will use the amounts made available to award grants to
nongovernmental entities and consortia in the Gulf Coast Region for the
establishment of Centers of Excellence. Treasury will develop and apply
policies and procedures consistent with this Act and Federal laws and
policies on grants. Each Gulf Coast State entity issuing grants must
establish and implement a program to monitor compliance with its
subaward agreements.
Sec. 34.702 Allocation of funds--Centers of Excellence Research
Grants Program.
An equal share of funds will be available to each Gulf Coast State
to carry out eligible activities. The duties of a Gulf Coast State will
be carried out by the following entities:
(a) In Alabama, the Alabama Gulf Coast Recovery Council, or such
administrative agent as it may designate.
(b) In Florida, the Florida Institute of Oceanography.
(c) In Louisiana, the Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority
Board of Louisiana, through the Coastal Protection and Restoration
Authority of Louisiana.
(d) In Mississippi, the Mississippi Department of Environmental
Quality.
(e) In Texas, the Office of the Governor or an appointee of the
Office of the Governor.
Sec. 34.703 Application procedure--Centers of Excellence Research
Grants Program.
Treasury has developed an application process for grants available
to the Gulf Coast States under this subpart that is consistent with the
Act and Federal laws and policies on grants. The process includes the
following requirements:
(a) Each Gulf Coast State must describe the competitive process
that the state will use to select one or more Centers of Excellence.
The competitive process must allow nongovernmental entities and
consortia in the Gulf Coast Region, including public and private
institutions of higher education, to compete. The process must give
priority to entities and consortia that demonstrate the ability to
establish the broadest cross-section of participants in the grant with
interest and expertise in science, technology, and monitoring in the
discipline(s) on which the proposal is focused. The process must also
guard against conflicts of interest.
(b) Each Gulf Coast State must describe in its application the
state rules and policies applying to subawards it will issue under this
subpart. At a minimum, these state rules and policies must include the
competitive selection process and measures to guard against conflicts
of interest.
(c) Each Gulf Coast State must demonstrate in its application that
the state rules and policies applying to subawards it will issue under
this subpart were published and available for public review and comment
for a minimum of 45 days, and that they were approved after
consideration of meaningful input from the public, including broad-
based participation from individuals, businesses, Indian tribes, and
non-profit organizations. These requirements do not apply to state
statutes and regulations, or to policies that were in effect prior to
August 15, 2014.
(d) Each application must state the amount of funding requested and
the purposes for which the funds will be used.
Sec. 34.704 Use of funds and eligible activities--Centers of
Excellence Research Grants Program.
(a) A Gulf Coast State receiving funds under this subpart must
establish a grant program that complies with the Act and Federal laws
and policies on grants.
(b) Gulf Coast States may use funds available under this subpart to
award competitive subawards for the establishment of Centers of
Excellence that focus on science, technology, and monitoring in at
least one of the following disciplines:
(1) Coastal and deltaic sustainability, restoration, and
protection, including solutions and technology that allow citizens to
live in a safe and sustainable manner in a coastal delta in the Gulf
Coast Region.
(2) Coastal fisheries and wildlife ecosystem research and
monitoring in the Gulf Coast Region.
(3) Offshore energy development, including research and technology
to improve the sustainable and safe development of energy resources in
the Gulf of Mexico.
(4) Sustainable and resilient growth and economic and commercial
development in the Gulf Coast Region.
(5) Comprehensive observation, monitoring, and mapping of the Gulf
of Mexico.
Sec. 34.705 Ineligible activities--Centers of Excellence Research
Grants Program.
Any activity that is not authorized under the provisions of Sec.
34.704 is ineligible for funding under this subpart.
Sec. 34.706 Reports--Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program.
Each Gulf Coast State entity must submit the following reports:
(a) An annual report to the Council in a form prescribed by the
Council that includes information on subrecipients, subaward amounts,
disciplines addressed, and any other information required by the
Council. When the subrecipient is a consortium, the annual report must
also identify the consortium members. This information will be included
in the Council's annual report to Congress.
(b) Reports as prescribed by Treasury.
Sec. 34.707 Recordkeeping--Centers of Excellence Research Grants
Program.
Recipients must maintain records as prescribed by Treasury and make
the records available to Treasury, including the Treasury Inspector
General.
Sec. 34.708 Audits--Centers of Excellence Research Grants Program.
Treasury, including the Treasury Inspector General, may conduct
audits and reviews of each recipient's accounts and activities relating
to the Act as deemed appropriate by Treasury.
Subpart I--Agreements
Sec. 34.800 General.
This subpart describes procedures applicable to grant agreements
used by Treasury, the Council (including Federal agencies carrying out
responsibilities for the Council), NOAA, Gulf Coast States, coastal
political subdivisions, and coastal zone parishes in making awards
under subparts D, E, F, G, and H of this part. It also describes
Treasury's authority to inspect records and the Treasury Inspector
General's authority under the Act.
[[Page 77252]]
Sec. 34.801 Grant agreements.
The grant agreements used must conform to the Act and Federal laws
and policies on grants, including audit requirements.
Sec. 34.802 Certifications.
At a minimum, grant applications and agreements for the Direct
Component, Comprehensive Plan Component, and Spill Impact Component
must contain the following certifications. The certification must be
signed by an authorized senior official of the entity receiving grant
funds who can legally bind the organization or entity, and who has
oversight for the administration and use of the funds in question. The
certification in paragraph (c) of this section does not apply to
planning assistance funds for the preparation and amendment of the
Multiyear Implementation Plan.
(a) I certify that each activity funded under this Agreement has
been designed to plan for or undertake activities to restore and
protect the natural resources, ecosystems, fisheries, marine and
wildlife habitats, beaches, coastal wetlands, or economy of the Gulf
Coast Region.
(b) I certify that each activity funded under this Agreement is
designed to carry out one or more of the eligible activities for this
component.
(c) I certify that each activity funded under this Agreement was
part of a plan made available for public review and comment in a manner
calculated to obtain broad-based participation from individuals,
businesses, Indian tribes, and nonprofit organizations, and that the
activity was selected after consideration of meaningful input from the
public, as described in the grant application.
(d) I certify that each activity funded under this Agreement that
protects or restores natural resources is based on the best available
science, as that term is defined in 31 CFR part 34.
(e) I certify that this recipient has procedures in place for
procuring property and services under this award that are consistent
with the procurement standards applying to Federal grants. This
recipient agrees that it will not request funds under this award for
any contract unless this certification remains true and accurate.
(f) I certify that a conflict of interest policy is in effect and
covering each activity funded under this Agreement.
(g) I make each of these certifications based on my personal
knowledge and belief after reasonable and diligent inquiry, and I
affirm that this recipient maintains written documentation sufficient
to support each certification made above, and that this recipient's
compliance with each of these certifications is a condition of this
recipient's initial and continuing receipt and use of the funds
provided under this Agreement.
Sec. 34.803 Conditions.
At a minimum, each grant agreement under subparts D, E, F, G, and H
of this part must contain the following conditions:
(a) The recipient must immediately report any indication of fraud,
waste, abuse, or potentially criminal activity pertaining to grant
funds to Treasury and the Treasury Inspector General.
(b) The recipient must maintain detailed records sufficient to
account for the receipt, obligation, and expenditure of grant funds.
The recipient must track program income.
(c) Prior to disbursing funds to a subrecipient, the recipient must
execute a legally binding written agreement with the entity receiving
the subaward. The written agreement will extend all the applicable
program requirements to the subrecipient.
(d) The recipient must use the funds only for the purposes
identified in the agreement.
(e) The recipient must report at the conclusion of the grant
period, or other period specified by the Federal agency administering
the grant, on the use of funds pursuant to the agreement.
(f) Trust Fund amounts may only be used to acquire land or
interests in land by purchase, exchange, or donation from a willing
seller.
(g) None of the Trust Fund amounts may be used to acquire land in
fee title by the Federal Government unless the land is acquired by
exchange or donation or the acquisition is necessary for the
restoration and protection of the natural resources, ecosystems,
fisheries, marine and wildlife habitats, beaches, and coastal wetlands
of the Gulf Coast Region and has the concurrence of the Governor of the
state in which the acquisition will take place.
Sec. 34.804 Noncompliance.
(a) If Treasury determines that a Gulf Coast State, coastal
political subdivision, or coastal zone parish has expended funds
received under the Direct Component, Comprehensive Plan Component, or
Spill Impact Component on an ineligible activity, Treasury will make no
additional funds available to that recipient from any part of the Trust
Fund until the recipient has deposited in the Trust Fund an amount
equal to the amount expended for an ineligible activity, or Treasury
has authorized the recipient to expend an equal amount from the
recipient's own funds for an activity that meets the requirements of
the Act.
(b) If Treasury determines that a Gulf Coast State, coastal
political subdivision, or coastal zone parish has materially violated a
grant agreement under the Direct Component, Comprehensive Plan
Component, or Spill Impact Component, Treasury will make no additional
funds available to that recipient from any part of the Trust Fund until
the recipient corrects the violation.
(c) As a condition of receiving funds, recipients and subrecipients
shall make available their records and personnel to Treasury in order
to carry out the purposes of this section.
Sec. 34.805 Treasury Inspector General.
In addition to other authorities available under the Act, the
Office of the Inspector General of the Department of the Treasury is
authorized to conduct, supervise, and coordinate audits and
investigations of activities funded through grants under the Act.
David A. Lebryk,
Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-31431 Filed 12-11-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P